Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "AOC Roasts Republican For Promoting The Caging Of Children" video.

magnetothewhite Fine... So let's accept your premise for a second. That would mean the former is as true as the ladder, correct? You don't care about children in these camps, and we don't care about unborn children? So you don't care about these lids, is what your saying? No labor? You mean except for these 5 and six year olds having to take care of 1 and 2 year olds, right? Also, the fact that you think they can just walk put is laughable at best. Again though, lets say that is true, so these 5 year olds are just gonna walk out with these 2 year olds on their backs? Just gonna strole out, huh? At least try and think about what you say before you say it.
7
Edward Gutierrez There are so many misnomer, half truths, assumptions and bias interpertations of the facts in your comment that I truely don't know where to begin. I will just simply say, educate yourself on the facts before you open your mouth again on this subject... And so we are very clear, that does not mean watch more Fox "News" or listing to president lies a lot over that. Look up facts.
5
@EddieChubb25694 Are you setious? You give the appearance of having sympathy for these children but you can't think of what might make it better? How about visitation with their parents, how about not being put in a concentration camp, how about soap, toothpaste and toothbrush, how about not having five-year-olds taking care of two year olds? How about clean living conditions so diseased doesn't run rampant? How about treating these children like their children and not caged animals to be dealt with?
2
That is a very elegant and we'll constructed point you just made there. Thank you!
1
Edward Gutierrez I'm confused... Are you justifying what these children are going through right now?
1
MEBEARDOG we all appreciate the thought and substance you put into that response.🙄
1
@adamdusenberry6455 " Concentration camps are only pertain to Jewish people. So your argument is s***." Ummm... How is that? Where did they say they only applied to Jewish people? Common sense tells you that it is the most well known in history. Therefore it would be the best example of the hypocrisy that they are trying to point out.
1
@laurab.9845 The difference between the two that you were describing is historically nothing, actually. They called Jewish concentration camps' death camps often because so many died there. His definition of a concentration camp is accurate. Also, some of the places they are holding those children now are those Chinese American concentration camps.
1
@EddieChubb25694 So your saying... They both suck... So it's okay? Saying something else is bad also, does not actually stop the first thing from being bad and if it is just as bad, then they shpuld both be fixed. We should not do that to children.
1
magnetothewhite They are small children, seperated from their parents. First, people applying for Asylum should not be treated as criminals. They are not criminals. They are coming in the right way, like people on the Rhine always say they want them to do. They surrender themselves. Second... the notion that a five year old or a two year old who are being neglected and abused in these concentration camps, can just walk out on their own into the world and be dropped off at a border somewhere, is ridiculous. Do you really think these children know they can do this? Do you really think that looks realistic to them? Do you really think they could even comprehended that reality? And regardless of all of that, these are children. They should not be treated like trash. They matter I need to be taken care of and protected.
1
magnetothewhite wow! So you're that kind of ignorant douchebag. Okay. You're incorrect dumbass. In the concentration camps that they are speaking about they do get separated from their parents. There are children in cages without being provided proper nutrition, Healthcare or even the basic necessities of a toothbrush. There are 5 year olds looking after 2 year olds. All because guards are telling them to. There have literally been outbreaks in these camps because of lack of medical attention and sanitary living environments. Your ignorance does not excuse your opinion in this day and age. Look it up. Educate yourself on the matter and then speak. By the way your contradictions and this little post are f**** ridiculous. " if they get Asylum or not they will be returned to their parents. You don't put kids with adults specifically because of potential of violence." But wait... I thought... " the children don't go off alone retard. They go with their parents, did I really have to spell that out?" No. What you have to spell out, is why you're such a dumbass who contradicts themselves a few sentences below what they just said. By the way, no one has to call another person stupid that many times if they actually believe themselves to be right or smart. Overcompensation is a big tell. Just saying. Lol
1
magnetothewhite Concentration camps refers to the place. Prisoners, legal aliens or political prisoners refer to the people. You're talking about two different things as if they were the same. Concentration camps is exactly what they are though. Some of them, literally. If you would do your research and then speak on what the subject matter is you would know that they are literally using the old Asian concentration camps we had here in America back in World War II. You know what happened back then? There were medical outbreaks, lack of nutrition, lack of adequate clean environment, child and parent separation, lack of basic necessities and children looking after smaller children. Your argument that they're not building ovens and sticking people in them yet is a pretty low bar. What they are, is people. Children. America should not ever treat children the way that they are being treated in these concentration camps. You should be ashamed of yourself for defending that.
