Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "CNN" channel.

  1. 359
  2. 301
  3. 298
  4. 238
  5. 198
  6. 192
  7. 192
  8. 179
  9. 173
  10. 168
  11. 145
  12. 140
  13. 140
  14. 136
  15. 132
  16. 129
  17. 121
  18. 120
  19. 120
  20. 117
  21. 115
  22. 111
  23. 110
  24. 106
  25. 92
  26. 91
  27. 91
  28. 81
  29. 76
  30. 76
  31. 74
  32. 72
  33. 70
  34. 70
  35. 67
  36. 66
  37. 66
  38. 65
  39. 65
  40. 63
  41. 62
  42. 60
  43. 59
  44. 58
  45. 58
  46. 56
  47. 56
  48. 53
  49. 53
  50. 52
  51. 52
  52. 51
  53. 50
  54. 50
  55. 50
  56. 50
  57. 49
  58. 47
  59. 46
  60. 45
  61. 45
  62. 44
  63. 44
  64. 43
  65. 43
  66. 42
  67. 42
  68. 42
  69. 42
  70. 42
  71. 41
  72. 41
  73. 41
  74. 40
  75. 40
  76. 39
  77. 39
  78. 39
  79. 39
  80. 39
  81. 39
  82. 38
  83. 38
  84. 37
  85. 37
  86. 37
  87. 36
  88. 36
  89. 36
  90. 36
  91. 35
  92. 35
  93. 35
  94. 34
  95. 34
  96. 34
  97. 33
  98. 33
  99. 33
  100. 32
  101. 32
  102. 32
  103. 32
  104. 31
  105. 31
  106. 31
  107. 31
  108. 31
  109. 31
  110. 31
  111. 30
  112. 30
  113. 30
  114. 30
  115. 30
  116. 29
  117. 29
  118. 29
  119. 29
  120. 29
  121. 29
  122. 28
  123. 28
  124. 28
  125. 27
  126. 27
  127. 27
  128. 27
  129. 27
  130. 27
  131. 27
  132. 27
  133. 27
  134. 26
  135. 26
  136. 26
  137. 26
  138. 25
  139. 25
  140. 25
  141. 24
  142. 24
  143. 24
  144. 24
  145. 24
  146. 24
  147. 24
  148. 24
  149. 24
  150. 24
  151. 24
  152. 24
  153. 24
  154. 23
  155. 23
  156. 23
  157. 23
  158. 23
  159. 23
  160. 23
  161. 23
  162. 23
  163. 23
  164. 23
  165. 23
  166. 23
  167. 23
  168. 22
  169. 22
  170. 22
  171. 22
  172. 22
  173. 22
  174. 22
  175. 22
  176. 22
  177. 22
  178. 22
  179. 21
  180. 21
  181. 21
  182. 21
  183. 21
  184. 21
  185. 21
  186. 21
  187. 21
  188. 21
  189. 21
  190. 21
  191. 21
  192. 20
  193. 20
  194. 20
  195. 20
  196. 20
  197. 20
  198. 20
  199. 20
  200. 20
  201. 19
  202. 19
  203. 19
  204. 19
  205. 19
  206. 19
  207. 19
  208. 19
  209. 19
  210. 19
  211. 19
  212. 19
  213. 19
  214. 19
  215. 19
  216. 19
  217. 19
  218. 19
  219. 19
  220. 19
  221. 19
  222. 19
  223. 19
  224. 19
  225. 19
  226. 18
  227. 18
  228. 18
  229. 18
  230. 18
  231. 18
  232. 18
  233. 18
  234. 18
  235. 18
  236. 18
  237. 18
  238. 18
  239. 18
  240. 18
  241. 18
  242. 18
  243. 18
  244. 18
  245. 18
  246. 18
  247. 18
  248. 18
  249. 17
  250. 17
  251. 17
  252. 17
  253. 17
  254. 17
  255. 17
  256. 17
  257. 17
  258. 17
  259. 17
  260. 17
  261. 17
  262. 17
  263. 17
  264. 17
  265. 17
  266. 17
  267. 17
  268. 17
  269. 17
  270. 17
  271. 17
  272. 17
  273. 17
  274. 16
  275. 16
  276. 16
  277. 16
  278. 16
  279. 16
  280. 16
  281. 16
  282. 16
  283. 16
  284. 16
  285. 16
  286. 16
  287. 16
  288. 16
  289. 16
  290. 16
  291. 16
  292. 16
  293. 16
  294. 16
  295. 16
  296. 16
  297. 16
  298. 16
  299. 16
  300. 16
  301. 16
  302. 16
  303. 16
  304. 16
  305. 15
  306. 15
  307. 15
  308. 15
  309. 15
  310. 15
  311. 15
  312. 15
  313. 15
  314. 15
  315. 15
  316. 15
  317. 15
  318. 15
  319. 15
  320. 15
  321. 15
  322. 15
  323. 15
  324. 15
  325. 15
  326. 15
  327. 15
  328. 15
  329. 15
  330. 15
  331. 15
  332. 15
  333. 15
  334. 15
  335. 14
  336. 14
  337. 14
  338. 14
  339. 14
  340. 14
  341. 14
  342. 14
  343. 14
  344. 14
  345. 14
  346. 14
  347. 14
  348. 14
  349. 14
  350. 14
  351. 14
  352. 14
  353. 14
  354. 14
  355. 14
  356. 14
  357. 14
  358. 14
  359. 14
  360. 14
  361. 14
  362. 14
  363. 14
  364. 14
  365. 14
  366. 14
  367. 14
  368. 14
  369. 14
  370. 14
  371. 14
  372. 14
  373. 14
  374. 14
  375. 14
  376. 14
  377. 14
  378. 13
  379. 13
  380. 13
  381. 13
  382. 13
  383. 13
  384. 13
  385. 13
  386. 13
  387. 13
  388. 13
  389. 13
  390. 13
  391. 13
  392. 13
  393. 13
  394. 13
  395. 13
  396. 13
  397. 13
  398. 13
  399. 13
  400. 13
  401. 13
  402. 13
  403. 13
  404. 13
  405. 13
  406. 13
  407. 13
  408. 13
  409. 13
  410. 13
  411. 13
  412. 13
  413. 13
  414. 12
  415. 12
  416. 12
  417. 12
  418. 12
  419. 12
  420. 12
  421. 12
  422. 12
  423. 12
  424. 12
  425. 12
  426. 12
  427. 12
  428. 12
  429. 12
  430. 12
  431. 12
  432. 12
  433. 12
  434. 12
  435. 12
  436. 12
  437. 12
  438. 12
  439. 12
  440. 12
  441.  @jiangzuodong2  Sure you "did". 🙄 You guys blaming all this on the media and claiming anyone who disagrees, has not done their "research" is straight out of the rights play book. Especially with someone who does do her own. Yep! 🙄 Weirdly enough, every Trump supporter ( and only Trump supporters ) has a mother's, uncle's, girlfriend's, gardner, "had" their death certificate or covid-19 test "forged". They all either died from a "heart attack" or "car crash" too, and the ones who's tests where "forged", all went and never took the test because they had to "leave early.... 🤔 And they only seem to ever bring them up, right after the ridiculousness of the same standard deflections, baseless claims and conspiracy theories. - "Less then 1% has died, who caught Covid 19." 5,135,360 Cases 164,836 Deaths 3.20% given today's current count - "It was all planned by the Left to make Trump look bad." One that, apparently, every Med Examiner and coroner in the country is "in on". - Which is clearly because the left wants mail in ballets, so they can "commit voter fraud" to win. 2 Decades/20 years/5 presidential elections = 1285 cases of voter fraud Most of which had nothing to do with mail in ballets. Most of which where, however, found on the right side of the isle. 5 states have had nothing but mail in ballets with no problem. We have had mail in ballets in this country sense 1967. Trump has voted with mail in ballets. - Media bias against Trump rallies and protests... But not "ANTIFA" or "BLM". I would challenge anyone to name a national station that hasn't mentioned or asked the question about the potential risk involving Covid 19, in regards to the BLM protests and Confederate monuments protests... Not once... But several times. You wont find one. You will see a whole lot more of those protestors wearing masks and separating then you will at any Trump rally. Just ask all the sick and quarantined Secret Service members. - "More are dying from the flu." 2019 flu deaths (at most) 61,000 in a Year. Covid death in half that time 164,836 "Car accidents" are not deadly and contagious, last time I checked. Apple's and Oranges Deflection.
    12
  442. 12
  443. 12
  444. 12
  445. 12
  446. 12
  447. 12
  448. 12
  449. 12
  450. 12
  451. 12
  452. 12
  453. 12
  454. 12
  455. 12
  456. 12
  457. 12
  458. 12
  459. 12
  460. 12
  461. 12
  462. 12
  463. 11
  464. 11
  465. 11
  466. 11
  467. 11
  468. 11
  469. 11
  470. 11
  471. 11
  472. 11
  473. 11
  474. 11
  475. 11
  476. 11
  477. 11
  478. 11
  479. 11
  480. 11
  481. 11
  482. 11
  483. 11
  484. 11
  485. 11
  486. 11
  487. 11
  488. 11
  489. 11
  490. 11
  491. 11
  492. 11
  493. 11
  494. 11
  495. 11
  496. 11
  497. 11
  498. 11
  499. 11
  500. 11
  501. 11
  502. 11
  503. 11
  504. 11
  505. 11
  506. 11
  507. 11
  508. 11
  509. 11
  510. 11
  511. 11
  512. 11
  513. 11
  514. 11
  515. 11
  516. 11
  517. 11
  518. 11
  519. 11
  520. 11
  521. 11
  522. 11
  523. 11
  524. 11
  525. 11
  526. 11
  527. 11
  528. 11
  529. 11
  530. 11
  531. 11
  532. 11
  533.  @billboon  And great! We can support them by recognising the mistakes "we" made in the past, to get them into this situation, so we don't end up repeating them. Like these! 👉He.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic and America, just exactly like covid-19 and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obama. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 has magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cares, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, we're literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the world worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away by several different dates and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a coded safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claims, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineer is building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    11
  534. 11
  535. 11
  536. 11
  537. 11
  538. 11
  539. 11
  540. 11
  541. 11
  542. 11
  543. 11
  544. 11
  545. 11
  546. 10
  547. 10
  548. 10
  549. 10
  550. 10
  551. 10
  552. 10
  553. 10
  554. 10
  555. 10
  556. 10
  557. 10
  558. 10
  559. 10
  560. 10
  561. 10
  562. 10
  563. 10
  564. 10
  565. 10
  566. 10
  567. 10
  568. 10
  569. 10
  570. 10
  571. 10
  572. 10
  573. 10
  574. 10
  575. 10
  576. 10
  577. 10
  578. 10
  579. 10
  580. 10
  581. 10
  582. 10
  583. 10
  584. 10
  585. 10
  586. 10
  587. 10
  588. 10
  589. 10
  590. 10
  591. 10
  592. 10
  593. 10
  594. 10
  595. 10
  596. 10
  597. 10
  598. 10
  599. 10
  600. 10
  601. 10
  602. 10
  603. 10
  604. 10
  605. 10
  606. 10
  607. 10
  608. 10
  609. 10
  610. 10
  611. 10
  612. 10
  613. 10
  614. 10
  615. 10
  616. 10
  617. 10
  618. 10
  619. 10
  620. 10
  621. 10
  622. 10
  623. 10
  624. 10
  625. 10
  626. 10
  627. 10
  628. 10
  629. 10
  630. 10
  631. 10
  632. 10
  633. 10
  634. 10
  635. 10
  636. 10
  637. 10
  638. 10
  639. 9
  640. 9
  641. 9
  642. 9
  643. 9
  644. 9
  645. 9
  646. 9
  647. 9
  648. 9
  649. 9
  650. 9
  651. 9
  652. 9
  653. 9
  654. 9
  655. 9
  656. 9
  657. 9
  658. 9
  659. 9
  660. 9
  661. 9
  662. 9
  663. 9
  664. 9
  665. 9
  666. 9
  667. 9
  668. 9
  669. 9
  670. 9
  671. 9
  672. 9
  673. 9
  674. 9
  675. 9
  676. 9
  677. 9
  678. 9
  679. 9
  680. 9
  681. 9
  682. 9
  683. 9
  684. 9
  685. 9
  686. 9
  687. 9
  688. 9
  689. 9
  690. 9
  691. 9
  692. 9
  693. 9
  694. 9
  695. 9
  696. 9
  697. 9
  698. 9
  699. 9
  700. 9
  701. 9
  702. 9
  703. 9
  704. 9
  705. 9
  706. 9
  707. 9
  708. 9
  709. 9
  710. 9
  711. 9
  712. 9
  713. 9
  714. 9
  715. 9
  716. 9
  717. 9
  718. 9
  719. 9
  720. 9
  721. 9
  722. 9
  723. 9
  724. 9
  725. 9
  726. 9
  727. 9
  728. 9
  729. 9
  730. 9
  731. 9
  732. 9
  733. 9
  734. 9
  735. 9
  736. 9
  737. 9
  738. 9
  739. 9
  740. 9
  741. 9
  742. 9
  743. 9
  744. 9
  745. 9
  746. 9
  747. 9
  748. 9
  749. 9
  750. 9
  751. 9
  752. 9
  753. 9
  754. 9
  755. 9
  756. 9
  757. 9
  758. 9
  759. 9
  760. 9
  761. 9
  762. 9
  763. 9
  764. 9
  765. 9
  766. 9
  767. 9
  768. 9
  769. 9
  770. 9
  771. 9
  772. 9
  773. 9
  774. 9
  775. 9
  776. 9
  777. 9
  778. 9
  779. 9
  780. 8
  781. 8
  782. 8
  783. 8
  784. 8
  785. 8
  786. 8
  787. 8
  788. 8
  789. 8
  790. 8
  791. 8
  792. 8
  793. 8
  794. 8
  795. 8
  796. 8
  797. 8
  798. 8
  799. 8
  800. 8
  801. 8
  802. 8
  803. 8
  804. 8
  805. 8
  806. 8
  807. 8
  808. 8
  809. 8
  810. 8
  811. 8
  812. 8
  813. 8
  814. 8
  815. 8
  816. 8
  817. 8
  818. 8
  819. 8
  820. 8
  821. 8
  822. 8
  823. 8
  824. 8
  825. 8
  826. 8
  827. 8
  828. 8
  829. 8
  830. 8
  831. 8
  832. 8
  833. 8
  834. 8
  835. 8
  836. 8
  837. 8
  838. 8
  839. 8
  840. 8
  841. 8
  842. 8
  843. 8
  844. 8
  845. 8
  846. 8
  847. 8
  848. 8
  849. 8
  850. 8
  851. 8
  852. 8
  853. 8
  854. 8
  855. 8
  856. 8
  857. 8
  858. 8
  859. 8
  860. 8
  861. 8
  862. 8
  863. 8
  864. 8
  865. 8
  866. 8
  867. 8
  868. 8
  869. 8
  870. 8
  871. 8
  872. 8
  873. 8
  874. 8
  875. 8
  876. 8
  877. 8
  878. 8
  879. 8
  880. 8
  881. 8
  882. 8
  883. 8
  884. 8
  885. 8
  886. 8
  887. 8
  888. 8
  889. 8
  890. 8
  891. 8
  892. 8
  893. 8
  894. 8
  895. 8
  896. 8
  897. 8
  898. 8
  899. 8
  900. 8
  901. 8
  902. 8
  903. 8
  904. 8
  905. 8
  906. 8
  907. 8
  908. 8
  909. 8
  910. 8
  911. 8
  912. 8
  913. 8
  914. 8
  915. 8
  916. 8
  917. 8
  918. 8
  919. 8
  920. 8
  921. 8
  922. 8
  923. 8
  924. 8
  925. 8
  926. 8
  927. 8
  928. 8
  929. 8
  930. 8
  931. 8
  932. 8
  933. 8
  934. 8
  935. 8
  936. 8
  937. 8
  938. 8
  939. 8
  940. 8
  941. 8
  942. 8
  943. 8
  944. 8
  945. 8
  946. 8
  947. 8
  948. 8
  949. 8
  950. 8
  951. 8
  952. 8
  953. 8
  954. 8
  955. 8
  956. 8
  957. 8
  958. 8
  959. 8
  960. 8
  961. 8
  962. 8
  963. 8
  964. 8
  965. 8
  966. 8
  967. 8
  968. 8
  969. 8
  970. 8
  971. 8
  972. 8
  973. 8
  974. 8
  975. 8
  976. 8
  977. 8
  978. 8
  979. 8
  980. 8
  981. 8
  982. 7
  983. 7
  984. 7
  985. 7
  986. 7
  987. 7
  988. 7
  989. 7
  990. 7
  991. 7
  992. 7
  993. 7
  994. 7
  995. 7
  996. 7
  997. 7
  998. 7
  999. 7
  1000. 7
  1001. 7
  1002. 7
  1003. 7
  1004. 7
  1005. 7
  1006. 7
  1007. 7
  1008. 7
  1009. 7
  1010. 7
  1011. 7
  1012. 7
  1013. 7
  1014. 7
  1015. 7
  1016. 7
  1017. 7
  1018. 7
  1019. 7
  1020. 7
  1021. 7
  1022. 7
  1023. 7
  1024. 7
  1025. 7
  1026. 7
  1027. 7
  1028. 7
  1029. 7
  1030. 7
  1031. 7
  1032. 7
  1033. 7
  1034. 7
  1035. 7
  1036. 7
  1037. 7
  1038. 7
  1039. 7
  1040. 7
  1041. 7
  1042. 7
  1043. 7
  1044. 7
  1045. 7
  1046. 7
  1047. 7
  1048. 7
  1049. 7
  1050. 7
  1051. 7
  1052. 7
  1053. 7
  1054. 7
  1055. 7
  1056. 7
  1057. 7
  1058. 7
  1059. 7
  1060. 7
  1061. 7
  1062. 7
  1063. 7
  1064. 7
  1065. 7
  1066. 7
  1067. 7
  1068. 7
  1069. 7
  1070. 7
  1071. 7
  1072. 7
  1073. 7
  1074. 7
  1075. 7
  1076. 7
  1077. 7
  1078. 7
  1079. 7
  1080. 7
  1081. 7
  1082. 7
  1083. 7
  1084. 7
  1085. 7
  1086. 7
  1087. 7
  1088. 7
  1089. 7
  1090. 7
  1091. 7
  1092. 7
  1093. 7
  1094. 7
  1095. 7
  1096. 7
  1097. 7
  1098. 7
  1099. 7
  1100. 7
  1101. 7
  1102. 7
  1103. 7
  1104. 7
  1105. 7
  1106. 7
  1107. 7
  1108. 7
  1109. 7
  1110. 7
  1111. 7
  1112.  @clevisbernier8973  He.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    7
  1113. 7
  1114. 7
  1115. 7
  1116. 7
  1117. 7
  1118. 7
  1119. 7
  1120. 7
  1121. 7
  1122. 7
  1123. 7
  1124. 7
  1125. 7
  1126. 7
  1127. 7
  1128. 7
  1129. 7
  1130. 7
  1131. 7
  1132. 7
  1133. 7
  1134. 7
  1135. 7
  1136. 7
  1137. 7
  1138. 7
  1139. 7
  1140. 7
  1141. 7
  1142. 7
  1143. 7
  1144. 7
  1145. 7
  1146. 7
  1147. 7
  1148. 7
  1149. 7
  1150. 7
  1151. 7
  1152. 7
  1153. 7
  1154. 7
  1155. 7
  1156. 7
  1157. 7
  1158. 7
  1159. 7
  1160. 7
  1161. 7
  1162. 7
  1163. 7
  1164. 7
  1165. 7
  1166. 7
  1167. 7
  1168. 7
  1169. 7
  1170. 7
  1171. 7
  1172. 7
  1173. 7
  1174. 7
  1175. 7
  1176. 7
  1177. 7
  1178. 7
  1179. 7
  1180. 7
  1181. 7
  1182. 7
  1183. 7
  1184. 7
  1185. 7
  1186. 7
  1187. 7
  1188. 7
  1189. 7
  1190. 7
  1191. 7
  1192. 7
  1193. 7
  1194. 7
  1195. 7
  1196. 7
  1197. 7
  1198. 7
  1199. 7
  1200. 7
  1201. 7
  1202. 7
  1203. 7
  1204. 7
  1205. 7
  1206. 7
  1207. 7
  1208. 7
  1209. 7
  1210. 7
  1211. 7
  1212. 7
  1213. 7
  1214. 7
  1215. 7
  1216. 7
  1217. 7
  1218. 7
  1219. 7
  1220. 7
  1221. 7
  1222. 7
  1223. 7
  1224. 7
  1225. 7
  1226. 7
  1227. 7
  1228. 7
  1229. 7
  1230. 7
  1231. 7
  1232. 7
  1233. 7
  1234. 7
  1235. 7
  1236. 7
  1237. 7
  1238. 7
  1239. 6
  1240. 6
  1241. 6
  1242. 6
  1243. 6
  1244. 6
  1245. 6
  1246. 6
  1247. 6
  1248. 6
  1249. 6
  1250. 6
  1251. 6
  1252. 6
  1253. 6
  1254. 6
  1255. 6
  1256. 6
  1257. 6
  1258. 6
  1259. 6
  1260. 6
  1261. 6
  1262. 6
  1263. 6
  1264. 6
  1265. 6
  1266. 6
  1267. 6
  1268. 6
  1269. 6
  1270. 6
  1271. 6
  1272. 6
  1273. 6
  1274. 6
  1275. 6
  1276. 6
  1277. 6
  1278. 6
  1279. 6
  1280. 6
  1281. 6
  1282. 6
  1283. 6
  1284. 6
  1285. 6
  1286. 6
  1287. 6
  1288. 6
  1289. 6
  1290. 6
  1291. 6
  1292. 6
  1293. 6
  1294. 6
  1295. 6
  1296. 6
  1297. 6
  1298. 6
  1299. 6
  1300. 6
  1301. 6
  1302. 6
  1303. 6
  1304. 6
  1305. 6
  1306. 6
  1307. 6
  1308. 6
  1309. 6
  1310. 6
  1311. 6
  1312. 6
  1313. 6
  1314. 6
  1315. 6
  1316. 6
  1317. 6
  1318. 6
  1319. 6
  1320. 6
  1321. 6
  1322. 6
  1323. 6
  1324. 6
  1325. 6
  1326. 6
  1327. 6
  1328. 6
  1329. 6
  1330. 6
  1331. 6
  1332. 6
  1333. 6
  1334. 6
  1335. 6
  1336. 6
  1337. 6
  1338. 6
  1339. 6
  1340. 6
  1341. 6
  1342. 6
  1343. 6
  1344. 6
  1345. 6
  1346. 6
  1347. 6
  1348. 6
  1349. 6
  1350. 6
  1351. 6
  1352. 6
  1353. 6
  1354. 6
  1355. 6
  1356. 6
  1357. 6
  1358. 6
  1359. 6
  1360. 6
  1361. 6
  1362. 6
  1363. 6
  1364. 6
  1365. 6
  1366. 6
  1367. 6
  1368. 6
  1369. 6
  1370. 6
  1371. 6
  1372. 6
  1373. 6
  1374. 6
  1375. 6
  1376. 6
  1377. 6
  1378. 6
  1379. 6
  1380. 6
  1381. 6
  1382. 6
  1383. 6
  1384. 6
  1385. 6
  1386. 6
  1387. 6
  1388. 6
  1389. 6
  1390. 6
  1391. 6
  1392. 6
  1393. 6
  1394. 6
  1395. 6
  1396. 6
  1397. 6
  1398. 6
  1399. 6
  1400. 6
  1401. 6
  1402. 6
  1403. 6
  1404. 6
  1405. 6
  1406. 6
  1407. 6
  1408. 6
  1409. 6
  1410. 6
  1411. 6
  1412. 6
  1413. 6
  1414. 6
  1415. 6
  1416. 6
  1417. 6
  1418. 6
  1419. 6
  1420. 6
  1421. 6
  1422. 6
  1423. 6
  1424. 6
  1425. 6
  1426. 6
  1427. 6
  1428. 6
  1429. 6
  1430. 6
  1431. 6
  1432. 6
  1433. 6
  1434. 6
  1435. 6
  1436. 6
  1437. 6
  1438. 6
  1439. 6
  1440. 6
  1441. 6
  1442. 6
  1443. 6
  1444. 6
  1445. 6
  1446. 6
  1447. 6
  1448. 6
  1449. 6
  1450. 6
  1451. 6
  1452. 6
  1453. 6
  1454. 6
  1455. 6
  1456. 6
  1457. 6
  1458. 6
  1459. 6
  1460. 6
  1461. 6
  1462. 6
  1463. 6
  1464. 6
  1465. 6
  1466. 6
  1467. 6
  1468. 6
  1469. 6
  1470. 6
  1471. 6
  1472. 6
  1473. 6
  1474. 6
  1475. 6
  1476. 6
  1477. 6
  1478. 6
  1479. 6
  1480. 6
  1481. 6
  1482. 6
  1483. 6
  1484. 6
  1485. 6
  1486. 6
  1487. 6
  1488. 6
  1489. 6
  1490. 6
  1491. 6
  1492. 6
  1493. 6
  1494. 6
  1495. 6
  1496. 6
  1497. 6
  1498. 6
  1499. 6
  1500. 6
  1501. 6
  1502. 6
  1503. 6
  1504. 6
  1505. 6
  1506. 6
  1507. 6
  1508. 6
  1509. 6
  1510. 6
  1511. 6
  1512. 6
  1513. 6
  1514. 6
  1515. 6
  1516. 6
  1517. 6
  1518. 6
  1519. 6
  1520. 6
  1521. 6
  1522. 6
  1523. 6
  1524. 6
  1525. 6
  1526. 6
  1527. 6
  1528. 6
  1529. 6
  1530. 6
  1531. 6
  1532. 6
  1533. 6
  1534. 6
  1535. 6
  1536. 6
  1537. 6
  1538. 6
  1539. 6
  1540. 6
  1541. 6
  1542. 6
  1543. 6
  1544. 6
  1545. 6
  1546. 6
  1547. 6
  1548. 6
  1549. 6
  1550. 6
  1551. 6
  1552. 6
  1553. 6
  1554. 6
  1555. 6
  1556. 6
  1557. 6
  1558. 6
  1559. 6
  1560. 6
  1561. 6
  1562. 6
  1563. 6
  1564. 6
  1565. 6
  1566. 6
  1567. 6
  1568. 6
  1569. 6
  1570. 6
  1571. 6
  1572. 6
  1573. 6
  1574. 6
  1575. 6
  1576. 6
  1577. 6
  1578. 6
  1579. 6
  1580. 6
  1581. 6
  1582. 6
  1583. 6
  1584. 6
  1585. 6
  1586. 6
  1587. 6
  1588. 6
  1589. 6
  1590. 6
  1591. 6
  1592. 6
  1593. 6
  1594. 6
  1595. 6
  1596. 6
  1597. 6
  1598. 6
  1599. 6
  1600. 6
  1601. 6
  1602. 6
  1603. 6
  1604. 6
  1605. 6
  1606. 6
  1607. 6
  1608. 6
  1609. 6
  1610. 6
  1611. 6
  1612. 6
  1613. 6
  1614. 6
  1615. 6
  1616. 6
  1617. 6
  1618. 6
  1619. 6
  1620. 6
  1621. 6
  1622. 6
  1623. 6
  1624. 6
  1625. 6
  1626. 6
  1627. 6
  1628. 6
  1629. 5
  1630. 5
  1631. 5
  1632. 5
  1633. 5
  1634. 5
  1635. 5
  1636. 5
  1637. 5
  1638. 5
  1639. 5
  1640. 5
  1641. 5
  1642. 5
  1643. 5
  1644. 5
  1645. 5
  1646. 5
  1647. 5
  1648. 5
  1649. 5
  1650. 5
  1651. 5
  1652. 5
  1653. 5
  1654. 5
  1655. 5
  1656. 5
  1657. 5
  1658. 5
  1659. 5
  1660. 5
  1661. 5
  1662. 5
  1663. 5
  1664. 5
  1665. 5
  1666. 5
  1667. 5
  1668. 5
  1669. 5
  1670. 5
  1671. 5
  1672. 5
  1673. 5
  1674. 5
  1675. 5
  1676. 5
  1677. 5
  1678. 5
  1679. 5
  1680. 5
  1681. 5
  1682. 5
  1683. 5
  1684. 5
  1685. 5
  1686. 5
  1687. 5
  1688. 5
  1689. 5
  1690. 5
  1691. 5
  1692. 5
  1693. 5
  1694. 5
  1695. 5
  1696. 5
  1697. 5
  1698. 5
  1699. 5
  1700. 5
  1701. 5
  1702. 5
  1703. 5
  1704. 5
  1705. 5
  1706. 5
  1707. 5
  1708. 5
  1709. 5
  1710. 5
  1711. 5
  1712. 5
  1713. 5
  1714. 5
  1715. 5
  1716. 5
  1717. 5
  1718. 5
  1719. 5
  1720. 5
  1721. 5
  1722. 5
  1723. 5
  1724. 5
  1725. 5
  1726. 5
  1727. 5
  1728. 5
  1729. 5
  1730. 5
  1731. 5
  1732. 5
  1733. 5
  1734. 5
  1735. 5
  1736. 5
  1737. 5
  1738. 5
  1739. 5
  1740. 5
  1741. 5
  1742. 5
  1743. 5
  1744. 5
  1745. 5
  1746. 5
  1747. 5
  1748. 5
  1749. 5
  1750. 5
  1751. 5
  1752. 5
  1753. 5
  1754. 5
  1755. 5
  1756. 5
  1757. 5
  1758. 5
  1759. 5
  1760. 5
  1761. 5
  1762. 5
  1763. 5
  1764. 5
  1765. 5
  1766. 5
  1767. 5
  1768. 5
  1769. 5
  1770. 5
  1771. 5
  1772. 5
  1773. 5
  1774. 5
  1775. 5
  1776. 5
  1777. 5
  1778. 5
  1779. 5
  1780. 5
  1781. 5
  1782. 5
  1783. 5
  1784. 5
  1785. 5
  1786. 5
  1787. 5
  1788. 5
  1789. 5
  1790. 5
  1791. 5
  1792. 5
  1793. 5
  1794. 5
  1795. 5
  1796. 5
  1797. 5
  1798. 5
  1799. 5
  1800. 5
  1801. 5
  1802. 5
  1803. 5
  1804. 5
  1805. 5
  1806. 5
  1807. 5
  1808. 5
  1809. 5
  1810. 5
  1811. 5
  1812. 5
  1813. 5
  1814. 5
  1815. 5
  1816. 5
  1817. 5
  1818. 5
  1819. 5
  1820. 5
  1821. 5
  1822. 5
  1823. 5
  1824. 5
  1825. 5
  1826. 5
  1827. 5
  1828. 5
  1829. 5
  1830. 5
  1831. 5
  1832. 5
  1833. 5
  1834. 5
  1835. 5
  1836. 5
  1837. 5
  1838. 5
  1839. 5
  1840. 5
  1841. 5
  1842. 5
  1843. 5
  1844. 5
  1845. 5
  1846. 5
  1847. 5
  1848. 5
  1849. 5
  1850. 5
  1851. 5
  1852. 5
  1853. 5
  1854. 5
  1855. 5
  1856. 5
  1857. 5
  1858. 5
  1859. 5
  1860. 5
  1861. 5
  1862. 5
  1863. 5
  1864. 5
  1865. 5
  1866. 5
  1867. 5
  1868. 5
  1869. 5
  1870. 5
  1871. 5
  1872. 5
  1873. 5
  1874. 5
  1875. 5
  1876. 5
  1877. 5
  1878. 5
  1879. 5
  1880. 5
  1881. 5
  1882. 5
  1883. 5
  1884. 5
  1885. 5
  1886. 5
  1887. 5
  1888. 5
  1889. 5
  1890. 5
  1891. 5
  1892. 5
  1893. 5
  1894. 5
  1895. 5
  1896. 5
  1897. 5
  1898. 5
  1899. 5
  1900. 5
  1901. 5
  1902. 5
  1903. 5
  1904. 5
  1905. 5
  1906. 5
  1907. 5
  1908. 5
  1909. 5
  1910. 5
  1911. 5
  1912. 5
  1913. 5
  1914. 5
  1915. 5
  1916. 5
  1917. 5
  1918. 5
  1919. 5
  1920. 5
  1921. 5
  1922. 5
  1923. 5
  1924. 5
  1925. 5
  1926. 5
  1927. 5
  1928. 5
  1929. 5
  1930. 5
  1931. 5
  1932. 5
  1933. 5
  1934. 5
  1935. 5
  1936. 5
  1937. 5
  1938. 5
  1939. 5
  1940. 5
  1941. 5
  1942. 5
  1943. 5
  1944. 5
  1945. 5
  1946. 5
  1947. 5
  1948. 5
  1949. 5
  1950. 5
  1951.  @seanconsack2786  He is responsible for... -Ignoring the 33 page, expertly laid out, pandemic CONTAINMENT plan he had on day one because the Obama Administration commissioned it. - discouraging people from listening to Medical experts about personal safety and spread protocols - not setting an example with masks his rallies and a myriad of other things as the leader of this country during the worst worldwide pandemic and over a hundred years. - pushing multiple snake oil cures during this pandemic and taking absolutely none of them when he got sick. - calling the severity of this virus a democratic hoax. - discouraging testing so his numbers would look better. - trying to defund public education as a threat to force parents teachers and administrators I'm bringing children back to school when it wasn't safe. - defending the process of refilling the medical stock piles, which in turn left each state to fend for themselves and sent them into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives. - tried to pretend for a good two and a half months that covid-19 had just magically gone away. - claimed you wouldn't hear about covid-19 anymore after the election. - claimed that he shut down the border to China but allowed over 40,000 people to come from China after doing so. - tried to blame the US infection rate on Mexico. - set several different dates that he claimed covid-19 would magically go away and got every single one of them wrong. - openly and frequently tried to play Down the severity of covid-19 by comparing it to the common flu. - continuously claimed that 99% of all covid-19 uses are totally harmless. - continuously lied about the covid-19 mortality rate in America. - by pure neglect and incompetence caused a larger job, housing and economic downturn worse than the Great Depression. - lied about a CDC study showing that 85% of the people wearing masks catch the virus. - lied about Google Engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the Coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. - claimed that the only reason that cases are going up in America is because of casting. And on... And on... And on
    5
  1952. 5
  1953. 5
  1954. 5
  1955. 5
  1956. 5
  1957. 5
  1958. 5
  1959. 5
  1960. 5
  1961. 5
  1962. 5
  1963. 5
  1964. 5
  1965. 5
  1966. 5
  1967. 5
  1968. 5
  1969. 5
  1970. 5
  1971. 5
  1972. 5
  1973. 5
  1974. 5
  1975. 5
  1976. 5
  1977. 5
  1978. 5
  1979. 5
  1980. 5
  1981. 5
  1982. 5
  1983. 5
  1984. 5
  1985. 5
  1986. 5
  1987. 5
  1988. 5
  1989. 5
  1990. 5
  1991. 5
  1992. 5
  1993. 5
  1994. 5
  1995. 5
  1996. 5
  1997. 5
  1998. 5
  1999. 5
  2000. 5
  2001. 5
  2002. 5
  2003. 5
  2004. 5
  2005. 5
  2006. 5
  2007. 5
  2008. 5
  2009. 5
  2010. 5
  2011. 5
  2012. 5
  2013. 5
  2014. 5
  2015. 5
  2016. 5
  2017. 5
  2018. 5
  2019. 5
  2020. 5
  2021. 5
  2022. 5
  2023. 5
  2024. 5
  2025. 5
  2026. 5
  2027. 5
  2028. 5
  2029. 5
  2030. 5
  2031. 5
  2032. 5
  2033. 5
  2034. 5
  2035. 5
  2036. 5
  2037. 5
  2038. 5
  2039. 5
  2040. 5
  2041. 5
  2042. 5
  2043. 5
  2044. 5
  2045. 5
  2046. 5
  2047. 5
  2048. 5
  2049. 5
  2050. 5
  2051. 5
  2052. 5
  2053. 5
  2054. 5
  2055. 5
  2056. 5
  2057. 5
  2058. 5
  2059. 5
  2060. 5
  2061. 5
  2062. 5
  2063. 5
  2064. 5
  2065. 5
  2066. 5
  2067. 5
  2068. 5
  2069. 5
  2070. 5
  2071. 5
  2072. 5
  2073. 5
  2074. 5
  2075. 5
  2076. 5
  2077. 5
  2078. 5
  2079. 5
  2080. 5
  2081. 5
  2082. 5
  2083. 5
  2084. 5
  2085. 5
  2086. 5
  2087. 5
  2088. 5
  2089. 5
  2090. 5
  2091. 5
  2092. 5
  2093. 5
  2094. 5
  2095.  @ryantaylor3828  Wow! Those are some racist ass stereotypey tropes. Also you are deflecting from what the Republicans have been doing to African Americans and Hispanic people for the past 80 plus years. The father of my child is black. He has a master's degree. He is a retired soldier from the Air Force. His father was never around. He's one of the best people I know. He's my best friend. He's the best father I've ever seen in my life. He is a published author. Never once been in a gang. If you want to talk about social welfare programs like welfare checks... then start talking about a living wage. In America for almost 60 years now, inflation and worker productivity have gone up but the minimum wage has not met that. Meaning we're working harder and things are getting more expensive but we're not getting paid what we're worth. If you want to get people off welfare, start there. As far as you trying to shove words into my mouth, that's just you trying to set up an argument you can argue against. Look up the history of the southern Dems and the party flip. Look at the platforms of southern Dems back then and the Reps of today. If you want to take history into account, then you're going to have to take the entirety of the history into account and not just what fits your narrative. If that offends you, then I don't know what to tell you. I, myself, live down south. If I was born over a hundred years ago, I would have been a registered Republican. I was born in 84, however. In this day and age the racist and bigots are on the Republican side. They show up to your rallies and support your candidates. If you don't like that, I don't know what to tell you. Get them to stop I guess.... But here's the part that you just sail right past in your little self-righteous speech. If you gave a damn about black people or minorities at all, you would care no matter what side it was on. Yet you only seem to care about the Democratic side. You're just one of those little posers that like to use racism to attack the left with it, because you got tired of the right having to defend it. So why are you using the platform of racism, a history that has caused more than enough pain for a million lifetimes, to attack one side, while ignoring the other?
    5
  2096. 5
  2097. 5
  2098. 5
  2099. 5
  2100. 5
  2101. 5
  2102. 5
  2103. 5
  2104. 5
  2105. 5
  2106. 5
  2107. 5
  2108. 5
  2109. 5
  2110. 5
  2111. 5
  2112. 5
  2113. 5
  2114. 5
  2115. 5
  2116. 5
  2117. 5
  2118. 5
  2119. 5
  2120. 5
  2121. 5
  2122. 5
  2123. 5
  2124. 5
  2125. 5
  2126. 5
  2127. 5
  2128. 5
  2129. 5
  2130. 5
  2131. 5
  2132. 5
  2133. 5
  2134. 5
  2135. 5
  2136. 5
  2137. 5
  2138. 5
  2139. 5
  2140. 5
  2141. 5
  2142. 5
  2143. 5
  2144. 5
  2145. 5
  2146. 5
  2147. 5
  2148. 5
  2149. 5
  2150. 5
  2151. 5
  2152. 5
  2153. 5
  2154. 5
  2155. 5
  2156. 5
  2157. 5
  2158. 5
  2159. 5
  2160. 5
  2161. 5
  2162. 5
  2163. 5
  2164. 5
  2165. 5
  2166. 5
  2167. 5
  2168. 5
  2169. 5
  2170. 5
  2171. 5
  2172. 5
  2173. 5
  2174. 5
  2175. 5
  2176. 5
  2177. 5
  2178. 5
  2179. 5
  2180. 5
  2181. 5
  2182. 5
  2183. 5
  2184. 5
  2185. 5
  2186. 5
  2187. 5
  2188. 5
  2189. 5
  2190. 5
  2191. 5
  2192. 5
  2193. 5
  2194. 5
  2195. 5
  2196. 5
  2197. 5
  2198. 5
  2199. 5
  2200. 5
  2201. 5
  2202. 5
  2203. 5
  2204. 5
  2205. 5
  2206. 5
  2207. 5
  2208. 5
  2209. 5
  2210. 5
  2211. 5
  2212. 5
  2213. 5
  2214. 5
  2215. 5
  2216. 5
  2217. 5
  2218. 5
  2219. 5
  2220. 5
  2221. 5
  2222. 5
  2223. 5
  2224. 5
  2225. 5
  2226. 5
  2227. 5
  2228. 5
  2229. 5
  2230. 5
  2231. 5
  2232. 5
  2233. 5
  2234. 5
  2235. 5
  2236. 5
  2237. 5
  2238. 5
  2239. 5
  2240. 5
  2241. 5
  2242. 5
  2243. 5
  2244. 5
  2245. 5
  2246. 5
  2247. 5
  2248. 5
  2249. 5
  2250. 5
  2251. 5
  2252. 5
  2253. 5
  2254. 5
  2255. 5
  2256. 5
  2257. 5
  2258. 5
  2259. 5
  2260. 5
  2261. 5
  2262. 5
  2263. 5
  2264. 5
  2265. 5
  2266. 5
  2267. 5
  2268. 5
  2269. 5
  2270. 5
  2271. 5
  2272. 5
  2273. 5
  2274. 5
  2275. 5
  2276. 5
  2277. 5
  2278. 5
  2279. 5
  2280. 5
  2281. 5
  2282. 5
  2283. 5
  2284. 5
  2285. 5
  2286. 5
  2287. 5
  2288. 5
  2289. 5
  2290. 5
  2291. 5
  2292. 5
  2293. 5
  2294. 5
  2295. 5
  2296. 5
  2297. 5
  2298. 5
  2299. 5
  2300. 5
  2301. 5
  2302. 5
  2303. 5
  2304. 5
  2305. 5
  2306. 5
  2307. 4
  2308. 4
  2309. 4
  2310. 4
  2311. 4
  2312. 4
  2313. 4
  2314. 4
  2315. 4
  2316. 4
  2317. 4
  2318. 4
  2319. 4
  2320.  @mikejohnson9606  1. Freedom dividend 2. Human centered capitalism 3. Reducing student loan burdens 4. Implement mandatory paid leave policy 5. Right to privacy abortion and contraception 6. Value added tax making it easier to save for retirement 7. Promote vocational education 8. Decrease pretrial cash bail 9. Free financial counseling for all 10. Paid family leave 11. Fight for Equal Pay 12. Legalized marijuana 13. Provide basic banking services through the post office 14. Prosperity grants 15. Increase assistance for single parents 16. Timing of payments for small businesses 17. Financial transaction 18. Tax data as a priority 19. Capital gains carried interest tax 20. No bidding wars for corporate relocation 21. Empowering MMA fighters 22. The penny makes no cents 23. NCAA should pay athletes 24. Cabinet climate change 25. Reduce wildfires 26. Carbon-free and dividend 27. Reduce packaging waste 28. Nuclear energy 29. Grid modernization race to the top 30. Rebuilding American infrastructure 31. Ranked-choice voting 32. Democracy dollars 33. 12 year Congressional term limits 34. Restoration of voting rights 35. Automatic voter registration 36. Make Washington DC a state 37. Partisan gerrymandering 38. Public Council of advisors 39. Make Election Day a holiday 40. 18-year term for Supreme Court Justices 41. Revise the office of Technology assessment 42. Relocate federal agencies 43. Reduce mass incarceration 44. Prevent corruption in the federal government 45. Campaign Finance reform 46. Make Puerto Rico a state 47. American journalism fellows 48. Closely monitor mental health of White House staff 49. Local journalism fund 50. Automatically Sunset old laws 51. Modernizing voting 52. Lowering the voting age to 16 53. Improving the Electoral College 54. Net neutrality 55. Lgbtq rights 56. Fighting the rise of white nationalism and extremism 57. Gun safety 58. Data as a property right 59. Medicare for all 60. Control the cost of higher education 61. Increase teacher salaries Just a few! 😉✌
    4
  2321. 4
  2322. 4
  2323. 4
  2324. 4
  2325. 4
  2326. 4
  2327. 4
  2328. 4
  2329. 4
  2330. 4
  2331. 4
  2332. 4
  2333.  @tmech8183  Guess Golf is what they use to call... - rescuing the country from the Great Recession, cutting the unemployment rate from 10% to 4.7% over 6 years - the Affordable Care Act that gave health insurance to over 20 million uninsured Americans - ending the war in Iraq - ordering the capture and kill of bin Laden - passing the 787 billion dollar American Recovery and restoration act to Spur the economic growth during the Great Recession - supporting the lgbtq communities fight for marriage equality - commuting the sentences of nearly 1,200 drug offenders to reverse unjust and outdated prison sentences - saving the US Auto industry - helping put the US on track for energy independence by 2020 - beginning the drawdown of troops in Afghanistan - signing the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform and consumer protection act 2 re-regulate the financial sector - dropping the veteran homeless rate by 50% - reversing bush-era torture policies - beginning the process of normalizing relations with Cuba - increasing Department of Veteran Affairs funding - signing the credit card accountability, responsibility and disclosure Act - boosting fuel efficiency standards for cars - improving School nutrition with the healthy hunger-free kids act - repealing the military's don't ask don't tell policy - signed the hate crimes prevention act, making it a federal crime to assault anyone based on sexual or gender identity - help negotiate the landmark Iran nuclear deal - sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to combat pay discrimination against women - nominating the first Hispanic to ever serve on the Supreme Court - supporting veterans through a 78 billion tuition assistance GI Bill .... Back in the day. 😜🤘
    4
  2334. 4
  2335. 4
  2336. 4
  2337. 4
  2338. 4
  2339. 4
  2340. 4
  2341. 4
  2342. 4
  2343. 4
  2344. 4
  2345. 4
  2346. 4
  2347. 4
  2348. 4
  2349. 4
  2350. 4
  2351. 4
  2352. 4
  2353. 4
  2354. 4
  2355. 4
  2356. 4
  2357. 4
  2358. 4
  2359. 4
  2360. 4
  2361. 4
  2362. 4
  2363. 4
  2364. 4
  2365. 4
  2366. 4
  2367. 4
  2368. 4
  2369. 4
  2370. 4
  2371. 4
  2372. 4
  2373. 4
  2374. 4
  2375. 4
  2376. 4
  2377. 4
  2378. 4
  2379. 4
  2380. 4
  2381. 4
  2382. 4
  2383. 4
  2384. 4
  2385. 4
  2386. 4
  2387. 4
  2388. 4
  2389. 4
  2390. 4
  2391. 4
  2392. 4
  2393. 4
  2394. 4
  2395. 4
  2396. 4
  2397. 4
  2398. 4
  2399. 4
  2400. 4
  2401. 4
  2402. 4
  2403. 4
  2404. 4
  2405. 4
  2406.  @Dick_Interritus  Those are a whole lot of assumptions you are making about millions of parents and children you have never met. Yes, doctors wear masks... they are also medical experts who tell us what can and cannot help us during this pandemic. I'm not a doctor and I do not have medical training. I doubt very much that you are. What I know is that medical professionals with the Education and Training to know these things are telling us that they help. They are not only telling us that but they are telling us that in droves and for almost the entirety of this pandemic. What I also know is that when it comes to Public Safety, you don't get to make that decision for other people. Which is exactly what you're doing if you're choosing not to go by the very simple guidelines for helping contain this pandemic. It's not my choice as a parent to put a mask on my child. It's my responsibility as a parent and a member of this Society. I don't get to put my wants over the needs of others in a worldwide health crisis. I don't really understand the argument that the majority of these people had other things wrong with them. What are you saying there? They are expendable? Did they have these pre-existing conditions before and it didn't kill them but then they had covid and it did. I, myself, am autoimmune compromised. I have a pre-existing health condition that can affect my immune system. Do you know what it's called? Psoriasis. It is certainly not something that's going to kill me. Does that mean I'm more Expendable? Because I certainly am not to my child. And I don't know where you say Delta is going down? Because it's spreading like wildfire down south. Which is where I live. What I know from listening to Medical experts is that there is too much of it still in the country. That's how we get the Delta variant. You get enough cases in a centralized location and it has a high probability of mutating. If it's still mutating and mutating into something worse like Delta, it's too damn much. It is certainly not the flu. That's silly missed was completely dispelled about a million times now. The flu is in no way this deadly. If you want to characterize it as living your life or living in fear then that's just you trying to give yourself an excuse not to give a damn about other people. One day we will have this controlled like we do the flu , enough as to where we can do exactly what you're saying. Today is not that day. If you want to get to that day, you're going to have to think about more than just yourself. You're going to have to stop swallowing narratives and talking points. You're going to have to listen to the actual experts.
    4
  2407. 4
  2408. 4
  2409. 4
  2410. 4
  2411. 4
  2412. 4
  2413. 4
  2414. 4
  2415. 4
  2416. 4
  2417. 4
  2418. 4
  2419. 4
  2420. 4
  2421. 4
  2422. 4
  2423. 4
  2424. 4
  2425. 4
  2426. 4
  2427. 4
  2428. 4
  2429. 4
  2430. 4
  2431. 4
  2432. 4
  2433. 4
  2434. 4
  2435. 4
  2436. 4
  2437. 4
  2438. 4
  2439. 4
  2440. 4
  2441. 4
  2442. 4
  2443. 4
  2444. 4
  2445. 4
  2446. 4
  2447. 4
  2448. 4
  2449. 4
  2450. 4
  2451. 4
  2452. 4
  2453. 4
  2454. 4
  2455. 4
  2456. 4
  2457. 4
  2458. 4
  2459. 4
  2460. 4
  2461. 4
  2462. 4
  2463. 4
  2464. 4
  2465. 4
  2466. 4
  2467. 4
  2468. 4
  2469. 4
  2470. 4
  2471. 4
  2472. 4
  2473.  @erico4868  Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations." And thats just some from before he ran for office.
    4
  2474. 4
  2475. 4
  2476. 4
  2477. 4
  2478. 4
  2479. 4
  2480. 4
  2481. 4
  2482. 4
  2483. 4
  2484. 4
  2485. 4
  2486. 4
  2487. 4
  2488. 4
  2489. 4
  2490. 4
  2491. 4
  2492. 4
  2493. 4
  2494. 4
  2495. 4
  2496. 4
  2497. 4
  2498. 4
  2499. 4
  2500. 4
  2501. 4
  2502. 4
  2503. 4
  2504. 4
  2505. 4
  2506. 4
  2507. 4
  2508. 4
  2509. 4
  2510. 4
  2511. 4
  2512. 4
  2513. 4
  2514. 4
  2515. 4
  2516. 4
  2517. 4
  2518. 4
  2519. 4
  2520. 4
  2521. 4
  2522. 4
  2523. 4
  2524. 4
  2525. 4
  2526. 4
  2527. 4
  2528. 4
  2529. 4
  2530. 4
  2531. 4
  2532. 4
  2533. 4
  2534. 4
  2535. 4
  2536. 4
  2537. 4
  2538.  @nickbierman3640  In Georgia, for example, the House has passed a sweeping bill that would limit early-voting hours on weekends and restrict the use of drop boxes for mail ballots, among other provisions. The state Senate, meanwhile, approved a measure that would eliminate no-excuses absentee voting altogether — limiting eligibility to those ages 65 and over, people with disabilities or those who will be away from home on Election Day. Limits to early or absentee voting are the most common measures among this year’s batch of proposed restrictions, with such bills on the table in 33 states. Nearly 85 million voters used one of those methods to cast their ballots in those states last year — more than half of all Americans who voted in the Nov. 3 election. And the new proposals could do more than rein in early and mail voting. Like squeezing a balloon, the measures could dramatically shift voting to Election Day. That has raised alarm among voting rights advocates that the 2022 midterm elections and 2024 presidential contest could be marred by catastrophically long waits to vote — particularly in big cities, where lines are already a common hurdle for millions of Americans. Of the roughly 250 voting restrictions proposed in 43 states — seven times the number introduced in state legislatures by the same time last year — about half seek to limit mail voting, according to the Brennan Center. Proposals target every step of the process, including limiting who is allowed to cast ballots by mail, eliminating the option of being sent a ballot automatically each election cycle and adding ID, notary or witness requirements. Georgia Republicans have also proposed banning “line-warming” activities such as passing out water and blankets to voters standing in long lines. Supporters of the measure, including Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R), say the practice encourages illegal campaign activity if volunteers are advocating for their preferred candidate and handing out free goodies in the process. Opponents say such activities are necessary to ease the discomfort that many voters face in cities that regularly struggle with long lines. Tennessee is among the states considering stiff new restrictions even though it is a deeply red state where no one contested the results last year. Another is Iowa, where Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) this week signed legislation that reduces early- and Election Day voting hours and moves up the deadline for mail ballots to arrive at local election offices.
    4
  2539. 4
  2540. 4
  2541. 4
  2542. 4
  2543. 4
  2544. 4
  2545. 4
  2546. 4
  2547. 4
  2548. 4
  2549. 4
  2550. 4
  2551. 4
  2552. 4
  2553. 4
  2554. 4
  2555. 4
  2556. 4
  2557. 4
  2558. 4
  2559. 4
  2560. 4
  2561.  @Wodz30  Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations." And thats just some from before he ran for office.
    4
  2562. 4
  2563. 4
  2564. 4
  2565. 4
  2566. 4
  2567. 4
  2568. 4
  2569. 4
  2570. 4
  2571. 4
  2572. 4
  2573. 4
  2574. 4
  2575. 4
  2576. 4
  2577. 4
  2578. 4
  2579. 4
  2580. 4
  2581. 4
  2582. 4
  2583. 4
  2584. 4
  2585. 4
  2586. 4
  2587. 4
  2588. 4
  2589. 4
  2590. 4
  2591. 4
  2592. 4
  2593. 4
  2594. 4
  2595. 4
  2596. 4
  2597. 4
  2598. 4
  2599. 4
  2600. 4
  2601. 4
  2602. 4
  2603. 4
  2604. 4
  2605. 4
  2606. 4
  2607. 4
  2608. 4
  2609. 4
  2610. 4
  2611. 4
  2612. 4
  2613. 4
  2614. 4
  2615. 4
  2616. 4
  2617. 4
  2618. 4
  2619.  W TF?  You are incorrect again. Trump firing Comey In May 2017 Trump fired FBI director James Comey, who was overseeing the investigation into whether members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russian Nationals to interfere in the 2016 election. Shortly before he fired the director, Trump reportedly asked me to drop the investigation into his National Security adviser Michael Flynn, which Trump denies. Following Comeys firing, trump even told a reporter that he had been thinking about "the Russia thing" when he made the decision to fire Comey. Trump's role in creating misleading statement on the Trump Tower meeting At Trump Tower in June of 2016 Donald Trump jr. Met with Natalia Veselnitskaya, an attorney from Russia, who supposedly had "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. The meeting quickly went downhill when it became clear that the attorney did not have any incriminating evidence on Clinton. A report published by the Washington post stated that Trump "personally dictated" a public statement about the meeting that misrepresented the meetings content as being "primarily" about a adoption program. Trump leveraging pardon power to influence Witnesses Trump's lawyer John Dowd reportedly told lawyers representing Paul manafort and Michael Flynn that Trump might be willing to Pardon them if they were charged in the Russia investigation. Trump pressuring Jeff sessions over his recusal from the Russia investigation Trump told White House counsel Don mcgahn to convince attorney general Jeff sessions to not recuse himself from the Russia investigation, which he oversaw as Attorney General. Sessions recused himself from the enquiry in March of 2017. A week after Comey was fired, Deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel to head the investigation. Trump tells FBI director James Comey "I need loyalty. I expect loyalty. " Trump asked Director of National Intelligence Dan coats and director of the National Security Agency Michael Rogers to publicly deny there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians. Trump also tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller.
    4
  2620. 4
  2621. 4
  2622. 4
  2623. 4
  2624. 4
  2625. 4
  2626. 4
  2627. 4
  2628. 4
  2629. 4
  2630. 4
  2631. 4
  2632. 4
  2633. 4
  2634. 4
  2635. 4
  2636. 4
  2637. 4
  2638. 4
  2639. 4
  2640. 4
  2641. 4
  2642. 4
  2643. 4
  2644. 4
  2645. 4
  2646. 4
  2647. 4
  2648. 4
  2649. 4
  2650. 4
  2651. 4
  2652. 4
  2653. 4
  2654. 4
  2655. 4
  2656. 4
  2657. 4
  2658. 4
  2659. 4
  2660. 4
  2661. 4
  2662. 4
  2663. 4
  2664. 4
  2665. 4
  2666. 4
  2667. 4
  2668. 4
  2669. 4
  2670. 4
  2671. 4
  2672. 4
  2673. 4
  2674. 4
  2675. 4
  2676. 4
  2677. 4
  2678. 4
  2679. 4
  2680. 4
  2681. 4
  2682. 4
  2683. 4
  2684. 4
  2685. 4
  2686. 4
  2687. 4
  2688. 4
  2689. 4
  2690. 4
  2691. 4
  2692. 4
  2693. 4
  2694. 4
  2695. 4
  2696. 4
  2697. 4
  2698. 4
  2699. 4
  2700. 4
  2701. 4
  2702. 4
  2703. 4
  2704. 4
  2705. 4
  2706. 4
  2707. 4
  2708. 4
  2709. 4
  2710. 4
  2711. 4
  2712. 4
  2713. 4
  2714. 4
  2715. 4
  2716. 4
  2717. 4
  2718. 4
  2719. 4
  2720. 4
  2721. 4
  2722. 4
  2723. 4
  2724. 4
  2725. 4
  2726. 4
  2727. 4
  2728. 4
  2729. 4
  2730. 4
  2731. 4
  2732. 4
  2733. 4
  2734. 4
  2735. 4
  2736. 4
  2737. 4
  2738. 4
  2739. 4
  2740. 4
  2741. 4
  2742. 4
  2743. 4
  2744. 4
  2745. 4
  2746. 4
  2747. 4
  2748. 4
  2749. 4
  2750. 4
  2751. 4
  2752. 4
  2753. 4
  2754. 4
  2755. 4
  2756. 4
  2757. 4
  2758. 4
  2759. 4
  2760. 4
  2761. 4
  2762. 4
  2763. 4
  2764. 4
  2765. 4
  2766. 4
  2767. 4
  2768. 4
  2769. 4
  2770. 4
  2771. 4
  2772. 4
  2773. 4
  2774. 4
  2775. 4
  2776. 4
  2777. 4
  2778. 4
  2779. 4
  2780. 4
  2781. 4
  2782. 4
  2783. 4
  2784. 4
  2785. 4
  2786. 4
  2787. 4
  2788. 4
  2789. 4
  2790. 4
  2791. 4
  2792. 4
  2793. 4
  2794. 4
  2795. 4
  2796. 4
  2797. 4
  2798. 4
  2799. 4
  2800. 4
  2801. 4
  2802. 4
  2803. 4
  2804. 4
  2805. 4
  2806. 4
  2807. 4
  2808. 4
  2809. 4
  2810. 4
  2811. 4
  2812. 4
  2813. 4
  2814. 4
  2815. 4
  2816. 4
  2817. 4
  2818. 4
  2819. 4
  2820. 4
  2821. 4
  2822. 4
  2823. 4
  2824. 4
  2825. 4
  2826. 4
  2827. 4
  2828. 4
  2829. 4
  2830. 4
  2831. 4
  2832. 4
  2833. 4
  2834. 4
  2835. 4
  2836. 4
  2837. 4
  2838. 4
  2839. 4
  2840. 4
  2841. 4
  2842. 4
  2843. 4
  2844. 4
  2845. 4
  2846. 4
  2847. 4
  2848. 4
  2849. 4
  2850. 4
  2851. 4
  2852. 4
  2853. 4
  2854. 4
  2855. 4
  2856. 4
  2857. 4
  2858. 4
  2859. 4
  2860. 4
  2861. 4
  2862. 4
  2863. 4
  2864. 4
  2865. 4
  2866. 4
  2867. 4
  2868. 4
  2869. 4
  2870. 4
  2871. 4
  2872. 4
  2873. 4
  2874. 4
  2875. 4
  2876. 4
  2877. 4
  2878. 4
  2879. 4
  2880. 4
  2881. 4
  2882. 4
  2883. 4
  2884. 4
  2885. 4
  2886. 4
  2887. 4
  2888. 4
  2889. 4
  2890. 4
  2891. 4
  2892. 4
  2893. 4
  2894. 4
  2895. 4
  2896. 4
  2897. 4
  2898. 4
  2899. 4
  2900. 4
  2901. 4
  2902. 4
  2903. 4
  2904. 4
  2905. 4
  2906. 4
  2907. 4
  2908. 4
  2909.  @hopelessent.1700  Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    4
  2910. 4
  2911. 4
  2912. 4
  2913. 4
  2914. 4
  2915. 4
  2916. 4
  2917. 4
  2918. 4
  2919. 4
  2920. 4
  2921. 4
  2922. 4
  2923. 4
  2924. 4
  2925. 4
  2926. 4
  2927. 4
  2928. 4
  2929. 4
  2930. 4
  2931. 4
  2932. 4
  2933. 4
  2934. 4
  2935. 4
  2936. 4
  2937. 4
  2938. 4
  2939. 4
  2940. 4
  2941. 4
  2942. 4
  2943. 4
  2944. 4
  2945. 4
  2946. 4
  2947. 4
  2948. 4
  2949. 4
  2950. 4
  2951. 4
  2952. 4
  2953. 4
  2954. 4
  2955. 4
  2956. 4
  2957. 4
  2958. 4
  2959. 4
  2960. 4
  2961. 4
  2962. 4
  2963. 4
  2964. 4
  2965. 4
  2966. 4
  2967. 4
  2968. 4
  2969. 4
  2970. 4
  2971. 4
  2972. 4
  2973. 4
  2974. 4
  2975. 4
  2976. 4
  2977. 4
  2978. 4
  2979. 4
  2980. 4
  2981. 4
  2982. 4
  2983. 4
  2984. 4
  2985. 4
  2986. 4
  2987. 4
  2988. 4
  2989. 4
  2990. 4
  2991. 4
  2992. 4
  2993. 4
  2994. 4
  2995. 4
  2996. 4
  2997. 4
  2998. 4
  2999. 4
  3000. 4
  3001. 4
  3002. 4
  3003. 4
  3004. 4
  3005. 4
  3006. 4
  3007. 4
  3008. 4
  3009. 4
  3010. 4
  3011. 4
  3012. 4
  3013. 4
  3014. 4
  3015. 4
  3016. 4
  3017. 4
  3018. 4
  3019. 4
  3020. 4
  3021. 4
  3022. 4
  3023. 4
  3024. 4
  3025. 4
  3026. 4
  3027. 4
  3028. 4
  3029. 4
  3030. 4
  3031. 4
  3032. 4
  3033. 4
  3034. 4
  3035. 4
  3036. 4
  3037. 4
  3038. 4
  3039. 4
  3040. 4
  3041. 4
  3042. 4
  3043. 4
  3044. 4
  3045. 4
  3046. 4
  3047. 4
  3048. 4
  3049. 4
  3050. 4
  3051. 4
  3052. 4
  3053. 4
  3054. 4
  3055. 4
  3056. 4
  3057. 4
  3058. 4
  3059.  Jay Chan  Just a few Econ lies Trump has told you, that you ate up, without even looking.... But first... Where I got it all from. The list itself... this is important because it's a list of falsehoods by political officials about the economy. It has 13 pages. Everyone else (Dems, Reps, Ind +, btw. Obama and Harris is even on there twice.) has a lie here and there. Maybe one or 2 other people had more then 1 lie per page.... Your boy... Well... He has no less then 3 lies per page, on all 13 pages. Proven falsehoods.... all about economy. 6 on page 1, 6 on page 2 and 7 on page 3. Yet some how, ppl like you still swallow everything he says and you think we are the ones who are misguided. Look for yourself. 😁 https://www.politifact.com/subjects/economy/statements/byruling/false/?page=1 Now... Just a few of them. A few lies of many lies Trump tells about the economy, you tout. 😁 https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/aug/22/donald-trump/donald-trump-incorrect-us-dollar-strongest-its-eve/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/may/14/donald-trump/does-china-mostly-pay-us-tariffs-rather-us-consume/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/jan/04/donald-trump/no-usmca-trade-deal-wont-pay-border-wall-despite-d/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/sep/24/donald-trump/did-nafta-kill-millions-jobs-donald-trump/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jul/02/donald-trump/donald-trump-base-describing-gdp-growth-his-watch/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jul/02/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-mercedes-bmw-import-cars-us-mil/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/mar/09/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-about-wage-trends/ https://www.politifact.com/missouri/statements/2017/dec/15/donald-trump/trump-misses-mark-missouri-unemployment-rate/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/aug/17/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-wages-havent-gone-long-time-s-wr/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jul/27/donald-trump/its-false-trump-achieved-historic-increase-defense/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/may/26/donald-trump/did-donald-trumps-trip-create-or-save-millions-job/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/apr/04/donald-trump/donald-trump-flubs-how-unemployment-calculated/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/27/donald-trump/donald-trump-my-trans-pacific-partnership-oppositi/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/27/donald-trump/donald-trump-talks-about-his-finances-first-presid/ https://www.politifact.com/iowa/statements/2016/aug/31/donald-trump/donald-trump-explains-why-hillary-clinton-wants-sh/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/04/donald-trump/ama-trump-exaggerates-youth-unemployment/ https://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2016/mar/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-about-wisconsins-effective-unem/ https://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/mar/21/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-virginia-winery-largest-east-coa/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/11/donald-trump/no-gdp-growth-not-zero-trump-says/
    4
  3060. 4
  3061. 4
  3062. 4
  3063. 4
  3064. 4
  3065. 4
  3066. 4
  3067. 4
  3068. 4
  3069. 4
  3070. 4
  3071. 4
  3072. 4
  3073. 4
  3074. 4
  3075. 4
  3076. 4
  3077. 4
  3078. 4
  3079. 4
  3080. 4
  3081. 4
  3082. 4
  3083. 4
  3084. 4
  3085. 4
  3086. 4
  3087. 4
  3088. 4
  3089. 4
  3090. 4
  3091. 4
  3092. 4
  3093. 4
  3094. 4
  3095. 4
  3096. 4
  3097. 4
  3098. 4
  3099. 4
  3100. 4
  3101. 4
  3102. 4
  3103. 4
  3104. 4
  3105. 4
  3106. 4
  3107. 4
  3108. 4
  3109. 4
  3110. 4
  3111. 4
  3112. 4
  3113. 4
  3114. 4
  3115. 4
  3116. 4
  3117. 4
  3118. 4
  3119. 4
  3120. 4
  3121. 4
  3122. 4
  3123. 4
  3124. 4
  3125. 4
  3126. 4
  3127. 4
  3128. 4
  3129. 4
  3130. 4
  3131.  @Daddys_Home_002  and some more... In a pitch to Black voters in 2016, Trump said, “You’re living in poverty, your schools are no good, you have no jobs, 58 percent of your youth is unemployed. What the hell do you have to lose?” Trump stereotyped a Black reporter at a press conference in February 2017. When April Ryan asked him if he plans to meet and work with the Congressional Black Caucus, he repeatedly asked her to set up the meeting — even as she insisted that she’s “just a reporter.” In the week after white supremacist protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017, Trump repeatedly said that “many sides” and “both sides” were to blame for the violence and chaos that ensued — suggesting that the white supremacist protesters were morally equivalent to counterprotesters who stood against racism. He also said that there were “some very fine people” among the white supremacists. All of this seemed like a dog whistle to white supremacists — and many of them took it as one, with white nationalist Richard Spencer praising Trump for “defending the truth.” Throughout 2017, Trump repeatedly attacked NFL players who, by kneeling or otherwise silently protesting during the national anthem, demonstrated against systemic racism in America. Trump reportedly said in 2017 that people who came to the US from Haiti “all have AIDS,” and he lamented that people who came to the US from Nigeria would never “go back to their huts” once they saw America. The White House denied that Trump ever made these comments. Speaking about immigration in a bipartisan meeting in January 2018, Trump reportedly asked, in reference to Haiti and African countries, “Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?” He then reportedly suggested that the US should take more people from countries like Norway. The implication: Immigrants from predominantly white countries are good, while immigrants from predominantly Black countries are bad. Trump denied making the “shithole” comments, although some senators present at the meeting said they happened. The White House, meanwhile, suggested that the comments, like Trump’s remarks about the NFL protests, will play well to his base. The only connection between Trump’s remarks about the NFL protests and his “shithole” comments is race.
    4
  3132.  @Daddys_Home_002  And some more Trump denied making the “shithole” comments, although some senators present at the meeting said they happened. The White House, meanwhile, suggested that the comments, like Trump’s remarks about the NFL protests, will play well to his base. The only connection between Trump’s remarks about the NFL protests and his “shithole” comments is race. Trump mocked Elizabeth Warren’s presidential campaign, again calling her “Pocahontas” in a 2019 tweet before adding, “See you on the campaign TRAIL, Liz!” The capitalized “TRAIL” is seemingly a reference to the Trail of Tears — a horrific act of ethnic cleansing in the 19th century in which Native Americans were forcibly relocated, causing thousands of deaths. Trump tweeted later that year that several Black and brown members of Congress — Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) — are “from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe” and that they should “go back” to those countries. It’s a common racist trope to say that Black and brown people, particularly immigrants, should go back to their countries of origin. Three of the four members of Congress whom Trump targeted were born in the US. Trump has called the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus the “Chinese virus” and “kung flu.” The World Health Organization advises against linking a virus to any particular region, since it can lead to stigma. Trump’s adviser, Kellyanne Conway, previously described the term “kung flu” as “highly offensive.” Meanwhile, Asian Americans have reported hateful incidents targeting them due to the spread of the coronavirus. Trump suggested that Kamala Harris, who’s Black and South Asian, “doesn’t meet the requirements” to be former Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s running mate — yet another example of birtherism.
    4
  3133.  @Daddys_Home_002  Trump launched his campaign in 2015 by calling Mexican immigrants “rapists” who are “bringing crime” and “bringing drugs” to the US. His campaign was largely built on building a wall to keep these immigrants out of the US. As a candidate in 2015, Trump called for a ban on all Muslims coming into the US. His administration eventually implemented a significantly watered-down version of the policy. When asked at a 2016 Republican debate whether all 1.6 billion Muslims hate the US, Trump said, “I mean a lot of them. I mean a lot of them.” He argued in 2016 that Judge Gonzalo Curiel — who was overseeing the Trump University lawsuit — should recuse himself from the case because of his Mexican heritage and membership in a Latino lawyers association. House Speaker Paul Ryan, who endorsed Trump, later called such comments “the textbook definition of a racist comment.” Trump has been repeatedly slow to condemn white supremacists who endorse him, and he regularly retweeted messages from white supremacists and neo-Nazis during his presidential campaign. He tweeted and later deleted an image that showed Hillary Clinton in front of a pile of money and by a Jewish Star of David that said, “Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!” The tweet had some very obvious anti-Semitic imagery, but Trump insisted that the star was a sheriff’s badge, and said his campaign shouldn’t have deleted it. Trump has repeatedly referred to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as “Pocahontas,” using her controversial — and later walked-back — claims to Native American heritage as a punchline. At the 2016 Republican convention, Trump officially seized the mantle of the “law and order” candidate — an obvious dog whistle playing to white fears of Black crime, even though crime in the US is historically low. His speeches, comments, and executive actions after he took office have continued this line of messaging.
    4
  3134. 4
  3135. 4
  3136. 4
  3137. 4
  3138. 4
  3139. 4
  3140. 4
  3141. 4
  3142. 4
  3143. 4
  3144. 4
  3145. 4
  3146. 4
  3147. 4
  3148. 4
  3149. 4
  3150. 4
  3151. 4
  3152. 4
  3153. 4
  3154. 4
  3155. 4
  3156. 4
  3157. 4
  3158. 4
  3159. 4
  3160. 4
  3161. 4
  3162. 4
  3163. 4
  3164. 4
  3165. 4
  3166. 4
  3167. 4
  3168. 4
  3169. 4
  3170. 4
  3171. 4
  3172. 4
  3173. 4
  3174. 4
  3175. 4
  3176. 4
  3177. 4
  3178. 4
  3179. 4
  3180. 4
  3181. 4
  3182. 4
  3183. 4
  3184. 4
  3185. 4
  3186. 4
  3187. 4
  3188. 4
  3189. 4
  3190. 4
  3191. 4
  3192. 4
  3193. 4
  3194. 4
  3195. 4
  3196. 4
  3197. 4
  3198. 4
  3199. 4
  3200. 4
  3201. 4
  3202. 4
  3203. 4
  3204. 4
  3205. 4
  3206. 4
  3207. 4
  3208. 4
  3209. 4
  3210. 4
  3211. 4
  3212. 4
  3213. 4
  3214. 4
  3215. 4
  3216. 4
  3217. 4
  3218. 4
  3219. 4
  3220. 4
  3221. 4
  3222. 4
  3223. 4
  3224. 4
  3225. 4
  3226. 4
  3227. 4
  3228. 4
  3229. 4
  3230. 4
  3231. 4
  3232. 4
  3233. 4
  3234. 4
  3235. 4
  3236. 4
  3237. 4
  3238. 4
  3239. 4
  3240. 4
  3241. 4
  3242. 4
  3243. 4
  3244. 4
  3245. 4
  3246. 4
  3247. 4
  3248. 4
  3249. 4
  3250. 4
  3251. 4
  3252. 4
  3253. 4
  3254. 4
  3255. 4
  3256. 4
  3257. 4
  3258. 4
  3259. 4
  3260. 4
  3261. 4
  3262. 4
  3263. 4
  3264. 4
  3265. 4
  3266. 4
  3267. 4
  3268. 4
  3269. 4
  3270. 4
  3271. 4
  3272. 4
  3273. 4
  3274. 4
  3275. 4
  3276. 4
  3277. 4
  3278. 4
  3279. 4
  3280. 4
  3281. 4
  3282. 4
  3283. 4
  3284. 4
  3285. 4
  3286. 4
  3287. 4
  3288. 4
  3289. 4
  3290. 4
  3291. 4
  3292. 4
  3293. 4
  3294. 4
  3295. 4
  3296. 4
  3297. 4
  3298. 4
  3299. 4
  3300. 4
  3301. 4
  3302. 4
  3303. 4
  3304. 4
  3305. 4
  3306. 4
  3307. 4
  3308. 4
  3309. 4
  3310. 4
  3311. 4
  3312. 4
  3313. 4
  3314. 4
  3315. 4
  3316. 4
  3317. 4
  3318. 4
  3319. 4
  3320. 4
  3321. 4
  3322. 4
  3323.  @markcherry6256  Here is the problem with your claims. You are only saying them because Trump told you a lie and you didn't bother fact checking it. 👇 Fact ✔ The population of Michigan is 9.962 mil as of the 2017 census. Trump would of had to of subpoenaed Michigan voter rolls to be able to know who is and who is not on the absentee ballot list. The public record will only give you... Number of votes Number registered Number of population Turnout Look for yourself https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-1633_8722-29616--,00.html The population size is not what counts. What counts is the average voter turn out. Which is 2.1 mil or 29%. The total number of registered voters in Michigan is 7,471,088. "President Donald Trump erroneously tweeted that Michigan’s Democratic secretary of state was “illegally” sending “absentee ballots to 7.7 million people” for this year’s primary and general elections. The state said it will send absentee ballot applications — not actual ballots — to all registered voters, who may want to vote by mail. Trump, who has been critical of mail-in voting, made the false claim May 20, in a since-deleted tweet. “Breaking: Michigan sends absentee ballots to 7.7 million people ahead of Primaries and the General Election,” he wrote. “This was done illegally and without authorization by a rogue Secretary of State. I will ask to hold up funding to Michigan if they want to go down this Voter Fraud path.” About an hour after his message was sent, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson corrected the president on Twitter. “Hi! I also have a name, it’s Jocelyn Benson. And we sent applications, not ballots. Just like my GOP colleagues in Iowa, Georgia, Nebraska and West Virginia,” she tweeted.  Benson is correct that Iowa, Georgia, Nebraska and West Virginia have mailed absentee ballot applications to voters. Trump’s original tweet was later deleted, six hours after he posted it, according to Politwoops. The president replaced it with one saying “ballot applications” — instead of just “ballots” — still claiming it’s “illegal.”" https://www.factcheck.org/2020/05/trumps-false-tweet-about-michigan-absentee-ballot-applications/
    4
  3324. 4
  3325. 4
  3326. 4
  3327. 4
  3328. 4
  3329. 4
  3330. 4
  3331. 4
  3332. 4
  3333. 4
  3334. 4
  3335. 4
  3336. 4
  3337. 4
  3338. 4
  3339. 4
  3340. 4
  3341. 4
  3342. 4
  3343. 4
  3344. 4
  3345. 4
  3346. 4
  3347. 4
  3348. 4
  3349. 4
  3350. 4
  3351. 4
  3352. 4
  3353. 4
  3354. 4
  3355. 4
  3356. 4
  3357. 4
  3358. 4
  3359. 4
  3360. 4
  3361. 4
  3362. 4
  3363. 4
  3364. 4
  3365. 4
  3366. 4
  3367. 4
  3368. 4
  3369. 4
  3370. 4
  3371. 4
  3372. 4
  3373. 4
  3374. 4
  3375. 4
  3376. 4
  3377. 4
  3378. 4
  3379. 4
  3380. 4
  3381. 4
  3382. 4
  3383. 4
  3384. 4
  3385. 4
  3386. 4
  3387. 4
  3388. 4
  3389. 4
  3390. 4
  3391. 4
  3392. 4
  3393. 4
  3394. 4
  3395. 4
  3396. 4
  3397. 4
  3398. 4
  3399. 4
  3400. 4
  3401. 4
  3402. 4
  3403. 4
  3404. 4
  3405. 4
  3406. 4
  3407. 4
  3408. 4
  3409. 4
  3410. 4
  3411. 4
  3412. 4
  3413. 4
  3414. 4
  3415. 4
  3416. 4
  3417. 4
  3418. 4
  3419. 4
  3420. 4
  3421. 4
  3422. 4
  3423. 4
  3424. 4
  3425. 4
  3426. 4
  3427. 4
  3428. 4
  3429. 4
  3430. 4
  3431. 4
  3432. 4
  3433. 4
  3434. 4
  3435. 4
  3436. 4
  3437. 4
  3438. 4
  3439. 4
  3440. 4
  3441. 4
  3442. 4
  3443. 4
  3444. 4
  3445. 4
  3446. 4
  3447. 4
  3448. 4
  3449. 4
  3450. 4
  3451. 4
  3452. 4
  3453. 4
  3454. 4
  3455. 4
  3456. 4
  3457. 4
  3458. 4
  3459. 4
  3460. 4
  3461. 4
  3462. 4
  3463. 4
  3464. 4
  3465. 4
  3466. 4
  3467. 4
  3468. 4
  3469. 4
  3470. 4
  3471. 4
  3472. 4
  3473. 4
  3474. 4
  3475. 4
  3476. 4
  3477. 4
  3478. 4
  3479. 4
  3480. 4
  3481. 4
  3482. 4
  3483. 4
  3484. 4
  3485. 4
  3486. 4
  3487. 4
  3488. 4
  3489. 4
  3490. 4
  3491. 4
  3492. 4
  3493. 4
  3494. 4
  3495. 4
  3496. 4
  3497. 4
  3498. 4
  3499. 4
  3500. 4
  3501. 4
  3502. 4
  3503. 4
  3504. 4
  3505. 4
  3506. 4
  3507. 4
  3508. 4
  3509. 4
  3510. 4
  3511. 4
  3512. 4
  3513. 4
  3514. 4
  3515. 4
  3516. 4
  3517. 4
  3518. 4
  3519. 4
  3520. 4
  3521. 4
  3522. 4
  3523. 4
  3524. 4
  3525. 4
  3526. 4
  3527. 4
  3528. 4
  3529. 4
  3530. 4
  3531. 4
  3532. 4
  3533. 4
  3534. 4
  3535. 4
  3536. 4
  3537. 4
  3538. 4
  3539. 4
  3540. 4
  3541. 4
  3542. 4
  3543. 4
  3544. 4
  3545. 4
  3546. 4
  3547. 4
  3548. 4
  3549. 4
  3550. 4
  3551. 4
  3552. 4
  3553. 4
  3554. 4
  3555. 4
  3556. 4
  3557. 4
  3558. 4
  3559. 4
  3560. 4
  3561. 4
  3562. 4
  3563. 4
  3564. 4
  3565. 4
  3566. 4
  3567. 4
  3568. 4
  3569. 4
  3570. 4
  3571. 4
  3572. 4
  3573. 4
  3574. 4
  3575. 4
  3576. 4
  3577. 4
  3578. 4
  3579. 4
  3580. 4
  3581. 4
  3582. 4
  3583. 4
  3584. 4
  3585. 4
  3586. 4
  3587. 4
  3588. 4
  3589. 4
  3590. 4
  3591. 4
  3592. 4
  3593. 4
  3594. 4
  3595. 4
  3596. 4
  3597. 4
  3598. 4
  3599. 4
  3600. 4
  3601. 4
  3602. 4
  3603. 4
  3604. 4
  3605. 4
  3606. 4
  3607. 4
  3608. 4
  3609. 4
  3610. 4
  3611. 4
  3612. 4
  3613. 4
  3614. 4
  3615. 4
  3616. 4
  3617. 4
  3618. 4
  3619. 4
  3620. 4
  3621. 4
  3622. 4
  3623. 4
  3624. 4
  3625. 4
  3626. 4
  3627. 4
  3628. 4
  3629. 4
  3630. 4
  3631. 4
  3632. 4
  3633. 4
  3634. 4
  3635. 4
  3636. 4
  3637. 4
  3638. 4
  3639. 4
  3640. 4
  3641. 4
  3642. 4
  3643. 4
  3644. 4
  3645. 4
  3646. 4
  3647. 4
  3648. 4
  3649. 4
  3650. 4
  3651. 4
  3652. 4
  3653. 4
  3654. @Miki Miki The combination of 💥👉racism and power👈💥 does nothing to offend you, but don't let some lady on the internet call you 😲buttercup😲. That's just a bridge too far! 🙄 1. Pithy has never been my thing. Long winded with everyone. 2. I have a mixed race 11 year old boy... And we live in Louisiana. So... Yeah... Its literally hitting home. 3. Wether that was the case or not, it's still the principle. It's the same argument everytime with you guys. You can't argue Against Racism is wrong, so you always gotta make it about something else. Why is that? Why can't we go "racism is wrong" and then you go, "yeah it is", and have that be the end of it 1 damned time? Why y'all always gotta feel compelled to add the "but"? Everytime? 4. I've told you who the victims are in this particular case in damn near every comment. You keep intentionally ignoring it because you have no argument against it and you don't want to look bad. She is a clear and Casual racist, which is revealed in that video. She is also a 💥👉JUDGE👈💥!!!!!! One that 💥👉DECIDES👈💥 how to 💥👉PUNISH BLACK PPL👈💥 for the crimes they commit, or on whether or not they've committed a crime at all, 💥👉EVERY DAY👈💥!!!! I wonder how you will excuse missing the point when it's that big and bold. Lets see. 5. Sure! Lets transition a discussion about racism, which apparently doesn't qualify as "BIG PICTURE MATERIAL" to you, into - weather of the word rant was appropriate - that someone was stealing her car so it's totally cool to be racist while they're doing that - and finally because someone filmed her being racist and some news channels put it up because they saw the alarming fact that she was not only racist but she was racist and the judge, it's now an invasion of privacy issue Please... Privacy is simply the diversion you landed on after 2 tries, that seamed to work best as a deflection. If only this wasn't a thread and no one could see what you had wrote before. 6. No one can do anything about what's in her head but the thing you constantly ignore is it's not just in her head if she's a judge deciding on the fate of African American people. The thing you keep trying to ignore. The thing you keep trying to ignore. The thing you keep trying to ignore. The thing you keep trying to ignore. The thing you keep trying to ignore, Buttercup!
    4
  3655. 4
  3656. 4
  3657. 4
  3658. 4
  3659. 4
  3660. 4
  3661. 4
  3662. 4
  3663. 4
  3664. 4
  3665. 4
  3666. 4
  3667. 4
  3668. 4
  3669. 4
  3670. 4
  3671. 4
  3672. 4
  3673. 4
  3674. 4
  3675. 4
  3676. 4
  3677. 4
  3678. 4
  3679. 4
  3680. 4
  3681. 4
  3682. 4
  3683. 4
  3684. 4
  3685. 4
  3686. 4
  3687. 4
  3688. 4
  3689.  Mj light  Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations." And thats just some from before he ran for office.
    4
  3690. 4
  3691.  Mj light  Again.... How does any of that relate to these facts? Why do you keep deflecting from them? Its like you can't account for them or something. 😁😁😁 "Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations." And thats just some from before he ran for office."
    4
  3692. 4
  3693. 4
  3694. 4
  3695. 4
  3696. 4
  3697. 4
  3698. 4
  3699. 4
  3700. 4
  3701. 4
  3702.  Jackson Hughes  As for your hypothetical... It's insane. Would I support making people American citizens but then take away the fundamental right all American citizens have, to pick their leader from them, so you can have more red votes? NO! Not because they would vote red... But because taking their right to vote for WHOEVER THEY CHOOSE is flat out wrong. Did you guys ever think about just speaking to that particular demographic issues? Do you ever even wonder why they vote for us? Look at how you guys talk about them... How you treat them... Like they are less than... like you would actually consider a scenario where they would become American citizens but not actual American citizens because they wouldn't have the right to vote. Everybody in the world knows our history. We are a nation built on immigrants. These people come here to try and work hard and do better, just like every other immigrant before them. Are they all Angels? No. But then again, neither are we. No one is talking about opening the border, like you guys always claim we are.... But how about you just give a damn about them. Treat them with respect... Give them a chance to earn a new life, instead of making it so difficult and having it take so long to even get that chance. Show them you're going to at least consider putting yourself in their shoes and what you would do in that scenario. Democrats can't get everything done for immigrants that we want. We show them we give a s***, though. The fact that he doesn't even occurred you guys to try that... That says so damned much.
    4
  3703. 4
  3704. 4
  3705. 4
  3706. 4
  3707. 4
  3708. 4
  3709. 4
  3710. 4
  3711. 4
  3712. 4
  3713. 4
  3714. 4
  3715. 4
  3716. 4
  3717. 4
  3718. 4
  3719. 4
  3720. 4
  3721. 4
  3722. 4
  3723. 4
  3724. 4
  3725. 4
  3726. 4
  3727. 4
  3728. 4
  3729. 4
  3730. 4
  3731. 4
  3732. 4
  3733. 4
  3734. 4
  3735. 4
  3736. 4
  3737. 4
  3738. 4
  3739. 4
  3740. 3
  3741. 3
  3742. 3
  3743. 3
  3744. 3
  3745. 3
  3746. 3
  3747. 3
  3748. 3
  3749. 3
  3750. 3
  3751. 3
  3752. 3
  3753. 3
  3754. 3
  3755. 3
  3756. 3
  3757. 3
  3758. 3
  3759. 3
  3760. 3
  3761. 3
  3762. 3
  3763. 3
  3764. 3
  3765. 3
  3766. 3
  3767. 3
  3768. 3
  3769. 3
  3770. 3
  3771. 3
  3772. 3
  3773. 3
  3774. 3
  3775. 3
  3776. 3
  3777. 3
  3778. 3
  3779. 3
  3780. 3
  3781. 3
  3782. 3
  3783. 3
  3784. 3
  3785. 3
  3786. 3
  3787.  @TheMINDL3SSGamers  a few things... The founding fathers did a great many things for this country but where hardly the only components in forming it. So... what they were for or against or even their hypocritical actions is besides the point. African people where slaves sense the very beginning of this country. They worked fields, built roads, building and tracks. They where forced to help build and maintain a country that wouldn't even fight for them to be seen as a whole person. Saying that 3/4s a person was a compromise because of the Dixiecrats, is not the excuse, you made it sound like. As for your last min attempted dig at Pres Biden.... He also voted against bussing. He basically didn't think school children should be forced into that position when they're supposed to be learning. HOWEVER... unlike the majority of politicians, Joe Biden is not afraid to grow or admit he was wrong. Which he did, shortly after those things happened. Which he has proven he has done all the years sense. You guys always bring that stuff up as some kind of "got you", and think we have to spend our time defending it. We don't treat our world leaders like their golden gods. They are flawed human beings like the rest of us. However, I take comfort in the fact that he was willing to admit he was wrong and changed his behavior. That is the important part. He doesn't hide from it, he doesn't lie about it and he doesn't go back on it. That shows more integrity then the majority of politicians nowadays.
    3
  3788. 3
  3789. 3
  3790. 3
  3791. 3
  3792. @OrcaBob 4337 So... I usually just call the nonsensical assumptions about total strangers and childish insults exactly what they are and leave it at that.. Because they are all just masks for their own insecurities anyways, and so.. Defending against that always seamed pointless to me.... BUT.... considering this one started out this way... And my goal tends to be helping people who do those kinds of things discredit themselves, I will have to make an exception with this one. 👇 Hi! I'm Charlotte Morgan. I live in Louisiana. I am 37. I am giving you this info, so you can verify who I am by looking me up on Facebook. I have a mixed race 10 year old son, named Gabriel. His father is my best friend. As I said, I live in Louisiana. The Rep loving Baptist bible belt.... As an atheist, single mother to a mixed race child, that one side calls the "N word" and the other calls "passing". A place where kids at his swim camp tell him "the president (Trump) hates him because he is black". Where I made the news last year for punching a popular local radio host for calling my son a "N word Baby" when I was giving him a 5 min Lyft ride. Only to have him drop the charges because of "bad publicity". Where I volunteer with 2 other graphic designers to do all the graphics for the local BLM and women's march events. A place where he has one mixed older brother and one AfAm younger brother and sister, that I love as my own. That I would gladly raise as my own if something ever happened to their moms.... Who are also my friends. I don't have to lie about or hide who I am. I am exactly what I represent myself to be. I live it everyday. I can't know what it would be like to live as a minority in this country. I do know how it feels to be the loved one of one... And seeing the daily pain it causes them. I don't understand how the father of my child doesn't get as angry about that stuff as I do. He says he is used to it... And that makes me sad. As for "hate".... I hate these people and their ignorance. Their need to make themselves feel better by making others feel worse. I have always hated bullies. Especially those that attack my loved ones... And that is exactly what they are. School yard bullies, all growed up... However I'm not irrational. I have a big brother and a mother, as well as several friends who are in the service and are staunch Republicans... all of whom voted for Trump the first time. I don't think they are racist or dumb. I don't feel the need to paint everybody in the world with the same paint brush because it's convenient for my argument. Maybe you should try that.
    3
  3793. 3
  3794. @OrcaBob 4337 😯 Wow! " when everyone else unites it's called civil rights when White People Unite it's called white supremacy." It depends on what your uniting for? What the hell are you uniting for? And unrepresented? Seriously? A white man in America is going to complain about being unrepresented? Really? Sweetheart, people think you sound like a racist because you sound like a racist. That's why you're so defensive about it. If you talk to them like you're phrasing this stuff to me... For instance, the only reason why, for example, African Americans get together in a group and work towards a common goal that has to do with their culture is because they would be discriminated against because of that culture or because of that color of their skin. White people really don't have that problem, sweetheart. I have news for you, minorities would much rather not have to group up to just be treated like everybody else. They would much rather just be treated like everybody else. The reason that it would be redundant for like a group of white people to saunter into a town hall somewhere and talk about how they're being discriminated because of the color of their skin, is because they're not. That's why it would be redundant for that to happen. Knock out some men who are white don't get discriminated against in other ways. For instance, man, even white men have a tendency to be screwed over when it comes to kid custody cases. For some reason the automatic assumption is always the mother even though that might not be the best place for the child. My point being, it's not that you may not have your own raison d'etre but it's just not about the color of your skin.
    3
  3795. 3
  3796. 3
  3797. 3
  3798. 3
  3799. 3
  3800. 3
  3801. 3
  3802. 3
  3803. 3
  3804. 3
  3805. 3
  3806. 3
  3807. 3
  3808. 3
  3809. 3
  3810. 3
  3811. 3
  3812. 3
  3813. 3
  3814. 3
  3815. 3
  3816. 3
  3817. 3
  3818. 3
  3819. 3
  3820. 3
  3821. 3
  3822. 3
  3823. 3
  3824. 3
  3825. 3
  3826. 3
  3827. 3
  3828. 3
  3829. 3
  3830. 3
  3831. 3
  3832. 3
  3833. 3
  3834. 3
  3835. 3
  3836. 3
  3837. 3
  3838. 3
  3839. 3
  3840. 3
  3841. 3
  3842. 3
  3843. 3
  3844. 3
  3845. 3
  3846. 3
  3847. 3
  3848. 3
  3849. 3
  3850. 3
  3851. 3
  3852. 3
  3853. 3
  3854. 3
  3855. 3
  3856. 3
  3857. 3
  3858. 3
  3859. 3
  3860. 3
  3861. 3
  3862. 3
  3863. 3
  3864. 3
  3865. 3
  3866. 3
  3867. 3
  3868. 3
  3869. 3
  3870. 3
  3871. 3
  3872. 3
  3873. 3
  3874. 3
  3875. 3
  3876. 3
  3877. 3
  3878. 3
  3879. 3
  3880. 3
  3881. 3
  3882. 3
  3883. 3
  3884. 3
  3885. 3
  3886. 3
  3887. 3
  3888. 3
  3889. 3
  3890. 3
  3891. 3
  3892. 3
  3893. 3
  3894. 3
  3895. 3
  3896. 3
  3897. 3
  3898. 3
  3899. 3
  3900. 3
  3901. 3
  3902. 3
  3903. 3
  3904. 3
  3905. 3
  3906. 3
  3907. 3
  3908. 3
  3909. 3
  3910. 3
  3911. 3
  3912. 3
  3913.  Trump 2020  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Posted this here also, I see! Well, I guess I'll have to post the proof of your 11 DIFFERENT LIES in this comment, here as well! 😜✌ Let's break down all 11 LIES you just told.... Lie #1 ... You misquoted "the economist" who said it. The quote was... " I honestly believe if anyone of the Democrats on that debate stage won the presidency, the games of the last two and a half years would be wiped out 👉( Conveniently leaving out the ","Pence said."" That was right here )👈 Taxes would Skyrocket. The stock market with tank. Jobs would vanish, and we would get that recession these naysayers keep talkin about." Lie #2 #3 .... The " leading economist " you where referring to is 👉MIKE PENCE👈 and has a 👉LAW👈 degree and not an economics degree. Therefore, is not an Economist of any kind. Lie #4 #5 .... The think you tried to pass off as, what a "leading economist said", was actually the 👉TITLE👈 of a Fox Business article, written by Blair Shiff and published August 19th 2019. Oh and you seamed to of forgotten a key word at the end of that title as well. " Recession coming if Democrat wins White House in 2020" 👉( What you left out was, ": Pence" )👈 Lie #6 #7 #8 #9 ... Misquoting what Pence, and not a leading Economist, said in your second quote. This is quoting the article you got this quote from. Which some KEY DIFFERENCES.... " As I stand before you today, I'm also mindful of the fact that America has a 👉( not a "big" )👈 choice to make in the next year and a half," PENCE 👉( not "he" )👈 said. "A choice of whether we're going to stay on the path that's created unprecedented Prosperity or whether we're going to take the hard left turn 👉( not "of a guaranteed recession" )👈 that 👉( left the word "that" out all together, for some reason )👈 you heard leading Democrats offer on a debate stage right here in Detroit two weeks ago." Lie #10 ... You tried to pass of the Fox Business articles words as your own by not quoting it.... 👉" But his biggest message was clear: if you like how the economy is going, you should vote for Trump."👈 Lie #11 ... I don't know what you were trying to do with this one. Maybe make it sound more official, I guess? Or maybe you where saying the fake economist AKA Mike Pence was from a US economic Institute... Either way... Its a lie.... What you said... " Says leading Economist at us economic Institute " The article you tried to plagiarize and intentionally incorrectly quote states that, 👉" Vice President Mike Pence addressed Detroit economic Club Monday at the Motor City Casino "👈 Its almost like you intentionally edited your comment to mislead people about who said these things and how they said them.... https://www-foxbusiness-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.foxbusiness.com/politics/if-the-democrats-win-a-recession-will-happen-vice-president-mike-pence.amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQEKAFwAQ%3D%3D#aoh=15668437520870&amp_ct=1566843758636&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxbusiness.com%2Fpolitics%2Fif-the-democrats-win-a-recession-will-happen-vice-president-mike-pence
    3
  3914. 3
  3915. 3
  3916. 3
  3917. 3
  3918. 3
  3919. 3
  3920. 3
  3921. 3
  3922. 3
  3923. 3
  3924. 3
  3925. 3
  3926. 3
  3927. 3
  3928. 3
  3929. 3
  3930. 3
  3931. 3
  3932. 3
  3933. 3
  3934. 3
  3935. 3
  3936. 3
  3937. 3
  3938. 3
  3939. 3
  3940. 3
  3941. 3
  3942. 3
  3943. 3
  3944. 3
  3945. 3
  3946. 3
  3947. 3
  3948. 3
  3949. 3
  3950. 3
  3951. 3
  3952. 3
  3953. 3
  3954. 3
  3955. 3
  3956. 3
  3957. 3
  3958. 3
  3959. 3
  3960. 3
  3961. 3
  3962. 3
  3963. 3
  3964. 3
  3965. 3
  3966. 3
  3967. 3
  3968. 3
  3969. 3
  3970. 3
  3971. 3
  3972. 3
  3973. 3
  3974. 3
  3975. 3
  3976. 3
  3977. 3
  3978. 3
  3979. 3
  3980. 3
  3981. 3
  3982. 3
  3983. 3
  3984. 3
  3985. 3
  3986. 3
  3987. 3
  3988. 3
  3989. 3
  3990. 3
  3991. 3
  3992. 3
  3993. 3
  3994. 3
  3995. 3
  3996. 3
  3997. 3
  3998. 3
  3999. 3
  4000. 3
  4001. 3
  4002. 3
  4003. 3
  4004. 3
  4005. 3
  4006. 3
  4007. 3
  4008. 3
  4009. 3
  4010. 3
  4011. 3
  4012. 3
  4013. 3
  4014. 3
  4015. 3
  4016. 3
  4017. 3
  4018. 3
  4019. 3
  4020. 3
  4021. 3
  4022. 3
  4023. 3
  4024. 3
  4025. 3
  4026. 3
  4027. 3
  4028. 3
  4029. 3
  4030. 3
  4031. 3
  4032. 3
  4033. 3
  4034. 3
  4035. 3
  4036. 3
  4037. 3
  4038. 3
  4039. 3
  4040. 3
  4041. 3
  4042. 3
  4043. 3
  4044. 3
  4045. 3
  4046. 3
  4047. 3
  4048. 3
  4049. 3
  4050. 3
  4051. 3
  4052. 3
  4053. 3
  4054. 3
  4055. 3
  4056. 3
  4057. 3
  4058. 3
  4059. 3
  4060. 3
  4061. 3
  4062. 3
  4063. 3
  4064. 3
  4065. 3
  4066. 3
  4067. 3
  4068. 3
  4069. 3
  4070. 3
  4071. 3
  4072. 3
  4073. 3
  4074. 3
  4075. 3
  4076. 3
  4077. 3
  4078. 3
  4079. 3
  4080. 3
  4081. 3
  4082. 3
  4083. 3
  4084. 3
  4085. 3
  4086. 3
  4087. 3
  4088. 3
  4089. 3
  4090. 3
  4091. 3
  4092. 3
  4093. 3
  4094. 3
  4095. 3
  4096. 3
  4097. 3
  4098. 3
  4099. 3
  4100. 3
  4101. 3
  4102. 3
  4103. 3
  4104. 3
  4105. 3
  4106. 3
  4107. 3
  4108. 3
  4109. 3
  4110. 3
  4111. 3
  4112. 3
  4113. 3
  4114. 3
  4115. 3
  4116. 3
  4117. 3
  4118. 3
  4119. 3
  4120. 3
  4121. 3
  4122. 3
  4123. 3
  4124. 3
  4125. 3
  4126. 3
  4127. 3
  4128. 3
  4129. 3
  4130. 3
  4131. 3
  4132. 3
  4133. 3
  4134. 3
  4135. 3
  4136. 3
  4137. 3
  4138. 3
  4139. 3
  4140. 3
  4141. 3
  4142. 3
  4143. 3
  4144. 3
  4145. 3
  4146. 3
  4147. 3
  4148. 3
  4149. 3
  4150. 3
  4151. 3
  4152. 3
  4153. 3
  4154. 3
  4155. 3
  4156. 3
  4157. 3
  4158. 3
  4159. 3
  4160. 3
  4161. 3
  4162. 3
  4163. 3
  4164. 3
  4165. 3
  4166. 3
  4167. 3
  4168. 3
  4169. 3
  4170. 3
  4171. 3
  4172. 3
  4173. 3
  4174. 3
  4175. 3
  4176. 3
  4177. 3
  4178. 3
  4179. 3
  4180.  @MeowNSheeit  Donald Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    3
  4181.  @jessejameson9749  Nope... Ask Donald Trump when he was doing all this.. He.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    3
  4182. 3
  4183. 3
  4184. 3
  4185. 3
  4186. 3
  4187. 3
  4188. 3
  4189. 3
  4190. 3
  4191. 3
  4192. 3
  4193. 3
  4194. 3
  4195. 3
  4196. 3
  4197. 3
  4198. 3
  4199. 3
  4200. 3
  4201. 3
  4202.  @antbeats6161  Yes... And to preempt the next question... Because he is a bad leader. He puts his ego above his country. He lies to us... And the rest of the world constantly. Even when he doesn't need to. Way to often he does not step up and lead us all, when we need it most. He doesn't listen to his experts. He has one basic move... And that is trying to bully people to get what he wants. Its not that he is always wrong... He has gotten somethings done. A crap ton of manufacturing jobs came back because of a deal he made. He saved the Special Olympics. Granite he appointed Betsy DeVos who was trying to defund them but he stopped her. He helped with the criminal Reform Bill. Hell... I am going to agree with him about China and intellectual property rights... However, he didn't handle it right. There was a reason no other president was willing to get into a trade war. No one ever wins one... And I mean.... No one! Look it up... In history... No one ever has. That is because all the people that buy our goods and services we're just going to wait around for us to sort our s*** out. They went and found other people to supply those things. Most of them are not ever coming back in the foreseeable future. He's lost us billions upon billions of dollars in the next couple of years. And the deal him and China made won't even cover of fourth of it. Plus nothing in the deal brought back any of our intellectual property rights. He allows his own personal interests overlap his service to America to much. A big example is the early on "Muslim ban". He banned every Muslim country except the ones that the 911 terrorists came from... Why? Because he had business deals with those countries. That is why presidents give all that up when they become president. It's to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. This president makes so much money off of being president. A lot of that coming from our tax dollars. And of late... He throws rallies during the pandemic. Exposing his supporters to unnecessary risk.... But makes sure they sign wavers, so they can't sue him later. It took him 6 months and 145000 dead Americans to endorse wearing masks in public... Then flip flopped on that 2 days later. He wouldn't implement the pandemic readiness plan for the country that was already there... Because the Obama administration came up with it. That was more important than slowing or stopping the spread early on. That was more important than people's lives. Then he goes and tries to blame the Obama Administration for the stockpiles being low but he had three and a half years to fill them up.... I mean.... I could go on... He is simply not a good leader.
    3
  4203. 3
  4204. 3
  4205. 3
  4206. 3
  4207. 3
  4208. 3
  4209. 3
  4210. 3
  4211. Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations." And thats just some from before he ran for office.
    3
  4212. 3
  4213. 3
  4214. 3
  4215. 3
  4216. 3
  4217. 3
  4218. 3
  4219. 3
  4220. 3
  4221. 3
  4222. 3
  4223. 3
  4224. 3
  4225. 3
  4226. 3
  4227. 3
  4228. 3
  4229. 3
  4230. 3
  4231. 3
  4232. 3
  4233. 3
  4234. 3
  4235. 3
  4236. 3
  4237. 3
  4238. 3
  4239. 3
  4240. 3
  4241. 3
  4242. 3
  4243. 3
  4244. 3
  4245. 3
  4246. 3
  4247. 3
  4248. 3
  4249. 3
  4250. 3
  4251. 3
  4252. 3
  4253. 3
  4254. 3
  4255. 3
  4256. 3
  4257. 3
  4258. 3
  4259. 3
  4260. 3
  4261. 3
  4262. 3
  4263. 3
  4264. 3
  4265. 3
  4266. 3
  4267. 3
  4268. 3
  4269. 3
  4270. 3
  4271. 3
  4272. 3
  4273. 3
  4274. 3
  4275. 3
  4276. 3
  4277. 3
  4278. 3
  4279. 3
  4280. 3
  4281. 3
  4282. 3
  4283. 3
  4284. 3
  4285. 3
  4286. 3
  4287. 3
  4288. 3
  4289. 3
  4290. 3
  4291. 3
  4292. 3
  4293. 3
  4294. 3
  4295. 3
  4296. 3
  4297. 3
  4298. 3
  4299. 3
  4300. 3
  4301. 3
  4302. 3
  4303. 3
  4304. 3
  4305. 3
  4306. 3
  4307. 3
  4308. 3
  4309. 3
  4310. 3
  4311. 3
  4312. 3
  4313. 3
  4314. 3
  4315. 3
  4316. 3
  4317. 3
  4318. 3
  4319. 3
  4320. 3
  4321. 3
  4322. 3
  4323. 3
  4324. 3
  4325. 3
  4326. 3
  4327. 3
  4328. 3
  4329. 3
  4330. 3
  4331. 3
  4332. 3
  4333. 3
  4334. 3
  4335. 3
  4336. 3
  4337. 3
  4338. 3
  4339. 3
  4340. 3
  4341. 3
  4342. 3
  4343. 3
  4344. 3
  4345. 3
  4346. 3
  4347. 3
  4348. 3
  4349. 3
  4350. 3
  4351. 3
  4352. 3
  4353. 3
  4354. 3
  4355. 3
  4356. 3
  4357. 3
  4358. 3
  4359. 3
  4360. 3
  4361. 3
  4362. 3
  4363. 3
  4364. 3
  4365. 3
  4366. 3
  4367. 3
  4368. 3
  4369. 3
  4370. 3
  4371. 3
  4372. 3
  4373. 3
  4374. 3
  4375. 3
  4376. 3
  4377. 3
  4378. 3
  4379. 3
  4380. 3
  4381. 3
  4382. 3
  4383. 3
  4384. 3
  4385. 3
  4386. 3
  4387. 3
  4388. 3
  4389. 3
  4390. 3
  4391. 3
  4392. 3
  4393. 3
  4394. 3
  4395. 3
  4396. 3
  4397. 3
  4398. 3
  4399. 3
  4400. 3
  4401. 3
  4402. 3
  4403. 3
  4404. 3
  4405. 3
  4406. 3
  4407. 3
  4408. 3
  4409. 3
  4410. 3
  4411. 3
  4412. 3
  4413. 3
  4414. 3
  4415. 3
  4416. 3
  4417.  @swmarb5236  The employment-population ratio measures the share of a demographic group that has a job, and it's been lower for Black people for years. The unemployment rate has also spiked for all racial groups in the US during the coronavirus pandemic, and is especially high for Black Americans. People of color, and especially Black Americans, are severely underrepresented at the top of the corporate hierarchy. Black Americans have historically been underrepresented in the highest echelons of government, as well. Black workers have historically earned far less than white workers. Similarly, overall income for Black Americans was about 42% lower than for whites in 2018. There's a similar disparity at the household level. Lower incomes mean that the poverty rate for Black families is over twice that of white families. The aggregate wealth white households have held has historically far outstripped that held by the Black community. And while it has increased for white people since the 1980s, it's remained stagnant for Black people. One of the contributing factors to the household wealth disparity is student loans. The wage gap between races also interacts with the gender wage gap between men and women. One common way to illustrate the gender and race wage gaps is through looking at "equal pay days" for different groups. Black Americans are underrepresented in high-paying jobs A key part of the "American Dream" is leaving your children in a better economic position than you were in, but that dream is less attainable for Black Americans. Educational opportunities remain starkly split by race. The share of both white and Black Americans with college degrees has increased dramatically over the last half-century, but there's still a gap. As with income, intergenerational educational mobility varies widely between racial groups. One common way to illustrate the gender and race wage gaps is through looking at "equal pay days" for different groups. Thus, the share of Black households that own their own homes is lower than other racial groups. The coronavirus crisis has only exacerbated an already wide disparity in access to healthcare. The current coronavirus pandemic has had a disparate impact on people of color. Black prisoners are overrepresented in the US prison population compared to their share of the total US population. Black men are roughly five times more likely to be imprisoned than their white counterparts — and nearly 13 times as likely in the 18-19 age group. Marijuana usage rates are similar between white and Black Americans, yet Black Americans are 3.64 times more likely to get arrested on marijuana possession charges. Just to name a few.
    3
  4418. 3
  4419. 3
  4420. 3
  4421. 3
  4422. 3
  4423. 3
  4424. 3
  4425. 3
  4426. 3
  4427. 3
  4428. 3
  4429. 3
  4430. 3
  4431. 3
  4432. 3
  4433. 3
  4434. 3
  4435. 3
  4436. 3
  4437. 3
  4438. 3
  4439. 3
  4440. 3
  4441. 3
  4442. 3
  4443. 3
  4444. 3
  4445. 3
  4446. 3
  4447. 3
  4448.  @Dan-ud8hz  This is who you are talking to. If ppl show you who they are, believe them. This is who this person is. ( I abbreviated some but do have the screenshots if you want the whole thing.) Threat beginner comment - Basically Trump can shoot everyone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. cj p - if they were antifa or in a pussy hat... Then yes it would be epic and I would want to see him shoot more. Me - So you're basically saying you want to see the president of the United States commit murder and then you want him to get away with it... All we need to know about you, to figure out how jacked up in the head you are. (This part is a lil long and crazy ranty, so highlights)👇 cj p - if he shot you, I would throw a black party. (Some comment section thing about people cheering for a red state woman dying in a hurricane and CNN YouTube commenters cheering. Basically a justification for his actions. Which tells us, he does feel the need to justify it or aka he knows he is wrong.) (Then assumptions about what I would do, just encase that justification didn't work.)(Libs are evil then...) I don't need to fake it. When I watch the skinny effeminate antifa kid get mowed down by a red pickup... I laughed and watched it again. He didn't even break a bone. When I saw it another video of a motorist get out of his white suburban and beat the crap out of an antifa weirdo standing in front of his car... I laughed again and make jokes in the comments like every other person did. You want links to those videos they are pretty good? Me - 👈👈👈ANNNNNDDD... A perfect example of what I was talking about, everyone. This is all you need to know about him, to know nothing that comes out of his mouth is important, in any way. He is always so eager to help me prove that point and I really do appreciate it! 😉✌ Me - BTW, you are talking about taking a little boys mother away from him. That is what you are celebrating. That is who you are right now... I'm sure yours would be super proud that just came out of her little boys mouth. You are such a sad person. cj p - you were going to raise a little nut job. He might be better off adopted. And there you go again with the virtue signaling. I don't use my kid as a shield. Pathetic how you're trying to squeeze guilt from me when I'm using satire. No wonder you don't get Trump jokes. I bet memes fly past you too. Fifty bucks says your son's girlfriend's will never get along with his overbearing controlling mother with no humor. (👆You will notice, throughout this portion, you see them justifying, excusing and trying to flip what he has said onto me. All signs he knows what he has said, was wrong.) Me - 👈👈👈 Yep... This is who this person is. 👆👆👆This is why anything they say, does not matter. They aren't a good person. They aren't even mostly human. When people show you who they are, believe them. I'm going to screenshot this, copy and paste it everywhere I see this "person" from now on.
    3
  4449. 3
  4450. 3
  4451. 3
  4452. 3
  4453. 3
  4454. 3
  4455. 3
  4456. 3
  4457. 3
  4458. 3
  4459. 3
  4460. 3
  4461. 3
  4462. 3
  4463. 3
  4464. 3
  4465. 3
  4466. 3
  4467. 3
  4468. 3
  4469. 3
  4470. 3
  4471. 3
  4472. 3
  4473. 3
  4474. 3
  4475. 3
  4476. 3
  4477. 3
  4478. 3
  4479. 3
  4480. 3
  4481. 3
  4482. 3
  4483. 3
  4484. 3
  4485. 3
  4486. 3
  4487. 3
  4488. 3
  4489. 3
  4490. 3
  4491. 3
  4492. 3
  4493. 3
  4494. 3
  4495. 3
  4496. 3
  4497. 3
  4498. 3
  4499. 3
  4500. 3
  4501. 3
  4502.  @MajorMovieDeal  Sigh... Okay, you need to understand that going back and looking at one side of things and not the other is not at all what I said. Would you not agree that having an objective standpoint on the facts at hand would entail going back and looking at both sides? Is that logical to you? As far as right winger and left Winger violence you need to look at both sides. That was my claim. "Obama weaponized the IRS and intelligence agencies against his political opponents." - where is your proof for this claim? " we see the left boycotting conservatives, and Trump supporters all the time," - and? You do know this is America, right? The land where protests and boycotts are perfectly legal... and you know ....in the Constitution and shit... you remember that whole thing that Thomas Jefferson said, back in the day, about how dissent is the purest form of patriotism? " confronting them at College, restaurants, public places " - see my last answer... Lol " and even threatening them and their families at their homes," - To be very clear, if anyone is threatening anyone else, their families or their homes in any kind of real way, then that is absolutely wrong and they should go to jail. Irregardless a party, irregardless of side, irregardless of ethnicity or religion or any of that crap..... It has been my personal experience however, our side is willing to say that about our people more than yours and when our people are wrong we hold them to the same standard we hold you to. Even in this last comment of yours you are already trying to excuse and offuskate your people. With vague references to being set up. " there have been numerous fake hate crimes blamed on Trump supporters, like the one that two-bit actor pulled in Chicago recently. There is also the unwarranted media attack on the Catholic school boy wearing the Maga hat who was confronted by the American activist, he was totally mangled for this standing here." What I didn't see is what I asked for. Now we could go back and forth, bit for bit on violence and claims and such from either party in the last decade but I think you know I would win that and so instead how about we just admit that? Hopefully? " you people are so ignorant, so intolerant, so pathetic." - now I gave you fair warning dumbass. I gave you a choice. You can either speak to me in an adult manner or you can act like an ass whole child and get treated like an a**** child. Still up to you. Okay , I forgot about Tucker Carlson. You might need to be more specific cuz dude does a lot of s***. However I think you might be talking about the IHOP thing? To which I simply respond, you're a right winger and do not believe in the free market?
    3
  4503. 3
  4504. 3
  4505. 3
  4506. 3
  4507. 3
  4508. 3
  4509. 3
  4510. 3
  4511. 3
  4512. 3
  4513. 3
  4514. 3
  4515. 3
  4516. 3
  4517. 3
  4518. 3
  4519. 3
  4520. 3
  4521. 3
  4522. 3
  4523. 3
  4524. 3
  4525. 3
  4526. 3
  4527. 3
  4528. 3
  4529. 3
  4530. 3
  4531.  FK_YT_Shadowban  Questions your running from bc you can't answer them. 1. Have they not charged smaller player in national and international cases with lesser charges? 2. Have they also charged people like mob bosses with lesser crimes just to get them in jail? 3. Provide evidence that Donald Trump try to send the National Guard and Nancy Pelosi denied it? 4. Why would Donald Trump be doing everything he can to stop the release of the national presidential archive correspondence for January 6th? 5. How could there not be coordination is people actually brought materials to construct a working Gallows on site? 6. How can there not be coordination if there were people with bull horns directing the people who broke into the capital as to where to go to find our elected leaders? 7. Why is there ample evidence update pipe bombs being planted the night before that you're ignoring? 8. Are there or are there not tons of open investigations into the subject, still? 9. Under the law does it require to prove prior knowledge to charge someone with treason or sedition or insurrection? 10. Would everybody who broke into the building need to have prior knowledge? 11. Wouldn't or would it not be difficult to prove prior knowledge for them? 12. Why would the FBI keep all these investigations open and actively investigating them if they didn't have any kind of coordination that they found after the fact? Its been 8 months. 13. Why would they plant bombs the night before, bring material and construct a working Gallows on site, bring bear spray and firearms, have people directing them where to go to find the leaders in the capital and still have open and active FBI investigations into all of this, if they do not have evidence of higher crimes? Which by the way would not be Insurrection, it would be sedition. 14. If the FBI has released some of this 1400 hours of footage, under a judge's order, where is it? 15. Is it or is it not common during open investigations not to release all evidence until they either closed the investigation or go to trial? 16. Why can't you give the site and the title?
    3
  4532. 3
  4533. 3
  4534. 3
  4535. 3
  4536. 3
  4537. 3
  4538. 3
  4539.  FK_YT_Shadowban  Questions your running from bc you can't answer them. 1. Have they not charged smaller player in national and international cases with lesser charges? 2. Have they also charged people like mob bosses with lesser crimes just to get them in jail? 3. Provide evidence that Donald Trump try to send the National Guard and Nancy Pelosi denied it? 4. Why would Donald Trump be doing everything he can to stop the release of the national presidential archive correspondence for January 6th? 5. How could there not be coordination is people actually brought materials to construct a working Gallows on site? 6. How can there not be coordination if there were people with bull horns directing the people who broke into the capital as to where to go to find our elected leaders? 7. Why is there ample evidence update pipe bombs being planted the night before that you're ignoring? 8. Are there or are there not tons of open investigations into the subject, still? 9. Under the law does it require to prove prior knowledge to charge someone with treason or sedition or insurrection? 10. Would everybody who broke into the building need to have prior knowledge? 11. Wouldn't or would it not be difficult to prove prior knowledge for them? 12. Why would the FBI keep all these investigations open and actively investigating them if they didn't have any kind of coordination that they found after the fact? Its been 8 months. 13. Why would they plant bombs the night before, bring material and construct a working Gallows on site, bring bear spray and firearms, have people directing them where to go to find the leaders in the capital and still have open and active FBI investigations into all of this, if they do not have evidence of higher crimes? Which by the way would not be Insurrection, it would be sedition. 14. If the FBI has released some of this 1400 hours of footage, under a judge's order, where is it? 15. Is it or is it not common during open investigations not to release all evidence until they either closed the investigation or go to trial?
    3
  4540. 3
  4541. 3
  4542. 3
  4543. 3
  4544. 3
  4545. 3
  4546. 3
  4547. 3
  4548. 3
  4549. 3
  4550. 3
  4551. 3
  4552. 3
  4553. 3
  4554. 3
  4555. 3
  4556. 3
  4557. 3
  4558. 3
  4559. 3
  4560. 3
  4561. 3
  4562. 3
  4563. 3
  4564. 3
  4565. 3
  4566. 3
  4567. 3
  4568. 3
  4569. 3
  4570. 3
  4571. 3
  4572. 3
  4573. 3
  4574. 3
  4575. 3
  4576. 3
  4577. 3
  4578. 3
  4579. 3
  4580. 3
  4581. 3
  4582. 3
  4583. 3
  4584. 3
  4585. 3
  4586. 3
  4587. 3
  4588. 3
  4589. 3
  4590. 3
  4591. 3
  4592. 3
  4593. 3
  4594. 3
  4595. 3
  4596. 3
  4597. 3
  4598. 3
  4599. 3
  4600. 3
  4601. 3
  4602. 3
  4603. 3
  4604. 3
  4605. 3
  4606. 3
  4607. 3
  4608. 3
  4609. 3
  4610. 3
  4611. 3
  4612. 3
  4613. 3
  4614. 3
  4615. 3
  4616. 3
  4617. 3
  4618. 3
  4619. 3
  4620. 3
  4621. 3
  4622. 3
  4623. 3
  4624. 3
  4625. 3
  4626. 3
  4627. 3
  4628. 3
  4629. 3
  4630. 3
  4631. 3
  4632. 3
  4633. 3
  4634. 3
  4635. 3
  4636. 3
  4637. 3
  4638. 3
  4639. 3
  4640. 3
  4641. 3
  4642. 3
  4643. 3
  4644. 3
  4645. 3
  4646. 3
  4647. 3
  4648. 3
  4649. 3
  4650. 3
  4651. 3
  4652. 3
  4653. 3
  4654. 3
  4655. 3
  4656. 3
  4657. 3
  4658. 3
  4659. 3
  4660. 3
  4661. 3
  4662. 3
  4663. 3
  4664. 3
  4665. 3
  4666. 3
  4667. 3
  4668. 3
  4669. 3
  4670. 3
  4671. 3
  4672. 3
  4673. 3
  4674. 3
  4675. 3
  4676. 3
  4677. 3
  4678. 3
  4679. 3
  4680. 3
  4681. 3
  4682. 3
  4683. 3
  4684. 3
  4685. 3
  4686. 3
  4687. 3
  4688. 3
  4689. 3
  4690. 3
  4691. 3
  4692. 3
  4693. 3
  4694. 3
  4695. 3
  4696. 3
  4697. 3
  4698. 3
  4699. 3
  4700. 3
  4701. 3
  4702. 3
  4703. 3
  4704. 3
  4705. 3
  4706. 3
  4707. 3
  4708. 3
  4709. 3
  4710. 3
  4711. 3
  4712. 3
  4713. 3
  4714. 3
  4715. 3
  4716. 3
  4717. 3
  4718. 3
  4719. 3
  4720. 3
  4721. 3
  4722. 3
  4723. 3
  4724. 3
  4725. 3
  4726. 3
  4727.  SGT Gardner  Hey crazy! He.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic and America, just exactly like covid-19 and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obama. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 has magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cares, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, we're literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the world worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away by several different dates and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a coded safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claims, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineer is building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on.... So my question for you is, what is your evidence that no other president could have done that?
    3
  4728. 3
  4729. 3
  4730. 3
  4731. 3
  4732. 3
  4733. 3
  4734. 3
  4735. 3
  4736. 3
  4737. 3
  4738. 3
  4739. 3
  4740. 3
  4741. 3
  4742. 3
  4743. 3
  4744. 3
  4745. 3
  4746. 3
  4747. 3
  4748. 3
  4749. 3
  4750. 3
  4751. 3
  4752. 3
  4753. 3
  4754. 3
  4755. 3
  4756. 3
  4757. 3
  4758. 3
  4759. 3
  4760. 3
  4761. 3
  4762. 3
  4763. 3
  4764. 3
  4765. 3
  4766. 3
  4767. 3
  4768. 3
  4769. 3
  4770. 3
  4771. 3
  4772. 3
  4773. 3
  4774. 3
  4775. 3
  4776. 3
  4777. 3
  4778. 3
  4779. 3
  4780. 3
  4781. 3
  4782. 3
  4783. 3
  4784. 3
  4785. 3
  4786. 3
  4787. 3
  4788. 3
  4789. 3
  4790. 3
  4791. 3
  4792. 3
  4793. 3
  4794. 3
  4795. 3
  4796. 3
  4797. 3
  4798. 3
  4799. 3
  4800. 3
  4801. 3
  4802. 3
  4803. 3
  4804. 3
  4805. 3
  4806. 3
  4807. 3
  4808. 3
  4809. 3
  4810. 3
  4811. 3
  4812. 3
  4813. 3
  4814. 3
  4815. 3
  4816. 3
  4817. 3
  4818. 3
  4819. 3
  4820. 3
  4821. 3
  4822. 3
  4823. 3
  4824. 3
  4825. 3
  4826. 3
  4827. 3
  4828. 3
  4829. 3
  4830. 3
  4831. 3
  4832. 3
  4833. 3
  4834. 3
  4835. 3
  4836. 3
  4837. 3
  4838. 3
  4839. 3
  4840. 3
  4841. 3
  4842. 3
  4843. 3
  4844. 3
  4845. 3
  4846. 3
  4847. 3
  4848. 3
  4849. 3
  4850. 3
  4851. 3
  4852. 3
  4853. 3
  4854.  @eby2257  Well... At least we agree on something... and we are probably closer on the abortion thing than you think. I'm just not willing to Forest a woman to be a human incubator. HOWEVER... my stance on abortion has always been this.... abortion should be readily available, safe, way less frequent then it is but always the woman's choice. I find women who use abortion as birth control, disgusting. Especially if they do it frequently. Other than in an extreme situation, I personally do not think that I could ever have an abortion. I had five miscarriages before I had my little boy. He is my world and the air I breathe. I also know there are women out there who don't get the choice over what happens to their own bodies. There are also women that has their health compromise or the health of their child in the womb compromised to the point that neither one of them have a good chance of living. In those cases, especially if the woman already has a child, I would understand it. Sometimes contraception doesn't work. My son is proof of that, actually. We used a condom and I was on birth control. If a woman came to me and asked me what she should do because she can't afford a baby or the situation isn't healthy for them, I would urge them to give them up for adoption. Older kids don't do too well with adoption but babies go like crazy. The only difference would be, in all of those cases, if it was not personally me, I would never presume to force my beliefs on their own bodies. I would never presume to take that choice away from that woman. I would hate it if they made one that I didn't like but I would never take that choice away.
    3
  4855. 3
  4856. 3
  4857. 3
  4858. 3
  4859. 3
  4860. 3
  4861. 3
  4862. 3
  4863. 3
  4864. 3
  4865. 3
  4866. 3
  4867. 3
  4868. 3
  4869. 3
  4870. 3
  4871. 3
  4872. 3
  4873. 3
  4874. 3
  4875. 3
  4876. 3
  4877. 3
  4878. 3
  4879. 3
  4880. 3
  4881. 3
  4882. 3
  4883. 3
  4884. 3
  4885. 3
  4886. 3
  4887. 3
  4888. 3
  4889. 3
  4890. 3
  4891. 3
  4892. 3
  4893. 3
  4894. 3
  4895. 3
  4896. 3
  4897. 3
  4898. 3
  4899. 3
  4900. 3
  4901. 3
  4902. 3
  4903. 3
  4904. 3
  4905. 3
  4906. 3
  4907. 3
  4908. 3
  4909. 3
  4910. 3
  4911. 3
  4912.  Brian Searle  That sure is a whole lot more then just 2. Denying recorded historical history is never a good thing. Strom Thurmond John Connolly Miles E Goodwin " the Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B Johnson, although a southern Democrat himself, was unable to Rally the per diem received heavy opposition from both Southern Democrats and 👉Southern Republicans👈." "By 1948 the protection of segregation led Democrats to the Deep South to reject Truman and run a third-party ticket of 👉Dixiecrats👈 in the 1948 election." "During the Civil Rights movement, Democrats in the south initially still voted loyal lead to their party. After the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the old argument that all whites had to stick together to prevent civil rights legislation lost its Force because the legislation had now been passed." " in the presidential election of 1952 and 1956 Republican nominee Dwight Eisenhower, a popular World War II General, 👉won several Southern States👈, thus breaking some white Southerners away from their Democratic party pattern." After the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 " Southern Democrats willingness to support Republicans on a presidential level increase dramatically. 👉Goldwater👈 won many of the solid South States over Democratic candidate Lyndon Johnson, himself a Texan, and with 👉many this Republican support👈 continued and seeped down the ballot to Congressional, State and ultimately local levels." " some Southern Democrats became Republicans at the national level, while remaining their old party in state and local policies throughout the 70s and 80s. Several prominent conservative Democrats switched parties to become Republicans, including storm Thurmond, John Connolly and Myles E Godwin Jr." 👉 in 1980 Republican Presidential nominee Ronald Reagan won every Southern State except for Georgia." " many of the representatives, senators, and voters who were referred to as Reagan democrats in the 80s work and serve it is Southern Democrats."
    3
  4913. 3
  4914. 3
  4915. 3
  4916. 3
  4917. 3
  4918. 3
  4919. 3
  4920. 3
  4921. 3
  4922. 3
  4923. 3
  4924. 3
  4925. 3
  4926. 3
  4927. 3
  4928. 3
  4929. 3
  4930. 3
  4931. 3
  4932. 3
  4933. 3
  4934. 3
  4935. 3
  4936. 3
  4937. 3
  4938. 3
  4939. 3
  4940. 3
  4941. 3
  4942. 3
  4943. 3
  4944. 3
  4945. 3
  4946. 3
  4947. 3
  4948. 3
  4949. 3
  4950. 3
  4951.  William Campbell  you are setting up a false black and white choice. That is what I am saying. Do we choose who we vote for? Yes. Are we responsible for everything they do in office after we vote for them? No. Just as old as the sayings that you just found out is another one... Politicians lie. So often nowadays we end up choosing the lesser of two evils. That would be like if I blamed everyone who voted for Trump, someone who are in my own family, for everything he did. I would like to believe that they choose the person they choose to vote for off of all current relevant information. That's not always the case, but it is an option. Several Freedom thing you don't like. You were trying to put the entire onus on the voter. Except if that's true then no politician is ever responsible for whatever they may do. Except politicians are people too. And people have the responsibility to take responsibility for the things they say and do. As for you, this was not your original narratives. You cannot change it every time that you figure out it's not a good one. Or, you can but that requires you admitting that that wasn't the best idea in the world. Which I have found many people on here really can't stand doing that for some reason. So I'm not going to hold my breath. Is democracy perfect? No. Would I exchange little choice for no choice, no. Because you know what tends to work out worse than democracy, dictatorships. Do you have any idea how many dictatorships over the centuries have been overthrown because when you give one person that much power it corrupts. That's as old as time. Dictatorships are for people who don't want to think and do the hard work. I don't mind hard work and I like thinking.
    3
  4952. 3
  4953. 3
  4954. 3
  4955. 3
  4956. 3
  4957. 3
  4958. 3
  4959. 3
  4960. 3
  4961. 3
  4962. 3
  4963. 3
  4964. 3
  4965. 3
  4966. 3
  4967. 3
  4968. 3
  4969. 3
  4970. 3
  4971. 3
  4972. 3
  4973. 3
  4974. 3
  4975. 3
  4976. 3
  4977. 3
  4978. 3
  4979. 3
  4980. 3
  4981. 3
  4982. 3
  4983. 3
  4984. 3
  4985. 3
  4986. 3
  4987. 3
  4988. 3
  4989. 3
  4990. 3
  4991. 3
  4992. 3
  4993. 3
  4994. 3
  4995. 3
  4996. 3
  4997. 3
  4998. 3
  4999. 3
  5000. 3
  5001. 3
  5002. 3
  5003. 3
  5004. 3
  5005. 3
  5006. 3
  5007. 3
  5008. 3
  5009. 3
  5010. 3
  5011. 3
  5012. 3
  5013. 3
  5014. 3
  5015. 3
  5016. 3
  5017. 3
  5018. 3
  5019. 3
  5020. 3
  5021. 3
  5022. 3
  5023. 3
  5024. 3
  5025. 3
  5026. 3
  5027. 3
  5028. 3
  5029. 3
  5030. 3
  5031. 3
  5032. 3
  5033. 3
  5034. 3
  5035. 3
  5036. 3
  5037. 3
  5038. 3
  5039. 3
  5040. 3
  5041. 3
  5042. 3
  5043. 3
  5044. 3
  5045. 3
  5046. 3
  5047. 3
  5048. 3
  5049. 3
  5050. 3
  5051. 3
  5052. 3
  5053. 3
  5054. 3
  5055. 3
  5056. 3
  5057. 3
  5058. 3
  5059. 3
  5060. 3
  5061. 3
  5062. 3
  5063. 3
  5064. 3
  5065. 3
  5066. 3
  5067.  Randy Smith  Wait... What? " no Republicans were arrested for working with the Russians"? Rodger Stone was just recently convicted of five counts of obstruction of justice, one count of making false statements to Congress and one count of witness tampering. The Mueller investigation chargestone on the seven counts in January in connection with his statements to Congress on his communication with people affiliated with Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.... and we're talkin post Embassy camp out from hell. The indictment laying out the charger Stone was convicted on alleged that stone made, multiple false statements to HIC about his interactions regarding organization one, and falsely denied possessing records that contained evidence of these interactions in 2017 testimony. Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal lawyer and right-hand man was sentenced to three years in prison on fraud and line charges, weeks after Mueller released a memorandum that detailed more than 70 hours of cooperating and witness testimony. In a separate filing Cohen told prosecutors about previously unknown contact with a Russian national who claimed to be a trusted person in the Russian Federation who offered the campaign political synergy and Synergy on a governmental level. Cohen claimed that person repeatedly suggested a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Cohen pleaded guilty to lying about the dates during which Trump organization actively pursued a business deal to pursue a Trump Tower in Moscow, initially claiming the decisions ended in January 2016 when they in fact continued into the summer of the year. Prosecutors from the special counsel's office also charged Cohen lied to the Senate select committee on intelligence in testifying that he had never offered to travel to Russia and that he didn't recall any response from the Russian government regarding the deal. Manafort, Trump's former campaign chairman, was found guilty on 8th Federal counts of bank and tax fraud and pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to obstruct Justice and one count of conspiracy against the US. The District of Columbia also indicted him on a separate count of failing to register as a foreign agent. Can you guess which country he failed to register as a foreign agent for? He surrendered to Federal authorities on October 30th, 2017, after he was indicted, and along with his business associate with Rick Gates, on 12 counts, including conspiracy against the US and money laundering. Manafort was forced to step down as Trump's campaign chairman in May of 2016 after coming under Fire for his connections to Russia oligarchs and his past lobbying efforts abroad. Guess where he went abroad? This one isn't just Russia. Trump's former campaign chairman is accused of committing crimes while working as an unregistered lobbyist in the US for the Ukraine government and pro Russia interest beginning in 2006. Mueller charged manafort's right-hand man kislyak on June with witness tampering in a superseding indictment that charges the Russian Citizen and manafort with conspiracy to obstruct Justice and obstruction of justice. The special counsel has said kislyak has strong ties from past work with Russian intelligence and was in contact with top figures in Trump's 2016 campaign. Now let's move on to Sam Patten, who plead guilty in federal court for failing to register as a foreign agent while he love bead on behalf of the Ukraine interest in the US. He worked on behalf of several Pro Russia Ukraine political parties, including helping Ukraine oligarchs illegally spend $50,000 in tickets to Trump's January 2017 Inauguration in violation of federal law that bans inauguration funds from accepting money from foreign entities. He also is linked to both manafort and kislyak, as well as the opposition research firm Cambridge analytica. That is four different campaign officials that are don't to the Bramble with Russians and Russian related charges. I could go on to Gates and all the rest if you like?
    3
  5068. 3
  5069. 3
  5070. 3
  5071. 3
  5072. 3
  5073. 3
  5074. 3
  5075. 3
  5076. 3
  5077. 3
  5078. 3
  5079. 3
  5080. 3
  5081. 3
  5082. 3
  5083. 3
  5084. 3
  5085. 3
  5086. 3
  5087. 3
  5088. 3
  5089. 3
  5090. 3
  5091. 3
  5092. 3
  5093. 3
  5094. 3
  5095. 3
  5096. 3
  5097. 3
  5098. 3
  5099. 3
  5100. 3
  5101. 3
  5102. 3
  5103. 3
  5104. 3
  5105. 3
  5106. 3
  5107. 3
  5108. 3
  5109. 3
  5110. 3
  5111. 3
  5112. 3
  5113. 3
  5114. 3
  5115. 3
  5116. 3
  5117. 3
  5118. 3
  5119. 3
  5120. 3
  5121. 3
  5122. 3
  5123. 3
  5124. 3
  5125. 3
  5126. 3
  5127. 3
  5128. 3
  5129. 3
  5130. 3
  5131. 3
  5132. 3
  5133. 3
  5134. 3
  5135. 3
  5136. 3
  5137. 3
  5138. 3
  5139. 3
  5140. 3
  5141. 3
  5142. 3
  5143. 3
  5144. 3
  5145. 3
  5146. 3
  5147. 3
  5148. 3
  5149. 3
  5150. 3
  5151. 3
  5152. 3
  5153. 3
  5154. 3
  5155. 3
  5156. 3
  5157. 3
  5158. 3
  5159. 3
  5160. 3
  5161. 3
  5162. 3
  5163. 3
  5164. 3
  5165. 3
  5166. 3
  5167. 3
  5168. 3
  5169. 3
  5170. 3
  5171. 3
  5172. 3
  5173. 3
  5174. 3
  5175. 3
  5176. 3
  5177. 3
  5178. 3
  5179. 3
  5180. 3
  5181. 3
  5182. 3
  5183. 3
  5184. 3
  5185. 3
  5186. 3
  5187. 3
  5188. 3
  5189. 3
  5190. 3
  5191. 3
  5192. 3
  5193. 3
  5194. 3
  5195. 3
  5196. 3
  5197. 3
  5198. 3
  5199. 3
  5200. 3
  5201. 3
  5202. 3
  5203. 3
  5204. 3
  5205. 3
  5206. 3
  5207. 3
  5208. 3
  5209. 3
  5210. 3
  5211. 3
  5212. 3
  5213. 3
  5214. 3
  5215. 3
  5216. 3
  5217. 3
  5218. 3
  5219. 3
  5220. 3
  5221. 3
  5222. 3
  5223. 3
  5224. 3
  5225. 3
  5226. 3
  5227. 3
  5228. 3
  5229. 3
  5230. 3
  5231. 3
  5232. 3
  5233. 3
  5234. 3
  5235. 3
  5236. 3
  5237. 3
  5238. 3
  5239. 3
  5240. 3
  5241. 3
  5242. 3
  5243. 3
  5244. 3
  5245. 3
  5246. 3
  5247. 3
  5248. 3
  5249. 3
  5250. 3
  5251. 3
  5252. 3
  5253. 3
  5254. 3
  5255. 3
  5256. 3
  5257.  @jayhawk4578  These are your claims. " why did Joe Biden have 👉not even a part-time schedule👈 for being the president of the United States. He starts at 9 a.m. and is done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest👈." This is the evidence you provided to disprove your own claim. 1. May 19th 👉7:30👈 am to 👉4:35👈 pm 👉9hrs and 5 min total. - not even a part-time schedule - He starts at 9 a.m. - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest 2. May 18th 👉8:30 a.m.👈 to 👉5:30 p.m.👈 👉9hrs total - not even a part-time schedule - He starts at 9 a.m. - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest 3. May 17th 👉6:40 a.m.👈 to 1 p.m. 6hrs 20 min - He starts at 9 a.m. - not even a part-time schedule 4. May 16th 9 a.m. to 👉4:15 p.m.👈 👉7hrs 15 min - not even a part-time schedule - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest 5. May 15th 11:30 a.m. to 👉6:55 p.m.👈 👉7hrs and 35 min - not even a part-time schedule - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest 6. May 14th 9:50 a.m. to 👉4:30 p.m.👈 👉6hrs and 35 min - not even a part-time schedule - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest But let's mix it up and Skip around a bit, shall we... 7. May 7th 10:30 a.m. to 👉5:30 p.m.👈 👉7hrs - not even a part-time schedule - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest 8. May 6th 9 a.m. to 👉9:05 p.m.👈 12hrs and 5 min - not even a part-time schedule - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest 9. May 3rd 👉7:30 a.m.👈 to 4 p.m. 👉7hrs and 30 min - He starts at 9 a.m. - not even a part-time schedule - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest 10. May 2nd 12 p.m. to 👉9:20 p.m.👈 👉9hrs and 20 min - not even a part-time schedule - done by 1 or 2 👉is the latest So, were you just hoping I wouldn't actually read your link?
    3
  5258. 3
  5259. 3
  5260. 3
  5261. 3
  5262. 3
  5263. 3
  5264. 3
  5265. 3
  5266. 3
  5267. 3
  5268. 3
  5269. 3
  5270. 3
  5271. 3
  5272. 3
  5273. 3
  5274. 3
  5275. 3
  5276. 3
  5277. 3
  5278. 3
  5279. 3
  5280. 3
  5281. 3
  5282. 3
  5283. 3
  5284. 3
  5285. 3
  5286. 3
  5287. 3
  5288. 3
  5289. 3
  5290. 3
  5291. 3
  5292. 3
  5293. 3
  5294. 3
  5295. 3
  5296. 3
  5297. 3
  5298. 3
  5299. 3
  5300. 3
  5301. 3
  5302. 3
  5303. 3
  5304. 3
  5305. 3
  5306. 3
  5307. 3
  5308. 3
  5309. 3
  5310. 3
  5311. 3
  5312. 3
  5313. 3
  5314. 3
  5315. 3
  5316. 3
  5317. 3
  5318. 3
  5319. 3
  5320. 3
  5321. 3
  5322. 3
  5323. 3
  5324. 3
  5325. 3
  5326. 3
  5327. 3
  5328. 3
  5329. 3
  5330. 3
  5331. 3
  5332. 3
  5333. 3
  5334. 3
  5335. 3
  5336. 3
  5337. 3
  5338. 3
  5339. 3
  5340. 3
  5341. 3
  5342. 3
  5343. 3
  5344. 3
  5345. 3
  5346. 3
  5347. 3
  5348. 3
  5349. 3
  5350. 3
  5351. 3
  5352. 3
  5353. 3
  5354. 3
  5355. 3
  5356. 3
  5357.  @chrissparks3254  To be clear... The stem grows with in the first 3 weeks. After 6 weeks the brain starts to form. It turns on generally between 6 and 8 weeks.... But... Yes... I would argue that after 6 to 8 weeks it developed the ability for basic motor function. After 10 weeks the nerve endings start to grow. Basically giving The Unborn the ability to feel. Not in the way that we feel, however, at this point. As I said the nerve endings would just be growing at that point. True Consciousness develops between 8 and 10 weeks. Personally I'm always torn between these six week Mark when basic motor function develops and the 10-week work actual Consciousness is there for the first time. Nevertheless that would be considered human life at that point. At that point the argument becomes about whether the undeveloped fetus having life becomes more important than the woman carrying it in some circumstances. There are many different circumstances why women would be able to justifiably abort up to 12 weeks. There are many circumstances where I wouldn't feel that it would be just viable. However, I'm pro- choice because at the same time, I recognize that's not my business. I have no right to make that medical decision for that woman. I may not like the medical decision they come to and I may not like why they are coming to it but, I would especially not like the fact that I had the power to tell her to go through that kind of trauma with her body. I have a kid. I carried him for almost 10 months. I had to have a cesarean section after 12 hours of Labor that I didn't dilate. They had to sever nerve endings that I'm never going to be able to feel again. I also had medical complications that put my life in an unusual amount of danger when giving birth. I became staunch pro-choice after I had my kid. That's because if I got pregnant again and had those same risk factors again, I don't think I would risk orphaning the child that I already have, given my medical situation. I certainly would not ever condone someone trying to take that right away from me. It's hard enough already. But that's what we're doing to women right now. Women that could be in my situation and have to make a horrible choice between orphaning possibly two children without any say over what she's doing because someone wants to take her rights away to make that hard choice.
