Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "Dexter Reed Is George Floyd 2.0, Media LIES To Start Leftist Riots, Reed SHOT COP, Cops Fired Back" video.

  1. ​ @alexjoneswasright11 False. 🙅🏻‍♀️ He begged to be put there and they were extremely accommodating to him. Watch it all.
    21
  2. Every time.
    16
  3. ​ @Smellygoat11 Moms know what their kids are up to.
    10
  4. ​ @matirion Thhey came out of a blinking car, several had on vests that clearly said police, their behavior was also that of the police.
    8
  5. ​ @thecommentor9898 they clearly had vests with police on them. Their behavior was clearly that of the police. Stop playing.
    8
  6.  @ABurntMuffin  Yes, it is exactly that, actually. They made that clear by saying that it shall not he infringed and by practicing what they were preaching, like allowing the ppl to own anything, including cannons.
    7
  7. ​ @matirion False. They didn't pull their paws until he started putting the window back up. You think that because the media is conveniently playing the same video and they're starting it a few seconds later and leaving out the parts that prove that they didn't have them out until then.
    7
  8. ​ @matirion You can see the lights in the back blinking on video. 😂
    7
  9. they were not acting like robbers. Robbers would have all jumped out at once and would have been aggressive. 😂 Hilarious that you think they acted like robbers
    7
  10.  @ABurntMuffin  The current (what it has always been) could not be more clear. They meant what they said.
    6
  11.  @ABurntMuffin  Law is based on the Constitution, intent, and precedent. All of which show that, yes, they meant all. Their words were clear. Idk how it isn't clear to you or the grabbers.
    6
  12. ​ @matirion watch fox 32 chicago. They have all the cams.
    6
  13. ​ @matirion their vests clearly said police. Robbers wouldn't just be asking you to lower your window. They would have jumped out armed and they would have done it all at once. This didn't go down like that. He lowered his window once. He clearly knew who they were.
    6
  14. ​ @matirion No, they did not pull until he stopped complying. You did not watch them if you think this. In cam 1, you can clearly see both her hands at the same time in the clip (media cut this out) up until he put window back up. The others, you can see them getting put and pulling when she is already at the door pulling on the handle, after he stopped complying
    6
  15.  @ABurntMuffin  "shall not be infringed" is that part
    5
  16. ​ @DogSpeak Exactly. You actually watched all of their videos...in full.
    5
  17. ​ @thecommentor9898 Also, only 1 got out and she was obviously the police. The rest didn't get out until he started to not comply.
    5
  18. Same. 🤷🏻‍♀️
    4
  19. ​Then you're a liar. 😂
    4
  20.  @ABurntMuffin  Arms” comes from Middle English and originated from the Old French word “armes,” which meant “weapons of a warrior.” This word dates back to 1300. “Arms” also originates from the Latin word for “weapons,”arma.” This word was also first used in the 14th Century. In 1755 Dr. Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language was first published. It defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence.” It still means the same thing today. If they meant for it to be infringed, they wouldn't have said otherwise. Also, again, they practiced what they preached. They could own anything then. "Shall not be infringed" is very clear and the opposite of flimsy.
    3
  21.  @ABurntMuffin  No, you're just being obtuse. You know what it means and you know that it says it shall not be infringed. You know what they meant.
    3
  22.  @matirion  He didn't shoot until several were at his car (due to noncompliance) and he had clear and obvious sight of them being police.
    3
  23.  @matirion  All lies. You're not gaslighting anyone here. fox32Chicago
    3
  24. ​ @faervas1234 ...it was the police...so no.
    3
  25.  @samuelwahls8315  You make a good point..
    2
  26.  @JDs_RandomHandle  Oh well.
    2
  27. ​ @matirion Police use unmarked cars all the time. Not unusual. Then 1 got out. When he wasn't complying, the others went. Clearly marked as the police.
    2
  28.  @btgkg9639  Exactly. Dude is trying to lie. Not working.
    2
  29.  @matirion  I gave you exact spots where they were pulled. Nice try tho
    2
  30.  @matirion  False. Video disagrees.
    2
  31.  @matirion  Same vid-lights at 1min16sec Again at 1min56sec Again at 2min18sec Again at 2min42sec-left side. He is standing right beside it. Again at 3min07sec
    2
  32.  @matirion  Giant fail.
    2
  33. ​ @matirion YOU didn't watch the full footage because the media cut off the beginning. She clearly is unarmed until he stopped complying. The same goes for the other videos of the others. Several have on vests with police on it clear as day. They were clearly not behaving like robbers. He clearly agreed since he put his window down on first command.
    2
  34.  @matirion  It was flashing lights and all they had vests that said it. They also had not pulled until he stopped listening and did the opposite. fox32Chicago....
    2
  35.  @A_Jeff  You mean how a race has disproportionate noncompliance with authority and law?
    1
  36.  @mikepalmer1971  👏🏻👏🏻
    1
  37.  @faervas1234  False. fox32Chicago....
