Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
28
-
23
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
@realneth Trump did not divide the country. We were divided already. He was a symptom, not the cause. You have to start warching more media of different kinds. Much more independent media who aren't multinational bilion dollar corporations. Watch Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL where he brings in different guests from all walka of life to chat), We Are Change, Karlyn Borysenko, YoungRippa, Actual Justice Warrior, Officer Tatum, The Reason We Learn, Jimmy Dore, Steven Crowder, Candace Owens, etc. To start. Ppl of different opinions than the bubble you are in. You don't have to like them or agree with them, but watch them. Expose yourself to more information. New information. Compare, contrast, and research each yourself. Get out of your bubble. You have to watch and learn from all sides. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@benjaminwebb5759 DT was doing a good job, objectively. So he said mean things..who cares? We had, as the media even acknowledged, "the best numbers of our lives." He was working with the ME countries to broker peace. We were energy independent. Ppl were working. Started prison reform. Lowered taxes. And IDC who got more, almost everyone had lower taxes. Objective fact. They even admitted his replacement of NAFTA was better. He got NATO countries to pay their "fair share" that they were supposed to be paying, but weren't. Studies show that on average, wealth for Americans increased 17% while it increased 54% for the bottom half of Americans, under DT. The country was doing great. It was the divisive media and the left constantly berating him with nonsensical rhetoric and impeachments and investigations that kept us apart. Think of what he could have gotten done if not for them stonewalling him at every step.
Now the country is falling apart, but hey, at least orange man isn't tweeting. 🤡
(I'm not a conservative, for context)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@goodnessalwayswins Since you won't read the bill(I know because it does not say it bans CRT), I'll paste it here.
AN ACT
RELATING TO DIGNITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION; AMENDING
CHAPTER 1, TITLE 33, IDAHO CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 33-138,
IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE LEGISLATIVE INTENT, TO PROVIDE LEGISLATIVE FIND-
INGS, TO ESTABLISH PROHIBITIONS REGARDING CERTAIN TENETS, DISTINCTIONS
OR CLASSIFICATIONS, OR COURSES OF INSTRUCTION OR UNITS OF STUDY, AND TO PROVIDE FOR STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION; AMENDING CHAPTER 1, TITLE 33, IDAHO
CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 33-139, IDAHO CODE, TO PROHIBIT
THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEYS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES; PROVIDING SEVERABIL-
ITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 1, Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is
hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and des-
ignated as Section 33-138, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
33-138. DIGNITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION. (1) It is
the intent of the legislature that administrators, faculty members, other
employees, and students at public schools, including public charter schools
and institutions of higher education, respect the dignity of others, ac-
knowledge the right of others to express differing opinions, and foster and
defend intellectual honesty, freedom of inquiry and instruction, and free-
dom of speech and association.
(2) The Idaho legislature finds that tenets outlined in subsection
(3)(a) of this section, often found in "critical race theory," undermine the
objectives outlined in subsection (1) of this section and exacerbate and
inflame divisions on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, na-
tional origin, or other criteria in ways contrary to the unity of the nation
and the well-being of the state of Idaho and its citizens.
(3) In accordance with section 6, article IX of the constitution of the
state of Idaho and section 67-5909, Idaho Code:
(a) No public institution of higher education, school district, or pub-
lic school, including a public charter school, shall direct or other-
wise compel students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to any of
the following tenets:
(i) That any sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national
origin is inherently superior or inferior;
(ii) That individuals should be adversely treated on the basis of
their sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin;
or
(iii) That individuals, by virtue of sex, race, ethnicity, reli-
gion, color, or national origin, are inherently responsible for
actions committed in the past by other members of the same sex,
race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin
2
-
@goodnessalwayswins (continued)
(b) No distinction or classification of students shall be made on ac-
count of race or color.
(c) No course of instruction or unit of study directing or otherwise
compelling students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to any of the
tenets identified in paragraph (a) of this subsection shall be used or
introduced in any institution of higher education, any school district,
or any public school, including a public charter school.
(4) Nothing in this section should be construed to prohibit the re-
quired collection or reporting of demographic data by public schools or
public institutions of higher education.
