Youtube comments of Ego Brain (@egobrain7349).
-
1700
-
764
-
693
-
304
-
260
-
240
-
229
-
217
-
206
-
194
-
192
-
181
-
174
-
166
-
157
-
145
-
139
-
136
-
135
-
133
-
124
-
121
-
119
-
117
-
112
-
111
-
111
-
106
-
101
-
100
-
96
-
94
-
93
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
89
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
85
-
85
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
75
-
73
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
67
-
67
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
63
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
This is just false. Firstly, why do you want to go back in time and give land rights to ppl, but you appear to have a certain cutoff point because it is convenient for you? If you want to go to the past and give land to who had it previously, it makes it Isr who own it. They were the original ppl there and they've always been there in some capacity.
Also, Isr bought the land. They began buying it from the landowners in the 1880s. They bought more and more over the years. All of this caused conflict and that led up to the '40s where the predecessor to the UN split the area. But, Isr paid for it. They even overpaid.
Over time, they were attacked and took more land as it was land that they were being attacked from and they won more. Over the time, both sides lost and gained, but Isr gained more. So, this all also makes it theirs.
You have a one-sided, propaganda, false view of the history there.
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
@lucabriatore7891 So you are defending murder, destruction, harassment, insurrection, etc...gross.
Most of the BLM ppl are not paying. Most have been let go.
What you fail to understand is that those Democrats were cherring on and instigating an already very violent and deadly group and Trump literally told the not yet violent (very few ever were) to be peaceful. His exact words were:
"After this, we’re going to walk down — and I’ll be there with you — we’re going to walk down, we’re going to walk down — anyone you want, but I think right here — we’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. And we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength, and you have to be strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing, and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated — lawfully slated. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your votes heard today."
After ppl did becone violent, he told ppl to respect police and go home. Repeatedly said to remain peaceful. Then he sent national guard.
You are wrong.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@Filipe17-17 It absolutely was. They talked of criminal immigrants coming in and drugs flowing through and needing a fence just twenty years ago.
A paragraph from the 1996 Democrat Party platform-
"Today's Democratic Party also believes we must remain a nation of laws. We cannot tolerate illegal immigration and we must stop it. For years before Bill Clinton became President, Washington talked tough but failed to act. In 1992, our borders might as well not have existed. The border was under-patrolled, and what patrols there were, were under-equipped. Drugs flowed freely. Illegal immigration was rampant. Criminal immigrants, deported after committing crimes in America, returned the very next day to commit crimes again."
There was a section of border wall that was built by President Clinton (democrat) in the 90s. It passed with bi-partisan support. They did so again in 2006. Many Democrat a have advocated for a barrier in the past. They have advocated for more border security, stopping illegal immigration, touted the facts that illegals take jobs and rss , commit crimes, bring in drugs, etc.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@reyalexandro Incorrect. Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the (you know the word) virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus that until the middle of March. 😆 On March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc. Idk how people cannot remember the rhetoric of just a year ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians. The extreme partisanship of the media is the literal point of pointing out the hypocrisy.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@realneth Trump did not divide the country. We were divided already. He was a symptom, not the cause. You have to start warching more media of different kinds. Much more independent media who aren't multinational bilion dollar corporations. Watch Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL where he brings in different guests from all walka of life to chat), We Are Change, Karlyn Borysenko, YoungRippa, Actual Justice Warrior, Officer Tatum, The Reason We Learn, Jimmy Dore, Steven Crowder, Candace Owens, etc. To start. Ppl of different opinions than the bubble you are in. You don't have to like them or agree with them, but watch them. Expose yourself to more information. New information. Compare, contrast, and research each yourself. Get out of your bubble. You have to watch and learn from all sides. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@satan6548 So you trust their numbers when they literally said you count as a death if you test positive, even if you died of "clear alternate cause?" When many weren't ever tested and added because they were "assumed?" When you were considered pos if you passed within 60 days of having a pos cov test. 60 days! You trust those numbers while they used a faulty test that they knew and admitted gave false positives and knew it was not meant to be used for diagnosis because it cant differentiate between Cov and the flu? You really think the flu just practically disappeared? You believe them when they knew and admitted that they were using too many cycles on those tests which allows the test to pick up old genetic material? You trust it even with all their misinformation, lies, nonsensical protocols, etc?
Study on seroprevalence studies show that cov has an IFR of 0.15% globally. Do you not see how insanely low that is? It is 0.2% for the US. This is without vax. The likelihood of a person being hospitalized is only 1-5%. Yes, the vax makes those lower...to already incredibly low numbers! The fearmongering is ridiculous. Yes, we should protect those who are elderly or compromised medically. Those ppl should get vaxed, if they want to. Everyone else should live their lives and make their own decisions. Vaxxed can still get it, they still get hospitalized, they can still die, and they carry the same viral load as nonvaxxed to spread it. If any of these politicians who are heavily subsidized by big pharma mind you, actually cared about lives, they'd be pushing healthy lifestyles. Eating healthy, losing weight, not smoking, go outside in the sun to make vitamin D, etc etc etc. But these things do not make billions of dollars for the ppl that pay them. They don't make ppl money. They dont make Amazon, Walmart, and big corporations money like the lockdown did when they picked winners and losers by shutting down small business and allowing corporations to stay open. 2020 was the greatest upward transfer of wealth in history. You have been fooled.
Also, "hospitalized by cov" and "vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed" has been hard to track since their definition of those have been silly. Persons were considered fully vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the second dose in a 2-dose series (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines) or after 1 dose of the single-dose Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine; partially vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the first dose and <14 days after the second dose in a 2-dose series; and unvaccinated <14 days after receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no CAIR2 vaccination data were available. COVID-19–associated hospitalizations were defined as hospital admissions occurring ≤14 days after a first SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19–associated deaths were defined as deaths occurring ≤60 days after the date of a first laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or deaths with COVID-19 listed as a cause of or contributing condition to death. And they also admitted that many ppl they were listing as "hospitalized with cov" were axtually people who were in the hos for something else entirely and discovered that they had it while there and/or had mild symptoms.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@pjjj23 He finally got the funding for the wall after years of fighting for it.
Lowered taxes, prison reform, deregulation, filled a ton of judge's seats (including 3 SCJ), canceled the PCA, TPP, NAFTA, got other countries to pay their share in NATO, approved pipelines, etc., etc.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
omar suarez socialism, communism, nazism, fascism...all typed of authoritarian control. The first step for communism, nazism, and fascism is socialism. It's the foot in the door that promises a utopia for the uneducated masses. Socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. Answer this..how many Americans applied asylum to a socialist country because capitalism threatens their safety and life?
“Only by focusing on the income brackets, instead of the actual people moving between those brackets, have the intelligentsia been able to verbally create a ‘problem’ for which a ‘solution’ is necessary. They have created a powerful vision of ‘classes’ with ‘disparities’ and ‘inequities’ in income, caused by ‘barriers’ created by ‘society.’ But the routine rise of millions of people out of the lowest quintile over time makes a mockery of the ‘barriers’ assumed by many, if not most, of the intelligentsia.”-Thomas Sowell
"Socialism itself can hope to exist only for brief periods here and there, and then only through the exercise of the extremist terrorism. For this reason, it is secretly preparing itself for rule through fear and is driving the word "justice" into the heads of the half-educated masses like a nail so as to rob them of their reason and to create in them a good conscience for the evil game they are to play." -Friedrich Nietzsche
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@jaywalker_4629 Ah so I see you mean this post. Thought you meant one that was laid out. Legal immigrants should be by merit only and should have a block on welfare and programs for at least 10 years. Legal immigrants come and are public charges just like illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants cost America 120 billion every single year so they're worse, but many legal are also high in welfare recipients and the ones from south of the border are the worst.
51% are public charges on one or more welfare programs for up to 20 years. Compared to 30% of native households.
Average immigrant household headed by an immigrant, legal or illegal, costs taxpayers $6,200 each in federal welfare benefits. That's 41% higher than native households
Average immigrant household receives 33% more cash welfare, 57% more food assistance, 44% more medicaid dollars,
Households headed by immigrants from Mexico and Central America have the highest welfare costs of any sending region at $8,251 each and 86% higher than native households.
71% of Hispanic led households are on one or more welfare program for up to 20 years.
They're low educated and have more children.24% of immigrants households are headed by a high school dropout compared to 8% of native households. 13% have 3 or more children compared to 6% of native households.
Corporations are the only ones benefiting from these low skilled, low wage immigration, aside from the immigrants themselves
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@CaraBolsaSTUDIOS Ppl will ne or stop believing these silly stereotypes about homeschooling. Lol This isn't 50 yrs ago. 😄 Millions of kids are homeschooling here. They create communities. They usually have HS groups, they typically play sports, take classes for instruments, outside classes, etc.
Research shows that on average, HS students routinely participate in eight social activities outside of the home. They can easily do this since they have more time. (It takes far less time than gov school) They have a much broader range of socialization. Also, gov school is a lot of negative socialization.
Research facts on homeschooling show that thry are doing well, typically above average, on measures of social, emotional, and psychological development. Research measures include peer interaction, self-concept, leadership skills, family cohesion, participation in community service, and self-esteem.
87% of peer-reviewed studies on social, emotional, and psychological development show HS students perform statistically significantly better than those in conventional schools.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Betta66 You're right, she never claimed there was an eyewitness in tbey room, but she said there were ppl in the house, as it was a party. And she kept changing the number of ppl who were there. The ones she named by name, including her best friend(!), denied ever being at such a party. Her story changed about several other points as well. Her story changed about the house it supposedly happened in, the timing of the alleged assault, etc. Her story of these different things changed after there was evidence against the first claim. Suddenly the house was different or where the house was was different. It is all Googleable. By leftist websites even.
She also lied several times, like about not being able to fly when she flew all the time on long flights. It is reported that she lied about the reasoning for the neeed of the second door of her house. An ex bf, in a sworn affidavit, said he saw her coach a friend on how to pass a polygraph.
Also, you note that she told her therapist. She never named him! She told her therapist a story of being assaulted. She never said who it was.
You also keep noting his calendar entry. That means nothing. She can't even decide on a time when the alleged assault even happened let aline pinpoint an exact date.
Sorry, at this point, it is not only unrealistic, but even irrational to believe her
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Starfire10982 Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the c...virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus that until the middle of March. 😆 On March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc. Idk how people cannot remember the rhetoric of just a year ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@foomp Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the ©️hunese virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus that until the middle of March. 😆 On March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
The WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc. Idk how people cannot remember the rhetoric of just a year ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Iamdissapoint 🤦 We should all pay the exact same, LOW percentage. Otherwise it is monetary discrimination. Rich people are penalized for working 80+ hour work weeks, taking risks, having ideas and following through with them, building companies and employing people, etc, etc, etc.
Trump came in and lowered taxes for everyone and started deregulating and what happened?...wages increased, millions more jobs were created, and we had one of the best economies the US has had. Studies show that on average, wealth for Americans increased 17% while it increased 54% for the bottom half of Americans.
The 1% already pay most of the taxes. The 1% pay 39% of all income taxes. The 10% pay 69%. The top 50% pay 96%. The lower half pay 3%. This does not even include the people who pay zero percent. The bottom half are a net negative as they take more in programs than they pay in. Their average tax rate is 4% while the 1% average tax rate is 27%. The top 1 percent paid a greater share of individual income taxes (37.3 percent) than the bottom 90 percent combined (30.5 percent).
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
"Midwestern states Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin always swing in the same direction as Ohio and Iowa, their regional peers. Ohio likewise swings with Florida. Current tallies show that, outside of a few cities, the Rust Belt swung in Trump’s direction. Yet, Biden leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin because of an apparent avalanche of black votes in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee.
Biden’s ‘winning’ margin was derived almost entirely from such voters in these cities, as coincidentally his Black vote spiked only in exactly the locations necessary to secure victory. He did not receive comparable levels of support among comparable demographic groups in comparable states, which is highly unusual for the presidential victor."
From The Spectator
https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the-2020-presidential-election-is-deeply-puzzling/
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@vsreeser So, I once had a hybrid. We had a 300 and the gas was just as bad as the Sequoia we had before it, so we traded the 300 in for a Toyota as Camry Hybrid.
We loved it. We drove to Virginia and on the way, the car said we were getting 99 miles per gallon. 😂 The meter topped out at 99, so could have been higher. 😂
However, we live in Ohio, so eventually winter came...we traded the car in for a Durango. 🤣 That car sucked in the snow, light snowed roads, etc. Lol
So, if you live somewhere with snow, think twice on that Hybrid. Maybe if it is a truck/SUV. Lol
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dom-hx7ki NCLB made extreme emphasis on standardized testing. Funding was connected to it. It wasn't based on being proficient in all subjects at their level, but proficient on passing that specific test for the year.
This made them focus just on what was going to be on the tests. If they didn't, the school would lose funding and eventually close. So, when they're not performing well, they lose funding. That makes them not perform as well because they have less resources...so they lose more funding. And it just keeps going in circles until the school would close. So, they had to put their focus on making sure they could learn what was on those tests, not make sure they were where they should be in every subject, on every topic, and work on holes in their knowledge.
Also, because of this, it made them have to focus on those who were right on the line of proficiency and not give enough attention to others.
It's a terrible and not helpful process.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@benjaminwebb5759 DT was doing a good job, objectively. So he said mean things..who cares? We had, as the media even acknowledged, "the best numbers of our lives." He was working with the ME countries to broker peace. We were energy independent. Ppl were working. Started prison reform. Lowered taxes. And IDC who got more, almost everyone had lower taxes. Objective fact. They even admitted his replacement of NAFTA was better. He got NATO countries to pay their "fair share" that they were supposed to be paying, but weren't. Studies show that on average, wealth for Americans increased 17% while it increased 54% for the bottom half of Americans, under DT. The country was doing great. It was the divisive media and the left constantly berating him with nonsensical rhetoric and impeachments and investigations that kept us apart. Think of what he could have gotten done if not for them stonewalling him at every step.
Now the country is falling apart, but hey, at least orange man isn't tweeting. 🤡
(I'm not a conservative, for context)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@TheRedemptionRain 🤦🏻♀️ Do you think this organization just exists without funding? Their joint ventures just happen without funding? Whonis contributing the most in that since we spend the most? You know the answer. And things like money given from one to another happens. Sending of troops, weapons, etc.
