Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "Anti Israel Riot TAKE OVER Columbia Building, SMASH And Barricade Hall Amid MASS Arrests OF Leftists" video.

  1.  @rayspeakmon2954  The numbers do not differentiate between the ppl and H. And H uses the ppl on purpose. And Is actually warns before they hit something, so if the ppl are still there, it is probably because H kept them there to pull your heartstrings. Also, some are due to the high % of misfires of H own.
    4
  2.  @brandont2690  Also, the dancers you speak of were five ppl. Lol And you are not correct. The Pals actually were celebrating and honking their horns and all that, in celebration of the day. A majority were in favor of what happened.
    4
  3. ​ @jasonfocacci9234 Yea...it is a place that doesn't exist. 😄
    3
  4. ​ @McCoy-j2w It is nowhere. Lol
    3
  5. ​ @WalrusWinking I'm tired of them sending it everywhere else. Ukr, Is, Gaz, etc, etc, etc.
    3
  6.  @jasonfocacci9234  H is the terriers groupnof the pals. I've tried to post that comment numerous times and it kept getting deleted.
    3
  7.  @polderrican  5 people. Wow. Yet, at the same time, in Gaza, there were a bunch celebrating in the streets, honking their horns, etc. Polls showed 65% agreed with what happened.
    3
  8. ​ TaxEvasion777  Why would they go to Is? Do you see ppl trespassing and destroying property, and breaking in entering on their behalf?
    2
  9.  @polderrican  Yes, of course they do. What does that have to do with Js/Is which you keep saying hate us?
    2
  10. ​ TaxEvasion777 They're trespassing, breaking and entering, and destroying property. This isn't about free speech.
    1
  11. ​ TaxEvasion777  Their actions are not free speech.
    1
  12.  TaxEvasion777  No, they were the ones who were attacked. At that time, it was by 7 countries at once. Simply for being there. They've been attacked over and over for working on 100 yrs. And they didn't trespass. They started buying the land in 1880s.
    1
  13.  TaxEvasion777  What did I say that was wrong?
    1
  14. ​ @breakupgoogle 🤣 That was good
    1
  15. ​ @brandont2690 Trying to save their citizens that were taken. Tell H to stop hiding behind them. Stop holding up in populated buildings. And Is warns before they hit. If they stay...it is probably because they were kept there. And the numbers don't differentiate between H and regular ppl.
    1
  16.  @brandont2690  I guess you haven't hear or seen that they have been attacking Is for what is working on 100 yrs now.
    1
  17.  @brandont2690  It was them doing it first, actually. Over and over and over for many decades.
    1
  18. ​​ @brandont2690 The numbers do not differentiate between regular ppl and their soldiers. You're trusting an actual terrier group. One that purposely uses the ppl
    1
  19.  @brandont2690  The numbers do not differentiate between the ppl and the fig hters. And you're trusting a terrier group. One that uses the ppl to hide behind.
    1
  20.  @brandont2690  7:52-7:53
    1
  21.  @whitehorse1961  7:52-7:53
    1
  22.  @brandont2690  Not correct. Gray zone has a good article on this.
    1
  23.  @brandont2690  Now you're deflecting.
    1
  24.  @polderrican  Acknowledge what happened?
    1
  25.  @polderrican  You can look up the article by Greyzone about it. They knew nothing and had no part in anything. They were investigated thoroughly. It had nothing to do with hate. It was about hoping we would see what they had been putting up with and help them with the ppl who have been attacking them for working on 100 yrs.
    1
  26.  @brandont2690  And? Lol We are allowed to do that. Not long ago you denied that they even did it and pretended like 5 ppl joking around, happily (there was no dancing) was something huge. 🤔
    1
  27.  @polderrican  Asking who benefits the most is irrelevant. And Idc. It doesn't matter to the topic. It was a pure deflection when he realized he knew incorrect things. And they weren't dancing and they knew nothing and their reasoning was not because of hating us.
    1
  28.  @polderrican  You don't have to believe my reasoning. It was 5 ppl that were thoroughly investigated. You pretended as if "dancing Is" was a big point before, but when shown you're not correct, your tune changes and bow it isn't important. Haha. Pals were....in much bigger numbers. Their words are that 65% of pals AGREED with what happened that day.
    1
  29.  @polderrican  Why do you think they hate us and what is the evidence?
    1
  30.  @polderrican  Idk what the last comment means.
    1
  31.  @polderrican  Ah, can't refute it, so you claim the source is wrong. You can go find the fbi files on it then
    1
  32.  @polderrican  Then show me the evidence that they hate us.
    1
  33.  @FACTBOT_5000  They've been moving goalposts and deflecting since the start and simultaneous pretending 5 ppl is major to it is minor and back to it is major. Lol No amount of facts will change their minds. They believe it and so it will be so.
    1
  34.  @polderrican  So, where'd you see this video of them dancing? 😄
    1
  35.  @polderrican  No, you didn't. Lmao There is and never was a video of them actually doing it. Tbe woman who seen it says they were smiling, hugging, and high fiving. The one who said dancing was one of the parents of the ppl who did the act. So, what was that about "you're done?" Lmao
    1
  36.  @polderrican  Dude, their bias is on YOUR side. Have you even know who you're talking about? Lol Proving the veracity of the article even more. 🤣🤣
    1
  37.  @polderrican  Translation: I have this belief and even though I can't prove it and all evidence is against me, I will still believe it. Lol
    1
  38.  @polderrican  You know what I mean, Jethro. Deflect the conversation because you know you were proven wrong.