SECTION 2. That Chapter 1, Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is
hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and des-
ignated as Section 33-139, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
33-139. PROHIBITION ON THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEYS FOR CERTAIN PUR-
POSES. No moneys shall be expended by the state board of education, any
entity under the state board of education's jurisdiction, or any school dis-
trict, public charter school, or public institution of higher education for
any purpose prohibited in section 33-138, Idaho Code.
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this act are hereby declared
to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such
provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason,
such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this act.
SECTION 4. An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby
declared to exist, this act shall be in full force and effect on and after its
passage and approval.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@benjaminwebb5759 "far right bs"
🙄 I watch mostly left libertarian media and also right and left media. No "far right". You even using that nonsensical term seems like you are watching "far left" media. Gas prices are skyrocketing. Food is skyrocketing. Lumber, cotton, etc, etc, etc. There is a crazy crisis going on at the border where they have an enormous influx of illegals due to JB's rhetoric. Masses of children are coming through the desert in a dangerous trek with traffickers who r8pe and harm them. They are now tightly packed into cages like stuffed burritos. Inflation is rising. Murders are rising. I can go on.
I care more about the state of the country more tham tweets. What was maniacal was ppls reaction to words. Most of which was taken out of context at every step of the way.
He was doing good things. The media divided us.
The GA phone call..also taken out of context. Look further into it. Listen to the whole thing.
Then go read the Time magazine article where they brag about. "Well funded cabal" who "fortified the election" by doing things such as suppressing and censoring information and hiring poll workers(...to do what exactly..this is ehat you should question. Especially when you watch video after video of Republican poll watchers being denied to do their job or obstructed in some way), etc. To "get the proper outcome of the election." I'm not saying anything happened or didn't happen. That article should alarm anyone.
You may need to broaden your types of media. Have to watch right, left, and middle. Watch a lot of independent media too. Right left and middle. I recommend Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), We Are Change, YoungRippa, Jimmy Dore, Matt Christensen, Karlyn Borysenko, The reason We Learn, etc. None of these are "far right" or even right. They are all left and libertarian. Probably should watch some right too, however. Watch everything. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Vin_Venture896 Go watch Karlyn Borysenko, The Reason We Learn, and Travis Mcnealy channels to see good discussions on it. There are tons more ppl who show it for the racist ideology that it is. It splits ppl up by identity like race, gender, sexuality, ableness, etc. And by oppressor or oppressed. In practice, makes kids affirm these identities and their oppressor or oppressed status. If a white kid feels uncomfortable or pushes back at all, they're told that that is their white fragility. They tell mixed kids that they should identify as their black half becauae their white half is an oppressor. It goes on and on with judging ppl by their race, gender, etc. And not their character. It is a gross and racist ideology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ruthharris123 Criminal Penalties for Improper Entry to the U.S.
For the first improper entry offense, the person can be fined (as a criminal penalty), or imprisoned for up to six months, or both.
For a subsequent offense, the person can be fined or imprisoned for up to two years, or both. (See 8 U.S.C. Section 1325, I.N.A. Section 275.)
But just in case that isn't enough to deter illegal entrants, a separate section of the law adds penalties for reentry (or attempted reentry) in cases where the person had been convicted of certain types of crimes and thus removed (deported) from the U.S., as follows:
People removed for a conviction of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a felony (other than an aggravated felony), shall be fined, imprisoned for up to ten years, or both.
People removed for a conviction of an aggravated felony shall be fined, imprisoned for up to 20 years, or both.
People who were excluded or removed from the United States for security reasons shall be fined, and imprisoned for up to ten years, which sentence shall not run concurrently with any other sentence.
Nonviolent offenders who were removed from the United States before their prison sentence was up shall be fined, imprisoned for up to ten years, or both.
What's more, someone deported before a prison sentence was complete may be incarcerated for the remainder of the sentence of imprisonment, without any reduction for parole or supervised release.
(See 8 U.S.C. Section 1326, I.N.A. Section 276.)
Civil Penalties
Entry (or attempted entry) at a place other than one designated by immigration officers carries additional civil penalties. The amount is at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or twice that amount if the illegal entrant has been previously fined a civil penalty for the same violation. (See 8 U.S.C. Section 1325, I.N.A. Section 275.)
1
-
@ruthharris123 In a bombshell report yesterday, the Justice Department Inspector General found that the Federal Bureau of Investigation made “fundamental errors” and persistently deceived a secret court to authorize surveilling a 2016 Trump presidential campaign official.
