Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "" video.

 @MikeWilliamson-dp6cp The other group openly says the genocidal term of "from river to sea." Js have tried a 2 state solution 5 times. Try again.
16
@a.elle.5630 They weren't "dumped" there. They had begun buying the land decades before then, on their own. By the time, the Brits came in power there, Js owned more land than the As. (The majority of the entire land was unowned and unoccupied) The Js bought undeveloped land, and even overpaid for it, and created successful societies there. Then the Brits came and doled out the rest of the land and then the As started attacking them and they won more over time. The Js have tried numerous times for a solution for both and it is refused every time. The Js even gave back the land the Ps are sitting on now.(after acquiring it through winning war)
14
@marshamercer False since the Js started BUYING the land in the 1880s. Well before the Brits took control. When that time came around, Js owned more land than the As. And 70% of the land was unowned (crown lands. After that, they acquired more for winning when they were attacked. It is theirs.
11
@Thejerusalemhascome False. Js started buying the land in the 1880s. They owned more than the As by the time the Brits got involved. (Both owned little. The majority was unowned, called Crown lands) They took undeveloped crap land and built thriving societies. As flocked to them as they were better than theirs. And they won more after being attacked.
3
@MikeWilliamson-dp6cp It is not unfounded claims. It is actual fact that is found in census and other historical documents. Everything I said is true and anyone can find the information online. There was never a Palestine. There was Syria-Palestina. By the 17th century, it was not a widely used name. They used Syria and Southern Syria mostly. Or the province names. It is a name that Europeans kept alive. Ironic. Their leaders even said this then.
3
@Thejerusalemhascome That is irrelevant. They bought land and built it up. They established society. Then they were attacked and won more. (They've even give some back...like where the Pals are now) It is theirs.
3
@a.elle.5630 False. Groups of them began moving to the area in the 1880s. They began purchasing land. They even overpaid. This was DECADES before the Brits came in power there. Again, bybthe time they came into the picture, the Js owned more land than the As. It has never been called Palestine.
2
@Thejerusalemhascome Not false at all and I didn't act like they bought the whole thing at all. I said that 70% of the place was unowned and unoccupied. (Crown lands) When the brits came into the picture, the Js owned 8.6%, As owned 3.3%. 16.9% was abandoned by As. Yes, they built up their portion. What else would I have meant? Lol And As flocked to their portion because they had better jobs, pay, etc. They were attacked. They did not start the attacking. And they gained more land doing so. It is absolutely theirs. They bought some and won the rest. No, you have it the opposite. It is their land and this is our land.
1