1
magnetothewhite I did look it up. That's how I know those conditions are there. Also you do understand that you just saying something doesn't actually make it true, right? This isn't the Trump White House. You are a factually incorrect. Deal.
1
magnetothewhite but I understand why you're not defending yourself. I wouldn't either if I didn't have anything else to back up my claims other than me saying so.
1
Anne Bergeron I understand that. I wasn't arguing they where. Just giving their then why their premise was invalid even if that was true.
1
@lolunderstated533 who's the arguing anything about Joe Biden? Did I miss that? Regardless, let me be very clear. If have sexually assaulted a woman in any way you should go to jail and have absolutely no chance of being in public office. So I'll tell you when I tell others who bring up other people's actions to distract from another's. I'm fine with condemning and jailing both of them. How about you?
1
magnetothewhite what I believe in, is a little something called factual evidence. Maybe before you start doing the research on all the other s*** you keep talking about and know nothing about you should actually look up that definition. You don't seem to know that you just sang stuff doesn't actually make it true. Oh good... You finally decided to Slither back in your ignorant hole. I would too if I were you. After all, at this point you're just making a fool of yourself. Bye bye now
1
@lolunderstated533 I don't find that to be true actually. I've met and interacted with some that are Biden supporters but by no means have I seen the overall presence of them. I don't argue that any of these people from any party are okay doing this. This is not an argument that should be along party lines. If you're saying that then I completely agree with you. The one that this happens to be talking about whoever is the leader of the Republican party at the moment. That doesn't mean it couldn't be 20 other guys on any other side. Just one just happens to be that.
1
@lolunderstated533 and you're good with the long comments sweetheart. I tend to be long-winded myself. I totally understand LOL
1
TheRetiredtrucker 👈👈 when you can't come up with a substance based argument
1
TheRetiredtrucker oh look, he can do substance. Maybe try that from the jump next time. That way people will take you more seriously. So I was tempted to debate with you about abortion but I don't think I'm going to do that. Not that I don't disagree with you but I'm interested in something else. So let's go with your deeply flawed premise for a moment. That means that you disagree with what's happening to these children in these concentration like camps, right? That means you're against the Trump organization defunding Children's Medical programs? That means you're against trumps education secretary defunding public schooling, right? I assume you're against the Trump White House trying to cut funding to Paid Family Leave? I assume you're against the Trump White House trying to cut funding to childcare? I assume you're against the Trump White House being anti minimum wage increase? All of this affects children and America in major ways. Especially minimum and low-wage Families. Because if you care about these children like you're feigning at the moment then you would have to care about those, right?
1
@NewNormalWorldOrder Why are you so insecure? Why dont you feel special? Why don't you do something about all of that?
1
Derek Lowe sigh... Hey, angry white guy... Diversity is pro American. "Brown" and "Black" people are Americans. Maybe stop blaming people with a different skin pigment for all your problems and take some personal responsibility? Just a thought...
1
@MrKeenes Hey, I don't mean to but in but, that is the most thoughtful and reasonable argument for pro life then I have heard in a long time. Wow! I really appreciate you sharing that. I can't agree with it because I think taking away the choice over your own body is a very slippery slope that leads to very very bad things. I can tell you that I wish, that all women would decide to only consider abortion in strenuous circumstance beyond their control. Like rape incest or life of the mother/child. I wish all women could agree to that universally. I just don't think I have the right to take that choice away from them. I don't know their circumstance. I don't know what's going on in their lives and I would probably not agree with some reasoning for having an abortion. I absolutely despise women who use abortion as birth control. I have and will in the future openly tell them how horrible that choices is. I just could not take that away from them. As I said comment that just leads to dangerous dangerous things. Too much choice is already being taken away from us. Historically that does not make things better. It's a complicated issue and a hard choice to make. That's why I feel like the people to make those choices are the ones living that and an educated balanced doctor. Anyways, that's just how I feel. Like I said, I loved hearing your side and the way you laid it out. Sorry if I intruded.
1
@Shane Funk SoOoOo... Lets say your crazy premise is true for a second.... It's so not but just for arguments sake... It shouldn't matter. The reason that "this" SHOULD "mean something to" YOU And EVERYONE is because they are children, being litterally caged in previously used concentration camps, with unsanitary conditions, basic necessities not provided (like showers, blankets and toothbrushes), with inadequate healthcare and serious illness outbreaks happening, with 5 year olds having to take care of 1 year olds, with children that had been removed from these places now being brought back and because it's happening right now, in america, are regardless of who's president at the moment. That's why it should matter to you... here regardless of your assumption based premise. America should not be doing this. This should not be what we are about and everybody should care about that and not excuse it.
1