Perhaps the most jolting revelations in the IG report detail the FBI’s efforts to secure a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) search warrant to use against the Trump campaign after suspicions were raised of Russian collusion. A FISA warrant is the nuclear bomb of searches, authorizing the FBI “to conduct, simultaneous telephone, microphone, cell phone, e-mail and computer surveillance of the U.S. person target’s home, workplace and vehicles,” as well as “physical searches of the target’s residence, office, vehicles, computer, safe deposit box and U.S. mails,” as a FISA court decision noted. The FISA court is extremely deferential, approving 99% of all search warrant requests.
A litany of missteps by the FBI
The IG report concluded FBI officials made 17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” in its submissions to the FISA court to secure warrants to target former Trump advisor Carter Page: “FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘scrupulously accurate.’ We identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation, based upon information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed.”
OPINION
Inspector General report on FBI's FISA abuse tells us one thing: We need radical reform.
James Bovard
Opinion columnist
In a bombshell report yesterday, the Justice Department Inspector General found that the Federal Bureau of Investigation made “fundamental errors” and persistently deceived a secret court to authorize surveilling a 2016 Trump presidential campaign official. Inspector General Michael Horowitz did not find that the FBI’s actions were spurred by political bias but that conclusion is not necessarily shared by Attorney General William Barr. Unfortunately, this is only the latest episode of decades of FBI misconduct before America’s most powerful secret court.
Perhaps the most jolting revelations in the IG report detail the FBI’s efforts to secure a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) search warrant to use against the Trump campaign after suspicions were raised of Russian collusion. A FISA warrant is the nuclear bomb of searches, authorizing the FBI “to conduct, simultaneous telephone, microphone, cell phone, e-mail and computer surveillance of the U.S. person target’s home, workplace and vehicles,” as well as “physical searches of the target’s residence, office, vehicles, computer, safe deposit box and U.S. mails,” as a FISA court decision noted. The FISA court is extremely deferential, approving 99% of all search warrant requests.
A litany of missteps by the FBI
The IG report concluded FBI officials made 17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” in its submissions to the FISA court to secure warrants to target former Trump advisor Carter Page: “FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘scrupulously accurate.’ We identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation, based upon information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed.”

The FBI refrained from launching a FISA warrant request until it came into possession of a dossier from Christopher Steele, a former British intelligent agent. The Steele dossier played "a central and essential role in the decision by FBI [Office of General Counsel] to support the request for FISA surveillance targeting Carter Page, as well as the FBI's ultimate decision to seek the FISA order," the IG report concluded. The FBI "drew almost entirely" from the Steele dossier to prove a “well-developed conspiracy” between Russians and the Trump campaign. The IG found that FBI agents were “unable to corroborate any of the specific substantive allegations against Carter Page” in the Steele dossier but the FBI relied on Steele’s allegations regardless.
The FBI withheld from the FISA court key details that would have undercut the dossier’s credibility, including a warning from a top Justice Department official that “Steele may have been hired by someone associated with presidential candidate Clinton or the DNC [Democratic National Committee].” The FBI also deceived the FISA court by wrongly claiming that Steele’s prior informant work had been “used in criminal proceedings” by the Justice Department. The CIA disdained the Steele dossier as “an internet rumor,” one FBI official told IG investigators. The IG report obliterated the credibility of the Steele dossier.
So, the infamous "Steele dossier," which was paid for by the Clinton campaign and conducted by a firm that specializes in peddling campaign dirt.
Once the origins of the Steele dossier became known, Democrats and the press insisted that it played little or no role in convincing federal judges to approve wiretaps on Carter Page.
For good reason, too. The idea that the FBI would use political propaganda paid for by one presidential campaign to launch a high-level investigation against the other in the middle of an election is horrifying.
So, they consistently downplayed the dossier's importance.
Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee asserted in February that the FISA application "made only narrow use of information from Steele's sources about Page's specific activities in 2016." Media reports said that any of the information that the FBI did use had been independently corroborated.
But now, with the application documents in hand, even the Washington Post admits that the dossier played "a prominent role" in the wiretap request. And we know that the FBI had corroborated none of the dossier claims before filing its application.
