Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "Ana Kasparian QUITS THE LEFT, Says Woke GO TOO FAR, Leftists DEMAND Cenk \u0026 TYT FIRE HER From Show" video.

@d.adrien7423 He openly acknowledged that he trusted the wrong ppl due to being new to DC and the whole scene. He now knows who is who and who is trustworthy.
15
@bettyriley7295 I see them everywhere. What are you even talking about? 🤣
14
@bettyriley7295 guessing you're talking about abore shin? Conservatives think that is murder. Lol That "day one" comment was a joke. Did you even watch the exchange? It was clearly a joke. And then the things he said were just jobs of the President. 😄 If you actually watched him, you'd see that he is actually a funny guy who jokes. It is absurd to think he actually wants to be one.
6
Yep. I always say I'm not choosing a babysitter. I'm choosing a President. (Not that I think he would be a bad babysitter. Lol Just probably not his forte. 😂)
5
@bettyriley7295 Explain "real conservatives."
5
@bettyriley7295 Are you claiming conservatives don't think that? 😄😄 It was a joke. LOL Anyone who actually watched it instead of listening to just what the tv told them knows this. I have 0 concern.
5
@bettyriley7295 Yes, we know you have no response because you're wrong. Have a good day.
3
@bettyriley7295 You completely misunderstood my comment. My comment was relating comments made by him where he said he trusted the wrong ppl. He didn't know all the ppl in DC so he asked ppl he thought were good and trustworthy to help pick ppl to choose for positions. They ended up bring rinos themselves. I can't remember if he named names. Maybe Ryan? Anyway, now he knows who is who. Now, in response to your comment, please provide the video or transcript of him saying that. Please explain why wanting loyalty is a bad thing. Please explain how someone can be trustworthy if they're not loyal and vice versa.
2
@bluelithium9808 Then don't vote for him. I am. Toodles.
1
@bluelithium9808 Sure, Jan. I'm going to.
1
@bettyriley7295 There is nothing wrong with wanting ppl close to you who are loyal. That is silly to think otherwise. Your comments reek of naivete. It is a constant stream of backstabbing and corruption in gov. You should want ppl around you that are trustworthy and loyal. Loyal to not leak information, loyal to not lie about you or other things, etc. You cannot be loyal if you are not trustworthy and you cannot be trustworthy if you are not loyal. You cannot be trusted if you are not loyal. You are not loyal if you can't be trusted. You make the unsubstantiated claim that DT wants only loyalty "above all" and use MP as your example, yet you say he was not loyal to DT. Weird pick of him to make if he was only wanting loyalty "above all." He is currently forming a unity party with lifelong Democrats. Ones who are respectable people. Ones who he and they openly say they have disagreements, but are working together on the things they agree with. Surely, this would be an odd thing to do for someone wanting loyalty "above all." Surely, if that was the only goal, different ppl would be picked. You also did not provide me with a video or transcript of him saying that he wants loyalty over honesty. Also, that quote is the claim of 1 man with zero proof that it was said. After the last 8yrs, it is foolish to believe anything that is said without proof. Claims are consistently made and later proven false. (Especially coming from ppl trying to sell a book) And again, just to clarify again, you completely misunderstood my original comment to begin with.
1
@bettyriley7295 There is nothing wrong with wanting ppl close to you who are loyal. That is silly to think otherwise. Your comments reek of naivete. It is a constant stream of backstabbing and corruption in gov. You should want ppl around you that are trustworthy and loyal. Loyal to not leak information, loyal to not lie about you or other things, etc. You cannot be loyal if you are not trustworthy and you cannot be trustworthy if you are not loyal. You cannot be trusted if you are not loyal. You are not loyal if you can't be trusted. You make the unsubstantiated claim that DT wants only loyalty "above all" and use MP as your example, yet you say he was not loyal to DT. Weird pick of him to make if he was only wanting loyalty "above all." He is currently forming a unity party with lifelong Democrats. Ones who are respectable people. Ones who he and they openly say they have disagreements, but are working together on the things they agree with. Surely, this would be an odd thing to do for someone wanting loyalty "above all." Surely, if that was the only goal, different ppl would be picked. You also did not provide me with a video or transcript of him saying that he wants loyalty over honesty. Also, that quote is the claim of 1 man with zero proof that it was said. After the last 8yrs, it is foolish to believe anything that is said without proof. Claims are consistently made and later proven false. (Especially coming from ppl trying to sell a book) And again, just to clarify again, you completely misunderstood my original comment to begin with.