And in their own words, the Alliance relies on the United States for the provision of some essential capabilities, regarding for instance, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; air-to-air refuelling; ballistic missile defence; and airborne electromagnetic warfare."
Also, the entire point of the required percentage to their defense is so that, if stuff goes down, they help each other, and each is ready and prepared. Us, wayyyyy outfunding everyone else, who will contribute the most? You know the answer.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@xandan1668 since he wasnt a dictator, he left it up to the states.
No state ahould have locked down. The WHO is even against lockdowns. The problems from that are worse.
He didnt ignore it. 🤦🏻♀️
He shut down travel from China immediately and the left(Biden specifically)said he was xenophobic for doing so. He created the coronavirus taskforce immediately. He ensured every state had all the ventilators and medical setups they needed and was applauded for it by several Democratic governors, including Cuomo and Newsom. Dr Fauci himself, whom is adored by the left, said that Trump did everything he should have and he can't think of anything more that he could have done.
Since Trump is NOT a dictator, he left decisions of mandates and lockdowns up to the states, as he should have. Some states did better than others. Some states, Democratic run, put sick people in NURSING HOMES. We all knew from the very beginning that the elderly were the most vulnerable yet they put sick people with them while their hospitals were empty and Trumps administration had medical facilities set up for them to use. Nursing homes represent less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they account for 42% of the COVID-19 deaths, with more than 70,000 fatalities reported by the COVID Tracking Project. (Number is from August)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@DariusSarrafi By your logic, we should stay locked down indefinitely because we get flus every single year that kill many elderly. You aren't suspicious that the seasonal flu has gone down by 98%? Or that they literally said that you are counted as a covid death if you have it, even if you died from "clear alternate cause"? Or that many of the ppl counted as covid deaths never even got tested, they just assumed it? Or that small businesses have to shut down but big businesses who sell the same things are allowed to stay open which just funnels more ppl into one small area? The IFR is 00.04%. That is what is destroying the economy, killed millions of jobs, shut down masses of small businesses forever, causing mass depression, causing suicide, impeding on childrens education and mental health, increasing hunger. Etc etc etc. You dont realize that we are a fascist(corporation + state) country, being run by corporations? This is only helping corporations. Big pharma(who is now suggesting that we will need a yearly vax), Amazon, Walmart, etc.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Brandonisfinished Yea, the bill in the video is ridiculous. There is no actual food on it. 😂
However, I actually buy meat, vegetables, etc. and cook actual food and my bill has doubled. And this is with buying cheaper food, even.
We haven't bought any beef in a few years. (aside from big packages of ground beef that are cheaper and we break it down into portions and freeze) No steak, roasts, etc. It costs too much.
We haven't bought pork chops in years. They cost too much.
We no longer buy cereal. Costs too much.
We no longer buy lunchmeat. Costs too much.
Etc. etc. I do still buy a lot of vegetables. But, those are insane, too. Potatoes have nearly doubled. Potatoes. Lol Onions, garlic, etc.
This is all with going out of my way to use sales, other apps, and cash back things to save money.
Food is ridiculous now.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@peterhouston-hencken455 As my comment said, you are moving the goalposts. Originally, you said "nobody is forcing you." Now you are saying "show me who was jailed." There are places where it is illegal, but the consequence is typically a large fine, probation, etc. This is still force. Especially to poor ppl. Also, sometimes, there is no fine, but an "order" to use proper pronouns in the future and if you are caught not doing so, you get in trouble for contempt of court. Also, basically everyone is forced to in their workplaces or they will be fired. This is force!
Also, if there is a law, ppl are literally being forced and so not having a ton of ppl to "prove" to you is silly since most ppl will obey it so they do not have to pay the fines.
With that said, this is just from part of 1 google search page.
Bill Whatcott was fined $55,000
In NY, landlords, service providers, and employers purposely misgendering is subject to fines (that could reach as high as $250,000 for multiple violations)
In California, for like 4 yrs, healthcare workers “willfully and repeatedly” failing to use a transgender person’s “preferred name or pronouns” after he or she is “clearly informed of the preferred name or pronouns and could be punished by a fine “not to exceed one thousand dollars” or “by imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed one year,” or both. I believe a judge struck it this year. Thank God.
In the UK, Kate Scottow was fine $1k for it
Caroline Farrow was investigated for misgendering in the UK
Whole Foods had a lawsuit
These go on and on and ppl are trying to make it so all over the place.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@SciFyerGaming Diamond Princess American passengers came home to quarantine and isolation.
On January 20, 2020, the Diamond Princess cruise ship departed Yokohama, Japan, carrying approximately 3,700 passengers and crew (Table). On January 25, a symptomatic passenger departed the ship in Hong Kong, where he was evaluated; testing confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. On February 3, the ship returned to Japan, after making six stops in three countries. Japanese authorities were notified of the COVID-19 diagnosis in the passenger who disembarked in Hong Kong, and the ship was quarantined. Information about social distancing and monitoring of symptoms was communicated to passengers. On February 5, passengers were quarantined in their cabins; crew continued to work and, therefore, could not be isolated in their cabins (6). Initially, travelers with fever or respiratory symptoms and their close contacts were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All those with positive test results were disembarked and hospitalized. Testing was later expanded to support a phased disembarkation of passengers, prioritizing testing of older persons, those with underlying medical conditions, and those in internal cabins with no access to the outdoors. During February 16–23, nearly 1,000 persons were repatriated by air to their home countries, including 329 persons who returned to the United States and entered quarantine or isolation.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@elizabethsmusicandarts1590 Oh lord, that is some hilarious revisionist history. 🙄 Im just hoping you are being sarcastic. Just in case, lets remind ourselves of last year, shall we?
Shot mortars at federal courthouse in Portland and tried to barracade the people inside and set it on fire when they couldnt get in
Burned down a police station in Minneapolis
Created the CHAZ/CHOP zone(which was actual insurrection)where people were harrassed, beaten, raped, and even killed.
Burned down a Wendy's
Dozens of people killed during their riots, including one man who was hunted and then shot point blank because he had a MAGA hat on
Billions of dollars in damage to small businesses and large businesses, cars, etc.
700 injured policemen
Harrassed many politicians and journalists (even at their homes)
"Stormed" the White House
BLM leader said "if this country doesn't give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it." ....ppl still gave them billions of dollars. Presumably so they can do just that.
BLM used mafia tactics in Louisville and made business owners comply with their demands or risk their business being trashed.
Chris Cuomo said on CNN of Antifa, "Who said free speech has to be peaceful?"
AOC said, "Riots are the language of the unheard."
Everyone was saying, "It's ok, they have insurance."
They said CHAZ/CHOP would be a "summer of love"
Ayanna Presley said, "There needs to be unrest in the streets."
Mazine Waters told people to show up at cabinet members houses
Then ppl gave billions of dollars to BLM for doing these things. Bailout funds have been created to bail out and provide legal services to all Antifa/BLM members for doing these things. Even by our Vice President.
All of this was done for something that almost everyone agreed was fcked up. Even since, when we have more information and know that he had a very lethal amount of drugs in his system and that he begged to be put on the ground, people still almost universally believe that the knee on his neck was unnecessary
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agees924 He banned travel.from China where covid originated and we had videos of them boarding ppl into their houses. Then he added European countries and so on when they got it bad. No inconsistency. They called him xenophobic and it had nothing to do with "inconsistency"
Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” biden later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the ©️hin🅰️ virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus that until the middle of March. 😆 On March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc. Idk how people cannot remember the rhetoric of just a year ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Bill Bill He handled it fine. He handled it how he should have..he left it up to the states. We are states who are part of a union. He shut down travel from China immediately and the left(Biden specifically)said he was xenophobic for doing so. He created the coronavirus taskforce immediately. He ensured every state had all the ventilators and medical setups they needed and was applauded for it by several Democratic governors, including Cuomo and Newsom. Dr Fauci himself, whom is adored by the left, said that Trump did everything he should have and he can't think of anything more that he could have done.
Since Trump is NOT a dictator, he left decisions of mandates and lockdowns up to the states, as he should have. Some states did better than others. Some states, Democratic run, put sick people in NURSING HOMES. We all knew from the very beginning that the elderly were the most vulnerable yet they put sick people with them while their hospitals were empty and Trumps administration had medical facilities set up for them to use. Nursing homes represent less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they account for 42% of the COVID-19 deaths, with more than 70,000 fatalities reported by the COVID Tracking Project. (Number is from August)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Jerouac Welfare is what makes it impossible. 😅 Follow me.l here.
You get food, healthcare, phone or tablet, cheaper electric/gas, water, internet, some get cash, etc. That is a ton.
There is a certain dollar amount that you earn and lose all of it, all at once.
So, what do you do if you're offered a promotion? You hit that dollar amount and you lose all that help. So, you don't take it. You're not going to get a better job either (unless it is a unicorn job that is way more that would immediately cover all of that...unlikely) because, again, you'll lose all that help. So, you stay stagnant. Never doing better. Never getting off of it. Always a dependent on the gov. On other Americans.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gavdaddy617 the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform was that absentee ballots are the largest source of potential voter fraud. Anyone who isn't lying to themselves can agree with this bipartisan report.
A 2012 report in the NYT noted that voter fraud involving mail-in ballots “is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention (interesting how their view changes when the candidate changes)
According to a Wall Street Journal report on voter exploitation in Hispanic communities in Texas, mail-in ballots have “spawned a mini-industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques.” Poor, elderly, and minority communities are most likely to be preyed upon by so-called ballot “brokers.” (also an interesting change of view)
Concerns about fraud in mail-in ballots were serious enough that a 2008 report produced by the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project recommended that states “restrict or abolish on-demand absentee voting in favor of in-person early voting.”
Another study done in 2008 from Reed College flagged various concerns related to absentee voting and conceded there is a “great deal of literature on turnout” but when it comes to mail-in ballots there is “a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud.”
The data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and the Election Administration and Voting Surveys for 2016 and 2018, provided by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), shows that between the 2016 and 2018 elections, roughly 16.4 million ballots mailed to registered voters went missing.
In the 2018 election, about 42.4 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than one million were undeliverable, more than 430,000 were rejected, and nearly 10.5 million went missing.
The 2016 election showed similar discrepancies. That year, about 41.6 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than 568,000 were undeliverable, nearly 320,000 were rejected, and close to six million went missing.
These are all points of possible fraud. Anyone can fill them out and they so not have to verify who they are with ID.
five states – Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Utah, and Hawaii – now do all elections exclusively by mail. Supporters point to smooth elections in these states as proof that it works. But PILF obtained voter data from Oregon, the first state to adopt voting by mail exclusively, for the 2012 and 2018 elections and checked it against census data. Of the 7 million ballots the state sent out in those two elections, some 871,000 ballots are totally unaccounted for. Oregon would not reveal its data for the 2014 and 2016 elections for reasons the state would not disclose
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gavindy_Sv2 the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform was that absentee ballots are the largest source of potential voter fraud. Anyone who isn't lying to themselves can agree with this bipartisan report.
A 2012 report in the NYT noted that voter fraud involving mail-in ballots “is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention (interesting how their view changes when the candidate changes)
According to a Wall Street Journal report on voter exploitation in Hispanic communities in Texas, mail-in ballots have “spawned a mini-industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques.” Poor, elderly, and minority communities are most likely to be preyed upon by so-called ballot “brokers.” (also an interesting change of view)
Concerns about fraud in mail-in ballots were serious enough that a 2008 report produced by the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project recommended that states “restrict or abolish on-demand absentee voting in favor of in-person early voting.”
Another study done in 2008 from Reed College flagged various concerns related to absentee voting and conceded there is a “great deal of literature on turnout” but when it comes to mail-in ballots there is “a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud.”
The data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and the Election Administration and Voting Surveys for 2016 and 2018, provided by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), shows that between the 2016 and 2018 elections, roughly 16.4 million ballots mailed to registered voters went missing.
In the 2018 election, about 42.4 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than one million were undeliverable, more than 430,000 were rejected, and nearly 10.5 million went missing.
The 2016 election showed similar discrepancies. That year, about 41.6 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than 568,000 were undeliverable, nearly 320,000 were rejected, and close to six million went missing.
These are all points of possible fraud. Anyone can fill them out and they so not have to verify who they are with ID.
five states – Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Utah, and Hawaii – now do all elections exclusively by mail. Supporters point to smooth elections in these states as proof that it works. But PILF obtained voter data from Oregon, the first state to adopt voting by mail exclusively, for the 2012 and 2018 elections and checked it against census data. Of the 7 million ballots the state sent out in those two elections, some 871,000 ballots are totally unaccounted for. Oregon would not reveal its data for the 2014 and 2016 elections for reasons the state would not disclose
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@slight1495 the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform was that absentee ballots are the largest source of potential voter fraud. Anyone who isn't lying to themselves can agree with this bipartisan report.
A 2012 report in the NYT noted that voter fraud involving mail-in ballots “is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention (interesting how their view changes when the candidate changes)
According to a Wall Street Journal report on voter exploitation in Hispanic communities in Texas, mail-in ballots have “spawned a mini-industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques.” Poor, elderly, and minority communities are most likely to be preyed upon by so-called ballot “brokers.” (also an interesting change of view)
Concerns about fraud in mail-in ballots were serious enough that a 2008 report produced by the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project recommended that states “restrict or abolish on-demand absentee voting in favor of in-person early voting.”
Another study done in 2008 from Reed College flagged various concerns related to absentee voting and conceded there is a “great deal of literature on turnout” but when it comes to mail-in ballots there is “a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud.”
The data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and the Election Administration and Voting Surveys for 2016 and 2018, provided by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), shows that between the 2016 and 2018 elections, roughly 16.4 million ballots mailed to registered voters went missing.
In the 2018 election, about 42.4 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than one million were undeliverable, more than 430,000 were rejected, and nearly 10.5 million went missing.
The 2016 election showed similar discrepancies. That year, about 41.6 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than 568,000 were undeliverable, nearly 320,000 were rejected, and close to six million went missing.
These are all points of possible fraud. Anyone can fill them out and they so not have to verify who they are with ID.
five states – Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Utah, and Hawaii – now do all elections exclusively by mail. Supporters point to smooth elections in these states as proof that it works. But PILF obtained voter data from Oregon, the first state to adopt voting by mail exclusively, for the 2012 and 2018 elections and checked it against census data. Of the 7 million ballots the state sent out in those two elections, some 871,000 ballots are totally unaccounted for. Oregon would not reveal its data for the 2014 and 2016 elections for reasons the state would not disclose.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ur Hair Exactly. The left has to keep the indoctrinated and feeling helpless so they have a voter block. Thomas Sowell says it best...
