General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Ego Brain
Megyn Kelly
comments
Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "Megyn Kelly Discusses the Key Reason She Believes Pete Hegseth Was Never Charged with Sexual Assault" video.
@brandong298 Yet it is ok for his name to be smeared and him to be harrassed and possibly lose positions due to something he wasn't even charged with due to the lack of evidence? Nah.
5
@derekturner3272 There seems to be a lot of accts in these videos (about the other cabinet picks, too) ignoring the facts and trying to keep the smear going. I'm guessing that is what the Robin person is doing
4
Same.
3
@blaineburns9957 Seems like it. Several other accts, too.
2
@denahom Why would he be charged? There was no evidence of her story occurring. You want to charge someone, without evidence? How authoritarian.
2
@brandong298 If her name can be blocked, his should too if no case was ever even brought. That's bs. This can ruin a person and it is bs that someone can just make an accusation that ruins someone while they stay hidden.
2
@brandong298 This case was 7 yrs ago. And it shouldn't even be brought up since no charges were made. Either both get named or neither.
2
@robynwells8249 incorrect. A settlement doesn't stop CRIMINAL charges. It doesn't work like that. They won't stop charging you of that crime just because you and the accuser made a deal. No criminal charges were brought due to lack of evidence of it happening and witness accounts, etc. He paid her to sign an NDA to keep her from bringing a CIVIL suit because he didn't want to be smeared. Especially during that time when lots of guys were.
1
@robynwells8249 Incorrect. It doesn't work like that. No CRIMINAL charge was brought because there was no evidence it happened. The settlement was separate to keep her from smearing him.
1
@robynwells8249 Nope. A payment doesn't stop criminal charges. No charges were brought because there was no evidence that it happened. Witness statements, video, etc didn't mix with the way she told it.
1
@geraldbaudoin336 It is from a police report. 7 yrs ago.
1
@acc4465 You're naive if you're having a hard time thinking that someone would do that. It is done all the time.
1
@peterjermey7235 To dave her marriage. To give it an air of legitimacy. And it wasn't even until several days later when she went.
1
@jeffn4836 I couldn't care less about his personal life.
1
@Justwow1962 Not guilt. She was trying to save her marriage, so she claimed grape.
1
@earthangel2590 You're giving in to the smear campaigns of the left. This is why DTs last administration didn't do as well. I don't care about his personal life.
1
@peterjermey7235 He isn't a suspect. The case was not brought. And you are innocent until proven guilty. And paying does not equal guilt. Ppl pay because of numerous reasons. It tends to be cheaper, they don't want their name smeared all over during the case, etc.
1
@michaelpauley125 No, he didn't...that is why he wasn't charged with the crime...
1
Seems to be bots/trolls invading these vids to help the smear against DT picks. They did this same exact smearing in his first admin.
1
@peterjermey7235 She didn't go to the er until 4 or 5 days later.
1
@peterjermey7235 I couldn't care less about their personal lives.
1
@peterjermey7235 Everything suggests she is lying. The video, witness statements, her husband's statements, PH knowing the exact story she told her husband, the grape kit, etc, etc.
1
@acc4465 Yes, he paid her to sign an NDA so she didn't spread her smear.
1
@peterjermey7235 Everyone said he was drunk and she wasn't. Her husband also said she was fine when she got back to their room. The video also showed that she was fine and was walking arm in arm with him. Grape kit came back negative for signs. Etc etc To save her marriage. To legitimize her story to her husband.
1
@peterjermey7235 Why would I care if PB was transportation sec?
1
@peterjermey7235 No, she did not. You can read the police report. Or just watch this video which you clearly have not watched. Why are you blatantly lying?
1
@peterjermey7235 You're sound pretty naive about ppl and their actions. I do not care about his personal life. I did not care about Bill Clintons. I did not care about K.Harris' and how she rose up the ladder, and I do not care about this guys. It is not my business. BC having his "wood" softened by someone had nothing to do with his ability to run the country or not and this guy sleeping around has nothing to do with his ability. We need to stop allowing the smear jobs.
1
@peterjermey7235 "he said it was disproved, it wasn't) Semantics. No charges were brought because all evidence showed it did not happen. "He paid her" Yes, so he wouldn't be smeared all over and lose his job and everything else. Not a shocking move. "Argument because he was SHing" Yet she walked arm in arm with him and went into his room... "She was the aggressor" He probably meant in the room. The one she happily walked to with him, arm in arm.
1
@peterjermey7235 So, you didn't even watch the videos you keep commenting on about it. As I guessed. Your opinion on her actions is very naive. I don't care about his personal life. I didn't care about BillC and his having his "wood" softened by someone either. It didn't effect his ability to run the country. I didn't care about how KamH climbed the ladder. I also don't care about him and his personal activity. It isn't my business.
1
@peterjermey7235 And no, we need to stop falling for Dem smear jobs.
1
@peterjermey7235 No, we actually need to stop falling for these smears.
1
@peterjermey7235 Also, I can see you made a comment claiming that he wasn't charged due to him paying her. That is not how criminal charges work. You can't just pay the other person and the gov not charge you. If they have enough evidence of it, they're charging you, regardless. They don't care what you paid. Charges were not brought because there was no evidence of it happening. The payment was to sign an NDA so she didn't go around smearing him with her story. Completely separate.
1
@YourFreeSpeechHQExactly
1
@DenaNieves Paying does not and has never equaled guilt. The entire point of shushing her was to not have his name dragged. Especially in 2017 when that was happening and ending careers with just accusations. Easy to say when it isn't you.
1