    3
  5358. 3
  5359. 3
  5360. 3
  5361. 3
  5362. 3
  5363. 3
  5364. 3
  5365. 3
  5366. 3
  5367. 3
  5368. 3
  5369. 3
  5370. 3
  5371. 3
  5372. 3
  5373. 3
  5374. 3
  5375. 3
  5376. 3
  5377. 3
  5378. 3
  5379. @Jefferson Project Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    3
  5380. 3
  5381. 3
  5382. 3
  5383. 3
  5384. 3
  5385.  @DJPlayz102  I don't think. I check the facts. Because it is Beyond irresponsible to spread disinformation during a worldwide crisis oh, such as this. Especially when the facts are literally at the tip of everybody's fingers. 👇 He wasn't just the wrong. He was wrong by a country mile. 👇 And so are you. Taking into account that every. Country has a different sized population, you calculate percentage per population count. Using raw numbers means nothing, when you consider the variables. You have to put them on the same levels. 👇 United States Latest estimate: 28.24 per thousand people; 9,348,458 in total (as of 11 May 2020). Australia Latest estimate: 34.43 per thousand people; 877,927 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Austria Latest estimate: 36.56 per thousand people; 329,314 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Bahrain Latest estimate: 116.3 per thousand people; 197,898 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Belarus Latest estimate: 30.1 per thousand people; 284,445 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Belgium Latest estimate: 42.09 per thousand people; 487,863 in total (as of 10 May 2020). Canada Latest estimate: 30.36 per thousand people; 1,145,683 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Czech Republic Latest estimate: 29.33 per thousand people; 314,138 in total (as of 11 May 2020). Denmark Latest estimate: 57.71 per thousand people; 334,260 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Estonia Latest estimate: 48.98 per thousand people; 64,975 in total (as of 11 May 2020). Germany Latest estimate: 32.89 per thousand people; 2,755,770 in total (as of 03 May 2020). Ireland Latest estimate: 52.41 per thousand people; 258,808 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Israel Latest estimate: 53.44 per thousand people; 462,580 in total (as of 11 May 2020). Italy Latest estimate: 28.81 per thousand people; 1,741,903 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Latvia Latest estimate: 41.91 per thousand people; 79,047 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Lithuania Latest estimate: 70.67 per thousand people; 192,386 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Luxembourg Latest estimate: 90.09 per thousand people; 56,394 in total (as of 12 May 2020). New Zealand Latest estimate: 40.87 per thousand people; 197,084 in total (as of 11 May 2020). Norway Latest estimate: 37.86 per thousand people; 205,239 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Portugal Latest estimate: 54.32 per thousand people; 553,855 in total (as of 10 May 2020). Qatar Latest estimate: 46.96 per thousand people; 135,294 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Russia Latest estimate: 39.78 per thousand people; 5,805,404 in total (as of 12 May 2020). Slovenia Latest estimate: 31.05 per thousand people; 64,547 in total (as of 11 May 2020). Spain Latest estimate: 34.76 per thousand people; 1,625,211 in total (as of 07 May 2020). Switzerland Latest estimate: 36.61 per thousand people; 316,851 in total (as of 11 May 2020). https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing#which-countries-do-we-have-testing-data-for
    3
  5386. 3
  5387. 3
  5388. 3
  5389. 3
  5390. 3
  5391. 3
  5392. 3
  5393. 3
  5394. 3
  5395. 3
  5396. 3
  5397. 3
  5398. 3
  5399. 3
  5400. 3
  5401. 3
  5402. 3
  5403. 3
  5404. 3
  5405. 3
  5406. 3
  5407. 3
  5408. 3
  5409. 3
  5410. 3
  5411. 3
  5412. 3
  5413. 3
  5414. 3
  5415. 3
  5416. 3
  5417. 3
  5418. 3
  5419. 3
  5420. 3
  5421. 3
  5422. 3
  5423. 3
  5424. 3
  5425. 3
  5426. 3
  5427. 3
  5428. 3
  5429. 3
  5430. 3
  5431. 3
  5432. 3
  5433. 3
  5434. 3
  5435. 3
  5436. 3
  5437. 3
  5438. 3
  5439. 3
  5440. 3
  5441. 3
  5442. 3
  5443. 3
  5444. 3
  5445. 3
  5446. 3
  5447. 3
  5448. 3
  5449. 3
  5450. 3
  5451. 3
  5452. 3
  5453. 3
  5454. 3
  5455. 3
  5456. 3
  5457. 3
  5458. 3
  5459. 3
  5460. 3
  5461. 3
  5462. 3
  5463. 3
  5464. 3
  5465. 3
  5466. 3
  5467. 3
  5468. 3
  5469. 3
  5470. 3
  5471. 3
  5472. 3
  5473. 3
  5474. 3
  5475. 3
  5476. 3
  5477. 3
  5478. 3
  5479. 3
  5480. 3
  5481. 3
  5482. 3
  5483. 3
  5484. 3
  5485. 3
  5486. 3
  5487. 3
  5488. 3
  5489. 3
  5490. 3
  5491. 3
  5492. 3
  5493. 3
  5494. 3
  5495. 3
  5496. 3
  5497. 3
  5498. 3
  5499. 3
  5500. 3
  5501. 3
  5502. 3
  5503. 3
  5504. 3
  5505. 3
  5506. 3
  5507. 3
  5508. 3
  5509. 3
  5510. 3
  5511. 3
  5512. 3
  5513. 3
  5514. 3
  5515. 3
  5516. 3
  5517. 3
  5518. 3
  5519. 3
  5520.  @richardgreene6810  All you have demonstrated is your need to willfully ignorant of understanding socialism. You don't even understand the limitations of it. Its an economic platform, only. It does not restrict your freedoms. It allocates resources to the most needed places, as well as funding. That is it. It wont prevent you from owning a gun, voting, speaking out or any of the rest. Unless your version of freedom involves taking food from childrens mouths because you simply want more then you need? No one could prove that to you. You have made up your mind already. Which is why your now trying to set up a false dichotomy. A situation in which either I have to "prove" something to you or I'm "brainwashed". Why? Because you said so... I guess... You don't even want to acknowledge the fact that America isn't run on pure capitalism. It's a hybrid system. Hence the socialist run programs in america, that you will try to cherry pic data from, in order to say it's not socialist. Like you tried to do with the military and their "only resorce", apparently.... Weapons. 1. The Military/Defense - The United States military is the largest and most funded socialist program in the world.  It operates thanks to our taxpayer dollars and protects the country as a whole. From the richest citizens to the homeless who sleep under the bridge. We are all protected by our military whether we pay taxes or not. This is complete socialism. 2. Highways/Roads - Those roads and highways you drive on every single day are completely taxpayer funded. Your tax dollars are used to maintain, expand, and preserve our highways and roads for every one's use. President Eisenhower was inspired by Germany's autobahn and implemented the idea right here in America. That's right, a republican president created our taxpayer funded, national highway system. This was a different time, before the republican party came down with a vicious case of rabies that never went away. 4. Police - Ever had a situation where you had to call the police? Then you have used a taxpayer funded socialist program. Anyone can call the police whether they pay taxes or not. They are there to protect and serve the community, not individuals. This is complete socialism on a state level, but still socialism all the same. Would you rather have to swipe your credit card before the police will help you? 5. Fire Dept. - Hopefully you have never had a fire in your home. But if you have, you probably called your local taxpayer-funded fire department to put the fire out. Like police, this is state socialism. You tax dollars are used to rescue your entire community in case of a fire. It use to be set up where you would pay a fee every month to the fire dept. for their service. If you didn't pay, they let your house burn down. Sadly, a man from Tennessee had this exact situation happen to him in 2011 because he didn't pay his $75.00 fee. I guess that small town in Tennessee would rather let people's houses burn down that resort to evil socialism. So don't take for granted the fact that you have a 24/7 fire dept. to put out your burning home thanks to socialism. 9. Garbage Collection - Like having your garbage collected once a week instead of having to drive it to the landfill yourself? Thank socialism. 13. CIA - The Central Intelligence Agency is vital to America's security. The CIA is completely taxpayer funded to protect the public from enemies. 14. FBI - The Federal bureau of investigations is a taxpayer funded government agency. 18. Social Security - You pay a tax to help ensure that our grandparents and senior citizens of America have money to live off of when they are retired or too elderly to work. I love hearing rich people bitch about this one because the truth is that they do not pay a social security tax, like most payroll taxes. This little piece of socialism helps prevent our senior citizens from sinking into poverty and starving to death. 30. Bird Flu Vaccine - You don't have bird flu right now and probably aren't worried about it because our federal government used taxpayer funds to pump vaccines all over America. 31. G.I. Bill - The G.I. bill allows veterans to pursue an education by using taxpayer dollars to help them pay for most of their schooling. It also helps them with loans, savings, and unemployment benefits. 36. The Pentagon - Our defense system in America is a socialist system from top to bottom. We as taxpayers fund the pentagon completely. 47. WIC - WIC is a federally funded program to assist women, infants, and children. WIC helps low-income families by providing funding for nutrition, education, and health care for children. 50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) - The CDC helps promote and enact the health and safety of the public along with helping to prevent and control illness and disease. The CDC is a government program that operates on taxpayer funding. https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2012/3/29/1078852/-75-Ways-Socialism-Has-Improved-America
    3
  5521. 3
  5522. 3
  5523. 3
  5524. 3
  5525. 3
  5526. 3
  5527. 3
  5528. 3
  5529. 3
  5530. 3
  5531. 3
  5532. 3
  5533. 3
  5534. 3
  5535. 3
  5536. 3
  5537. 3
  5538. 3
  5539. 3
  5540. 3
  5541. 3
  5542. 3
  5543. 3
  5544. 3
  5545. 3
  5546. 3
  5547. 3
  5548. 3
  5549. 3
  5550. 3
  5551. 3
  5552. 3
  5553. 3
  5554. 3
  5555. 3
  5556. 3
  5557. 3
  5558. 3
  5559. 3
  5560. 3
  5561. 3
  5562. 3
  5563. 3
  5564. 3
  5565. 3
  5566. 3
  5567. 3
  5568. 3
  5569. 3
  5570. 3
  5571. 3
  5572. 3
  5573. 3
  5574. 3
  5575. 3
  5576. 3
  5577. 3
  5578. 3
  5579. 3
  5580. 3
  5581. 3
  5582. 3
  5583. 3
  5584. 3
  5585. 3
  5586. 3
  5587. 3
  5588. 3
  5589. 3
  5590. 3
  5591. 3
  5592. 3
  5593. 3
  5594. 3
  5595. 3
  5596. 3
  5597. 3
  5598. 3
  5599. 3
  5600. 3
  5601. 3
  5602. 3
  5603. 3
  5604.  @dg3513  As for Obama... 1 – Rescued the country from the Great Recession, cutting the unemployment rate from 10% to 4.7% over six years 2 – Signed the Affordable Care Act which provided health insurance to over 20 million uninsured Americans 3 – Ended the war in Iraq 4 – Ordered for the capture and killing of Osama Bin Laden 5 – Passed the $787 billion America Recovery and Reinvestment Act to spur economic growth during the Great Recession 6 – Supported the LGBT community’s fight for marriage equality 7 – Commuted the sentences of nearly 1200 drug offenders to reverse “unjust and outdated prison sentences” 8 – Saved the U.S. auto industry 9 – Helped put the U.S. ontrack for energy independence by 2020 10 – Began the drawdown of troops in Afghanistan 11 – Signed the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals allowing as many as 5 million people living in the U.S. illegally to avoid deportation and receive work permits 12 –Signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to re-regulate the financial sector 13 – Dropped the veteran homeless rate by 50 percent 14 – Reversed Bush-era torture policies 15 – Began the process of normalizing relations with Cuba 16 – Increased Department of Veteran Affairs funding 17 – Signed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act 18 – Boosted fuel efficiency standards for cars 19 – Improved school nutrition with the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act 20 – Repealed the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy 21 – Signed the Hate Crimes Prevention Act, making it a federal crime to assault anyone based on sexual or gender identification 22 – Helped negotiate the landmark Iran Nuclear Deal 23 – He signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to combat pay discrimination against women 24 – Nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, making her the first Hispanic ever to serve as a justice 25 – Supported veterans through a $78 billion tuition assistance GI bill 26 – Won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples” 27 – Launched My Brother’s Keeper, a White House initiative designed to help young minorities achieve their full potential 28 – Expanded embryonic stem cell research leading to groundbreaking work in areas including spinal injury treatment and cancer Just to name a few. 🤣
    3
  5605. 3
  5606. 3
  5607. 3
  5608. 3
  5609. 3
  5610. 3
  5611. 3
  5612. 3
  5613. 3
  5614. 3
  5615. 3
  5616. 3
  5617. 3
  5618. 3
  5619. 3
  5620. 3
  5621. 3
  5622. 3
  5623. 3
  5624. 3
  5625.  @fleafarts3576  Well... one big one was the only kind of war that literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade war. So if you want to talk about how people got us into war I'm assuming you're also adding in the Republican presidents before trump, right? if by took on trying to you meant got us in a trade War we had never had any chance of winning and cost us hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade, if we're lucky. are we green? Cuz if we're not green he didn't get us energy independent. close the border that was never open in the first place.. check... and then did so by putting children in cages. "Yeah that's something we should be super proud about". let's say he funded these black colleges, that does not make up for all the racist dog whistling he did. provide proof that Donald Trump pardoned more AA inmates for petty drug crimes than any other president? started the withdrawal from Afghanistan and then had Biden finish it so him and his people could say how bad of an idea that was? Why did it take him 4 years just to start it? what was so s*** about the Paris climate accords? Please be ready to provide proof of this because that's exactly where I'm going next... how did he go after big pharma? Especially considering he took funding from them and hired a lot of their pundits? the military was never unbuilt to be rebuilt. So that's another right-wing propaganda saying you're trying to give him credit for breaking that was never broken in the first place. woke is a ridiculous childish term used to trying to dismiss social justice... when it makes it too uncomfortable for you guys to talk about. please tell me how he reduced gas prices? I'll wait how did he keep Russia out of ukraine? Unless you count him being Vladimir Putin's b** in public all the damn time... besides you understand during Donald Trump's entire presidency there was a war in Ukraine that Russia invaded?
    3
  5626. 3
  5627. 3
  5628. 3
  5629. 3
  5630. 3
  5631. 3
  5632. 3
  5633. 3
  5634. 3
  5635. 3
  5636. 3
  5637. 3
  5638. 3
  5639. 3
  5640. 3
  5641. 3
  5642. 3
  5643. 3
  5644. 3
  5645. 3
  5646. 3
  5647. 3
  5648. 3
  5649. 3
  5650. 3
  5651. 3
  5652. 3
  5653. 3
  5654. 3
  5655. 3
  5656. 3
  5657. 3
  5658. 3
  5659. 3
  5660. 3
  5661. 3
  5662. 3
  5663. 3
  5664. 3
  5665. 3
  5666. 3
  5667. 3
  5668. 3
  5669. 3
  5670. 3
  5671. 3
  5672. 3
  5673. 3
  5674. 3
  5675. 3
  5676. 3
  5677. 3
  5678. 3
  5679. 3
  5680. 3
  5681. 3
  5682. 3
  5683. 3
  5684. 3
  5685. 3
  5686. 3
  5687. 3
  5688. 3
  5689. 3
  5690. 3
  5691. 3
  5692. 3
  5693. 3
  5694. 3
  5695. 3
  5696. 3
  5697. 3
  5698. 3
  5699. 3
  5700. 3
  5701. 3
  5702.  @realthings5821  5. You claim the cases were thrown out by technicalities. That is what it has standing on. However from this statement, " you, presumably, want poor cases included, despite them having no bearing on any conclusion, for no reason at all." 👈 is you trying to already dismiss any evidence that goes against your chosen narrative. What is "Poor cases"? You made the claimed that all the cases were thrown out by technicalities. They were not. A whole bunch of them we're not. You made this claim to point out that they didn't investigate. Except.... not being thrown out on standing meant that each one of those cases had every opportunity in the world to present preliminary evidence in order to show the court that they needed to proceed to a trial. " if one large enough case support my argument than I am correct" 👈 and this is true. Why? Because you said so? The only big case you've presented so far west Texas which I dismantled in two seconds because it was such a ridiculous suit.... and, because all Texas had to do was to render their "evidence" to one person who lived in that state and have them file suit. It didn't even have to be a lawyer or a government worker. They could have pulled anyone off the street to do that. Yet they did not. The courts didn't block it and the courts can initiate those kinds of Investigations. You can't go to court and get a warrant on nothing and those are the only part of Investigations that courts decide. These are several different sources, siting lists of post election lawsuits. It is literally everywhere. Yet you claim they where all thrown out for technical issues. False... there is absolutely no reason you shouldn't already have this information unless you did not want it. I can provide more, if you like. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election?wprov=sfla1 https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia%27s_2020_Election_Help_Desk:_Tracking_election_disputes,_lawsuits,_and_recounts https://www-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.businessinsider.com/trump-campaign-lawsuits-election-results-2020-11?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16247394361449&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Ftrump-campaign-lawsuits-election-results-2020-11
    3
  5703. 3
  5704. 3
  5705. 3
  5706. 3
  5707. 3
  5708. 3
  5709. 3
  5710. 3
  5711. 3
  5712. 3
  5713. 3
  5714. 3
  5715. 3
  5716. 3
  5717. 3
  5718. 3
  5719. 3
  5720. 3
  5721. 3
  5722. 3
  5723. 3
  5724. 3
  5725. 3
  5726. 3
  5727. 3
  5728. 3
  5729. 3
  5730. 3
  5731. 3
  5732. 3
  5733. 3
  5734. 3
  5735. 3
  5736. 3
  5737. 3
  5738. 3
  5739. 3
  5740. 3
  5741. 3
  5742. 3
  5743. 3
  5744. 3
  5745. 3
  5746. 3
  5747. 3
  5748. 3
  5749. 3
  5750. 3
  5751. 3
  5752.  @calebmahoney2448  I'm sorry that argument is completely unrealistic. Are there people on the Democratic side that do it in regards to rigging the court or elections or the economy, sure probably and they should be held accountable. However to suggest that they're both measured in the same amount is ridiculous. Gerrymandering has been going on for years on both sides and is complete BS. However it can only sway one way or the other so much. As long as you get each district show out that it doesn't matter at all. At least not without all these other new Republican rules where they're taking ballot boxes and polling locations out of minority or Democratic districts, making lines longer and harder to wait in. Blocking countless bills which would mandate that all national elections be on weekends. Which would, by the way, almost solve the entire problem. National elections are held on weekdays. Where most people are working nine-to-five. Because that's how our system is structured. I don't have time, especially in minority areas to weigh to ride in the line all day. They have to be at work. There's a million little things that the Republicans are trying to pass in order to either invalidate any vote they don't like or make it as hard as possible for working-class Americans to go practice their constitutional right to vote. They're doing that all over the country and have been for over a year now. All based on a lie. So to say that the Democrats and the Republicans equate to each other in that way in this time, is completely disingenuous.
    3
  5753. 3
  5754. 3
  5755. 3
  5756. 3
  5757. 3
  5758. 3
  5759. 3
  5760.  @travisjohnson7065  1. While you, apparently, like to set up a bunch of false equivalencies and Paper Tigers, I do not break that way. You keep talking about a body as if that's life. Its not. Its a shell. It must closely resembles that of someone in a permanent vegetative state. You can keep the body operating but there's nobody home. Not simply a body. Science defines life as consciousness and the ability to feel pain. 2. In Most states, abortion limitations are so strict now that zygotes and newly-formed fetuses are the norms. 3 to 12 weeks. During this time, there's no basic motor function, no cognitive ability whatsoever because the brain hasn't even switched on yet. In fact, through most of that time span, it's not even done developing. At this point, what's inside your reproductive system, has no more consciousness then that of the sperm before it entered the egg. Given that standard, male masturbation is murder. 3. Which leads us to 3. Your false equivalency trying to split the atom between development and growth, is, hopefully, intentional. During that stage, in the womb, the brain is developing its basic building blocks and actually forming itself. The growth you're trying to equate it with is a point when the brain has already formed but is now gaining girth and switching certain parts of it on. Scientifically, two completely different stages. I'm talking about building the lamp and you're talking about turning it on, like their the same thing. They are not. 4. As for "life lyrically being displayed buy unborn children", that all depends on what stage of development you're talking about. Between 12 and 16 weeks the brain starts turning on and forming basic motor skills. Which require a brain to tell your body what to do. After 12 weeks, I, myself, would not support abortion unless it was an extreme circumstance. Which is only predicated on the fact that I would have the right to tell somebody what to do with their own body. Which I don't. And neither do you. After that point, there are signs of life. Because it has a Consciousness and that has become alive. Any involuntary movement before that is body development. Basically anything before 12 weeks when it comes to movement is like how a doctor checks your reflexes by knocking on your knee and it involuntarily kicks. It's called a muscle spasm. 5. The reason that I'm claiming you don't care about the life of the other body and play, is because you haven't mentioned it once. You are treating women like a walking talking human incubators. Like that's our primary function in life. 6. The virtue signaling is crazy misguided. That's only you failing to see the other side of that coin. Let's say abortion became illegal tomorrow. If that would happen, do you understand the equally as messed up stuff as murder would be happening in this country? What start with childhood sexual assault. If abortion was outlawed completely tomorrow, in this country on unfortunately regular basis there would be a child being strapped down, while doctors force them to give birth to their assaulters child. There would be mothers being forced to die giving birth and leaving the children they already had, without their mothers. There would be a surge of back ally abortions and deaths, and/or mutilation. Just to name a few.
    3
  5761. 3
  5762. 3
  5763. 3
  5764. 3
  5765. 3
  5766. 3
  5767. 3
  5768. 3
  5769. 3
  5770. 3
  5771. 3
  5772. 3
  5773. 3
  5774. 3
  5775. 3
  5776. 3
  5777. 3
  5778. 3
  5779. 3
  5780. 3
  5781. 3
  5782. 3
  5783. 3
  5784. 3
  5785. 3
  5786. 3
  5787. 3
  5788.  @m3ictsolutions993  by the way, you skipped all this👇... Which is kind of funny because you're the one that asked for it. It's like you don't want to see it or something. LOL "and you're right, it's not very hard. As a matter of fact, Trump released all the evidence for his crimes thus far that have been proven, himself. Ironically. Dude just can't stop shooting himself in the foot. In the edited version of the July 25th transcript... And I say edited version because if he released an edited version and it still showed him committing a crime, what does the unedited version show? But I digress. In the edited version of the July 25th transcript it shows him committing campaign Finance fraud. When he asked the president of a foreign country to investigate his den political opponent in the next election, that is campaign Finance fraud. He has also committed three provable obstruction of Congress violations. All having to do with subpoenas. He tried to curtail 1 Witnesses testimony by abusing his executive privilege. He tried to stop another witness from even testifying and he has ordered his administration not to release subpoenaed documents to the house. This isn't the Mueller investigation. His office is not going to protect him from being charged for obstruction this time. Impeachment is a whole new ballgame. Those documents that he refuses to turn over for subpoena, by the way, are ones that will tie the money, the aid from Ukraine and why it was held. If that's proven, you also have bribery extortion and conspiracy."
    3
  5789. 3
  5790. 3
  5791. 3
  5792. 3
  5793. 3
  5794. 3
  5795. 3
  5796. 3
  5797. 3
  5798. 3
  5799. 3
  5800. 3
  5801. 3
  5802. 3
  5803. 3
  5804. 3
  5805. 3
  5806. 3
  5807. 3
  5808. 3
  5809. 3
  5810. 3
  5811. 3
  5812. 3
  5813. 3
  5814. 3
  5815. 3
  5816. 3
  5817. 3
  5818. 3
  5819. 3
  5820. 3
  5821. 3
  5822. 3
  5823. 3
  5824. 3
  5825. 3
  5826. 3
  5827. 3
  5828. 3
  5829. 3
  5830. 3
  5831. 3
  5832. 3
  5833. 3
  5834. 3
  5835. 3
  5836. 3
  5837. 3
  5838. 3
  5839. 3
  5840. 3
  5841. 3
  5842. 3
  5843. 3
  5844. 3
  5845. 3
  5846. 3
  5847. 3
  5848. 3
  5849. 3
  5850. 3
  5851. 3
  5852. 3
  5853. 3
  5854. 3
  5855. 3
  5856. 3
  5857. 3
  5858. 3
  5859. 3
  5860. 3
  5861. 3
  5862. 3
  5863. 3
  5864. 3
  5865. 3
  5866. 3
  5867. 3
  5868. 3
  5869. 3
  5870. 3
  5871. 3
  5872. 3
  5873. 3
  5874. 3
  5875. 3
  5876. 3
  5877. 3
  5878. 3
  5879. 3
  5880. 3
  5881. 3
  5882. 3
  5883. 3
  5884. 3
  5885. 3
  5886. 3
  5887. 3
  5888. 3
  5889. 3
  5890. 3
  5891. 3
  5892. 3
  5893.  @williamh5646  Let me count the ways... Foreign emoluments- Article 1 section 9 November 16th 2016 the Trump International Hotel host about a hundred foreign diplomats for a tour, baiting them with champagne and Sliders and sending them home with goodie bags. December 7th 2016 the Kingdom of Bahrain host its National Day celebration at the Trump International Hotel. December 14th 2016 the embassy of Azerbaijan hosts a Hanukkah Party at the Trump International Hotel. January 23rd through 26th of 2017 An employee of Qorvis MSLGROUP, a firm hired by Saudi Arabia to Lobby Congress to repeal a law allowing 911 victims to sue the kingdom, pains for at least one room at the Trump International Hotel. January 27th 2017 Trump issues a travel ban on Nationals from several majority-muslim countries, notably excluding nations in which he himself has business interests. He also plugs the Trump Turnberry Resort in Scotland during an appearance with British prime minister Theresa May. " I happen to be in Scotland at Turnberry cutting a ribbon when brexit happened and we had a vast amount of press there." February 11th 2017 Trump host the Japanese prime minister at his Palm Beach Mar-A-Lago club, golfing 27 holes together and hashing out how to respond to news of a North Korean intermediate-range ballistic missile launch in the middle of the dining area. According to the White House, the host of the visit is a gift from Trump. February 21st 2017 Trump wins 3 trade marks from the Mexican Institute of industrial property. March 17th 2017 the Trump organization announces that it won't begin donating profits from foreign officials to the US Treasury As Trump promised. April 11th 2017 the New York Times reports that the Trump organization has 157 trademark applications pending in 36 countries. October 22nd 2017 Trump Cashes in on an Irish golf tourism conference, in part sponsored by the governments of Ireland and Northern Ireland, held at the Trump International Golf Links and hotel in Ireland. October 31st 2017 Mexico's foreign US ambassador tweets that the state department is encouraging diplomats to stay at the Trump International Hotel during official visits. Ongoing the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Trump's Towers largest commercial tenant, pays nearly 2 million per year for office space. This is the year it's supposed to renegotiate its lease. Domestic emoluments- Article 2 Section 1 August 5th 2000 13 Trump Old Post Office LLC signs a 60 year lease with a government agency to open the Trump International Hotel in Washington DC from which Trump has yet to divest his interests. November 14th 2016 6 days after the election, Trump receives all but final approval from National Park Service for a 32 million-dollar historic preservation tax credit for the Trump International Hotel January 1st 2017 Trump celebrates New Year's Eve at Mar-A-Lago at an 800 guest event that cost over $500 per ticket March to May 2017 Marine Governor Paul LePage stains at Trump Hotel during a taxpayer-funded trip to Washington, spends at least $2,500 on accommodations at the hotel. March 11th 2017 Trump had seen Trump National Golf Course in Virginia for a working lunch with members of his cabinet. March 22nd 2017 The Washington Post reports that the Secret Service, strained under the cost of providing security at Trump Tower and Mar-A-Lago, has requested an additional 60 million in funding to protect the first family. February to April 2017 the Secret Service pays at least $63,000 directly to Mar-A-Lago to account for Trump's visit to the property October 5th 2017 USA Today reports that the Secret Service golf cart have at Trump properties has run into at least $137,000 These are only a few from the very first year....
    3
  5894. 3
  5895. 3
  5896. 3
  5897. 3
  5898. 3
  5899. 3
  5900. 3
  5901. 3
  5902. 3
  5903. 3
  5904. 3
  5905. 3
  5906. 3
  5907. 3
  5908. 3
  5909. 3
  5910. 3
  5911. 3
  5912. 3
  5913.  @willtellall638  "or telling us our tolerance of Lifestyles we don't agree with isn't nearly enough. No we must celebrate any lifestyle choice or gender option. Forget science you throw our Direction or you think it's fine to call us homophobic or some other degrading slur you decide is okay to call us... All while lecturing us on hate speech. " Just the way this guy describes this subject is a clear representation of how much he doesn't get it and how privileged he is. Wouldn't it be insane for someone to say to you.... I tolerate the fact that you are a biological male, who is straight and sleeps with women... so why are you trying to force me to celebrate that? Because if that is what sounds and same to you. Imagine how insane you sound to other people. I don't know what science you're talkin about. Because science now we have homosexuality, bisexuality, no sexuality Anna flurry of other sexualities in all species all over the world, but there's been gods of proof of this for Generations upon Generations. Genuinely most of us just don't fucken understand why it's any of your goddamn business what somebody wants to be called or who they sleep with. Do you check with all of society when you sleep with women? As for you thinking that apparently every gay or transgender man is a pedophile, that's just ignorant. Also there's literally been no cases involving transgender man sexually assaulting little girls in the scenarios upon which that you or trying to claim. So you're just making things up.
    3
  5914. 3
  5915. 3
  5916. 3
  5917. 3
  5918. 3
  5919. 3
  5920. 3
  5921. 3
  5922. 3
  5923. 3
  5924. 3
  5925. 3
  5926. 3
  5927. 3
  5928. 3
  5929. 3
  5930. 3
  5931. 3
  5932. 3
  5933. 3
  5934. 3
  5935. 3
  5936. 3
  5937. 3
  5938. 3
  5939. 3
  5940. 3
  5941. 3
  5942. 3
  5943. 3
  5944. 3
  5945. 3
  5946. 3
  5947. 3
  5948. 3
  5949. 3
  5950. 3
  5951. 3
  5952. 3
  5953. 3
  5954. 3
  5955. 3
  5956. 3
  5957. 3
  5958. 3
  5959. 3
  5960. 3
  5961. 3
  5962. 3
  5963. 3
  5964. 3
  5965. 3
  5966. 3
  5967. 3
  5968. 3
  5969. 3
  5970. 3
  5971. 3
  5972. 3
  5973. 3
  5974. 3
  5975. 3
  5976. 3
  5977. 3
  5978. 3
  5979. 3
  5980. 3
  5981. 3
  5982. 3
  5983. 3
  5984. 3
  5985. 3
  5986. 3
  5987. 3
  5988. 3
  5989. 3
  5990. 3
  5991. 3
  5992. 3
  5993. 3
  5994. 3
  5995. 3
  5996. 3
  5997. 3
  5998. 3
  5999. 3
  6000. 3
  6001. 3
  6002. 3
  6003. 3
  6004. 3
  6005. 3
  6006. 3
  6007. 3
  6008. 3
  6009. 3
  6010. 3
  6011. 3
  6012. 3
  6013. 3
  6014. 3
  6015. 3
  6016. 3
  6017. 3
  6018. 3
  6019. 3
  6020. 3
  6021. 3
  6022. 3
  6023.  @zbudda  Oh! Now I know what you where talking about. With Fusion GPS... AND ALL THAT! The Mueller Report was 2 years long. It had 152 agents and investigaters working on different portions of it. Fusion GPS dossier where one of the very first things investigated at the beginning of those 2 years. They reference in the Mueller report that this portion was done by Comey, before Mueller was hired on. Of which he was hired on to lead the investigation. Is it real irrational to think that he investigated each portion of this massive investigation, personally? Also, let me explain how the Steel Dossier is irrelevant, which is also in the Mueller report. The main issue with the dossier is it's used and getting the fisa warrants to tap Carter page. But if you know all the details of that. It is easily irrelevant. So they did use the dossier along with other evidence to get the very first Carter page cap fisa warrant. After the very first one, they then found out that Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier we're just credited in a couple of ways and could not trust that anymore. So they took the dossier out of the information to get the next warrant. After this happened the same judge that approved the first fisa warrant with the dossier approved a second one without the dossier in it adjust the other evidence. This not only happened the second time it happened the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and Ninth time. By 7 different judges in total. All without the Dossier in the evidence to get the warrant. Which makes that irrelevant. You can check the report and the gov records. And all the other evidence certainly dwarfs it anyways.
    3
  6024. 3
  6025. 3
  6026. 3
  6027. 3
  6028. 3
  6029. 3
  6030. 3
  6031. 3
  6032. 3
  6033. 3
  6034. 3
  6035. 3
  6036. 3
  6037. 3
  6038. 3
  6039. 3
  6040. 3
  6041. 3
  6042. 3
  6043. 3
  6044. 3
  6045. 3
  6046. 3
  6047. 3
  6048. 3
  6049. 3
  6050. 3
  6051. 3
  6052. 3
  6053. 3
  6054. 3
  6055. 3
  6056. 3
  6057. 3
  6058. 3
  6059. 3
  6060. 3
  6061. 3
  6062. 3
  6063. 3
  6064. 3
  6065. 3
  6066. 3
  6067. 3
  6068. 3
  6069. 3
  6070. 3
  6071. 3
  6072. 3
  6073. 3
  6074. 3
  6075. 3
  6076. 3
  6077. 3
  6078. 3
  6079. 3
  6080. 3
  6081. 3
  6082. 3
  6083. 3
  6084. 3
  6085. 3
  6086. 3
  6087. 3
  6088. 3
  6089. 3
  6090. 3
  6091. 3
  6092. 3
  6093. 3
  6094. 3
  6095. 3
  6096. 3
  6097. 3
  6098. 3
  6099. 3
  6100. 3
  6101. 3
  6102. 3
  6103. 3
  6104. 3
  6105. 3
  6106. 3
  6107. 3
  6108. 3
  6109. 3
  6110. 3
  6111. 3
  6112. 3
  6113. 3
  6114. 3
  6115. 3
  6116. 3
  6117. 3
  6118. 3
  6119. 3
  6120. 3
  6121.  @thehatefull1761  1. Who has convinced you guys that if you just say something enough it's magically going to become true? Donald Trump has warped your brains. You should sue. 2. " nothing is getting done is any saying is getting worse" - Vac roll outs ahead of schedule. - Mask mandates going down all over - C19 deaths and infection rate are steady going down - Transgender soldiers can now come back out of the closet that they had to hide in because it was illegal for them to be transgender and server country, even though they've been fighting and dying for us for a long time now. - We are getting back into the Paris climate Accords because it turns out we only have this one planet and we're killing ourselves by killing it. - Our good relations with our oldest allies are finally back to where they need to be - We are helping police reform - The Democrats are putting up bills all over the country, including the Congress in order to fight gun crime Just to name a few. 2. As the economy starts back up, the gas prices go up. It's supply and demand. If Donald Trump had bothered to pull his head out of his ass and got us going on this whole pandemic recovery thing instead of making it worse so he could try and win an election our economy would have gone back up awhile ago. It's that free-market capitalist economy you guys love so much. Not President Biden. But someone told you it was so you're just going to run with it. 3. How high did the inflation get for Trump's four years? 4. It's super ironic hell y'all don't care about anything going on at the border when anyone's doing until the administration is blue. "Kids in cages... give him a tinfoil blanket. They're cool. Rampant disease, no due process and malnutrition in our border facilities... who cares! It's not like they're human beings or anything. Now let's get back to taking all that money away from military families two years into his administration so we can build that tiny section of the wall and run on it again. Oh! Wait! He lost and now the Democrats have the White House. What's going on with that border! This is an atrocity! How dare you!" Could you guys be more disingenuous.
    3
  6122. 3
  6123. 3
  6124. 3
  6125. 3
  6126. 3
  6127. 3
  6128. 3
  6129. 3
  6130. 3
  6131. 3
  6132. 3
  6133. 3
  6134. 3
  6135. 3
  6136. 3
  6137. 3
  6138. 3
  6139. 3
  6140. 3
  6141. 3
  6142. 3
  6143. 3
  6144. 3
  6145. 3
  6146. 3
  6147. 3
  6148. 3
  6149. 3
  6150. 3
  6151. 3
  6152. 3
  6153. 3
  6154. 3
  6155. 3
  6156. 3
  6157. 3
  6158. 3
  6159. 3
  6160. 3
  6161.  @headoftaxreformandpercenta4908  For example... YOU - " Tell me one thing that is false about my initial comment. Not only did you put a 👉period👈, instead of a question mark. Right after, you immediately said, 👉"You Can't"👈. BUT THEN... I did! 😁👇 I literally quoted you step by step and gave you explanations along the way, illustrating every part of it, in order to answer you. What did you do after that? 👉 Ignored it. 👈👇👇👇 "Things that you got wrong about your initial comment. " it's always on a run it how you choose to listen to the media blatantly lie without any desire for evidence" 👈 How in the world would you qualify that statement? You don't even know my real name... But you somehow know what I "always" do? "without any desire for evidence" Almost every interaction I have with anyone on here begins with me requiring them to provide evidence for their claims. Go look around the threads... You'll see plenty of evidence for that. " but when people counter your fragile believes you want to be certain they do all the homework for you" Again... Total stranger... You would have no way of knowing the state of what I do or do not "believe". For instance... Your word usage is incorrect. I don't believe anything. I am presented evidence for it. The have the the facts to back it up. Then I repeat it. "do all the homework for you." You mean require ppl to back up their claims, instead of them expecting me to prove their claims right? Why... Yes... That is exactly what I expect and give. "If you want the truth, turnoff to news" 👈 As I said... If you have proof this clip isn't try, present it? And I don't mean, give some vague reference to some show. I mean, provide specific proof of those specific claims. " you're literally choosing to live in a world of lies to confirm your own beliefs instead of searching for the actual truth" 👈 Again... What's my name? How do you know what I do? What is your evidence of this claim? Bc I don't automatically believe the total stranger on the internet? Just to name a few."
    3
  6162. 3
  6163. 3
  6164. 3
  6165. 3
  6166.  @headoftaxreformandpercenta4908  Its not difficult at all to get specific. I've done it several times. Everytime I do you try to ignore it, even when its your own questions. Then come back with more, " I could totally prove everything I say specifically but I'm not going to and here's the Myriad of vague shady excuses as to why". For example... YOU - " Tell me one thing that is false about my initial comment. Not only did you put a 👉period👈, instead of a question mark. Right after, you immediately said, 👉"You Can't"👈. BUT THEN... I did! 😁👇 I literally quoted you step by step and gave you explanations along the way, illustrating every part of it, in order to answer you. What did you do after that? 👉 Ignored it. 👈👇👇👇 "Things that you got wrong about your initial comment. " it's always on a run it how you choose to listen to the media blatantly lie without any desire for evidence" 👈 How in the world would you qualify that statement? You don't even know my real name... But you somehow know what I "always" do? "without any desire for evidence" Almost every interaction I have with anyone on here begins with me requiring them to provide evidence for their claims. Go look around the threads... You'll see plenty of evidence for that. " but when people counter your fragile believes you want to be certain they do all the homework for you" Again... Total stranger... You would have no way of knowing the state of what I do or do not "believe". For instance... Your word usage is incorrect. I don't believe anything. I am presented evidence for it. The have the the facts to back it up. Then I repeat it. "do all the homework for you." You mean require ppl to back up their claims, instead of them expecting me to prove their claims right? Why... Yes... That is exactly what I expect and give. "If you want the truth, turnoff to news" 👈 As I said... If you have proof this clip isn't try, present it? And I don't mean, give some vague reference to some show. I mean, provide specific proof of those specific claims. " you're literally choosing to live in a world of lies to confirm your own beliefs instead of searching for the actual truth" 👈 Again... What's my name? How do you know what I do? What is your evidence of this claim? Bc I don't automatically believe the total stranger on the internet? Just to name a few."
    3
  6167. 3
  6168. 3
  6169. 3
  6170. 3
  6171. 3
  6172. 3
  6173. 3
  6174. 3
  6175. 3
  6176. 3
  6177. 3
  6178. 3
  6179. 3
  6180. 3
  6181. 3
  6182. 3
  6183. 3
  6184. 3
  6185. 3
  6186. 3
  6187. 3
  6188. 3
  6189. 3
  6190. 3
  6191. 3
  6192. 3
  6193. 3
  6194. 3
  6195. 3
  6196. 3
  6197. 3
  6198. 3
  6199. 3
  6200. 3
  6201. 3
  6202. 3
  6203. 3
  6204. 3
  6205. 3
  6206. 3
  6207. 3
  6208. 3
  6209. 3
  6210. 3
  6211. 3
  6212. 3
  6213. 3
  6214. 3
  6215. 3
  6216. 3
  6217. 3
  6218. 3
  6219. 3
  6220. 3
  6221. 3
  6222. 3
  6223. 3
  6224. 3
  6225. 3
  6226. 3
  6227. 3
  6228. 3
  6229. 3
  6230. 3
  6231. 3
  6232. 3
  6233. 3
  6234. 3
  6235. 3
  6236. 3
  6237. 3
  6238. 3
  6239. 3
  6240. 3
  6241. 3
  6242. 3
  6243. 3
  6244. 3
  6245. 3
  6246. 3
  6247.  @SalvatoreSausage  I'm saying... you're putting choosing the perceived disrespect of a piece of cloth over choosing to respect the people and the lives of those people... And the freedoms of those people, that that piece of cloth is supposed to be representing. They could have done a lot of things with that flag. They could have flipped it off. They could have turned their backs on it. They could have burnt it on the field. Instead, they got an actual US servicemen to recommend a respectful way to peacefully protest unjust murder of minorities by the people who were supposed to be protecting them. And all you guys wanted to do was talk about disrespecting the cloth instead of the human lives that were being lost. Look, if you want to believe in a being that no one has ever even bothered to be able to prove actually exists in all of human history, that's on you, but you don't get to make that decision for the rest of the country and you don't get to treat others like they are last day on because they don't believe in that. Nobody's asking you to change your beliefs or saying you should be treated like you are less than anyone else's because you believe in it. Don't treat others that way. America is the greatest country in the world is a nice saying but it's simply not backed up by fact. And why do we have to be? Especially if we're not. It's a good goal but just saying it means very little when we can't prove it to be true. Thinking that way did not get us where we are. Acting as such got us where we are. Recognizing our faults and fixing them. Continuing to evolve instead of devolve. Working to make our country serve all of its people. Not just the most rich and powerful. It's about holding everybody accountable equally under the law. Holding all our politicians to a higher standard or none of them.
    3
  6248. 3
  6249. 3
  6250. 3
  6251. 3
  6252. 3
  6253. 3
  6254. 3
  6255. 3
  6256. 3
  6257. 3
  6258. 3
  6259. 3
  6260. 3
  6261. 3
  6262. 3
  6263. 3
  6264. 3
  6265. 3
  6266. 3
  6267. 3
  6268. 3
  6269. 3
  6270. 3
  6271. 3
  6272. 3
  6273. 3
  6274. 3
  6275. 3
  6276. 3
  6277. 3
  6278. 3
  6279. 3
  6280. 3
  6281. 3
  6282. 3
  6283. 3
  6284. 3
  6285. 3
  6286. 3
  6287. 3
  6288. 3
  6289. 3
  6290. 3
  6291. 3
  6292. 3
  6293. 3
  6294. 3
  6295. 3
  6296. 3
  6297. 3
  6298. 3
  6299. 3
  6300. 3
  6301. 3
  6302. 3
  6303. 3
  6304. 3
  6305. 3
  6306. 3
  6307. 3
  6308. 3
  6309. 3
  6310. 3
  6311. 3
  6312. 3
  6313. 3
  6314. 3
  6315. 3
  6316. 3
  6317. 3
  6318. 3
  6319. 3
  6320. 3
  6321. 3
  6322. 3
  6323. 3
  6324. 3
  6325. 3
  6326. 3
  6327. 3
  6328. 3
  6329. 3
  6330. 3
  6331. 3
  6332. 3
  6333. 3
  6334. 3
  6335. 3
  6336. 3
  6337. 3
  6338. 3
  6339. 3
  6340. 3
  6341. 3
  6342. 3
  6343. 3
  6344. 3
  6345. 3
  6346. 3
  6347. 3
  6348. 3
  6349. 3
  6350. 3
  6351. 3
  6352. 3
  6353. 3
  6354. 3
  6355. 3
  6356. 3
  6357. 3
  6358. 3
  6359. 3
  6360. 3
  6361. 3
  6362. 3
  6363. 3
  6364. 3
  6365. 3
  6366. 3
  6367. 3
  6368. 3
  6369. 3
  6370. 3
  6371. 3
  6372. 3
  6373. 3
  6374. 3
  6375. 3
  6376. 3
  6377. 3
  6378. 3
  6379. 3
  6380. 3
  6381.  Robert Phipps  well, first I live in one of the reddest States in America. My entire friend and family base are Republicans and voted for Trump in the last election. I am a lone liberal here basically. All of them lifelong Republicans, and not one of them are voting for Trump again. Now, I'm not going to play fortune teller like you are, because I deal in facts oh, but I will say that it's not as Lockdown as you guys like to believe. You have numbers? Please show them to me...? Because whoever just gave you what you just described, is lying to you. The actual government numbers tell a different story. Which I will be more than happy to show you. again, I deal in facts and not hopes and dreams. Also, for those of us who actually read the Mueller report, we can spot right off the bat who hasn't and is lying about it. Unless you want to show me what page in the 448 page report that says no collusion? You guys betting on us being as L informed as you are, never really works out for you. If you want to see what the Democrats are doing for everybody, you should go look on Mitch McConnell's desk. I think the count was up to 312 bills with Democrats on it in a variety of different areas that he refuses to put up for a vote in the Senate because it might give a democratic political win. They're walking and chewing gum at the same time. The other side is just too corrupt to give a damn about the people. You should go look up what they had to do and just to get the 9/11 responders bill to be put up for a vote. ...
    3
  6382. 3
  6383. 3
  6384. 3
  6385. 3
  6386. 3
  6387. 3
  6388. 3
  6389. 3
  6390. 3
  6391. 3
  6392. 3
  6393. 3
  6394. 3
  6395. 3
  6396. 3
  6397. 3
  6398.  @kgs_7186  1. That has a lot to do with Trump's obstruction. You can't first complain about the quality of the witnesses and what they have to testify to and then not recognized Trump's continuous effort to block any witness that could testify to anything more than that, with obstruction of Congress Acts. Which leads you to have to ask, why would he be pleading not guilty and then blocking Witnesses and documents and anything else he can towards the investigation? If he is innocent, he should have nothing to hide or worry about. 2. Your characterization of Christine Ford is at best way over exaggerated. Which begs the question why you would need to over exaggerate that much. 3. You are also way over exaggerating Robert Miller's testimony. You're also not providing any examples for either the Mueller testimony or Christine Ford testimony. 4. What you are making very clean, When You Say "Nothing Burger Russian collusion" claim is that you don't know the facts of the case, have not read the report and are, therefore, intentionally ignoring public and relevant information, and don't know what the law is, in regards to that claim. 🔹10 laid out cases for Obstruction 🔹3 reasons why they did not recommend charges. None of which had to do with him not being guilty 🔹Collusion is not a thing under the law. Trump set up that impossible standard for the purpose of gaslighting people like you. The crimes would fall under the legal statutes for conspiracy, campaign finance and other things, such as, failure to register as a foreign agent. 🔹Under those previews, there was not enough evidence to make a case. Not any but not enough. Which, like in the impeachment case, had a lot to do with the obstruction. Again, you can't has Trump obstruct an investigation at every turn and then ignore that to say that the case was not proven for this or for that... Without acknowledging that it was not proven for this or for that because of the obstruction. 5. There where 3 legal experts that testified in regards to their being enough evidence for impeachment. 1 Testified against that. So how did you not know that, if you say you watch it on CSPAN? Maybe you should just sight the source you are really getting all this from? 6. The 3 legal experts that testified for proceeding with impeachment, did so by citing the newly-released 300-page report that makes the argument. Have you read it?
    3
  6399. 3
  6400. 3
  6401. 3
  6402. 3
  6403. 3
  6404. 3
  6405. 3
  6406. 3
  6407. 3
  6408.  @kgs_7186  https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20181102-why-dont-rape-and-sexual-assault-victims-come-forward "2. A ‘real’ sexual assault survivor always reports immediately According to UK Home Office data, 46% of recorded rapes were reported on the day they took place – while 14% of people took more than six months to report that they’d been assaulted. If the victim was a child, they were even more likely to delay coming forward: just 28% of those aged under 16 reported the offence on the day it happened, while a third waited for longer than six months. That is just for assaults that ultimately are reported. Many others are not. In the US, for example, studies have estimated that two out of three sexual assaults never are reported. There is no evidence that suggests the timing of when you report is linked to the genuineness of the report – Nicole Westmarland There are many reasons why some people either delay reporting or never do, as testified to by the “#WhyIDidn’tReport” hashtag on Twitter. “A lot of people don’t report because they don’t want the perpetrator to go to prison: maybe they’re in love with them, or it’s a family member, or it’s a partner and are reliant on their income,” says Nicole Westmarland, director of Durham Centre for Research into Violence and Abuse in the UK. “Another common reason I hear from students is that they don’t want to ruin the rest of the person’s life.” Even so, “there is no evidence that suggests the timing of when you report is linked to the genuineness of the report", she says."
    3
  6409.  @kgs_7186  https://www-psychologytoday-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-compassion-chronicles/201809/stop-shaming-victims-sexual-assault-not-reporting?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15758753430711&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.psychologytoday.com%2Fus%2Fblog%2Fthe-compassion-chronicles%2F201809%2Fstop-shaming-victims-sexual-assault-not-reporting "1. Victims are too ashamed to come forward. Shame is at the core of the intense emotional wounding women (and men) experience when they are sexually violated. Sexual assault is, by its very nature, humiliating and dehumanizing. The victim feels invaded and defiled while simultaneously experiencing the indignity of being helpless and at the mercy of another person. This is what a former client shared with me about her experience of being shamed by a sexual assault: “I felt so humiliated when I was raped. I felt dirty and disgusting. The thought of this horrible man being inside me made me want to vomit. I felt contaminated. I didn’t want to see anyone. I was afraid to look anyone in the eyes because I felt so much shame.” Victims of sexual assault also feel shame because as human beings we want to believe that we have control over what happens to us. When that personal power is challenged by a victimization of any kind, we believe we “should have” been able to defend ourselves. And because we weren’t able to do so, we feel helpless and powerless. This powerlessness causes us to feel further humiliated. This is especially true for boys and men who are sexually assaulted, since males are raised to believe they should be tough and strong and be able to fight off any attacker. Males who were unable to do so experience horrific shame. 2. Victims of sexual assault blame themselves. Most victims of sexual assault blame themselves in some way. This is true whether the victim is male or female, young or old. I have first-hand experience with this self-blame, which I wrote about in my newly published memoir, Raising Myself: A Memoir of Neglect, Shame and Growing Up Too Soon: “My mother was asleep when I got home, so I hid my bloody underwear and torn dress where she wouldn’t find them and went to bed. As I lay alone in my dark room I vowed to myself that I would never tell anyone what happened, not even my mother—or rather, especially not my mother. I felt so alone with my pain, but I didn’t feel like I deserved any comforting. Mostly, I didn’t want anyone to know what a stupid idiot I had been to go out with Harvey in the first place.” As Matt Atkinson wrote in his book, Resurrection After Rape: A Guide to Transforming from Victim to Survivor, “Self-blame is by far, the most devastating after effect of being sexually violated. This is particularly true for former victims of child sexual abuse and adult victims of sexual assault. In fact, ninety percent of rape trauma recovery is undoing a victim’s tendency to self-blame. Ten percent is everything else. But the ten percent has to come after the end of self-blame: it can’t happen while the former victim is still ashamed and guilty.” 3. Victims are afraid of being blamed. This makes sense since we have a victim-blaming culture in which we make the assumption that if something bad happens to you, it is somehow your own fault. This is particularly true for the way we blame women. “She shouldn’t have gone to that party,” “What does she expect if she wears a dress that short. She’s just asking for it.” “It’s her own fault for drinking so much.” Blaming the victim is by far the most common reaction people have when a victim tells others that she was sexually assaulted and is, by far, the most damaging. The idea is that the victim “put herself in that position” or was “asking for it.” Not only does the victim not receive the comfort and support she needs, but she is further shamed by being blamed for her own victimization. As one former client told me: “My boyfriend got so angry with me. He yelled at me for going to that party in the first place. ‘I told you those guys were trouble! You should have never been there.’ And then he yelled at me for not leaving the party earlier: ‘And why didn’t you leave when Linda did? That was so stupid of you to stay there all alone! And you were probably drunk, weren’t you? Dammit Gina, what did you expect?’” It is fairly common for boyfriends and husbands to blame the victim. Men are extremely tribal. They identify with one another so intensely that some feel personally attacked whenever another man is being accused of something like rape. Because of this, some, will defend the man and blame the victim. Other men have the belief that women are the ones who bear the duty to prevent rape. But women are guilty of blaming the victim as well. This can be a way of convincing themselves that they will never be raped because they would never put themselves in that position. 4. Victims are afraid they will not be believed. Sexual misconduct is the most under-reported crime because victims’ accounts are often scrutinized to the point of exhaustion and there is a long history of women not being believed when they attempted to report a sexual violation. Although friends and family usually believe a woman when she tells them she was sexually assaulted, when it comes to reporting the crime, it is another story. Most women have heard horror stories about how other victims have had to jump through hoops in order to be believed and often the perpetrator’s word is taken over hers, especially when the rape has occurred on a college campus or when the perpetrator is a popular guy on campus, such as a star football player. This was the situation with my former client Courtney: “I was raped at a party by a popular football player,” she told me. “When I reported it to the police it ended up being my word against his. And I became the town pariah. Everyone at school hated me and constantly made comments like, ‘How could you accuse Randy of doing such a thing!’ ‘You’re ugly—he can get any girl he wants, why would he chose you?’ ‘You’re just trying to hurt him—why would you do such a thing?’ It got so bad I had to drop out of school. But Randy just kept on playing football. By the time the case went to court, I couldn’t even step outside my house. There was a mistrial because half of the people on the jury supported Randy. My family had to move out of town so I could get a new start.” Young college women are being sexually assaulted in record numbers. Many are afraid to report the rape to their college administration because of a long history of cases being mishandled. How can victims get past their fear of not being believed and not being supported by their college administrators when they continue to be treated badly?
    3
  6410.  @kgs_7186  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_and_aftermath_of_rape "Self-blameEdit Further information: Blame § Self-blame Self-blame is among the most common of both short- and long-term effects and functions as an avoidance coping skill that inhibits the healing process and can often be remedied by a cognitive therapy technique known as cognitive restructuring. There are two main types of self-blame: behavioral self-blame (undeserved blame based on actions) and characterological self-blame (undeserved blame based on character). Survivors who experience behavioral self-blame feel that they should have done something differently, and therefore feel at fault. Survivors who experience characterological self-blame feel there is something inherently wrong with them which has caused them to deserve to be assaulted. A leading researcher on the psychological causes and effects of shame, June Tangney, lists five ways shame can be destructive:[20] lack of motivation to seek care; lack of empathy; isolation; anger; aggression. Tangney notes the link of shame and anger. "In day-to-day life, when people are shamed and angry they tend to be motivated to get back at a person and get revenge." In addition, shame is connected to psychological problems – such as eating disorders, substance abuse, anxiety, depression, and other mental disorders as well as problematic moral behavior. In one study over several years, shame-prone children were also prone to substance abuse, earlier sexual activity, less safe sexual activity, and involvement with the criminal justice system.[20] Behavioral self-blame is associated with feelings of guilt within the survivor. While the belief that one had control during the assault (past control) is associated with greater psychological distress, the belief that one has more control during the recovery process (present control) is associated with less distress, less withdrawal, and more cognitive reprocessing.[21] This need for control stems from the just-world belief, which implies that people get what they deserve and the world has a certain order of things that individuals are able to control. This control reassures them that this event will not happen again.[22] Counseling responses found helpful in reducing self-blame are supportive responses, psychoeducational responses (learning about rape trauma syndrome) and those responses addressing the issue of blame.[23] A helpful type of therapy for self-blame is cognitive restructuring or cognitive-behavioral therapy. Cognitive reprocessing is the process of taking the facts and forming a logical conclusion from them that is less influenced by shame or guilt.[24] Most rape survivors cannot be reassured enough that what happened to them is "not their fault." This helps them fight through shame and feel safe, secure, and grieve in a healthy way. In most cases, a length of time, and often therapy, is necessary to allow the survivor and people close to the survivor to process and heal.[25]"
    3
  6411. 3
  6412. 3
  6413.  @kgs_7186  https://www.secasa.com.au/pages/feelings-after-sexual-assault/ "Guilt/self blame "I feel as if I did something to make this happen. If only I hadn't..." Victims of sexual assault may feel that they could have avoided it by acting differently. These sorts of reactions are often strongly linked to the myths about sexual assault that prevail in the community which frequently blame the victim rather than the offender. The behaviour and reactions of friends, family, police, lawyers and social workers may reinforce the victim's own feeling that s/he 'asked for it'. The victim may also feel guilty that they have brought shame on their family and themselves by talking about it or reporting it to the police. Similarly, if they believe they could have resisted more forcefully they may also feel at fault. This is particularly true for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse who tend to see themselves as they are now, as adults rather than as they were at the time of the abuse. The offender is always at fault, never the victim. Nothing a victim does is 'asking for it'. Equally, the victim's strategies for surviving the assault are issues for affirmation, not condemnation. Embarrassment/shame "I feel so dirty, like there is something wrong with me now. Can you tell that I've been raped? What will people think?" Many people who have been sexually assaulted feel intensely ashamed and embarrassed. They often feel dirty and in some way 'marked for life'. This reaction may prevent victims from speaking out about the assault. Cultural background factors can intensify such feelings. Underpinning these reactions is the internalisation of the myths pertaining to sexual assault. Loss of confidence "I feel I can't do anything any more....even the simplest things." The experience of assault exposes the victim to the stark reality that they cannot always protect themselves no matter how hard they try. The assault is not only an invasion of the victim's physical self but also the intellectual, social and emotional self. The experience of assault brings vulnerability issues to the fore, which can devastate self-confidence and destroy assumptions about the world and your place within it."
    3
  6414. 3
  6415. 3
  6416. 3
  6417. 3
  6418. 3
  6419.  @kgs_7186   @Kyle Stevens  http://www.arisenm.org/effects-and-recovery "Shame: Some people experience a sense of shame and some may feel that being sexually assaulted marks them or makes them dirty/soiled in some way. They may repeatedly wash themselves. Feeling dirty can also extend into the home, especially if that is where the attack occurred. Cleaning can be a form of exorcism in trying to get rid of the evidence of the attack. For some, they may not feel like cleaning either themselves or their homes because they do not feel they are worthy of being clean or of living in a clean environment. This is because having their body violently abused has served to confirm feelings that they are not worthy of respect. Men may feel that assumptions have been or will be made about their sexuality and may even start to question it themselves. Guilt: Experience shows that most people who are sexually assaulted feel a degree of guilt. People can always think of something they should have done to stop the attack. "If only I had screamed." If only I had locked the door." If only I was not drunk." The list of "if only" is endless. This feeling is often reinforced by the legal system and by family and friends who ask questions such as "Why didn't you scream?" Asking "why" in such circumstances can often imply guilt. It is therefore not surprising that so many people feel guilty and blame themselves for not avoiding the attack. Guilt, as well as shame, also springs from many of the myths that place responsibility on the person for the attack. Myths such as "If you wear tight clothes you are asking for it" only serve to reinforce the unfair and incorrect belief that people who are assaulted are responsible for the assailant's behavior and that they were the cause of the sexual assault. The belief that they were in some way responsible can result in them thinking they can avoid or prevent future sexual assault by doing something such as screaming. This may be a way of the person trying to re-establish a sense of control over their life. Guilt and shame are often the reasons why people choose not to report a sexual assault."
    3
  6420. 3
  6421. 3
  6422. 3
  6423. 3
  6424. 3
  6425. 3
  6426. 3
  6427. 3
  6428. 3
  6429. 3
  6430. 3
  6431. 3
  6432. 3
  6433. 3
  6434. 3
  6435. 3
  6436. 3
  6437. 3
  6438. 3
  6439. 3
  6440. 3
  6441. 3
  6442. 3
  6443. 3
  6444. 3
  6445. 3
  6446. 3
  6447. 3
  6448. 3
  6449. 3
  6450. 3
  6451. 3
  6452. 3
  6453. 3
  6454. 3
  6455. 3
  6456. 3
  6457. 3
  6458. 3
  6459. 3
  6460. 3
  6461. 3
  6462. 3
  6463. 3
  6464. 3
  6465. 3
  6466. 3
  6467. 3
  6468. 3
  6469. 3
  6470. 3
  6471. 3
  6472. 3
  6473. 3
  6474. 3
  6475. 3
  6476. 3
  6477. 3
  6478. 3
  6479. 3
  6480. 3
  6481. 3
  6482. 3
  6483. 3
  6484. 3
  6485. 3
  6486. 3
  6487. 3
  6488. 3
  6489. 3
  6490. 3
  6491. 3
  6492. 3
  6493. 3
  6494. 3
  6495. 3
  6496. 3
  6497. 3
  6498. 3
  6499. 3
  6500. 3
  6501. 3
  6502. 3
  6503. 3
  6504. 3
  6505. 3
  6506. 3
  6507. 3
  6508. 3
  6509. 3
  6510. 3
  6511. 3
  6512. 3
  6513. 3
  6514. 3
  6515. 3
  6516. 3
  6517. 3
  6518. 3
  6519. 3
  6520. 3
  6521. 3
  6522. 3
  6523. 3
  6524. 3
  6525. 3
  6526. 3
  6527. 3
  6528. 3
  6529. 3
  6530. 3
  6531. 3
  6532. 3
  6533. 3
  6534. 3
  6535. 3
  6536. 3
  6537. 3
  6538. 3
  6539. 3
  6540. 3
  6541. 3
  6542. 3
  6543. 3
  6544. 3
  6545. 3
  6546. 3
  6547. 3
  6548. 3
  6549. 3
  6550. 3
  6551. 3
  6552. 3
  6553. 3
  6554. 3
  6555. 3
  6556. 3
  6557. 3
  6558. 3
  6559. 3
  6560. 3
  6561. 3
  6562. 3
  6563. 3
  6564. 3
  6565. 3
  6566. 3
  6567. 3
  6568. 3
  6569. 3
  6570. 3
  6571. 3
  6572. 3
  6573. 3
  6574. 3
  6575. 3
  6576. 3
  6577. 3
  6578. 3
  6579. 3
  6580. 3
  6581. 3
  6582. 3
  6583. 3
  6584.  Hingle McCringleberry  boy have you read me wrong. sweetheart the only one here being ignorant is you. Please do not ever even come close to indicating that you and me think the same when it comes to the way we think about people. See, the primary difference between me and you is going to be what we use to come to the conclusions we have. I tend to use logic, common sense and fact. You seem to use racist tropes and useless hateful nonsense, with a heavy helping of willful ignorance. Cuz what exactly are you implying there? All black people voted for Obama because he was black? Does that mean that all white people vote for other white people just because they're white? And how would one go about collecting that data to be able to come to that conclusion? You just made a blanket Assumption of 26% of our population without knowing 99.9% of them. I find that's usually done because people like you aren't interested in facts or truth. You just want your ignorant assumptions parodied back to you. I have a mixed-race nine-year-old son. Are you basically saying that without even meeting this small child, he is half completely ignorant just because half of who he is, is African-American? Are you saying his daddy, who is African-American is ignorant as well? Even though you've never met him? Even if you did make any of those implications, they wouldn't matter not at all. Why? Because you're making them out of a place of ignorance. Just like the comments you're making about Obama. Grow up, educate yourself and for the love of everything that is Holy, less Kool-Aid, more independent thought. 😉✌
    3
  6585. 3
  6586. 3
  6587. 3
  6588. 3
  6589. 3
  6590. 3
  6591.  Mj light  I mean... You can keep lying... But at this point, its just gonna make you look silly! 😁😁😁 "Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations." And thats just some from before he ran for office."
    3
  6592.  Mj light  How does all of this relate to that and why can't you seam to reply to the fact? Why do you keep deflecting from them? Telling... Very telling. "Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations." And thats just some from before he ran for office."
    3
  6593. 3
  6594. 3
  6595. 3
  6596. 3
  6597. 3
  6598. 3
  6599. 3
  6600. 3
  6601. 3
  6602. 3
  6603. 3
  6604. 3
  6605. 3
  6606. 3
  6607. 3
  6608. 3
  6609. 3
  6610. 3
  6611. 3
  6612. 3
  6613. 3
  6614.  @potsmokingatheist9290  Soooo... Let's go bit by bit then.... "Where is it?" I have the feeling that the best way to start is to give you the definition of Obstruction of Justice. Just to move things along. Obstruction of Justice : obstruction of justice in the United States jurisdictions is a process crime consisting of obstructing prosecutors or other officials. Obstruction of Justice : the crime or act of willfully interfering with the process of justice and law especially by influencing, threatening, harming or impeding a witness, potential witness, juror or judicial or legal officer or by Furnishing false information in or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process. 1. Trump fired Comey. In May of 2017 Trump fired FBI director James Comey, who was overseeing the investigation into whether members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia Nationals to interfere in the 2016 election. Shortly before he's fired the director, Trump reportedly asked him to drop the investigation into his National Security adviser Michael Flynn, which Trump denies. Following comey's firing, Trump even told a reporter that he had been thinking about "the Russia thing" when he made the decision to fire Comey. 2. Trump's role in creating misleading statements on the Trump Tower meeting. At Trump Tower in June of 2016 Donald Trump jr. Met with Natalie Veselnitskaya, an attorney from Russia, who supposedly had "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. The meeting quickly went downhill when it became clear that the attorney did not have any incriminating evidence on Clinton. A report published by The Washington Post stated that Trump "personally dictated" a public statement about the meeting that misrepresented the meetings content as being "primarily" an about adoption program. 3. Trump leveraged pardon power to influence Witnesses. Trump's lawyer, John Dowd, reportedly told lawyers representing Paul manafort and Michael Flynn that Trump might be willing to Pardon them if they were charged in the Russia investigation. 4. Trump pressure Jeff sessions over his recusal from the Russia investigation. Trump told White House counsel Don mcgahn to convince attorney general Jeff sessions to not recuse himself from the Russia investigation, which he oversaw as Attorney General. Sessions recused himself from the inquiry in March of 2017. A week after Comey was fired, Deputy attorney-general Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel to head the investigation. 5. Trump channels FBI director James Comey, " I need loyalty. I expect loyalty." 6. Trump asked Director of National Intelligence Dan coats and director of the National Security Agency Michael Rogers to publicly deny there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians. 7. Trump also tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller. 8. Recently, Trump in the Democrats had a meeting about infrastructure. In which he stated to them, and directly after to a lawn full of reporters and cameras, (with pre-made signs at the ready) that he was not willing to do an infrastructure deal unless they dropped the investigation on him. Basically blackmailing or rather trying to Blackmail the Democrats into dropping an investigation.
    3
  6615. 3
  6616. 3
  6617.  @potsmokingatheist9290  " Trump is the best president we've had in your lifetime. " Lets take the economy first, sense that is what he is always on about. Now I could do this with just about every POTUS in the last 50 years but sense he was the last one, lets take President Obama. This last year Trumps GDP was at 3%. Last year it was 2%. In 2 out of Presdent Obama's 8 years he also got 3% GDP. He also did so without having to dangerously deregulate many things that sould not of been deregulated. The same can not be said for Trump. 3 out of 8 of President Obama's years he beat Trump's first year of 2% As I said before, Trump dangerously deregulated every sector. For example... -Streamlining medical Appeals - commercial and Industrial Solid Waste incineration standards and emissions -training requirements for entry-level commercial motor vehicle operators -VA claims and appeals modernization -affordable housing program amendments methane and waste prevention rule -disclosure exemptions to certain nonprofits -Public Transportation safety certification -pre-shift mining examinations rule -expanding State flexibility to the find essential health benefits and qualified health plans -Electrical shock prevention rule Global politics He alienation often insults long-time friendly global leaders and yet seems to Buddy up to dictators and take their word over the word of our own intelligence agency. He only has one card to play when it comes to negotiations and it rarely works. He has to try and be a strong man. Even if that means getting us into a trade War or lying about starving desperate men women and children and calling them gang members and terrorists and suggesting that they're invading Brakes almost every deal we have with other countries, including global warming initiatives and nucular disarmament treaties without provocation and seaming only because they where what Obama did. There is also an endless list of racism, bully tactics, disrespectful behavor involving our troops, tax cuts for the rich, goverment shutdowns that amounted to nothing, idiotic and childish shuffling of air craft carriers in order to not see a decieced political rivals name, defense of white supremacy, putting children in cages and then loosing them in the system, disapearing tax returns ... I could go on. In the end, I have given you facts, provable hard data and you have given me speculation, personal attacks and assumptions you need to tell yourself in order to continue believing your already decided conclusion.
    3
  6618. 3
  6619. 3
  6620. 3
  6621. 3
  6622. 3
  6623. 3
  6624. 3
  6625. 3
  6626. 3
  6627. 3
  6628. 3
  6629. 3
  6630. 3
  6631. 3
  6632. 3
  6633. 3
  6634. 3
  6635. 3
  6636. 3
  6637. @Andrew Rosenthal okay... Keep lying and playing ignorant, while I use your own words to prove you wrong. 👇 I said... In your article it give the definition of capitalism. "A socio-economic system based on the abstraction of resources into the form of privately-owned money, wealth, and goods, with economic decisions made largely through the operation of a market unregulated by the state" There are several criteria of the capitalist definition that you presented, that the United States does not actually qualify as being. "on the abstraction of resources into the form of privately-owned money, wealth, and goods" all of America's money is not actually allocated through privately owned money wealth and goods. That's not how our federal government runs. That's how our free-market runs. However, our government is filled with programs to allocate and regulate money towards specific causes. Not the free market. That's what the budget is for every year. That's how all of our programs local state and federal get funding to run. "with economic decisions made largely through the operation of a market 👉unregulated👈 by the state." The major portion of this one that you should pay attention to is 👉unregulated👈. We have countless regulations on both our market and our economy in a ton of different categories. We're talkin infrastructure, medical and Pharmaceutical, trades and regulations, foreign trade, the Fine Arts, education, military defense... And on and on. There is not one part of our government that is unregulated. YOUR REPLY.... " Those regulations are not the regulations referred to in the article and do not disprove it." My reply... " please quote me the regulations that it refers to in the article?" Your reply... " the regulation that refers to in the article?"
    3
  6638. 3
  6639. 3
  6640. 3
  6641. 3
  6642. 3
  6643. 3
  6644. 3
  6645. 3
  6646. 3
  6647. 3
  6648. 3
  6649. 3
  6650. 3
  6651. 3
  6652. 3
  6653. 3
  6654. 3
  6655. 3
  6656. 3
  6657. 3
  6658. 3
  6659. 3
  6660. 3
  6661. 3
  6662. 3
  6663. 3
  6664. 3
  6665. 3
  6666. 3
  6667. 3
  6668. 3
  6669. 3
  6670. 3
  6671. 3
  6672. 3
  6673. 3
  6674. 3
  6675. 3
  6676. 3
  6677. 3
  6678. 3
  6679. 3
  6680. 2
  6681. 2
  6682. 2
  6683. 2
  6684. 2
  6685. 2
  6686. 2
  6687. 2
  6688. 2
  6689. 2
  6690. 2
  6691. 2
  6692. 2
  6693. 2
  6694. 2
  6695. 2
  6696. 2
  6697. 2
  6698. 2
  6699. 2
  6700. 2
  6701. 2
  6702. 2
  6703. 2
  6704. 2
  6705. 2
  6706. 2
  6707. 2
  6708. 2
  6709. 2
  6710. 2
  6711. 2
  6712. 2
  6713. 2
  6714. 2
  6715. 2
  6716. 2
  6717. 2
  6718. 2
  6719. 2
  6720. 2
  6721. 2
  6722. 2
  6723. 2
  6724. 2
  6725. 2
  6726. 2
  6727. 2
  6728. 2
  6729. 2
  6730. 2
  6731. 2
  6732. 2
  6733. 2
  6734. 2
  6735. 2
  6736. 2
  6737. 2
  6738. 2
  6739. 2
  6740. 2
  6741. 2
  6742. 2
  6743. 2
  6744. 2
  6745. 2
  6746. 2
  6747. 2
  6748. 2
  6749. 2
  6750. 2
  6751. 2
  6752. 2
  6753. 2
  6754. 2
  6755. 2
  6756. 2
  6757. 2
  6758. 2
  6759. 2
  6760. 2
  6761. 2
  6762. 2
  6763. 2
  6764. 2
  6765. 2
  6766. 2
  6767. 2
  6768. 2
  6769. 2
  6770. 2
  6771. 2
  6772. 2
  6773. 2
  6774. 2
  6775. 2
  6776. 2
  6777. 2
  6778. 2
  6779. 2
  6780. 2
  6781. 2
  6782. 2
  6783. 2
  6784. 2
  6785. 2
  6786. 2
  6787. 2
  6788. 2
  6789. 2
  6790. 2
  6791. 2
  6792. 2
  6793. 2
  6794. 2
  6795. 2
  6796. 2
  6797. 2
  6798. 2
  6799. 2
  6800. 2
  6801. 2
  6802. 2
  6803. 2
  6804. 2
  6805. 2
  6806. 2
  6807. 2
  6808. 2
  6809. 2
  6810. 2
  6811. 2
  6812. 2
  6813. 2
  6814. 2
  6815. 2
  6816. 2
  6817. 2
  6818. 2
  6819. 2
  6820. 2
  6821. 2
  6822. 2
  6823. 2
  6824. 2
  6825. 2
  6826. 2
  6827. 2
  6828. 2
  6829. 2
  6830. 2
  6831. 2
  6832. 2
  6833. 2
  6834. 2
  6835. 2
  6836. 2
  6837. 2
  6838. 2
  6839. 2
  6840. 2
  6841. 2
  6842. 2
  6843. 2
  6844. 2
  6845. 2
  6846. 2
  6847. 2
  6848. 2
  6849. 2
  6850. 2
  6851. 2
  6852. 2
  6853. 2
  6854. 2
  6855. 2
  6856. 2
  6857. 2
  6858. 2
  6859. 2
  6860. 2
  6861. 2
  6862. 2
  6863. 2
  6864. 2
  6865. 2
  6866. 2
  6867. 2
  6868. 2
  6869. 2
  6870. 2
  6871. 2
  6872. 2
  6873. 2
  6874. 2
  6875. 2
  6876. 2
  6877. 2
  6878. 2
  6879. 2
  6880. 2
  6881. 2
  6882. 2
  6883. 2
  6884. 2
  6885. 2
  6886. 2
  6887. 2
  6888. 2
  6889. 2
  6890. 2
  6891. 2
  6892. 2
  6893. 2
  6894. 2
  6895. 2
  6896. 2
  6897. 2
  6898. 2
  6899. 2
  6900. 2
  6901. 2
  6902. 2
  6903. @3 Fractures Then there was that one time he thought that these African American boys should still die even though they were proven innocent. In fact he thought that's so strongly that he took a full-page ad in the newspaper out. “Bring Back the Death Penalty” The so-called Central Park Five were a group of black and Latino teens who were accused—wrongly—of raping a white woman in Central Park on April 19, 1989. Donald Trump took out full-page ads in all four major New York newspapers to argue that perpetrators of crimes such as this one “should be forced to suffer” and “be executed.” In two trials, in August and December 1990, the youths were convicted of violent offenses including assault, robbery, rape, sodomy, and attempted murder; their sentences ranged from five to 15 years in prison. In 2002, after the discovery of exonerating DNA evidence and the confession by another individual to the crime, the convictions of the Central Park Five were vacated. The men were awarded a settlement of $41 million for false arrest, malicious prosecution, and a racially motivated conspiracy to deprive them of their rights. Trump took to the pages of the New York Daily News, calling the settlement “a disgrace.” During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump would again insist on the guilt of the Central Park Five https://amp-theatlantic-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/588067/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15908934109256&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fmagazine%2Farchive%2F2019%2F06%2Ftrump-racism-comments%2F588067%2F
    2
  6904. @3 Fractures “He Doesn’t Have a Birth Certificate” “Our current president came out of nowhere, came out of nowhere … The people who went to school with him—they never saw him; they don’t know who he is.” That statement, made at the February 2011 Conservative Political Action Conference, marked the launch of Donald Trump’s public efforts to sow doubt about whether President Barack Obama had been born in the United States. “Birtherism” had been festering for several years before Trump embraced it—supplanting other proponents and becoming its most prominent advocate. In March, on The View, Trump called on Obama to show his birth certificate. In April, he said that he had dispatched a team of investigators to Hawaii to search for Obama’s birth records. For Trump, the run-up to birtherism had been a controversy that flared when a Manhattan developer proposed building an Islamic cultural center on a site in Lower Manhattan—the so-called Ground Zero mosque. In 2010, on the Late Show, Trump told David Letterman: “I think it’s very insensitive to build it there. I think it’s not appropriate.” Letterman pushed back, saying that blocking an Islamic facility would be akin to declaring “war with Muslims.” Trump answered: “Somebody’s blowing up buildings, and somebody’s doing lots of bad stuff.” Trump offered to buy out one of the investors in order to halt the project. The action made him one of the project’s key opponents and for the first time gave him national visibility on the political right. https://amp-theatlantic-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/588067/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15908934109256&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fmagazine%2Farchive%2F2019%2F06%2Ftrump-racism-comments%2F588067%2F
    2
  6905. 2
  6906. 2
  6907. 2
  6908. 2
  6909. 2
  6910. 2
  6911. 2
  6912. 2
  6913. 2
  6914. 2
  6915. 2
  6916. 2
  6917. 2
  6918. 2
  6919. 2
  6920. 2
  6921. 2
  6922. 2
  6923. 2
  6924. 2
  6925. 2
  6926. 2
  6927. 2
  6928. 2
  6929. 2
  6930. 2
  6931. 2
  6932. 2
  6933. 2
  6934. 2
  6935. 2
  6936. 2
  6937. 2
  6938. 2
  6939. 2
  6940. 2
  6941. 2
  6942. 2
  6943. 2
  6944. 2
  6945. 2
  6946. 2
  6947. 2
  6948. 2
  6949. 2
  6950. 2
  6951. 2
  6952. 2
  6953. 2
  6954. 2
  6955. 2
  6956. 2
  6957. 2
  6958. 2
  6959. 2
  6960. 2
  6961. 2
  6962. 2
  6963. 2
  6964. 2
  6965. 2
  6966. 2
  6967. 2
  6968. 2
  6969. 2
  6970. 2
  6971. 2
  6972. 2
  6973. 2
  6974. 2
  6975. 2
  6976. 2
  6977. 2
  6978. 2
  6979. 2
  6980. 2
  6981. 2
  6982. 2
  6983. 2
  6984. 2
  6985. 2
  6986. 2
  6987. 2
  6988. 2
  6989. 2
  6990. 2
  6991. 2
  6992. 2
  6993. 2
  6994. 2
  6995. 2
  6996. 2
  6997. 2
  6998. 2
  6999. 2
  7000. 2
  7001. 2
  7002. 2
  7003. 2
  7004. 2
  7005. 2
  7006. 2
  7007. 2
  7008. 2
  7009. 2
  7010. 2
  7011. 2
  7012. 2
  7013. 2
  7014. 2
  7015. 2
  7016. 2
  7017. 2
  7018. 2
  7019.  @904_Florida  You are cool! Misunderstanding s happen. Wouldn't be the first time I made that mistake either. My only issue I ever was accuracy. Which is important when it comes to something as serious as systemic racism and violence. The first video reminded me of Trey. That's why I brought him up. A few months after his dad's Day released the footage and those cops were giving that man just as many chances as Trey tried to give that suicidal man. He just kept trying to talk him down... Reason with him... He went on with him for half an hour. The second reminded me of the story my brother told me about his first kill. I mentioned him earlier. He joined the army. He did 2 tours in Iraq. I was the one he talked to.... It was a 17 year old boy. Radicalized.... He popped out of a window while his unit was going through a slim walkway, they couldn't avoid. He was up front. When the kid popped out the first time he winged the combat interpreter with 1 shot and hit him center mass into his vest with the second one. The soldier behind my brother told him it was a kid. He didn't get a good look at first. So they tried to talk to the kid and tried to get him not pop out again because they didn't want to shot him.... But he had shot the combat interpreter who got immediately pulled into a doorway to get his arm tied off and regain the ability to breathe after being shot Center Mass in his vest. The kid didn't speak English. Popped out again with the gun. My brother had the shot. After... He sounded just like that officer. He was in so much pain from having to shoot that kid. He just kept saying that all he wanted was for him not to poke his head out the window. That they weren't even trying to take his gun away. Just trying to get through the narrow walkway. My brother's 37 now. He was 21 on his first tour. He still talks about that kid. He still has that same tone in his voice that police officer had when he had to shoot that man.
    2
  7020. 2
  7021. 2
  7022. 2
  7023. 2
  7024. 2
  7025. 2
  7026. 2
  7027. 2
  7028. 2
  7029. 2
  7030. 2
  7031. 2
  7032. 2
  7033. 2
  7034. 2
  7035. 2
  7036. 2
  7037. 2
  7038. 2
  7039. 2
  7040. 2
  7041. 2
  7042. 2
  7043. 2
  7044. 2
  7045. 2
  7046. 2
  7047. 2
  7048. 2
  7049. 2
  7050. 2
  7051. 2
  7052. 2
  7053. 2
  7054. 2
  7055. 2
  7056.  stephen glover  Once again... Your reality is not actual reality. 1. Held money 2 days before call 2. Mention of the held money as well as favor during call 3. Lying about talking about Biden on camera 4. Asking for Biden to be investigated after he became his political opponent in the next presidential election, even though the investigations he was talking about happened while he was in office but long before Biden became his political opponent. 5. Lying on camera about why the money was held. 6. His guy coming out the other day admitting to the quid pro quo 7. Attempting to curtail witness testimony and trying to get other Witnesses not to testify at all 8. Failure to abide by Congressional subpoenas to turn over documents 9. Putting the phone call in storage, where it would not of normally gone and where it wasn't qualified to go, in order to try and hide it. 10. Trying to get his administration to not turn over the whistleblower report, going so far as to try to claim executive privilege over it. There is more... But... It's enough to prove you wrong.... So... Basiclly... They have him standing over the body, with a knife in his hands, covered in blood, dirt and bruises, muttering he had to die over and over again, with 3 wittnesses in the corners pointing fingers at him and handing them a hand written confession... But your argument is... If he didn't out right say, I stabbed that person to death... They obviously have nothing.... Yeah... I'm not gonna be able to take your word on that one... Or consider it sound logic.
    2
  7057. 2
  7058. 2
  7059. 2
  7060. 2
  7061. 2
  7062. 2
  7063. 2
  7064. 2
  7065. 2
  7066. 2
  7067. 2
  7068. 2
  7069. 2
  7070. 2
  7071. 2
  7072. 2
  7073. 2
  7074. 2
  7075. 2
  7076. 2
  7077. 2
  7078. 2
  7079. 2
  7080. 2
  7081. 2
  7082. 2
  7083. 2
  7084. 2
  7085. 2
  7086. 2
  7087. 2
  7088. 2
  7089. 2
  7090. 2
  7091. 2
  7092. 2
  7093. 2
  7094. 2
  7095. 2
  7096. 2
  7097. 2
  7098. 2
  7099. 2
  7100. 2
  7101. 2
  7102. 2
  7103. 2
  7104. 2
  7105. 2
  7106. 2
  7107. 2
  7108. 2
  7109. 2
  7110. 2
  7111. 2
  7112. 2
  7113. 2
  7114. 2
  7115. 2
  7116. 2
  7117. 2
  7118. 2
  7119. 2
  7120. 2
  7121.  kaiss-kc kc Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt said "[t]here's literally nothing that I've seen yet with the meaningful potential to affect the final result". Ohio State University election law professor Ned Foley noted "[y]ou have to have a legal claim, and you have to have evidence to back it up. And that's just not there." University of Kentucky law professor Joshua Douglas said the lawsuits "all seem to have no merit whatsoever". Bradley P. Moss, an attorney specializing in national security, wrote that the suits "continue to defy reason and logic, and are purely theater ... It's all a farce". University of California, Irvine election law professor Rick Hasen said there is "no evidence of fraud so far that could conceivably affect the election results". Barry Richard, who helped to oversee the Republican-led Florida recount effort during the 2000 election, called the lawsuits "entirely without merit" and said they "will not be successful"; Gerry McDonough, an attorney who worked for the Gore campaign, said Trump "has no chance of overturning the result—it's just impossible". The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a statement calling the 2020 election "the most secure in American history" and noting "[t]here is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised". Jones Day, one of many law firms working for the Trump campaign and one that specifically handled Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar, faced internal criticism for its "shortsighted" efforts on litigation that "erode[s] public confidence in the election results".
    2
  7122. 2
  7123. 2
  7124. 2
  7125. 2
  7126. 2
  7127. 2
  7128. 2
  7129. 2
  7130. 2
  7131. 2
  7132. 2
  7133. 2
  7134. 2
  7135. 2
  7136. 2
  7137. 2
  7138. 2
  7139. 2
  7140. 2
  7141. 2
  7142. 2
  7143. 2
  7144. 2
  7145. 2
  7146. 2
  7147. 2
  7148. 2
  7149. 2
  7150. 2
  7151. 2
  7152. 2
  7153. 2
  7154. 2
  7155. 2
  7156. 2
  7157. 2
  7158. 2
  7159. 2
  7160. 2
  7161. 2
  7162. 2
  7163. 2
  7164. 2
  7165. 2
  7166. 2
  7167. 2
  7168. 2
  7169. 2
  7170. 2
  7171. 2
  7172. 2
  7173. 2
  7174. 2
  7175. 2
  7176. 2
  7177. 2
  7178. 2
  7179. 2
  7180. 2
  7181. 2
  7182. 2
  7183. 2
  7184. 2
  7185. 2
  7186. 2
  7187. 2
  7188. 2
  7189. 2
  7190. 2
  7191. 2
  7192. 2
  7193. 2
  7194. 2
  7195. 2
  7196. 2
  7197. 2
  7198. 2
  7199. 2
  7200. 2
  7201. 2
  7202. 2
  7203. 2
  7204. 2
  7205. 2
  7206. 2
  7207. 2
  7208. 2
  7209. 2
  7210. 2
  7211. 2
  7212. 2
  7213. 2
  7214. 2
  7215. 2
  7216. 2
  7217. 2
  7218. 2
  7219. 2
  7220. 2
  7221. 2
  7222. 2
  7223. 2
  7224. 2
  7225. 2
  7226. 2
  7227. 2
  7228. 2
  7229. 2
  7230. 2
  7231. 2
  7232. 2
  7233. 2
  7234. 2
  7235. 2
  7236. 2
  7237.  Bryan Halstead  Maybe you should... Or at least... Provide the tiniest bit of substance behind that. The Nazis aimed not at separation, but extermination. This is true, but only beginning in 1941. Before that, the used immigration as their method of removing Jews, and camps to encourage this immigration. Child detention centers, some of which where once the Chinese concentration camps, in America, during WW2, in an attempt to discourage immigration, is now a factor... and certainly her sure American Immigration policy is designed to keep out a certain group of people, much as the Nazis to remove a group already there. Trump, as a presidential candidate explicitly made appeals to violence during his campaign. Trump's well documented use of dehumanizing language is another clear similarity to the early stages of Nazi rule. He caters to a particular demographic of unhappy voters, as did the Nazis. After all, his "America First" rally cry was the motto of Nazi friendly Americans in the 1930s. Nazis literally descended on Charlottesville, while screaming, "blood and soil", the same racist slogan as their counterparts in Germany. The recent executive order making administrative law judges political appointees subject to executive power cannot be seen as anything less than an attempt to bring the courts in line with the administration's political ideology. The Nazis called it coordination, as they sought to co-op government and private organizations. John Fitzgerald, a GOP Congressional candidate in California, stated live on the radio that," everything we've been told about the Holocaust is a lie." He went on to receive 23% of the primary votes cast, making him the official Republican candidate of the House of Representatives. The GOP endorsed him, then retracted that endorsement. This is not an isolated event. An Illinois, Holocaust denier Arthur Jones won the Republican primary for the State House. The most prominent conservative Challenger for Republican Paul Ryan's house seat from Wisconsin is a white nationalist an anti-semite. In short, actual Nazis are running for office in America and some are winning. I could go on. Read your history. Nazi Germany did not become what it did with a snap of a finger. It happened slowly and by degrees.
    2
  7238. 2
  7239. 2
  7240. 2
  7241. 2
  7242. 2
  7243. 2
  7244. 2
  7245. 2
  7246. 2
  7247. 2
  7248. 2
  7249. 2
  7250. 2
  7251. 2
  7252. 2
  7253. 2
  7254. 2
  7255. 2
  7256. 2
  7257. 2
  7258. 2
  7259. 2
  7260. 2
  7261. 2
  7262. 2
  7263. 2
  7264. 2
  7265. 2
  7266. 2
  7267. 2
  7268. 2
  7269. 2
  7270. 2
  7271. 2
  7272. 2
  7273. 2
  7274. 2
  7275. 2
  7276. 2
  7277. 2
  7278. 2
  7279. 2
  7280. 2
  7281. 2
  7282. 2
  7283. 2
  7284. 2
  7285. 2
  7286. 2
  7287. 2
  7288. 2
  7289. 2
  7290. 2
  7291. 2
  7292. 2
  7293. 2
  7294. 2
  7295. 2
  7296. 2
  7297. 2
  7298. 2
  7299. 2
  7300. 2
  7301. 2
  7302. 2
  7303. 2
  7304. 2
  7305. 2
  7306. 2
  7307. 2
  7308. 2
  7309. 2
  7310. 2
  7311. 2
  7312. 2
  7313. 2
  7314. 2
  7315. 2
  7316.  @1776concernedcitizen  I'm sorry... I just figured your comment was so jammed packed for of crazy, that a rebuttal wasn't necessary. But... Okay... First we start out with this bit of convoluted thinking. "I think it's funny how the left claims they're standing up for the Constitution while they attempt to undo the 2016 election from behind closed doors." Impeachment is actually in the Constitution. SoOoOo.... That would be following the constitution actually... And it's not to reverse anything. It's their Duty to practice the authority of their given branch, when the president of the United States is found to be doing wrong.... And last but not least... How often do you think investigations of any kind, tends to gather, sort and not reveal evidence in the investigatory stage. That is what trials are for.... And there are reps in there asking questions and looking into things as well. "while at the same time arguing that our Second Amendment is archaic and needs to be abolished." How many Democratic Representatives has come out and said anything along the lines of taking away all our guns? Now... You are going to say 1... Petty Boy... But you can't name 5 more, or 4... 3...2. You can't name any bills that has that in it. So you are making that statment off of 1 person, saying something 1 time. Then attempting to attack it to the entire Dem party. In other words... You have nothing, except a strong case of confirmation bias. " I think Pelosi knows they can't even pass impeachment in the house, otherwise they would vote on it." And what do you get this thought from, exactly? Impeachment is a constitutional process. Like I said above. There are different stages. We are in the inquiry stage. Meaning we're still investigating everything. God forbid we be thorough in our investigation, when it's about something small and silly, like removing the president of the United States from office under Article 2 Section 4. How dare they not rush this process... Its not like its about anything important at all...🙄 You guys are grasping at straws... anything to stop you from having to focus on Trump's actions and the consequences that follow.
    2
  7317. 2
  7318. 2
  7319. 2
  7320. 2
  7321. 2
  7322. 2
  7323. 2
  7324. 2
  7325. 2
  7326. 2
  7327. 2
  7328. 2
  7329. 2
  7330. 2
  7331. 2
  7332. 2
  7333. 2
  7334. 2
  7335. 2
  7336. 2
  7337. 2
  7338. 2
  7339. 2
  7340. 2
  7341. 2
  7342. 2
  7343. 2
  7344. 2
  7345. 2
  7346. 2
  7347. 2
  7348. 2
  7349. 2
  7350. 2
  7351. 2
  7352. 2
  7353. 2
  7354. 2
  7355. 2
  7356. 2
  7357. 2
  7358. 2
  7359. 2
  7360. 2
  7361. 2
  7362. 2
  7363. 2
  7364. 2
  7365. 2
  7366. 2
  7367. 2
  7368. 2
  7369. 2
  7370. 2
  7371. 2
  7372. 2
  7373. 2
  7374. 2
  7375. 2
  7376. 2
  7377. 2
  7378. 2
  7379.  @willmont8258  Here is the presidential records Act of 1972. Please show me where it makes that stipulation?   RecoP) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents that were created or received after January 20, 1981 (i.e., beginning with the Reagan Administration). The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations. The PRA was amended in 2014, which established several new provisions. Specifically, the PRA: Establishes public ownership of all Presidential records and defines the term Presidential records. Requires that Vice-Presidential records be treated in the same way as Presidential records. Places the responsibility for the custody and management of incumbent Presidential records with the President. Requires that the President and his staff take all practical steps to file personal records separately from Presidential records. Allows the incumbent President to dispose of records that no longer have administrative, historical, informational, or evidentiary value, once the views of the Archivist of the United States on the proposed disposal have been obtained in writing. Establishes in law that any incumbent Presidential records (whether textual or electronic) held on courtesy storage by the Archivist remain in the exclusive legal custody of the President and that any request or order for access to such records must be made to the President, not NARA. Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office. Establishes a process by which the President may restrict and the public may obtain access to these records after the President leaves office; specifically, the PRA allows for public access to Presidential records through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) beginning five years after the end of the Administration, but allows the President to invoke as many as six specific restrictions to public access for up to twelve years. Codifies the process by which former and incumbent Presidents conduct reviews for executive privilege prior to public release of records by NARA (which had formerly been governed by Executive order 13489). Establishes procedures for Congress, courts, and subsequent Administrations to obtain “special access” to records from NARA that remain closed to the public, following a privilege review period by the former and incumbent Presidents; the procedures governing such special access requests continue to be governed by the relevant provisions of E.O. 13489. Establishes preservation requirements for official business conducted using non-official electronic messaging accounts: any individual creating Presidential records must not use non-official electronic messaging accounts unless that individual copies an official account as the message is created or forwards a complete copy of the record to an official messaging account. (A similar provision in the Federal Records Act applies to federal agencies.) Prevents an individual who has been convicted of a crime related to the review, retention, removal, or destruction of records from being given access to any original records
    2
  7380. 2
  7381. 2
  7382. 2
  7383. 2
  7384. 2
  7385. 2
  7386. 2
  7387. 2
  7388. 2
  7389. 2
  7390. 2
  7391. 2
  7392. 2
  7393. 2
  7394. 2
  7395. 2
  7396. 2
  7397. 2
  7398. 2
  7399. 2
  7400. 2
  7401. 2
  7402. 2
  7403. 2
  7404. 2
  7405. 2
  7406. 2
  7407. 2
  7408. 2
  7409. 2
  7410. 2
  7411. 2
  7412. 2
  7413. 2
  7414. 2
  7415. 2
  7416. 2
  7417. 2
  7418. 2
  7419. 2
  7420. 2
  7421. 2
  7422. 2
  7423. 2
  7424. 2
  7425. 2
  7426. 2
  7427. 2
  7428. 2
  7429. 2
  7430. 2
  7431. 2
  7432. 2
  7433. 2
  7434. 2
  7435. 2
  7436. 2
  7437. 2
  7438. 2
  7439. 2
  7440. 2
  7441. 2
  7442. 2
  7443. 2
  7444. 2
  7445. 2
  7446. 2
  7447. 2
  7448. 2
  7449. 2
  7450. 2
  7451. 2
  7452. 2
  7453. 2
  7454. 2
  7455. 2
  7456. 2
  7457. 2
  7458. 2
  7459. 2
  7460. 2
  7461. 2
  7462. 2
  7463. 2
  7464. 2
  7465. 2
  7466. 2
  7467. 2
  7468. 2
  7469. 2
  7470. 2
  7471. 2
  7472. 2
  7473. 2
  7474. 2
  7475. 2
  7476. 2
  7477. 2
  7478. 2
  7479. 2
  7480. 2
  7481. 2
  7482. 2
  7483. 2
  7484. 2
  7485. 2
  7486. 2
  7487. 2
  7488. 2
  7489. 2
  7490. 2
  7491. 2
  7492. 2
  7493. 2
  7494. 2
  7495. 2
  7496. 2
  7497. 2
  7498. 2
  7499. 2
  7500.  Sigkim  Endorcing Hilary over the other option is responsible. Not sucking up. He also only did so after he lost the primary. If you knew his record, you would know hpw silly your claim is. I already told you. He did qhatnhe could to try and keep Trump out of office because he is worse. You can assume he did it for whatever reason you want though. Makes no difference. At the end of the day, your making things up. Especially sense he has said, multiple times why he did what he did. You have to speculate and make stuff up to believe what you want about him. You have to ignore his long history of ahowing that he fights for the people. If your argument can't be made on its merits, then it should not be made. Trump... Well.... You mean other than breaking so many emoluments Clause has in office but I've lost count? Or how about the dangerous deregulations that he's made? Or how about the deals that he's pulled out of simply because they were Obama's that actually hurt America? Or how about making tax cuts to the rich permanent ond putting a clock on the tax cuts for the middle class? Or how about closing to dictators and alienating our longtime allies in the world? Or how about doing nothing about campaign Finance reform While claiming that he's going to clean out the swamp? I could go on.... You know... You wouldn't have to use so many childish tactics... If your argument had merit, right? The only one screaming anything here, is you, and the words your screaming are, "childish destractions, baseless speculations and hot air. " I have my own disclaimer... No paper tigers, childish and useless taunting, baseless assumptions, whataboutism, excuses or cherry picking facts. Argue your point on the merit or not at all.
    2
  7501. 2
  7502. 2
  7503. 2
  7504. 2
  7505. 2
  7506. 2
  7507. 2
  7508. 2
  7509. 2
  7510. 2
  7511. 2
  7512. 2
  7513. 2
  7514. 2
  7515. 2
  7516. 2
  7517. 2
  7518. 2
  7519. 2
  7520. 2
  7521. 2
  7522. 2
  7523. 2
  7524. 2
  7525. 2
  7526. 2
  7527. 2
  7528. 2
  7529. 2
  7530. 2
  7531. 2
  7532. 2
  7533. 2
  7534. 2
  7535. 2
  7536. 2
  7537. 2
  7538. 2
  7539. 2
  7540. 2
  7541. 2
  7542. 2
  7543. 2
  7544. 2
  7545. 2
  7546. 2
  7547. 2
  7548. 2
  7549. 2
  7550. 2
  7551. 2
  7552. 2
  7553. 2
  7554. 2
  7555. 2
  7556. 2
  7557. 2
  7558. 2
  7559. 2
  7560. 2
  7561. 2
  7562. 2
  7563. 2
  7564. 2
  7565. 2
  7566. 2
  7567. 2
  7568. 2
  7569. 2
  7570. 2
  7571. 2
  7572. 2
  7573. 2
  7574. 2
  7575. 2
  7576. 2
  7577. 2
  7578. 2
  7579. 2
  7580. 2
  7581. 2
  7582. 2
  7583. 2
  7584. 2
  7585. 2
  7586. 2
  7587. 2
  7588. 2
  7589. 2
  7590.  @wmp0074  Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    2
  7591. 2
  7592. 2
  7593. 2
  7594. 2
  7595. 2
  7596. 2
  7597. 2
  7598. 2
  7599. 2
  7600. 2
  7601. 2
  7602. 2
  7603. 2
  7604. 2
  7605. 2
  7606. 2
  7607. 2
  7608. 2
  7609. 2
  7610. 2
  7611. 2
  7612. 2
  7613. 2
  7614. 2
  7615. 2
  7616. 2
  7617. 2
  7618. 2
  7619. 2
  7620. 2
  7621. 2
  7622. 2
  7623. 2
  7624. 2
  7625. 2
  7626. 2
  7627. 2
  7628. 2
  7629. 2
  7630. 2
  7631. 2
  7632. 2
  7633. 2
  7634. 2
  7635. 2
  7636. 2
  7637. 2
  7638. 2
  7639. 2
  7640. 2
  7641. 2
  7642. 2
  7643. 2
  7644. 2
  7645. 2
  7646. 2
  7647. 2
  7648. 2
  7649. 2
  7650. 2
  7651. 2
  7652. 2
  7653. 2
  7654. 2
  7655. 2
  7656. 2
  7657. 2
  7658. 2
  7659. 2
  7660. 2
  7661. 2
  7662. 2
  7663. 2
  7664. 2
  7665. 2
  7666. 2
  7667. 2
  7668. 2
  7669. 2
  7670. 2
  7671. 2
  7672. 2
  7673. 2
  7674. 2
  7675. 2
  7676. 2
  7677. 2
  7678. 2
  7679. 2
  7680. 2
  7681. 2
  7682. 2
  7683. 2
  7684. 2
  7685. 2
  7686. 2
  7687. 2
  7688. 2
  7689. 2
  7690. 2
  7691. 2
  7692. 2
  7693. 2
  7694. 2
  7695. 2
  7696. 2
  7697. 2
  7698. 2
  7699. 2
  7700. 2
  7701. 2
  7702. 2
  7703. 2
  7704. 2
  7705. 2
  7706. 2
  7707. 2
  7708. 2
  7709. 2
  7710. 2
  7711. 2
  7712. 2
  7713. 2
  7714. 2
  7715. 2
  7716. 2
  7717. 2
  7718. 2
  7719. 2
  7720. 2
  7721. 2
  7722. 2
  7723. 2
  7724. 2
  7725. 2
  7726. 2
  7727. 2
  7728. 2
  7729. 2
  7730. 2
  7731. 2
  7732. 2
  7733. 2
  7734. 2
  7735. 2
  7736. 2
  7737. 2
  7738. 2
  7739. 2
  7740. 2
  7741. 2
  7742. 2
  7743. 2
  7744. 2
  7745. 2
  7746. 2
  7747. 2
  7748. 2
  7749. 2
  7750. 2
  7751. 2
  7752. 2
  7753. 2
  7754. 2
  7755. 2
  7756. 2
  7757. 2
  7758. 2
  7759. 2
  7760. 2
  7761. 2
  7762. 2
  7763. 2
  7764. 2
  7765. 2
  7766. 2
  7767. 2
  7768. 2
  7769. 2
  7770. 2
  7771. 2
  7772. 2
  7773. 2
  7774. 2
  7775. 2
  7776. 2
  7777. 2
  7778. 2
  7779. 2
  7780. 2
  7781. 2
  7782. 2
  7783. 2
  7784. 2
  7785. 2
  7786. 2
  7787. 2
  7788. 2
  7789. 2
  7790. 2
  7791. 2
  7792. 2
  7793. 2
  7794. 2
  7795. 2
  7796. 2
  7797. 2
  7798. 2
  7799. 2
  7800. 2
  7801. 2
  7802. 2
  7803. 2
  7804. 2
  7805. 2
  7806. 2
  7807. 2
  7808. 2
  7809. 2
  7810. 2
  7811. 2
  7812. 2
  7813. 2
  7814. 2
  7815. 2
  7816. 2
  7817. 2
  7818. 2
  7819. 2
  7820. 2
  7821. 2
  7822. 2
  7823. 2
  7824. 2
  7825. 2
  7826. 2
  7827. 2
  7828. 2
  7829. 2
  7830. 2
  7831. 2
  7832. 2
  7833. 2
  7834. 2
  7835. 2
  7836. 2
  7837. 2
  7838. 2
  7839. 2
  7840. 2
  7841. 2
  7842. 2
  7843. 2
  7844. 2
  7845. 2
  7846. 2
  7847. 2
  7848. 2
  7849. 2
  7850. 2
  7851. 2
  7852. 2
  7853.  @btredinger  Oh goodness! Dude! I mean... There really isn't a point. You're so sure you're right about this. Which by the way, is a sign of being brainwashed... But still, there's nothing that's going to get through.... Though...correcting lies is never bad for others who read it. SoOoOo... Mueller investigation was a two-year investigation, involving over 200 FBI agents, endless hours of witness testimony, 23 convictions of guilty, 9 of hume were Trump campaign lead officials, endless document trails, 10 laid out cases for obstruction that took place during the investigation and Trump just randomly coming out and shooting himself in the foot on a regular bases... Like he tends to do.... All the damn time. All of which mean... the only hope is calling it a hoax. There is absolutely no evidence to back up that it was a hoax. For the past thirteen years Fox News has been at the top of the list of dishonest media, every time somebody made a list. That's how often they lie. The manufactured crisis thing was something that Don Lemon said and he was referring to the Caravan I was desperate half-starved exhausted sunburned people heading towards our Southern border and how the Trump Administration was trying to paint them as all manner of ridiculous things like MS-13 and terrorists. That's what they were referring to as the manufactured crisis. But they had always said that there was a humanitarian crisis at the border. Which you would know if you you know weren't brainwashed and therefore were willing to challenge your ideals and put them up to scrutiny to make sure they are the truth.
    2
  7854. 2
  7855. 2
  7856. 2
  7857. 2
  7858. 2
  7859. 2
  7860. 2
  7861. 2
  7862. 2
  7863. 2
  7864. 2
  7865. 2
  7866. 2
  7867. 2
  7868. 2
  7869. 2
  7870. 2
  7871. 2
  7872. 2
  7873. 2
  7874. 2
  7875. 2
  7876. 2
  7877. 2
  7878. 2
  7879. 2
  7880. 2
  7881. 2
  7882. 2
  7883. 2
  7884. 2
  7885. 2
  7886. 2
  7887. 2
  7888. 2
  7889. 2
  7890. 2
  7891. 2
  7892. 2
  7893. 2
  7894. 2
  7895. 2
  7896. 2
  7897. 2
  7898. 2
  7899. 2
  7900. 2
  7901. 2
  7902. 2
  7903. 2
  7904. 2
  7905. 2
  7906. 2
  7907. 2
  7908. 2
  7909. 2
  7910. 2
  7911. 2
  7912. 2
  7913. 2
  7914. 2
  7915. 2
  7916. 2
  7917. 2
  7918. 2
  7919. 2
  7920. 2
  7921. 2
  7922. 2
  7923. 2
  7924. 2
  7925. 2
  7926. 2
  7927. 2
  7928. 2
  7929. 2
  7930. 2
  7931. 2
  7932. 2
  7933. 2
  7934. 2
  7935. 2
  7936. 2
  7937. 2
  7938. 2
  7939. 2
  7940. 2
  7941. 2
  7942. 2
  7943. 2
  7944. 2
  7945. 2
  7946. 2
  7947. 2
  7948. 2
  7949. 2
  7950. 2
  7951. 2
  7952. 2
  7953. 2
  7954. 2
  7955. 2
  7956. 2
  7957. 2
  7958. 2
  7959. 2
  7960. 2
  7961. 2
  7962. 2
  7963. 2
  7964. 2
  7965. 2
  7966. 2
  7967. 2
  7968. 2
  7969. 2
  7970. 2
  7971. 2
  7972. 2
  7973. 2
  7974. 2
  7975. 2
  7976. 2
  7977. 2
  7978. 2
  7979. 2
  7980. 2
  7981. 2
  7982. 2
  7983. 2
  7984. 2
  7985. 2
  7986. @Mister Morgan SoOoOo... Where you just counting on noone taking the time to read the link or look up the bill on Gov sites? That was a fools bluff.... - The last Dem to even touch the bill was Jimmy Carter, in 1979. - The bill was originally put in place in 1948. - Its original intent was not to do what you say. It was to strategically dispense propaganda and general information to foreign adversaries and allies, as needed. - It was also supposed to Shield the American people from it. - Except over the past 60 plus years, Republicans got to it. To be accurate, one Democrat and 6 Republicans. - The last few where Ronald Reagan in 1985, George HW Bush in 1991 and 1992.... - Then James Kenneth Glassman (R), the founding executive director of The George Bush Institute. - Several Dems have protested these changes to the original bill... A good example of which, is Edward Zorinsky, in 1985 tried to fight against these changes. - John M. Vorys (R) was the one to add the second provision to remove the stigma of propaganda. - The action in 2012 that you where referring to was by (R) Thornberry. (R) Smith was the other co signer. - They have tried to ammend the Bill to authorize the domestic dissemination of information and material about the United States intended primarily for foreign audiences, and for other purposes. The 2 BEST PARTS of your lies... 1. The amendment that you claim to allow this " propaganda " NEVER MADE IT PAST THE HOUSE.... For 2 reasons.... The first, Money..... Of course. The second, concerns about the freedom of the press provision and freedom of speech provision in the Constitution itself.... The limitation and overlapping of them. 2. OBAMA HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. Go look for yourself on https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736
    2
  7987. 2
  7988. 2
  7989. 2
  7990. 2
  7991. 2
  7992. 2
  7993. 2
  7994. 2
  7995. 2
  7996. 2
  7997. 2
  7998. 2
  7999. 2
  8000. 2
  8001. 2
  8002. 2
  8003. 2
  8004. 2
  8005. 2
  8006. 2
  8007. 2
  8008. 2
  8009. 2
  8010. 2
  8011. 2
  8012. 2
  8013. 2
  8014. 2
  8015. 2
  8016. 2
  8017. 2
  8018. 2
  8019. 2
  8020. 2
  8021. 2
  8022. 2
  8023. 2
  8024. 2
  8025. 2
  8026. 2
  8027. 2
  8028. 2
  8029. 2
  8030. 2
  8031. 2
  8032. 2
  8033. 2
  8034. 2
  8035. 2
  8036. 2
  8037. 2
  8038. 2
  8039. 2
  8040. 2
  8041. 2
  8042. 2
  8043. 2
  8044. 2
  8045. 2
  8046. 2
  8047. @Wilma SoOoOo... Your swallowing a bunch pf right wing scare tactics? Why do they need fear to convince you... Look at the facts. Illegals.... Your saying that like noone else has done anything abput it. They just choose to do it humanely. I would prefer America not to have the reputation I'm ripping children out of their parents arms, losing them in a system to never see their parents again and stuffing them in cages. There are ways to handle things like this that do not have to involve that. Should illigals be here... No... Do we have to loose our humanity in order to deal with the situation... No. Career polititions... What has he done to combat that? He is being sing right now for profiting from being president by breaking tons of emolument clauses as president. How is that in any way fighting corruption or setting an example? Job growth has been on a steady decline since he became president. The trend of unemployment going down started way back before he even thought about running. You're giving him credit for a five-man relay race. The good did not over come the bad. Before he even ran there was a long history of hiring illigals, racism, sexual assault, curruption, bankruptcy, lying and just down right being a bad guy. In his first year and a half in office he had the house Senate and Whitehouse. He could of gotten the wall funded, healcare fixed and a myriad of other things he promised. All he got was tax cuts for the rich, played a ton of golf and blamed the other half of the country for everything.... Then shut down the gov, had government workers standing at food pantries with their family and losing their homes the longest stretch of time in American history, only two gave and make that worth nothing.
    2
  8048. 2
  8049. 2
  8050. 2
  8051. 2
  8052. 2
  8053. 2
  8054. 2
  8055. 2
  8056. 2
  8057. 2
  8058. 2
  8059. 2
  8060. 2
  8061. 2
  8062. 2
  8063. 2
  8064. 2
  8065. 2
  8066. 2
  8067. 2
  8068. 2
  8069. 2
  8070. 2
  8071. 2
  8072. 2
  8073. 2
  8074. 2
  8075. 2
  8076. 2
  8077. 2
  8078. 2
  8079. 2
  8080. 2
  8081. 2
  8082. 2
  8083. 2
  8084. 2
  8085. 2
  8086. 2
  8087. 2
  8088. 2
  8089. 2
  8090. 2
  8091. 2
  8092. 2
  8093. 2
  8094. 2
  8095. 2
  8096. 2
  8097. 2
  8098. 2
  8099. 2
  8100. 2
  8101. 2
  8102. 2
  8103. 2
  8104. 2
  8105. 2
  8106. 2
  8107. 2
  8108. 2
  8109. 2
  8110. 2
  8111. 2
  8112. 2
  8113. 2
  8114. 2
  8115. 2
  8116. 2
  8117.  @gigi6374  or just noy do any of this... He is responsible for... -Ignoring the 33 page, expertly laid out, pandemic CONTAINMENT plan he had on day one because the Obama Administration commissioned it. - discouraging people from listening to Medical experts about personal safety and spread protocols - not setting an example with masks his rallies and a myriad of other things as the leader of this country during the worst worldwide pandemic and over a hundred years. - pushing multiple snake oil cures during this pandemic and taking absolutely none of them when he got sick. - calling the severity of this virus a democratic hoax. - discouraging testing so his numbers would look better. - trying to defund public education as a threat to force parents teachers and administrators I'm bringing children back to school when it wasn't safe. - defending the process of refilling the medical stock piles, which in turn left each state to fend for themselves and sent them into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives. - tried to pretend for a good two and a half months that covid-19 had just magically gone away. - claimed you wouldn't hear about covid-19 anymore after the election. - claimed that he shut down the border to China but allowed over 40,000 people to come from China after doing so. - tried to blame the US infection rate on Mexico. - set several different dates that he claimed covid-19 would magically go away and got every single one of them wrong. - openly and frequently tried to play Down the severity of covid-19 by comparing it to the common flu. - continuously claimed that 99% of all covid-19 uses are totally harmless. - continuously lied about the covid-19 mortality rate in America. - by pure neglect and incompetence caused a larger job, housing and economic downturn worse than the Great Depression. - lied about a CDC study showing that 85% of the people wearing masks catch the virus. - lied about Google Engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the Coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. - claimed that the only reason that cases are going up in America is because of casting. And on... And on... And on
    2
  8118. 2
  8119. 2
  8120. 2
  8121. 2
  8122. 2
  8123. 2
  8124. 2
  8125. 2
  8126. 2
  8127. 2
  8128. 2
  8129. 2
  8130. 2
  8131. 2
  8132. 2
  8133. 2
  8134. 2
  8135. 2
  8136. 2
  8137. 2
  8138. 2
  8139. 2
  8140. 2
  8141. 2
  8142. 2
  8143. 2
  8144. 2
  8145. 2
  8146. 2
  8147. 2
  8148. 2
  8149. 2
  8150. 2
  8151. 2
  8152. 2
  8153. 2
  8154. 2
  8155. 2
  8156. 2
  8157. 2
  8158. 2
  8159. 2
  8160. 2
  8161. 2
  8162. 2
  8163. 2
  8164. 2
  8165. 2
  8166. 2
  8167. 2
  8168. 2
  8169. 2
  8170. 2
  8171. 2
  8172. 2
  8173. 2
  8174. 2
  8175. 2
  8176. 2
  8177. 2
  8178.  @marcusarelius   Your LYING YOUR ASS OFF AND CHANGING YOUR STORY TO SEAM LIKE YOUR LESS THAN COMPLETELY FULL OF SHIT NOW..... But it didn't help... LMFAO These are your DIRECT QUOTES WORD FOR WORD. AND I QUOTE "No, wrong, next. He gave him 19 pages that were without redactions because the four-page summary Barr provided was causing the media to speculate. Barr chose not to release the 19 pages but instead chose to release the entire report... ALL OF IT." Which is BS anyways but still... Now you're changing One Lie into another and still no link showing any of this. Give it up dude! You lied or you didn't do your homework after hearing that. Barr literally just yesterday refused to show up for a closed-door hearing with the House of Representatives judicial committee on why he would not let 12 members of the House see the entire report unless they promise to not discuss it with their colleagues and not bring any notes out of there. AND I QUOTE AGAIN "Bars summary of four pages, released. Muller's 19 page summary, released. The entire (redacted) report, released. THE UNREDACTED REPORT, RELEASED TO CONGRESS." That's what you just said to me right? Well, I will back my shit up with proof. Straight from Representative jerrold Nadler democratic chairman of the judicial committee... And to dumb it down for you, you need to start at 0:99 - 1:54 if your to lazy to watch the whole thing... Sense thus far you have been to lazy to do even the basic homework before just making shit up. https://youtu.be/kX8NqpKXTlw Congress has not seen the full report. No one outside of Barr's control or Mueller's investigation has seen the entire report. Your LYING YOUR ASS OFF AND CHANGING YOUR STORY TO SEAM LIKE YOUR LESS THAN COMPLETELY FULL OF SHIT NOW..... But it didn't help... LMFAO These are your DIRECT QUOTES WORD FOR WORD.
    2
  8179. 2
  8180. 2
  8181. 2
  8182. 2
  8183. 2
  8184. 2
  8185. 2
  8186. 2
  8187. 2
  8188. 2
  8189. 2
  8190. 2
  8191. 2
  8192. 2
  8193. 2
  8194. 2
  8195. 2
  8196.  @austingiguere938  liberals still defend Human Rights and freedom of speech and women and lgbtq and anyone that needs it. For instance I'm a liberal and right now I'm just sending the entire day of every single person in the Muslim religion that has none of the things that you say that you're doing. I love how people like you get up on your high horse and act like because we're not stoning people to death nowadays we're not doing other egregious and horrible things. In the name of our religion or lack thereof. There are people of every religion every color every Creed every sexual orientation that does horrible s*** two people. There are billions of Muslims that don't subscribe to that. That live in peace. That help people. That would help run this country. You are basing all of them on extremist views. Extremist views that mostly just their leaders hold. If you haven't noticed our leaders hold some extremist views themselves. Currently our leaders are ripping children from their parents and then losing the children. We're taking lives and jailing people for life for the smallest of offenses. Where allowing big corporations like the pharmaceutical companies to jack up medicine prices so high that it's killing people and we're allowing them to make addicts out of one in five people in this country right now which will also eventually kill them. On that note the Muslim and Arab community are some of the highest statistics for people who work in the health industry as in doctors and nurses that save lives everyday. You want to cherry pick so you can justify your hate and bigotry that doesn't make any damn sense. You want to come to me with all this stuff come with a balanced argument.
    2
  8197. 2
  8198. 2
  8199. 2
  8200. 2
  8201. 2
  8202. 2
  8203. 2
  8204. 2
  8205. 2
  8206. 2
  8207. 2
  8208. 2
  8209. 2
  8210. 2
  8211. 2
  8212. 2
  8213. 2
  8214. 2
  8215. 2
  8216. 2
  8217. 2
  8218. 2
  8219. 2
  8220. 2
  8221. 2
  8222. 2
  8223. 2
  8224. 2
  8225. 2
  8226. 2
  8227. 2
  8228. 2
  8229. 2
  8230. 2
  8231. 2
  8232. 2
  8233. 2
  8234. 2
  8235. 2
  8236. 2
  8237. 2
  8238. 2
  8239. 2
  8240. 2
  8241. 2
  8242. 2
  8243. 2
  8244. 2
  8245. 2
  8246. 2
  8247. 2
  8248. 2
  8249. 2
  8250. 2
  8251. 2
  8252. 2
  8253. 2
  8254. 2
  8255. 2
  8256. 2
  8257. 2
  8258. 2
  8259. 2
  8260. 2
  8261. 2
  8262. 2
  8263. 2
  8264. 2
  8265. 2
  8266. 2
  8267. 2
  8268. 2
  8269. 2
  8270. 2
  8271. 2
  8272. 2
  8273. 2
  8274. 2
  8275. 2
  8276. 2
  8277. 2
  8278. 2
  8279. 2
  8280. 2
  8281. 2
  8282. 2
  8283. 2
  8284. 2
  8285. 2
  8286. 2
  8287. 2
  8288. 2
  8289. 2
  8290. 2
  8291. 2
  8292. 2
  8293. 2
  8294. 2
  8295. 2
  8296. 2
  8297. 2
  8298. 2
  8299. 2
  8300. 2
  8301. 2
  8302. 2
  8303. 2
  8304. 2
  8305. 2
  8306. 2
  8307. 2
  8308. 2
  8309. 2
  8310. 2
  8311. 2
  8312. 2
  8313. 2
  8314. 2
  8315. 2
  8316. 2
  8317. 2
  8318. 2
  8319. 2
  8320. 2
  8321. 2
  8322. 2
  8323. 2
  8324. 2
  8325. 2
  8326. 2
  8327. 2
  8328. 2
  8329. 2
  8330. 2
  8331. 2
  8332. 2
  8333. 2
  8334. 2
  8335. 2
  8336. 2
  8337. 2
  8338. 2
  8339. 2
  8340. 2
  8341. 2
  8342. 2
  8343. 2
  8344. 2
  8345. 2
  8346. 2
  8347. 2
  8348. 2
  8349. 2
  8350. 2
  8351. 2
  8352. 2
  8353. 2
  8354. 2
  8355. 2
  8356. 2
  8357. 2
  8358. 2
  8359. 2
  8360. 2
  8361. 2
  8362. 2
  8363. 2
  8364. 2
  8365. 2
  8366. 2
  8367. 2
  8368. 2
  8369. 2
  8370. 2
  8371. 2
  8372. 2
  8373. 2
  8374. 2
  8375. 2
  8376. 2
  8377. 2
  8378. 2
  8379. 2
  8380. 2
  8381. 2
  8382. 2
  8383. 2
  8384. 2
  8385. 2
  8386. 2
  8387. 2
  8388. 2
  8389. 2
  8390. 2
  8391. 2
  8392. 2
  8393. 2
  8394. 2
  8395. 2
  8396. 2
  8397. 2
  8398. 2
  8399. 2
  8400. 2
  8401. 2
  8402. 2
  8403. 2
  8404. 2
  8405. 2
  8406. 2
  8407. 2
  8408. 2
  8409. 2
  8410. 2
  8411. 2
  8412. 2
  8413. 2
  8414. 2
  8415. 2
  8416. 2
  8417. 2
  8418. 2
  8419. 2
  8420. 2
  8421. 2
  8422. 2
  8423. 2
  8424. 2
  8425. 2
  8426. 2
  8427. 2
  8428. 2
  8429. 2
  8430. 2
  8431. 2
  8432. 2
  8433. 2
  8434. 2
  8435. @J L Getting mad? Aren't we precious! No, silly boy. I'm not mad. I know you guys wish you had that much power over us, but I'm afraid you're shooting blanks. Oh! Look more lies and cherry picked facts, designed to project what you already have decided to be true, back to you, despite all the evidence to the contrary. How original. Then tell me something... If Trump did nothing wrong on that call, why in the world would he and his cronies have done so much to try and cover it up? - putting it on a private server, for top secret classified information, even though it didn't meet those qualifications - abusing his executive privilege to block Congress from getting the report from The Whistleblower - telling multiple lies about whether the call actually happened or didn't happen, given the hour of the day that he was asked before he released the transcript - then only releasing the transcript, the report and the money to Ukraine after the news got a hold of the story and he was pressured to If you think it doesn't make a difference that Biden is a candidate oh, you need to go back to law school. This isn't the Trump White House sweetheart. Just saying stuff does not actually make it true. Sorry And the way you're using that Twisted logic, it's desperation. Yes that's exactly what I'm saying. I can just go commit a bunch of crimes and then run for president and I'll be fine. 🤣 That is sound logic. If he was trying to investigate Biden on the level, why would he ask another country to do so? Why wouldn't he asked his own? You didn't destroy anything. You have silly logic. That's all. I'm still good! Don't you worry about me! 😜✌
    2
  8436. 2
  8437. 2
  8438. 2
  8439. 2
  8440. 2
  8441. 2
  8442. 2
  8443. 2
  8444. 2
  8445. 2
  8446. 2
  8447. 2
  8448. 2
  8449. 2
  8450. 2
  8451. 2
  8452. 2
  8453. 2
  8454. 2
  8455. 2
  8456. 2
  8457. 2
  8458. 2
  8459. 2
  8460. 2
  8461. 2
  8462. 2
  8463. The interview was a little over 16 min long. - 30 sec of Intro/Trip and queen🇬🇧 - 50 sec on the whether that day🌈 - 3 sec shy of a full minute (57 seconds) on the Vets and WW2🇺🇸 - 2 min and 25 sec Lying about NATO falling apart, on Theresa May and how he saved NATO and made everyone pay.🤥 - 2 min and 45 sec on how the tariffs that he put dow are everyone else's fault but his, lying about Border Patrol numbers, invasion and general fear mongering about brown people🤥 - 2 min 5 secs of him childishly trashing Nancy Pelosi, Robert Mueller and the justifiably respected Democrat prosecutors on his team. Also, lying again about the findings of the Muller Report.🤥 - 1 min 30 sec Lying about Joe Biden, the reason for his GDP and putting words in the mouth of all American farmers.🤥 - 20 sec bragging about how he is holding everyone up so he can do an interview with Fox News. Then another 5 sec on Laura ingraham's ratings 🙄 - 1 min 20 sec about Russia, China and a trade deal. Also, "Witch Hunt", lying about numbers again (Stock Market) and talking shit about Hillary Clinton because he still can't get over the fact that he lost the popular vote 🙄🤥 - 1 min 25 sec being asked about what he can do to unite the country and deciding the best way to do that is to talk more shit about people. At some point deciding to become a $5 a pop mall fortune teller about Mexico and using the usual hypocrisy on deals when talking about China 🙄💩🙄 - 35 sec on✌, military building, 💰, brag, brag, brag, Iran, brag, brag, brag, China again, brag, brag and brag.🙄 - Just over 1 min about fist bumping with the Queen of England, brag, talking with her, complementing her and thankfully the end!🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩 Sorry about the sassy pants in the middle and twards the end. It was starting to be like audio water torture up in here. 😢
    2
  8464. 2
  8465. 2
  8466. 2
  8467. 2
  8468. 2
  8469. 2
  8470. 2
  8471. 2
  8472. 2
  8473. 2
  8474. 2
  8475. 2
  8476. 2
  8477. 2
  8478. 2
  8479. 2
  8480. 2
  8481. 2
  8482. 2
  8483. 2
  8484. 2
  8485. 2
  8486. 2
  8487. 2
  8488. 2
  8489. 2
  8490. 2
  8491. 2
  8492. 2
  8493. 2
  8494. 2
  8495. 2
  8496. 2
  8497. 2
  8498. 2
  8499. 2
  8500. 2
  8501. 2
  8502. 2
  8503. 2
  8504. 2
  8505. 2
  8506. 2
  8507. 2
  8508. 2
  8509. 2
  8510. 2
  8511. 2
  8512. 2
  8513. 2
  8514. 2
  8515. 2
  8516. 2
  8517. 2
  8518. 2
  8519. 2
  8520. 2
  8521. 2
  8522. 2
  8523. 2
  8524. 2
  8525. 2
  8526. 2
  8527. 2
  8528. 2
  8529. 2
  8530. 2
  8531. 2
  8532. 2
  8533. 2
  8534. 2
  8535. 2
  8536. 2
  8537. 2
  8538. 2
  8539. 2
  8540. 2
  8541. 2
  8542. 2
  8543. 2
  8544. 2
  8545. 2
  8546. 2
  8547. 2
  8548. 2
  8549. 2
  8550. 2
  8551. 2
  8552. 2
  8553.  @ricflair2743  Trump Report card.... - Jobs +5,121,00 - Unemployment rate 3.8% - job openings + 26% - real weekly earnings + 2.6% - economically growth 2.9% - S&P 500 + 27.6% - u.s. Mexico border apprehensions + 31.9% - home prices + 9.9% - home ownership + 1.1 points - corporate profits + 12% - Federal regulatory restrictions negative 1% - people without health insurance + 1.1 million - people with gap insurance + 7 million - food stamp recipients negative 10.4% - coal mining jobs + 1900 - manufacturing jobs + 453000 - federal debt held by public + 12.5% - carbon dioxide emissions plus 2% - trade deficit + 23.5% - Consumer Price Index Plus 4.3% - us crude oil production Plus 25.6% Job growth slowed a bit under Trump, but unemployment dropped to the lowest level in nearly half a century. The average monthly gain under Trump so far is 197,000. So your numbers about how many jobs have been added in the last 12 months is off but for the better when it comes to your point. It's actually more than that. It would be more around 2.3 million and change. Here is the thing though, in Obama's second term, his average monthly was 217,000 jobs. Which would make his 2.6 million and change. So, job growth has slowed. So Trump is going to have to pick up the pace if he is going to fulfill his campaign boast that "he will be the greatest jobs president that God ever created". The unemployment rate, which was well below the historic Norm when Trump took office, has continued to fall even lower. It was already 4.7% when he was sworn in. The most recent numbers show 3.8% now. So, team effort, is my point. But the historical more MS 5.6% which is the median monthly rate for all the months since starting 1948. So still good. One reason why the employment growth has slowed is a shortage of qualified workers. Which is tied to the lack of Education opportunities. The number unfilled job openings hit more than 7.7 million in November, the highest in the 18 years the BLS has tracked this figure. As of the last day of February, the most recent figure on record, it was still nearly 7.1 million. That's a gain of almost 1.5 million unfilled job openings or 26% since Trump took office. For the first time on record the number of job openings exceeded the number of unemployed people looking for work in March of last year. And in every month sense. Despite the abundance of jobs, the labor force participation rate which went down 2.8% points during the Obama years, has remained little changed under Trump. Since Trump took office, the rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 63.2% and 62.7%. It was 63.0% in March, up just .1% from where it was the month Trump took office. Manufacturing jobs increased under Trump, just at a rate slightly faster than total employment. The number Rose by 453000 between Trump's inauguration and March. That followed a net decrease of 192 thousand under Obama. The increase in January 2017 amounts to 3.7%, compared with the 3.5% increase in overall employment. The number of manufacturing jobs is still 920000 below where it was in December of 2007, at the start of the Great Recession.
    2
  8554. 2
  8555. 2
  8556. 2
  8557. 2
  8558. 2
  8559. 2
  8560. 2
  8561. 2
  8562. 2
  8563. 2
  8564. 2
  8565. 2
  8566. 2
  8567. 2
  8568. 2
  8569. 2
  8570. 2
  8571. 2
  8572. 2
  8573. 2
  8574. 2
  8575. 2
  8576. 2
  8577. 2
  8578. 2
  8579. 2
  8580. 2
  8581. 2
  8582. 2
  8583. 2
  8584. 2
  8585. 2
  8586. 2
  8587. 2
  8588. 2
  8589. 2
  8590. 2
  8591.  @ewalker1057  Nope! You just have to stick with that narrative, no matter what I say or how many times I point out these other children. Which I have many times now. In fact... Lets make a list, so you can stop perpetuating this deflection wrapped in a lie. Then you'll have to come up with some other excuse for trying to minimize these 103 childrens deaths. 1. You didn't point out hypocrisy. You tried to use 👉the unconscionable death of some children👈 to minimize the death of these children. 2. Again... You didn't point out hypocrisy. You tried to use 😮the unconscionable death of some children👈 to minimize the death of these children. 3. However... This isn't about me, as much as you are trying to make it.... because you think I'm more of a convenient Target than 103 dead children... it's about them. It's about the tragedy of these young lives being taken for this BS horrid reason. It's about how that matters. It's about how people like you were trying to distract from that, 👉and use these children's deaths, and other children's deaths👈 in order to attack another side. 4. Infact... You did not, bc you tried to attribute that to me, 👉by making the assumption that I support all those other acts.👈 5. If they don't report on 👉every single child death in the world,👈 they can't report on any of them? 6. Your trying to use 👉dead kids👈 to minimize and deflect from other dead kids. I've mentioned all these children, all along. Even calling it unconscionable. You just choose to ignore that because it doesn't fit your narrative of, make this about me, because I make a better target. That's just 6 times today that I've mentioned or made reference to all the other children.
    2
  8592. 2
  8593. 2
  8594. 2
  8595. 2
  8596. 2
  8597. 2
  8598. 2
  8599. 2
  8600. 2
  8601. 2
  8602. 2
  8603. 2
  8604. 2
  8605. 2
  8606. 2
  8607. 2
  8608. 2
  8609. 2
  8610. 2
  8611. 2
  8612. 2
  8613. 2
  8614. 2
  8615. 2
  8616. 2
  8617. 2
  8618.  @chrissparks3254  My little boy is 11. ☺ He has sickle cell. Which I am oddly grateful for. We couldn't keep his Iron up when he was little. Along with a few other factors, and we didn't know why. They where throwing around scary words like leukemia and brain cancer, as we waiting 6 whole months, after they finally sent the tests away to get them tested. It was a hard diagnosis because he had an odd presentation.... But when they finally figured it out I was actually relieved to hear it... Ya know... Considering what it could how been. I remember the hardest part for me was knowing that there where always going to be struggles for him. That he was never just going to be okay... Or a normal little boy.... That I was always going to have to worry. The hardest day was one of the last. They had to poke him with needles all the time to check his Iron or take blood. One day, they Hasbro draw blood to send to the lab. He had just had it. He screamed and cried for an hour. Struggled against and fought having another needle going into his body with all his 3 year old might. I had to hold him down. I tried everything. Me and that lab tech. Nothing worked. He had just had it. Seeing him in that much pain and having to do that to him anyways.... Sigh.... So I know how hard it is for you to see your little boy struggle. I also know the joy of them and wonder you have over them. Even with their struggles... You see their smiles. You are happy if they are. The smallest things matter the most. Even just being goofy with them. It makes it all worth it. ☺ So I understand your choice, as well. I would have made the same. No matter how many hard days there was. We would die for them every day... A million times over... But we would much rather live for them... With them... I so got you on that! I do want to give you something to think about, though. Imagine when you had to decide to keep your precious little boy or not, someone told you that you couldn't. Someone told you he had to be aborted bc of his condition. Imagine that someone was the gov you live under. Imagine how insane that would be to you on every level. That is why it should be your choice. ... And no one else's. 💙
    2
  8619. 2
  8620. 2
  8621. 2
  8622. 2
  8623. 2
  8624. 2
  8625. 2
  8626. 2
  8627. 2
  8628. 2
  8629. 2
  8630. 2
  8631. 2
  8632. 2
  8633. 2
  8634. 2
  8635. 2
  8636. 2
  8637. 2
  8638. 2
  8639. 2
  8640. 2
  8641. 2
  8642. 2
  8643. 2
  8644. 2
  8645. 2
  8646. 2
  8647. 2
  8648. 2
  8649. 2
  8650. 2
  8651. 2
  8652. 2
  8653. 2
  8654. 2
  8655. 2
  8656. 2
  8657. 2
  8658. 2
  8659. 2
  8660. 2
  8661. 2
  8662. 2
  8663. 2
  8664. 2
  8665. 2
  8666. 2
  8667. 2
  8668. 2
  8669. 2
  8670. 2
  8671. 2
  8672. 2
  8673. 2
  8674. 2
  8675. 2
  8676. 2
  8677. 2
  8678. 2
  8679. 2
  8680. 2
  8681. 2
  8682. 2
  8683. 2
  8684. 2
  8685. 2
  8686. 2
  8687. 2
  8688. 2
  8689. 2
  8690. 2
  8691. 2
  8692. 2
  8693. 2
  8694. 2
  8695. 2
  8696. 2
  8697. 2
  8698. 2
  8699. 2
  8700. 2
  8701. 2
  8702. 2
  8703. 2
  8704. 2
  8705. 2
  8706. 2
  8707. 2
  8708. 2
  8709. 2
  8710. 2
  8711. 2
  8712. 2
  8713. 2
  8714. 2
  8715. 2
  8716. 2
  8717. 2
  8718. 2
  8719. 2
  8720. 2
  8721. 2
  8722. 2
  8723. 2
  8724. 2
  8725. 2
  8726. 2
  8727. 2
  8728. 2
  8729. 2
  8730. 2
  8731. 2
  8732. 2
  8733. 2
  8734. 2
  8735. 2
  8736. 2
  8737. 2
  8738. 2
  8739. 2
  8740. 2
  8741. 2
  8742. 2
  8743. 2
  8744. 2
  8745. 2
  8746. 2
  8747. 2
  8748. 2
  8749. 2
  8750. 2
  8751. 2
  8752. 2
  8753. 2
  8754. 2
  8755. 2
  8756. 2
  8757. 2
  8758. 2
  8759. 2
  8760. 2
  8761. 2
  8762. 2
  8763. 2
  8764. 2
  8765. 2
  8766. 2
  8767. 2
  8768. 2
  8769. 2
  8770. 2
  8771. 2
  8772. 2
  8773. 2
  8774. 2
  8775. 2
  8776. 2
  8777. 2
  8778. 2
  8779. 2
  8780. 2
  8781. 2
  8782. 2
  8783. 2
  8784. 2
  8785. 2
  8786. 2
  8787. 2
  8788. 2
  8789. 2
  8790. 2
  8791. 2
  8792. 2
  8793. 2
  8794. 2
  8795. 2
  8796. 2
  8797. 2
  8798. 2
  8799. 2
  8800. 2
  8801. 2
  8802. 2
  8803. 2
  8804. 2
  8805. 2
  8806. 2
  8807. 2
  8808. 2
  8809. 2
  8810. 2
  8811. 2
  8812. 2
  8813. 2
  8814. 2
  8815. 2
  8816. 2
  8817. 2
  8818. 2
  8819. 2
  8820. 2
  8821. 2
  8822. 2
  8823. 2
  8824. 2
  8825. 2
  8826. 2
  8827. 2
  8828. 2
  8829. 2
  8830. 2
  8831. 2
  8832. 2
  8833. 2
  8834. 2
  8835. 2
  8836. 2
  8837. 2
  8838. 2
  8839. 2
  8840. 2
  8841. 2
  8842. 2
  8843. 2
  8844. 2
  8845. 2
  8846. 2
  8847. 2
  8848. 2
  8849. 2
  8850. 2
  8851. 2
  8852. 2
  8853. 2
  8854. 2
  8855. 2
  8856. 2
  8857. 2
  8858. 2
  8859. 2
  8860. 2
  8861. 2
  8862. 2
  8863. 2
  8864. 2
  8865. 2
  8866. 2
  8867. 2
  8868. 2
  8869. 2
  8870. 2
  8871. 2
  8872. 2
  8873. 2
  8874. 2
  8875. 2
  8876. 2
  8877. 2
  8878. 2
  8879. 2
  8880. 2
  8881. 2
  8882. 2
  8883. 2
  8884. 2
  8885. 2
  8886. 2
  8887. 2
  8888. 2
  8889. 2
  8890. 2
  8891. 2
  8892. 2
  8893. 2
  8894. 2
  8895. 2
  8896. 2
  8897. 2
  8898. 2
  8899. 2
  8900. 2
  8901. 2
  8902. 2
  8903. 2
  8904. 2
  8905. 2
  8906. 2
  8907. 2
  8908. 2
  8909. 2
  8910. 2
  8911. 2
  8912. 2
  8913. 2
  8914. 2
  8915. 2
  8916. 2
  8917. 2
  8918. 2
  8919. 2
  8920. 2
  8921. 2
  8922. 2
  8923. 2
  8924. 2
  8925. 2
  8926. 2
  8927. 2
  8928. 2
  8929. 2
  8930. 2
  8931. 2
  8932. 2
  8933. 2
  8934. 2
  8935. 2
  8936. 2
  8937. 2
  8938. 2
  8939.  Mike B  I think we are talking about 2 different things. I may not have been clear enough. I was referring to Mud arguing the president. It was arguing that you're not necessarily supposed to report on the presidents words to foreign diplomats. So it is practice to monitor those. For a variety of reasons. But you're supposed to be there monitoring them to listen to the other guy. Not the president. What he's not considering is checks and balances. Our system of government is designed to have those. To make sure that one person does not have too much power. So then arguing that you should ignore something the President says even if it sounds a bit like conspiracy with a foreign adversary, is kind of like someone doing a sting to catch a drug dealer and then accidentally coming upon the inclination of a possible murder, and then saying well that's not what I'm looking for so it doesn't matter. His argument is not taking everything into consideration. Neither is yours by the way. Every time you guys say the left is trying to take all our guns, it's a talking point made up by the NRA that you get to throw out every single time someone tries to have reasonable gun regulation because we have mass shootings almost every day in America now. Reasonable gun regulation does not require taking everybody's guns away and no liberal or leftist that I know wants that. Which is why you can only name one politician that is ever said that. Which is why you guys don't have any evidence of any other politicians saying or doing something to that extent. I'm a liberal leftist but I'm also a gun owner who lives down south. I don't want your gun. I have my own.
    2
  8940. 2
  8941. 2
  8942. 2
  8943. 2
  8944. 2
  8945. 2
  8946.  @-me-myself-and-I  But they did predict it. Several times. Look at the last one, if your to lazy to read the whole thing. Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    2
  8947.  @kathyb9390  Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    2
  8948. 2
  8949. 2
  8950. 2
  8951. 2
  8952. 2
  8953. 2
  8954. 2
  8955. 2
  8956. 2
  8957. 2
  8958. 2
  8959. 2
  8960.  @realthings5821  1. Where is your evidence that the chain of custody was broke? 2. Six different states have been doing strictly mail-in ballots for the last decade with no significant voter fraud or anybody else giving a damn about it. The military does mail-in vote. Its called a reliable pattern of events. If there has been no trouble with it before this election.... If there is no evidence of issues with mail in voter fraud in this election.... If the only reason to suspect any mail in voter fraud this time, is the word obey habitual liar, who claimed that the only way he could lose is by voter fraud... Logic dictates the most logical conclusion would be that there is no mail in ballot voter fraud. 3. The courts did not block investigations. That doesn't even make sense. The courts do not have the power to stop any organization from investigating voter fraud when presented with merit and standing. Meaning.... you have to standing to sue in that particular court and you have to have enough evidence that you can show the grand jury in order to Warrant further investigation, warrants and trials. 4. What is the "evidence" that these claims were supported by? 5. " Claims refuse to initiate investigations into claim supported by evidence are rejecting claims on legal technicality. " 👈 This is false. Some where thrown out for jurisdictional issues. None of them prevented people in the jurisdiction and therefore having standing in that particular court, from bringing another suit. ALSO... It's false because that is not why more then half of them where thrown out. More than half were thrown out by reason of lack of evidence. Again... Cherry picking gets you no where. Would you like me to get you a list, so you can see for yourself? It's all public record and easy to verify... that is, if one actually want the facts.
    2
  8961. 2
  8962. 2
  8963. 2
  8964. 2
  8965. 2
  8966. 2
  8967. 2
  8968. 2
  8969. 2
  8970. 2
  8971. 2
  8972. 2
  8973. 2
  8974. 2
  8975. 2
  8976. 2
  8977. 2
  8978. 2
  8979. 2
  8980. 2
  8981. 2
  8982. 2
  8983. 2
  8984. 2
  8985. 2
  8986. 2
  8987. 2
  8988. 2
  8989. 2
  8990. 2
  8991. 2
  8992. 2
  8993. 2
  8994. 2
  8995. 2
  8996. 2
  8997. 2
  8998. 2
  8999. 2
  9000. 2
  9001. 2
  9002. 2
  9003. 2
  9004. 2
  9005. 2
  9006. 2
  9007. 2
  9008. 2
  9009.  @gchannel9463  Well, you sound "SUPER rational and mature enough to listen". 😉✌ But sure... 1. The whistleblower report has been proven to be accurate. 2. Trump lied on camera 3 times about the July 25th phone call and mentioning Biden in it. 3. The transcript shows a clear quid pro quo. 4. Trump had the phone call put in storage that it would not normally go into and does not qualify for, in order to keep it from people. 5. Trump put the money on hold on July 23rd, before the scheduled phone call... and has changed his story on camera as to why he did that three times since this all began. - "I didn't talk about Biden" but if I did, it "would have been fine". - I talked about him but the money was put on hold because "the EU should be giving more aid and we should be giving less". Which quickly changed after the reports came out showing that the EU has actually given a lot more money in Aid to Ukraine that America has. - A lot of people are saying Biden did something wrong and I'm concerned about "curruption" in Ukraine. 6. Trump has openly tried to stop Witnesses from testifying in the impeachment inquiry and refuses to turn over documents. These documents being me text message conversations. 7. Rudy Giuliani and his associates being investigated and arrested for involvement in this. 8. Ambassador Taylor, a career Foreign Service Officer, text Soundland asking a pointant question." Are we now saying that security assistance and white house meeting are conditioned on investigations?" Suondland replies, "call me." Not no... Not absolutely not. Not don't be ridiculous that's wrong and against the law.... But Call me. 9. On September 9th Soundland makes a statement... " As I said on the phone, I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign". 3 hours later he gets a call from Rudy Giuliani and then puts this statement out. " The president has been crystal clear no quid pro quos for any kind. I suggest we stomped the back and forth by text." It was later found out that Trump told him to make the second statement. 10. On September 11th under pressure from lawmakers, the White House releases the funding for Ukraine without any explanation of what changed..... Just off the top of my head... Now... I'm more concerned with your delusions... and if you don't know all of this already, what business do you have forming an opinion or speaking on the matter?
    2
  9010. 2
  9011. 2
  9012. 2
  9013. 2
  9014. 2
  9015. 2
  9016. 2
  9017. 2
  9018. 2
  9019. 2
  9020. 2
  9021. 2
  9022. 2
  9023. 2
  9024. 2
  9025. 2
  9026. 2
  9027. 2
  9028. 2
  9029. 2
  9030. 2
  9031. 2
  9032. 2
  9033. 2
  9034. 2
  9035. 2
  9036. 2
  9037. 2
  9038. 2
  9039. 2
  9040. 2
  9041. 2
  9042. 2
  9043. 2
  9044. 2
  9045. 2
  9046. 2
  9047. 2
  9048. 2
  9049. 2
  9050. 2
  9051. 2
  9052. 2
  9053. 2
  9054. 2
  9055. 2
  9056. 2
  9057. 2
  9058. 2
  9059. 2
  9060. 2
  9061. 2
  9062. 2
  9063. 2
  9064. 2
  9065. 2
  9066. 2
  9067. 2
  9068. 2
  9069. 2
  9070. 2
  9071. 2
  9072. 2
  9073. 2
  9074. 2
  9075. 2
  9076. 2
  9077. 2
  9078. 2
  9079. 2
  9080. 2
  9081. 2
  9082. 2
  9083. 2
  9084. 2
  9085. 2
  9086. 2
  9087. 2
  9088. 2
  9089. 2
  9090. 2
  9091. 2
  9092. 2
  9093. 2
  9094. 2
  9095. 2
  9096. 2
  9097. 2
  9098. 2
  9099. 2
  9100. 2
  9101. 2
  9102. 2
  9103. 2
  9104. 2
  9105. 2
  9106. 2
  9107. 2
  9108. 2
  9109. 2
  9110. 2
  9111. 2
  9112. 2
  9113. 2
  9114. 2
  9115. 2
  9116. 2
  9117. 2
  9118. 2
  9119. 2
  9120. 2
  9121. 2
  9122. 2
  9123. 2
  9124. 2
  9125. 2
  9126. 2
  9127. 2
  9128. 2
  9129. 2
  9130. 2
  9131.  Sara M  and I'm only repeating this because it Bears repeating... the governing state of Israel does not represent every Jewish person. The Democrats don't so much support Hamas as they called both sides out for doing messed up s***. Why? Because both sides do messed up s***? It's called being consistent. Also... We don't all have to agree all the time, or pretend we do. We don't all have to shares the same opinion on every subject or support everything that comes from our side, simply because it's on our side. It's actually pretty cool. I don't have to worry about doing mental yoga poses to try and figure out a way to excuse something stupid someone did on my side. I can just say, yeah that was f**** stupid. My opinion on Israel and Hamas is also consistent. It's a pox on both their houses at this point. This began so many years ago and may have had a clear fault, no fault narrative at one point but at some point everybody just seems to have decided that they never want to stop killing each other. Because how many more people have to die for a strip of land. How many more children have to grow up, knowing they could be walking down the street, and at any moment, be dead or mutilated. The futility of that conflict died along time ago. They just won't stop kicking the dead body. 👆 This is my view. Other people in the Democratic party hold a different View. Which is perfectly fine. I just don't happen to agree with them on this particular issue. It doesn't make either of our opinions any less valid, either.
    2
  9132. 2
  9133. 2
  9134. 2
  9135. 2
  9136. 2
  9137. 2
  9138. 2
  9139. 2
  9140. 2
  9141. 2
  9142. 2
  9143. 2
  9144. 2
  9145. 2
  9146. 2
  9147. 2
  9148. 2
  9149. 2
  9150. 2
  9151. 2
  9152. 2
  9153. 2
  9154. 2
  9155. 2
  9156. 2
  9157. 2
  9158. 2
  9159. 2
  9160. 2
  9161. 2
  9162. 2
  9163. 2
  9164. 2
  9165. 2
  9166. 2
  9167. 2
  9168. 2
  9169. 2
  9170. 2
  9171. 2
  9172. 2
  9173. 2
  9174. 2
  9175. 2
  9176. 2
  9177. 2
  9178. 2
  9179. 2
  9180. 2
  9181. 2
  9182. 2
  9183. 2
  9184. 2
  9185. 2
  9186. 2
  9187. 2
  9188. 2
  9189. 2
  9190. 2
  9191. 2
  9192. 2
  9193. 2
  9194. 2
  9195. 2
  9196. 2
  9197. 2
  9198. 2
  9199. 2
  9200. 2
  9201.  @georgewashington8097  He.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic and America, just exactly like covid-19 and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obama. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 has magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cares, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, we're literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the world worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away by several different dates and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a coded safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claims, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineer is building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    2
  9202. 2
  9203. 2
  9204. 2
  9205. 2
  9206. 2
  9207. 2
  9208. 2
  9209. 2
  9210. 2
  9211. 2
  9212. 2
  9213. 2
  9214. 2
  9215. 2
  9216. 2
  9217. 2
  9218. 2
  9219. 2
  9220. 2
  9221. 2
  9222. 2
  9223. 2
  9224. 2
  9225. 2
  9226. 2
  9227. 2
  9228. 2
  9229. 2
  9230. @Rick James5678 Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    2
  9231. 2
  9232. 2
  9233. 2
  9234. 2
  9235. 2
  9236. 2
  9237. 2
  9238. 2
  9239. 2
  9240. 2
  9241. 2
  9242. 2
  9243. 2
  9244. 2
  9245. 2
  9246. 2
  9247. 2
  9248. 2
  9249. 2
  9250. 2
  9251. 2
  9252. 2
  9253. 2
  9254. 2
  9255. 2
  9256. 2
  9257. 2
  9258. 2
  9259. 2
  9260. 2
  9261. 2
  9262. 2
  9263. 2
  9264. 2
  9265. 2
  9266. 2
  9267. 2
  9268. 2
  9269. 2
  9270. 2
  9271. 2
  9272. 2
  9273. 2
  9274. 2
  9275. 2
  9276. 2
  9277. 2
  9278. 2
  9279. 2
  9280. 2
  9281. 2
  9282. 2
  9283. 2
  9284. 2
  9285. 2
  9286. 2
  9287. 2
  9288. 2
  9289. 2
  9290. 2
  9291. 2
  9292. 2
  9293. 2
  9294. 2
  9295. 2
  9296. 2
  9297. 2
  9298. 2
  9299. 2
  9300. 2
  9301. 2
  9302. 2
  9303. 2
  9304. 2
  9305. 2
  9306. 2
  9307. 2
  9308. 2
  9309. 2
  9310. 2
  9311. 2
  9312. 2
  9313. 2
  9314. 2
  9315. 2
  9316. 2
  9317. 2
  9318. 2
  9319. 2
  9320. 2
  9321. 2
  9322. 2
  9323. 2
  9324. 2
  9325. 2
  9326. 2
  9327. 2
  9328. 2
  9329. 2
  9330. 2
  9331. 2
  9332. 2
  9333. 2
  9334. 2
  9335. 2
  9336. 2
  9337. 2
  9338. 2
  9339. 2
  9340. 2
  9341. 2
  9342. 2
  9343. 2
  9344. 2
  9345. 2
  9346. 2
  9347. 2
  9348. 2
  9349. 2
  9350. 2
  9351. 2
  9352. 2
  9353. 2
  9354. 2
  9355. 2
  9356. 2
  9357. 2
  9358. 2
  9359. 2
  9360. 2
  9361. 2
  9362. 2
  9363. 2
  9364. 2
  9365. 2
  9366. 2
  9367. 2
  9368. 2
  9369. 2
  9370. 2
  9371. 2
  9372. 2
  9373. 2
  9374.  @zbudda  " Since 2016 the Democrats have done nothing but divide the country, obstructed Trump's Maga agenda, and focus on removing Trump from office by any means necessary." This is another silly claim. This is from a 2 second google search. So you have no excuse for this comment you just made. You don't know what they have done because you didn't look.👇 "House Democrats haven’t been squandering time. In addition to their investigations, they’ve been passing legislation at a rapid clip. In all, the House has taken up 51 bills, resolutions, and suspensions since January — 49 of which they’ve passed. This includes a slate of bills to attempt to end the longest government shutdown in history, the result of a protracted fight between Trump and Congress over border wall funding. Ironically, over the past two weeks, the House has passed bills to address most of the issues Trump mentioned in his tweet. They recently passed a bill to lower prescription drug prices, and another one to protect preexisting conditions. The House also passed nine bills on veterans issues this week alone, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi noted at her weekly press conference. On Thursday, Democrats tried to present Trump their infrastructure plan before he walked out of their meeting." https://www-vox-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2019/5/24/18637163/trump-pelosi-democrats-bills-congress?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15716870959031&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vox.com%2F2019%2F5%2F24%2F18637163%2Ftrump-pelosi-democrats-bills-congress
    2
  9375. 2
  9376. 2
  9377. 2
  9378. 2
  9379. 2
  9380. 2
  9381. 2
  9382. 2
  9383. 2
  9384. 2
  9385. 2
  9386. 2
  9387. 2
  9388. 2
  9389. 2
  9390. 2
  9391. 2
  9392. 2
  9393. 2
  9394. 2
  9395. 2
  9396. 2
  9397. 2
  9398. 2
  9399. 2
  9400. 2
  9401. 2
  9402. 2
  9403. 2
  9404. 2
  9405. 2
  9406. 2
  9407. 2
  9408. 2
  9409. 2
  9410. 2
  9411. 2
  9412. 2
  9413. 2
  9414. 2
  9415. 2
  9416. 2
  9417. 2
  9418. 2
  9419. 2
  9420. 2
  9421. 2
  9422. 2
  9423. 2
  9424. 2
  9425. 2
  9426. 2
  9427. 2
  9428. 2
  9429. 2
  9430. 2
  9431. 2
  9432. 2
  9433. 2
  9434. 2
  9435. 2
  9436. 2
  9437. 2
  9438. 2
  9439. 2
  9440. 2
  9441. 2
  9442. 2
  9443. 2
  9444. 2
  9445. 2
  9446. 2
  9447. 2
  9448. 2
  9449. 2
  9450. 2
  9451. 2
  9452. 2
  9453. 2
  9454. 2
  9455. 2
  9456.  Anne M  So... 1... This REALLY REALLY is not about me. But... Sense you brought it up... I have faith in things I can prove to be real. Its not that I don't have faith. Its that I don't have blind faith. I choose to have faith in things that are real. Blind faith tends to end badly. Has so many times in history. Measured and evidence proven, thought process and the conclusion to such, is what tends to be the smart play. Science... Nor any other entity, person, group, experiment, object... etc... Has ever shown any proof of any higher being of any sort in hundreds of thousands of years. Religion tends to be made up by people in power, trying to keep that power, by subduing the masses with threats and promises. Usually centered around being punished horribly for not believing and the promise of something after, for those who can't take the pressure of this life being the only one we get. Your suggestion that because science hasn't been able to prove something to be true or not true as of yet, it makes it "god"... That is nothing new. It is also not sound logic. Just bc one thing can't be figured out right away, it doesn't mean it is "god". It just means it hasn't been figured out yet. That used to be a lot of things... Fire The wheel Antibiotics Electricity 👆 We didn't understand all those things, but then we figured them out. That did not mean while we didn't have them figured out, that it was "god" and then after, it was science. It just meant it hadn't been understood yet.