“Racism is not dead. But it is on life-support, kept alive mainly by the people who use it for an excuse or to keep minority communities fearful or resentful enough to turn out as a voting block on election day.” -Thomas Sowell
“It is amazing how many of the intelligentsia call it “greed” to want to keep what you have earned, but not greed to want to take away what somebody else has earned, and let politicians use it to buy votes.”-Thomas Sowell
“Those who have helped the poor the most have not been those who have gone around loudly expressing ‘compassion’ for the poor, but those who found ways to make industry more productive and distribution more efficient, so that the poor of today can afford things that the affluent of yesterday could only dream about.”-Thomas Sowell
The problem isn't that Johnny can't read. The problem isn't even that Johnny can't think. The problem is that Johnny doesn't know what thinking is. He confuses it with feeling."-Thomas Sowell
“Only by focusing on the income brackets, instead of the actual people moving between those brackets, have the intelligentsia been able to verbally create a ‘problem’ for which a ‘solution’ is necessary. They have created a powerful vision of ‘classes’ with ‘disparities’ and ‘inequities’ in income, caused by ‘barriers’ created by ‘society.’ But the routine rise of millions of people out of the lowest quintile over time makes a mockery of the ‘barriers’ assumed by many, if not most, of the intelligentsia.”-Thomas Sowell
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@vaderirken147 For a quick rundown. They went there and starting buying the land in the 1880s. They actually even overpaid. It was mostly undeveloped land anyway.
Decades go by and they built up towns and the As started coming in to their towns for better pay and such. Then, in the 1940s, the international group did split the land, but at that time, the Js owned more than the As and over 70% was unowned, unoccupied lands (they called them crown lands)
Then, 7 countries attacked them at once. And they fought back. Over time, they kept doing it and each side would gain and lose land. The Js won more. But, they have also given land back to the As. That is what they did for the area the As are in now. It was given to them. And over this time, more As came in because the Js built up towns and cities. This is another reason why they're not actually Pals. They used to agree that that was a Brit given name for them. And they're different ppl from different areas, cultures, languages, etc. The actual Pals, originally, were Phoenician, Greek and Roman.
Js have tried over and over to try to negotiate a solution where they both have their own place, which is what they've been trying to do since the beginning, but the As refuse. They will only accept the Js to be completely gone.
And that is where we actually are today.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform was that absentee ballots are the largest source of potential voter fraud. Anyone who isn't lying to themselves can agree with this bipartisan report.
A 2012 report in the NYT noted that voter fraud involving mail-in ballots “is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention (interesting how their view changes when the candidate changes)
According to a Wall Street Journal report on voter exploitation in Hispanic communities in Texas, mail-in ballots have “spawned a mini-industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques.” Poor, elderly, and minority communities are most likely to be preyed upon by so-called ballot “brokers.” (also an interesting change of view)
Concerns about fraud in mail-in ballots were serious enough that a 2008 report produced by the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project recommended that states “restrict or abolish on-demand absentee voting in favor of in-person early voting.”
Another study done in 2008 from Reed College flagged various concerns related to absentee voting and conceded there is a “great deal of literature on turnout” but when it comes to mail-in ballots there is “a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud.”
The data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and the Election Administration and Voting Surveys for 2016 and 2018, provided by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), shows that between the 2016 and 2018 elections, roughly 16.4 million ballots mailed to registered voters went missing.
In the 2018 election, about 42.4 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than one million were undeliverable, more than 430,000 were rejected, and nearly 10.5 million went missing.
The 2016 election showed similar discrepancies. That year, about 41.6 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than 568,000 were undeliverable, nearly 320,000 were rejected, and close to six million went missing.
These are all points of possible fraud. Anyone can fill them out and they so not have to verify who they are with ID.
five states – Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Utah, and Hawaii – now do all elections exclusively by mail. Supporters point to smooth elections in these states as proof that it works. But PILF obtained voter data from Oregon, the first state to adopt voting by mail exclusively, for the 2012 and 2018 elections and checked it against census data. Of the 7 million ballots the state sent out in those two elections, some 871,000 ballots are totally unaccounted for. Oregon would not reveal its data for the 2014 and 2016 elections for reasons the state would not disclose
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MusicGunn How is he better? His comments on what he would do are what Trump already did. Lol
Trump shut down travel from China immediately and the left(Biden specifically)said he was xenophobic for doing so. He created the coronavirus taskforce immediately. He ensured every state had all the ventilators and medical setups they needed and was applauded for it by several Democratic governors, including Cuomo and Newsom. Dr Fauci himself, whom is adored by the left, said that Trump did everything he should have and he can't think of anything more that he could have done.
Since Trump is NOT a dictator, he left decisions of mandates and lockdowns up to the states, as he should have. Some states did better than others. Some states, Democratic run, put sick people in NURSING HOMES. We all knew from the very beginning that the elderly were the most vulnerable yet they put sick people with them while their hospitals were empty and Trumps administration had medical facilities set up for them to use. Nursing homes represent less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they account for 42% of the COVID-19 deaths, with more than 70,000 fatalities reported by the COVID Tracking Project. (Number is from August)
Before you spread the lie that Biden didnt call him xenophobic because of his banning travel, lets look at some key pieces of information. On Jan. 27, Biden wrote an op-ed published in USA Today, he said President Trump’s calls in 2014 for travel restrictions during the Ebola outbreak as “reactionary.” He said, Biden wrote, “I remember how Trump sought to stoke fear and stigma during the 2014 Ebola epidemic. He called President Barack Obama a ‘dope’ and ‘incompetent’ and railed against the evidence-based response our administration put in place – which quelled the crisis and saved hundreds of thousands of lives – in favor of reactionary travel bans that would only have made things worse.” So he thought travel bans were bad. He clearly was anticipating the move. And the WHO was against Trumps ban so, in Bidens words(you will see later), he was against it since the "science" was against it. (Fauci has since said it was a good move and he can't think of anything else Trump could have done)
Then a few days later, Trump issued the travel ban for this virus. One day after the travel restrictions were put into place, Biden said in Iowa, “We have, right now, a crisis with the coronavirus… This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia – hysterical xenophobia – and fearmongering to lead the way instead of science.” He then added that “Diseases have no borders, they have no borders.”
On March 12, the very same day President Trump implemented further travel restrictions on Europe, leaving little doubt about his thoughts on the travel ban, Biden said, “Banning all travel from Europe or any other part of the world may slow it but as we’ve seen will not stop it. And travel restrictions based on favoritism and politics, rather than risk, will be counterproductive.”
The same day, Biden Tweeted, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it…”
He called the travel bans “reactionary,” “hysterical,” “xenophobic,” and “counterproductive.”
He is not the better option for this.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@richardisner4030 Go learn about what is happening in our schools and tbat most teachers, administrators, and boards are behind it. Go watch The Reason We Learn, Karlyn Borysenko, New Discourses, etc. And learn why I am negative about it. They are too far gone. They have been taken over by activists who want to turn your kids into activists. Go learn about crt praxis in schools, social emotional learning, the screening and surveying, the schools transitioning kids without parents consent, getting them medicated without parents consent, etc, etc, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That is a nonsensical phrase that shows low information of history.
The Js started BUYING land in the 1880s. By time the 1940s came around, Js owned more land than the As (you now call them Pals...even though they refused being calling that then, as it wasn't a name they gave themselves) The vast majority of the land wasn't owned by or occupied by anyone. It was crown lands. Then it was divided up.
The land was also undeveloped and underdeveloped until the Js went and bought the land and built towns and societies. Those societies offered better living and that brought in As from all over. To Js land.
As soon as Is was created, they were bombarded by all the countries around them (like 7 of them). They've been being attacked by the Pals for 80+ years now. Pals have refused any solution. Over time, land was won and lost. Is VOLUNTARILY gave back the area they're in now.
Instead of building up the area and creating their own society, they instead spent their time, money, rss, etc. on continuing to go after Is.
Many of th Pals have come to the area after Is was created. Again they came to the towns and cities that were created by them that offered better living. And yet, still attacked them.
So, it is Is land.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@musicfanatic6558 As for covid, he shut down travel from China immediately and the left(Biden specifically)said he was xenophobic for doing so. He created the coronavirus taskforce immediately. He ensured every state had all the ventilators and medical setups they needed and was applauded for it by several Democratic governors, including Cuomo and Newsom. Dr Fauci himself, whom is adored by the left, said that Trump did everything he should have and he can't think of anything more that he could have done.
Since Trump is NOT a dictator, he left decisions of mandates and lockdowns up to the states, as he should have. Some states did better than others. Some states, Democratic run, put sick people in NURSING HOMES. We all knew from the very beginning that the elderly were the most vulnerable yet they put sick people with them while their hospitals were empty and Trumps administration had medical facilities set up for them to use. Nursing homes represent less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they account for 42% of the COVID-19 deaths, with more than 70,000 fatalities reported by the COVID Tracking Project. (Number is from August)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@goodnessalwayswins Since you won't read the bill(I know because it does not say it bans CRT), I'll paste it here.
AN ACT
RELATING TO DIGNITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION; AMENDING
CHAPTER 1, TITLE 33, IDAHO CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 33-138,
IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE LEGISLATIVE INTENT, TO PROVIDE LEGISLATIVE FIND-
INGS, TO ESTABLISH PROHIBITIONS REGARDING CERTAIN TENETS, DISTINCTIONS
OR CLASSIFICATIONS, OR COURSES OF INSTRUCTION OR UNITS OF STUDY, AND TO PROVIDE FOR STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION; AMENDING CHAPTER 1, TITLE 33, IDAHO
CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 33-139, IDAHO CODE, TO PROHIBIT
THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEYS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES; PROVIDING SEVERABIL-
ITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 1, Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is
hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and des-
ignated as Section 33-138, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
33-138. DIGNITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION. (1) It is
the intent of the legislature that administrators, faculty members, other
employees, and students at public schools, including public charter schools
and institutions of higher education, respect the dignity of others, ac-
knowledge the right of others to express differing opinions, and foster and
defend intellectual honesty, freedom of inquiry and instruction, and free-
dom of speech and association.
(2) The Idaho legislature finds that tenets outlined in subsection
(3)(a) of this section, often found in "critical race theory," undermine the
objectives outlined in subsection (1) of this section and exacerbate and
inflame divisions on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, na-
tional origin, or other criteria in ways contrary to the unity of the nation
and the well-being of the state of Idaho and its citizens.
(3) In accordance with section 6, article IX of the constitution of the
state of Idaho and section 67-5909, Idaho Code:
(a) No public institution of higher education, school district, or pub-
lic school, including a public charter school, shall direct or other-
wise compel students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to any of
the following tenets:
(i) That any sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national
origin is inherently superior or inferior;
(ii) That individuals should be adversely treated on the basis of
their sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin;
or
(iii) That individuals, by virtue of sex, race, ethnicity, reli-
gion, color, or national origin, are inherently responsible for
actions committed in the past by other members of the same sex,
race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin
2
-
@goodnessalwayswins (continued)
(b) No distinction or classification of students shall be made on ac-
count of race or color.
(c) No course of instruction or unit of study directing or otherwise
compelling students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to any of the
tenets identified in paragraph (a) of this subsection shall be used or
introduced in any institution of higher education, any school district,
or any public school, including a public charter school.
(4) Nothing in this section should be construed to prohibit the re-
quired collection or reporting of demographic data by public schools or
public institutions of higher education.
SECTION 2. That Chapter 1, Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is
hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and des-
ignated as Section 33-139, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
33-139. PROHIBITION ON THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEYS FOR CERTAIN PUR-
POSES. No moneys shall be expended by the state board of education, any
entity under the state board of education's jurisdiction, or any school dis-
trict, public charter school, or public institution of higher education for
any purpose prohibited in section 33-138, Idaho Code.
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this act are hereby declared
to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such
provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason,
such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this act.
SECTION 4. An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby
declared to exist, this act shall be in full force and effect on and after its
passage and approval.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Betta66 You're right, she never claimed there was an eyewitness in tbey room, but she said there were ppl in the house, as it was a party. And she kept changing the number of ppl who were there. The ones she named by name, including her best friend(!), denied ever being at such a party. Her story changed about several other points as well. Her story changed about the house it supposedly happened in, the timing of the alleged assault, etc. Her story of these different things changed after there was evidence against the first claim. Suddenly the house was different or where the house was was different. It is all Googleable. By leftist websites even.
She also lied several times, like about not being able to fly when she flew all the time on long flights. It is reported that she lied about the reasoning for the neeed of the second door of her house. An ex bf, in a sworn affidavit, said he saw her coach a friend on how to pass a polygraph.
Also, you note that she told her therapist. She never named him! She told her therapist a story of being assaulted. She never said who it was.
Sorry, at this point, it is not only unrealistic, but even irrational to believe her.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Ericleeproject Did you see who planted them? It could have been anyone of any affiliation. Here are some things they have done.
Shot mortars at federal courthouse in Portland and tried to barracade the people inside
Burned down a police station in Minneapolis
Created the CHAZ/CHOP zone(which was actual insurrection)where people were harrassed, beaten, raped, and even killed.
Burned down a Wendy's
Dozens of people killed during their riots, including one man who was hunted and then shot point blank because he had a MAGA hat on
Billions of dollars in damage to small businesses and large businesses, cars, etc.
700 injured policemen
Harrassed many politicians and journalists (even at their homes)
"Stormed" the White House
Anti Kavanaugh protesters took over Senate building
Occupied Nancy Pelosi's office
BLM leader said "if this country doesn't give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it." ....ppl still gave them billions of dollars. Presumably so they can do just that.
BLM used mafia tactics in Louisville and made business owners comply with their demands or risk their business being trashed.
Chris Cuomo said on CNN of Antifa, "Who said free speech has to be peaceful?"
AOC said, "Riots are the language of the unheard."
Everyone was saying, "It's ok, they have insurance."
They said CHAZ/CHOP would be a "summer of love"
Ayanna Presley said, "There needs to be unrest in the streets."
Mazine Waters told people to show up at cabinet members houses
Then ppl gave billions of dollars to BLM for doing these things. Bailout funds have been created to bail out and provide legal services to all Antifa/BLM members for doing these things.