1
-
1
-
@ruthharris123 from By negotiating safe-third-country agreements and getting Mexico to crack down on caravans, Trump reduced the number of border encounters reported by Border Patrol -- they plummeted to their lowest point since the beginning of Trump's presidency in mid-2020. Reported encounters from May 2019 to April of the following year fell by 88%.
Now, two months into his presidency, Biden has undone all of that, manufacturing a crisis of migrants flooding our southern border. And yes, that means he is locking kids up in cages that approach full capacity.
According to internal documents from the Department of Health and Human Services obtained by Axios, Border Patrol put an average of 321 children per day in HHS custody by the beginning of March -- those would be the "cages" once maligned by the media -- in contrast to just 47 per day on average during the first week in January. HHS also reported child migrant facilities at 94% capacity "and expected to reach its maximum this month."
So amid a global pandemic, ICE says that we're set to see a deluge of migrants the size of which we haven't experienced in "over 20 years." And, whereas a negative COVID test is required for entry to the U.S. via air travel, Border Patrol has been releasing migrants into the country without any tests at all.
In January, Border Patrol reported more than twice as many border encounters as they had in January of 2020. This is a humanitarian crisis compounded by a pandemic due. It is going to get drastically worse, and Biden is responsible for that.
Thanks to Trump's safe-third-country agreements and negotiations with Mexico, he drastically ameliorated the "kids in cages" crisis. Instead of lockups in the U.S., families could remain together in civil society in Mexico while their asylum claims were processed.
But by giving migrants a clear path to our border and revoking the Remain in Mexico policy, Biden must either keep adult migrants in CPB facilities or revert to catch and release. Biden is currently doing a mix of both.
If he had kept Trump's diplomatic deterrents from inviting this surge, Biden wouldn't have to make this decision at all. But as long as the courts continue to refuse family reunification because it incarcerates minors, his dilemma will persist. But Biden asked for this, and now hundreds of thousands of migrants and Americans along the southern border will suffer as a result.
1
-
@ruthharris123 After recent reports of overcrowding at a temporary U.S. Customs and Border Protection facility in Donna, Texas where unaccompanied immigrant children are held, the Biden administration allowed a few members of the media to tour the facility on Tuesday. The photos and videos taken by journalists from inside the facility paint a dark picture of the overcrowded and inhumane conditions that these children are facing.
The Donna facility was divided into smaller “pods” by thick plastic walls, each of which was designed to only hold 32 kids each, but the pods seen by the reporters were currently holding between 500 and 700 children, CNN reports. Young children were kept in a smaller playpen area, which is also where they sleep at night. Although the children in the facility wore masks, they are only tested for covid-19 if they start to display symptoms, despite being forced to live in extremely close quarters. Currently, the covid-19 positivity rate at the Donna facility is approximately 14 percent.
The facility is currently housing 4,100 migrant minors—more than 10 times over its CDC-mandated pandemic capacity of only 250, said acting Executive Officer for Rio Grande Valley Operational Programs Division Oscar Escamilla. Of those immigrant children, 3,400 were unaccompanied, and more than 2,000 had been kept at the facility for over the 72-hour legal limit within which unaccompanied children must be turned over within 72 hours to the Department of Health and Human Services. Migrant children spend an average of 133 hours at the facility, and at least 39 of the children had been in the Donna facility for over 15 days.
According to Escamilla, about 250 to 300 children typically enter the Donna facility each day, but far fewer are released into the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which has quickly led to the extreme overcrowding that they are now experiencing.“We’re way overcapacity. We’re like 700% overcapacity,” Escamilla said.
The HHS has announced the creation of a number of new border facilities to accommodate immigrant children, with plans to build up its capacity to 13,500 beds, which doesn’t do much for the hundreds of new unaccompanied children who are detained along the border daily.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins I'm sorry but no. Read the bill. It does not silence teaching of race. I see nothing that stops a Hispanic club.
No, EVERYONE was disgustednby the death of George Floyd. It wasn't until more video came out and more information came out that ppl started questioning. Stop this stereotyping that conservatives are "racist". It isn't true. I am a middle kind of person. A libertarian (not the party). I look at both sides and see that they're both batshit. The left is MUCH more, however. They are pushing this CRT which is LITERALLY racist.