    2
  9457. 2
  9458. 2
  9459. 2
  9460. 2
  9461. 2
  9462. 2
  9463. 2
  9464. 2
  9465. 2
  9466. 2
  9467. 2
  9468. 2
  9469. 2
  9470. 2
  9471. 2
  9472. 2
  9473. 2
  9474. 2
  9475. 2
  9476. 2
  9477. 2
  9478. 2
  9479. 2
  9480. 2
  9481. 2
  9482. 2
  9483. 2
  9484. 2
  9485. 2
  9486. 2
  9487. 2
  9488. 2
  9489. 2
  9490. 2
  9491. 2
  9492. 2
  9493. 2
  9494. 2
  9495. 2
  9496. 2
  9497. 2
  9498. 2
  9499. 2
  9500. 2
  9501. 2
  9502. 2
  9503. 2
  9504. 2
  9505. 2
  9506. 2
  9507. 2
  9508. 2
  9509. 2
  9510. 2
  9511. 2
  9512. 2
  9513. 2
  9514. 2
  9515. 2
  9516. 2
  9517. 2
  9518. 2
  9519. 2
  9520. 2
  9521. 2
  9522. 2
  9523. 2
  9524. 2
  9525. 2
  9526. 2
  9527. 2
  9528. 2
  9529. 2
  9530. 2
  9531. 2
  9532. 2
  9533. 2
  9534. 2
  9535. 2
  9536. 2
  9537. 2
  9538. 2
  9539.  @AirForceOneCV2007  1. "We've done more test in 8 days than South Korea has done in 8 weeks." 2. Gov Cuomo didn't buy 16,ooo vent when he had the chance to stock up for a pandemic, for a very good price, in 2015. Instead, he had death panels and lotteries. 3. The WHO coronavirus test was a bad test. 4. The health insurance industry has agreed to waive all co-payments for Coronavirus treatments. 5. The Obama Administration didn't do anything about swine flu. 6. Claiming the media cut out his request of Russian hackers to find Hillary Clinton's emails, right at the end so that you don't see the laughter, the joke. 7. The USMCA is the biggest trade deal ever made. 8. Years of economic delay are over because Trump reversed the sales economy policies of the previous administration. 9. The democrat-controlled house never even asked John Bolton to testify. 10. Today I opened a major Apple manufacturing plant in Texas that will bring high paying jobs back to America. 11. "Nancy Pelosi, Adam Chef, and the rest of the corrupt Democrats made a promise to their crazy left-wing based that they would impeach me even before I took office." 12. "Many of the people in DACA, no longer very young, are far from Angels. Some are very tough, hardened criminals." 13. Says he is cutting illegal immigration in half. 14. "The Kurds are much safer right now." 15. "Long-standing whistleblower rules we're changed just before submittal of the fake whistleblower report." 16. "Yesterday we have the strongest Dollar in the history of our country." 17. "Wow, report just out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election!" 18. "The farmers are receiving 16 billion out of the tariffs that we've gotten from China." 19. Democrats want virtual immunity for illegal aliens who have created horrible crime and murder. 20. "Mexico, they took 30% of our automobile business."
    2
  9540. 2
  9541. 2
  9542. 2
  9543. 2
  9544. 2
  9545. 2
  9546. 2
  9547. 2
  9548. 2
  9549. 2
  9550. 2
  9551. 2
  9552. 2
  9553. 2
  9554. 2
  9555. 2
  9556. 2
  9557. 2
  9558. 2
  9559. 2
  9560. 2
  9561. 2
  9562. 2
  9563. 2
  9564. 2
  9565. 2
  9566. 2
  9567. 2
  9568. 2
  9569. 2
  9570. 2
  9571. 2
  9572. 2
  9573. 2
  9574. 2
  9575. 2
  9576. 2
  9577. 2
  9578. 2
  9579. 2
  9580. 2
  9581. 2
  9582. 2
  9583. 2
  9584. 2
  9585. 2
  9586. 2
  9587. 2
  9588. 2
  9589. 2
  9590. 2
  9591. 2
  9592. 2
  9593. 2
  9594. 2
  9595. 2
  9596. 2
  9597. 2
  9598. 2
  9599. 2
  9600. 2
  9601. 2
  9602. 2
  9603. 2
  9604. 2
  9605. 2
  9606. 2
  9607. 2
  9608. 2
  9609. 2
  9610. 2
  9611. 2
  9612. 2
  9613. 2
  9614.  @toobmaniac  Yeah... Not everybody is that petty, sugar. I have a long history of examples on the Yputube comment section. The only time I have ever even mentioned someone's spelling or grammar is when I literally didn't understand what they were trying to say and needed them to correct it so I could understand what they meant. Not everyone is as petty as you are... Or as desprate to try and make others feel bad. As I said... Its called being an adult. It was a late night typo... Cuz I wrote it... Late night... I remember especially because I have been sick for the past 2 days and have done basiclly nothing but sleeping, resting and feeling like crap. And you are childish... Because instead of presenting a substance based argument, you choose childish insults. If you don't like that label, then you should stop acting in such a manner. Yes... I did say that. I offered verifiable fact, instead of childish insult. Also, I'm not complaining. You could never have that much power over me, sweetheart. I was just point out the difference in our responses. Not sure what you think some Canadian dude has to do with me. 🤷 That kinda falls under the catagory of not my problem. I would actually usually say something to people being bullies, irreguardless of weather the person being bullied agrees with me or not. However... You seam to want to present that same juvenile standard, in reguards to me... For no particular reason. So... You 2 can battle it out on the kids playground, all you like. As for me and proof... You never asked... Because if you had, I would explain to you the proper order of debates. See... You made the original claims. Therefore the onus is on you to prove your claims. Otherwise, you would be asking me to disprove the claims that you have yet to prove. Which makes no sense. So... You prove your claims and... As long as your will agree to conduct yourself as an adult, I would be more then happy to counter your evidence. Though your further need to try and insult me, in order to make yourself feel better about your obvious insecurities, doesn't give me much hope for your adulthood. Though, we shall see, I suppose. 😉✌
    2
  9615. 2
  9616. 2
  9617. 2
  9618. 2
  9619. 2
  9620. 2
  9621. 2
  9622. 2
  9623. 2
  9624. 2
  9625. 2
  9626. 2
  9627. 2
  9628. 2
  9629. 2
  9630. 2
  9631. 2
  9632. 2
  9633. 2
  9634. 2
  9635. 2
  9636. 2
  9637. 2
  9638. 2
  9639. 2
  9640. 2
  9641. 2
  9642. 2
  9643. 2
  9644. 2
  9645. 2
  9646. 2
  9647. 2
  9648. 2
  9649. 2
  9650. 2
  9651.  @Michael-yl2iq  No... Sweetheart, in your opinion, you think you can spot silly. In my opinion, that's just you not being able to effectively argue your point, and so you got to try and put labels on me. Cuz it can't just be that we disagree anymore. Someone's always got to be a jackass. 🙄 Where did I say," people are confused over Trump being president"? Either you're confused by that statement, and should have asked for a clarification, or you're trying to twist my words, because you don't have an argument otherwise. The confusion, is the impression that is given to the World, about all Americans, that we consider it that man to be a respectable president. See... This is where I always start butting heads with people. See, I choose to look at all relevant information and then make an educated opinion. You want to look at one thing and go it's settled, cuz I ain't looking anywhere else. You feel free to do that, but that don't mean I got to agree, and that doesn't mean I'm silly because I don't. Here we go with rights again. 1st Amendment. He has the right to call himself president all damn day long if you would like. I equally have the same right, not to refer to a man, who acts like a child on a daily basis, as my president. Those are our Collective rights! You give talking about what we grew up learning, but yet again you were only looking at that one thing. We've learned a whole lot more than that, when it came to this country. But you are right about me being divisive. I want a big ass divided between myself and referring to that man, which respect that he has not earned. If anyone wants to ask me why I don't refer to him as president, I will be more than happy to explain that. As I just did here. I am responsible for my own actions. You just don't seem to understand that I disagree with your point of view, and that does not make me wrong, and it does not make you right. It simply means, we have a difference of opinion.
    2
  9652. 2
  9653. 2
  9654. 2
  9655. 2
  9656. 2
  9657. 2
  9658. 2
  9659. 2
  9660. 2
  9661. 2
  9662. 2
  9663. 2
  9664. 2
  9665. 2
  9666. 2
  9667. 2
  9668. 2
  9669. 2
  9670. 2
  9671. 2
  9672. 2
  9673. 2
  9674. 2
  9675. 2
  9676. 2
  9677. 2
  9678. 2
  9679. 2
  9680. 2
  9681. 2
  9682. 2
  9683. 2
  9684. 2
  9685. 2
  9686. 2
  9687.  @davidcouncil493  See the whole Board! Ford and Reagan had higher unemployment. They where both after the great depression. Also, Obama came in on the Great Recession, brought on by Bush. Which he got us out of with in 7nmonths of his first year in office. His first year in office the GDP started at -2.5%. At the end of that year, it was +3.9%. Make a GDP growth of 6.4% Trumps first years GDP growth was 0.4% and his second was 1.7%. Bring it to 3.9% GDP. OBAMA said auto manufacturing jobs weren't coming back. Which he was incorrect about. Not all jobs, though. TRUMP has the lowest unemployment sense the 70s. Not the 60s. Johnsons are lower and his term ended in 73. Also, crediting Trump for unemployment, is like crediting the guy who passed the finish line of a five-man relay race... Including Republican presidents, btw. Also, Job growth is lower than Obama's and has been slowly going down sense Trump has entered office. - The economy gained a net 11.6 million jobs. - The unemployment rate dropped to below the historical Norm. - The average weekly earnings for all workers were up 4.0% after inflation. - The gain was 3 to 7% of just production and non-supervisory employees. - After tax corporate profits also set records, as did stock prices. - The S&P 500 Index Rose 166%. A number of people lacking health insurance dropped by 15 million. - The premiums Rose but more slowly than before. - The federal debt Ode to the public Rose 128%. - Deficits were Rising as Obama deported. Home prices Rose 20%. - But the homeownership rate hit the lowest point in half a century. - Illegal immigration declined. The border patrol 35% fewer people trying to get into the US from Mexico. - Wind and solar power increased 360 9%. Coal production declined 39%. - Carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels dropped 11%. - Production of handguns Rose 192%, to a record level. - The murder rate dropped to the lowest on record in 2014, then Rose and finished at the same rate as when Obama took office. Jobs +11,641,000 Unemployment rate 4.8% Job openings +97% Median household income +5.3% Real weekly earnings +4% Home prices +20% Poverty rate -5% Food stamp recipients +33% Homeownership rate -3.8 points Corporate profits + 57% S&P 500 + 166% Federal debt held by public + 128% Uninsured -15.2 million Premiums + 43% U.s. Mexico border apprehensions -35% Unauthorized immigrant population -6 % Pew -3.6 % CMS U.s. cold production -38 % wind and solar power + 369% carbon dioxide emissions -11 % us crude oil production +77% new car MTG + 20% violent crime rate -16% handgun production +192% Guantanamo prisoners -83 % US military facilities Iraq 284 Afghanistan 1751 Only being willing to focus on your sides strengths and the other sides weaknesses, always comes across as you not being an honest actor.
    2
  9688. 2
  9689. 2
  9690. 2
  9691. 2
  9692. 2
  9693. 2
  9694. 2
  9695. 2
  9696. 2
  9697. 2
  9698. 2
  9699. 2
  9700. 2
  9701. 2
  9702. 2
  9703. 2
  9704. 2
  9705. 2
  9706. 2
  9707. 2
  9708. 2
  9709. 2
  9710. 2
  9711. 2
  9712. 2
  9713. 2
  9714. 2
  9715. 2
  9716. 2
  9717. 2
  9718. 2
  9719. 2
  9720. 2
  9721. 2
  9722. 2
  9723. 2
  9724. 2
  9725. 2
  9726. 2
  9727. 2
  9728. 2
  9729. 2
  9730. 2
  9731. 2
  9732.  @phollywood9650   P Hollywood  lies... It's lies... Not lie. 1. Something you couldn't possibly know. Also a bit of a false dichotomy considering you couldn't know that about that. So the only reason you would have to be setting it up is if you were insecure about your own argument. " you guys are all sheep being led to the slaughter by democrats" 2. Again, something you could not possibly know about a total stranger. Are we sensing a pattern here. "You were the one believing everything CNN regurgitates." 3. This is a recurring one. Even if, let's say for a second nobody ever found any evidence whatsoever about Trump collusion and obstruction oh, you still would not honestly be able to say that something was a hoax done by that many people. That's entirely not the K it's but even if it was, calling it a hoax would still be a lie. "Russian Hoax" 4. In all honesty I genuinely tried to warn you off of this. I said not only had I read those things I actually studied them a great deal so that's how I know that you calling it a hoax meant that you have not read the evidence. I said don't keep telling that silly lie because I can easily prove it's not true.... But you didn't listen.... I didn't want to waist time messing with it. But... Nope! You not only made me prove your lie was a lie but then you also tried to shove words in my mouth and tried to change the narrative twice to get out of the meeting it. Which brings us to.... " I read the Mueller report, and the transcript of Michael Flynn's call." 5. Now we know that's not true. I know it and knew it even before this. That's for a few reasons one it's happened before in major cases... 2 it would have never gone to a judge or a jury if it could not legally get past the grand jury first. If it was not illegal to obstruct Justice despite whether or not they could prove the original crime oh, it wouldn't have gotten past the grand jury. He would have never been in jail. The FBI would not have leverage on him. There's so many reasons why that was a ridiculous lie. " Michael Flynn is being exonerated because obstruction charges can't be brought if there was no crime to begin with. " 6. 1... Even if there was no proof of collusion and no proof of obstruction, again there is... That still wouldn't make him duly elected. Because if you would rather Motorola forward you would know that we without a doubt that Russians were messing with the election in order to get him elected. Even if he had nothing to do with it. You still could not call him duly elected. " duly elected president"
    2
  9733. 2
  9734. 2
  9735. 2
  9736. 2
  9737. 2
  9738. 2
  9739. 2
  9740. 2
  9741. 2
  9742. 2
  9743. 2
  9744. 2
  9745. 2
  9746. 2
  9747. 2
  9748. 2
  9749. 2
  9750. 2
  9751. 2
  9752. 2
  9753. 2
  9754. 2
  9755. 2
  9756. 2
  9757. 2
  9758. 2
  9759. 2
  9760. 2
  9761. 2
  9762. 2
  9763. 2
  9764. 2
  9765. 2
  9766. 2
  9767. 2
  9768. 2
  9769. 2
  9770. 2
  9771. 2
  9772. 2
  9773. 2
  9774. 2
  9775. 2
  9776. 2
  9777. 2
  9778. 2
  9779. 2
  9780. 2
  9781. 2
  9782. 2
  9783. 2
  9784. 2
  9785. 2
  9786. 2
  9787. 2
  9788. 2
  9789. 2
  9790. 2
  9791. 2
  9792. 2
  9793. 2
  9794. 2
  9795. 2
  9796. 2
  9797. 2
  9798. 2
  9799. 2
  9800. 2
  9801. 2
  9802. 2
  9803. 2
  9804. 2
  9805. 2
  9806. 2
  9807. 2
  9808. 2
  9809. 2
  9810. 2
  9811. 2
  9812. 2
  9813. 2
  9814. 2
  9815. 2
  9816. 2
  9817. 2
  9818. 2
  9819. 2
  9820. 2
  9821. 2
  9822. 2
  9823. 2
  9824. 2
  9825. 2
  9826. 2
  9827. 2
  9828. 2
  9829. 2
  9830. 2
  9831. 2
  9832. 2
  9833. 2
  9834. 2
  9835. 2
  9836. 2
  9837. 2
  9838. 2
  9839. 2
  9840. 2
  9841. 2
  9842. 2
  9843. 2
  9844. 2
  9845. 2
  9846. 2
  9847. 2
  9848. 2
  9849. 2
  9850. 2
  9851. 2
  9852. 2
  9853. 2
  9854. 2
  9855. 2
  9856. 2
  9857. 2
  9858. 2
  9859. 2
  9860. 2
  9861. 2
  9862. 2
  9863. 2
  9864. 2
  9865. 2
  9866. 2
  9867. 2
  9868. 2
  9869. 2
  9870. 2
  9871. 2
  9872. 2
  9873. 2
  9874. 2
  9875. 2
  9876. 2
  9877. 2
  9878. 2
  9879. 2
  9880. 2
  9881. 2
  9882. 2
  9883. 2
  9884. 2
  9885. 2
  9886. 2
  9887. 2
  9888. 2
  9889. 2
  9890. 2
  9891. 2
  9892. 2
  9893. 2
  9894. 2
  9895. 2
  9896. 2
  9897. 2
  9898. 2
  9899. 2
  9900. 2
  9901. 2
  9902. 2
  9903. 2
  9904. 2
  9905. 2
  9906. 2
  9907. 2
  9908. 2
  9909. 2
  9910. 2
  9911. 2
  9912. 2
  9913. 2
  9914. 2
  9915. 2
  9916. 2
  9917. 2
  9918. 2
  9919. 2
  9920. 2
  9921. 2
  9922. 2
  9923. 2
  9924. 2
  9925. 2
  9926. 2
  9927. 2
  9928. 2
  9929. 2
  9930. 2
  9931. 2
  9932.  @sionel2604  Okay, headline educated.... Maybe read a little more into a subject. These "biologically born males" are also often found to have biologically female brains and natural hormone distrubution. Doesn't sound so Bio Male after all... Huh? What law and what Dem law maker is pushing it? Or are you full of shit? Now imagine your brain is telling you that you are in the wrong body for as long as you can remember. Now imagine your going through puberty, your getting told on a conatant basis that you are a freak by all your piers and just general uneducated ass holes. Now imagine your family has rejected you. The youth trans community has one of the highest risk of suicide and ita in large part because of uneducated assholes like you. They don't support illegal immigration. "The wall" does nothing for that problem. Unless you would lile to quote an expert that says it will? Again .. Educate yourself. All the wall does is help reelect Trump. Did you read the released version of the Muller report or just listen to what Trumps hand picked prosecutor said about it? If so.... By all means... Quote us where it says that. We will all be waiting.... For a long time. In the mean time maybe explain to us why Trump needs to tell people to ignore congressional subpoenas, fire and try to fire those that are investigating him, keeps lying about his tax returns, keeps replacing those he fired with puppet yes men and refused to even sit down with Muller for 2 years, all while claiming he is being completely transparent?
    2
  9933. 2
  9934. 2
  9935. 2
  9936. 2
  9937. 2
  9938. 2
  9939. 2
  9940. 2
  9941. 2
  9942.  @Lord_Poyo  1. That is not true. A variety of evidence is presented at court that isn't necessarily broadcast over the news. This could range from... - witness statements, - 2 character statements both the accused and the victim... - more than one person could have been taping - the 911 call - recorded audio and body cam footage - prior record of the officer And loads more. 2. The only difference between murder 1 and murder 2 is prior intent. Manslaughter is an unlawful killing that doesn't involve malice or forethought intent to seriously harm or kill or extreme recklessness disregard for life. 3. Logical deduction doesn't necessarily only pertain to what you can imagine. I'm not using emotional equivalent to make my argument. Merely the definition of murder 2. Which, again, does not require prior intent. 4. You seem to be mistaking what you think is logic as to what actually is logic when considering all relevant material. For instance, your assumptions about the taser and gun. As I am stated, one of the key factors that is drummed into your head, not only in Pryor police training but in every maintenance review, is left side right side. In most police departments you can actually get busted down a rank and lose pay for having your taser and your gun on the wrong side. This is not something officers forget or mistake. Especially not a seasoned officer of more than 20 years. It's the wrong Captain sees you... as for getting caught up, that's what your training is for, as well. That's why countless people are not only coming on here but going to the media not being able to understand how this person mistook the taser for the firearm. 5. If you claim to be a logical thinker, then you must consider all relevant material. Not just what fits your narrative. You continuing to make claims like, "which you can in no way prove", only shows your lack of logical Thinking by considering all relevant information. 6. You clearly don't have the training that these people do oh, by the mistakes you're making in your logic, yet you feel confident enough to say that "personal experience doesn't help here". That's not logical thinking.
    2
  9943. 2
  9944. 2
  9945. 2
  9946. 2
  9947. 2
  9948. 2
  9949. 2
  9950. 2
  9951. 2
  9952. 2
  9953. 2
  9954. 2
  9955. 2
  9956. 2
  9957. 2
  9958. 2
  9959. 2
  9960. 2
  9961. 2
  9962. 2
  9963. 2
  9964.  @potsmokingatheist9290  First a definition.... What is brainwashing? The term brainwashing was first coined in the 1950s during the Korean War. It was used to explain how to italic Terry Unruh jeans were able to completely indoctrinate American soldiers to a process of torture and propaganda. Brainwashing is the theory that a person's core beliefs, ideas, affiliations and values can be replaced, so much so that they have no autonomy over themselves and can't think critically or independently. You, yourself have presented at least 3 out of the 5 markers for brainwashing. I suspect more but am not willing to say so because there is nkt enough evidence to do so and I choose not to speculate or assume like you do. Us V Them Which can be demonstrated by your insistence that Fox is somehow more factual and relivent then CNN and MSNBC ( which is something you assumed that I watch ). The following is information that you will probably ignore but what the hell. Did you know that Gallup has polled the Most and least trusted news sources once every 3 months for the past 6 years? Here are the results ( which again, you can easily verify ). - Americans believe that 62% of the news they consume on TV, and newspapers and on the radio is biased. - they believe that 44% of news reporting and 66% of news on social media is inaccurate - 80% of them are upset about it - perception of bias in an accuracy differ based on the respondents political Persuasions, particularly with regard to Fox News, Breitbart, CNN and MSNBC - the only two media organizations Republican surveyed said weren't biased were Fox News and the Wall Street Journal - Democrats said they believe that just 44% of news on TV, and newspapers and on the radio is biased, while Republicans said they believed 77% of it is biased - presented with a host of major news outlets, respondents ranked PBS news and the Associated Press as the least biased Outlets, while Fox News and Breitbart News tied for being perceived as most biased. Calculating all the different respondents this is what they came up with from most to least bias. 1. Fox news and Breitbart News 87% bias by democrats and 3% bias Republicans for Fox. 73% bias by democrats and 19% by Republicans for Breitbart News 2. MSNBC 1% bias by democrats and 85% bias by Republicans 3. Huffington Post 61% bias rating from Republicans and 9% bias rating from Democrats 4. CNN 87% bias rating from Republicans and 29% bias rating from Democrats 5. Mother Jones 29% bias rating from Republicans and 16% bias rating from Democrats 6. Vox 5% bias rating from Democrats and 16% bias rating from Republicans 7. The New York Times 44% bias rating from democrats' 74% bias rating from Republicans 8. NBC News 42% bias rating from Democrats and 64% bias rating from Republicans 9. Washington Post 40% bias rating from Democrats and 65% bias rating from Republicans 10. ABC News 56% bias rating from Democrats and 60% bias rating from Republicans It goes on but you get the picture. You will notice I did not spare CNN or MSNBC. Country wide concencus shows your Them V Me bias is incorrect.
    2
  9965.  @potsmokingatheist9290  Then next sign is BLIND obedience. You have presented this in many ways. - the obvious way you choose to lie to yourself and others, about yourself and other in order to maintain your believe structure. "Stay away from Rachel Maddow because she is an anti-American conspiracy Nut Job" Noone has once said anything about Rachel Madow, for or against. You are the only one talking about her. You are the one bringing her up. So where are you getting that obvious assumption from? " you have been brainwashed to believe Donald Trump was a sleeper Russian agent " No evidence that I ever said that or claimed that at any point. - the obvious way you choose to reject, ignore or dismiss all factually verifiable evidence to the contrary of your claims. " regarding obstruction, where is it?" I presented you with at least 8 different examples which you chose to completely ignore. " he was turned down for a job the day before he took on the new role. " You have rejected him being cleared by an ethics bored and that the administration was trying to get him to take that job. He did not come in asking for it. " he could have told Comey to stop the investigation into Michael Flynn " Crickets when I pointed out that he could not, evident by the fact that he had to fire him to get him to stop the investigation. - the multitude of affirmative statements you make about your beliefs and then when asked to present evidence to the "facts" you fail to do so. " The Mueller report turned up no collusion because the investigation was a fraud from the start " You have had several oppertunities to present evidence to both the no collusion claim and the fraud claim. You have yet to do so. Blind obedience as a sign of brainwashing ☑
    2
  9966. 2
  9967. 2
  9968.  @potsmokingatheist9290  I forgot one thing. I forgot to mention your tendency to set up paper tigers in order to be able to tear them down. all because that's the only argument you have. Cuz watch this I will be more than happy to apologize if you can only quote me where I claimed that you said the show's on fox where all not bias. I'll be waiting... This is the second time you've claimed that you search out all sides of the argument. Except you've proven that not to be true. You willfully ignore facts. You also keep making asinine statements. Like the implication in this one that you have to be anti-American to be anti Trump. " do you seriously not realize that CNN and MSNBC have been spewing anti-American Trump hating propaganda every day since he decided to run for office?" You claim that you seek out both sides but you just dismissed the entirety of CNN and MSNBC news reporting. You are contradicting yourself from sentence 2 sentence. What I see about people spewing conspiracy theories is the several you have tried to do here and then when asked for evidence to this you failed to provide it. For yet another example, please provide me a link or a quote from any Democratic politician that has an anyway ever advocated for open borders??? And then there is your persistent claims that there's something wrong with me is I don't agree with all your baseless accusations. It is super simple. If you would like me to consider any of your accusations then please provide any modicum of evidence or proof that what you were saying is not complete b*******. if you do so I will consider it but until you do logic dictates that I don't take what you say seriously.
    2
  9969. 2
  9970. 2
  9971. 2
  9972. 2
  9973. 2
  9974. 2
  9975. 2
  9976. 2
  9977. 2
  9978. 2
  9979. 2
  9980. 2
  9981. 2
  9982. 2
  9983. 2
  9984. 2
  9985. 2
  9986. 2
  9987. 2
  9988. 2
  9989. 2
  9990. 2
  9991. 2
  9992. 2
  9993. 2
  9994. 2
  9995. 2
  9996. 2
  9997. 2
  9998. 2
  9999. 2
  10000. 2
  10001. 2
  10002. 2
  10003. 2
  10004. 2
  10005. 2
  10006. 2
  10007. 2
  10008. 2
  10009. 2
  10010. 2
  10011. 2
  10012. 2
  10013. 2
  10014. 2
  10015. 2
  10016. 2
  10017. 2
  10018. 2
  10019. 2
  10020. 2
  10021. 2
  10022. 2
  10023. 2
  10024. 2
  10025. 2
  10026. 2
  10027. 2
  10028. 2
  10029. 2
  10030. 2
  10031. 2
  10032. 2
  10033. 2
  10034. 2
  10035. 2
  10036. 2
  10037. 2
  10038. 2
  10039. 2
  10040. 2
  10041. 2
  10042. 2
  10043. 2
  10044. 2
  10045. 2
  10046. 2
  10047. 2
  10048. 2
  10049. 2
  10050. 2
  10051. 2
  10052. 2
  10053. 2
  10054. 2
  10055. 2
  10056. 2
  10057. 2
  10058. 2
  10059. 2
  10060. 2
  10061. 2
  10062. 2
  10063. 2
  10064. 2
  10065. 2
  10066. 2
  10067. 2
  10068. 2
  10069. 2
  10070. 1
  10071. 1
  10072. 1
  10073. 1
  10074. 1
  10075. 1
  10076. 1
  10077. 1
  10078. 1
  10079. 1
  10080. 1
  10081. 1
  10082. 1
  10083. 1
  10084. 1
  10085. 1
  10086. 1
  10087. 1
  10088. 1
  10089. 1
  10090. 1
  10091. 1
  10092. 1
  10093. 1
  10094. 1
  10095. 1
  10096. 1
  10097. 1
  10098. 1
  10099. 1
  10100. 1
  10101. 1
  10102. 1
  10103. 1
  10104. 1
  10105. 1
  10106. 1
  10107. 1
  10108. 1
  10109. 1
  10110. 1
  10111. 1
  10112. 1
  10113. 1
  10114. 1
  10115. 1
  10116. 1
  10117. 1
  10118. 1
  10119. 1
  10120. 1
  10121. 1
  10122. 1
  10123. 1
  10124. 1
  10125. 1
  10126. 1
  10127. 1
  10128. 1
  10129. 1
  10130. 1
  10131. 1
  10132. 1
  10133.  @Mulinaster  Your speaking about safety net programs. Which is 9% of the GDP. 357 billion. Welfare itself is less than a forth of that 9%. Military is 15%. I actually agree with you on military. As do many generals and Armed Forces. There have been so many proposals and Memo's written up over the years from these Armed Forces suggestion that we strategically shrink the size of our military. Which won't put us in any danger but will save us a whole lot of money. As far as social safety net programs, what would you prefer we spend our tax dollars on, other than the American people? We need more Vet and Education funding. Which could be covered by The Cutting military funding as a whole. But I'm curious why you think, other than making judgments on these people, upon which the statistics do not back you up, why we should take money away from the people who really need it? On welfare stats from now back into the early 90s show that the majority of people on welfare, do not stay on it for long, use it to better themselves and their family and the majority work the entire time they are on welfare. Which means they are paying back into welfare, as they are on it. Yet you keep making statements like, " I just see it as something that enables and encourages people not to become solvent, self-sufficient individuals for too much time. " Less than 3% of people on welfare commits welfare fraud. It wasn't that much to begin with but you guys kept bitching about it, so we can move wagon and away. It generally happened in a 6 year process. Which you guys jump on.... But that's a stat that encompasses all welfare programs. It's set up as a tier system, that caters to families. That's why there's food stamps and public assistance, public housing, medical needs for children WIC program. Your not on all of them, all 6 years. -People, women, more than men, on agevrage get out of public housing in under a year, -stop getting public assistance money in under a year and a half, again women more than men. -food stamps taper off at that time, as their income goes up. - which happens because over the 6 years, on average, they hold down 2 or more jobs. - paying more into the system, they are taking out of. - The 2 program that they tend to stay on for over 2 years and tends to last the entire 6, is medical for children and WIC for children. That is why you are either ignorant of the facts or need to judge. Public Assistance programs actually work quite well in America. We're always going to need them though, until we get things like a living wage an affordable health care.
    1
  10134. 1
  10135. 1
  10136. 1
  10137. 1
  10138. 1
  10139. 1
  10140. 1
  10141. 1
  10142. 1
  10143. 1
  10144. 1
  10145. 1
  10146. 1
  10147. 1
  10148. 1
  10149. 1
  10150. 1
  10151. 1
  10152. 1
  10153. 1
  10154. 1
  10155. 1
  10156. 1
  10157. 1
  10158. 1
  10159. 1
  10160. 1
  10161. 1
  10162. 1
  10163. 1
  10164. 1
  10165. 1
  10166. 1
  10167. 1
  10168. 1
  10169. 1
  10170. 1
  10171. 1
  10172. 1
  10173. 1
  10174. 1
  10175. 1
  10176. 1
  10177. 1
  10178. 1
  10179. 1
  10180. 1
  10181. 1
  10182. 1
  10183. 1
  10184. 1
  10185. 1
  10186. 1
  10187. 1
  10188. 1
  10189. 1
  10190. 1
  10191. 1
  10192. 1
  10193. 1
  10194. 1
  10195. 1
  10196. 1
  10197. 1
  10198. 1
  10199. 1
  10200. 1
  10201. 1
  10202. 1
  10203. 1
  10204. 1
  10205. 1
  10206. 1
  10207. 1
  10208. 1
  10209. 1
  10210. 1
  10211. 1
  10212. 1
  10213. 1
  10214. 1
  10215. 1
  10216. 1
  10217. 1
  10218. 1
  10219. 1
  10220. 1
  10221. 1
  10222. 1
  10223. 1
  10224. 1
  10225. 1
  10226. 1
  10227. 1
  10228. 1
  10229. 1
  10230. 1
  10231. 1
  10232. 1
  10233. 1
  10234. 1
  10235. 1
  10236. 1
  10237. 1
  10238. 1
  10239. 1
  10240. 1
  10241. 1
  10242. 1
  10243. 1
  10244. 1
  10245. 1
  10246. 1
  10247. 1
  10248.  @SalvatoreSausage  👈 So... Let me show everyone else here, the faulty logic that these cherry pickin attempted self validators use, to try and convince themselves they are right. I mention 2 things in regards to their comments about ships not being backed up and saying it was so easy to get things shipped to our houses during the pandemic. I mentioned that we did have ships waiting at the ports them AND the reason why. Everybody else remember when we closed down the ports because a bunch of ships filled with covid outbreaks were coming in? Right... Everyone except this guy. But instead of remembering that well-publicized point he decides to try and suddenly get very specific on his previously vague point, in order to try and convince himself that he is right. "Show me one article where 60 votes were offshore during Trump's presidency." Cuz now I'm supposed to be counting boats and it has to be a very exact number for some nonsensical reason. He also completely ignores the claimed he'd just made about how easy it was to get people things shipped to their house during the pandemic. All the sudden that's disappeared. It's been replaced with transparently insecure passive-aggressive childish insults and him trying to say he is right enough to make himself believe it. This👆 all this right here 👆 That is all the work they have to do, in order to continue to feign outrage over things they really don't care about, in order to keep validating there blame the Democrats for everything strategy in their head.
    1
  10249. 1
  10250. 1
  10251. 1
  10252. 1
  10253. 1
  10254. 1
  10255. 1
  10256. 1
  10257. 1
  10258. 1
  10259. 1
  10260. 1
  10261. 1
  10262. 1
  10263. 1
  10264. 1
  10265. 1
  10266. 1
  10267. 1
  10268. 1
  10269. 1
  10270. 1
  10271. 1
  10272. 1
  10273. 1
  10274. 1
  10275. 1
  10276. 1
  10277. 1
  10278. 1
  10279. 1
  10280. 1
  10281. 1
  10282. 1
  10283. 1
  10284. 1
  10285. 1
  10286. 1
  10287. 1
  10288. 1
  10289. 1
  10290. 1
  10291. 1
  10292. 1
  10293. 1
  10294. 1
  10295. 1
  10296. 1
  10297. 1
  10298. 1
  10299. 1
  10300. 1
  10301. 1
  10302. 1
  10303. 1
  10304. 1
  10305. 1
  10306. 1
  10307. 1
  10308. 1
  10309. 1
  10310. 1
  10311. 1
  10312. 1
  10313. 1
  10314. 1
  10315. 1
  10316. 1
  10317. 1
  10318. 1
  10319. 1
  10320. 1
  10321. 1
  10322. 1
  10323. 1
  10324. 1
  10325. 1
  10326. 1
  10327. 1
  10328. 1
  10329. 1
  10330. 1
  10331. 1
  10332. 1
  10333. 1
  10334. 1
  10335. 1
  10336. 1
  10337. 1
  10338. 1
  10339. 1
  10340. 1
  10341. 1
  10342. 1
  10343. 1
  10344. 1
  10345. 1
  10346. 1
  10347. 1
  10348. 1
  10349. 1
  10350. 1
  10351. 1
  10352. 1
  10353. 1
  10354. 1
  10355. 1
  10356. 1
  10357. 1
  10358. 1
  10359. 1
  10360. 1
  10361. 1
  10362. 1
  10363. 1
  10364. 1
  10365. 1
  10366. 1
  10367. 1
  10368. 1
  10369. 1
  10370. 1
  10371. 1
  10372. 1
  10373. 1
  10374. 1
  10375. 1
  10376. 1
  10377. 1
  10378. 1
  10379.  Longhorn  4. So not answer! Still running from your own claims! 🤣 I love 6. An amazing example of how he just makes s*** up! " people calling State red or blue Republican or Democrat based on the party affiliation of the governor of the state it's common sense." Do they? So it has nothing to do with how those States actually vote, huh? That's not what like on every side of the aisle judges whether a state is red or blue? It's the governor not whether they vote primary Democrat or primary of Republicans say in a national election? That doesn't happen every four years? Would you like me to pull up some videos of various different news channels declaring ones red and ones blue due to that fact? 🤣 8. " where did I say gas inflation reaching 42% was incorrect" This is the question he is running from... "What is your evidence that the annual gas price inflation was incorrect?" This is him trying to take the b** way of saying I was wrong about my figures, without actually saying those very particular words. Showing exactly how much he doubts his own claims. " gas prices were extremely low the entire time Trump was in office!" " you might want to check those annual inflation rates you posted again" " you have to admit your comment about gas prices is pretty damn funny" These are the annual price differentials I posted that he made all those comments about and is now running like a little b** from! 👇 "2016 - 👆 9.1% annually 2017 - 👆 10.7% annually 2018 - 👇 2.1% annually 2019 - 👆 7.9% annually 2020 - 👇 15.2% annually 👈 Being the year of the pandemic and 3 1/2 month lock down and the majority of the rest of the year with half the country still out of work. They needed less gas." 🤣
    1
  10380. 1
  10381. 1
  10382. 1
  10383. 1
  10384. 1
  10385. 1
  10386. 1
  10387. 1
  10388. 1
  10389. 1
  10390. 1
  10391. 1
  10392. 1
  10393. 1
  10394. 1
  10395. 1
  10396. 1
  10397. 1
  10398. 1
  10399. 1
  10400. 1
  10401. 1
  10402. 1
  10403. 1
  10404. 1
  10405. 1
  10406. 1
  10407. 1
  10408. 1
  10409. 1
  10410. 1
  10411. 1
  10412. 1
  10413. 1
  10414. 1
  10415. 1
  10416. 1
  10417. 1
  10418. 1
  10419. 1
  10420. 1
  10421. 1
  10422. 1
  10423. 1
  10424. 1
  10425. 1
  10426. 1
  10427. 1
  10428. 1
  10429. 1
  10430. 1
  10431. 1
  10432. 1
  10433. 1
  10434. 1
  10435. 1
  10436. 1
  10437. 1
  10438. 1
  10439. 1
  10440. 1
  10441. 1
  10442. 1
  10443. 1
  10444. 1
  10445. 1
  10446. 1
  10447. 1
  10448. 1
  10449. 1
  10450. 1
  10451. 1
  10452. 1
  10453. 1
  10454. 1
  10455. 1
  10456. 1
  10457. 1
  10458. 1
  10459. 1
  10460. 1
  10461. 1
  10462. 1
  10463. 1
  10464. 1
  10465. 1
  10466. 1
  10467. 1
  10468. 1
  10469. 1
  10470. 1
  10471. 1
  10472. 1
  10473. 1
  10474. 1
  10475. 1
  10476. 1
  10477. 1
  10478. 1
  10479. 1
  10480. 1
  10481. 1
  10482. 1
  10483. 1
  10484. 1
  10485. 1
  10486. 1
  10487. 1
  10488. 1
  10489. 1
  10490. 1
  10491. 1
  10492. 1
  10493. 1
  10494. 1
  10495. 1
  10496. 1
  10497. 1
  10498. 1
  10499. 1
  10500. 1
  10501. 1
  10502. 1
  10503. 1
  10504. 1
  10505. 1
  10506. 1
  10507. 1
  10508. 1
  10509. 1
  10510. 1
  10511. 1
  10512. 1
  10513. 1
  10514. 1
  10515. 1
  10516. 1
  10517. 1
  10518. 1
  10519. 1
  10520. 1
  10521.  @mazinsakharov  "Is it that somehow Russia gets to invade Ukraine because Ukraine(a sovereign country who left the Iron Curtain almost unanimously, forever ago) didn't do what they were told to do by not trying to join NATO? " 👈 My 1st attempt to get him to make an actual stance on something... 👉 His Non Response, meant to use just enough words to attempt a diversion. 👉" the Iron Curtain was coined by Winston Churchill who was known for incompetence, Antics and historical fault fictions. Would treat his characterizations of the USSR and Russia with caution. How does that answer the question or have any relevance to anything other then him trying to fluff his own ego, when he clearly knows what I meant? Anyone? 👉 Non answer B ( going to short hand this one cuz we ain't got the time ) 👉 over a decade ago it didn't used to be a sovereign country... Okay? And? "With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine became an independent state, formalised with a referendum in December 1991. On 21 January 1990, over 300,000 Ukrainians organized a human chain for Ukrainian independence between Kyiv and Lviv." 👉Non answer C 👉 Also an attempt to get me to do his homework for him. 👉" how many offensive Wars against Sovereign Nations has NATO engaged in since the fall of the USSR?" You tell me, Boo Boo? Then be ready to prove they where not defensive acts? I'll wait. Still waiting for the actual answer to the question. He thinks if he talks enough nonsense he can distract me from the fact that he didn't answer. Ya got the wrong one, Boo Boo.
    1
  10522. 1
  10523. 1
  10524.  @mazinsakharov  And he came so close to actually giving a straight answer to this one, finally. "Or is it the non-existent missile bases in Ukraine being setup to point weapons at Russia?" 👉 His response... To take a tiny portion of what I said and try to pretend the rest doesn't exist. 👉 " Bases do exist in Ukraine, and before the invasion." 👉 Think he missed a few key factors there? Plus, again, whole stop Run Country of their own. They have their own military and their trips we allowed to have their own bases in their own country. Wild! I know! But lets continue with some baseless speculation... 👉" if they have or words I have missiles pointed towards Russia that is to be established in the first place, isn't it? But has that been established?" So what you're saying is a sovereign country has its own military to protect its own country and therefore that must mean that it wants to invade Russia? Cuz it has some bases? Apparently every other first-world country and some Second World countries want to invade Russia to if that's the barometer? I wonder why Russia still there. 🤔 "Please be reminded that Russia asked for security guarantees months before the invasion." 👉 Please be reminded that Russia asked for security guarantees years after actually invading Ukraine in the first place and still being there in Crimea and Dombas. And please be reminded that before they even did that Russia got together with America to guarantee that Russia and America would have Ukraine's back if they were invaded and therefore Ukraine surrendered all their nuclear arms to Russia. Gee! I wonder Ukraine couldn't make that guarantee. 🤔 Still haven't answered 1 question.
    1
  10525. 1
  10526. 1
  10527. 1
  10528. 1
  10529. 1
  10530. 1
  10531. 1
  10532. 1
  10533. 1
  10534. 1
  10535. 1
  10536. 1
  10537. 1
  10538. 1
  10539. 1
  10540. 1
  10541. 1
  10542. 1
  10543. 1
  10544. 1
  10545. 1
  10546. 1
  10547. 1
  10548. 1
  10549. 1
  10550. 1
  10551. 1
  10552. 1
  10553. 1
  10554. 1
  10555. 1
  10556. 1
  10557. 1
  10558. 1
  10559. 1
  10560. 1
  10561. 1
  10562. 1
  10563. 1
  10564. 1
  10565. 1
  10566. 1
  10567. 1
  10568. 1
  10569. 1
  10570. 1
  10571. 1
  10572. 1
  10573. 1
  10574. 1
  10575. 1
  10576. 1
  10577. 1
  10578. 1
  10579. 1
  10580. 1
  10581. 1
  10582. 1
  10583. 1
  10584. 1
  10585. 1
  10586. 1
  10587. 1
  10588. 1
  10589. 1
  10590. 1
  10591. 1
  10592. 1
  10593. 1
  10594. 1
  10595. 1
  10596. 1
  10597. 1
  10598. 1
  10599. 1
  10600. 1
  10601. 1
  10602. 1
  10603. 1
  10604. 1
  10605. 1
  10606. 1
  10607. 1
  10608. 1
  10609. 1
  10610. 1
  10611. 1
  10612. 1
  10613. 1
  10614. 1
  10615. 1
  10616. 1
  10617. 1
  10618. 1
  10619. 1
  10620. 1
  10621. 1
  10622. 1
  10623. 1
  10624. 1
  10625. 1
  10626. 1
  10627. 1
  10628. 1
  10629. 1
  10630. 1
  10631. 1
  10632. 1
  10633. 1
  10634. 1
  10635. 1
  10636. 1
  10637. 1
  10638. 1
  10639. 1
  10640. 1
  10641. 1
  10642. 1
  10643. 1
  10644. 1
  10645. 1
  10646. 1
  10647. 1
  10648. 1
  10649. 1
  10650. 1
  10651. 1
  10652. 1
  10653. 1
  10654. 1
  10655. 1
  10656. 1
  10657. 1
  10658. 1
  10659. 1
  10660. 1
  10661. 1
  10662. 1
  10663. 1
  10664. 1
  10665. 1
  10666. 1
  10667. 1
  10668. 1
  10669. 1
  10670. 1
  10671. 1
  10672. 1
  10673. 1
  10674. 1
  10675. 1
  10676. 1
  10677. 1
  10678. 1
  10679. 1
  10680. 1
  10681. 1
  10682. 1
  10683. 1
  10684. 1
  10685. 1
  10686. 1
  10687. 1
  10688. 1
  10689. 1
  10690. 1
  10691. 1
  10692. 1
  10693. 1
  10694. 1
  10695. 1
  10696. 1
  10697. 1
  10698. 1
  10699. 1
  10700. 1
  10701. 1
  10702. 1
  10703. 1
  10704. 1
  10705. 1
  10706. 1
  10707. 1
  10708. Let's put aside Trumps ignorance on basic human decency for just a second... And let's address his ignorance on basic geography. His argument is... Democrats = open borders Open borders = NO country Here is the problem with that. Its insane and idiotic fear mongering. For example... I am a Lyft / Uber Driver and I live in Louisiana, about an hour away from the Texas State Line. Which is ( you guessed it ) the border between Texas and Louisiana. I, as well as many other moterists travel, upon occasion, between the 2 for work. We do so without check points guards or dogs at these boarders. Infact, the only way you can tell your in Texas and not Louisiana anymore is a sign on the side of I-20 that says, "Welcome To Texas".YET SOMEHOW, Texas and Louisiana still exist. Shocking! I know, right! Now... do i think we should try and have a system of documenting people coming in and out of the country that helps to protect us from drugs and criminals from getting in? Of course! Who would not want that? Do I think in order to achieve that we need to throw aside the factual and historic record of this immigrant country? Do we need to buy into the coincidence that this President and his administration only seems to be concerned about one of the borders of this country? Do we need to throw entirely too much money at a border wall ( that we were never supposed to pay for ) in order to slow down people from crossing our border by mere minutes when that money could be better spent elsewhere? Do we need to buy into this administration's blatant lies about how this is all the Democratic party's fault even though they are the ones that instituted this policy? Do we need to all the sudden redefine asylum-seekers as illegal immigrants? Do we need to forget our Humanity and literally rip small children out of the arms of their mothers? Is any of this necessary to achieve the goal of having a more secure border? Of course not! Of course not! You and I both know it's not.
    1
  10709. 1
  10710. 1
  10711. 1
  10712. 1
  10713. 1
  10714. 1
  10715. 1
  10716. 1
  10717. 1
  10718. 1
  10719. 1
  10720. 1
  10721. 1
  10722. 1
  10723. 1
  10724. 1
  10725. 1
  10726. 1
  10727. 1
  10728. 1
  10729. 1
  10730. 1
  10731. 1
  10732. 1
  10733. 1
  10734. 1
  10735. 1
  10736. 1
  10737. 1
  10738. 1
  10739. 1
  10740. 1
  10741. 1
  10742. 1
  10743. 1
  10744. 1
  10745. 1
  10746. 1
  10747. 1
  10748. 1
  10749. 1
  10750. 1
  10751. 1
  10752. 1
  10753. 1
  10754. 1
  10755. 1
  10756. 1
  10757. 1
  10758. 1
  10759. 1
  10760. 1
  10761. 1
  10762. 1
  10763. 1
  10764. 1
  10765. 1
  10766. 1
  10767. 1
  10768. 1
  10769. 1
  10770. 1
  10771. 1
  10772. 1
  10773. 1
  10774. 1
  10775. 1
  10776. 1
  10777. 1
  10778. 1
  10779. 1
  10780. 1
  10781. 1
  10782. 1
  10783. 1
  10784. 1
  10785. 1
  10786. 1
  10787. 1
  10788. 1
  10789. 1
  10790. 1
  10791. 1
  10792. 1
  10793. 1
  10794. 1
  10795. 1
  10796. 1
  10797. 1
  10798. 1
  10799. 1
  10800. 1
  10801. 1
  10802. 1
  10803. 1
  10804. 1
  10805. 1
  10806. 1
  10807. 1
  10808. 1
  10809. 1
  10810. 1
  10811. 1
  10812. 1
  10813. 1
  10814. 1
  10815. 1
  10816. 1
  10817. 1
  10818. 1
  10819. 1
  10820. 1
  10821. 1
  10822. 1
  10823. 1
  10824. 1
  10825. 1
  10826. 1
  10827. 1
  10828. 1
  10829. 1
  10830. 1
  10831. 1
  10832. 1
  10833. 1
  10834. 1
  10835. 1
  10836. 1
  10837. 1
  10838. 1
  10839. 1
  10840. 1
  10841. 1
  10842. 1
  10843. 1
  10844. 1
  10845. 1
  10846. 1
  10847. 1
  10848. 1
  10849. 1
  10850. 1
  10851. 1
  10852. 1
  10853. 1
  10854.  Born In Shithole Country  He became a senior advisor to Trump during his presidential campaign and served as the National Security advisor from January 23rd to February 13th of 2017. He resigned after information surfaced that he had 📌misled the FBI and vice president about the nature and content of his Communications with Russian ambassador to the US, Sergey kislyak. Flynn's tenure of just 24 days is the shortest in the offices history. On April 27th 2017 to Pentagon Inspector General announced an investigation into whether Flynn had 📌accepted money from foreign government without the required approval. The New York Times reported on May 18th 2018 that a longtime FBI CIA informant had met Flynn at an intelligence seminar in Britain, six months earlier and became alarmed by Flynn's closeness to a Russian woman there. This concern prompted another individual to alert American authorities that Flynn may have been 📌compromised by Russian intelligence. Flynn initially 📌refused to hand over subpoenaed documents to the Senate intelligence committee, pleading the 📌Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination, but a compromise with the committee was worked out. On December 1st 2017 Flynn appeared in federal court to formalize a deal with special counsel Robert Mueller to plead 📌guilty to a felony count of 📌willfully and knowingly making false fictitious and fraudulent statements to the FBI. He confirmed his intention to cooperate with the special counsel investigation.
    1
  10855. 1
  10856. 1
  10857. 1
  10858. 1
  10859. 1
  10860. 1
  10861. 1
  10862. 1
  10863. 1
  10864. 1
  10865. 1
  10866. 1
  10867. 1
  10868. 1
  10869.  Born In Shithole Country  OMG! He learned to read! I bet your momma is so proud of you! Here's a cookie for your effort! 🍪 Now... I got another one in my back pocket if you can understand why thats relivant! You asked, " Now please find me in the text of that the male wear down says," the president wants me to let you know...". Now let's go back to your answer to the question. " Could it be, represent his client ". Now back to your Question again little B** Boy! " Now please find me in the text of that the male wear down says," the president wants me to let you know...". And the answer... " Could it be, represent his client ". Okay... Now I'm going to hit you with a big complicated word here but I have faith in you little B** Boy. You can understand it, if you use your whole brain. Hopefully... Are you ready? It's called, implicit! Now don't freak out! I'm gonna explain but I treat people the way they act on here and your round about 3 to 5. So I have to take it really slow. So, if you hire (give some one money) someone to represent you with people in legal matters then, unless otherwise stated by both you and your hired counsel, it is automatically implied that when they are representing you with other counsel, that they are doing so on your behalf. Hence, it is implicit. Now don't go throwing a fit little b** Boy. I'm going to answer your other question. Remember... I just have to take it slow with you because you told me you can't read and your maturity range is obviously around 3-5. I'm doing that next. Run! Little b** boy! Run! 🏃
    1
  10870.  Born In Shithole Country  Now... To answer your question about Flynn. Now.... I will give you what he was charged with, as well as a little context. Oh NO! Do I have to explain to you what context is first and why thats important? Here... Let me do that first. It just means that I will give you your answer but I will also give you a few key details to help you better understand the answer to your question. Okay.... Are we ready? There where 2 investigations. 1. Misleading the FBI and vice president about the Russian ambassador Sergey kislyak and his relation to him. 2. The Pentagon and Inspector General investigated him for accepting money from Russia without letting anybody know we're getting approval. -Then a nice FBI/CIA man saw him being to friendly with similar ppl at a get together. - During the second investigation they legally compelled ( subpoena ) him to give some these important paper thingies but he wouldn't. He was being a bad boy. - then he proved how bad of a boy he was by pleading the 5th. Which means he did not want to admit to the bad bad things that he did. - so then, a nice man named Mr. Muller came along and made a deal with him. HERE IS YOUR ANSWER BEFORE YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT OR SOMETHING LITTL B****BOY. Flynn plead guilty to a felony count of willfully and knowingly making false, fictitious and fraudulent statements to the FBI. Then he told the nice man (Mr Mueller) that he didn't want to be bad anymore and that he would help him. Now you just let me know if there were too many words or some of them were too big for you little b** boy. I'll try my best to help you understand. Run! Little b** boy! Run! 🏃
    1
  10871.  Born In Shithole Country  Darn! And you where doing so good to! Sorry little B** boy! No more cookies today! Let me see if I can explain this... So when people give you more then you ask for and then explain that it is to better help you understand the situation, it's a good thing. Understanding things is GOOD! Now... Explaining the difference between fact and speculation. Let's see... How do I explain this in simple and small words.... Speculation means your guessing. Fact means it's what happened. So... since I know you're a slow little b** boy, maybe if you told me where you got confused between fact and speculation, I could explain to you the difference using your example of what I said. Show show me what I said that you thought was speculation and I'll use very small words to try and clear it up for you. Okay I understand you don't read very well but do you remember those big words that you saw. Right below their is where your answer is. That's why those big old words say there's where the answer is. See I had figured out that you're incurably stupid so I put it in big bold letters in hopes that you wouldn't miss it. I guess you don't get a cookie for that one either. Darn it! Poor little b** boy. And yes I put it in childish terms because as I stated before, I speak to people in a manner that reflects the age that they are acting. Also remember you can't read big long sentences and big long words. It hurts your little brain. Are you sure you don't know what speculation means? Because you're sure could do a whole bunch of that right there at the end. Did a good job at speculating. Maybe you should get a cookie. I mean... Unless you want to show me any proof of that? Show me the evidence that says where... " the two FBI agents Comey Cent interview Flynn said he was being truthful in his testimony, Comey and McCabe agreed Flynn didn't lie, the nice man Mueller steps in and picks up the file and decrees that Flynn lied and pressured him to the point of bankruptcy to compose against the president." Also, while you're saying Mueller is apparently a bad bad man maybe you should give some evidence on that as well. Why don't you point out any other investigation that he has ever been in where he conducted himself in any manner, inappropriately? The Republican, Robert Mueller, has almost a Flawless record. Which is why he got the job. So he would not just decree anything without evidence. He has a long track record saying you're full of s*** and he is not. But if you want backup your words with evidence then feel free. Run! Little b** boy! Run! 🏃
    1
  10872. 1
  10873. 1
  10874. 1
  10875. 1
  10876. 1
  10877. 1
  10878. 1
  10879. 1
  10880. 1
  10881. 1
  10882. 1
  10883. 1
  10884. 1
  10885. 1
  10886. 1
  10887. 1
  10888. 1
  10889. 1
  10890. 1
  10891. 1
  10892. 1
  10893. 1
  10894. 1
  10895. 1
  10896. 1
  10897. 1
  10898. 1
  10899. 1
  10900. 1
  10901. 1
  10902. 1
  10903. 1
  10904. 1
  10905. 1
  10906. 1
  10907. 1
  10908. 1
  10909. 1
  10910. 1
  10911. 1
  10912. 1
  10913. 1
  10914. 1
  10915. 1
  10916. 1
  10917. 1
  10918. 1
  10919. 1
  10920. 1
  10921. 1
  10922. 1
  10923. 1
  10924. 1
  10925. 1
  10926. 1
  10927. 1
  10928. 1
  10929. 1
  10930. 1
  10931. 1
  10932. 1
  10933. 1
  10934. 1
  10935. 1
  10936. 1
  10937. 1
  10938. 1
  10939. 1
  10940. 1
  10941. 1
  10942. 1
  10943. 1
  10944. 1
  10945. 1
  10946. 1
  10947. 1
  10948. 1
  10949. 1
  10950. 1
  10951. 1
  10952. 1
  10953. 1
  10954.  Born In Shithole Country  The best part!!! The following will be quoted from the article that you just linked me to. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 " Mueller's roster of lawyers has earned bipartisan a claim for their wealth of experience" Publicly available voter registration information shows that 13 of the 18 members of Mueller's team have previously registered as Democrats, while 4 had no affiliation or their affiliation could not be found. 9 of the 18 made political donations to Democrats, their contributions totaling more than 57,000. The majority came from one person, who also contributed to Republicans. Sick donated to Hillary Clinton, Trump's opponent in the 2016 race. Short hand.... Sense I know you don't like to read... -Team hired and run by 2 REPUBLICANS. -13 are Democrats. -4 No affiliation -9 donated to Democrats -Totally $57, 000. -Most from 1 person, who also donated to the REPUBLICANS. Justice department policy prohibits discrimination on hiring for career positions on the basis of politics. 📌Brian Richardson no donations no affiliations Ryan Dickey no donations Democrat Kyle Freent Donated $250 to Barack Obama's presidential campaign in 2008, another 252 Obama's re-election campaign in 2012 and 252 Clinton's campaign in 2016 Democrat 📌Scott Meisler no donations no affiliations Greg Andrews donated $2,700 to the campaign of Senator Kristen gillibrand this year and a thousand to the US Senate campaign of David Hoffman in 2019 in Illinois Democrat Rush Atkinson donated $200 to Clinton's campaign in 2016 Democrat Michael Dreeben No donations Democrat Andrew Goldstein donated $3,300 to Obama's campaign in 2008 and 2012 Democrat Adam Jed no donations Democrat Elizabeth Prelogar Donated $250 each to Clinton's campaign in 2016 and Barack Obama's Victory Fund in 2012 Democrat 📌James Queries Donated more than 30,000 to various Democratic campaigns in 2016 including $2,700 to Clinton over two decades. Gave $2,500 in 2015 to Republican Jason Chaffetz and $250 to Senator George Allen Republican Virginia in 2005 Democrat Jeannie Rhee Donated a total of $5,400 to Clinton's campaign in 2015 and 16 and a total of $4,800 to the Obama Victory Fund in 2008 and 2011. Also made small donations totaling $1,750 to Democratic National Committee and to various Democrats running for Senate. Democrat Brandon Van Grack Donated $286.77 to Barack Obama's campaign in 2008 Democrat Andrew Weissman donated $2,300 to the Obama Victory fun in 2008 $2,000 to the DNC in 2006 and $2,300 to the Clinton campaign in 2007 Democrat 📌Aaron Zebley No donations No affiliations Aaron Zelinsky No donations Democrat
    1
  10955. 1
  10956.  Born In Shithole Country  Fact Checks.. - The investigation, named Operation Crossfire hurricane, began on July 31st 2016. The dossier was given to the FBI in September of 2016 Everyone who have confirmed, with the same story, that the dossier was not the start of the investigation, and what actually was. The FBI Step Smith of Fox News Devin Nunes (Nunes Memo) Democtats in the House Intel Committee (via Memo) Former FBI director James Comey ( testimony to Congress ) Intelligence from friendly governments (British and Dutch) Phil Bump Lisa Page Spacific public record facts below. - top FBI officials received the dossier the following September - the actual impetus was a series of comments made in May 2016 by Trump foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos to Alexander Downer, a top Australian Diplomat, during a night of "heavy drinking at an upscale London bar." - Shep Smith, an anchor for Fox News, confirm this series of events, directly contradicting trumps and Fox News host Sean Hannity's false claims that the dossier was the impetus for the start of the investigation - all of this can be confirmed by the court records from papadopoulos's charges and trial - Devin Nunes memo described that the information on George Papadopoulos triggered the opening of the original FBI investigation in Late July 2016 into links between the Trump campaign and Russia. -In late February 2018 a rebuttal Memo by democrats in the house intelligence committee stated that Christopher Steele's reporting Played No role in launching the counterintelligence investigation. Steele's reporting did not reach the counterintelligence team investigating Russia at FBI headquarters until mid September 2016, more than 7 weeks after the FBI opened its investigation, because the probes existence was so closely held within the FBI - in April 2018, the house intelligence committee, then in Republican control, released a final report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential American election, which stated that the house intelligence committee found that in Late July 2016 the FBI opened an Enterprise CI investigation into the Trump campaign following the receipt of derogatory information about foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. - in December of 2018, former FBI director James Comey testified before the house judicial committee and describe the origins of the Russia investigation. He described how the investigation initially looked at 4 Americans, and that it was not prompted by the dossier, but by comments made by Papadopoulos. "It was weeks or months after that the so-called Steele dossier came to our attention. Obama had never ordered him to have the FBI surveillance or infiltrate the Trump campaign" - other factors also played into the FBI's decision to investigate Russian interference in the Donald Trump campaign. Intelligence from friendly governments, especially the British and Dutch, and information about Pages Moscow trip. - Philip Bump send how there "is no evidence the investigation stemmed from the dossier." - Lisa Page testify that Bruce Ohr was not the FBI's initial source for their first copies of the early portion of the dossier, but rather that they came from steals FBI Handler in mid to late September. Long after the start of the Russia investigation in Late July.
    1
  10957. 1
  10958. 1
  10959. 1
  10960. 1
  10961. 1
  10962. 1
  10963. 1
  10964.  Born In Shithole Country  Let me show you how you saying this⤵ was false. " not to mention placing FBI agents inside the campaign receiving foreign intelligence assets from Italy UK and Australia to ring information from campaign officials then leaking this information to the press and using all of those questionable information to prosecute certain people that in the end has been proven not to have done a damn thing out of the ordinary" You are, of course, talking about the "Spygate" conspiracy theory. 🙄 Facts on the matter.... - Trump claims that the Obama Administration with help from the FBI and foreign government officials had both wiretapped Trump Tower an implanted spies in the Trump campaign. - he did not reveal at the time that he had gotten this information from Breitbart News - Trump Thomas through his den press secretary Sean Spicer on March 5th asked the Congressional intelligence committee to determine whether executive branch investigative Powers were abused in 2016 as part of their investigation into Russian interference in the election - Devin Nunes and Lindsey Graham, both on the committee, stated that they would look into and you subpoena power to investigate this claim. - on March 15th Nunes ( Republican and Trump supporter ) reported that the house intelligence committee ⏩had not found any evidence supporting the wiretapping claim.⏪ - on March 14th Andrew Napolitano stated on a Fox & Friends interview "3 intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command" using British government Communications Headquarters to implement surveillance to avoid leaving "American fingerprints". Specifically Robert Hannigan. - Fox News anchor Bret Baier later stated that the "Fox News division was never able to back up Napolatanos claims". - Napoleon I was temporarily taken off air by Fox due to the allegations - one of Napoleon oh sources was Former Intelligence Officer Larry Johnson who later told CNN. Napolitano had misrepresented the statements he made on an online discussion board. - on March 16th Sean Spicer repeated Napoleono's claims that a White House press breathing. The following day, GC HQ responded with a rare public statement. " recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about gchq being asked to conduct wiretapping against the then president-elect are nonsense they are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored." - a British government Source said the allegation was "totally untrue and quite frankly absurd". - Admiral Michael Rogers, Director of National Security Agency, said he has seen nothing to suggest that there was any such activity nor any requests to do so. - former gchq director David amond told financial times that the suggestion that Barack Obama asked gchq to spy on Trump is just completely barking - that would be evident to anyone who knew the system. - speaking to NBC's Meet the Press, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said "for the part of the National Security I purchased that I oversaw as dni there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign." - on September 1st 2017 ad MJ Court filing stated that both the FBI and NSD confirm that they have no records related to wiretap as directed by the March 4th 2017 tweets. Furthermore, it said that the Department of Justice and the FBI do not confirm or deny the existence of any other records that are responsive to American oversights FOIA request , which was broader than the alligated wiretap of Trump Tower. On April 25th 2019 Trump said that his original allegation of wiretapping was "not literal as he had used quotation marks." Saying that "he really meant surveillance spying you can sort of say whatever you want." Trump also said that "his allegations were made just on a little bit of a hunch and a little bit of wisdom maybe." Trump elaborated that "he thought his allegations were pretty insignificant" when he made them. So Not only was there no evidence of wiretapping or spies being implanted in the campaign but every intelligence agency that could have had anything to do with it, inside and outside of the US, denied anything like that ever happening and then eventually in April Trump took all those allegations back.
    1
  10965. 1
  10966. 1
  10967. 1
  10968. 1
  10969. 1
  10970. 1
  10971. 1
  10972. 1
  10973. 1
  10974. 1
  10975. 1
  10976.  @ITech2005  Insisting that the border agents follow the immigration laws and then calling them out when they don't, is not demonizing them. What free healthcare are you talking about that we are giving them? Are you talking about the people who apply for Asylum and are put in literal concentration camps until they are approved or denied? Cuz yeah if we're going to imprison them for a. Of time then it's kind of our job to make sure they're taken care of. More so it's our moral responsibility as a world leader. We've had legal and illegal immigration coming over to this country for hundreds of years now. Is everyone that cross that border and Angel? No. Does everybody work hard and do what they're supposed to do when all that jazz? No. Is there overall contribution helping to build and sustain this country? Historically absolutely. You are doing a lot of blowing things out of proportion to make your argument valid. If your argument is valid then it's valid as it stands. No one as far as I know our saying hey all the people of the world come to America take all our jobs in our Healthcare and let's crack open those borders. That is stereotypical fear-mongering. You keep claiming that I don't think things through. When thus far I have presented facts and you have presented blown up assumptions. I'm thinking things through. I just don't agree with your tank. That does not mean I'm not thinking things through. That's just a convenient excuse you're using to reassure yourself that you're right and I am wrong. You have no facts to back it up though
    1
  10977. 1
  10978. 1
  10979. 1
  10980. 1
  10981. 1
  10982.  @ITech2005  it's the only thing you're talkin about. All those damn illegals. You keep accusing me of not listening or not knowing what I'm talking about and you're choosing to dismiss large quantities of information that make a much bigger impact than illegal immigrants. Here's the problem with your argument that until we're all taken care of taking care of anybody else should not be a discussion. It's called multitasking oh, it's also called a greater responsibility to humankind oh, it's also called we have 327.2 million people living in America according to the 2018 census. If we were to take that tact we would never help anyone ever because there's no possible way we're all going to be taken care of at any given point across the board. Legal and illegal immigrants pay taxes, they work doing s*** jobs for lower pay than you would even think to take a job for, they get hired by Major manufacturers and companies knowing that they're illegal. As well as by the way Trump. It's much easier to blame the poor powerless people for taking the shift jobs they can get then it is to put any of that onus on the actual companies or people that hire them. Again, it's the powerless poor people that are causing all the trouble. Not the actual rich people who pull all the levers. On what facts do you base that where the most generous country in the world? Actually it is kind of negotiable because this is a democracy and not a dictatorship. Progressive policy on the other hand is about treating human beings with the dignity and respect that we would like to be treated with as well. This is Progressive policy. It's also what our mom has taught us when we were a kid and that you guys seem to have forgotten. We are not the only ones that matter. And comments like they spent the majority of their time talking about illegal immigration shows exactly what bias you have. Did you watch the entirety of both debates? Cuz I did. The most talked about subject was Healthcare and they talked about that ship for f**** ever. Not illegal immigrant Health Care American Health Care. The illegal immigrants getting Healthcare was brought up in a small portion of it but it's interesting that that's all you've heard or at least that's what you heard enough to mention. You were seriously living up to some sad stereotypes. Stop blaming all the Poor and Powerless people for your problems and start looking up instead of down. I know it's easier to judge people who you deem to be below you but that doesn't solve the damn bit of anyone's problem.
    1
  10983. 1
  10984. 1
  10985. 1
  10986. 1
  10987. 1
  10988. 1
  10989. 1
  10990. 1
  10991. 1
  10992. 1
  10993.  @timscott3892  Speaking of Santa... You guys can tell yourself Trump broke no laws as many times as you want, it won't magically make it true. Just like me saying Santa Claus is real a million times doesn't make a jolly red-clad fat man squeeze down my chimney on Christmas Eve. You ignoring all the evidence doesn't make it disappear. It only shows that you have confirmation bias. 1. The whistleblower report has been proven to be accurate. 2. Trump lied on camera 3 times about the July 25th phone call and mentioning Biden in it. 3. The transcript shows a clear quid pro quo. 4. Trump had the phone call put in storage that it would not normally go into and does not qualify for, in order to keep it from people. 5. Trump put the money on hold on July 23rd, before the scheduled phone call... and has changed his story on camera as to why he did that three times since this all began. - "I didn't talk about Biden" but if I did, it "would have been fine". - I talked about him but the money was put on hold because "the EU should be giving more aid and we should be giving less". Which quickly changed after the reports came out showing that the EU has actually given a lot more money in Aid to Ukraine that America has. - A lot of people are saying Biden did something wrong and I'm concerned about "curruption" in Ukraine. 6. Trump has openly tried to stop Witnesses from testifying in the impeachment inquiry and refuses to turn over documents. These documents being me text message conversations. 7. Rudy Giuliani and his associates being investigated and arrested for involvement in this. 8. Ambassador Taylor, a career Foreign Service Officer, text Soundland asking a pointant question." Are we now saying that security assistance and white house meeting are conditioned on investigations?" Suondland replies, "call me." Not no... Not absolutely not. Not don't be ridiculous that's wrong and against the law.... But Call me. 9. On September 9th Soundland makes a statement... " As I said on the phone, I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign". 3 hours later he gets a call from Rudy Giuliani and then puts this statement out. " The president has been crystal clear no quid pro quos for any kind. I suggest we stomped the back and forth by text." It was later found out that Trump told him to make the second statement. 10. On September 11th under pressure from lawmakers, the White House releases the funding for Ukraine without any explanation of what changed..... Just off thw top of my head... Btw, if Trump didn't think he did anything wrong, why was he trying so hard to hide the phone call, lie about what was said during it, trying to get his administration to withhold evidence and dictate witness statements or deny Witnesses to testify at all?
    1
  10994. 1
  10995. 1
  10996. 1
  10997.  @timscott3892  6.... What are you talking about? That is absolutely zero to do with number 6. Attempting to withhold subpoenaed Witnesses, curtail witness statements and withhold documents isn't him showing he wants a fair trial or due process. That is showing that he wants an unfair process but one that puts him in the net positive instead of negative. As for all these crazy statments at the bottom of this comment.... did Democrats won't allow him to question evidence, present evidence hear evidence or even know what questions are being asked. First... an impeachment hearing in the house is not yet a trial. As you stated earlier, the trial would happen in the Senate. Think of the house impeachment inquiry as the Grand Jury. Which would mean that they determine whether or not to proceed to trial.... And I say, think of it that way because it has the same rules. When it gets to the Senate, Trump will be given opportunity to questioned evidence, present evidence hear evidence and know what people are asking. " the Democrats" have nothing to do with that. If you have a problem with how the impeachment process works, take that up with the founders od the constitution. The Democrats are following impeachment investigation. Which they are mandated to do. They have no choice. It's the law to do this in a spacific way. Again... You don't understand what you are talking abput. Would I cooperate? Yeah! Because not to do so would be breaking another law and if I'm in that situation, I'm already in enough trouble. Ain't no sense of me making it worse. As transparent as all of yours have been. You are clearly one of those low info voters, Trump counts on so much. 😉✌
    1
  10998. 1
  10999. 1
  11000. 1
  11001. 1
  11002. 1
  11003. 1
  11004. 1
  11005. 1
  11006. 1
  11007. 1
  11008. 1
  11009. 1
  11010. 1
  11011. 1
  11012. 1
  11013. 1
  11014. 1
  11015. 1
  11016. 1
  11017. 1
  11018. 1
  11019. 1
  11020. 1
  11021. 1
  11022. 1
  11023. 1
  11024. 1
  11025. 1
  11026. 1
  11027. 1
  11028. 1
  11029. 1
  11030. 1
  11031. 1
  11032. 1
  11033.  @naythanstonge9411  As far as what he has done... Well.. There are a range of things... Constantly pocketing taxpayer dollars. Waiting 6 months and 145000 American deaths to endorse wearing a mask in public, only to take it back 2 Days Later. Costing American lives by refusing to implement the already made pandemic plan for the country, just because the Obama Administration came up with it. Leaving the medical stock piles bear for 3 and 1/2 years, forcing states to enter a bidding war with each other for literal American lives. Deciding that, despite the fact that literally nobody in history has ever won a trade War, getting us in one with China and losing American billions upon billions of dollars over the next couple of years because of it. Not a fourth of which the deal they came to after will recover. Defending the Postal Service off of ABS narrative, so he can suppress Americans Vote or make them choose between their health and the house of their loved ones, or practicing their legally protected right to elect their leader. Breaking all manner of foreign and domestic emoluments Clauses. Putting illegal immigrants and their children in cages for months on end, while sending his lawyer to argue the case that things like daily baths, tooth brushes, basic medical attention or three meals a day were not necessities. Despite the fact that if you treated a dog that poorly in america, you would be going to jail. Banning transgender troops, who had already fought and bled for this country, from the military, simply because they were transgender. Gassing and shooting rubber bullets at peaceful protesters, so he could have a photo op that exploited the Christian church for his own benefit. On the record admissions of sexual assault. After doing nothing on his key promise during his campaign of building a wall that Mexico will pay you for, deciding to shut down the government for so long that government employees were lining up on bread lines and losing their homes just to have him cave after, making all of that meaningless. After failing at his shut down and to get Mexico to pay for the wall, trying to poach money from the military to do so. Asking a foreign government to investigate his political opponents son. Inviting the Taliban to Camp David. Giving turkey The Greenway to invade Syria and attack our Kurdish allies. Trying to take away millions of Americans Healthcare and promising to replace it with something better, but never doing so.... Just a few off the top of my head.
    1
  11034. 1
  11035. 1
  11036. 1
  11037. 1
  11038. 1
  11039. 1
  11040. 1
  11041. 1
  11042. 1
  11043. 1
  11044. 1
  11045. 1
  11046. 1
  11047. 1
  11048. 1
  11049. 1
  11050. 1
  11051. 1
  11052. 1
  11053. 1
  11054. 1
  11055. 1
  11056. 1
  11057. 1
  11058. 1
  11059. 1
  11060. 1
  11061. 1
  11062. 1
  11063. 1
  11064. 1
  11065. 1
  11066. 1
  11067. 1
  11068. 1
  11069. 1
  11070. 1
  11071. 1
  11072. 1
  11073. 1
  11074. 1
  11075. 1
  11076. 1
  11077. 1
  11078. 1
  11079. 1
  11080. 1
  11081. 1
  11082. 1
  11083. 1
  11084. 1
  11085. 1
  11086. 1
  11087. 1
  11088. 1
  11089. 1
  11090. 1
  11091. 1
  11092. 1
  11093. 1
  11094. 1
  11095. 1
  11096. 1
  11097. 1
  11098. 1
  11099. 1
  11100. 1
  11101.  @Dankness4201  Once again... Not panic mode... Appropriate response to a virus vastly different then the common flu. The flu is way less contagious and less deadly by more then double. You saying we don't know how many... Is you trying to bring an unknowable into the info, for the sole purpose of mudding the waters. If that is true... You would not be able to say how much. So you would have to go with what you can prove. What you would be able to do is prove the death count isn't that high... Because if they are staying home and not reporting the flu, they are clearly not dying from it. Otherwise we would know. It would be on there death certificate and filed with the local County. We know that we have more info about the flu then C19. We know the average death rate of the flu. We know C19 more then doubles the death rate. We know there is a SCIENTIFIC DIFFERENCE between an epidemic of the flu and a pandemic. There are specific science-based criteria. AN OUTBREAK is a greater-than-anticipated increase in the number of endemic cases. It can also be a single case in a new area. If it’s not quickly controlled, an outbreak can become an epidemic. A PANDEMIC is an epidemic that’s spread over multiple countries or continents. An influenza pandemic is a global outbreak of a new influenza A virus. Pandemics happen when new (novel) influenza A viruses emerge which are able to infect people easily and spread from person to person in an efficient and sustained way. The United States is NOT currently experiencing an influenza pandemic. You are trying to compare apples to oranges and make a blueberry pie.
    1
  11102. 1
  11103. 1
  11104. 1
  11105. 1
  11106. 1
  11107. 1
  11108. 1
  11109. 1
  11110. 1
  11111. 1
  11112. 1
  11113. 1
  11114. 1
  11115. 1
  11116. 1
  11117. 1
  11118. 1
  11119. 1
  11120. 1
  11121. 1
  11122. 1
  11123. 1
  11124. 1
  11125. 1
  11126. 1
  11127. 1
  11128. 1
  11129. 1
  11130. 1
  11131. 1
  11132. 1
  11133. 1
  11134. 1
  11135. 1
  11136. 1
  11137. 1
  11138. 1
  11139. 1
  11140. 1
  11141. 1
  11142. 1
  11143. 1
  11144. 1
  11145. 1
  11146. 1
  11147. 1
  11148. 1
  11149. 1
  11150. 1
  11151. 1
  11152. 1
  11153. 1
  11154. 1
  11155. 1
  11156. 1
  11157. 1
  11158. 1
  11159. 1
  11160. 1
  11161. 1
  11162. 1
  11163. 1
  11164. 1
  11165. 1
  11166. 1
  11167. 1
  11168. 1
  11169. 1
  11170. 1
  11171. 1
  11172. 1
  11173. 1
  11174. 1
  11175. 1
  11176. 1
  11177. 1
  11178. 1
  11179. 1
  11180. 1
  11181. 1
  11182. 1
  11183. 1
  11184. 1
  11185. 1
  11186. 1
  11187. 1
  11188. 1
  11189. 1
  11190. 1
  11191. 1
  11192. 1
  11193. 1
  11194. 1
  11195. 1
  11196. 1
  11197. 1
  11198. 1
  11199. 1
  11200. 1
  11201. 1
  11202. 1
  11203. 1
  11204. 1
  11205. 1
  11206. 1
  11207. 1
  11208. 1
  11209. 1
  11210. 1
  11211. 1
  11212. 1
  11213. 1
  11214. 1
  11215. 1
  11216. 1
  11217. 1
  11218. 1
  11219. 1
  11220. 1
  11221. 1
  11222. 1
  11223. 1
  11224. 1
  11225.  @sierracosta47  You are spouting out a bunch of right wing talking points. You didn't even try to get specific. You know why? Because if you get specific you'll have to prove specific. You'd much rather just blanket blame it all on the Democrats. Look in the mirror. You are the problem. Since you won't get specific, you can correct me if I'm wrong. You think that having to get vaccinated or wear and Mast due to the pandemic is politics in schools and workplace. Except it's not. It's called having to force a bunch of selfish people to act like responsible members of society like the rest of us are already doing voluntarily because we don't want people to die. Especially children. It's also nothing new. If you go into another country nor leave this country you're mandated to get certain vaccines. To enter the public school system you're mandated to get vaccines. In the Constitution the rights of the individual are not recognized above the safety of the public. That would be that whole thing I told you from the beginning that you thought you had rights you didn't. You saying we're clearly doing something doesn't actually make it true. Your be yet to bring up anything that would actually substantiate that claim. Other than false accusations that you can't prove. As I said, if you need an AR-15 to defend your person or other people or your home, you have no business owning or firing a weapon. This is not a war zone. Ninjas aren't going to attack your house. And this may be a crazy idea to you guys but I don't really think it's a good idea to give crazy people guns. Bad stuff tends to happen. Mass ideological enforcement in Media. I understand why you guys keep coming after the media. Are you just always making the assumption that we listen to whatever fits our false narrative like you do? There are plenty of neutral and right-wing channels. You just don't want to go to any of those. Those right-wing and neutral channels present their own brand of a message as well. It's called personal responsibility though. You want to know something is true you check it yourself. And don't even get me started on the freaking elections. You guys both up that stolen election BS like it was beer on a Friday night. Over 100 court cases and God knows how many Audits and recounts and nothing has been found. It's been almost a year. In the meantime Republican politicians are passing so many voting safety bills that it's making it super easy to rig the election on the right. But you don't care about that when your side does it, right? Inflation and low producivity is the free market. Has nothing to do with Democrats. Actually, the free market tends to be Republican territory. Constantly deregulating that to the point where they can do just about anything. Like charging thousands of dollars for a single vial of insulin. Thanks deregulation.... but hey, something's going wrong so it must be the Democrats fault. And for you to sit up there and say that the risk between economic inequality has absolutely nothing to do with the Republicans? Who do you think keeps blocking all the bills to raise the minimum wage to a living wage that matches inflation and worker productivity? It's not the Democrats. They keep presenting the bills. Who do you think votes against bills that would make Healthcare a right and not a privilege for those who can afford it? Ultimately doing people who are poor to dying simply because they are. Like I said, everything's to Democrats fault and you guys are perfect angel sent from above but don't have to bother having anything to back up their claims. You just have to hurl enough.
    1
  11226. 1
  11227. 1
  11228. 1
  11229. 1
  11230. 1
  11231. 1
  11232. 1
  11233. 1
  11234. 1
  11235. 1
  11236. 1
  11237. 1
  11238. 1
  11239. 1
  11240. 1
  11241. 1
  11242. 1
  11243. 1
  11244. 1
  11245. 1
  11246. 1
  11247. 1
  11248. 1
  11249. 1
  11250. 1
  11251. 1
  11252. 1
  11253. 1
  11254. 1
  11255. 1
  11256. 1
  11257. 1
  11258. 1
  11259. 1
  11260. 1
  11261. 1
  11262. 1
  11263. 1
  11264. 1
  11265. 1
  11266. 1
  11267. 1
  11268. 1
  11269. 1
  11270. 1
  11271. 1
  11272. 1
  11273. 1
  11274. 1
  11275. 1
  11276. 1
  11277. 1
  11278. 1
  11279. 1
  11280. 1
  11281. 1
  11282. 1
  11283. 1
  11284. 1
  11285. 1
  11286. 1
  11287. 1
  11288. 1
  11289. 1
  11290. 1
  11291. 1
  11292. 1
  11293. 1
  11294. 1
  11295. 1
  11296. 1
  11297. 1
  11298. 1
  11299. 1
  11300. 1
  11301. 1
  11302. 1
  11303. 1
  11304. 1
  11305. 1
  11306. 1
  11307. 1
  11308. 1
  11309. 1
  11310. 1
  11311. 1
  11312. 1
  11313. 1
  11314.  @markwarren5644  Well... If they are a criminal, they are already making bad choices.... they also showing clear lack of reasoning. That does not actually mean that you have to get on their level. Besides... That is why we have the police, the military, federal law enforcement agencies and even security guards. There is absolutely no need for you to go out there and try and live your Rambo fantasy. Statistically, all night usually does is me that there are twice as many bullets flying by less experienced hands, and, therefore, more likely to hit innocent people. What if they ran their car in there? Well, let me explain the several ways that analogy is flawed. 1. If it didn't happen that often, then that kind of nullifies your point. You would have a point if we had some mad rash of people using their cars as weapons to run people down. That's not the case. In 2019 we had more mass shootings in this country then we had days of the year. So... It's a little more then a one off. 2. We actually already have a couple of solutions for that. Even if it was a one-off. For instance, if you drink and drive you go to jail, pay huge fines and lose your license. They don't make you drive a Prius. They take away your ability to drive all together. No one is suggesting we take away all our guns. We are just saying that there is absolutely no need for the average citizen to be carrying a submachine gun... Or own a gun at all without a background check and annual gun safety and proficiency training, like police and military have to do every year to be able to carry a weapon. Hell, maybe it's even a good idea to have gun safe requirements. "Crazy"... I know! Requiring people to be responsible with their deadly weapons. How dare we... 🙄
    1
  11315. 1
  11316. 1
  11317. 1
  11318. 1
  11319. 1
  11320. 1
  11321. 1
  11322. 1
  11323. 1
  11324. 1
  11325. 1
  11326. 1
  11327. 1
  11328. 1
  11329. 1
  11330. 1
  11331. 1
  11332. 1
  11333. 1
  11334. 1
  11335. 1
  11336. 1
  11337. 1
  11338. 1
  11339. 1
  11340. 1
  11341. 1
  11342. 1
  11343. 1
  11344. 1
  11345. 1
  11346. 1
  11347. 1
  11348.  @majinhiei7  SoOoOo... You just saying, "it's not news" does not actually make it true. That's the real TDS. Trump does his best to try and convince everyone, that just saying things enough, actually makes it true. CNN is still run by people, and thefore, can still get things wrong, but just because they don't suck Trump off, every chance they get, does not actually mean, they are not news or that everything they say is wrong or divisive. Its not "emotions". Which is only a word, you guys like to use, because your not evolved enough to realize that the reference does not actually automatically dismiss logical thought. Basic word Association is what they begin teaching in middle school. Using negative or dehumanizing terms to denote people, and almost exclusively doing so, to discrible people of color, is what racists do on the daily. Having a history of such, while also occupying the Oval office, is news worthy, dispite what you or anyone else thinks. Ignoring that correlation because it doesn't look good, is disingenuous at best. "CNN blacked mailed a kid for using a Trump meme" Proof or evidence? "CNN faked and forged a Muslim protest acting like it was genuine." Proof or evidence? "Whenever some one talks positive about Jesus Christ and negative about democrats, they cut them off and pretend that its "technical difficulties". Proof or evidence? Also, You argued earlier about how the news should not be about emotion. Jesus Christ is not a provable concept. So how is that not using emotion on the news? No, I don't because that's not true. I have actually read the Mueller Report, and I do not choose to ignore what does not fit, what I have already decided to be true. I use logic and fact to inform my opinions. I assume that if I can't make my argument on facts alone, then its not worth making. I also, don't pretend to know the future, in order to make myself feel better. You clearly don't understand socialism. So maybe its best not to speak on it.
    1
  11349.  @majinhiei7  Because I use logic, I read the actual evidence in the Mueller Report, and also noticed that you have yet to do anything but make the claim it was BS. Which means nothing. Because I use logic, I read scientific studies done on transgender individuals and know that they have been found to have high levels of the other genders sexual hormones and brain chemistry to suggest the same. I read studies of other species with similar traites, suggesting that it occures naturally in genetics across the species spectrum. I also noticed that people who make the argument of having transgender women compete in athletics against other women, can't ever seem to come up with a single example of that happening. Which makes their argument irrelevant. Because I use logic, don't have to assume that people who belong to a group of Millions are all stupid because they don't agree with what I say or think. I simply use logic and evidence to make my point. Because I use logic, I also recognize the past six Decades of History, when reps and dems flipped. I don't have to ignore relevant information or six decades worth of history in order to make my argument. I also recognized that all the white supremacists and skinheads claim the Republican side now. Because I use logic, I choose to look at all relevant information and not just that which reconfirms my preconceived notions. Like with President Obama and the racist backlash that came against him in the form of, the birtherism movement, political charactertures of Obama and the "Obama is a Muslim" conspiracy. I also see people these days, shooting up black churches, running over peacefully protesters and turning on homemade blow torches on them. "Jumping people" Proof or evidence? " setting things on fire" Proof or evidence? " spring women in the face with mace" Proof or evidence?
    1
  11350. 1
  11351. 1
  11352. 1
  11353. 1
  11354. 1
  11355. 1
  11356. 1
  11357. 1
  11358.  @mylifeastedturner9731  so, Papadopoulos was speaking to Alexander Downer, who was the Australian diplomat to London. It was at the Kensington wine rooms, in 2016. Over a decade before 2016 and that meeting in the bar, had a roll in securing 25 million and made from his country to help the Clinton Foundation fight AIDS. It was chronicled an Old Government memos, archived on the Australian foreign ministry's website. The Australian foreign minister says the Clinton Grant was handled like all its other two billion annual foreign aid Awards, and It ultimately helped thousands in Asia gain access to antiviral AIDS medications. Dems claim it to basically be reaching. That this guy working as a representative of Australia, being 1 in many people working to secure funds for the Clinton AIDS Foundation, as well as many others that year, over a decade before the interaction with Papadopoulos in the bar, is Reps trying to make something out of nothing. One of the many reason one would come to that conclusion being, the Clintons have been deeply involved with world government and politics for many decades now, and for that reason, you would be hard pressed to find anyone, working in that same area, to not of had some kind of interaction with the Clintons. Especially, considering that there doesn't appear to be any other interaction between the Clinton family and Downer, before or after this. Which sounds reasonable enough to me. Personally, I was not a Hillary Supporter. I was Bernie 2016 and will be Bernie 2020. I think she is shady, entitled and lacking in substance, for the most part.... But I do try to not let my personal opinions get in the way of basic logic, like Occam's razor.
    1
  11359. 1
  11360. 1
  11361. 1
  11362. 1
  11363.  @majinhiei7  Soo!! I'm gonna go back to the rest and see what you dug up 🤣 but i just had to do this one first.. Cuz... Really??? Lol "Russian Hoax, the burden of proof on This one belongs to you." I'm not the one that made the claim. I'm also not the one that made a big stink over... "OMG! I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE YOU DON'T KNOW THIS! YOUR SO STUPID! HPW CAN YOU NOT KNOW THIS! OMG!".... 🤣 So... If I'm so dumb for not knowing it, why can't you prove it? Don't you just need the Mueller Report? All ya gotta do is go in there and show me the page number and give me the quote, right? How hard is that, if it says what you claim it does? Do you not have a copy? Here you go! You can borrow mine! 😜 https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html. Just let me know the page number and I can look it up! 😁😁😁 " If Trump committed a crime, 👉despite Mueller, on multiple occasions the saying "no collusion"👈 I have no idea why you think continuing to make stuff up is going to save you from this mess you got yourself in. 🤣 But WTH! Its fun! Show me 1 time those words EVER came out of his mouth or he wrote them down anywhere!!! If he has done it multiple times then it should be easy to find one of them, right? "then you clearly know something that Mueller doesn't." No I don't! We both would automatically know that you're lying and trying to get out of having to prove your lies! 😁 " Show me the specific part were Trump committed crime. " OH, I WOULD LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE TO! And will do just that, just as soon as you either prove your original claim OR admit you where lying! 😁 Diversion tactics don't work on me, sweet cheeks! 😉 I'll be waiting for you to put your money where your mouth is! And stop trying to BS about how, your claims, that you have yet to prove, or somehow my job to disprove. Cuz that doesn't make any sense I'm going to call your ass out on Monday every damn time. You shouldn't have said it if you couldn't back it up. 😁😁😁✌
    1
  11364. 1
  11365. 1
  11366. 1
  11367. 1
  11368. 1
  11369. 1
  11370. 1
  11371. 1
  11372. 1
  11373. 1
  11374. 1
  11375. 1
  11376. 1
  11377. 1
  11378. 1
  11379. 1
  11380. 1
  11381. 1
  11382. 1
  11383. 1
  11384. 1
  11385. 1
  11386. 1
  11387. 1
  11388. 1
  11389. 1
  11390. 1
  11391. 1
  11392. 1
  11393. 1
  11394. 1
  11395. 1
  11396. 1
  11397. 1
  11398. 1
  11399. 1
  11400. 1
  11401. 1
  11402. 1
  11403. 1
  11404. 1
  11405. 1
  11406. 1
  11407. 1
  11408. 1
  11409. 1
  11410. 1
  11411. 1
  11412. 1
  11413. 1
  11414. 1
  11415. 1
  11416. 1
  11417. 1
  11418. 1
  11419. 1
  11420. 1
  11421. 1
  11422. 1
  11423. 1
  11424. 1
  11425. 1
  11426. 1
  11427. 1
  11428. 1
  11429. 1
  11430. 1
  11431. 1
  11432. 1
  11433. 1
  11434. 1
  11435. 1
  11436. 1
  11437. 1
  11438. 1
  11439. 1
  11440. 1
  11441. 1
  11442. 1
  11443. 1
  11444. 1
  11445. 1
  11446. 1
  11447. 1
  11448. 1
  11449. 1
  11450. 1
  11451. 1
  11452. 1
  11453. 1
  11454.  William Plummer  as far as covid-19 not existing, that is super easy to disprove. From the beginning of the pandemic, the CDC and the WHO had issued an AllShare, which has never been rescinded. Which means, if you want any information about the chemical compound of covid-19 from the US Laboratories that are working on it, studying at or studying a vaccine and treatment processes, all you have to do is request it. Same goes for the World Health Organization when it comes to any information outside of the US. Of course the country would have to be under the World Health Organization. This order is currently active. Every biological scientist in the world wants this thing solved. It's a global pandemic. You making up some masses worldwide conspiracy where are all these countries I'm so far reported over 3 million deaths total sounds a little crazy at this point. That's a level of denial I don't think I'm qualified to deal with. I can give you links to chemical compositions and research. I just don't think that's going to matter to you. Hell, I could give you the memos on the AllShare orders. As I said, though, I don't think that's going to matter to you. I don't think you're all there in the head, baby. You're all over the place. Like, I'm genuinely concerned about your mental health, In This Moment. I can't know, for sure, without medical training oh, but I don't think feeding into your delusions is going to help you. So I'm really not sure if it would be responsible of me to continue to do so.
    1
  11455. 1
  11456. 1
  11457. 1
  11458. 1
  11459. 1
  11460. 1
  11461. 1
  11462. 1
  11463. 1
  11464. 1
  11465. 1
  11466. 1
  11467.  @Altair885  Okay... So is this about you being right? Because I went into detail explaining how I basically live in Trump land, that most of my family and friends voted for him and that we have healthy debate into the differences. I do not have a problem with all Trump voters. Simply the willfully ignorant ones. The ones who choose to think that way and act on it. All their choices. You are making excuses for them. They are "brainwashed". Except being brainwashed is kind of a clinical term and unless you're a doctor that specializes in that you are not qualified to make that assumption about millions of people you've never met. Even if you were a doctor, you would not be qualified to make that assumption or diagnosis upon millions of people you've never met. Therefore, when you say they're brainwashed, you are making a mess of assumption for which you have no basis and using that as an excuse. To be clear, those people who stormed the Capitol Building or those people that tried to take the governor hostage, are domestic terrorists. They're criminals and guilty of sedition. That is under the law. That's not my opinion. Soft pedaling that kind of stuff is what is dangerous. These people storm the capital with pipe bombs, tactical gear, zip ties, Spears and literally built a guillotine. They beat a veteran police officer to death with a fire extinguisher. Unity under a false premise will never stand for long. As for some people will only ever be a certain way... That's exactly what they'll be until you start expecting them to be better. No one ever expects them to be better and so they do what they can and want to. Personal responsibility
    1
  11468. 1
  11469. 1
  11470. 1
  11471. 1
  11472. 1
  11473. 1
  11474. 1
  11475. 1
  11476. 1
  11477. 1
  11478. 1
  11479. 1
  11480. 1
  11481. 1
  11482. 1
  11483. 1
  11484. 1
  11485. 1
  11486. 1
  11487. 1
  11488. 1
  11489. 1
  11490. 1
  11491. 1
  11492. 1
  11493. 1
  11494. 1
  11495. 1
  11496. 1
  11497. 1
  11498. 1
  11499. 1
  11500. 1
  11501. 1
  11502. 1
  11503. 1
  11504. 1
  11505. 1
  11506. 1
  11507. 1
  11508. 1
  11509. 1
  11510. 1
  11511. 1
  11512. 1
  11513. 1
  11514. 1
  11515. 1
  11516. 1
  11517.  @Altair885  👈 Now let me explain why this one wouldn't answer that question. Right now, in America, we have a group of radical right crazy extremists that have already attempted and are continuing to attempt to take one of our most fundamental freedoms away from us. The right of every American to pick our leaders. This is current state of events . My question was... Would you expect slaves to come together with slave owners while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved? I asked that specific question because he keeps going on about how we need to unite even with the most extreme right-wing that are perpetrating this coup. He's making up all kinds of future... scenarios and trying to call the people in the building tearing stuff up, "sightseers". He also tried to change the question to another one he wanted to answer. If he answered this question, it would either destroy his whole argument or make him look silly. Probably both. If he would have said "yes. I would have expected for slaves to unify with their slave owners while they were trying to still keep them slaves", I would have pointed out... how do you know that the unification was genuine, considering their slaves and have to do everything their masters tell them to do? He wouldn't have an answer for that. It's applicable for that reason. These people are currently trying to take our rights away to pick our leaders. They are currently inciting violence and literally killing police officers. We don't UniFi with people like that. We put them in jail for treason. His big thing where the people who weren't beating to death police officers with fire extinguishers, carrying pipe bombs or making a Gallows. All the other people who were just sitting around watching and cheering how to "hang Mike Pence" were apparently "innocent bystanders" to him. Never mind they also broke into the capitol. Nevermind they were accomplices under the law to murder, attempted murder, assault, attempted assault and treason. To name a few. They were just sitting there taking pictures, apparently. This is all over these comments sections now. All the sudden it's finally gotten through to them that they are losing and that they lost the election and all three branches of government, to boot and so now they're about Unity. Now they want to try and claim some kind of moral High Ground, while still excusing and dismissing treason and an attempted coup. No thank you. That BS won't work.
    1
  11518. 1
  11519. 1
  11520. 1
  11521. 1
  11522. 1
  11523. 1
  11524. 1
  11525. 1
  11526. 1
  11527.  @Altair885  Would you expect slaves to come together with slave owners while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved? 1. Ignored 2. Ignored 3. " Garden slaves and their owners, well again just look back to history, there are instances after the Civil War where former slaves did indeed coexist with their former Masters " Except that isn't the question. You got the circumstance wrong.... 👉 while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved 👈... And the core of the question itself. " Would you expect ". Not what happened. 4. " I think I did answer actually answered your question about slavery? Except you didn't because you got the circumstance wrong and the core of the question wrong. As I just demonstrated a minute ago. 5. " The slavery question is obviously a play to imply Unity is not possible and so my ideals are flawed. But it means nothing because your hypothesis is based on past event that has a well-documented outcome, it has no relevance to the current affairs of which we are discussing unless you had another point you are trying to make. The question is now, not "relevant". Except the past and histories the exact same thing you keep pointing out, that proves your point. So apparently we only listen to history when it supports your narrative. On top of that, and once again, history is not what I'm talking about. Your expectations are the subject of the sentence. 6. " you answers from my on now answered questions first and I will. Thank You observe I've already answered a lot more of your questions then you have mine. " Now it's time to divert to a silly lie, while simultaneously (passive aggressively) admitting that you haven't actually answered the question up till that point. Which led me to ask another question. I asked you to provide these questions I had not answered. You never did. 7. "Keep trying to turn us around lady, it looks to me like you're perhaps being a little bit of a hypocrite I'm afraid"... currently it seems that you are the one who is not even attempting to answer a number of the later questions I have put to you, why one wonders" The point in the tactic list that you tried to draw attention away from himself and deflect On To Me, by literally telling me that's what I'm doing. Good times... Once again bringing up this list of questions I have "not" answered, that you claim are there. 8. " okay I'll make it easy for you and answer this one as fast I can even though you have not answered the last few I've asked you." And do you know why. I told you that you needed to answer this question that you have been ignoring this entire time, and as soon as you did that I would answer whatever questions you like. " ordinary I would assume no would be easy answer you'd expect. However history has shown that is not always the case, during the Civil War there were black slaves who willingly fought for the Confederacy" This one is awful special. Cuz you presented an argument claiming that a Slave had a choice. Talk about not having a clue. 9. And finally... After all of that... " no I haven't, you just can't accept the answer I've given you, but just to reiterate it for you my answer was yes and no if you don't understand." So not once did you ever say yes or no. If you had, we would have moved on by now. Now I was going to ask you what that cop out of an answer meant, but directly below you giving a yes and no answer, you once again start talkin about what you claim to be historical facts and how we can't change them. Except you don't need to change them to answer the question. " I'm sorry you didn't like the way I answered but I can't change history or go back and ask them why they made the choices they did." So, what does historical facts about history have to do with your expectations of them? Nothing... If you contest this, please feel free to go up top and quote me and you to disprove the track record you have of avoiding a question. As well as any discrepancies in the timeline.
    1
  11528. 1
  11529. 1
  11530. 1
  11531. 1
  11532. 1
  11533. 1
  11534. 1
  11535. 1
  11536. 1
  11537. 1
  11538. 1
  11539. 1
  11540. 1
  11541. 1
  11542. 1
  11543. 1
  11544. 1
  11545.  @Altair885  your queen of not being able to give a definitive answer gets washed down the BS train as soon as you look at your track record on the 20,000 different ways you tried to avoid answering this question. Some of which had nothing to do with your claims from history now. All illustrated here. 👇 You are just lying. Plain and simple. 👇  @John Chilton  Would you expect slaves to come together with slave owners while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved? 1. Ignored 2. Ignored 3. " Garden slaves and their owners, well again just look back to history, there are instances after the Civil War where former slaves did indeed coexist with their former Masters " Except that isn't the question. You got the circumstance wrong.... 👉 while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved 👈... And the core of the question itself. " Would you expect ". Not what happened. 4. " I think I did answer actually answered your question about slavery? Except you didn't because you got the circumstance wrong and the core of the question wrong. As I just demonstrated a minute ago. 5. " The slavery question is obviously a play to imply Unity is not possible and so my ideals are flawed. But it means nothing because your hypothesis is based on past event that has a well-documented outcome, it has no relevance to the current affairs of which we are discussing unless you had another point you are trying to make. The question is now, not "relevant". Except the past and histories the exact same thing you keep pointing out, that proves your point. So apparently we only listen to history when it supports your narrative. On top of that, and once again, history is not what I'm talking about. Your expectations are the subject of the sentence. 6. " you answers from my on now answered questions first and I will. Thank You observe I've already answered a lot more of your questions then you have mine. " Now it's time to divert to a silly lie, while simultaneously (passive aggressively) admitting that you haven't actually answered the question up till that point. Which led me to ask another question. I asked you to provide these questions I had not answered. You never did. 7. "Keep trying to turn us around lady, it looks to me like you're perhaps being a little bit of a hypocrite I'm afraid"... currently it seems that you are the one who is not even attempting to answer a number of the later questions I have put to you, why one wonders" The point in the tactic list that you tried to draw attention away from himself and deflect On To Me, by literally telling me that's what I'm doing. Good times... Once again bringing up this list of questions I have "not" answered, that you claim are there. 8. " okay I'll make it easy for you and answer this one as fast I can even though you have not answered the last few I've asked you." And do you know why. I told you that you needed to answer this question that you have been ignoring this entire time, and as soon as you did that I would answer whatever questions you like. " ordinary I would assume no would be easy answer you'd expect. However history has shown that is not always the case, during the Civil War there were black slaves who willingly fought for the Confederacy" This one is awful special. Cuz you presented an argument claiming that a Slave had a choice. Talk about not having a clue. 9. And finally... After all of that... " no I haven't, you just can't accept the answer I've given you, but just to reiterate it for you my answer was yes and no if you don't understand." So not once did you ever say yes or no. If you had, we would have moved on by now. Now I was going to ask you what that cop out of an answer meant, but directly below you giving a yes and no answer, you once again start talkin about what you claim to be historical facts and how we can't change them. Except you don't need to change them to answer the question. " I'm sorry you didn't like the way I answered but I can't change history or go back and ask them why they made the choices they did." So, what does historical facts about history have to do with your expectations of them? Nothing... If you contest this, please feel free to go up top and quote me and you to disprove the track record you have of avoiding a question. As well as any discrepancies in the timeline.
    1
  11546. 1
  11547. 1
  11548. 1
  11549. 1
  11550. 1
  11551. 1
  11552. 1
  11553. 1
  11554. 1
  11555. 1
  11556. 1
  11557. 1
  11558. 1
  11559. 1
  11560. 1
  11561. 1
  11562. 1
  11563. 1
  11564. 1
  11565. 1
  11566. 1
  11567. 1
  11568. 1
  11569. 1
  11570. 1
  11571. 1
  11572. 1
  11573. 1
  11574. 1
  11575. 1
  11576. 1
  11577. 1
  11578. 1
  11579. 1
  11580. 1
  11581. 1
  11582. 1
  11583. 1
  11584. 1
  11585. 1
  11586. 1
  11587. 1
  11588. 1
  11589. 1
  11590. 1
  11591. 1
  11592. 1
  11593. 1
  11594. 1
  11595. 1
  11596. 1
  11597. 1
  11598. 1
  11599. 1
  11600. 1
  11601. 1
  11602. 1
  11603. 1
  11604. 1
  11605. 1
  11606. 1
  11607. 1
  11608. 1
  11609. 1
  11610. 1
  11611. 1
  11612. 1
  11613. 1
  11614. 1
  11615. 1
  11616. 1
  11617. 1
  11618. 1
  11619. 1
  11620. 1
  11621. 1
  11622. 1
  11623. 1
  11624. 1
  11625. 1
  11626. 1
  11627. 1
  11628. 1
  11629. 1
  11630. 1
  11631. 1
  11632. 1
  11633. 1
  11634. 1
  11635. 1
  11636. 1
  11637. 1
  11638. 1
  11639. 1
  11640. 1
  11641. 1
  11642. 1
  11643. 1
  11644. 1
  11645. 1
  11646. 1
  11647. 1
  11648. 1
  11649. 1
  11650. 1
  11651. 1
  11652. 1
  11653. 1
  11654. 1
  11655. 1
  11656. 1
  11657. 1
  11658. 1
  11659. 1
  11660. 1
  11661. 1
  11662. 1
  11663. 1
  11664. 1
  11665. 1
  11666. 1
  11667. 1
  11668. 1
  11669. 1
  11670. 1
  11671. 1
  11672. 1
  11673. 1
  11674. 1
  11675. 1
  11676. 1
  11677. 1
  11678. 1
  11679. 1
  11680. 1
  11681. 1
  11682. 1
  11683.  @doyouevenwarpbro8674  Overuse of identity politics can be a thing... But what's more common is, people like you, throwing around that term, so you don't have to defend your sides shity actions. Its lazy thinking, is what it is. That's why every time the news report something you don't like or isn't reflecting well on your side, you just say "fake news". It doesn't matter if it's actually true. That's just a super lazy way for you guys to dismiss it, without having to defend it. It's like, oops... My side messed up again. It's okay though. I'll just call it fake news or identity politics. That way I don't actually have to use my brain, or consider anybody else's point of view other than my own. Though, I would love to see your example of using white privilege for African Americans though. If you said they do it, show me? Unless your just talking out your ass? And you guys always want to talk about how we have this victimhood... But you guys are the ones that want to blame anybody but yourself for everything. Everything is somebody else's fault. You guys are all holier-than-thou now, walking on water, second coming so f**** Jesus m********** Christ. Everything your guys do you got an excuse for but everything we do and we're Satan. And goes against who? Did I give you the impression that I held my tongue at some point? Cuz I do that s*** with my people too. Say I'm like being consistent. If my sides f**** up I'm going to say so, I have in the past and I will in the future. And nobody's kicked me out yet. Hell, I just got into it the other day was someone talking about how they wanted to deport every Republican. I told them that was a stupid ass comment because it was a stupid ass comment. Well I'm sorry that you're too dumb to know how insecure, having to put everybody who doesn't agree with your point of view in the stupid column, makes you look. Actually... Na! I'm not sorry about that.
    1
  11684. 1
  11685. 1
  11686. 1
  11687. 1
  11688. 1
  11689. 1
  11690. 1
  11691. 1
  11692. 1
  11693. 1
  11694. 1
  11695. 1
  11696. 1
  11697. 1
  11698. 1
  11699. 1
  11700. 1
  11701. 1
  11702. 1
  11703. 1
  11704. 1
  11705. 1
  11706. 1
  11707. 1
  11708. 1
  11709. 1
  11710. 1
  11711. 1
  11712. 1
  11713. 1
  11714. 1
  11715. 1
  11716. 1
  11717. 1
  11718. 1
  11719. 1
  11720. 1
  11721. 1
  11722. 1
  11723. 1
  11724. 1
  11725. 1
  11726. 1
  11727. 1
  11728. 1
  11729. 1
  11730. 1
  11731. 1
  11732. 1
  11733. 1
  11734. 1
  11735. 1
  11736. 1
  11737. 1
  11738. 1
  11739. 1
  11740. 1
  11741. 1
  11742. 1
  11743. 1
  11744. 1
  11745. 1
  11746. 1
  11747. 1
  11748. 1
  11749. 1
  11750. 1
  11751. 1
  11752. 1
  11753. 1
  11754. 1
  11755. 1
  11756. 1
  11757. 1
  11758. 1
  11759. 1
  11760. 1
  11761. 1
  11762. 1
  11763. 1
  11764. 1
  11765. 1
  11766. 1
  11767. 1
  11768. 1
  11769. 1
  11770. 1
  11771. 1
  11772. 1
  11773. 1
  11774. 1
  11775. 1
  11776. 1
  11777. 1
  11778. 1
  11779. 1
  11780. 1
  11781. 1
  11782. 1
  11783. 1
  11784. 1
  11785. 1
  11786. 1
  11787. 1
  11788. 1
  11789. 1
  11790. 1
  11791. 1
  11792. 1
  11793. 1
  11794. 1
  11795. 1
  11796. 1
  11797. 1
  11798. 1
  11799. 1
  11800. 1
  11801. 1
  11802. 1
  11803. 1
  11804. 1
  11805. 1
  11806. 1
  11807. 1
  11808. 1
  11809. 1
  11810. 1
  11811. 1
  11812. 1
  11813. 1
  11814. 1
  11815. 1
  11816. 1
  11817. 1
  11818. 1
  11819. 1
  11820. 1
  11821. 1
  11822. 1
  11823. 1
  11824. 1
  11825. 1
  11826. 1
  11827. 1
  11828. 1
  11829. 1
  11830. 1
  11831. 1
  11832. 1
  11833. 1
  11834. 1
  11835. 1
  11836. 1
  11837. 1
  11838. 1
  11839. 1
  11840. 1
  11841. 1
  11842. 1
  11843. 1
  11844. 1
  11845. 1
  11846. 1
  11847. 1
  11848. 1
  11849. 1
  11850. 1
  11851. 1
  11852. 1
  11853. 1
  11854. 1
  11855. 1
  11856. 1
  11857. 1
  11858. 1
  11859. 1
  11860. 1
  11861. 1
  11862. 1
  11863. 1
  11864. 1
  11865. 1
  11866. 1
  11867. 1
  11868. 1
  11869. 1
  11870. 1
  11871. 1
  11872. 1
  11873. 1
  11874. 1
  11875. 1
  11876. 1
  11877.  @tdbomba8496  Cool! Then we have The Washington Post Forbes Factcheck afp Fresnobee NPR The military times And the fact that you could not come close to proving your claim..... Would you like some more? Cuz there is plenty. https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/03/01/jordans-false-claim-that-pelosi-denied-request-national-guard-troops/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16236190095847&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fpolitics%2F2021%2F03%2F01%2Fjordans-false-claim-that-pelosi-denied-request-national-guard-troops%2F https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/02/15/house-republicans-suggest-pelosi-may-be-responsible-for-delaying-national-guard-deployment-on-jan-6/amp/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16236190095847&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fjemimamcevoy%2F2021%2F02%2F15%2Fhouse-republicans-suggest-pelosi-may-be-responsible-for-delaying-national-guard-deployment-on-jan-6%2F https://factcheck.afp.com/pelosi-did-not-reject-appeals-troops-secure-us-capitol https://amp-fresnobee-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.fresnobee.com/news/california/article249315725.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16236190095847&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fresnobee.com%2Fnews%2Fcalifornia%2Farticle249315725.html https://www.npr.org/2021/01/11/955548910/ex-capitol-police-chief-rebuffs-claims-national-guard-was-never-called-during-ri https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2021/01/07/this-is-why-the-national-guard-didnt-respond-to-the-attack-on-the-capitol/
    1
  11878. 1
  11879. 1
  11880. 1
  11881. 1
  11882. 1
  11883. 1
  11884. 1
  11885. 1
  11886. 1
  11887. 1
  11888. 1
  11889. 1
  11890. 1
  11891. 1
  11892. 1
  11893. 1
  11894. 1
  11895. 1
  11896. 1
  11897. 1
  11898. 1
  11899. 1
  11900. 1
  11901. 1
  11902. 1
  11903. 1
  11904. 1
  11905. 1
  11906. 1
  11907. 1
  11908. 1
  11909. 1
  11910. 1
  11911. 1
  11912. 1
  11913. 1
  11914. 1
  11915. 1
  11916. 1
  11917. 1
  11918. 1
  11919. 1
  11920. 1
  11921. 1
  11922.  @theniceguy7824    The FDA did an emergency approval. Correct. 👉At first.👈 However, they never stopped studying and testing. Which allowed them to officially approve it for standard, like everything else they approve, a few months ago. Now it is approved in the same way all the other drugs and vacs are. So, that may have been a legit concern at one point. However, not anymore. Which is something I mentioned and something you are ignoring because it doesn't fit your false narrative. Citing the survival rate is a false right wing narrative. First, then don't measure the survival rate. They measure the death rate and glean the rest from there. Second, the death rate fluctuates on a literal daily basis, and you guys ALWAYS. try and quote the same number. Which doesn't make sense. Just last week the death rate dropped by 13.3%... Which is great when it goes down. Not so much when it goes the other direction. Which happens as well. So, I'm, infact, not "ignoring" that. Its a false narrative. McDonald's? What? You literally have no clue what your talking about. 🤦 👉"FDA does not approve food, beverages, or dietary supplements. ... Food facilities are required to register with FDA, but being registered with FDA does not indicate FDA approval of the facility or its products. New food additives do require FDA approval."👈 The FDA also does not control what companies put on their products according to labels. It requires food companies to list their ingredients on their products them too register with them. New additives are in need of approval. That is it. Also, the FDA is fine for approving the other vacs but not the covid one? Your contradicting yourself and believing right wing propaganda, instead of facts. So first, there is "just as many" and now there is "an abundance" of these medical professionals. Which is it? Where are they since I asked you to provide them and you haven't? That's far on this topic the only thing you've proven is that you keep saying there is an ever fluctuating amount of medical professionals that don't agree with the mandate. 1. I'm sure there are doctors and scientists that have shared their personal opinion in this manner. We have an abundance of diverse opinions. However, the medical professionals that need to be listened to as for specialists in the field of study. 2. When a medical professional gives their medical opinion, instead of personal opinion, they are required to back it up with data to support that. So... I will say, yet again... If you have scientist or medical professionals in the fields of infectious disease, that has given their medical opinion on this and has provided ample data to back it up, feel free to post it here. As for fear... 700 million + Americans have died from covid-19 and experienced in the last two years. This is the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. You would have to be tragically naive and completely willfully ignorant not to be afraid of this. You would also have to be as equally ignorant for mocking people who are. It is a rational fear. We all have rational fear for good reason. You have no basis for the assumption of me not reading your post that I responded to. Your just making that up. Your doing so, in order to manipulate the onus you have of providing source pages for your claims, onto me. What says a lot is that you apparently already know where all this information is because you're claiming it came from the CDC site, yet your not providing it, to back up your claim.... but as I just pointed out, you're doing your best to put the onus of your claims onto me. Which really says all we really need to know about your "CDC numbers". Sweetheart, that's not how that works. I have absolutely no need to just prove something you have yet to prove. You do understand just saying something doesn't make it true, right?
    1
  11923. 1
  11924. 1
  11925.  @nickvignola3   @Nick Vignola  I'm a single mom, having a mixed race child out of wedlock, living in southern Louisiana, while being a member of the LBGTQ community, being an atheist and a progressive liberal, who has to work 4 different jobs to take care of me and my little boy. It sucks your struggling as well... But your, by far, not the only one doing so. It certainly does not excuse or explain any mind set you may have. Like calling me vaccine that is saving American lives, a Nazis vaccine. That's just juvenile. The reason people are talking about vaccine mandates now is because it took 7 and 1/2 months to get over 50% of the population vaccinated even though it was distributed literally everywhere and completely free. It shouldn't have had to have come to that. But people like you won't pull your head out of your ass long enough to think about more than just your own situation. You guys always fight the same number with the death rate. You do understand the death rate literally changes everyday, right? Yet you always cite the same damn number. How does that even make sense to you? Just last week the death rate dropped 13.3% from the following week. Which is great when it jumps down but not so much when it jumps up. And you trying to copy my observation about you being super self-centered, doesn't make any sense. So I'm not sure why you did it. At the end of the day you only give a damn about yourself and not wanting to save other people's lives by getting a vaccine that could also possibly save your own, based on a bunch of false narratives that you didn't bother to look up yourself. You also trying to tell me that I said something about the Constitution that I didn't say, doesn't actually make it true. It just shows the desperation in your argument. The Pfizer vaccine does not give you natural immunity. It's literally by definition manufactured immunity. The natural immunity you were referring to would have had to have come from either herd immunity, for which we have not achieved yet in America or having covid early at which point you would only be naturally immune to it for up to six months, depending on the variant.
    1
  11926. 1
  11927. 1
  11928. 1
  11929. 1
  11930. 1
  11931. 1
  11932. 1
  11933. 1
  11934. 1
  11935. 1
  11936. 1
  11937. 1
  11938. 1
  11939. 1
  11940. 1
  11941. 1
  11942. 1
  11943. 1
  11944. 1
  11945. 1
  11946. 1
  11947. 1
  11948. 1
  11949. 1
  11950. 1
  11951. 1
  11952. 1
  11953. 1
  11954. 1
  11955. 1
  11956. 1
  11957. 1
  11958. 1
  11959. 1
  11960. 1
  11961. 1
  11962. 1
  11963. 1
  11964. 1
  11965. 1
  11966. 1
  11967. 1
  11968. 1
  11969. 1
  11970. 1
  11971. 1
  11972. 1
  11973. 1
  11974. 1
  11975. 1
  11976. 1
  11977. 1
  11978. 1
  11979. 1
  11980. 1
  11981. 1
  11982. 1
  11983. 1
  11984. 1
  11985. 1
  11986. 1
  11987. 1
  11988. 1
  11989. 1
  11990. 1
  11991. 1
  11992. 1
  11993. 1
  11994. 1
  11995. 1
  11996. 1
  11997. 1
  11998. 1
  11999. 1
  12000. 1
  12001.  @tweetercopspdx2878  As for the claim that I keep trying to spin things and put a blanket opinion over all Trump supporters... I tell you what, go back up to my original comment and quote me. Put the exact quote in that you say I am doing this with. I've already explained to you that I'm not and why. If you would read the entirety of the comment and not just cherry-pick what is already going to encourage your under-educated preconceived notions about me, you're going to see that you're wrong. However, as I invited you to please quote me and show me that I'm wrong. It's all there for you to do. Just FYI on some technical definition though... communist... A person who supports or believes in the principles of communism. How could you know whether I believe in communism or not? Do you know the definition of communism? As for the rest, as I said I'm not going to take the bait. Also and mostly because it feels like you're yelling at yourself and hating on yourself through other people and that just makes me feel sorry for you. Doesn't make me want to beat up on you. It makes me want to ask what's going on in your life that you feel that you need to do all this? I hope you get help with that and go on to live a lovely life sweetheart. Also I frequently listen to other people's points of view that don't agree with mine. I just find it very hard to take people seriously who can't have a conversation with another adult without having to try an insult them every 2 seconds or call them names or do other childish things. I take those people less seriously and give less credit to their opinions because they do not conduct themselves in an adult fashion and if they cannot even have an adult conversation then how can they come to a reasonable adult conclusion... that's more common sense than it is the snobby like Behavior you are accusing me of. Come at me like an adult and then I'll start taking your opinions more seriously.
    1
  12002.  @tweetercopspdx2878  thank you so very much. Now go back to your objection of it and read what you said. Quote what you said. You used my words in this one but not so much in the ones before. Before you said that I blanketed all Trump supporters. When from the very beginning I gave the example of specific Trump supporters that go around calling themselves Patriots. I pointed out that those specific Trump supporters were merely convenient Patriots. Meaning they were Trump supporting Patriots only when it was convenient for them to be Donald Trump supporting and Patriots at the same time. Thank you very much for proving my point and (not that it needed it but) disproving your own. You see, to not be covered under what you would call my blanket would be your responsibility and not my own. If you are not convenient Patriots but you are Trump supporters then you're not covered under the people I was describing. If you only choose to be a patriot after being a trump supporter then you were exactly who I was describing and that was exactly my point. So angry childlike person I asked you... Are you a patriot before you are a trump supporter? Because as I said in my comment, this is not the first time he has attacked our soldiers. It's not even the second. Is that the problem? Is that why you taking so much offense to my original comment that you cannot conduct yourself like an adult? Are you a trump supporter before you're a patriot? Do you not like that about yourself? If that's the case then you can easily change it. Just decide our country is bigger then one under-qualified and corrupt man. Also I would suggest if you did do that then you should probably learn to speak as an adult or as I've said before no one's really going to take you that seriously.
    1
  12003. 1
  12004. 1
  12005. 1
  12006. 1
  12007.  @tweetercopspdx2878  no... Just making sure how clear your BS is for anyone that might happen upon this. You absolutely refuse to recognize the last word in the very first comment. The very first sentence of the very first comment. You absolutely refuse to answer any questions or reply to any points that I happen to make and then ironically say that I'm the one twisting things and claim that I'm the one that refuses to see any other point of view. So what did I do 4 times? As a matter of fact let's call you on your BS one more time. Use nothing but my original comment. Not the Gettysburg Address that you're over dramatically saying that I'm putting down to explain the comment but just the original comment. Tell the good people who will read this later what you think I'm doing in that original comment. You've done it before but let's try it one more time blanket boy. Please show them how you originally didn't bother paying attention to the entirety of the original comment and then when you got called on it you started screaming spin spin their spinning things or spinning everyone spinning but me. I am repeating verbatim what I said in the original comment and you're simply choosing not to read the part of it that would make you have to admit you were wrong. All Trump supporters does not = all Trump supporting Patriots I put it in the simplest terms possible they're slow learner. Do you see how they are different. One has more words than the other. One has less than the other. The variations of the word SUPPORT are used differently in each sentence. There is a thing called the subject sentence at the beginning of paragraphs where you address the subject in clear terms. So later on you can shorthand it. I'm not sure how much more clear I can be. Got that now slow learner? All Trump supporters does not = all Trump supporting Patriots.
    1
  12008. 1
  12009. 1
  12010. 1
  12011. 1
  12012. 1
  12013. 1
  12014. 1
  12015. 1
  12016. 1
  12017. 1
  12018. 1
  12019. 1
  12020. 1
  12021. 1
  12022. 1
  12023. 1
  12024. 1
  12025. 1
  12026. 1
  12027. 1
  12028. 1
  12029. 1
  12030. 1
  12031. 1
  12032. 1
  12033. 1
  12034. 1
  12035. 1
  12036. 1
  12037. 1
  12038. 1
  12039. 1
  12040. 1
  12041. 1
  12042. 1
  12043. 1
  12044. 1
  12045. 1
  12046. 1
  12047. 1
  12048. 1
  12049. 1
  12050. 1
  12051. 1
  12052. 1
  12053. 1
  12054. 1
  12055. 1
  12056. 1
  12057. 1
  12058. 1
  12059. 1
  12060. 1
  12061. 1
  12062. 1
  12063. 1
  12064. 1
  12065. 1
  12066. 1
  12067. 1
  12068. 1
  12069. 1
  12070. 1
  12071. 1
  12072. 1
  12073. 1
  12074. 1
  12075. 1
  12076. 1
  12077. 1
  12078. 1
  12079. 1
  12080. 1
  12081. 1
  12082. 1
  12083. 1
  12084. 1
  12085. 1
  12086. 1
  12087. 1
  12088. 1
  12089. 1
  12090. 1
  12091. 1
  12092. 1
  12093. 1
  12094. 1
  12095. 1
  12096. 1
  12097. 1
  12098. 1
  12099. 1
  12100. 1
  12101. 1
  12102. 1
  12103. 1
  12104. 1
  12105. 1
  12106. 1
  12107. 1
  12108. 1
  12109. 1
  12110. 1
  12111. 1
  12112. 1
  12113. 1
  12114. 1
  12115. 1
  12116. 1
  12117. 1
  12118. 1
  12119. 1
  12120. 1
  12121. 1
  12122. 1
  12123. 1
  12124. 1
  12125. 1
  12126.  @jasoncottier  What in the world are you talking about? 😂 You still making things up, for lack of a better argument? Cool! We will do this then... Quote me up top where all this was happening? No one is bragging. You are making assumptions about me, a total stranger to you, and I am correcting them. Just like your non provable assumption about my graphics biz. And just to prove how much you are willing to make up baseless lies about others... Because it fits your sad narrative.... Just 2 of my book cover designs... From one of the authors I work with on a regular bases. If you can pull your head out of your a** long enough to stop tripping over your own insecurities, I'd suggest you read them. She is a great writer. https://www.amazon.com/Horrors-Occupational-Hazards-Sharon-Higa/dp/1502949520?ref_=d6k_applink_bb_dls_failed https://www.amazon.com/dp/1495969215/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_hVAnFbWP1VS0T You made baseless assumptions... I corrected them. I'm sorry if that bruises your delicate ego. As for the rest 😁 How much do you make a year? How many hours do you work a week? Do you own your own home? Gonna have enough money to put your kinds through collage and for retirement? I'm not rich..... But I do work hard to give me and my child, what we need. Am I proud of that? Sure. I should be. I've earned it. The reason I don't get unemployment is because all 4 of my jobs are technically self employment. But... Lets not be mistaken... I usually don't talk about these things... But in your case... Well... You seam to feel the need to judge others all the time. That is how you started on this thread and how you have been all this time. You need to tear people down to feel better about yourself. Which... Probably means you are profoundly unhappy with your own life. That's to bad... Maybe focus more on fixing your own life and less on trying to make yourself feel better at others expense. One will help you... The other just makes you look sad. 😉✌
    1
  12127. 1
  12128. 1
  12129. 1
  12130. 1
  12131. 1
  12132. 1
  12133. 1
  12134. 1
  12135. 1
  12136. 1
  12137. 1
  12138. 1
  12139. 1
  12140. 1
  12141. 1
  12142. 1
  12143. 1
  12144. 1
  12145. 1
  12146. 1
  12147. 1
  12148. 1
  12149. 1
  12150. 1
  12151. 1
  12152. 1
  12153. 1
  12154. 1
  12155. 1
  12156. 1
  12157. 1
  12158. 1
  12159. 1
  12160. 1
  12161. 1
  12162. 1
  12163. 1
  12164. 1
  12165. 1
  12166. 1
  12167. 1
  12168. 1
  12169. 1
  12170. 1
  12171. 1
  12172. 1
  12173. 1
  12174. 1
  12175. 1
  12176. @Jim myz And it's not a math problem YOU are having issues with understanding. It's how LLCs file their taxes. Though... Even if you don't know a whole lot about Biz Taxes, you think you would have gleaned they where filed differently through the very specific DATES they cited... Guess not. June 30th 2011 - June 30yh 2020 Big Biz and LLCs don't file their taxes the same as us, brain trust. The avg W2 (👉working for someone else👈) gets filed yearly. 1090s (👉self employed👈) actually have the option to file yearly, semi quarterly (👉twice a year, or once every 6 months) or quarterly (4 times a year, or every 3 months👈). This is done to give the small biz owner options as to paying back their lack of withholdings in one lump some (biggest amount), twice a year or for times a year (smallest amount). Not a lot of small businesses has upwards of ten Grand on average to pay back Uncle Sam at the end of the year. Then their are LLCs or... Big Biz, who are required to file quarterly (Once every 6 months). This is done bc this is a large chunk of where out gov gets the money to keep running the country throughout the year. It is also used by the IRS to keep better track of their earnings and spending, considering that is a lot of finances to review if they would wait a year, and could be more prone to missing the shady. Now, let's revisit the actual dates, shall we. .. And ask yourself the question of, why they would claim Mazars would not be able to verify the accuracy of 👇 June 30th, 2011 - June 30th, 2020... And not Dec 30th, 2010 - Dec 30th, 2019... Mazars was still responsible for half the years 👉quarterly👈 taxes in 2020. That's why.
    1
  12177. 1
  12178. 1
  12179. 1
  12180. 1
  12181. 1
  12182. 1
  12183. 1
  12184. 1
  12185. 1
  12186. 1
  12187. 1
  12188. 1
  12189. 1
  12190. 1
  12191. 1
  12192. 1
  12193. 1
  12194. 1
  12195. 1
  12196. 1
  12197. 1
  12198. 1
  12199. 1
  12200. 1
  12201. 1
  12202. 1
  12203. 1
  12204. 1
  12205. 1
  12206. 1
  12207. 1
  12208. 1
  12209. 1
  12210. 1
  12211. 1
  12212. 1
  12213. 1
  12214. 1
  12215. 1
  12216. 1
  12217. 1
  12218. 1
  12219. 1
  12220. 1
  12221. 1
  12222. 1
  12223. 1
  12224. 1
  12225. 1
  12226. 1
  12227. 1
  12228. 1
  12229. 1
  12230. 1
  12231. 1
  12232. 1
  12233. 1
  12234. 1
  12235. 1
  12236. 1
  12237. 1
  12238. 1
  12239. 1
  12240. 1
  12241. 1
  12242. 1
  12243. 1
  12244. 1
  12245. 1
  12246. 1
  12247. 1
  12248. 1
  12249. 1
  12250. 1
  12251. 1
  12252. 1
  12253. 1
  12254. 1
  12255. 1
  12256. 1
  12257. 1
  12258. 1
  12259. 1
  12260. 1
  12261. 1
  12262. 1
  12263. 1
  12264. 1
  12265. 1
  12266. 1
  12267. 1
  12268. 1
  12269. 1
  12270. 1
  12271. 1
  12272. 1
  12273. 1
  12274. 1
  12275. 1
  12276. 1
  12277. 1
  12278. 1
  12279. 1
  12280. 1
  12281. 1
  12282. 1
  12283. 1
  12284. 1
  12285. 1
  12286. 1
  12287. 1
  12288. 1
  12289. 1
  12290. 1
  12291. 1
  12292. 1
  12293. 1
  12294. 1
  12295. 1
  12296. 1
  12297. 1
  12298. 1
  12299. 1
  12300. 1
  12301. 1
  12302. 1
  12303. 1
  12304. 1
  12305. 1
  12306. 1
  12307. 1
  12308. 1
  12309. 1
  12310. 1
  12311. 1
  12312. 1
  12313. 1
  12314. 1
  12315. 1
  12316. 1
  12317. 1
  12318. 1
  12319. 1
  12320. 1
  12321. 1
  12322. 1
  12323. 1
  12324. 1
  12325. 1
  12326. 1
  12327. 1
  12328. 1
  12329. 1
  12330. 1
  12331. 1
  12332. 1
  12333. 1
  12334. 1
  12335. 1
  12336. 1
  12337. 1
  12338. 1
  12339. 1
  12340. 1
  12341. 1
  12342. @3 Fractures Sense I know you have trouble keeping up with your lies... I made this list for you. That way, you know what you have to provide proof for. You can thank me later! 😁 " old racist Joe has said the n-word several times on live television and suggested that people commit felony gun crimes yet no citizenship" If it was on tv then there is tape on it. Link it? " yet you ignore blue check Lefty marks who are calling for violence and the death of police officers." I'm thinking the only way you're going to be able to prove that is go through all of my YouTube comments, compiled a database of them and then show that I've ignored "blue check lefty marks"? I'll be waiting. 😁 " Democrats want to change the voting demographic so that they can get away with cheap labor and lower standards of living just like the good old days when they formed the clan." I mean... Like... All of us? Have you talked to all democrats to confirm your "theory"? And why do we push for a living wage, sending the younger generation to get an education and affordable heathcare for all? Wouldn't that go against that claim? " I guess it's racist to criticize opening the floodgates and letting barbarians killing wave unchallenged. You're right. You have exemplified perfectly why we need Sharia law in this country..." Now... This is where you started claiming that I wanted Sharia Law... And I would like to know where I every said anything like that? Please feel free to quote me, as I have just done with you. Who are these "barbarians"? " everything that I mentioned is commonly known information" Then why have you, thus far, not been able to prove any of it? " typical Lefty, total dismiss a lot of FBI crimes statistics." Where? You have not presented any? And what does that have to do with all the above claims you have made, thus far? " coming from someone who believes Tech censorship is fake news" Where did I say that? "Comrade" Now you make reference to me being Russian a couple of different times but I'm just going to put it on here once. Where is your proof that I am a Russian bot? And if you have proof can you please go tell my English grandmother and my Irish grandmother so I don't have to? OH! BUT WAIT UNTIL IM THERE CUZ I SOOOOOOOOOOOOO NEED TO FILM THAT!!!! 🤣 " pretending like there is no text censorship" And I said that, where, again? And how is fact checking censorship? Are they taking the post down or they just labeling them as untrue?
    1
  12343. 1
  12344. 1
  12345. 1
  12346. 1
  12347. 1
  12348. 1
  12349. 1
  12350. 1
  12351. 1
  12352. 1
  12353. 1
  12354. 1
  12355. 1
  12356. 1
  12357. 1
  12358. 1
  12359. 1
  12360. 1
  12361. 1
  12362. 1
  12363. 1
  12364. 1
  12365. 1
  12366. 1
  12367. 1
  12368. 1
  12369. 1
  12370. 1
  12371. 1
  12372. 1
  12373. 1
  12374. 1
  12375. 1
  12376. 1
  12377. 1
  12378. 1
  12379. 1
  12380. 1
  12381. 1
  12382. 1
  12383. 1
  12384. 1
  12385. 1
  12386. 1
  12387. 1
  12388. 1
  12389. 1
  12390. 1
  12391. 1
  12392. 1
  12393. 1
  12394. 1
  12395. 1
  12396. 1
  12397. 1
  12398. 1
  12399. 1
  12400. 1
  12401. 1
  12402. 1
  12403. 1
  12404. 1
  12405. 1
  12406. 1
  12407. 1
  12408. 1
  12409. 1
  12410. 1
  12411. 1
  12412. 1
  12413. 1
  12414. 1
  12415. 1
  12416. 1
  12417. 1
  12418. 1
  12419. 1
  12420. 1
  12421. 1
  12422. 1
  12423. 1
  12424. 1
  12425. 1
  12426. 1
  12427. 1
  12428. 1
  12429. 1
  12430. 1
  12431. 1
  12432. 1
  12433. 1
  12434. 1
  12435. 1
  12436. 1
  12437. 1
  12438. 1
  12439. 1
  12440. 1
  12441. 1
  12442. 1
  12443. 1
  12444. 1
  12445. 1
  12446. 1
  12447. 1
  12448. 1
  12449. 1
  12450. 1
  12451. 1
  12452. 1
  12453. 1
  12454. 1
  12455. 1
  12456. 1
  12457. 1
  12458. 1
  12459. 1
  12460. 1
  12461. 1
  12462. 1
  12463. 1
  12464. 1
  12465. 1
  12466. 1
  12467. 1
  12468. 1
  12469. 1
  12470. 1
  12471. 1
  12472. 1
  12473. 1
  12474. 1
  12475. 1
  12476. 1
  12477. 1
  12478. 1
  12479. 1
  12480. 1
  12481. 1
  12482. 1
  12483. 1
  12484. 1
  12485. 1
  12486. 1
  12487. 1
  12488. 1
  12489. 1
  12490. 1
  12491. 1
  12492. 1
  12493. 1
  12494. 1
  12495. 1
  12496. 1
  12497. 1
  12498. 1
  12499. 1
  12500. 1
  12501. 1
  12502. 1
  12503. 1
  12504. 1
  12505. 1
  12506. 1
  12507. 1
  12508. 1
  12509. 1
  12510. 1
  12511. 1
  12512. 1
  12513. 1
  12514. 1
  12515. 1
  12516. 1
  12517. 1
  12518. 1
  12519. 1
  12520. 1
  12521. 1
  12522. 1
  12523. 1
  12524. 1
  12525. 1
  12526. 1
  12527. 1
  12528. 1
  12529. 1
  12530. 1
  12531. 1
  12532. 1
  12533. 1
  12534. 1
  12535. 1
  12536. 1
  12537. 1
  12538. 1
  12539. 1
  12540. 1
  12541. 1
  12542. 1
  12543. 1
  12544. 1
  12545. 1
  12546. 1
  12547. 1
  12548. 1
  12549. 1
  12550. 1
  12551. 1
  12552. 1
  12553. 1
  12554. 1
  12555. 1
  12556. 1
  12557. 1
  12558. 1
  12559. 1
  12560. 1
  12561. 1
  12562. 1
  12563. 1
  12564. 1
  12565. 1
  12566. 1
  12567. 1
  12568. 1
  12569. 1
  12570. 1
  12571. 1
  12572. 1
  12573. 1
  12574. 1
  12575. 1
  12576. 1
  12577. 1
  12578. 1
  12579. 1
  12580. 1
  12581. 1
  12582. 1
  12583. 1
  12584. 1
  12585. 1
  12586. 1
  12587. 1
  12588. 1
  12589. 1
  12590. 1
  12591. 1
  12592. 1
  12593. 1
  12594. 1
  12595. 1
  12596. 1
  12597. 1
  12598. 1
  12599. 1
  12600. 1
  12601. 1
  12602. 1
  12603. 1
  12604. 1
  12605. 1
  12606. 1
  12607. 1
  12608. 1
  12609. 1
  12610. 1
  12611. 1
  12612. 1
  12613. 1
  12614. 1
  12615. 1
  12616. 1
  12617. 1
  12618. 1
  12619. 1
  12620. 1
  12621. 1
  12622. 1
  12623. 1
  12624. 1
  12625. 1
  12626. 1
  12627. 1
  12628. 1
  12629. 1
  12630. 1
  12631. 1
  12632. 1
  12633. 1
  12634. 1
  12635. 1
  12636. 1
  12637. 1
  12638. 1
  12639. 1
  12640. 1
  12641. 1
  12642. 1
  12643. 1
  12644. 1
  12645. 1
  12646. 1
  12647. 1
  12648. 1
  12649. 1
  12650. 1
  12651. 1
  12652. 1
  12653. 1
  12654. 1
  12655. 1
  12656. 1
  12657. 1
  12658. 1
  12659. 1
  12660. 1
  12661. 1
  12662. 1
  12663. 1
  12664.  @somerandomnification  Goodness... Look.... I hate this happened. It's sad and pointless.... And just a waste of human life.... But we can NOT go around assigning every police involved death between white police officers and black assailants as as the same thing that George Floyd went through. You have to be reasonable, if we expect them to be. sigh.... Was he or was he not drinking and driving, showing a reckless disregard for human life? Was he or was he not so drunk while behind the wheel that he passed out, behind the wheel in a Wendy's drive thru? Where the cops beyond respectful and professional the entire time they where interacting with him before he attacked them, with no sign of racial bias or even anger of any kind? Did he or did he not attack them, wrestle them to the ground twice? Did he or did he not grab one of their weapons (POLICE ISSUE taser) and fire and hit one of the police officers with it, while attempting to flee? Is the REASON he grabbed the TASER (and not a gun) because that is what was out, BECAUSE they had already tried to subdue him with, what you call the NON LETHAL WEAPON, which did not work, AT ALL? Had he or had he not YET AGAIN shown a reckless disregard for not only his own life by others around him by attacking the police officers multiple times, unprompted? Was he or was he not doing all of this in a parking lot with quite a few people in it? Would you feel safe for yourself, your partner and the civilians around you if you had been attacked by a drunk drivers, who had wrestled 2 grown trained police officials to the ground twice, tried to use non lethal force on him, he got your taser, fired it at your partner, disabling him for god knows how long, with innocent people all around and the guy who did all of that is running clear of you being able to do anything about it, understandably at this point having NO CLUE WHAT HE WOULD DO.... Whether he would turn around, attack again or take someone hostage or what....? They escalated properly after the unwarranted attack. They first tried to Grapple him down the first time with just her hands. Then he got away and they pulled out the tasers. They used it on him and it didn't even slow him down. Then he got a hold of one of the tasers. Then he fires it and hits a cop with it while he's running away. Civilians all around. He's already displayed flippant disregard for human life several times and he was the aggressor. They had no idea that point what she was going to do.
    1
  12665. 1
  12666. 1
  12667. 1
  12668. 1
  12669. 1
  12670. 1
  12671. 1
  12672. 1
  12673. 1
  12674. 1
  12675. 1
  12676. 1
  12677. 1
  12678. 1
  12679. 1
  12680. 1
  12681. 1
  12682. 1
  12683. 1
  12684. 1
  12685. 1
  12686. 1
  12687. 1
  12688. 1
  12689. 1
  12690. 1
  12691. 1
  12692. 1
  12693. 1
  12694. 1
  12695. 1
  12696. 1
  12697. 1
  12698. 1
  12699. 1
  12700. 1
  12701. 1
  12702. 1
  12703. 1
  12704. 1
  12705. 1
  12706. 1
  12707. 1
  12708. 1
  12709. 1
  12710. 1
  12711. 1
  12712. 1
  12713. 1
  12714. 1
  12715. 1
  12716. 1
  12717. 1
  12718. 1
  12719. 1
  12720. 1
  12721. 1
  12722. 1
  12723. 1
  12724. 1
  12725. 1
  12726. 1
  12727. 1
  12728. 1
  12729. 1
  12730. 1
  12731. 1
  12732. 1
  12733. 1
  12734. 1
  12735. 1
  12736. 1
  12737. 1
  12738. 1
  12739. 1
  12740. 1
  12741. 1
  12742. 1
  12743. 1
  12744. 1
  12745. 1
  12746. 1
  12747. 1
  12748. 1
  12749. 1
  12750. 1
  12751. 1
  12752. 1
  12753. 1
  12754. 1
  12755. 1
  12756. 1
  12757. 1
  12758. 1
  12759. 1
  12760. 1
  12761. 1
  12762. 1
  12763. 1
  12764. 1
  12765. 1
  12766. 1
  12767. 1
  12768. 1
  12769. 1
  12770. 1
  12771. 1
  12772. 1
  12773. 1
  12774. 1
  12775. 1
  12776. 1
  12777. 1
  12778. 1
  12779. 1
  12780. 1
  12781. 1
  12782. 1
  12783. 1
  12784. 1
  12785. 1
  12786. 1
  12787. 1
  12788. 1
  12789. 1
  12790. 1
  12791. 1
  12792. 1
  12793. 1
  12794. 1
  12795. 1
  12796. 1
  12797. 1
  12798. 1
  12799. 1
  12800. 1
  12801. 1
  12802. 1
  12803. 1
  12804. 1
  12805. 1
  12806. 1
  12807. 1
  12808. 1
  12809. 1
  12810. 1
  12811. 1
  12812. 1
  12813. 1
  12814. 1
  12815. 1
  12816. 1
  12817. 1
  12818. 1
  12819. 1
  12820. 1
  12821. 1
  12822. 1
  12823. 1
  12824. 1
  12825. 1
  12826. 1
  12827. 1
  12828. 1
  12829. 1
  12830. 1
  12831. 1
  12832. 1
  12833. 1
  12834. 1
  12835. 1
  12836. 1
  12837. 1
  12838. 1
  12839. 1
  12840. 1
  12841. 1
  12842. 1
  12843. 1
  12844. 1
  12845. 1
  12846. 1
  12847. 1
  12848. 1
  12849. 1
  12850. 1
  12851. 1
  12852. 1
  12853. 1
  12854. 1
  12855. 1
  12856. 1
  12857. 1
  12858. 1
  12859. 1
  12860. 1
  12861. 1
  12862. 1
  12863. 1
  12864. 1
  12865. 1
  12866. 1
  12867. 1
  12868. 1
  12869. 1
  12870. 1
  12871. 1
  12872. 1
  12873. 1
  12874. 1
  12875. 1
  12876. 1
  12877. 1
  12878. 1
  12879. 1
  12880. 1
  12881. 1
  12882. 1
  12883. 1
  12884. 1
  12885. 1
  12886. 1
  12887. 1
  12888. 1
  12889. 1
  12890. 1
  12891. 1
  12892. 1
  12893. 1
  12894. 1
  12895. 1
  12896. 1
  12897. 1
  12898. 1
  12899. 1
  12900. 1
  12901. 1
  12902. 1
  12903. 1
  12904. 1
  12905. 1
  12906. 1
  12907. 1
  12908. 1
  12909. 1
  12910. 1
  12911. 1
  12912. 1
  12913. 1
  12914.  Tommy Thompson  No... That's why DJ is racist. Trump is racist because..... Trump’s real-estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African-Americans in the 1970s and gave preferential treatment to whites, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former hotel executive said Trump criticized a black accountant: “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks.” In 1989, Trump took out ads in New York newspapers urging the death penalty for five black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park; he argued they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than 10 years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said: “I think sometimes a black may think they don’t have an advantage or this and that. I’ve said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage.” He began his 2016 presidential campaign with a speech disparaging Mexican immigrants as criminals and “rapists.” He uses the gang MS-13 to disparage all immigrants. Among many other statements, he has suggested that Obama’s protection of the Dreamers — otherwise law-abiding immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children — contributed to the spread of MS-13. In December 2015, Trump called fora “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” including refusing to readmit Muslim-American citizens who were outside of the country at the time. Trump said a federal judge hearing a case about Trump University was biased because of the judge’s Mexican heritage. In June 2017, Trump said 15,000 recent immigrants from Haiti “all have AIDS” and that 40,000 Nigerians, once seeing the United States, would never “go back to their huts” in Africa. At the White House on Jan. 11, Trump vulgarly called for less immigration from Haiti and Africa and more from Norway. He spent years suggesting that the nation’s first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya, a lie that Trump still has not acknowledged as such. Trump called Obama (who was editor in chief of the Harvard Law Review) “a terrible student, terrible.” Trump frequently claimed that Obama did not work hard as president. Trump falsely claimed that President Obama “issued a statement for Kwanzaa but failed to issue one for Christmas.” He often casts heavily black American cities as dystopian war zones. In a 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump said, “Our inner cities, African Americans, Hispanics are living in hell because it’s so dangerous. You walk down the street, you get shot.” Trump also said to black voters: “You’re living in poverty; your schools are no good; you have no jobs.” He frequently offers false crime statistics to exaggerate urban crime, including about Oakland, Philadelphia and Ferguson, Mo. He is quick to highlight crimes committed by dark-skinned people, sometimes exaggerating or lyingabout them (such as a claim about growing crime from “radical Islamic terror” in Britain). He is very slow to decry hate crimes committed by whites against dark-skinned people (such as the killing of an Indian man in Kansas last year). He frequently criticizes prominent African-Americans for being unpatriotic, ungrateful and disrespectful. He called Puerto Ricans who criticized his administration’s response to Hurricane Maria “politically motivated ingrates.” He has retweeted white nationalistswithout apology. He called some of those who marched alongside white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va., last August “very fine people.” After David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, endorsed him, Trump was reluctant to disavow Duke even when asked directly on television. Trump hired Steve Bannon as his campaign head and later White House chief strategist. Under Bannon’s leadership, the website Breitbart made white nationalism a central theme. It featured a section, for example, on “black crime.” Trump endorsed and campaigned for Roy Moore, the Alabama Senate candidate who spoke positively about slavery and who called for an African-American Muslim member of Congress not to be seated because of his religion. Trump pardoned – and fulsomely praises – Joe Arpaio, the Arizona sheriff sanctioned for racially profiling Latinos and for keeping immigrants in brutal prison conditions. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the “Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well documented.” At the time, he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. “I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations.” In a November 2017 meeting with Navajo veterans of World War II, Trump mocked Senator Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas.” Trump has trafficked in anti-Semitic caricatures, including the tweeting of a six-pointed star alongside a pile of cash. He has also been reluctant to condemn anti-Semitic attacks on journalists from his supporters, and he echoed neo-Nazi conspiracy theories by saying that Hillary Clinton “meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.” In a White House meeting with a Korean-American intelligence analyst briefing him on Pakistan, Trump wondered aloud why she was not working on North Korea policy. Trump once referred to a Hispanic Miss Universe as “Miss Housekeeping.” At a June 2016 campaign rally, Trump pointed to one attendee and said: “Oh, look at my African-American over here. Look at him.”