All of this was done for something that almost everyone agreed was fcked up. Even since, when we have more information and know that he had a very lethal amount of drugs in his system and that he begged to be put on the ground, people still almost universally believe that the knee on his neck was unnecessary.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CyberMachine Trickle down meant behavioral changes, not an actual trickle down.
Also, under high income taxes, like the end of Woodrow Wilson's administration in 1921, large amounts of money are put into tax shelters instead of being invested into the economy, where it would create output, incomes, and jobs. We seen this in the 20s, after Wilson and after taxes were lowered, and there was rising output, rising employment to produce that output, rising incomes as a result, and rising tax revenues because of the rising incomes. The rich also paid a higher total amount of taxes and a larger percentage of all taxes. There were similar results after high taxes were cut during Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush administrations.
In 1921, those who made over $100k were taxed 73% and the government collected over $700m in income taxes. (30% from those over $100k) By 1929, a series of tax cuts had cut it to 24% and the government collected over a billion in income taxes. (65% from those over $100k) Both the amount and proportion paid by ppl with net income of less than $25k went down between these years. The amount and proportion paid by those with incomes of $50k to $100k went up.
There were 206 people who reported taxable incomes of over a million in 1916. That dropped to just 21 people by 1921. After the tax cuts, it rose to 207 by 1925.
After sharply rising tax increases under Wilson, less and less ppl reported high taxable incomes by either putting into tax exempt securities or rearranging things to lower their liability. Under this increase, the number of ppl who reported income of over $300k (a ton of money at that time) declined from well over a thousand in 1916 to less than 300 in 1921. Taxable income by ppl making over $300k declined by over 4/5. Incomes were rising at that time so this shouldn't have been the case. According to the Treasury Department, money invested in tax exempt securities nearly tripled in a decade. Tax rates can be so high that they fail to bring in more revenue. And then the burden is on the lower income people.
High taxes that the rich avoid paying do not necessarily bring in as much revenue as lower taxes that ppl are actually paying. Lower tax rates make it safer to invest where they can get a higher rate of return.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bradychick6535 So after last year when the other side caused billions in property damage, got dozens of ppl killed and beaten, injured over 700 cops and countless citizens, use m🅰️fia like tactics and forced businesses to obey them or risk their business being destroyed (like in St. Louis), created zones that were actual insurrection that caused ppl to be killed, r🅰️ped, and beaten that lasted for over 100 days, shot mortars at federal courthouse and tried to barricade ppl inside it and set it on fire, burned down police stations and a Wendys, etc etc etc etc, that side deserves the same?
(I'm not a Republican or conservative just for context)
1
-
@sayckeone If you want to really know what is going on you need to watch all media. The truth is somewhere in the middle. Watch a ton of independent media. The ppl who aren't multinational billion dollar corporations, several of whom have said they are entertainment, opinion, and shouldn't be believed as fact, ect. In court. Stop watching one side of something. That gives you only one side of a story. Then watch lots of independent. I recommend Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL),Jimmy Dore, we are change, YoungRippa, actual justice warrior, Matt Christensen, Project Veritas, The Reason We Learn, Karlyn Borysenko, etc. None of these ppl are right wing but they are honest and call out both sides. You should watch some right wing too though. Candace Owens, Steven Crowder, Officer Tatum, etc. You don't have to agree with media to watch it. It is just how you gwt all sides. Truth is somewhere in the middle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Adrianhernandez-xy5dt Q1: $78,333 to the Department of Interior’s National Park Service (NPS) for maintenance backlog at historic battlefields. Specifically, the donation went to restore the Newcomer House on the Antietam battlefield and for the replacement of its deteriorated rail fencing.
Q2: $100,000 to the Department of Education to host a free, two-week space camp for 30 low-income, middle school girls. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos received a $100,000 check in 2017, and announced a year later that the President’s donation had doubled the space camp’s participants.
Q3: $100,000 to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for “the planning and design of a large-scale public awareness campaign about the dangers of opioid addiction.”
Q4: $100,000 to the Department of Transportation to support its programs to “rebuild and modernize our crumbling infrastructure.”
In 2018, President Trump gave:
Q1: $100,000 to the Veteran’s Administration for “caregiver support in the form of mental health and peer support programs, financial aid, education training, and research.”
Q2: $100,000 to the Small Business Administration earmarked for a seven-month training program tailored for veteran entrepreneurs.
Q3: $100,000 to the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Trump’s brother died of alcoholism-related causes at the age of 43.
Q4: $100,000 to the Department of Homeland Security.
In 2019, President Trump gave:
Q1: $100,000 to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to be “used for outreach programs that benefit farmers[.]”
Q2: $100,000 to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Surgeon General. The President tweeted, “I donate 100% of my President’s salary, $400,000, back to our Country, and feel very good about it!”
Q3: $100,000 to the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health to “the ongoing fight against the opioid crisis.”
Q4: $100,000 to HHS, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health to “confront, contain, and combat #Coronavirus[.]”
In 2020, President Trump gave:
Q1: $100,000 to HHS to “develop new therapies for treating and preventing COVID-19 so that we can safely reopen.”
Q2: $100,000 to the NPS in July 2020 to help pay for repairs on national monuments.
Not sure what the last two went to. Not searching for it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I do mostly agree with you about the dollar. However, certain things do better and have an effect on the economy just by speculation.
For instance, JB is very anti-oil. Well, oil has a huge impact on our dollar. It effects the entire supply chain. Well, when they look for places to drill, apply for the things they need, set it all up, etc, they're not going to see a return on that for many years. But, when they see ppl like Joe and other politicians bring SO anti-oil and pushing to move away from it(we currently do not have the replacements available to even do this yet..not anywhere close. Not to mention the many, many things that are made with the byproduct), they have to decide if it is even worth the enormous cost now if there is no future for it. This is why they've changed their refining for other things. So, just the rhetoric of the ppl on the top can have a big effect. If a new person comes in and is pro-oil, pushes for more (that is what we should be doing) the prices can come down in that area, and have a domino effect. The problem will be getting corps to want to lower their prices. If anyone could do it, I think DT could think of ways to incentivize. 😅
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@coreyshapiro2440 For M-dyslipidaemia, Elevated liver enzymes, Polycythaemia, Heart disease, stroke, blood clots and breast cancer, high glutamate levels, reduction of the size of the brain, and increase in the size of ventricles, reduction in grey matter and vastly increases the risk of Alzheimer’s Disease and psychopathology,
For W-Male pattern baldness, painful enlargement of the females "button." infertility, vaginal and uterine atrophy, endometrial cancer, emotional imbalance that can lead to ending self or aggression, etc, etc.
In a longitudinal study of over a decade of persons on hormonal or surgical “transition” treatment on data from the entire population with no drop-outs, mental health did not improve with such treatments. So, not only are the risks high, and the brain impacts severe, there is no evidence that they even help the patient with their original issue.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Michael Timely He shut down travel from China immediately and the left(Biden specifically)said he was xenophobic for doing so. He created the coronavirus taskforce immediately. He ensured every state had all the ventilators and medical setups they needed and was applauded for it by several Democratic governors, including Cuomo and Newsom. Dr Fauci himself, whom is adored by the left, said that Trump did everything he should have and he can't think of anything more that he could have done.
Since Trump is NOT a dictator, he left decisions of mandates and lockdowns up to the states, as he should have. Some states did better than others. Some states, Democratic run, put sick people in NURSING HOMES. We all knew from the very beginning that the elderly were the most vulnerable yet they put sick people with them while their hospitals were empty and Trumps administration had medical facilities set up for them to use. Nursing homes represent less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they account for 42% of the COVID-19 deaths, with more than 70,000 fatalities reported by the COVID Tracking Project. (Number is from August)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TeddyT6 So tons of people burning down and destroying private businesses, killing regular citizens, etc. Is the commendable riot because you agree with the cause? Not the people who atleast took it straight to the people they have grievances with. Not to mention 99% of them were just standing and meandering around and the DOJ already walked back tbat they were there to capture or hurt lawmakers.
Also, Trumps whole shtick all along has been peaceful protests, law and order, and respecting police and his literal words of peace that day vs. The left whi were cheering on the burning, looting, and even killing of people. Also the literal insurrection of CHAZ/CHOP where people were beaten, raped, and several were killed. Even Kamala funding bailouts for these people. But hey, you agree with their reasoning(which is a complete misrepresentation of actual facts anyway) so it is ok?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mloftus8618 The main ones that come to mind. Some are old and some are new. The funniest was ehen Trump wenr to Japan. They freaked out that he threw the whole container of food into the koi pond. They edited out the beginning of the clip that showed the Japanese PRES doing it first and Trump followed suit.
They keep saying Trump sent "storm troopers" to Portland. No. Not true. They didn't engage until the 38th day of the Portland riot when the riot broke through the door of the federal building. That is ehen they started defending the building. If the rioters didn't go to the federal court house and launch explosives at it, those federal police wouldmt engage back. And the ppl they picked up were suspected of doing these things, that is why they were picked up. They also freaked and said they had no badges (lie) and were in unmarked cars(happens all the time)
They also keep conflating two different operations. One which is fed police protecting federal property. The other is him sending different 3 letter agencies (not police or soldiers) to help cities(with their permission) with the skyrocketing crime rates.
There are times when the same paper (like NYT) will have two conflicting stories. Tim Pool points these types of things out when he sees them.
Said he was xenophobic to stop travel from covid hit countries and then even tried to pass a bill to stop it and then said he didn't do enough. He acted before anyone and did it when people called him xenophobic. It wouldve been far worse then if he didn't do it.
Said he closed some pandemic team when he just restructured it to make it more efficient.
In the beginning of the virus, the media themselves called it foreign virus, Wuhan virus, Chinese virus, etc. Then blast him when he says it.
They pushed it off as nothing and were even recommending people continue doing as normal (NY mayor and Pelosi) in March but as soon as Trump said it, the entire story shifted to the opposite.
They said that he called the virus a hoax. He did not. He said their witch hunt against him about it due to some of the things I've stated was a hoax. Never did he say the virus is.
Calling the current riots "peaceful protests" and them not really even talking about them anymore unlessnit is to accost Trump over them. One media person in the beginning said it was a peaceful protest ehen there was a building burning down behind him even. 😂
The "all Mexicans are rapists and murderers" lie that was taken wholly out of context.
They said he never condemned white supremacists when he has MANY times. This also includes them saying that he was saying white supremacists are fine ppl.
The biggest lie of all...Trump Russia collusion. 3 years, several investigations, tens of millions of dollars, millions of documents, hundreds intervirwed , and no collusion. They then ignore the lying and spying by the FBI which is still coming to light more and more every day. Lile them knowing in Jan 2017 that there was no collusion yet kept using a dossier they knew was fake to get FISA warrants over and over. Then several Democratic politicians (Schiff is one) who said they seen evidence of collusion and kept saying it over and over and thrn the transcripts were released and not fine person had any evidence of collusion.
The list goes ON and ON. Every single day there is lies, taking of context, manipulation, N@.zi style propaganda. You would see it if you truly watched all types of news and did it with an open mind.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Xxd_unit_007xX They called his travel ban from China xenophobic. Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the Chinese virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus the Chinese virus until the middle of March. 😆 On
March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc.Idk how peoole cannot remember the rhetoric of just a few months ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@benjaminwebb5759 "far right bs"
🙄 I watch mostly left libertarian media and also right and left media. No "far right". You even using that nonsensical term seems like you are watching "far left" media. Gas prices are skyrocketing. Food is skyrocketing. Lumber, cotton, etc, etc, etc. There is a crazy crisis going on at the border where they have an enormous influx of illegals due to JB's rhetoric. Masses of children are coming through the desert in a dangerous trek with traffickers who r8pe and harm them. They are now tightly packed into cages like stuffed burritos. Inflation is rising. Murders are rising. I can go on.
I care more about the state of the country more tham tweets. What was maniacal was ppls reaction to words. Most of which was taken out of context at every step of the way.
He was doing good things. The media divided us.
The GA phone call..also taken out of context. Look further into it. Listen to the whole thing.
Then go read the Time magazine article where they brag about. "Well funded cabal" who "fortified the election" by doing things such as suppressing and censoring information and hiring poll workers(...to do what exactly..this is ehat you should question. Especially when you watch video after video of Republican poll watchers being denied to do their job or obstructed in some way), etc. To "get the proper outcome of the election." I'm not saying anything happened or didn't happen. That article should alarm anyone.
You may need to broaden your types of media. Have to watch right, left, and middle. Watch a lot of independent media too. Right left and middle. I recommend Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), We Are Change, YoungRippa, Jimmy Dore, Matt Christensen, Karlyn Borysenko, The reason We Learn, etc. None of these are "far right" or even right. They are all left and libertarian. Probably should watch some right too, however. Watch everything. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bhubnipz Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the ©️hinese virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus that until the middle of March. 😆 On March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc. Idk how people cannot remember the rhetoric of just a year ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@FernyForest Yes, and as I already stated, that is also true.
My point is something that they do often. They say "so and so doesn't pay taxes." Then they show federal invome taxes that are 0 or low. Yes, what you said is also true, but they also do not show the state, local, sales, property, excise, etc, etc, etc taxes that are paid directly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KarlFullerNZ That is a nonsensical phrase that shows low information of history.
The Js started BUYING land in the 1880s. By time the 1940s came around, Js owned more land than the As (you now call them Pals...even though they refused being calling that then, as it wasn't a name they gave themselves) The vast majority of the land wasn't owned by or occupied by anyone. It was crown lands. Then it was divided up.
The land was also undeveloped and underdeveloped until the Js went and bought the land and built towns and societies. Those societies offered better living and that brought in As from all over. To Js land.
As soon as Is was created, they were bombarded by all the countries around them (like 7 of them). They've been being attacked by the Pals for 80+ years now. Pals have refused any solution. Over time, land was won and lost. Is VOLUNTARILY gave back the area they're in now.
Instead of building up the area and creating their own society, they instead spent their time, money, rss, etc. on continuing to go after Is.
Many of th Pals have come to the area after Is was created. Again they came to the towns and cities that were created by them that offered better living. And yet, still attacked them.
So, it is Is land.
1
-
@KarlFullerNZ The Js started BUYING land in the 1880s. By time the 1940s came around, Js owned more land than the As (you now call them Pals...even though they refused being calling that then, as it wasn't a name they gave themselves) The vast majority of it wasn't owned by or occupied by anyone. It was crown lands. Then it was divided up.