    1
  38.  @faervas1234  ....2 days ago, vidcalled "video shows chicago po..." At 7sec, you see her right hand empty. At 23sec, you hear her pull and then see it.(you'll see this from different views later-2min46 sec) 1min36sec is when her and this next one pull (you'll see the view of him do it later from another-4min11sec) At 2min46sec, you see the woman pull and you can compare that to exactly when I said before. This is also where this 3rd one pulls. The guy is already not listening and doing the opposite. At 2min49sec you can see the 2nd one is one that was wearing the vest that showed who they were and this is well before the guy in the car popped his. So he knew who they were. 3min56sec- you see the 4th has not pulled. 4min11sec is when the 2nd pulls(in the background) You can hear that he stopped listening already
    1
  39.  @irocksup123  Everything that guy said is a straigh up lie. Lol
    1
  40. ​ @matirion False, false, false. Several had vests on that clearly said police. They didn't pull their pews until he put his window back up. They keep using the one video and they conveniently cut out the beginning that proves this. Watch all their vids. Every single one pulled after. They were not "breaking in" until he put his window up and was clearly not complying to what was obviously the police.
    1
  41. ​ @matirion Incorrect. The video they keep showing cut off the beginning that proves that they did NOT have their guns out until he put his window up and ignored her. Only one of them got out. The rest got out when he put his window up. They have on vests that say police. Their car is lit up blinking. Their behavior is obviously that of police.
    1
  42.  @matirion  All false claims. They weren't armed until he stopped complying. Only 1 got out until he stopped complying. Their behavior was obviously that of police and they had on vests that said they were.
    1
  43. Watch fox32Chicago so Matirion can't gaslight you.
    1
  44.  @matirion  False. I watched the videos of each of them from the beginning (not the one that other channels keep putting out) that proves that No pew until he put window up and stopped listening. One of them went up to him until he did that. That is when the others came up to to him. They had pews when they went up to the car because he had already stopped listening by then. The car has blinking lights on the back. They have vests that say who they are and he can see several of them BEFORE he uses his pew, which is after several went up to his car since he stopped listening. The behavior is obvious to show who they are. Nice try. Nobody is fooled.
    1
  45.  @matirion  Robbers do not slowly walk up to your car, not armed, and stop several feet away, and ask you to lower your window. When you do lower it, they wouldn't casually walk closer, they would use that opportunity right then and there. Nice try. Not working.
    1
  46.  @matirion  In the video that btgkg posted, you can see both her hands have nothing in them. You see the right hand pop up in the beginning with nothing in it. You then hear her grab it at 20 seconds. Nice try.
    1
  47.  @matirion  And you can see beyond him that she is already up at the door and yelling at him to open it, so he can visibly see and hear that the guy isn't listening. Try again.
    1
  48.  @matirion  They weren't armed until he stopped listening. You can say that until you're blue in the face. It won't make it true.
    1
  49.  @matirion  Before he got out, after seeing and hearing that he wasn't listening. The video shows all.
    1
  50.  @matirion  Before HE initiated. Not before the person was initiated.
    1
  51.  @matirion  In btgkg at the 26 min, 31-33 second mark, you see the other guy (in the background) pulling his after getting out because he already stopped listening and doing the opposite as told.
    1
  52.  @matirion  Fox..
    1
  53.  @matirion ....32 Chicago
    1
  54.  @matirion  ....2 days ago, vidcalled "video shows chicago po..." At 7sec, you see her right hand empty. At 23sec, you hear her pull and then see it.(you'll see this from different views later-2min46 sec) 1min36sec is when her and this next one pull (you'll see the view of him do it later from another-4min11sec) At 2min46sec, you see the woman pull and you can compare that to exactly when I said before. This is also where this 3rd one pulls. The guy is already not listening and doing the opposite. At 2min49sec you can see the 2nd one is one that was wearing the vest that showed who they were and this is well before the guy in the car popped his. So he knew who they were. 3min56sec- you see the 4th has not pulled. 4min11sec is when the 2nd pulls(in the background) You can hear that he stopped listening already
    1
  55.  @KrisTomich  I don't mind facts being laid out for others to see (by me) or engagement for the channel. I've sen him before. He is one of those contrarians.
    1
  56.  @KrisTomich  Just don't break TOS. Lol And I keep backups for when they shadow an acct or hit it with spamming claim.
    1
  57.  @matirion  Lies. I pointed out exactly when each one pulls. Debunked.
    1
  58.  @matirion  ....2 days ago, vidcalled "video shows chicago po..." At 7sec, you see her right hand empty. At 23sec, you hear her pull and then see it.(you'll see this from different views later-2min46 sec) 1min36sec is when her and this next one pull (you'll see the view of him do it later from another-4min11sec) At 2min46sec, you see the woman pull and you can compare that to exactly when I said before. This is also where this 3rd one pulls. The guy is already not listening and doing the opposite. At 2min49sec you can see the 2nd one is one that was wearing the vest that showed who they were and this is well before the guy in the car popped his. So he knew who they were. 3min56sec- you see the 4th has not pulled. 4min11sec is when the 2nd pulls(in the background) You can hear that he stopped listening already
    1
  59.  @matirion  Same vid-lights at 1min16sec Again at 1min56sec Again at 2min18sec Again at 2min42sec-left side. He is standing right beside it. Again at 3min07sec
    1