    1
  12915. 1
  12916. 1
  12917. 1
  12918. 1
  12919. 1
  12920. 1
  12921. 1
  12922. 1
  12923. 1
  12924. 1
  12925. 1
  12926. 1
  12927. 1
  12928. 1
  12929. 1
  12930. 1
  12931.  Tommy Thompson  Trump is racist because..... Trump’s real-estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African-Americans in the 1970s and gave preferential treatment to whites, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former hotel executive said Trump criticized a black accountant: “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks.” In 1989, Trump took out ads in New York newspapers urging the death penalty for five black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park; he argued they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than 10 years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said: “I think sometimes a black may think they don’t have an advantage or this and that. I’ve said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage.” He began his 2016 presidential campaign with a speech disparaging Mexican immigrants as criminals and “rapists.” He uses the gang MS-13 to disparage all immigrants. Among many other statements, he has suggested that Obama’s protection of the Dreamers — otherwise law-abiding immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children — contributed to the spread of MS-13. In December 2015, Trump called fora “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” including refusing to readmit Muslim-American citizens who were outside of the country at the time. Trump said a federal judge hearing a case about Trump University was biased because of the judge’s Mexican heritage. In June 2017, Trump said 15,000 recent immigrants from Haiti “all have AIDS” and that 40,000 Nigerians, once seeing the United States, would never “go back to their huts” in Africa. At the White House on Jan. 11, Trump vulgarly called for less immigration from Haiti and Africa and more from Norway. He spent years suggesting that the nation’s first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya, a lie that Trump still has not acknowledged as such. Trump called Obama (who was editor in chief of the Harvard Law Review) “a terrible student, terrible.” Trump frequently claimed that Obama did not work hard as president. Trump falsely claimed that President Obama “issued a statement for Kwanzaa but failed to issue one for Christmas.” He often casts heavily black American cities as dystopian war zones. In a 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump said, “Our inner cities, African Americans, Hispanics are living in hell because it’s so dangerous. You walk down the street, you get shot.” Trump also said to black voters: “You’re living in poverty; your schools are no good; you have no jobs.” He frequently offers false crime statistics to exaggerate urban crime, including about Oakland, Philadelphia and Ferguson, Mo. He is quick to highlight crimes committed by dark-skinned people, sometimes exaggerating or lyingabout them (such as a claim about growing crime from “radical Islamic terror” in Britain). He is very slow to decry hate crimes committed by whites against dark-skinned people (such as the killing of an Indian man in Kansas last year). He frequently criticizes prominent African-Americans for being unpatriotic, ungrateful and disrespectful. He called Puerto Ricans who criticized his administration’s response to Hurricane Maria “politically motivated ingrates.” He has retweeted white nationalistswithout apology. He called some of those who marched alongside white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va., last August “very fine people.” After David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, endorsed him, Trump was reluctant to disavow Duke even when asked directly on television. Trump hired Steve Bannon as his campaign head and later White House chief strategist. Under Bannon’s leadership, the website Breitbart made white nationalism a central theme. It featured a section, for example, on “black crime.” Trump endorsed and campaigned for Roy Moore, the Alabama Senate candidate who spoke positively about slavery and who called for an African-American Muslim member of Congress not to be seated because of his religion. Trump pardoned – and fulsomely praises – Joe Arpaio, the Arizona sheriff sanctioned for racially profiling Latinos and for keeping immigrants in brutal prison conditions. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the “Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well documented.” At the time, he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. “I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations.” In a November 2017 meeting with Navajo veterans of World War II, Trump mocked Senator Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas.” Trump has trafficked in anti-Semitic caricatures, including the tweeting of a six-pointed star alongside a pile of cash. He has also been reluctant to condemn anti-Semitic attacks on journalists from his supporters, and he echoed neo-Nazi conspiracy theories by saying that Hillary Clinton “meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.” In a White House meeting with a Korean-American intelligence analyst briefing him on Pakistan, Trump wondered aloud why she was not working on North Korea policy. Trump once referred to a Hispanic Miss Universe as “Miss Housekeeping.” At a June 2016 campaign rally, Trump pointed to one attendee and said: “Oh, look at my African-American over here. Look at him.”
    1
  12932. 1
  12933. 1
  12934. 1
  12935. 1
  12936. 1
  12937.  Tommy Thompson  Third time posting it. Let's see what your excuse is this time. Trump is racist because..... Trump’s real-estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African-Americans in the 1970s and gave preferential treatment to whites, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former hotel executive said Trump criticized a black accountant: “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks.” In 1989, Trump took out ads in New York newspapers urging the death penalty for five black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park; he argued they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than 10 years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said: “I think sometimes a black may think they don’t have an advantage or this and that. I’ve said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage.” He began his 2016 presidential campaign with a speech disparaging Mexican immigrants as criminals and “rapists.” He uses the gang MS-13 to disparage all immigrants. Among many other statements, he has suggested that Obama’s protection of the Dreamers — otherwise law-abiding immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children — contributed to the spread of MS-13. In December 2015, Trump called fora “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” including refusing to readmit Muslim-American citizens who were outside of the country at the time. Trump said a federal judge hearing a case about Trump University was biased because of the judge’s Mexican heritage. In June 2017, Trump said 15,000 recent immigrants from Haiti “all have AIDS” and that 40,000 Nigerians, once seeing the United States, would never “go back to their huts” in Africa. At the White House on Jan. 11, Trump vulgarly called for less immigration from Haiti and Africa and more from Norway. He spent years suggesting that the nation’s first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya, a lie that Trump still has not acknowledged as such. Trump called Obama (who was editor in chief of the Harvard Law Review) “a terrible student, terrible.” Trump frequently claimed that Obama did not work hard as president. Trump falsely claimed that President Obama “issued a statement for Kwanzaa but failed to issue one for Christmas.” He often casts heavily black American cities as dystopian war zones. In a 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump said, “Our inner cities, African Americans, Hispanics are living in hell because it’s so dangerous. You walk down the street, you get shot.” Trump also said to black voters: “You’re living in poverty; your schools are no good; you have no jobs.” He frequently offers false crime statistics to exaggerate urban crime, including about Oakland, Philadelphia and Ferguson, Mo. He is quick to highlight crimes committed by dark-skinned people, sometimes exaggerating or lyingabout them (such as a claim about growing crime from “radical Islamic terror” in Britain). He is very slow to decry hate crimes committed by whites against dark-skinned people (such as the killing of an Indian man in Kansas last year). He frequently criticizes prominent African-Americans for being unpatriotic, ungrateful and disrespectful. He called Puerto Ricans who criticized his administration’s response to Hurricane Maria “politically motivated ingrates.” He has retweeted white nationalistswithout apology. He called some of those who marched alongside white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va., last August “very fine people.” After David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, endorsed him, Trump was reluctant to disavow Duke even when asked directly on television. Trump hired Steve Bannon as his campaign head and later White House chief strategist. Under Bannon’s leadership, the website Breitbart made white nationalism a central theme. It featured a section, for example, on “black crime.” Trump endorsed and campaigned for Roy Moore, the Alabama Senate candidate who spoke positively about slavery and who called for an African-American Muslim member of Congress not to be seated because of his religion. Trump pardoned – and fulsomely praises – Joe Arpaio, the Arizona sheriff sanctioned for racially profiling Latinos and for keeping immigrants in brutal prison conditions. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the “Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well documented.” At the time, he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. “I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations.” In a November 2017 meeting with Navajo veterans of World War II, Trump mocked Senator Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas.” Trump has trafficked in anti-Semitic caricatures, including the tweeting of a six-pointed star alongside a pile of cash. He has also been reluctant to condemn anti-Semitic attacks on journalists from his supporters, and he echoed neo-Nazi conspiracy theories by saying that Hillary Clinton “meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.” In a White House meeting with a Korean-American intelligence analyst briefing him on Pakistan, Trump wondered aloud why she was not working on North Korea policy. Trump once referred to a Hispanic Miss Universe as “Miss Housekeeping.” At a June 2016 campaign rally, Trump pointed to one attendee and said: “Oh, look at my African-American over here. Look at him.”
    1
  12938. 1
  12939. 1
  12940. 1
  12941. 1
  12942. 1
  12943. 1
  12944. 1
  12945. 1
  12946. 1
  12947. 1
  12948. 1
  12949. 1
  12950. 1
  12951. 1
  12952. 1
  12953. 1
  12954. 1
  12955. 1
  12956. 1
  12957. 1
  12958. 1
  12959. 1
  12960. 1
  12961. 1
  12962. 1
  12963. 1
  12964. 1
  12965. 1
  12966. 1
  12967. 1
  12968. 1
  12969. 1
  12970. 1
  12971. 1
  12972. 1
  12973. 1
  12974. 1
  12975. 1
  12976. 1
  12977. 1
  12978. 1
  12979. 1
  12980. 1
  12981. 1
  12982. 1
  12983. 1
  12984. 1
  12985. 1
  12986. 1
  12987. 1
  12988. 1
  12989. 1
  12990. 1
  12991. 1
  12992. 1
  12993. 1
  12994. 1
  12995. 1
  12996. 1
  12997. 1
  12998. 1
  12999. 1
  13000. 1
  13001. 1
  13002. 1
  13003. 1
  13004. 1
  13005. 1
  13006. 1
  13007. 1
  13008. 1
  13009. 1
  13010. 1
  13011. 1
  13012. 1
  13013. 1
  13014. 1
  13015. 1
  13016. 1
  13017. 1
  13018. 1
  13019. 1
  13020. 1
  13021. 1
  13022. 1
  13023. 1
  13024. 1
  13025. 1
  13026. 1
  13027. 1
  13028. 1
  13029. 1
  13030. 1
  13031. 1
  13032. 1
  13033. 1
  13034. 1
  13035. 1
  13036. 1
  13037. 1
  13038. 1
  13039. 1
  13040. 1
  13041. 1
  13042. 1
  13043. 1
  13044. 1
  13045. 1
  13046. 1
  13047. 1
  13048. 1
  13049. 1
  13050. 1
  13051. 1
  13052. 1
  13053. 1
  13054. 1
  13055. 1
  13056. 1
  13057. 1
  13058. 1
  13059. 1
  13060. 1
  13061. 1
  13062. 1
  13063. 1
  13064. 1
  13065. 1
  13066. 1
  13067. 1
  13068. 1
  13069. 1
  13070. 1
  13071. 1
  13072. 1
  13073. 1
  13074. 1
  13075. 1
  13076. 1
  13077. 1
  13078. 1
  13079. 1
  13080. 1
  13081. 1
  13082. 1
  13083. 1
  13084. 1
  13085. 1
  13086. 1
  13087. 1
  13088. 1
  13089. 1
  13090. 1
  13091. 1
  13092. 1
  13093. 1
  13094. 1
  13095. 1
  13096. 1
  13097. 1
  13098. 1
  13099. 1
  13100. 1
  13101. 1
  13102. 1
  13103. 1
  13104. 1
  13105. 1
  13106. 1
  13107. 1
  13108. 1
  13109. 1
  13110. 1
  13111. 1
  13112. 1
  13113. 1
  13114. 1
  13115. 1
  13116. 1
  13117. 1
  13118. 1
  13119. 1
  13120. 1
  13121. 1
  13122. 1
  13123. 1
  13124. 1
  13125. 1
  13126. 1
  13127. 1
  13128. 1
  13129. 1
  13130. 1
  13131. 1
  13132. 1
  13133. 1
  13134. 1
  13135. 1
  13136. 1
  13137. 1
  13138. 1
  13139. 1
  13140. 1
  13141. 1
  13142. 1
  13143. 1
  13144. 1
  13145. 1
  13146. 1
  13147. 1
  13148. 1
  13149. 1
  13150. 1
  13151. 1
  13152. 1
  13153. 1
  13154. 1
  13155. 1
  13156. 1
  13157. 1
  13158. 1
  13159. 1
  13160. 1
  13161. 1
  13162. 1
  13163. 1
  13164. 1
  13165. 1
  13166. 1
  13167. 1
  13168. 1
  13169. 1
  13170. 1
  13171. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about this guy. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  13172. 1
  13173. 1
  13174. 1
  13175. 1
  13176. 1
  13177. 1
  13178. 1
  13179. 1
  13180. 1
  13181. 1
  13182. 1
  13183. 1
  13184. 1
  13185. 1
  13186. 1
  13187. 1
  13188. 1
  13189. 1
  13190. 1
  13191. 1
  13192. 1
  13193. 1
  13194. 1
  13195. 1
  13196. 1
  13197. 1
  13198. 1
  13199. 1
  13200. 1
  13201. 1
  13202. 1
  13203. 1
  13204. 1
  13205. 1
  13206. 1
  13207. 1
  13208. 1
  13209. 1
  13210. 1
  13211. 1
  13212. 1
  13213. 1
  13214. 1
  13215.  @americachillout9386  But I'm going to take the opportunity to point out all the questions you are running from like the pussy you where calling everyone else in your original false equivalency. 😁 You claimed that the flu had a higher death rate then Covid 19 because you can't do math. The flu killed 43,200 people in the WORLD last year. Covid 19 has killed 90,000 in JUST AMERICA in under 5 months. You tried to compare the people staying home during the pandemic with the Americans fighting the Nazis. When your equivalency was shattered by me pointing out the people who are actually staying home and listening to the experts on how to fight this pandemic would be the ones that are actually fighting and that the people who are thinking they are smarter than everybody I'm trying to excuse their lack of sight and cowardice by going out and disregarding the experts are the ones that are basically the traitors to their country in your analogy. ... Also being something you keep ignoring and running from. You then try to compare a virus to a disease like cancer. Thinking that the coronavirus could have a cure instead of a vaccine. Clearly showing that you don't know the difference between those. Oh! The part where you where ignoring my question of WHY the Germans had to sign the treaty... And trying to change that to WHAT they did... Because if you said the reason WHY you would have to admit my point about ww1 and the Germans lose in it, was, in part, responsible for the formation and rise of the Nazi party. Then claiming that I was the one ignoring things or being dumb and confused. 😂 Making your ego, yet again, your greatest down fall. 😂 Oh! And lets not forget your theory on the "flattened" curve! That I actually gave you up to date evidence against and your response was basically... Nuah! 😂 And that is not even counting the number of questions you just flat out, had to ignore before finally trying to save face and run away like a big pussy! Good times! 😂
    1
  13216. 1
  13217. 1
  13218. 1
  13219. 1
  13220. 1
  13221. 1
  13222. 1
  13223. 1
  13224. 1
  13225. 1
  13226. 1
  13227. 1
  13228. 1
  13229. 1
  13230. 1
  13231. 1
  13232. 1
  13233. 1
  13234. 1
  13235. 1
  13236. 1
  13237. 1
  13238. 1
  13239. 1
  13240. 1
  13241. 1
  13242. 1
  13243. 1
  13244. 1
  13245. 1
  13246. 1
  13247. 1
  13248. 1
  13249. 1
  13250. 1
  13251. 1
  13252. 1
  13253. 1
  13254. 1
  13255. 1
  13256. 1
  13257. 1
  13258. 1
  13259. 1
  13260. 1
  13261. 1
  13262. 1
  13263. 1
  13264. 1
  13265. 1
  13266. 1
  13267. 1
  13268. 1
  13269. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about Waterborne Camper / D R. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  13270. 1
  13271. 1
  13272. 1
  13273. 1
  13274. 1
  13275. 1
  13276. 1
  13277. 1
  13278. 1
  13279. 1
  13280. 1
  13281. 1
  13282. 1
  13283.  @904_Florida   @Luftwaffe Offizier  I quoted you... The one where you said it was "rare". It's not, comparatively to the amount it should be, considering the diversity ratio of ethnicity.... But on the bright side.. I'm glad we agree on some of it and in some ways, I read you wrong. However jobs and qualifications absolutely have to do with race. If not directly, then slightly indirectly. On average, African Americans get paid almost as little as women when it comes to the dollar. Historically low wages for different Sexes and ethnicity groups leads to less education opportunities for generations to come. Half the country lives paycheck-to-paycheck and a huge hunk of that is women and minorities. Poverty is a cycle. Well I never really agreed with minority quotas oh, I didn't understand the thought process behind it. At several points since African Americans got the right to vote, enough politicians and lawmakers deemed it a necessity to pass laws and regulations that insisted on people hiring women and minorities. That's how much they weren't doing that. You can look at Congress or even the presidency. The only two presidents we've ever had that we're not old white men were President Kennedy and President Obama. Meaning what isn't directly correlated to systemic racism in the hiring process as is simply One Step removed from it. Due to lack of resources for better education. What exactly is malicious intent to you? Because if you're describing what I think you're describing , you think malicious intent is walking away from the police to get into your car... Where Your Children Are and leave the Hostile situation... at which point a cop decides to shoot you in the back 7 times about a foot away from your kids... also, this isn't the wild West. We do not authorize police officers to use deadly force unless absolutely necessary. People in a free Society find that the Protectors of that Society just generally deciding when they get to execute people without a trial, is a bad thing. You making the excuse that somebody else is acting a certain way so it's cool for you to isn't good either. When We Were Young our mothers were supposed to teach us that two wrongs don't make a right.
    1
  13284.  @904_Florida  Yeah... So... Not sense about Junior High have I ever had an issue with expressing what was exactly on my mind. In fact some would say I have the opposite of that issue. If I thought you were an evil f***, I would have said... hey.... you're an evil f***! The words you chose Echo that of a very recent case we probably both know about of a man being paralyzed. Which is why I didn't assume but I said it sounded like that's what you were speaking about. Which is what prompted me to ask you what malicious intent was according to you. I should mention both my parents where military police. My mom went on to work for our local police force and I have a mixed race child... so while I do believe systemic racism is a very real thing in America, I also know that there are good police officers and they are the many and not the few. I grew up around them. One of whom died in front of my mother, when he entered a home, attempting to talk down a suicidal man with a gun. The man shot him (His name was Trey) and then killed himself. As far as I'm concerned those that would do the horrible things we've seen them do to African Americans are not police officers. They just happen to carry the badge. Those that go out and try and help the community and save lives everyday while putting their own at risk, like Trey, damn are police officers and they deserve just as much respect as weekend every military veteran. They are why it is so important for us to get those people who aren't them off the force and behind bars. Because the good cops are now getting punished for the actions of the bad and that is so unbelievably wrong. I don't care if they are friend or foe... Like minded or not.... You know how many fights I got into as a kid because some stupid kid was saying things like how they hope every cop gets KIAed... Me and my brother, both. But when you put police officers above the laws that they are supposed to inform us, that's when corruption happens. I mean, I could care less if it gets them out of a traffic ticket every once in awhile but murder...
    1
  13285. 1
  13286. 1
  13287. 1
  13288. 1
  13289. 1
  13290. 1
  13291. 1
  13292. 1
  13293. 1
  13294. 1
  13295. 1
  13296. 1
  13297. 1
  13298. 1
  13299. 1
  13300. 1
  13301. 1
  13302. 1
  13303. 1
  13304. 1
  13305. 1
  13306. 1
  13307. 1
  13308. 1
  13309. 1
  13310. 1
  13311. 1
  13312. 1
  13313. 1
  13314. 1
  13315. 1
  13316. 1
  13317. 1
  13318.  @degen83  Nope! Wrong again, Bob! You have not read the report, obviously. You continuing to be willfully ignorant of the report and the facts within it doesn't actually make them disapear. It just makes you look silly for thinking it would. You might as well be screaming Benghazi! The originator of the Mueller investigation was the FBI. It began with Papadopoulos shooting his mouth off to a foreign diplomat, and not, what is popularly believed to be, the Steele dossier. The Steele dossier could not have started the investigation because the FBI did not become aware of the existence of the dossier until 7 weeks after the investigation began. There were 23 indictments, 9 of which where high-ranking Trump campaign officials. Some took deals and some were found guilty. As far as the investigation goes into collusion, it would be incorrect to say that there was no evidence. There was not enough evidence to indict on collusion, which is actually conspiracy. .. But that has a lot to do with the second part of the investigation, on obstruction of justice, which they had plenty of evidence to indict. 10 counts actually. Which is why I find it particularly ironic that you said the Dems are "above the law". So unless you can provide some evidence to the contrary, you have no way of qualifying the statments that you have made. As for Hillary... She was shady then, is shady now and will be shady tomorrow. Hopefully, one day, justice will seek her out and win. I have no problem recognising corruption, irregardless of whether there is an A or a R before their name. That's called being objective. I don't care what party you're from, you earn my loyalty and my respect or you don't. Its that simple.
    1
  13319. 1
  13320. 1
  13321. 1
  13322. 1
  13323. 1
  13324. 1
  13325. 1
  13326. 1
  13327.  @degen83  Lying it is then. I gave you a chance to take it back. Now... This is just a little snipit of Volume 1. Which described the conspiracy. Yet still enough to prove you the one lying here. Though I can give LOTS MORE! 😉✌ So... Page 9 of the cloud doc and page 1 of Volume 1 " in Late July 2016 soon after Wikileaks first release of stolen documents a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. 👉Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of the foreign governments at the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.👈 That information prompted the FBI on July 31st 2016 to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump campaign we're coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities." " second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer intrusion operations against entities employees and volunteers working on the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. 👉The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.👈" Page 13 of the cloud doc and page 5 of the report... " the presidential campaign of Donald J Trump showed interest in Wikileaks release of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton." " the social media campaign and DJ are you hacking operation coincided West a series of contacts between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government." " some of the earliest contacts were made in connection with the Trump organization real estate project and Russia Known As Trump Tower Moscow. Candidate Trump signed a letter of interest for Trump Tower Moscow by November 2015, and in January 2016 Trump organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dmitry peskov. The Trump organization Pursuit the project through at least June 2016 including by considering travel to Russia by Cohen and candidate Trump." " campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos made early contact through a london-based professor who had connections with Russia and traveled to Moscow in April of 2016. Immediately upon his return to London from that trip, he told Papadopoulos that the Russian government had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later in the first week of May 2016 Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton"
    1
  13328.  @degen83  As for obstruction... Here are some more snip its for that. 😁 Page 250 of the cloud doc and page 1 of volume 2 " beginning in 2017 the president of the United States took a variety of actions towards the ongoing FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters that raised questions about whether he had obstructed Justice." Attempting to set up a falsified paper trail. " later that afternoon the president cleared the Oval Office and had a one-on-one meeting with Comey. Referring to the FBI's investigation of Flynn the president said, I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go. 👉Shortly after requesting Flynn's resignation and speaking privately to Coney the president's sught to have Deputy National Security advisor KT McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the president have not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with kislyak. McFarland declined because she did not know whether that was true and a White House counsel's Office attorney thought that the request would look like a quid pro quo for an ambassadorship she had been offered.👈" "In early March the president told White House counsel Don mcgahn to stop sessions from recusing. And after sessions announced that he was work using on March 2nd the president expressed anger at the decision and told advisers that he should have an attorney general that would protect him. That weakened the president took sessions aside at an event and urged him to Unruh cues. Later and March Comey publicly disclosed at a congressional hearing that the FBI was investigating the Russian government efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election." " on June 14th 2017 the media reported that special counsel's office was investigating whether the president had obstructed Justice. The press reports call this a major turning point in the investigation. While Comey had told the president he was not under investigation, following companies firing, the president now was under investigation. The president reacted to this news with a series of tweets criticizing the Department of Justice and the special counsel's investigation." WAIT FOR IT! " on June 17th 2017 the president called Magan at home and directed him to call the acting attorney general and say that the special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. Mcgahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday night Massacre."
    1
  13329. 1
  13330. 1
  13331.  @degen83  Now... This is just a little snipit of Volume 1. Which described the conspiracy. Yet still enough to prove you the one lying here. Though I can give LOTS MORE! 😉✌ So... Page 9 of the cloud doc and page 1 of Volume 1 " in Late July 2016 soon after Wikileaks first release of stolen documents a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. 👉Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of the foreign governments at the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.👈 That information prompted the FBI on July 31st 2016 to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump campaign we're coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities." " second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer intrusion operations against entities employees and volunteers working on the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. 👉The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.👈" Page 13 of the cloud doc and page 5 of the report... " the presidential campaign of Donald J Trump showed interest in Wikileaks release of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton." " the social media campaign and DJ are you hacking operation coincided West a series of contacts between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government." " some of the earliest contacts were made in connection with the Trump organization real estate project and Russia Known As Trump Tower Moscow. Candidate Trump signed a letter of interest for Trump Tower Moscow by November 2015, and in January 2016 Trump organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dmitry peskov. The Trump organization Pursuit the project through at least June 2016 including by considering travel to Russia by Cohen and candidate Trump." " campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos made early contact through a london-based professor who had connections with Russia and traveled to Moscow in April of 2016. Immediately upon his return to London from that trip, he told Papadopoulos that the Russian government had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later in the first week of May 2016 Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton"
    1
  13332. 1
  13333. 1
  13334.  @degen83  Nope! Your the one lying. I'm the one providing actual proof. Your just saying a bunch of lies... Trying to pass it off as truth. Though.. You could provide your own proof? Something that contradicts what I have given you direct from the Mueller Report, you keep trying to lie about? Now... This is just a little snipit of Volume 1. Which described the conspiracy. Yet still enough to prove you the one lying here. Though I can give LOTS MORE! 😉✌ So... Page 9 of the cloud doc and page 1 of Volume 1 " in Late July 2016 soon after Wikileaks first release of stolen documents a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. 👉Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of the foreign governments at the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.👈 That information prompted the FBI on July 31st 2016 to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump campaign we're coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities." " second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer intrusion operations against entities employees and volunteers working on the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. 👉The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.👈" Page 13 of the cloud doc and page 5 of the report... " the presidential campaign of Donald J Trump showed interest in Wikileaks release of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton." " the social media campaign and DJ are you hacking operation coincided West a series of contacts between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government." " some of the earliest contacts were made in connection with the Trump organization real estate project and Russia Known As Trump Tower Moscow. Candidate Trump signed a letter of interest for Trump Tower Moscow by November 2015, and in January 2016 Trump organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dmitry peskov. The Trump organization Pursuit the project through at least June 2016 including by considering travel to Russia by Cohen and candidate Trump." " campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos made early contact through a london-based professor who had connections with Russia and traveled to Moscow in April of 2016. Immediately upon his return to London from that trip, he told Papadopoulos that the Russian government had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later in the first week of May 2016 Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton" As for obstruction... Here are some more snip its for that. 😁 Page 250 of the cloud doc and page 1 of volume 2 " beginning in 2017 the president of the United States took a variety of actions towards the ongoing FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters that raised questions about whether he had obstructed Justice." Attempting to set up a falsified paper trail. " later that afternoon the president cleared the Oval Office and had a one-on-one meeting with Comey. Referring to the FBI's investigation of Flynn the president said, I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go. 👉Shortly after requesting Flynn's resignation and speaking privately to Coney the president's sught to have Deputy National Security advisor KT McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the president have not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with kislyak. McFarland declined because she did not know whether that was true and a White House counsel's Office attorney thought that the request would look like a quid pro quo for an ambassadorship she had been offered.👈" "In early March the president told White House counsel Don mcgahn to stop sessions from recusing. And after sessions announced that he was work using on March 2nd the president expressed anger at the decision and told advisers that he should have an attorney general that would protect him. That weakened the president took sessions aside at an event and urged him to Unruh cues. Later and March Comey publicly disclosed at a congressional hearing that the FBI was investigating the Russian government efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election." " on June 14th 2017 the media reported that special counsel's office was investigating whether the president had obstructed Justice. The press reports call this a major turning point in the investigation. While Comey had told the president he was not under investigation, following companies firing, the president now was under investigation. The president reacted to this news with a series of tweets criticizing the Department of Justice and the special counsel's investigation." WAIT FOR IT! " on June 17th 2017 the president called Magan at home and directed him to call the acting attorney general and say that the special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. Mcgahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday night Massacre."
    1
  13335. 1
  13336.  @degen83  Nope! Your the one lying. I'm the one providing actual proof. Your just saying a bunch of lies... Trying to pass it off as truth. Though.. You could provide your own proof? Something that contradicts what I have given you direct from the Mueller Report, you keep trying to lie about? Now... This is just a little snipit of Volume 1. Which described the conspiracy. Yet still enough to prove you the one lying here. Though I can give LOTS MORE! 😉✌ So... Page 9 of the cloud doc and page 1 of Volume 1 " in Late July 2016 soon after Wikileaks first release of stolen documents a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. 👉Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of the foreign governments at the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.👈 That information prompted the FBI on July 31st 2016 to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump campaign we're coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities." " second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer intrusion operations against entities employees and volunteers working on the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. 👉The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.👈" Page 13 of the cloud doc and page 5 of the report... " the presidential campaign of Donald J Trump showed interest in Wikileaks release of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton." " the social media campaign and DJ are you hacking operation coincided West a series of contacts between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government." " some of the earliest contacts were made in connection with the Trump organization real estate project and Russia Known As Trump Tower Moscow. Candidate Trump signed a letter of interest for Trump Tower Moscow by November 2015, and in January 2016 Trump organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dmitry peskov. The Trump organization Pursuit the project through at least June 2016 including by considering travel to Russia by Cohen and candidate Trump." " campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos made early contact through a london-based professor who had connections with Russia and traveled to Moscow in April of 2016. Immediately upon his return to London from that trip, he told Papadopoulos that the Russian government had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later in the first week of May 2016 Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton" As for obstruction... Here are some more snip its for that. 😁 Page 250 of the cloud doc and page 1 of volume 2 " beginning in 2017 the president of the United States took a variety of actions towards the ongoing FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters that raised questions about whether he had obstructed Justice." Attempting to set up a falsified paper trail. " later that afternoon the president cleared the Oval Office and had a one-on-one meeting with Comey. Referring to the FBI's investigation of Flynn the president said, I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go. 👉Shortly after requesting Flynn's resignation and speaking privately to Coney the president's sught to have Deputy National Security advisor KT McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the president have not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with kislyak. McFarland declined because she did not know whether that was true and a White House counsel's Office attorney thought that the request would look like a quid pro quo for an ambassadorship she had been offered.👈" "In early March the president told White House counsel Don mcgahn to stop sessions from recusing. And after sessions announced that he was work using on March 2nd the president expressed anger at the decision and told advisers that he should have an attorney general that would protect him. That weakened the president took sessions aside at an event and urged him to Unruh cues. Later and March Comey publicly disclosed at a congressional hearing that the FBI was investigating the Russian government efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election." " on June 14th 2017 the media reported that special counsel's office was investigating whether the president had obstructed Justice. The press reports call this a major turning point in the investigation. While Comey had told the president he was not under investigation, following companies firing, the president now was under investigation. The president reacted to this news with a series of tweets criticizing the Department of Justice and the special counsel's investigation." WAIT FOR IT! " on June 17th 2017 the president called Magan at home and directed him to call the acting attorney general and say that the special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. Mcgahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday night Massacre." and let me make it easy for you... Here! The Mueller Report! Once again! 😉✌ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html
    1
  13337. 1
  13338. 1
  13339. 1
  13340.  @degen83  Nope! Your the one lying. I'm the one providing actual proof. Your just saying a bunch of lies... Trying to pass it off as truth. Though.. You could provide your own proof? Something that contradicts what I have given you direct from the Mueller Report, you keep trying to lie about? Now... This is just a little snipit of Volume 1. Which described the conspiracy. Yet still enough to prove you the one lying here. Though I can give LOTS MORE! 😉✌ So... Page 9 of the cloud doc and page 1 of Volume 1 " in Late July 2016 soon after Wikileaks first release of stolen documents a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. 👉Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of the foreign governments at the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.👈 That information prompted the FBI on July 31st 2016 to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump campaign we're coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities." " second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer intrusion operations against entities employees and volunteers working on the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. 👉The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.👈" Page 13 of the cloud doc and page 5 of the report... " the presidential campaign of Donald J Trump showed interest in Wikileaks release of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton." " the social media campaign and DJ are you hacking operation coincided West a series of contacts between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government." " some of the earliest contacts were made in connection with the Trump organization real estate project and Russia Known As Trump Tower Moscow. Candidate Trump signed a letter of interest for Trump Tower Moscow by November 2015, and in January 2016 Trump organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dmitry peskov. The Trump organization Pursuit the project through at least June 2016 including by considering travel to Russia by Cohen and candidate Trump." " campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos made early contact through a london-based professor who had connections with Russia and traveled to Moscow in April of 2016. Immediately upon his return to London from that trip, he told Papadopoulos that the Russian government had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later in the first week of May 2016 Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton" As for obstruction... Here are some more snip its for that. 😁 Page 250 of the cloud doc and page 1 of volume 2 " beginning in 2017 the president of the United States took a variety of actions towards the ongoing FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters that raised questions about whether he had obstructed Justice." Attempting to set up a falsified paper trail. " later that afternoon the president cleared the Oval Office and had a one-on-one meeting with Comey. Referring to the FBI's investigation of Flynn the president said, I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go. 👉Shortly after requesting Flynn's resignation and speaking privately to Coney the president's sught to have Deputy National Security advisor KT McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the president have not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with kislyak. McFarland declined because she did not know whether that was true and a White House counsel's Office attorney thought that the request would look like a quid pro quo for an ambassadorship she had been offered.👈" "In early March the president told White House counsel Don mcgahn to stop sessions from recusing. And after sessions announced that he was work using on March 2nd the president expressed anger at the decision and told advisers that he should have an attorney general that would protect him. That weakened the president took sessions aside at an event and urged him to Unruh cues. Later and March Comey publicly disclosed at a congressional hearing that the FBI was investigating the Russian government efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election." " on June 14th 2017 the media reported that special counsel's office was investigating whether the president had obstructed Justice. The press reports call this a major turning point in the investigation. While Comey had told the president he was not under investigation, following companies firing, the president now was under investigation. The president reacted to this news with a series of tweets criticizing the Department of Justice and the special counsel's investigation." WAIT FOR IT! " on June 17th 2017 the president called Magan at home and directed him to call the acting attorney general and say that the special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. Mcgahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday night Massacre." and let me make it easy for you... Here! The Mueller Report! Once again! 😉✌ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html
    1
  13341. 1
  13342. 1
  13343. 1
  13344. 1
  13345. 1
  13346. 1
  13347. 1
  13348. 1
  13349. 1
  13350. 1
  13351. 1
  13352. 1
  13353. 1
  13354. 1
  13355. 1
  13356. 1
  13357. 1
  13358. 1
  13359. 1
  13360. 1
  13361. 1
  13362. 1
  13363. 1
  13364. 1
  13365. 1
  13366. 1
  13367. 1
  13368. 1
  13369. 1
  13370. 1
  13371. 1
  13372. 1
  13373. 1
  13374. 1
  13375. 1
  13376. 1
  13377. 1
  13378. 1
  13379. 1
  13380. 1
  13381. 1
  13382. 1
  13383. 1
  13384. 1
  13385. 1
  13386. 1
  13387. 1
  13388. 1
  13389. 1
  13390. 1
  13391. 1
  13392. 1
  13393. 1
  13394. 1
  13395. 1
  13396. 1
  13397. 1
  13398. 1
  13399. 1
  13400. 1
  13401. 1
  13402. 1
  13403. 1
  13404. 1
  13405. 1
  13406. 1
  13407. 1
  13408. 1
  13409. 1
  13410. 1
  13411. 1
  13412. 1
  13413. 1
  13414. 1
  13415. 1
  13416. 1
  13417. 1
  13418. 1
  13419. 1
  13420. 1
  13421. 1
  13422. 1
  13423. 1
  13424. 1
  13425. 1
  13426. 1
  13427. 1
  13428. 1
  13429. 1
  13430. 1
  13431. 1
  13432. 1
  13433. 1
  13434. 1
  13435. 1
  13436. 1
  13437. 1
  13438. 1
  13439. 1
  13440. 1
  13441. 1
  13442. 1
  13443. 1
  13444. 1
  13445. 1
  13446. 1
  13447. 1
  13448. 1
  13449. 1
  13450. 1
  13451. 1
  13452. 1
  13453. 1
  13454. 1
  13455. 1
  13456. 1
  13457. 1
  13458. 1
  13459. 1
  13460. 1
  13461. 1
  13462.  stephen glover  First... Thank you for identifying yourself as a TRUMP TROLL. 😁 Second... No-one "think"s anything. That is what the polls have steadily tracked for almost a month now. A steady gain for Biden. Whether you want to live in reality or not is honestly no concern to us. Third... Fortune telling is not an argument . Sorry. Forth... You wanting to rewrite history and cherry pick facts, just makes you look silly and forever will. Especially when you guys try and pretend the whole second volume of the Muller report doesn't exist and the the Rep Senate didn't, yet again, do the complete opposite of what they had done before in an impeachment trial, when it was convenient for them. Rigging it for Trump. But when we look at all relevant facts about situations, the truth actually comes out instead of some crazy right-wing bias that you're trying to paint as accurate history. Fifth... You speak of evidence and produce none. Just you saying, "Nuah!" And trying to play fortune teller. Sorry. Your not magic. Sixth... Your fit about the Supreme court would ring more genuine if it was applied to all matters involving the Supreme court picks. It doesn't. You guys are just mad because you have been playing games and steeling seats for a hot min with the SC... But can't handle when it's done back to you. Like any childish bully. Don't start s***, won't be s***. Seventh... Your party and their representatives live on fear. They're coming over the border to rape you and kill you. Democrats are burning down our cities Their socialism is going to destroy our country and we have to stop them. Etc Basically, they don't agree with me, and since I'm so massively insecure, that must mean they're evil incarnate. 😂
    1
  13463. 1
  13464. 1
  13465. 1
  13466. 1
  13467. 1
  13468. 1
  13469. 1
  13470. 1
  13471. 1
  13472. 1
  13473. 1
  13474. 1
  13475. 1
  13476. 1
  13477. 1
  13478. 1
  13479. 1
  13480. 1
  13481. 1
  13482. 1
  13483. 1
  13484. 1
  13485. 1
  13486. 1
  13487. 1
  13488. 1
  13489. 1
  13490. 1
  13491. 1
  13492. 1
  13493. 1
  13494. 1
  13495. 1
  13496. 1
  13497. 1
  13498. 1
  13499. 1
  13500. 1
  13501. 1
  13502. 1
  13503.  @RM-ov8gk  SoOoOo... I'm not a never Trumpet! Meaning... It's not impossible for me to see him doing anything right. Yes... In my beliefs I run.. Lib/Pre/Dem but I do like seeing both sides. More points of view... More info... Means better decisions. Plus I'm a little too OCD / analytical to ignore a bunch of stuff... 😆 or... What my 8 year old son calls crazy mommy! 😆 knew I should of never taught him how to talk! 😉 So... I actually agree with him on some things. Now... Dude did bring in a whole lot of swamp monster's... And one I pay particular attention to was DeVos. Education secretary. You would too if you were living where I am and the schools that your child was going to was so under funded. So... this last year, she got it in her head that she was going to defund the special Olympics... Now... He hired her.. Yes... But I just don't see him engaged enough to know about that... And when he found out, he fixed it. Him and his staff where actually a big part in getting the Justice reform bill passed. It wasn't all we wanted... But it was enough and a good effort. Another one... Is konda give and take and didn't end up well... But I count it because he had a gpod point... he ended up pulling has strong man act with a country that wasn't going to fall for it but he gave have a very good point about China and intellectual property rights. Another is manufacturing jobs. Obama said they weren't coming back. Trump's Administration got them back. Or at least a good deal of them.
    1
  13504.  @RM-ov8gk  Now... To the bad... Well speaking of jobs... While he got those jobs back... We have him taking credit for Obama's job growth trend... Which he kept up throughout his whole 8 year term. When you look at the numbers, you can see a kernel of Truth in what they're trying to say about Trump. Being unemployment being solo has been a trend started back with Obama when he pulled us out of the Great Recession. It's been steadily going down since. It has continued to do so during Trump's term. It's slowed a little bit but it still dropping.... But when you look at the other job numbers, that's not so encouraging. His Job Growth numbers have been going down, sense he took office. He has instituted a nonsensical deregulation policy. Basically saying for every regulation added their needs to be to taken away. Except the ones that his administration are trying to take away are super important. Like in every field has taken a major hit free things like safety, education, the environment, Financial... Workers rights.. On and on. Like if you looked at some of the things they they are trying to deregulate. .... You will be concerned. The GDP... The thing you have to watch out for is people who want to talk aboout the GDP only and not GDP growth. This is what his administration is doing. GDP growth is what is more important. It is what shows the trends. Whether its rising... Falling... Holding steady... And how much on each. GDP is the number the GDP is at. GDP growth is how much it has gone up or down in a quarter. What the growth trend is and what that meams for the country. This is also something that helps predict financial trends. Trumps GDP growth is not good. The reason the number itself is okay, is a trend from back when Obama was in office. When Obama entered office it was -2.5% and we where in the great recession. With in 7 months he put the stimulus package in place and had gotten the GDP up to 3.9% Which meant the Growth was 6.4%. At the end of his last term it had leveled out to be 2.1%. Not a bad number.... Now another thing you need to know about the GDP is you don't want it going to high either.... That would almost assuredly cause a bubble. You really don't want it going above 5.0%. The GDP and not the growth. In Trump's first hear he got the GDP up to 2.2%. Which was only a GDP growth of 0.1%. His second year was a little better. So it stopped having the financial sector panic because the GDP went to 3.5%. Which was a GDP Growth of 1.3%. So it had everyone thinking it was just a slow starter.... But this years GDP Growth is expected to be -1.2%. Dropping the GDP to 2.3%. The up and down fluxuations to that extent are not a good sign for the economy. Then we go to the China Trade war thing. We fired the first shot... This is what I have mentioned before. He had a good point... But because he only knows one play... Strong man... This is what he always does. Except you don't play strong man with a country who is probably the best in the world at playing the long game. Which is how we get a trade war... And NO ONE WINS A TRADE WAR.... Especially not one that long. The countries in corporations that we sell our goods and services to we're not just going to wait around for both of our countries to get our s*** together. They needed what they needed. So what they did was go somewhere else for it. Most of that business isn't coming back and Trump's tactic of strongman just cost us billions of dollars. Sure... They got a little back from the deal that was finally made but it is dwarfed by what we lost. There is lots more but those are some good starters. But basiclly... He is on par.. With some... And very lacking on a lot. Its not exactly the shinning city on the hill they are trying to sell it as... When you look at the whole pic.... And that's not even getting into the crimes...
    1
  13505. 1
  13506. 1
  13507. 1
  13508. 1
  13509. 1
  13510. 1
  13511. 1
  13512. 1
  13513. 1
  13514. 1
  13515. 1
  13516. 1
  13517. 1
  13518. 1
  13519. 1
  13520. 1
  13521. 1
  13522. 1
  13523. 1
  13524. 1
  13525. 1
  13526. 1
  13527. 1
  13528. 1
  13529. 1
  13530. 1
  13531. 1
  13532. 1
  13533.  @ashanator1991 Oddly enough, you seamed to of made it and then sailed right past it! That's okay though. I quoted the whole thing for you, again, right here! 😜✌ "LMAO! You know what makes you guys so easy to shoot down? You contradict yourself from sentence 2 sentence, and don't even realize it.😁🤣😁 Paraphrased... HOW DARE YOU ASSUME I'M A REP!!!!.... Now be quiet you 🌈far leftist🦄! 😁😁😁 Which, I didn't, by the way. You should read closer. I said you were using far-right tropes. Because you're using far-right tropes. Reality is so hard for you guys to grasp, sometimes! But.... Ya know what... I got some time. Lets investigate your little theory about me. 😁😁😁 Now... Was your "different point of view" - that I " forgot to take" my "crazy pills for that anxiety" I was feeling? - Or was it that I needed "to visit" my "safe space so" I "can feel safe again"? - Or was it your attempt at getting into Hogwarts by magically predicting the future, by claiming "Trump" will win "a second term", and that Dems would have themselves "to blame for it"? - Or when you made vague and baseless assumptions, about a party filled with millions of people, that you don't even know, and have not provided any proof for, when you claimed that, " because your party's propaganda and lies they sold you over and over again." So which one of those little "nuggets of knowledge" where you were referring to, when you claimed that I Was only dismissing what you said because it was a different point of view than what I had? I'll be waiting... 😁😁😁"
    1
  13534. 1
  13535. 1
  13536. 1
  13537. 1
  13538. 1
  13539. 1
  13540. 1
  13541. 1
  13542. 1
  13543. 1
  13544. 1
  13545. 1
  13546. 1
  13547. 1
  13548. 1
  13549. 1
  13550. 1
  13551. 1
  13552. 1
  13553. 1
  13554. 1
  13555. 1
  13556. 1
  13557. 1
  13558. 1
  13559. 1
  13560. 1
  13561. 1
  13562. 1
  13563. 1
  13564. 1
  13565. 1
  13566. 1
  13567. 1
  13568. 1
  13569. 1
  13570. 1
  13571. 1
  13572. 1
  13573. 1
  13574. 1
  13575. 1
  13576. 1
  13577. 1
  13578. 1
  13579. 1
  13580. 1
  13581. 1
  13582. 1
  13583. 1
  13584. 1
  13585. 1
  13586. 1
  13587. 1
  13588. 1
  13589. 1
  13590. 1
  13591. 1
  13592. 1
  13593. 1
  13594. 1
  13595. 1
  13596. 1
  13597. 1
  13598. 1
  13599. 1
  13600. 1
  13601. 1
  13602. 1
  13603. 1
  13604. 1
  13605. 1
  13606. 1
  13607. 1
  13608. 1
  13609. 1
  13610. 1
  13611. 1
  13612. 1
  13613. 1
  13614. 1
  13615. 1
  13616. 1
  13617. 1
  13618. 1
  13619. 1
  13620. 1
  13621. 1
  13622. 1
  13623. 1
  13624. 1
  13625. 1
  13626. 1
  13627. 1
  13628. 1
  13629. 1
  13630. 1
  13631. 1
  13632. 1
  13633. 1
  13634. 1
  13635. 1
  13636. 1
  13637. 1
  13638. 1
  13639. 1
  13640. 1
  13641. 1
  13642. 1
  13643. 1
  13644. 1
  13645. 1
  13646. 1
  13647. 1
  13648. 1
  13649. 1
  13650. 1
  13651. 1
  13652. 1
  13653. 1
  13654. 1
  13655. 1
  13656. 1
  13657. 1
  13658. 1
  13659. 1
  13660. 1
  13661. 1
  13662. 1
  13663. 1
  13664. 1
  13665. 1
  13666. 1
  13667. 1
  13668. 1
  13669. 1
  13670. 1
  13671. 1
  13672. 1
  13673. 1
  13674. 1
  13675. 1
  13676. 1
  13677. 1
  13678. 1
  13679. 1
  13680. 1
  13681. 1
  13682. 1
  13683. 1
  13684. 1
  13685. 1
  13686. 1
  13687. 1
  13688. 1
  13689. 1
  13690. 1
  13691. 1
  13692. 1
  13693.  @irgong6875  Yeah... luckily you're not the one that gets to decide what matters and what doesn't.... Also... Unless you have any proof that things are fabricated... You might as well be screaming into the wind. You Obvy have some conformation bias. When one chooses to ignore all relevant material and only conveniently thinks that the material that is relevant is the one that supports their point of view, they're not being truthful. They want to be right more than they want the truth. If you can't make your argument off of all relevant material, then you have no business making that argument. Why should I care on why or how he waited for? Really? Do you know the details of the Biden thing? That happened a good while ago and conveniently the one time Trump seems to care about it is when he is running against him in a presidential election. As for the Y, you should care because he's trying to unduly influence our Democratic process.... And he's abusing his power to do so. All of which I think you already know, but it doesn't fit what you've decided to be true, so you're playing dumb. What another great example of you only paying attention to the relevant material that fits your preconceived notions. He released efficient information only after lying back and forth a couple of times on camera, trying to hide the phone call itself on a top secret server, to which it did not belong, tried to abuse his executive power to keep Congress from getting the Whistleblower report and then finally only caved because he saw the Republican and Democratic lawmakers getting together and saying hey no that's not cool. He had his own party turn against him on that. If he had nothing to hide and thought he was doing nothing wrong, why do all of that before releasing the information? When did he change his story... Maybe you don't have enough info about the situation to come to a educated opinion on the matter. He denied several times on camera that he put the money for Ukraine on hold. https://youtu.be/4S_x5yI4Q6o https://youtu.be/A0KTdsydt6E https://youtu.be/rnM1H2RYzzU https://youtu.be/4Gc8HGtPDtg To get with Barr for what? That means nothing. What did I say that was not true? Really... Cuz the only reason... Biden is an issue is because Trump is try to divert the attention to Biden and npt his actions. SoOoOo... Yeah... WhatAboutIsm... And your buying into it. Which is not a bog suprise. Considering your bias cherry picking thus far. No... The problem is... Your only willing to look at information that confirms what you want to be true. As evodent by your discribing the "problem" just now. For instance it's not just a Democrat, though that is a good point. It's odd that he's not worried about investigating any Republican corruption. It is his political opponent in the election. Again, another example of you only looking at very specifically tailored information. Runs the justice department. Yet he's going to another country to find out whether Biden did anything shady oh, and only when he becomes his rival candidate in the presidential election, when what he saying happened, happened a long time ago. As for whether Biden is corrupt or not, here's the difference between me and you. I don't want corruption and Liars as my leaders just because they happen to be on the same side that I'm on. If there is enough evidence, there should be an investigation, there should be a trial and if he is found guilty he should go to jail. I would absolutely not make any excuse for his actions. You however cannot say the same.
    1
  13694. 1
  13695.  @Lerian_V  SoOoOo... Your a judge? Maybe legal expert? How about constitutional scholar? Are you talking about the DNA that everybody wanted to Fire and? And I mean fired by everybody as in multiple countries? Trump denied holding the money. I said nothing about him denying the investigation. The Giuliani did do that. Seriously, Trump denied any quid pro quo so we're fine carrying the guy who's been caught in countless lies just while being president denied something that he could have done wrong and everything is hunky-dory now? That... that's your argument? Why I can't find anything wrong with that logic. 🙄 Again... Cherry picking info. He withhold American tax dollars in the form of aid, from ukraine, to get him to investigate his political opponent in the next election, instead of getting the justice department, upon which he runs, to do so, he did so only when he became his opponent, he tried to hide this in a multitude of ways and that involved abusing his executive privilege, lying to the American people in charging a story 3 different times on camera, putting the call in a place for top secert material, and did so only when he because an election opponent. There was mention of withholding aid if you know what the aid was for and what it was designated to do. Also knowing about the EU. The Javelins... Is one of the key portions you need to pay attention to. Go look up the Ukraine money for Aid and that history. You'll figure out why him mentioning that was exactly what that was.
    1
  13696. 1
  13697.  @irgong6875  How didn't I answer your question? There was a whole paragraph on your question about lion how. So you can stop lying on me. I didn't say you didn't get to decide what matters to you. I said you don't get to decide that for everybody. You can just dismiss things all you want, but unless you're in a place to make decisions like that for the people who matter in this situation, it don't matter. Unless you're under the impression I'm trying to convince you of something? Because I'm not. You don't have to prove a damn thing to me or anyone else but you're supposed to be an adult and adults have evidence to back up the claims they make. If you can't do that you either need to get used to not people not caring what you're saying or you need to stop arguing it. Which was the larger amount of time? You say you know the the details of the Biden thing. How long after he decided he was going to run did this phone call happen? And how long before that did he do what Trump is claiming he did with his son? Here's another question, why don't you ever hear him talking to other countries about getting dirt on a Republican or someone who's not running against him in a presidential campaign? " I only pay attention to the material that makes sense" like I said, confirmation bias. Anything that doesn't fit what you've decided to be true you throw up is not making sense. Which is very convenient and it's faulty logic. And it's all the more reason why your opinion should matter. " asking the question why would he do that and then filling in the gaps is exactly the way to back your preconceived notions... I'm not cherry-picking." Except you seem to be doing just that because you're throwing everything aside that doesn't fit what you want it to be as not mattering. That's called cherry picking oh, that's called confirmation bias. You don't have to guess at someone's motives. You're not considering all of the physical facts. Not guessing at someone's motivations, what they are actually doing. Which includes something they did it for a specific reason. Say it this is your fault a logic. It's just laying me. Now you're even trying to put words in my mouth. At what point did I say what about the corrupt Republicans? Please quote me where I said that. This whole thing is just a huge example of you using lazy logic and confirmation bias. whatever doesn't fit... What you decided is true, throw it out the window. That way, what I thought was thrue, can be. And I will assume, lie and put words in your mouth if I have to because I have to be right. I'm barely through your first three paragraphs and you've done that so much then I'm about done. You're just simply not being an honest actor. Not to mention the hypocracy. You literally just got done saying " anything that requires me to guess at someone's motives was Ill take with a grain of salt." But then you wanna guess on my motives.... isn't that convenient.
    1
  13698. 1
  13699. 1
  13700. 1
  13701. 1
  13702. 1
  13703. 1
  13704.  @Lerian_V  Okay, then you can prove it then, right? You can prove that the investigation into Joe Biden was reopened before the July 25th phone call? You continuing to say that Trump didn't breach any of American laws does not actually make it true. It doesn't actually make the laws go away. It's also something you and me cannot determine. Most of what he did fell under 👉conflict of interest👈. Upon which, makes him the wrong person to have anything to do with an investigation. Conflict of interest legal statute in Washington State. ..... A conflict of interest exists when a state officer has "an interest, financial or 👉otherwise👈, direct or 👉indirect👈, or engage in a business or 👉transaction👈 or 👉professional activity👈, or 👉incur an obligation of any nature👈, that is in conflict with the proper discharge of the state officer's or state employee's official duties." Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 42.52.020. These are what there is more then enough to indight him with at this point.... campaign finance, bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice. Though you do bring up a good point about his duty. Which is why it's curious why he did not go to hia own department of justice to handle the investigations and deal with Ukraine. That would have avoided conflict of interest all together. Then he tries to cover it up by putting the recording where it doesn't normally go, attempting to invoke executive privilage, getting his administration to not turn over the report and only caving when his own party turned against him. Why do all that?
    1
  13705. 1
  13706. 1
  13707. 1
  13708. 1
  13709. 1
  13710. 1
  13711. 1
  13712. 1
  13713. 1
  13714. 1
  13715. 1
  13716. 1
  13717. 1
  13718. 1
  13719. 1
  13720. 1
  13721. 1
  13722.  @irgong6875  Dude... It it literally one of the biggest stories IN THE WORLD right now. I'm not giving you vague refferences, I'm giving you subject matter to Google. It takes 2 seconds. Will it help if I give you spacific sentences to type into google? Do I need to chew your food for you to? Goggle- all you need to know about the US aid money for Ukraine Google- July 25th Ukraine Phone call Google-Ukraine whistleblower report Or... If you want to cut through all that... Trump impeachment inquiry timeline. .... As a matter of fact... Here! I'll do that one, so you can stop making excuses.... Multiple sources that say basically the same thing. https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/09/trump-ukraine-impeachment-scandal-timeline-key-events?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15707315603709&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fus-news%2F2019%2Foct%2F09%2Ftrump-ukraine-impeachment-scandal-timeline-key-events https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/oct/03/timeline-trump-impeachment-inquiry/ https://amp-usatoday-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/2417517001?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15707315603709&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Famp.usatoday.com%2Famp%2F2417517001%23aoh%3D15707315603709%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s https://qz-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/qz.com/1719034/trump-and-ukraine-the-complete-impeachment-timeline/amp/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15707315603709&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fqz.com%2F1719034%2Ftrump-and-ukraine-the-complete-impeachment-timeline%2Famp%2F%23aoh%3D15707315603709%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s https://www-latimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-09-26/ukraine-trump-impeachment-inquiry-timeline?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&_amp=true&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15707315603709&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.latimes.com%2Fpolitics%2Fstory%2F2019-09-26%2Fukraine-trump-impeachment-inquiry-timeline%3F_amp%3Dtrue%23aoh%3D15707315603709%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s
    1
  13723. 1
  13724. 1
  13725. 1
  13726. 1
  13727. 1
  13728. 1
  13729. 1
  13730. 1
  13731. 1
  13732. 1
  13733. 1
  13734. 1
  13735.  @irgong6875  The Mueller Report.... You claimed there was no collusion evidence, including in the Mueller Report. I ... -Gave you the Report - Told you on what pages you can find the summary of what your looking for to prove or disprove your claims - I also told you where to start reading in order to get a more detailed account of it, to prove or disprove your claims - I told you that you are looking for conspiracy and not collusion, sense collusion isn't a thing under the law and so you don't get confused - NOW I will even give you some ear markers to be watching out for in terms of conspiracy, which is going to make it even easier for you to prove or disprove your claim... *Trump Tower Meeting- Start on page 110 of volume 1 *The IRA- Start on page 33 of volume 1 *Theft of DNC Docs - Start on page 40 of volume 1 *Trump Tower Moscow- Start on page 67 of volume 1 *Trumps letter of intent- Start on page 70 of volume 1 *Michael Cohen and Trump travel to Russia- start on page 76 of volume 1 * George Papadopoulos - Start on page 80 of volume 1 *Clinton Emails- - Start on page 86 of volume 1 * Contacts with Ambassador kolinsky start on page 127 of volume 1 There is more... But that is more then enough to show you! 😁 Oh and here is the Mueller report, yet again... So you don't even have to bother scrolling up to find the link again... https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html#text/p9 Now... I have done everything for you except use your own brain and eyeballs to read for yourself. And I bet you don't do it for the 6th time now. 😁
    1
  13736. 1
  13737. 1
  13738. 1
  13739. 1
  13740. 1
  13741. 1
  13742. 1
  13743. 1
  13744. 1
  13745. 1
  13746. 1
  13747. 1
  13748. 1
  13749. 1
  13750. 1
  13751. 1
  13752. 1
  13753. 1
  13754. 1
  13755. 1
  13756. 1
  13757. 1
  13758. 1
  13759. 1
  13760. 1
  13761. 1
  13762. 1
  13763. 1
  13764. 1
  13765. 1
  13766. 1
  13767. 1
  13768. 1
  13769. 1
  13770. 1
  13771. 1
  13772. 1
  13773. 1
  13774. 1
  13775. 1
  13776. 1
  13777. 1
  13778. 1
  13779. 1
  13780. 1
  13781. 1
  13782. 1
  13783. 1
  13784. 1
  13785. 1
  13786. 1
  13787. 1
  13788. 1
  13789. 1
  13790. 1
  13791. 1
  13792. 1
  13793. 1
  13794. 1
  13795. 1
  13796. 1
  13797. 1
  13798. 1
  13799. 1
  13800. 1
  13801. 1
  13802. 1
  13803. 1
  13804. 1
  13805. 1
  13806. 1
  13807. 1
  13808. 1
  13809. 1
  13810. 1
  13811. 1
  13812. 1
  13813. 1
  13814. 1
  13815. 1
  13816. 1
  13817. 1
  13818. 1
  13819. 1
  13820. 1
  13821. 1
  13822. 1
  13823. 1
  13824. 1
  13825. 1
  13826. 1
  13827. 1
  13828. 1
  13829. 1
  13830. 1
  13831. 1
  13832. 1
  13833. 1
  13834. 1
  13835. 1
  13836. 1
  13837. 1
  13838. 1
  13839. 1
  13840. 1
  13841. 1
  13842. 1
  13843. 1
  13844. 1
  13845. 1
  13846. 1
  13847. 1
  13848. 1
  13849. 1
  13850. 1
  13851. 1
  13852. 1
  13853. 1
  13854. 1
  13855. 1
  13856. 1
  13857. 1
  13858. 1
  13859. 1
  13860. 1
  13861. 1
  13862. 1
  13863. 1
  13864. 1
  13865. 1
  13866. 1
  13867. 1
  13868. 1
  13869. 1
  13870. 1
  13871. 1
  13872. 1
  13873. 1
  13874. 1
  13875. 1
  13876. 1
  13877. 1
  13878. 1
  13879. 1
  13880. 1
  13881. 1
  13882. 1
  13883. 1
  13884. 1
  13885. 1
  13886. 1
  13887. 1
  13888. 1
  13889. 1
  13890. 1
  13891. 1
  13892. 1
  13893. 1
  13894. 1
  13895. 1
  13896. 1
  13897. 1
  13898. 1
  13899. 1
  13900. 1
  13901. 1
  13902. 1
  13903.  @stevepest4143  Yeah.. I mean... You can be childish... But that lonely have you pointing out that you're super insecure about the argument you're making. You do you. " Especially for 2020 and many states you did not have to prove who you were to get ballots. Inside many stayed automatically mailed out ballots even without being asked for. " This is why I asked you if you knew all the safeguards against things like voter fraud for the elections. Have you ever heard of voter registration? That's IDing. What you're talkin about is having them ID themselves a second time. Which is what makes it completely unnecessary. In my opinion it's not worth the argument and it probably won't stop most of anyone from voting so whatever... but it's still kind of pointless if you actually know how elections are run. " These same states did not reject the ellipse based on bad signature matches." Prove it? " Nor on invalid addresses" That's just flat-out wrong for every state I've ever heard of. You get a provisional ballot. Do you know what a provisional ballot is? If you did you wouldn't be making this statement right after. 👉 " and the balance get counted regardless" " I could legally vote for you." No you couldn't. Again educate yourself on all the safeguards and redundancies involved in elections. Because the very few that you're talkin about aren't even half. "Ballot harvesting means I can throw away your vote if it's for the wrong person." 👈 Again... No it doesn't. In order to turn in someone else's ballot for them you have to pre-register them to do so. When you do that you indicate your intention to vote. You have to name a specific person and you both have to go there together, give your consent and intent. Again.. More safe guards. No guy off the street can just take it in for you. " in many or most days working as a shins can Harvest ballots not just relatives" 👈 Prove it? They may live in the same house or just be a friend. Either way you have to pre-register and designate that person. " but then again Liberals are the best at this" 👈 Wrong again. You guys are just the best at being willfully ignorant and parroting back whatever your told without checking it first. " You ever stop to think how many lies Trump told that turned out to be true? " No... Because they didn't. You guys just like to cherry pick facts and pretend you know things you don't. Its called confirmation bias. For example... Russia... you guys like to scream about how there was no evidence of collusion found while completely ignoring volume two of the Mueller report which lays out nine different acts of congressional obstruction of justice which Donald Trump committed in order to block them from finding out anything about collusion. .. but you choose to ignore that so you can say no Russian collusion. Except your cherry picking while trying to pretend half of the damn report doesn't exist. Or... Another... Very fine ppl on both sides. What was one side comprised of and what were they they're protesting against? White supremacist. They were white supremacist. So if he says on both sides, he's calling white supremacist "very fine people". It's not that hard to understand. " what is any of these voting bills that suppresses any votes? " 👈 I'll be more than happy to answer that question just as soon as you answer the one I asked you first but you ignored.
    1
  13904. 1
  13905. 1
  13906. 1
  13907. 1
  13908. 1
  13909. 1
  13910. 1
  13911. 1
  13912. 1
  13913. 1
  13914. 1
  13915. 1
  13916. 1
  13917. 1
  13918. 1
  13919. 1
  13920. 1
  13921. 1
  13922. 1
  13923. 1
  13924. 1
  13925. 1
  13926. 1
  13927. 1
  13928. 1
  13929. 1
  13930. 1
  13931. 1
  13932. 1
  13933. 1
  13934. 1
  13935. 1
  13936. 1
  13937. 1
  13938. 1
  13939. 1
  13940. 1
  13941. 1
  13942. 1
  13943. 1
  13944. 1
  13945. 1
  13946. 1
  13947. 1
  13948. 1
  13949. 1
  13950. 1
  13951. 1
  13952. 1
  13953. 1
  13954. 1
  13955. 1
  13956. 1
  13957. 1
  13958. 1
  13959. 1
  13960. 1
  13961. 1
  13962. 1
  13963. 1
  13964. 1
  13965. 1
  13966. 1
  13967. 1
  13968. 1
  13969. 1
  13970. 1
  13971. 1
  13972. 1
  13973. 1
  13974. 1
  13975. 1
  13976. 1
  13977. 1
  13978. 1
  13979. 1
  13980. 1
  13981. 1
  13982. 1
  13983. 1
  13984. 1
  13985. 1
  13986. 1
  13987. 1
  13988. 1
  13989. 1
  13990. 1
  13991. 1
  13992. 1
  13993. 1
  13994. 1
  13995. 1
  13996. 1
  13997. 1
  13998. 1
  13999. 1
  14000. 1
  14001. 1
  14002. 1
  14003. 1
  14004. 1
  14005. 1
  14006. 1
  14007. 1
  14008. 1
  14009. 1
  14010. 1
  14011. 1
  14012. 1
  14013. 1
  14014. 1
  14015. 1
  14016. 1
  14017. 1
  14018. 1
  14019. 1
  14020. 1
  14021. 1
  14022. 1
  14023. 1
  14024. 1
  14025. 1
  14026. 1
  14027. 1
  14028. 1
  14029. 1
  14030. 1
  14031. 1
  14032. 1
  14033. 1
  14034. 1
  14035. 1
  14036. 1
  14037. 1
  14038. 1
  14039. 1
  14040. 1
  14041. 1
  14042. 1
  14043. 1
  14044. 1
  14045. 1
  14046. 1
  14047. 1
  14048. 1
  14049. 1
  14050. 1
  14051. 1
  14052. 1
  14053. 1
  14054. 1
  14055.  @MeowNSheeit  how many of these things did the Democratic party do? He.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    1
  14056. 1
  14057. 1
  14058. 1
  14059. 1
  14060. 1
  14061. 1
  14062. 1
  14063. 1
  14064. 1
  14065. 1
  14066. 1
  14067. 1
  14068. 1
  14069. 1
  14070. 1
  14071. 1
  14072. 1
  14073. 1
  14074. 1
  14075. 1
  14076. 1
  14077. 1
  14078. 1
  14079.  @MeowNSheeit  Except all these facts you keep running from and the WAY out of context first clip of the video you presented as evidence of some crazy qanan conspiracy, right? Donald Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    1
  14080. 1
  14081. 1
  14082. 1
  14083. 1
  14084. 1
  14085. 1
  14086. 1
  14087. 1
  14088. 1
  14089. 1
  14090. 1
  14091. 1
  14092. 1
  14093. 1
  14094. 1
  14095.  @MeowNSheeit  Donald Trump's long list of racist statements is insane. I don't even know why you Trump trolls bring up racism. All you're doing is using a horrible thing like racism to attack the other side. If you actually cared about racism you care about racism on both sides. Which makes you pretty disgusting. When you're honest and an adult, you don't have to justify or ignore everything someone is saying just because they're on your side. You don't have to make a bunch of bulshit excuses and make yourself look like an a**** doing it. You just admit their faults. Lord knows Joe Biden isn't perfect. I don't have to defend that because I've never claimed that. You, on the other hand or trying to sell that Donald Trump may be crass but he's awesome because he did what? Other than being responsible for 270000 + dead Americans do to covid-19? Or that time he shut down the government to try and force funding for his racist wall that would have never worked in the first place, allowing government workers to whine up in food lines for a month-and-a-half until he caved and made that absolutely worth nothing? Or that time he dropped the mother of all bombs for no discernible reason and against his General's advice? Or that time he crippled the EPA and set us back years with climate change? Or that time he's so dangerously deregulated things like jobs and Environmental Protections that it alienated so many of our allies that we've had four generations now? Or that time he got us into a trade War and lost America hundreds of billions of dollars over the next couple of years because everybody was screaming at him and telling him that nobody ever wins a trade War and he didn't listen? Just a few off the top of my head. As for his racism... This is just a few, cuz I don't have the time or patience to name them all. Kung Fu, Miss housekeeping, shitholecountries, good people on both sides, stand down and standby, I hate black people counting my money, they don't look like Indians, Pocahontas, Mexicans are rapists and murderers, they all have AIDS, look at my African-American over there....
    1
  14096. 1
  14097. 1
  14098. 1
  14099. 1
  14100. 1
  14101. 1
  14102. 1
  14103. 1
  14104. 1
  14105. 1
  14106. 1
  14107.  @MeowNSheeit  Give a logical explanation as to why you keep ignoring these facts and the deaths he has caused? Donald Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    1
  14108. 1
  14109. 1
  14110. 1
  14111. 1
  14112. 1
  14113. 1
  14114. 1
  14115. 1
  14116. 1
  14117. 1
  14118. 1
  14119. 1
  14120. 1
  14121. 1
  14122. 1
  14123. 1
  14124. 1
  14125. 1
  14126. 1
  14127. 1
  14128. 1
  14129. 1
  14130. 1
  14131. @fred head Journal and TV news that is reporting some or all miss characterizations that you keep trying to make, as just that. You'll notice that they are all major news networks and publications. Facts are a b****, aren't they! CNN https://youtu.be/cAQRVst46dk https://youtu.be/n17EK10mbuc https://youtu.be/aSdS9ifKlTc MSNBC https://youtu.be/QswOr9gurSc https://youtu.be/oOQfIhsoDEs https://youtu.be/xe85nB9CjqQ https://youtu.be/2cAGfU4PBY4 https://youtu.be/RVnOIF1mKqc https://youtu.be/eCfRdBTP1T0 https://youtu.be/z7dqWSbMKZo CBS https://youtu.be/XHwCpKhPec4 https://youtu.be/CmnWHEWgiLo The Hill https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/454635-gop-blocks-election-security-bills-after-mueller-testimony?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQA#aoh=15640922049661&amp_ct=1564092487019&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fblogs%2Ffloor-action%2Fsenate%2F454635-gop-blocks-election-security-bills-after-mueller-testimony Buisness insider https://amp-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.businessinsider.com/robert-mueller-congress-hearings-7-big-takeaways-2019-7?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Famp.businessinsider.com%2Frobert-mueller-congress-hearings-7-big-takeaways-2019-7%23referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s New York Times https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/07/24/us/politics/mueller-testimony.amp.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2019%2F07%2F24%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fmueller-testimony.html Washington Examiner https://www-washingtonexaminer-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/impeachnow-trends-after-mueller-testimony?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&_amp=true&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fimpeachnow-trends-after-mueller-testimony The Hill https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/homenews/house/454689-jeffries-dismisses-optics-we-wanted-testimony-from-mueller-not-robert-de-niro?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fhouse%2F454689-jeffries-dismisses-optics-we-wanted-testimony-from-mueller-not-robert-de-niro
    1
  14132. 1
  14133. 1
  14134. 1
  14135. 1
  14136. 1
  14137. 1
  14138. 1
  14139. 1
  14140. 1
  14141. 1
  14142. 1
  14143. 1
  14144. 1
  14145. 1
  14146. 1
  14147. 1
  14148. 1
  14149. 1
  14150. 1
  14151. 1
  14152. 1
  14153. 1
  14154. 1
  14155. 1
  14156. 1
  14157. 1
  14158. 1
  14159. 1
  14160. 1
  14161. 1
  14162. 1
  14163. 1
  14164. 1
  14165. 1
  14166. 1
  14167. 1
  14168.  Sean moynihan  Aww! Puddin! Just couldn't make your argument without acting like a toddler, could you... Keep reading Brain Trust... 😂 "In the impeachment context, abuse of power is generally defined as using the vast powers of the presidency for personal benefit. Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." But the founders of the United States intended the phrase "other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said. Alexander Hamilton, a famed American statesman, wrote in 1788 that impeachment proceedings were for "those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust." Louis Michael Seidman, a professor at Georgetown Law, said the core allegation against Republican Trump - that he withheld security aid to Ukraine to pressure it to announce investigations that would benefit him politically - was the sort of conduct the founders considered impeachable. "The U.S. has a national security interest in Ukraine and it does appear that what the president was doing was putting that national security interest at risk in exchange for political benefits," said Seidman. "If that is what happened, that is the core of what impeachment is about." Abuse of power was one of the articles of impeachment advanced against President Richard Nixon, who resigned before a full House vote on the charges. In approving the charge of abuse of power against Nixon, a House committee accused of him of authorizing tax audits of political opponents on his "enemies list." Abuse of power was advanced as an article of impeachment against former President Bill Clinton relating to his affair with a White House intern, but a majority of House members voted against including that charge. Clinton was eventually impeached on two other charges - perjury and obstruction of justice - but was not convicted by the Senate." Thank you! Come again!
    1
  14169. 1
  14170. 1
  14171. 1
  14172. 1
  14173. 1
  14174. 1
  14175. 1
  14176. 1
  14177. 1
  14178. 1
  14179. 1
  14180. 1
  14181. 1
  14182. 1
  14183. 1
  14184. 1
  14185. 1
  14186. 1
  14187. 1
  14188. 1
  14189. 1
  14190. 1
  14191. 1
  14192. 1
  14193. 1
  14194. 1
  14195. 1
  14196. 1
  14197. 1
  14198. 1
  14199. 1
  14200. 1
  14201. 1
  14202. 1
  14203. 1
  14204. 1
  14205. 1
  14206. 1
  14207. 1
  14208. 1
  14209. 1
  14210. 1
  14211. 1
  14212. 1
  14213. 1
  14214. 1
  14215. 1
  14216. 1
  14217. 1
  14218. 1
  14219. 1
  14220. 1
  14221. 1
  14222. 1
  14223. 1
  14224. 1
  14225. 1
  14226. 1
  14227. 1
  14228. 1
  14229. 1
  14230. 1
  14231. 1
  14232. 1
  14233. 1
  14234. 1
  14235. 1
  14236. 1
  14237. 1
  14238. 1
  14239. 1
  14240. 1
  14241. 1
  14242. 1
  14243. 1
  14244. 1
  14245. 1
  14246. 1
  14247. 1
  14248. 1
  14249. 1
  14250. 1
  14251. 1
  14252. 1
  14253. 1
  14254. 1
  14255. 1
  14256. 1
  14257. 1
  14258. 1
  14259. 1
  14260. 1
  14261. 1
  14262. 1
  14263. 1
  14264. 1
  14265. 1
  14266. 1
  14267. 1
  14268. 1
  14269. 1
  14270. 1
  14271. 1
  14272. 1
  14273. 1
  14274. 1
  14275. 1
  14276. 1
  14277. 1
  14278. 1
  14279. 1
  14280. 1
  14281. 1
  14282. 1
  14283. 1
  14284. 1
  14285. 1
  14286. 1
  14287. 1
  14288.  @ok-up4qx  👈" Trump isn't and racist for trying to stabilize the situation in the USA. People fail to understand that even if it was Hillary, the riots and protests would have been still happening, it's not just "Trump". So it's starting to feel like you are having an argument with someone else. Who are you talking to? Trump is a racist because Trump has a 60 year history or saying racist things and doing racist things. "S***hole countries" "Huts" "Kung flu" "Pocahontas" "Good people on both sides" "They all have AIDS" "Their rapists. Their murderers" "Miss House Keeping" ...Only ever being interested and the illegal immigrants coming through the southern border, when that only covers about 26% of the illegal immigration issue. ... denying black people Residence in their properties and marking on Ledger's the ones that did get in, with the letter B for black in their book keeping, but not doing that with any of the white people. ....sending tear gas and rubber bullet wielding armed men to remove peaceful BLM protests for a photo op Just to name a few. The Hillary thing.... I could claim that isn't something you can back up again, and that would be true (not a Hillary supporter btw) ... But given the facts about systemic racism and the needless killing of black people by cops would still be happening, so it is reasonably a good guess. So... We can go with that... But the reaction to the protests and riots would have been substantially different. Trump has 2 moves Bully and Posture. I may not be the biggest Hillary fan but she has substantially more skills in problem solving to deploy. Skills she has a record of showing. Diplomacy for 1. And... No one is claiming its just "Trump". Again... Trying to set up paper tiger.... But if you need to clean the house and the house is also on FIRE... Which one of those problems do you take care of first?
    1
  14289.  @ok-up4qx  " the protests and riots are ruining progress of the country on were also not helping the covid-19 situation" The protests and riots WOULD NOT HAVE been a thing if people like you would have listened to them when they where kneeling. You speak of progress when they're watching their mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters and children being murdered in the light of day, in the middle of the street, by the people who are supposed to be protecting them.... As they beg for their mothers and their lives..... As other black people watching beg for them to stop... And then you see the very people doing this be protected by that very system that employs them and gives them retirement benefits. You see those very people not going to prison. You see them pull up and shoot 12 year olds playing in parks. You see them victimize people over and over again, more often than not being the same color as all the rest. Did you really think they were just going to sit back and keep letting that happen? The protesters and the rioters aren't problem. They're a symptom. The roblem is people not recognizing the actual problem and just wanting to focus on what affects them. As for Covid.... is it great for the pandemic spread... No. But what I do see is protesters and rioters wearing masks. Rioters.... rioters, wearing masks as they riot. People who are showing Brazen disregard for the law, STILL wearing masks. What I don't see is the president wearing a mask or his giant auditoriums filled with people wearing masks.
    1
  14290. 1
  14291. 1
  14292. 1
  14293. 1
  14294. 1
  14295. 1
  14296. 1
  14297. 1
  14298. 1
  14299. 1
  14300. 1
  14301. 1
  14302. 1
  14303. 1
  14304. 1
  14305. 1
  14306. 1
  14307. 1
  14308. 1
  14309. 1
  14310. 1
  14311. 1
  14312. 1
  14313. 1
  14314. 1
  14315. 1
  14316. 1
  14317. 1
  14318. 1
  14319. 1
  14320. 1
  14321. 1
  14322. 1
  14323. 1
  14324. 1
  14325. 1
  14326. 1
  14327. 1
  14328. 1
  14329. 1
  14330. 1
  14331. 1
  14332. 1
  14333. 1
  14334. 1
  14335. 1
  14336. 1
  14337. 1
  14338. 1
  14339. 1
  14340. 1
  14341. 1
  14342. 1
  14343. 1
  14344. 1
  14345. 1
  14346. 1
  14347. 1
  14348. 1
  14349. 1
  14350. 1
  14351. 1
  14352. 1
  14353. 1
  14354. 1
  14355. 1
  14356. 1
  14357. 1
  14358. 1
  14359. 1
  14360. 1
  14361. 1
  14362. 1
  14363. 1
  14364. 1
  14365. 1
  14366. 1
  14367. 1
  14368. 1
  14369. 1
  14370. 1
  14371. 1
  14372. 1
  14373. 1
  14374. 1
  14375. 1
  14376. 1
  14377. 1
  14378. 1
  14379. 1
  14380. 1
  14381. 1
  14382. 1
  14383. 1
  14384. 1
  14385. 1
  14386. 1
  14387. 1
  14388. 1
  14389. 1
  14390. 1
  14391. 1
  14392. 1
  14393. 1
  14394. 1
  14395. 1
  14396. 1
  14397. 1
  14398. 1
  14399. 1
  14400. 1
  14401. 1
  14402. 1
  14403. 1
  14404. 1
  14405. 1
  14406. 1
  14407. 1
  14408. 1
  14409. 1
  14410. 1
  14411. 1
  14412. 1
  14413. 1
  14414. 1
  14415. 1
  14416. 1
  14417. 1
  14418. 1
  14419. 1
  14420. 1
  14421. 1
  14422. 1
  14423. 1
  14424. 1
  14425. 1
  14426. 1
  14427. 1
  14428. 1
  14429. 1
  14430. 1
  14431. 1
  14432. 1
  14433. 1
  14434. 1
  14435. 1
  14436. 1
  14437. 1
  14438. 1
  14439. 1
  14440. 1
  14441. 1
  14442. 1
  14443. 1
  14444. 1
  14445. 1
  14446. 1
  14447. 1
  14448. 1
  14449. 1
  14450. 1
  14451. 1
  14452. 1
  14453. 1
  14454. 1
  14455. 1
  14456. 1
  14457. 1
  14458. 1
  14459. 1
  14460. 1
  14461. 1
  14462. 1
  14463. 1
  14464. 1
  14465. 1
  14466. 1
  14467. 1
  14468. 1
  14469. 1
  14470. 1
  14471. 1
  14472. 1
  14473. 1
  14474. 1
  14475. 1
  14476. 1
  14477. 1
  14478. 1
  14479. 1
  14480. 1
  14481. 1
  14482. 1
  14483. 1
  14484. 1
  14485. 1
  14486. 1
  14487. 1
  14488. 1
  14489. 1
  14490. 1
  14491. 1
  14492. 1
  14493. 1
  14494. 1
  14495. 1
  14496. 1
  14497. 1
  14498. 1
  14499. 1
  14500. 1
  14501. 1
  14502. 1
  14503. 1
  14504. 1
  14505. 1
  14506. 1
  14507. 1
  14508. 1
  14509. 1
  14510. 1
  14511. 1
  14512. 1
  14513. 1
  14514. 1
  14515. 1
  14516. 1
  14517. 1
  14518. 1
  14519. 1
  14520. 1
  14521. 1
  14522. 1
  14523. 1
  14524. 1
  14525. 1
  14526. 1
  14527. 1
  14528. 1
  14529. 1
  14530. 1
  14531. 1
  14532. 1
  14533. 1
  14534. 1
  14535. 1
  14536. 1
  14537. 1
  14538. 1
  14539. 1
  14540. 1
  14541. 1
  14542. 1
  14543. 1
  14544. 1
  14545. 1
  14546. 1
  14547. 1
  14548. 1
  14549. 1
  14550. 1
  14551. 1
  14552. 1
  14553. 1
  14554. 1
  14555. 1
  14556. 1
  14557. 1
  14558. 1
  14559. 1
  14560. 1
  14561. 1
  14562. 1
  14563. 1
  14564. 1
  14565. 1
  14566. 1
  14567. 1
  14568. 1
  14569. 1
  14570. 1
  14571. 1
  14572. 1
  14573. 1
  14574. 1
  14575. 1
  14576. 1
  14577. 1
  14578. 1
  14579. 1
  14580. 1
  14581. 1
  14582. 1
  14583. 1
  14584. 1
  14585. 1
  14586. 1
  14587. 1
  14588. 1
  14589. 1
  14590. 1
  14591. 1
  14592. 1
  14593. 1
  14594. 1
  14595. 1
  14596. 1
  14597. 1
  14598. 1
  14599. 1
  14600. 1
  14601. 1
  14602. 1
  14603. 1
  14604. 1
  14605. 1
  14606. 1
  14607. 1
  14608. 1
  14609. 1
  14610. 1
  14611. 1
  14612. 1
  14613. 1
  14614. 1
  14615. 1
  14616. 1
  14617. 1
  14618. 1
  14619. 1
  14620. 1
  14621. 1
  14622. 1
  14623. 1
  14624. 1
  14625. 1
  14626. 1
  14627. 1
  14628. 1
  14629. 1
  14630. 1
  14631. 1
  14632. 1
  14633. 1
  14634. 1
  14635. 1
  14636. 1
  14637. 1
  14638. 1
  14639. 1
  14640. 1
  14641. 1
  14642. 1
  14643. 1
  14644. 1
  14645. 1
  14646. 1
  14647. 1
  14648. 1
  14649. 1
  14650. 1
  14651. 1
  14652. 1
  14653. 1
  14654. 1
  14655. 1
  14656. 1
  14657. 1
  14658.  @scottemmons6409  what Freedom do they not have that they're fighting for in Ukraine? What Freedom are they going to get by invading another country who never attacked them or tried to take any of their freedoms away? It's not wrong because America says it is. It's wrong because they attacked and invaded another country who never gave them reason to do so. It's wrong because after they invaded they decided to start wholesale slaughtering Ukrainian civilians. It's wrong because they decided a real good place to bomb would be a children's hospital and a maternity ward. It's wrong because soldiers are over there shooting 11 year old girls in the face. It's wrong because they're bombing theaters with giant letters on them saying children. It's wrong because they're blowing up whole families and intentionally aiming for Refugee areas miles away from any kind of combat situation. It's wrong because Vladimir Putin decided he wanted to invade Ukraine and that he would just make up a reason later. First it was him deciding he got to choose what another country did with their sovereignty bc there was some notion that NATO and America needed Ukraine in order to attack and invade Russia. Then it went to the country that overwhelmingly elected a Jewish comedian as their president was somehow a Nazi state Two never-before-seen chemical weapons To the same Ukrainian people who are picking up arms to fight them, begged Russia to come and liberate them To god knows what it will be tomorrow. It's wrong because all Russia needs to do in order to eliminate any kind of threat on them used to walk there happy ass across the border that they came from and leave everybody the hell alone.
    1
  14659.  @scottemmons6409  As for your claim of support, you may wanna stop watching so much Russian state TV. "Due to its good relations with the Russian Federation and Ukraine, India has maintained a neutral position as a non-aligned state." "China aims to take diplomatic measures and strike a balance between western countries and Russia. On the other side, the Chinese president Xi Jinping is eager to boost the nation’s ties with Russia, so it cannot endorse the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. Beijing’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, pleaded with all parties to be restrained." In this conflict, countries that were once part of the Soviet Union, including Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kyrgyzstan, will stand by Russia. "Also extending its support to Putin was Cuba, a close ally of the Russians." "As a result of Russia’s recognition of the two Ukrainian provinces of Luhansk and Donetsk as independent countries, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Canada are all supporting Ukraine." ""There is full support among NATO countries – Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States. It is the cause of the most massive support for Ukraine from the United States and the United Kingdom." "Germany and France made a hurried visit to Moscow recently to defuse the controversy that has newly erupted. The United States and Canada halted approval of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline after President Putin recognized two breakaway regions of Ukraine as independent nations and sent Russian troops there."
    1
  14660. 1
  14661. 1
  14662. 1
  14663. 1
  14664. 1
  14665. 1
  14666. 1
  14667. 1
  14668. 1
  14669. 1
  14670. 1
  14671. 1
  14672. 1
  14673. 1
  14674. 1
  14675. 1
  14676. 1
  14677. 1
  14678. 1
  14679. 1
  14680. 1
  14681. 1
  14682. 1
  14683. 1
  14684. 1
  14685. 1
  14686. 1
  14687. 1
  14688. 1
  14689. 1
  14690. 1
  14691. 1
  14692. 1
  14693. 1
  14694. 1
  14695. 1
  14696. 1
  14697. 1
  14698. 1
  14699. 1
  14700. 1
  14701. 1
  14702. 1
  14703. 1
  14704. 1
  14705. 1
  14706. 1
  14707. 1
  14708. 1
  14709. 1
  14710. 1
  14711. 1
  14712. 1
  14713. 1
  14714. 1
  14715. 1
  14716. 1
  14717. 1
  14718. 1
  14719. 1
  14720. 1
  14721. 1
  14722. 1
  14723. 1
  14724. 1
  14725. 1
  14726. 1
  14727. 1
  14728. 1
  14729. 1
  14730. 1
  14731. 1
  14732. 1
  14733. 1
  14734. 1
  14735. 1
  14736. 1
  14737. 1
  14738. 1
  14739. 1
  14740. 1
  14741. 1
  14742. 1
  14743. 1
  14744. 1
  14745. 1
  14746. 1
  14747. 1
  14748. 1
  14749. 1
  14750. 1
  14751. 1
  14752. 1
  14753. 1
  14754.  @danemart1842  First... I would like to thank your for finally admitting by example, that you cherry pick, by asking that question. 😁 See, I have posted the same info, with the same links provided twice now. Both times you have either choose to ignore it, because you could not argue against it, or you where, ironically, too lazy to click the link and read it. But, it's cool. I'll just post it again, and again, and again, and again. You can just keep trying to ignore it and then you'll discredit yourself more and more and that will work out just fine for me. Here we go. The ACLU, sites generations of studies to come up with 21 mil disenfranchised, mostly minority or disabled voters. "Voter ID laws are a backhanded form of discrimination, pointless because we already have voter registration and are inherently against the freedom this country is supposed to stand for. Every single American who has registered to vote has the absolute right, in America, to vote. End of story. "Millions of Americans Lack ID. 11% of U.S. citizens – or more than 21 million Americans – do not have government-issued photo identification.1 Obtaining ID Costs Money. Even if ID is offered for free, voters must incur numerous costs (such as paying for birth certificates) to apply for a government-issued ID. Underlying documents required to obtain ID cost money, a significant expense for lower-income Americans. The combined cost of document fees, travel expenses and waiting time are estimated to range from $75 to $175.2 The travel required is often a major burden on people with disabilities, the elderly, or those in rural areas without access to a car or public transportation. In Texas, some people in rural areas must travel approximately 170 miles to reach the nearest ID office.3" https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheet
    1
  14755. 1
  14756. 1
  14757. 1
  14758. 1
  14759. 1
  14760. 1
  14761. 1
  14762. 1
  14763. 1
  14764. 1
  14765. 1
  14766. 1
  14767. 1
  14768. 1
  14769. 1
  14770. 1
  14771. 1
  14772. 1
  14773. 1
  14774. 1
  14775. 1
  14776. 1
  14777. 1
  14778. 1
  14779. 1
  14780. 1
  14781. 1
  14782. 1
  14783. 1
  14784. 1
  14785. 1
  14786. 1
  14787. 1
  14788. 1
  14789. 1
  14790. 1
  14791. 1
  14792. 1
  14793. 1
  14794. 1
  14795. 1
  14796. 1
  14797. 1
  14798. 1
  14799. 1
  14800. 1
  14801. 1
  14802. 1
  14803. 1
  14804. 1
  14805. 1
  14806. 1
  14807. 1
  14808. 1
  14809. 1
  14810. 1
  14811. 1
  14812. 1
  14813. 1
  14814. 1
  14815. 1
  14816. 1
  14817. 1
  14818. 1
  14819. 1
  14820. 1
  14821. 1
  14822. 1
  14823. 1
  14824. 1
  14825. 1
  14826. 1
  14827. 1
  14828. 1
  14829. 1
  14830. 1
  14831. 1
  14832. 1
  14833. 1
  14834. 1
  14835. 1
  14836. 1
  14837. 1
  14838. 1
  14839. 1
  14840. 1
  14841. 1
  14842. 1
  14843. 1
  14844. 1
  14845. 1
  14846. 1
  14847. 1
  14848. 1
  14849. 1
  14850. 1
  14851. 1
  14852. 1
  14853. 1
  14854. 1
  14855. 1
  14856. 1
  14857. 1
  14858. 1
  14859. 1
  14860. 1
  14861. 1
  14862. 1
  14863. 1
  14864. 1
  14865. 1
  14866. 1
  14867. 1
  14868. 1
  14869. 1
  14870. 1
  14871. 1
  14872. 1
  14873. 1
  14874. 1
  14875. 1
  14876. 1
  14877. 1
  14878. 1
  14879. 1
  14880. 1
  14881. 1
  14882. 1
  14883. 1
  14884. 1
  14885. 1
  14886. 1
  14887. 1
  14888. 1
  14889. 1
  14890. 1
  14891. 1
  14892. 1
  14893. 1
  14894. 1
  14895. 1
  14896. 1
  14897. 1
  14898. 1
  14899. 1
  14900. 1
  14901. 1
  14902. 1
  14903. 1
  14904. 1
  14905. 1
  14906. 1
  14907. 1
  14908. 1
  14909. 1
  14910. 1
  14911. 1
  14912. 1
  14913. 1
  14914. 1
  14915. 1
  14916. 1
  14917. 1
  14918. 1
  14919. 1
  14920. 1
  14921. 1
  14922. 1
  14923. 1
  14924. 1
  14925. 1
  14926. 1
  14927. 1
  14928. 1
  14929. 1
  14930. 1
  14931. 1
  14932. 1
  14933. 1
  14934. 1
  14935. 1
  14936. 1
  14937. 1
  14938. 1
  14939. 1
  14940. 1
  14941. 1
  14942. 1
  14943. 1
  14944. 1
  14945. 1
  14946. 1
  14947. 1
  14948. 1
  14949. 1
  14950.  @FleurPillager  That is what you are doing. Considering I just pointed out that I have brought up this subject several times. Long before you brought up the " religious practice". So is the president of the United States shilling for his pharmaceutical rich friends in order to make money off of suicidal veterans right or wrong? BTW thank you for letting me know your real reason for being against meditation and yoga. Let me guess, you're not a Buddhist? It's against your religious belief? You're very very Christian? In Christianity, most prevalently in the Catholic faith you light a candle in remembrance. People light candles outside of the Christian faith to though, right? Sometimes people light them in their house because they smell good, right? Sometimes they're having a romantic evening with their honey... I want some mood lighting, right? Meditation and yoga are only religious practices when you practice the religion of Buddhism. Otherwise it's therapy and exercise. I'm atheist and I do yoga and meditation. More spacifically Yoga is stretching, which doctors have been recommending for a long time before they started calling it yoga. Meditation is calming and clearing your mind . Also things therapist and psychologists have been recommending for a long time before they started calling it meditation . Science and doctors originally got it from those things in history but science takes ideas from all Arenas in order to better Our Lives . It's not threatening your Christian religion sweetheart. calm down. Now is it or is it not wrong for the president of the United States to shill for his Rich pharmaceutical friends to take money from suicidal veterans?
    1
  14951. 1
  14952. 1
  14953. 1
  14954. 1
  14955.  @FleurPillager What does thoughts have to do with major depressive disorder. First come on let's be clear you're changing the goal post. You're rich no question was what does yoga and meditation have to do with mental health. Every time I point that out you change the goal post. Now it's this very specific thing. That's okay though, I can make this work as well. Someone who had a major depressive disorder in my life, as well as helped my brother (who is a soldier with two tours under his belt) through one, as well as knowing the science behind it, I can tell you that "thoyghts" have quite a bit to do with getting through. If you would like some critical thinking, then how about this... Oftentimes in depths of depression the patient will experience auditory hallucinations urging them to harm themselves or others. Patients have a had time recognizing these hallucinations at first and sometimes longer stretches of time because they commingle in there had without our thoughts. The trigger for recognizing auditory hallucinations is often you can hear them outside of your head instead of inside of your head but when they're beginning they often sound low. The volume is not that high. So it can be hard to tell. Which is why psychologist recommend to major depressive patients to have regular meditation sessions. For this and a variety of other reasons it could help catch that circumstance and put them on antipsychotics at an earlier stage. Which is what happened with my brother. Why in the world you would be so against stretching or stilling your mind for anyone, let alone major depressive patients, is beyond me. It's not like it's a chemical you're putting in your body with major side effects all over the place. It's literally exercise and making your mind quiet. Maybe it's just some critical thinking on that.
    1
  14956. 1
  14957. 1
  14958. 1
  14959. 1
  14960. 1
  14961. 1
  14962. 1
  14963. 1
  14964. 1
  14965. 1
  14966. 1
  14967. 1
  14968. 1
  14969. 1
  14970. 1
  14971. 1
  14972. 1
  14973. 1
  14974. 1
  14975. 1
  14976. 1
  14977. 1
  14978. 1
  14979. 1
  14980. 1
  14981. 1
  14982. 1
  14983. 1
  14984. 1
  14985. 1
  14986. 1
  14987. 1
  14988. 1
  14989. 1
  14990. 1
  14991. 1
  14992. 1
  14993. 1
  14994. 1
  14995. 1
  14996. 1
  14997. 1
  14998. 1
  14999. 1
  15000. 1
  15001. 1
  15002. 1
  15003. 1
  15004. 1
  15005. 1
  15006. 1
  15007. 1
  15008. 1
  15009. 1
  15010. 1
  15011. 1
  15012. 1
  15013. 1
  15014. 1
  15015. 1
  15016. 1
  15017. 1
  15018. 1
  15019. 1
  15020. 1
  15021. 1
  15022. 1
  15023. 1
  15024. 1
  15025. 1
  15026. 1
  15027. 1
  15028. 1
  15029. 1
  15030. 1
  15031. 1
  15032. 1
  15033. 1
  15034. 1
  15035. 1
  15036. 1
  15037. 1
  15038. 1
  15039. 1
  15040. 1
  15041. 1
  15042. 1
  15043. 1
  15044. 1
  15045. 1
  15046. 1
  15047. 1
  15048. 1
  15049. 1
  15050. 1
  15051. 1
  15052. 1
  15053. 1
  15054. 1
  15055. 1
  15056. 1
  15057. 1
  15058. 1
  15059. 1
  15060. 1
  15061. 1
  15062. 1
  15063. 1
  15064. 1
  15065. 1
  15066. 1
  15067. 1
  15068. 1
  15069. 1
  15070. 1
  15071. 1
  15072. 1
  15073. 1
  15074. 1
  15075. 1
  15076. 1
  15077. 1
  15078. 1
  15079. 1
  15080. 1
  15081. 1
  15082. 1
  15083. 1
  15084. 1
  15085. 1
  15086. 1
  15087. 1
  15088. 1
  15089. 1
  15090. 1
  15091. 1
  15092. 1
  15093. 1
  15094. 1
  15095. 1
  15096. 1
  15097. 1
  15098. 1
  15099. 1
  15100. 1
  15101. 1
  15102. 1
  15103. 1
  15104. 1
  15105. 1
  15106. 1
  15107. 1
  15108. 1
  15109. 1
  15110. 1
  15111. 1
  15112. 1
  15113. 1
  15114. 1
  15115. 1
  15116. 1
  15117. 1
  15118. 1
  15119. 1
  15120. 1
  15121. 1
  15122. 1
  15123. 1
  15124. 1
  15125. 1
  15126. 1
  15127. 1
  15128. 1
  15129. 1
  15130. 1
  15131. 1
  15132. 1
  15133. 1
  15134. 1
  15135. 1
  15136. 1
  15137. 1
  15138.  @hellwithit  Yeah... Go look at your original question. That comma was not there... And so, in that sentence structure I answered that question accurately, but its whatever... I guess. Moving on.... It is a more interesting question, this way, however. Cuz, depending on how you look at it, we can be and we aren't. Plus it's all pretty inconsistent. From the Conqueror standpoint, I'm an American because I was born into a country that was formed by slaughtering and enslaving in indigenous people and taking over their land, then forming a working government upon that soil. Only later to... kind of... half-ass... make it right. Now, we have done good and bad after the fact. Which could be argued for. May good things have come from America, and Americans. Which means, the very least we can say, is that in a lot of ways, America has made the best out of the situation. So, in that context, we conquered, therefore we are. From a native people context, we stole the land, in one of the most horrible ways imaginable. Practically wiping out an entire civilization. Completelty wiping out some. All coutries have a good and bad history, though. It's compared mostly in the way to what human nature can do. Good and bad. Its a mixed bag. That does not mean that we should not try to do good for people though. It does not excuse us only caring about the people who you're born on this side of the Border. That is not adequate criteria to dismiss someone's life and decide that it means less than ours does. Especially, from a country, founded and built by immigrants. We should do better.
    1
  15139. 1
  15140. 1
  15141. 1
  15142. 1
  15143. 1
  15144. 1
  15145. 1
  15146.  @theheretic3764  But I tell you what... Oh Bitch ass wise one... let's go with your premise for half a second... That way you can explain this to me.... Your comment was, " I yeah that's exactly what we're saying... Indians had Mongoloid DNA. They are not indigenous to America." What does... Ya know what... I was going to ask you what indigenous man but I ain't got that kind of time. Indigenous - originating or occurring naturally in a particular place; native Indigenous people, also known as first peoples, Aboriginal people or native people, are ethnic groups who are the original settlers of a given region, in contrast to groups that have settled, occupied or colonized the area more recently. In smaller words for your special Ed ass... for an ethnic group of people to be indigenous to the area they would have had to have settled ( sorry to big of a work. Been there 😜 ) and then procreated ( to big again, my bad. Had babies 😜 ) in an area for a long time. Groups are usually described as indigenous when they maintain Traditions or other aspects of an early culture that is associated with a given region. Not all indigenous people share this characteristic, as many have adopted substantial elements of a colonizing culture, such as dress, religion or language. Indigenous people may be settled in a given region or exhibit a nomadic lifestyle across a large territory, but they are generally historically associated with a specific territory on which they depend. The ancestors of living Native Americans arrived in what is now the United States at least 😜 15,000 😜 years ago, possibly much earlier, from Asia via Beringia. A vast variety of people's, societies and cultures subsequently developed. The British first arrived and established Jamestown in Virginia in 😜1607😜. Do I need to do that math for you to slow learner?
    1
  15147. 1
  15148. 1
  15149. 1
  15150.  @theheretic3764  Awwwwesome! You must be getting so sad now! Deleting comments again, I see! 😜😜😜 Don't worry! Screenshot that one too. Just in case you decided to tell a stupid ass lie again. This one said... "Shhhhhhh....🤫 It's all in the links I posted... How they immigrated here. Dispersed. ... 😏" That's the part where you admitted that they immigrated here. Then you skipped the part that made them "indigenous" to the area because apparently you're too stupid to know what indigenous people are, and the definition of the words you use. Because indigenous does not necessarily mean that you originated from the area. You know what indigenous means? Do you know what indigenous people are? Of course you don't, slow learner. So let me fill you in. Ya know.... again. 🤣🤣🤣 Indigenous - originating 👉👉👉or👈👈👈 occurring naturally in a particular place; native Indigenous people, also known as First Peoples, Aboriginal people or native people, or ethnic groups who are the 🤯 original settlers🤯 of a given region, in contrast to groups that have settled occupied or colonized the area more recently.🤣😂🤣😂😜 Groups are usually described as indigenous when they maintain Traditions or other aspects of an early culture that is associated with a given region. I'm only judging these people share this characteristic, as many have adapted Substantial elements of a colonizing culture, such as dress, religion or language. Indigenous people may be settled in a given region or exhibit nomadic lifestyle across a large territory, but they are generally historically associated with a specific territory on which they depend. 😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜 Then I gave you a timeline and some fun math to do. The ancestors of 👉living Native Americans👈 arrived in what is now the 👉United States👈 at least 👉15,000 years ago👈, possibly much earlier, from Asia via Beringia. a vast variety of peoples Societies and cultures subsequently developed. The British first arrived and established Jamestown, in what now is Virginia, in 👉1607👈. Now, if the British got here in 1607 and the Indians have been here for 15,000 years.... then that means the british got here 412 years ago.... that means by the tike the british got here, the indians had been here for a little over 11,000 years. I'm pretty sure that's meets the "indigenous" quota. AT least you anyone who isn't trying to not have to NOT HAVE TO admit that they were wrong. THEN, you went off on this whole little tangent, which sounded a little like you were staring in the mirror and masturbating with your tears while you were saying it. It also kind of smacked of desperation, because let's face it, no one has to try that hard to feel like they're above somebody else unless they don't really think they are. I mean, it was basically like you were screaming into the wind about how you didn't have a tiny penis. " you're so used to faking it aren't you? Acquiring just enough information to come across as an intelligent" Which, BTW oh, I'm not usually a grammar Nazi but if you're trying to put down somebody's intelligence in a particular sentence, it's usually a good idea to make sure that sentence doesn't have unnecessary words in front of the word intelligent. Just saying...🤣😂🤣😂🤣 But I digress.... " In line? What is it like to be so terrified the people are actually going to figure you out? To realize that you're a fraud? This latent hostility you've developed for people that are actually more well-read and more intelligent than you?" You're trying so hard at this point.😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 " See I look at those people laughing at me in the corner and you know what?" No, what? Other than the fact that you're fixing to put down your own analogy! 😜 " I don't want to be them. But you? Oh god it pains you so that you're not. Sad. 😦 And repulsive. 🤢" Hey, I'm glad we can finally agree on something. You are sad and repulsive. 😛✌
    1
  15151. 1
  15152. 1
  15153. 1
  15154. 1
  15155. 1
  15156. 1
  15157. 1
  15158. 1
  15159. 1
  15160. 1
  15161. 1
  15162. 1
  15163. 1
  15164. 1
  15165. 1
  15166. 1
  15167. 1
  15168. 1
  15169. 1
  15170. 1
  15171. 1
  15172. 1
  15173. 1
  15174. 1
  15175. 1
  15176. 1
  15177. 1
  15178. 1
  15179. 1
  15180. 1
  15181. 1
  15182. 1
  15183. 1
  15184. 1
  15185. 1
  15186. 1
  15187. 1
  15188. 1
  15189. 1
  15190. 1
  15191. 1
  15192. 1
  15193. 1
  15194. 1
  15195. 1
  15196. 1
  15197. 1
  15198. 1
  15199. 1
  15200. 1
  15201. 1
  15202. 1
  15203. 1
  15204. 1
  15205. 1
  15206. 1
  15207. 1
  15208. 1
  15209. 1
  15210. 1
  15211. 1
  15212. 1
  15213. 1
  15214. 1
  15215. 1
  15216. 1
  15217. 1
  15218. 1
  15219. 1
  15220. 1
  15221. 1
  15222. 1
  15223. 1
  15224. 1
  15225. 1
  15226. 1
  15227. 1
  15228. 1
  15229. 1
  15230. 1
  15231. 1
  15232. 1
  15233. 1
  15234. 1
  15235. 1
  15236. 1
  15237. 1
  15238. 1
  15239. 1
  15240. 1
  15241. 1
  15242. 1
  15243. 1
  15244. 1
  15245. 1
  15246. 1
  15247. 1
  15248. 1
  15249. 1
  15250. 1
  15251. 1
  15252. 1
  15253. 1
  15254. 1
  15255. 1
  15256. 1
  15257. 1
  15258. 1
  15259. 1
  15260. 1
  15261. 1
  15262. 1
  15263. 1
  15264. 1
  15265. 1
  15266. 1
  15267. 1
  15268. 1
  15269. 1
  15270. 1
  15271. 1
  15272. 1
  15273. 1
  15274. 1
  15275. 1
  15276. 1
  15277. 1
  15278. 1
  15279. 1
  15280. 1
  15281. 1
  15282. 1
  15283. 1
  15284. 1
  15285. 1
  15286. 1
  15287. 1
  15288. 1
  15289. 1
  15290. 1
  15291. 1
  15292. 1
  15293. 1
  15294. 1
  15295. 1
  15296. 1
  15297. 1
  15298. 1
  15299. 1
  15300. 1
  15301. 1
  15302. 1
  15303. 1
  15304. 1
  15305. 1
  15306. 1
  15307. 1
  15308. 1
  15309. 1
  15310. 1
  15311. 1
  15312. 1
  15313. 1
  15314. 1
  15315. 1
  15316. 1
  15317. 1
  15318. 1
  15319. 1
  15320. 1
  15321. 1
  15322. 1
  15323. 1
  15324. 1
  15325.  @williamhodgden8970  yeah... that's just false dichotomies and false narratives. All propped up by right-wing fear-mongering. First... One... Has like... Nothing to do with the other. Like you can advocate for reasonable mental health and gun regulations in America while also saying it's not cool for cops to go around indiscriminately shooting or killing black people and then getting away with it so they can go out and do it again. If you support police officers that choose to do so, then that's you being in the wrong with them. Those people shouldn't be police officers. My mother is a retired police officer and a staunch Republican. She would say that those type of police officers get the rest of them very bad names and shouldn't be allowed to hold that position. A badge does not give you the right to murder people. So maybe if more people like you paid a little more attention to that reality and not the distraction narratives that your side of the aisle is feeding you, every time my side of the aisle has tried to peacefully protest this over the past couple of decades, "this summer" wouldn't have been an issue. You should have listened to them when they were kneeling. Or were they just supposed to keep letting people murder their children and get away with it? Next I found very very few Democrats coming anywhere close to supporting those that weren't peaceful protesters in their actions. I did, however, disagree with a few of them that got too close for my comfort. Like Maxine Waters. Her comment about going out and confronting these people in the streets was not helpful at all. See I have this amazing ability to criticize my own side so that we actually have a chance of making our problems on our side of the aisle better. We don't just dismiss to the other one and pretend that nothing's going on over here, then feign outrage about the issues. You should try it. I'm curious if you're just as passionate about January 6th? I'm also curious as to what law-abiding citizens you think they're charging, while letting other not law-abiding citizens free? You got some names or just a general talking point? I love how you guys claim where the blind ones but then spout all this nonsensical right-wing fear-mongering like it's gospel. Would you like me to give you a list of all the republican-run cities that are just as bad if not worse? Or would that challenge you were Democrats are evil and everything is all their fault false narrative?
    1
  15326. 1
  15327. 1
  15328. 1
  15329. 1
  15330. 1
  15331. 1
  15332. 1
  15333. 1
  15334. 1
  15335. 1
  15336. 1
  15337. 1
  15338. 1
  15339. 1
  15340. 1
  15341. 1
  15342. 1
  15343. 1
  15344. 1
  15345. 1
  15346. 1
  15347. 1
  15348. 1
  15349. 1
  15350. 1
  15351. 1
  15352. 1
  15353. 1
  15354. 1
  15355. 1
  15356. 1
  15357. 1
  15358. 1
  15359. 1
  15360. 1
  15361. 1
  15362. 1
  15363. 1
  15364. 1
  15365. 1
  15366. 1
  15367. 1
  15368. 1
  15369. 1
  15370. 1
  15371. 1
  15372. 1
  15373. 1
  15374. 1
  15375. 1
  15376. 1
  15377. 1
  15378. 1
  15379. 1
  15380. 1
  15381. 1
  15382. 1
  15383. 1
  15384. 1
  15385. 1
  15386. 1
  15387. 1
  15388. 1
  15389. 1
  15390. 1
  15391. 1
  15392. 1
  15393. 1
  15394. 1
  15395. 1
  15396. 1
  15397. 1
  15398. 1
  15399. 1
  15400. 1
  15401. 1
  15402. 1
  15403. 1
  15404.  @joshuaoverlord5327  Boulder, Colorado (King Soopers grocery store)  Date: March 10 Lives lost: 10 Weapon used: Ruger AR-556 pistol Orlando, Florida (Pulse nightclub) Date: June 12, 2016 Lives lost: 49 Weapon used: Sig Sauer MCX Parkland, Florida (Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School) Date: Feb. 14, 2018 Lives lost: 17 Weapon used: Smith and Wesson M&P15, that manufacturer's version of the AR-15, USA TODAY reported. Las Vegas (Highway 91 country music festival) Date: Oct. 1, 2017 Lives lost: 58 Weapons used: 23 different weapons were recovered in the gunman's hotel suite, including multiple AR-15 style rifles and hundreds of rounds of ammunition, USA TODAY reported. Aurora, Colorado (Century 16 movie theater)  Date: July 20, 2012 Lives lost: 12 Weapon used: One AR-15 variant from Smith & Wesson, a pump-action 12-gauge shotgun and at least one .40-caliber semiautomatic pistol, according to The New York Times. Sandy Hook Elementary School (Newtown, Connecticut) Date: Dec. 14, 2012 Lives lost: 27 Weapon used: Remington AR-15-style bushmaster, USA TODAY reported. Waffle House (Nashville, Tennessee) Date: April 22, 2018 Lives lost: 4 Weapon used: AR-15 assault-style rifle, according to The Tennessean. San Bernadino, California (holiday office party at Inland Regional Center): Date: Dec. 2, 2015 Lives lost: 14 Weapon used: Two AR-15 variants (Smith & Wesson M&P assault rifle and a DPMS Panther Arms assault rifle) a Smith & Wesson handgun and a Llama handgun, according to The New York Times. Midland/Odessa (West Texas cities) Date: Aug. 31, 2019 Lives lost: 7 Weapon used: At least one AR-15 variant, as stated in a Justice Department press release about a case involving the man who sold the gun to the shooter. Poway synagogue (near San Diego) Date: Apr. 27, 2019 Lives lost: 1 Sutherland Springs (rural Texas church service) Date: Nov. 5, 2017 Lives lost: 26 Weapon used: Ruger AR-15 variant, USA TODAY reported. Tree of Life Synagogue (Pittsburgh) Date: Oct. 27, 2018 Lives lost: 11 Weapon used: "multiple firearms'' including a Colt AR-15 rifle and three Glock .357, according to a Justice Department press release about the shooting's designation as a hate crime Weapon used: AR-15 variant, according to a Justice Department court filing. That's 210 lives lost in just just 11 school shootings. You wanna keep playing body count? Catch up...
    1
  15405. 1
  15406. 1
  15407. 1
  15408. 1
  15409. 1
  15410. 1
  15411. 1
  15412. 1
  15413. 1
  15414. 1
  15415.  @joshuaoverlord5327  Nope... "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Check the founding fathers other writings and the goings on that brought the second amendment to fruition. During the Civil War many non-military Affiliated militias were formed to fight the Redcoats. After they won the newly formed government of the United States tried to get them to surrender their guns back over. They didn't want to. They were fresh from war and had no idea whether another one was coming around the corner soon or not and felt they had the right to keep their gums and defend themselves add to stay did during the Civil War. The well-regulated militia part was a concession on both sides. The founding fathers agreed to allow them to keep their stocks of firearms as long as they continue to demonstrate that they were going to be responsible with them. So when they wrote the Second Amendment they put well-regulated militia in there intentionally to say they could keep their guns. Well which is why it's the very first line of the very first sentence in the Second Amendment. The people they were talking about not having their gun rights infringed upon were the people in the well-regulated militia. You don't have the rights you think you do. Everything has restrictions in a civilized society for the betterment of the entirety of the society. Not the selfish wants and desires of the single individual.
    1
  15416. 1
  15417. 1
  15418. 1
  15419. 1
  15420. 1
  15421. 1
  15422. 1
  15423. 1
  15424. 1
  15425. 1
  15426. 1
  15427. 1
  15428. 1
  15429. 1
  15430. 1
  15431. 1
  15432. 1
  15433. 1
  15434. 1
  15435. 1
  15436. 1
  15437. 1
  15438. 1
  15439. 1
  15440. 1
  15441. 1
  15442. 1
  15443. 1
  15444. 1
  15445. 1
  15446. 1
  15447. 1
  15448. 1
  15449. 1
  15450. 1
  15451. 1
  15452. 1
  15453. 1
  15454. 1
  15455. 1
  15456. 1
  15457. 1
  15458. 1
  15459. 1
  15460. 1
  15461. 1
  15462. 1
  15463. 1
  15464. 1
  15465. 1
  15466. 1
  15467. 1
  15468. 1
  15469. 1
  15470. 1
  15471. 1
  15472. 1
  15473. 1
  15474. 1
  15475. 1
  15476. 1
  15477. 1
  15478. 1
  15479. 1
  15480. 1
  15481. 1
  15482. 1
  15483. 1
  15484. 1
  15485. 1
  15486. 1
  15487. 1
  15488. 1
  15489. 1
  15490. 1
  15491. 1
  15492. 1
  15493. 1
  15494. 1
  15495. 1
  15496. 1
  15497. 1
  15498. 1
  15499. 1
  15500. 1
  15501. 1
  15502. 1
  15503. 1
  15504. 1
  15505. 1
  15506. 1
  15507. 1
  15508. 1
  15509. 1
  15510. 1
  15511. 1
  15512. 1
  15513. 1
  15514. 1
  15515. 1
  15516. 1
  15517. 1
  15518. 1
  15519. 1
  15520. 1
  15521. 1
  15522. 1
  15523. 1
  15524. 1
  15525. 1
  15526. 1
  15527. 1
  15528. 1
  15529. 1
  15530. 1
  15531. 1
  15532. 1
  15533. 1
  15534. 1
  15535. 1
  15536. 1
  15537. 1
  15538. 1
  15539. 1
  15540. 1
  15541. 1
  15542. @Scott Covert 👈 👇THIS is this persons sad but persistent attempt to get off the subject at hand by trying to bait me into talking about anything other turn Donald Trump and his racism. " it also seems like you don't want to acknowledge Biden's racist comments and sexual predations because you know I'm right, and I'm not acknowledging it yourself, you are supporting a racist and creep." 👆THIS is this persons sad but persistent attempt to get off the subject at hand by trying to bait me into talking about anything other turn Donald Trump and his racism. Anyone who looks up will notice that the original comments and video were about Trump and his racism. This is a very common tactic of the right. They want to do anything other than recognized Trump's wrongdoing, so every time someone brings it up, all they want to do is talk about the other side. They've given up on trying to defend all the craziness he does. Now it's just divert, divert divert, desert, divert, deflect, divert. Even going so far as to try abd insist the main narrative was Biden. I am not going to play that game with them. You shouldn't either. It's simply a transparent attempt to get you on the defensive because they know if they're on it, they would lose. Now this one's trying to shove words into my mouth to try and get me on that subject, but I've already corrected that once. That's all I need to do. From this point forward, this is the only message they will get from me in regards to any other subject, then the original one that they are desperately trying to avoid. They can say whatever they want about me from now on on a completely different subject. All that will show is their desperation to run away from Trump and his actions.
    1
  15543. 1
  15544. 1
  15545. 1
  15546. 1
  15547. 1
  15548. 1
  15549. 1
  15550. 1
  15551. 1
  15552. 1
  15553. @Scott Covert 👈 Once again, this one Insists on running from the main topic, by attempting to put me on the defensive about another topic. He CANNOT speak about Trump's racism, yet insists claiming "my hypocrisy" in not condemning Joe Biden, "for his", 👉thereby admitting Trump's racism👈, despite his best efforts. He knows He can't defend Trump against racism, he has to change the subject and try to save face. That is why he....👇 1. Keeps trying to 👉DIVERT👈 to Joe Biden. 2. Keeps trying to 👉bait me👈, by putting words in my mouth and calling me names. 3. Making 👉baseless assumptions👈 about what I, and others are doing. 4. 👉Running from substance based questions👈 about the claims he has made. EVEN when the answers to these questions are in this very thread, or the clip above. 5. Constantly insist that I am somehow the problem because 👉I won't play his diversion game👈. 6. Thinking that if he keeps 👉repeating👈 his claim... That it will have... Somehow... Become true, despite any evidence. 7. Attempting, at first, to take a singular situation by itself, until realizing that I would insist he consider 👉all relevant data👈. 8. Sets up 👉paper tiger👈, after 👉paper tiger👈, to have something to 👉argue against👈. 👉I won't play his game👈, and he has nowhere else to go. He came unprepared, and that is a whole lot of 👉effort👈 to not have to address 👉Donald Trump being racist👈. Which is SIMPLY all the point I have to make about this RACISM CONTRIBUTOR. 😁✌
    1
  15554. 1
  15555. @Scott Covert 👈 Once again, this one Insists on running from the main topic, by attempting to put me on the defensive about another topic. He CANNOT speak about Trump's racism, yet insists claiming "my hypocrisy" in not condemning Joe Biden, "for his", 👉thereby admitting Trump's racism👈, despite his best efforts. He knows He can't defend Trump against racism, he has to change the subject and try to save face. That is why he....👇 1. Keeps trying to 👉DIVERT👈 to Joe Biden. 2. Keeps trying to 👉bait me👈, by putting words in my mouth and calling me names. 3. Making 👉baseless assumptions👈 about what I, and others are doing. 4. 👉Running from substance based questions👈 about the claims he has made. EVEN when the answers to these questions are in this very thread, or the clip above. 5. Constantly insist that I am somehow the problem because 👉I won't play his diversion game👈. 6. Thinking that if he keeps 👉repeating👈 his claim... That it will have... Somehow... Become true, despite any evidence. 7. Attempting, at first, to take a singular situation by itself, until realizing that I would insist he consider 👉all relevant data👈. 8. Sets up 👉paper tiger👈, after 👉paper tiger👈, to have something to 👉argue against👈. 👉I won't play his game👈, and he has nowhere else to go. He came unprepared, and that is a whole lot of 👉effort👈 to not have to address 👉Donald Trump being racist👈. Which is SIMPLY all the point I have to make about this RACISM CONTRIBUTOR. 😁✌
    1
  15556. 1
  15557. @Scott Covert 👈 Once again, this one Insists on running from the main topic, by attempting to put me on the defensive about another topic. He CANNOT speak about Trump's racism, yet insists claiming "my hypocrisy" in not condemning Joe Biden, "for his", 👉thereby admitting Trump's racism👈, despite his best efforts. He knows He can't defend Trump against racism, he has to change the subject and try to save face. That is why he....👇 1. Keeps trying to 👉DIVERT👈 to Joe Biden. 2. Keeps trying to 👉bait me👈, by putting words in my mouth and calling me names. 3. Making 👉baseless assumptions👈 about what I, and others are doing. 4. 👉Running from substance based questions👈 about the claims he has made. EVEN when the answers to these questions are in this very thread, or the clip above. 5. Constantly insist that I am somehow the problem because 👉I won't play his diversion game👈. 6. Thinking that if he keeps 👉repeating👈 his claim... That it will have... Somehow... Become true, despite any evidence. 7. Attempting, at first, to take a singular situation by itself, until realizing that I would insist he consider 👉all relevant data👈. 8. Sets up 👉paper tiger👈, after 👉paper tiger👈, to have something to 👉argue against👈. 👉I won't play his game👈, and he has nowhere else to go. He came unprepared, and that is a whole lot of 👉effort👈 to not have to address 👉Donald Trump being racist👈. Which is SIMPLY all the point I have to make about this RACISM CONTRIBUTOR. 😁✌
    1
  15558. 1
  15559. 1
  15560. 1
  15561. 1
  15562. 1
  15563. 1
  15564. 1
  15565. 1
  15566. 1
  15567. 1
  15568. 1
  15569. 1
  15570. 1
  15571. 1
  15572. 1
  15573. 1
  15574. 1
  15575. 1
  15576. 1
  15577. 1
  15578. 1
  15579. 1
  15580. 1
  15581. 1
  15582. 1
  15583. 1
  15584. 1
  15585. 1
  15586. 1
  15587. 1
  15588. 1
  15589. 1
  15590. 1
  15591. 1
  15592. 1
  15593. 1
  15594. 1
  15595. 1
  15596. 1
  15597. 1
  15598. 1
  15599. 1
  15600. 1
  15601. 1
  15602. 1
  15603. 1
  15604. 1
  15605. 1
  15606. 1
  15607. 1
  15608. 1
  15609. 1
  15610. 1
  15611. 1
  15612. 1
  15613. 1
  15614. 1
  15615. 1
  15616. 1
  15617. 1
  15618. 1
  15619. 1
  15620. 1
  15621. 1
  15622. 1
  15623. 1
  15624. 1
  15625. 1
  15626. 1
  15627. 1
  15628. 1
  15629. 1
  15630. 1
  15631. 1
  15632. 1
  15633. 1
  15634. 1
  15635. 1
  15636. 1
  15637. 1
  15638. 1
  15639. 1
  15640. 1
  15641. 1
  15642. 1
  15643. 1
  15644. 1
  15645. 1
  15646. 1
  15647.  @dustinhendricks951  SoOoOo.... Did you think that stuffing all those comments with irrelevant to the subject babble, was somehow going to discourage me from pointing out that you have yet to answer my question?🤣 Yes! I do keep asking the same thing. This right here. 👇 You said, "You might want to look closer how (regulated) in the Constitution was used. It's not what you think.". So, how is "(regulated)" used differently then how I think? BECAUSE... The first thing you said to me was this! 👇 "You might want to look closer how (regulated) in the Constitution was used. It's not what you think." AT NO POINT have you answered that question. All you keep doing is dancing around it and asking things that indicate that you don't know the answer, yourself. Like this latest one, here! 👇 "...? Ok "Do you mean federal government is responsible for monitoring how many Firearms are what kind of firearms in law-abiding citizens have?" WHICH WAS A RESPONSE to these 2, here!👇 "Ugh.... Dude... Just say that you where not prepared to back up that claim you made... This is like the 3rd time I have asked you to explain what you meant when you said I was not using regulation incorrectly. This is the third time you've dodged it. How was I not using the word regulation in the Constitution correctly?" "Oh goodness! So you never had anything to back up your critique then. You just thought you'd throw out there that I wasn't using regulation right and then totally not be prepared to back that up with anything.... Think whatever you like about me... You keep dodging the substance. Not me. 😉✌"
    1
  15648. 1
  15649. 1
  15650. 1
  15651. 1
  15652. 1
  15653. 1
  15654. 1
  15655. 1
  15656. 1
  15657. 1
  15658. 1
  15659. 1
  15660. 1
  15661. 1
  15662. 1
  15663. 1
  15664. 1
  15665. 1
  15666. 1
  15667. 1
  15668. 1
  15669. 1
  15670. 1
  15671. 1
  15672. 1
  15673. 1
  15674. 1
  15675. 1
  15676. 1
  15677. 1
  15678. 1
  15679. 1
  15680. 1
  15681. 1
  15682. 1
  15683. 1
  15684. 1
  15685. 1
  15686. 1
  15687.  DB Stevens  I never really got you guys who cherry-picked some stat that you just feed off the other people without looking at the entirety of the picture. You think it's going to make you sound smart enough to scare somebody else away for some reason. Yes.... Our gun problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. Our mass shooting problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. If you want to slow or stop mass shootings guns are not the only thing that need to be addressed. If you want to stop mass shootings taking away all guns is not necessarily the answer and it's not what anyone wants. You guys are letting the right-wing scare you into thinking we're trying to take all your guns away all the damn time. I don't give a damn about your gun. I grew up down south. I'm still here now. I do a reasonably dangerous job on a daily basis. Ain't nobody taking my gun from me. What I also have is regular gun safety courses, a clean bill of Mental Health, regular maintenance on my firearm oh, the ability to only carry it when necessary and be responsible while I'm doing so and I don't need a goddamn hand Cannon to get the job done. Because... If you need an auto, semi-auto or a bump that basically makes yours a semi-auto to be able to hit what you're firing at, you ain't got no business carrying that gun in the first place. The good ideas for gun regulations that I've heard of would be annual proficiency exams paid for by the government for anyone who wants to open carry Scientific studies to determine the specific problems that cause the gun violence epidemic in America getting rid of what most people call the Gun Show loophole but is really the private seller loophole making people who have been diagnosed with severe and mental illnesses not able to get ahold of a firearm Government-sponsored firearm safety classes And the only thing that I would probably consider Banning would be bumps that turn regular guns into semi automatics.... but I'm still a little iffy on that one. Now, drama queens like you will hear nothing but.... oh my God these crazy Democrats are trying to take our guns away. .... that right there is exactly what the right-wing feeds you every time anyone wants to put a new gun regulation up except it's b***** and you're being there useful idiot.
    1
  15688. 1
  15689. 1
  15690.  @dustinhendricks951  SoOoOo... That is an interesting article.... it's super late so I'm probably going to get to the rest tomorrow but the first thing that struck me was the definitions. In the sentences from the dictionary, it seems to be saying that it's kept... Or kept up.... orderly... Organized even.... well regulated. That actually doesn't go against the understanding of the regulations to keep it that way. Were you ever in the military? I'm not. My whole family is though. Literally. My entire family except me and the generation below me. There's commonality between the military regiments. Air Force, Army, Navy, Coast Guard... It doesn't matter. They all have what they call Regs.... obviously short for regulations. Most of the founders themselves were military men. So I could see them placing well-regulated there. It doesn't discount the regulations about gun control. It back some up. Regs are Universal in the military. You have regulations for almost everything when you're in the military. From your guns, to how you wear your clothes and even your family and house if you live on base. Which I'm sure you know we're basically rules. Do this a certain way. It's done that certain way for a purpose. There's always a purpose. So when they use that with gun control and regulations... Or well regulated, they're talking about regulations. Wench, again we have always had with firearms from the jump. There has always been some kind of regulation on a firearm since we have had the birth of the right. That is because they are recognized as deadly tools. Yes, they can be tools but they can also hurt and kill people, innocent people. Whether it's on purpose or by accident. Regulations are meant to mitigate damage.
    1
  15691.  @dustinhendricks951  You are 33... I'm 35. 1984. Both my grandfathers where in World War 1 & 2. 1 Army 1 Navy. Both my grandmothers were Army nurses. My dad's brother was in Vietnam. My dad guarded Air Force One under two presidents. My mom and her three sisters we're all Air Force. My brother is Army and has done two tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. High school when the towers went down. I had an uncle in tower 2. No one did anything that day but watch the TV screens. There were teachers crying in the hallways. Everybody was really quiet. I had not registered until my dad came to pick me up from school that, Uncle Len was in tower 2. I felt bad about that for years. I just didn't think about it. I had been watching all day.... I almost got suspended two days later forgetting in this fight because of my Uncle. This stupid girl overheard me telling a friend about my uncle and I had not remembered he was there. I said something about how he was not blood related. I believe it was... he wasn't my uncle uncle... Uncle Len and my dad had known each other basically back since sandbox days and so he was my uncle. That's the part this stupid little girl overheard, what's around and said do you think you would have remembered him if he was your real Uncle. I sat there stunned for about half a second. Long enough to see the smile form on her face and then I lunged.... pretty sure the only reason I got a pass was because of the whole Uncle Tower thing. I've actually read that before. Bluster and posturing aside, I really do make it my business to know the facts about what I'm talking about, before I speak on it. Not enough people do that nowadays.... Which is why I am unclear as to why you gave me this to read? What are you trying to prove out? And I section them out in different comments, so its easier all around to track the topics... BTW. I don't try and comment flood for nefarious purpose, or anything. I'm just a little OCD like that.
    1
  15692. 1
  15693. 1
  15694. 1
  15695. 1
  15696. 1
  15697. 1
  15698. 1
  15699. 1
  15700. 1
  15701. 1
  15702. 1
  15703. 1
  15704. 1
  15705. 1
  15706. 1
  15707. 1
  15708. 1
  15709. 1
  15710. 1
  15711. 1
  15712. 1
  15713. 1
  15714. 1
  15715. 1
  15716. 1
  15717. 1
  15718.  DB Stevens  and ya skipped some stuff... what's wrong? Got your feels all up in it because you didn't have a good response! 🤣 "And I love that logic by the way. Laws don't work! That's why we have vigilantes running about and no order in the streets and the justice system has absolutely just collapsed. Prisoners are out running everywhere. People are declaring martial law... Except they can't do that because laws don't work... Wait oh, no. That's silly. Which means where it came from was silly. LOL" "yes, before reasonable gun regulation it was easier to get a gun. Getting a gun and having the quantity of guns in America as a whole are two different things. Are more guns in America today than there ever has been since America started. You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with scientific statistic. In fact I could get you that scientific statistics." "I never really got you guys who cherry-picked some stat that you just feed off the other people without looking at the entirety of the picture. You think it's going to make you sound smart enough to scare somebody else away for some reason. Yes.... Our gun problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. Our mass shooting problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. If you want to slow or stop mass shootings guns are not the only thing that need to be addressed. If you want to stop mass shootings taking away all guns is not necessarily the answer and it's not what anyone wants. You guys are letting the right-wing scare you into thinking we're trying to take all your guns away all the damn time. I don't give a damn about your gun. I grew up down south. I'm still here now. I do a reasonably dangerous job on a daily basis. Ain't nobody taking my gun from me. What I also have is regular gun safety courses, a clean bill of Mental Health, regular maintenance on my firearm oh, the ability to only carry it when necessary and be responsible while I'm doing so and I don't need a goddamn hand Cannon to get the job done. Because... If you need an auto, semi-auto or a bump that basically makes yours a semi-auto to be able to hit what you're firing at, you ain't got no business carrying that gun in the first place. The good ideas for gun regulations that I've heard of would be annual proficiency exams paid for by the government for anyone who wants to open carry Scientific studies to determine the specific problems that cause the gun violence epidemic in America getting rid of what most people call the Gun Show loophole but is really the private seller loophole making people who have been diagnosed with severe and mental illnesses not able to get ahold of a firearm Government-sponsored firearm safety classes And the only thing that I would probably consider Banning would be bumps that turn regular guns into semi automatics.... but I'm still a little iffy on that one. Now, drama queens like you will hear nothing but.... oh my God these crazy Democrats are trying to take our guns away. .... that right there is exactly what the right-wing feeds you every time anyone wants to put a new gun regulation up except it's b***** and you're being there useful idiot."
    1
  15719. 1
  15720. 1
  15721. 1
  15722. 1
  15723. 1
  15724.  DB Stevens  and ya skipped some stuff... what's wrong? Got your feels all up in it because you didn't have a good response! 🤣 "And I love that logic by the way. Laws don't work! That's why we have vigilantes running about and no order in the streets and the justice system has absolutely just collapsed. Prisoners are out running everywhere. People are declaring martial law... Except they can't do that because laws don't work... Wait oh, no. That's silly. Which means where it came from was silly. LOL" "yes, before reasonable gun regulation it was easier to get a gun. Getting a gun and having the quantity of guns in America as a whole are two different things. Are more guns in America today than there ever has been since America started. You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with scientific statistic. In fact I could get you that scientific statistics." "I never really got you guys who cherry-picked some stat that you just feed off the other people without looking at the entirety of the picture. You think it's going to make you sound smart enough to scare somebody else away for some reason. Yes.... Our gun problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. Our mass shooting problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. If you want to slow or stop mass shootings guns are not the only thing that need to be addressed. If you want to stop mass shootings taking away all guns is not necessarily the answer and it's not what anyone wants. You guys are letting the right-wing scare you into thinking we're trying to take all your guns away all the damn time. I don't give a damn about your gun. I grew up down south. I'm still here now. I do a reasonably dangerous job on a daily basis. Ain't nobody taking my gun from me. What I also have is regular gun safety courses, a clean bill of Mental Health, regular maintenance on my firearm oh, the ability to only carry it when necessary and be responsible while I'm doing so and I don't need a goddamn hand Cannon to get the job done. Because... If you need an auto, semi-auto or a bump that basically makes yours a semi-auto to be able to hit what you're firing at, you ain't got no business carrying that gun in the first place. The good ideas for gun regulations that I've heard of would be annual proficiency exams paid for by the government for anyone who wants to open carry Scientific studies to determine the specific problems that cause the gun violence epidemic in America getting rid of what most people call the Gun Show loophole but is really the private seller loophole making people who have been diagnosed with severe and mental illnesses not able to get ahold of a firearm Government-sponsored firearm safety classes And the only thing that I would probably consider Banning would be bumps that turn regular guns into semi automatics.... but I'm still a little iffy on that one. Now, drama queens like you will hear nothing but.... oh my God these crazy Democrats are trying to take our guns away. .... that right there is exactly what the right-wing feeds you every time anyone wants to put a new gun regulation up except it's b***** and you're being there useful idiot."
    1
  15725. 1
  15726. 1
  15727. 1
  15728. 1
  15729. 1
  15730. 1
  15731. 1
  15732. 1
  15733. 1
  15734. 1
  15735. 1
  15736. 1
  15737. 1
  15738. 1
  15739. 1
  15740. 1
  15741. 1
  15742. 1
  15743. 1
  15744. 1
  15745. 1
  15746. 1
  15747. 1
  15748. 1
  15749. 1
  15750. 1
  15751. 1
  15752. 1
  15753. 1
  15754. 1
  15755. 1
  15756. 1
  15757. 1
  15758. 1
  15759. 1
  15760. 1
  15761. 1
  15762. 1
  15763. 1
  15764. 1
  15765. 1
  15766. 1
  15767. 1
  15768. 1
  15769.  @erico4868  Well... Smart girl... But it's whatever. 😁 Though I am a little confused as to why you thought I wasn't being direct. I have never been accused of that before... 😆 Also... Not sure why you think or who you think deamed the Mueller report is not liget... But I would love to hear the evidence for that one???? Cuz, that's gonna be funny! If nothing else. 🤣 Then we come to the part where you try and play fortune teller and think that is some kind of point. It's not. I'm really not sure why so many of you guys thing trying to predict the future without a time machine handy is any kind of lagit argument... 🤷 Doing good for this country... Well... The nicest way I can put that is... Its seriously up for debate... 🙊🙉🙈 But the only one undermining hos presidency, is him. Everytime he abuses his power and breaks the laws. 😶 OH! I get it! Your just special! Is that it. Only you know the real truth. Everyone else is wrong. Is that it? 🤣 Your one of those. You have to be right. You are willing to present nonsense false dichotomies all day long, of which you can provide absolutely no proof for, just because you can't handle being wrong.... That's always just a little sad. 😢🤣 I mean... Just look at that logic... you don't know most of the people on your side or most of the people on the other side, and so you can't back up any of that, BUT you still feel like it's a good idea to make sweeping generalizations about both. "Obviously the people who agree with you or holier-than-thou hard-working patriotic Americans and the other people are demon spawn who never did anything good for anyone!"🤣 Sweetheart, you showed nothing but your obvious bias, willful ignorance or facts, a lack of ability to prove what you claim and irrational need to villainize anyone who might not agree with you, even though you don't know them oh, because you need to be right that damn bad! 🤣 And why not throw some fortune telling in at the end... Just encase you haven't already proven that reality doesn't live where you are. 😉✌
    1
  15770.  @erico4868  Hey, you wanna see what your Kryptonite is? 😁 " Russia was a hoax and the people who started the entire Witch Hunt will be held accountable either with loss of gurira, jail or both. That is the future." Prove it! 😁 " Just because I am right about Trump continuing his presidency does not mean I need to be right." No... You need to be right.because there is no possible way you can prove that and yet you still continue to say it.... Oh... And Prove it! 😁 By admitting that you're bias oh, you are also admitting that you were seeing things in a way that isn't clear. Which means what your determinations are about the thing you are biased against, couldn't possibly be true. Especially all that silly nonsense. You would have to ignore an incredible amount to say the thing you just did about the Dems.... But lets be clear... I don't think the Dems have hallows and the Reps have horns... There is good and bad on both sides. After all, the dams are impart responsible for why we have Trump now. They decided that Hillary Clinton was their best option in the last election. Even if you don't count all her shadiness, all she gave anyone for her to run by is a bunch of empty platitudes and I'm not him. Not to mention her air of entitlement. Like the presidency was her turn now. People need someone to vote for. Not just against.🙄 Not going to go through all of them because I don't have that kind of time right now but I will mention a few points. Socialism, monarchy, democracy, oligarchy, dictatorship... do you know what all these things have in common? They are systems of operation. Which is why you painting socialist as a negative doesn't make any sense. Systems of operation are not good or bad. They are in the hands of the user. You don't understand enough about that to be able to form an educated opinion on it. For instance, Republicans are big proponents of local government. States rights and all that... But a good deal of local government is run off of socialist systems. So Republicans are advocating for a socialist regime without even knowing it. Like police departments, fire departments, ambulance services and a big one is social security. Even roadworks is runoff of socialist programs. Socialist is clearly a buzzword for you. But you should really look up what that actually means and how its instituted. To throw up the slavery flag, is to ignore the past 60 or so years of History.... and you can't willfully ignore that much recent history without having your point be completely nuel void at the end of the day. And I know who I am defending. You are defending a side that want to excuse law breaking, setting up of concentration camps, wripping of children from there parents and loosing them. Leaving Kurdish soldiers who have saved countless American lives to die after years of fighting side-by-side with them. A racist, currupt, rapist as our world leader. The dangerous deregulation of our country. Wars on climate change scientific evidence so they don't have to do anything abput it and can keep making money on big oil. Shutting down of our gov for the longest time on record... To have millions of government employees standing at breadlines and losing their homes only for him to Cave In The End. Especially when he could have gotten the wall funding in his first year and a half in office when he was in control of the house the Senate and the White House. The only thing he did get done in that first year and a half was tax cuts for the rich... While claiming to be clearing out the swamp.... I mean... I could go on... This is what you are defending... 😉✌
    1
  15771. 1
  15772.  @erico4868  Man of his word... 🤣🤣🤣 At last count there are over 12,000 lies he has told sense entering office. Walls not going up Mexico isn't paying for it Cuts to Medicaid No tax returns And on and on and on and on.... Orange man bad complex is a lazy argument the Right comes up with so they don't have to get into the details. Hell I can even name a few things he was right abput if you like... That way your lazy argument has no validity. DeVos, his education secretary was trying to defund the Special Olympics. Yes he hired her but I don't really see how he could have predicted she was going to try and do that, but he did stop her when she tried. He played a decent role in the Criminal Justice Reform Bill that was passed. He even have a good point about China and their intellectual property rights theft.... went about it in a horrible way and got us into a no-win trade War but he had a good point... And... We are on to the silly over-emotional left thing. Except you guys are the ones that always get your feelings all up in everything. Cuz you don't give a damn about anything or anyone as long as you don't have to say you were wrong. Saying you were wrong about him and what he does is going to hurt your ego and so you will just back whatever crazy-ass s*** he does, no matter who it hurts. So y'all really need to stop playing the emotion card. Your emotions are all up in this... And pride and ego... And it's not over emotional. There are still over a thousand children lost in America today because they were taken from their parents while trying to cross the border and then his administration didn't bother to track where they were going. Just cuz the facts don't make your son look good doesn't mean they're not there. And the people didn't vote him in. He lost the people's vote. The Electoral College voted him in. You can't even get that right. No one is buying your wishful thinking anymore... Sorry Charlie! 😉✌
    1
  15773. 1
  15774.  @erico4868  oh... Okay.. Well why didn't you say so... Here is fox news talking abput the Russia investigation today 😁 https://www-foxnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-rules-congressional-democrats-can-have-access-to-mueller-grand-jury-material.amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Ffederal-judge-rules-congressional-democrats-can-have-access-to-mueller-grand-jury-material Here is Politico talking about the Russia investigation today 😁 https://www-politico-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/10/25/judge-rules-doj-must-turn-over-mueller-grand-jury-material-to-house-democrats-000299?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2019%2F10%2F25%2Fjudge-rules-doj-must-turn-over-mueller-grand-jury-material-to-house-democrats-000299 Here is the Washington Post talking about the Russia investigation today😁 https://www-wsj-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/mueller-grand-jury-materials-must-be-transmitted-to-congress-judge-rules-11572034351?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2Fmueller-grand-jury-materials-must-be-transmitted-to-congress-judge-rules-11572034351 Here is the hill talking about the Russia investigation today 😁 https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/467506-judge-orders-doj-to-release-grand-jury-material-from-mueller-report?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fregulation%2Fcourt-battles%2F467506-judge-orders-doj-to-release-grand-jury-material-from-mueller-report Got any more excuses to ignore things that prove your claims wrong? Cuz I can knock those out easy too. It's not that hard when you're dealing with actual facts and not make believe. 😉✌
    1
  15775.  @erico4868  Nope! Took that excuse away from you. Gave you the same story... Saying the same thing... From 4 other sources... One being fox news.... Which not only proves your silly CNN bias wrong but also gives you no excuse to recognize that you where wrong about no one talking about Russia anymore. See! I'll do it again! 👇 "oh... Okay.. Well why didn't you say so... Here is fox news talking abput the Russia investigation today 😁 https://www-foxnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-rules-congressional-democrats-can-have-access-to-mueller-grand-jury-material.amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Ffederal-judge-rules-congressional-democrats-can-have-access-to-mueller-grand-jury-material Here is Politico talking about the Russia investigation today 😁 https://www-politico-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/10/25/judge-rules-doj-must-turn-over-mueller-grand-jury-material-to-house-democrats-000299?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2019%2F10%2F25%2Fjudge-rules-doj-must-turn-over-mueller-grand-jury-material-to-house-democrats-000299 Here is the Washington Post talking about the Russia investigation today😁 https://www-wsj-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/mueller-grand-jury-materials-must-be-transmitted-to-congress-judge-rules-11572034351?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2Fmueller-grand-jury-materials-must-be-transmitted-to-congress-judge-rules-11572034351 Here is the hill talking about the Russia investigation today 😁 https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/467506-judge-orders-doj-to-release-grand-jury-material-from-mueller-report?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15721427658571&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fregulation%2Fcourt-battles%2F467506-judge-orders-doj-to-release-grand-jury-material-from-mueller-report Got any more excuses to ignore things that prove your claims wrong? Cuz I can knock those out easy too. It's not that hard when you're dealing with actual facts and not make believe. 😉✌"
    1
  15776. 1
  15777. 1
  15778. 1
  15779. 1
  15780. 1
  15781. 1
  15782. 1
  15783. 1
  15784. 1
  15785. 1
  15786. 1
  15787. 1
  15788. 1
  15789. 1
  15790. 1
  15791. 1
  15792. 1
  15793. 1
  15794. 1
  15795. 1
  15796. 1
  15797. 1
  15798.  @mrlopez5009  okay.... A few questions. Like, I'm not trying to trick you or anything. I'm just confused about a few points and need some clarification before I reply further. If you got my point then how is his tactic unorthodox and not just down right not good? How does China holding the largest amount of US debt give them less wiggle room and not more? I asked that because that is essentially giving them the American nuke button. If things got really bad, all they would have to do is call in the debt ( and yes I know full well it's more complicated than that but for argument's sake ) bankrupt us... And sure they would take a big hit but they have been preparing for this for a long time now. That is why they started making those moves with trade. They basically knew they could get away with it. It's more complicated than that obvy but... Anyways... That the first question. Okay but she didn't get a deal with North Korea and we also work trying to go to war with North Korea before he really brought it up. Yeah Kim Jong crazy pants would fire off some Rockets every once in awhile and wave his dick around but we weren't worried about it. It's just not that serious of a threat and he's asked elated in other wars were in and now talking about sending more troops to the Middle East. As far as a trade War he's actions are going to get us in a trade war with two different countries right now. And the ones that we import the most from. Okay another question... Why do you value a living wage through economic growth and not Minimum Wage Enforcement? Also I really don't get the thing on how Trump is doing good things for the environment. I mean just the deregulations alone then he is enacted, is in the middle of enacting and have plans to enact in the future is crazy bad for the environment. I can give you a list if you want. He won't even let people talk about climate change. At least on his people. Well I'm bisexual and I'm very offended on a regular basis about what he says about my transgender friends. Trying to kick them out of military. Don't even get me started on the bathroom stuff. And again not trying to be rude but you would be wrong about it being a mental illness. That was the consensus back in the day but today and through years and years of studying and multiple doctors points of view and a million other things... Thats just simply not the conscience the medical professionals have come to anymore. Also.... Why shouldn't transgender be in the military? That puberty blockers thing for young children is just a scare tactic. Most medical professionals wouldn't even entertain the idea and most liberals don't believe that. They do believe when they get older and they're ready to transition they should be allowed to. I'm going to have to look up the pharmaceutical thing because I don't know enough about it and this is the first time I've heard it. But I will The Last Vegas thing isn't best anecdotal sweetheart. I live in Louisiana and that is just not the case here but I don't bring that up because it's just one spot you know? So you're not going to hear an argument from me about then focusing way too much on Russia and not enough on policy. I don't agree with you on a lot of what you think he's doing and so my tactic would be to attack him on those policies. The Russia thing it's not unimportant but it's not the whole ballgame and if that's what they run on next time then they're going to lose. Because at the end of the day Russia doesn't make every Americans day today better or worse. I will disagree with you on the racist thing and if you like I will give you mounds of proof about that and explain to you why that is important. Anyways if you want to answer those two questions and kind of hash that out that would be great. it's nice talking to you
    1
  15799. 1
  15800. 1
  15801. 1
  15802. 1
  15803. 1
  15804. 1
  15805. 1
  15806.  @ericmartin2470  there are a few problems with you continuing to quote Edmund Burke to me. Not counting the argument that these are complex matters and should be. So there for its not generally a good idea to make rash decisions with peoples lives based off of a quote that your taking out of context. One, of your referring to Trump.... He is not a good man. With mountians of evidence to back it up. But if your referring to Russia annexing Crimea.... It was messed up but not unlike what Trump is doing now with the GTO. In the sense that they both are using the wrong tactic, and therefore weakened their argument by doing the wrong thing and breaking the rules to get something done which, had they gone about it in a different way, would have probably worked out in there favor. Russia and Vladimir Putin actually had a good argument for reclaiming Crimea. For a lot of reasons. Not the least of which was the people of Crimea wanted to be Russian citizens instead of Ukrainian citizens. Also Crimea was originally Russian territory. Had he come about it the right way, he would have probably ended up in the same position he's in now except with a stronger stance on the issue and the rest of the world in recognition. Now, we are back to your "doing nothing" thing. America and the other nations did not do nothing. They did a bunch of things actually and within the bounds of laws and rules. Ukraine and many other world leaders condemn the annexation and considered it to be a violation of international law and Russian signed agreements safeguarding the territorial Integrity of Ukraine. This leg to the other members Aldi Dan G8 suspending Russia from the group, then introducing the first round of sanctions against the country. The United Nations General Assembly also rejected the vote and annexation, adopting a non-binding resolution affirming the territorial Integrity of Ukraine within its International recognized borders. The UN resolution also underscores that the referendum having no validity, can't form the basis for any alteration of the status of Crimea and calls upon all states and international organizations not to recognize or to imply the recognition of Russia's annexation. The assembly reaffirmed non-recognition of the annexation and condemned the temporary occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine. In the end, even though Russia's ill-advised strongman tactics was not the best way to get it done, it hurt no one and it is what the people of Crimea wanted. That being the case I would argue that your quote really does not apply to the situation.