The land was also undeveloped and underdeveloped until the Js went and bought the land and built towns and societies. Those societies offered better living and that brought in As from all over. To Js land.
As soon as Is was created, they were bombarded by all the countries around them (like 7 of them). They've been being attacked by the Pals for 80+ years now. Pals have refused any solution. Over time, land was won and lost. Is voluntarily gave back the area they're in now.
Instead of building up the area and creating their own society, they instead spent their time, money, rss, etc. on continuing to go after Is.
Many of th Pals have come to the area after Is was created. Again they came to the towns and cities that were created by them that offered better living. And yet, still attacked them.
So, it is Isr's land.
1
-
@KarlFullerNZ The Js started BUYING land in the 1880s. By time the split of land came around, Js owned more land than the As (you now call them Pals...even though they refused being calling that then, as it wasn't a name they gave themselves) The vast majority of it wasn't owned by or occupied by anyone. It was crown lands. Then it was divided up.
The land was also undeveloped and underdeveloped until the Js went and bought it and built towns and societies. Those societies offered better living and that brought in As from all over. To Js land.
As soon as Is was created, all the countries around them went after them. They've been being attacked by the Pals for 80+ years now. Pals have refused any ideas to stop. Over time, land was won and lost by Is. Is voluntarily gave back the area they're in now.
Instead of building up the area and creating their own society, they instead spent their time, money, rss, etc. on continuing to go after Is.
Many of the Pals have come to the area after Is was created. Again they came to the towns and cities that were created by them that offered better living. And yet, still attacked them.
So, it is Is land.
1
-
@KarlFullerNZ The Js started BUYING land in the 1880s. By time the splitting of it came around, Js owned more than the As (you now call them Pals...even though they refused being calling that then, as it wasn't a name they gave themselves) The vast majority of it wasn't owned by or occupied by anyone. It was crown lands. Then it was divided up, as you know.
Js went and paid (overpaid even) and then built towns and societies. Those societies offered better living and that brought in As from all over. To Js land.
As soon as Is was created, all the countries around them went after them. They've been being attacked by the Pals for 80+ years now. Pals have refused any ideas to stop. Over time, area was won and lost by Is. Is voluntarily gave back the area they're in now.
Instead of building up the area and creating their own society, they instead spent their time, money, rss, etc. on continuing to go after Is.
Many of the Pals have come to the area after Is was created. Again they came to the towns and cities that were created by them that offered better living. And yet, still attacked them.
So, it is Is land.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheDeliuxii We don't need to make becoming a citizen easier. We need to strongly secure the border, by any means necessary and all immigration should be by merit only. A person coming here should have to have an education and have something to offer. They should be banned from receiving any welfare for at least 10 years after coming here and proving that they'll be able to be self sufficient and support themselves. Sounds harsh, but we have plenty of public charges and we do not need more. See, the issue is, that illegal immigrants aren't the only problem. They already cost Americans 120 billion every single year (after any taxes they pay even) so they are definitely a problem, but many legal immigrants are also a problem. They're public charges just as much as the illegal immigrants are. Better, for sure, but still an issue. Especially immigrants from countries south of the border.
51% of immigrants, in general, are public charges on one or more welfare programs for up to 20 years. Compared to 30% of native households.
Average immigrant household headed by an immigrant, legal or illegal, costs taxpayers $6,200 each in federal welfare benefits. That's 41% higher than native households.
Average immigrant household receives 33% more cash welfare, 57% more food assistance, 44% more medicaid dollars than native households.
Households headed by immigrants from Mexico and Central America have the highest welfare costs of any sending region at $8,251 each and 86% higher than native households.
71% of Hispanic led households, in general, are on one or more welfare program for up to 20 years. They're low educated and have more children. 24% of immigrants households are headed by a high school dropout compared to 8% of native households. 13% have 3 or more children compared to 6% of native households.
Corporations are the only ones benefiting from this low skilled, low wage immigration, aside from the immigrants themselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnlee5721 South Korea dod major lockdowns of their entire country. I'll pass on that authoritarianism.
They said Trump cut CDC funding. He did not. He wanted to but Congress blocked that and it was actually raised. Obama also sought to cut their budget?..
They said Trump called the virus itself a hoax. He did not call the virus itself a hoax. He said the Democrats were politicizing it and it they were blaming it on him and that was a hoax. They edited the video to make it appear as though he said something else.
They called his travel ban from China xenophobic. Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the Chinese virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus the Chinese virus until the middle of March. 😆 On
March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc.Idk how peoole cannot remember the rhetoric of just a few months ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians.
The list goes on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrisconner3720 Biden also proposed to outright repeal Trump's tax reform which would raise almost everyone's taxes, including the middle class. Trumps tax reform led to more jobs, better pay, less taxes for most people, and one of the best economies the US has ever had.
The gov. Needs ro stop raising taxes and lower them and do what the rest of us do..live within our means. Stop sending money to other countries, get rid of gov. Sectors, lower pay of Congress, the POTUS, Justices, etc, etc. IDC if it is Trump, Bidenz or Bob the Builder as POTUS, we need LESS taxes. Not more.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BICIeCOMPUTERconGabriele Each state has their own regulations, rules, etc.
I homeschooled my son in Ohio. I had to send a letter of intent to the superintendent at the beginning of the year.
At the end of the year, I would find a teacher (many homeschoolers are teachers, so it was easy to find one who homeschools, herself) to send a portfolio to (I just sent images of a few things he did and an explanation of what we did) and she signed a paper that said he was good. The next year, when I would send the letter of intent, I'd send that signed paper, too. Or, you I could send results of a state test. It was our choice for the teacher letter or the state test.
Now, they've simplified it, however. I can't remember what the difference is.
But, each state has it's own things to follow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You two are a breath of fresh air. My husband and I disciplined our son. (We also homeschooled him) He is almost 19, now, and is mature, intelligent, dosen't get into trouble, works hard, etc. He has a really good head on his shoulders. Growing up, he knew he had rules, boundaries, chores, etc. Kids need it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rcmrcm3370 How so? Lowered taxes(Idc if you disagree with who got more of a break or what. Almost everyone seen their taxes go down. Biden and Dems ran on raising them🥴) , Prison reform, deregulation, moved embassy to Jerusalem, replaced supreme court judges, many federal judges replaced, canceled Paris Climate Agreement, TPP, NAFTA, got other NATO countries to pay their share, got the travel ban, wall has been being fixed all along and in the end, after trying and trying, he did get the funding for it and it was being built before he ledt office, limiting legal immigration, raised tariffs, repatriation tax, more funding for military, more production of oil and gas, approve pipelines, open Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for exploration, etc, etc.
Like the ideas or not, he's kept MANY of his promises. And ones he hasn't, it wasn't for lack of trying! He was visibly trying to get all of the things he ran on done. He did more of his promises probably than any POTUS in modern history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yoshistar3141 He did follow the guidelines. Dr Fauci himself said he did. 🤦 This trope that Trump didn't do this or he did do that so its his fault is asinine.
He immediately put in a travel ban from China and expanded ro other countries as needed. They called his travel ban from China xenophobic. Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the Chinese virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus the Chinese virus until the middle of March. 😆 On
March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc.Idk how peoole cannot remember the rhetoric of just a few months ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians.
The government isn't there to be our nannies and make sure everyone eats right. Your rhetoric is frightening as someone eho values freedom over everything. Most people are OK with the stay at home order it is governors lile Michigans who are taking it too far that is the problem. I think you should broaden your news. Not mainstream but to independent. And you should watch different types. Democrat, Republicans, socialist, libertarians, etc. And when you research, you need to combat confirmation bias by also looking up the opposite argument. And as much as you can. Only then will uou really know what is going on.
I recommend Tim Pool, Jimmy Dore, Dr Karlyn Borysenko, Styxhexenhammer, Actual Justice Warrior as a few to start to go along with the, I'm guessing overwhelmingly leftist news you watch now. They all have different politics and backgrounds. Oh and I guess for a conservative one...Steven Crowder is fun.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Preaplanes Masculine/Feminine are expressions of gender. Not gender itself. Under your explanation, these ppl (a man, for instance) really can be the opposite just by being feminine. That is just his expression of it.
Sex-female/male-based on chromosomes and gametes and is for different species. (Humans, cats, dogs, etc, plants, etc)
Gender-woman/man-same as sex, but for adult humans, specifically.
Girl/boy-same as sex, but for child humans, specifically.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@heatherc2939 Minneapolis, Seattle, NYC, Chicago, Portland, Atlanta, LA, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington DC, and others have all defunded their police. They have also all seen an increase in crime since and some have re-funded them because of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@turnerfamilyinozi Debates are typically led by CNN, MSNBC, etc anchors who are liberal. Even this one by FOX was led by a liberal host. The debates should have different moderators with different views. It is impossible to have an impartial one so they should have differing viewpoints.
Independent media is media and people who give commentary on media that is not mainstream. Fox, CNN, MSNBC, etc.
Examples that I watch: Tim Pool(center left), Styxhexenhammer(libertarian right monarchist), Steven Crowder(conservative), Jimmy Dore(socialist), Karlyn Borysenko(liberal Trump supporting psychologist), TYT(socialist morons), and many more. I watch news all day long from many sources. I also watch clips of FOX, CNN, etc. And read articles by them to get differing ideas and opinions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dylan 604 By believing the socialist utopia, you're an idiot. Especially from a man who has never truly worked a day in his life. He's never done anything except live off taxpayers. He wants to grow and strengthen the government. The government and take even more of your money for the government to have even more control over our lives and they can have more mansions. The government only exacerbates problems and creates new ones.
Democracy and socialism have nothing in common, but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. -Alexis de Tocqueville
"Socialism itself can hope to exist only for brief periods here and there, and then only through the exercise of the extremist terrorism. For this reason, it is secretly preparing itself for rule through fear and is driving the word "justice" into the heads of the half-educated masses like a nail so as to rob them of their reason and to create in them a good conscience for the evil game they are to play." -Friedrich Nietzsche
"It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it."-Thomas Sowell
“Only by focusing on the income brackets, instead of the actual people moving between those brackets, have the intelligentsia been able to verbally create a ‘problem’ for which a ‘solution’ is necessary. They have created a powerful vision of ‘classes’ with ‘disparities’ and ‘inequities’ in income, caused by ‘barriers’ created by ‘society.’ But the routine rise of millions of people out of the lowest quintile over time makes a mockery of the ‘barriers’ assumed by many, if not most, of the intelligentsia.”-Thomas Sowell
“It is amazing how many of the intelligentsia call it “greed” to want to keep what you have earned, but not greed to want to take away what somebody else has earned, and let politicians use it to buy votes.”-Thomas Sowell
“Those who have helped the poor the most have not been those who have gone around loudly expressing ‘compassion’ for the poor, but those who found ways to make industry more productive and distribution more efficient, so that the poor of today can afford things that the affluent of yesterday could only dream about.”-Thomas Sowell
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@feydrautha191 Lowered taxes, deregulated, got funding for 🧱, got the best policy for the border in (JB undid it), pulled us from several bad international treaties, renegotiated others, 1st step act, AbrahamAccords, had a great economy, etc, etc.
I didn't make you wait long.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Vin_Venture896 Go watch Karlyn Borysenko, The Reason We Learn, and Travis Mcnealy channels to see good discussions on it. There are tons more ppl who show it for the racist ideology that it is. It splits ppl up by identity like race, gender, sexuality, ableness, etc. And by oppressor or oppressed. In practice, makes kids affirm these identities and their oppressor or oppressed status. If a white kid feels uncomfortable or pushes back at all, they're told that that is their white fragility. They tell mixed kids that they should identify as their black half becauae their white half is an oppressor. It goes on and on with judging ppl by their race, gender, etc. And not their character. It is a gross and racist ideology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MochudiSwaagVEVO the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform was that absentee ballots are the largest source of potential voter fraud. Anyone who isn't lying to themselves can agree with this bipartisan report.
A 2012 report in the NYT noted that voter fraud involving mail-in ballots “is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention (interesting how their view changes when the candidate changes)
According to a Wall Street Journal report on voter exploitation in Hispanic communities in Texas, mail-in ballots have “spawned a mini-industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques.” Poor, elderly, and minority communities are most likely to be preyed upon by so-called ballot “brokers.” (also an interesting change of view)
Concerns about fraud in mail-in ballots were serious enough that a 2008 report produced by the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project recommended that states “restrict or abolish on-demand absentee voting in favor of in-person early voting.”
Another study done in 2008 from Reed College flagged various concerns related to absentee voting and conceded there is a “great deal of literature on turnout” but when it comes to mail-in ballots there is “a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud.”
The data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and the Election Administration and Voting Surveys for 2016 and 2018, provided by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), shows that between the 2016 and 2018 elections, roughly 16.4 million ballots mailed to registered voters went missing.
In the 2018 election, about 42.4 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than one million were undeliverable, more than 430,000 were rejected, and nearly 10.5 million went missing.
The 2016 election showed similar discrepancies. That year, about 41.6 million ballots were mailed to registered voters. Of those mailed, more than 568,000 were undeliverable, nearly 320,000 were rejected, and close to six million went missing.
These are all points of possible fraud. Anyone can fill them out and they so not have to verify who they are with ID.
five states – Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Utah, and Hawaii – now do all elections exclusively by mail. Supporters point to smooth elections in these states as proof that it works. But PILF obtained voter data from Oregon, the first state to adopt voting by mail exclusively, for the 2012 and 2018 elections and checked it against census data. Of the 7 million ballots the state sent out in those two elections, some 871,000 ballots are totally unaccounted for. Oregon would not reveal its data for the 2014 and 2016 elections for reasons the state would not disclose
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cryp4life509 I watch CNN, FOX, Tim Pool, We Are Change, YoungRippa59, Jimmy Dore, Matt Christansen, Project Veritas, Actual Justice Warrior, Anthony Brian Logan, Crowder, Officer Tatum, Dont Walk run Profuctions, The Young Turks, and so on and so on and so on. Tons of ppl of all sides. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
1
-
@cryp4life509 It certainly isn't far left either which is the biggest problem right now. Lol Or even just the left in many cases. They are pushing the racist and asinine ideology of CRT everywhere, even in schools. They are the ppl tbat have caused over a billion in damage across the US, 700 police injured, shot mortars at federal courthouses and tried to barricade the ppl inside and light it on fire, impeding ppl from tracel and attacking their cars, harrassing and attacking ppl, dozens killed, creating no go insurrection zones where ppl were killed, attacked, and r** inside that last months, used moffia(misspelled on purpose) tactics and forced businesses to comply with their demands or risk damage, Harrassed many politicians and journalists (even at their homes), stormed the WH, also took over the Senate building and occupied Pelosi's office, etc etc.