Im sorry but you really need to watch/read more types of media. All sides. All types. Then you can compare, contrast, research, etc and see the truth. It's usually somewhere in the middle. Get a lot more independent media. I recommend Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), Jimmy Dore, We Are Change, YoungRippa, Officer Tatum, Steven Crowder, Actual Justice Warrior, Karlyn Borysenko, Candace Owens, The Reason We Learn(you can learn about CRT here and at Karlyn Borysenkos channel), etc to start. A little of everything. You don't have to like the media to watch it. Purposely seek out media you disagree with to a get a well rounded diet of media. Only way to see the truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins Anyway, I'm done engaging with you. You are hateful and you indulge in stereotyping based on assumptions and misinformation due to your one sided intake of media and the like. I find it gross. Just as bad as a racist. I will again give you some ppl that you can start to watch so ypu can get more than a one sided view. And contrary to your inane comment before about me "believing alt right media", they are almost all libertarians, classical liberals, and even a progressive. You will forever be indoctrinated and uninformed until you start learning all sides of things. You don't have to lile them or even agree with them. I watch plenty I don't like or don't agree with, but I like a well rounded media. One of my favorites is a progressive who I definitely do not agree with politically but he is honest and funny.
For CRT in general-Karlyn Borysenko and The Reason We Learn
In general-Tim Pool (also TimCastIRL..this one is good because he brings in other ppl to chat), We Are Change, YoungRippa, Matt Christansen, Jimmy Dore(the progressive I mentioned), Actual Justice Warrior, Anthony Brian Logan(conservative), Project Veritas, Candace Owens(conservative). A few to get you started.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins Lastly, the idea that there are a bunvh of ppl who are truly racist out there is false. Stop letting them tell you the boogie man is out there. This is fear. Gov loves to use fear to get what they want. The hegelian dialectic. This division among ppl that we see now just started like 10 years ago, whenever Occupy Wall St was. The ppl were working together and fighting the system. They couldn't have that. They started pushing all this intersectionality bs real hard. You can track it in google analytics and see the huge uptick in the talking points in search. It got ppl to stop fighting them and fight each other. You think telling all white ppl that they are racist is gonna help race relations? There are so few actual racists in this country that being called that is the worst thing any white person wants to be called. If they were actual racists, ppl wouldn't care about the word. The overuse and misuse of it is certainly lessening the impact it has. They've really taken the sting out of it by labeling everything racist. Whiteness, math, history, self reliance, time, individualism. Milk(not joking), objectivity, and a slew of other crazy things have been called racist/white supremacy by these ppl. You think telling ppl that they are bad for their skin color is helping race relations? Or telling black kids that they can't go anywhere in life because of their skin color, and that it is because of white ppl, is good for race relations? This is all creating racism. Look at rsce relation trends. They were going up more and more and then they started pushing this BS and they've plummeted again. You are supporting this system with this garbage. You need to wake up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins Candace Owens(black conservative, ex Democrat) Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL)(left libertarian/classic liberal), We Are Change(libertarian) , Jimmy Dore(progressive Democrat) , Karlyn Borysenko(classic liberal, ex Democrat), Actual Justice Warrior(guessing libertarian, classic liberal), Anthony Brian Logan(conservative), Officer Tatum(conservative), Matt Christensen(also guessing libertarian..maybe right libertarian), Steven Crowder(conservative), The Reason We Learn(liberal), Dave Rubin(classic liberal, ex Democrat), YoungRippa(an-cap libertarian).
Start watching these ppl. (Highly doubt you will since you seem deeply rooted in your belief system and don't want your view of the world upended. Easier to just virtue signal and stick with the narrative..which I get because I used to sound like you and then I started to actually research those narratives) But if you must only pick 3, make it Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), We Are Change, and Jimmy Dore.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michael murillo It is where I live too. As I said, in some places in this country, that is not the case. Therefore, your comment makes little sense to millions of people. You can look up mandates in all states currently. Look up stories of businesses being shut down and not allowed to reopen and more restrictions making it harder and harder for them to run. You can look up places in CA, for instance, that have stay at home orders. You can look up churches that are not allowed to open. You can look up one womans, in NJ I think it was, wbo was stopped from selling her wares live online! Dur to covid restrictions. Cops came to her business and stopped her live stream selling her stuff. Look up stories where ppl are being fined thousands of dollars every day for opening tbeir business. Wake up man. We have dystopian level shit in some places.
Watch more news. Ppl like Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), Young Rippa, We Are Change, etc.
1
-
1
-
1