    1
  15807. 1
  15808. 1
  15809.  @ericmartin2470  no you're not agreeing with me you're setting up a different narrative than the one that I presented. You wanted your example so damn bad. Your example is in the very thing we've been talking about this entire time and I explained that in detail. Which you should have already known before speaking on the subject by the way. Now you're trying to set up a false premise and in a way that indicates that you still don't understand what is going on in this situation. On top of which you're trying to somehow put the statement of inaccuracy on to me for it. Which is just nonsense. It's also really starting to look like you can't argue your premise so you keep trying to set up paper tigers, change the narrative and just generally seem to be avoiding facts all together that doesn't fit your preconceived notion. But here's the thing, it's not necessary to set up another scenario. The very situation has your example in it. China is screwing around with World economics and has been for a long time. No one's denying that. The argument and premise is trying to punish other countries for breaking the deals we make with them by breaking the deals we make with them... Which is at best I'll advised. It also has consequences. Like we're not the only people in the world and we're eventually going to have to work with the other countries. You know like the ones that are lining up behind China right now because Trump decided to do what he did. Those countries who can no longer trust us to hold up our end of things, but then have to deal with the fact that we expect them to hold up theirs. It also has consequences like it's going to be rejected by the UN. Because you can't punish another country for breaking the rules by breaking the rules yourself. You don't need to set up another scenario or premise. All the details are in the one that we've been talking about all along. No one saying there shouldn't be sanctions or tariffs. All those countries are saying that those need to fall under the rules and regulations of the WTO which America and all these other countries agreed to and signed. Also I'm getting a little tired of not getting actual answers to my questions but then you proceed to keep asking me yours. All I get is deflection tactics and sarcasm.
    1
  15810. 1
  15811. 1
  15812.  @ericmartin2470  okay so now you're going to tell me what the narrative was that we were just talking about. Which by the way originally was not brought up By Me but by you, when you asked me about what I would do to China. You cannot then completely disregard the subject matter just because you can no longer argue your point with it. You brought up the subject of the tariffs and what I would do. Then you argued how what I was doing was nothing. Then after explaining to you that not only what I was doing wasn't nothing ...I explained to you that if you don't like it... There was recourse within the deal (of the WTO) to change that... and that he was not doing that... but doing something else that was stupid and put America in a worse negotiating standpoint.... And so on and so forth. You can not, now that the conversation isn't working out the way you thought it would, completely disregard the entirety of all of that... and then say no we're talkin about this. That's a cop out. A thing that you accused me of before. Me on the other hand, I'm not working backwards. You talking yourself into a corner isn't my problem. So would you like to explain why it's totally cool for America the break the rules but not for China? And let me preface this, I don't like Trump for a variety of reasons but let's just say someone else was president. Let's say it was my very best friend in the world, Sally. If Sally was trying to punish somebody else for breaking the rules by breaking the rules herself, I would still tell her that was a stupid idea. I would explain to her that it puts her in a bad position when it comes to negotiating a damn thing in the future, because noone can trust you to honor your agreement. So in this.... My dear friend... Me, joe, bob, Anne and the rest of the class are going to have to stand up for Sarah and against you because even though we dont like what Sarah is doing either... We don't think you should be the one punishing her given your CHOOSING to do the same thing your punishing her for, in order to punish her. You have lost perspective dear friend and should step back or choose a different tactic. And you know why Sally? Because the only thing necessary for the Triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke Sally = America / president Sarah = China Me and all the others being the other countries.
    1
  15813. 1
  15814. 1
  15815. 1
  15816. 1
  15817. 1
  15818. 1
  15819. 1
  15820. 1
  15821. 1
  15822.  @ericmartin2470  Well... I don't need to hear I'm right. But thanks. I was simply pointing out an obvious flaw in stratagy, given all the pieces on the board. Unfortunately I have to disagree with the rest of what you said. To be clear, the issue was not instituting tariffs at all. The issue was the amount of tariffs there instituting. That is where they broke the rules. Here is what I would have done if I was him. I would have instituted the tariffs that are capable under the current rules in the deal with WTO. I would have used the clause in that same deal and at the same time to renegotiate the deal and the amount of tariffs that are allowed to be put on China. I would have a good argument with that as well. Because the WTO was written back in the 70s when China was a less developed state. So the argument that they use to get the Tariff limitations that they have is that if they go higher than a certain amount it could bankrupt their economy. That argument is no longer valid and therefore the terrorist should be increased. If he had done that, then he would have been able to sanction the smaller amount of tariffs and increase them when the rules were changed. He would have also had all those countries that are standing against him right now, standing with him. That Global pressure alone would have put America in an amazing negotiating stamps when it came to trade Wars. Sometimes it's just better to use the carrot than it is the stick. " instead the US should leave the WTO, break all ties to China and impose sanctions. The US would no longer do any kind of business with China and countries that do business with China." Sorry but that's a massive overreaction that would end up screwing us so hard. First... China owns most of our debt. II WTO is where we do all of our trade. 3rd China is also one of the largest markets for trade and therefore no other country would be willing to sacrifice China for us especially if China called in there debt on us. Here's the trouble. China has done a damn fine job setting themselves up for being unexpendable. You have to acknowledge that to get anywhere good. It doesn't mean they're untouchable. It does mean you have to be just as smart when trying to put them back in their place.
    1
  15823.  @ericmartin2470  Well.... I would do what I said before. "To be clear, the issue was not instituting tariffs at all. The issue was the amount of tariffs there instituting. That is where they broke the rules. Here is what I would have done if I was him. I would have instituted the tariffs that are capable under the current rules in the deal with WTO. I would have used the clause in that same deal and at the same time to renegotiate the deal and the amount of tariffs that are allowed to be put on China. I would have a good argument with that as well. Because the WTO was written back in the 70s when China was a less developed state. So the argument that they use to get the Tariff limitations that they have is that if they go higher than a certain amount it could bankrupt their economy. That argument is no longer valid and therefore the terrorist should be increased. If he had done that, then he would have been able to sanction the smaller amount of tariffs and increase them when the rules were changed. He would have also had all those countries that are standing against him right now, standing with him. That Global pressure alone would have put America in an amazing negotiating stamps when it came to trade Wars. Sometimes it's just better to use the carrot than it is the stick." But that would be just to start. You would have to wait for there move after that. It would be a long game for sure. China would make sure of that. They are good at the long game.... But using the WTO rules to raise the tariffs and getting all those countries on our side with the rules and valid argument would be a good start.... But just a start.
    1
  15824. 1
  15825. 1
  15826.  @ericmartin2470  well the numbers I'm getting say China owns 1.123 trillion dollars of our debt since Dec, 2018. Which you are right. Is not most. Used the wrong term. They hold the majority of it. With Japan coming in second with 1.042 trillion. My point about the debt still stands however. Except the stick screws us over more than it does China. You're not looking at all the pieces. They have a bigger stick. You cannot take them on alone and that's exactly what he would be doing by alienating all the other countries and Not only would he be alienating them they are on China side. The stick gives China all the power. As demonstrated by all the other countries that are aligning with China right now. " the US has exhausted all diplomatic channels and reassurances from the Chinese," Thats not true. I just told you what they should do. Where do you get the information from that " the majority of Americans agree with what Trump is doing"? History is all well and good but you also need to understand the details of the issues at hand, that are happening right now. Why do you think all those other presidents, the Bush's included, didn't go after China like this? It was for good reason. It's because you can't win that way. It's also trumps only play. That play may work on people like Ken Jeong Hoon but it's not going to work on China. They're not simpleton strong men over there. They spent the last thirty years sharing their self up and playing the long game. Which is why they now have a stronger position that was handed to them by Trump strongman tactic. They are no longer now standing alone against us. They have a ton of other countries standing with them and do you see any other country raising their hand back in the house right now?
    1
  15827. 1
  15828. 1
  15829. 1
  15830. 1
  15831. 1
  15832. 1
  15833. 1
  15834. 1
  15835. 1
  15836. 1
  15837. 1
  15838. 1
  15839. 1
  15840. 1
  15841. 1
  15842. 1
  15843. 1
  15844. 1
  15845. 1
  15846. 1
  15847. 1
  15848. 1
  15849. 1
  15850. 1
  15851. 1
  15852. 1
  15853. 1
  15854. 1
  15855. 1
  15856. 1
  15857. 1
  15858. 1
  15859. 1
  15860. 1
  15861. 1
  15862. 1
  15863. 1
  15864. 1
  15865. 1
  15866. 1
  15867. 1
  15868. 1
  15869. 1
  15870. 1
  15871. 1
  15872. 1
  15873. 1
  15874. 1
  15875. 1
  15876. 1
  15877. 1
  15878. 1
  15879. 1
  15880. 1
  15881. 1
  15882. 1
  15883. 1
  15884. 1
  15885. 1
  15886. 1
  15887. 1
  15888. 1
  15889. 1
  15890. 1
  15891. 1
  15892. 1
  15893. 1
  15894. 1
  15895. 1
  15896. 1
  15897. 1
  15898. 1
  15899. 1
  15900. 1
  15901. 1
  15902. 1
  15903. 1
  15904. 1
  15905. 1
  15906. 1
  15907. 1
  15908. 1
  15909. 1
  15910. 1
  15911. 1
  15912. 1
  15913. 1
  15914. 1
  15915. 1
  15916. 1
  15917. 1
  15918. 1
  15919. 1
  15920. 1
  15921. 1
  15922. 1
  15923. 1
  15924. 1
  15925. 1
  15926. 1
  15927. 1
  15928. 1
  15929. 1
  15930. 1
  15931. 1
  15932. 1
  15933. 1
  15934. 1
  15935. 1
  15936. 1
  15937. 1
  15938. 1
  15939. 1
  15940. 1
  15941. 1
  15942. 1
  15943. 1
  15944. 1
  15945. 1
  15946. 1
  15947. 1
  15948. 1
  15949. 1
  15950. 1
  15951. 1
  15952. 1
  15953. 1
  15954. 1
  15955. 1
  15956. 1
  15957. 1
  15958. 1
  15959. 1
  15960. 1
  15961. 1
  15962. 1
  15963. 1
  15964. 1
  15965. 1
  15966. 1
  15967. 1
  15968. 1
  15969. 1
  15970. 1
  15971. 1
  15972. 1
  15973. 1
  15974. 1
  15975. 1
  15976. 1
  15977. 1
  15978. 1
  15979. 1
  15980. 1
  15981. 1
  15982. 1
  15983. 1
  15984. 1
  15985. 1
  15986. 1
  15987. 1
  15988. 1
  15989. 1
  15990. 1
  15991. 1
  15992. 1
  15993. 1
  15994. 1
  15995. 1
  15996. 1
  15997. 1
  15998. 1
  15999. 1
  16000. 1
  16001. 1
  16002. 1
  16003. 1
  16004. 1
  16005. 1
  16006. 1
  16007. 1
  16008. 1
  16009. 1
  16010. 1
  16011. 1
  16012. 1
  16013. 1
  16014. 1
  16015. 1
  16016. 1
  16017. 1
  16018. 1
  16019. 1
  16020. 1
  16021. 1
  16022. 1
  16023. 1
  16024. 1
  16025. 1
  16026. 1
  16027. 1
  16028. 1
  16029. 1
  16030. 1
  16031. 1
  16032. 1
  16033. 1
  16034. 1
  16035. 1
  16036. 1
  16037. 1
  16038. 1
  16039. 1
  16040. 1
  16041. 1
  16042. 1
  16043. 1
  16044. 1
  16045. 1
  16046. 1
  16047. 1
  16048. 1
  16049. 1
  16050. 1
  16051. 1
  16052. 1
  16053. 1
  16054. 1
  16055. 1
  16056. 1
  16057. 1
  16058. 1
  16059. 1
  16060. 1
  16061. 1
  16062. 1
  16063. 1
  16064. 1
  16065. 1
  16066. 1
  16067. 1
  16068. 1
  16069. 1
  16070. 1
  16071. 1
  16072. 1
  16073. 1
  16074. 1
  16075. 1
  16076. 1
  16077. 1
  16078. 1
  16079. 1
  16080. 1
  16081. 1
  16082. 1
  16083. 1
  16084. 1
  16085. 1
  16086. 1
  16087. 1
  16088. 1
  16089. 1
  16090. 1
  16091. 1
  16092. 1
  16093. 1
  16094. 1
  16095. 1
  16096. 1
  16097. 1
  16098. 1
  16099. 1
  16100. 1
  16101. 1
  16102. 1
  16103. 1
  16104. 1
  16105. 1
  16106. 1
  16107. 1
  16108. 1
  16109. 1
  16110. 1
  16111. 1
  16112. 1
  16113. 1
  16114. 1
  16115. 1
  16116. 1
  16117. 1
  16118. 1
  16119. 1
  16120. 1
  16121. 1
  16122. 1
  16123. 1
  16124. 1
  16125. 1
  16126. 1
  16127. 1
  16128. 1
  16129. 1
  16130. 1
  16131. 1
  16132. 1
  16133. 1
  16134. 1
  16135. 1
  16136. 1
  16137. 1
  16138. 1
  16139. 1
  16140. 1
  16141. 1
  16142. 1
  16143. 1
  16144. 1
  16145. 1
  16146. 1
  16147. 1
  16148. 1
  16149. 1
  16150. 1
  16151. 1
  16152. 1
  16153. 1
  16154. 1
  16155. 1
  16156. 1
  16157. 1
  16158. 1
  16159. 1
  16160. 1
  16161. 1
  16162. 1
  16163. 1
  16164. 1
  16165. 1
  16166. 1
  16167. 1
  16168. 1
  16169. 1
  16170. 1
  16171. 1
  16172. 1
  16173. 1
  16174. 1
  16175. 1
  16176. 1
  16177. 1
  16178. 1
  16179. 1
  16180. 1
  16181. 1
  16182. 1
  16183. 1
  16184. 1
  16185. 1
  16186. 1
  16187. 1
  16188. 1
  16189. 1
  16190. 1
  16191. 1
  16192. 1
  16193. 1
  16194. 1
  16195. 1
  16196. 1
  16197. 1
  16198. 1
  16199. 1
  16200. 1
  16201. 1
  16202. 1
  16203. 1
  16204. 1
  16205. 1
  16206. 1
  16207. 1
  16208. 1
  16209. 1
  16210. 1
  16211. 1
  16212. 1
  16213. 1
  16214. 1
  16215. 1
  16216. 1
  16217. 1
  16218. 1
  16219. 1
  16220. 1
  16221. 1
  16222. 1
  16223. 1
  16224. 1
  16225. 1
  16226. 1
  16227. 1
  16228. 1
  16229. 1
  16230. 1
  16231. 1
  16232. 1
  16233. 1
  16234. 1
  16235. 1
  16236. 1
  16237. 1
  16238. 1
  16239. 1
  16240. 1
  16241. 1
  16242. 1
  16243. 1
  16244. 1
  16245. 1
  16246. 1
  16247. 1
  16248. 1
  16249. 1
  16250. 1
  16251. 1
  16252. 1
  16253. 1
  16254. 1
  16255. 1
  16256. 1
  16257. 1
  16258. 1
  16259. 1
  16260. 1
  16261. 1
  16262. 1
  16263. 1
  16264. 1
  16265. 1
  16266. 1
  16267. 1
  16268. 1
  16269. 1
  16270. 1
  16271. 1
  16272. 1
  16273. 1
  16274. 1
  16275. 1
  16276. 1
  16277. 1
  16278. 1
  16279. 1
  16280. 1
  16281. 1
  16282. 1
  16283. 1
  16284. 1
  16285. 1
  16286. 1
  16287. 1
  16288. 1
  16289. 1
  16290. 1
  16291. 1
  16292. 1
  16293. 1
  16294. 1
  16295. 1
  16296. 1
  16297. 1
  16298. 1
  16299. 1
  16300. 1
  16301. 1
  16302. 1
  16303. 1
  16304.  @UnKnown-sf9vw   Seriously... Dude.. Stop telling silly lies. Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16305. 1
  16306. 1
  16307. 1
  16308. 1
  16309. 1
  16310. 1
  16311. 1
  16312. 1
  16313. 1
  16314. 1
  16315. 1
  16316. 1
  16317. 1
  16318. 1
  16319. 1
  16320. 1
  16321. 1
  16322. 1
  16323. 1
  16324. 1
  16325. 1
  16326.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  The summary of this interaction.... You have whittled down your arguments to claim that a parasite does not actually need to be a living organism feeding off of another living organism. It can be a living organism feeding also something else. For which you gave a definition that you claimed was "mine", for some strange reason. One, for which you never gave a source for. Which was one of those questions you ignored. Unless you count your lie that it was my definition.... Or to quote you directly, " from your dictionary" Even though I gave you 11 different definitions from academic sources, and you used none of them. This is what you claimed to be my definition. 👉 " a parasitic relationship or parasitism is a relationship between a parasite and a host that's beneficial to the parasite and detrimental to The Host " Now... You tried to be clever and give me the definition of a 👉parasitic relationship👈, and not a 👉parasite👈 itself. Which is why you wont give the source of that definition. So I gave you the definitions of the actual definition of parasite from 7 different educational sources. You have sense been trying to dismiss them. Then you tried to exchange parasitic as a descriptive word... Or an adjective, for a noun.... Because in your world an adjective can be a noun and a noun can be an adjective anytime it's convenient for your lack of an argument. All because you're trying to use an example of a parasitic computer or parasitic technology. Which is clearly a descriptor of the technology and/or computer. And now it's all about everything I'm saying is "dribble" so you don't actually have to come back with a rebuttal for it, because you know you can't. So... Your going to clearly keep doing several things. 1. Insisting your correct about the definition of parasite, even though literally every definition of parasite proves you wrong. 2. You're going to continue to make passive aggressive Jabs at me because you're insecure about the validity of your argument. 3. You're going to continue to try and dismiss anything you can't argue against. 4. Your going to lie whenever its convenient. Which is all cool! I will give you facts and question, as you continue to make a record of dodging, ignoring and lying.
    1
  16327. 1
  16328. 1
  16329. 1
  16330. 1
  16331. 1
  16332. 1
  16333. 1
  16334. 1
  16335. 1
  16336. 1
  16337. 1
  16338. 1
  16339. 1
  16340. 1
  16341. 1
  16342. 1
  16343. 1
  16344. 1
  16345. 1
  16346. 1
  16347. 1
  16348. 1
  16349. 1
  16350. 1
  16351.  @bradynlotterman8164  Look... If you can stay civil... Which you mostly have...i will give you my full opinion on abortion. I say opinion because some is based on science and some on feeling. That will not be something I deny. Women who use abortion as birth control are disgusting to me. Even the squandering of potential life feels wrong for me. Especially doing so in a callous nature. You are talking to a woman who had 5 miscarriages before having my, now, 10 year old son. Who is my reason for everything... Each one of those children had names and, much like my son, I just knew their sex. Emotionally and hormonal I was quite attached to all of them. If the first one had come into this world he would be 20 today. His name was going to be Oliver. So, to watch women just carelessly throw away something I lost 5 different times... With that being said... I do recognize the necessity in certain cases for abortions. Even late-term abortions in very rare and extreme cases. If I got to make the decision for all of these women, my choice would be that no one got an abortion unless early abortions were done in the circumstance of rape, incest or life of the mother and child. Late-term abortions would only be done in case of life of the mother and/or child. Until I had my son, I, personally, would never have chosen abortion. I almost never would now. However, if it's a choice between me and the child I'm carrying dying or just the child I'm carrying dying and I already have a child, I'm getting the abortion. I'm not having my child grow up without his mother. But obviously that's an extreme case. Given the scientific parameters early abortions, the only person in that equation that will have pain or cognitive issues with that choice, would be the woman. Intellectually, that puts it as being her choice. She is the one that has to live with those consequences. Which comes to the place where we're going to butt heads. I will always feel like even though I hate some of the decisions, I have no right to decide that for another woman. There's bad no matter what the decision is made. Especially given certain circumstances. However, I don't have to live with it. So I can't make that choice for somebody else. Especially a decision that large. I have and would counsel any woman that came to me about an abortion, to reconsider it if she would. If nothing else giving that child up for adoption. It's just, at the end of the day I can't force someone to do something. I shouldn't have that power.
    1
  16352. 1
  16353. 1
  16354. 1
  16355. 1
  16356. 1
  16357. 1
  16358. 1
  16359. 1
  16360. 1
  16361. 1
  16362. 1
  16363. 1
  16364. 1
  16365. 1
  16366. 1
  16367. 1
  16368. 1
  16369. 1
  16370. 1
  16371. 1
  16372. 1
  16373. 1
  16374. 1
  16375. 1
  16376. 1
  16377. 1
  16378. 1
  16379. 1
  16380. 1
  16381. 1
  16382. 1
  16383. 1
  16384. 1
  16385. 1
  16386. 1
  16387. 1
  16388. 1
  16389. 1
  16390. 1
  16391. 1
  16392. 1
  16393. 1
  16394. 1
  16395. 1
  16396. 1
  16397. 1
  16398. 1
  16399. 1
  16400. 1
  16401. 1
  16402. 1
  16403. 1
  16404. 1
  16405. 1
  16406. 1
  16407. 1
  16408. 1
  16409. 1
  16410. 1
  16411. 1
  16412. 1
  16413. 1
  16414. 1
  16415. 1
  16416. 1
  16417.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16418.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16419.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16420.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16421.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16422.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16423.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16424. 1
  16425.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16426. 1
  16427.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16428. 1
  16429.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16430. 1
  16431.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16432. 1
  16433. 1
  16434. 1
  16435.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16436. 1
  16437. 1
  16438. 1
  16439.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16440. 1
  16441. 1
  16442.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16443. 1
  16444. 1
  16445. 1
  16446. 1
  16447. 1
  16448. 1
  16449.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16450. 1
  16451. 1
  16452. 1
  16453.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Correct! To bad none of the examples you gave where doing anything but 👉mimicking👈 a parasitic relationship, because both of them need to be organisms and none of your examples met that criteria. Definitions of Parasite. 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16454. 1
  16455. 1
  16456. 1
  16457. 1
  16458. 1
  16459. 1
  16460. 1
  16461. 1
  16462. 1
  16463. 1
  16464.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Cool! 👇 Here 👇 are all the definitions of parasite, except, of course, your made up one. Which one of them don't require both parties to be organisms? And what are the sources of these "definitions" you claim to have given? 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16465. 1
  16466.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  As I said... 👇 Here 👇 are all the definitions of parasite, except, of course, your made up one. Which one of them don't require both parties to be organisms? And what are the sources of these "definitions" you claim to have given? 👇 Oxford Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives in or on an 👉organism👈 of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. Webster Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 living in, on, or with another 👉organism👈 in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host. The CDC - A parasite is an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in a host 👉organism👈 and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. There are three main classes of parasites that can cause disease in humans: protozoa, helminths, and ectoparasites. Dictionary co - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. Biology online - An👉 organism 👈that obtains nourishment and shelter on another 👉organism👈 Wikipedia - Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one 👉organism👈, the parasite, lives on or inside another 👉organism👈, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. Encyclopedia Britannica - parasitism, relationship between two species of 👉plants or animals👈 in which one benefits at the expense of the other, sometimes without killing the host 👉organism👈. Cambridge Dictionary - an 👉animal or plant👈 that lives on or in another 👉animal or plant👈 of a different type and feeds from it: Collins Dictionary - an 👉organism👈 that lives on or in an 👉organism👈 of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment Vocabulary co - A creature that lives off another 👉organism👈 is a parasite. The parasite might not hurt the host, but it doesn't do anything to help it, either. MacMillan dictionary - BIOLOGY a 👉plant or animal👈 that lives in or on another type of animal and feeds on it
    1
  16467. 1
  16468. 1
  16469. 1
  16470.  @UnKnown-sf9vw  Oh... I remember what you said... And so do you. That is why you can't answer the questions I asked. That is why you have to continue degrading yourself by acting childish. Let's see, there was the time you tried to pretend that there wasn't a difference between the word parasite and the phrase parasitic relationship. There was the time you pretended that there wasn't a difference between organisms and inanimate objects. Specifically technology. Computer hardware and software. There was all the times you tried to cherry pick both the definitions of the word parasite and the word mimicry. And pretty much throughout this whole thing you've tried to cherry-pick any legitimate definition of the word parasite in order to try and convince yourself you're correct about something you're clearly not correct about. Seeming to think that if you just say it enough times it will magically change the definition of the word parasite as we know it. Unfortunately for you, that is just not how reality works. Which you have constantly demonstrated you already know, by... - constantly outright lying - cherry picking facts - constantly running from questions - attempting to ignore the obvious - constantly deflecting from your own behaviour and lack of logic - grasping at straws - acting like a child when no of that was working for you - using desperate deflection tactics like weather I post my rebuttals in one long reply instead of several short ones... No idea what that os about... All of which screams you know your wrong.... But your not fixing to admit it, because you are desperate to save face at this point. The only thing you don't seem to understand is how all this behavior isn't making you save face. It's making you look worse. The obvious truth is, you can't save face at this point. You can only make yourself look worse. You also only have yourself to blame for that.
    1
  16471. 1
  16472. 1
  16473. 1
  16474. 1
  16475. 1
  16476. 1
  16477. 1
  16478. 1
  16479. 1
  16480. 1
  16481. 1
  16482. 1
  16483. 1
  16484. 1
  16485. 1
  16486. 1
  16487. 1
  16488. 1
  16489. 1
  16490. 1
  16491. 1
  16492. 1
  16493. 1
  16494. 1
  16495. 1
  16496. 1
  16497. 1
  16498. 1
  16499. 1
  16500. 1
  16501. 1
  16502. 1
  16503. 1
  16504. 1
  16505. 1
  16506. 1
  16507. 1
  16508. 1
  16509. 1
  16510. 1
  16511. 1
  16512. 1
  16513. 1
  16514. 1
  16515. 1
  16516. 1
  16517. 1
  16518. 1
  16519. 1
  16520. 1
  16521. 1
  16522. 1
  16523. 1
  16524. 1
  16525. 1
  16526. 1
  16527. 1
  16528. 1
  16529. 1
  16530. 1
  16531. 1
  16532. 1
  16533. 1
  16534. 1
  16535. 1
  16536. 1
  16537. 1
  16538. 1
  16539. 1
  16540. 1
  16541. 1
  16542. 1
  16543. 1
  16544. 1
  16545. 1
  16546. 1
  16547. 1
  16548. 1
  16549. 1
  16550. 1
  16551. 1
  16552. 1
  16553. 1
  16554. 1
  16555. 1
  16556. 1
  16557. 1
  16558. 1
  16559. 1
  16560. 1
  16561. 1
  16562. 1
  16563. 1
  16564. 1
  16565. 1
  16566. 1
  16567. 1
  16568. 1
  16569. 1
  16570. 1
  16571. 1
  16572. 1
  16573. 1
  16574. 1
  16575. 1
  16576. 1
  16577. 1
  16578. 1
  16579. 1
  16580. 1
  16581. 1
  16582. 1
  16583. 1
  16584. 1
  16585. 1
  16586. 1
  16587. 1
  16588. 1
  16589. 1
  16590. 1
  16591. 1
  16592. 1
  16593. 1
  16594. 1
  16595. 1
  16596. 1
  16597. 1
  16598. 1
  16599. 1
  16600.  @guibiaojiang1633  Way back in the day that was 1 of the reasons NATO was formed. It is very easy to find out that their preview has changed sense then. Not only has NATO offered membership to Russia 3 different times in the last the decades, backed by the US support, there are several different American satellite installations in Russia, america buys 9% of our gas and oil from Russia (when we really don't need to), and the US backed the deal that convinced Ukraine to literally surrender all it's nukes TO RUSSIA, for a promise that ( ironically ) the US and RUSSIA would have its back, if attacked. Ukraine was NOT willing to do so with just Russia making that promise. "For some reason" they didn't trust Russia to keep their word by themselves. Gee! I wonder why. If your going to give historical context, you can't cherry pick your historical context. RUSSIA is the aggressor and bad faith actor. Putin is the aggressor and bad faith actor.... And not for the first time. Over the past several years, Putin has been becoming more and more aggressive and shady. -The annexation of Crimea -The Proven pampering into US elections -The bounty's put on US and Canadian soldiers heads in Afghanistan -The tendency for Putin's opposition to meet with very shady ends, at very convenient times. Just to name a few.... Not to mention... Ukraine is a sovereign country all of its own. Russia does not control it anymore. It does not get to decide what Ukraine does or does not do to better their country and their people's future. The Iron Curtain dropped a long time ago and Ukraine damn near unanimously voted to leave. They broke up with you. Get over it.
    1
  16601. 1
  16602. 1
  16603. 1
  16604. 1
  16605. 1
  16606. 1
  16607. 1
  16608. 1
  16609. 1
  16610. 1
  16611. 1
  16612. 1
  16613. 1
  16614. 1
  16615. 1
  16616. 1
  16617. 1
  16618.  @user-tj3et5ep6t  conjecture is the forming of an opinion based on incomplete information. Which would only apply if I accept your premise that I was originally talking about the legality of her move. Which I've already stated I think twice now, that I'm not. I get that split your trying to turn it into because that seems to be the only way you can come up with an argument but that doesn't actually make it so. Using your argument, you would have agreed with slavery back when that was legal. How is asking a public official, why she only does these unnecessary and extreme things when she's left in charge after her boss leaves town, a leading or biased question? If this was about her going above and beyond, she wouldn't be showboating so she could get elected. She knew good and damn well that unnecessary Act was going to be rescinded as soon as her boss got back into town, yet she did it twice. To be very clear, the media merely showed a video that she willingly recorded and posted up to get elected using a gun and a Bible. So if you're going to hold the media accountable for showing the video that she put together herself, then why in the world wouldn't you hold her accountable for the same? Unless your bias yourself, of course. Aspirate being out of context, how was it out of context? This entire time you've tried to hold the media responsible for things that you excuse when it comes to her. Either everybody's accountable for their actions or you have no business telling anybody they should be.
    1
  16619. 1
  16620. 1
  16621. 1
  16622. 1
  16623. 1
  16624. 1
  16625. 1
  16626. 1
  16627. 1
  16628. 1
  16629. 1
  16630. 1
  16631. 1
  16632. 1
  16633. 1
  16634. 1
  16635. 1
  16636. 1
  16637. 1
  16638. 1
  16639. 1
  16640. 1
  16641. 1
  16642. 1
  16643. 1
  16644. 1
  16645. 1
  16646. 1
  16647. 1
  16648. 1
  16649. 1
  16650. 1
  16651. 1
  16652. 1
  16653. 1
  16654. 1
  16655. 1
  16656. 1
  16657. 1
  16658. 1
  16659. 1
  16660. 1
  16661. 1
  16662. 1
  16663. 1
  16664. 1
  16665. 1
  16666. 1
  16667. 1
  16668. 1
  16669. 1
  16670. 1
  16671. 1
  16672. 1
  16673. 1
  16674. 1
  16675. 1
  16676. 1
  16677. 1
  16678. 1
  16679. 1
  16680. 1
  16681. 1
  16682. 1
  16683. 1
  16684. 1
  16685. 1
  16686. 1
  16687. 1
  16688. 1
  16689. 1
  16690. 1
  16691. 1
  16692. 1
  16693. 1
  16694. 1
  16695. 1
  16696. 1
  16697. 1
  16698. 1
  16699. 1
  16700. 1
  16701. 1
  16702. 1
  16703. 1
  16704. 1
  16705. 1
  16706.  @bovineone2420  to be clear and because you asked, instead of assume, which I find refreshing coming from someone on your side of the aisle... My opinion on free speech... I for damn sure ain't going to shut up. The only way to protect my ability not to shut the hell up even when people want me to, is to protect your ability to do the same. When you get into the Nitty Gritty of hate speech, I guess, I have a thick skin. I grew up hanging out with boys. You can call me whatever the hell you want. It isn't going to matter to me. Personally I think that's a strength people need to get through this world. Also it's pretty good to remember that the person who's trying to put you down, is doing so because they don't feel good about themselves and I really don't have anything to do with you. ... But if I did care, if I did mind, I still wouldn't be trying to force somebody else just stop calling me names. because their ability to call me a snobby b** is also my ability to call them an ignorant ass hat. Such as in our constitution. Lol... now, to get to the Constitution itself. There are restrictions on freedom of speech Rd in the Constitution. Like the famous one of you can't run in and scream fire in a crowded room when there isn't one. Inciting mass panic with no cause, isn't covered under free speech. Instructing a group of followers to commit crimes or violence against other people is not covered under free speech. But these are things that are already in there.... So we are already covered.
    1
  16707. 1
  16708. 1
  16709. 1
  16710. 1
  16711. 1
  16712. 1
  16713. 1
  16714. 1
  16715. 1
  16716. 1
  16717. 1
  16718. 1
  16719. 1
  16720. 1
  16721. 1
  16722. 1
  16723. 1
  16724. 1
  16725. 1
  16726. 1
  16727. 1
  16728. 1
  16729. 1
  16730. 1
  16731. 1
  16732. 1
  16733. 1
  16734. 1
  16735. 1
  16736. 1
  16737. 1
  16738. 1
  16739. 1
  16740. 1
  16741. 1
  16742. 1
  16743. 1
  16744. 1
  16745. 1
  16746. 1
  16747. 1
  16748. 1
  16749. 1
  16750. 1
  16751. 1
  16752. 1
  16753. 1
  16754. 1
  16755. 1
  16756. 1
  16757. 1
  16758. 1
  16759. 1
  16760. 1
  16761. 1
  16762. 1
  16763. 1
  16764. 1
  16765. 1
  16766. 1
  16767. 1
  16768. 1
  16769. 1
  16770. 1
  16771. 1
  16772. 1
  16773. 1
  16774. 1
  16775. 1
  16776. 1
  16777. 1
  16778. 1
  16779. 1
  16780. 1
  16781. 1
  16782. 1
  16783. 1
  16784. 1
  16785. 1
  16786. 1
  16787. 1
  16788. 1
  16789. 1
  16790. 1
  16791. 1
  16792. 1
  16793. 1
  16794. 1
  16795. 1
  16796. 1
  16797. 1
  16798. 1
  16799. 1
  16800. 1
  16801. 1
  16802. 1
  16803. 1
  16804. 1
  16805. 1
  16806. 1
  16807. 1
  16808. 1
  16809. 1
  16810. 1
  16811. 1
  16812. 1
  16813. 1
  16814. 1
  16815. @Carl G " as politicians allowed cities to be burned people to be murdered in thousands to be injured with no real denouncement of the groups doing it" 👈 And now we have deflection to BLM. While conveniently toting around the propaganda of the right. The reason they said it was mostly peaceful protest for a solid 6 months is because it was mostly peaceful protests for a solid 6 months. But you guys want a cherry pick a few things and then blow them crazy out of proportion. For instance, please show me a city that has been burnt down? I'll wait... And I have no idea how many times I saw Democrats and the left-wing media denounce those that are getting violent while still holding the message and making sure everybody knew that the majority of the people there were peaceful and were marching for a reason you guys tried to ignore. It's much easier to see them all as thugs so you don't have to pay attention to the real issue they were marching for. Which is ironic, because what exactly did you think was going to happen? For the ones that did get violent? You have the people that are supposed to be there protecting you actually killing you, and you spend years trying to peacefully bring about awareness to this subject, and all you get back is people bitching about how you kneeled... And you wonder why some had made the bad choice of getting violent? They are getting murdered for just walking around in their own skin. People like you always find a reason to ignore what they're saying, which is, by the way, "we're being murdered by the people who are supposed to be protecting us simply because we're a darker shade then they are, can you please do something about this".
    1
  16816. 1
  16817. 1
  16818. 1
  16819. 1
  16820. 1
  16821. 1
  16822. 1
  16823. @Carl G "you wrote in a previous comment the capital police called for backup repeatedly and didn't get it" Yep! " Are we really supposed to believe that with 2,000 officers in the capital Police Department. Police command called repeatedly for officers to help with backup and those officers refused so." In that same comment you are referencing... You are intentionally leaving a few things out. Not sure why you wouldn't think I wouldn't immediately call you on that but sure... 1. As I have stated, Have you listened to the capital police testimony or any of the recorded radio chatter from January 6th? I didn't say that police command called them. Literally every officer there called for backup and support at one time or another. 2. Why do you have it in your head that all 2000 Capital police are just chilling in a closet somewhere geared up and ready to go 24/7? They have families. They have homes. Much like literally everywhere else, they work on shifts. 3. And as I have stated... About 3 times now... the protocol dictated you called for the National Guard who actually have to be geared up and ready to go write down the road 24/7. Any hour of the day there is a National Guard unit ready to go either to the capital or to the White House if necessary. That is protocol.... because a long time ago people smarter than obviously you are, thought it was probably a good idea to have that available in our nation's capital. So why would the capital police, Under Siege from a violent mob, call in Jimmy Joe halfway across the city barbecuing ribs in his backyard, who then has to Gear Up, get out the door, fight past all the traffic and then all the mob, just to get inside and help all the rest of his police officers came with him... when they have a geared up unit right down the road? Why does that make sense to you?
    1
  16824. 1
  16825. 1
  16826. 1
  16827. 1
  16828. 1
  16829. 1
  16830. 1
  16831. 1
  16832. 1
  16833. 1
  16834. 1
  16835. 1
  16836. 1
  16837. 1
  16838. 1
  16839. 1
  16840. 1
  16841. 1
  16842. 1
  16843. 1
  16844. 1
  16845. 1
  16846. 1
  16847. 1
  16848. 1
  16849. 1
  16850. 1
  16851. 1
  16852. 1
  16853. 1
  16854. 1
  16855. 1
  16856. 1
  16857. 1
  16858. 1
  16859. 1
  16860. 1
  16861. 1
  16862. 1
  16863. 1
  16864. 1
  16865. 1
  16866. 1
  16867. 1
  16868. 1
  16869. 1
  16870. 1
  16871. 1
  16872. 1
  16873. 1
  16874. 1
  16875. 1
  16876. 1
  16877. 1
  16878. 1
  16879. 1
  16880. 1
  16881. 1
  16882. 1
  16883. 1
  16884. 1
  16885. 1
  16886. 1
  16887. 1
  16888. 1
  16889. 1
  16890. 1
  16891. 1
  16892. 1
  16893. 1
  16894. 1
  16895. 1
  16896. 1
  16897. 1
  16898. 1
  16899. 1
  16900. 1
  16901. 1
  16902. 1
  16903. 1
  16904. 1
  16905. 1
  16906. 1
  16907. 1
  16908. 1
  16909. 1
  16910. 1
  16911. 1
  16912. 1
  16913. 1
  16914. 1
  16915. 1
  16916. 1
  16917. 1
  16918. 1
  16919. 1
  16920. 1
  16921. 1
  16922. 1
  16923. 1
  16924. 1
  16925. 1
  16926. 1
  16927. 1
  16928. 1
  16929. 1
  16930. 1
  16931. 1
  16932. 1
  16933. 1
  16934. 1
  16935. 1
  16936. 1
  16937. 1
  16938. 1
  16939. 1
  16940. 1
  16941. 1
  16942. 1
  16943. 1
  16944. 1
  16945. 1
  16946. 1
  16947. 1
  16948. 1
  16949. 1
  16950. 1
  16951. 1
  16952. 1
  16953. 1
  16954. 1
  16955. 1
  16956. 1
  16957. 1
  16958. 1
  16959. 1
  16960. 1
  16961. 1
  16962. 1
  16963. 1
  16964. 1
  16965. 1
  16966. 1
  16967. 1
  16968. 1
  16969. 1
  16970. 1
  16971. 1
  16972. 1
  16973. 1
  16974. 1
  16975. 1
  16976. 1
  16977. 1
  16978. 1
  16979. 1
  16980. 1
  16981. 1
  16982. 1
  16983. 1
  16984. 1
  16985. 1
  16986. 1
  16987. 1
  16988. 1
  16989. 1
  16990. 1
  16991. 1
  16992. 1
  16993. 1
  16994. 1
  16995. 1
  16996. 1
  16997. 1
  16998. 1
  16999. 1
  17000. 1
  17001. 1
  17002. 1
  17003. 1
  17004. 1
  17005. 1
  17006. 1
  17007. 1
  17008. 1
  17009. 1
  17010. 1
  17011. 1
  17012.  @willmont8258  The Presidential Records Act The history of the PRA and the broader, complementary Federal Records Act (FRA) is well documented. Briefly, the FRA was enacted in 1950. It requires federal agencies, but not the president, to preserve their papers. In 1955, Congress passed the Presidential Libraries Act, which encouraged, but did not require, presidents to donate their records to private libraries so that they could be made available to the general public. The law tracked the norm that President Franklin Roosevelt started when he opened his presidential library in 1941 and eventually donated his papers. It wasn’t until President Nixon attempted to flout this norm that Congress took action to proactively protect public access to presidential records. After Nixon resigned, he promptly entered into an agreement with the General Services Administration that would have allowed him to destroy his records, including the Watergate tapes. Congress acted quickly to head off the destruction of the tapes, enacting the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act. That act specifically prohibited Nixon from destroying the tapes, and further specified that: [n]otwithstanding any other law or any agreement, the [General Services] Administrator shall receive, retain, or make reasonable efforts to obtain, complete possession and control of all papers, documents, memorandums, transcripts, and other objects and materials which constitute the Presidential historical materials of Richard M. Nixon, covering the period beginning January 20, 1969, and ending August 9, 1974.
    1
  17013. 1
  17014. 1
  17015. 1
  17016. 1
  17017. 1
  17018. 1
  17019. 1
  17020. 1
  17021. 1
  17022. 1
  17023. 1
  17024. 1
  17025. 1
  17026. 1
  17027. 1
  17028. 1
  17029. 1
  17030. 1
  17031. 1
  17032. 1
  17033. 1
  17034. 1
  17035. 1
  17036. 1
  17037. 1
  17038. 1
  17039. 1
  17040. 1
  17041. 1
  17042. 1
  17043. 1
  17044. 1
  17045. 1
  17046. 1
  17047. 1
  17048. 1
  17049. 1
  17050. 1
  17051. 1
  17052. 1
  17053. 1
  17054. 1
  17055. 1
  17056. 1
  17057. 1
  17058. 1
  17059. 1
  17060. 1
  17061. 1
  17062. 1
  17063. 1
  17064. 1
  17065. 1
  17066. 1
  17067. 1
  17068. 1
  17069. 1
  17070. 1
  17071. 1
  17072. 1
  17073. 1
  17074. 1
  17075. 1
  17076. 1
  17077. 1
  17078. 1
  17079. 1
  17080. 1
  17081. 1
  17082. 1
  17083. 1
  17084. 1
  17085. 1
  17086. 1
  17087. 1
  17088. 1
  17089. 1
  17090. 1
  17091. 1
  17092. 1
  17093. 1
  17094. 1
  17095. 1
  17096. 1
  17097. 1
  17098. 1
  17099. 1
  17100. 1
  17101. 1
  17102. 1
  17103. 1
  17104. 1
  17105. 1
  17106. 1
  17107. 1
  17108. 1
  17109. 1
  17110. 1
  17111. 1
  17112. 1
  17113. 1
  17114. 1
  17115. 1
  17116. 1
  17117. 1
  17118. 1
  17119. 1
  17120. 1
  17121. 1
  17122. 1
  17123. 1
  17124. 1
  17125. 1
  17126. 1
  17127. 1
  17128. 1
  17129. 1
  17130. 1
  17131. 1
  17132. 1
  17133. 1
  17134. 1
  17135. 1
  17136. 1
  17137. 1
  17138. 1
  17139. 1
  17140. 1
  17141. 1
  17142. 1
  17143. 1
  17144. 1
  17145. 1
  17146. 1
  17147. 1
  17148. 1
  17149. 1
  17150. 1
  17151. 1
  17152. 1
  17153. 1
  17154. 1
  17155. 1
  17156. 1
  17157. 1
  17158. 1
  17159. 1
  17160. 1
  17161. 1
  17162. 1
  17163. 1
  17164. 1
  17165. 1
  17166. 1
  17167. 1
  17168. 1
  17169. 1
  17170. 1
  17171. 1
  17172. 1
  17173. 1
  17174. 1
  17175. 1
  17176. 1
  17177. 1
  17178. 1
  17179. 1
  17180. 1
  17181. 1
  17182. 1
  17183. 1
  17184. 1
  17185.  @dobsr1184  "Did you say Republicans never did anything for black ppl?" Nope! " did you say Republicans were swastika" Nope! " I bet your family has them" Nope! At least not any part that I know of. If they did, they would be disowned. I have a mixed race child, Salty Spice. "Are you suggesting that black Americans are less than?" How you would get that from what I said is some kind of wonder leap logic that I am not familiar with. However, I personally think my mixed race son is the most amazing thing in the world! His daddy is my best damned friend and is the best person I've ever known. He got that from his amazing and big family, that has taken me and my son (who is light skinned like me) in lime we have always been their family and don't let anyone mess with us. Especially the father of my childs grandma. Who walks beside me with her arm around me at big gatherings calling me her daughter, when everyone is wondering who that white girl is! 😂 My adopted big brother, that I Nick named Goo, is one of the best ppl I know, as well. He has 2 beautiful boys and has always had my back. But... In short... Your making a lot of ignorant assumptions in order to have an argument here. "How can healthcare be a right if you have to pay for it?" That's the entire point. Every other major country in the world has universal healthcare. Meaning, it's free. Meaning if we're a first world country we shouldn't have people dying because they can't afford to get better. If every other major country in the world can figure it out, then so can we. " should a free car be a right to?" Most cities and most large towns have access to public transportation, already. It's for people who can't necessarily afford a vehicle but still need to go to work and contribute to society. As well as support themselves. " why are Democrat cities tossing minorities in jail" why are you singling out Democrat cities and what's your definition of democrat City? Are you saying black people don't go to jail in what you consider to be Republican cities? Defund the police is something the right-wing Twisted to mean something other than what it was supposed to mean. Basically we want to keep good cops and precincts going while weeding out those bad apples that do things like randomly executes black people in the street that are running away or just standing there doing nothing, or getting in their cars or playing on playgrounds as children, or playing in toy isles of Walmart. " you are throwing crap to see what sticks" that's a nice opinion of yours. However I articulated my issue with those specific subjects I brought up and brought them all together in order to make the point to the person I was talking to about how Society discriminates against minorities and in particular African-Americans in those cases. If that doesn't fit your agenda then, that's just tough cookies. " you think black people are not capable of having successful because you think they are less than you" Again... Nope! That's just you continuing to try and shove words into my mouth so you have an actual argument.
    1
  17186. 1
  17187. 1
  17188. 1
  17189. 1
  17190. 1
  17191. 1
  17192. 1
  17193. 1
  17194. 1
  17195. 1
  17196. 1
  17197. 1
  17198. 1
  17199. 1
  17200. 1
  17201. 1
  17202. 1
  17203. 1
  17204. 1
  17205. 1
  17206. 1
  17207. 1
  17208. 1
  17209. 1
  17210. 1
  17211. 1
  17212. 1
  17213. 1
  17214. 1
  17215. 1
  17216. 1
  17217. 1
  17218. 1
  17219. 1
  17220. 1
  17221. 1
  17222. 1
  17223. 1
  17224. 1
  17225. 1
  17226. 1
  17227. 1
  17228. 1
  17229. 1
  17230. 1
  17231. 1
  17232. 1
  17233. 1
  17234. 1
  17235. 1
  17236. 1
  17237. 1
  17238. 1
  17239. 1
  17240. 1
  17241. 1
  17242. 1
  17243. 1
  17244. 1
  17245. 1
  17246. 1
  17247. 1
  17248. 1
  17249. 1
  17250. 1
  17251. 1
  17252. 1
  17253. 1
  17254. 1
  17255. 1
  17256. 1
  17257. 1
  17258. 1
  17259. 1
  17260. 1
  17261. 1
  17262. 1
  17263. 1
  17264. 1
  17265. 1
  17266. 1
  17267. 1
  17268. 1
  17269. 1
  17270. 1
  17271. 1
  17272. 1
  17273. 1
  17274. 1
  17275. 1
  17276. 1
  17277. 1
  17278. 1
  17279. 1
  17280. 1
  17281. 1
  17282. 1
  17283. 1
  17284. 1
  17285. 1
  17286. 1
  17287. 1
  17288. 1
  17289. 1
  17290. 1
  17291. 1
  17292. 1
  17293. 1
  17294. 1
  17295. 1
  17296. 1
  17297. 1
  17298. 1
  17299. 1
  17300. 1
  17301. 1
  17302. 1
  17303. 1
  17304. 1
  17305. 1
  17306. 1
  17307. 1
  17308. 1
  17309. 1
  17310. 1
  17311. 1
  17312. 1
  17313. 1
  17314. 1
  17315. 1
  17316. 1
  17317. 1
  17318. 1
  17319. 1
  17320. 1
  17321. 1
  17322. 1
  17323. 1
  17324. 1
  17325. 1
  17326. 1
  17327. 1
  17328. 1
  17329. 1
  17330. 1
  17331. 1
  17332. 1
  17333. 1
  17334. 1
  17335. 1
  17336. 1
  17337. 1
  17338. 1
  17339. 1
  17340. 1
  17341. 1
  17342. 1
  17343. 1
  17344. 1
  17345.  Mark The Fart  You said I have not debunked 1 thing... 😁 This is 1 example so far of Thoroughly debunking and claim that you have made.😁 BUT WAIT! 😁Cuz, you are not done trying to walk it back! 😊👇 " and don't spout off about Papadopoulos, Flynn or Stone... Those are process crimes that have nothing to do with President Trump or his campaign." " all those indictments were 👉palmed off👈 to other jurisdictions and have nothing to do with what we are talking about...." Lets begin with Papadopoulos... on October 5th, 2017, Papadopoulos pleaded 👉guilty👈 in the US District Court of the District of Columbia to 👉making false statements to FBI agents👈 relating to 👉👉contacts he had with agents of the Russian government👈👈 while working for 👉👉👉the Trump campaign.👈👈👈 Now for Flynn we are going to have to go back to a statement you made. 😁 👇 " all those indictments were palmed off to other jurisdictions and have nothing to do with what we are talking about...." On December 1st, 2017, appeared in federal court to formalize a deal 👉👉👉with special counsel Robert Mueller👈👈👈 to plead guilty to a felony count of willfully and knowingly making false, thick tissues and fraudulent statements to the FBI. He confirmed his intention to cooperate with the special counsel's investigation. But I thought you said Flynn was "palmed off"? Didn't you also say twice that Papadopoulos, Flynn or and Stone were charged with process crimes that had "nothing to do with President Trump or his campaign"! Except they where all lying to the FBI about the campaigns contacts with Russia, about the campaign and while they where working for Trump. It's almost like you have no idea what your talking about! Now Stone! 😁 Remember this!?! 👇 " all those indictments were 👉palmed off👈 to other jurisdictions and have nothing to do with what we are talking about...." On January 25th, 2019, Stone was arrested at his Fort Lauderdale, Florida, home in connection with 👉👉👉Robert Mueller special counsel investigation👈👈👈 and charged in an indictment with witness tampering, obstructing an official proceeding, and five counts of making false statements. Well... It turns out... All 3 where Related to Trump and the campaign... And All 3 where not palmed off! In short, it's not the best idea to lie when you're trying to walk back your previous BS claim. 😁✌
    1
  17346. 1
  17347. 1
  17348. 1
  17349. 1
  17350. 1
  17351.  Mark The Fart  all you're doing with this comment below is proving that you're not reading my comment oh, like you never read the Mueller report.... oh... and, of course, another failed attempt and moving the goalposts. 😁 " You also fail to understand that those convictions have nothing to do with collusion or conspiracy." Lets begin with Papadopoulos... on October 5th, 2017, Papadopoulos pleaded 👉guilty👈 in the US District Court of the District of Columbia to 👉making false statements to FBI agents👈 relating to 👉👉contacts he had with agents of the Russian government👈👈 while working for 👉👉👉the Trump campaign.👈👈👈 Now for Flynn we are going to have to go back to a statement you made. 😁 👇 " all those indictments were palmed off to other jurisdictions and have nothing to do with what we are talking about...." On December 1st, 2017, appeared in federal court to formalize a deal 👉👉👉with special counsel Robert Mueller👈👈👈 to plead guilty to a felony count of willfully and knowingly making false, thick tissues and fraudulent statements to the FBI. He confirmed his intention to cooperate with the special counsel's investigation. But I thought you said Flynn was "palmed off"? Didn't you also say twice that Papadopoulos, Flynn or and Stone were charged with process crimes that had "nothing to do with President Trump or his campaign"! Except they where all lying to the FBI about the campaigns contacts with Russia, about the campaign and while they where working for Trump. It's almost like you have no idea what your talking about! Now Stone! 😁 Remember this!?! 👇 " all those indictments were 👉palmed off👈 to other jurisdictions and have nothing to do with what we are talking about...." On January 25th, 2019, Stone was arrested at his Fort Lauderdale, Florida, home in connection with 👉👉👉Robert Mueller special counsel investigation👈👈👈 and charged in an indictment with witness tampering, obstructing an official proceeding, and five counts of making false statements. 👉👉👉Well... It turns out... All 3 where Related to Trump and the campaign... And All 3 where not palmed off! 👈👈👈 In short, it's not the best idea to lie when you're trying to walk back your previous BS claim. 😁✌"
    1
  17352. 1
  17353. 1
  17354. 1
  17355. 1
  17356.  Mark The Fart  Oh! I forgot about this little nugget as well! 😁 You said... " So go ahead.. Reference where in the mall report there is actual proof that Trump did anything indictable." Why! I am so glad you asked! This one is the absolute easiest to find of all. And least for those who aren't lying about reading the Mueller report. 😁 The entirety of Volume 2, PAGE 1 - 182! 😁 But I will me specific, since I know you don't like to read, and all! You just like to lie about doing it. 😁 Volume 2, PAGE... Literally.... 1! 🤣 Second Paragraph! " Beginning and 2017, the president of the United States took a variety of actions towards the ongoing FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters that raised questions about whether he had obstructed Justice. The or appointing the special counsel gave this office jurisdiction to investigate matters that arose directly from the FBI's Russia investigation, including whether the president had obstructed Justice in connection with Russia related investigations. The special counsel's Jurisdiction also covered potentially obstructive acts related to the special counsel's investigation itself. This volume of our report summarizes our obstruction of justice investigation of the president." But wait! Keep your panties on! We're not done! 😁 Now... On... Again .... Literally.... Page 2 of volume 2.... there are a list of four declarations that are made. All four are pretty relevant but to this particular comment of yours, the fourth one is the most important. 😁 " fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so State. Based on these facts and the applicable legal standard, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions I'm in 10th present difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determine a name that no criminal conduct occurred. " But wait! There's more! 😁 Now... Just going on the read pages 3 - 6 of volume 2 there is 10... Count them... Which I know you won't.... Because that would require you reading the report... But still... 10 laid out, detailed cases of obstruction of justice! 😁 Or at least the summaries of such. Of course you're going to have to actually read volume 2 to get all the relevant details of each laid out case. 1. the campaign's response to reports about Russian support for Trump 2. conduct involving FBI director Comey and Michael Flynn 3. the president's reaction to the continuing Russia investigation 4. the president's termination of Comey 5. the appointment of a special counsel and efforts to remove him 6. efforts to curtail the special counsel's investigation 7. efforts to prevent public disclosure of evidence 8. further efforts to have the Attorney General take control of the investigation 9. efforts to have Megan deny that the president had ordered him to have the special counsel removed 10. conduct towards Flynn and manafort conduct involving Michael Cohen
    1
  17357. 1
  17358. 1
  17359. 1
  17360. 1
  17361. 1
  17362.  Mark The Fart  And ya keep saying I I'm such an idiot and I pedal in accusations in conspiracy theories and yada yada yada... I'm such a joke... Yet for some reason... 1. you have yet to bring a scrap of evidence to the table 2. you are using blanket lazy a statement so you don't have to address the actual substance 3. I've never seen as much poorly constructed goalpost moving as that which has come from you, trying to pretend that you can do things like change laws just because you say so... 🤣 4. You constantly keep up this ever more pathetic lie that you actually read the Mueller report but somehow did not retain a scrap of information because you have, those far, gotten zero things right about it, Except.... Maybe the correct spelling of some of the players names 5. you ask for things like page numbers and volume numbers. I don't only give you that but I also give you paragraph number and the quilt and you completely ignore all of that every time I did it. I wonder if that could be because you can't argue against it... Like that's not shockingly obvious right now and hasn't been forever now. 6. You claim me and my kind or so bad and stupid and everything wrong in the world but in this entire conversation. The only thing you have done is lie, be ridiculous, you was transparent Shady tactics and then, of course, because you're on the side you're on, try to put all of that off on me. Cuz if anything in the world is ever on any of you guys, someone has told you that the world will explode. And you were dumb enough to believe it LOL... 🤣
    1
  17363. 1
  17364. 1
  17365. 1
  17366. 1
  17367. 1
  17368. 1
  17369. 1
  17370. 1
  17371. 1
  17372. 1
  17373. 1
  17374. 1
  17375. 1
  17376. 1
  17377. 1
  17378. 1
  17379. 1
  17380. 1
  17381. 1
  17382. 1
  17383. 1
  17384. 1
  17385. 1
  17386. 1
  17387. 1
  17388. 1
  17389. 1
  17390. 1
  17391. 1
  17392. 1
  17393. 1
  17394. 1
  17395. 1
  17396. 1
  17397. 1
  17398. 1
  17399. 1
  17400. 1
  17401. 1
  17402. 1
  17403. 1
  17404. 1
  17405. 1
  17406. 1
  17407. 1
  17408. 1
  17409. 1
  17410. 1
  17411. 1
  17412. 1
  17413. 1
  17414. 1
  17415. 1
  17416. 1
  17417. 1
  17418. 1
  17419. 1
  17420. 1
  17421. 1
  17422. 1
  17423. 1
  17424. 1
  17425. 1
  17426. 1
  17427. 1
  17428. 1
  17429. 1
  17430. 1
  17431. 1
  17432. 1
  17433. 1
  17434. 1
  17435. 1
  17436. 1
  17437. 1
  17438. 1
  17439. 1
  17440. 1
  17441. 1
  17442. 1
  17443. 1
  17444. 1
  17445. 1
  17446. 1
  17447. 1
  17448. 1
  17449. 1
  17450. 1
  17451. 1
  17452. 1
  17453. 1
  17454. 1
  17455. 1
  17456. 1
  17457. 1
  17458. 1
  17459. 1
  17460. 1
  17461. 1
  17462. 1
  17463. 1
  17464. 1
  17465. 1
  17466. 1
  17467. 1
  17468. 1
  17469. 1
  17470. 1
  17471. 1
  17472. 1
  17473. 1
  17474. 1
  17475. 1
  17476. 1
  17477. 1
  17478. 1
  17479. 1
  17480. 1
  17481. 1
  17482. 1
  17483. 1
  17484. 1
  17485. 1
  17486. 1
  17487. 1
  17488. 1
  17489. 1
  17490. 1
  17491. 1
  17492. 1
  17493. 1
  17494. 1
  17495. 1
  17496. 1
  17497. 1
  17498. 1
  17499. 1
  17500. 1
  17501. 1
  17502. 1
  17503. 1
  17504. 1
  17505. 1
  17506. 1
  17507. 1
  17508. 1
  17509. 1
  17510. 1
  17511. 1
  17512. 1
  17513. 1
  17514. 1
  17515. 1
  17516. 1
  17517. 1
  17518. 1
  17519. 1
  17520. 1
  17521. 1
  17522. 1
  17523. 1
  17524. 1
  17525. 1
  17526. 1
  17527. 1
  17528. 1
  17529. 1
  17530. 1
  17531. 1
  17532.  cj p  👈👈👈 HEY EVERYONE!!!! Just encase you wanted to know who this "person" really is. If ppl show you who they are, believe them. This is who this person is. ( I abbreviated some but do have the screenshots if you want the whole thing.) Threat beginner comment - Basically Trump can shoot everyone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. cj p - if they were antifa or in a pussy hat... Then yes it would be epic and I would want to see him shoot more. Me - So you're basically saying you want to see the president of the United States commit murder and then you want him to get away with it... All we need to know about you, to figure out how jacked up in the head you are. (This part is a lil long and crazy ranty, so highlights)👇 cj p - if he shot you, I would throw a black party. (Some comment section thing about people cheering for a red state woman dying in a hurricane and CNN YouTube commenters cheering. Basically a justification for his actions. Which tells us, he does feel the need to justify it or aka he knows he is wrong.) (Then assumptions about what I would do, just encase that justification didn't work.)(Libs are evil then...) I don't need to fake it. When I watch the skinny effeminate antifa kid get mowed down by a red pickup... I laughed and watched it again. He didn't even break a bone. When I saw it another video of a motorist get out of his white suburban and beat the crap out of an antifa weirdo standing in front of his car... I laughed again and make jokes in the comments like every other person did. You want links to those videos they are pretty good? Me - 👈👈👈ANNNNNDDD... A perfect example of what I was talking about, everyone. This is all you need to know about him, to know nothing that comes out of his mouth is important, in any way. He is always so eager to help me prove that point and I really do appreciate it! 😉✌ Me - BTW, you are talking about taking a little boys mother away from him. That is what you are celebrating. That is who you are right now... I'm sure yours would be super proud that just came out of her little boys mouth. You are such a sad person. cj p - you were going to raise a little nut job. He might be better off adopted. And there you go again with the virtue signaling. I don't use my kid as a shield. Pathetic how you're trying to squeeze guilt from me when I'm using satire. No wonder you don't get Trump jokes. I bet memes fly past you too. Fifty bucks says your son's girlfriend's will never get along with his overbearing controlling mother with no humor. (👆You will notice, throughout this portion, you see them justifying, excusing and trying to flip what he has said onto me. All signs he knows what he has said, was wrong.) Me - 👈👈👈 Yep... This is who this person is. 👆👆👆This is why anything they say, does not matter. They aren't a good person. They aren't even mostly human. When people show you who they are, believe them. I'm going to screenshot this, copy and paste it everywhere I see this "person" from now on.
    1
  17533. @jonny s This is who you are talking to. If ppl show you who they are, believe them. This is who this person is. ( I abbreviated some but do have the screenshots if you want the whole thing.) Threat beginner comment - Basically Trump can shoot everyone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. cj p - if they were antifa or in a pussy hat... Then yes it would be epic and I would want to see him shoot more. Me - So you're basically saying you want to see the president of the United States commit murder and then you want him to get away with it... All we need to know about you, to figure out how jacked up in the head you are. (This part is a lil long and crazy ranty, so highlights)👇 cj p - if he shot you, I would throw a black party. (Some comment section thing about people cheering for a red state woman dying in a hurricane and CNN YouTube commenters cheering. Basically a justification for his actions. Which tells us, he does feel the need to justify it or aka he knows he is wrong.) (Then assumptions about what I would do, just encase that justification didn't work.)(Libs are evil then...) I don't need to fake it. When I watch the skinny effeminate antifa kid get mowed down by a red pickup... I laughed and watched it again. He didn't even break a bone. When I saw it another video of a motorist get out of his white suburban and beat the crap out of an antifa weirdo standing in front of his car... I laughed again and make jokes in the comments like every other person did. You want links to those videos they are pretty good? Me - 👈👈👈ANNNNNDDD... A perfect example of what I was talking about, everyone. This is all you need to know about him, to know nothing that comes out of his mouth is important, in any way. He is always so eager to help me prove that point and I really do appreciate it! 😉✌ Me - BTW, you are talking about taking a little boys mother away from him. That is what you are celebrating. That is who you are right now... I'm sure yours would be super proud that just came out of her little boys mouth. You are such a sad person. cj p - you were going to raise a little nut job. He might be better off adopted. And there you go again with the virtue signaling. I don't use my kid as a shield. Pathetic how you're trying to squeeze guilt from me when I'm using satire. No wonder you don't get Trump jokes. I bet memes fly past you too. Fifty bucks says your son's girlfriend's will never get along with his overbearing controlling mother with no humor. (👆You will notice, throughout this portion, you see them justifying, excusing and trying to flip what he has said onto me. All signs he knows what he has said, was wrong.) Me - 👈👈👈 Yep... This is who this person is. 👆👆👆This is why anything they say, does not matter. They aren't a good person. They aren't even mostly human. When people show you who they are, believe them. I'm going to screenshot this, copy and paste it everywhere I see this "person" from now on.
    1
  17534.  @Drunk.Cthulhu  This is who you are talking to. If ppl show you who they are, believe them. This is who this person is. ( I abbreviated some but do have the screenshots if you want the whole thing.) Threat beginner comment - Basically Trump can shoot everyone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. cj p - if they were antifa or in a pussy hat... Then yes it would be epic and I would want to see him shoot more. Me - So you're basically saying you want to see the president of the United States commit murder and then you want him to get away with it... All we need to know about you, to figure out how jacked up in the head you are. (This part is a lil long and crazy ranty, so highlights)👇 cj p - if he shot you, I would throw a black party. (Some comment section thing about people cheering for a red state woman dying in a hurricane and CNN YouTube commenters cheering. Basically a justification for his actions. Which tells us, he does feel the need to justify it or aka he knows he is wrong.) (Then assumptions about what I would do, just encase that justification didn't work.)(Libs are evil then...) I don't need to fake it. When I watch the skinny effeminate antifa kid get mowed down by a red pickup... I laughed and watched it again. He didn't even break a bone. When I saw it another video of a motorist get out of his white suburban and beat the crap out of an antifa weirdo standing in front of his car... I laughed again and make jokes in the comments like every other person did. You want links to those videos they are pretty good? Me - 👈👈👈ANNNNNDDD... A perfect example of what I was talking about, everyone. This is all you need to know about him, to know nothing that comes out of his mouth is important, in any way. He is always so eager to help me prove that point and I really do appreciate it! 😉✌ Me - BTW, you are talking about taking a little boys mother away from him. That is what you are celebrating. That is who you are right now... I'm sure yours would be super proud that just came out of her little boys mouth. You are such a sad person. cj p - you were going to raise a little nut job. He might be better off adopted. And there you go again with the virtue signaling. I don't use my kid as a shield. Pathetic how you're trying to squeeze guilt from me when I'm using satire. No wonder you don't get Trump jokes. I bet memes fly past you too. Fifty bucks says your son's girlfriend's will never get along with his overbearing controlling mother with no humor. (👆You will notice, throughout this portion, you see them justifying, excusing and trying to flip what he has said onto me. All signs he knows what he has said, was wrong.) Me - 👈👈👈 Yep... This is who this person is. 👆👆👆This is why anything they say, does not matter. They aren't a good person. They aren't even mostly human. When people show you who they are, believe them. I'm going to screenshot this, copy and paste it everywhere I see this "person" from now on.
    1
  17535.  @bboygenetics9882  This is who you are talking to. If ppl show you who they are, believe them. This is who this person is. ( I abbreviated some but do have the screenshots if you want the whole thing.) Threat beginner comment - Basically Trump can shoot everyone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. cj p - if they were antifa or in a pussy hat... Then yes it would be epic and I would want to see him shoot more. Me - So you're basically saying you want to see the president of the United States commit murder and then you want him to get away with it... All we need to know about you, to figure out how jacked up in the head you are. (This part is a lil long and crazy ranty, so highlights)👇 cj p - if he shot you, I would throw a black party. (Some comment section thing about people cheering for a red state woman dying in a hurricane and CNN YouTube commenters cheering. Basically a justification for his actions. Which tells us, he does feel the need to justify it or aka he knows he is wrong.) (Then assumptions about what I would do, just encase that justification didn't work.)(Libs are evil then...) I don't need to fake it. When I watch the skinny effeminate antifa kid get mowed down by a red pickup... I laughed and watched it again. He didn't even break a bone. When I saw it another video of a motorist get out of his white suburban and beat the crap out of an antifa weirdo standing in front of his car... I laughed again and make jokes in the comments like every other person did. You want links to those videos they are pretty good? Me - 👈👈👈ANNNNNDDD... A perfect example of what I was talking about, everyone. This is all you need to know about him, to know nothing that comes out of his mouth is important, in any way. He is always so eager to help me prove that point and I really do appreciate it! 😉✌ Me - BTW, you are talking about taking a little boys mother away from him. That is what you are celebrating. That is who you are right now... I'm sure yours would be super proud that just came out of her little boys mouth. You are such a sad person. cj p - you were going to raise a little nut job. He might be better off adopted. And there you go again with the virtue signaling. I don't use my kid as a shield. Pathetic how you're trying to squeeze guilt from me when I'm using satire. No wonder you don't get Trump jokes. I bet memes fly past you too. Fifty bucks says your son's girlfriend's will never get along with his overbearing controlling mother with no humor. (👆You will notice, throughout this portion, you see them justifying, excusing and trying to flip what he has said onto me. All signs he knows what he has said, was wrong.) Me - 👈👈👈 Yep... This is who this person is. 👆👆👆This is why anything they say, does not matter. They aren't a good person. They aren't even mostly human. When people show you who they are, believe them. I'm going to screenshot this, copy and paste it everywhere I see this "person" from now on.
    1
  17536. 1
  17537. 1
  17538. 1
  17539. 1
  17540. 1
  17541. 1
  17542. 1
  17543. 1
  17544. 1
  17545. 1
  17546. 1
  17547. 1
  17548. 1
  17549. 1
  17550. 1
  17551. 1
  17552. 1
  17553. 1
  17554. 1
  17555. 1
  17556. 1
  17557. 1
  17558.  @muddywater4505  That is because you are only paying attention to what you think confirms what you believe. Some of the things you are choosing to ignore... 1. The edited version of the transcript where Trump asks a foreign government to investigate his political opponent. Which is a campaign Finance law violation. Mind you, that is the activate version. If they released in the edited version and that still a crime in it, what does the unedited version say? 2. Trump committing 4 acts of obstruction of Congress since the impeachment inquiry started. I'm being him trying to block subpoenaed documents. One being him trying to block a subpoenaed witness. One being him trying to curtail a subpoenaed witness statement. One being witness intimidation live tweeted during the hearing. 3. Three Witnesses who are on the call, who testified today before yesterday tell me about the phone call but also the comments in text messages, that before and after and the things Trump has been asking if they can fire the witnesses that are going to go up and tell the truth. He's also been trying to discredit them. Period. And we're talkin about war heroes and lifelong civil servants. 4. Then there is Trump lying on camera about even talking about biting to the Ukraine president. 5. Trump originally trying to hide the phone call on a top-secret server for which it did not qualify and would not have normally gone. 6. Trump consistently trying to attack The Whistleblower even though he has no idea who it is. 7. The Republican party in General trying to pull of ridiculous stunts and acting like they don't know how impeachment works.
    1
  17559. 1
  17560. 1
  17561. 1
  17562. 1
  17563. 1
  17564. 1
  17565. 1
  17566. 1
  17567. 1
  17568. 1
  17569. 1
  17570. 1
  17571. 1
  17572.  William Burgess  " you just described every Democrat I know." With what? Also, maybe its not a good idea to put all Dems in the same box like that. " You might be a good girl, which is a narcissist statement." Not every statment about someone saying something good about themselves is narcissistic. You can, also, not judge someone off of saying some 1 good thing about themselves, as being narcissistic. " Most people in America think about the same." Do you know most people in America? How do you qualify that statement? " The far left on the far right are small minorities. Demographics play a role in all this." You are correct. I am niether. They play several roles. Which one are you referring to? " I'm a sixty-two-year-old ex-marine, and I'm from New England. Lowest unemployment in the country. Too damn. Senators, and a rap. Gov. They get it done." Thank you for your service. I come from a military family. My brother is National Guard unit is in New Orleans right now. He was also there for Katrina. Which happens 72 hours after he got back from his first deployment to Iraq. So again, thank you for your service. Genuinely. " Now I was a conservative, I don't want to harm illegal trespassers. But it's got to be done right." When was the last time that you heard about a rain being announced beforehand? How was calling these people rapists and murderers the right way? How is locking children in cages doing things the right way? I coupd go on. I'm not saying that you should not Deport someone who is found to be here illegally. I'm saying there's a smart way to do it and a humane way to do it. I'm saying we don't have to dehumanize these people to do it. I'm saying, America is better than this and we should act like it because our soldiers fought and died for it.
    1
  17573. 1
  17574. 1
  17575. 1
  17576. 1
  17577. 1
  17578. 1
  17579. 1
  17580. 1
  17581. 1
  17582. 1
  17583. 1
  17584. 1
  17585. 1
  17586. 1
  17587. 1
  17588. 1
  17589. 1
  17590. 1
  17591. 1
  17592. 1
  17593. 1
  17594. 1
  17595. 1
  17596. 1
  17597. 1
  17598. 1
  17599.  @danielporter4568  A little light readings 😁 That I know you wont read! 😁 https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/us/texas-citizen-detained-immigration.amp.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15764462450389&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2019%2F07%2F23%2Fus%2Ftexas-citizen-detained-immigration.html https://cmsny.org/trumps-executive-orders-immigration-refugees/ https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/07/23/francisco-erwin-galicia-ice-cpb-us-citizen-detained-texas/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15764462450389&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fnation%2F2019%2F07%2F23%2Ffrancisco-erwin-galicia-ice-cpb-us-citizen-detained-texas%2F https://www-vox-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2019/11/27/20982671/trump-border-mexican-asylum-seeker-migrant-metering-harp-pacr-pilot-program-el-paso-camps?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15764462450389&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vox.com%2Fpolicy-and-politics%2F2019%2F11%2F27%2F20982671%2Ftrump-border-mexican-asylum-seeker-migrant-metering-harp-pacr-pilot-program-el-paso-camps https://www-esquire-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.esquire.com/news-politics/amp27813648/concentration-camps-southern-border-migrant-detention-facilities-trump/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15764470801358&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.esquire.com%2Fnews-politics%2Fa27813648%2Fconcentration-camps-southern-border-migrant-detention-facilities-trump%2F https://amp-theatlantic-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/593239/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15764470801358&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fideas%2Farchive%2F2019%2F07%2Fborder-facilities%2F593239%2F https://psmag-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/psmag.com/.amp/ideas/yes-trumps-detention-centers-are-concentration-camps?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15764470801358&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fpsmag.com%2Fideas%2Fyes-trumps-detention-centers-are-concentration-camps https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_administration_migrant_detentions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_detention_in_the_United_States https://nymag-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/nymag.com/intelligencer/amp/2019/07/the-inhumane-conditions-at-migrant-detention-camps.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15764470801358&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=http%3A%2F%2Fnymag.com%2Fintelligencer%2F2019%2F07%2Fthe-inhumane-conditions-at-migrant-detention-camps.html
    1
  17600. 1
  17601. 1
  17602. 1
  17603. 1
  17604. 1
  17605. 1
  17606. 1
  17607. 1
  17608. 1
  17609. 1
  17610. 1
  17611. 1
  17612. 1
  17613. 1
  17614. 1
  17615. 1
  17616. 1
  17617. 1
  17618. 1
  17619. 1
  17620. 1
  17621. 1
  17622. 1
  17623. 1
  17624. 1
  17625. 1
  17626. 1
  17627. what did you dodge of? I will be more than happy to answer that question for you. WHAT YOU CHOSE TO FOCUS ON Well... you claimed they were not concentration camp conditions. I gave you the actual definition of concentration camp. "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution. The term is most strongly associated with the several hundred camps established by the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe in 1933–45, among the most infamous being Dachau, Belsen, and Auschwitz." Your idea of refuting that was saying.... they do not meet those conditions. You also thought that cherry picking specific words and ignoring all the rest was a rebuttal of some kind. Except, you only picked out the words that were not requirements. That we're only sometimes this happens, sometimes it doesn't. Which are very clear in that actual definition. Like... political prisoners.... now, I gave you an argument that they were political prisoners but at the same time that's clearly not a requirement by the actual definition. " a place where large numbers of people, 👉especially political prisoners👈" Now here, we have the definition pointing out a specific group of people being put in these concentration camps. Clearly implying that that isn't always the case. Therefore it's not a requirement. Otherwise why reference a specific set of them? Next, you referenced persecuted minority. " a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities" Again, why reference those specific groups if everybody there was a persecuted minority? In other words, not a requirement.... Yet again, I gave you an argument as to why it was also true but, it's also not a requirement.
    1
  17628. 1
  17629.  @danielporter4568  what did you dodge of? I will be more than happy to answer that question for you. WHAT YOU CHOSE TO FOCUS ON Well... you claimed they were not concentration camp conditions. I gave you the actual definition of concentration camp. "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution. The term is most strongly associated with the several hundred camps established by the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe in 1933–45, among the most infamous being Dachau, Belsen, and Auschwitz." Your idea of refuting that was saying.... they do not meet those conditions. You also thought that cherry picking specific words and ignoring all the rest was a rebuttal of some kind. Except, you only picked out the words that were not requirements. That we're only sometimes this happens, sometimes it doesn't. Which are very clear in that actual definition. Like... political prisoners.... now, I gave you an argument that they were political prisoners but at the same time that's clearly not a requirement by the actual definition. " a place where large numbers of people, 👉especially political prisoners👈" Now here, we have the definition pointing out a specific group of people being put in these concentration camps. Clearly implying that that isn't always the case. Therefore it's not a requirement. Otherwise why reference a specific set of them? Next, you referenced persecuted minority. " a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities" Again, why reference those specific groups if everybody there was a persecuted minority? In other words, not a requirement.... Yet again, I gave you an argument as to why it was also true but, it's also not a requirement.
    1
  17630. 1
  17631. 1
  17632. 1
  17633. 1
  17634. 1
  17635. 1
  17636. 1
  17637. 1
  17638. 1
  17639. 1
  17640. 1
  17641. 1
  17642. 1
  17643. 1
  17644. 1
  17645. 1
  17646. 1
  17647. 1
  17648.  @danielporter4568  Prove me wrong? You claim... " the entire definition must apply" The only 2 mandatory portions of the definition of concentration camp, using a plain text reading, are... "a place where large numbers of people" "are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities" The second one, of course, you keep ignoring.... Because... "👉especially👈 political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities" are specific groups within the camps, that are likely to be a large portion of the camps. 👉Not👈 that they are the 👉only ones👈. If that were the case, the definition would read 👉"are either political prisoners or persecuted minorities"👈. All of which is born out by the word that comes before. 👉"Especially"👈. If they where all either "political prisoners" or "persecuted minorities", 👉especially👈 would not be necessary. "sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution" is proven not to be mandatory, again, by the word that comes before, "to provide forced labor or await mass executions". That word being, "sometimes". The definition of sometimes is "occasionally, rather than all of the time". The full definition... Word for word! 😉 "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution. The term is most strongly associated with the several hundred camps established by the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe in 1933–45, among the most infamous being Dachau, Belsen, and Auschwitz."
    1
  17649. 1
  17650. 1
  17651. 1
  17652. 1
  17653. 1
  17654. 1
  17655. 1
  17656. 1
  17657. 1
  17658. 1
  17659. 1
  17660. 1
  17661. 1
  17662. 1
  17663. 1
  17664. 1
  17665. 1
  17666. 1
  17667. 1
  17668. 1
  17669. 1
  17670. 1
  17671. 1
  17672. 1
  17673. 1
  17674.  @danielporter4568  Prove me wrong? You claim... " the entire definition must apply" The only 2 mandatory portions of the definition of concentration camp, using a plain text reading, are... "a place where large numbers of people" "are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities" The second one, of course, you keep ignoring.... Because... "👉especially👈 political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities" are specific groups within the camps, that are likely to be a large portion of the camps. 👉Not👈 that they are the 👉only ones👈. If that were the case, the definition would read 👉"are either political prisoners or persecuted minorities"👈. All of which is born out by the word that comes before. 👉"Especially"👈. If they where all either "political prisoners" or "persecuted minorities", 👉especially👈 would not be necessary. "sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution" is proven not to be mandatory, again, by the word that comes before, "to provide forced labor or await mass executions". That word being, "sometimes". The definition of sometimes is "occasionally, rather than all of the time". The full definition... Word for word! 😉 "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution. The term is most strongly associated with the several hundred camps established by the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe in 1933–45, among the most infamous being Dachau, Belsen, and Auschwitz."
    1
  17675. 1
  17676. 1
  17677. 1
  17678. 1
  17679. 1
  17680. 1
  17681. 1
  17682. 1
  17683. 1
  17684.  @danielporter4568  Prove me wrong? You claim... " the entire definition must apply" The only 2 mandatory portions of the definition of concentration camp, using a plain text reading, are... "a place where large numbers of people" "are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities" The second one, of course, you keep ignoring.... Because... "👉especially👈 political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities" are specific groups within the camps, that are likely to be a large portion of the camps. 👉Not👈 that they are the 👉only ones👈. If that were the case, the definition would read 👉"are either political prisoners or persecuted minorities"👈. All of which is born out by the word that comes before. 👉"Especially"👈. If they where all either "political prisoners" or "persecuted minorities", 👉especially👈 would not be necessary. "sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution" is proven not to be mandatory, again, by the word that comes before, "to provide forced labor or await mass executions". That word being, "sometimes". The definition of sometimes is "occasionally, rather than all of the time". The full definition... Word for word! 😉 "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution. The term is most strongly associated with the several hundred camps established by the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe in 1933–45, among the most infamous being Dachau, Belsen, and Auschwitz."
    1
  17685. 1
  17686. 1
  17687. 1
  17688. 1
  17689. 1
  17690. 1
  17691. 1
  17692. 1
  17693. 1
  17694. 1
  17695. 1
  17696. 1
  17697.  @danielporter4568  Prove me wrong? You claim... " the entire definition must apply" The only 2 mandatory portions of the definition of concentration camp, using a plain text reading, are... "a place where large numbers of people" "are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities" The second one, of course, you keep ignoring.... Because... "👉especially👈 political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities" are specific groups within the camps, that are likely to be a large portion of the camps. 👉Not👈 that they are the 👉only ones👈. If that were the case, the definition would read 👉"are either political prisoners or persecuted minorities"👈. All of which is born out by the word that comes before. 👉"Especially"👈. If they where all either "political prisoners" or "persecuted minorities", 👉especially👈 would not be necessary. "sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution" is proven not to be mandatory, again, by the word that comes before, "to provide forced labor or await mass executions". That word being, "sometimes". The definition of sometimes is "occasionally, rather than all of the time". The full definition... Word for word! 😉 "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution. The term is most strongly associated with the several hundred camps established by the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe in 1933–45, among the most infamous being Dachau, Belsen, and Auschwitz."
    1
  17698. 1
  17699. 1
  17700. 1
  17701. 1
  17702. 1
  17703. 1
  17704. 1
  17705. 1
  17706. 1
  17707. 1
  17708. 1
  17709. 1
  17710. 1
  17711. 1
  17712. 1
  17713. 1
  17714. 1
  17715. 1
  17716. 1
  17717. 1
  17718. 1
  17719. 1
  17720. 1
  17721. 1
  17722. 1
  17723. 1
  17724. 1
  17725. 1
  17726. 1
  17727. 1
  17728. 1
  17729. 1
  17730. 1
  17731. 1
  17732. 1
  17733. 1
  17734. 1
  17735. 1
  17736. 1
  17737. 1
  17738. 1
  17739. 1
  17740. 1
  17741.  @T_1357_F  Oh and you might have a little better grasp on Irony, as well... Like the irony of this statment, here! 👇 " I was making an incredibly hyperbolic comment in an attempt to make fun of Democrats who 👉believe👈 Trump is guilty, because I 👉know👈 it, and that's enough proof for me," But no worries! I'm here to help! See! I have already identify the problem you seem to be having. You seem to be getting the word KNOW and BELIEVE mixed up. See! The word KNOW means - be aware of through observation, inquiry, or information.... When used as a verb, and how you where using it. Now... You couldn't of 👉observed👈 Trump being innocent on July 25th, during that phone call because you weren't in the white house or on the phone with them. You couldn't have 👉inquired👈 about it because you've shown a propensity of not wanting to add knowledge information or answer questions that do not fit your preconceived notions on this very subject, multiple times. You couldn't have fact based 👉information👈 on this subject of Trumps guilt or innocence because you refuse to see anything that doesn't fit your preconceived notions. You go out of your way to ignore things that don't support what you've already decided to be true. So obviously... You don't KNOW he hasn't committed a crime. 😉 As for BELIEVE... Well, it means- hold (something) as an opinion; think or suppose. As in we believe Trump is guilty of a crime... Except it is not an opinion and we don't think or suppose.... Why? Because all that evidence you want to ignore is the actual proof of the crime. Like the transcript... where he ask the president of a foreign country to investigate his political opponent in the next presidential election, after said person announced he was going to be his political opponent in the next presidential election. That is a crime. That is not an opinion. So much as it is legal fact. But, it's an easy fix. All you have to do is replace you saying that you know with you saying you believe and replace unsane we believe as us actually knowing. Just use the add a button. And it's all fixed! No need to thank me. It was no trouble at all! 😁✌
    1
  17742. 1
  17743. 1
  17744. 1
  17745. 1
  17746. 1
  17747. 1
  17748.  @T_1357_F  and just for a little recap on the things you are running away from now... 👇😁👇😆👇😋👇😉👇 🤥YOU🤥👉 "There is no evidence. There is allegations." 😁ME😁👉 "The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, 👉 that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.👈 Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me." See where he just asked a foreign gov to investigate his political opponent in the next presidential election.... Yeah... That's a crime. ✌😉 🤥YOU🤥👉 " Allegations that have yet to be substantiated by proof of guilt Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. " 😁ME😁👉 Beyond a reasonable doubt is not the standard in reguards to impeachment. You don't even have to commit a crime to be impeached. 🤥YOU🤥👉 " What evidence proves Beyond A Reasonable Doubt a law was broken?" 😁ME😁👉 "The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, 👉 that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.👈 Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me." See where he just asked a foreign gov to investigate his political opponent in the next presidential election.... Yeah... That's a crime. ✌😉 🤥YOU🤥👉 " Of course you don't want to set a standard for determining guilt." 😁ME😁👉 Ummm... Yeah.... That is not my standard, sweetness! I'm 35 years old. The Constitution was ratified in 1778. Unless I have a secret time machine... I didn't have anything to do with setting the standards for impeachment. 🤥YOU🤥👉 " Unless someone can provide otherwise, any claims of guilt is BS," 😁ME😁👉 "The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, 👉 that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.👈 Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me." See where he just asked a foreign gov to investigate his political opponent in the next presidential election.... Yeah... That's a crime. ✌😉 🤥YOU🤥👉 " you cite quotes from the transcript selectively, and out of order in order to misconstrue and infer the facts." 😁ME😁👉 Okay.... Sure.... Show me how, quoting the spacific part which shows he comitted a crime, which is what we where talking about, means that I somehow took anything out of context?
    1
  17749. 1
  17750. 1
  17751. 1
  17752. 1
  17753. 1
  17754. 1
  17755. 1
  17756. 1
  17757. 1
  17758. 1
  17759. 1
  17760. 1
  17761. 1
  17762. 1
  17763. 1
  17764. 1
  17765. 1
  17766. 1
  17767. 1
  17768. 1
  17769. 1
  17770. 1
  17771. 1
  17772. 1
  17773. 1
  17774. 1
  17775. 1
  17776. 1
  17777. 1
  17778. 1
  17779. 1
  17780. 1
  17781. 1
  17782. 1
  17783. 1
  17784. 1
  17785. 1
  17786. 1
  17787. 1
  17788. 1
  17789. 1
  17790. 1
  17791. 1
  17792. 1
  17793. 1
  17794. 1
  17795. 1
  17796. 1
  17797. 1
  17798. 1
  17799. 1
  17800. 1
  17801. 1
  17802. 1
  17803. 1
  17804. 1
  17805. 1
  17806. 1
  17807. 1
  17808. 1
  17809. 1
  17810. 1
  17811. 1
  17812. 1
  17813. 1
  17814. 1
  17815. 1
  17816. 1
  17817. 1
  17818. 1
  17819. 1
  17820. 1
  17821. 1
  17822. 1
  17823. 1
  17824. 1
  17825. 1
  17826. 1
  17827. 1
  17828. 1
  17829. 1
  17830. 1
  17831. 1
  17832. 1
  17833. 1
  17834. 1
  17835. 1
  17836. 1
  17837. 1
  17838. 1
  17839. 1
  17840. 1
  17841. 1
  17842. 1
  17843. 1
  17844. 1
  17845. 1
  17846. 1
  17847. 1
  17848. 1
  17849. 1
  17850. 1
  17851. 1
  17852. 1
  17853. 1
  17854. 1
  17855. 1
  17856. 1
  17857. 1
  17858. 1
  17859. 1
  17860. 1
  17861. 1
  17862. 1
  17863. 1
  17864. 1
  17865. 1
  17866. 1
  17867. 1
  17868. 1
  17869. 1
  17870. 1
  17871. 1
  17872. 1
  17873. 1
  17874. 1
  17875. 1
  17876. 1
  17877. 1
  17878. 1
  17879. 1
  17880. 1
  17881. 1
  17882. 1
  17883. 1
  17884. 1
  17885. 1
  17886. 1
  17887. 1
  17888. 1
  17889. 1
  17890. 1
  17891. 1
  17892. 1
  17893. 1
  17894. 1
  17895. 1
  17896. 1
  17897. 1
  17898. 1
  17899. 1
  17900. 1
  17901. 1
  17902. 1
  17903. 1
  17904. 1
  17905. 1
  17906. 1
  17907. 1
  17908. 1
  17909. 1
  17910. 1
  17911. 1
  17912. 1
  17913. 1
  17914. 1
  17915. 1
  17916. 1
  17917. 1
  17918. 1
  17919. 1
  17920. 1
  17921. 1
  17922. 1
  17923. 1
  17924. 1
  17925. 1
  17926. 1
  17927.  Sigkim  Examples of Bob and weave but to afraid to step into the ring. (Arguing something on its merits, with facts and evidence. Not rampent speculation, diversion, deflection, cherry picking, lies, ignoring what people say because you can't argue against it and paper tigers.) "LMAO... NO, I mean by sucking up to the very thing, that stole his, and his supporters chance to have their votes be counted" Rampent speculation on why someone did what they did, with no proof and him saying differently. Setting up a paper tiger, in the form of, not only mischaracterizing his motivations but his actions, in order for you to be able to have an argument. Sanders never changed one position he had that was opposite of hers. Also, he doesn't have the power to take our vote away. We still have the right to vote for one or the other candidate. It just wasn't him. So that is what we call a lie. All so you can set up a false comparison against Trump. That is in no way arguing your point on its Merit. That is in fact bobbing and weaving, while still being afraid to step into the ring. " you, and his supporters, can mental gymnastic all the justification you please to try and soothe your asshap over his spineless ring kissing okay." At that point, I had clearly told you, what he did and the reasons he said that he did it. You ignored this so that you could continue with the paper tiger you set up. All because that is the only narrative that you had to argue with. Even though, it was a lie. That is in no way arguing your point on its Merit. That is in fact bobbing and weaving, while still being afraid to step into the ring. " translation: I have a problem with others actually challenging fake news indoctrinated claim." Now.. We have already been through this one. This is another really good example of you having to mischaracterize something I said in order for you to have an argument. It's also you making baseless assumptions about me and where I get my information. Something you could not possibly know oh, but you need to assume I get it from mainstream media in order for you to be able to argue against it. Yet again, setting up another paper tiger.That is in no way arguing your point on its Merit. That is in fact bobbing and weaving, while still being afraid to step into the ring. " oh thank you for this bichos fake-ass news rhetoric" Same thing... And at this point... I was getting board. Where are you getting that from again? You know, the assumption that I get my information from the news? Where did I say that again? Feel free to quote me. I'll be waiting... Forever. That is in no way arguing your point on its Merit. That is in fact bobbing and weaving, while still being afraid to step into the ring. That's not even counting the childish taunting and way to over inflated ego... That just screams that your really needing some attention.... Now we are up to you current comment.... But keep your panties on. I have every intention on answering your questions. I just wanted to make it perfectly chear why was actually bobbing and weaving in this conversation and who was lying. Next up... Your answers.
    1
  17928. 1
  17929.  Sigkim  Violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause The Constitution bars federal officials from receiving payments from foreign officials, something Trump has been accused of breaching since before he even took office. Many of the complaints have centered on the Trump Organization's hotels and golf resorts around the globe. Multiple lawsuits have been filed accusing Trump of violating the clause. Violation of the Domestic Emoluments Clause The domestic emoluments clause prohibits a sitting president from accepting compensation beyond that of his salary. Trump's new hotel in Washington, D.C., which has hosted multiple foreign dignitaries and government officials, has been a particular source of controversy. This link is a case study on some of his foreign emoluments Clause violations. With an active case and detail. https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-and-foreign-emoluments-clause/ The Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause prohibits the president from accepting personal benefits from any foreign government or official. Trump has retained his ownership interests in his family business while he is in office. Thus, every time a foreign official stays at a Trump hotel, or a foreign government approves a new Trump Organization project, or grants a trademark, Trump is in violation of the Constitution. For example: shortly after he was sworn into office, the Chinese government gave preliminary approval to 38 trademarks of Trump’s name. Then, in June, China approved nine Donald Trump trademarks they had previously rejected. And every time he goes to golf at a Trump property, he funnels taxpayer money into his family business—violating the Domestic Emoluments Clause. Other various corruption. When Trump encouraged police officers to rough up people they have under arrest, he violated his obligation to oversee faithful execution of the laws. When Trump shared anti-Muslim content on Twitter, he violated his obligation to uphold equal protection of the laws. President Trump has repeatedly pressured the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate and prosecute political adversaries like Hillary Clinton. A piece of corruption that is near and dear to you. President Trump has repeatedly attacked the concept of an independent press. He’s called critical coverage “fake news” and journalists “the enemy of the American people,” made threats to change libel laws and revoke licenses, and his battles with CNN led him to try to interfere in the AT&T/Time Warner merger. This demonstrates his unwillingness to respect and uphold the Constitution, and disdain for the crucial foundations to our free society. Enforcing its new “zero tolerance” policy, the Trump administration separated as many as 3,000 immigrant children from their parents at the southern border. This policy was meant to deter families from attempting to cross the border. The children and their families have been held in internment camps and cages with what lawyers call “inhumane conditions” Due to negligence, the Trump administration has no plan to reunite all children with their families, even deporting some parents while their children remain detained. Donald Trump knew disclosure of his extramarital affairs with Stephanie Clifford (A.K.A. Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal could hurt his chances at winning the 2016 election. At the direction of Trump, Michael Cohen and American Media, Inc. (AMI), the publisher of the National Enquirer bought the rights to the women’s stories and forced them to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements to prevent them from going public. Cohen admitted to making illegal, hush-money payments to hide Trump’s affairs in the fall of 2016, just weeks before the election. Federal prosecutors, and Trump’s co-conspirators Cohen and AMI, all say that Cohen made the payments at Trump’s direction, “in concert with the campaign,” and with the intention of helping Trump win. Trump is unindicted co-conspirator because he directed Cohen to “cause an unlawful corporate contribution” and an “excessive campaign contribution” by paying the two women hush money with the intent to influence the election.
    1
  17930. 1
  17931. 1
  17932. 1
  17933. 1
  17934.  Sigkim  So your reaction to ignoring a bunch of things... That I called you on, is to pivot, deflect and tell me what I should be arguing? Na! I'm good with showing how you can't argue things. I don't need to take tips from someone who has been, thus far, more bluster and less actual substance. Ya know what else I said though? I said you would contradict yourself. Above you said this.... "no, I mean by sucking up to the very thing, that stole his, and his supporters chance to have their vote be counted. 👉👉👉In direct contrast👈👈👈, Trump and his supporters fought like hell against the RNC, and when they tried to pull the same shenanigans on Triumph, as the DNC tried on Bernie, and succeeded." But wait for it... " by your logic, you should be "arguing" against Donna Brazil's account of how Hillary took over the dnc's finances, showed biased against Bernie, and again how Bernie's reaction of "stoic", 👉👉👉was NOT in direct contrast👈👈👈 to Trump, and his supporters, fighting tooth-and-nail to have a fair shot at becoming the RNC nominee." That last one was yet another example of you mischaracterizing someone's actions, in order for you to have an argument. Bernie fought against Hillary up until the very end. Being almost entirely self-funded, with barely any name recognition, towards the end he damn near outspent her and got closer to beating her than anyone. He traveled to every single state. Which nobody else did, by the way. He just chose to do so by actually focusing on policy and not childish name calling, division tactics, threats, inciting violence and telling a whole bunch of lies. Then, when he lost, he put his ego aside and backed her to do what he could to not have Trump in the Whitehouse. He did not flip on any of the things he disagreed with Hilary about. He made that clear in several interviews. So... Mabye try coming up with a lagit argument next time.
    1
  17935.  Sigkim  Nice try, but I gave you a whole bunch of facts that you're ignoring, on purpose. And what? I'm ignoring your facts now? Like the Donna brazile thing that you literally just brought up in this comment? How dumb was I supposed to respond to something that wasn't up there until you just posted it? Try an excuse and pivot that makes more sense next time. But, I tell you what... I'll answer right now.... I don't have a problem with it. I was not a Hillary supporter. I was a Bernie supporter. She went around with a sense of entitlement, like s*** was owed to her. She spoke very little on policy and just used BS catchphrases way too often.... And yeah... She was messing around with the DNC. ... That's what's called being objective enough, not to not end up defending the indefensible, just because you guys are wearing the same blue shirt. I don't need to defend her actions.... I'm facts, logic and country over team, every day of the week. Now... How about all the things your ignoring? Or are you going to try and continue to divert from the things you can't defend? Cuz... That's fine also. That says all anyone needs to know. 😉 OH! I see! Your just going to ignore the quotes I gave you, from yourself... That showed all that bobbing and weaving, which I also laid out a clear definition for... All so you can pretend that I'm the one who is lying here. Okay... Good times! That also shows how much BS your talking. Ignoring your own words. SPEAKS VOLUMES! 😂 Now... I responded to the emoluments thing. So I'm not sure what you're talkin about there. The deals... The 2 biggest is Iran and climate. He even had to make shit up about the Iran one. Which had a good hunk of countries, most of which are our long time allies, backing a country like Iran. They had to back Iran, for goodness sake.... Because he was lying so much. Also responded to the tax thing... So again... What the hell are you talking about. No I don't mean diplomacy. Threatening, bullying, lying and just plain old talking s*** about our long-term allies and the dictators, is no diplomacy that I've ever heard of. That's just called trying to be a bully... and then reverting to childish behavior as soon as somebody has the nerve to disagree with him. that's why he likes the dictators. He wants to be one. He's made several comments that point to that as well. And its very different then other Presidents. They divested from their financial ties. They did go and chill at their hotel with a ton of ppl, and shovel the governments money into them. They showed their tax returns. So either you were lying or drastically ill-informed and need to not talk about this subject until you get more informed. Oh you were addressed some. With diversion tactics, misrepresentations and Paper Tigers. None of which are arguments. Also the ones you just put above are not the only ones that were there. You skipped all these. Some of which I am posting for the third time now. That's odd. Its almost like, its on purpose or something. "You skipped how Trump has retained his own interests and it's family business while he is in office. That team breaks in emoluments Clause every single time a foreign official or even a local official stays in his hotel or works on a trump project or gets granted a trademark. Like how the Chinese government approved 38 trademarks of Trumps after he entered office. 9 of which they had previously objected to. Or every time he goes to golf or hanging out at one of his hotels. He's funneling taxpayer money into his own pocket. Not just for him but for the Secret Service, all his staff and family. When he encourages police officers to rough up people they have under arrest. When he shares anti-muslim content on Twitter. When he pressures the Department of Justice and the FBI into Prosecuting his political enemies. When he attacks the freedom of the press in the multitude of ways that he does. When he uses children as hostages and lock them in cages and then loses them in a system, that still have yet to be reunited with their parents or found at all, because they kept shity records. Donald Trump knew disclosure of his extramarital affairs with Stephanie Clifford (A.K.A. Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal could hurt his chances at winning the 2016 election. At the direction of Trump, Michael Cohen and American Media, Inc. (AMI), the publisher of the National Enquirer bought the rights to the women’s stories and forced them to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements to prevent them from going public. Cohen admitted to making illegal, hush-money payments to hide Trump’s affairs in the fall of 2016, just weeks before the election. Federal prosecutors, and Trump’s co-conspirators Cohen and AMI, all say that Cohen made the payments at Trump’s direction, “in concert with the campaign,” and with the intention of helping Trump win. Trump is unindicted co-conspirator because he directed Cohen to “cause an unlawful corporate contribution” and an “excessive campaign contribution” by paying the two women hush money with the intent to influence the election." Have any idea when your going to get to these curruptions? by the way, that false dichotomy you keep trying to set up of impeachable offenses... Was not actually the standard that was set for the onset. It was corruption. Yeah... Sorry... You can keep lying on me if you want with your littlw "rant" but before you do... You might want to scroll up a tiny bit on the comment and re read all those facts that your ignoring, and that I gave. That was you stop making hypocritical and ignorant arguments like that. How many have I rebutted? All that I know of. Again, scroll up or stop lying. I have clearly Identified that your rebuttals were not actual rebuttals. They where mischaracterizations, Paper Tigers, excuses, deflections, lies, whataboutism and a few questions... Sprinkled on the side. Also... Maybe respond to all the ones your ignoring.
    1
  17936. 1
  17937. 1
  17938.  Sigkim  Now... I will be more than happy to continue to address yours... And have. So it's your turn. You can address these that you have been ignoring and then we can move on to another subject. Cuz I'm not doing anything else until then. Which shouldn't be a problem because you keep saying that your going to get to everything, right? "You skipped how Trump has retained his own interests and it's family business while he is in office. That team breaks in emoluments Clause every single time a foreign official or even a local official stays in his hotel or works on a trump project or gets granted a trademark. Like how the Chinese government approved 38 trademarks of Trumps after he entered office. 9 of which they had previously objected to. Or every time he goes to golf or hanging out at one of his hotels. He's funneling taxpayer money into his own pocket. Not just for him but for the Secret Service, all his staff and family. When he encourages police officers to rough up people they have under arrest. When he shares anti-muslim content on Twitter. When he pressures the Department of Justice and the FBI into Prosecuting his political enemies. When he attacks the freedom of the press in the multitude of ways that he does. When he uses children as hostages and lock them in cages and then loses them in a system, that still have yet to be reunited with their parents or found at all, because they kept shity records. Donald Trump knew disclosure of his extramarital affairs with Stephanie Clifford (A.K.A. Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal could hurt his chances at winning the 2016 election. At the direction of Trump, Michael Cohen and American Media, Inc. (AMI), the publisher of the National Enquirer bought the rights to the women’s stories and forced them to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements to prevent them from going public. Cohen admitted to making illegal, hush-money payments to hide Trump’s affairs in the fall of 2016, just weeks before the election. Federal prosecutors, and Trump’s co-conspirators Cohen and AMI, all say that Cohen made the payments at Trump’s direction, “in concert with the campaign,” and with the intention of helping Trump win. Trump is unindicted co-conspirator because he directed Cohen to “cause an unlawful corporate contribution” and an “excessive campaign contribution” by paying the two women hush money with the intent to influence the election."
    1
  17939. 1
  17940. 1
  17941. 1
  17942. 1
  17943. 1
  17944. 1
  17945.  Sigkim  Show me where you answered anymore than half of one of these? Or stop lying.... Or keep lying. Its whatever. That just means, your proving my prediction of what you would do. "Now lets go back and see what you skipped.... You skipped Bob and Weave... When you called me a liar and then I used your own words to correct you. You skipped how Trump has retained his own interests and it's family business while he is in office. That team breaks in emoluments Clause every single time a foreign official or even a local official stays in his hotel or works on a trump project or gets granted a trademark. Like how the Chinese government approved 38 trademarks of Trumps after he entered office. 9 of which they had previously objected to. Or every time he goes to golf or hanging out at one of his hotels. He's funneling taxpayer money into his own pocket. Not just for him but for the Secret Service, all his staff and family. When he encourages police officers to rough up people they have under arrest. When he shares anti-muslim content on Twitter. When he pressures the Department of Justice and the FBI into Prosecuting his political enemies. When he attacks the freedom of the press in the multitude of ways that he does. When he uses children as hostages and lock them in cages and then loses them in a system, that still have yet to be reunited with their parents or found at all, because they kept shity records. There's more. You seem to have only addressed one part of that entire post actually. Didn't I predict you were going to ignore things that you couldn't argue against? I'm pretty sure I did."
    1
  17946. 1
  17947. 1
  17948. 1
  17949. 1
  17950. 1
  17951. 1
  17952. 1
  17953. 1
  17954. 1
  17955. 1
  17956. 1
  17957. 1
  17958. 1
  17959. 1
  17960. 1
  17961. 1
  17962. 1
  17963. 1
  17964. 1
  17965. 1
  17966.  @monacallender721  Shouldn't of told me to do that! 😁 Turns out, you didn't do your research. You heard some old false rumors and started repeating them... "A 2017 article posted on Revenge of the Herd claims, "John McCain was pardoned for treason." It alleges that, during his time as a prisoner of war, McCain gave information to the North Vietnamese in exchange for better treatment, and that he would have been executed if President Richard Nixon didn’t pardon him. The story resurfaced after McCain’s death and was flagged as part Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) It’s not true. "Desperate, I tried to bargain with him. 'Take me to the hospital and I'll give you the information you want.' I didn't intend to keep my word, reasoning that after my injuries had been treated, I would be strong enough to deal with the consequences of not holding up my end of the bargain,'' McCain wrote. It’s impossible to determine everything McCain told his captors -- interrogations took place one-on-one, in secluded prisons, more than 50 years ago. Based on his personal accounts, though, McCain was used mostly for propaganda: filmmakers would show him in the hospital, being treated by the North Vietnamese. Officials also encouraged him to say that he wanted the war to end, or that he was grateful to his captors and sorry for his participation in the fighting. McCain said he refused to do so."
    1
  17967. 1
  17968. 1
  17969. 1
  17970. 1
  17971. 1
  17972. 1
  17973. 1
  17974. 1
  17975. 1
  17976. 1
  17977. 1
  17978. 1
  17979. 1
  17980. 1
  17981. 1
  17982. 1
  17983. 1
  17984. 1
  17985. 1
  17986. 1
  17987. 1
  17988. 1
  17989. 1
  17990. 1
  17991. 1
  17992. 1
  17993. 1
  17994. 1
  17995. 1
  17996. 1
  17997. 1
  17998. 1
  17999. 1
  18000. 1
  18001. 1
  18002. 1
  18003. 1
  18004. 1
  18005. 1
  18006. 1
  18007. 1
  18008. 1
  18009. 1
  18010. 1
  18011. 1
  18012. 1
  18013. 1
  18014. 1
  18015. 1
  18016. 1
  18017. 1
  18018. 1
  18019. 1
  18020. 1
  18021. 1
  18022. 1
  18023. 1
  18024. 1
  18025. 1
  18026. 1
  18027. 1
  18028. 1
  18029. 1
  18030. 1
  18031. 1
  18032. 1
  18033. 1
  18034. 1
  18035. 1
  18036. 1
  18037. 1
  18038. 1
  18039. 1
  18040. 1
  18041. 1
  18042. 1
  18043. 1
  18044. 1
  18045. 1
  18046. 1
  18047. 1
  18048. 1
  18049. 1
  18050. 1
  18051. 1
  18052. 1
  18053. 1
  18054. 1
  18055. 1
  18056. 1
  18057. 1
  18058. 1
  18059. 1
  18060. 1
  18061. 1
  18062. 1
  18063. 1
  18064. 1
  18065. 1
  18066. 1
  18067. 1
  18068. 1
  18069. 1
  18070. 1
  18071. 1
  18072. 1
  18073. 1
  18074. 1
  18075. 1
  18076. 1
  18077. 1
  18078. 1
  18079. 1
  18080. 1
  18081. 1
  18082. 1
  18083. 1
  18084. 1
  18085. 1
  18086. 1
  18087. 1
  18088. 1
  18089. 1
  18090. 1
  18091. 1
  18092. 1
  18093. 1
  18094. 1
  18095. 1
  18096. 1
  18097. 1
  18098. 1
  18099. 1
  18100. 1
  18101. 1
  18102. 1
  18103. 1
  18104. 1
  18105. 1
  18106. 1
  18107. 1
  18108. 1
  18109. 1
  18110. 1
  18111. 1
  18112. 1
  18113. 1
  18114. 1
  18115. 1
  18116. 1
  18117. 1
  18118. 1
  18119. 1
  18120. 1
  18121. 1
  18122. 1
  18123. 1
  18124. 1
  18125. 1
  18126. 1
  18127. 1
  18128. 1
  18129. 1
  18130. 1
  18131. 1
  18132. 1
  18133. 1
  18134. 1
  18135. 1
  18136. 1
  18137. 1
  18138. 1
  18139. 1
  18140. 1
  18141. 1
  18142. 1
  18143. 1
  18144. 1
  18145. 1
  18146. 1
  18147. 1
  18148. 1
  18149. 1
  18150. 1
  18151. 1
  18152. 1
  18153. 1
  18154. 1
  18155. 1
  18156. 1
  18157. 1
  18158. 1
  18159. 1
  18160. 1
  18161. Well... As far as I am aware... Your an adult, right? He did not speak to me that way. He spoke to you that way and as an adult, you can stand up for yourself, correct? I told him he was being funny and awesome, because he was being funny and awesome to me. Again, we are all adults here. Also half the time we were not talking about you. If he had spoken to me like an ass whole child, then we would have had a completely different conversation. He did not. "Yet, that you applaud?" Where did I applaud that? Please quote me, or move on with your life. Or you can do me a favor and quote me where I said how, "you treat people the way they deserve to be treated." I said, and we'll say again, that I treat people how they present themselves. As in, to me. But please continue to try and make yourself some kind of victim. Cuz did you forget that part where I also tried to speak to you as an adult and the very first time I did, even after warning you, you still decided to act like an ass whole child? You remember any of that? I treat people how they present themselves. So you can justify your actions however you please but don't expect to me to feel sorry for you while you're doing it. You can tell I'm not full of s*** by how I spoke to you to begin with in those first three comments. Not once did I speak to you in a disrespectful Manner and you were the one that started speaking to me in a disrespectful manner. And I hate to break it to you, but I already disagreed with you at that point. So try again. Plus this is all just starting to sound like a justification for you being an a******. And here we go with the shells again. I get it. You're setting yourself up to be right at the end. That way even if you get proven to be full of s***, you can just say we are all just " paid shills". We understand. You're the victim, and everybody else is wrong. We get it. Move on with your life.
    1
  18162. 1
  18163.  @MajorMovieDeal  Actually.... I am saying there is more violence from the right. Neo-nazis alone has us beat. SPACIFFICALLY however, I pointed out how you only referenced 1 side of things and from the jump, I insisted and still do insist that both sides be looked at for a legitimate comparison. You did not do that. In fact oh, you seem to suggest that the majority of the stuff on your side was made up. Which suggests to me that you were either incapable or not willing to look at this from an objective standpoint. Also, most of what you said was covered under freedom of speech. That's what you consider an attack. Lawful protest and boycott is not an "attack". You need to redefine your definition of "attack". Here we go again with the accusations you don't back up. This is also my problem with your behavior. You just keep making baseless accusations. You think because you say it, it automatically makes it true. Except that's not how reality works. Example, you can say all day long that the last doesn't reprimand their people for being shity and the encouragement and then I can counter that with I see them reprimanding these people all the time , not to mention I just clearly said it was an acceptable... but then we just go back and forth and never get anywhere. Which is why, when you make a claim, you are supposed to back this claim up. Also, to show a little more credibility on your part, you can go as far as to mention anything happening on your side and how it's wrong. I have yet to see that and that speaks volumes to your impartiality. "There are the confrontations at restaurants, and public places by mobs of radical leftist screaming in people's faces because they don't like their political ideology, or because they were wearing a Maga hat. Maxine Waters publicly encourage such Behavior." Again, I'm going to need some examples of these mobs. That was plural by the way. Also you don't get to talk about politicians inciting violence when you're defending the guy who's done it more times than me and my son have fingers and toes. Even offering to pay for their legal fees. This is why you need to have a more objective opinion. Maxine Waters does not have the codes to the nuclear bombs. Again with the multitude of just baseless accusations. What do you expect me to keep doing with all of this? Big references that generalized the s*** out of the left. These are just words without specific incidents to back them up. What's this one, for example... " leftist falsely label all Trump supporters as Nazis, and tries to portray them as less than human, that's deserving to be bullied, or harassed." Where have I done that? That is an overgeneralization with nothing to back it up again. You aggressively put lefts in this little box of who they are and what they believe, as you preach about not wanting them to do the exact same thing to you. Do you not see the hypocrisy there? You are literally making a sound like we are the Antichrist right now but at the same time playing the victim because you're assuming that's what we think. Tucker Carlson... What did they say to threaten his family? I'm genuinely asking, because I am not aware of this incident and again need evidence to back it up. This whole harassing the sponsors thing, you seriously sound like you would be happy in an authoritarian dictatorship. All these things you keep painting in this reprehensible light are literally freedom of speech at work. Also free market. Which is kind of a republican thing. So that confuses me about you. In America we are allowed to call sponsors of people we think are being blatantly racist and bigoted, not to mention lying... And suggest that they do not sponsor this person anymore. This person, by the way, you were trying to hold up as a victim for them doing this, who has a huge platform to say whatever he wants at any given time despite the validity of the statement. But people can't make a few phone calls about him? Hypocrisy again. I'm not glossing over a damn thing. You are. You make all these claims and refused to look at the other side. You generalize us to basically being Satan incarnate and then insists that we do that to you without an indication that you might think that it's not the best idea to be doing that. You have not acknowledged or reference anything on the other side. you are clearly incapable of looking at this and it from you are clearly incapable of looking at this and it from you are clearly incapable of looking at this from an objective standpoint. Or it's something you have not displayed as of yet. which also kind of proves my point. The one I was saying about how we tend to recognize the people on our side more than you guys recognize the people on your side for doing f*** up s***.
    1
  18164. 1
  18165.  @MajorMovieDeal  I just said, that almost everything you said in your last comment was untrue. Most of it was actual Assumption of future action but the things that you did say had already happened I can prove otherwise. " not that ridiculous Russia collusion scam the Democrats and the whores in the media have been pushing for the last two, or three years." This is what you call a "scam"... All factual data on public record that you can easily look up. Also with multiple credible references. BTW, I like using the exacting nature of Wikipedia because they give lots of details and do not keep anything up without at least three credible references. So most of what I'm going to say is taken from them. As you know, special prosecutor Robert Mueller was sent to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 United States election and the suspicious links between Trump Associates and Russian officials. He did so between May of 2017 and March of 2019. The FBI had been covertly investigating the Russian activity with the Trump campaign under a pseudonym of Crossfire hurricane. Which all began with coffee boy Papadopoulos , who is actually a trump presidential campaign advisor , specifically for foreign affairs , decided one night he was going to shoot his mouth off , for some damned reason , to an Australian Diplomat in a bar . Where he started talking all kinds of s*** . The thing that peaked this diplomats interest however was him saying that he knew that Russian officials were in possession of politically damaging information related to Hillary Clinton . Which is when Comey started the investigation . Not with this dossier that you guys tend to think start it. Trump found out, tried to turn Comey by insisting that he be loyal to him, which is covered in comey's dictated notes. When he could not do that he fired him and publicly admitted that it was because of the Russia thing. Which is when Muller comes into play and his team. All of which has a lifetime of credible, Fair and publicly accredited prosecution experience. Democrats and Republicans. Through the investigation a total of 34 individuals were indicted by Mueller. 8 plead guilty or have been convicted of felonies including five Trump Associates and campaign officials. None of them weather for collusion. Which I know you guys like to say. Because collusion isn't a thing under the law and because in cases like, Michael Flynn, they would get more jail time on other charges. However it is still in the court records with Michael Flynn and a few others that collusion, or the legal definitions of collusion were factors. You can also look that up. Just a quick side note, I'm talk texting this whole thing because it's a lot. So if one part doesn't make sense to you just let me know. So after all of this clear evidence that there wasn't any kind of hoax... Trump starts freaking out and trying to do whatever he can to stop the investigation, going so far as to commit obstruction of justice I don't know how many times. That is the definition under the law and not just my opinion. This is the opinion of seasoned legal Scholars all over the world. Who have written multiple articles on the many ways he has committed obstruction of justice. I will list a few though ... actually I'm going to post a link for this because I found an article with credible references that lays it out better than I ever could. It also has a second edition at the bottom for updates since the first article. https://www-brookings-edu.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.brookings.edu/research/presidential-obstruction-of-justice-the-case-of-donald-j-trump-2nd-edition/amp/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQDoAEB#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brookings.edu%2Fresearch%2Fpresidential-obstruction-of-justice-the-case-of-donald-j-trump-2nd-edition%2F Here is also the Wikipedia page for you to get more details on the things you seem to think you know https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017%E2%80%932019)
    1
  18166.  @MajorMovieDeal  an analysis of the global terrorism database by researchers at the University of Maryland published in 2017 shows a sharp increase in the share of attacks by right-wing extremists, from 6% in mm to 35% in the 2010s. Meanwhile the share of attacks by left-wing terrorists an environmentalist extremist dropped from 64% in mm to 12% in 2010. The study defines right-wing extremist as violence in support of the belief that personal and or national way of life is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent, including antique globalism, white supremacy, nationalism, suspicion of the government and beliefs and conspiracies. An analysis by corns of the same Global terrorism database confirm that the trend persists in 2017, when most attacks in the US were committed by right-wing extremists. Out of 65 incidences in that year, 37 were tied to racist, anti-muslim, homophobic, anti-semitic, racist, anti-government or xenophobic motivations. This list includes an attack by Neo-Nazi extremists James Fields against a crowd of counter-protesters in Charlottesville, which left one woman dead. It also includes attacks against a gay bar in Puerto Rico, mosques in Washington, Texas and Florida, and a vehicle decorated with Jewish iconology in New York. In the same. 7 attacks were linked to Islamic extremists, and 11 attacks were inspired by left-leaning ideologies. You will notice I'm putting the left in there too. Which is something you did not do with your side. The right-wing activities is fueling a surge of terrorism in the US. Overall, the US had only six attacks a decade ago but 65 in 2017. The number of fatalities is also increasing, in contrast to a global decrease in Terror attacks.
    1
  18167. 1
  18168. 1
  18169. 1
  18170. 1
  18171. 1
  18172. 1
  18173. 1
  18174. 1
  18175. 1
  18176. 1
  18177. 1
  18178. 1
  18179. 1
  18180. 1
  18181. 1
  18182. 1
  18183. 1
  18184. 1
  18185. 1
  18186. 1
  18187. 1
  18188. 1
  18189. 1
  18190. 1
  18191. 1
  18192. 1
  18193. 1
  18194. 1
  18195. 1
  18196. 1
  18197. 1
  18198. 1
  18199. 1
  18200. 1
  18201. 1
  18202. 1
  18203. 1
  18204. 1
  18205. 1
  18206. 1
  18207. 1
  18208. 1
  18209. 1
  18210. 1
  18211. 1
  18212. 1
  18213. 1
  18214. 1
  18215. 1
  18216. 1
  18217. 1
  18218. 1
  18219. 1
  18220. 1
  18221. 1
  18222. 1
  18223. 1
  18224. 1
  18225. 1
  18226. 1
  18227. 1
  18228. 1
  18229. 1
  18230. 1
  18231. 1
  18232. 1
  18233. 1
  18234. 1
  18235. 1
  18236. 1
  18237. 1
  18238. 1
  18239. 1
  18240. 1
  18241. 1
  18242. 1
  18243. 1
  18244. 1
  18245. 1
  18246. 1
  18247. 1
  18248. 1
  18249. 1
  18250. 1
  18251. 1
  18252. 1
  18253. 1
  18254. 1
  18255. 1
  18256. 1
  18257. 1
  18258. 1
  18259. 1
  18260. 1
  18261. 1
  18262. 1
  18263. 1
  18264. 1
  18265. 1
  18266. 1
  18267. 1
  18268. 1
  18269. 1
  18270. 1
  18271. 1
  18272. 1
  18273. 1
  18274. 1
  18275. 1
  18276. 1
  18277. 1
  18278. 1
  18279. 1
  18280. 1
  18281. 1
  18282. 1
  18283. 1
  18284. 1
  18285. 1
  18286. 1
  18287. 1
  18288.  @berserko2008  The only difference between me and you us, I don't puss out and say everything all passive aggressively, so I can play the victim later. If I'm being a bitch... I'm being honest about being a bitch. What you're trying to claim is you being civil... or, rather what you're lying about you being civil.👇👇👇👇 1. " sounds like you want a good time, you're a little itch needs to be scratched..?? I'll be ain't putting it down right for you.??" 2. " I think you're trying to get your squirt on with your suggestive commentary....... It's all good we're all human beings and adults here....... No shame to the game, don't b*******....." 3. " you westerners" as if we all come out of a box exactly the same LOL.... 4. " have a very insulting, bulgur, and condescending demeanors" 5. "that calls for the death penalty even by your own people, back in the times of the old west in the days of the gunslingers" And really? You think I should be put to death because I'm rude to you... But I'm the "vulgar" one??? Yeah... That makes sense! 🤣 6. "Any other way, you're just outmatched".... Passive aggressive threats.... But here is the thing with that... Which made it so hilarious.... You don't know who you are talking to. I've quite a bit of fighting experience myself but I'm not saying that to brag... I'm saying that to make this point... One of the first things you learn in any form of self-defense is to never underestimate your opponent. What's tells me... if you do spar with these prizefighters you're sure as hell not listening to them. 🤣 so either you're completely full of s*** about that comment or you're not a very good fighter and I really don't have anything to worry about. 🤣 thanks for telling on yourself. LOL
    1
  18289. 1
  18290. 1
  18291. 1
  18292. 1
  18293. 1
  18294. 1
  18295. 1
  18296. 1
  18297. 1
  18298. 1
  18299. 1
  18300. 1
  18301. 1
  18302. 1
  18303. 1
  18304. 1
  18305. 1
  18306. 1
  18307. 1
  18308. 1
  18309. 1
  18310. 1
  18311. 1
  18312. 1
  18313. 1
  18314. 1
  18315. 1
  18316. 1
  18317. 1
  18318. 1
  18319. 1
  18320. 1
  18321. 1
  18322. 1
  18323. 1
  18324. 1
  18325. 1
  18326. 1
  18327. 1
  18328. 1
  18329. 1
  18330. 1
  18331. 1
  18332. 1
  18333. 1
  18334. 1
  18335. 1
  18336. 1
  18337. 1
  18338. 1
  18339. 1
  18340. 1
  18341. 1
  18342.  TequilaOrWhiskey  And SHOCKER! More lies about what "I said". What you're doing is just trying what little credibility you have left. But, hey... You do you. I said, you guys would have to ignore the last 80 years of history to be able to say that the democrats are the ones with all the racist policies and people. Also that you would have to ignore the last 80 years of history to try and claim (as you did) that the party flip didn't happen. Again... Doesn't even sound like me. 1. I would say, it began around 80 years ago, but by no means, was it a light switch. A few minor things that happened before this but the first real big move towards it was Lyndon Johnson, the Democratic president, being worried about re-election and trying to Court the northern and blacks vote by supporting the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act. it's not like he was doing it for altruistic reasons or anything either. It's just what one of the first big pushes were. Hence, his famous quote, "We just lost the South for a generation." He was referring to southern and VERY racist Democrats. Who would be so mad at his support for those bills, that a HUGE BLOCK of them, on mass, would switch parties, to Republican. 2. I was talking hard data and platform shifts. Something you are trying to stay away from. The 2 key components that the southern democrats turn republicans could not get rid of after taking over the republican party, where lower taxes and states rights. Those are still there. Everything else slowly changed over about a 3 decade time period..... On both sides.
    1
  18343. 1
  18344. 1
  18345. 1
  18346. 1
  18347. 1
  18348. 1
  18349. 1
  18350. 1
  18351. 1
  18352. 1
  18353. 1
  18354. 1
  18355. 1
  18356. 1
  18357. 1
  18358. 1
  18359. 1
  18360. 1
  18361. 1
  18362. 1
  18363. 1
  18364. 1
  18365.  @blurplebear8573  this problem with trying to rewrite history in the same thread of a YouTube comment section... All you have to do to confirm you're full of s*** is scroll up. According to your very first comment Trump was not political before he got elected he is not a traitor, imposter and he may be a thief but there is no evidence for that.... and before you get all uppity, I'm obviously paraphrasing. He was clearly political because he kept saying he was going to run for the past four elections before he actually did, kept constantly making political commentary and donated to both parties. WRONG. FOR 1 He chose his ego over literal American lives by not taking the expertly laid out plan for pandemic containment that he had on day one because the Obama Administration commissioned it. Therefore allowing the rapid and out-of-control spread of covid-19 In America which eventually ended up killing over 200,000 plus Americans that would still be alive today had he not. Declaring a national state of emergency, which despite your silly statement is absolutely our governing bodies responsibility. WRONG. FOR. 2 You claiming him not being an imposter even though he lies like he breathes and literally run on being a successful businessman despite never turning over his tax returns and the only ones we've gotten hold of show the exact opposite. So I'm not quite sure what your basis on him not being an imposter is? WRONG. FOR 3 You for some reason willingly admit that he may be a thief... Like that's totally cool with you... Then go in and ignore that there's evidence by arguing that there isn't any. Clearly demonstrating your ignorance of emoluments clause is both foreign and domestic. Also your ignorance of him funneling as much taxpayer dollars into his own pocket while using his presidency to do so. Which in the information age is just willful ignorance. WRONG. FOR 4 then you're going to bring up unproven allegations towards Hunter Biden and ironically just completely Leave Out All the Trump little Goblin children. I forget where did they all work again? WRONG. FOR 5 Then we have your disgusting attempt to you sexual assault of children as a platform to attack the left. Clearly showing you don't give a damn about those children or they're supposed sexual assault, because if you did you would be equally as upset with Donald Trump and his 28 + accusers and court documents to back it up. So where do you use child sex abuse as a platform you disgusting human being. WRONG. FOR 6 Now we have your cherry-pick data from the CDC and rounding up of guess. Because that's totally cool. Also your intentional misinformation about town guess it's self works. Which can be easily demonstrated by me asking you these questions about that data that you're going to run away from, because if you answer them they will disprove your cherry-picked data and demonstrate that only a full and accurate reading of all relevant data brings the truth. Any ass home was a third grade reading level can cherry-pick out of a data report to make it say whatever they want. If you want the actual truth you have to take in all of the data. Which is especially true when we're talking about things like the death of the American citizens. But only if you have an actual conscience. 1. The CDC data what's the fatality rate of the pre-existing conditions they're referring to if any? 2. How does covid kill? 3. Are most coded cases indirect or direct causes of covid-19? 4. Are most cancer deaths a direct or indirect cause of having cancer? 5. If you have diabetes and high blood that you lived with for over a decade... pressure and then contractor covid-19 and die what's the contributing factor to that deaths? Was the diabetes and high blood pressure killing you right away before you got covid-19?
    1
  18366. 1
  18367. 1
  18368. 1
  18369. 1
  18370.  @blurplebear8573  this problem with trying to rewrite history in the same thread of a YouTube comment section... All you have to do to confirm you're full of s*** is scroll up. According to your very first comment Trump was not political before he got elected he is not a traitor, imposter and he may be a thief but there is no evidence for that.... and before you get all uppity, I'm obviously paraphrasing. He was clearly political because he kept saying he was going to run for the past four elections before he actually did, kept constantly making political commentary and donated to both parties. WRONG. FOR 1 He chose his ego over literal American lives by not taking the expertly laid out plan for pandemic containment that he had on day one because the Obama Administration commissioned it. Therefore allowing the rapid and out-of-control spread of covid-19 In America which eventually ended up killing over 200,000 plus Americans that would still be alive today had he not. Declaring a national state of emergency, which despite your silly statement is absolutely our governing bodies responsibility. WRONG. FOR. 2 You claiming him not being an imposter even though he lies like he breathes and literally run on being a successful businessman despite never turning over his tax returns and the only ones we've gotten hold of show the exact opposite. So I'm not quite sure what your basis on him not being an imposter is? WRONG. FOR 3 You for some reason willingly admit that he may be a thief... Like that's totally cool with you... Then go in and ignore that there's evidence by arguing that there isn't any. Clearly demonstrating your ignorance of emoluments clause is both foreign and domestic. Also your ignorance of him funneling as much taxpayer dollars into his own pocket while using his presidency to do so. Which in the information age is just willful ignorance. WRONG. FOR 4 then you're going to bring up unproven allegations towards Hunter Biden and ironically just completely Leave Out All the Trump little Goblin children. I forget where did they all work again? WRONG. FOR 5 Then we have your disgusting attempt to you sexual assault of children as a platform to attack the left. Clearly showing you don't give a damn about those children or they're supposed sexual assault, because if you did you would be equally as upset with Donald Trump and his 28 + accusers and court documents to back it up. So where do you use child sex abuse as a platform you disgusting human being. WRONG. FOR 6 Now we have your cherry-pick data from the CDC and rounding up of guess. Because that's totally cool. Also your intentional misinformation about town guess it's self works. Which can be easily demonstrated by me asking you these questions about that data that you're going to run away from, because if you answer them they will disprove your cherry-picked data and demonstrate that only a full and accurate reading of all relevant data brings the truth. Any ass home was a third grade reading level can cherry-pick out of a data report to make it say whatever they want. If you want the actual truth you have to take in all of the data. Which is especially true when we're talking about things like the death of the American citizens. But only if you have an actual conscience. 1. The CDC data what's the fatality rate of the pre-existing conditions they're referring to if any? 2. How does covid kill? 3. Are most coded cases indirect or direct causes of covid-19? 4. Are most cancer deaths a direct or indirect cause of having cancer? 5. If you have diabetes and high blood that you lived with for over a decade... pressure and then contractor covid-19 and die what's the contributing factor to that deaths? Was the diabetes and high blood pressure killing you right away before you got covid-19?
    1
  18371. 1
  18372. 1
  18373. 1
  18374. 1
  18375. 1
  18376. 1
  18377. 1
  18378. 1
  18379. 1
  18380. 1
  18381. 1
  18382. 1
  18383. 1
  18384. 1
  18385. 1
  18386. 1
  18387. 1
  18388. 1
  18389. 1
  18390. 1
  18391. 1
  18392. 1
  18393. 1
  18394. 1
  18395. 1
  18396. 1
  18397. 1
  18398. 1
  18399. 1
  18400. 1
  18401. 1
  18402. 1
  18403. 1
  18404. 1
  18405. 1
  18406. 1
  18407. 1
  18408.  Matthew Pickeral  Well thanks! I may have secretly been a little too proud of that one, actually! 😏 And your reading me wrong. Though, the way this thread going, it's understandable. I use the word substance for people who choose not to use any. They simply choose to use a bunch of ignorant insults and put down towards people because they don't agree with them. Instead of just saying, "I don't agree with you and here is why". I detest ignorant bullies, you need to try and bring people down to make themselves feel better. So, I f*** with them and waste their time a little. Since I generally don't care what these people think about me, I don't really mind getting down on their level, either. Go back up and see what they where saying before I said something to them. If it was substance, I would argue substance with them. Though I'm not sure where you got the whole imaginary level of intelligence thing from. I mean, I don't think I'm stupid or anything... and I make it my business to know what I'm talking about before I start talking about it, unless you're acting super ignorant, I'm not going to think I'm smarter than you. That's not something I assume. Now if you want to tell me what isn't factual, we could get into that if you like. Santiago Arias Lee understand what is me f**** with people and what is me actually talkin... Lol Cuz ya laughed at Brother Uncle! 😉 I disagree with Trump being a better president than Obama. The numbers just don't add up. I'm objective enough to say that he doesn't get everything wrong... But most Trump protest talk about him like he's the freaking second coming or something. Jobs, GDP growth, the market, and crime legislation, he's about on par. Sometimes a little lower and sometimes a little higher. For instance, Obama said that the auto manufacturing jobs weren't coming back. Trump has gotten a good hunk of them back... But on the other hand, job growth overall has slowed under Trump. That's just 1 example out of many. You think he's not better than Obama but Obama beat him on a few things, by quite a bit and with a harder road to hoe.... Because if you remember correctly, Obama started his first term in the Great Recession.... and got a sound of that b** before his first year was up. But let me be clear, I voted for Obama twice, but I wasn't a die-hard, by any means. There's some things I disagree with him about. I never thought Hillary was a good idea. She ran that campaign like a jackass. That crap she was pulling with the DNC, just heard General Air of entitlement, and she rarely talked about policy. It was just all platitude. I was for Bernie and still am now. That guy genuinely wants to help us and has a 50-year track record of doing so. But I have done my homework. I do know the stats. Seriously, it irks me when people talk about things that they don't know about. Thanks for stopping with the back and forth and actually talking to me though. If someone's going to be an a******, then I can be a b****, but I really do prefer this kind of Exchange. So... Convince me otherwise?
    1
  18409. 1
  18410. 1
  18411. 1
  18412. 1
  18413. 1
  18414. 1
  18415. 1
  18416. 1
  18417. 1
  18418. And they only seem to ever bring them up, right after the ridiculousness of the same standard deflections, baseless claims and conspiracy theories. - "Less then 1% has died, who caught Covid 19." 5,135,360 Cases 164,836 Deaths 3.20% given today's current count - "It was all planned by the Left to make Trump look bad." One that, apparently, every Med Examiner and coroner in the country is "in on". - Which is clearly because the left wants mail in ballets, so they can "commit voter fraud" to win. 2 Decades/20 years/5 presidential elections = 1285 cases of voter fraud Most of which had nothing to do with mail in ballets. Most of which where, however, found on the right side of the isle. 5 states have had nothing but mail in ballets with no problem. We have had mail in ballets in this country sense 1967. Trump has voted with mail in ballets. - Media bias against Trump rallies and protests... But not "ANTIFA" or "BLM". I would challenge anyone to name a national station that hasn't mentioned or asked the question about the potential risk involving Covid 19, in regards to the BLM protests and Confederate monuments protests... Not once... But several times. You wont find one. You will see a whole lot more of those protestors wearing masks and separating then you will at any Trump rally. Just ask all the sick and quarantined Secret Service members. - "More are dying from the flu." 2019 flu deaths (at most) 61,000 in a Year. Covid death in half that time 164,836 "Car accidents" are not deadly and contagious, last time I checked. Apple's and Oranges Deflection.
    1
  18419. 1
  18420. 1
  18421. 1
  18422. 1
  18423. 1
  18424. 1
  18425. 1
  18426. 1
  18427. 1
  18428. 1
  18429. 1
  18430. 1
  18431. 1
  18432. 1
  18433. 1
  18434. 1
  18435. 1
  18436. 1
  18437. 1
  18438. 1
  18439. 1
  18440. 1
  18441. 1
  18442. 1
  18443. 1
  18444. 1
  18445. 1
  18446. 1
  18447. 1
  18448. 1
  18449. 1
  18450. 1
  18451. 1
  18452. 1
  18453. 1
  18454. 1
  18455. 1
  18456. 1
  18457. 1
  18458. 1
  18459. 1
  18460. 1
  18461. 1
  18462. 1
  18463. 1
  18464. 1
  18465. 1
  18466. 1
  18467. 1
  18468. 1
  18469. 1
  18470. 1
  18471. 1
  18472. 1
  18473. 1
  18474. 1
  18475. 1
  18476. 1
  18477. 1
  18478. 1
  18479. 1
  18480. 1
  18481. 1
  18482. 1
  18483. 1
  18484. 1
  18485. 1
  18486. 1
  18487. 1
  18488. 1
  18489. 1
  18490. 1
  18491. 1
  18492. 1
  18493. 1
  18494. 1
  18495. 1
  18496. 1
  18497. 1
  18498. 1
  18499. 1
  18500. 1
  18501. 1
  18502. 1
  18503. 1
  18504. 1
  18505. 1
  18506. 1
  18507. 1
  18508. 1
  18509. 1
  18510. 1
  18511. 1
  18512. 1
  18513. 1
  18514. 1
  18515. 1
  18516. 1
  18517. 1
  18518. 1
  18519. 1
  18520. 1
  18521. 1
  18522. 1
  18523. 1
  18524. 1
  18525. 1
  18526. 1
  18527. 1
  18528. 1
  18529. 1
  18530. 1
  18531. 1
  18532. 1
  18533. 1
  18534. 1
  18535. 1
  18536. 1
  18537. 1
  18538. 1
  18539. 1
  18540. 1
  18541. 1
  18542. 1
  18543. 1
  18544. 1
  18545. 1
  18546. 1
  18547. 1
  18548. 1
  18549. 1
  18550. 1
  18551. 1
  18552. 1
  18553. 1
  18554. 1
  18555. 1
  18556. 1
  18557. 1
  18558. 1
  18559. 1
  18560. 1
  18561. 1
  18562. 1
  18563. 1
  18564. 1
  18565. 1
  18566. 1
  18567. 1
  18568. 1
  18569. 1
  18570. 1
  18571. 1
  18572. 1
  18573. 1
  18574. 1
  18575. 1
  18576. 1
  18577. 1
  18578. 1
  18579. 1
  18580. 1
  18581. 1
  18582. 1
  18583. 1
  18584. 1
  18585. 1
  18586. 1
  18587. 1
  18588. 1
  18589. 1
  18590. 1
  18591. 1
  18592. 1
  18593. 1
  18594. 1
  18595. 1
  18596. 1
  18597. 1
  18598. 1
  18599. 1
  18600. 1
  18601. 1
  18602. 1
  18603. 1
  18604. 1
  18605. 1
  18606. 1
  18607. 1
  18608. 1
  18609. 1
  18610. 1
  18611. 1
  18612. 1
  18613. 1
  18614. 1
  18615. 1
  18616. 1
  18617. 1
  18618. 1
  18619. 1
  18620. 1
  18621. 1
  18622. 1
  18623. 1
  18624. 1
  18625. 1
  18626. 1
  18627. 1
  18628. 1
  18629. 1
  18630. 1
  18631. 1
  18632. 1
  18633. 1
  18634. 1
  18635. 1
  18636. 1
  18637. 1
  18638. 1
  18639. 1
  18640. 1
  18641. 1
  18642. 1
  18643. 1
  18644. 1
  18645. 1
  18646. 1
  18647. 1
  18648. 1
  18649. 1
  18650. 1
  18651. 1
  18652. 1
  18653. 1
  18654. 1
  18655. 1
  18656. 1
  18657. 1
  18658. 1
  18659. 1
  18660. 1
  18661. 1
  18662. 1
  18663. 1
  18664. 1
  18665. 1
  18666. 1
  18667. 1
  18668. 1
  18669. 1
  18670. 1
  18671. 1
  18672. 1
  18673. 1
  18674. 1
  18675. 1
  18676. 1
  18677. 1
  18678. 1
  18679. 1
  18680. 1
  18681. 1
  18682. 1
  18683. 1
  18684. 1
  18685. 1
  18686. 1
  18687. 1
  18688. 1
  18689. 1
  18690. 1
  18691. 1
  18692. 1
  18693. 1
  18694. 1
  18695. 1
  18696. 1
  18697. 1
  18698. 1
  18699. 1
  18700. 1
  18701. 1
  18702. 1
  18703.  @KTGNetwork  Yeah... I'm not. You just seem to be cherry picking your data. So... If we are going off of what the CDC says, let's address your question about " less contagious" "COVID-19 vaccines are effective at keeping you from getting COVID-19, especially severe illness and death. COVID-19 vaccines 💥reduce the risk of people spreading the virus💥 that causes COVID-19. " https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/keythingstoknow.html?s_cid=10493:vaccine%20for%20covid:sem.ga:p:RG:GM:gen:PTN:FY21 I said, "it has a lot to do with quantity and clusters". As in, the amount of antibodies in your system at any given time, and then the amount of people you surround yourself with that have or have not been vaccinated. "Yes, you should be vaccinated regardless of whether you already had COVID-19. That’s because experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19. Even if you have already recovered from COVID-19, it is possible—although rare—that you could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 again. Studies have shown that vaccination provides 💥a strong boost💥 in protection in people who have recovered from COVID-19. Learn more about why getting vaccinated is a safer way to build protection than getting infected." https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html#:~:text=Yes%2C%20you%20should%20be,had%20COVID%2D19. I never said one way or another about how long they would last. The CDC isn't even sure of that. However, developing the third booster, like moderna just did, suggest that they're getting closer to that answer. " They also say covid-19 vaccinations help protect people from getting sick or severely ill with covid-19 and my also help protect people around them. " Yes... There is no guarantee there's going to not be a breakthrough infection even if your vaccinated. There are whole lot less common and if you're vaccinated then get it, it's going to be less contagious and less deadly... But again, there are breakthrough infections and if you get one you are going to be contagious. That is the reason for the "might". A vaccine is not a cure-all. It just makes it extremely less likely you will get ill and if you do extremely less likely that you will pass it on, get severely ill, or die. You really shouldn't cherry pick your data.
    1
  18704. 1
  18705. 1
  18706. 1
  18707. 1
  18708. 1
  18709. 1
  18710. 1
  18711. 1
  18712. 1
  18713. 1
  18714. 1
  18715. 1
  18716. 1
  18717. 1
  18718. 1
  18719. 1
  18720. 1
  18721. 1
  18722. 1
  18723. 1
  18724. 1
  18725. 1
  18726. 1
  18727. 1
  18728. 1
  18729. 1
  18730. 1
  18731. 1
  18732. 1
  18733. 1
  18734. 1
  18735. 1
  18736. 1
  18737. 1
  18738. 1
  18739. 1
  18740. 1
  18741. 1
  18742. 1
  18743. 1
  18744. 1
  18745. 1
  18746. 1
  18747. 1
  18748. 1
  18749. 1
  18750. 1
  18751. 1
  18752. 1
  18753. 1
  18754. 1
  18755. 1
  18756. 1
  18757. 1
  18758. 1
  18759. 1
  18760. 1
  18761. 1
  18762. 1
  18763. 1
  18764. 1
  18765. 1
  18766. 1
  18767. 1
  18768. 1
  18769. 1
  18770. 1
  18771. 1
  18772. 1
  18773. 1
  18774. 1
  18775. 1
  18776. 1
  18777. 1
  18778. 1
  18779. 1
  18780. 1
  18781. 1
  18782. 1
  18783. 1
  18784. 1
  18785. 1
  18786. 1
  18787. 1
  18788. 1
  18789. 1
  18790. 1
  18791. 1
  18792. 1
  18793. 1
  18794. 1
  18795. 1
  18796. 1
  18797. 1
  18798. 1
  18799. 1
  18800. 1
  18801. 1
  18802. 1
  18803. 1
  18804. 1
  18805. 1
  18806. 1
  18807. 1
  18808. 1
  18809. 1
  18810. 1
  18811. 1
  18812. 1
  18813. 1
  18814. 1
  18815. 1
  18816. 1
  18817. 1
  18818. 1
  18819. 1
  18820. 1
  18821. 1
  18822. 1
  18823. 1
  18824. 1
  18825. 1
  18826. 1
  18827. 1
  18828. 1
  18829. 1
  18830. 1
  18831. 1
  18832. 1
  18833. 1
  18834. 1
  18835. 1
  18836. 1
  18837. 1
  18838.  Loki the sly one  You go ahead and get started on these! When I get back to work I'll be interested in finding what excuses and dancing you're doing to run away from them now! 😁 1. Referring to CNN, you claimed all they give are Anonymous sources. I asked if Anonymous sources was all that they give? You ran away from that because you made a silly claim you couldn't substantiate. 2. Why would they be okay with not approving Detroit for minor irregularities, but be okay with approving three other majority Caucasian districts with substantially more irregularities? 3. Your response to this 👆 was making a claim that they too Michigan election officials had nothing to do with these three other districts with irregularities. Which point, I pointed out a comment that one of them made and asked you if they had nothing to do with it why would they make that comment.👇 "Really? Then explain who Palmer would say this? "Palmer's comment that she would be willing to certify results in Detroit's suburbs — which experienced some of the same clerical errors that Detroit did — but not in Detroit was seen as particularly outrageous." https://amp-freep-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.freep.com/amp/3775242001?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=16060651033625&amp_ct=1606065121564&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.freep.com%2Fstory%2Fnews%2Fpolitics%2Felections%2F2020%2F11%2F19%2Fwayne-county-board-of-canvassers-monica-palmer-william-hartmann%2F3775242001%2F 4. The numbers you kept siting about Mass irregularities and over the came from a tweet that Donald Trump made because he still salty about losing the election. I also pointed out that just because Donald Trump said it, doesn't make it actually true. The dude was like all the damn time. Probably a big reason why he lost the election. To illustrate this I pointed out that Twitter flagged it as a false comment. You then claimed that Twitter got it wrong. At which point I told you that was great and to prove they got it wrong. 👉👉👉Here comes my favorite part... You then asked what tweet I was referring to.👈👈👈🤣🤣🤣 Which led to me simply asking, how you can claim the Twitter flagged his tweet wrong if you didn't even know what tweet it was? Nothing but silence on that little gem! 🤣 Did I mention I posted the link for that one, in the original comment? Most hilarious idiotism of yours so far, but still an unanswered question. "Twitter flagged both tweets with an advisory label to notify social media users that statements included in each are unsubstantiated. "This claim about election fraud is disputed," the advisory messages read. https://www-newsweek-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-detroit-have-more-votes-people-election-trump-claims-1548448?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&amp=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=16060659948050&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsweek.com%2Ffact-check-did-detroit-have-more-votes-people-election-trump-claims-1548448"
    1
  18839. 1
  18840. 1
  18841. 1
  18842. 1
  18843. 1
  18844. 1
  18845. 1
  18846.  @mrcountchoculitis3284  Lets take a look at the on going list of excuses why My LiL B** Boy can't back up the s*** he keeps talking! Shall we!?!?! 😂 So.. First.. You claim you would prove to me you are not American if I. Prove to you my brother is in the service. Then, after I do, you try and convince me its my job to prove your not American. Then, after I quote you directly saying you will prove your not American after I prove my brothers service, you try and claim I have proven nothing, so you don't have to prove your claims. Then, after I repeat the proof of my brother being in the service, you go back to trying to convince me it is my job to prove the claim you said you would prove. And now... It's... My brother isn't my brother!!! And now... I never gave anything at all... And certainly not like 20 different times now! 😂 And now... His rank, MOS, unit, branch, and where you can find news of his unit, (which you tried to tell me wasn't there when you googled it, but then got proven to be a liar about) isn't proof enough, without his personal info, like his name, while you wont even give the name of the country you are in. Now he seems to have just transitioned into the fetal position, in the corner of him moms basement, rocking back and forth, with his fingers in his ears and his eyes firmly closed, while trembling and chanting, "Hear No Evil! See No Evil! La! La! La! La! La! La! La! So which excuse is it little one? 😂 Wow! Its almost like your FOS! 😂 The silly things My LiL B** Boy says to try and Save Face! 😂
    1
  18847. 1
  18848. 1
  18849. 1
  18850. 1
  18851. 1
  18852. 1
  18853. 1
  18854. 1
  18855. 1
  18856. 1
  18857. 1
  18858. 1
  18859. 1
  18860. 1
  18861. 1
  18862. 1
  18863. 1
  18864. 1
  18865. 1
  18866. 1
  18867. 1
  18868. 1
  18869. 1
  18870. 1
  18871. 1
  18872. 1
  18873. 1
  18874. 1
  18875. 1
  18876. 1
  18877. 1
  18878. 1
  18879. 1
  18880. 1
  18881. 1
  18882. 1
  18883. 1
  18884. 1
  18885. 1
  18886. 1
  18887. 1
  18888. 1
  18889. 1
  18890. 1
  18891. 1
  18892. 1
  18893. 1
  18894. 1
  18895. 1
  18896. 1
  18897. 1
  18898. 1
  18899. 1
  18900. 1
  18901. 1
  18902. 1
  18903. 1
  18904. 1
  18905. 1
  18906. 1
  18907. 1
  18908. 1
  18909. 1
  18910. 1
  18911. 1
  18912. 1
  18913. 1
  18914. 1
  18915. 1
  18916. 1
  18917. 1
  18918. 1
  18919. 1
  18920. 1
  18921. 1
  18922. 1
  18923. 1
  18924. 1
  18925. 1
  18926. 1
  18927. 1
  18928. 1
  18929. 1
  18930. 1
  18931. 1
  18932. 1
  18933. 1
  18934. 1
  18935. 1
  18936. 1
  18937. 1
  18938. 1
  18939. 1
  18940. 1
  18941. 1
  18942. 1
  18943. 1
  18944. 1
  18945. 1
  18946. 1
  18947. 1
  18948. 1
  18949. 1
  18950. 1
  18951. 1
  18952. 1
  18953. 1
  18954. 1
  18955. 1
  18956. 1
  18957. 1
  18958. 1
  18959. 1
  18960. 1
  18961. 1
  18962. 1
  18963. 1
  18964. 1
  18965.  @mvgamer9637  MR. LEMON:  Because you know the pandemic is a big concern for everyone, really, around the world — THE PRESIDENT:  Sure is. MR. LEMON:  — especially around America.  New cases are up three — you know, three times since last month.  Right?  The pandemic is a big concern.  Hospitalizations, death rising. So, you said last month that this — that the virus is in retreat.  Do you still feel that way?  Is that still the case? THE PRESIDENT:  Well, the virus — look, here’s the — it’s real simple: We have a pandemic for those who haven’t gotten a vaccination.  It’s that basic, that simple.  Ten thousand people have recently died; 9,950 of them, thereabouts, are people who hadn’t been vaccinated. There’s a simple, basic proposition: If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in an ICU unit, and you’re not going to die. So it’s gigantically important that you act like — we all act like Americans that care about our — our fellow Americans.  To get — there’s legitimate questions people can ask — that they worry about getting vaccinated — but the questions should be asked, answered, and people should get vaccinated. But this is not a pandemic.  We’ve made sure that since I got in office, we — we’ve inoculated over 160 million people; 85 percent of people over the age of 50.  (Applause.)  Anyway. It’s frustrating. MR. LEMON:  But what do you say to people who are worried about a new round of restrictions and mask mandates and so forth? THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I’m saying — look — (laughs) — it’s a little bit like when I got elected.  You know, the — this pandemic was out of control.  You know, we’ve lost more people in the United States — over 630-some-thousand people than in every major war we’ve ever fought, in the United States of America.  And that’s come to a screeching halt for those who’ve been vaccinated.  It really has.  Not a joke.  This is overwhelming evidence to sustain that. And so, what I say to people who are worried about a new pandemic is: Get vaccinated.  If you’re vaccinated, even if you do catch the “virus,” quote, unquote — like people talk about it in normal terms — you’re in overwhelm- — not many people do.  If you do, you’re not likely to get sick.  You’re probably going to be symptomless.  You’re not going to be in a position where you — where your life is in danger. So, it’s really, kind of, basic.