BLM leader said "if this country doesn't give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it." ....ppl still gave them billions of dollars. Presumably so they can do just that.
Chris Cuomo said on CNN of Antifa, "Who said free speech has to be peaceful?"
AOC said, "Riots are the language of the unheard."
Everyone was saying, "It's ok, they have insurance."
They said CHAZ/CHOP would be a "summer of love"
Ayanna Presley said, "There needs to be unrest in the streets."
Mazine Waters told people to show up at cabinet members houses
Then ppl gave billions of dollars to BLM for doing these things. Bailout funds have been created to bail out and provide legal services to all Antifa/BLM members for doing these things. Even by our Vice President.
Etc etc etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brexzo3222 Considine, Douglas (ed.). Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia. 5th edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1976, p. 943
Carlson, Bruce M. Patten's Foundations of Embryology. 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 3]
O'Rahilly, Ronan and M�ller, Fabiola. Human Embryology & Teratology. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1996, pp. 8, 29. This textbook lists "pre-embryo" among "discarded and replaced terms" in modern embryology, describing it as "ill-defined and inaccurate" (p. 12}]
England, Marjorie A. Life Before Birth. 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996, p.31
Moore, Keith L. Essentials of Human Embryology. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988, p.2
Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2
Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146
[Dr. John Eppig, Senior Staff Scientist, Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and Member of the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel -- Panel Transcript, February 2, 1994, p. 31
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brexzo3222 I just gave you a huge list of studies.
Considine, Douglas (ed.). Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia. 5th edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1976, p. 943
Carlson, Bruce M. Patten's Foundations of Embryology. 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 3]
O'Rahilly, Ronan and M�ller, Fabiola. Human Embryology & Teratology. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1996, pp. 8, 29. This textbook lists "pre-embryo" among "discarded and replaced terms" in modern embryology, describing it as "ill-defined and inaccurate" (p. 12}]
England, Marjorie A. Life Before Birth. 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996, p.31
Moore, Keith L. Essentials of Human Embryology. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988, p.2
Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2
Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146
[Dr. John Eppig, Senior Staff Scientist, Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and Member of the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel -- Panel Transcript, February 2, 1994, p. 31
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@blessedbybelldandy3765 No offense, but ypu seem to be in the bubble that many leftists seem ro be in. And it isn't a simple answer to say wjy one would vote for Trump or walk away from the Democratic party(I did). It took me a good year of watching and reading as much news as I could from ALL sides. Lots of reading studies and counters to those studies, etc. Now it has been 4 years for me and it is a daily barrage of lies and stretched truths or committed facts by the leftist news, Hollywood, big tech, Democrats, etc. that makes one finally see truth. The left has also gone absolutely insane if you haven't noticed. I would reccomend an open mind and LOTS of news. From all sides. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
A few recommended people to watch: Tim Pool(center left), Styxhexenhammer(minarchist libertarian), Jimmy Dore(socialist..I disagree with him mostly but he is at least truthful. Also funny. Good guy), Karlyn Borysenko(ex-Democrat psychologist who admits she used to have TDS and she woke from it over time as I did), etc. Lots of independent commentary who aren't huge corporations just pandering for clicks.
1
-
@blessedbybelldandy3765 Communism is a society with public ownership of production and resources, no private property,
The goal of socialism IS communism. Marx used the two interchangeably. He said that society would become socialist to become communist. Socialism is a transitional stage. Communism is the end goal. It is a system that can only be gained through violent revolution and always ends with a ruling group of people who rule with an iron fist.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”-Marx. This is a despicable idealogy. It is an impossible ideology on a grand scale.
Some words from past communist rulers...
We must be ready to employ trickery, deceit, law breaking, withholding and concealing truth. We can and must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion, scorn toward those who disagree with us.--Lenin
The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses.--Lenin
A lie told often enough becomes the truth --Lenin
Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a Bolshevik forever.--Lenin
Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed. --Stalin
America is like a healthy body and its resistance is three fold; its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within --Stalin
"Words mean what we want them to mean"-Lenin
Now something to ponder...How many Americans applied asylum to a socialist country because capitalism threatens their safety and life?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ruthharris123 Criminal Penalties for Improper Entry to the U.S.
For the first improper entry offense, the person can be fined (as a criminal penalty), or imprisoned for up to six months, or both.
For a subsequent offense, the person can be fined or imprisoned for up to two years, or both. (See 8 U.S.C. Section 1325, I.N.A. Section 275.)
But just in case that isn't enough to deter illegal entrants, a separate section of the law adds penalties for reentry (or attempted reentry) in cases where the person had been convicted of certain types of crimes and thus removed (deported) from the U.S., as follows:
People removed for a conviction of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a felony (other than an aggravated felony), shall be fined, imprisoned for up to ten years, or both.
People removed for a conviction of an aggravated felony shall be fined, imprisoned for up to 20 years, or both.
People who were excluded or removed from the United States for security reasons shall be fined, and imprisoned for up to ten years, which sentence shall not run concurrently with any other sentence.
Nonviolent offenders who were removed from the United States before their prison sentence was up shall be fined, imprisoned for up to ten years, or both.
What's more, someone deported before a prison sentence was complete may be incarcerated for the remainder of the sentence of imprisonment, without any reduction for parole or supervised release.
(See 8 U.S.C. Section 1326, I.N.A. Section 276.)
Civil Penalties
Entry (or attempted entry) at a place other than one designated by immigration officers carries additional civil penalties. The amount is at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or twice that amount if the illegal entrant has been previously fined a civil penalty for the same violation. (See 8 U.S.C. Section 1325, I.N.A. Section 275.)
1
-
@ruthharris123 In a bombshell report yesterday, the Justice Department Inspector General found that the Federal Bureau of Investigation made “fundamental errors” and persistently deceived a secret court to authorize surveilling a 2016 Trump presidential campaign official.
Perhaps the most jolting revelations in the IG report detail the FBI’s efforts to secure a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) search warrant to use against the Trump campaign after suspicions were raised of Russian collusion. A FISA warrant is the nuclear bomb of searches, authorizing the FBI “to conduct, simultaneous telephone, microphone, cell phone, e-mail and computer surveillance of the U.S. person target’s home, workplace and vehicles,” as well as “physical searches of the target’s residence, office, vehicles, computer, safe deposit box and U.S. mails,” as a FISA court decision noted. The FISA court is extremely deferential, approving 99% of all search warrant requests.
A litany of missteps by the FBI
The IG report concluded FBI officials made 17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” in its submissions to the FISA court to secure warrants to target former Trump advisor Carter Page: “FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘scrupulously accurate.’ We identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation, based upon information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed.”
OPINION
Inspector General report on FBI's FISA abuse tells us one thing: We need radical reform.
James Bovard
Opinion columnist
In a bombshell report yesterday, the Justice Department Inspector General found that the Federal Bureau of Investigation made “fundamental errors” and persistently deceived a secret court to authorize surveilling a 2016 Trump presidential campaign official. Inspector General Michael Horowitz did not find that the FBI’s actions were spurred by political bias but that conclusion is not necessarily shared by Attorney General William Barr. Unfortunately, this is only the latest episode of decades of FBI misconduct before America’s most powerful secret court.
Perhaps the most jolting revelations in the IG report detail the FBI’s efforts to secure a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) search warrant to use against the Trump campaign after suspicions were raised of Russian collusion. A FISA warrant is the nuclear bomb of searches, authorizing the FBI “to conduct, simultaneous telephone, microphone, cell phone, e-mail and computer surveillance of the U.S. person target’s home, workplace and vehicles,” as well as “physical searches of the target’s residence, office, vehicles, computer, safe deposit box and U.S. mails,” as a FISA court decision noted. The FISA court is extremely deferential, approving 99% of all search warrant requests.
A litany of missteps by the FBI
The IG report concluded FBI officials made 17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” in its submissions to the FISA court to secure warrants to target former Trump advisor Carter Page: “FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘scrupulously accurate.’ We identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation, based upon information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed.”

The FBI refrained from launching a FISA warrant request until it came into possession of a dossier from Christopher Steele, a former British intelligent agent. The Steele dossier played "a central and essential role in the decision by FBI [Office of General Counsel] to support the request for FISA surveillance targeting Carter Page, as well as the FBI's ultimate decision to seek the FISA order," the IG report concluded. The FBI "drew almost entirely" from the Steele dossier to prove a “well-developed conspiracy” between Russians and the Trump campaign. The IG found that FBI agents were “unable to corroborate any of the specific substantive allegations against Carter Page” in the Steele dossier but the FBI relied on Steele’s allegations regardless.
The FBI withheld from the FISA court key details that would have undercut the dossier’s credibility, including a warning from a top Justice Department official that “Steele may have been hired by someone associated with presidential candidate Clinton or the DNC [Democratic National Committee].” The FBI also deceived the FISA court by wrongly claiming that Steele’s prior informant work had been “used in criminal proceedings” by the Justice Department. The CIA disdained the Steele dossier as “an internet rumor,” one FBI official told IG investigators. The IG report obliterated the credibility of the Steele dossier.
So, the infamous "Steele dossier," which was paid for by the Clinton campaign and conducted by a firm that specializes in peddling campaign dirt.
Once the origins of the Steele dossier became known, Democrats and the press insisted that it played little or no role in convincing federal judges to approve wiretaps on Carter Page.
For good reason, too. The idea that the FBI would use political propaganda paid for by one presidential campaign to launch a high-level investigation against the other in the middle of an election is horrifying.
So, they consistently downplayed the dossier's importance.
Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee asserted in February that the FISA application "made only narrow use of information from Steele's sources about Page's specific activities in 2016." Media reports said that any of the information that the FBI did use had been independently corroborated.
But now, with the application documents in hand, even the Washington Post admits that the dossier played "a prominent role" in the wiretap request. And we know that the FBI had corroborated none of the dossier claims before filing its application.
1
-
1
-
@ruthharris123 from By negotiating safe-third-country agreements and getting Mexico to crack down on caravans, Trump reduced the number of border encounters reported by Border Patrol -- they plummeted to their lowest point since the beginning of Trump's presidency in mid-2020. Reported encounters from May 2019 to April of the following year fell by 88%.
Now, two months into his presidency, Biden has undone all of that, manufacturing a crisis of migrants flooding our southern border. And yes, that means he is locking kids up in cages that approach full capacity.
According to internal documents from the Department of Health and Human Services obtained by Axios, Border Patrol put an average of 321 children per day in HHS custody by the beginning of March -- those would be the "cages" once maligned by the media -- in contrast to just 47 per day on average during the first week in January. HHS also reported child migrant facilities at 94% capacity "and expected to reach its maximum this month."
So amid a global pandemic, ICE says that we're set to see a deluge of migrants the size of which we haven't experienced in "over 20 years." And, whereas a negative COVID test is required for entry to the U.S. via air travel, Border Patrol has been releasing migrants into the country without any tests at all.
In January, Border Patrol reported more than twice as many border encounters as they had in January of 2020. This is a humanitarian crisis compounded by a pandemic due. It is going to get drastically worse, and Biden is responsible for that.
Thanks to Trump's safe-third-country agreements and negotiations with Mexico, he drastically ameliorated the "kids in cages" crisis. Instead of lockups in the U.S., families could remain together in civil society in Mexico while their asylum claims were processed.
But by giving migrants a clear path to our border and revoking the Remain in Mexico policy, Biden must either keep adult migrants in CPB facilities or revert to catch and release. Biden is currently doing a mix of both.
If he had kept Trump's diplomatic deterrents from inviting this surge, Biden wouldn't have to make this decision at all. But as long as the courts continue to refuse family reunification because it incarcerates minors, his dilemma will persist. But Biden asked for this, and now hundreds of thousands of migrants and Americans along the southern border will suffer as a result.
1
-
@ruthharris123 After recent reports of overcrowding at a temporary U.S. Customs and Border Protection facility in Donna, Texas where unaccompanied immigrant children are held, the Biden administration allowed a few members of the media to tour the facility on Tuesday. The photos and videos taken by journalists from inside the facility paint a dark picture of the overcrowded and inhumane conditions that these children are facing.
The Donna facility was divided into smaller “pods” by thick plastic walls, each of which was designed to only hold 32 kids each, but the pods seen by the reporters were currently holding between 500 and 700 children, CNN reports. Young children were kept in a smaller playpen area, which is also where they sleep at night. Although the children in the facility wore masks, they are only tested for covid-19 if they start to display symptoms, despite being forced to live in extremely close quarters. Currently, the covid-19 positivity rate at the Donna facility is approximately 14 percent.
The facility is currently housing 4,100 migrant minors—more than 10 times over its CDC-mandated pandemic capacity of only 250, said acting Executive Officer for Rio Grande Valley Operational Programs Division Oscar Escamilla. Of those immigrant children, 3,400 were unaccompanied, and more than 2,000 had been kept at the facility for over the 72-hour legal limit within which unaccompanied children must be turned over within 72 hours to the Department of Health and Human Services. Migrant children spend an average of 133 hours at the facility, and at least 39 of the children had been in the Donna facility for over 15 days.
According to Escamilla, about 250 to 300 children typically enter the Donna facility each day, but far fewer are released into the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which has quickly led to the extreme overcrowding that they are now experiencing.“We’re way overcapacity. We’re like 700% overcapacity,” Escamilla said.
The HHS has announced the creation of a number of new border facilities to accommodate immigrant children, with plans to build up its capacity to 13,500 beds, which doesn’t do much for the hundreds of new unaccompanied children who are detained along the border daily.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JacobSnell1998 Antifa/BLM are absolutely organized. Saying otherwise shows lack of knowledge. Here are some things the left has done.
Shot mortars at federal courthouse in Portland and tried to barracade the people inside
Burned down a police station in Minneapolis
Created the CHAZ/CHOP zone(which was actual insurrection)where people were harrassed, beaten, raped, and even killed.
Burned down a Wendy's
Dozens of people killed during their riots, including one man who was hunted and then shot point blank because he had a MAGA hat on
Billions of dollars in damage to small businesses and large businesses, cars, etc.