1
@bettyriley7295 There is nothing wrong with wanting ppl close to you who are loyal. That is silly to think otherwise. That comment reeks of naivete. It is a constant stream of lies, leaks, etc in gov. All of them should and do want ppl around them that are trustworthy and loyal. Loyal to not leak information, loyal to not lie, etc. One cannot be loyal if they are not trustworthy and vice versa. One cannot be trusted if they are not loyal. They are not loyal if they can't be trusted. You make the unsubstantiated claim that DT wants only loyalty "above all" and use MP as your example, yet say he was not loyal to DT. Weird pick of him to make if he was only wanting loyalty "above all." He is currently forming a unity party with lifelong Democrats. Ones who are respectable people. Ones who he and they openly say they have disagreements, but are working together on the things they agree with. Ones who we have no reason to believe would be loyal to a negative point, as you're suggesting DT wants. Surely, this would be an odd thing to do for someone wanting loyalty "above all." Surely, if that was the only goal, different ppl would be picked to work with. You also did not provide me with a video or transcript of him saying that he wants loyalty above all. Also, that quote you did provide is the claim of 1 man with 0 proof that it was said. After the last 8yrs, it is foolish to believe anything that is said without proof. Claims are consistently made and later proven false. (Especially coming from ppl trying to sell a book) And again, just to clarify again, you completely misunderstood my original comment to begin with.
1
@bettyriley7295 There is nothing wrong with wanting ppl close to you who are loyal. That is silly to think otherwise. That comment reeks of naivete. It is a constant stream of lies, leaks, etc in gov. All of them should and do want ppl around them that are trustworthy and loyal. Loyal to not leak information, loyal to not lie, etc.
1
@bettyriley7295 One cannot be loyal if they are not trustworthy and vice versa. One cannot be trusted if they are not loyal. They are not loyal if they can't be trusted.
1
@bettyriley7295 You make the unsubstantiated claim that DT wants only loyalty "above all" and use MP as your example, yet say he was not loyal to DT. Weird pick of him to make if he was only wanting loyalty "above all."
1
@bettyriley7295 He is currently forming a unity party with lifelong Democrats. Ones who are respectable people. Ones who he and they openly say they have disagreements, but are working together on the things they agree with. Ones who we have no reason to believe would be loyal to a negative point, as you're suggesting DT wants. Surely, this would be an odd thing to do for someone wanting loyalty "above all." Surely, if that was the only goal, different ppl would be picked to work with.
1
@bettyriley7295 You also did not provide me with a video or transcript of him saying that he wants loyalty above all. Also, that quote you did provide is the claim of 1 man with 0 proof that it was said. After the last 8yrs, it is foolish to believe anything that is said without proof. Claims are consistently made and later proven false. (Especially coming from ppl trying to sell a book) And again, just to clarify again, you completely misunderstood my original comment to begin with.
1
@bettyriley7295 But, now after looking at your acct, I realize that you're likely a bot.
1
@bettyriley7295 And now I see the false claim bot comment of claiming he is a gRapist. We're not falling for this.
1
@bettyriley7295 The non response is not shocking, but anyway, I'm non-religious and wouldn't care where it was made if I was.
1
@bettyriley7295 I said "likely."
1
@bettyriley7295 Please share the quotes of them saying it and where you got it. Please share the quote of DT saying he "admires" them. It was quite literally a joke. And did you even listen to what he said it would be for? Of course not because you clearly didn't watch it. He stated things that are the Pres job.
1
@bettyriley7295 You, yet again, only have part of the story. This is getting embarrassing for you. Did you not hear their over the top hick accents? That didn't seem too on the nose to you? Lol Clearly, they were there to make ppl like you believe this. It was 1 boat that other ACTUAL DT supporters weren't have any of and they were removed from the parade.
1
@bettyriley7295 You-"I don't have those quotes and I never watched the actual video."
1
@bettyriley7295 You, yet again, only have part of the story. Did you not hear their over the top accents? They didn't seem too on the nose to you? Lol Clearly, they were there to make ppl like you believe this. It was 1 boat and the ACTUAL DT supporters weren't have any of it and kept dousing them and they were removed from the parade.
1
@bettyriley7295 Yet again, only have part of the information. Did you not hear their over the top expression and phrasing?That and everything didn't seem too on the nose to you? Lol Clearly, they were there to make ppl believe as you do. It was 1 boat and ACTUAL DT supporters weren't have any of it and they were removed from the parade.
1
@bettyriley7295 Yet again, only part of the information. Did you not hear their over the top expression and phrasing?That and everything didn't seem too on the nose to you? Lol Clearly, they were there to make ppl believe that. It was 1 boat and ACTUAL DT fans weren't having any of it and they doused them. Then, they were removed.
1