    1
  18966. 1
  18967.  @mvgamer9637  And 👇HERE 👇 Is the full question and answer that goes along with you half a sentence clip. 👉 MR. LEMON:  You said that you’re talking to scientists, though, but what — what are they telling you, Mr. President? THE PRESIDENT:  What they’re telling me is, “Let us decide, based on scientific data, in how we proceed.  Do it the way we would ordinarily do it.” Look, for example, everybody talks about how, you know, this virus came — this — this — the drugs that are designed to kill the virus came along so quickly.  They’ve been working on it for two decades.  There’s nothing quick about this.  It’s been over two decades. So people said, “I’m not taking a drug that was approved so quickly.”  It’s been two decades.  The truth is we haven’t said it enough to people to allay their feals [sic].  There’s nothing — their fears.  This is nothing that just happened yesterday and they said, “Well, let’s take a shot on this.”  And there’s a process.  Usually the process takes the better part of a year or more to get some of these things decided. But the expectation — they’re not promising me any specific date — but my expectation, talking to the group of scientists we put together — over 20 of them, plus others in the field — is that sometime maybe in the beginning of the school year — at the end of August, beginning of September, October — they’ll get a final approval saying the FDA said, “No, this is it.  It’s good.” But again, one last thing.  I — we don’t talk enough to you about this, I don’t think.  One last thing that’s really important is: We’re not in a position where we think that any virus — including the Delta virus, which is much more transmissible and more deadly in terms of non — unvaccinated people — the vi- — the various shots that people are getting now cover that.  They’re — you’re okay.  You’re not going to — you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations..👈
    1
  18968. 1
  18969. 1
  18970. 1
  18971. 1
  18972. 1
  18973. 1
  18974. 1
  18975. 1
  18976. 1
  18977. 1
  18978. 1
  18979. 1
  18980. 1
  18981. 1
  18982. 1
  18983.  @mvgamer9637  👈 Lets recap on the things this one flat out got wrong or straight out lied about.... 1. We have him trying to play Doctor. You know this right wing talking point... "President Biden is somehow mentally impaired because of his age or other reasons. " all because he stumbles through his sentences sometimes because he has a stuttering issue he has had all his life... but most of the time speaks just fine in public... this argument quickly evaporated after he tried to claim that there was plenty of neurologist that have diagnosed President Biden with some mental illness without ever meeting him and then me challenging him to provide evidence of that happening, because no medical doctor is going to put their license on the line for that BS. These "neurologist" never manifested. Shocker 2. Then he starts arguing with.. I guess... his Imaginary liberal friend about Donald Trump not being mentally impaired, because I never said word one about any of that. So that was weird. 3. Then he starts claiming that President Biden wouldn't take medical exams and present them. At which point I linked him the medical records that he released two years ago and the announcement that the White House made, unprompted, about how they're going to release his tax records and medical records at the end of July, again. Which he tried to quickly dismissed by saying that "means nothing to me". Then why'd you bring it up? It's exactly what you were just bitching about him not doing. Which it turns out he did and is fixing to do again. 4. At which point he tries to bring up the recent Town Hall as yet another deflection tactic from the last subject. Basically trying to claim that Joe Biden said that "if you have the vaccine you won't get sick". At which point I took the actual transcript of the speech unquoted his direct comment, which was absolutely not that. Which brings us to the best one and my personal Fav... 5. The transcript, which I quoted from and linked, was from whitehouse.gov... but this one decides the claim that the transcript was edited afterwards to make him sound better... But that's cool! Lets role tape and time stamp the quote from an unedited clip, shall we! 😁 but what do we do... Still keep on insisting that he said it. That he went back and watched him say it. Okay cool! I gave him the full unedited clip of the Town Hall, so just go in there and timestamp where he said it? I'll wait... What happens... instead of using the full unedited version, he finds a known far right-wing YouTuber... Who had literally edited out a 4 second clip of a half a sentence of the town hall intentionally edited that way in order to make it seem as to that is what he said. So when I did was go back in the transcript and the full unedited version of the Town Hall, copy and pasted that whole question and whole answer, time-stamped it and posted the link to the video yet again... But wait... I didn't stop there. I also took all these statements about that very same subject that he had made previously in the town hall and posted those as well. Cuz it turns out that when you at the beginning of that sentence and the rest of those sentences that came before that he was absolutely not saying that. Yep this one is trying to insist that's what he said. Because he completely ignored that whole thing. That's not even counting the amount of times that he tried to insist that all Democrats are a myriad of horrible things even though he knows none of these people. Its lies... Deflections... And a clear dishonest and bias hate for all things Democrats, liberals and President Biden to a completely illogical and unreasonable degree is all you're going to get from this person. Meanwhile he will insist you are the one doing all of those things.
    1
  18984. 1
  18985.  @mvgamer9637  👈 Lets recap on the things this one flat out got wrong or straight out lied about.... 1. We have him trying to play Doctor. You know this right wing talking point... "President Biden is somehow mentally impaired because of his age or other reasons. " all because he stumbles through his sentences sometimes because he has a stuttering issue he has had all his life... but most of the time speaks just fine in public... this argument quickly evaporated after he tried to claim that there was plenty of neurologist that have diagnosed President Biden with some mental illness without ever meeting him and then me challenging him to provide evidence of that happening, because no medical doctor is going to put their license on the line for that BS. These "neurologist" never manifested. Shocker 2. Then he starts arguing with.. I guess... his Imaginary liberal friend about Donald Trump not being mentally impaired, because I never said word one about any of that. So that was weird. 3. Then he starts claiming that President Biden wouldn't take medical exams and present them. At which point I linked him the medical records that he released two years ago and the announcement that the White House made, unprompted, about how they're going to release his tax records and medical records at the end of July, again. Which he tried to quickly dismissed by saying that "means nothing to me". Then why'd you bring it up? It's exactly what you were just bitching about him not doing. Which it turns out he did and is fixing to do again. 4. At which point he tries to bring up the recent Town Hall as yet another deflection tactic from the last subject. Basically trying to claim that Joe Biden said that "if you have the vaccine you won't get sick". At which point I took the actual transcript of the speech unquoted his direct comment, which was absolutely not that. Which brings us to the best one and my personal Fav... 5. The transcript, which I quoted from and linked, was from whitehouse.gov... but this one decides the claim that the transcript was edited afterwards to make him sound better... But that's cool! Lets role tape and time stamp the quote from an unedited clip, shall we! 😁 but what do we do... Still keep on insisting that he said it. That he went back and watched him say it. Okay cool! I gave him the full unedited clip of the Town Hall, so just go in there and timestamp where he said it? I'll wait... What happens... instead of using the full unedited version, he finds a known far right-wing YouTuber... Who had literally edited out a 4 second clip of a half a sentence of the town hall intentionally edited that way in order to make it seem as to that is what he said. So when I did was go back in the transcript and the full unedited version of the Town Hall, copy and pasted that whole question and whole answer, time-stamped it and posted the link to the video yet again... But wait... I didn't stop there. I also took all these statements about that very same subject that he had made previously in the town hall and posted those as well. Cuz it turns out that when you at the beginning of that sentence and the rest of those sentences that came before that he was absolutely not saying that. Yep this one is trying to insist that's what he said. Because he completely ignored that whole thing. That's not even counting the amount of times that he tried to insist that all Democrats are a myriad of horrible things even though he knows none of these people. Its lies... Deflections... And a clear dishonest and bias hate for all things Democrats, liberals and President Biden to a completely illogical and unreasonable degree is all you're going to get from this person. Meanwhile he will insist you are the one doing all of those things.
    1
  18986. 1
  18987. 1
  18988. 1
  18989. 1
  18990.  @muhlenberg2608  So... My fathers side had not come over just yet. They where still in England. On my mothers side, the Cencaboughs, had been in the country for about a decade and a half by then. My great great great grandma Gwendolyn came over from Ireland with her 3 young boys and her father, who died 2 years later. They worked in a candy shop in New York. One they also lived above. When the time came, all 3 boys went. 2 came back. My great grandfathers dad didn't come back.... But he was the oldest and fathered twin boys before he left. One of which was my great grandpa who went on to also have twin boys. One of which was my grandpa. He ended up joining the Navy with his twin brother, Peter, who died in WW1. My grandpa came back and met my grandma K, who served as an army nurse. Also full blooded Irish.... They didn't end up having my mom, her twin and their youngest daughter, My aunt Kelly, till later in life, after my grandpa got back from a short stint captioning his own Sub in WW2. He ended up having one of his legs crushed. As well as, part of his left hand. When my mom and her sisters got old enough they joined the Air Force. Then she went on to have the first child in the next generation. My big brother, and only sibling. He joined the Army at 17 and has fathered 3 children and done 3 tours. 2 in Iraq. 1 in Afghanistan. He past his 20y 3 years ago. My niece... His oldest... Wants to be a Marine. My son... And only child... wants to join the Army when he gets older, like his Uncle RT. That's just the service on my mothers side.... But all of that including your comments begs the question... What in the world does that deflection of yours have to do with what we where just talking about? Does our families service somehow erase the fact that when America had almost unfettered access to states rights, we got things like decades of slavery?
    1
  18991. 1
  18992. 1
  18993. 1
  18994. 1
  18995. 1
  18996. 1
  18997. 1
  18998. 1
  18999. 1
  19000. 1
  19001. 1
  19002. 1
  19003. 1
  19004. 1
  19005. 1
  19006. 1
  19007. 1
  19008. 1
  19009. 1
  19010. 1
  19011. 1
  19012. 1
  19013. 1
  19014. 1
  19015. 1
  19016. 1
  19017. 1
  19018. 1
  19019. 1
  19020. 1
  19021. 1
  19022. 1
  19023. 1
  19024. 1
  19025. 1
  19026. 1
  19027. 1
  19028. 1
  19029. 1
  19030. 1
  19031. 1
  19032. 1
  19033. 1
  19034. 1
  19035. 1
  19036. 1
  19037. 1
  19038. 1
  19039. 1
  19040. 1
  19041. 1
  19042. 1
  19043. 1
  19044. 1
  19045. 1
  19046. 1
  19047. 1
  19048. 1
  19049. 1
  19050. 1
  19051. 1
  19052. 1
  19053. 1
  19054. 1
  19055. 1
  19056. 1
  19057. 1
  19058. 1
  19059. 1
  19060. 1
  19061. 1
  19062. 1
  19063.  @skozzi2845  Nope! It's your narrative to think they have a narrative. They are reporting what is going on. Not all pf which is what you are trying to spin it to be. Facts Russia is a MUCH LARGER FORCE in both weapons, equipment and troops. Bc of this, they stroll in and think this is going to be easy. Yet it takes them literal months to take 1 city.... And that's not even saying they can hold it. There are multiple examples in history where a smaller force prevailed. Not bc they won some big battle against insurmountable odds, but bc they made is WAY TO MUCH TROUBLE over time for the other side to keep going. Over the past decade Russia has been trying to pick a fight with the US. Not the other way around. - from putting bounties out on US soldiers heads - interfere in US elections - set up massive troll Farms Just to name a few... And what do they get from that? Measured sanctions on Russian oil imports. Also... America is fully aware of the inflation and gas issues it is and will continue to cause. I live in a conservative state... And while we are not wild about it... It's a burden most I know, are willing to bare. Especially sense its not really that much over here. America only got 9% of its oil and gas from Russia, and our president has released our reserves in order to help. People may thing you are a Trump or a Putin puppet bc you sound like one. You focus on America... For some reason.. Except you don't call it America. You call it "the west". You make it about reinforcing the "lie" of a Ukraine victory... But you don't quite say that either, bc your main focus on that area is the idea that Ukraine is somehow beating Russia. That is what troubles you. You set up a victim scenario for yourself, if anyone dare question your motives or narrative, long before anyone ever did. Which some would call overcompensation. You are making this about America starting some kind of war with Russia when the country invading and mass slaughtering other countries right now is actually not America. Its Russia... Who is certainly not going to be taking its ques from the US. So... In the ends... Simply put... What in the hell are you talking about? Cuz none of it makes sense given a complete reading of facts.
    1
  19064. 1
  19065. 1
  19066. 1
  19067. 1
  19068. 1
  19069. 1
  19070. 1
  19071. 1
  19072. 1
  19073. 1
  19074. 1
  19075. 1
  19076. 1
  19077. 1
  19078. 1
  19079. 1
  19080. 1
  19081. 1
  19082. 1
  19083. 1
  19084. 1
  19085. 1
  19086. 1
  19087. 1
  19088. 1
  19089. 1
  19090. 1
  19091. 1
  19092. 1
  19093. 1
  19094. 1
  19095. 1
  19096. 1
  19097. 1
  19098. 1
  19099. 1
  19100. 1
  19101. 1
  19102. 1
  19103. 1
  19104. 1
  19105. 1
  19106. 1
  19107. 1
  19108. 1
  19109. 1
  19110. 1
  19111. 1
  19112. 1
  19113. 1
  19114. 1
  19115. 1
  19116. 1
  19117. 1
  19118. 1
  19119. 1
  19120. 1
  19121. 1
  19122. 1
  19123. 1
  19124. 1
  19125. 1
  19126. 1
  19127. 1
  19128. 1
  19129. 1
  19130. 1
  19131. 1
  19132. 1
  19133. 1
  19134. 1
  19135. 1
  19136. 1
  19137. 1
  19138. 1
  19139. 1
  19140. 1
  19141. 1
  19142. 1
  19143. 1
  19144. 1
  19145. 1
  19146.  @damienkoy4689  Are you serious? That is your big evidence? Him tripping and limping? Wow! I mean, you can clearly see his leg, that was closest to the car, buckle right before he fell. Even what he said in the video about the "witnesses acknowledging he tried to resist arrest" WASN'T TRUE! Look it up! You wont find the witnesses who "said" that. https://www-bostonherald-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bostonherald.com/2020/06/05/witness-floyd-didnt-resist-arrest-tried-to-defuse-things/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15920773423588&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonherald.com%2F2020%2F06%2F05%2Fwitness-floyd-didnt-resist-arrest-tried-to-defuse-things%2F https://nypost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/nypost.com/2020/06/04/george-floyds-friend-says-he-did-not-resist-arrest-before-death/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15920773423588&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fnypost.com%2F2020%2F06%2F04%2Fgeorge-floyds-friend-says-he-did-not-resist-arrest-before-death%2Famp%2F%23aoh%3D15920773423588%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s https://www-insider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.insider.com/george-floyd-resist-arrest-death-witness-2020-6?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15920773423588&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.insider.com%2Fgeorge-floyd-resist-arrest-death-witness-2020-6%3Famp%23aoh%3D15920773423588%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s HELL! Even Fox NEWS is reporting the same! https://fox6now-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/fox6now.com/2020/06/05/witness-george-floyd-didnt-resist-arrest-tried-to-defuse-things/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15920773423588&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Ffox6now.com%2F2020%2F06%2F05%2Fwitness-george-floyd-didnt-resist-arrest-tried-to-defuse-things%2Famp%2F%23aoh%3D15920773423588%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s
    1
  19147. 1
  19148. 1
  19149. 1
  19150. 1
  19151. 1
  19152. 1
  19153. 1
  19154. 1
  19155. 1
  19156. 1
  19157. 1
  19158. 1
  19159. 1
  19160. 1
  19161. 1
  19162. 1
  19163. 1
  19164. 1
  19165. 1
  19166. 1
  19167. 1
  19168. 1
  19169. 1
  19170. 1
  19171. 1
  19172. 1
  19173. 1
  19174. 1
  19175. 1
  19176. 1
  19177. 1
  19178. 1
  19179. 1
  19180. 1
  19181. 1
  19182. 1
  19183. 1
  19184. 1
  19185. 1
  19186. 1
  19187. 1
  19188. 1
  19189. 1
  19190. 1
  19191. 1
  19192. 1
  19193. 1
  19194. 1
  19195. 1
  19196. 1
  19197. 1
  19198. 1
  19199. 1
  19200. 1
  19201. 1
  19202. 1
  19203. 1
  19204. 1
  19205. 1
  19206. 1
  19207. 1
  19208. 1
  19209. 1
  19210. 1
  19211. 1
  19212. 1
  19213. 1
  19214. 1
  19215. 1
  19216. 1
  19217. 1
  19218. 1
  19219. 1
  19220. 1
  19221. 1
  19222. 1
  19223. 1
  19224. 1
  19225. 1
  19226. 1
  19227. 1
  19228. 1
  19229. 1
  19230. 1
  19231. 1
  19232. 1
  19233. 1
  19234. 1
  19235. 1
  19236. 1
  19237. 1
  19238. 1
  19239. 1
  19240. 1
  19241. 1
  19242. 1
  19243. 1
  19244. 1
  19245. 1
  19246. 1
  19247. 1
  19248. 1
  19249. 1
  19250. 1
  19251. 1
  19252. 1
  19253. 1
  19254. 1
  19255. 1
  19256. 1
  19257. 1
  19258. 1
  19259. 1
  19260. 1
  19261. 1
  19262. 1
  19263. 1
  19264. 1
  19265. 1
  19266. 1
  19267. 1
  19268. 1
  19269. 1
  19270. 1
  19271. 1
  19272. 1
  19273. 1
  19274. 1
  19275. 1
  19276. 1
  19277. 1
  19278. 1
  19279. 1
  19280. 1
  19281. 1
  19282. 1
  19283. 1
  19284. 1
  19285. 1
  19286. 1
  19287. 1
  19288. 1
  19289. 1
  19290. 1
  19291. 1
  19292. 1
  19293. 1
  19294. 1
  19295. 1
  19296. 1
  19297. 1
  19298. 1
  19299. 1
  19300. 1
  19301. 1
  19302. 1
  19303. 1
  19304. 1
  19305. 1
  19306. 1
  19307. 1
  19308. 1
  19309. 1
  19310. 1
  19311. 1
  19312. 1
  19313. 1
  19314. 1
  19315. 1
  19316. 1
  19317. 1
  19318. 1
  19319. 1
  19320. 1
  19321. 1
  19322. 1
  19323. 1
  19324. 1
  19325. 1
  19326. 1
  19327. 1
  19328. 1
  19329. 1
  19330. 1
  19331. 1
  19332. 1
  19333. 1
  19334. 1
  19335. 1
  19336. 1
  19337. 1
  19338. 1
  19339. 1
  19340. 1
  19341. 1
  19342. 1
  19343. 1
  19344. 1
  19345. 1
  19346. 1
  19347. 1
  19348. 1
  19349. 1
  19350. 1
  19351. 1
  19352. 1
  19353. 1
  19354. 1
  19355. 1
  19356. 1
  19357. 1
  19358. 1
  19359. 1
  19360. 1
  19361. 1
  19362. 1
  19363. 1
  19364. 1
  19365. 1
  19366. 1
  19367. 1
  19368. 1
  19369. 1
  19370. 1
  19371. 1
  19372. 1
  19373. 1
  19374. 1
  19375. 1
  19376. 1
  19377. 1
  19378. 1
  19379. 1
  19380. 1
  19381. 1
  19382. 1
  19383. 1
  19384. 1
  19385. 1
  19386. 1
  19387. 1
  19388. 1
  19389. 1
  19390. 1
  19391. 1
  19392. 1
  19393. 1
  19394. 1
  19395. 1
  19396. 1
  19397. 1
  19398. 1
  19399. 1
  19400. 1
  19401. 1
  19402. 1
  19403. 1
  19404. 1
  19405. 1
  19406. 1
  19407. 1
  19408. 1
  19409. 1
  19410. 1
  19411. 1
  19412. 1
  19413. 1
  19414. 1
  19415. 1
  19416. 1
  19417. 1
  19418. 1
  19419. 1
  19420. 1
  19421. 1
  19422. 1
  19423. 1
  19424. 1
  19425. 1
  19426. 1
  19427. 1
  19428. 1
  19429. 1
  19430. 1
  19431. 1
  19432. 1
  19433. 1
  19434. 1
  19435. 1
  19436. 1
  19437. 1
  19438. 1
  19439. 1
  19440. 1
  19441. 1
  19442. 1
  19443. 1
  19444. 1
  19445. 1
  19446. 1
  19447. 1
  19448. 1
  19449. 1
  19450. 1
  19451. 1
  19452. 1
  19453. 1
  19454. 1
  19455. 1
  19456. 1
  19457. 1
  19458. 1
  19459. 1
  19460. 1
  19461. 1
  19462. 1
  19463. 1
  19464. 1
  19465. 1
  19466. 1
  19467. 1
  19468. 1
  19469. 1
  19470. 1
  19471. 1
  19472. 1
  19473. 1
  19474. 1
  19475. 1
  19476. 1
  19477. 1
  19478. 1
  19479. 1
  19480. 1
  19481. 1
  19482. 1
  19483. 1
  19484. 1
  19485. 1
  19486. 1
  19487. 1
  19488. 1
  19489. 1
  19490. 1
  19491. 1
  19492. 1
  19493. 1
  19494. 1
  19495. 1
  19496. 1
  19497. 1
  19498. 1
  19499. 1
  19500. 1
  19501. 1
  19502. 1
  19503. 1
  19504. 1
  19505. 1
  19506. 1
  19507. 1
  19508. 1
  19509. 1
  19510. 1
  19511. 1
  19512. 1
  19513. 1
  19514. 1
  19515. 1
  19516. 1
  19517. 1
  19518. 1
  19519. 1
  19520. 1
  19521. 1
  19522. 1
  19523. 1
  19524. 1
  19525. 1
  19526. 1
  19527. 1
  19528. 1
  19529. 1
  19530. 1
  19531. 1
  19532. 1
  19533. 1
  19534. 1
  19535. 1
  19536. 1
  19537. 1
  19538. 1
  19539. 1
  19540. 1
  19541. 1
  19542. 1
  19543. 1
  19544. 1
  19545. 1
  19546. 1
  19547. 1
  19548. 1
  19549. 1
  19550. 1
  19551. 1
  19552. 1
  19553. 1
  19554. 1
  19555. 1
  19556. 1
  19557. 1
  19558. 1
  19559. 1
  19560. 1
  19561. 1
  19562. 1
  19563. 1
  19564. 1
  19565. 1
  19566. 1
  19567. 1
  19568. 1
  19569. 1
  19570. 1
  19571. 1
  19572. 1
  19573. 1
  19574. 1
  19575. 1
  19576. 1
  19577. 1
  19578. 1
  19579. 1
  19580. 1
  19581. 1
  19582. 1
  19583. 1
  19584. 1
  19585. 1
  19586. 1
  19587. 1
  19588. 1
  19589. 1
  19590. 1
  19591. 1
  19592. 1
  19593. 1
  19594. 1
  19595. 1
  19596. 1
  19597. 1
  19598. 1
  19599. 1
  19600. 1
  19601. 1
  19602. 1
  19603. 1
  19604. 1
  19605. 1
  19606. 1
  19607. 1
  19608. 1
  19609. 1
  19610. 1
  19611. 1
  19612. 1
  19613. 1
  19614. 1
  19615. 1
  19616. 1
  19617. 1
  19618. 1
  19619. 1
  19620. 1
  19621. 1
  19622. 1
  19623. 1
  19624. 1
  19625. 1
  19626. 1
  19627. 1
  19628. 1
  19629. 1
  19630. 1
  19631. 1
  19632. 1
  19633. 1
  19634. 1
  19635. 1
  19636. 1
  19637. 1
  19638. 1
  19639. 1
  19640. 1
  19641. 1
  19642. 1
  19643. 1
  19644. 1
  19645. 1
  19646. 1
  19647. 1
  19648. 1
  19649. 1
  19650. 1
  19651. 1
  19652. 1
  19653. 1
  19654. 1
  19655. 1
  19656. 1
  19657. 1
  19658. 1
  19659. 1
  19660. 1
  19661. 1
  19662. 1
  19663. 1
  19664. 1
  19665. 1
  19666. 1
  19667. 1
  19668. 1
  19669. 1
  19670. 1
  19671. 1
  19672. 1
  19673. 1
  19674. 1
  19675. 1
  19676. 1
  19677. 1
  19678. 1
  19679. 1
  19680. 1
  19681. 1
  19682. 1
  19683. 1
  19684. 1
  19685. 1
  19686. 1
  19687. 1
  19688. 1
  19689. 1
  19690. 1
  19691. 1
  19692. 1
  19693. 1
  19694. 1
  19695. 1
  19696. 1
  19697. 1
  19698. 1
  19699. 1
  19700. 1
  19701. 1
  19702. 1
  19703. 1
  19704. 1
  19705. 1
  19706. 1
  19707. 1
  19708. 1
  19709.  @mrcountchoculitis3284  Well... I'll be damned... He finally came up with a rebuttal! Took him a day and a half... But... Better late then never, I guess. 😂 Sure thing! Well... In every free country in the world, we have these things called choices. They allow free ppl to work hard and peruse what they are good at. For some, like my brother... That is being damned good Soldier, Fighter, Leader and now Recruiter. For others, it is manufacturing the guns they fire... For some its feeding these brave soldiers.... For some... Its transporting these troops home safe at night after a night out of having fun... For some its making they clothes they wear... For some its designing their recruitment posters and unit symbols.... For some its doing the many different things that need to be done to keep their home country going, while they are gone. All of which are vital components to that free country they fight for. Most ppl understand all of this. The rest understand it, as well. They just pretend they don't, when it's something they are trying to come up with an argument against.... But failing miserably. But... Just for s***s and giggles, lets go further down the path that you tried and failed to lay out. You tell me, if your country was being taken over and you needed troops to come help save you and you children... Would you prefer the other country to send a myriad of seasoned warriors, available to them right away... Orrrr would you prefer to wait at least the 6 to 9 months (depending on the branch) it would take to train a green service person, who has never been in combat, over there to do so? Common sense is a wonderful thing.
    1
  19710. 1
  19711. 1
  19712. 1
  19713. 1
  19714. 1
  19715. 1
  19716. 1
  19717. 1
  19718. 1
  19719. 1
  19720. 1
  19721. 1
  19722. 1
  19723. 1
  19724. 1
  19725. 1
  19726. 1
  19727. 1
  19728. 1
  19729. 1
  19730. 1
  19731. 1
  19732. 1
  19733. 1
  19734. 1
  19735. 1
  19736. 1
  19737. 1
  19738. 1
  19739. 1
  19740. 1
  19741. 1
  19742. 1
  19743. 1
  19744. 1
  19745. 1
  19746. 1
  19747. 1
  19748. 1
  19749. 1
  19750. 1
  19751. 1
  19752. 1
  19753. 1
  19754. 1
  19755. 1
  19756. 1
  19757. 1
  19758. 1
  19759. 1
  19760. 1
  19761. 1
  19762. 1
  19763. 1
  19764. 1
  19765. 1
  19766. 1
  19767. 1
  19768. 1
  19769. 1
  19770. 1
  19771. 1
  19772. 1
  19773. 1
  19774. 1
  19775. 1
  19776. 1
  19777. 1
  19778. 1
  19779. 1
  19780. 1
  19781. 1
  19782. 1
  19783. 1
  19784. 1
  19785. 1
  19786.  @mrcountchoculitis3284  Lets take a look at the on going list of excuses why My LiL B** Boy can't back up the s*** he keeps talking! Shall we!?!?! 😂 So.. First.. You claim you would prove to me you are not American if I. Prove to you my brother is in the service. Then, after I do, you try and convince me its my job to prove your not American. Then, after I quote you directly saying you will prove your not American after I prove my brothers service, you try and claim I have proven nothing, so you don't have to prove your claims. Then, after I repeat the proof of my brother being in the service, you go back to trying to convince me it is my job to prove the claim you said you would prove. And now... It's... My brother isn't my brother!!! And now... I never gave anything at all... And certainly not like 20 different times now! 😂 And now... His rank, MOS, unit, branch, and where you can find news of his unit, (which you tried to tell me wasn't there when you googled it, but then got proven to be a liar about) isn't proof enough, without his personal info, like his name, while you wont even give the name of the country you are in. Now he seems to have just transitioned into the fetal position, in the corner of him moms basement, rocking back and forth, with his fingers in his ears and his eyes firmly closed, while trembling and chanting, "Hear No Evil! See No Evil! La! La! La! La! La! La! La! So which excuse is it little one? 😂 Wow! Its almost like your FOS! 😂 The silly things My LiL B** Boy says to try abd Save Face! 😂
    1
  19787. 1
  19788.  @mrcountchoculitis3284  Lets take a look at the on going list of excuses why My LiL B** Boy can't back up the s*** he keeps talking! Shall we!?!?! 😂 So.. First.. You claim you would prove to me you are not American if I. Prove to you my brother is in the service. Then, after I do, you try and convince me its my job to prove your not American. Then, after I quote you directly saying you will prove your not American after I prove my brothers service, you try and claim I have proven nothing, so you don't have to prove your claims. Then, after I repeat the proof of my brother being in the service, you go back to trying to convince me it is my job to prove the claim you said you would prove. And now... It's... My brother isn't my brother!!! And now... I never gave anything at all... And certainly not like 20 different times now! 😂 And now... His rank, MOS, unit, branch, and where you can find news of his unit, (which you tried to tell me wasn't there when you googled it, but then got proven to be a liar about) isn't proof enough, without his personal info, like his name, while you wont even give the name of the country you are in. Now he seems to have just transitioned into the fetal position, in the corner of him moms basement, rocking back and forth, with his fingers in his ears and his eyes firmly closed, while trembling and chanting, "Hear No Evil! See No Evil! La! La! La! La! La! La! La! So which excuse is it little one? 😂 Wow! Its almost like your FOS! 😂 The silly things My LiL B** Boy says to try abd Save Face! 😂
    1
  19789. 1
  19790. 1
  19791.  @mrcountchoculitis3284  Lets take a look at the on going list of excuses why My LiL B** Boy can't back up the s*** he keeps talking! Shall we!?!?! 😂 So.. First.. You claim you would prove to me you are not American if I. Prove to you my brother is in the service. Then, after I do, you try and convince me its my job to prove your not American. Then, after I quote you directly saying you will prove your not American after I prove my brothers service, you try and claim I have proven nothing, so you don't have to prove your claims. Then, after I repeat the proof of my brother being in the service, you go back to trying to convince me it is my job to prove the claim you said you would prove. And now... It's... My brother isn't my brother!!! And now... I never gave anything at all... And certainly not like 20 different times now! 😂 And now... His rank, MOS, unit, branch, and where you can find news of his unit, (which you tried to tell me wasn't there when you googled it, but then got proven to be a liar about) isn't proof enough, without his personal info, like his name, while you wont even give the name of the country you are in. Now he seems to have just transitioned into the fetal position, in the corner of him moms basement, rocking back and forth, with his fingers in his ears and his eyes firmly closed, while trembling and chanting, "Hear No Evil! See No Evil! La! La! La! La! La! La! La! So which excuse is it little one? 😂 Wow! Its almost like your FOS! 😂 The silly things My LiL B** Boy says to try abd Save Face! 😂
    1
  19792. 1
  19793.  @mrcountchoculitis3284  Lets take a look at the on going list of excuses why My LiL B** Boy can't back up the s*** he keeps talking! Shall we!?!?! 😂 So.. First.. You claim you would prove to me you are not American if I. Prove to you my brother is in the service. Then, after I do, you try and convince me its my job to prove your not American. Then, after I quote you directly saying you will prove your not American after I prove my brothers service, you try and claim I have proven nothing, so you don't have to prove your claims. Then, after I repeat the proof of my brother being in the service, you go back to trying to convince me it is my job to prove the claim you said you would prove. And now... It's... My brother isn't my brother!!! And now... I never gave anything at all... And certainly not like 20 different times now! 😂 And now... His rank, MOS, unit, branch, and where you can find news of his unit, (which you tried to tell me wasn't there when you googled it, but then got proven to be a liar about) isn't proof enough, without his personal info, like his name, while you wont even give the name of the country you are in. Now he seems to have just transitioned into the fetal position, in the corner of him moms basement, rocking back and forth, with his fingers in his ears and his eyes firmly closed, while trembling and chanting, "Hear No Evil! See No Evil! La! La! La! La! La! La! La! So which excuse is it little one? 😂 Wow! Its almost like your FOS! 😂 The silly things My LiL B** Boy says to try and Save Face! 😂
    1
  19794. 1
  19795. 1
  19796. 1
  19797. 1
  19798. 1
  19799.  @mrcountchoculitis3284  Lets take a look at the on going list of excuses why My LiL B** Boy can't back up the s*** he keeps talking! Shall we!?!?! 😂 So.. First.. You claim you would prove to me you are not American if I. Prove to you my brother is in the service. Then, after I do, you try and convince me its my job to prove your not American. Then, after I quote you directly saying you will prove your not American after I prove my brothers service, you try and claim I have proven nothing, so you don't have to prove your claims. Then, after I repeat the proof of my brother being in the service, you go back to trying to convince me it is my job to prove the claim you said you would prove. And now... It's... My brother isn't my brother!!! And now... I never gave anything at all... And certainly not like 20 different times now! 😂 And now... His rank, MOS, unit, branch, and where you can find news of his unit, (which you tried to tell me wasn't there when you googled it, but then got proven to be a liar about) isn't proof enough, without his personal info, like his name, while you wont even give the name of the country you are in. Now he seems to have just transitioned into the fetal position, in the corner of him moms basement, rocking back and forth, with his fingers in his ears and his eyes firmly closed, while trembling and chanting, "Hear No Evil! See No Evil! La! La! La! La! La! La! La! So which excuse is it little one? 😂 Wow! Its almost like your FOS! 😂 The silly things My LiL B** Boy says to try and Save Face! 😂
    1
  19800. 1
  19801. 1
  19802. 1
  19803. 1
  19804. 1
  19805. 1
  19806.  @rockmcdwayne1710  If that was your point... You have an insanely bad way of pointing it out. Singling me and the dem party out, due to wonder leaps of logic, based on very little info. Info that is extremely blindly bias, considering the fact that the Dems aren't exactly the ones who have actually tried to violently overthrow our democracy. So if there is some nameless dem out there saying the rep party needs to go far far way... Maybe... Just maybe.. That has something to do with it. I mean... It was one thing when they just started overlooking countless acts of police brutality and straight out murder of minorities. It was one thing when they championed or, at the very least, ignored and excused kids in cages, in the name of "border security". It was one thing when they showed callous disregard for human life, in lue of a basic right they intentionally kept stretching and bending to the point of breaking in order to, maybe, one day, live out their Rambo fantasies, with weapons that are only appropriately used in a war. It was one thing when they constantly virtue signaled about being "pro life" right up until the point of actually being born. At which time they no longer cared if their parents could make enough money to feed and shelter them due to how little they where paid for all their hard work or that children where dying due to lack of affordable medical care. It was one thing when they spend all their times virtue signaling about their "rights" being taken away bc they have to home school for a little while, slap on a mask when ya pop by the grocery store or get a Vax in order to get the worst world wide pandemic in over 100 years, under control for more then 2 seconds at a time. There by completely disregarding the most fundamental and Universal look of those rights. The right to live. Cuz you not slapping a mask on for 10 minutes out of your day is totally worth millions of people dying. All those things are passive. Gross and inexcusable... But passive... But then you literally try and violently overthrow this countries democracy and install a wannabe dictator back into office, all bc the Psychopathic / narcissistic ass clown was a sore loser... Well.. That's no longer passive. That's actively and violently trying to bend a free Society to their own close-minded and brutal will.... and that may have a little something to do with why so many people are so fed up with this version of the far right wing of the Republican Party. I mean... Good God... Its like the entirety of the far right wing of the rep party simultaneously looked at the Tea Party, turn to the guy on the left and said, "Hold my beer!"
    1
  19807. 1
  19808. 1
  19809. 1
  19810. 1
  19811. 1
  19812. 1
  19813. 1
  19814. 1
  19815. 1
  19816. 1
  19817. 1
  19818. 1
  19819. 1
  19820. 1
  19821. 1
  19822. 1
  19823. 1
  19824. 1
  19825. 1
  19826. 1
  19827. 1
  19828. 1
  19829. 1
  19830. 1
  19831. 1
  19832. 1
  19833. 1
  19834. 1
  19835. 1
  19836. 1
  19837. 1
  19838. 1
  19839. 1
  19840. 1
  19841. 1
  19842. 1
  19843. 1
  19844. 1
  19845. 1
  19846. 1
  19847. 1
  19848. 1
  19849. 1
  19850. 1
  19851. 1
  19852. 1
  19853. 1
  19854. 1
  19855. 1
  19856. 1
  19857. 1
  19858. 1
  19859. 1
  19860. 1
  19861. 1
  19862. 1
  19863. 1
  19864. 1
  19865. 1
  19866. 1
  19867. 1
  19868. 1
  19869. 1
  19870. 1
  19871. 1
  19872. 1
  19873. 1
  19874. 1
  19875. 1
  19876. 1
  19877. 1
  19878. 1
  19879. 1
  19880. 1
  19881. 1
  19882. 1
  19883. 1
  19884. 1
  19885. 1
  19886. 1
  19887. 1
  19888. 1
  19889. 1
  19890. 1
  19891. 1
  19892. 1
  19893. 1
  19894. 1
  19895. 1
  19896. 1
  19897. 1
  19898. 1
  19899. 1
  19900. 1
  19901. 1
  19902. 1
  19903. 1
  19904. 1
  19905. 1
  19906. 1
  19907. 1
  19908.  @scipioafricanus6979  Lord... 🙄 1. Provide the source of the "proof" then? 2. Provide the "proof" it had been "swept under the rug"? 3. "Blame everything that is inconvenient for your false narrative, on the media" isn't going to work this time, because I'm not the one making the claim that I can't prove. You are. Provide proof for your claim? 4. 6 states have had all mail in ballets for 2 decades now. Yet none of you cared about it then. Combine that with your insistence that something is true that you cannot possibly prove almost sounds like you're just parroting off a bunch of nonsense that someone told you to stay. 5. In 2016 21% of votes in this country were mail-in votes. Should we also discount those? I'd checked to see if that would switch the election over before you answer. 6. Since World War 1 we have had mail-in ballots in this country. Of course you're going to call those absentee ballots and try and claim that those absentee ballots are different because you have to request them. Except you didn't bother to look up and find that in most States, you can't request an absentee ballot when you're in state. 7. The spin from the right about absentee ballots being safer is basically that with mail-in ballots there's no way to track them. Except that's not true. In Most states if you're even going to allow someone else to turn in your ballot for you you have to designate them beforehand. All ballots have security codes that they are tracked by. 8. Over 100 cases, all over the country, with over 100 judges, many of which who were Trump appointed judges, countless recounts and audits performed, and over a year to prove some kind of mass voter fraud. Yet you can still show me nothing that proves mass voter fraud, and have spent the last day and a half trying to convince me it's my job to prove your claim, and then disprove your claim. Occam's razor Is it more likely that all the election officials, all the judges, all the Biden admin and all the Dems Leadership and their staffers had somehow pulled off a country wide mass conspiracy of massive election fraud, based on the sole fact that instead of requesting a ballot it just got sent to you..... Or is it more likely that Donald Trump just lost the election? Barring any ACTUAL evidence that you present, that you clearly do not have, I rest my case.... And I rest it, not on what the "media" has said, but the facts that you are either ignorant of or willfully ignorant of.
    1
  19909. 1
  19910. 1
  19911. 1
  19912. 1
  19913. 1
  19914. 1
  19915. 1
  19916. 1
  19917. 1
  19918. 1
  19919. 1
  19920. 1
  19921. 1
  19922. 1
  19923. 1
  19924. 1
  19925. 1
  19926. 1
  19927. 1
  19928. 1
  19929. 1
  19930. 1
  19931.  @stephentoth6003  Okay... So, to say he exaggerates is an understatment. He lies. Like... A lot. Most of the time to get him out of something he has done or said. ... Sorry... Not trying to start off to sassy, cuz I am always up for a civil convo, like you... But... Dude just wouldnt know the truth if it came up and bit him on the butt. Lol And the important part of that is what he does when he lies. Lile the huge group of migrants, the caravan, trying to get here. These where desprate, hungry and scared people.... Just trying to get someqhere safe and he goes and continuously talks about how they have Isis memebers and gang members in there and that it's an invasion. It was hurtful and didn't make sense to anyone looking at it for more than a few seconds. We are talking MS13 and Isis here... Do you really think thats the way they are gonna come over? Walking for months across desert country's for thousands of miles? Thats just silly.... But it did what he wanted it to. Villainized these people. Point being... His lies hurt others and they hurt us as a country. Thats why they should not be downplayed. So... The border. There is and has been a big problem for a long time. I very much agree. I would agree with your stats even. This is not a small thing. Do people lie to get in? Yes. Do they overstay? Yes. Are they all angels or honest actors? No. Should they come in the right way? Yes. For them and us actually. They come in the right way and it gives them a better chance of making a better life. America afords them the full protection of its rights and privileges to them as citizens. I also don't think it's fair to the people who go through the process of coming in the right way.... That all being said... I alsonsee another side. I see the desperation of these people... You have mothers who litterally scar their little girls faces over there if they are to pretty. They aren't being cruel. They do it because if they don't they have a 1 in 4 chance of being taken and sold into sex slavery. For the boys it's not much better. One in 3 will work for the cartels between the ages of 13 and 30.... And if you don't, you often go hungry. These are not uncommon things... And what makes it worse is our country was a big part in making them lile that. Our drug war empowered the cartels. Our CIA. I'm a mother of an 8 year old little boy. If that was his life, crossing over a border illegally would seam very arbitrary to me. Conning an Asylum claim would also. The average wait time for citizenship is anywhere from 10 to 15 years and Asylum is no less than 2. When you're dealing with that kind of life for you and your children , that might as well be a lifetime away. ... And then there are the other policies... Taking people's children, putting them in cages and loosing them in the system. Some still haven't been found. Also, the restriction on asylem claims are only getting worse and waittimes for citizenship longer.... With his policies. So claiming he just wants them to come in legally and then making it harder fpr them to even do that. Thats not even counting the ICE agents run a mock. Litterally pulling kids with cancer out of their hospital beds and locking them up, refusing to even take asylum claims at the border with no questions asked... And more. See... My argument is not that there isn't an issue. We have a broken system amd it needs fixing. My argument is, the way Trump is going about it is cruel and also ineffective, to the point of making it worse. And don't even get me started on that stupid wall... Of the goverment he held hostage too try and get it. Goverment workers and families lost their homes and their kids when without food. Some lost pentions cuz it went on so long that they had only 2 paths. Quit and get a new job or go broke.... And then it was all for nothing. Hell,that is the only time that wall had a lagit reason. Just to get the goverment back up and help those goverment workers and their fams. So all that wouldnt of been for nothing. Okay... Sorry... That was a little rant happy. 😊 lol Bottom line, at some point Mexico needs to take hold of their own country and fix things. I do agree with that... But we need to be helping them do that and not hurting the people. We need a better system. We should not downplay the situation by any means. We just can't forget these people, we can't forget our own moral compass in the process, is all.
    1
  19932.  @stephentoth6003   I get the family separation thing. Though, there are studies that indicate that keeping smaller children with their parents in a family center would be less tramatic, but court ruling is a court ruling. The way this administration went about it though. ... - kids in cages - not keeping records of where these kids are going - who they are - who their parents are - missing several court ordered deadlines to turn over records because they didnt want to get caught not keeping accurate records - because of this there are still about 1200 kids missing. Thats on our watch. That was our gobernment that did that... Ya know. As far as terrorists... I'm not saying they don't. I'm saying they where not in that caravan of starving, desprate men women and children that walked across 2 desert countries for months on end, in order to get here. You wanna talk about faulse narratives... That was a big one. As well as saying it was an invasion. So... If your going to be frustrated at misinformation and faulse naratives then you should be mad at that one also, right? Also a nerd thing for me. In the last decade there has only been 1 confirmed terrorist choosing to cross at our southern border and he didnt come in a caravan of starving desperate people over thousend of miles on foot. Gangs and drugs? Yes but they also did not come in that caravan. They are both criminal orginizations and they have better funding and better ways. Thats just common sense. Wouldn't you agree? Cuz if you do, then you should also agree that these people where being skapegoated? Here is another things about that and this is where I argue that for some (I'm sure not you) it is about race. Why is it all about that border? Just as many drugs come from the other one and the 911 terrorists came from that one. Yet we don't hear anything about it?
    1
  19933.  @stephentoth6003    alright... Calm down a little please? No, I'm not kidding you. I do not amd did not claim all that think that securing our Southern border and dealing with our Southern border crisis are racist. You're starting to have a tendency of putting words in my mouth instead of hearing what I'm actually saying. Maybe it's because you're passionate on the subject or maybe you're used to hearing that argument from others. I don't know, but I think you should go back and read what I wrote. There is an element of racism in the fact that we spend all this time and all this energy on the southern border. We don't even mention the northern border. Just as many drugs and just as many illegals come in through that border but most tend to be white. That is the only difference. So to not acknowledge that in some fashion, there is an element of racism oh, it's simply not looking at all the facts. I don't go around calling people racist and I don't use that phrase as a shutdown argument either. I also gave you a couple of examples why the northern border is just as at-risk. I also acknowledged and will continue to acknowledge the problems on the southern border. Braces and being a element but far from the only one. So you implying that I'm using racism as some kind of excuse, is Ludacris. Who told me that was government statistics by the way. I'm at work now but when I get home later I can send you the link. They are different kinds of drugs but in similar quantities. For instance, more coke and weed come through the southern border fight a lot more amphetamines and stolen prescriptions ecstasy, stuff like that come to the more northern border. Opioids. This has reason behind it as well. Drugs across the board are cheaper in Canada. I'm not ignoring that Canada is fighting against it. I didn't say that one way or another. You're putting words into my mouth again. Yes they are different situations but the numbers don't lie. You can have different situations with similar results. Also again I'm not ignoring any of the other problems from the southern border, I have addressed and agreed with you on a lot of them. You just seem to be losing your mind that I brought up a racism Factor. I never once said that all the problems were made up and that it was strictly about racism. I do believe ignoring ignoring that factor is tantamount to the same thing you seem to be getting cranky about right now with me. I could name about a dozen major factors in the southern border problems. One of them just happens to be the fear-mongering about people who come in from that border. That's not a small problem. They get treated as less than human by a lot of people.
    1
  19934. 1
  19935. 1
  19936. 1
  19937. 1
  19938. 1
  19939. 1
  19940. 1
  19941. 1
  19942. 1
  19943. 1
  19944. 1
  19945. 1
  19946. 1
  19947. 1
  19948. 1
  19949. 1
  19950. 1
  19951. 1
  19952. 1
  19953. 1
  19954. 1
  19955. 1
  19956. 1
  19957. 1
  19958. 1
  19959. 1
  19960. 1
  19961. 1
  19962. 1
  19963. 1
  19964. 1
  19965. 1
  19966. 1
  19967. 1
  19968. 1
  19969. 1
  19970. 1
  19971. 1
  19972. 1
  19973. 1
  19974. 1
  19975. 1
  19976. 1
  19977. 1
  19978. 1
  19979. 1
  19980. 1
  19981. 1
  19982. 1
  19983. 1
  19984. 1
  19985. @NMN89-k2b  VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: So, I was raised as a middle-class kid. I am actually the only person on this stage who has a plan that is about lifting up the middle class and working people of America. I believe in the ambition, the aspirations, and the dreams of the American people. That is why I imagine and have actually a plan to build what I call an opportunity economy. Because here's the thing. We know that we have a shortage of homes and housing, and the cost of housing is too expensive for far too many people. We know that young families need support to raise their children. I intend on extending a tax cut for those families of $6,000, which is the largest child tax credit that we have given in a long time. So that those young families can afford to buy a crib, buy a car seat, and buy clothes for their children. My passion, one of them, is small businesses. I was actually -- my mother raised my sister and me, but there was a woman who helped raise us. We call her our second mother. She was a small business owner. I love our small businesses. My plan is to give a $50,000 tax deduction to start-up small businesses, knowing they are part of the backbone of America's economy. My opponent, on the other hand, his plan is to do what he has done before, which is to provide a tax cut for billionaires and big corporations, which will result in $5 trillion to America's deficit. My opponent has a plan that I call the Trump sales tax, which would be a 20% tax on everyday goods that you rely on to get through the month. Economists have said that Trump's sales tax would actually result for middle-class families in about $4,000 more a year because of his policies and his ideas about what should be the backs of middle-class people paying for tax cuts for billionaires.
    1
  19986. 1
  19987. 1
  19988. 1
  19989. 1
  19990. 1
  19991. 1
  19992. 1
  19993. 1
  19994. 1
  19995. 1
  19996. 1
  19997. 1
  19998. 1
  19999. 1
  20000. 1
  20001. 1
  20002. 1
  20003. 1
  20004. 1
  20005. 1
  20006. 1
  20007. 1
  20008. 1
  20009. 1
  20010. 1
  20011. 1
  20012. 1
  20013. 1
  20014. 1
  20015. 1
  20016. 1
  20017. 1
  20018. 1
  20019. 1
  20020. 1
  20021. 1
  20022. 1
  20023. 1
  20024. 1
  20025. 1
  20026. 1
  20027. 1
  20028. 1
  20029. 1
  20030. 1
  20031. 1
  20032. 1
  20033. 1
  20034. 1
  20035. 1
  20036. 1
  20037. 1
  20038. 1
  20039. 1
  20040. 1
  20041. 1
  20042. 1
  20043. 1
  20044. 1
  20045. 1
  20046. 1
  20047. 1
  20048. 1
  20049. 1
  20050. 1
  20051. 1
  20052. 1
  20053. 1
  20054. 1
  20055. 1
  20056. 1
  20057. 1
  20058. 1
  20059. 1
  20060. 1
  20061. 1
  20062. 1
  20063. 1
  20064. 1
  20065. 1
  20066. 1
  20067. 1
  20068. 1
  20069. 1
  20070. 1
  20071. 1
  20072. 1
  20073. 1
  20074. 1
  20075. 1
  20076. 1
  20077. 1
  20078. 1
  20079. 1
  20080. 1
  20081. 1
  20082. 1
  20083. 1
  20084. 1
  20085. 1
  20086. 1
  20087. 1
  20088. 1
  20089. 1
  20090. 1
  20091. 1
  20092. 1
  20093. 1
  20094. 1
  20095. 1
  20096. 1
  20097. 1
  20098. 1
  20099. 1
  20100. 1
  20101. 1
  20102. 1
  20103. 1
  20104. 1
  20105. 1
  20106. 1
  20107. 1
  20108. 1
  20109. 1
  20110. 1
  20111. 1
  20112. 1
  20113. 1
  20114. 1
  20115. 1
  20116. 1
  20117. 1
  20118. 1
  20119. 1
  20120. 1
  20121. 1
  20122. 1
  20123. 1
  20124. 1
  20125. 1
  20126. 1
  20127. 1
  20128. 1
  20129. 1
  20130. 1
  20131. 1
  20132. 1
  20133. 1
  20134. 1
  20135. 1
  20136. 1
  20137. 1
  20138. 1
  20139. 1
  20140. 1
  20141. 1
  20142. 1
  20143. 1
  20144. 1
  20145. 1
  20146. 1
  20147. 1
  20148. 1
  20149. 1
  20150. 1
  20151. 1
  20152. 1
  20153. 1
  20154. 1
  20155. 1
  20156. 1
  20157. 1
  20158. 1
  20159. 1
  20160. 1
  20161. 1
  20162. 1
  20163. 1
  20164. 1
  20165. 1
  20166. 1
  20167. 1
  20168. 1
  20169. 1
  20170. 1
  20171. 1
  20172. 1
  20173. 1
  20174. 1
  20175. 1
  20176. 1
  20177. 1
  20178. 1
  20179. 1
  20180. 1
  20181. 1
  20182. 1
  20183. 1
  20184. 1
  20185. 1
  20186. 1
  20187. 1
  20188. 1
  20189. 1
  20190. 1
  20191. 1
  20192. 1
  20193. 1
  20194.  @kam1470  The Prez of Ukraine is asking and receiving help for his ppl being massacred right now. For the little girls getting shot on the face.. For the little boys being shot in the back, while running away... For the whole towns being raped, tortured, tied up, shot and dumped in mass graves... For the mass refugee crisis... For the war crimes being committed on his ppl... For his people, as they try and stop this unwarranted invasion.... And... More over... The world is responding... The world is helping Ukraine. The world agrees with Ukraine.... And not Russia... But Russia are the ones in the right here? How's that? As for propaganda.... Russia took over and damn near blew up the largest Nuke power plant in Europe. They control a third of the EUs power now.... And if russia would invade and genocide it's closest neighbor, well trying to come up with an excuse to do so only after that starts, why would the world not have cause to believe the Russia's not going to stop with Ukraine? Putin clearly has no regard for human life... He keeps intentionally aiming for civilians. However.. I do love you guys who talk about how emotional we are and how much propaganda we swallow when you cherry pick the hell outta situations so you can excuse mass genocide. Most of the Free World is fighting against Russia but to you, that must mean that Russia is right and everybody else is wrong.. Cuz that makes "loads of sense". That's why I bladimir Putin had to just keep trying to make up reasons as to why he invaded a sovereign country? Like that they have chemical weapons factories in Ukraine that nobody knows where the hell they are has any knowledge of them, has any witness to them, has any documents about them and that has never been mentioned before... But they're "there" and that's another excuse to invade a sovereign country. But this is all propaganda, right? Even though those excuses came right outta Putin's mouth?
    1
  20195. 1
  20196. 1
  20197. 1
  20198. 1
  20199. 1
  20200. 1
  20201. 1
  20202. 1
  20203. 1
  20204. 1
  20205. 1
  20206. 1
  20207. 1
  20208. 1
  20209. 1
  20210. 1
  20211. 1
  20212. 1
  20213. 1
  20214. 1
  20215. 1
  20216. 1
  20217. 1
  20218. 1
  20219. 1
  20220. 1
  20221. 1
  20222. 1
  20223. 1
  20224. 1
  20225. 1
  20226. 1
  20227. 1
  20228. 1
  20229. 1
  20230. 1
  20231. 1
  20232. 1
  20233. 1
  20234. 1
  20235. 1
  20236. 1
  20237. 1
  20238. 1
  20239. 1
  20240. 1
  20241. 1
  20242. 1
  20243. 1
  20244. 1
  20245. 1
  20246. 1
  20247. 1
  20248. 1
  20249. 1
  20250. 1
  20251. 1
  20252. 1
  20253. 1
  20254. 1
  20255. 1
  20256. 1
  20257. 1
  20258. 1
  20259. 1
  20260.  benny pitt  conduct involving FBI director Comey and Michael Flynn. - on January 27th the day after the president was told that Flynn had lied to the vice president and I have made similar statements to the FBI, the president invited, FBI director Comey to a private dinner at the White House and told Comey that he needed to loyalty. Tried to influince Comey involving the election, when he was running it. - on February 14th, the day after the president requested Flynn's resignation, the president told an outside advisor, "now that we fired Flynn, the Russia thing is over". The adviser disagreed and said the investigation would continue. Fired Flynn to try and stop the investigation. - later that afternoon, so president clear the Oval Office to have a one-on-one meeting with Comey. Referring to the FBI's investigation of Flynn, the president said, "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go". Again trying to get Comey to drop the investigation. - shortly after requesting cleanse resignation speaking privately Tacoma, the president's want to have the deputy National Security advisor KT McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the president had not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with kislyak. McFarland declined because she did not know whether that was true, and a White House counsel's Office attorney. That the request would look like a quid pro quo for an ambassadorship she had been offered. Trying to get subordinates to falsify documents.
    1
  20261. 1
  20262. 1
  20263. 1
  20264. 1
  20265. 1
  20266. 1
  20267. 1
  20268. 1
  20269. 1
  20270. 1
  20271. 1
  20272. 1
  20273. 1
  20274. 1
  20275. 1
  20276. 1
  20277. 1
  20278. 1
  20279. 1
  20280. 1
  20281. 1
  20282. 1
  20283. 1
  20284. 1
  20285. 1
  20286. 1
  20287. 1
  20288. 1
  20289. 1
  20290. 1
  20291. 1
  20292. 1
  20293. 1
  20294. 1
  20295. 1
  20296. 1
  20297. 1
  20298. 1
  20299. 1
  20300. 1
  20301. 1
  20302. 1
  20303. 1
  20304. 1
  20305. 1
  20306. 1
  20307. 1
  20308. 1
  20309. 1
  20310. 1
  20311. 1
  20312.  @socialismsux2261   Jason Engelbrecht  you're still not bothering to base any opinion you may have on fact. First I never said I was liberal. Unless you can point out where I said and you didn't just make that assumption? Second you talk about liberals like they're the freaking Boogeyman. Anytime you generalize a huge group of people into a tiny box it's usually coming from a place of ignorance. 3rd can you please show me the stats on that crap about more black women are having abortions than births? Not liberal or Republican or Democratic or Nazi base but fact-based stats on that? 4th let's go back to your assumptions that for some reason I don't care about black children I guess? This is the problem with you assuming all this craziness and not actually knowing any facts before you let words come out of your mouth ... you don't bother to find out handy pieces of information about the person that you're talking with.... the fact that I have a mixed-race child. He is eight years old and his name is Gabriel. His daddy is African-American and one of my very best friends. So to protect my child I take cultural issues very seriously and I bothered to educate myself on them. You obviously cannot say the same. Lastly... Unplanned... You mean that BS documentary that has all that supposed baby killing footage that has been disproved in about a thousand times by now but some desperate crazy people who don't like to look into facts or you know reality choose to still believe it? Is that the one you're referring to?
    1
  20313. 1
  20314. 1
  20315.  @socialismsux2261  okay so first you sent me to a site that does not say that black women abort more babies than they have. Anywhere... Second I checked out your cites credential site. Have you gone there? This is the descriptor The Source site that they got their stats from. The Guttmacher Institute is a primary source for research and policy analysis on abortion in the United States. In many cases, Guttmacher’s data are more comprehensive than state and federal government sources..... this is the site describing itself. period. And it's lying. " a primary source for research and policy analysis on abortion in the United States". " are more comprehensive than the state and federal government sources" it could not possibly be that because the state and federal government are the ones that make the determination of that. so that is just a site saying something about themselves. also the reason that it has to say that it's more comprehensive than the state and federal government sources is because it is not a state and federal government source. The Institute’s work examines the incidence of abortion, access to care and barriers to obtaining services, factors underlying women’s decisions to terminate a pregnancy, characteristics of women who have abortions and the conditions under which women obtain them. Guttmacher also tracks abortion-related legislation and policies at the federal and state level, promoting access to abortion services and making an evidence-based case against restrictions that limit access. now the second part of this got me interested and I began searching the site. which is when I found out that the site you sent me to was bastardizing and cherry-picking some information off this site about the subject you're talkin about. You sent me to a propaganda site and I looked up the source site it claimed to get its information from and it turned out that your propaganda site just bastardized and twisted this other sites information. this other site being a site that claims to be a research and information site about abortion but is not accredited by the state or federal government and this is why that's important... I could make a site that claims bad unicorns exist and they poop out Skittles and then another site could site my quote on that but turn it around a little bit and say this site says that unicorns only poop out purple Skittles in the dark on a full moon in February. now it's saying what I said about those poop in unicorns but it's adding its own little twist to it and guess what... My original claim was unfounded to begin with. It's like a bad game telephone. In other words oh, I should have been more clear when I said send me some stats from an accredited state or federal datasite. not a propaganda site that links to another site that doesn't even say what you think it does.
    1
  20316.  @abnergarzaro4287  "I guarantee you 99.9% of babies would choose life if they could" You assigned them an unknowable stat. One Which you guaranteed. Which is careless at best. Suicide stats are relivant to that point because when these ppl do have a choice of life and death, many do npt chpose life. My point being with both of those points is... Not all things are that black and white and we don't know what we don't know.... So we should stop pretending we know we are right and they are wrong. Especially on a subject as imprtant as this. Everyone has lines. I bet if I acked you questions and you answered them honestly... We would quickly find your line as to which "potential life" doesn't become as important as the life your living now. Okay... So your contridicting yourself. You just showed me your line... Which is fine because it's one of mine as well. " it's murder and there shouldn't be an option for it." But then... " in the situation that the mother's life is in danger it is up to the mother's choice." Thats pro choice love. You also seam to lean that way on rape and incest. You basically say (if I'm understanding correctly) you would not force them to keep the baby but you would try to encurage them to have it, try and keep it or adoption. Thats pro choice hun. I know we get painted with horns and a tail but us pro choicers are not out there saying f*** those babies! Kill them all! Thats crazy pants. Especially sense I'm a mother. Just that safe and respectful abortion should be avalible to those that need it and that it should be rare they do. I dont know one pro choicer who doesn't have contempt for women who use abortion as a form of birth control.
    1
  20317. 1
  20318. 1
  20319. 1
  20320. 1
  20321. 1
  20322. 1
  20323. 1
  20324. 1
  20325. 1
  20326.  @maryc8552  Well... Whoever was making you feel bad about believing what you do was being a jackass! They also sound like they're not securing their own beliefs because if they were they wouldn't have to put down others. Me, I'm take a different tact. I have many Christian friends. I live down here in the Louisiana Bible Belt. I wouldn't have many friends if I didn't have Christian friends. Talking to you I would try to inform you, I guess. Not to disavow you of your beliefs but maybe give you a little information and possibly learn some myself. Like for instance oh, you brought up the beginning of existence and the planets. Posing that they could not have happened just by themselves like that. Well I agree with you and so does science by the way. There are tons of scientific mechanisms that, in theory, we think contributed to the forming of our universe and planets structure. Things like gravity, inertia and one of the most handsome dating things being that our solar system is not the only one. This has happened millions of times. It's not uncommon at all. It's also not nothing that did it. For our solar system or any of the others. It's actually very fascinating and I'm not doing it justice with my explanation by any means. So if you're looking for reasons why our solar system came together in this specific design then I really would encourage you to look up outer space structure. That's at least a good place to start. I think you'd find it really interesting. Not that I am, by any means, trying to talk you out of your belief. I believe in choice and therefore respect others ability to do so. That's why I raise my son like that when it comes to religion. He's the most precious thing in my life and I want to give him the education he needs to be able to make an educated decision about something like religion. I don't want my beliefs or lack thereof to be forced upon him... Or anyone else and any of those people who do that in your case, just try and remember it's not about you when they do. It speaks more volumes about their insecurities than it will about yours. 😉 Or you could send them my way. I wouldn't mind giving him some business. LOL
    1
  20327. 1
  20328. 1
  20329. 1
  20330. 1
  20331. 1
  20332. 1
  20333. 1
  20334. 1
  20335. 1
  20336. 1
  20337. 1
  20338. 1
  20339. 1
  20340. 1
  20341. 1
  20342. 1
  20343. 1
  20344. 1
  20345. 1
  20346. 1
  20347. 1
  20348. 1
  20349. 1
  20350. 1
  20351. 1
  20352. 1
  20353. 1
  20354. 1
  20355. 1
  20356. 1
  20357. 1
  20358. 1
  20359. 1
  20360. 1
  20361. 1
  20362. 1
  20363. 1
  20364. 1
  20365. 1
  20366. 1
  20367. 1
  20368. 1
  20369.  @hystericallily9662  1. That just simply is not true, when you actually look at the data. Which I'm sure you haven't. 2. I'm not deflecting from a thing. I'm on topic for the thread and you can't prove otherwise. 3. You are pushing a false narrative because as I stated before, the facts do not back up your claim. 4. You are not bothering to make the distinction. You are not bring up the protestors. Leaving only 1 option. It's tantamount to the same thing and intentional, on your part. 4. You are the reason they riot.There are police that are beating them, harassing them, murdering them, framing them and generally just treating them like they're less than... Then we have the whole swans of police who see this happen and just don't do a damn thing about it. Like those four policemen standing around George Floyd as one of them chokes him to death with his me for 8 minutes.... while mr. Floyd and people surrounding the area are literally begging them for his life. Then they try and tell people about it by kneeling, peaceful protesting and family's of these people speaking out... Yet people like you still play hear no evil/see no evil. For decades now... And you wonder why they riot. You're giving them nothing to lose. What are they going to do just stop these rioters? Arrest them, beat them or kill them? They're already doing that. If YOU want to deescalate, get your head out of the stand and start paying attention to the facts. Start listening to them. 5. CNN uses facts to back up their narrative. I have no issue with that. 6. African Americans are 13.4% of the American population, yet account for 26% of all officer-involved killings. Caucasian 73% population African-American 13.4% population 2017 Just police 👉shootings👈 Caucasian 457 African American 221 2018 Just police 👉shootings👈 Caucasian 399 African American 209 2019 Just police 👉shootings👈 Caucasian 370 African American 235 2020 so far, just police 👉shootings👈 Caucasian 215 African American 111 And remember... Caucasian 73% population African-American 13.4% population https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/
    1
  20370. 1
  20371. 1
  20372. 1
  20373. 1
  20374. 1
  20375. 1
  20376. 1
  20377. 1
  20378. 1
  20379. 1
  20380. 1
  20381. 1
  20382. 1
  20383. 1
  20384. 1
  20385. 1
  20386. 1
  20387. 1
  20388. 1
  20389. 1
  20390. 1
  20391. 1
  20392. 1
  20393. 1
  20394. 1
  20395. 1
  20396. 1
  20397. 1
  20398. 1
  20399. 1
  20400. 1
  20401. 1
  20402. 1
  20403. 1
  20404. 1
  20405. 1
  20406. 1
  20407. 1
  20408. 1
  20409. 1
  20410. 1
  20411. 1
  20412. More than 100 years of US intervention, drug wars, Banana Republic and right-wing death squads we backed broke their countries.... But somehow they are invading us by trying to come to the Border and Legally claim Asylum? Even the ones that don't come in a legal port of entry... The majority of which are just here to give their children a future... and yeah! I wish they would come in Legally. If only to give them the rights and protections that doing so affords, but who are we to judge and demonize these people. For a long time now America has acted like we can go anywhere, and do anything, in any other country. How are we not worse? How have we not done worse? As for Trump, his policies and threats have exacerbated the situation.... Made it way worse. They are holding children in concentration camps right now... And I don't use that phrase to emphasize the point. Some of these places are literally the old Chinese concentration camps we had, in America, in World War II. There has been countless cases where Broder Patrol denies them the right to even apply for Asylum. Which is breaking the law. He perpetrated the longest government shutdown in American history, in order to fund a wall, that every expert says, will not make a difference, and then ended up caving and not getting a dime for it. Meanwhile government workers and their children are losing their homes and having to get into food lines.... All for nothing in the end. That's how people dare to blame America and Trump.
    1
  20413. 1
  20414. 1
  20415. 1
  20416. 1
  20417. 1
  20418. 1
  20419. 1
  20420. 1
  20421. 1
  20422. 1
  20423. 1
  20424. 1
  20425. 1
  20426. 1
  20427. 1
  20428. 1
  20429. 1
  20430. 1
  20431. 1
  20432. 1
  20433. 1
  20434. 1
  20435. 1
  20436. 1
  20437. 1
  20438. 1
  20439. 1
  20440. 1
  20441. 1
  20442. 1
  20443. 1
  20444. 1
  20445. 1
  20446. 1
  20447. 1
  20448. 1
  20449. 1
  20450. 1
  20451. 1
  20452. 1
  20453. 1
  20454. 1
  20455. 1
  20456. 1
  20457. 1
  20458. 1
  20459. 1
  20460. 1
  20461. 1
  20462. 1
  20463. 1
  20464. 1
  20465. 1
  20466. 1
  20467. 1
  20468. 1
  20469. 1
  20470. 1
  20471. 1
  20472. 1
  20473.  Special Bronze  Yeah... I would love to see you try to qualify that statment. Tell me, how do you intend on asking every Democrat wether they want "slaves" or not? 🤣 I alone prove that tin foil hat theory of yours wrong because I don't want slaves. 🤣 Yes! Dems have many ideas on how to combat climate change. They are, infact, the only ones attemting to legislate the matter.... Maybe if your weren't all Dems evil grr! You would know some of this. Confirmation bias is clearly what your suffering from. Lol Also, lazy logic. You think its a good idea to make the baseless assumption, about aomeone you don't even know, that they are a drone, so you don't have your Preconcieved Notions challenged... And I'm the one programmed.... Sorry.... Try again, spanky. If you would have, instead, asked me.... For instance... If I had any criticism of the democratic party that I would like to share, I would have answered, yes. 1. First and foremost, they have the opposite problem of the Republican Party. The Democrats use the carrot way too much and need to pick up a goddamn stick every once and a while. They need to start hplding more people accountable for compromising our democracy. They need to stop worrying, first and foremost, about getting re-elected and start worrying about doing the right thing more. 2.... If they are going to be for the people, they need to stop taking donations from Big Corps. 3... They need to stop pushing middle of the road candidate. That's how we got Donald Trump. People are sick to death of the status quo. 4.... They need to do more to get money out of politics. Just off the top of my head. This is why people say... Making assumptions makes an ass out of you. 😉✌
    1
  20474. 1
  20475. 1
  20476. 1
  20477. 1
  20478. 1
  20479. 1
  20480. 1
  20481. 1
  20482. 1
  20483. 1
  20484. 1
  20485. 1
  20486. 1
  20487. 1
  20488. 1
  20489. 1
  20490. 1
  20491. 1
  20492. 1
  20493. 1
  20494. 1
  20495. 1
  20496. 1
  20497. 1
  20498. 1
  20499. 1
  20500. 1
  20501. 1
  20502. 1
  20503. 1
  20504. 1
  20505. 1
  20506. 1
  20507. 1
  20508. 1
  20509. 1
  20510. 1
  20511. 1
  20512. 1
  20513. 1
  20514. 1
  20515. 1
  20516. 1
  20517. 1
  20518. 1
  20519. 1
  20520. 1
  20521. 1
  20522. 1
  20523. 1
  20524. 1
  20525. 1
  20526. 1
  20527. 1
  20528. 1
  20529. 1
  20530. 1
  20531. 1
  20532. 1
  20533. 1
  20534. 1
  20535. 1
  20536. 1
  20537. 1
  20538. 1
  20539. 1
  20540. 1
  20541. 1
  20542. 1
  20543. 1
  20544. 1
  20545. 1
  20546. 1
  20547. 1
  20548. 1
  20549. 1
  20550. 1
  20551. 1
  20552. 1
  20553. 1
  20554. 1
  20555. 1
  20556. 1
  20557. 1
  20558. 1
  20559. 1
  20560. 1
  20561. 1
  20562. 1
  20563. 1
  20564. 1
  20565. 1
  20566.  @captainmelvinseahorse9654  yeah... I'm an adult dude and your kinda supposed to be as well. That means I don't have to personally attack you as a person in order to prove my point. It also means I don't have to do so in lieu of making my point. Next, and I can't believe you're making me quote you... But here goes. First "video shows what the Virginia governor WANTS TO KILL UNWANTED already born babies" Now would you like to time stamp where this man says that?? Or even half that? Time stamp me where killing unwanted babies is something he wants? He did not verbally say that at any point and in lieu of that, your declaration (that he wants to do it) is simply an assumption. In other... And more simple terms... Your making shit up. Now in the other video you seam to have a medical professional saying one thing and a random lady in the waiting room, that the staff had even actually warned the lady about (innterms of saying pro life protesters getting into waiting rooms just to spread bs about abortions)telling the lady videoing about "her experience". While also talking way more casual that any normal pregnant woman would about going through an abortion process. Smells rotten as hell. Especialy when you consider that the lady with the camera in there to "get an abortion" is also fake from the jump. It's simply not credable and doesn't make sense on a number of levels. Thanks not even touching on who is posting thos video. A man known to be a BS artist that is only in it for the ratings and money. YOUR QUOTE "So what happens if that PERFECTLY HEALTHY, unwanted baby comes out too soon?? Well you can refer to the governor's words in the first video." The governor's quote TIME STAMP 1:04 " and it's done in cases where there may be <<<SEVERE DEFORMITIES>>>. That there may be <<<A FETUS THAT IS NON-VIABLE>>>>. Again... Your quote "Perfectly healthy" Gov quotes "SEVERE DEFORMITIES" "A FETUS THAT IS NON-VIABLE" Then and only then does he go into explaining the bill and what it would actually mean. NEVER giving an opinion on it one way or another. Simply explaining the process that occurs. Infact the only time he even almost comes close to giving an opinion is when he talks about ppl blowing things out of proportion in reguards to the understanding of the bill. Ppl... Let's say ... Like you... Finally... This quote of yours... " they want to make it legal to kill healthy already born babies and sell their body parts" Please explain to the class where where selling "baby body parts" even comes into play? Who said that shit? Lol Then fpr a second time you make the false statment about killing "healthy" (didn't happen)" already born babies. I will leave you for the night with this... If you have to make shit up tonprove your point.... Maybe consider for a second that its not worth making in the first place.
    1
  20567. 1
  20568. 1
  20569. 1
  20570. 1
  20571. 1
  20572. 1
  20573. 1
  20574. 1
  20575. 1
  20576. 1
  20577. 1
  20578. 1
  20579. 1
  20580. 1
  20581. 1
  20582. 1
  20583. 1
  20584. 1
  20585. 1
  20586. 1
  20587. 1
  20588. 1
  20589. 1
  20590. 1
  20591. 1
  20592. 1
  20593. 1
  20594. 1
  20595. 1
  20596. 1
  20597. 1
  20598. 1
  20599. 1
  20600. 1
  20601. 1
  20602. 1
  20603.  @dandr0id950  SoOoOo... I'm gonna get to your book at some point tonight but, I figured I would address the first line. " This is you making a political argument..." Yeah... This 👆 is you, yet again, jumping the gun because of your confirmation bias... While using the same logic I just got done shooting down. 😉 Now... I certainly don't claim to be perfect. I dictate my responses to the level of logical thought and maturity of the person that I am speaking to. If you want to talk substance and have an honest debate, I'll be down for that. If you want to be an asshole and simply come here to needlessly insult people on mass that you don't even know... Well I can be a bitch. Is that somewhat petty... Sure.... But we are all adults here and choose our own actions and words at the end of the day. Not to mention... Some people simply are not worth the time and effort to try and reach them with facts and logic. They simply come here to try and make others feel bad, in order to make themselves feel better... And then other simply need to be right about things... No matter what... For instance.... You came in swinging with... This 1 thread, in this 1 section of the youtube comment section, under this 1 video "proves" that liberals Obvy name call more. Why? Cuz, that is the conclusion you wanted to come to. SoOoOo... I pointed out that silly logic. If you had come in with substance... Facts, data or even just an open mind... I would have approached you differently. Your basis of name calling and what makes that wrong is the judgment assumed by it. Which is exactly what you did by coming in here making assumptions about a vast group of people, you don't know, off of the tiniest bit of circumstantial evidence you could find. Now you want to count yourself as somehow better because you only discribed all those people you don't know as a particular name, instead of out right calling them it. At least if you just came out and just called us all childish or even bullies, you would have been being honest about what you where doing. Instead of trying to veil it with posturing and ego. You choose that action, that path... And your an adult. I'm guessing you just where not prepared for someone to deconstruct it like this and call you on your name calling and BS attempt to hide it. Whoops! 😉✌
    1
  20604. 1
  20605. 1
  20606. 1
  20607. 1
  20608. 1
  20609. 1
  20610. 1
  20611. 1
  20612. 1
  20613. 1
  20614. 1
  20615. 1
  20616. 1
  20617. 1
  20618. 1
  20619. 1
  20620. 1
  20621. 1
  20622. 1
  20623. 1
  20624. 1
  20625. 1
  20626. 1
  20627. 1
  20628. 1
  20629. 1
  20630. 1
  20631. 1
  20632. 1
  20633. 1
  20634. 1
  20635. 1
  20636. 1
  20637. 1
  20638. 1
  20639. 1
  20640. 1
  20641. 1
  20642. 1
  20643. 1
  20644. 1
  20645. 1
  20646. 1
  20647. 1
  20648. 1
  20649. 1
  20650. 1
  20651. 1
  20652. 1
  20653. 1
  20654. 1
  20655. 1
  20656. 1
  20657. 1
  20658. 1
  20659. 1
  20660. 1
  20661. 1
  20662. 1
  20663. 1
  20664. 1
  20665. 1
  20666. 1
  20667. 1
  20668. 1
  20669. 1
  20670. 1
  20671. 1
  20672. 1
  20673. 1
  20674. 1
  20675. 1
  20676. 1
  20677. 1
  20678. 1
  20679. 1
  20680. 1
  20681. 1
  20682. 1
  20683. 1
  20684. 1
  20685. 1
  20686. 1
  20687. 1
  20688. 1
  20689. 1
  20690.  @michaelhodges6493  I honestly think they don't care because they continue to make that false claim about the Second Amendment. That's what they give you guys to argue with. Except it's not true. They're manipulating you to see the Democrats has wrong on their side. Because if you guys think that the Democrats just want to take away your guns then you're going to fight against them. Except you can't name a Democrat who says that. so, yes I don't think they care. I think they want you to fight us, while they cash checks. Democrats have put many things in there gun control bills. None of them have anything to do with collecting everybody's guns.... They actually have some very common sense ideas and proposals.. One is having people who want to participate in open carry, tank annual proficiency tests. Their argument for that is because police officers and the military take annual proficiency test because they carry guns all the time. So why shouldn't untrained civilians who want to practice open carry. Another is closing what most people call the Gun Show loophole but what is actually the private seller loophole. Another is making certain bumps mags and guns illegal without special permits and special training. Like automatic and semi-automatic weapons and bumps and mags that turn your regular weapon into those, not being available for the public at Large at such great ease. Which makes sense. These are weapons of war. They should have had that done a long time ago. because at some point they decided it's not a good idea for the general public to have things like tanks and rocket launchers. They should have added the automatic and semi-automatic weaponry to that. And this one is the one that should be the most obvious but for some reason is not... People who have been diagnosed with a severe mental illness should not be able to purchase a gun. Also, money allocated for research on people who perpetrate these mass shootings, focusing on things like Mental Health and social media consumption. Basically studying the issue so we can better understand it and have a better chance of stopping it. Again.... These are not crazy martial law dictatorial things. It's simple measures to make sure that high-powered Weaponry does not fall in the hands of people who will then go perform a mass shooting.
    1
  20691. 1
  20692. 1
  20693. 1
  20694.  @michaelhodges6493   Michael Hodges  Well... Thanks... But that's why I purposely did not bring up the Second Amendment. I could have made that argument for well regulated militia. It's not completely out of bounds. You should take the entirety of the amendment into consideration, but you're right about it shutting down any kind of back and forth. Yes, the gun show loophole got a bad name. I'm not sure where that started actually... And I'm a big geek, so it's gonna bug me till I look it up now. Lol Yes, see, that's what is in those bills they're trying to pass. Thats a good solution. The one that you said. There are quite a few that use modified mags in those kinds of shootings. Also, it's not a ban. It would make it more difficult for people to get it because they would have to get special permits and take a lot of classes, pass a more extensive background check for instance. But it's not a ban, and these are weapons of war. I also haven't heard you yet give me a reason why we need them? Or rather why we need the civilian population to have them? What do they use them for? Oh, you are right about that. The full autos... Sorry, I'm just so use to speaking about them together oh, but you're right about that and I didn't know that. My bad. And I should of been more specific. About the type of semi auto. Last I checked... They have a list. Some rifles but no hand guns... And again... Not banned. Restricted. More heavy-duty background checks for those, special permits and training classes. It will be less accessible but still accessible. Yes... I agree that they need to be a little more specific on the mental illness. And I'm sure they will be. Which is why almost every bill allocates money to studying things like mental illness in the mass shootings. However violence is not the only thing that they're going to be looking at. You don't necessarily have to be violent for it not to be a good idea for you to have a gun, if you have a mental illness. Would you not agree that someone needs to be fully aware of a guns capability and and have at least a basic understanding of how to use one in order to get one? That's... Not a bad point. Power does run a mock at times. That is a good reason why they need to be really specific when it comes to mental illness. It comforts me though that they actually want to study it before they make a ruling on that kind of thing. I think they know that and they're trying to go in there with as much information as they can. So thanks for the specs on the guns. I knew some but not all of that. I come from a 5 generation back military family and my mom was also a police officer when I was growing up. I I think you misunderstood me when I said they don't care. I wasn't talking about Republicans. Actually most of my family are Republican. I was talking about politicians, mostly Republican. But there are some Republicans fighting with the Democrats to get those bills passed. Which is encouraging. I don't assume just every Republican out there are like heartless gun nuts. That would be a silly. I grew up around military and cops. I know they're not heartless Oh! One thing I would like to have your input on and you didn't mention... the annual proficiency tests, for those who want to open carry? Police and military have to take them if they handled guns on a regular basis. They are trained to do this way more than any civilian would be. So I think it's pretty reasonable to ask a civilian who wants to open carry to pass an annual proficiency test. What do you think?
    1
  20695. 1
  20696. 1
  20697. 1
  20698. 1
  20699. 1
  20700. 1
  20701. 1
  20702. 1
  20703. 1
  20704. 1
  20705. 1
  20706. 1
  20707. 1
  20708. 1
  20709. 1
  20710. 1
  20711. 1
  20712. 1
  20713. 1
  20714. 1
  20715. 1
  20716. 1
  20717. 1
  20718. 1
  20719. 1
  20720. 1
  20721. 1
  20722. 1
  20723. 1
  20724. 1
  20725. 1
  20726. 1
  20727. 1
  20728. 1
  20729. 1
  20730. 1
  20731. 1
  20732. 1
  20733. 1
  20734. 1
  20735. 1
  20736. 1
  20737. 1
  20738. 1
  20739. 1
  20740. 1
  20741. 1
  20742. 1
  20743. 1
  20744. 1
  20745. 1
  20746. 1
  20747. 1
  20748. 1
  20749. 1
  20750. 1
  20751. 1
  20752. 1
  20753. 1
  20754. 1
  20755. 1
  20756. 1
  20757. 1
  20758. 1
  20759. 1
  20760. 1
  20761. 1
  20762. 1
  20763. 1
  20764. 1
  20765. 1
  20766. 1
  20767.  @motoko9888  We play the worlds police to much. Yes. However.. This is not that. This is America holding itself to its agreement. This is the UN supporting its allies. Its what we are supposed to do. We have their back and they have ours. You keep trying to blame this all on us. Like where the one amassing 300,000 fruits that Ukraine's border. All we're doing is what we're supposed to be doing. Backing our allies when they need us so they back us when we need them. Its that simple. Donald Trump only ever took care of himself. The insane amount of things you have to ignore to make that statement is baffling. The democratic presidents took in refugees because they needed somewhere to go. Because their own countries were either eating themselves alive or committing Mass genocide. But the fact that you only want to blame everything on Democrats is very telling. Also... Your insane if you think a country like ours doesn't need allies like that. We are a wealthy, powerful first world country... But we are not the only one. If we didn't have 192 countries having our back it wouldn't matter how much money we threw into military budget every year. One or two or even three picking up players could just show up at our doorstep and we wouldn't be able to do a damn thing about it. For instance, Russia and China are super buddies now. Russia's the only country in the world with more nukes than us and China is these Financial Powerhouse. Without the backing of the UN, those 2 could come knocking and we'd become Rina real quick. You know why they don't? Because they know that if they do, 192 countries in the world will show up at their door.
    1
  20768. 1
  20769. 1
  20770. 1
  20771. 1
  20772. 1
  20773. 1
  20774. 1
  20775. 1
  20776. 1
  20777. 1
  20778. 1
  20779. 1
  20780. 1
  20781. 1
  20782. 1
  20783. 1
  20784. 1
  20785. 1
  20786. 1
  20787. 1
  20788. 1
  20789. 1
  20790. 1
  20791. 1
  20792. 1
  20793. 1
  20794. 1
  20795. 1
  20796. 1
  20797. 1
  20798. 1
  20799. 1
  20800. 1
  20801. 1
  20802. 1
  20803. 1
  20804. 1
  20805. 1
  20806. 1
  20807. 1
  20808. 1
  20809. 1
  20810. 1
  20811. 1
  20812. 1
  20813. 1
  20814. 1
  20815. 1
  20816. 1
  20817. 1
  20818. 1
  20819. 1
  20820. 1
  20821. 1
  20822. 1
  20823. 1
  20824. 1
  20825. 1
  20826. 1
  20827. 1
  20828. 1
  20829. 1
  20830. 1
  20831. 1
  20832. 1
  20833. 1
  20834. 1
  20835. 1
  20836. 1
  20837. 1
  20838. 1
  20839. 1
  20840. 1
  20841. 1
  20842. 1
  20843. 1
  20844. 1
  20845. 1
  20846. 1
  20847. 1
  20848. 1
  20849. 1
  20850. 1
  20851. 1
  20852. 1
  20853. 1
  20854. 1
  20855. 1
  20856. 1
  20857. 1
  20858. 1
  20859. 1
  20860. 1
  20861. 1
  20862. 1
  20863. 1
  20864. 1
  20865. 1
  20866. 1
  20867. 1
  20868. 1
  20869. 1
  20870. 1
  20871. 1
  20872. 1
  20873. 1
  20874.  @davidpaz9389  two out of the three vaccines issued in America not only have emergency FDA approval but now have complete FDA approval. No scientist would tell you that vaccines me and you won't get it. That never happened. No scientist or medical professional issuing any vaccine would tell you that because they know that's not how vaccines work. Same goes for transmissibility. Don't know who you're referencing is day but they didn't say that if they were medical professional or a scientist... and I would challenge you to prove otherwise. The efficiency of the shot never waned and nobody ever made any such claim. What happened was a bunch of people were still not getting the shot and then clustering into big'o lumps and forming brand new strains. Which the vaccine isn't necessarily designed for. Which is why all of them kept telling them not to do it but they did it anyways. When you go get any one of the three shots not only are they legally required to list off all major side effects but they also require you to sit there for 8:30 getting the shot to make sure that you don't have any of the immediate side effects. Not only that but they are all listed on the CDC and the WHo websites. So I don't know what you mean by being wholly dismissed. The only tests that are being done as of now is for vaccines for the newer strains or two tests to see the efficiency of the original vaccine on these newer strains. Which says nothing about the safety or efficiency of the vaccines. It just says people didn't listen and so now we have to deal with this. But again not only has it been emergency FDA-approved but wholly FDA-approved at this point.
    1
  20875. 1
  20876. 1
  20877. 1
  20878. 1
  20879. 1
  20880. 1
  20881. 1
  20882. 1
  20883. 1
  20884. 1
  20885. 1
  20886. 1
  20887. 1
  20888. 1
  20889. 1
  20890. 1
  20891. 1
  20892. 1
  20893. 1
  20894. 1
  20895. The interview was a little over 16 min long. - 30 sec of Intro/Trip and queen🇬🇧 - 50 sec on the whether that day🌈 - 3 sec shy of a full minute (57 seconds) on the Vets and WW2🇺🇸 - 2 min and 25 sec Lying about NATO falling apart, on Theresa May and how he saved NATO and made everyone pay.🤥 - 2 min and 45 sec on how the tariffs that he put dow are everyone else's fault but his, lying about Border Patrol numbers, invasion and general fear mongering about brown people🤥 - 2 min 5 secs of him childishly trashing Nancy Pelosi, Robert Mueller and the justifiably respected Democrat prosecutors on his team. Also, lying again about the findings of the Muller Report.🤥 - 1 min 30 sec Lying about Joe Biden, the reason for his GDP and putting words in the mouth of all American farmers.🤥 - 20 sec bragging about how he is holding everyone up so he can do an interview with Fox News. Then another 5 sec on Laura ingraham's ratings 🙄 - 1 min 20 sec about Russia, China and a trade deal. Also, "Witch Hunt", lying about numbers again (Stock Market) and talking shit about Hillary Clinton because he still can't get over the fact that he lost the popular vote 🙄🤥 - 1 min 25 sec being asked about what he can do to unite the country and deciding the best way to do that is to talk more shit about people. At some point deciding to become a $5 a pop mall fortune teller about Mexico and using the usual hypocrisy on deals when talking about China 🙄💩🙄 - 35 sec on✌, military building, 💰, brag, brag, brag, Iran, brag, brag, brag, China again, brag, brag and brag.🙄 - Just over 1 min about fist bumping with the Queen of England, brag, talking with her, complementing her and thankfully the end!🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩 Sorry about the sassy pants in the middle and twards the end. It was starting to be like audio water torture up in here. 😢
    1
  20896. 1
  20897. 1
  20898. 1
  20899. 1
  20900. 1
  20901. 1
  20902. 1
  20903. 1
  20904. 1
  20905. 1
  20906. 1
  20907. 1
  20908. 1
  20909.  @0sumgamezzz435  I am being honest. I did! If it wouldn't take a day and a year to go look it up, I could show you in the YouTube comment sections where I was raising hell about Hillary. Even after she "won" the Primary. Not even counting all these shadiness with the DNC and emails and God knows a million other things. .. She didn't give anyone anything to vote for. Just empty platitudes and I'm not him. Not to mention she has always had that air of entitlement. Like it was her turn or something. It was BS... in the end I ended up voting for her because I thought she would be the lesser of two evils. She would screw up less things than Trump, basically. ... Its not about being tough or sensitive. It is about the standard we expect our elected leaders to up hold. That has been my consistent message. We keep lowering the bar on these people and then we wonder why they keep pushing their limits. Third grade name-calling is simply not acceptable for our elected leaders to be doing in public let alone in private. If that is the level of their political discourse, then they don't deserve the office they have. It is a testament to their mindset. To our tolerance of their unacceptable Behaviour. It's the precedent. Its not about feelings... And that is what I am talking about, with you... what's my name? Do I have any children? What job do I have? How old am I? You don't know anything about me. So there's no way you can qualify what you keep claiming about me. Which means it's an assumption.
    1
  20910. 1
  20911.  @btredinger  SoOoOo... we start off your new comment with obvious insecurities, that you're trying to mask with silly 1990s Junior High put-downs. Then we move onto crazy roll right wing babble. Standard questions that only outline your ignorance of the situation. But you guys still think they sound good for some reason. That's how I can always tell people who've actually done their research and people who were just parroting back when some right-wing activist has told them. Why wasn't anyone charged or convicted with collusion? Well sweetheart, that's because collusion isn't a thing under the law. Go to Google it and see if you can find a crime that says collusion. The closest you will find are laws of varying kinds under conspiracy or fraud. And now let's move on to the dossier of course. Who paid for the dossier, well originally Republican lawmakers dead. It turned out they didn't need it which is where Hillary Clinton picked it up. You guys always seem to forget that part though. Weird it's almost like you're so biased you can't see anything wrong on your side and blow up ours. Who Supply the contents of the dossier? Wow that hasn't all been vetted out yet. They started to investigate some of the dossier and where it came from but after it became irrelevant to the investigation, they didn't feel the need to discredit it any further. So only some things were proven wrong and others were just kind of left out there hanging. And, yep oh, you heard me. The dossier was rendered irrelevant. How you ask? How many times in the Mueller investigation was the dossier used? How many times was it referenced in the report? So it was used a total of 1 time. It was put in with a whole collection of evidence for the first fisa warrant on Carter Pages office. At the time the FBI had no reason to doubt the person that gave it to them. Once they did they took it out of the other dance for the next 9 fisa warrants and all nine of those warrants got approved by seven different judges with the remaining evidence. That is the only incident of it being used. Hence, the irrelevance of the Steele dossier. But this is what you guys do, you cling onto the most shaky branch of an investigation, claim it's so important, it snaps and falls to the ground and yet the tree still stands. But you do so because you don't have anything else. You certainly can't argue with the rest of it. That's why you blew up the dossier, that's why you're now trying to blow up the identity of the Whistleblower. Both are completely irrelevant to those cases at this point. But y'all just clinging on to them like they're lifelines. At least once a week I hear you guys trying to steal reference the dossier is being what started the damn investigation in the first place. Except the FBI didn't even know about the dossier until about seven weeks after the investigation at already began. The dossier is irrelevant. The whistleblowers identity at this point is irrelevant. Argue relevance or stay quiet because the rest is just going to embarrass you.
    1
  20912. 1
  20913. 1
  20914. 1
  20915. 1
  20916. 1
  20917. 1
  20918. 1
  20919. 1
  20920. 1
  20921. 1
  20922. 1
  20923. 1
  20924. 1
  20925. 1
  20926. 1
  20927. 1
  20928. 1
  20929. 1
  20930. 1
  20931. 1
  20932. 1
  20933. 1
  20934. 1
  20935. 1
  20936. 1
  20937. 1
  20938. 1
  20939. 1
  20940. 1
  20941. 1
  20942. 1
  20943. 1
  20944. 1
  20945. 1
  20946. 1
  20947. 1
  20948. 1
  20949. 1
  20950. 1
  20951. 1
  20952. 1
  20953. 1
  20954. 1
  20955. 1
  20956. 1
  20957. 1
  20958. 1
  20959. 1
  20960. 1
  20961. 1
  20962. 1
  20963. 1
  20964. 1
  20965. 1
  20966. 1
  20967. 1
  20968. 1
  20969. 1
  20970. 1
  20971.  @bradynlotterman8164  Donald Trump lied... Like constantly... alienated us from our oldest allies... put his personal desire above the American people on countless occasions... Deregulated companies so they could pollute and treat their employees like crap all they want and get away with it... Committed at least ten acts of obstruction of Congress... Broke countless emolument Clausees... Ended his term with over half a million dead Americans, job and housing crisis and the economy in the gutter, all born out of pure apathy and callous disregard for human life and basic common sense. How in the world in, less then ha year can stack up to that... And that isn't even the half of it.... Not even a forth... Didn't even touch the gov shut down and gov workers standing in bread lines and/or losing their houses for a wall that never was and was pointless to boot... Or the trade war that cost America trillions of dollars in lost profit... The pulling out of the Paris climate accord.... On an international stage believing Putin over his own intelligent agency... Pardoning Joe Arpio... Calling violent Neo Nazis good ppl... Having peaceful protestors gassed and man handled for that ridiculous photo op... publicly soliciting rival countries governments to attack his political opponent... Defunding the restocking of medical stock piles, sending each state into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives... Completely ignoring the expertly laid out pandemic containment plan he had available to him on day one, because the last Administration was the one that commissioned it... Trying to sell America several snake will carers while thousands of Americans are dying everyday during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a years and not bothering to take any of them when he got sick... I could literally go on for days... But some how you think Joe Biden is worse...
    1
  20972. 1
  20973. 1
  20974. 1
  20975. 1
  20976. 1
  20977. 1
  20978. 1
  20979. 1
  20980. 1
  20981. 1
  20982. 1
  20983. 1
  20984. 1
  20985. 1
  20986. 1
  20987.  @defiance1790  First... Your claim that because his parents where communists and because he grew up around those beliefs, there is a good chance he is as well, is blown out of the water by a few keep details of his and his parents lives. He was born in 1944. Both his parents joined the Communist Party in 1942, while living in San Francisco. They also both left the Communist Party in 1947, never to return. Meaning, at the most, his parents equated themselves with communism for about 5 years, less then 3 of that was with Carl even existing... And being less then 3 years old. In his book "Loyalties", he explains their youth, at that time, and their left wing activism that had them going to rash extremes. Once realizing what communism really was to the people they surrounded themselves with, they left. Still being active in the left wing ideology for the rest of their lives, but never extremists. Meaning, Carl Bernstein was never raised in a communist Centric childhood environment. The little time that he experienced his parents being in that environment he was not old enough to even grasp the concept of communism. Hell... He probably couldn't even spell the word at 2 or 3. BUT... Lets go further... In the same book, (Loyalties) he explains how most children have come to terms with their parents, at one point in time, equating themselves with Communism.... "Bernstein, however, cannot exorcise the “vast reservoir of anger” his upbringing created. His complaint is that political commitment diverts people from the day-to-day business of living. He sees the decision by his parents to join the party in 1942 (when it was at the peak of its popularity) as recklessly endangering the family’s prospects, including his own--although he had yet to be conceived. Instead of organizing to save the Rosenbergs, his mother should have organized her “chaotic” household."
    1
  20988. 1
  20989. 1
  20990. 1
  20991. 1
  20992. 1
  20993. 1
  20994. 1
  20995. 1
  20996. 1
  20997. 1
  20998. 1
  20999. 1
  21000. 1
  21001. 1
  21002. 1
  21003. 1
  21004. 1
  21005. 1
  21006. 1
  21007. 1
  21008. 1
  21009. 1
  21010. 1
  21011. 1
  21012. 1
  21013. 1
  21014. 1
  21015. 1
  21016. 1
  21017. 1
  21018. 1
  21019. 1
  21020. 1
  21021. 1
  21022. 1
  21023. 1
  21024. 1
  21025. 1
  21026. 1
  21027. 1
  21028. 1
  21029. 1
  21030. 1
  21031.  @bradynlotterman8164  the reason you were getting so much of this wrong is because you believe right-wing media on spec. Or at least that's what your responses suggest. Your missing huge gaps of information. On multiple things. For instance, voter ID is the right-wing spin. You're arguing voter ID and only voter ID because that's what they're arguing. They want to argue but her ID so you don't pay attention within the rest of the bill. They refuse to make Election Day a national holiday or move it to a weekend. They make the voting hours 9 to 5 work hours, which most people work. Especially minority. They remove polling locations from areas that need more and not less. Making the lines longer in, conveniently, mostly Democratic or minority areas. They cut back on after hours for early morning voting. They needlessly demonize mail-in ballots They require that absentee ballots only be issued to those who are out of state All of which adds up to this scenario to a lot of democratic and minority voters... the pole in most areas are open from either 6 to 6 or 7 to 7... meaning on voting day. Which means if you're working a nine-to-five like the average American, you have one of the three small windows to try and vote that day. Keep in mind this is all happening with the lines being hours-long, in, again, conveniently mostly Democratic or a minority areas... you could go in the morning before work for maybe an hour, you can try and do it during your lunch break for also maybe an hour or you could try and go after work for also made an hour. None of which guarantees that you're actually going to get to vote. Voter ID is stupid and pointless but it's the least of our worries. Not to mention it's all based on a lie about voter fraud in the first place. All of these tactics by the way, they used back in Jim Crow era when black people finally got the right to vote. All these backhanded way of suppressing people's ability to vote, all in very specific areas. Conveniently.
    1
  21032. 1
  21033. 1
  21034. 1
  21035. 1
  21036.  @bradynlotterman8164  so you're one of those. You're not going to look at it any of the information in there and you're just going to unspec dismiss what you don't want to be true. Lord knows what you consider to be a good source. By the way, that's not how Wikipedia works. Yes people can edit and put stuff up there but if it's challenged and is brought to the fact-checkers and fails, it gets taken down. It must have three credible sources. Not to mention Wikipedia is just a sore sight because all of what they put on the site they Source down at the bottom. So you don't have to check the page itself. Go to the source Links at the bottom. Stop making excuses for not wanting to do your homework. As I said, it's a war that's going on for literally decades. There's no way in hell I can explain that to you in the YouTube comment section. There's not enough room. You're going to have to look up the last hundred years of battles over Jerusalem between Israel and the Palestinians. And yes the US moved the embassy Jerusalem to and said they recognize as the capital of Israel. That's exactly what I said. They however do not have the power to declare it the capital. The US recognizing it as the capital just gives it clout. Though it is way more complicated than this and this tiny submarine does not give it justice and you should really do your homework on the battle between Israel and Palestine, to sum it up America needed not to pick a side. That was America picking a side. It was America picking a side between two potential nuclear powers with the overwhelming abundance of being just fine with shooting s*** at people and killing innocent bystanders like it's nothing. They're both done so much horrible crap to each other at this point that it's basically a pox on both their houses and by picking a side you condone one and condemned the other. Meaning you're condoning war crimes. You're also alienating a major World state with the backing of Russia... The only other country in the world that has more nuclear weapons than we do. Those are just a few small but really big reasons why it was a really stupid idea to pick a side. Especially when we did not have to.
    1
  21037. 1
  21038. 1
  21039. 1
  21040. 1
  21041.  @bradynlotterman8164  Russian sanctions. From multiple sources. https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/business-47023004.amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16276231542851&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fbusiness-47023004 https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/10/13/no-trump-has-not-been-tough-russia/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16276231542851&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fopinions%2F2020%2F10%2F13%2Fno-trump-has-not-been-tough-russia%2F https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/17/house-rebukes-trump-russia-sanctions-1108939 https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/politics/sanctions-oleg-deripaska-russia-trump.amp.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16276231542851&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2018%2F12%2F19%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fsanctions-oleg-deripaska-russia-trump.html https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/07/16/heres-where-trump-has-been-tough-on-russia--and-where-hes-backed-do.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16276231542851&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2018%2F07%2F16%2Fheres-where-trump-has-been-tough-on-russia--and-where-hes-backed-do.html https://www-independent-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-sanctions-putin-oleg-deripaska-treasury-department-rusal-en-a8749781.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16276231542851&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Famericas%2Fus-politics%2Ftrump-russia-sanctions-putin-oleg-deripaska-treasury-department-rusal-en-a8749781.html https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/jan/15/mark-warner/trump-wants-lift-sanctions-related-russian-oligarc/
    1
  21042. 1
  21043. 1
  21044. 1
  21045. 1
  21046. 1
  21047. 1
  21048. 1
  21049. 1
  21050. 1
  21051. 1
  21052. 1
  21053. 1
  21054. 1
  21055. 1
  21056. 1
  21057. 1
  21058. 1
  21059. 1
  21060. 1
  21061. 1
  21062. 1
  21063. 1
  21064. 1
  21065. 1
  21066. 1
  21067. 1
  21068. 1
  21069. 1
  21070. 1
  21071. 1
  21072. 1
  21073. 1
  21074. 1
  21075. 1
  21076. 1
  21077. 1
  21078. 1
  21079. 1
  21080. 1
  21081. 1
  21082. 1
  21083. 1
  21084. 1
  21085. 1
  21086. 1
  21087. 1
  21088. 1
  21089. 1
  21090. 1
  21091. 1
  21092. 1
  21093. 1
  21094. 1
  21095. 1
  21096. 1
  21097. 1
  21098. 1
  21099. 1
  21100. 1
  21101. 1
  21102. 1
  21103. 1
  21104. 1
  21105. 1
  21106. 1
  21107. 1
  21108. 1
  21109. 1
  21110. 1
  21111. 1
  21112. 1
  21113. 1
  21114. 1
  21115. 1
  21116. 1
  21117. 1
  21118. 1
  21119. 1
  21120. 1
  21121. 1
  21122. 1
  21123. 1
  21124. 1
  21125. 1
  21126. 1
  21127. 1
  21128. 1
  21129. 1
  21130. 1
  21131. 1
  21132. 1
  21133. 1
  21134. 1
  21135. 1
  21136. 1
  21137. 1
  21138. 1
  21139. 1
  21140. 1
  21141. 1
  21142. 1
  21143. 1
  21144. 1
  21145. 1
  21146. 1
  21147. 1
  21148. 1
  21149. 1
  21150. 1
  21151. 1
  21152. 1
  21153. 1
  21154. 1
  21155. 1
  21156. 1
  21157. 1
  21158. 1
  21159. 1
  21160. 1
  21161. 1
  21162. 1
  21163. 1
  21164. 1
  21165. 1
  21166. 1
  21167. 1
  21168. 1
  21169. 1
  21170. 1
  21171. 1
  21172. 1
  21173. 1
  21174. 1
  21175. 1
  21176. 1
  21177.  @johnroma2624  First! Thank you for acknowledging all these people being killed by police officers and that it is so very wrong. Let me be clear... I don't support the Looting where the riots are the burning down buildings or the violence. I know that there are some then you're doing it because they just want to be an a******. There's some that have just been pushed to their Brink though. I can't blame them for it. And all these people on here only paying attention to what these people are doing instead of why they're doing it is a big part of the problem. Especially when they threatened or say something violent should happen to them back. That ain't going to work. You want to solve the problem you're going to have to listen. You can threaten them all you want. You can do whatever you want to them. They already walk around on a daily basis expecting to be attacked or killed by police officers on a daily basis. That ain't going to do nothing. You have to acknowledge and address the problem. They already think these people don't care about them. So while the thinking is amateur, they think, then why should I care about you? Look, I'm white as all get-out but I have a mixed-race son and the father of my child is my best friend and one of the best fathers I've ever seen. If something happened to either one of them in that way and then they let the guy get away with it because he was a police officer... I'd lose my goddamn mind to. I'm not saying everything they're doing is right. I'm saying the way everybody is reacting is making it worse.
    1
  21178. 1
  21179. 1
  21180. 1
  21181. 1
  21182. 1
  21183. 1
  21184. 1
  21185. 1
  21186. 1
  21187. 1
  21188. 1
  21189. 1
  21190. 1
  21191. 1
  21192. 1
  21193. 1
  21194. 1
  21195. 1
  21196. 1
  21197. 1
  21198. 1
  21199. 1
  21200. 1
  21201. 1
  21202. 1
  21203. 1
  21204. 1
  21205. 1
  21206. 1
  21207. 1
  21208. 1
  21209. 1
  21210. 1
  21211. 1
  21212. 1
  21213. 1
  21214. 1
  21215. 1
  21216. 1
  21217. 1
  21218. 1
  21219. 1
  21220. 1
  21221. 1
  21222. 1
  21223. 1
  21224. 1
  21225. 1
  21226. 1
  21227. 1
  21228. 1
  21229. 1
  21230. 1
  21231. 1
  21232. 1
  21233. 1
  21234. 1
  21235. 1
  21236. 1
  21237. 1
  21238. 1
  21239. 1
  21240. 1
  21241. 1
  21242. 1
  21243. 1
  21244. 1
  21245. 1
  21246. 1
  21247. 1
  21248. 1
  21249. 1
  21250. 1
  21251. 1
  21252. 1
  21253. 1
  21254. 1
  21255. 1
  21256. 1
  21257. 1
  21258. 1
  21259. 1
  21260. 1
  21261. 1
  21262. 1
  21263. 1
  21264. 1
  21265. 1
  21266. 1
  21267. 1
  21268. 1
  21269. 1
  21270. 1
  21271. 1
  21272. 1
  21273. 1
  21274. 1
  21275. 1
  21276. 1
  21277.  @kaybel5104  To be crystal clear... You asked me to give you good things he did. 1 did so under the agreement that you would objectively view them without making excuses or ignoring them. One of them was this 👉 " He’s also placed 👉new👈 sanctions on Russia, taking a harder line than his predecessor. " I even tried to give you 12 different source links for the info. I have also informed you that it will not let me post those links. INSTEAD, I gave you the you the 👉TITLE👈 to the Gov Source. Meaning ALL YOU WOULD HAVE TO DO to get the info is 👉Google👈 the title. HERE IS THE TITLE AGAIN! 👉FACT SHEET: Imposing Costs for Harmful Foreign Activities by the Russian Government You have then insisted that I google it, EVEN AFTER I have already explained that I had, informed you the links wont post and, then, gave you the title to look up for the Gov direct source. You keep making claims about President Biden removing sanctions on Russia. For which I have asked you to provide evidence for this. THE SAME THING I DID FOR YOU. You, instead have chosen to name call and insist it is true, while providing 👉no proof👈. And now you are trying to ignore the subject all together. Now that I called you out on your hypocrisy getting Donald Trump credit for sanctions that you're trying to dismiss when it comes to President Biden, you were trying to pretend I never gave you a source for sanctions that President Biden has initiated towards Russia. So... My question now is... How is this objective and non bias actions on your part? A question you will surely dodge.
    1
  21278.  @kaybel5104  Again... To be clear... 1 out of the 4 different good things Biden has done, which you asked for and I gave you, was the rapid release of vaccine distribution and more specifically getting it to over 80% of the immune-compromised people who need it most. You then called me a liar and insisted that Donald Trump's vaccine distribution was a million a day. I even asked you to provide evidence for this. Your response was for me to look up the evidence for you. Except you also just insisted that I provide evidence for my claim about Russian sanctions. It was not allowing me to post the link and so I gave you the title of the government source. So now, you are insisting not only do I prove my claims, but I also am required to prove your claims, while you are required to prove nothing? Correct? Now you are claiming that on the day that Joe Biden was inaugurated as president, they had given 1.5 million shots out already. Except you had previously claimed that he was doing one million shots a day. Using your math Donald Trump would have only of been distributing these shots for a day and a half. Is that correct? So then you tried to pretend you said something you didn't to correct the above mistake. I called you on that and then you ignored it. Like you do most things you can argue against. Now, instead of answering the question that I asked, which was why does Donald Trump get credit for his vaccination rate but President Biden does not? You decided to try and asked me why he should. When that's super obvious. It's just another way to point out your bias. How is this objective reasoning on your part?
    1
  21279. 1
  21280. 1
  21281. 1
  21282. 1
  21283. 1
  21284. 1
  21285. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about Waterborne Camper / D R. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  21286. 1
  21287. 1
  21288. 1
  21289. 1
  21290. 1
  21291. 1
  21292. 1
  21293. 1
  21294. 1
  21295. 1
  21296. 1
  21297. 1
  21298. 1
  21299. 1
  21300. 1
  21301. 1
  21302. 1
  21303. 1
  21304. 1
  21305. 1
  21306. 1
  21307. 1
  21308. 1
  21309. 1
  21310. 1
  21311. 1
  21312. 1
  21313. 1
  21314. 1
  21315. 1
  21316. 1
  21317. 1
  21318. 1
  21319. 1
  21320. 1
  21321. 1
  21322. 1
  21323. 1
  21324. 1
  21325. 1
  21326. 1
  21327. 1
  21328. 1
  21329. 1
  21330. 1
  21331. 1
  21332. 1
  21333. 1
  21334. 1
  21335. 1
  21336. 1
  21337. 1
  21338. 1
  21339. 1
  21340. 1
  21341. 1
  21342. 1
  21343. 1
  21344. 1
  21345. 1
  21346. 1
  21347. 1
  21348. 1
  21349. 1
  21350. 1
  21351. 1
  21352. 1
  21353. 1
  21354. 1
  21355. 1
  21356. 1
  21357. 1
  21358. 1
  21359. 1
  21360. 1
  21361. 1
  21362. 1
  21363. 1
  21364. 1
  21365. 1
  21366. 1
  21367. 1
  21368. 1
  21369. 1
  21370. 1
  21371. 1
  21372. 1
  21373. 1
  21374. 1
  21375. 1
  21376. 1
  21377. 1
  21378. 1
  21379. 1
  21380. 1
  21381. 1
  21382. 1
  21383. 1
  21384. 1
  21385. 1
  21386. 1
  21387. 1
  21388. 1
  21389. 1
  21390. 1
  21391. 1
  21392. 1
  21393. 1
  21394.  @paulsmith7836  1. How many other people did her preform for? What are their beliefs and goals? Does he agree with all of them, as well? 2. Provide proof he made such a claim and in the context for which he did? 3. As president of the INVADED country... I'm sure you would agree that he has... At the most... Half the control over that, right? He isn't the one who is invading another country, correct? He isn't Putin, right? 4. Provide proof for your claim? And provide proof that this, in itself, provides proof for your original claim? 5. Now you are just using obfuscation and bias interpretation. This is in no way proof of anything about him. 6. Almost all leaders that I know of, in any country has, off shore holdings. This is proof of nothing. 7. This is a vague reference to a perceived goal, with absolutely nothing to back it up. It doesn't come close to providing proof for your claim. 8. Provide proof of this? 9. Provide proof of this? 10. How? " obviously you would just miss everything I wrote because it doesn't fit into your Western nor into your Narrative of the solensky" 👈 This is you making baseless claims of a total stranger, that you have made for at least 2 purposes. 1. To dismiss (in your mind, at least) any counter argument or challenge of validity before they are made and before you even know what they might be. Showing the person with the person who has a problem with bias narratives, is, infact, you.... 2. An attempt to deflect from the fact that you, infact, gave nothing that would be considered proof to your original claim. Mostly option and obfuscation, coupled with more claims you need to prove. The baffling part of all of this is, you seem to want to blame the invaded country for the acts pf the invaders, yet insist that you are, infact, the one, seeing things clearly.
    1
  21395. 1
  21396. 1
  21397. 1
  21398. 1
  21399. 1
  21400. 1
  21401. 1
  21402. 1
  21403. 1
  21404. 1
  21405. 1
  21406. 1
  21407. 1
  21408. 1
  21409. 1
  21410. 1
  21411. 1
  21412. 1
  21413. 1
  21414. 1
  21415. 1
  21416. 1
  21417. 1
  21418. 1
  21419. 1
  21420. 1
  21421. 1
  21422. 1
  21423. 1
  21424. 1
  21425. 1
  21426. 1
  21427. 1
  21428. 1
  21429. 1
  21430. 1
  21431. 1
  21432. 1
  21433. 1
  21434. 1
  21435. 1
  21436. 1
  21437. 1
  21438. 1
  21439. 1
  21440. 1
  21441. 1
  21442. 1
  21443. 1
  21444. 1
  21445. 1
  21446. 1
  21447. 1
  21448. 1
  21449. 1
  21450. 1
  21451. 1
  21452. 1
  21453. 1
  21454. 1
  21455. 1
  21456. 1
  21457. 1
  21458. 1
  21459. 1
  21460. 1
  21461. 1
  21462. 1
  21463. 1
  21464. 1
  21465. 1
  21466. 1
  21467. 1
  21468. 1
  21469. 1
  21470. 1
  21471. 1
  21472. 1
  21473. 1
  21474. 1
  21475. 1
  21476. 1
  21477. 1
  21478. 1
  21479. 1
  21480. 1
  21481. 1
  21482. 1
  21483. 1
  21484. 1
  21485. 1
  21486. 1
  21487. 1
  21488. 1
  21489. 1
  21490. 1
  21491. 1
  21492. 1
  21493. 1
  21494. 1
  21495. 1
  21496. 1
  21497. 1
  21498. 1
  21499. 1
  21500. 1
  21501. 1
  21502. 1
  21503. 1
  21504. 1
  21505. 1
  21506. 1
  21507. 1
  21508. 1
  21509. 1
  21510. 1
  21511. 1
  21512. 1
  21513. 1
  21514. 1
  21515. 1
  21516. 1
  21517. 1
  21518. 1
  21519. 1
  21520. 1
  21521. 1
  21522. 1
  21523. 1
  21524. 1
  21525. 1
  21526. 1
  21527. 1
  21528. 1
  21529. 1
  21530. 1
  21531. 1
  21532. 1
  21533. 1
  21534. 1
  21535. 1
  21536. 1
  21537. 1
  21538. 1
  21539. 1
  21540. 1
  21541. 1
  21542. 1
  21543. 1
  21544. 1
  21545. 1
  21546. 1
  21547. 1
  21548. 1
  21549. 1
  21550. 1
  21551. 1
  21552. 1
  21553. 1
  21554. 1
  21555. 1
  21556. 1
  21557. 1
  21558. 1
  21559. 1
  21560. 1
  21561. 1
  21562. 1
  21563. 1
  21564. 1
  21565. 1
  21566. 1
  21567. 1
  21568. 1
  21569. 1
  21570. 1
  21571. 1
  21572. 1
  21573. 1
  21574. 1
  21575. 1
  21576. 1
  21577. 1
  21578. 1
  21579. 1
  21580. 1
  21581. 1
  21582. 1
  21583. 1
  21584. 1
  21585. 1
  21586. 1
  21587. 1
  21588. 1
  21589. 1
  21590. 1
  21591. 1
  21592. 1
  21593. 1
  21594. 1
  21595. 1
  21596. 1
  21597. 1
  21598. 1
  21599. 1
  21600. 1
  21601. 1
  21602. 1
  21603. 1
  21604. 1
  21605. 1
  21606. 1
  21607. 1
  21608. 1
  21609. 1
  21610. 1
  21611. 1
  21612. 1
  21613. 1
  21614. 1
  21615. 1
  21616. 1
  21617. 1
  21618. 1
  21619. 1
  21620. 1
  21621.  @Cinco762  👈Thank you so much poser Joe! If "kids pretend" Then I guess your a little boy! Cuz, I have posted this lit of 22 on Trump's sexual assault history about 10 times now and each time.... You pretend its not there. All so you can keep pretending that your not a hypocrite and Trump isn't exactly what you're saying you hate. So thank you for showing everyone who you are! That was my only goal in this convo and you helped me achieve it. You keep using rape victims as pawns... I'll keep posting the list that you keep ignoring! No one else is going to pretend to be blind like you. 😁👇👇👇👇👇👇 1. At least 25 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct since 1970. 2. The pussy Grabbers Access Hollywood tape, willingly admitting to sexually assaulting women from his own words. "Grab them by the pussy, I don't even wait." Waiting For What? 3. He has been accused of a roll of variety of things. Olga Lane, harassment, groping and rape. 4. Jessica Leeds Groping her unwillingly on a flight in 1970 5. Ivana Trump Violently raping her while pulling out her hair as described in a court deposition 6. Kristen Anderson Trump reaching under her skirt and touching her vagina through her underwear. 👉Grab them by the pussy I don't even wait.👈 7. Jill Harth Pushed her up against the wall, put his hands up her skirt and tried to kiss her at a dinner at his Mar-A-Lago Resort in the early 90s. 8. Lisa Boyne When she was attending a 1996 dinner with Trump and modeling agent John Casablancas during which several women in attendance for forced to walk across a table in order to leave. As the women walked on the table Trump looked up their skirts and commented on their underwear and genitals. Asking the people beside him who he should sleep with. 9. Temple Taggart Kissed me directly on the lips when she met him at the Miss USA pageant in 1997 and then again when she met him at Trump Tower in Manhattan after he offered to Aid her modeling career. 10. Cathy Heller Trump approached her table introducing himself to her and forcefully kissed her at a Mother's Day brunch with her husband children and in-laws at Mar-A-Lago in 1990. 11. Karena Virginia Trump groped her as she waited for her car outside the US Open in New York in 1998. 12. Tasha Dixon Trump unapologetically strolled into hers and another victims Miss USA contestants The Dressing Room. Refusing to leave as they tried to cover themselves. 13. Bridget Sullivan Trump unapologetically strolled into hers and another victims Miss USA contestants The Dressing Room. Refusing to leave as they tried to cover themselves. 14. Melinda McGillivary Donald Trump grabbed her butt while they were backstage during a room Ray Charles concert at Mar-A-Lago in 2003 15. Natasha stoynoff Trump sexually assaulted her in a 2005 at Mar-A-Lago. While she was there visiting Trump and his new and pregnant wife Melania. While Melania with changing clothes for a photoshoot Trump offered to shows her a tremendous room at the resort. We walked into that room alone and Trump shut the door behind us. I turned around, and within seconds he was pushing me against the wall and forcing his tongue down my throat. She added that Trump told her that they were going to have a sexual affair. 16. Rachel Crooks Trump kissed her on the mouth without her consent when she introduced herself to him in 2005 at Trump Tower in Manhattan where she worked as a receptionist. 17. Jessica Drake accused wrong as a graphing and a kissing her without permission and offering her money to accept a private invitation to his Penthouse hotel room in Lake Tahoe in 2006 18. Ninni laaksonen Trump groped her backstage at The Late Show with David Letterman in 2006 18. Summer Servos Trump assaulted her during a 2007 meeting at the Beverly Hills Hotel 19. Cassandra Searles Trump treated her and other female Miss USA contestants like cattle. He had the line up so he could get a closer look at his property. 20. Alva Johnson Trump kissed her without permission and a Tampa Florida rally on August 24th 2016. She worked for him as a campaign staffer at the time. 21. E. Jean Carrol Trump and her against the wall in forced his penis inside of her in a department store dressing room in the mid-90s 22. Karen Johnson Trump hold her behind a tapestry and kissed and groped her without her consent during a New Year's Eve party there in the year 2000.
    1
  21622. 1
  21623. 1
  21624. 1
  21625. 1
  21626. 1
  21627. 1
  21628. 1
  21629. 1
  21630. 1
  21631. 1
  21632. 1
  21633. 1
  21634. 1
  21635. 1
  21636. 1
  21637. 1
  21638. 1
  21639. 1
  21640. 1
  21641. 1
  21642. 1
  21643. 1
  21644. 1
  21645. 1
  21646. 1
  21647. 1
  21648. 1
  21649. 1
  21650. 1
  21651. 1
  21652. 1
  21653. 1
  21654. 1
  21655. 1
  21656. 1
  21657. 1
  21658. 1
  21659. 1
  21660. 1
  21661. 1
  21662. 1
  21663. 1
  21664. 1
  21665. 1
  21666. 1
  21667. 1
  21668. 1
  21669. 1
  21670. 1
  21671. 1
  21672. 1
  21673. 1
  21674. 1
  21675. 1
  21676. 1
  21677. 1
  21678. 1
  21679. 1
  21680. 1
  21681. 1
  21682. 1
  21683. 1
  21684. 1
  21685. 1
  21686. 1
  21687. 1
  21688. 1
  21689. 1
  21690. 1
  21691. 1
  21692. 1
  21693. 1
  21694. 1
  21695. 1
  21696. 1
  21697. 1
  21698. 1
  21699. 1
  21700. 1
  21701. 1
  21702. 1
  21703. 1
  21704. 1
  21705. 1
  21706. 1
  21707. 1
  21708. 1
  21709. 1
  21710. 1
  21711. 1
  21712. 1
  21713. 1
  21714. 1
  21715. 1
  21716. 1
  21717. 1
  21718. 1
  21719.  goku san  I'm the one bringing opinion and not fact? Hmmmm... Lets take a look at that list of assumptions you made, after LYING about not making them, again, shall we! 😁 "BUT still I am the one saying facts and you make assumptions but you turn it always around." List of assumptions you have made so far. 1. " most of you can't have a normal conversation without losing your shit" 2. " your home Russian story is going to fall away because people are going to get arrested about illegal search warrants when they already knew the Russians were never involved in election" 3. " but even if someone is going to get arrested do you say it's a lie" 4. " the left is as nuts as in America" 5. "but know I know how stupid you people are" 6. " even if I come with socks you don't acknowledge it say something like CNN and try to make me look stupid" 7. "I noticed how unfair the left is" 8. " search why stupid people don't know they are stupid that's the link. That covers exactly the left" 9. " already knows how stupid you are that's why you not react" 10. " you will never react normally even if I show evidence you will always react the same" 11. "You know its all a lie" 12. "Your news channel" 13. "There is evidence they where never involved" 14. "You don't know what that means" 15. "fascisten can't handle other views and use aggression to make their point" 16. " you are all high in your sky" 17. " what kind of voices who are the Democrats for falsely accusing president of Fraud and try to impeach him on that" 18. "he is doing nothing" Please feel free to explain how they are not assumptions? I'll be waiting.
    1
  21720. 1
  21721. 1
  21722. 1
  21723. 1
  21724. 1
  21725. 1
  21726. 1
  21727. 1
  21728. 1
  21729. 1
  21730. 1
  21731. 1
  21732. 1
  21733. 1
  21734. 1
  21735. 1
  21736. 1
  21737. 1
  21738. 1
  21739. 1
  21740. 1
  21741. 1
  21742. 1
  21743. 1
  21744. 1
  21745. 1
  21746. 1
  21747. 1
  21748. @Misbah Al-Zayt Ya know what 8s also a lazy and transparent argument...? Someone making vague generalizations and only, intentionally, focusing on one side. Also not considering all relevant material when coming to conclusions. The first part... You are probably speaking about impeachment.... Considering you guys have decided that now that a little time has past, and the election is coming up, it's a real good time to try and rewrite history.... ... And... We don't so much disagree with work and getting sick... Bringing it home and killing our families. We are funny like that... Listening to experts and following the rules... So the worst world wide pandemic in over 100 year stops kicking our a** and killing out loved ones.... The next bit... I'm guessing it the rioting... Etc... Yeah... That's not cool... But... Then again neither was you guys ignoring the unjustifiable beating, murdering and imprisoning of black men, women and children for all these years, by the people who where supposed to be protecting them... And then it getting tossed aside like it was nothing or covered up... Only caring when it actually effecting you. I don't feel sorry for you... If you did or said nothing about the problem before now... You should have listened to them when they where kneeling. Did you really think they where just going to let people keep murdering them in the streets? As for the mirror... Up until just a second ago... You had no clue about any of my view points... But you still tried to call me a hypocrite anyways and tell me to look in the mirror... Based off of what? Is that just what you say to people when they challenge your lazy arguments? Were you trying to paint me as if I mother people? Did you just need to make that assumption so you could have an argument?
    1
  21749. 1
  21750. 1
  21751. 1
  21752. 1
  21753. 1
  21754. 1
  21755. 1
  21756. 1
  21757. 1
  21758. 1
  21759. 1
  21760. 1
  21761. 1
  21762. 1
  21763. 1
  21764. 1
  21765. 1
  21766. 1
  21767. 1
  21768. 1
  21769. 1
  21770. 1
  21771. 1
  21772. 1
  21773. 1
  21774. 1
  21775. 1
  21776. 1
  21777. 1
  21778. 1
  21779. 1
  21780. 1
  21781. 1
  21782. 1
  21783. 1
  21784. 1
  21785. 1
  21786. 1
  21787. 1
  21788. 1
  21789. 1
  21790. 1
  21791. 1
  21792. 1
  21793. 1
  21794. 1
  21795. 1
  21796. 1
  21797. 1
  21798. 1
  21799. 1
  21800. 1
  21801. 1
  21802. 1
  21803. 1
  21804. 1
  21805. 1
  21806. 1
  21807. 1
  21808. 1
  21809. 1
  21810. 1
  21811. 1
  21812. 1
  21813. 1
  21814. 1
  21815. 1
  21816. 1
  21817. 1
  21818. 1
  21819. 1
  21820. 1
  21821. 1
  21822. 1
  21823. 1
  21824. 1
  21825. 1
  21826. 1
  21827. 1
  21828. 1
  21829. 1
  21830. 1
  21831. 1
  21832. 1
  21833. 1
  21834. 1
  21835. 1
  21836. 1
  21837. 1
  21838. 1
  21839. 1
  21840. 1
  21841. 1
  21842. 1
  21843. 1
  21844.  @XtremeConditions  1. We have two vaccines now. Going to take a few months but we are going to turn the corner soon. Right now it's about mitigating life damage. This was a mismanaged crisis from the top down. Which is why it hits so hard here and has lasted so long here. But I, like you and in the fixing the problem now business and not looking at the script we made in the past. At least not yet. We will have to do that in the future so it's something like this hit again we get it right next time but right now we have to figure out what's the best thing. It's not the same all over. Lives are the most important things to save. We have a housing crisis and almost 75% of the population has slipped into poverty in the last year. I get the money issues. Trust me. I'm a single mom with four jobs who had to work all four of them through the entire pandemic. If some places have to stay down to save lives oh, then that's what we have to do right now. It's not everywhere and it's certainly not going to be very much longer because we had vaccines. They are literally being injected into people's arms as we speak. Global pandemics are no joke. If they don't turn around, if we don't do it we need to to make that turn around, the spread could be a million times worse and the vaccines could become irrelevant because it's not getting there soon enough. Not to mention the virus could mutate and then they'd have to make a new vaccine. Containing the spread as we vaccinate the population is vital. The coronavirus has gone through multiple mutations just in the last year. It's not uncommon.
    1
  21845. 1
  21846. 1
  21847. 1
  21848. 1
  21849. 1
  21850. 1
  21851. 1
  21852. 1
  21853. 1
  21854. 1
  21855. 1
  21856. 1
  21857. 1
  21858. 1
  21859. 1
  21860. 1
  21861. 1
  21862. 1
  21863. 1
  21864. 1
  21865.  @funlovenboy  Hello, all you silly right wing false talking points your just parroting back at me without bothering to even attempt an original thought. 1. President Biden had tons of detailed and laid out plans for a variety of issues. His first being covid, Obvy. All of which he spoke of often and had laid out on his website. 2. Just a few of many things he has accomplished that is worth value. 1986 Sponsored one of the first climate change bills in the Senate 1991 Presided over confirmation hearings for Clarence Thomas 1993 Presided over confirmation hearings for Ruth Bader 1994 Co-sponsored the Violence Against Women Act 1994 Wrote and sponsored a major federal crime bill 2002 Voted in favor of the Iraq War 2008 Selected as Barack Obama's running mate 2008 Served as the main sponsor for the PROTECT Our Children Act 2009 Oversaw the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to help end the Great Recession 2010 Helped pass the Affordable Care Act to make health insurance more affordable for the average American 2016 Was put in charge of an initiative called "Moonshot" to prevent and cure cancer 2017 Awarded the Medal of Freedom by Barack Obama All of which are super easy to find if you're actually looking for them instead of just looking for the things that would support your confirmation bias. 3. While he certainly screwed the pooch on the exit plan for AFG... He was also the only president that had actually pulled us out of there, like we should have been a long damn time ago. Well I agree it was stupid as hell for him to allow his General to talk him into letting the troops go before everybody else, at the same time I also know that no matter who was going to pull us out of Afghanistan, finally, was going to catch s*** about it. Which is exactly why no one else beforehand did it.. but all of them should have. He has also spent the better part of the year mending fences with all our long time allies that Trump managed to alienate and stood up to the crony deskbots and dictators that Donald Trump tried to pull closer when he was in office. He also immediately got us back in to the Paris climate accords that we never should have left and that helped us earn Goodwill with our fellow First World countries. Not to mention setting another good example. Again, I know this must be super hard for you, but please try thinking for yourself and being objective. 4. I'm just curious if you guys who constantly harass this man for having a legitimate medical condition called a stutter, if you would actually do the same is to say it was a child with the same problem? You just go around making fun of children for having stutters? And by the way just spite having that stutter he managed to work his way up to the highest office in the land. What you doing with your life? I'm also equally as curious is you actually had a problem with us having a president who clearly couldn't read past of fourth grade level in the white house for four years before President Biden got there? 5. As for there being no reason for anyone to vote for him, you would actually think differently if you could bother to think for yourself instead of just repeating what all the right-wing pundits tell you to. Look things up. 6. I love how you describe him actually caring about the safety and health of his constituents and setting a good example by adhering to the medical guidelines for the worst worldwide pandemic we've had in over 100 years, as "hiding in his basement". It's called being a responsible adult and thinking about more than just yourself. If only the acting president would have done the same. He wouldn't have held so many super spreader events and not getting a damn about the health and safety of his own constituents even after he tested positive.
    1
  21866. 1
  21867. 1
  21868. 1
  21869. 1
  21870. 1
  21871. 1
  21872. 1
  21873. 1
  21874. 1
  21875. 1
  21876. 1
  21877. 1
  21878. 1
  21879. 1
  21880. 1
  21881. 1
  21882. 1
  21883. 1
  21884. 1
  21885. 1
  21886. 1
  21887. 1
  21888. 1
  21889. 1
  21890. 1
  21891. 1
  21892. 1
  21893. 1
  21894. 1
  21895. 1
  21896. 1
  21897. 1
  21898. 1
  21899. 1
  21900. 1
  21901. 1
  21902. 1
  21903. 1
  21904. 1
  21905. 1
  21906. 1
  21907. 1
  21908. 1
  21909. 1
  21910. 1
  21911. 1
  21912. 1
  21913. 1
  21914. 1
  21915. 1
  21916. 1
  21917. 1
  21918. 1
  21919. 1
  21920. 1
  21921. 1
  21922. 1
  21923. 1
  21924. 1
  21925. 1
  21926. 1
  21927. 1
  21928. 1
  21929. 1
  21930. 1
  21931. 1
  21932. 1
  21933. 1
  21934. 1
  21935. 1
  21936. 1
  21937. 1
  21938. 1
  21939. 1
  21940. 1
  21941. 1
  21942. 1
  21943. 1
  21944. 1
  21945. 1
  21946. 1
  21947. 1
  21948. 1
  21949. 1
  21950. 1
  21951. @Bruce B Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    1
  21952. 1
  21953. 1
  21954. 1
  21955. @Bruce B Trump.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    1
  21956. 1
  21957. 1
  21958. 1
  21959. 1
  21960. 1
  21961. 1
  21962. 1
  21963. 1
  21964. 1
  21965. 1
  21966. 1
  21967. 1
  21968. 1
  21969. 1
  21970. 1
  21971. 1
  21972. 1
  21973. 1
  21974. 1
  21975. 1
  21976. 1
  21977. 1
  21978. 1
  21979. 1
  21980. 1
  21981. 1
  21982. 1
  21983. 1
  21984. 1
  21985. 1
  21986. 1
  21987. 1
  21988. 1
  21989. 1
  21990. 1
  21991. 1
  21992. 1
  21993. 1
  21994.  @Keepskatin  Starting off your comment with that... I mean... Really dude? Tell me, which side of the isle has all the skinhead an Aryan Nation groups been on for the past 6 decades? But keep your pants on! Cuz, apparently unlike you, I can be objective. The Super Predator bill your talking abput was crazy racist. It should not have ever been a thing. Much like the mandatory minimum ones, that followed. But to put Trump, with his decades of racism, up as some kind of social justice Warrior, is disingenuous, at best. One of the first thing he did was bane a minority from this country, as soon as he got in office. Now it's all about keep the brown people out by focusing only on the southern border, even though most drugs, traffickers and illegals come in from a combination of air travel, boat and the northern border. Dems support, treating everyone, including the LGBTQ community, as equals and with respect... Because... Ya know... This is America. 🙄 The open borders thing is a right wing false talking point. Unless you can show me 1 Dem leader that has come out and said that? I'll be waiting... The got reparations for 1 and are currently fighting for the rest. Btw, what have the Reps. dine about all that, sense... Ya know... They controlled the House, Senate and the White House for Trump's first two years? I mean.. Other than having plenty of time to pass more tax cuts for the rich, of course. I don't see anyone advicating for the job thing.... And actually job growth as a whole has gone down sense Trump took office... Though... Again... objectivity... He did seam to be able to get quite a few auto manufacturing jobs back, when Obama said it wasn't going to happen. The fact that you said that he will tax foreigners and their low-cost economics, means that you know that that isn't happening right now. So come back and talk to me about that when it's actually done. Stop trying to credit him for things he hasn't done yet. Over all... He has done more harm than good and that is especially true when it comes to our reputation in the world.
    1
  21995. 1
  21996. 1
  21997. 1
  21998. 1
  21999. 1
  22000. 1
  22001. 1
  22002. 1
  22003. 1
  22004. 1
  22005. 1
  22006. 1
  22007. 1
  22008. 1
  22009. 1
  22010. 1
  22011. 1
  22012. 1
  22013. 1
  22014. 1
  22015. 1
  22016. 1
  22017. 1
  22018. 1
  22019. 1
  22020. 1
  22021. 1
  22022. 1
  22023. 1
  22024. 1
  22025. 1
  22026. 1
  22027. 1
  22028. 1
  22029. 1
  22030. 1
  22031. 1
  22032. 1
  22033. 1
  22034. 1
  22035. 1
  22036. 1
  22037. 1
  22038. 1
  22039. 1
  22040. 1
  22041. 1
  22042. 1
  22043. 1
  22044. 1
  22045. 1
  22046. 1
  22047. 1
  22048. 1
  22049. 1
  22050. 1
  22051. 1
  22052. 1
  22053. 1
  22054. 1
  22055. 1
  22056. 1
  22057. 1
  22058. 1
  22059. 1
  22060. 1
  22061. 1
  22062. 1
  22063. 1
  22064. 1
  22065. 1
  22066. 1
  22067. 1
  22068. 1
  22069. 1
  22070. 1
  22071. 1
  22072. 1
  22073. 1
  22074. 1
  22075. 1
  22076. 1
  22077. 1
  22078. 1
  22079. 1
  22080. 1
  22081. 1
  22082. 1
  22083. 1
  22084. 1
  22085. 1
  22086. 1
  22087. 1
  22088. 1
  22089. 1
  22090. 1
  22091. 1
  22092. 1
  22093. 1
  22094. 1
  22095. 1
  22096. 1
  22097. 1
  22098. 1
  22099. 1
  22100. 1
  22101. 1
  22102. 1
  22103. 1
  22104. 1
  22105. 1
  22106. 1
  22107. 1
  22108. 1
  22109. 1
  22110. 1
  22111. 1
  22112. 1
  22113. 1
  22114. 1
  22115. 1
  22116. 1
  22117. 1
  22118. 1
  22119. 1
  22120. 1
  22121. 1
  22122. 1
  22123. 1
  22124. 1
  22125. 1
  22126. 1
  22127. 1
  22128. 1
  22129. 1
  22130. 1
  22131. 1
  22132. 1
  22133. 1
  22134. 1
  22135. 1
  22136. 1
  22137. 1
  22138. 1
  22139. 1
  22140. 1
  22141. 1
  22142. 1
  22143. 1
  22144. 1
  22145. 1
  22146. 1
  22147. 1
  22148. 1
  22149. 1
  22150. 1
  22151. 1
  22152. 1
  22153. 1
  22154. 1
  22155. 1
  22156. 1
  22157. 1
  22158. 1
  22159. 1
  22160. 1
  22161. 1
  22162. 1
  22163. 1
  22164. 1
  22165. 1
  22166. 1
  22167. 1
  22168. 1
  22169. 1
  22170. 1
  22171. 1
  22172. 1
  22173. 1
  22174. 1
  22175. 1
  22176. 1
  22177. 1
  22178. 1
  22179. 1
  22180. 1
  22181. 1
  22182. 1
  22183. 1
  22184. 1
  22185. 1
  22186. 1
  22187. 1
  22188. 1
  22189. 1
  22190. 1
  22191. 1
  22192. 1
  22193. 1
  22194. 1
  22195. 1
  22196. 1
  22197. 1
  22198. 1
  22199. 1
  22200. 1
  22201. 1
  22202. 1
  22203. 1
  22204. 1
  22205. 1
  22206. 1
  22207. 1
  22208. 1
  22209. 1
  22210. 1
  22211. 1
  22212. 1
  22213. 1
  22214. 1
  22215. 1
  22216. 1
  22217. 1
  22218. 1
  22219. 1
  22220. 1
  22221. 1
  22222. 1
  22223. 1
  22224. 1
  22225. 1
  22226. 1
  22227. 1
  22228. 1
  22229. 1
  22230. 1
  22231. 1
  22232. 1
  22233. 1
  22234. 1
  22235. 1
  22236. 1
  22237. 1
  22238. 1
  22239. 1
  22240. 1
  22241. 1
  22242. 1
  22243. 1
  22244. 1
  22245. 1
  22246. 1
  22247. 1
  22248.  @genumanapparel909  No one attacked Russia. In order for them to be acting in defense someone would have had to, unprovoked, attacked them. No one did. No one is talking about putting bases in Ukraine. No one os talking about putting weapons in Ukraine. Simply joining a united front for which Russia has also been offered. That is not a provocation. You are just trying to make it one. NATO has the right to expand to whatever country wishes to become a member. Russia does not get to dictate that. Russia does not control or run the "east". They run Russia. No one attacked Russia. In order for them to be acting in defense someone would have had to, unprovoked, attacked them. No one did. No one is talking about putting bases in Ukraine. No one os talking about putting weapons in Ukraine. Simply joining a united front for which Russia has also been offered. That is not a provocation. You are just trying to make it one. NATO has the right to expand to whatever country wishes to become a member. Russia does not get to dictate that. Russia does not control or run the "east". They run Russia. All you offer is wild theories and speculation on motivations. That is the justification you're using for war crimes currently being committed by Russia. Wholesale Slaughter of innocent civilians. Damn near making Chernobyl * 10. And let's not forget unprovoked invading your country because they didn't like the club they were trying to join. You say bullied? What in the world is anyone bullying Russia into doing? What is anyone tried to get Russia to do? No one's making Russia do a damn thing. Unless you count not invading others countries on slaughtering civilians for no good reason. No one bullying Russia and Russia is not the victim here. You are so brainwashed. Russia doesn't own the world. NATO can go wherever they like as long as it's not in Russia. Is Russia doesn't want a part of it then stay out of it. It's that simple. You don't get the wholesale Slaughter civilians because your neighbor wanted to go play with some other kids. No one is provoking Russia. They are responsible for their own actions. No one attacked them nobody did a damn thing to them. Your whole country throwing a tantrum because your friends don't want to play with you anymore and you're getting a crap ton of people killed because of it. It's called personal responsibility.
    1
  22249. 1
  22250. 1
  22251. 1
  22252. 1
  22253. 1
  22254. 1
  22255. 1
  22256. 1
  22257. 1
  22258. 1
  22259. 1
  22260. 1
  22261. 1
  22262. 1
  22263. 1
  22264. 1
  22265. 1
  22266. 1
  22267. 1
  22268. 1
  22269. 1
  22270. 1
  22271. 1
  22272. 1
  22273. 1
  22274. 1
  22275. 1
  22276. 1
  22277. 1
  22278. 1
  22279. 1
  22280. 1
  22281. 1
  22282. 1
  22283. 1
  22284. 1
  22285. 1
  22286. 1
  22287. 1
  22288. 1
  22289. 1
  22290. 1
  22291. 1
  22292. 1
  22293. 1
  22294. 1
  22295. 1
  22296. 1
  22297. 1
  22298. 1
  22299. 1
  22300. 1
  22301. 1
  22302. 1
  22303. 1
  22304. 1
  22305. 1
  22306. 1
  22307. 1
  22308. 1
  22309. 1
  22310. 1
  22311. 1
  22312. 1
  22313. 1
  22314. 1
  22315. 1
  22316. 1
  22317. 1
  22318. 1
  22319. 1
  22320. 1
  22321. 1
  22322. 1
  22323. 1
  22324. 1
  22325. 1
  22326. 1
  22327. 1
  22328. 1
  22329. 1
  22330. 1
  22331. 1
  22332. 1
  22333. 1
  22334. 1
  22335. 1
  22336. 1
  22337. 1
  22338. 1
  22339. 1
  22340. 1
  22341. 1
  22342. 1
  22343. 1
  22344. 1
  22345. 1
  22346. 1
  22347. 1
  22348. 1
  22349. 1
  22350. 1
  22351. 1
  22352. 1
  22353. 1
  22354. 1
  22355. 1
  22356. 1
  22357. 1
  22358. 1
  22359. 1
  22360. 1
  22361. 1
  22362. 1
  22363. 1
  22364. 1
  22365. 1
  22366. 1
  22367. 1
  22368. 1
  22369. 1
  22370. 1
  22371. 1
  22372. 1
  22373. 1
  22374. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22375. 1
  22376. 1
  22377. 1
  22378. 1
  22379. 1
  22380. 1
  22381. 1
  22382. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22383. 1
  22384. 1
  22385. 1
  22386. 1
  22387. 1
  22388. 1
  22389. 1
  22390. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22391. 1
  22392. 1
  22393. 1
  22394. 1
  22395. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22396. 1
  22397. 1
  22398. 1
  22399. 1
  22400. 1
  22401. 1
  22402. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22403. 1
  22404. 1
  22405. 1
  22406. 1
  22407. 1
  22408. 1
  22409. 1
  22410. 1
  22411. 1
  22412. 1
  22413. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22414. 1
  22415. 1
  22416. 1
  22417. 1
  22418. 1
  22419. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22420. 1
  22421. 1
  22422. 1
  22423. 1
  22424. 1
  22425. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22426. 1
  22427. 1
  22428. 1
  22429. 1
  22430. @Andrew Rosenthal Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22431. 1
  22432. @Andrew Rosenthal . Wrong again Bob. Even The Daily Beast and Fox News debunked. That's why it was never sufficient evidence to appear in any kind of court case. If you actually want the video instead of listening to what she told you was in the video, you will blatantly see her lying. https://www.cbs46.com/news/election-officials-debunk-video-alleging-voter-fraud/article_e4e49db0-367e-11eb-ad70-235dfcb0669a.html https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/12/03/fact-check-video-doesnt-show-election-fraud-in-georgia https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/dec/04/facebook-posts/no-georgia-election-workers-didnt-kick-out-observe/ https://amp-onlineathens-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.onlineathens.com/amp/3838383001?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080871476751&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.onlineathens.com%2Fstory%2Fnews%2Fpolitics%2Felections%2F2020%2F12%2F05%2Ffact-check-video-doesnt-show-suitcases-illegal-ballots-georgia%2F3838383001%2F https://www-fox5atlanta-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.fox5atlanta.com/news/surveillance-tape-breeds-false-fraud-claims-in-georgia.amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080871476751&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fox5atlanta.com%2Fnews%2Fsurveillance-tape-breeds-false-fraud-claims-in-georgia https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-giulianis-new-theory-on-debunked-ga-video-is-that-they-were-handing-out-dope https://triblive.com/news/world/surveillance-tape-breeds-false-fraud-claims-in-georgia/
    1
  22433. 1
  22434. 1
  22435. 1
  22436. @Andrew Rosenthal https://www.factcheck.org/2020/12/video-doesnt-show-election-fraud-in-georgia/ https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/12/04/no-atlanta-didnt-count-ballots-in-secret-or-in-suitcases/amp/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fjoewalsh%2F2020%2F12%2F04%2Fno-atlanta-didnt-count-ballots-in-secret-or-in-suitcases%2F https://www.allsides.com/story/fact-checking-georgia-suitcase-voter-fraud-claims https://news-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/georgias-top-election-investigator-debunks-115236191.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fgeorgias-top-election-investigator-debunks-115236191.html https://www-tampabay-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/elections/2020/11/20/dozens-of-claims-about-election-fraud-debunked-politifact/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tampabay.com%2Fnews%2Fflorida-politics%2Felections%2F2020%2F11%2F20%2Fdozens-of-claims-about-election-fraud-debunked-politifact%2F https://abcnews-go-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/election-2020-debunking-false-misleading-videos-claiming-show/story?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&id=74148233&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FPolitics%2Felection-2020-debunking-false-misleading-videos-claiming-show%2Fstory%3Fid%3D74148233 https://www-cbsnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/viral-videos-do-not-show-election-fraud-evidence-donald-trump-joe-biden/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2Fnews%2Fviral-videos-do-not-show-election-fraud-evidence-donald-trump-joe-biden%2F https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1247898?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2020-election%2Fgop-secretary-state-goes-facebook-fact-checking-spree-over-trump-n1247898 https://globalnews-ca.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/globalnews.ca/news/7504720/trump-georgia-rally-fact-check/amp/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s https://thecurrentga-org.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thecurrentga.org/2020/12/04/fact-check-rudy-giulianis-grandiose-georgia-election-fraud-claim/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthecurrentga.org%2F2020%2F12%2F04%2Ffact-check-rudy-giulianis-grandiose-georgia-election-fraud-claim%2F https://www.newsbreak.com/georgia/atlanta/news/2117988304846/fact-check-video-doesnt-show-election-fraud-in-georgia https://www-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-fox-news-georgia-voter-fraud-agnes-blalock-election-2020-11?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080887007970&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Ftucker-carlson-fox-news-georgia-voter-fraud-agnes-blalock-election-2020-11
    1
  22437. 1
  22438. 1
  22439. 1
  22440. 1
  22441. 1
  22442. @Andrew Rosenthal  @Andrew Rosenthal  Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22443. 1
  22444. 1
  22445. 1
  22446. 1
  22447. 1
  22448. 1
  22449. 1
  22450. 1
  22451. 1
  22452. @Andrew Rosenthal  @Andrew Rosenthal  Basically your argument is, - Despite their not being enough 👉evidence👈 in either 👉District👈, 👉state👈 and 👉federal👈 court to even hear a case about Mass voter fraud, let alone rule on a case about Mass voter fraud, - And despite the fact that every state has at least five levels of checks counteracting any attempts of voter fraud - And despite the fact that you claimed it wasn't about the numbers, yet sited mail in ballot numbers being off - Even though there is no 👉documented video👈 or 👉data👈 evidence backing up the claims of mass voter fraud, in any 👉County👈, in any 👉state👈, in the entirety of the 👉United States👈, - Your going to ignore the fact that there are almost a 👉million👈 poll workers at over a 👉hundred thousand👈 polling locations throughout the country, every presidential election (on average), and the only people who are claiming there was voter fraud are a handful of people on the losing side, that you've never met in your life, who (once again) have absolutely no video or data evidence to back them up, you're going to insist there was mass voter fraud in this election, where the guy you wanted to win also didn't win, because those are the people that are telling you what you want to hear. Oh, and because I'm insisting on more than just taking a stranger's word for it, as evidence of mass voter fraud and the theft of a presidential election in the United States, I'm clearly being too difficult...
