Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "Youtuber DELETES MASSIVE ACCOUNT After Buying Baby For Clout \u0026 ABANDONING It!" video.

@BadlydrawnBen Every single one of them is bad. They use their children for content. They can't consent to it. Think about how it is to have your every moment put out there for all to see as a kid who can't consent to it. The good and the bad.
12
 @AmasserOfTears Kids cannot consent. They should not be used as content. If the adults want a channel, it should be them. Not the kids. It is gross.
9
 @freeborn204 Why should taxpayers pay? That's ridiculous. Especially for the lawyer.
8
 @spencerhardy8667 tf? No, that is called a career. 😂
7
@Brenden.Jackson Exactly
7
@alikhat1647 Also, it doesn't matter if they do get some of the money. (I highly doubt it) They cannot consent to their life being displayed for all to see, forever. They shouldn't be used as content.
7
Idk why anyone watches family channels. It is gross to put your child on the internet for all to see. They monetize their own children.
7
@tankalove1749 You should have to pay. You adopted them. You take on all responsibility.
7
 @agricolaregs My husband was adopted and he had wonderful parents who loved and cared for him.
6
@BadlydrawnBen There's an enormous difference between tv and family channels. TV is you seeing them act. These channels is you seeing their actual life. Inside their house. All day long. Imagine growing up with cameras in your face all day, your parents setting everything up as content, your good times and bad times being shown to the world for everyone to see. And not being able to have a say if it happens or not. It is wrong.
5
@HavokBWR If that is true, they should have gotten help for that. Not return him like a pet. When you adopt a person, you take responsibility for them, good or bad. A person is not a pet that you just return.
4
 @LogicAndCompassion Ok. That doesn't change the situation. They adopted a human. That is now their responsibility. Full stop.
3
@LogicAndCompassion They adopted a human being! Just gross to toss them away. They should get them help. Just as they would if it were their child by birth. That is supposed to be the intention when you adopt. Gross
2
 @NikoRoulias Sadly? You think we should do that to humans? That is despicable.
2
@HavokBWR No, they wouldn't. They would get him help just as they would if it was a child that they made together. That is what you do when you adopt a human. You take on the responsibility for them. Good or bad.
2
Using any of your kids for content is evil.
1
@LetItSnow51 Exactly. And they'll be worse off having their private lives out there for everyone to see.
1
So, are you against adoption?
1
@samanthawhang7498 Yea, I agree with all of that. I don't think any should be adopted from anywhere, but here. And if you want kids, but can't have them, there are plenty here that need it. Planning another one is wrong. My husband was adopted as a baby by a wonderful family. He needed a family and they gave him one. Planning it and setting it up is wrong.
1
@edennis8578 No, he created it and took it from and will deprive it of its mother.
1
@Brenden.Jackson It is fine for them to do outdoor activities. Not fine for them to show it to the world.
1
 @Drogoran Better to not adopt if you're not ready to take full responsibility.
1
 @RoyMunsonBowling Exactly 👏🏻
1