700 injured policemen
Harrassed many politicians and journalists (even at their homes)
"Stormed" the White House
Anti Kavanaugh protesters took over Senate building
Occupied Nancy Pelosi's office
BLM leader said "if this country doesn't give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it." ....ppl still gave them billions of dollars. Presumably so they can do just that.
BLM used mafia tactics in Louisville and made business owners comply with their demands or risk their business being trashed.
Chris Cuomo said on CNN of Antifa, "Who said free speech has to be peaceful?"
AOC said, "Riots are the language of the unheard."
Everyone was saying, "It's ok, they have insurance."
They said CHAZ/CHOP would be a "summer of love"
Ayanna Presley said, "There needs to be unrest in the streets."
Mazine Waters told people to show up at cabinet members houses
Then ppl gave billions of dollars to BLM for doing these things. Bailout funds have been created to bail out and provide legal services to all Antifa/BLM members for doing these things.
All of this was done for something that almost everyone agreed was fcked up. Even since, when we have more information and know that he had a very lethal amount of drugs in his system and that he begged to be put on the ground, people still almost universally believe that the knee on his neck was unnecessary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jw11432 As I've said repeatedly, it isn't about the ppl switching(although a few did).
Throughout the US history, parties have changed and their platforms have changed. It is ablut little things switching and changing back and forth, over time. For instance, the Republicans used to be the big government side and were more for federal rights over states rights(Lincoln's time). Now, that is the Democrats.
One day, the Democratic nominee ran on civil rights for black ppl (this is why Strom left) which was different than their previous positions. This does not mean that the Republicans, despite the belief of leftists, decided to be against it, however. They too, were for it. The Democrats did a great job at convincing ppl otherwise and the Republicans erroneously decided to try to keep their white constituents and never really fought hard for black ppl after this period. They weren't against it, they were just weren't focused on it. Which the Democrats used against them to portray them as racists and all the ridiculous insults they use.
Another example is that the Democrats used to be the ones who wanted immigration curbed and wanted a wall and the Republicans were the ones that wanted it open to use the cheap labor in big business. This was just 20-30 years ago. The Democrats are now the ones in league with big business the most and want the immigrants to pour in.
Etc etc etc. There are so many sites that explain all this. You and I both know that you didn't do shit for looking it up.
The parties are still the same parties. They have just changed positions over time, over and over.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The more I learn about schooling, the more I'm super grateful for growing up where I did, in Ohio. We lived in a town of around 20k, but, we lived in the outskirts of the town, around all the cornfields. We lived in the school district of a nearby village. We were 5min from the village and 15 from town.
So, we spent most of our time in the village. And we went to their schools. (I'm class of 2003) They were great. Small-around 100 kids per grade, 15-20 per class. Most of the teachers grew up there and had kids there, so they had a vested interest in its success and student's success.
It was always well funded. They put a lot into sports and activities, too. We had brand new weight room, indoor and outdoor tracks, an FFA building, etc. We had a pool. The school from the town didn't even have one, so they used ours sometimes.
They also always had the newest in computers, too. Every classroom had at least 2 computers and there were numerous computer labs.
It was also safe there. The whole village was.
All in all, it was a great school. I look back and realize how lucky we were now. I actually thanked my parents for moving there just a few years ago, as I was learning all of the things going on in schools.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jediknightdiscomike22 I highly agree with all those things. Lol Your TDS id clear.
He isn't a pedophile or murderous 🙄 Prove these asinine accusations and don't use the woman who nobody has even seen and her handler is some crazy af dude that used to be a producer for Jerry Springer.
Misogynist? Yea maybe. No more than most guys.
He didn't break "nearly every promise". At all. Lowered taxes, deregulation, moved embassy to Jerusalem, replaced supreme court judges, many federal judges replaced, canceled Paris Climate Agreement, TPP, NAFTA, got other NATO countries to pay their share, got the travel ban, wall has been being fixed all along and now will be adding new wall, limitig legal immigration, raised tariffs, repatriation tax, more funding for military, more production of oil and gas, approve pipelines, open Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for exploration, etc, etc. The list goes on. Like the ideas or not, he's kept MANY of his promises. And ones he hasn't, it wasn't for lack of trying!
Most Americans got a tax cut. Including most of the middle class.
He didn't nearly tank the economy unless you mean this coronavirus shit which is no fault of his own and is happening across the entire world. Before this, studies show that on average, wealth for Americans increased 17% while it increased 54% for the bottom half of Americans.
He didn't bring us to the brink of ww3. That is just asinine.
Invited the coronavirus? He stipped travel from China in January and ppl called him racist for it and Democrats were telling the ppl to go out and go to parades and shit just a few weeks ago.
medicaid should be cut. Ppl should be given a cap of time to be on medicaid.
Only thing I agree with you on is his wanting to cut ss.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@musicfanatic6558 And before you counter with the false claim that Biden wasnt saying Trump's travel ban from China was xenophobic, the proof say otherwise.
On Jan. 27, Biden wrote an op-ed published in USA Today, he said President Trump’s calls in 2014 for travel restrictions during the Ebola outbreak as “reactionary.” He said, Biden wrote, “I remember how Trump sought to stoke fear and stigma during the 2014 Ebola epidemic. He called President Barack Obama a ‘dope’ and ‘incompetent’ and railed against the evidence-based response our administration put in place – which quelled the crisis and saved hundreds of thousands of lives – in favor of reactionary travel bans that would only have made things worse.” So he thought travel bans were bad. He clearly was anticipating the move. And the WHO was against Trumps ban so, in Bidens words(you will see later), he was against it since the "science" was against it. (Fauci has since said it was a good move and he can't think of anything else Trump could have done)
Then a few days later, Trump issued the travel ban for this virus. One day after the travel restrictions were put into place, Biden said in Iowa, “We have, right now, a crisis with the coronavirus… This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia – hysterical xenophobia – and fearmongering to lead the way instead of science.” He then added that “Diseases have no borders, they have no borders.”
On March 12, the very same day President Trump implemented further travel restrictions on Europe, leaving little doubt about his thoughts on the travel ban, Biden said, “Banning all travel from Europe or any other part of the world may slow it but as we’ve seen will not stop it. And travel restrictions based on favoritism and politics, rather than risk, will be counterproductive.”
The same day, Biden Tweeted, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it…”
He called the travel bans “reactionary,” “hysterical,” “xenophobic,” and “counterproductive.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins I'm sorry but no. Read the bill. It does not silence teaching of race. I see nothing that stops a Hispanic club.
No, EVERYONE was disgustednby the death of George Floyd. It wasn't until more video came out and more information came out that ppl started questioning. Stop this stereotyping that conservatives are "racist". It isn't true. I am a middle kind of person. A libertarian (not the party). I look at both sides and see that they're both batshit. The left is MUCH more, however. They are pushing this CRT which is LITERALLY racist.
Im sorry but you really need to watch/read more types of media. All sides. All types. Then you can compare, contrast, research, etc and see the truth. It's usually somewhere in the middle. Get a lot more independent media. I recommend Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), Jimmy Dore, We Are Change, YoungRippa, Officer Tatum, Steven Crowder, Actual Justice Warrior, Karlyn Borysenko, Candace Owens, The Reason We Learn(you can learn about CRT here and at Karlyn Borysenkos channel), etc to start. A little of everything. You don't have to like the media to watch it. Purposely seek out media you disagree with to a get a well rounded diet of media. Only way to see the truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins Anyway, I'm done engaging with you. You are hateful and you indulge in stereotyping based on assumptions and misinformation due to your one sided intake of media and the like. I find it gross. Just as bad as a racist. I will again give you some ppl that you can start to watch so ypu can get more than a one sided view. And contrary to your inane comment before about me "believing alt right media", they are almost all libertarians, classical liberals, and even a progressive. You will forever be indoctrinated and uninformed until you start learning all sides of things. You don't have to lile them or even agree with them. I watch plenty I don't like or don't agree with, but I like a well rounded media. One of my favorites is a progressive who I definitely do not agree with politically but he is honest and funny.
For CRT in general-Karlyn Borysenko and The Reason We Learn
In general-Tim Pool (also TimCastIRL..this one is good because he brings in other ppl to chat), We Are Change, YoungRippa, Matt Christansen, Jimmy Dore(the progressive I mentioned), Actual Justice Warrior, Anthony Brian Logan(conservative), Project Veritas, Candace Owens(conservative). A few to get you started.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins Lastly, the idea that there are a bunvh of ppl who are truly racist out there is false. Stop letting them tell you the boogie man is out there. This is fear. Gov loves to use fear to get what they want. The hegelian dialectic. This division among ppl that we see now just started like 10 years ago, whenever Occupy Wall St was. The ppl were working together and fighting the system. They couldn't have that. They started pushing all this intersectionality bs real hard. You can track it in google analytics and see the huge uptick in the talking points in search. It got ppl to stop fighting them and fight each other. You think telling all white ppl that they are racist is gonna help race relations? There are so few actual racists in this country that being called that is the worst thing any white person wants to be called. If they were actual racists, ppl wouldn't care about the word. The overuse and misuse of it is certainly lessening the impact it has. They've really taken the sting out of it by labeling everything racist. Whiteness, math, history, self reliance, time, individualism. Milk(not joking), objectivity, and a slew of other crazy things have been called racist/white supremacy by these ppl. You think telling ppl that they are bad for their skin color is helping race relations? Or telling black kids that they can't go anywhere in life because of their skin color, and that it is because of white ppl, is good for race relations? This is all creating racism. Look at rsce relation trends. They were going up more and more and then they started pushing this BS and they've plummeted again. You are supporting this system with this garbage. You need to wake up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodnessalwayswins Candace Owens(black conservative, ex Democrat) Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL)(left libertarian/classic liberal), We Are Change(libertarian) , Jimmy Dore(progressive Democrat) , Karlyn Borysenko(classic liberal, ex Democrat), Actual Justice Warrior(guessing libertarian, classic liberal), Anthony Brian Logan(conservative), Officer Tatum(conservative), Matt Christensen(also guessing libertarian..maybe right libertarian), Steven Crowder(conservative), The Reason We Learn(liberal), Dave Rubin(classic liberal, ex Democrat), YoungRippa(an-cap libertarian).
Start watching these ppl. (Highly doubt you will since you seem deeply rooted in your belief system and don't want your view of the world upended. Easier to just virtue signal and stick with the narrative..which I get because I used to sound like you and then I started to actually research those narratives) But if you must only pick 3, make it Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), We Are Change, and Jimmy Dore.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chriscarlone527 Dude, it isn't just the surveillance of the post office. I was just telling you what you asked of the other guy. The Post Office has been failing for years. Tons of articles of it online. Governments do not run things well. The DMV, the PO, SS, Healthcare for Vets, schools!!!, etc.
Yes, you are right that the gov does not represent the interests of the public...and it never will! Yes, it has been hijacked by corporations. Gov let it happen. Gov is ran by ppl. Ppl are corrupt. Im not saying we should have no Gov, I'm saying we need WAY less. It is always funny to me how people bash the Gov(rightly so), yet argue for more of it. People can't get off that teet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@B B He shut down travel from China immediately and the left(Biden specifically)said he was xenophobic for doing so. He created the coronavirus taskforce immediately. He ensured every state had all the ventilators and medical setups they needed and was applauded for it by several Democratic governors, including Cuomo and Newsom. Dr Fauci himself, whom is adored by the left, said that Trump did everything he should have and he can't think of anything more that he could have done.
Since Trump is NOT a dictator, he left decisions of mandates and lockdowns up to the states, as he should have. Some states did better than others. Some states, Democratic run, put sick people in NURSING HOMES. Cuomo is under investigation as we speak for trying to cover up and fudging the numbers of how many ppl died (15k) in nursing homes directly because of his mandate that he was told not to do. We all knew from the very beginning that the elderly were the most vulnerable yet they put sick people with them while their hospitals were empty and Trumps administration had medical facilities set up for them to use and they were barely used so there was zero reason to send sick ppl to nursing homes(MI even sent young sick ppl and there is even a video of one of those young sick ppl abusing an elderly man) Nursing homes represent less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they account for 42% of the COVID-19 deaths, with more than 70,000 fatalities reported by the COVID Tracking Project.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bettyriley7295 There is nothing wrong with wanting ppl close to you who are loyal. That is silly to think otherwise. Your comments reek of naivete. It is a constant stream of backstabbing and corruption in gov. You should want ppl around you that are trustworthy and loyal. Loyal to not leak information, loyal to not lie about you or other things, etc.
You cannot be loyal if you are not trustworthy and you cannot be trustworthy if you are not loyal. You cannot be trusted if you are not loyal. You are not loyal if you can't be trusted.
You make the unsubstantiated claim that DT wants only loyalty "above all" and use MP as your example, yet you say he was not loyal to DT. Weird pick of him to make if he was only wanting loyalty "above all."
He is currently forming a unity party with lifelong Democrats. Ones who are respectable people. Ones who he and they openly say they have disagreements, but are working together on the things they agree with. Surely, this would be an odd thing to do for someone wanting loyalty "above all." Surely, if that was the only goal, different ppl would be picked.
You also did not provide me with a video or transcript of him saying that he wants loyalty over honesty.
Also, that quote is the claim of 1 man with zero proof that it was said. After the last 8yrs, it is foolish to believe anything that is said without proof. Claims are consistently made and later proven false. (Especially coming from ppl trying to sell a book)
And again, just to clarify again, you completely misunderstood my original comment to begin with.
1
-
@bettyriley7295 There is nothing wrong with wanting ppl close to you who are loyal. That is silly to think otherwise. Your comments reek of naivete. It is a constant stream of backstabbing and corruption in gov. You should want ppl around you that are trustworthy and loyal. Loyal to not leak information, loyal to not lie about you or other things, etc.
You cannot be loyal if you are not trustworthy and you cannot be trustworthy if you are not loyal. You cannot be trusted if you are not loyal. You are not loyal if you can't be trusted.
You make the unsubstantiated claim that DT wants only loyalty "above all" and use MP as your example, yet you say he was not loyal to DT. Weird pick of him to make if he was only wanting loyalty "above all."
He is currently forming a unity party with lifelong Democrats. Ones who are respectable people. Ones who he and they openly say they have disagreements, but are working together on the things they agree with. Surely, this would be an odd thing to do for someone wanting loyalty "above all." Surely, if that was the only goal, different ppl would be picked.
You also did not provide me with a video or transcript of him saying that he wants loyalty over honesty.