    1
  22453. 1
  22454. 1
  22455. 1
  22456. 1
  22457. 1
  22458. 1
  22459. 1
  22460. 1
  22461. 1
  22462. 1
  22463. 1
  22464. 1
  22465. 1
  22466. 1
  22467. 1
  22468. 1
  22469. @Andrew Rosenthal Giant list of a week's worth of crazy logic, lies and delusions. All the reasons, anyone who comes here, shouldn't take this crazy, BEYOND blindly partisan, lying and clearly delusional person seriously. Basically a list definitively and proving that this person has absolutely no credibility and that all of that is of their own doing. 1. Lets begin with the first crazy, shall we! The original poster. " Delusional people tend to believe in what they're doing." This is where the Wonder leaps of logic begins. " This struck entirely too close to home for this delusional person. 🤣 cuz then we get this Wonder leap of logic... " "By that logic every person ever would be delusional. Lin-manuel Miranda sure believe in making Hamilton, so you're saying he is delusional." No, crazy! That is entirely not what that means. 🤣 at the very most, that means that delusional people believe in what they're saying just as much as non delusional people. But I understand why you cannot tell them apart! 🤣 I simply tried to explain to Crazy, to check the sentence descriptors. Which began my trip down the magical Rabbit Hole of this delusional persons crazy mind. Cuz, their response was... " clearly I'm the one who does understand logic as I am the only one giving any actual arguments. If you had any you'd give them as well so you're admitting you have none." Signaling to me, clearly from the jump, this person wasn't going to use actual truth. So I went to work. 🤣 ""There is some of that crackerjack "logic" again. That is why I told you to look at the descriptors. Now stop your Wonder leaps of nonsensical "logic" and maybe I'll stop embarrassing yourself. ... Or not lol 🤣" At which point he just tried doing something for which that became a theme for him later. Repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping that would somehow magically manifested into existence. " you didn't just prove what I said so you don't have any argument against baby. Sounds like you're the one who's wrong." " still don't disprove me" " no it's not my saying things that makes it true. The fact that their true makes them true. I just happened to also be saying them. But me saying them isn't what makes them true." 👆 we will also discover later event that was also a delusion of his. Because in many instances but it'll literally all he offers in the way of proof. Just repeating it over and over and over again hoping that it will magically manifest it to be true. Did I mention during this whole first exchange, crazy here is doing the exact same crazy with like two other people?. I'm a bit masochistic so I kind of stuck around for a lot longer than I should have but they realized crazy was crazy a while ago and don't enjoy screaming into the wind as much as I do. 🤣
    1
  22470. @Andrew Rosenthal 2. I tell, #CrazyBYNature over here, that Joe Biden won. Which is the rest begins! 🤣 "👉The way the numbers came out was impossible"👈 This part is important because later on in the back and forth, he would insist this is not about the numbers. He would also insist he doesn't change his story. Except this was his original argument. Going on later to elaborate about these numbers that later on will become absolutely pointless, because he keeps insisting it's not about the numbers and the data after he knew he couldn't provide proof of that. " in Pennsylvania are there was 1.8 million mail-in ballots sent out in 2.5 million ended up being counted." " these numbers were not mistakes and there was no debunking of them or explanation for them" " those are 100% the objective truth of what really happened as reported by the Pennsylvania state government themselves" After reading this comment I would literally go to find the Pennsylvania Government website where all of this is and told him to show me that. I found it and linked it for him. At which point he told a lie about how they had taken them down. The number isn't there anymore." This portion is important for later on. Pretty much the Crux of one of the biggest lies. Later on he would insist that this was not about the data. He started doing so because I kept asking him for proof of the data. Proof of these numbers. In the same original statement he also elaborated about these "numbers". " they have expert statistician jobs getting sworn testimony under penalty of perjury who say that." Where is this testimony and where are these statisticians? No one will ever know. 🤣 " because it's not about the data of. It's about the breaking of the constitution in the counting of the ballots that's making the ballots in ballot." " I never changed my story and I didn't lie about anything." " Biden should have gotten a lot of mail-in votes but not the extreme amount he got. With the amount left to be counted left in Pennsylvania the amount Biden was behind he would have needed an extreme irregularity that could only come from fraud to catch up let alone win in Pennsylvania" But it's so not about the numbers. LOL
    1
  22471. 1
  22472. @Andrew Rosenthal you don't have to agree with me crazy. The evidence is right here. It's totally cool. I know you're going to keep up with your delusion.  @Andrew Rosenthal  Giant list of a week's worth of crazy logic, lies and delusions. All the reasons, anyone who comes here, shouldn't take this crazy, BEYOND blindly partisan, lying and clearly delusional person seriously. Basically a list definitively and proving that this person has absolutely no credibility and that all of that is of their own doing. 1. Lets begin with the first crazy, shall we! The original poster. " Delusional people tend to believe in what they're doing." This is where the Wonder leaps of logic begins. " This struck entirely too close to home for this delusional person. 🤣 cuz then we get this Wonder leap of logic... " "By that logic every person ever would be delusional. Lin-manuel Miranda sure believe in making Hamilton, so you're saying he is delusional." No, crazy! That is entirely not what that means. 🤣 at the very most, that means that delusional people believe in what they're saying just as much as non delusional people. But I understand why you cannot tell them apart! 🤣 I simply tried to explain to Crazy, to check the sentence descriptors. Which began my trip down the magical Rabbit Hole of this delusional persons crazy mind. Cuz, their response was... " clearly I'm the one who does understand logic as I am the only one giving any actual arguments. If you had any you'd give them as well so you're admitting you have none." Signaling to me, clearly from the jump, this person wasn't going to use actual truth. So I went to work. 🤣 ""There is some of that crackerjack "logic" again. That is why I told you to look at the descriptors. Now stop your Wonder leaps of nonsensical "logic" and maybe I'll stop embarrassing yourself. ... Or not lol 🤣" At which point he just tried doing something for which that became a theme for him later. Repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping that would somehow magically manifested into existence. " you didn't just prove what I said so you don't have any argument against baby. Sounds like you're the one who's wrong." " still don't disprove me" " no it's not my saying things that makes it true. The fact that their true makes them true. I just happened to also be saying them. But me saying them isn't what makes them true." 👆 we will also discover later event that was also a delusion of his. Because in many instances but it'll literally all he offers in the way of proof. Just repeating it over and over and over again hoping that it will magically manifest it to be true. Did I mention during this whole first exchange, crazy here is doing the exact same crazy with like two other people?. I'm a bit masochistic so I kind of stuck around for a lot longer than I should have but they realized crazy was crazy a while ago and don't enjoy screaming into the wind as much as I do. 🤣  @Andrew Rosenthal  2. I tell, #CrazyBYNature over here, that Joe Biden won. Which is the rest begins! 🤣 "👉The way the numbers came out was impossible"👈 This part is important because later on in the back and forth, he would insist this is not about the numbers. He would also insist he doesn't change his story. Except this was his original argument. Going on later to elaborate about these numbers that later on will become absolutely pointless, because he keeps insisting it's not about the numbers and the data after he knew he couldn't provide proof of that. " in Pennsylvania are there was 1.8 million mail-in ballots sent out in 2.5 million ended up being counted." " these numbers were not mistakes and there was no debunking of them or explanation for them" " those are 100% the objective truth of what really happened as reported by the Pennsylvania state government themselves" After reading this comment I would literally go to find the Pennsylvania Government website where all of this is and told him to show me that. I found it and linked it for him. At which point he told a lie about how they had taken them down. The number isn't there anymore." This portion is important for later on. Pretty much the Crux of one of the biggest lies. Later on he would insist that this was not about the data. He started doing so because I kept asking him for proof of the data. Proof of these numbers. In the same original statement he also elaborated about these "numbers". " they have expert statistician jobs getting sworn testimony under penalty of perjury who say that." Where is this testimony and where are these statisticians? No one will ever know. 🤣 " because it's not about the data of. It's about the breaking of the constitution in the counting of the ballots that's making the ballots in ballot." " I never changed my story and I didn't lie about anything." " Biden should have gotten a lot of mail-in votes but not the extreme amount he got. With the amount left to be counted left in Pennsylvania the amount Biden was behind he would have needed an extreme irregularity that could only come from fraud to catch up let alone win in Pennsylvania" But it's so not about the numbers. LOL
    1
  22473. 1
  22474. @Andrew Rosenthal 3. Now there was these silly lie about asking me a question then insisting I didn't answer it even if I did answer it. "What could they present to you that you would say is proof?" Two comments down from the comment that asked that question, I replied, but just for s** and giggles What would be proof? "Every state has at least five different self check programs operating within the electoral system of that state. All the numbers have to line up to a certain degree in all five to certify the election. What would make it not true is as someone had proof, didn't just say, but had proof that those numbers don't line up. This is not what's happening. People lie all the damn time. There are over a million poll workers every four years during the presidential election. There's over a hundred thousand polling places. Getting a fraction of them to lie for you because they're a salty about their guy not winning, not that hard. Switching up the numbers and providing proof that that happened, very hard. Our election system has a myriad of self-checks. Even the recounts came back with the same numbers. But I'll ask you the same question you asked me, since you're not going to not answer my original one. What would convince you that Joe Biden won legitimately?" Then we get " You didn't answer it whether you say you did or not." The truth was I did answer it and in great detail, as you can see. However he didn't have any good responses for it so he tried to pretend it wasn't there. Cuz that's what crazy people do.
    1
  22475. @Andrew Rosenthal 4. Then there was the Epic Saga of dodging giving actual data to back up his claims. Going on forever insisting that , after asking me what sources I would believe and then insisting that I wouldn't believe any sources, me telling him that either government or academic sources were fine about a million times. Then he switch to the ONLY government sources that he would provide was Donald Trump's word.... and because I wasn't willing to take that, from a President Who Lies as much as he breathes, I clearly won't accept any Source. This was all an attempt to not have to admit that he didn't have any proof. Then when that was clearly not going to fly, he switched to the," it's not about the data or the numbers" argument. While insisting he never changes his story, of course. 🤣 I say... "government or scientific sources. I'm done with your excuses. Provide sources of evidence that is either governmental or scientific. Preferably both. So, if you could you would have by now. You're just making excuses and telling lies because you don't have your evidence. So, provide evidence or stop making the claims. It's not that hard." Directly under that comment. " I said I had asked you what sources you'd accept." I say... " I told you three times already. Direct government sources or scientific sources. Stop making excuses. Words from Donald Trump's mouth does not count as a source. The man has literally created a new job description at every local news agency in the country to track the amount of Lies that he tells on a regular basis. Straight from Donald Trump's mouth is not a government Source backed up by data. Nice try though. Government Source numbers." " Donald Trump is the president. You know the president is in the government right? So you want government sources but only the government sources you agree with? Huh?" This whole entire time I am asking for gov data. The actual facts and figures. But this one has trouble understanding the difference between someone saying something and something actually being true and backed up by hard facts and data that can be proven. See is there on his side and they just say something then it's automatically true to him. This goes back and forth for a little while. But you get the picture. Donald Trump is apparently the only government Source he is willing to give. And just what he says. So at one point I go fine. You want to use Donald Trump is a source and he gave his sources when he was giving this information, then just go to the source is he named and give me that. After saying that he got all quiet about Donald Trump being a source.
    1
  22476. @Andrew Rosenthal Giant list of a week's worth of crazy logic, lies and delusions. All the reasons, anyone who comes here, shouldn't take this crazy, BEYOND blindly partisan, lying and clearly delusional person seriously. Basically a list definitively and proving that this person has absolutely no credibility and that all of that is of their own doing. 1. Lets begin with the first crazy, shall we! The original poster. " Delusional people tend to believe in what they're doing." This is where the Wonder leaps of logic begins. " This struck entirely too close to home for this delusional person. 🤣 cuz then we get this Wonder leap of logic... " "By that logic every person ever would be delusional. Lin-manuel Miranda sure believe in making Hamilton, so you're saying he is delusional." No, crazy! That is entirely not what that means. 🤣 at the very most, that means that delusional people believe in what they're saying just as much as non delusional people. But I understand why you cannot tell them apart! 🤣 I simply tried to explain to Crazy, to check the sentence descriptors. Which began my trip down the magical Rabbit Hole of this delusional persons crazy mind. Cuz, their response was... " clearly I'm the one who does understand logic as I am the only one giving any actual arguments. If you had any you'd give them as well so you're admitting you have none." Signaling to me, clearly from the jump, this person wasn't going to use actual truth. So I went to work. 🤣 ""There is some of that crackerjack "logic" again. That is why I told you to look at the descriptors. Now stop your Wonder leaps of nonsensical "logic" and maybe I'll stop embarrassing yourself. ... Or not lol 🤣" At which point he just tried doing something for which that became a theme for him later. Repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping that would somehow magically manifested into existence. " you didn't just prove what I said so you don't have any argument against baby. Sounds like you're the one who's wrong." " still don't disprove me" " no it's not my saying things that makes it true. The fact that their true makes them true. I just happened to also be saying them. But me saying them isn't what makes them true." 👆 we will also discover later event that was also a delusion of his. Because in many instances but it'll literally all he offers in the way of proof. Just repeating it over and over and over again hoping that it will magically manifest it to be true. Did I mention during this whole first exchange, crazy here is doing the exact same crazy with like two other people?. I'm a bit masochistic so I kind of stuck around for a lot longer than I should have but they realized crazy was crazy a while ago and don't enjoy screaming into the wind as much as I do. 🤣  @Andrew Rosenthal  2. I tell, #CrazyBYNature over here, that Joe Biden won. Which is the rest begins! 🤣 "👉The way the numbers came out was impossible"👈 This part is important because later on in the back and forth, he would insist this is not about the numbers. He would also insist he doesn't change his story. Except this was his original argument. Going on later to elaborate about these numbers that later on will become absolutely pointless, because he keeps insisting it's not about the numbers and the data after he knew he couldn't provide proof of that. " in Pennsylvania are there was 1.8 million mail-in ballots sent out in 2.5 million ended up being counted." " these numbers were not mistakes and there was no debunking of them or explanation for them" " those are 100% the objective truth of what really happened as reported by the Pennsylvania state government themselves" After reading this comment I would literally go to find the Pennsylvania Government website where all of this is and told him to show me that. I found it and linked it for him. At which point he told a lie about how they had taken them down. The number isn't there anymore." This portion is important for later on. Pretty much the Crux of one of the biggest lies. Later on he would insist that this was not about the data. He started doing so because I kept asking him for proof of the data. Proof of these numbers. In the same original statement he also elaborated about these "numbers". " they have expert statistician jobs getting sworn testimony under penalty of perjury who say that." Where is this testimony and where are these statisticians? No one will ever know. 🤣 " because it's not about the data of. It's about the breaking of the constitution in the counting of the ballots that's making the ballots in ballot." " I never changed my story and I didn't lie about anything." " Biden should have gotten a lot of mail-in votes but not the extreme amount he got. With the amount left to be counted left in Pennsylvania the amount Biden was behind he would have needed an extreme irregularity that could only come from fraud to catch up let alone win in Pennsylvania" But it's so not about the numbers. LOL 3. Now there was these silly lie about asking me a question then insisting I didn't answer it even if I did answer it. "What could they present to you that you would say is proof?" Two comments down from the comment that asked that question, I replied, but just for s** and giggles What would be proof? "Every state has at least five different self check programs operating within the electoral system of that state. All the numbers have to line up to a certain degree in all five to certify the election. What would make it not true is as someone had proof, didn't just say, but had proof that those numbers don't line up. This is not what's happening. People lie all the damn time. There are over a million poll workers every four years during the presidential election. There's over a hundred thousand polling places. Getting a fraction of them to lie for you because they're a salty about their guy not winning, not that hard. Switching up the numbers and providing proof that that happened, very hard. Our election system has a myriad of self-checks. Even the recounts came back with the same numbers. But I'll ask you the same question you asked me, since you're not going to not answer my original one. What would convince you that Joe Biden won legitimately?" Then we get " You didn't answer it whether you say you did or not." The truth was I did answer it and in great detail, as you can see. However he didn't have any good responses for it so he tried to pretend it wasn't there. Cuz that's what crazy people do. 4. Then there was the Epic Saga of dodging giving actual data to back up his claims. Going on forever insisting that , after asking me what sources I would believe and then insisting that I wouldn't believe any sources, me telling him that either government or academic sources were fine about a million times. Then he switch to the ONLY government sources that he would provide was Donald Trump's word.... and because I wasn't willing to take that, from a President Who Lies as much as he breathes, I clearly won't accept any Source. This was all an attempt to not have to admit that he didn't have any proof. Then when that was clearly not going to fly, he switched to the," it's not about the data or the numbers" argument. While insisting he never changes his story, of course. 🤣
    1
  22477. 1
  22478. 1
  22479. @Andrew Rosenthal  @Andrew Rosenthal  Giant list of a week's worth of crazy logic, lies and delusions. All the reasons, anyone who comes here, shouldn't take this crazy, BEYOND blindly partisan, lying and clearly delusional person seriously. Basically a list definitively and proving that this person has absolutely no credibility and that all of that is of their own doing. 1. Lets begin with the first crazy, shall we! The original poster. " Delusional people tend to believe in what they're doing." This is where the Wonder leaps of logic begins. " This struck entirely too close to home for this delusional person. 🤣 cuz then we get this Wonder leap of logic... " "By that logic every person ever would be delusional. Lin-manuel Miranda sure believe in making Hamilton, so you're saying he is delusional." No, crazy! That is entirely not what that means. 🤣 at the very most, that means that delusional people believe in what they're saying just as much as non delusional people. But I understand why you cannot tell them apart! 🤣 I simply tried to explain to Crazy, to check the sentence descriptors. Which began my trip down the magical Rabbit Hole of this delusional persons crazy mind. Cuz, their response was... " clearly I'm the one who does understand logic as I am the only one giving any actual arguments. If you had any you'd give them as well so you're admitting you have none." Signaling to me, clearly from the jump, this person wasn't going to use actual truth. So I went to work. 🤣 ""There is some of that crackerjack "logic" again. That is why I told you to look at the descriptors. Now stop your Wonder leaps of nonsensical "logic" and maybe I'll stop embarrassing yourself. ... Or not lol 🤣" At which point he just tried doing something for which that became a theme for him later. Repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping that would somehow magically manifested into existence. " you didn't just prove what I said so you don't have any argument against baby. Sounds like you're the one who's wrong." " still don't disprove me" " no it's not my saying things that makes it true. The fact that their true makes them true. I just happened to also be saying them. But me saying them isn't what makes them true." 👆 we will also discover later event that was also a delusion of his. Because in many instances but it'll literally all he offers in the way of proof. Just repeating it over and over and over again hoping that it will magically manifest it to be true. Did I mention during this whole first exchange, crazy here is doing the exact same crazy with like two other people?. I'm a bit masochistic so I kind of stuck around for a lot longer than I should have but they realized crazy was crazy a while ago and don't enjoy screaming into the wind as much as I do. 🤣  @Andrew Rosenthal  2. I tell, #CrazyBYNature over here, that Joe Biden won. Which is the rest begins! 🤣 "👉The way the numbers came out was impossible"👈 This part is important because later on in the back and forth, he would insist this is not about the numbers. He would also insist he doesn't change his story. Except this was his original argument. Going on later to elaborate about these numbers that later on will become absolutely pointless, because he keeps insisting it's not about the numbers and the data after he knew he couldn't provide proof of that. " in Pennsylvania are there was 1.8 million mail-in ballots sent out in 2.5 million ended up being counted." " these numbers were not mistakes and there was no debunking of them or explanation for them" " those are 100% the objective truth of what really happened as reported by the Pennsylvania state government themselves" After reading this comment I would literally go to find the Pennsylvania Government website where all of this is and told him to show me that. I found it and linked it for him. At which point he told a lie about how they had taken them down. The number isn't there anymore." This portion is important for later on. Pretty much the Crux of one of the biggest lies. Later on he would insist that this was not about the data. He started doing so because I kept asking him for proof of the data. Proof of these numbers. In the same original statement he also elaborated about these "numbers". " they have expert statistician jobs getting sworn testimony under penalty of perjury who say that." Where is this testimony and where are these statisticians? No one will ever know. 🤣 " because it's not about the data of. It's about the breaking of the constitution in the counting of the ballots that's making the ballots in ballot." " I never changed my story and I didn't lie about anything." " Biden should have gotten a lot of mail-in votes but not the extreme amount he got. With the amount left to be counted left in Pennsylvania the amount Biden was behind he would have needed an extreme irregularity that could only come from fraud to catch up let alone win in Pennsylvania" But it's so not about the numbers. LOL 3. Now there was these silly lie about asking me a question then insisting I didn't answer it even if I did answer it. "What could they present to you that you would say is proof?" Two comments down from the comment that asked that question, I replied, but just for s** and giggles What would be proof? "Every state has at least five different self check programs operating within the electoral system of that state. All the numbers have to line up to a certain degree in all five to certify the election. What would make it not true is as someone had proof, didn't just say, but had proof that those numbers don't line up. This is not what's happening. People lie all the damn time. There are over a million poll workers every four years during the presidential election. There's over a hundred thousand polling places. Getting a fraction of them to lie for you because they're a salty about their guy not winning, not that hard. Switching up the numbers and providing proof that that happened, very hard. Our election system has a myriad of self-checks. Even the recounts came back with the same numbers. But I'll ask you the same question you asked me, since you're not going to not answer my original one. What would convince you that Joe Biden won legitimately?" Then we get " You didn't answer it whether you say you did or not." The truth was I did answer it and in great detail, as you can see. However he didn't have any good responses for it so he tried to pretend it wasn't there. Cuz that's what crazy people do. 4. Then there was the Epic Saga of dodging giving actual data to back up his claims. Going on forever insisting that , after asking me what sources I would believe and then insisting that I wouldn't believe any sources, me telling him that either government or academic sources were fine about a million times. Then he switch to the ONLY government sources that he would provide was Donald Trump's word.... and because I wasn't willing to take that, from a President Who Lies as much as he breathes, I clearly won't accept any Source. This was all an attempt to not have to admit that he didn't have any proof. Then when that was clearly not going to fly, he switched to the," it's not about the data or the numbers" argument. While insisting he never changes his story, of course. 🤣
    1
  22480. @Andrew Rosenthal Added a few more direct quotes to number 4. 😁 4. Then there was the Epic Saga of dodging giving actual data to back up his claims. Going on forever insisting that , after asking me what sources I would believe and then insisting that I wouldn't believe any sources, me telling him that either government or academic sources were fine about a million times. Then he switch to the ONLY government sources that he would provide was Donald Trump's word.... and because I wasn't willing to take that, from a President Who Lies as much as he breathes, I clearly won't accept any Source. This was all an attempt to not have to admit that he didn't have any proof. Then when that was clearly not going to fly, he switched to the," it's not about the data or the numbers" argument. While insisting he never changes his story, of course. 🤣 I say... "government or scientific sources. I'm done with your excuses. Provide sources of evidence that is either governmental or scientific. Preferably both. So, if you could you would have by now. You're just making excuses and telling lies because you don't have your evidence. So, provide evidence or stop making the claims. It's not that hard." Directly under that comment. " I said I had asked you what sources you'd accept." I say... " I told you three times already. Direct government sources or scientific sources. Stop making excuses. Words from Donald Trump's mouth does not count as a source. The man has literally created a new job description at every local news agency in the country to track the amount of Lies that he tells on a regular basis. Straight from Donald Trump's mouth is not a government Source backed up by data. Nice try though. Government Source numbers." " Donald Trump is the president. You know the president is in the government right? So you want government sources but only the government sources you agree with? Huh?" This whole entire time I am asking for gov data. The actual facts and figures. But this one has trouble understanding the difference between someone saying something and something actually being true and backed up by hard facts and data that can be proven. See is there on his side and they just say something then it's automatically true to him. This goes back and forth for a little while. But you get the picture. Donald Trump is apparently the only government Source he is willing to give. And just what he says. So at one point I go fine. You want to use Donald Trump is a source and he gave his sources when he was giving this information, then just go to the source is he named and give me that. After saying that he got all quiet about Donald Trump being a source.
    1
  22481. @Andrew Rosenthal   Giant list of a week's worth of crazy logic, lies and delusions. All the reasons, anyone who comes here, shouldn't take this crazy, BEYOND blindly partisan, lying and clearly delusional person seriously. Basically a list definitively and proving that this person has absolutely no credibility and that all of that is of their own doing. 1. Lets begin with the first crazy, shall we! The original poster. " Delusional people tend to believe in what they're doing." This is where the Wonder leaps of logic begins. " This struck entirely too close to home for this delusional person. 🤣 cuz then we get this Wonder leap of logic... " "By that logic every person ever would be delusional. Lin-manuel Miranda sure believe in making Hamilton, so you're saying he is delusional." No, crazy! That is entirely not what that means. 🤣 at the very most, that means that delusional people believe in what they're saying just as much as non delusional people. But I understand why you cannot tell them apart! 🤣 I simply tried to explain to Crazy, to check the sentence descriptors. Which began my trip down the magical Rabbit Hole of this delusional persons crazy mind. Cuz, their response was... " clearly I'm the one who does understand logic as I am the only one giving any actual arguments. If you had any you'd give them as well so you're admitting you have none." Signaling to me, clearly from the jump, this person wasn't going to use actual truth. So I went to work. 🤣 ""There is some of that crackerjack "logic" again. That is why I told you to look at the descriptors. Now stop your Wonder leaps of nonsensical "logic" and maybe I'll stop embarrassing yourself. ... Or not lol 🤣" At which point he just tried doing something for which that became a theme for him later. Repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping that would somehow magically manifested into existence. " you didn't just prove what I said so you don't have any argument against baby. Sounds like you're the one who's wrong." " still don't disprove me" " no it's not my saying things that makes it true. The fact that their true makes them true. I just happened to also be saying them. But me saying them isn't what makes them true." 👆 we will also discover later event that was also a delusion of his. Because in many instances but it'll literally all he offers in the way of proof. Just repeating it over and over and over again hoping that it will magically manifest it to be true. Did I mention during this whole first exchange, crazy here is doing the exact same crazy with like two other people?. I'm a bit masochistic so I kind of stuck around for a lot longer than I should have but they realized crazy was crazy a while ago and don't enjoy screaming into the wind as much as I do. 🤣  @Andrew Rosenthal  2. I tell, #CrazyBYNature over here, that Joe Biden won. Which is the rest begins! 🤣 "👉The way the numbers came out was impossible"👈 This part is important because later on in the back and forth, he would insist this is not about the numbers. He would also insist he doesn't change his story. Except this was his original argument. Going on later to elaborate about these numbers that later on will become absolutely pointless, because he keeps insisting it's not about the numbers and the data after he knew he couldn't provide proof of that. " in Pennsylvania are there was 1.8 million mail-in ballots sent out in 2.5 million ended up being counted." " these numbers were not mistakes and there was no debunking of them or explanation for them" " those are 100% the objective truth of what really happened as reported by the Pennsylvania state government themselves" After reading this comment I would literally go to find the Pennsylvania Government website where all of this is and told him to show me that. I found it and linked it for him. At which point he told a lie about how they had taken them down. The number isn't there anymore." This portion is important for later on. Pretty much the Crux of one of the biggest lies. Later on he would insist that this was not about the data. He started doing so because I kept asking him for proof of the data. Proof of these numbers. In the same original statement he also elaborated about these "numbers". " they have expert statistician jobs getting sworn testimony under penalty of perjury who say that." Where is this testimony and where are these statisticians? No one will ever know. 🤣 " because it's not about the data of. It's about the breaking of the constitution in the counting of the ballots that's making the ballots in ballot." " I never changed my story and I didn't lie about anything." " Biden should have gotten a lot of mail-in votes but not the extreme amount he got. With the amount left to be counted left in Pennsylvania the amount Biden was behind he would have needed an extreme irregularity that could only come from fraud to catch up let alone win in Pennsylvania" But it's so not about the numbers. LOL 3. Now there was these silly lie about asking me a question then insisting I didn't answer it even if I did answer it. "What could they present to you that you would say is proof?" Two comments down from the comment that asked that question, I replied, but just for s** and giggles What would be proof? "Every state has at least five different self check programs operating within the electoral system of that state. All the numbers have to line up to a certain degree in all five to certify the election. What would make it not true is as someone had proof, didn't just say, but had proof that those numbers don't line up. This is not what's happening. People lie all the damn time. There are over a million poll workers every four years during the presidential election. There's over a hundred thousand polling places. Getting a fraction of them to lie for you because they're a salty about their guy not winning, not that hard. Switching up the numbers and providing proof that that happened, very hard. Our election system has a myriad of self-checks. Even the recounts came back with the same numbers. But I'll ask you the same question you asked me, since you're not going to not answer my original one. What would convince you that Joe Biden won legitimately?" Then we get " You didn't answer it whether you say you did or not." The truth was I did answer it and in great detail, as you can see. However he didn't have any good responses for it so he tried to pretend it wasn't there. Cuz that's what crazy people do. 4. Then there was the Epic Saga of dodging giving actual data to back up his claims. Going on forever insisting that , after asking me what sources I would believe and then insisting that I wouldn't believe any sources, me telling him that either government or academic sources were fine about a million times. Then he switch to the ONLY government sources that he would provide was Donald Trump's word.... and because I wasn't willing to take that, from a President Who Lies as much as he breathes, I clearly won't accept any Source. This was all an attempt to not have to admit that he didn't have any proof. Then when that was clearly not going to fly, he switched to the," it's not about the data or the numbers" argument. While insisting he never changes his story, of course. 🤣 I say... "government or scientific sources. I'm done with your excuses. Provide sources of evidence that is either governmental or scientific. Preferably both. So, if you could you would have by now. You're just making excuses and telling lies because you don't have your evidence. So, provide evidence or stop making the claims. It's not that hard." Directly under that comment. " I said I had asked you what sources you'd accept." I say... " I told you three times already. Direct government sources or scientific sources. Stop making excuses. Words from Donald Trump's mouth does not count as a source. The man has literally created a new job description at every local news agency in the country to track the amount of Lies that he tells on a regular basis. Straight from Donald Trump's mouth is not a government Source backed up by data. Nice try though. Government Source numbers." " Donald Trump is the president. You know the president is in the government right? So you want government sources but only the government sources you agree with? Huh?" This whole entire time I am asking for gov data. The actual facts and figures. But this one has trouble understanding the difference between someone saying something and something actually being true and backed up by hard facts and data that can be proven. See is there on his side and they just say something then it's automatically true to him. This goes back and forth for a little while. But you get the picture. Donald Trump is apparently the only government Source he is willing to give. And just what he says. So at one point I go fine. You want to use Donald Trump is a source and he gave his sources when he was giving this information, then just go to the source is he named and give me that. After saying that he got all quiet about Donald Trump being a source.
    1
  22482. @Andrew Rosenthal 5. After I have to bring it up about 7 times, he finally acknowledges the 50 plus cases that have been in the courts all over the country, some getting dismissed by Trump appointed judges all over the country. All for lack of evidence. Before they ever got to the trial phase even. The first thing he does is trying to dismiss all 50 plus of them by insisting that not all 50 were done directly by the Trump Administration. At which point I keep asking why that matters. He first brings up some random shut about the media lying about it, in order to deflect from those 50 cases. Claiming that the media said that Donald Trump had done all of them. Though as you can clearly say that has absolutely no relevance to what I was saying. Then, ask her a few more rounds he changes his story again and insists that the only reason that 50 plus cases were thrown out for lack of evidence was because each and every one of them, all over the country had bad lawyers and therefore that could be the only possible reason that they all got thrown out for lack of evidence. There was no other reason. It was only that. In his crazy head. So I did what I always do. Asked him to prove that all 50 got thrown out because all 50 had bad lawyers. His response was obviously that's the only reason they would all get thrown out for lack of evidence. That in itself is proof. Because in his crazy head oh, that could be the only possibility. It couldn't be the most simplest answer. They didn't have any evidence. It all had to be because all 50 of those cases had bad lawyers. Even though he doesn't know any of the lawyers names or anything about them.
    1
  22483. 1
  22484. @Andrew Rosenthal Giant list of a week's worth of crazy logic, lies and delusions. All the reasons, anyone who comes here, shouldn't take this crazy, BEYOND blindly partisan, lying and clearly delusional person seriously. Basically a list definitively and proving that this person has absolutely no credibility and that all of that is of their own doing. 1. Lets begin with the first crazy, shall we! The original poster. " Delusional people tend to believe in what they're doing." This is where the Wonder leaps of logic begins. " This struck entirely too close to home for this delusional person. 🤣 cuz then we get this Wonder leap of logic... " "By that logic every person ever would be delusional. Lin-manuel Miranda sure believe in making Hamilton, so you're saying he is delusional." No, crazy! That is entirely not what that means. 🤣 at the very most, that means that delusional people believe in what they're saying just as much as non delusional people. But I understand why you cannot tell them apart! 🤣 I simply tried to explain to Crazy, to check the sentence descriptors. Which began my trip down the magical Rabbit Hole of this delusional persons crazy mind. Cuz, their response was... " clearly I'm the one who does understand logic as I am the only one giving any actual arguments. If you had any you'd give them as well so you're admitting you have none." Signaling to me, clearly from the jump, this person wasn't going to use actual truth. So I went to work. 🤣 ""There is some of that crackerjack "logic" again. That is why I told you to look at the descriptors. Now stop your Wonder leaps of nonsensical "logic" and maybe I'll stop embarrassing yourself. ... Or not lol 🤣" At which point he just tried doing something for which that became a theme for him later. Repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping that would somehow magically manifested into existence. " you didn't just prove what I said so you don't have any argument against baby. Sounds like you're the one who's wrong." " still don't disprove me" " no it's not my saying things that makes it true. The fact that their true makes them true. I just happened to also be saying them. But me saying them isn't what makes them true." 👆 we will also discover later event that was also a delusion of his. Because in many instances but it'll literally all he offers in the way of proof. Just repeating it over and over and over again hoping that it will magically manifest it to be true. Did I mention during this whole first exchange, crazy here is doing the exact same crazy with like two other people?. I'm a bit masochistic so I kind of stuck around for a lot longer than I should have but they realized crazy was crazy a while ago and don't enjoy screaming into the wind as much as I do. 🤣  @Andrew Rosenthal  2. I tell, #CrazyBYNature over here, that Joe Biden won. Which is the rest begins! 🤣 "👉The way the numbers came out was impossible"👈 This part is important because later on in the back and forth, he would insist this is not about the numbers. He would also insist he doesn't change his story. Except this was his original argument. Going on later to elaborate about these numbers that later on will become absolutely pointless, because he keeps insisting it's not about the numbers and the data after he knew he couldn't provide proof of that. " in Pennsylvania are there was 1.8 million mail-in ballots sent out in 2.5 million ended up being counted." " these numbers were not mistakes and there was no debunking of them or explanation for them" " those are 100% the objective truth of what really happened as reported by the Pennsylvania state government themselves" After reading this comment I would literally go to find the Pennsylvania Government website where all of this is and told him to show me that. I found it and linked it for him. At which point he told a lie about how they had taken them down. The number isn't there anymore." This portion is important for later on. Pretty much the Crux of one of the biggest lies. Later on he would insist that this was not about the data. He started doing so because I kept asking him for proof of the data. Proof of these numbers. In the same original statement he also elaborated about these "numbers". " they have expert statistician jobs getting sworn testimony under penalty of perjury who say that." Where is this testimony and where are these statisticians? No one will ever know. 🤣 " because it's not about the data of. It's about the breaking of the constitution in the counting of the ballots that's making the ballots in ballot." " I never changed my story and I didn't lie about anything." " Biden should have gotten a lot of mail-in votes but not the extreme amount he got. With the amount left to be counted left in Pennsylvania the amount Biden was behind he would have needed an extreme irregularity that could only come from fraud to catch up let alone win in Pennsylvania" But it's so not about the numbers. LOL 3. Now there was these silly lie about asking me a question then insisting I didn't answer it even if I did answer it. "What could they present to you that you would say is proof?" Two comments down from the comment that asked that question, I replied, but just for s** and giggles What would be proof? "Every state has at least five different self check programs operating within the electoral system of that state. All the numbers have to line up to a certain degree in all five to certify the election. What would make it not true is as someone had proof, didn't just say, but had proof that those numbers don't line up. This is not what's happening. People lie all the damn time. There are over a million poll workers every four years during the presidential election. There's over a hundred thousand polling places. Getting a fraction of them to lie for you because they're a salty about their guy not winning, not that hard. Switching up the numbers and providing proof that that happened, very hard. Our election system has a myriad of self-checks. Even the recounts came back with the same numbers. But I'll ask you the same question you asked me, since you're not going to not answer my original one. What would convince you that Joe Biden won legitimately?" Then we get " You didn't answer it whether you say you did or not." The truth was I did answer it and in great detail, as you can see. However he didn't have any good responses for it so he tried to pretend it wasn't there. Cuz that's what crazy people do. 4. Then there was the Epic Saga of dodging giving actual data to back up his claims. Going on forever insisting that , after asking me what sources I would believe and then insisting that I wouldn't believe any sources, me telling him that either government or academic sources were fine about a million times. Then he switch to the ONLY government sources that he would provide was Donald Trump's word.... and because I wasn't willing to take that, from a President Who Lies as much as he breathes, I clearly won't accept any Source. This was all an attempt to not have to admit that he didn't have any proof. Then when that was clearly not going to fly, he switched to the," it's not about the data or the numbers" argument. While insisting he never changes his story, of course. 🤣 I say... "government or scientific sources. I'm done with your excuses. Provide sources of evidence that is either governmental or scientific. Preferably both. So, if you could you would have by now. You're just making excuses and telling lies because you don't have your evidence. So, provide evidence or stop making the claims. It's not that hard." Directly under that comment. " I said I had asked you what sources you'd accept." I say... " I told you three times already. Direct government sources or scientific sources. Stop making excuses. Words from Donald Trump's mouth does not count as a source. The man has literally created a new job description at every local news agency in the country to track the amount of Lies that he tells on a regular basis. Straight from Donald Trump's mouth is not a government Source backed up by data. Nice try though. Government Source numbers." " Donald Trump is the president. You know the president is in the government right? So you want government sources but only the government sources you agree with? Huh?" This whole entire time I am asking for gov data. The actual facts and figures. But this one has trouble understanding the difference between someone saying something and something actually being true and backed up by hard facts and data that can be proven. See is there on his side and they just say something then it's automatically true to him. This goes back and forth for a little while. But you get the picture. Donald Trump is apparently the only government Source he is willing to give. And just what he says. So at one point I go fine. You want to use Donald Trump is a source and he gave his sources when he was giving this information, then just go to the source is he named and give me that. After saying that he got all quiet about Donald Trump being a source.
    1
  22485. @Andrew Rosenthal 5. After I have to bring it up about 7 times, he finally acknowledges the 50 plus cases that have been in the courts all over the country, some getting dismissed by Trump appointed judges all over the country. All for lack of evidence. Before they ever got to the trial phase even. The first thing he does is trying to dismiss all 50 plus of them by insisting that not all 50 were done directly by the Trump Administration. At which point I keep asking why that matters. He first brings up some random shut about the media lying about it, in order to deflect from those 50 cases. Claiming that the media said that Donald Trump had done all of them. Though as you can clearly say that has absolutely no relevance to what I was saying. Then, ask her a few more rounds he changes his story again and insists that the only reason that 50 plus cases were thrown out for lack of evidence was because each and every one of them, all over the country had bad lawyers and therefore that could be the only possible reason that they all got thrown out for lack of evidence. There was no other reason. It was only that. In his crazy head. So I did what I always do. Asked him to prove that all 50 got thrown out because all 50 had bad lawyers. His response was obviously that's the only reason they would all get thrown out for lack of evidence. That in itself is proof. Because in his crazy head oh, that could be the only possibility. It couldn't be the most simplest answer. They didn't have any evidence. It all had to be because all 50 of those cases had bad lawyers. Even though he doesn't know any of the lawyers names or anything about them.
    1
  22486. 1
  22487. @Andrew Rosenthal Giant list of a week's worth of crazy logic, lies and delusions. All the reasons, anyone who comes here, shouldn't take this crazy, BEYOND blindly partisan, lying and clearly delusional person seriously. Basically a list definitively and proving that this person has absolutely no credibility and that all of that is of their own doing. 1. Lets begin with the first crazy, shall we! The original poster. " Delusional people tend to believe in what they're doing." This is where the Wonder leaps of logic begins. " This struck entirely too close to home for this delusional person. 🤣 cuz then we get this Wonder leap of logic... " "By that logic every person ever would be delusional. Lin-manuel Miranda sure believe in making Hamilton, so you're saying he is delusional." No, crazy! That is entirely not what that means. 🤣 at the very most, that means that delusional people believe in what they're saying just as much as non delusional people. But I understand why you cannot tell them apart! 🤣 I simply tried to explain to Crazy, to check the sentence descriptors. Which began my trip down the magical Rabbit Hole of this delusional persons crazy mind. Cuz, their response was... " clearly I'm the one who does understand logic as I am the only one giving any actual arguments. If you had any you'd give them as well so you're admitting you have none." Signaling to me, clearly from the jump, this person wasn't going to use actual truth. So I went to work. 🤣 ""There is some of that crackerjack "logic" again. That is why I told you to look at the descriptors. Now stop your Wonder leaps of nonsensical "logic" and maybe I'll stop embarrassing yourself. ... Or not lol 🤣" At which point he just tried doing something for which that became a theme for him later. Repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping that would somehow magically manifested into existence. " you didn't just prove what I said so you don't have any argument against baby. Sounds like you're the one who's wrong." " still don't disprove me" " no it's not my saying things that makes it true. The fact that their true makes them true. I just happened to also be saying them. But me saying them isn't what makes them true." 👆 we will also discover later event that was also a delusion of his. Because in many instances but it'll literally all he offers in the way of proof. Just repeating it over and over and over again hoping that it will magically manifest it to be true. Did I mention during this whole first exchange, crazy here is doing the exact same crazy with like two other people?. I'm a bit masochistic so I kind of stuck around for a lot longer than I should have but they realized crazy was crazy a while ago and don't enjoy screaming into the wind as much as I do. 🤣  @Andrew Rosenthal  2. I tell, #CrazyBYNature over here, that Joe Biden won. Which is the rest begins! 🤣 "👉The way the numbers came out was impossible"👈 This part is important because later on in the back and forth, he would insist this is not about the numbers. He would also insist he doesn't change his story. Except this was his original argument. Going on later to elaborate about these numbers that later on will become absolutely pointless, because he keeps insisting it's not about the numbers and the data after he knew he couldn't provide proof of that. " in Pennsylvania are there was 1.8 million mail-in ballots sent out in 2.5 million ended up being counted." " these numbers were not mistakes and there was no debunking of them or explanation for them" " those are 100% the objective truth of what really happened as reported by the Pennsylvania state government themselves" After reading this comment I would literally go to find the Pennsylvania Government website where all of this is and told him to show me that. I found it and linked it for him. At which point he told a lie about how they had taken them down. The number isn't there anymore." This portion is important for later on. Pretty much the Crux of one of the biggest lies. Later on he would insist that this was not about the data. He started doing so because I kept asking him for proof of the data. Proof of these numbers. In the same original statement he also elaborated about these "numbers". " they have expert statistician jobs getting sworn testimony under penalty of perjury who say that." Where is this testimony and where are these statisticians? No one will ever know. 🤣 " because it's not about the data of. It's about the breaking of the constitution in the counting of the ballots that's making the ballots in ballot." " I never changed my story and I didn't lie about anything." " Biden should have gotten a lot of mail-in votes but not the extreme amount he got. With the amount left to be counted left in Pennsylvania the amount Biden was behind he would have needed an extreme irregularity that could only come from fraud to catch up let alone win in Pennsylvania" But it's so not about the numbers. LOL 3. Now there was these silly lie about asking me a question then insisting I didn't answer it even if I did answer it. "What could they present to you that you would say is proof?" Two comments down from the comment that asked that question, I replied, but just for s** and giggles What would be proof? "Every state has at least five different self check programs operating within the electoral system of that state. All the numbers have to line up to a certain degree in all five to certify the election. What would make it not true is as someone had proof, didn't just say, but had proof that those numbers don't line up. This is not what's happening. People lie all the damn time. There are over a million poll workers every four years during the presidential election. There's over a hundred thousand polling places. Getting a fraction of them to lie for you because they're a salty about their guy not winning, not that hard. Switching up the numbers and providing proof that that happened, very hard. Our election system has a myriad of self-checks. Even the recounts came back with the same numbers. But I'll ask you the same question you asked me, since you're not going to not answer my original one. What would convince you that Joe Biden won legitimately?" Then we get " You didn't answer it whether you say you did or not." The truth was I did answer it and in great detail, as you can see. However he didn't have any good responses for it so he tried to pretend it wasn't there. Cuz that's what crazy people do. 4. Then there was the Epic Saga of dodging giving actual data to back up his claims. Going on forever insisting that , after asking me what sources I would believe and then insisting that I wouldn't believe any sources, me telling him that either government or academic sources were fine about a million times. Then he switch to the ONLY government sources that he would provide was Donald Trump's word.... and because I wasn't willing to take that, from a President Who Lies as much as he breathes, I clearly won't accept any Source. This was all an attempt to not have to admit that he didn't have any proof. Then when that was clearly not going to fly, he switched to the," it's not about the data or the numbers" argument. While insisting he never changes his story, of course. 🤣 I say... "government or scientific sources. I'm done with your excuses. Provide sources of evidence that is either governmental or scientific. Preferably both. So, if you could you would have by now. You're just making excuses and telling lies because you don't have your evidence. So, provide evidence or stop making the claims. It's not that hard." Directly under that comment. " I said I had asked you what sources you'd accept." I say... " I told you three times already. Direct government sources or scientific sources. Stop making excuses. Words from Donald Trump's mouth does not count as a source. The man has literally created a new job description at every local news agency in the country to track the amount of Lies that he tells on a regular basis. Straight from Donald Trump's mouth is not a government Source backed up by data. Nice try though. Government Source numbers." " Donald Trump is the president. You know the president is in the government right? So you want government sources but only the government sources you agree with? Huh?" This whole entire time I am asking for gov data. The actual facts and figures. But this one has trouble understanding the difference between someone saying something and something actually being true and backed up by hard facts and data that can be proven. See is there on his side and they just say something then it's automatically true to him. This goes back and forth for a little while. But you get the picture. Donald Trump is apparently the only government Source he is willing to give. And just what he says. So at one point I go fine. You want to use Donald Trump is a source and he gave his sources when he was giving this information, then just go to the source is he named and give me that. After saying that he got all quiet about Donald Trump being a source.
    1
  22488. @Andrew Rosenthal 5. After I have to bring it up about 7 times, he finally acknowledges the 50 plus cases that have been in the courts all over the country, some getting dismissed by Trump appointed judges all over the country. All for lack of evidence. Before they ever got to the trial phase even. The first thing he does is trying to dismiss all 50 plus of them by insisting that not all 50 were done directly by the Trump Administration. At which point I keep asking why that matters. He first brings up some random shut about the media lying about it, in order to deflect from those 50 cases. Claiming that the media said that Donald Trump had done all of them. Though as you can clearly say that has absolutely no relevance to what I was saying. Then, ask her a few more rounds he changes his story again and insists that the only reason that 50 plus cases were thrown out for lack of evidence was because each and every one of them, all over the country had bad lawyers and therefore that could be the only possible reason that they all got thrown out for lack of evidence. There was no other reason. It was only that. In his crazy head. So I did what I always do. Asked him to prove that all 50 got thrown out because all 50 had bad lawyers. His response was obviously that's the only reason they would all get thrown out for lack of evidence. That in itself is proof. Because in his crazy head oh, that could be the only possibility. It couldn't be the most simplest answer. They didn't have any evidence. It all had to be because all 50 of those cases had bad lawyers. Even though he doesn't know any of the lawyers names or anything about them.
    1
  22489. 1
  22490. 1
  22491. 1
  22492. 1
  22493. 1
  22494. 1
  22495. 1
  22496. 1
  22497. 1
  22498. 1
  22499. 1
  22500. 1
  22501. 1
  22502. 1
  22503. 1
  22504. 1
  22505. 1
  22506. 1
  22507. 1
  22508. 1
  22509. 1
  22510. 1
  22511. 1
  22512. 1
  22513. 1
  22514. 1
  22515. 1
  22516. 1
  22517. 1
  22518. 1
  22519. 1
  22520. 1
  22521. 1
  22522. 1
  22523. 1
  22524. 1
  22525. 1
  22526. 1
  22527. 1
  22528. 1
  22529. 1
  22530. 1
  22531. 1
  22532. 1
  22533. 1
  22534. 1
  22535. 1
  22536. 1
  22537. 1
  22538. 1
  22539. 1
  22540. 1
  22541. 1
  22542. 1
  22543. 1
  22544. 1
  22545. 1
  22546. 1
  22547. 1
  22548. 1
  22549. 1
  22550. 1
  22551. 1
  22552. 1
  22553. 1
  22554. 1
  22555. 1
  22556. 1
  22557. 1
  22558. 1
  22559. 1
  22560. 1
  22561. 1
  22562. 1
  22563. 1
  22564. 1
  22565. 1
  22566. 1
  22567. 1
  22568. 1
  22569. 1
  22570. 1
  22571. 1
  22572. 1
  22573. 1
  22574. 1
  22575. 1
  22576. 1
  22577. 1
  22578. 1
  22579. 1
  22580. 1
  22581. 1
  22582. 1
  22583. 1
  22584. 1
  22585. 1
  22586. 1
  22587.  @birddog7492  Of course they do. They are the experts. Data is what they do. How do you think they can say that it will do little to nothing to solve the problem and cost to much? I'll have to find the report but I believe the number is correct. It will only slow people who are trying to cross illegally, on average 9.2 min. Our southern border is to large to have people manning the whole thing, all the time. There are payrolls, but on average, they can only cover one portion, every 40 min. That would also only be for 37% of entries as well. Most come in by boat, plane or cross through the Canadian border. They get behind better border security. They just don't get behind the wall. It costs to much. It won't help nearly enough. Mexico was supposed to pay for it. Not our military.... And all the bills they have offered has not addressed the humanitarian crisis down there right now. Dems have put up their own bills also. They are willing to address the issue. Just not waist time and money like that, just so Trump can get re-elected by half way, keeping a campaign promise that was never a good idea in the first place. As for adding money to the budget... 27% of military households with more than 1 child are on food stamp programs. He added the money for that wall that will not work but not for them? What he has done, is lied to get re-elected, so he wont be charged when he gets out of office. What he has done, is not have Mexico pay for it, like he said he would. What he has done, is perpetrate the longest government shutdown in modern history, had government workers lining up in food pantries and losing their homes and having that all before nothing in the end, all so he could get this done, then made it all for nothing, by caving. Most drugs also come in through other means. There are actually not that many drugs that are being hoofed across the desert. That's just inefficient. He is playing you.... Like I said. You shpuld look into the numbers of all of this. Once you do that, you could see what I mean.
    1
  22588. 1
  22589. 1
  22590. 1
  22591. 1
  22592. 1
  22593. 1
  22594. 1
  22595. 1
  22596. 1
  22597. 1
  22598. 1
  22599. 1
  22600. 1
  22601. 1
  22602. 1
  22603. 1
  22604. 1
  22605. 1
  22606. 1
  22607. 1
  22608. 1
  22609. 1
  22610. 1
  22611. 1
  22612. 1
  22613. 1
  22614. 1
  22615. 1
  22616. 1
  22617. 1
  22618. 1
  22619. 1
  22620. 1
  22621. 1
  22622. 1
  22623. 1
  22624. 1
  22625. 1
  22626. 1
  22627. 1
  22628. 1
  22629. 1
  22630. 1
  22631. 1
  22632. 1
  22633. 1
  22634. 1
  22635. 1
  22636. 1
  22637. 1
  22638. 1
  22639. 1
  22640. 1
  22641. 1
  22642. 1
  22643. 1
  22644. 1
  22645. 1
  22646. 1
  22647. 1
  22648. 1
  22649. 1
  22650. 1
  22651. 1
  22652. 1
  22653. 1
  22654. 1
  22655. 1
  22656. 1
  22657. 1
  22658. 1
  22659. 1
  22660. 1
  22661. 1
  22662. 1
  22663. 1
  22664. 1
  22665. 1
  22666. 1
  22667. 1
  22668. 1
  22669. 1
  22670. 1
  22671. 1
  22672. 1
  22673. 1
  22674. 1
  22675. 1
  22676. 1
  22677. 1
  22678. 1
  22679. 1
  22680. 1
  22681. 1
  22682. 1
  22683. 1
  22684. 1
  22685. 1
  22686. 1
  22687. 1
  22688. 1
  22689. 1
  22690. 1
  22691. 1
  22692. 1
  22693. 1
  22694. 1
  22695. 1
  22696. 1
  22697. 1
  22698. 1
  22699. 1
  22700. 1
  22701. 1
  22702. 1
  22703. 1
  22704. 1
  22705. 1
  22706. 1
  22707. 1
  22708. 1
  22709. 1
  22710. 1
  22711. 1
  22712. 1
  22713. 1
  22714. 1
  22715. 1
  22716. 1
  22717. 1
  22718. 1
  22719. 1
  22720. 1
  22721. 1
  22722. 1
  22723. 1
  22724. 1
  22725. 1
  22726. 1
  22727.  @scottso9755  Sure! You can find the transcript in the links of this page. https://www-cbsnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/ukraine-transcript-read-ukraine-president-phone-call-transcript-pdf-released-today-joe-biden-crowdstrike-2019-09-25/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15697005392177&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2Fnews%2Fukraine-transcript-read-ukraine-president-phone-call-transcript-pdf-released-today-joe-biden-crowdstrike-2019-09-25%2F The phone call and money held dates are public record, as well as in 3 different whitehouse released press statments in the last 4 days. Which will say, the phone call was made July 25th. The funds where put on hold on July 23rd. They where on hold for 2 full months and only released 8 days ago. This is one of many times he described the conspiracy crime on camera in the last few day. https://youtu.be/x4Madtsq-ZM You never asked me about Biden. So you assuming my answer, is you desperately trying to set up a paper tiger. Show me the evidence on Biden and his son? Cuz I'm not blinded by party or partisan politics like you seem to be. I don't want crooked, self-serving troglodytes on my side of the aisle. I want people who were going to do their damn job. Who are going to represent me, as they were elected to do. So if you can show me the evidence, I don't no problem calling his ass out. It's called not being biased. Maybe you should try it?
    1
  22728. 1
  22729. 1
  22730. 1
  22731. 1
  22732. 1
  22733. 1
  22734. 1
  22735. 1
  22736. 1
  22737. 1
  22738. 1
  22739. 1
  22740. 1
  22741. 1
  22742. 1
  22743. 1
  22744. 1
  22745. 1
  22746. 1
  22747. 1
  22748. 1
  22749. 1
  22750. 1
  22751. 1
  22752. 1
  22753. 1
  22754. 1
  22755. 1
  22756. 1
  22757. 1
  22758. 1
  22759. 1
  22760. Jk F1 wow that is a lot to unpack there. LOL I voted for Hillary but only by default. I don't believe in wasting my vote but I wasn't still in a Bernie fan. I guess you can hear it in different ways. I just don't understand it the way that you explained it either honestly. I never use my ID when I use my debit or credit card. I never get asked to. Do you? So both ways to mean really don't make much sense. That's all I'm saying. Before I respond to the rest I want to tell you that I am being forthright and honest with you as a sign of respect and not the former. I feel like Donald Trump has more than proven that he is not in this for America he's in it for himself. I feel like he's going to continue to prove that in a variety of ways. I feel like one of the most recent was the Helsinki Summit where he threw America, the entirety of the intelligence agencies and basically everyone except for Vladimir Putin under the bus. Then when that didn't play well he held another press conference when he got home and away from bladimir Putin and read a written statement. Which is very different than him just speaking off-the-cuff. The written statement basically said everything I said in Helsinki was wrong. Then he vamp'd and took that back. North Korea... What can you say about North Korea? The last president before him to meet with that government was the first bush and what people are forgetting is the exact same thing that happened and is happening now. Back then they told the first President Bush that they were going to denuclearize and take apart all their missiles. Then they did then what they are doing now which is the exact opposite. Or is that is what all of our intelligence reports are telling us. The reason the last two presidents did not meet with this guy and his government is because they didn't want to lend him the respectability and platform for doing so to get absolutely nothing out of it. Which is exactly what we got. We let them our credibility and haven't gotten anything for it. Not to mention Trump didn't mention in the negotiations or any of the press conferences the atrocities that Kim and his family Dole out onto their own people. Not to mention in that same 72-hour time frame he also insulted two of our long-standing allies. The UK and Canada. Which was kind of a cherry on top of him lending someone like Kim Jeong Hoon our platform and credibility. I feel like America is as protected as we will and can get it. There will always be ways bad people can get in and do bad things. I feel like we need to weigh that against the freedoms that we should not be willing to give up in order to have some temporary safety. I feel like he asks us to give too much of our Humanity up under the notion of us being safe which in reality will never really happen. I do like that is a dangerous presidents. I want us to be safe. I come from a military family period five generations back. Both sides of my family have thought in every single war that we have ever fought in America or by Americans. Including my own brother who did two tours in Iraq and 1 in Afghanistan. all of which he almost didn't come back from. Right now we are citing seven different Wars in seven different countries. None of which who attacked us. I am obviously not blaming that on Trump. The last few presidents have had more to do with that then Trump could but he has ratcheted up the body count in his short time in office past anything the last you have done. I will agree with you that a lot of Americans take what we have here for granted and think it can never be taken away from us. I just think there are lots of different ways to take that away. And not all of them are at the tip of a gun. they can also be taken away by slowly taking away our freedoms and our choice. As for the national anthem... I will first say that I feel that the football players that did that protest did a good faith effort to make sure that their protest was as respectful to our Anthem our flag and our country as possible period going so far as to my defiant and ask Marines how to do it as respectfully as possible. I feel like your comment on why they were doing it was minimalizing one side and maximizing the other. It's not that they don't like police. They were protesting the way too frequent way in which police officers were shooting and killing innocent children. Doing so in what seemed to be a not so colorblind way as well. That's not something small. Especially to the parents of those children or really any parents. my son is biracial and could just as easily be put in that position and if you want to talk about freedoms we should have in this country and celebrating what this country is about... I feel like we should be able to send our children out into the world without the fear of them being gunned down by the people who are supposed to be protecting them. that should definitely be what our country should be about and I am grateful to those football players to say that as well. The only reason the right started framing it as unpatriotic is so they did not have to respond to the original protest. as for the example those football players where settings... It was peaceful and respectful but also a protest against atrocity. I feel like that's the exact example I would want my child to have. Showing people you can stand up for what's right in a peaceful and respectful manner. showing our children that you should do so despite the consequence and simply because it's the right thing to do. I dislike Trump because he is a pompous ass... I think he is a bad president because of his actions their consequences and how they affect the standing we have in this world. those are two separate things. They can come together but they don't always. I respect where you're coming from even though I think you might not be looking at the whole picture in an objective manner. then again I'm probably not either and that's why it's good to have these conversations with people you don't necessarily agree with.
    1
  22761. 1
  22762. 1
  22763. 1
  22764. 1
  22765. 1
  22766. 1
  22767. 1
  22768. 1
  22769. 1
  22770. 1
  22771. 1
  22772.  @howardhayden9202  he dodged the draft, the last time claiming he had bone spurs but then couldn't remember which foot the bone spurs were in. Have you ever had bone spurs? Do you understand how painful those are? If you did you would know which foot they were in. On Howard Stern Show he called dodging BD at Studio 54 his own personal Vietnam He called a Vietnam war hero not a hero because he was captured. He disrespected dead soldiers families. Including an incident where he put off calling a war Widow after her husband died for three weeks, until press wouldn't stop pestering him about it. When he finally called her he didn't even bother to learn the Soldier's name and he made her cry. He's never once visited a combat zone. Being the first president in 50 years not to do that in his first year in office. He passed out Veterans Day ceremonies other leaders made time to attend He is repeatedly stated that he knows more about the military issues than generals do He uses Soldier holidays to brag about his own Administration He's attempted on several occasions to use defense dollars on a parade He tried to borrow transgender service members Also Muslim service members He fantasized about shooting an army Sergeant He tried to keep military Charity donations that he said he collected for the troops for himself until he got caught. this was proven by the date on the check. He insulted veterans with PTSD by calling them weak On multiple occasions he has tried to command officials without understanding their job. Used slain soldiers to insult Barack Obama He rarely contacted minority military families He also attacked a Muslim soldier, who was killed in combat. Parents Trump made fun of a military tradition Now you have seen him disrespect the military.
    1
  22773. 1
  22774. 1
  22775. 1
  22776. 1
  22777. 1
  22778. 1
  22779. 1
  22780. 1
  22781. 1
  22782. 1
  22783.  Danny G  But should you though? 🤣 I know you can try and make a childish jome out of my user name... And it doesn't really matter... Cuz like I said, you've already discredited yourself... But should you, as a grown ass man, make a childish parody of my user name... Probably not... especially when you ended that sentence with suggesting that I'm acting like a bully. I'm not sure you know what the meaning of that word is.... 🤣 .... As far as not caring about being right or wrong and wanting to know if you are, that's great news! I can totally work with that! 😁 Lets start with that very claim. " all I'm interested in is reality and being knowledgeable. " Your words... Well... They tell a different story. " the Democratic party and the liberal media have turn the government into a complete joke and the entire world can see it except for them because they're blinded by arrogance and spite." So... What part of "reality" was that statment from? You know this about everyone else in the world and therefore you can speak for them? Next... " They quite literally made up the Russian collusion." Really? Okay, well... Then that should be very easily reference the source you got that from then, correct? I mean... You had to get that from somewhere. So it should be fairly simple to tell us where you got it from? And... " even further the Democrats were the ones colluding against Trump." Same coin different side... Show me? Once again, if it's true, shouldn't be that hard for you to prove it, correct? " If anyone actually believes it this time after what they've done they'd have to be the most gullible group of morons alive. " False dichotomy number two. Own that shows has your massive insecurities about arguing your own point. You, for some reason, find it necessary to set up a set up a situation, as to where, if they don't agree with your point of view then they're idiots. It's transparent lazy logic. " it's clear as day and they're lying and making up another farce, a political play and betraying the American people." Good news again. If its clear as day, you will have no trouble showing us proof if that claim! We will be here waiting at the edge of our seats. 😉 Then there is, the transcript being "the only piece of evidence that matters". And why is that exactly? Because it makes it easier for you to argue your point that way? Because if you pay attention to all relevant information, hit points in the opposite direction of where you're trying to go with this? But wouldn't you need all relevant information to come to the best rational and logic based opinion possible? And... " what else is new, a damn using condescension instead of facts to attempt to discredit someone." I actually agree with you that it's a waste of time for someone else to try and discredit you. You're doing that just fine by yourself. " I mean go ahead and make me look stupid with facts, and not the ones you regurgitate from liberal media," Except... You don't seam to know how simple declarative statements and problem-solving work. See when you make a claim, the onus is on you to back it up. Why? Because it doesn't make sense to ask someone to prove you wrong about something, that you have yet to prove to be true. Balls in your court. You can either pick it up or show everyone how uncoordinated and lazy you are. That's entirely up to you. 😜 ... " you people on the other hand get force-fed your b***** and regurgitate it, then only care about winning an argument, or engaging with someone to try and make them look stupid. Which good luck you're not very good at it, especially with your attempt at flaunty words while you mean while using correct grammar. " So... First... To qualify the first bit of vast you would have to actually know us, at least enough to know where we get our information. Yeah... Not so much. Next... And this is going to be quite funny for a multitude of the reasons. One being, I'm a bit lazy with my grammar on here. Some people tend to comment on it , using it to both insult and distract from their lack of information. Which is what I usually tell them. However, in your case... See... this is why I keep telling you I don't have to discredit you. You do it all by yourself. Cuz my grammar maybe bad but it's not nearly as bad as the grammar and spelling you just used to try and tell me I had bad grammar. 🤣🤣🤣👇👇👇 "You people 👉comma here👈 on the other hand 👉comma here👈 get force fed 👉force-fed not force fed👈 your b***** and regurgitate it, then only care about winning an argument, or engaging with someone to try and make them look stupid. Which 👉comma here👈 good luck 👉 period here 👈 you're not very good at it 👉 period here 👈 Especially with your attempt at flaunty 👉 so flaunty is not actually a word 👈 words while you mean while 👉 while you mean while... Do what now? 🤣 👈 using correct grammar. " Here is a better version, for you to use in the future, So you don't embarrass yourself like this anymore. "You people, on the other hand, get force-fed your bullshit and regurgitate it, then only care about winning an argument, or engaging with someone to try and make them look stupid. Which, good luck! You're not very good at it. Especially with your attempt at flaunting words while you use incorrect grammar." My gift to you! 🤣 It may not be perfect but it's certainly better than what you provide. 🤣 Ya know what I love? You guys always trying to talk about how we're so triggered but for some reason you guys are always the one playing victim. the big bad Democrats are always picking on you, aren't they.... And the last bit is what we've come to expect from you. Someone doesn't agree with your point of view, so you have to childishly insult them to make yourself feel better. Reality isn't where you live. Sorry! 😉✌
    1
  22784. 1
  22785. 1
  22786. 1
  22787. 1
  22788. 1
  22789. 1
  22790. 1
  22791. 1
  22792. 1
  22793. 1
  22794. 1
  22795. 1
  22796. 1
  22797. 1
  22798. 1
  22799. 1
  22800. 1
  22801. 1
  22802. 1
  22803.  Lou Hayhurst  What in the world are you talking about? It was less then an hour and I think... Your not getting the reference. 🤣 " Decades of criticism about Baltimore but now it's racist when a white president does it? " I find it Oh So Funny that you guys always try and find a million ways to say or imply how stupid we are, then choose to willfully be ignorant of all relevant facts, when it comes to forming your own opinions. Cuz there is ignorant and then there is willfully ignorant. Ignorant is relatively easy to fix. Willfully ignorant... On the other hand.... That's just someone choosing to be stupid, on a regular bases, because they don't want to deal with the truth. They just want their preconceived notions parotid back to them. See... Willfully ignorant ( and massively insecure ) people need to constantly reiterate that, they are the smart ones, and anyone who doesnt agree with them are, obviously, stupid. " hahaha!" "Are you "special"?" " I wonder in the future when you Google "pretty" words you at least spell them correctly." You might as well have saved yourself some future carpal tunnel, and, instead, just go get, "I have a tiny penis tattooed on your forehead". 🙃 Then, if it wasn't crystal clear already, you have to further deflect from your lack of proper context, by making a ton of baseless assumptions, about someone, you don't even know. Which is a form of desperation, that you would not have to resort to, if you had played it straight from the jump. " Wing nut" " extreme lefty" "I've managed to get the entire Democratic agenda down because it's so simple. Attack Trump!!!" " I also know that somehow I'm second place to a hitler-loving, racist, pedophile, baby murdering, warmonger, seven-year-old toddler, sexist, KKK member, white supremacist, Russian spy Antichrist." " I will accept us without any self evaluation because I know Trump is "not" a symptom of a country that has forgotten the will of its people." " These same people are "not" thinking about their own families and perhaps their savings or things like mutual funds or Roth IRAs." " They "are" always supremacist you obviously worship the devil. And the "devil" is Donald Trump." "How am I doing so far?" Why... Your doing GREAT! at giving a perfect example of someone who has no actual argument, and therefore has to set false dichotomies, name call, make baseless assumptions, dance around and incessantly babbel about nonsense, all with the hope that no-one notices that you've said little to nothing of substance. ANNNDDDDD.... Now we move on to the fabricated / twisted right wing talking points, portion of the script. After all... You guys always have to be the poor, helpless, angelic, victims. 🙄 " fabricated border crisis" " my tax dollars paying for transgender men getting abortions" " legal repercussions for using the wrong pronouns" " paying for illegal immigrants" " accepting unlimited genders" " Jussie Smollett" "The Russian collusion hoax" " keeping the Mexican cartels/ drug trade /human trafficking in business" "the end of all religion" " the acceptance of socialism " " rainbow flag" You might actually want to try and think for yourself, every once and a while. It can be quite refreshing. 🤓 SoOoOo... I'm guessing you thought if you threw enough BS to the wall... At least a few would stick? Sorry for you.😄 Deflection doesn't actually work on me. Especially not this SpaZzZMonster, ADHDesk, Thorazine resistant form of it. Cuz.... Wow! Dude! It's like I just read an HD depiction of your brain melting. 😳 You guys really can't handle people calling you out on your false narratives.... Can ya... 🤣 Little tip for the future though... If you can't make your argument, using all relevant material, if you have to ignore facts, in order to continue believing what you wanted to from the beginning, the argument is probably not worth making. 😜✌
    1
  22804. 1
  22805. 1
  22806. 1
  22807. 1
  22808. 1
  22809. 1
  22810. 1
  22811. 1
  22812. 1
  22813. 1
  22814. 1
  22815. 1
  22816. 1
  22817. 1
  22818. 1
  22819. 1
  22820. 1
  22821. 1
  22822. 1
  22823. 1
  22824. 1
  22825. 1
  22826. 1
  22827. 1
  22828. 1
  22829. 1
  22830. 1
  22831. 1
  22832. 1
  22833. 1
  22834. 1
  22835. 1
  22836. 1
  22837. 1
  22838. 1
  22839. 1
  22840. 1
  22841. 1
  22842. 1
  22843. 1
  22844. 1
  22845. 1
  22846. 1
  22847.  @bluemeanie9554  I know exactly what you're talking about and I read the entire thing. You should probably read mine to him. I have a big brother who says almost exactly the same thing. That was the situation over there. He did two tours in Afghanistan. Around the same time this guy did. Comments like the one you're referring to are common for soldiers coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan with those kinds of interactions. My brother, came back saying so many things completely out of his character. They're born out of frustration, and most of the time, PTSD. Especially after the Rules of Engagement changed over there for them. There are situations in combat where they would have to make a hard choice between shooting one civilian to save 10 or 20, which is hard to live with by itself but then not even being able to do that. They strap bombs to the civilians and get them to walk into crowded areas. If a soldier can take them out or take them down before they get there, they save lives. However, if this is on the Pakistan border, that's an entirely different situation. All of my family is military for five generations back. Both of my grandfathers fought in World War 1 and 2 and both of my grandmothers were combat nurses. My parents, my uncle my brother might cousins. All different branches of the service. I know Stolen Valor when I see it. I know what to ask and I know what they sound like. If this guy was lying about his service, he wouldn't know the very unpublished particulars of what goes on over there.
    1
  22848. 1
  22849. 1
  22850. 1
  22851. 1
  22852. 1
  22853. 1
  22854. 1
  22855. 1
  22856. 1
  22857. 1
  22858. 1
  22859. 1
  22860. 1
  22861. 1
  22862. 1
  22863. 1
  22864. 1
  22865. 1
  22866. 1
  22867. 1
  22868. 1
  22869. 1
  22870. 1
  22871. 1
  22872. 1
  22873. 1
  22874. 1
  22875. 1
  22876. 1
  22877. 1
  22878. 1
  22879. 1
  22880. 1
  22881. 1
  22882. 1
  22883. 1
  22884. 1
  22885. 1
  22886. 1
  22887. 1
  22888. 1
  22889. 1
  22890. 1
  22891. 1
  22892. 1
  22893. 1
  22894. 1
  22895. 1
  22896. 1
  22897. 1
  22898. 1
  22899. 1
  22900. 1
  22901. 1
  22902. 1
  22903. 1
  22904. 1
  22905. 1
  22906. 1
  22907. 1
  22908. 1
  22909. 1
  22910. 1
  22911. 1
  22912. 1
  22913. 1
  22914. 1
  22915. 1
  22916. 1
  22917. 1
  22918. 1
  22919. 1
  22920. 1
  22921. 1
  22922. 1
  22923. 1
  22924. 1
  22925. 1
  22926. 1
  22927. 1
  22928. 1
  22929. 1
  22930. 1
  22931. 1
  22932. 1
  22933. 1
  22934. 1
  22935. 1
  22936. 1
  22937. 1
  22938. 1
  22939. 1
  22940. 1
  22941. 1
  22942. 1
  22943. 1
  22944. 1
  22945. 1
  22946. 1
  22947. 1
  22948. 1
  22949. 1
  22950. 1
  22951. 1
  22952. 1
  22953. 1
  22954. 1
  22955. 1
  22956. 1
  22957. 1
  22958. 1
  22959. 1
  22960. 1
  22961. 1
  22962. 1
  22963. 1
  22964. 1
  22965. 1
  22966. 1
  22967. 1
  22968. 1
  22969. 1
  22970. 1
  22971. 1
  22972. 1
  22973. 1
  22974. 1
  22975. 1
  22976. 1
  22977. 1
  22978. 1
  22979. 1
  22980. 1
  22981. 1
  22982. 1
  22983. 1
  22984. 1
  22985. 1
  22986. 1
  22987. 1
  22988. 1
  22989. 1
  22990. 1
  22991. 1
  22992. 1
  22993. 1
  22994. 1
  22995. 1
  22996. 1
  22997. 1
  22998. 1
  22999. 1
  23000. 1
  23001. 1
  23002. 1
  23003. 1
  23004. 1
  23005. 1
  23006. 1
  23007. 1
  23008. 1
  23009. 1
  23010. 1
  23011. 1
  23012. 1
  23013. 1
  23014. 1
  23015. 1
  23016. 1
  23017. 1
  23018. 1
  23019. 1
  23020. 1
  23021. 1
  23022. 1
  23023. 1
  23024. 1
  23025. 1
  23026. 1
  23027. 1
  23028. 1
  23029. 1
  23030. 1
  23031. 1
  23032. 1
  23033. 1
  23034. 1
  23035. 1
  23036. 1
  23037. 1
  23038. 1
  23039. 1
  23040. 1
  23041. 1
  23042. 1
  23043. 1
  23044. 1
  23045. 1
  23046. 1
  23047. 1
  23048. 1
  23049. 1
  23050. 1
  23051. 1
  23052. 1
  23053. 1
  23054. 1
  23055. 1
  23056. 1
  23057. 1
  23058. 1
  23059. 1
  23060. 1
  23061. 1
  23062. 1
  23063. 1
  23064. 1
  23065. 1
  23066. 1
  23067. 1
  23068. 1
  23069. 1
  23070. 1
  23071. 1
  23072. 1
  23073. 1
  23074. 1
  23075. 1
  23076. 1
  23077. 1
  23078. 1
  23079. 1
  23080. 1
  23081. 1
  23082. 1
  23083. 1
  23084. 1
  23085.  @paulstedmond1765  to further elaborate, I've had five miscarriages. I have one child. All of those other children had names and were talked to before they died. 3 had to be taken out using a DNC... so, you know.. I didn't die of sepsis or form a brain bleed or a blood clot somewhere and have a stroke. The same procedure you use for a portion and that is now being outlawed all across the country. But... I'm not telling you that to have you feel bad for me. I'm telling you that to impact what I'm fixing to say. I absolutely despise women who use abortion as birth control. It's SUCH A BS REASON FOR HAVING AN ABORTION! ... But... That's okay. I can hate them. I can look at their faces and think what the Hell is wrong with you. I can tell them that. I can try and get them to change their minds... But what I have absolutely no right to do, is force them to undergo a full term pregnancy, labor and then birth AGAINST THEIR WILL! And... For what? You think of you force these women to give birth to these children they're going to somehow become magically better mothers and they're equipped to be? They're going to somehow be a financially more stable than they were before... or maybe they're going to be more mentally stable than they were? Or is your solution to have that woman go through all of that only to give up their child and live with that... while these children go into the Foster system and God knows what happens to them in there? It's super easy to be self-righteous about morals when you hold none of the consequences for those actions. I do not have the right to tell any woman what to do with their body. Nor does anyone else. We are not human incubators. That is not our primary purpose.
    1
  23086. 1
  23087. 1
  23088. 1
  23089. 1
  23090. 1
  23091. 1
  23092. 1
  23093. 1
  23094. 1
  23095. 1
  23096. 1
  23097. 1
  23098. 1
  23099. 1
  23100. 1
  23101. 1
  23102. 1
  23103. 1
  23104. 1
  23105. 1
  23106. 1
  23107. 1
  23108. 1
  23109. 1
  23110. 1
  23111. 1
  23112. 1
  23113. 1
  23114. 1
  23115. 1
  23116. 1
  23117. 1
  23118. 1
  23119. 1
  23120. 1
  23121. 1
  23122. 1
  23123. 1
  23124. 1
  23125. 1
  23126. 1
  23127. 1
  23128. 1
  23129. 1
  23130. 1
  23131. 1
  23132. 1
  23133. 1
  23134.  William Campbell   @William Campbell  List of your "not insults" just on this thread. Which, ironically and mostly consist of you making massive assumptions about people you don't know, and then calling them facts... As if you say it enough, it will magically become true.... "👉Most people👈 can't think for themselves and need to be told what to do" That is a stupidly large term, you could not come close to proving... Which makes it an insult and not a fact. " go back under your Bridge" Now this comment was made in response to me telling you, that you where TFG, after you suggested that America should be a dictatorship. " I don't mind helping out people who are weak and scared." Cuz, you must be "weak and scared" If you listen to medical professionals and science about the largest worldwide pandemic we've had in over a hundred years? You are either mistaking common sense with weakness and fear... Or you're trying to insult her. Neither make you look good. " you have lost your mind." I'm curious... How do you know that? Because I don't agree with you? Are you so insecure about your own argument that you have to insult anybody who doesn't agree with it? Are you a doctor? So... How would you go about proving that "fact"? " I hope you're not married cuz if so I feel sorry for your husband having to come home to a close-minded argument everyday" you're excuse for that was "concern for another human being"... a person you have no clue whether they exist or not. So that certainly cannot be called a fact. Just a childish insult. " you're cute when you're mad probably the only time you are" Now... Why would you bring a superficial appearance into this? How does that support your argument in any way? What does that have to do with the damn thing other than you trying to be a smart-ass? Not fact... especially since you were doing what you said you don't do, which is make an assumption. This time about my mood. Hypocrisy So... Be my guest... Go and prove each one of those are facts and not childish insults? We will be waiting. 😁✌
    1
  23135. 1
  23136. 1
  23137. 1
  23138. 1
  23139. 1
  23140. 1
  23141. 1
  23142. 1
  23143. 1
  23144. 1
  23145. 1
  23146.  William Campbell  THE LIST OF EVIDENCE OF HIS INSULTS TOWARDS PEOPLE, IN WORD FOR WORD QUOTES, STRAIGHT FROM HIM, THAT HE IS TRYING TO IGNORE BECAUSE HE MADE THE MISTAKE OF CALLING THEM FACTS AND NOW HE CAN NOT PROVE IT! 👇😁 "List of your "not insults" just on this thread. Which, ironically and mostly consist of you making massive assumptions about people you don't know, and then calling them facts... As if you say it enough, it will magically become true.... "👉Most people👈 can't think for themselves and need to be told what to do" That is a stupidly large term, you could not come close to proving... Which makes it an insult and not a fact. " go back under your Bridge" Now this comment was made in response to me telling you, that you where TFG, after you suggested that America should be a dictatorship. " I don't mind helping out people who are weak and scared." Cuz, you must be "weak and scared" If you listen to medical professionals and science about the largest worldwide pandemic we've had in over a hundred years? You are either mistaking common sense with weakness and fear... Or you're trying to insult her. Neither make you look good. " you have lost your mind." I'm curious... How do you know that? Because I don't agree with you? Are you so insecure about your own argument that you have to insult anybody who doesn't agree with it? Are you a doctor? So... How would you go about proving that "fact"? " I hope you're not married cuz if so I feel sorry for your husband having to come home to a close-minded argument everyday" you're excuse for that was "concern for another human being"... a person you have no clue whether they exist or not. So that certainly cannot be called a fact. Just a childish insult. " you're cute when you're mad probably the only time you are" Now... Why would you bring a superficial appearance into this? How does that support your argument in any way? What does that have to do with the damn thing other than you trying to be a smart-ass? Not fact... especially since you were doing what you said you don't do, which is make an assumption. This time about my mood. Hypocrisy So... Be my guest... Go and prove each one of those are facts and not childish insults? We will be waiting. 😁✌"
    1
  23147. 1
  23148. 1
  23149. 1
  23150. 1
  23151. 1
  23152. 1
  23153. 1
  23154. 1
  23155. 1
  23156. 1
  23157. 1
  23158. 1
  23159. 1
  23160. 1
  23161. 1
  23162. 1
  23163. 1
  23164. 1
  23165. 1
  23166. 1
  23167. 1
  23168. 1
  23169. 1
  23170. 1
  23171. 1
  23172. 1
  23173. 1
  23174. 1
  23175. 1
  23176. 1
  23177. 1
  23178. 1
  23179. 1
  23180. 1
  23181. 1
  23182. 1
  23183. 1
  23184. 1
  23185. 1
  23186. 1
  23187. 1
  23188. 1
  23189. 1
  23190. 1
  23191. 1
  23192. 1
  23193. 1
  23194. 1
  23195. 1
  23196. 1
  23197. 1
  23198. 1
  23199. 1
  23200. 1
  23201. 1
  23202. 1
  23203. 1
  23204. 1
  23205. 1
  23206. 1
  23207. 1
  23208. 1
  23209. 1
  23210. 1
  23211. 1
  23212. 1
  23213. 1
  23214. 1
  23215. 1
  23216. 1
  23217. 1
  23218. 1
  23219. 1
  23220. 1
  23221. 1
  23222. 1
  23223. 1
  23224. 1
  23225. 1
  23226. 1
  23227. 1
  23228. 1
  23229. 1
  23230. 1
  23231. 1
  23232. 1
  23233. 1
  23234. 1
  23235. 1
  23236. 1
  23237. 1
  23238. 1
  23239. 1
  23240. 1
  23241. 1
  23242. 1
  23243. 1
  23244. 1
  23245. 1
  23246. 1
  23247. 1
  23248. 1
  23249. 1
  23250. 1
  23251. 1
  23252. 1
  23253. 1
  23254. 1
  23255. 1
  23256. 1
  23257. 1
  23258. 1
  23259. 1
  23260. 1
  23261. 1
  23262. 1
  23263. 1
  23264. 1
  23265. 1
  23266. 1
  23267. 1
  23268. 1
  23269. 1
  23270. 1
  23271. 1
  23272. 1
  23273. 1
  23274. 1
  23275. 1
  23276. 1
  23277. 1
  23278. 1
  23279. 1
  23280. 1
  23281. 1
  23282. 1
  23283. 1
  23284. 1
  23285. 1
  23286. 1
  23287. 1
  23288. 1
  23289. 1
  23290. 1
  23291. 1
  23292. 1
  23293. 1
  23294. 1
  23295. 1
  23296. 1
  23297. 1
  23298. 1
  23299. 1
  23300. 1
  23301. 1
  23302. 1
  23303. 1
  23304. 1
  23305. 1
  23306. 1
  23307. 1
  23308. 1
  23309. 1
  23310. 1
  23311. 1
  23312. 1
  23313. 1
  23314. 1
  23315. 1
  23316. 1
  23317. 1
  23318. 1
  23319. 1
  23320. 1
  23321. 1
  23322. 1
  23323. 1
  23324. 1
  23325. 1
  23326. 1
  23327. 1
  23328. 1
  23329. 1
  23330. 1
  23331. 1
  23332. 1
  23333. 1
  23334. 1
  23335. 1
  23336. 1
  23337. 1
  23338. 1
  23339. 1
  23340. 1
  23341. 1
  23342. 1
  23343. 1
  23344. 1
  23345. 1
  23346. 1
  23347. 1
  23348. 1
  23349. 1
  23350. 1
  23351. 1
  23352. 1
  23353. 1
  23354. 1
  23355. 1
  23356. 1
  23357. 1
  23358. 1
  23359. 1
  23360. 1
  23361. 1
  23362. 1
  23363. 1
  23364. 1
  23365. 1
  23366. 1
  23367. 1
  23368. 1
  23369. 1
  23370. 1
  23371. 1
  23372. 1
  23373. 1
  23374. 1
  23375. 1
  23376. 1
  23377. 1
  23378. 1
  23379. 1
  23380. 1
  23381. 1
  23382. 1
  23383. 1
  23384. 1
  23385. 1
  23386. 1
  23387. 1
  23388. 1
  23389. 1
  23390. 1
  23391. 1
  23392. 1
  23393. 1
  23394. 1
  23395. 1
  23396. 1
  23397. 1
  23398. 1
  23399. 1
  23400. 1
  23401. 1
  23402. 1
  23403. 1
  23404. 1
  23405. 1
  23406. 1
  23407. 1
  23408. 1
  23409. 1
  23410. 1
  23411. 1
  23412. 1
  23413. 1
  23414. 1
  23415. 1
  23416. 1
  23417. 1
  23418. 1
  23419. 1
  23420. 1
  23421. 1
  23422. 1
  23423. 1
  23424. 1
  23425. 1
  23426. 1
  23427. 1
  23428. 1
  23429. 1
  23430. 1
  23431. 1
  23432. 1
  23433. 1
  23434. 1
  23435. 1
  23436. 1
  23437. 1
  23438. 1
  23439. 1
  23440. 1
  23441. 1
  23442. 1
  23443. 1
  23444. 1
  23445. 1
  23446. 1
  23447. 1
  23448. 1
  23449. 1
  23450. 1
  23451. 1
  23452. 1
  23453. 1
  23454. 1
  23455. 1
  23456. 1
  23457. 1
  23458. 1
  23459. 1
  23460. 1
  23461. 1
  23462. 1
  23463. 1
  23464. 1
  23465. 1
  23466. 1
  23467. 1
  23468. 1
  23469. 1
  23470. 1
  23471. 1
  23472. 1
  23473. 1
  23474. 1
  23475. 1
  23476.  @augustsaintmichael3634  I would say you are disregarding those better parts of yourself in that moment, yes! We have seen him disrespect out troops and their families on camera. Lie countless times on camera and then lie about telling that lie the next day, on camera. We've seen him take the word of dictators over his own intelligence agencies, on camera. We've seen him run away from numerous fact-based questions on camera. We've seen him promise life saving aid to Americans (during the pandemic and before) and not deliver... Then blame the people who needed it. We've seen him put kids in cages and lose them in the system. We've seen him attack war hero's for their service. We've seen him alienate long-term allies and buddy up to dictators. We've seen him constantly attack the freedom of the press, even going so far as to threaten to laws written to silence them. We've seen him begin a trade war, that has cost Americans a metric ton more money then the deal to end it, would ever recover. And more recent. ... We've seen him try to Blackmail our state's into doing what he wants them to do using taxpayer dollars, on camera. And that is just very few of countless examples. Disregarding all of that and a whole lot more is simply willful ignorance. Disregarding that lack of humanity Trump shows on a regular basis and putting yours aside to help him continue to be more inhumane is simply a lack of comparison. There are about a million and a half different shades of grey. The truth is more than just the gray. though.
    1
  23477. 1
  23478. 1
  23479. 1
  23480. 1
  23481. 1
  23482. 1
  23483. 1
  23484. 1
  23485. 1
  23486. 1
  23487. 1
  23488. 1
  23489. 1
  23490. 1
  23491. 1
  23492. 1
  23493. 1
  23494. 1
  23495. 1
  23496. 1
  23497. 1
  23498. 1
  23499. 1
  23500. 1
  23501. 1
  23502. 1
  23503. 1
  23504. 1
  23505. 1
  23506. 1
  23507. 1
  23508. 1
  23509. 1
  23510. 1
  23511. 1
  23512. 1
  23513. 1
  23514. 1
  23515. 1
  23516. 1
  23517. 1
  23518. 1
  23519. 1
  23520. 1
  23521. 1
  23522. 1
  23523. 1
  23524. 1
  23525. 1
  23526. 1
  23527. 1
  23528. 1
  23529. 1
  23530. 1
  23531. 1
  23532. 1
  23533. 1
  23534. 1
  23535. 1
  23536. 1
  23537. 1
  23538. 1
  23539. 1
  23540. 1
  23541. 1
  23542. 1
  23543. 1
  23544. 1
  23545. 1
  23546. 1
  23547. 1
  23548. 1
  23549. 1
  23550. 1
  23551. 1
  23552. 1
  23553. 1
  23554. 1
  23555. 1
  23556. 1
  23557. 1
  23558. 1
  23559. 1
  23560. 1
  23561. 1
  23562. 1
  23563. 1
  23564. 1
  23565. 1
  23566. 1
  23567. 1
  23568. 1
  23569. 1
  23570. 1
  23571. 1
  23572. 1
  23573. 1
  23574. 1
  23575. 1
  23576. 1
  23577. 1
  23578. 1
  23579. 1
  23580. 1
  23581. 1
  23582. 1
  23583. 1
  23584. 1
  23585. 1
  23586. 1
  23587. 1
  23588. 1
  23589. 1
  23590. 1
  23591. 1
  23592. 1
  23593. 1
  23594. 1
  23595. 1
  23596. 1
  23597. 1
  23598. 1
  23599. 1
  23600. 1
  23601. 1
  23602. 1
  23603. 1
  23604. 1
  23605. 1
  23606. 1
  23607. 1
  23608. 1
  23609. 1
  23610. 1
  23611. 1
  23612. 1
  23613. 1
  23614. 1
  23615. 1
  23616. 1
  23617. 1
  23618. 1
  23619. 1
  23620. 1
  23621. 1
  23622. 1
  23623. 1
  23624. 1
  23625. 1
  23626. 1
  23627. 1
  23628. 1
  23629. 1
  23630. 1
  23631. 1
  23632. 1
  23633. 1
  23634. 1
  23635. 1
  23636. 1
  23637. 1
  23638. 1
  23639. 1
  23640. 1
  23641. 1
  23642. 1
  23643. 1
  23644. 1
  23645. 1
  23646. 1
  23647. 1
  23648. 1
  23649. 1
  23650. 1
  23651. 1
  23652. 1
  23653. 1
  23654. 1
  23655. 1
  23656. 1
  23657. 1
  23658. 1
  23659. 1
  23660. 1
  23661. 1
  23662. 1
  23663. 1
  23664. 1
  23665. 1
  23666. 1
  23667. 1
  23668. 1
  23669. 1
  23670.  @kj3n569  the Trump Administration was supposed to have stockpiles of the second dose of the covid-19 vaccine. They made statements to this several times. When it came time to release it oh, they kept making excuses until they had to leave the White House. What we found out after that was that they didn't have stockpiles of it. That's why they weren't releasing it. There are literal tons of examples allies deflections and outright negligence of the Trump Administration during this pandemic. So, excuse me if I find it hilariously ignorant of you just think just because the news reported something it can't be true. On day one of the pandemic, the Trump administration had a 33-page pandemic containment plan, put together by experts and left to the Trump Administration to use in the event of one. The reason Donald Trump never touched it was because the Obama Administration left it for him. President Obama had to put together by expert after the H1 N1 crisis. If you'd like to see it I can show you where you can find a copy. During several of the peaks of the pandemic Donald Trump put out there several supposed cures. By put out there oh, I mean he went into the White House briefing room and announced that these things worked. While people were dying and desperate. Yet he didn't use any of those when he got sick. Despite the CDC and who giving multiple warnings and guidelines about social distancing, Donald Trump felt like it was more important to throw big celebrations and Rally's then it was to keep the American people who support him safe. Despite a major outbreak that only happening in the White House but with in the Secret Service. The people who actually protect him for a living. He didn't give a damn about their lives. When the pandemic finally got in full swing in this country he literally left every single state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives because he wanted to defund the medical equipment stockpile program. Well Americans were dying he kept trying to convince everyone that the severity of the covid-19 pandemic itself was a democratic hoax. Multiple times at rallies and on camera stating that the day after the election the pandemic would magically go away. There's about 20 or 30 more major screw-ups on his part for this pandemic that I could list off the top of my head and that you have decided to ignore because it doesn't fit your narrative.
    1
  23671. 1
  23672. 1
  23673. 1
  23674. 1
  23675. 1
  23676. 1
  23677. 1
  23678. 1
  23679. 1
  23680. 1
  23681. 1
  23682. 1
  23683. 1
  23684. 1
  23685. 1
  23686. 1
  23687. 1
  23688. 1
  23689. 1
  23690. 1
  23691. 1
  23692. 1
  23693. 1
  23694. 1
  23695. 1
  23696. 1
  23697. 1
  23698. 1
  23699. 1
  23700. 1
  23701. 1
  23702. 1
  23703. 1
  23704. 1
  23705. 1
  23706. 1
  23707. 1
  23708. 1
  23709. 1
  23710. 1
  23711. 1
  23712. 1
  23713. 1
  23714. 1
  23715. 1
  23716. 1
  23717. 1
  23718. 1
  23719. 1
  23720. 1
  23721. 1
  23722. 1
  23723. 1
  23724. 1
  23725. 1
  23726. 1
  23727. 1
  23728. 1
  23729. 1
  23730. 1
  23731. 1
  23732. 1
  23733. 1
  23734. 1
  23735. 1
  23736. 1
  23737. 1
  23738. 1
  23739. 1
  23740. 1
  23741. 1
  23742. 1
  23743. 1
  23744. 1
  23745. 1
  23746. 1
  23747. 1
  23748. 1
  23749. 1
  23750. 1
  23751. 1
  23752. 1
  23753. 1
  23754. 1
  23755. 1
  23756. 1
  23757. 1
  23758. 1
  23759. 1
  23760. 1
  23761. 1
  23762.  AlphaMax Male  Now... As I have stated, I believe you are lying. About several things, but in particular, your educational background. I believe you are doing so, in order to try and give your words, more weight... Hoping that would be enough to not have to provide evidence of your other claims. This is why. 👇 1. You have randomly added to and contradicted yourself on your educational background. Claiming, at first, only claiming to have a "PhD 👉program👈 (for some strange reason) with a graduate degree in math and physics". Also claiming that one "does not need" to know " about the mechanism" for analyzing data. Essentially, claiming that one does not need to know the method of arrival of said data, in order to understand the data. However that is such basic science, they teach that in high school biology classes. So how do you have a PhD and Grad degree and not know that? You then claim to be a "scientist" and "expert on the history of science", much later. 2. You have made several claims that do not align with your claims of higher education in any of the fields you claim to have that education in. You attempt to use a weighted coin experiment to equate it with a complicated and ever changing virus strain. Something you should have known, didn't come close to a good comparison, if you understood what you claim to, due to your "educational background". You claim to only be arguing debate ability, later on. Yet you began your comments on this thread with definitive statements. Declaring the virus and response was "overblown". And, as I mentioned above, claiming that one does not need to understand the method, in order to understand the data. You tried to give an example of all the "state's following almost opposite approaches all ending up with the same data". Generalizing and leaving out massive amounts of data and timeline considerations, someone who is a scientist and expert in the history of science, would have reflexively considered. You have claimed that a mathematics PhD "Trump's all other specialists degrees". When that is, not at all, how that works. It wouldn't even be something you would make some sort of context out of, due to the vast differences in educational branches. You have also made several claims and, when asked to provide proof of these claims, you'll be either ignored the request or attempted to imply that I was somehow in the wrong for asking for this proof. Not very scientific. I'm sure there are more but I have ran out of time for the moment. However, my many examples are plenty. That would be me presenting evidence of why I have come to the conclusion that you are lying about your educational background.
    1
  23763. 1
  23764. 1
  23765. 1
  23766. 1
  23767. 1
  23768. 1
  23769. 1
  23770. 1
  23771. 1
  23772. 1
  23773. 1
  23774. 1
  23775. 1
  23776. 1
  23777. 1
  23778. 1
  23779. 1
  23780. 1
  23781. 1
  23782. 1
  23783. 1
  23784. 1
  23785. 1
  23786. 1
  23787. 1
  23788. 1
  23789. 1
  23790. 1
  23791. 1
  23792. 1
  23793. 1
  23794. 1
  23795. 1
  23796. 1
  23797. 1
  23798. 1
  23799. 1
  23800. 1
  23801. 1
  23802. 1
  23803. 1
  23804. 1
  23805. 1
  23806. 1
  23807. 1
  23808. 1
  23809. 1
  23810. 1
  23811. 1
  23812. 1
  23813. 1
  23814. 1
  23815. 1
  23816. 1
  23817. 1
  23818. 1
  23819. 1
  23820. 1
  23821. 1
  23822. 1
  23823. 1
  23824. 1
  23825. 1
  23826. 1
  23827. 1
  23828. 1
  23829. 1
  23830. 1
  23831. 1
  23832. 1
  23833. 1
  23834. 1
  23835. 1
  23836. 1
  23837. 1
  23838. 1
  23839. 1
  23840. 1
  23841. 1
  23842. 1
  23843. 1
  23844. 1
  23845. 1
  23846. 1
  23847. 1
  23848. 1
  23849. 1
  23850. 1
  23851. 1
  23852. 1
  23853. 1
  23854. 1
  23855. 1
  23856. 1
  23857. 1
  23858. 1
  23859. 1
  23860. 1
  23861. 1
  23862. 1
  23863. 1
  23864. 1
  23865. 1
  23866. 1
  23867. 1
  23868. 1
  23869.  @you457wx7  Did you skip the whole first part? Saying things over and over again.. Is not going to make the law go away. Irregardless of what he might have heard, he obviously did not have proof. The only way you even come close to having a point, is if you disreguard a huge hunk of relivant info. *The held money *Him being his political opponent *The convenient timing of him asking only when fighting was his political opponent and not when the investigation was actually opened in the first place *Him lying about talking about Biden on the phone call, on camera *Trump putting the call in a storage place that it would not have normally gone into, and did not qualify for, in an attempt to keep it secret *Trump and his administration attempting to keep the Whistleblower report away from Congress, even going so far as to try and claim executive privilege *Then only finally releasing the information after his own party turned against him *Trumps attempt to keep witnesses from testifying to congress, that later gave incriminating testimony *Attempting to keep evidentiary documents from Congress... Text message conversations Just a few off the top of my head. .... You ignoring all of that, does not show his innocent. It just shows your confirmation bias. Legal experts have suggested that he has potentially broken at least 4 laws. There are rules you have to follow when there is an investigation. Like... You can't break laws while attemting to "investigate". That is where things lile probable cause comes from. Also... Conflict of intreast. Also, Biden... Not the front runner. Hopefully... Not ever going to be... That still doesn't excuse Trumps actions. Not sure why you are trying to convince me that Biden is shady.... 1... I'm not his fan... 2... That does not give Trump the right to disreguard the law. Even if you are an actual investigater, you have laws and regulation you have to follow. Which is why I pointed out the 2 different ways he could of had the investigation, without the law breaking.
    1
  23870. 1
  23871. 1
  23872.  @you457wx7  Actually... Not so much... the reason I said that construction jobs were done on a local level... Is because they are. Can President Obama's stimulus package give us an infusion of Cold Hard Cash do our local economies oh, yes. Can he then Force local government to spend it on things like infrastructure? Nope... It should have... It should have created those jobs... but this is a democracy. It's not a dictatorship. The area I live in is actually a pretty good example of this. I live around the Shreveport Louisiana area. It has literally been almost 20 years since Road repair and things like water Pipelines had been maintained or replaced. It got so bad that the federal government had to come in and force our local government to repair the water pipelines just this last year, because our water was starting to look like Flint Michigan... And one of our main bridges was about to collapse.... So basically what happened was the federal government gave Shreveport and Bossier Louisiana an influx of money emergency and then sent people down from the federal government to make sure that money went to water pipelines and road construction. ( made the news a few times, if ya wanna look it up ) Which is why I have been dodging Construction everywhere all damn near. One of my jobs is I'm a Rideshare driver.... But it took them 20 years to do that. Because we live in a democracy and a lot of things run off of local government. So unless things get really bad, our federal government's not going to come in and try and tell her local government what the hell to do. In my area the reason it was getting really bad was because our elected leaders we're finding a variety of different ways to pocket the money. Not a big shocker over here. Point being... You are trying to Blame President Obama for respecting our democracy. Except, he can bring a fish to water, but you can't make it drink. Another good example of this is Obamacare. It allowed to shoot a large Fusion of cash into things like Medicaid and Medicare. In order to get this cash and update our system and put it to work for the people, local government would have had to of accepted it. Except stupid ass Republican petty ass holes all over the country thought it was more important to give President Obama the middle finger ( because they lost the Obamacare vote ) then it was to help their people and they would not accept the damn money. That also happened with my local government. sorry, that one was a little extra sassy. That just pisses me off. Lol Now if you want to talk about jobs that President Obama was wrong about, you can talk about manufacturing jobs. He said on multiple occasions that manufacturing jobs weren't coming back. Trump got that done to a certain extent.... and when I say certain extent, I mean to an extent that definitely matter to a whole lot of people. That wasn't me trying to take anything away from what he did. Just, there were a lot of other factors. But... Overall job growth has been on a steady decline since he took office. The trend that Obama Started With low unemployment and more job growth has slowed on the unemployment and started to reverse on the job growth. Now it's not a whole bunch on the unemployment, which is why you have so many Republicans siting unemployment numbers and completely ignoring the job growth number.... but just like giving Trump the credit for the manufacturing jobs, you have to give President Obama the credit for beginning the overall job Trend. Which began and continued, steadily from the moment that stimulus package that you were talking about went through.
    1
  23873. 1
  23874. 1
  23875.  @you457wx7  And you forgot to respond to this earlier...👇 "Did you skip the whole first part? Saying things over and over again.. Is not going to make the law go away. Irregardless of what he might have heard, he obviously did not have proof. The only way you even come close to having a point, is if you disreguard a huge hunk of relivant info. *The held money *Him being his political opponent *The convenient timing of him asking only when fighting was his political opponent and not when the investigation was actually opened in the first place *Him lying about talking about Biden on the phone call, on camera *Trump putting the call in a storage place that it would not have normally gone into, and did not qualify for, in an attempt to keep it secret *Trump and his administration attempting to keep the Whistleblower report away from Congress, even going so far as to try and claim executive privilege *Then only finally releasing the information after his own party turned against him *Trumps attempt to keep witnesses from testifying to congress, that later gave incriminating testimony *Attempting to keep evidentiary documents from Congress... Text message conversations Just a few off the top of my head. .... You ignoring all of that, does not show his innocent. It just shows your confirmation bias. Legal experts have suggested that he has potentially broken at least 4 laws. There are rules you have to follow when there is an investigation. Like... You can't break laws while attemting to "investigate". That is where things lile probable cause comes from. Also... Conflict of intreast. Also, Biden... Not the front runner. Hopefully... Not ever going to be... That still doesn't excuse Trumps actions. Not sure why you are trying to convince me that Biden is shady.... 1... I'm not his fan... 2... That does not give Trump the right to disreguard the law. Even if you are an actual investigater, you have laws and regulation you have to follow. Which is why I pointed out the 2 different ways he could of had the investigation, without the law breaking."
    1
  23876. 1
  23877.  @you457wx7  Gee! I wonder why... Could it be because they are on the same team... they didn't mind screwing over Obama's numbers. They weren't on his side. They do mind screwing over Trump's numbers. Especially when they are vocally supporting Trump. You are skipping past the point though. The point is, you are trying to blame President Obama for local government. Which is not how the system works. Obama did a lot for college degrees jobs and health care. Which all by the way helped Joe Blow. You have a tendency to ignore any evidence that does not fit your already decided conclusion. The trend for jobs in general, for unemployment and for job growth, began at the beginning a President Obama's term and proceeded throughout his term and then carried on into Trump's term. You all are trying to credit Trump for the entirety of a two-man relay race. That doesn't have the evidence to back it up. Not only did that job Trend begin with Obama and continue through both of his terms but both of those numbers have began and have been steadily declining in Trump's term. So yes there are more construction jobs, which aren't Obama's fault. And yes there are more manufacturing jobs. Like he was wrong about, but the overall job Trends began with Obama and have started declining since Trump became president. As far as joblo holding water for healthcare, you need to go back and look at the history of how Obamacare came about. What Obama originally wanted and what he had to settle for because he had an obstructionist Congress to deal with. You keep focusing on manufacturing and construction jobs and ignoring the overall job growth. The overall unemployment decline. The trend that is very clear once you look at all the data. And are you suggesting at the end there that people who voted for someone other than Trump weren't hard-working? Also, Trump was elected by the Electoral College. He lost the popular vote. Which some people call the people's vote.
    1
  23878. 1
  23879.  @you457wx7  and you forgot this again... For the third time now... It's almost like you don't wamt to have to address the subject for some reason. 😉✌ 👇 "Did you skip the whole first part? Saying things over and over again.. Is not going to make the law go away. Irregardless of what he might have heard, he obviously did not have proof. The only way you even come close to having a point, is if you disreguard a huge hunk of relivant info. *The held money *Him being his political opponent *The convenient timing of him asking only when fighting was his political opponent and not when the investigation was actually opened in the first place *Him lying about talking about Biden on the phone call, on camera *Trump putting the call in a storage place that it would not have normally gone into, and did not qualify for, in an attempt to keep it secret *Trump and his administration attempting to keep the Whistleblower report away from Congress, even going so far as to try and claim executive privilege *Then only finally releasing the information after his own party turned against him *Trumps attempt to keep witnesses from testifying to congress, that later gave incriminating testimony *Attempting to keep evidentiary documents from Congress... Text message conversations Just a few off the top of my head. .... You ignoring all of that, does not show his innocent. It just shows your confirmation bias. Legal experts have suggested that he has potentially broken at least 4 laws. There are rules you have to follow when there is an investigation. Like... You can't break laws while attemting to "investigate". That is where things lile probable cause comes from. Also... Conflict of intreast. Also, Biden... Not the front runner. Hopefully... Not ever going to be... That still doesn't excuse Trumps actions. Not sure why you are trying to convince me that Biden is shady.... 1... I'm not his fan... 2... That does not give Trump the right to disreguard the law. Even if you are an actual investigater, you have laws and regulation you have to follow. Which is why I pointed out the 2 different ways he could of had the investigation, without the law breaking."
    1
  23880. 1
  23881.  @you457wx7  ok... No... this is not how this is going to work. I have addressed every single thing that you have brought up. I have done so in detail. I will also do so for all the new stuff in these new comments but not until you give me some reciprocation. I don't make excuses or blanket statments to wash try and dismiss your points... You don't to do so with me. This is the 4th time I am posting this. You can respond AND THEN we can move on.... Or this can turn into a whole different kind of interaction. Your choice. 👇 "Did you skip the whole first part? Saying things over and over again.. Is not going to make the law go away. Irregardless of what he might have heard, he obviously did not have proof. The only way you even come close to having a point, is if you disreguard a huge hunk of relivant info. *The held money *Him being his political opponent *The convenient timing of him asking only when fighting was his political opponent and not when the investigation was actually opened in the first place *Him lying about talking about Biden on the phone call, on camera *Trump putting the call in a storage place that it would not have normally gone into, and did not qualify for, in an attempt to keep it secret *Trump and his administration attempting to keep the Whistleblower report away from Congress, even going so far as to try and claim executive privilege *Then only finally releasing the information after his own party turned against him *Trumps attempt to keep witnesses from testifying to congress, that later gave incriminating testimony *Attempting to keep evidentiary documents from Congress... Text message conversations Just a few off the top of my head. .... You ignoring all of that, does not show his innocent. It just shows your confirmation bias. Legal experts have suggested that he has potentially broken at least 4 laws. There are rules you have to follow when there is an investigation. Like... You can't break laws while attemting to "investigate". That is where things lile probable cause comes from. Also... Conflict of intreast. Also, Biden... Not the front runner. Hopefully... Not ever going to be... That still doesn't excuse Trumps actions. Not sure why you are trying to convince me that Biden is shady.... 1... I'm not his fan... 2... That does not give Trump the right to disreguard the law. Even if you are an actual investigater, you have laws and regulation you have to follow. Which is why I pointed out the 2 different ways he could of had the investigation, without the law breaking."
    1
  23882. 1
  23883.  @you457wx7  😁 Here! Let me try again.. See if you can see the info this time.... I mean... Unless there is some reason you are trying to ignore the info intentionally, because you can't defend the premise, when addressing that info? That wouldn't be the case, would it? Cuz, that would be kinda silly, considering it was about the original premise and all... 🤔👇 "Did you skip the whole first part? Saying things over and over again.. Is not going to make the law go away. Irregardless of what he might have heard, he obviously did not have proof. The only way you even come close to having a point, is if you disreguard a huge hunk of relivant info. *The held money *Him being his political opponent *The convenient timing of him asking only when fighting was his political opponent and not when the investigation was actually opened in the first place *Him lying about talking about Biden on the phone call, on camera *Trump putting the call in a storage place that it would not have normally gone into, and did not qualify for, in an attempt to keep it secret *Trump and his administration attempting to keep the Whistleblower report away from Congress, even going so far as to try and claim executive privilege *Then only finally releasing the information after his own party turned against him *Trumps attempt to keep witnesses from testifying to congress, that later gave incriminating testimony *Attempting to keep evidentiary documents from Congress... Text message conversations Just a few off the top of my head. .... You ignoring all of that, does not show his innocent. It just shows your confirmation bias. Legal experts have suggested that he has potentially broken at least 4 laws. There are rules you have to follow when there is an investigation. Like... You can't break laws while attemting to "investigate". That is where things lile probable cause comes from. Also... Conflict of intreast. Also, Biden... Not the front runner. Hopefully... Not ever going to be... That still doesn't excuse Trumps actions. Not sure why you are trying to convince me that Biden is shady.... 1... I'm not his fan... 2... That does not give Trump the right to disreguard the law. Even if you are an actual investigater, you have laws and regulation you have to follow. Which is why I pointed out the 2 different ways he could of had the investigation, without the law breaking."
    1
  23884.  @you457wx7  Gee! I still can't see any of it! 😁 Maybe we are both having the same problem now?😁 Cuz, it seams like you haven't been able to see this one of mine, sense the beginning! 👇👇 "Did you skip the whole first part? Saying things over and over again.. Is not going to make the law go away. Irregardless of what he might have heard, he obviously did not have proof. The only way you even come close to having a point, is if you disreguard a huge hunk of relivant info. *The held money *Him being his political opponent *The convenient timing of him asking only when fighting was his political opponent and not when the investigation was actually opened in the first place *Him lying about talking about Biden on the phone call, on camera *Trump putting the call in a storage place that it would not have normally gone into, and did not qualify for, in an attempt to keep it secret *Trump and his administration attempting to keep the Whistleblower report away from Congress, even going so far as to try and claim executive privilege *Then only finally releasing the information after his own party turned against him *Trumps attempt to keep witnesses from testifying to congress, that later gave incriminating testimony *Attempting to keep evidentiary documents from Congress... Text message conversations Just a few off the top of my head. .... You ignoring all of that, does not show his innocent. It just shows your confirmation bias. Legal experts have suggested that he has potentially broken at least 4 laws. There are rules you have to follow when there is an investigation. Like... You can't break laws while attemting to "investigate". That is where things lile probable cause comes from. Also... Conflict of intreast. Also, Biden... Not the front runner. Hopefully... Not ever going to be... That still doesn't excuse Trumps actions. Not sure why you are trying to convince me that Biden is shady.... 1... I'm not his fan... 2... That does not give Trump the right to disreguard the law. Even if you are an actual investigater, you have laws and regulation you have to follow. Which is why I pointed out the 2 different ways he could of had the investigation, without the law breaking."
    1
  23885. 1
  23886. 1
  23887. 1
  23888. 1
  23889. 1
  23890. 1
  23891. 1
  23892. 1
  23893. 1
  23894. 1
  23895. 1
  23896. 1
  23897. 1
  23898. 1
  23899. 1
  23900. 1
  23901. 1
  23902. 1
  23903. 1
  23904. 1
  23905. 1
  23906. 1
  23907. 1
  23908. 1
  23909. 1
  23910. 1
  23911. 1
  23912. 1
  23913. 1
  23914. 1
  23915. 1
  23916. 1
  23917. 1
  23918. 1
  23919. 1
  23920. 1
  23921. 1
  23922. 1
  23923. 1
  23924. 1
  23925. 1
  23926. 1
  23927. 1
  23928. 1
  23929. 1
  23930. 1
  23931. 1
  23932. 1
  23933. 1
  23934. 1
  23935. 1
  23936. 1
  23937. 1
  23938. 1
  23939. 1
  23940. 1
  23941. 1
  23942. 1
  23943. 1
  23944. 1
  23945. 1
  23946. 1
  23947. 1
  23948. 1
  23949. 1
  23950. 1
  23951. 1
  23952. 1
  23953. 1
  23954. 1
  23955. 1
  23956. 1
  23957. 1
  23958. 1
  23959. 1
  23960. 1
  23961. 1
  23962. 1
  23963. 1
  23964. 1
  23965. 1
  23966. 1
  23967. 1
  23968. 1
  23969. 1
  23970. 1
  23971. 1
  23972. 1
  23973. 1
  23974. 1
  23975. 1
  23976. 1
  23977. 1
  23978. 1
  23979. 1
  23980. 1
  23981. 1
  23982. 1
  23983. 1
  23984. 1
  23985. 1
  23986. 1
  23987. 1
  23988. 1
  23989. 1
  23990. 1
  23991. 1
  23992. 1
  23993. 1
  23994. 1
  23995. 1
  23996. 1
  23997. 1
  23998. 1
  23999. 1
  24000. 1
  24001. 1
  24002. 1
  24003. 1
  24004. 1
  24005. 1
  24006.  @KentBalzer  no, I wasn't. I just choose to look at all relevant information, in order for me to make an educated decision. Instead of just having my preconceived notions parroted back to me by cherry-picking information and painting everyone with the same brush when it's convenient to my argument. The last time I checked, Hillary Clinton was actually not every Democrat. She's not even in the game anymore and when she was most of us didn't support her. Ironically, you're using the same sentimentality as racism by trying to paint all of us with the same brush as Hillary Clinton. While you rail Against that thought process. Donald Trump goes, I'm a graphic designer. I literally put together these for a living. Given enough video of you, I could make a video where you said you were a purple chicken who is fluent in Japanese. Which is why I know it's important to check your sources and not just believe them out right because someone did a halfway decent job of putting a video together. Did you even bother to check the dates on the eclipse or Google real quick whether he had said anything else about David Duke? In one interview he tried to play like you didn't David Duke. In the next one he tried to blame his earpiece on why he accidentally endorsed him and then finally on the last one he disavowed David Duke because so many people were giving him so much s***. It's funny how your video didn't show the first two parts. https://youtu.be/Gz2ETH8Gpr4 https://youtu.be/Qwnqv44rMXM https://youtu.be/CSd_iSCtWzk That's just David do. We can go onto for instance like how he pardoned Joe Arpaio before he even went to trial. He was literally going to go to jail because he refused to stop racially profiling Mexicans even though a court had ordered him to like four times. He also reinstituted chain gangs and was one of the original racist birthers. https://youtu.be/CSd_iSCtWzk https://youtu.be/sy9naTef0rg https://youtu.be/gLDhb1fWJ1c https://youtu.be/3HSO3abzpzU We could move on to the Muslim ban, if you like. https://youtu.be/hLgTF8FrYlU
    1
  24007. 1
  24008. 1
  24009. 1
  24010. 1
  24011. 1
  24012. 1
  24013. 1
  24014. 1
  24015. 1
  24016. 1
  24017. 1
  24018. 1
  24019. 1
  24020. 1
  24021. 1
  24022. 1
  24023. 1
  24024. 1
  24025. 1
  24026. 1
  24027. 1
  24028. 1
  24029. 1
  24030. 1
  24031. 1
  24032. 1
  24033. 1
  24034. 1
  24035. 1
  24036. 1
  24037. 1
  24038. 1
  24039. 1
  24040. 1
  24041. 1
  24042. 1
  24043. 1
  24044. 1
  24045.  @Jeff-cr6ur  As far as historical requirements... The supreme court disagrees with you... And has forever. Consistently rolling that that particular run around to not being able to hold in impeachment inquiry or put up articles of impeachment by the house. Doesn't make any damn sense. . The requirement is the investigation. Unless you'd prefer them putting up articles of impeachment without investigating first? The Speaker of the House has that same right? Until they vote for or against impeachment in the house. And on which articles to present to the Senate. Like in the case of President Buchanan. "He maintained that the House of Representatives possessed no general powers to investigate him, except when sitting as an impeaching body. When the Supreme Court has considered similar issues, it held that the power to secure "needed information ... has long been treated as an attribute of the power to legislate. ... [The power to investigate is deeply rooted in the nation's history:] It was so regarded in the British Parliament and in the colonial Legislatures before the American Revolution, and a like view has prevailed and been carried into effect in both houses of Congress and in most of the state Legislatures."[30] The Supreme Court also held, "There can be no doubt as to the power of Congress, by itself or through its committees, to investigate matters and conditions relating to contemplated legislation."[31] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States
    1
  24046. 1
  24047. 1
  24048. 1
  24049. 1
  24050. 1
  24051. 1
  24052. 1
  24053. 1
  24054. 1
  24055. 1
  24056. 1
  24057. 1
  24058. 1
  24059. 1
  24060. 1
  24061. 1
  24062. 1
  24063. 1
  24064. 1
  24065. 1
  24066. 1
  24067. 1
  24068. 1
  24069. 1
  24070. 1
  24071. 1
  24072. 1
  24073. 1
  24074. 1
  24075. 1
  24076. 1
  24077. 1
  24078. 1
  24079. 1
  24080. 1
  24081. 1
  24082. 1
  24083. 1
  24084. 1
  24085. 1
  24086. 1
  24087. 1
  24088. 1
  24089. 1
  24090. 1
  24091. 1
  24092. 1
  24093. 1
  24094. 1
  24095. 1
  24096. 1
  24097. 1
  24098. 1
  24099. 1
  24100. 1
  24101. 1
  24102. 1
  24103. 1
  24104. 1
  24105. 1
  24106. 1
  24107. 1
  24108. 1
  24109. 1
  24110. 1
  24111. 1
  24112. 1
  24113. 1
  24114. 1
  24115. 1
  24116. 1
  24117. 1
  24118. 1
  24119. 1
  24120. 1
  24121. 1
  24122. 1
  24123. 1
  24124. 1
  24125. 1
  24126. 1
  24127. 1
  24128. 1
  24129. 1
  24130. 1
  24131. 1
  24132. 1
  24133. 1
  24134. 1
  24135. 1
  24136. 1
  24137. 1
  24138. 1
  24139. 1
  24140. 1
  24141. 1
  24142. 1
  24143. 1
  24144. 1
  24145. 1
  24146. 1
  24147. 1
  24148. 1
  24149. 1
  24150. 1
  24151. 1
  24152. 1
  24153. 1
  24154. 1
  24155. 1
  24156. 1
  24157. 1
  24158. 1
  24159. 1
  24160. 1
  24161. 1
  24162. 1
  24163. 1
  24164. 1
  24165. 1
  24166. 1
  24167. 1
  24168. 1
  24169. 1
  24170. 1
  24171. 1
  24172. 1
  24173. 1
  24174. 1
  24175. 1
  24176. 1
  24177. 1
  24178. 1
  24179. 1
  24180. 1
  24181. 1
  24182. 1
  24183. 1
  24184. 1
  24185. 1
  24186. 1
  24187. 1
  24188. 1
  24189. 1
  24190. 1
  24191. 1
  24192. 1
  24193. 1
  24194. 1
  24195. 1
  24196. 1
  24197. 1
  24198. 1
  24199. 1
  24200. 1
  24201. 1
  24202. 1
  24203. 1
  24204. 1
  24205. 1
  24206. 1
  24207. 1
  24208. 1
  24209. 1
  24210. 1
  24211. 1
  24212. 1
  24213. 1
  24214. 1
  24215. 1
  24216. 1
  24217. 1
  24218. 1
  24219. 1
  24220. 1
  24221. 1
  24222. 1
  24223. 1
  24224. 1
  24225. 1
  24226. 1
  24227. 1
  24228. 1
  24229. 1
  24230. 1
  24231. 1
  24232. 1
  24233. 1
  24234. 1
  24235. 1
  24236. 1
  24237. 1
  24238. 1
  24239. 1
  24240. 1
  24241. 1
  24242. 1
  24243. 1
  24244. 1
  24245. 1
  24246. 1
  24247. 1
  24248. 1
  24249. 1
  24250. 1
  24251. 1
  24252. 1
  24253. 1
  24254. 1
  24255. 1
  24256. 1
  24257. 1
  24258. 1
  24259. 1
  24260. 1
  24261. 1
  24262. 1
  24263. 1
  24264. 1
  24265. 1
  24266. 1
  24267. 1
  24268. 1
  24269. 1
  24270. 1
  24271. 1
  24272. 1
  24273. 1
  24274. 1
  24275. 1
  24276. 1
  24277. 1
  24278. 1
  24279.  @scotp5592   @Scotp  1. Electorally, Trump was losing election night. 2. Trump had a partial lead in 3 swing states. All with less then 50% of the vote, per states, being counted. 3. Donald Trump actively discouraged his voters to vote by mail. 4. Long before Donald Trump even thought about running for president, it has been a practice in this country that Democrats vote early and Republicans vote on Election Day. In this election, with covid-19 and mail-in ballots to help contain the spread of the virus, more people voted by mail than ever. 5. In almost every state but two, you must count the day in ballots before you count the mail-in ballots. 6. No MSM declared Biden the winner until the third day. 7. Even in states that are historically red, Joe Biden surprisingly came really close to taking them from Donald Trump. Texas being a very good example. 8. Mail-in ballots are not a scheme. There is no evidence there was a scheme of mail-in ballot fraud. 9. In the past 20 years, or five presidential elections, the amount of proven mail-in ballot fraud in America as I reached out to about twenty-six votes a presidential election. 10. 5 States have done strictly mail-in ballots for the last 17 years with no mail-in ballot fraud. 11. Mail-in ballots have been widely prevalent in every election since the beginning of World War I. 12. Thus far, in this election, every claim of mail-in ballot fraud has been unsubstantiated. 13. The mainstream media is merely reporting the news. Which is that Donald Trump both lost the Electoral College and the popular vote by quite a bit. 31 out of the 33 lawsuits filed in different states have provided absolutely no proof of voter fraud whatsoever and have been summarily dismissed by 31 different judges. Which also means they're not going to a supreme court because they weren't found enough to have evidence to go to a trial phase. 14. And, of course, Donald Trump, a notorious liar, would claim that if he did not win the election then it was rigged. That doesn't actually make it true. 15. Every president who won the election, has gone through a period of being president elect. Pretending that position doesn't exist, also doesn't make it go away. And finally, you have proven nothing. Try again
    1
  24280. 1
  24281. 1
  24282. 1
  24283. 1
  24284. 1
  24285. 1
  24286. 1
  24287. 1
  24288. 1
  24289. 1
  24290. 1
  24291. 1
  24292. 1
  24293. 1
  24294. 1
  24295. 1
  24296. 1
  24297. 1
  24298. 1
  24299. 1
  24300. 1
  24301.  @saveyourself8798  1. The leaders on the Democratic side calling Donald Trump a racist because of the China ban at the beginning of covid-19 was a mistake. They made it about him instead of making it about what it needed to be about. Which was focusing on what the ban was and what that could prevent giving expert advice. They put the focus on attacking Donald Trump on his character instead of paying attention to what he was actually doing. 2. The Democrats also should have kept their mouths shut in the very least if not advise caution at the beginning of the pandemic, before they had all the information they needed to make an informed decision. That was stupid and they jump the gun. 3. Even though they were forced into the position by Trump's lack of leadership, the governors of each state, including the Democratic states could have done a way better job at working together to get everybody to help they needed at the peak of the first outbreak. They fought against each other instead of working with each other which wound up with things like nursing homes being crammed full of sick people. 4. The many Democratic leaders came out and advocated against large crowds of protesters and especially against rioting, in no way was it a consistent message. I get why they didn't want to come too hard with it because they wanted people to exercise their right to speech and protest especially on such a important subject like police brutality and racism, but they should have been stronger and more consistent in their condemnation of rioters and people not social distancing or wearing masks enough. 5. Hillary Clinton and Democratic boxden vision is exactly why we got Trump. Or at least it's half of it. She wasn't giving anyone anything to vote for. Just against. She didn't offer up any plans and all she really had with platitudes. She also acted like she was entitled. Like it was her turn. That's not even counting the DNC corruption with her and her bestie. 6. When was President Obama's biggest mistakes that bothered me was that he claimed while he was running for office the first time that he would clear out Guantanamo Bay because America shouldn't torture people. He didn't do anything on that for the first four years because he was trying to get reelected and by the time he could, Republicans had the house in the Senate. Some things are more important than re-election. 7. President Obama was also politically afraid to deal with African-American issues. For fear that he would not be labeled as the African American president only out for African-Americans, he let a whole bunch of s*** slide you shouldn't have. 8. Another thing President Obama did that really struck me the wrong way why is glorifying killing Osama bin Laden. They finally found him and killed him right before the second election began. That entire time I don't think I can remember one of his speech that didn't reference then killing Osama bin Laden. I have a lot of military in my family. Many who have fought killed and died for our country. If you have to kill then you have to tell but it should never be anything you brag about. That always rubbed me the wrong way
    1
  24302. 1
  24303. 1
  24304. 1
  24305. 1
  24306. 1
  24307. 1
  24308. 1
  24309. 1
  24310. 1
  24311. 1
  24312. 1
  24313. 1
  24314. 1
  24315. 1
  24316. 1
  24317. 1
  24318. 1
  24319. 1
  24320. 1
  24321. 1
  24322. 1
  24323. 1
  24324. 1
  24325. 1
  24326. 1
  24327. 1
  24328. 1
  24329. 1
  24330. 1
  24331. 1
  24332. 1
  24333. 1
  24334. 1
  24335. 1
  24336.  Adam Eaton  And... Goodness! Are we going to have to go over the whole subject predicate thing again? 🤣🤣🤣 Okay! I guess it takes some people longer to learn, then everyone else. 🤣🤣🤣 "Sure! We can go back to grade school if it helps you! There are two parts of sentences. One is the subject and the second one is the predicate. The subject describes what or who performed the action. The predicate is the action. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that (Subject) 👉 Biden 👈 (Subject) (Predicate)👉 stopped the prosecution 👈 (Predicate) 👉 and a lot of people want to find out about 👉that👈 What does that describe? Why, the SUBJECT and the PREDICATE, of course! AND what is the SUBJECT and PREDICATE again? That's right! (Subject) 👉 Biden 👈 (Subject) (Predicate)👉 stopped the prosecution 👈 (Predicate) "so whatever you can 👉do👈 with the Attorney General would be great. " Do about what, you ask? Why, finding out about the SUBJECT and the PREDICATE, of course! (Subject) 👉 Biden 👈 (Subject) (Predicate)👉 stopped the prosecution 👈 (Predicate) And look! A further supporting sentence that also has Biden as the Subject! Just encase it wasn't clear enough! 😁 "👉Biden👈 went around 👉bragging👈 that he stopped the prosecution 👉so if you can look into it👈... It sounds horrible to me. Look into what, you ask? The subject... Biden... And the predicate... bragging about stopping the prosecution.🤣" "
    1
  24337. 1
  24338. 1
  24339. 1
  24340. 1
  24341. 1
  24342. 1
  24343. 1
  24344. 1
  24345. 1
  24346. 1
  24347. 1
  24348. 1
  24349. 1
  24350. 1
  24351. 1
  24352. 1
  24353. 1
  24354. 1
  24355. 1
  24356. 1
  24357. 1
  24358. 1
  24359. 1
  24360. 1
  24361. 1
  24362. 1
  24363. 1
  24364. 1
  24365. 1
  24366. 1
  24367. 1
  24368. 1
  24369. 1
  24370. 1
  24371. 1
  24372. 1
  24373. 1
  24374. 1
  24375. 1
  24376. 1
  24377. 1
  24378. 1
  24379. 1
  24380. 1
  24381. 1
  24382. 1
  24383. 1
  24384. 1
  24385. 1
  24386. 1
  24387. 1
  24388. 1
  24389. 1
  24390. 1
  24391. 1
  24392. 1
  24393. 1
  24394. 1
  24395. 1
  24396. 1
  24397. 1
  24398. 1
  24399. 1
  24400. 1
  24401. 1
  24402. 1
  24403. 1
  24404. 1
  24405. 1
  24406. 1
  24407. 1
  24408. 1
  24409. 1
  24410. 1
  24411. 1
  24412. 1
  24413. 1
  24414. 1
  24415. 1
  24416. 1
  24417. 1
  24418. 1
  24419. 1
  24420. 1
  24421. 1
  24422. 1
  24423. 1
  24424. 1
  24425. 1
  24426. 1
  24427. 1
  24428. 1
  24429. 1
  24430. 1
  24431. 1
  24432. 1
  24433. 1
  24434. 1
  24435.  @brandonbenson2812  https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/12/04/no-atlanta-didnt-count-ballots-in-secret-or-in-suitcases/amp/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080666462121&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fjoewalsh%2F2020%2F12%2F04%2Fno-atlanta-didnt-count-ballots-in-secret-or-in-suitcases%2F https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/07/trump-touts-misleading-video-proof-georgia-voter-fraud/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080666462121&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fpolitics%2F2020%2F12%2F07%2Ftrump-touts-misleading-video-proof-georgia-voter-fraud%2F https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/live/2020/2020-election-misinformation-distortions.amp.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080666462121&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Flive%2F2020%2F2020-election-misinformation-distortions https://news-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/surveillance-tape-breeds-false-fraud-231226245.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080666462121&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fsurveillance-tape-breeds-false-fraud-231226245.html https://www-dailymail-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9019125/amp/Georgia-secretary-state-investigated-bombshell-video-Giuliani-claims-proves-fraud.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16080666462121&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farticle-9019125%2FGeorgia-secretary-state-investigated-bombshell-video-Giuliani-claims-proves-fraud.html https://www.allsides.com/story/fact-checking-georgia-suitcase-voter-fraud-claims
    1
  24436. 1
  24437. 1
  24438. 1
  24439. 1
  24440. 1
  24441. 1
  24442. 1
  24443. 1
  24444. 1
  24445. 1
  24446. 1
  24447. 1
  24448. 1
  24449. 1
  24450. 1
  24451. 1
  24452. 1
  24453. 1
  24454. 1
  24455. 1
  24456. 1
  24457. 1
  24458. 1
  24459. 1
  24460. 1
  24461. 1
  24462. 1
  24463. 1
  24464. 1
  24465. 1
  24466. 1
  24467. 1
  24468. 1
  24469. 1
  24470. 1
  24471. 1
  24472. 1
  24473. 1
  24474. 1
  24475. 1
  24476. 1
  24477. 1
  24478. 1
  24479. 1
  24480. 1
  24481. 1
  24482. 1
  24483. 1
  24484. 1
  24485. 1
  24486. 1
  24487. 1
  24488. 1
  24489. 1
  24490. 1
  24491. 1
  24492. 1
  24493. 1
  24494. 1
  24495. 1
  24496. 1
  24497. 1
  24498. 1
  24499. 1
  24500. 1
  24501. 1
  24502. 1
  24503. 1
  24504. 1
  24505. 1
  24506. 1
  24507. 1
  24508. 1
  24509. 1
  24510. 1
  24511. 1
  24512. 1
  24513. 1
  24514. 1
  24515. 1
  24516. 1
  24517. 1
  24518. 1
  24519. 1
  24520. 1
  24521. 1
  24522. 1
  24523. 1
  24524. 1
  24525. 1
  24526. 1
  24527. 1
  24528. 1
  24529. 1
  24530. 1
  24531. 1
  24532. 1
  24533. 1
  24534. 1
  24535. 1
  24536. 1
  24537. 1
  24538. 1
  24539. 1
  24540. 1
  24541. 1
  24542. 1
  24543. 1
  24544. 1
  24545. 1
  24546. 1
  24547. 1
  24548. 1
  24549. 1
  24550. 1
  24551. 1
  24552. 1
  24553. 1
  24554. 1
  24555. 1
  24556. 1
  24557. 1
  24558. 1
  24559. 1
  24560. 1
  24561. 1
  24562. 1
  24563. 1
  24564. 1
  24565. 1
  24566. 1
  24567. 1
  24568. 1
  24569. 1
  24570. 1
  24571. 1
  24572. 1
  24573. 1
  24574. 1
  24575. 1
  24576. 1
  24577. 1
  24578. 1
  24579. 1
  24580. 1
  24581. 1
  24582. 1
  24583. 1
  24584. 1
  24585. 1
  24586. 1
  24587. 1
  24588. 1
  24589. 1
  24590. 1
  24591. 1
  24592. 1
  24593. 1
  24594. 1
  24595. 1
  24596. 1
  24597. 1
  24598. 1
  24599. 1
  24600. 1
  24601. 1
  24602. 1
  24603. 1
  24604. 1
  24605. 1
  24606. 1
  24607. 1
  24608. 1
  24609. 1
  24610. 1
  24611. 1
  24612. 1
  24613. 1
  24614.  @timmyormsby1468  Sure! We can give those examples.... 1. During a press conference, in all seriousness, turning to a doctor and claiming " they where looking into" light rays and cleaners for the inside of someones body and that same doctor saying that wasn't happening directly after... And then the next day trying to claim that to be sarcastic and a joke, to see what people would do. Which is either a straight out lie or majorly unconscionable at a time like this. 2. And I had actually already gave you on in the other examples. Cuz, how are you going to shut down the Border and then a few hours later hold a rally with tens of thousands of people all squash together in a belt thing, after being briefed by experts multiple times about that risky Behavior right now? 3. Stating on camera that if states need ventilator is in PPE equipment all I have to do is call them and ask... And then a short time later announce that states would have to buy their own. Forcing them into a situation to be competing against each other for Vital life-saving equipment during a major World ride Health crisis. 4. On camera, and multiple different venues and on multiple different occasions playing down the impending pandemic and then once it finally became undeniable claiming that he "felt it was a pandemic before it was called the pandemic" and that "all you had to do was look at other countries". 5. Early March he claimed on several different occasions and again in several different ways, that everything would testing is going smoothly and anybody that needs a test can get one and that the tests are perfect and beautiful. The same week his health and human services secretary had to walk that back and told everyone that you may not get a test unless a doctor or public health official prescribes to test and that's just our medical system in the United States. 6. Claiming multiple times that the virus is being contained and predicting that it will disappear one day like a miracle. This happening at a time when numbers were skyrocketing and Peaks were at their worst. Also claiming that numbers are very substantially going down during that time. That's not being helpful or hopeful. That's simply lying. 7. Trump making claims that the number of people who died of the flu last year was a false number or a lie. Going so far as to tweet on March 9th, that 37000 Americans died from the flu in america and it averages between 27000 and 70000 per year. That nothing is shut down in the economy goes on... Ironically the numbers that were incorrect, were his. 34200 people died last year of the flu, all year in the whole world. Not America. This forced medical experts to go back out and correct this. Giving me information that 0.1% of people who get the flu die from it. 8. Trump making several comments towards claims that warm weather will kill covid-19. That needs no further explanation. That's insane. He also used miracle in that too. As before.. There are plenty more examples.
    1
  24615.  @timmyormsby1468  Trump: We bought a tremendous amount of … hydroxychloroquine, which I think is, you know, it’s a great malaria drug. It’s worked unbelievably, it’s a powerful drug on malaria. And there are signs that it works on [coronavirus], some very strong signs. And in the meantime, it’s been around a long time, and also works very powerfully on lupus. So there are some very strong, powerful signs, and we’ll have to see. Because again, it’s being tested now, this is a new thing that just happened to us, the invisible enemy, we call it. … It’s a very strong, powerful medicine, but it doesn’t kill people. We have some very good results and some very good tests. You’ve seen the same test that I have. In France, they had a very good test. But we don’t have time to go and say, gee, let’s take a couple of years and test it out. And let’s go and test with the test tubes and the laboratories. We don’t have time. I’d love to do that. fact check: It is true that hydroxychloroquine is a drug shown to be effective at treating and preventing malaria, as well as lupus. There is conflicting evidence as to whether hydroxychloroquine, or hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin, is effective at treating coronavirus symptoms. All the studies of the drug are small, and none are definitive. One French study seemed to show hydroxychloroquine is effective at reducing the amount of virus in Covid-19 patients. But a small randomized study in China appeared to show that patients who took the drug did not benefit substantially compared to patients who didn’t use it.
    1
  24616. 1
  24617. 1
  24618. 1
  24619. 1
  24620. 1
  24621. 1
  24622.  @timmyormsby1468  Trump: We passed something I’m very proud of, it’s called “right to try.” For 45, 50 years, they’ve been trying, it makes so much sense. …  So a person would be diagnosed terminally ill from something. And in the old days, meaning before a year ago, they would say, “Do you think I could try this pill, this whatever, this medicine, that’s testing so well?” “No, you can’t do that. You can’t do that, under no circumstances.” They’d leave for Asia, they’d leave for Europe — if they had money. If they had no money, they’d go home and die with no hope. STAT: Trump signed so-called right-to-try legislation into law in May 2018. But Trump is dramatically overselling its impact. Long before Trump signed that law, the Food and Drug Administration had established a clear, well-defined pathway for helping terminally ill Americans get access to unapproved, still-experimental treatments, and approved roughly 99% of those “compassionate use” requests. More than 30 states had also passed legislation similar to the 2018 law before the federal legislation advanced. Few patients have publicly announced that they’re pursuing unapproved drugs through the new pathway, though it’s unclear exactly how many have taken advantage of the new law. Trump’s comments on the right-to-try legislation are telling, however. The president has made his broader philosophy clear, arguing that terminally ill patients should be given access to drugs almost regardless of potential consequences, since they’re likely to die if a dramatic intervention isn’t undertaken.
    1
  24623. 1
  24624. 1
  24625. 1
  24626. 1
  24627. 1
  24628. 1
  24629. 1
  24630. 1
  24631. 1
  24632. 1
  24633. 1
  24634. 1
  24635. 1
  24636. 1
  24637. 1
  24638. 1
  24639. 1
  24640. 1
  24641. 1
  24642. 1
  24643. 1
  24644. 1
  24645. 1
  24646. 1
  24647. 1
  24648. 1
  24649. 1
  24650. 1
  24651. 1
  24652. 1
  24653. 1
  24654. 1
  24655. 1
  24656. 1
  24657. 1
  24658. 1
  24659. 1
  24660. 1
  24661. 1
  24662. 1
  24663. 1
  24664. 1
  24665. 1
  24666. 1
  24667. 1
  24668. 1
  24669. 1
  24670. 1
  24671. 1
  24672. 1
  24673. 1
  24674. 1
  24675. 1
  24676. 1
  24677. 1
  24678. 1
  24679. 1
  24680. 1
  24681. 1
  24682. 1
  24683. 1
  24684. 1
  24685. 1
  24686. 1
  24687. 1
  24688. 1
  24689. 1
  24690. 1
  24691. 1
  24692. 1
  24693. 1
  24694. 1
  24695. 1
  24696. 1
  24697. 1
  24698. 1
  24699. 1
  24700.  @ben73010  Well... Now that my power is back... You have no bases for claiming fake news. You simply don't want to believe it.... None the less... This girl plays with live ammo. This summery includes links to all correlating info... Which includes but not limited to... His super sketchy past with AIDS research and crazy Christian theories, and acts in regards to those beliefs. Like leaving AIDS infected US Troops to die after using them as human guinea pigs for a super sketchy AIDS cure... And the crazy amount of money, he is making right now.... And his contradicting of what Trump was saying partly through the pandemic... And so forth. "On 21 May 2020, The Atlantic magazine reported on the intentional conflation of the viral and antibody testing results that the CDC, under Redfield's leadership, has been compiling data on since the beginning of the year. This conflation of the tests' results has led to misrepresentations in the media and in public opinion of the current state of the virus's spread. Several states have now also adopted this approach for reporting on the number of tests given and their results, and they've used those faulty, unscientific statistics to aid in the planning for reopening their states." Redfield wrote the introduction to a 1990 book, "Christians in the Age of AIDS," co-written by Smith, in which he denounced distribution of sterile needles to drug users and condoms to sexually active adults, and described anti-discrimination programs as the efforts of "false prophets." In the 1980s Redfield worked closely with W. Shepherd Smith, Jr. and his Christian organization, Americans for a Sound AIDS/HIV Policy, or ASAP. The group maintained that AIDS was "God's judgment" against homosexuals, spread in an America weakened by single-parent households and loss of family values. Redfield's early engagement with the AIDS epidemic in the US in the 1980s and 90s was controversial. As an Army major at Walter Reed Medical Institute, he designed policies for controlling the disease within the US military that involved placing infected personnel in quarantine and investigating their pasts to identify and track possible sexual partners. Soldiers were routinely discharged and left to die of AIDS, humiliated and jobless, often abandoned by their families. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_R._Redfield?wprov=sfla1
    1
  24701. 1
  24702. 1
  24703. 1
  24704. 1
  24705. 1
  24706. 1
  24707. 1
  24708. 1
  24709. 1
  24710. 1
  24711. 1
  24712. 1
  24713. 1
  24714. 1
  24715. 1
  24716. 1
  24717. 1
  24718. 1
  24719. 1
  24720. 1
  24721. 1
  24722.  @ben73010  My claim... In your words... " Trump is subverting the CDC." ME... Source links and quoted material. 👇 "You have no bases for claiming fake news. You simply don't want to believe it.... None the less... This girl plays with live ammo. This summery includes links to all correlating info... Which includes but not limited to... His super sketchy past with AIDS research and crazy Christian theories, and acts in regards to those beliefs. Like leaving AIDS infected US Troops to die after using them as human guinea pigs for a super sketchy AIDS cure... And the crazy amount of money, he is making right now.... And his contradicting of what Trump was saying partly through the pandemic... And so forth. "On 21 May 2020, The Atlantic magazine reported on the intentional conflation of the viral and antibody testing results that the CDC, under Redfield's leadership, has been compiling data on since the beginning of the year. This conflation of the tests' results has led to misrepresentations in the media and in public opinion of the current state of the virus's spread. Several states have now also adopted this approach for reporting on the number of tests given and their results, and they've used those faulty, unscientific statistics to aid in the planning for reopening their states." Redfield wrote the introduction to a 1990 book, "Christians in the Age of AIDS," co-written by Smith, in which he denounced distribution of sterile needles to drug users and condoms to sexually active adults, and described anti-discrimination programs as the efforts of "false prophets." In the 1980s Redfield worked closely with W. Shepherd Smith, Jr. and his Christian organization, Americans for a Sound AIDS/HIV Policy, or ASAP. The group maintained that AIDS was "God's judgment" against homosexuals, spread in an America weakened by single-parent households and loss of family values. Redfield's early engagement with the AIDS epidemic in the US in the 1980s and 90s was controversial. As an Army major at Walter Reed Medical Institute, he designed policies for controlling the disease within the US military that involved placing infected personnel in quarantine and investigating their pasts to identify and track possible sexual partners. Soldiers were routinely discharged and left to die of AIDS, humiliated and jobless, often abandoned by their families. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_R._Redfield?wprov=sfla1 " YOU.... Wiki and atlantic are bias or not reliable... ME... Okay... Well... Then adhere to the same standard that you, yourself, set for me by proving the Atlantic is bias and Wiki is not reliable. Also, if you have such a problem with my sources... Give me some you would, meet your standard? Have not yet once answered that question... YOU... Look over here... And saying thing does make them real...
    1
  24723. 1
  24724. 1
  24725. 1
  24726. 1
  24727. 1
  24728. 1
  24729. 1
  24730. 1
  24731. 1
  24732. 1
  24733. 1
  24734. 1
  24735. 1
  24736. 1
  24737. 1
  24738. 1
  24739. 1
  24740. 1
  24741. 1
  24742. 1
  24743. 1
  24744. 1
  24745. 1
  24746. 1
  24747. 1
  24748. 1
  24749. 1
  24750. 1
  24751. 1
  24752. 1
  24753. 1
  24754. 1
  24755. 1
  24756. 1
  24757. 1
  24758. 1
  24759. 1
  24760. 1
  24761. 1
  24762. 1
  24763. 1
  24764. 1
  24765. 1
  24766. 1
  24767. 1
  24768. 1
  24769. 1
  24770. 1
  24771. 1
  24772. 1
  24773. 1
  24774. 1
  24775. 1
  24776. 1
  24777. 1
  24778. 1
  24779. 1
  24780. 1
  24781. 1
  24782. 1
  24783. 1
  24784. 1
  24785. 1
  24786. 1
  24787. 1
  24788. 1
  24789. 1
  24790. 1
  24791. 1
  24792. 1
  24793. 1
  24794. 1
  24795. 1
  24796. 1
  24797. 1
  24798. 1
  24799. 1
  24800. 1
  24801. 1
  24802. 1
  24803. 1
  24804. 1
  24805. 1
  24806. 1
  24807. 1
  24808. 1
  24809. 1
  24810. 1
  24811. 1
  24812. 1
  24813. 1
  24814. 1
  24815. 1
  24816. 1
  24817. 1
  24818. 1
  24819. 1
  24820. 1
  24821. 1
  24822. 1
  24823. 1
  24824. 1
  24825. 1
  24826. 1
  24827. 1
  24828. 1
  24829. 1
  24830. 1
  24831. 1
  24832. 1
  24833. 1
  24834. 1
  24835. 1
  24836. 1
  24837. 1
  24838. 1
  24839. 1
  24840. 1
  24841. 1
  24842. 1
  24843. 1
  24844. 1
  24845. 1
  24846. 1
  24847. 1
  24848. 1
  24849. 1
  24850. 1
  24851. 1
  24852. 1
  24853. 1
  24854. 1
  24855. 1
  24856. 1
  24857. 1
  24858. 1
  24859. 1
  24860. 1
  24861. 1
  24862. 1
  24863.  @jimnorton3718  "The Capitol Police are overseen by the Capitol Police Board and committees from the Senate and House of Representatives." 👈 Not Nancy Pelosi. So she was not in charge of even the basic security there. The Pentagon themselves, have absolutely no record of this request on any day in the entirety of his 4 years.👇 "Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby had previously looked into Trump’s claim and told The Washington Post in March that “we have no record of such an order being given.”" The only thing that got anywhere close to mentioning National Guard being deployed on that day didn't even come from Donald Trump and certainly wasn't in those numbers or for that reason.👇 "A timeline from the Department of Defense only mentions an agreement made on Jan. 4 about potentially providing 340 District of Columbia National Guard members at the request of D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to support traffic control points and to deploy a quick reaction force “if additional support is requested by civilian authorities.” " Not even the most staunch far right-wing Republican senators are backing him on this. 👇 "Additionally, when asked by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, during a Feb. 23 Senate hearing if discussions took place on Jan. 4 with congressional leadership about bringing in the National Guard, former House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving said he "had no follow up conversations." "It was not until the sixth that I alerted leadership that we might be making a request," Irving said. "And that was the end of the discussion." " Or... In short... You are wrong.
    1
  24864. 1
  24865. 1
  24866. 1
  24867. 1
  24868.  @craigconway6048  me and my son both live in the same house with my parents who both got covid. My dad got it then gave it to my mom. Me and my son who are both immune-compromised did not get it. However I know of several other friends and co-workers who either got it or gave it to someone in similar circumstances and either got really really sick or passed away. I do Rideshare has my side gig. At the beginning of the pandemic back when Louisiana have the highest infection rate literally in the world, I was in New Orleans I'm heading back home from working the Mardi Gras parades. I left 37 hours before they shut down the whole city. Within six weeks 18 of my fellow Rideshare drivers that had come from New Orleans to work the parade themselves, including those that got stuck there or lived there, we're either severely ill in the hospital or had already passed away. Three of them are still alive today. They made me test and quarantine for three and a half weeks when I got back. I had not seen my son in a week. I could not go near him. It was the longest we had ever been apart. As I said, I do rideshare. Which was deemed a necessary job for the lockdown to get the medical and maintenance workers back and forth from their jobs. The busses where not running at the time. However we also work for ourselves technically so every Rideshare driver had the option. We have a whole lot of retired vets who are Rideshare drivers in my area. Mostly doing the work for extra gambling money. They all quit. Which left the people who were the most exposed lacking transportation to get back and forth from work. Our job was one of the only jobs in the city that I actually picked up business during the lockdown. Once again, even though I was immune compromised, and tested so many times I lost count, I've never had covid. However, once again, drivers in my area with similar immune-compromised issues had tested positive from driving mostly medical workers back and forth. It's about circumstance and dumb luck. There are things you can do to mitigate your risk. Which is why we have social distancing guidelines. To this day nobody gets in my car without a mask period not just because the jobs require it but because I require it. You can either put your mask on inside of my car or you can protest outside of my car. Are people still going to get sick? Yes. Can you mitigate that risk? Yes. Should you mitigate that risk? Yes.