    1
  39.  @polderrican  woman What have I disregarded other than the irrelevant question the other guy made? And hilarious coming from the guy who still hasn't given evidence of them hating us. The same guy who made up seeing a video that doesn't even exist. Same guy who won't read an article due to bias...but the bias is on your side. I haven't said coincidental even once. You did.
    1
  40.  @polderrican  Your opinion here is your side. Now stop deflecting.
    1
  41.  @polderrican  What have I disregarded other than the irrelevant question the other guy made? And hilarious coming from the guy who still hasn't given evidence of them hating us. The same guy who made up seeing a video that doesn't even exist. Same guy who won't read an article due to bias...but the bias is on your side. I haven't said coincidental even once. You did.
    1
  42.  @polderrican  You said they have a bias. Their bias is against Is. So is yours. What have I disregarded other than the irrelevant question the other guy made? And this deflection here, which I just answered? You are wrong so you need to keep deflecting it to irrelevant things that do not matter to the topic. And hilarious coming from the guy who still hasn't given evidence of them hating us. The same guy who made up seeing a video that doesn't even exist. Same guy who won't read an article due to bias...but the bias is on your side. I haven't said coincidental even once. You did. Tell me exactly where I ever said coincidence. I already said no they do not hate us. I asked you to give evidence they do and you refuse to.
    1
  43.  @polderrican  Tbey literally were not dancing. You claimed you seen it despite there being 0 video of it. They were high fiving, hugging, and smiling. My exact words. There were lots of ppl there. It is NYC. 🤦🏻‍♀️ Happy and hoping we would help them. Again, read the article. We are literally talking about it right now. I am clearing up the misinformation on it. When did I tell you to not talk about it? When did I say not to acknowledge it? The ppl YOU claimed had bias and is the reason you won't read their article have a bias AGAINST Is. This is a fact that is easy to look up and verify. YOU tried claiming they had bias against it and used that as your reasoning to not read the article and to imply that it isn't correct, despite it being the opposite. That is proof that it is true info because if they were out to lie, they'd have said the opposite, which is what their bias is. Projection.
    1
  44.  @polderrican  So, you know you cannot prove your claims. 👍🏻
    1
  45.  @polderrican  Idc what your side is. This entire point is irrelevant. You keep taking small portions of things that are irrelevant and ignoring the relevance. Easy way to deflect. And every person has bias, so what, you use no sources, whatsoever? Ridiculous. You just don't want to have your position proven wrong. Read the article or dont. Your comments on those ppl have been incorrect. And you lied about seeing them dance, since no video exists and the person who seen them never said dance.
    1
  46.  @polderrican  No, you brought up their bias to try to prove the source not credible. I said theirs is the same as yours, yet the article is the opposite. If they were letting their bias fo the writing, they would have written differently. You turned this into a discussion on your opinion and it is irrelevant. You are the one who has leaned on it. You won't let it go. It is irrelevant to the discussion of the Js/Is, yet you can't stop talking about your opinion. Your bias was minor part of the point. It was only to prove you implying they're a bad source wrong. Cheese and rice. The disingenuousness is thick today. Answer what question? What your bias is? I already said. It is clearly antk-Is and don't pretend it isn't. Answer my question that you keep using this conversation to deflect from. Where is the evidence that they hate us? Also, why lie about seeing a video that doesn't exist?
    1
  47.  @polderrican  You seem to care more about talking about yourself rather than seeing if you're wrong or not.
    1
  48.  @polderrican  And it seems like you had more comments this time, but the only one that came through started "also, to backtrack.."
    1
  49.  @polderrican "I'm honest..." You already lied about seeing a video that doesn't even exist.
    1
  50.  @polderrican  And as has been stated numerous times before, you used me proving a point (that is irrelevant to the whole point and had one purpose and it doesn't even matter) about you trying to pretend the source was bad to deflect from the questions and comments that were actually on the topic. And you continue to.
    1
  51.  @polderrican  No, you haven't seen the video because that video does not exist. There never was one. The "dancing" came from one of the plane flyer's Dad.
    1
  52.  @polderrican  🤦🏻‍♀️ Yes, and the obvious purpose of your comment was to imply it is a bad source. As I've said over and over. Cheese and rice. Do you honestly think ppl are dumb? Have you tried to locate the article? Have you read it? Have you looked up any position that doesn't already align with yours?
    1
  53.  @polderrican  And for the millionth time, What you IMPLIED was that it was bad. IMPLIED.
    1
  54.  @polderrican  Your words were clear.
    1
  55.  @polderrican  So, what other video is there of them dancing about that day?
    1
  56.  @polderrican  So, back to the original topic that you've sufficiently deflected from for hours.. What evidence is there that they hate us? Have you found the article that explains your questions of why they were there and whatnot and have you read it?
    1
  57.  @polderrican  Also, what words, actions, and history of the Z movement inform you of your opinion on them?
    1
  58.  @polderrican  I did see it and my response was pointing out that you lied about seeing the video. Now, what is your evidence for thinking that they hate us?
    1
  59.  @polderrican  Where do they say it? What videos? What publications? You read their language? Read what part specifically? Which ceremony and at what part?
    1
  60.  @polderrican  Ok, what do you think she is saying and why is her comment so important?
    1