Also, that quote is the claim of 1 man with zero proof that it was said. After the last 8yrs, it is foolish to believe anything that is said without proof. Claims are consistently made and later proven false. (Especially coming from ppl trying to sell a book)
And again, just to clarify again, you completely misunderstood my original comment to begin with.
1
-
@bettyriley7295 There is nothing wrong with wanting ppl close to you who are loyal. That is silly to think otherwise. That comment reeks of naivete. It is a constant stream of lies, leaks, etc in gov. All of them should and do want ppl around them that are trustworthy and loyal. Loyal to not leak information, loyal to not lie, etc.
One cannot be loyal if they are not trustworthy and vice versa. One cannot be trusted if they are not loyal. They are not loyal if they can't be trusted.
You make the unsubstantiated claim that DT wants only loyalty "above all" and use MP as your example, yet say he was not loyal to DT. Weird pick of him to make if he was only wanting loyalty "above all."
He is currently forming a unity party with lifelong Democrats. Ones who are respectable people. Ones who he and they openly say they have disagreements, but are working together on the things they agree with. Ones who we have no reason to believe would be loyal to a negative point, as you're suggesting DT wants. Surely, this would be an odd thing to do for someone wanting loyalty "above all." Surely, if that was the only goal, different ppl would be picked to work with.
You also did not provide me with a video or transcript of him saying that he wants loyalty above all.
Also, that quote you did provide is the claim of 1 man with 0 proof that it was said. After the last 8yrs, it is foolish to believe anything that is said without proof. Claims are consistently made and later proven false. (Especially coming from ppl trying to sell a book)
And again, just to clarify again, you completely misunderstood my original comment to begin with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chlamydiayourdaddyishere No. You should get your information from as many types of sources as you can. You saying people should only get it from one side of the argument is proof of your intense bias and wanting everyone to be indoctrinated I to your belief. I read and watch all sides, mainstream and independent and I encourage everyone to read EVERYTHING. That is how you get to the truth. Watch Trump himself, read thr bills and court rulings, watch FOX, CNN, ETC. watch mainstream AND independent. Watch liberals, conservatives, libertarians, socialists, anarchists, etc. It is the inly way to know the actual truth and not be indoctrinated to any narrative. Wake up you are still dead asleep.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Myla Starseed They called his travel ban from China xenophobic. Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the Chinese virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus the Chinese virus until the middle of March. 😆 On
March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc.Idk how peoole cannot remember the rhetoric of just a few months ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians
1
-
1
-
@Matt-yz3iq He did not call the virus itself a hoax. That is fake news. He said the politicization of the virus and blaming it on Trump is thr hoax. When you watch the full clip, it is very clear. The msm/Biden campaign cut the clip.
He may have been downplaying in words, but so was everyone. His actions, however, were not downplaying.
He implemented a travel ban a day after the WHO called it a global health emergency. They called his travel ban from China xenophobic. Biden said,“This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia … and fearmongering.” He later said that he was not talking about the travel ban, and that he was talking about Trump's calling it the Chinese virus and that he supported the ban all along...yet Biden said the original quote one day after the travel ban, on January 31st, at a rally and then in a tweet, the next day, on February 1st. Trump didn't call the virus the Chinese virus until the middle of March. 😆 On
March 12(after Trump had extended the ban to other countries), Biden also said, “A wall will not stop the coronavirus. Banning all travel from Europe — or any other part of the world — will not stop it.”
WHO was against the travel ban and said it would increase fear and stigma with little benefit to public health; as well as Bernie, who said he wouldnt have done a travel ban; epidemiologist Dr. Osterholm was quoted by the NYT saying it was a "emotional and political reaction"; The New York Times themselves said the travel ban was "unjust and doesn't work anyway". They said it was "xenophobic rhetoric and the building of walls" and also that it was "extreme measures" and that its morphing into "outright racism". They talked of the "racism at the heart of Trump's travel ban"; China, who said he was racist and "very mean"; CNN, who said it could backfire and it was stigmatizing to countries and ethnicities; The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said on Feb. 3 that, “There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel.” She went on to say the U.S. travel restrictions “could only create and spread fear [setting] a very bad example,” noting, “Even American media and experts doubted the government’s decision,” which also “violated civil rights” of travelers. The list goes on and on. Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, etc etc. Idk how people cannot remember the rhetoric of just a few months ago. It was all over the tv and written news and from politicians.
He immediately created his task forxe as well and they said he was fear mongering. There was a big list of things that he was doing behind the scenes.
You seem to be stuck in a new bubble. I hope you expand your viewing and look up all news on all sides. Also, look up independent news and not just mainstream.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tylerstrang3753 It can influence LOCAL and STATE elections since they come down to close elections and even ties. From 2013 to 2017, 56 elections in Ohio resulted in a tie vote and 86 were decided by only one vote. Just Ohio!
The U.S. Supreme Court said in 2008 when it upheld Indiana’s voter ID law:
"flagrant examples of such fraud have been documented throughout this Nation’s history by respected historians and journalists. Including Indiana’s own experience with fraudulent voting in the 2003 Democratic primary for East Chicago Mayor … demonstrate that not only is the risk of voter fraud real, but that it could affect the outcome of a close election."
Last year, Pennsylvania officials admitted that more than 11,000 illegal immigrants had registered to vote in the state.
5,556 illegal immigrants in Virginia who were removed as registered voters but not before a third of them had cast ballots
Almost 5,000 illegal immigrants in Allegheny County, Pa., sanctuary jurisdictions in seven states, 11 townships in Michigan, and Palm Beach, Fla., many of whom had voted before they were removed.
These go on and on.
And as stated many times, it does not decrease turnout. It is a common sense mandate. You should prove who you are and I should prove who I am. Every single fraudulent vote negates a vote from a voter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michael murillo It is where I live too. As I said, in some places in this country, that is not the case. Therefore, your comment makes little sense to millions of people. You can look up mandates in all states currently. Look up stories of businesses being shut down and not allowed to reopen and more restrictions making it harder and harder for them to run. You can look up places in CA, for instance, that have stay at home orders. You can look up churches that are not allowed to open. You can look up one womans, in NJ I think it was, wbo was stopped from selling her wares live online! Dur to covid restrictions. Cops came to her business and stopped her live stream selling her stuff. Look up stories where ppl are being fined thousands of dollars every day for opening tbeir business. Wake up man. We have dystopian level shit in some places.
Watch more news. Ppl like Tim Pool(also TimCastIRL), Young Rippa, We Are Change, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DixonCider1234 So, the 2 are very different. One is defending Itself from the other. Something they've been doing for 100 yrs.
Js started buying land there (and even overpaying) in the 1880s. At this time, it was sparsely populated, the majority was unpopulated crown lands, and there was very little of anything. Js were buying land amd building upon it. The As(pals as they're known now, even though they used to hate being called that since that isn't who they are and it was Brits who brought that name back, so they said it was a Brit name) came from all over to these towns because they had better jobs and pay. Then, As started attacking those towns, a lot like they did on the 7th of Oct. They kept doing this (and Js defended themselves) for 20+ years before Is was even created. By the time it was created, Js owned more land than the As did. (Remmbering that the majority of land was unowned and unoccupied) And As even started abandoning theirs after being warned by the surrounding countries that they were going to attack Is. And they did. 7 countries attacked them after its creation, but they still won and that got them some more land. At some point in there, though, Is just gave back some of it to the As (the place we are discussing now) Decades and decades of being attacked by the As and defending themselves later and we are here. Decades of the As still doing the exact thing that got them there instead of building a better society. Taking ade(yt deletes when I spell it right) and buying "booms" instead of building infrastructure. Every time Is loosens up on them, they attack again. Over and over. 100 yrs of this.
So, yea, they're different.
That being said, we should not be giving either anything. Let them sort it out. Is should make that place a parking lot, though.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DixonCider1234 So, the 2 are very different. One is defending itself from the other. Something they've been doing for 100 yrs.
Js started buying land there (and even overpaying) in the 1880s. At this time, it was sparsely populated, the majority was unpopulated crown lands, and there was very little of anything. Js were buying land amd building upon it. The As(pals as they're known now, even though they used to hate being called that since that isn't who they are and it was Brits who brought that name back, so they said it was a Brit name) came from all over to these towns because they had better jobs and pay. Then, As started Oct7ing those towns. They kept doing this (and Js defended themselves) for 20+ years before Is was even created. By the time it was created, Js owned more land than the As did. (Remembering that the majority of land was unowned and unoccupied) And As even started abandoning theirs after being warned by the surrounding countries that they were going to hit Is. And they did. 7 countries attacked them after its creation, but they still won and that got them some more land. At some point in there, though, Is just gave back some of it to the As (the place we are discussing now) Decades and decades of being Oct7thed by the As and defending themselves later and we are here. Decades of the As still doing the exact thing that got them there instead of building a better society. Taking ade(yt deletes when I spell it right) and buying Pockets (with an R) instead of building infrastructure. Every time Is loosens up on them, they Oct7 again. Over and over. 100 yrs of this.
So, yea, they're different.
That being said, we should not be giving either anything. Let them sort it out. Is should make that place a parking lot, though.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DixonCider1234 So, the 2 are very different. One is defending itself from the other. Something they've been doing for 100 yrs.
Js started buying land there (and even overpaying) in the 1880s. At this time, it was sparsely populated, the majority was unowned crown lands, and there was very little of anything. Js were buying land amd building upon it. The As(pals as they're known now, even though they used to hate being called that since that isn't who they are and it was GB who brought that name back, so they said it was a GB name) came from all over to these towns because they had better opportunities. Then, As started Oct7ing those towns. They kept doing this (and Js defended themselves) for 20+ years before Is was even created. By the time it was created, Js owned more land than the As did. (Remembering that the majority of land was unowned and unoccupied) And As even started abandoning theirs after being warned by the surrounding countries that they were going to uh..tack Is. And they did. 7 countries uh..tacked them after its creation, but they still won and that got them some more land. At some point in there, though, Is gave back some of it to the As (the place we are discussing now) Decades and decades of being uh..tacked by the As and defending themselves later and we are here and As refuse to the solution. Decades of the As still doing the exact thing that got them there instead of building better infrastructure. Taking ade(yt deletes when I spell it right) and buying Pockets (with an R) instead. Even taking apart what was there for it. Every time Is loosens up on them, they uh...tack again. Over and over. 100 yrs of this.
So, yea, they're different.
That being said, we should not be giving either anything.
1
-
@DixonCider1234 So, the 2 are very different. One(Is) is defending Itself. Something they've been doing for 100 yrs.
Js started buying land there (and even overpaying) in the 1880s. At this time, it was sparsely populated, the majority was unowned crown lands, and there was very little of anything. Js were buying land amd building societies. The As(pals as they're known now, even though they used to hate being called that since that isn't who they are and it was GB who brought that name back, so they said it was a GB name) came from all over to these towns because they had better jobs. Then, surrounding As started uh...tacking those towns. They kept doing this (and Js defended) for 20+ years before Is was even made.
By the time it was created, Js owned more land than the As did. (Remembering that the majority of land was unowned and unoccupied) And As even started abandoning theirs after being warned by the surrounding countries that they were going to uh..tack Is. And they did. All of them, at once, uh..tacked them after its creation, but they (Is) still won and that got them some more land. At some point in there, though, Is gave back some of it to the As (the place we are discussing now)
Decades and decades of being uh..tacked by the As and defending later and we are here and As still refuse the solution. Decades of the As still doing the exact thing that got them there. And of them taking ade(yt deletes when I spell it right) and buying Pockets (with an R) instead. Even taking apart what was there for it. Every time Is loosens up on them, they uh...tack again. Over and over. 100 yrs of this.
So, yea, they're different.
That being said, we should not be giving either anything.
1
-
1
-
@DixonCider1234 So, the 2 are very different. One(Is) is defending itself. Something they've been doing for 100 yrs.
To begin, Js started buying land there (and even overpaying) in the 1880s. This is what is not told by the pro-Pals. At this time, it was sparsely populated, the majority was unowned crown lands, and there was very little of anything.
Js were buying land and creating towns. The As(pals as they're known now, even though they used to hate being called that since that isn't who they are and it was GB who brought that name back, so they said it was a GB name) came from all over to these towns because they had better jobs.
Then, surrounding As started uh...tacking those towns and complaining about Js buying land. They kept doing this (and Is defended) for 20+ years before Is was even made.
By the time it was made, Js owned more than the As did. (Remember that the majority of land was unowned and unoccupied) And As even started leaving theirs behind after being told to get out by the surrounding places that they were going to uh..tack Is. And they did. All of them, at once, uh..tacked them after its creation, but they (Is) still won amd over timex they gained more land. At some point in there, though, Is gave some of it to the As. (the place we are discussing now)
Decades of being uh..tacked by the As and defending later and we are here. And As still refuse the fix. Decades of the As still doing the exact thing that got them there. And of them taking ade(yt deletes when I spell it right) and buying Pockets (with an R) instead. Even taking apart what was there for it. Every time Is loosens up on them, they uh...tack again. Over and over. 100 yrs of this.
So, yea, they're different.
That being said, we should not be giving either anything.
1
-
1
-
@DixonCider1234 So, the 2 are very different. One(Is) is defending itself. Something they've been doing for 100 yrs.
To begin, Js started buying land there (and even overpaying) in the 1880s. This is what is not told by the proPals.
At this time, it was sparsely populated, the majority was unowned crown lands, and there was very little of anything.
Js were buying land and creating better towns. The As(pals as they're known now, even though they used to hate being called that since they aren't and it was GB who brought it back, so they said it was a GB name) came from all over to these towns because they offered more. And their pop. has bloomed since.
Then, surrounding As started uh...takking those towns and complaining about Js buying land. They kept doing this (and Is defended) for 20+ years before Is was even made.
By the time it was made, Js had more than the As did. (the majority was unowned and unoccupied) And As even started leaving theirs behind after being told to get out by the surrounding places that they were going to uh..takk Is. And they did. All of them, at once, uh..takked Is after its creation, but Is still won and over time, they gained more. At some point in there, though, Is gave some of it to the As. (Where we are discussing now)
Decades of being uh..takked by the As and Js defending later and we are here. And As still refuse the fix. Decades of the As still doing the exact thing that got them there. And of them taking ade(purposely misspelled) and buying Pockets (with an R) instead. Even taking apart what was there for it. Every time Is loosens up on them, they uh...takk again. Over and over. 100 yrs of this.
So, yea, they're different.
That being said, we should not be giving to either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1