    1
  24869. 1
  24870. 1
  24871. 1
  24872. 1
  24873. 1
  24874. 1
  24875. 1
  24876. 1
  24877. 1
  24878. 1
  24879. 1
  24880. 1
  24881. 1
  24882. 1
  24883. 1
  24884. 1
  24885. 1
  24886. 1
  24887. 1
  24888. 1
  24889. 1
  24890. 1
  24891. 1
  24892. 1
  24893. 1
  24894. 1
  24895. 1
  24896. 1
  24897. 1
  24898. 1
  24899. 1
  24900. 1
  24901. 1
  24902. 1
  24903. 1
  24904. 1
  24905. 1
  24906. 1
  24907. 1
  24908. 1
  24909. 1
  24910. 1
  24911. 1
  24912. 1
  24913. 1
  24914. 1
  24915. 1
  24916. 1
  24917. 1
  24918. 1
  24919. 1
  24920. 1
  24921. 1
  24922. 1
  24923. 1
  24924. 1
  24925. 1
  24926. 1
  24927. 1
  24928. 1
  24929. 1
  24930. 1
  24931. 1
  24932. 1
  24933. 1
  24934. 1
  24935. 1
  24936. 1
  24937. 1
  24938. 1
  24939. 1
  24940. 1
  24941. 1
  24942. 1
  24943. 1
  24944. 1
  24945. 1
  24946. 1
  24947. 1
  24948. 1
  24949. 1
  24950. 1
  24951. 1
  24952. 1
  24953. 1
  24954. 1
  24955. 1
  24956. 1
  24957. 1
  24958. 1
  24959. 1
  24960. 1
  24961. 1
  24962. 1
  24963. 1
  24964. 1
  24965. 1
  24966. 1
  24967. 1
  24968. 1
  24969. 1
  24970. 1
  24971. 1
  24972. 1
  24973. 1
  24974. 1
  24975. 1
  24976. 1
  24977. 1
  24978. 1
  24979. 1
  24980. 1
  24981. 1
  24982. 1
  24983. 1
  24984. 1
  24985. 1
  24986. 1
  24987. 1
  24988. 1
  24989. 1
  24990. 1
  24991. 1
  24992. 1
  24993. 1
  24994. 1
  24995. 1
  24996. 1
  24997. 1
  24998. 1
  24999. 1
  25000. 1
  25001. 1
  25002. 1
  25003. 1
  25004. 1
  25005. 1
  25006. 1
  25007. 1
  25008. 1
  25009. 1
  25010.  @Notawoketard  3 things... 1... Show me one city burn to the ground? Being overdramatic to the point of lying, does nothing for your point. 2.... this is a great opportunity to teach you guys how to actually handle a situation like an adult. Though the majority of protesters were non-violent, those that were violent are wrong for it and should be put in jail. That includes vandalism and looting, as well. Now that I have addressed that subject instead of trying to deflect from it, like you did, and I used accurate context in order to do so, like you did not, I will also bring up a question about that very same subject. Why is the only thing you guys ever want to talk about when you talk about black lives matter protest, is the violence, instead of the point of them? And I asked that because, the reason they were damn near a year along and all over the country with Millions participating is because that's literally what it took to get anyone to pay attention to police openly murdering black people in the street on a regular basis in this country for decades now. Literally nothing else worked. Every single time everybody did exactly what you were doing. Ignoring the actual context and complaining about the method. Or, in better terms, ignoring me actual illness and only trying to treat one of the symptoms. Then b****ing about why it keeps happening. 3. You know why nobody takes you seriously when you gripe about this stuff? Because you're feigning outrage and you really don't care. If you actually cared, you would care no matter who was doing it. You only care when it's the opposition. So, start holding your people to the same standard then come talk to me about mine.
    1
  25011. 1
  25012. 1
  25013. 1
  25014. 1
  25015. 1
  25016. 1
  25017. 1
  25018. 1
  25019.  @Notawoketard  in the video... That is a man telling you 1 thing about what is happening in the video. As a parent... I don't see it. If you had kids... the first thing that you would think of, if that was your child is "I'm going to kill him". Straight out. If that was my child, I'm going to jail... And I'm doing it covered in blood and with a smile on my face. Its just that simple.... With that in mind... The first thing I think of is to look at weather those parents said or did anything, afterwards. If the child said anything. I'm looking to see what happened after... Because that video is not clear. It has a narrator telling you what to see but that doesn't necessarily mean the narrator is right. I can't find anything. What I notice is that little girl is dressed up, looks healthy and is generally well-cared-for. Which is the responsibility of her parents. I can't find anything that suggests that they have a pattern of neglect with her and so have absolutely no reason to believe that they would allow something like that to happen to their child, on camera or in front of them without putting up some kind of a fight. I can't find anything like that. Which would mean the next logical step would be to look into the video and its creator. Especially with as how grainy that video is. If you're taking a video in the Oval Office, you're not doing it with some janky camera phone. So why is that video so grainy and pixelated? Why does this guy feel the need to narrate what is happening? Who is he and why aren't there any more videos like this? But... That's just me thinking logically. I see You'd much rather just make assumptions about total strangers
    1
  25020. 1
  25021. 1
  25022. 1
  25023. 1
  25024. 1
  25025. 1
  25026. 1
  25027. 1
  25028. 1
  25029. 1
  25030. 1
  25031. 1
  25032. 1
  25033. 1
  25034. 1
  25035. 1
  25036. 1
  25037. 1
  25038. 1
  25039. 1
  25040. 1
  25041. 1
  25042. 1
  25043. 1
  25044. 1
  25045. 1
  25046. 1
  25047. 1
  25048. 1
  25049. 1
  25050. 1
  25051. 1
  25052. 1
  25053. 1
  25054. 1
  25055. 1
  25056. 1
  25057. 1
  25058. 1
  25059. 1
  25060. 1
  25061. 1
  25062. 1
  25063. 1
  25064. 1
  25065. 1
  25066. 1
  25067. 1
  25068. 1
  25069. 1
  25070. 1
  25071. 1
  25072. 1
  25073. 1
  25074. 1
  25075. 1
  25076. 1
  25077. 1
  25078. 1
  25079. 1
  25080. 1
  25081. 1
  25082. 1
  25083. 1
  25084. 1
  25085. 1
  25086. 1
  25087. 1
  25088. 1
  25089. 1
  25090. 1
  25091. 1
  25092. 1
  25093. 1
  25094. 1
  25095. 1
  25096. 1
  25097. 1
  25098. 1
  25099. 1
  25100. 1
  25101. 1
  25102. 1
  25103. 1
  25104. 1
  25105. 1
  25106. 1
  25107. 1
  25108. 1
  25109. 1
  25110. 1
  25111. 1
  25112. 1
  25113. 1
  25114. 1
  25115. 1
  25116. 1
  25117. 1
  25118. 1
  25119. 1
  25120. 1
  25121. 1
  25122. 1
  25123. 1
  25124. 1
  25125. 1
  25126. 1
  25127. 1
  25128. 1
  25129. 1
  25130. 1
  25131. 1
  25132. 1
  25133. 1
  25134. 1
  25135. 1
  25136. 1
  25137. 1
  25138. 1
  25139. 1
  25140. 1
  25141. 1
  25142. 1
  25143. 1
  25144. 1
  25145. 1
  25146. 1
  25147. 1
  25148. 1
  25149. 1
  25150. 1
  25151. 1
  25152. 1
  25153. 1
  25154. 1
  25155. 1
  25156. 1
  25157. 1
  25158. 1
  25159. 1
  25160. 1
  25161. 1
  25162. 1
  25163. 1
  25164. 1
  25165. 1
  25166. 1
  25167. 1
  25168. 1
  25169. 1
  25170. 1
  25171. 1
  25172. 1
  25173. 1
  25174. 1
  25175. 1
  25176. 1
  25177. 1
  25178. 1
  25179. 1
  25180. 1
  25181. 1
  25182. 1
  25183. 1
  25184. 1
  25185. 1
  25186. 1
  25187. 1
  25188. 1
  25189. 1
  25190. 1
  25191. 1
  25192. 1
  25193. 1
  25194. 1
  25195. 1
  25196. 1
  25197. 1
  25198. 1
  25199. 1
  25200. 1
  25201. 1
  25202. 1
  25203. 1
  25204. 1
  25205. 1
  25206. 1
  25207. 1
  25208. 1
  25209. 1
  25210. 1
  25211. 1
  25212. 1
  25213. 1
  25214. 1
  25215. 1
  25216. 1
  25217. 1
  25218. 1
  25219. 1
  25220. 1
  25221. 1
  25222. 1
  25223. 1
  25224. 1
  25225. 1
  25226. 1
  25227. 1
  25228. 1
  25229. 1
  25230. 1
  25231. 1
  25232. 1
  25233. 1
  25234. 1
  25235. 1
  25236. 1
  25237. 1
  25238. 1
  25239.  @btraina85   Bryochemical Intuition  So your problem is you can't get out of your own personal experience. Got ya! You need to be rational and find someone to blame and for some reason you thought that would be every Democrat in America. Yeah... that totally seems logical. You need to be worried about your own ignorance and stop worrying about mine. But I see why you would have to assume things about me. That seems to be what you do. Seems to be the only card you have to play. But you missed something. Do you hear that part where I said I live down south. This is the land of conservative. So how about we stop assuming I don't know nothing about them and then I'm going to think all kinds of horrible things about them. You're projecting your ignorance onto me. See I don't choose to put millions of people in one tiny box so I can make an argument. That's you. Oh sweetheart, I don't feel stupid. Eric swalwell, well that was kind of an extreme argument, it in no way said we're going to take all your guns away. Unless you think all guns are automatic weapons? As4 for Dianne Feinstein, are you ready to feel stupid... https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/oct/08/chris-cox/nras-chris-cox-falsely-says-dianne-feinstein-wante/ 🤣🤣🤣 I'm not even going to bother responding to your Anonymous Democrat guy that you can't even remember. Considering you got your first two wrong. Well thank you for admitting at the end there that you would much rather stay ignorant of the truth so you can form your own opinions based off of nothing and hate people who didn't do a damn thing to you.
    1
  25240. 1
  25241. 1
  25242. 1
  25243. 1
  25244. 1
  25245. 1
  25246. 1
  25247. 1
  25248. 1
  25249. 1
  25250. 1
  25251. 1
  25252. 1
  25253. 1
  25254. 1
  25255. 1
  25256. 1
  25257. 1
  25258. 1
  25259. 1
  25260. 1
  25261. 1
  25262. 1
  25263. 1
  25264. 1
  25265. 1
  25266. 1
  25267. 1
  25268. 1
  25269. 1
  25270. 1
  25271. 1
  25272. 1
  25273. 1
  25274. 1
  25275. 1
  25276. 1
  25277. 1
  25278. 1
  25279. 1
  25280. 1
  25281. 1
  25282. 1
  25283. 1
  25284. 1
  25285. 1
  25286. 1
  25287. 1
  25288. 1
  25289. 1
  25290. 1
  25291. 1
  25292. 1
  25293. 1
  25294. 1
  25295. 1
  25296. 1
  25297. 1
  25298. 1
  25299. 1
  25300. 1
  25301. 1
  25302. 1
  25303. 1
  25304. 1
  25305. 1
  25306. 1
  25307. 1
  25308. 1
  25309. 1
  25310. 1
  25311. 1
  25312. 1
  25313. 1
  25314. 1
  25315. 1
  25316. 1
  25317. 1
  25318. 1
  25319. 1
  25320. 1
  25321. 1
  25322. 1
  25323. 1
  25324. 1
  25325. 1
  25326. 1
  25327. 1
  25328. 1
  25329. 1
  25330. 1
  25331. 1
  25332. 1
  25333. 1
  25334. 1
  25335. 1
  25336. 1
  25337. 1
  25338. 1
  25339. 1
  25340. 1
  25341. 1
  25342. 1
  25343. 1
  25344. 1
  25345. 1
  25346. 1
  25347. 1
  25348. 1
  25349. 1
  25350. 1
  25351. 1
  25352. 1
  25353. 1
  25354. 1
  25355. 1
  25356. 1
  25357. 1
  25358. 1
  25359. 1
  25360. 1
  25361. 1
  25362. 1
  25363. 1
  25364. 1
  25365. 1
  25366. 1
  25367. 1
  25368. 1
  25369. 1
  25370. 1
  25371. 1
  25372. 1
  25373. 1
  25374. 1
  25375. 1
  25376. 1
  25377. 1
  25378. 1
  25379. 1
  25380. 1
  25381.  @milehighgimpster  see, we live in a free society and therefore I get to choose what I am. You can try and minimize that but all you're really doing is minimizing yourself. I am a Democrat because I believe in democracy. I am a socialist because I believe that our governments should run just as well for the poorest of us as it does the richest. Therefore, I am a Democratic Socialist. Also, a socialist is not a dirty word. It's just right when brainwashing telling you that. There is literally no border open. There is literally no Democrat calling for an open border. The u.s. still controls its National Security while recognizing its obligations to the rest of the world. We are not a Hermit country as much as you would like us to be. We could not survive in the way that we have become accustomed to living if we were a Hermit country. Whether you like it or not, America needs other countries. We need other people in the world. We need the world. It's okay though, because the world needs us. None of that is a bad thing. I don't know why you're preaching all this isolationist BS but you should probably look into our international relations recognize just how dependent we all are on each other and forever will be because different things growing different parts of the world. Different things are found in different parts of the world. Different things are produced in different parts of the world. If you want to live on an island, go buy one. In the meantime, you do not speak for anyone but yourself.
    1
  25382. 1
  25383. 1
  25384. 1
  25385. 1
  25386. 1
  25387. 1
  25388. 1
  25389. 1
  25390. 1
  25391. 1
  25392. 1
  25393. 1
  25394. 1
  25395. 1
  25396. 1
  25397. 1
  25398.  @milehighgimpster  you have to stop using words you don't understand. exact conformity as learned by observation or experiment between judgments or propositions and externally existent things in their actual status and relations. — called also actual truth, contingent truth. Gas prices being lower When Donald Trump was President does not mean that Donald Trump made the gas prices lower. It also does not mean that president Biden made them hire. No president has that power. Also... The economy is not a light switch. What happened the last two years of Donald Trump's presidency? A global pandemic for which he had power to help but bungled that so much that we ended up being shut down for the better part of five months. No one was working. Supply chains where ground to a halt. There was a mass eviction crisis. The hospitals where overrun and ppl where dying all over the place. You don't just bounce back from that. You also can't pretend none of that happened.. And blame everything on the current admin... Bc your salty your guy lost. I mean... You can... But your gonna look silly doing it. Oh... And guess what... Its not all trump, either. He didn't bring the crisis to America. He just f**ed up the recovery, because, like always the only thing he gave a s** about was how he looked or what he wanted. None of the law makers on either side did enough to stop him or help the situation either. Then there are about a million outside factors. And by outside... I mean... Outside of this country. Things for which we have little to no control over or responsibility for. You just want to blame everything on the other side... Cuz you are so bias against it... Except that fixes nothing.
    1
  25399. 1
  25400. 1
  25401. 1
  25402. 1
  25403. 1
  25404. 1
  25405. 1
  25406. 1
  25407. 1
  25408. 1
  25409. 1
  25410. 1
  25411. 1
  25412. 1
  25413. 1
  25414. 1
  25415. 1
  25416. 1
  25417. 1
  25418. 1
  25419. 1
  25420. 1
  25421. 1
  25422. 1
  25423. 1
  25424. 1
  25425. 1
  25426. 1
  25427. 1
  25428. 1
  25429. 1
  25430. 1
  25431. 1
  25432. 1
  25433. 1
  25434. 1
  25435. 1
  25436. 1
  25437. 1
  25438. 1
  25439. 1
  25440. 1
  25441. 1
  25442. 1
  25443. 1
  25444. 1
  25445. 1
  25446. 1
  25447. 1
  25448. 1
  25449. 1
  25450. 1
  25451. 1
  25452. 1
  25453. 1
  25454. 1
  25455. 1
  25456. 1
  25457. 1
  25458. 1
  25459. 1
  25460. 1
  25461. 1
  25462. 1
  25463. 1
  25464. 1
  25465. 1
  25466. 1
  25467. 1
  25468. 1
  25469. 1
  25470. 1
  25471. 1
  25472. 1
  25473. 1
  25474. 1
  25475. 1
  25476. 1
  25477. 1
  25478. 1
  25479. 1
  25480. 1
  25481. 1
  25482. 1
  25483. 1
  25484. 1
  25485. 1
  25486. 1
  25487. 1
  25488. 1
  25489. 1
  25490. 1
  25491. 1
  25492. 1
  25493. 1
  25494. 1
  25495. 1
  25496. 1
  25497. 1
  25498. 1
  25499. 1
  25500. 1
  25501. 1
  25502. 1
  25503. 1
  25504. 1
  25505. 1
  25506. 1
  25507. 1
  25508. 1
  25509. 1
  25510. 1
  25511. 1
  25512. 1
  25513. 1
  25514. 1
  25515. 1
  25516. 1
  25517. 1
  25518. 1
  25519. 1
  25520. 1
  25521. 1
  25522. 1
  25523. 1
  25524. 1
  25525. 1
  25526. 1
  25527. 1
  25528. 1
  25529. 1
  25530. 1
  25531. 1
  25532. 1
  25533. 1
  25534. 1
  25535. 1
  25536. 1
  25537. 1
  25538. 1
  25539. 1
  25540.  @btredinger  See! Now this is you here... Not taking the advice, but trying to turn it on me. You assume I am like you and only pay attention to what parrots back what I've already decided to be true. Except that's not true.... You are trying to see if I know who the investigators are for this investigation of the investigation thing... That mostly looks like a distraction and has yet to show anything. I don't know what it is, though. Nobody gives a s*** about Hillary Clinton. That's why a mostly unknown senator with absolutely no financial support almost beat her ass in the primaries... but that doesn't fit your silly a stereotype that you've decided all of us on the Democratic side are.... Now does it? You're nothing but I'm lazy thinker. That's it. You want to blanket dismiss anything you don't agree with, while ignoring huge swaths of information in order to do so and then call us the crazy people. And, once more, you're not even original. There are like a million of you on here. I don't subscribe to the silly ass tribalism that you do. I don't want Shady corrupt people on my side that I always have to strip my morals away one threat at a time in order to defend them. I just want to get rid of those f**** and put some good people in there that I don't have to worry about offending all the time cuz they're doing their damn job. Stop worrying about team so goddamn much. Get some leaders in there on your side that will do their goddamn job and not require defending on a regular basis. Stop blaming all your f**** problems on the other side too. It's called personal responsibility.
    1
  25541. 1
  25542. 1
  25543. 1
  25544. 1
  25545. 1
  25546. 1
  25547. 1
  25548. 1
  25549. 1
  25550. 1
  25551. 1
  25552. 1
  25553. 1
  25554. 1
  25555. 1
  25556. 1
  25557. 1
  25558. 1
  25559. 1
  25560. 1
  25561. 1
  25562. 1
  25563. 1
  25564. 1
  25565. 1
  25566. 1
  25567. 1
  25568. 1
  25569. 1
  25570. 1
  25571. 1
  25572. 1
  25573. 1
  25574. 1
  25575. 1
  25576. 1
  25577. 1
  25578. 1
  25579. 1
  25580. 1
  25581. 1
  25582. 1
  25583. 1
  25584. 1
  25585. 1
  25586. 1
  25587. 1
  25588. 1
  25589. 1
  25590. 1
  25591. 1
  25592. 1
  25593. 1
  25594. 1
  25595. 1
  25596. 1
  25597. 1
  25598. 1
  25599. 1
  25600. 1
  25601.  @renjia3504     pleading ignorance is not an excuse. You were trying to put me off as some victim being taken advantage of by the situation. Claiming that I could not possibly see things in an objective manner because of my history. Which I took issue with. I'm claiming that you're not seeing things in an objective manner because you refuse to look at the whole picture. I blame the people who choose to always call out those few cases where false rape accusations were levied every single time someone gets accused of rape that they happen to like. Those people are not responsible for you not having enough common sense or intellectual integrity to look up the rape stats for false accusations. It does not excuse anyone, including you, for using that as an excuse every time you don't like who is having the finger pointed at them. There is data and fact on this subject and if you choose not to look at it that's not anyone's fault but your own. I've given you evidence and I can give you more. These are only some of the women who accused Trump of sexual assault and sexual harassment. Namely the ones that did so either in court filings or police reports long before he ever ran for president were there was some question of credibility due to a book deal. I also threw in the grab them by the pussy thing because in that statement, which he made back in 2005, he admits to sexual assault. He does so when he says "he doesn't even wait" Doesn't even wait for what? It spans from the 80s to today. Ivana Trump 1997 Grab them by the pussy and don't even wait in 2005 Going into the underage girls dressing room at the Miss Universe Pageant and admitting to it on the Howard Stern Show happened in 1997 2000 2001 and 2006 Jill harth 1992 Summer Zarvos 2007 Jessica Leeds the 1980s Christian Andersen the 1990s E. Jean Carroll 1995 through 1996 Lisa Boyd 1996 Cathy Heller 1997 Temple Target McDowell 1997 Karena Virginia 1998 Mindy mcgilvery 2003 Jennifer Murphy 2005 Rachel Crooks 2005 Natasha stoynoff 2005 Juliet Huddy 2005 and 2006 Jessica Drake 2006 Ninni Laaksonen 2006 Cassandra Steelers 2013 To end... Here is the Wiki page of false sexual assault claims.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape
    1
  25602. 1
  25603. 1
  25604. 1
  25605. 1
  25606. 1
  25607. 1
  25608. 1
  25609. 1
  25610. 1
  25611. 1
  25612. 1
  25613. 1
  25614. 1
  25615. 1
  25616. 1
  25617. 1
  25618. 1
  25619. 1
  25620. 1
  25621. 1
  25622. 1
  25623. 1
  25624.  @andrewschnatter4338  So... A lot had gone on with Iran and was not %100 on the timeline and technical. Sense I'm a big geek, ai looked it up. Here is what I found. Through Sep 10-17 5 votes for approval and disapproval came up in the house and Senate. None passed. They could not drop the discussion nor could they pass the bill. This was important because amid the negotiations of the deal back in April 14th 2015 the Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously passes legislation authored by Senator Bob Corker that will require the president to submit the deal to Congress for a vote of approval or disapproval. So you are correct on that point. Here is my argument though... When the debate began in this country and the Dems and Reps took sides, it was largely based on mega donors and not the people they are supposed to represent. Most of which apposed the deal. More accurately, there were donors on both sides but the donors on the side of against we're giving substantial more money. A few examples are Sheldon Adelson Paul singer and Haim Saban.... They gave all together 13 mil. Money.... Money is where I make my argument for due process. If your argument is due process then you would have to agree that congrees is elected to represent the people of their district, correct? Except thats not who they where voting for. They where voting for the mega donors. So if you where to argue that Obama didn't abide by due process then you would also have to argue that the congress did not as well.... Sense their vote is supposed to represent the will of the people that elected them and not big money donors, correct?
    1
  25625. 1
  25626. 1
  25627. 1
  25628. 1
  25629. 1
  25630. 1
  25631. 1
  25632. 1
  25633. 1
  25634. 1
  25635. 1
  25636. 1
  25637. 1
  25638. 1
  25639. 1
  25640. 1
  25641. 1
  25642. 1
  25643. @synco pated Are you talking about this? "on April 30th of 2018 the United States and Israel said that Iran had not disclosed a past covert nuclear weapons program. In 2019 however the iaea certified that Iran was abiding by the main terms of the deal. There was however some question over how many Advanced centrifuges were allowed. Because that was not specified in the deal." That was in context of what the other person said and where not my words. They where facts from Wikipedia. I was arguing that they had followed the deal. That there had been claims that they did not and some had to do with spacific things they said where for 1 thing (bombs) but where actually for energy. Also... Look at my convo with Andrew. Ive been arguing that Obama had to make the deal the way he did because of the Republicans. There is a difference between correcting asshole Trump troll and picking a fight with everying just cuz. Even some of the Trump people you can have a decent debate with. I'm having one with Andrew right now. You don't have to just start off and continue to be a dick just because you disagree. Especially when you apparently don't bother reading more than a sentence or two and then decide on your own that this person is a piece of s*** and therefore you must treat them that way. I've been arguing the same things you have throughout the whole thread and you didn't bother looking at one of those damn things. I was an a**** because I disagreed with you. It turned out I didn't and you were the a******. Bring it down dude. Sometimes it's just unnecessary.
    1
  25644. 1
  25645. 1
  25646. 1
  25647. 1
  25648. 1
  25649. 1
  25650. 1
  25651. 1
  25652. 1
  25653. 1
  25654. 1
  25655. 1
  25656. 1
  25657. 1
  25658. 1
  25659. 1
  25660. 1
  25661. 1
  25662. 1
  25663. 1
  25664. 1
  25665. 1
  25666. 1
  25667. 1
  25668. 1
  25669. 1
  25670. 1
  25671. 1
  25672. 1
  25673. 1
  25674. 1
  25675. 1
  25676. 1
  25677. 1
  25678. 1
  25679. 1
  25680. 1
  25681. 1
  25682. 1
  25683.  @elizabethstanley7137  " Donald Trump was a very successful president" Because of Donald Trump's tragic handling of the pandemic the last year-and-a-half he was in office, he had half the country out of work for almost a year. While trying to sell us snake oil cures for covid. None of which he took when he got sick. Refusing to set an example and wear a mask for the first 5 months of the pandemic. Defunding the refilling medical stockpiles, forsake the states to literally go into a bidding war against each other for American lives. He got us into the only kind of war that literally nobody in history has ever won on either side. A trade war. One that cost us long-term hundreds of billions of dollars for which the "New Deal" he made, does not cover. He pulled us out of basically every good deal that Obama got us into. For no good reason... Other then to say it was a "bad deal" and lying about what was in them. When we all know it was bc of his jealousy over him. The Iran Nuk Deal, Paris climate accords, etc... The only reason he couldn't get rid of ACA and take affordable health care away from 100s of millions of Americans is because he never bothered to come up with a healthcare plan to replace it. Remember? It was always coming in 2 weeks... That and a final brave act from a war hero. Turning the situation at our border into a scene from the boy of the Striped Pajamas. Kids in cages... And all you cult followers can say about it is, "well, who built the cages?".... Who the F cares? Get them out. This is not who America is supposed to be. All the wild tried to clear this has nothing to do with raised with the old Lee border he ever cared about was the southern border which is literally only 22% of the illegal immigration issue. Except almost everybody else that was cubby good from the other ports of Entry happened to look more like him. Then there is "the wall" that was never going to slow anyone down and would only cost us more money, cuz Mexico was not paying for it.... That one ended up putting hundreds of thousands of gov workers out of a job for almost 6 months, having them stand in bread lines and loose their homes. All for him to fold, make all that sacrifice for nothing and then try and take the money from our military families. Still to never get a wall up. Going on a crazy deregulation party. Taking protections away from from the enviroment, workers, public edducation, etc... All while cashing big biz checks. Adding trillions to our national debt, while promising to lower it. Budding up to dictators and despots while alienating our long-term allies Just to name a few.
    1
  25684. 1
  25685. 1
  25686. 1
  25687. 1
  25688. 1
  25689. 1
  25690. 1
  25691. 1
  25692. 1
  25693. 1
  25694. 1
  25695. 1
  25696. 1
  25697. 1
  25698. 1
  25699. 1
  25700. 1
  25701. 1
  25702. 1
  25703. 1
  25704. 1
  25705. 1
  25706. 1
  25707. 1
  25708. 1
  25709. 1
  25710. 1
  25711. 1
  25712. 1
  25713. 1
  25714. 1
  25715. 1
  25716. 1
  25717. 1
  25718. 1
  25719. 1
  25720. 1
  25721. 1
  25722. 1
  25723. 1
  25724. 1
  25725. 1
  25726. 1
  25727. 1
  25728. 1
  25729. 1
  25730. 1
  25731. 1
  25732. 1
  25733. 1
  25734. 1
  25735. 1
  25736. 1
  25737. 1
  25738. 1
  25739. 1
  25740. 1
  25741. 1
  25742. 1
  25743. 1
  25744. 1
  25745. 1
  25746. 1
  25747. 1
  25748. 1
  25749. 1
  25750. 1
  25751. 1
  25752. 1
  25753. 1
  25754. 1
  25755. 1
  25756. 1
  25757. 1
  25758. 1
  25759. 1
  25760. 1
  25761. 1
  25762. 1
  25763. 1
  25764. 1
  25765. 1
  25766. 1
  25767. 1
  25768. 1
  25769. 1
  25770. 1
  25771. 1
  25772. 1
  25773. 1
  25774. 1
  25775. 1
  25776. 1
  25777. 1
  25778. 1
  25779. 1
  25780. 1
  25781. 1
  25782. 1
  25783. 1
  25784. 1
  25785. 1
  25786. 1
  25787. 1
  25788. 1
  25789. 1
  25790. 1
  25791. 1
  25792. 1
  25793. 1
  25794. 1
  25795. 1
  25796. 1
  25797. 1
  25798. 1
  25799. 1
  25800. 1
  25801. 1
  25802. 1
  25803. 1
  25804. 1
  25805. 1
  25806. 1
  25807. 1
  25808. 1
  25809. 1
  25810. 1
  25811. 1
  25812. 1
  25813. 1
  25814. 1
  25815. 1
  25816. 1
  25817. 1
  25818. 1
  25819. 1
  25820. 1
  25821. 1
  25822. 1
  25823. 1
  25824. 1
  25825.  @zachkh  And then there is this silliness! 😂 Lets recap! Shall we! 😁 You - Biden: "shoot the protestors in the leg" wow such solidarity Except He NEVER made the QUOTE. You LIED. I then proceed to give you the quote he made. Me - "Goodness! Don't be sad. " The idea that instead of standing there in teaching a cop when there is an unarmed person, coming at him with a knife or something, to shoot him in the leg instead of in the heart. There's a lot of different things that can change." Me - "now if you read the rest of the transcript of his remarks two days ago, you will see that portion is where he was talkin about police training, so unarmed black men stop getting killed by cops. It wasn't about the protestors. Why would you need to shot a protestor, btw? Violent rioters, I can see... But why aren't those 2 separate in your mind?" Then... You... Once again... And very sadly... Tried this sad thing. 👇 You - Please don't get a gun if you think shooting the legs is deescalation. Holy shit. Which is when I challenged you to quote me where I said anything like that because you are yet again trying to lie and make things up. As you can see above. Which is something you're going to desperately run away from. Then there was the whole will they wont they extremities thing... Blah blah blah... You acting like your a gun and cop expert. And then we get to this one! The Caboose, if you will, of your very sad train. 😁 You - "so glad you want to shoot peaceful people in the legs" Which brings us all back to you originally misquoting Biden. When you lied about his quote.... And are now forced to lie about what I have said. Cuz, that is what happens when you lie. You get caught! Then you have to tell another lie to cover up the lie you told. Your mother really should have taught you this.
    1
  25826. 1
  25827. 1
  25828. 1
  25829. 1
  25830. 1
  25831. 1
  25832. 1
  25833.  Jay Chan  I know you have nothing else to say, sweetheart! 😂 You guys always run from THOSE SCARY FACT THING! 😯😂😏 "Just a few Econ lies Trump has told you, that you ate up, without even looking.... But first... Where I got it all from. The list itself... this is important because it's a list of falsehoods by political officials about the economy. It has 13 pages. Everyone else (Dems, Reps, Ind +, btw. Obama and Harris is even on there twice.) has a lie here and there. Maybe one or 2 other people had more then 1 lie per page.... Your boy... Well... He has no less then 3 lies per page, on all 13 pages. Proven falsehoods.... all about economy. 6 on page 1, 6 on page 2 and 7 on page 3. Yet some how, ppl like you still swallow everything he says and you think we are the ones who are misguided. Look for yourself. 😁 https://www.politifact.com/subjects/economy/statements/byruling/false/?page=1 Now... Just a few of them. A few lies of many lies Trump tells about the economy, you tout. 😁 https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/aug/22/donald-trump/donald-trump-incorrect-us-dollar-strongest-its-eve/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/may/14/donald-trump/does-china-mostly-pay-us-tariffs-rather-us-consume/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/jan/04/donald-trump/no-usmca-trade-deal-wont-pay-border-wall-despite-d/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/sep/24/donald-trump/did-nafta-kill-millions-jobs-donald-trump/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jul/02/donald-trump/donald-trump-base-describing-gdp-growth-his-watch/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jul/02/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-mercedes-bmw-import-cars-us-mil/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/mar/09/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-about-wage-trends/ https://www.politifact.com/missouri/statements/2017/dec/15/donald-trump/trump-misses-mark-missouri-unemployment-rate/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/aug/17/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-wages-havent-gone-long-time-s-wr/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jul/27/donald-trump/its-false-trump-achieved-historic-increase-defense/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/may/26/donald-trump/did-donald-trumps-trip-create-or-save-millions-job/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/apr/04/donald-trump/donald-trump-flubs-how-unemployment-calculated/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/27/donald-trump/donald-trump-my-trans-pacific-partnership-oppositi/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/27/donald-trump/donald-trump-talks-about-his-finances-first-presid/ https://www.politifact.com/iowa/statements/2016/aug/31/donald-trump/donald-trump-explains-why-hillary-clinton-wants-sh/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/04/donald-trump/ama-trump-exaggerates-youth-unemployment/ https://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2016/mar/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-about-wisconsins-effective-unem/ https://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/mar/21/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-virginia-winery-largest-east-coa/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/11/donald-trump/no-gdp-growth-not-zero-trump-says/"
    1
  25834. 1
  25835. 1
  25836. 1
  25837. 1
  25838. 1
  25839. 1
  25840. 1
  25841. 1
  25842. 1
  25843. 1
  25844. 1
  25845. 1
  25846. 1
  25847. 1
  25848. 1
  25849. 1
  25850. 1
  25851. 1
  25852. 1
  25853. 1
  25854. 1
  25855. 1
  25856. 1
  25857. 1
  25858. 1
  25859. 1
  25860. 1
  25861. 1
  25862. 1
  25863. 1
  25864. 1
  25865. 1
  25866. 1
  25867. 1
  25868. 1
  25869. 1
  25870. 1
  25871. 1
  25872. 1
  25873. 1
  25874. 1
  25875. 1
  25876. 1
  25877. 1
  25878. 1
  25879. 1
  25880. 1
  25881. 1
  25882. 1
  25883. 1
  25884. 1
  25885. 1
  25886. 1
  25887. 1
  25888. 1
  25889. 1
  25890. 1
  25891. 1
  25892. 1
  25893. 1
  25894. 1
  25895. 1
  25896. 1
  25897. 1
  25898. 1
  25899. 1
  25900. 1
  25901. 1
  25902. 1
  25903. 1
  25904. 1
  25905. 1
  25906. 1
  25907. 1
  25908. 1
  25909. 1
  25910. 1
  25911. 1
  25912. 1
  25913. 1
  25914. 1
  25915. 1
  25916. 1
  25917. 1
  25918. 1
  25919. 1
  25920. 1
  25921. 1
  25922. 1
  25923. 1
  25924. 1
  25925. 1
  25926. 1
  25927. 1
  25928. 1
  25929. 1
  25930. 1
  25931. 1
  25932. 1
  25933. 1
  25934. 1
  25935. 1
  25936. 1
  25937. 1
  25938. 1
  25939. 1
  25940. 1
  25941. 1
  25942. 1
  25943. 1
  25944. 1
  25945. 1
  25946. 1
  25947. 1
  25948. 1
  25949. 1
  25950. 1
  25951. 1
  25952. 1
  25953. 1
  25954. 1
  25955. 1
  25956. 1
  25957. 1
  25958. 1
  25959. 1
  25960. 1
  25961. 1
  25962. 1
  25963. 1
  25964. 1
  25965.  news now hampton roads  I sure can. The Nazis aimed not at separation, but extermination. This is true, but only beginning in 1941. Before that, the used immigration as their method of removing Jews, and camps to encourage this immigration. Child detention centers, some of which where once the Chinese concentration camps, in America, during WW2, in an attempt to discourage immigration, is now a factor... and certainly her sure American Immigration policy is designed to keep out a certain group of people, much as the Nazis to remove a group already there. Trump, as a presidential candidate explicitly made appeals to violence during his campaign. Trump's well documented use of dehumanizing language is another clear similarity to the early stages of Nazi rule. He caters to a particular demographic of unhappy voters, as did the Nazis. After all, his "America First" rally cry was the motto of Nazi friendly Americans in the 1930s. Nazis literally descended on Charlottesville, while screaming, "blood and soil", the same racist slogan as their counterparts in Germany. The recent executive order making administrative law judges political appointees subject to executive power cannot be seen as anything less than an attempt to bring the courts in line with the administration's political ideology. The Nazis called it coordination, as they sought to co-op government and private organizations. John Fitzgerald, a GOP Congressional candidate in California, stated live on the radio that," everything we've been told about the Holocaust is a lie." He went on to receive 23% of the primary votes cast, making him the official Republican candidate of the House of Representatives. The GOP endorsed him, then retracted that endorsement. This is not an isolated event. An Illinois, Holocaust denier Arthur Jones won the Republican primary for the State House. The most prominent conservative Challenger for Republican Paul Ryan's house seat from Wisconsin is a white nationalist an anti-semite. In short, actual Nazis are running for office in America and some are winning. I could go on. Read your history. Nazi Germany did not become what it did with a snap of a finger. It happened slowly and by degrees. And that's not even touching on the human hunting parties that are being glorified right now, by the president of the United States. I wonder how many of those people that they're going to try and Round Up are going to be any thing other than brown.
    1
  25966. 1
  25967. 1
  25968. 1
  25969. 1
  25970. 1
  25971. 1
  25972. 1
  25973. 1
  25974. 1
  25975. 1
  25976. 1
  25977. 1
  25978. 1
  25979. 1
  25980. 1
  25981. 1
  25982. 1
  25983. 1
  25984. 1
  25985. 1
  25986. 1
  25987. 1
  25988. 1
  25989. 1
  25990. 1
  25991. 1
  25992. 1
  25993. 1
  25994. 1
  25995. 1
  25996. 1
  25997. 1
  25998. 1
  25999. 1
  26000. 1
  26001. 1
  26002. 1
  26003. 1
  26004. 1
  26005. 1
  26006. 1
  26007. 1
  26008. 1
  26009. 1
  26010. 1
  26011. 1
  26012. 1
  26013. 1
  26014. 1
  26015. 1
  26016. 1
  26017. 1
  26018. 1
  26019. 1
  26020. 1
  26021. 1
  26022. 1
  26023. 1
  26024. 1
  26025. 1
  26026. 1
  26027. 1
  26028. 1
  26029. 1
  26030. 1
  26031. 1
  26032. 1
  26033. 1
  26034. 1
  26035. 1
  26036. 1
  26037. 1
  26038. 1
  26039. 1
  26040. 1
  26041. 1
  26042. 1
  26043. 1
  26044. 1
  26045. 1
  26046. 1
  26047. 1
  26048. 1
  26049. 1
  26050. 1
  26051. 1
  26052. 1
  26053. 1
  26054. 1
  26055. 1
  26056. 1
  26057. 1
  26058.  @tycox8704  yeah.. I'm more than capable of forming my own thoughts and expressing my own opinion. So probably refrain from trying to put words in my mouth or thoughts in my head. Just because I'm not willing to take a woman's Choice away from her as to what happens to her own body, does not mean I think abortion is nonchalant or something that shouldn't be taken seriously. First... It could have future reproductive consequences towards women. It's a medical procedure. Every medical procedure comes with the risk. And it's not just physical risk either. I volunteered for 12 years at our local women's center before they shut it down. Have you ever been present or helped talk a whole lot of women through that difficult decision. It's something you live with. I also did so at a time where I was having several miscarriages. 5 in total before I had my little boy. They all had names. I felt them all... Talked to them all... However.. It actually helped that I knew the biology of the situation later. I knew they did not have consciousness. Their brains and pain receptors where not developed yet. Which meant, even though I was sad about their possibility being taken from me, I also knew they where not really there yet. Which meant there was no pain for them. No suffering on their part. Back then, even though I was still pro choice, I would have never chose abortion for myself. The funny part is... I might now. I have medical complications that make any pregnancy I have in the future high risk for me and the child. I am a single mom. So I would be faced with the choice of orphaning the child I already have for little hope of me and the new child surviving. Ironic twist.. I'm also easy to get pregnant. Three out of the five miscarriages and pregnancies were conceived when we were using protection and I was on the pill. I can not stand women who use abortion as birth control. Like most women would... I'm just not willing to force women to become walking talking incubators or think I have any right to do so. That devalues our existence.
    1
  26059.  @tycox8704  No... It doesn't. You just want to blame women.... So the idea of a medical decision being taken away from a man to prevent the very thing that you don't want to happen, is unacceptable to you. Mandatory reversible vasectomies are much less traumatic to the human body then abortion or pregnancy. The health risks are massively lower. It would allow for better planning. It would pay for itself, from all we would save from the creation, buying and distribution of not only birth control, but also the abortion pill. And.. Yes... Mandatory... As you would have women have it be mandatory for them to carry a pregnancy to full term and then give birth. Way more invasive than the vasectomy. I don't know how does someone qualify to be able to have an abortion to you? Rape, incest or life of the mother/child? And why would sexual servitude factor in? Did you just notice that even in your example of trying to prove your case you still put women in a subjugation role? How in the world you would think that mandatory vasectomies on men would in debt women is beyond me. How would that be? Considering their reversible a woman would still have the same choice she always did. Whether she was ready to be pregnant or not. The only difference to that would be that instead of women going off the pill, men would go in and get a reversal. That is very telling to your mindset... But... Irregardless, you just got to my point. You know how insane mandatory vasectomy sound to you? That's how insane forced pregnancy sounds to women. The point is, neither is okay. You claim I'm not thinking it through yet you dismiss any consequences women may have to face or any circumstance they may be in when it comes to them. It's insane to force men to have mandatory vasectomies. Just like it's insane to force women to give birth and carry children. We are not walking talking incubators, you are not walking talking seeders. You just proved my point about your mind set and pro choice.
    1
  26060. 1
  26061. 1
  26062. 1
  26063. 1
  26064. 1
  26065. 1
  26066. 1
  26067. 1
  26068. 1
  26069. 1
  26070. 1
  26071. 1
  26072. 1
  26073. 1
  26074. 1
  26075. 1
  26076. 1
  26077. 1
  26078. 1
  26079. 1
  26080. 1
  26081. 1
  26082. 1
  26083. 1
  26084. 1
  26085. 1
  26086. 1
  26087. 1
  26088. 1
  26089. 1
  26090. 1
  26091. 1
  26092. 1
  26093. 1
  26094. 1
  26095. 1
  26096. 1
  26097.  @mikeanderson3588  As for Brianna Taylor. I tell you what. I'm going to give you one last chance to stop lying about this woman, before I start copy and pasting all the court docs. You might wanna take me up on it. Cuz otherwise it's going to be super embarrassing for you. You know they released all that evidence to the public in one giant report, right? A few of the many thing s that prove you wrong in there are.... 1. Videotaped interviews of the officers talking about when they where at the door talking about the " knock-and-announce" warrent, and how they "heard her in there". 2. The police reprimands in their jackets for not following Department policy because none of them wore body cams. 3. A photocopy of the actual "knock-and-announce" warrent, which says, "knock-and-announce" on it. 4. ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION of Brianna Taylor having any affiliation with drugs or dealings of any kind. The only thing they mention in there is her allowing her 👉EX👈 boyfriend to use her rental car a few times when she was at work. 5. The fact that she had only dated this man for less than 4 months and was not dating him or even in the house the night she was shot. 6. The man they where investigating was not her current boyfriend. They had broken up a month prior to her death. The man in the house with her that night was her new boyfriend. The man in the house with her that night who shot a cop in the thigh didn't even get charged with anything. 7. In a taped interview, one of the officers admitting she started yelling "Who is it?" about 5 seconds before they busted in the door. Now why would she ask "Who is it?" If they didn't knock first? And why would the knock if they had a " no knock" warrant? 8. A 3D layout they put together of the apartments complex and bullet paths and landings. Several of which went into 2 other apartments in the complex. 1 beside and one above. Both of which had small children inside of them and one of which had a pregnant woman in them. 9. Interviews with several of the residents. All saying they heard the knock but not the announce. So... Let me repeat... Not from ANY NEWS SOURCE. The actual police interview tapes, records and court evidence and findings documents. Would you like to see them all or would you like to stop making yourself look silly? Entirely up to you?
    1
  26098. 1
  26099. 1
  26100. 1
  26101. 1
  26102. 1
  26103. 1
  26104. 1
  26105. 1
  26106. 1
  26107. 1
  26108. 1
  26109. 1
  26110. 1
  26111. 1
  26112. 1
  26113. 1
  26114. 1
  26115. 1
  26116. 1
  26117. 1
  26118. 1
  26119. 1
  26120. 1
  26121. 1
  26122. 1
  26123. 1
  26124. 1
  26125. 1
  26126. 1
  26127. 1
  26128. 1
  26129. 1
  26130. 1
  26131. 1
  26132. 1
  26133. 1
  26134. 1
  26135. 1
  26136. 1
  26137. 1
  26138. 1
  26139. 1
  26140. 1
  26141. 1
  26142. 1
  26143. 1
  26144. 1
  26145. 1
  26146. 1
  26147. 1
  26148. 1
  26149. 1
  26150. 1
  26151. 1
  26152. 1
  26153. 1
  26154. 1
  26155. 1
  26156. 1
  26157. 1
  26158. 1
  26159. 1
  26160. 1
  26161. 1
  26162. 1
  26163. 1
  26164. 1
  26165. 1
  26166. 1
  26167.  news now hampton roads  Deregulations, which you propped up as a good thing. Which makes me wonder if you really know what he is deregulating. So let's give you a few. Again verifiable fact based ones. Then maybe you can explain why that's a good thing? To be as accurate as possible, we will only list some of the ones that are in effect now, are partially in effect or are about to go in effect. No delayed, repealed or unchanged. Transportation Deregulations -Electrical shock protection rule - Military licensing and state commercial driver's license reciprocity - Training requirements for entry-level commercial motor vehicle operators - Public Transportation safety certification - Denied boarding compensation on airlines - Hours of service for commercial Motor Vehicles Agriculture deregulations - livestock carcass labeling rule - hog carcass cleaning rule - ban on the pesticide chlorpyrifos - for profit eligibility in the child and adult care food program - uninspected inedible meat products Education deregulations - Borrower defense rule - Head Start service duration requirements - sexual assault regulations - hiring flexibility for school nutrition program directors Environmental deregulations - methane and waste protection rule - additional monitoring requirements for pressure relief devices - fast-tracking small-scale natural gas exports - test procedures for electric motors - Waters of the u.s. rule - Mercury and air toxics standards - emission limits for new coal power plants - clean power plan - natural resource damages for hazardous substances - nuclear Safety Management - science transparency rule - production safety system role Labor deregulations - Fair labor standards Act - overtime regular rate calculation - White Collar exemptions for the fair labor standards Act - letting youth work with patient lifts - occupational exposure to Beryllium rule As I said before, these are only a few from 5 different categories. As I also said before, Obama never had to do this for his economy.
    1
  26168.  news now hampton roads  Lets talk taxes... Of course setting aside his own... That he has yet to show like he said he would and is now fighting in court not to. On average one out of three of us now work freelance or contract jobs. Those people will not benefit in any way in the Trump tax plan and will actually hurt them due to the new code restricting access to Major exemptions these Americans depend on annually for refunds and reduction. The average tax refund across the board except to the rich, went down by 8% this year. Causing many middle and lower class Americans that have never paid in before to have to this year. On average the only increase that average Americans are finding in their weekly or bi-weekly paychecks is $2.50 Getting Less on your tax refund hurts middle and lower class Americans across the board. Especially when you consider that most Americans, approximately one in four, use their tax refund to pay down debt from holiday spending or in general. Which is troubling when you consider Consumer Debt is at an all-time high. This is also bad for the US economy. Holiday spending is a critical economic boost for the u.s. GDP annually. Consumer spending makes up 70% of our GDP, and about 20% of retail purchases occur over the last two months of the year. If we expect Americans will overhaul their spending and debt habits to account for a small annual refund, consumer spending will drop and the economy will sputter. 1 and 3 Americans work for the gig economy, and those paychecks don't benefit from new withholding changes.
    1
  26169. 1
  26170. 1
  26171. 1
  26172. 1
  26173. 1
  26174. 1
  26175. 1
  26176. 1
  26177. 1
  26178. 1
  26179. 1
  26180. 1
  26181. 1
  26182. 1
  26183. 1
  26184. 1
  26185. 1
  26186. 1
  26187. 1
  26188. 1
  26189. 1
  26190. 1
  26191. 1
  26192. 1
  26193. 1
  26194. 1
  26195. 1
  26196. 1
  26197. 1
  26198. 1
  26199. 1
  26200. 1
  26201. 1
  26202. 1
  26203. 1
  26204. 1
  26205. 1
  26206. 1
  26207. 1
  26208. 1
  26209. 1
  26210. 1
  26211. 1
  26212. 1
  26213. 1
  26214. 1
  26215. 1
  26216. 1
  26217. 1
  26218. 1
  26219. 1
  26220. 1
  26221. 1
  26222. 1
  26223. 1
  26224. 1
  26225. 1
  26226. 1
  26227. 1
  26228. 1
  26229. 1
  26230. 1
  26231. 1
  26232. 1
  26233. 1
  26234. 1
  26235. 1
  26236. 1
  26237. 1
  26238. 1
  26239. 1
  26240. 1
  26241. 1
  26242. 1
  26243. 1
  26244. 1
  26245. 1
  26246. 1
  26247. 1
  26248. 1
  26249. 1
  26250. 1
  26251. 1
  26252. 1
  26253. 1
  26254. 1
  26255. 1
  26256. 1
  26257. 1
  26258. 1
  26259. 1
  26260. 1
  26261. 1
  26262. 1
  26263. 1
  26264. 1
  26265. 1
  26266. 1
  26267. 1
  26268. 1
  26269. 1
  26270. 1
  26271. 1
  26272. 1
  26273. 1
  26274. 1
  26275. 1
  26276. 1
  26277. 1
  26278. 1
  26279. 1
  26280. 1
  26281. 1
  26282. 1
  26283. 1
  26284. 1
  26285. 1
  26286. 1
  26287. 1
  26288. 1
  26289. 1
  26290. 1
  26291. 1
  26292. 1
  26293. 1
  26294. 1
  26295. 1
  26296. 1
  26297. 1
  26298. 1
  26299. 1
  26300. 1
  26301. 1
  26302. 1
  26303. 1
  26304. 1
  26305. 1
  26306. 1
  26307. 1
  26308. 1
  26309. 1
  26310. 1
  26311. 1
  26312. 1
  26313. 1
  26314. 1
  26315. 1
  26316. 1
  26317. 1
  26318. 1
  26319. 1
  26320. 1
  26321. 1
  26322. 1
  26323. 1
  26324. 1
  26325. 1
  26326. 1
  26327. 1
  26328. 1
  26329. 1
  26330. 1
  26331. 1
  26332. 1
  26333. 1
  26334. 1
  26335. 1
  26336. 1
  26337. 1
  26338. 1
  26339. 1
  26340. 1
  26341. 1
  26342. 1
  26343.  @aaronjacobs4900  I already did... Your ignoring it. That's why you tried moving the goal post and arguing symamtics. You said... " There is not one word from either party that addresses financials in that call." Your words, correct? I provided you with the part of the conversation right before Trump asks for a "favor". I highlighted the parts about money. Did I not? Sanctions... " International sanctions are political and 👉economic👈 decisions that are part of diplomatic efforts by countries, multilateral or regional organizations against states or organizations either to protect national security interests, or to protect international law, and defend against threats to international peace and security.[1][2][3][4] These decisions principally include the temporary imposition on a target of 👉economic👈, trade, diplomatic, cultural or other restrictions (sanctions measures) that are lifted when the motivating security concerns no longer apply, or when no new threats have arisen." Ukraine Pres... " the united States is doing quite a lot for Ukraine." What are we doing for Ukraine? It ain't rocket science. And then there is the one you mentioned... " great support". Except using the whole sentence clears the "support" up a bit. " I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense." Tell me, what are we doing for them in the "area of defense"? Money... Money money... All day long. So.... Your statment was a lie. The conversation was in reguards to current issues. Not history. What indicated to you that it was about the past with Europe? He was obviously fluffing Trump's ego. Cuz the UK gave them more then we did. The difference between sanctions in military Finance is irrelevant. Ukraine knew about the money on hold before the call. Why you think it's even almost possible that Ukraine would take a full month to realize that the money had not shown up when it was supposed to, is beyond me. We are not talking chump change or patty cake here. Especially as desprate as they where for the money. Other parts your missing... And intentionally flat out ignoring I will say again. Trump put the phone call in a top-secret server, which did not qualify as and was not the normal placement. He called on his executive power to try and keep the Whistleblower complaint from Congress. He lied several times, back and forth in a 48 hout period about did he hold the money, did he not... But if he did , it would be totally fine because the UK needs to give their fare share and that's why he did it. Except that didn't make any sense either because the UK gave way more then we did. So if everything was just sunshine and roses, why would they of done all that to keep the call secret and the report secret?
    1
  26344. 1
  26345. 1
  26346. 1
  26347. 1
  26348. 1
  26349. 1
  26350. 1
  26351. 1
  26352. 1
  26353. 1
  26354. 1
  26355.  @tukolo5408  Prison reform was all sides... Bipartason. Low unemployment is simply not as much as it is made out to be on his part. Job growth rate has been steadily decreasing since he took office. The reason that unemployment is low was a trend starting way back in the beginning of the Obama Administration. But also something he chooses to take full credit for. So I'll give him credit for the little bit that he helped on that, once he gives everybody else the credit they deserve on it. He dropped the mother of all bombs in his first 3 months, for no good reason and against his generals advice and due to his lies and unwillingness to admit it, he has gotten us in a needless war with Iran. Did he cheat the election? Which one? The one coming up or 2016? The one coming up... Yes. Blackmailing a foreign power to investigate his political opponent in the race, is absolutely doing that. Doing it right after Mueller testified shows just how little respect he has for the democracy that he is running. Russians messing with the ballots is not the only way to sway an election. The russians attacked out democracy and Trump asked them to do it. They broke the law, in attempts to get him elected. That is no small thing. The dems and the media are not lock step. And what they are that way on... Did anyone ever consider that it had anything to do with both parties, as well as a big chunk of the voting public thinking that the things that 45 does are crazy, selfish, corrupt and a myriad of other things. All comes razor dictates that being the simplest answer. All of these people were saying, hey this guy is doing all this messed up stuff. So maybe the answer is, hey this guy is doing all this messed up stuff. See... That's what you see.... I see them finally getting off their butts and doing what they should have done before. Holding him responsible for his actions, should not hinge on electability. Also... In no way... Has any sitting president in the past 60 plus years ever been considered the underdog when they are going for thwir second term. Thats just silly. Poles say his base is shrinking. Even here and other comment sections... The only ones left defending him are the die hards. Farmers are turning on him, rep Congress members as well. Ive told you why he should be impeached. President and it just generally what is supposed to happen when a president abuses his office like this. CNN and others had Hillary winning weeks before the election. Not days. That's a misknomer... Healthcare and reparations? The health care is for all Americans as a right and not a privilege for the wealthy well it bankrupts the rest of us. The immigrants that would get it are the ones that are detained. If they want to save money on that healthcare, its a real easy solution. Stop feeding the prison industrial complex by keeping them longer than they need to be there before they are deported, and get some damn judges in there. You won't have to worry about any kind of major Healthcare going to them if they did that. I don't know what the hell you're talking about reparations for illegal immigrants? I haven't seen that to be the case... But unless you are inciting violence or shouting fire in a crowded building when there isn't one, yeah, everybody should get just saying what they want.
    1
  26356.  @aaronjacobs4900  Well... First, the sanctions are not on Ukraine. They are on Russia.... Who is attacking Ukraine right now. The money for Ukraine... Is a bit convoluted and has been this back and forth 3 man tennis game for a while not. Ukraine, uk and USA. A good example of this is in the quoted Ukraine president speaking to Trump in the transcript. The Ukraine President was trying to make it sound like the UK had not helped Ukraine as much as the us had. This was a lie. The ukraine president knew it was a lie. The UK had given them much more. That is why Trump's claims of putting a hold on the money for Ukraine and it's reasoning being that the UK isn't giving them enough money and the u.s. is giving them more, was so readily dismissed. It's also why I say that the Ukraine president was trying to fluff Trump's ego. $391 million is the ammount of the money put on hold. ... Where the hard to understand part comes in... In June the Pentagon announced plans to provide 250 million dollars to Ukraine and security cooperation funds for additional training, equipment and advisory efforts to build the capacity of Ukraine's Armed Forces. They also, but separately plan to provide 141 million in aid. Both of those are the total of the money Trump put on hold. Hope your with me so far... The first set of money from the Pentagon was the 250 million dollars. One of those things that money was for was for "equipment". In the quote I gave you it mentioned the Ukraine president refrencing "Javelin". Which are anti tank weapons. This was part of the "equipment" they where supposed to buy from us with the money we gave them for aid. The easiest way to put that is, we give them money for all those things. They buy things like the Javelin from us. Which doesn't give all our money back but recoops some of it. Basiclly we give them aid for a lot of things. They promise to buy equipment and weapons from us. So when the president of Ukraine was referencing buying these anti-tank weapons, he was referencing the money on hold.
    1
  26357.  @aaronjacobs4900  1. You choosing not to consider all relevant material and Circumstance does not mean this is evidence of nothing. Barack Obama and Joe Biden were not attempting to get Ukraine to investigate their opposing candidate in an up coming election. You're setting up a false dichotomy. Withholding Aid by itself, for legitimate reason is not wrong or illegal. Doing so to Blackmail an entire country into investigating your political opponent in an upcoming election, is. Again, you're disregarding all relevant material in order to make your case. If you cannot make your case on all relevant material, your case isn't worth making. 2. This again... yes, that is correct. You cannot blackmail someone who is not being aware they're being blackmailed. Except that was not the case. You just keep making that up and have provided absolutely no evidence to that. So you continuing to lie about that does not actually mean anything. 3. Yes, there is. That phone call which did not qualify where it went and would not have gone there it's not specifically directed, had nothing to do with the nation's top security secrets. That is the database it went into. It would not have gone there naturally. And where in the world are you getting it from that the president can just throw away or burn any kind of recording of any phone call he might have with any foreign leader at any given point? That is absolutely not true. So please explain to me where that little bit of information came from? Where is your source? 5. The DNI, Rudy Giuliani and Trump himself have stated that he was the one that directed him to withhold they're report. They have all three done so on camera.
    1
  26358. 1
  26359. 1
  26360. 1
  26361. 1
  26362. 1
  26363.  @tukolo5408  Yes.. Prison reform was bipartisan. That's what I was saying. Trump is part of that bipartisan. I thought bipartisan would be enough. I wasn't taking anything away from him on that. In fact, I'll give you one you didn't list. His education secretary was trying to cut funding for Special Olympics and he overrode her. Now he did hire her in the first place but there was not a way he could of known she would try and do that and when she did, he stopped her. Yes... The economy is party him. Its also not all good. Like tax cuts for the rich and the massive and dangerous deregulations that he had to put fours in order to get the economy that way.... Again... I'm looking at all relevant material on subject by subject. I have issues with cherry pickers. Those are the people that usually just want one thing to be a certain way and only choose to look at the information that has that specific outcome. that doesn't make they're out come true, though. It just means they want to be right. They're not interested in the facts. If they were they would use all relevant material to come to a conclusion. The right to try... Well... Its over all good. Well, it leans more good than bad. These people are desperate and are looking for Hail Marys. If I was in that situation and I was going to leave this world and leave my son, I'd try anything to stay a little longer. The only part of that that gives me kind of an icky feeling is there is a reason that we have our medicine or drugs go through such strenuous trials before giving them to people. Then again, at the same time, it's the individual's life and their choice. So, like I said, I fall on the side of right to try. I would never want anybody to stop me from trying whatever I could and I don't think I have the right to ask someone else to do that either. He has so much media on his side. You can't claim that the entirety of the media is against him. Democrats and liberals, sure. The democrat-leaning news networks. Sure. But not all of it. Also, he holds the office. We may not agree on a lot of those, but I don't think you're crazy. You presented yourself very well, respectfully and articulately. We just have a difference of opinion. Though, there is a whole lot of people out there who thinks all the things that he does is crazy and Occam's razor dictates that maybe he's just crazy. Not you but him.
    1
  26364. 1
  26365.  @aaronjacobs4900  Now... Correcting his reading... 1. So this guy keeps saying that the quid pro quo or the blackmail wasn't possible because they didn't know the ad was on home during the conversation. He's provided nothing to substantiate that. He just keep saying it. The requirement that does need to be met however for a charge of blackmail or extortion would be a judge's ruling on whether the information he was trying to get was of any value and how much it would be worth. Which would be something that would happen in court. That would be the only barrier to an extortion or a blackmail if this was a regular person. 2. What also happened between those 48 hours that he's talking about and yet another example of him not holding true to not being bias, Trump Giuliani and bar went back and forth a couple of different times lying about whether the money was on hold, then it wasn't on hold then if it was on hold it would be totally fine. There was also a claim of executive privilege put on it at the beginning of those 48 hours. Another thing he doesn't mention is all the Republican lawmakers coming out and saying that that was an okay. His own party turned against him because they refused to release the report to Congress. With pressure from that and the media he finally decided to try and get ahead of the story. I guess he just forgot that though. 3. Well... he's just setting up a false dichotomy there. Either you agree with me or you're not being intellectually honest.except to be plain ole honest, we do what? That's right! Consider all relevant material. Not just what fits what he has already decided to be true. And if you haven't noticed the pattern.. If it doesn't fit but just wont let him forget it, he just makes some stuff up. Like Trump had every right she just delete the call and not save any of it and you can totally do that with all of them no matter what. Except the presidential records act what has something different to say about that. Now... This is what happened with the report before it was released. Trump can his lawyers produce a statement part of which said, " have the right to withhold such Communications for foreign leaders from lawmakers and the public as classified or otherwise privileged." Now why would that of been released before the report? I wonder? 😉 since then and when it happened, many legal analysts have said, " we can't say that executive privilege and control over classified information is going to be used to Shield the president from his duties to comply with federal law." - Claire Finkelstein does facility director of the center of ethics and the rules of law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. " that's just a sort of complete abuse of office." Plus... we certainly know this wasn't the first time Trump and his justice department have refused to comply with lawmakers requests. The Whistleblower filed the report Wes the Inspector General who has deemed it both "credible" and "urgent". Usually these complaints are supposed to be forwarded to the intelligence committee is within 7 days. The office of legal counsel, of course, stopped this. The inspector-general who deemed it urgent and credible has to this day objected to that decision. And stated," the president of the United States solicited a foreign government to conduct an investigation of a political adversary in a manner that could have subverted the Integrity, yet again, of our Democratic process is abhorrent." He's also mentioned several times that this could discourage further whistleblowers. It is important to know. That the office of legal counsel is essentially the brain of the justice department and the administration more broadly, issuing opinions on some of the thorniest legal questions that agencies might have faced. But the offices lawyers are not neutral parties, like judges. Their guidance Austin seeks to facilitate the goals of the administration. Another important thing to consider. well the president could generally invoke presidential Communications privilege to keep secret his talks with foreign leaders, his publicly acknowledging the conversation could complicate that. If Trump was invoking privilege merely to keep secret an inappropriate request of a foreign leader it could be interpreted dad he has abused his power. David Kress, and a former justice department National Security official said that while case law on the issue was murky, the justice department would be on terribly weak ground if Trump was pressing his counterpart on Biden. That's not classified, and it's the core of what's wrong here. 4. He should not of done what he did but you insist on defending and excusing it, while claiming no bias. BTW, If there was nothing to hide in that transcript, in that call, if they thought nothing was wrong with it, why would they go to all of those links to try and keep that conversation and The Whistleblower report out of the hands of Congress?
    1
  26366. 1
  26367. 1
  26368. 1
  26369. 1
  26370. 1
  26371. 1
  26372.  @aaronjacobs4900  SoOoOo... Lets do this... Sense this isnstarting to waist my time... Which is partly my fault, cuz I should have stuck to my original tactic of just giving proof of your claims being wrong. Back to smarter, not harder. Your claims and proof they are wrong. 1. " There's not one word from either party that addresses financials in that call. 0." "I did talk to Angela Merkel and I did meet with her. I also met and talked with Macron and I told them that they are not doing quite as much as they need to be doing on the issues with the 👉sanctions. They are not enforcing the sanctions. They are not working as much as they should work for Ukraine.👈 The sanctions they refer to are FINANCIAL sanctions on Russia, from The UK and Canada. It could only be that because those are the only type sanctions against Russia at this time, from those 2 countries. "It turns out that even though logically, the European Union should be our biggest partner but technically the United States is a much bigger partner than the European Union and I’m very grateful to you for that because the United States is doing quite a lot for Ukraine. Much more than the European Union especially when we are talking about 👉sanctions against the Russian Federation.👈 which is confirmed in this comment. Russian financial sanctions. 👉I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense.👈 The support that Ukrain is recoeving from us is money to buy the Javelins, among other things, from us, using the financial aid that was on hold at the time. Asking about buying these things is asking for the money to be taken off of hold. So they can do so. "👉We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps. specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.👈" which is further illostrated here, naming the Javelin and commenting that it's from defense. 2. That Ukraine was not aware of the hold on the money until after the call. A full month after, infact. - the Trump Administration initially told Congress it was releasing the age to Ukraine on February 28th. It repeated that assertion to Congress again on May 23rd. Whene the second deadline came and went, the hold became public knowledge, due to the Congress, who had approved the aid, wondering why the money was still being held up. Which means, there was one deadline for the money TO BE RELEASEED TO TGE UKRAINE on Feb 28th, which was not met. Then another on May 23rd. SoOoOo.... If for no other reason, unless the entire Ukraine gov was living under a rock the time, by May 24th, Ukraine knew about the aid being on hold. If checking their bank accounts and not seeing it there after the first deadline, was not enough. Now I could be mistaken... But isn't May 23rd and fed 28th before July 25? 3. " Objectively, does the EU pull its weight in support of Ukraine, no." Your own words prove you wrong here. "The u.s. does not get us more overall Aid, what is the largest contributor of military aid, " If you would like a more specific number... The European union and European financial institutions have contributed more than 16.4 billion dollars in Grants and Loans to Ukraine since 2014. European countries have contributed an estimated two-thirds of all of the aim to Ukraine since Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. " according to the organization of economic cooperation and development, the EU institutions top the oecd's list of the top 10 donors of official development assistance to Ukraine, with 425.2 million dollars contributed on average for 2016 and 2017. The US was second with 204.4 million dollars in assistance. 4. Innocent until proven guilty applies even if one is not charged with a crime. " How do you take an innocent until proven guilty standard, which never takes into account interpretation, and decide the guilt of someone based on nothing but interpretation?" "You Don't invoke innocent until proven guilty, that is the default legal standard. You must not understand that innocent people do not have to be exonerated it is not how this works." The universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11, states " Everyone 👉charged with a penal offence👈 has the right to be Presumed Innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense" 5. Your continued insistence that the only thing that mattered was to transcript. " what was the whistleblowers complaint? Abuse of power during a phone call. What information is needed to understand the complaint. The words of said conversation. So I'm exactly the right amount of concerned only on the transcript. It's the definition of this entire discussion." Except... Not so much. You're once again trying to set up a false dichotomy and "framing" to boot. The transcript is a major part of this situation but not all of it. - time of the first deadline on the money... Feb - time of the second deadline of the money... May - moving the call to a server intentionally, that it would have otherwise, not gone in. - documented attempts at claiming executive privilage. - breach of normal protocol in regards to the Whistleblower report and where it will go or not go - Trump back and forth lies about the hold. - The White House lawyers releasing statements saying that they were in their rights to withhold the report from Congress using executive privilege May have forgotten 1 or 2 but that's enough to show that the transcript is not the only relevant piece of information.
    1
  26373.  @aaronjacobs4900  6. So....there where a lot of these but to list them all would take forever. So, I'm just gonna give you 1 example of you assuming things I've said or couldn't saw, in order to validate your point of view. " If what you're saying was true, you could outline what Financial sanctions were being discussed, but you can't." This was very curious. Cuz... If you look, the comment where you asked me to do just that is 2 above this one.... " If you're correct, please explain the specific Financial sanctions in regards to EU and Ukraine are being discussed here. Please. I'm genuinely asking you to inform me." With no comment from me in between those 2. Which meant, you asked the question, INSISTED you where being genuine and then proceeded to assume I could not answer that question, just below it. Even though I had not replied at all. 7. " There's no qualification for where the president's saves private phone calls for foreign leaders. Presidents have 100% control over their Communications with other leaders, it would have been within his right as the executive and chief to burn the phone calls if you want it. There's absolutely no responsibility or obligation to share them with the public." Let's educate you on the presidential records Act of 1978. This is an act of Congress of the United States governing the official records of presidents and vice-presidents created or received after January 20th 1981, and 👉mandating the preservation of all presidential records👈. Enacted November 4th, 1978 the pra charged the 👉legal ownership of the official records of the president from private to public👈. Wrong again. Bob! 😉✌ 8. " this situation would not legally qualifies blackmail or extortion technically, I was just avoided correcting you or someone else in the chain who described it as such for the sake of argument. Extortion and blackmail have certain elements of exchange that need to be met And this is not meet them." Legal experts have explained that you are wrong. I am not one. So I choose to listen to them. Blackmail - a threat to report or testify against a person for violation of federal law, or a demand of money or 👉something else of value👈, is considered a federal crime. Now...i never used extortion. So that's moot. Basiclly legal experts have argued that the Crux of the charge of blackmail would be a judge's ruling on whether the information that Trump got from Ukraine was of significant value. Last time I checked... Your not that judge or a judge at all. So you can not make that determination. 9. " There's no high crime or misdemeanor that establishes grounds for impeachment." This is more arrogance on your part. Which lends credibility to my guests. You're not biased towards Trump, but you are biased about needing to be right and forming your opinions around that assumption. What makes you think you're the one that gets to determine that? Do you have any particular experience in the field? Are you a member of Congress? Have you already gone through the proceedings of finding out whether there has been an unimpeachable offense? So how do you know there's no high crime or misdemeanor? 10. " The contents of transcript can only be read as persuading someone if you don't care about the actual definition of pressure at all. The call may have included inappropriate elements, but pressure was not one, if you're intellectually honest. " Here is your false dichotomy. I have not only told you but I have proven to you that the Ukraine president knew about the hold on the money Before the phone call. You continue to ignore it and Act like it's not there because you seem to think your argument would fall apart if you did not. And you're right. So... It's accept those terms, that framing of things, so that you wont see the "pressure" or you're not intellectually honest. in other words, accept my interpretation of the facts in whole and ignore all else or you're not being honest. 11. " now in this situation last less than two days before he provides the information, which you also classified as "so much effort to cover it up" no matter what he does or how long it takes information to come to light he is Implicated in some cover-up effort." Yet another exampme of you being dishonest about what I have said, in order to validate your own point of view. It's super easy to prove as well. Using yours and my words. You got "so much effort to cover it up" from a comment I made where I listed other things that you left out in that 48 hours. You then made a comment going point by point on each of those. "Yeah... I know. I'm saying you're only interested in talking about the transcript of this specific case. When there is other facts to consider. You can whataboutism all you want. It doesn't make it not true. 1 the freezing of the money 2 the implied blackmail in the phone call to get a foreign country to investigate his political adversary 3 the intentional placing of the record of this phone call in a top secret server for which it did not qualify 4 the abuse of executive power as an attempt to keep the whistleblowers report from Congress 5 the back-and-forth lying on camera, of trump saying he didn't put the money on hold, but he did put the money on hold, but he didn't put the money on hold, but if he did put the money on hold it would totally be okay probably. So, yes. You're ignoring other things on purpose. You're also ignoring this question that I've asked almost every time." Only skipping the last one where you just got that quote from me. "If there was nothing to hide in that transcript, in that call, if they thought nothing was wrong with it, why would they go to all of those links to try and keep that conversation and The Whistleblower report out of the hands of Congress?" In my words "why would they go to 👉all of those things👈 to try and keep that conversation and The Whistleblower report out of the hands of Congress?" I was clearly refering to the list of things on the same comment that I just listed. which you obviously understood when you had replied before Because you went point-by-point trying to refute that comment. Now you're trying to take it out of context and say That it was just about the 48 hours. Your lying.
    1
  26374. 1
  26375. 1
  26376. 1
  26377.  @aaronjacobs4900  1. " There's not one word from either party that addresses financials in that call. 0." "I did talk to Angela Merkel and I did meet with her. I also met and talked with Macron and I told them that they are not doing quite as much as they need to be doing on the issues with the 👉sanctions. They are not enforcing the sanctions. They are not working as much as they should work for Ukraine.👈 The sanctions they refer to are FINANCIAL sanctions on Russia, from The UK and Canada. It could only be that because those are the only type sanctions against Russia at this time, from those 2 countries. "It turns out that even though logically, the European Union should be our biggest partner but technically the United States is a much bigger partner than the European Union and I’m very grateful to you for that because the United States is doing quite a lot for Ukraine. Much more than the European Union especially when we are talking about 👉sanctions against the Russian Federation.👈 which is confirmed in this comment. Russian financial sanctions. 👉I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense.👈 The support that Ukrain is recoeving from us is money to buy the Javelins, among other things, from us, using the financial aid that was on hold at the time. Asking about buying these things is asking for the money to be taken off of hold. So they can do so. "👉We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps. specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.👈" which is further illostrated here, naming the Javelin and commenting that it's from defense.
    1
  26378. 1
  26379. 1
  26380. 1
  26381. 1
  26382. 1
  26383. 1
  26384. 1
  26385. 1
  26386. 1
  26387.  @aaronjacobs4900  11. " now in this situation last less than two days before he provides the information, which you also classified as "so much effort to cover it up" no matter what he does or how long it takes information to come to light he is Implicated in some cover-up effort." Yet another exampme of you being dishonest about what I have said, in order to validate your own point of view. It's super easy to prove as well. Using yours and my words. You got "so much effort to cover it up" from a comment I made where I listed other things that you left out in that 48 hours. You then made a comment going point by point on each of those. "Yeah... I know. I'm saying you're only interested in talking about the transcript of this specific case. When there is other facts to consider. You can whataboutism all you want. It doesn't make it not true. 1 the freezing of the money 2 the implied blackmail in the phone call to get a foreign country to investigate his political adversary 3 the intentional placing of the record of this phone call in a top secret server for which it did not qualify 4 the abuse of executive power as an attempt to keep the whistleblowers report from Congress 5 the back-and-forth lying on camera, of trump saying he didn't put the money on hold, but he did put the money on hold, but he didn't put the money on hold, but if he did put the money on hold it would totally be okay probably. So, yes. You're ignoring other things on purpose. You're also ignoring this question that I've asked almost every time." Only skipping the last one where you just got that quote from me. "If there was nothing to hide in that transcript, in that call, if they thought nothing was wrong with it, why would they go to all of those links to try and keep that conversation and The Whistleblower report out of the hands of Congress?" In my words "why would they go to 👉all of those things👈 to try and keep that conversation and The Whistleblower report out of the hands of Congress?" I was clearly refering to the list of things on the same comment that I just listed. which you obviously understood when you had replied before Because you went point-by-point trying to refute that comment. Now you're trying to take it out of context and say That it was just about the 48 hours. Your lying.
    1
  26388. 1
  26389. 1
  26390. 1
  26391. 1
  26392. 1
  26393. 1
  26394. 1
  26395. 1
  26396.  @tukolo5408  I agree with both of those. Media being powerful and tribalism. Though I do have a firm practice of checking facts that are given to me by any form of news media, before I start speaking on them. I wish more people had that practice. I wouldn't completely agree that CNN and MSNBC sensationalize has a lot of what he does. At most, I would say some. He has from the beginning and will continue to shoot himself in the foot, in that manner, most of the time. Though I don't argue that there is corruption on both sides. I just feel like, more on our side, we choose to take responsibility for our leaders who are corrupt and we tried to get rid of them more. I personally don't want dishonesty and Corruption leading my way. It's been my experience on the Republican side that they will defend an excuse that action by their leaders all day everyday because they want to be right more than they want the truth. I don't remember that thing with Pelosi and the mainstream media happening. I'm not doubting it. I just don't see it as necessarily, nefarious. More as, she made a suggestion and they thought it was a good idea. Fox... For sure! As soon as he's not good for business, he'd be gone. Agree That's not true. I'm a Democrat and I don't think that. I want my ideas challenged. If they don't stand up to basic scrutiny then I need to re-evaluate my position. So the healthcare for undocumented people was in reference to the ones we are holding in the detention centers. If we are going to hold them for long periods of time we should take care of them. We're not doing that right now and America should be better than that. If you're not going to treat them like human beings then send them back right away. Reparations, is not so much an unpopular issue as it is tenuous and hard to quantify to millions of people. Basically the argument is due to the circumstance that African-Americans began in, in this country, they are now more likely to be poor, go to jail, commit crimes, go to jail for crimes they didn't commit... And less likely to seek higher education, contribute in major ways and whatnot. It's basically the argument that everybody started the race at the starting line, but due to our abuse, negligence and downright in human behavior, African Americans started their race with 50 lb weights attached to their ankles. And people feel like there's a direct correlation with that and how the African-American has progressed to today. It's legally feasible to make a good case for that in a court. It would just be a long and complicated process. Healthcare for all and not just those that can afford it should be an inalienable right. The number one cause of bankruptcy in America is Healthcare cost. Children should not be dying in America because their parents can't afford the astronomical medical bills brought on by the corrupt drug companies and health institutions, or health insurance companies. Other major countries in the world have figured out how to make Healthcare a right and not a privilege for those who can afford it. We should have led that fight and we need to catch up. Gun confiscation is a misnomer to a certain extent. That's what the right screams every time the left wants Common Sense gun regulations. The amount of guns that we have in this country has a direct correlation with the last decade-and-a-half of progressively more often mass shootings. At the same time, we're not trying to take your guns away. When people say that I always ask them to name two or three or four politicians that have ever said that. It's just not true for 99.9% of us. - autos... Are quite simply, weapons of war and have not buisness in general population. That's why people aren't alowed tanks or land mines, granades and what not. - if you are in the military or a police officer (my parents where both) you have to take an annual proficiency exam in order to carry your gun in public. People without that training should at least have to demonstrate in some form or manner that they are capable of handling a firearm in public in a responsible manner if they intend to practice open carry. - we need to close the private seller loophole. The one that most people think is the Gun Show loophole. - if you have been diagnosed with a severe mental illness, to the point that you cannot responsibly handle your own finances, then you shouldn't be able to have a gun. - we need to educate on gun safety - we need to study the cause and effect of all these mass shootings - there needs to be a strong push for mental health evaluations, for registered gun owners These are not taking guns away. It's reasonable regulations. Abortion up to birth is also not a thing. Again... Right wing scare tactics again. Even the gov that said something lile that (can't remember his nmae) on that radio show, was taken out of context. He use to be a doctor and was answering a medical question with medical facts. Not giving an opinion. Every dem, including myself, that I have ever heard of, basiclly has this opinion about abortion. It should be rare. Very rare. If someone was to put up a bill that limited aborting to first trimester for rape, incest and life of the mother/child and second trimester in terms of life of the mother/child. We would support it. Everything after that is personal responsibility. When people try to demonize me for being pro choice, and call me a baby killer... Intend to point out the other ugly side. The one they dont think of. If abortions was deemed illegal tomorrow, there would come a time when a 12 year old child who's been raped gets pregnant and then is forced to carry that child to term and forced to give birth to them... That is only 1 of the horrific sanarios that could happen. Abortion is a hard issue. Bottom line... I would never do it... But that is the chpice I make with my body. I have no right to force someone to do that with theirs. I also don't agree with your assessment that we want to punish them for voting for someone we don't like. Being on the other side of it... Is just exceedingly frustrating to see you guys back him as he dismantles our democracy and does so in such a Brazen way. He is obviously corrupt. He is obviously lying to everyone almost every single day and you guys act like it's us for pointing it out. You're shooting the messenger. If there was any real unbias opinion on your side... We would not have to find ourselves explaining all the time, news media and all, that what he is doing, how he is acting and what he is saying, is not good on so many different things. it's not about punishing you. It's honestly that were flummoxed upon the realization that we have to make the case for most of these things to you guys. Its so obvious. Or it should be. I can Guarantee you Republicans are not less combative than Democrats. I've already told you that is silencing the right voices is happening, I do genuinely think that's b***** and needs to not happen. And I would stand with you on that. Any day of the week. No matter what..... There is no "but" that comes after that. With that being said, I'm in the youtube comment section every day.... Almost. Giving opinions that you guys don't like. On a daily bases I am threatened, insulted, called a race tratior because my son is mixed... I hear calls for war, violance, rape and all manner of other things. I even have a guy who right now who is threatening to put a collar on me and chain me in his basement... All of which go against the guidlines of these platforms. That has a lot to do with those people disapearing. Just look at almost every thread on this platform, on your side. I'm, by no means, calling us perfect. Myself included.... But your far from angels on that side.
    1
  26397.  @tukolo5408  I don't think your wrong... Or like any of that... Just... One sided. As I'm sure I am as well. Thought I do try and see the other side. especially with decent and respectful people like you, calmly trying to illustrate your point. I try to find things we can agree on with you guys. There can be a middle ground. Noone is advicating for non-citizens to vote in our elections. a lot of the things that you say or right wing propaganda. Look, you seem reasonable and so I would implore you to do your research on these things and see how true they are before you swallow them whole. I do the same thing on my side. I don't comment on every video on CNN or MSNBC. Sometimes I even argue against what they're saying Because I've researched it and I've gone in and check their facts. They certainly don't get everything right all the time. and at the end of the day I'm more interested in the truth than I am about being right or wrong. because I can work with the truth. Even if it goes against what I thought was true. If I know there's truth and that truth is a particular problem then I'm better equipped to fix it... Ya know. Voting age... Hmmm... Can I say that I am undecided on that one? I see almost even positives and negatives on both sides. There's a reason that we don't allow teenagers to drink or smoke. It's literally that their brains aren't done growing and the part of their brain That needs to be developed to do that is one of the last ones to finish growing. insurent, they're not really good at decision-making and considering all the consequences of their actions. They're impulsive. At the same time, they're inheriting this from us, this country, this world. so part of me says, why shouldn't they get a say in what they're going to have to deal with in the future? Ya know? I go back and forth. Though, they don't all think the world is going to end in 12 years. Come on now. Not only could you not qualify that statement... It's an Oversimplification of the actual problem. And climate change is a problem. And it should be understood correctly or not Flippantly tossed to the side. Come on now. On some I think you're wrong, on others I don't. As I've laid out. as for winning until the next election, I understand why that would make more sense. in a political one side winning kind of way. Here's the thing though, I don't want Mike Pence To become the de facto president. What I'm more concerned about is our democracy though. The precedent it would set. Of having a president, tried to interfere in our electoral process in order to get himself re-elected to office And using his position and power to do so. if we don't challenge that, what we're saying to every president from now on, Democrat or Republican is all you have to do in order to steal the next election and ask for another countries help in doing so by leveraging them with American tax dollars, is to do so about a year before the election happens. Cuz, that way, its more politically expedient to just wait for the next election. that thinking is not good for either side.
    1
  26398. 1
  26399. 1
  26400. 1
  26401. 1
  26402.  @gregw8232  Oh... So you are one of those... Focus on the transcript and nothing else... I don't know why you guys think that it's a good idea to focus just on that... But sure... Ya know the part where Trump asks the ukraine prez to investigate Biden, hos current political opponent... Yeah... That is breaking the law.... The thing is... He had options to get that done without breaking the law. He could of had Ukraine investigate before he became his opponent and back when the original investigation was going on... Or he could of had the justice department, of which he runs, do an independant investigation, in conjunction with Ukraine. If he had done either or both of those things, he would not have to deal with impeachment. So ask yourself, if he had those options and still chose to do it this way, then why? Now... Some of the investigation that you are not mentioning but that are npt any less relevant. 1. Lying on cam about not talking about Biden in the phone call 2. Trying to claim executive privilage and instructing his admin to not comply with Congressional subpoena to release the Whistleblower report. 3. Obstruction of justice for attempting to curtail witness accounts and block other Witnesses from even testifying. As well as having his administration ignore Congressional subpoenas for documents on text message Exchange 4. Attempting to hide the transcript of the July 25th phone calls by ordering it be put in top secret storage, upon which it does not normally go and does not qualify for 5. His administration coming out and saying that there was quid pro quo. 6. Witness testimony of quid pro quo from people who were on the phone call 7. The holding of the money and schedule meeting at the White House with the Ukraine president until after his demands were met. There is a bunch more but.. That is enough fpr now.
    1
  26403. 1
  26404. 1
  26405. 1
  26406. 1
  26407. 1
  26408. 1
  26409. 1
  26410. 1
  26411.  @girlonfire00net  Let me tell you a story. We live in Louisiana. My brother is Army National Guard. 36 hours after his first year-long deployment Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans. That is 36 hours with his three year old little girl. His unit and 2 other local units were the closest and so they got sent to help with disaster relief. I don't know if you remember back that far but shortly after they got there and the governor declared martial law there were several different new stories about how the soldiers were going power-mad and doing all kinds of craziness. Removing people from their homes by force and whatnot. Not once, that I saw, did they mention that they had to because even though their houses were not underwater they literally had the corpses of their neighbors washing up in their backyards, in an area without running water, electricity or emergency assistance. Because they were painted so badly, on what little off time they had, some people, some local and some not, took two following them around and harassing them. Some peaceful protesters but some not so much. Some got physical with them. Because of this, some of the soldiers in my brother's unit took to getting physical right back with them. I'm not sure I would have reacted any differently. They had just gotten back from being halfway across the world, getting shot at every day for an entire year, away from their loved ones and now they get sent to go help people and have the people they are trying to help attack them. After a few days of this things got very contentious there. As you can imagine. Since the soldiers were still soldiers they could not directly attack somebody without provocation. A lot of them started standing in front of these people long enough, hoping that they would do something. Something that would allow them to do something back. One day my brother and his unit Commander are walking back from lunch at one of the dining facilities and he sees a group of soldiers standing at rest in front of a group of protesters. He stands there and watches for a while. These protesters are saying all manner of shity things to them. I mean things like, how they were f**** these soldiers wives when they were away, that their kids were glad they were gone, that they were traitors and so on and so forth. Then a protester runs up to the group with this box. That got my brother's attention because he didn't know what was in the box. It turns out it was a box filled with American flags and those long-armed lighters that you use to light a fireplace. I don't have to spell out what happened next. This got the best of 2 of these soldier's. They jumped out from the unit and started swinging on these 2 guys who where close to the front. The other guys from the unit didn't swing or anything but they also didn't stop them. My brother and his unit commander rush over and his unit commander starts yelling. The 2 stopped of course. They where apparently not to far gone enough to not respect the rank. Even though they where a different unit. If you where army, you know that doesn't matter anyways. One of the protesters that got hit, starts yelling about charges and the other was pretty quiet but still pushing against my brother who was standing in front of the protesters at this point, holding them back. The unit commander has the 2 soldiers stand at attention. My brother told me the hard part was seeing the soldiers cry as they stood there. He knew the situation. He knew they had screwed up. He also knew what they had gone threw. The part he said supprised him was what he didn't know but had found out later about the protesters. They where 2 medical discharges from the Army. Those where the ones burning the flags. Both with obvious and diignosed PTSD. One had also lost a leg (which they didnt notice at the time because he had a prostetic and pants on). They had both also lost a lot of friends.... Road side bombs was one of the ways how. There where a few more but I can't remember those. Needless to say, these 2 guys where really messed up. It didn't help that they had just been fprced out of their homes by fellow soldiers because of the hazardous conditions in the area. My brother found this all out because he was the one who had to do the paper work for the report that had to be filled after the incident. They told him they had lost to much to be assaulted for exercising the rights the fought for. They said they lost to much to lose their homes. They said they had families and asked what they where supposed to do? A few months after he got home, we had taken to having all these long talks. We are 15 months apart and so have always been close. He had brought back up this situation at one point. He said, after all that he had been through and seen... One of the hardest thinks for him was not being able to give those 2 soldier protesters an answer to the question they asked him. He told me that if burning that flag and yelling was what they needed to do, then he basically could not fault them for it. They faught and almost died for that right. He didn't agree with what they where doing. He hated it because he knew what those units down there in Katrina had just came from and what they where going through then but they did all that for a reason. Because if it wasn't for a reason then what was it for? Look, didn't mean to get all deep on you or anything. I just saw you came back with a more level head and some respect. So I thought you would be open enough to catch a point.... And that poimt is... We all have reasons.... For doing what we do. What seams like madness to one person, is just what another needs to hold on a little longer to themselves and all they know. It doesnt excuse anything are make things right or wrong but in a country that prides itself on the freedom that it offeres to its people, and as long as it not hurting anyone else... Then isnt it reasonable enough to have understanding with one another before there is judgment? Thanks for the prayers and your service.
    1
  26412. 1
  26413. 1
  26414. 1
  26415. 1
  26416. 1
  26417. 1
  26418. 1
  26419. 1
  26420. 1
  26421. 1
  26422. 1
  26423. 1
  26424. 1
  26425.  @luckyluc25  SoOoOo... Actually one was already investigated... Not by us... which is what could have happened if Donald Trump wanted to do anything other than just get dirt on his political opponent in the next presidential election. He could have either asked for the investigation before Biden became in his political opponent or he could have had the justice department, for which he is the head, open an independent investigation, had them work with the Ukraine government and then have them come to an independent conclusion. He did none of those things. If he had done either of those things or even both of those things, the Democrats wouldn't have a leg to stand on when it comes to impeachment. He didn't care weather Biden broke the law or not. He wanted dirt. He wanted to interfere in the next presidential election, like you tried to do in the last one.... Oh... And I noticed you didn't answer my question.... If you think Biden doing that is wrong then you must thing Trump is, as well, correct? You find who's being investigated curious. The rest of us can't help to have a little curiosity about the fact that you guys keep bobbing and weaving when addressing Trump's illegal actions and trying to put them off onto Biden. All you want to talk about is Biden. To me, it makes more sense to focus on the bigger issue. You know, the guy with more power and influence at the moment.... But fine... You wanna talk about both... We can talk abput both but you don't seam to want to do that. Which is why most of us just see this as some b***** diversion tactic. We bring up Trump you scream Biden. We make the comparison you ignore the question. So why don't you stop worrying about the media and what it's doing or not doing and start paying attention to your own actions. The whole premise was about Trump but you don't want to mention him. You want to talk about Biden this and Biden that. If you want to talk about hypocrisy, look in the mirror.
    1
  26426. 1
  26427. 1
  26428. 1
  26429. 1
  26430. 1
  26431. 1
  26432. 1
  26433. 1
  26434. 1
  26435. 1
  26436. 1
  26437. 1
  26438. 1
  26439. 1
  26440. 1
  26441. 1
  26442. 1
  26443. 1
  26444. 1
  26445. 1
  26446. 1
  26447. 1
  26448. 1
  26449. 1
  26450. 1
  26451. 1
  26452. 1
  26453. 1
  26454. 1
  26455. 1
  26456. 1
  26457. 1
  26458. 1
  26459. 1
  26460. 1
  26461. 1
  26462. 1
  26463. 1
  26464. 1
  26465. 1
  26466. 1
  26467. 1
  26468. 1
  26469. 1
  26470. 1
  26471. 1
  26472. 1
  26473. 1
  26474. 1
  26475. 1
  26476. 1
  26477. 1
  26478. 1
  26479. 1
  26480. 1
  26481. 1
  26482. 1
  26483. 1
  26484. 1
  26485. 1
  26486. 1
  26487. 1
  26488. 1
  26489. 1
  26490. 1
  26491. 1
  26492. 1
  26493. 1
  26494. 1
  26495. 1
  26496. 1
  26497. 1
  26498. 1
  26499. 1
  26500. 1
  26501. 1
  26502. 1
  26503. 1
  26504.  @michaeld9682  Well thank you gor being willing to admit that. I don't like everything Biden does either. I did vote for him over Trump. For instance, I understand the border is the bane of every presidency and he is certainly doing a better job than Donald Trump but we're in no position to take in that many people right now. From any border. We're still battling through it and trying to recover ourselves. I hate they have it worse but it's like any parent has to learn. You have to take care of yourself in order to take care of the children. We just need to find a better solution. I'm not saying leaving them out in the cold but... Ya know... As for Trump. ... His policies are not as you describe... I'm afraid. I understand that in politics is always about the compromise. You're not going to always get anything you want. Most of the time you're not going to get everything you want either. However, there's a difference between that and doing real farm with your policies. As I mentioned... The border... Trump's border policy was simply inhumane. I agree that we have to find a better solution for our Southern border issue... ripping families apart, putting children in cages or losing them in a broken Foster system, is so far from a solution to any of this. Before coronavirus we had another shutdown. One where all are government workers were losing their homes and standing in bread lines for nothing. All for a while, our experts in engineering and econ told us would only slow ppl from crossing for an average of 9 min. Billions just to make it and that's not even mentioning the man power it would take to man it and maintain it. For it to even work for those nine minutes, we would have to move tripled the Border Patrol. As of right now we only have enough officers to patrol a section of the border every 35 minutes. It was never going to work and he didn't even care about it until 2 years in. When he realized he wasn't going to get the funding to even start building it, he decided to go after the money for other government workers and their families to get it. But before that he ended up caving and opening up the government again. Meaning all those government workers went through all that for nothing. Also he could look like he was keeping his promise come election time. No one in our written history has ever won a trade war on either side. Go check. While he was absolutely right about China's intellectual property rights theft problem, there was a reason no other president took that step. They knew that we would lose more money then we could ever gain back with a new deal with China. Which is exactly what happened. Another policy of defunding the med stock piles literally had deadly consequences for hundreds of thousands of Americans. Then there's the tax cuts. Mostly benefited by the 1%. The 1% got huge tax cuts that were permanent and the rest of us got okay tax cuts that had a clock on it. And this one literally has too much context to it to go into any part of it but the crazy amount of deregulations he put into practice.. it's not something that gets talked about much but it's something that will do probably the most harm. His deregulations further allowed big companies to pollute the planet without health and safety checks and balances. They took a big hit on workers rights. They also shifted even more money from public schools, which didn't have anywhere close enough to begin with, two private schools thanks to everyone's favorite jackass Betsy DeVos..... To name a very few. As for Israel, again, there was a good reason why no other president did that. Recognizing Mecca as the Israeli capital, and therefore choosing a slide, was only ever going to bring more damage and not just to the Palestinians. Though they faced the brunt of it. And also not just in their country. The Palestine government is refining nuclear weapons as we speak and Israel has the backing of Russia. It did nothing but escalate the problem. If you remember right almost right after that they had the gas attacks. Chemical weapons is a new step for both sides.
    1
  26505. 1
  26506. 1
  26507. 1
  26508. 1
  26509. 1
  26510. 1
  26511. 1
  26512. 1
  26513. 1
  26514. 1
  26515. 1
  26516. 1
  26517. 1
  26518. 1
  26519. 1
  26520. 1
  26521. 1
  26522. 1
  26523. 1
  26524. 1
  26525. 1
  26526. 1
  26527. 1
  26528. 1
  26529. 1
  26530. 1
  26531. 1
  26532. 1
  26533. 1
  26534. 1
  26535. 1
  26536. 1
  26537. 1
  26538. 1
  26539. 1
  26540. 1
  26541. 1
  26542. 1
  26543. 1
  26544. 1
  26545. 1
  26546. 1
  26547. 1
  26548. 1
  26549. 1
  26550. 1
  26551. 1
  26552. 1
  26553. 1
  26554. 1
  26555. 1
  26556. 1
  26557. 1
  26558. 1
  26559. 1
  26560. 1
  26561. 1
  26562. 1
  26563. 1
  26564. 1
  26565. 1
  26566. 1
  26567. 1
  26568. 1
  26569. 1
  26570. 1
  26571. 1
  26572. 1
  26573. 1
  26574. 1
  26575. 1
  26576. 1
  26577. 1
  26578. 1
  26579. 1
  26580. 1
  26581. 1
  26582. 1
  26583. 1
  26584. 1
  26585. 1
  26586. 1
  26587. 1
  26588. 1
  26589. 1
  26590. 1
  26591. 1
  26592. 1
  26593. 1
  26594. 1
  26595. 1
  26596. 1
  26597. 1
  26598. 1
  26599. 1
  26600. 1
  26601. 1
  26602. 1
  26603. 1
  26604. 1
  26605. 1
  26606. 1
  26607. 1
  26608. 1
  26609. 1
  26610. 1
  26611. 1
  26612. 1
  26613. 1
  26614. 1
  26615. 1
  26616. 1
  26617. 1
  26618. 1
  26619. 1
  26620. 1
  26621. 1
  26622. 1
  26623. 1
  26624. 1
  26625. 1
  26626. 1
  26627. 1
  26628. 1
  26629. 1
  26630. 1
  26631. 1
  26632. 1
  26633. 1
  26634. 1
  26635. 1
  26636. 1
  26637. 1
  26638. 1
  26639. 1
  26640. 1
  26641. 1
  26642. 1
  26643. 1
  26644. 1
  26645. 1
  26646. 1
  26647. 1
  26648. 1
  26649. 1
  26650. 1
  26651. 1
  26652. 1
  26653. 1
  26654. 1
  26655. 1
  26656. 1
  26657. 1
  26658. 1
  26659. 1
  26660. 1
  26661. 1
  26662. 1
  26663. 1
  26664. 1
  26665. 1
  26666. 1
  26667. 1
  26668. 1
  26669. 1
  26670. 1
  26671. 1
  26672. 1
  26673. 1
  26674. 1
  26675. 1
  26676.  @jayhawk4578  I'm glad you asked. 😁 - Covid relief bill - 200 million vaccine shots - Unemployment going down - More and more schools opening to in-person learning - Public Health experts and scientists are now dictating our pandemic policies, instead of a whimpering man-child who only pays attention half the time. - Federal moratoriums on evicting people because of the pandemic - Putting time effort and money towards food programs for Starving Children - Reversing the Trump administration's changes to the Affordable Care Act and making it easier for Americans to receive Health Care without going bankrupt - Subsidizing workers Healthcare - reversing the veiled racism and bigotry of the Muslim ban - creating a task force focused on finding and reuniting all of those immigrant children that Donald Trump ripped from their families and then lost them in a system - rescinded Trump's executive order taking money from the military families to build a wall that would have never worked in the first place and that he didn't even really care about other than its ability to help him get re-elected - The President also directed relevant agencies to ensure LGBTQI+ refugees and asylum seekers have equal access to protections. - withdrawing troops from Afghanistan and putting together an actual timeline with a plan to do so - resuming talks with Iran - recommitting goes to the Paris climate Accord - sweeping sanctions and diplomatic expulsion from Russia for that whole hacking our election thing that Donald Trump kept trying to ignore I could keep going... But I doubt you're going to read or pay attention to half of this
    1
  26677. 1
  26678. 1
  26679. 1
  26680. 1
  26681. 1
  26682. 1
  26683. 1
  26684. 1
  26685. 1
  26686. 1
  26687. 1
  26688. 1
  26689. 1
  26690. 1
  26691. 1
  26692. 1
  26693. 1
  26694. 1
  26695. 1
  26696. 1
  26697. 1
  26698. 1
  26699. 1
  26700. 1
  26701. 1
  26702. 1
  26703. 1
  26704. 1
  26705. 1
  26706. 1
  26707. 1
  26708. 1
  26709. 1
  26710. 1
  26711. 1
  26712. 1
  26713. 1
  26714. 1
  26715. 1
  26716. 1
  26717. 1
  26718. 1
  26719. 1
  26720. 1
  26721. 1
  26722. 1
  26723. 1
  26724. 1
  26725. 1
  26726. 1
  26727. 1
  26728. 1
  26729. 1
  26730. 1
  26731. 1
  26732. 1
  26733. 1
  26734. 1
  26735. 1
  26736. 1
  26737. 1
  26738. 1
  26739. 1
  26740. 1
  26741. 1
  26742. 1
  26743.  @kimihitothegreat6396  The tax thing isn't a law of any kind. It is simply every person that has one for that office, being the highest office and most powerful office in the land, has given their tax returns. This is because they find it necessary to show that they are not bought and paid for it where have ulterior motives, or are shady in any real way. All he offers are lies and excuses about his tax returns. He went from, I'll release them as soon as I get them together, to being audited and my lawyers say not to release when it's being audited, then lawyers came out and said that's not a thing, then he went to it's just plain stupid to release your taxes when you're being audited and I get audited more than anyone else in the entire world, then just passed his first year as president it all the sudden turned into nobody cares about my tax returns other than the fake news media. For me... That's a lot of dancing to get around doing somethingnhe said he would and that everyone else has. There is a reasonable argument for seeing presidential candidate tax returns, and to get out of it he is lying, moving the goalposts, changing a story and deflecting. At some point the American people need to Institute Occam's razor. Also.... There are no appropriate authorities for running for government. You are elected. The veting process is running... Is making your case to the American people. Why get them? We have a right to know that whoever sits in that office does not have a shady history. Transparency in gov. That is a fare point... Some could use what they have to do bad things... But that does not nigate the necessity of the American people to have a presidential candidate and eventually a president that they can trust. That position holds a great deal of power over all of us. Not to mention... If we just didn't do common sense things, simply because someone might do something bad with the results of that, later.... We would never do anything. I'm not a big Clinton fav, honestly. She, herself is shady. For more then just those emails. Plus... She never offerend anything other then platitudes and I'm not him. That is exactly why she lost. The American people are sick to death of status quo. As we should be. We need to demand more from our leaders. All we keep doing is lowering the bar. That doesn't get us anywhere good. Thanks... I appreciate your point of view. I even somewhat get all these crazy Trump supporters claims of beating a dead horse, sometimes.... Just everytime I do something like... Watch the news and go, "Come on guys! I know you need to report on Trump but let's talk about something else for a min." He does some more stupid and potentially illegal stuff... Its like... Damnit man! Ya know... 😆
    1
  26744. 1
  26745. 1
  26746. 1
  26747. 1
  26748. 1
  26749. 1
  26750. 1
  26751. 1
  26752. 1
  26753. 1
  26754. 1
  26755. 1
  26756. 1
  26757. 1
  26758. 1
  26759. 1
  26760. 1
  26761. 1
  26762. 1
  26763. 1
  26764. 1
  26765. 1
  26766. 1
  26767. 1
  26768. 1
  26769. 1
  26770. 1
  26771. 1
  26772. 1
  26773. 1
  26774. 1
  26775. 1
  26776.  @kaybel5104  Yeah... Sorry... Wrong again, Bob! 🤣 "The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action." And so now your argument isn't they aren't doing it the way that they're supposed to, but they're just not doing it to your liking.... and yet again, you are also shockingly, disregarding all I'm Trump's actions and putting this on the other side.... Lets see... why would the house Democrats be choosing not to let his lawyers in the room... Hmmm.... Lets think about that.... well, if I had a choice to do one or the other and both would be perfectly legal, and then I had a guy who's been trying to obstruct the process in a variety of different ways, from the jump, while being super disrespectful and childish... trying to curtail witness statements, trying to block other Witnesses, refusing to release documents that were subpoenaed.... I'm not sure I would be feeling like I really need to do anything extra for him either. It's called actions have consequences. Maybe if you took off those partisan blinders and actually tried to get an objective view of both sides, you wouldn't have to ask such silly questions. 😉✌
    1
  26777. 1
  26778. 1
  26779.  @kaybel5104  Wrong again, Bob! 😁 you are trying to spin what I said... They don't need a vote... That is true.... They have the option of the vote and when to do it during the inquiry process.... All are options laid out above... In the quoted text. Both are true... Which you would know... If you bothered to look up the House impeachment procedures. Some of which I quoted for you above. Also... you know what's not fooling anyone question mark the false dichotomy of ridiculous you just tried to set up with either you're sensible and agree with me or you're not sensible at all. That's just desperation....cuz, I have no clue how its sensable to not know the rules and options of the House proceedings, while trying to claim someone else is getting it wrong.... 🤣 I also don't Cy the impeachment proceedings should have more then a general court of law would have. In fact, set it up like a court of law. The house does the investigation. The house then becomes the grand jury. Which is one of the only ways that the process differs from a regular court of law. And it's too Trump's favor. Because Trump gets all those Republicans in there who are on his side, when they deem to show up, asking questions and getting equal time as the Democrats.... as soon as all the information is collected, the house can choose to vote whenever they please, then if they've decided there's enough to go to trial, it goes to the Senate. Where there is a trial and we're Trump and his lawyers will get all the rights given to any other person charged with a crime....
    1
  26780. 1
  26781. 1
  26782. 1
  26783. 1
  26784. 1
  26785. 1
  26786. 1
  26787. 1
  26788. 1
  26789. 1
  26790. 1
  26791. 1
  26792. 1
  26793. 1
  26794. 1
  26795. 1
  26796. 1
  26797. 1
  26798. 1
  26799. 1
  26800. 1
  26801. 1
  26802. 1
  26803. 1
  26804. 1
  26805. 1
  26806. 1
  26807. 1
  26808. 1
  26809. 1
  26810. 1
  26811. 1
  26812. 1
  26813. 1
  26814. 1
  26815. 1
  26816. 1
  26817. 1
  26818. 1
  26819. 1
  26820. 1
  26821. 1
  26822. 1
  26823. 1
  26824. 1
  26825. 1
  26826. 1
  26827. 1
  26828. 1
  26829. 1
  26830. 1
  26831. 1
  26832. 1
  26833. 1
  26834. 1
  26835. 1
  26836. 1
  26837. 1
  26838. 1
  26839. 1
  26840. 1
  26841. 1
  26842. 1
  26843. 1
  26844. 1
  26845. 1
  26846. 1
  26847. 1
  26848. 1
  26849. 1
  26850. 1
  26851. 1
  26852. 1
  26853. 1
  26854. 1
  26855. 1
  26856. 1
  26857. 1
  26858. 1
  26859. 1
  26860. 1
  26861. 1
  26862. 1
  26863. 1
  26864. 1
  26865. 1
  26866. 1
  26867. 1
  26868. 1
  26869. 1
  26870. 1
  26871. 1
  26872. 1
  26873. 1
  26874. 1
  26875. 1
  26876. 1
  26877. 1
  26878. 1
  26879. 1
  26880. 1
  26881. 1
  26882. 1
  26883. 1
  26884. 1
  26885. 1
  26886. 1
  26887. 1
  26888.  @derekwang7330  look, I'm not going to keep repeating. I will lay it out clear one more time all of these points. If you don't get it after that then you were intentionally not doing so. 1. The site and the article that I titled for you from Princeton it's something I read through before I did. Which is why I recommended it. When I go back to look for it after you start saying it's saying a bunch of stuff that I didn't see, the web code formatting for the entire site is rudimentary at best. I'm a coder. I build sites. Someone has to go in there and change all of that. They have to remove all the graphics from it and all the frames. Or they have to buy a URL code that is slightly different than the original. Then slap up something else. There isn't even the Princeton logo there anymore. It's just text on a blank page. You can't think that's how a reputable institution like Princeton University runs their website. Even if you're not a coder like me. It's easy to tell that it was spoofed. I even gave you the extra lettering in the URL code. This is when I tried to move on to another article by other scientists because, obviously, at this point, whatever is on that page cannot be trusted. Only further demonstrated by the fact that they are making claims as scientists that they have not been backed up with data. So, I'm not talkin about that page anymore. If you want to look up this doctor or give some data from another reputable source that this doctor gave at some point that they also backed up with data for all of it, feel free.
    1
  26889.  @derekwang7330  2. Which is when I moved on to an embryologist. Who is both a scientist and a doctor. So I have no clue what you're talking about how all these people aren't doctors. I gave you the article again and where it came from. I also quoted specific sections out of it. For which mostly ignored. Which is a habit you have had for quite a while. Ignoring things you can't argue against. As per your definition or wherever you got that from. Of course a human embryo is a human embryo. That doesn't make it a human being. Embryos and people are different In A Million Ways. Many of which I have already stated and you have already ignored. and forgot to post this a bit ago. 👇 "a zygote (a single-celled embryo)" Not a human being. This is its classification in scientific terms.  @Derek Wang  So here is another... Posting some full context quotes separately from the article, encase it gets deleted for the link. "Second, “human life” implies individuality, which is also not consistent with scientific observations. In the clinical practice of IVF, we often speak of preimplantation embryos as individual entities, with distinct qualities like a specific genotype (mosaicism notwithstanding), and morphologic and developmental characteristics. But at the same time we realize that each of the totipotent cells that comprise these embryos is, at least theoretically, capable of producing a complete new individual. Indeed, multiple individuals can arise from the implantation of a single embryo, as in the case of identical twins. Therefore, we know that the preimplantation embryo is not actually an individual. The preimplantation embryo is essentially an aggregate of stem cells, which has the potential to produce a pregnancy, including placental and fetal tissues, assuming that it successfully implants in a receptive endometrium. It is only after implantation that the early embryo can further differentiate into the organized cell groups that enable the developing conceptus to progress further in embryonic and eventually fetal development."
    1
  26890. 1
  26891. 1
  26892. 1
  26893. 1
  26894. 1
  26895. 1
  26896. 1
  26897. 1
  26898. 1
  26899. 1
  26900. 1
  26901. 1
  26902. 1
  26903. 1
  26904. 1
  26905. 1
  26906. 1
  26907. 1
  26908. 1
  26909. 1
  26910. 1
  26911. 1
  26912. 1
  26913. 1
  26914. 1
  26915. 1
  26916. 1
  26917. 1
  26918. 1
  26919. 1
  26920. 1
  26921. 1
  26922. 1
  26923. 1
  26924. 1
  26925. 1
  26926. 1
  26927. 1
  26928. 1
  26929. 1
  26930. 1
  26931. 1
  26932. 1
  26933. 1
  26934. 1
  26935. 1
  26936. 1
  26937. 1
  26938. 1
  26939. 1
  26940. 1
  26941. 1
  26942. 1
  26943. 1
  26944. 1
  26945. 1
  26946. 1
  26947. 1
  26948. 1
  26949. 1
  26950. 1
  26951. 1
  26952. 1
  26953. 1
  26954. 1
  26955. 1
  26956. 1
  26957. 1
  26958. 1
  26959. 1
  26960. 1
  26961. 1
  26962. 1
  26963. 1
  26964. 1
  26965. 1
  26966. 1
  26967. 1
  26968. 1
  26969. 1
  26970. 1
  26971. 1
  26972. 1
  26973. 1
  26974. 1
  26975. 1
  26976. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about this guy. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  26977. 1
  26978. 1
  26979. 1
  26980. 1
  26981. 1
  26982. 1
  26983. 1
  26984. 1
  26985. 1
  26986. 1
  26987.  @issuesthatmatter2825  as you already stated we need Russian oil. We also import like God knows how many goods from China.... I can't quite tell what China's doing all the way but I know they play chess and not Checkers. I don't think we have enough info on what they're doing in order to judge that just yet. Russia... Or more accurately, Putin, has been very passive thus far in his attacks. I'll give you that. On the other hand, our nuclear arms are built to withstand EMP damage. And he probably knows if he gets that much of a direct attack we're going to fire one of them off. I'm not happy about the idea of either one of us playground with nuclear weapons. Don't get me wrong. I live near Barksdale Air Force Base. We'd be a prime target. Lets just put it that way. But what makes you think that we would wait an entire winter to retaliate from an EMP attack? That's not how that would go down. Most of our systems are set to withstand EMP attacks on a military level. Donald Trump's energy policies gave us a bigger Global issue. None of this is going to matter either country if the Earth becomes uninhabitable. It is critical at this point for us to go green. Just look at the massive increase in mass casualty massive weather events happening in the last decade. The polar ice caps. The God knows how many climate scientist trying to scream their heads off to us... Etc... Its the bigger issue. One the Trump admin ignored when putting together their energy practices. Your not looking at the bigger picture.
    1
  26988. 1
  26989. 1
  26990. 1
  26991. 1
  26992. 1
  26993. 1
  26994. 1
  26995. 1
  26996. 1
  26997. 1
  26998. 1
  26999. 1
  27000. 1
  27001. 1
  27002. 1
  27003. 1
  27004. 1
  27005. 1
  27006. 1
  27007. 1
  27008. 1
  27009. 1
  27010. 1
  27011. 1
  27012. 1
  27013. 1
  27014. 1
  27015. 1
  27016. 1
  27017. 1
  27018. 1
  27019. 1
  27020. 1
  27021. 1
  27022. 1
  27023. 1
  27024. 1
  27025. 1
  27026. 1
  27027. 1
  27028. 1
  27029. 1
  27030. 1
  27031. 1
  27032. 1
  27033. 1
  27034. 1
  27035. 1
  27036. 1
  27037. 1
  27038. 1
  27039. 1
  27040. 1
  27041. 1
  27042. 1
  27043. 1
  27044. 1
  27045. 1
  27046. 1
  27047. 1
  27048. 1
  27049. 1
  27050. 1
  27051. 1
  27052. 1
  27053. 1
  27054. 1
  27055. 1
  27056. 1
  27057. 1
  27058. 1
  27059. 1
  27060. 1
  27061. 1
  27062. 1
  27063. 1
  27064. 1
  27065. 1
  27066. 1
  27067. 1
  27068. 1
  27069. 1
  27070. 1
  27071. 1
  27072. 1
  27073. 1
  27074. 1
  27075. 1
  27076. 1
  27077. 1
  27078. 1
  27079. 1
  27080. 1
  27081. 1
  27082. 1
  27083. 1
  27084. 1
  27085. 1
  27086. 1
  27087. 1
  27088. 1
  27089. 1
  27090. 1
  27091. 1
  27092. 1
  27093. 1
  27094. 1
  27095. 1
  27096. 1
  27097. 1
  27098. 1
  27099. 1
  27100. 1
  27101. 1
  27102. 1
  27103. 1
  27104. 1
  27105. 1
  27106. 1
  27107. 1
  27108. 1
  27109. 1
  27110. 1
  27111. 1
  27112. 1
  27113. 1
  27114. 1
  27115. 1
  27116. 1
  27117. 1
  27118. 1
  27119. 1
  27120. 1
  27121. 1
  27122. 1
  27123. 1
  27124. 1
  27125. 1
  27126. 1
  27127. 1
  27128. 1
  27129. 1
  27130. 1
  27131. 1
  27132. 1
  27133. 1
  27134. 1
  27135. 1
  27136. 1
  27137. 1
  27138. 1
  27139. 1
  27140. 1
  27141. 1
  27142. 1
  27143. 1
  27144. 1
  27145. 1
  27146. 1
  27147. 1
  27148. 1
  27149. 1
  27150. 1
  27151. 1
  27152. 1
  27153. 1
  27154. 1
  27155. 1
  27156. 1
  27157. 1
  27158. 1
  27159. 1
  27160. 1
  27161. 1
  27162. 1
  27163. 1
  27164. 1
  27165. 1
  27166. 1
  27167. 1
  27168. 1
  27169. 1
  27170. 1
  27171. 1
  27172. 1
  27173. 1
  27174. 1
  27175. 1
  27176. 1
  27177. 1
  27178. 1
  27179. 1
  27180. 1
  27181. 1
  27182. 1
  27183. 1
  27184. 1
  27185. 1
  27186. 1
  27187. 1
  27188. 1
  27189. 1
  27190. 1
  27191. 1
  27192. 1
  27193. 1
  27194. 1
  27195. 1
  27196. 1
  27197. 1
  27198. 1
  27199. 1
  27200. 1
  27201. 1
  27202. 1
  27203. 1
  27204. 1
  27205. 1
  27206. 1
  27207. 1
  27208. 1
  27209. 1
  27210. 1
  27211. 1
  27212. 1
  27213. 1
  27214. 1
  27215. 1
  27216. 1
  27217. 1
  27218. 1
  27219. 1
  27220. 1
  27221. 1
  27222. 1
  27223. 1
  27224. 1
  27225. 1
  27226.  Life In The Faith Lane  Deregulations... Environmental -Clean power plan - test procedures for electronic Motors - Waters of the u.s. rule (WOTUS) - emission limits for new coal power plants - methane and waste prevention rule - methane rule, emissions - natural resource damages for hazardous substances - nuclear Safety Management - coal ash Rule, Amendment 1 - Endangered Species Act, migration policy - lowering Renewable Fuel standards for 2018 - accidental chemical release prevention rule - greenhouse gas emissions measure - scientific transparency rule - Universal waste rule, aerosol cans - power plant water pollution rule - stream protection rule Labor - overtime regular rate calculation - White Collar exemptions from the fair labor standards Act - occupational exposure to Berylilum rule - pre-shift mining examinations rule - drug test for unemployment compensation - record of injury rule Safe Harbor for State administrator retirement Savings Program Education... - Head Start service duration requirements - tilt 6 sexual assault regulations - gainful employment regulations - teacher preparation issues - School accountability role Health..... - federal employee dental and vision insurance program eligibility - non-discrimination provision in the Affordable Care Act - streamlining Medicare Appeals - informed consent waivers for minimal risk studies - religious and moral exemptions from contraceptive-coverage mandates - calorie labeling rule - penalties for drug company overcharging - off label intended use rule - claims and appeals procedure for employee benefit plans providing disability benefits - expanding State flexibility to Define essential health benefits and qualified health plans - Firearms prohibition for the mentally disabled There are much more but those are just a few under some of the categories. https://www.brookings.edu/interactives/tracking-deregulation-in-the-trump-era/
    1
  27227. 1
  27228. 1
  27229. 1
  27230. 1
  27231. 1
  27232. 1
  27233. 1
  27234.  @Dermahon13  only a few from before he was in office.... To show the decades of history. I generally give people these at first. Mostly because they are all before presidency became a factor. Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations."
    1
  27235. 1
  27236. 1
  27237. 1
  27238.  @Dermahon13  Actually, I gave you the unemployment growth numbers from his 👉2nd term👈. After the recession was over, and had been 👉for 3 years👈. A little over 3 years. Considering Obama pulled us out of the Great Recession in 7 months. Which is certainly nothing to scoff at. And I wasn't trying to say anything, hun. I was just giving you a hard data, at that point. In fact, I don't like speculating. I don't like doing it and I don't like others doing it either. Especially when debating. A valid point was rarely made, when saying, "This is what's going to happen". So I don't know if manufacturing would have come back..... Maybe. He did save the auto manufacturing industry in his first term, but he also had the House in Senate majority at that point. In his second one, Rep Congress would not let him do almost anything. Though, I don't like to guess, an education one would be, only if the Dems got the House and Senate back. But, like I said, take that with a grain of salt, considering term limits and the fact that your scenario would never happen in real life. I actually did not forget African American, Asian, Hispanic or women. I did give you the data for all metrics being a an historic low. I mearly acknowledged that it's a five-man relay race and you seam to only be giving credit to the guy who passed the finish line. That is inaccurate. Also, I would argue that Obama should get full credit for that job peak during his terms, because, after all, he was thw one who got out out of the Great Recession. He had farther to go and a herder job to do, considering. Like I said, 5 man relay race. Not a sprint. Its also only fair to to recognize the extremely obstructionist Republican House and Senate, that occurred during his second term. Obama had to take his name off of several bills during his second term, in order to get them passed. One of the most notable being, the second 911 responders bill. Which still had to have a Financial cat put on it, for the Republicans to pass it. So if we're being fair, that needs to be a consideration, as well. Wait, how did he mess it up and then fix it? He did not put us in the Great Recession. That was Bush. Also, you're only focusing on unemployment rate and not job growth. They all did their part. Not just Obama, BTW. I'm says, all of them, as far back as Reagan. Trump's presidency certainly did not happen in a bubble. It is very disingenuous to a true reading of all the facts, to say that it did. That would be dismissing a lot of work, that even the Rep presidents did, before Trump. Your arguing with facts and numbers. Which isn't advised. It sounds a bit partisan, as well. I have my opinions but I am trying not bias myself, by giving you the full reading of the facts and data. Even though, I'm not a fan of Trump, Obvy. I'm also not trying to take anything away from him.
    1
  27239. 1
  27240. 1
  27241. 1
  27242. 1
  27243. 1
  27244. 1
  27245. 1
  27246. 1
  27247. 1
  27248. 1
  27249. 1
  27250. 1
  27251. 1
  27252. 1
  27253. 1
  27254.  @Dermahon13  His deregulatory strategy alone is crazy pants. For every regulation you take away to others. We're Not Kids on a playground trying to decide who gets most of the candy just because they brought it. This guy has deregulated some seriously scary s***. - federal employee dental and vision insurance program eligibility - streamlining Medicare Appeals The people who need medical attention the most, having to wait the longest. - informed consent waivers for minimal risk studies They don't have to tell you the risk to your health. - calorie labeling rule Obesity kills slightly less people in America then heart attacks do. - penalties for drug company overcharging The drug companies can charge whatever they want and people who can't afford it will get sick or die. - Firearms prohibition for the mentally disabled Crazy people running around with guns. - overtime regular rate calculation - White Collar exemptions from the fair labor standards Act - occupational exposure to beryllium rule They don't have to care whether you get poisoned on the job or not - pre-shift mining examinations role They don't have to go in and make sure the whole damn thing isn't going to fall on your head before you go in. - record of injury rule - Safe Harbor for State administrative retirement savings programs - clean power plan the Earth is rapidly becoming uninhabitable for humans - test procedures for electronic Motors - commercial and Industrial Solid Waste incineration standards and emissions - Waters of the u.s. rule - emission limit for new coal power plants - methane and waste prevention rule - nuclear Safety Management Cuz that doesn't sound important. These people have obviously never heard of Chernobyl. - multiple endangered species Acts - accidental chemical release prevention rule Cuz nobody should worry about that. - scientific transparency rule If dr. Mengele had this rule he wouldn't have gotten away with all that he did. - greenhouse gas emissions measure So not only do they not want us to care about whether a place is going to melt down but now we can even measure it to see if it might. - power plant water pollution role Cuz you need clean water to drink. I mean really... Flint Michigan seems to be doing just fine. These are only a few
    1
  27255. 1
  27256. 1
  27257. 1
  27258. 1
  27259. 1
  27260. 1
  27261. 1
  27262. 1
  27263. 1
  27264. 1
  27265. 1
  27266. 1
  27267. 1
  27268. 1
  27269. 1
  27270. 1
  27271. 1
  27272. 1
  27273. 1
  27274.  @Dermahon13  Yeah... I'm going to call BS on those. You can't first say that Trump was the first president to go into office supporting the lgbtq community and then plane that it's totally cool that he discriminated against transgender members already in the service. Transgender men and women are part of that lgbtq community. Also, you are correct. Barack Obama did change his mind in office. He admitted that he was wrong, which is more than we can say for Trump on anything, and then not only did he do that but he put all his weight behind getting gay marriage passed in the entire country. So not only did he man up and admit that he was wrong oh, but he also admirably did whatever he could to fix it. That's not something that should be scoffed at. As for transgender military service people, that's the other BS I'm going to call. There are transgender service members right now that has gone overseas and been in combat. They've passed all the tests that all the other soldiers pass, they've served and fought for our country. They've drugged people off the battlefield. They lost their lives protecting their fellow soldiers. That alone proves you're, somewhat, small-minded comment wrong about them. They've been doing it forever now. They deserve more respect than that. I've also heard that argument about how it's not okay to have the military pay for your transition. Here's my rebuttal, if it was cancer, or they broke their leg, or they had PTSD, would you be so outraged at the military paying for their medical treatment? Its a medical condition. When you sign up to serve, with all that doing so entails, one of the things you get back for doing so, is your medical needs get taken care of. That should apply to all, across the board. BTW, I absolutely follow facts and science. I just choose to follow and pay attention to all of that. Like the multitude of scientific studies that claim that transgender people have the hormone levels and hormone types of the opposite sex. They show that even though you have external genitalia that contradicts you being one sex, inside, when it comes to types of hormones types, hormone levels and brain processes, shows you're a different sex. Science also tells us that the entirety of the lgbtq spectrum is found in species other than our own. Which proves that it is a natural occurrence. There have been many new studies on transgenderism since the scientific Community stopped labeling it as gender dysphoria. All of which point to these people living a life, in a body, that they don't belong in. That's not an easy thing to live with. If you're going to choose to do that and also serve our country, fight and die for us, the very least we can do, is treat them with some respect.
    1
  27275. 1
  27276.  @Dermahon13  no. It's not the same. Obama got us out of the recession. He did that work. That's why they're started to be more jobs. He didn't just sit back and do nothing. He pulled us out of that recession. He did so in 7 months. Trump has not gotten us more jobs. He's lowered unemployment, again through the relay race. But lower unemployment and job growth are two different metrics. Your scenario does not hold water. Of course Trump's going to do it faster. He has a shorter distance to cover. The GDP is a good example of that. GDP numbers and GDP growth are two different metrics as well. GDP is what the number is at. GDP growth is how far you had to travel between the last number and the number you have now. When Obama entered office, during the recession, which again he pulled us out of, the GDP was -2.5 %. By the end of his first year he had pulled that up to + 3.9%. Which makes his GDP growth rate 6.1%. When Trump entered office the GDP was 1.8%. After his first year it went up to 2.2%. Which made his GDP growth rate, 0.4%. Now I will say that he is picking up the pace in his second year because this last years GDP was 3.9% and the year before, it was 2.2%. Which now makes his GDP growth rate, 1.7%. And Obamas growth rate did slow throughout his term because of the small boom bust cycle we had to go through in order to get us through the Great Recession.... But it wad always pretty respectable. The point being, your using the recession as the reason why you shouldn't pay attention to his numbers, but the recession is exactly why you should pay attention to his numbers being the highest. He had farther to go and he got us out of the Great Recession. The numbers are higher for him because he did the work and had more work to do then Trump did. For example... in February 2009, Congress approved Obama's 787 billion dollar economic stimulus package. It cut taxes, extended unemployment benefits and funded Public Works projects. The recession ended in July 2009 when GDP growth turned positive. In just seven months, the American Recovery and restoration Act comped 241.9 billion dollars into the economy. That increased growth to a robust 3.9% rate by early 2010. Obama also bailed out the US Auto industry on March 30th, 2009. The federal government took over General Motors and Chrysler and saved 3 million jobs. It forced the companies to become more fuel efficient and therefore more globally competitive. He also regulated the big Banks. In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act improved regulation of 8 area is that led to the financial crisis. The Consumer Financial Protection Agency reduced harmful practices of credit cards and mortgages. The financial stability oversight Council regulated hedge funds and banks that became too big to fail. The volcker rule banned Banks from risking losses with their depositors money. Dodd-Frank clarified which agencies regulated which banks, stopping Banks from cherry picking their regulators. Dodd-Frank directed The Securities and Exchange Commission and the commodity Futures Trading Commission. These regulated the riskiest derivatives, like credit default swaps and Commodities Futures. Dog Frank also asked the SEC to recommend how the credit rating agencies, like Moody's and Standard & Poor's, could be improved In 2010 he cut taxes. In December 2010, Obama and Congress agreed upon additional stimulus in the form of an 858 billion dollar tax cut. It had three main components, a 350 billion dollar extension of the Bush tax cuts, a 56 billion dollar extension of unemployment benefits, and a 120 billion dollar reduction in workers payroll taxes. Business has received 140 billion dollars in tax cuts for a capital Improvement and 80 billion dollar in research and development tax credits. The estate tax was Exempted up to five million dollars and there were additional credits for college tuition in children. So you saything that he just stood in the rain and just got wet, is simply untrue. He did the work and had farther to go, in order to get to a similar place.
    1
  27277.  @Dermahon13  you are mistaken. As a matter of fact it is almost exactly the same as the conditions that Obama had. In Obama's first four years, he had the house the senate in the White House for the blue team. At which point he... - had to First pull us out of the Great Recession -then he modernize the Auto industry -then he reformed Healthcare -then he regulated the big Banks -then he got us tax cuts -then he raised fuel efficiency standards -then he reduce carbon emissions -all the while creating 16 million jobs -taking care of the Federal Reserve -keeping his budget deficits to minimum -and of course finally getting bin Laden And that is just the most notable short list. To answer your question, he left it to his last term because he was doing all of that stuff I just named above.... And more. So the guys, was most certainly not just sitting around and Chillin while all this stuff was going on, like you keep suggesting. Dude was busy! You have to acknowledge that? In his second term, he lost the house and the Senate. But he still tried to get things done. One of the main pushes being Criminal Justice Reform. Mitch McConnell and the Republicans would not even bring it up for a vote. Mitch McConnell refused to bring it up for a vote. Even ask her Obama offered to take his name off of it. So tell me how bad is Obama's fault? It had almost exactly the same things that the Trump bill has and that Mitch McConnell brought up for a vote and everyone passed. In his second term, Mitch McConnell and the Republicans were so obstructionists that they would not even pass the 911 responders medical fund bill, until getting so much backlash on it they were afraid they were going to lose their next election. All because Obama was trying to help them get the bill done. It still took them almost up until the end of Obama's presidency to get it done, and they insisted on a cap for it. Which is why they have to go back now and fix that. Because the 9/11 responders are running out of money for their health care.
    1
  27278. 1
  27279. 1
  27280.  @Dermahon13  so, you're making a common mistake in understanding taxes in America and how they work. My mom happens to be the lead tax professional into separate states. Louisiana and Texas. I also worked for H&R Block for 6 years. The reason we do tax rate and not dollar rate is because of income fluctuation. If we said everybody had a set amount that they had to pay into the government every year, like a dollar amount. Period. Let's say that amount is, $2,000. .. One percenters would scoff at that and be like whatever I spend more money than that before breakfast. But the bottom 85% of Americans cannot survive a sudden life event that would cost more than $800 to fix, without getting into more trouble. Also America would go broke. So we set the taxes at a tax rate. Which you mentioned. So they pay equivalently what everybody else pays, depending on how much wealth they have. This makes sense for a lot of reasons. The rich use up more resources through their companies, they make more money, they also, often don't pay a living wage to their employees. I, personally would be fine with the rich getting there taxes cut even a little more if they started paying their employees, voluntarily, a living wage. The richest 1% of Americans own 35% of the nation's wealth. The bottom 80%, (I think I said 85 before. I was mistaken), own just 11% of the nation's wealth. In the fifties and sixties when the economy was booming, the wealthiest Americans pay their top income rate of 91%. Today the top income rate is 43.4%. The richest 1% pay an effective federal income tax rate of 24.7% back in 2014. Someone makes an average of $75,000 is paying a 19.7% rate. In 2009 the average federal income tax rate of the richest 400 Americans was just 20%. Taxing investment income at a much lower rate than salaries and wages are taxed loses 1.3 trillion dollars over 10 years. 1470 households reported income of more than 1 million in 2009 but paid 0 federal income tax on it. CEOs of major corporations are nearly three hundred times more than an average worker. The largest contributor to increasing income inequality has been changes in income from capital gains and dividends. The top 1% also have many more tax loopholes in order to pay way less than the percentage is, then the average middle to lower class worker. One of the worst things that trumps tax cut did, was getting rid of the tax credit for teachers buying school supplies. Instead of cutting education funding for our children, we should ask millionaires to pay a tax rate at least as high as their secretaries. Which as of now, they do not. And once again, the top 1% CEO makes 300 times more then that secretary. She pays a higher tax rate though. Just cutting 1/4 of the rich loopholes that the middle-class don't have access to would basically allow us to fund things like Medicare and the VA, it would allow us to make sure every child in America got a quality education, it would allow us to make sure every American gets the health care they deserve, it would do all of those at the same time, as well as do things like fun the space program properly. So when you're talkin about the 1%, you have to take a lot more factors into your thought process then the average American taxpayer.
    1
  27281. 1
  27282. 1
  27283. 1
  27284. 1
  27285.  @Dermahon13  sweetheart, we are absolutely going through climate change in a big horrible way with a multitude of examples. I'm going to watch the video but whatever that video says is not going to outweigh the 99.9% of climate scientists saying this is happening. The only ones that are saying that it is not are the ones that are getting paychecks from Big Oil. The experts say this is happening in this is why. You pay attention to science right? You stated that earlier. Then I assume you know how rare it is for that percentage of Any Given field to come to a consensus on anything. Yet they all have done it for climate change. The scientific Community is damn near just as dysfunctional as Congress but they all got together and said," Naa! This s*** is happening." NASA is also jumping in that pool. - 99.9% of climate scientists agree that climate warming Trends over the past Century are extremely likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide has issued public statements endorsing this position. - the current warming trend is a particular significance because of it is greater than 95% possibility to be the result of human activities since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented over decades to Millenia. - Earth orbiting satellite and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information around our planet and its climate on a global scale. This body of data, collected over many years, reveals the signals of a changing climate. - the heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases were demonstrated in the mid-nineteenth century. Their ability to effect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There's no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response. - ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical Mountain glaciers show that the earth's climate response to changes in greenhouse-gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs and layers of sedimentary rock. This ancient or paleo climate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of Ice Age recovery warming. Signs... - Global temperature rise - warming oceans - shrinking ice sheets - glacial retreat - decreased snow cover - sea level rise - declining Arctic sea ice - increase in extreme weather events - ocean acidification https://climate-nasa-gov.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/climate.nasa.gov/evidence.amp?usqp=mq331AQMmAH3zKeWkfPAlbAB&amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fclimate.nasa.gov%2Fevidence.amp%23referrer%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com
    1
  27286.  @Dermahon13  well the Russia thing isn't b*******. There is a 448 page report that says so. A special counsel induced to investigate the president of the United States is slightly different then a regular investigation. And also follows different rules. One of which is, even if they found something, they can't charge him. Doj policy prevents it. Which is why he got away with the very clear case in the second half of the Mueller report that they made for him obstructing justice, using eight separate highly detailed examples. In the past, most special counsel's investigating matters like this have actually been way more reviewing then Robert Mueller did. He is actually quite conservative on that. He didn't even want to testify. They had to subpoena him. Congress! Congress had to subpoena him. Also, you're mistaken when it comes to American law. You said you don't live here so that's understandable. One has to be charged with a crime for innocent until proven guilty to go into affect. As was mentioned earlier, you can't charge a sitting president with a crime. There's also a difference between innocent and not having enough evidence to charge. Robert Mueller went so far as to say that if he could have cleared the president of any of those charges then he would have. Have you actually read and study the Mueller report? At no point did the Mueller report say no collusion and no obstruction. The only thing bar has done is testified that he heard Mueller's say that. Bar also came out and gave a summary of the Mueller report before it came out that was so inaccurate that Bob Mueller had to come out of his normal character and hold a press conference correcting it. Bar also has a shady ass record. so you'll excuse me if I don't take him saying this guy said something as gospel. Especially since Bob Mueller has yet to testify whether that's true or not.
    1
  27287. 1
  27288.  @Dermahon13  it wasn't our money. The money you were talking about that Iran got. All we did was release the hold on the bank account that they had with their money in it. They didn't get a cent from us. Because we did that, for the very first time in our long history with them they followed our rules to a T. Along with the UN to verify it. And of course they're going to build nukes now. In good faith they cooperating fully with the deal that was set forth which one's confirmed by the UN. Then Trump goes and lies about Iran, the UN says no that's not what's happening, but he still uses it as the reason to pull out of the deal that was working. They weren't making nuclear weapons. They were making power. Trump lied on them. Those facilities were back when they were making that stuff. They had stopped and it those programs were not secret because it was in the deal. The UN and the US went in and inspected on a regular basis. Why else would our allies, be backing Iran? Are long-standing allies are in the UN backing Iran. Say that out loud. Why would that be happening? why would our long-standing allies be backing a country like Iran? Why would they feel that they need to do so to the extent of sanctioning trump and America in the UN? I mean, it's Iran. Crazy vicious dictator Colt country that treats their women like s*** and makes little boys in the soldiers. Everything most of these countries are appalled by, yet they're still backing them on this. The global leaders are still giving evidence at the un to show that Trump is lying about them. Every time America went over to Iran to do these inspections, several Alder representatives from the countries that are in the UN went with them. They had the same data and collected it at the same time. Yet their data says something completely different than what Trump is saying. They have the evidence to prove that he lied. If every other country in the world backing I ran against America wasn't enough already. All those other consequences that you are listing are effects from Trump lying on them. Of course that's going to happen now. Of course Iran's going to say fuk it we did everything we could and this guy is still acting like an ass and lying on us. Why the hell am I not do what we want now. The part you're not paying attention to is all that stuff they can do with the money now and trade, they gave all that up to make a deal with us. The only reason they have all that back is because of Trump's actions. The deal was temporary because Congress wouldn't approve. Also it covered the span of a decade. A decade in which they were doing a damn good job of being completely transparent and showing us that they were serious about that deal and if Trump hadn't gone in there and mess that up, then the next time they had to start renegotiating the deal, they would have been in a stronger position. because they had a decade worth of trust built up. That's why I ran was going to follow the deal. It was going to be renegotiated. They were going to have a better bargaining position. I'm not under the impression that they were doing it to be good or turn over a new Leaf or anything like that. It's Iran. They were doing it for self-interest but they were doing it. And there's something to be said for the only country in the world that has ever used a nuke on civilian population, deciding that they're the ones that get to decide who has nuclear weapons in the world and who does not, being majorly hypocritical. I've never thought we were the ones that needed to do that. They were allowed to enrich uranium to a certain point. That was one of the main functions of the inspectors from the US and the UN. There is a point that you can enriched uranium to create nuclear power and a point where you can enrich uranium to make nuclear bombs. All the tests that the UN had said that they were only reaching the levels to create nuclear power. It was a good deal. A good deal does not entail that we get everything we want and the other side gets nothing. Considering the long history America and Iran has with broken promises towards each other they gave up a lot to make this deal with us and to follow it to a T. It was working. The only reason it stopped working was Trump started lying on them so that he could pull out. Which put us on a global scale in a weaker position by the way. Because now not only can they speculate that Trump lies to the other world leaders, they have actual proof of it now. now they have proof that America can't be trusted under this president. I'm sorry but he led with his ego and messed this thing up good and proper.
    1
  27289. 1
  27290. 1
  27291.  @Dermahon13  her story was not b*******. Kanvanagh, did it and had done similar things to other girls who also came up and told their stories. So here's the thing about me that you don't know, I'm an abuse and a rape Survivor. More than half of my life was spent that way. I'm 35 now. I also volunteer at a woman's crisis center because of my history and the training I had to take to be able to volunteer there. Look, BS stories about abuse and sexual assault could not possibly piss you off more than it does me. There have been times that I have talked to women who have coming to the center and after talking to them about things me and the other volunteers knew they were lying. They wanted us to take a statement and file a report so there could be records for the police. That's part of what we do. We knew this because there are markers. Markers we learn from our training and from our personal experience. Some common ones are... - younger victims rarely report the incident at the time. It's unfortunate but it's true. I did the same thing. - when a victim describes their story, they go through levels of Detachment as they go along. That's why when you hear them described it you'll hear them Focus on, what you would consider to be, small mynute details and almost not talk about the actual event, the penetration. That's a common symptom of the level of shock your body goes into in order to protect your mind. - most commonly there's an outcry witness, if not immediately then within the first couple of months or years later. - your body can go back into a State of Shock giving a certain trigger even years after the incident. That's happened to me as well. - there are often micro expressions that you exhibit with your body. These are extremely hard if not impossible to duplicate. Shaking your head at certain points, crossing your arms and protecting your body, lowering your head, closing your eyes, your body recoiling, leaning back instead of forward, unknowingly going into defensive stances. - feeling a sense of Shame while speaking on the matter, even though your head knows it wasn't your fault. - it being easier to write write it down or have somebody bring up the subject then it is to outright start talkin about it. To this day it's difficult for me to just start talking about it. Cuz think about it, how do you just bring that up? You're always worried about the reaction of the other person. If they bring it up first or if you're writing it down and you don't have to see their reaction then it makes it a little safer. It's the shame Factor. You are terrified of other people's reactions. Those are just a few that I saw in the Doctors reactions and claims. Could you do me a favor? Go look at her testimony. Have that list I just gace you in mind and watch for the signs. You already think its not true. So you gonna be able to really tell if they are there or not. Because you're not going to be looking to confirm them. I understand you're on the other side of the spectrum on this, but you've shown me to be logic based and even somewhat reasonable. So maybe consider that the reason you believe that and only focus on the things that prove that in the case, is because you had to experience the other side of that. Which is f*** up by the way. Like I said, you could not possibly be more pissed at women that do s*** like that then people like me are. That ex of yours is crazy and a horrible human being for doing that. She's Not Just disrespecting you but she's just respecting every single woman who is actually suffered through that kind of thing. But for a true rape Survivor, not believing them, is just about the worst thing you can do to them, aside from the actual assault. I'm sure you can see that.
    1
  27292.  @Dermahon13  Lol! Yeah... I just kinda went down the list and hoped I didnt miss something. Lol Yeah I don't know what was going on with those crazy people. Ireland and England just needed to have a Kumbaya moment. Lol and they all really need to get through this damn brexit thing. cuz it's kind of starting to bomb us out over here. LOL Apollo 11? IDK, I like to see the other side of things. So I guess it could be argued. On the basis of the standards of society at the time. Back then into this day you tend to get most your astronauts from the Air Force. Back then not a whole lot of officers were women or people of color and you had to be pretty high-ranking to become an astronaut. So I guess that would kind of be there argument... But really that's just based on the time that it was. And it's not like there weren't huge steps taken towards correcting that and in the last couple of decades. The Space Program in America now is massively diverse. There will always be racial and sexual divides in America but you know give people credit for the work they've done, you don't have to bring up old s*** all the time. If we're not repeating those mistakes now, then move on with your life. That would be the only reason you would look at mistakes in the past, is to make sure we didn't happen to do them in the future. With the Space Program we're not doing that. There are women and people of color all over NASA now. You mentioned the space program and it made me think of my little boy. His name is Gabriel and he is 8. Sense he was little, he was sure he wanted to be an astronaut and a YouTuber. Apparently both at the same time. But a specific kind of astronaut. He wants to fly the ships. One point when he was smaller, he started talking about how he wanted to pop wheelies in space. He was so disappointed when I had to explain to him how you kind of float and glide in space and there's not really anything you can pop a wheelie off of. 😂 He is such a science nerd though. He makes us watch every SpaceX test live. He actually understands pretty well about what they're doing. He loves the idea that they're trying to make space travel affordable for everybody by making reusable Rockets. He was super excited when they cracked the technology about a month ago and got all the Rockets to come back and land. It's pretty cute! 😊 personally, I told him that off planet was too far away from mommy and that if he did that that he had to take me with him. Which I think is completely reasonable and no one can convince me otherwise.😉 lol Idk, something like you mentioned, I see as identity politics but some things may be that also... But at the same time, and as I have said before, are things we need to call out by its proper name in order to begin fixing. I don't see every little thing as sexist or racist or bigoted, like a lot of right-wingers try to paint people like me. Is it fits the definition though, the actual definition, then it should be called such in any scenario or under any subject and even if it makes people feel uncomfortable. Cuz that's how we change it. That's how we make things better. Denying that it exists because it may fall under the realm of identity politics does not make a whole lot of sense to me. I do see a lot of people on my side of the Divide labeling people and things incorrectly though. Usually for devices purpose. And if you think you're passionate about identity politics oh, you should see me when I go after bullies. That's my identity politics. Which in what we were just talking about, people Miss labeling other people in a negative way, and in order to bring shame upon them, is exactly what that is. That is bullying. If your point is valid then it will stand alone without any of those childish bullying tactics. If it is not then it will fall as it should, but you're not going to go around bullying people into believing what you want them to. You're certainly not going to get me to shut the hell up about it. I don't give a damn what side you're on. You're acting like an ass clown I'll tell you you're acting like an ass clown. Bullies get me real ignorant real quick. LOL
    1
  27293.  @Dermahon13  Why? Why shouldn't transgender people be in the military? You do know they already are? You do know they're transgender service members, serving our country right now? You do know they fought and died for us already? You do know they've saved other soldiers lives? And absolutely women should be on the battlefield. I don't think the strict standard of 50/50 should apply. That's silly. It regardless of whether you are a man or a woman, if you can pass the test and the training, the same test and training that every other Soldier has to to be able to participate, then you should be out there. That's the only fair way to do it. Well then you have to take that credit away from Trump because he's discriminating against transgender. I give Obama the credit because he did not only say he's for or against something, like Trump, he took action. Actions speak louder than words. Obama evolved his opinion on gay marriage and then he went out there and helped get gay marriage passed in the entire country during his term. He put his money where his mouth was. Changing minds and hearts is how we make things better. That shouldn't be scoffed at. Sweetheart, we've been talking long enough for you to know that I'm pretty blunt and straightforward. If I thought you were a bigot or closed minded oh, I would have said so. I think you can be a little overly stubborn despite the evidence and a little hypocritical at times but not bigoted her closed-minded. And we can all be a little stubborn and hypocritical at times. The transgender suicide rate is high and it's because of how people treat them, by large part. The other part... Is living every day of your life and a body that you don't feel like it is your own. K... Well... First... slavery is a hell of a standard dude... Second... you should look up some of the scientific studies on the self. As in yourself and how your own personal identity is so vital to you doing everything. It's a vinyl to everybody's overall Mental Health. Also, comparing slavery to transgenderism, is a little like apples and oranges babe. Slave masters over a pretty short. Of time developed a very efficient system for getting slaves to do what they wanted them to do. Brainwashing, dominance training and letting them have families. That way they had something to hold over them. That's why more than half of the slave suicides happened on the boats on the way over. It was before a whole lot of their conditioning set in. It's just not comparable to modern-day transgenderism. I thought you said that you cared about science in fact? These are scientific studies. If you ignore some and only pay attention to the others because they fit your preconceived notions, that's not scientific at all. Estrogen and testosterone have a lot to do with what makes men, men and what makes women, women. Again, you're claiming to go by science but you're denying the science of sexual hormones? That's like basic science sweetheart. Men have naturally high levels of testosterone and women have naturally high levels of estrogen. And transgender women, those who are born with men genitalia, they have naturally high levels of estrogen and not testosterone. The same is true for transgender man. Those who are born with women genitalia, have naturally high levels of testosterone. Also their brain functioning is different. Women and men have different kinds of brain functioning. Transgender have been found to have the opposite sex brain functioning. External genitalia is not the only Factor when it comes to determining someone sex. Men and women have many differences in their body from each other. Inside and outside. That's why women tend to be smaller built. As I believe you mentioned earlier when we were talking about women on battlefields. So you recognized already that men and women have different characteristics more than just what genitalia they have. You can't just throw that to the side and dismiss that now because it doesn't fit your argument. At least you can't do it with out looking like you have one standard for one thing and another for another. Also, refusing to recognize scientific studies about gender identification in other species, does not make it go away. Plus, you're smarter than that. Go do some studying on it first at least please? Also mutation is just a word in science to describe what we know to be a standard and the diversion from that. Our standards can change though, as we gain more knowledge and understanding about the world around us. Science is evolving. That's a fundamental part of science. There are zillions of examples of this in history and science. We thinks things are one way oh, then we find another way and then we find another way after that. science has never been something you can box in that way. there is over reaching without evidence oh, but that's where the term scientific theory comes in. Scientific theory is different than regular Theory. there is a higher standard of evidentiary studies that needs to be met before you can call something a scientific theory. I'm not suggesting that science is not factual. I'm suggesting that you are not looking at all of the science available and only looking at that which fits your preconceived notions. There are plenty of papers done by people who aren't lgbtq. But even if that it wasn't true, is scientific protocols were observed, recorded and met, it would not matter whether they where LGBTQ or not. That does not automatically dismiss the study. Especially if they used all scientific protocols. and sorry but I'm going to speak my mind, whether you like it or not. I wouldn't expect any different from you.
    1
  27294. 1
  27295. 1
  27296. 1
  27297. 1
  27298. 1
  27299.  @Dermahon13  again you're just missing facts so you can have an argument. Go talk to any tax professional, hell Google it. The effective tax rate for the rich is much lower than 30%. Because of loopholes and deductions. This is what I do. This is what my family does and you dismissing facts out of whole cloth because it doesn't fit your preconceived notions doesn't mean that they aren't there. You need to start being more of an honest actor or this is getting pretty pointless. I don't want more of a socialist system. I want the system we have right now to go across the board. I want everybody to stop giving rich people more and more loopholes to keep more and more of their money and take more and more money from the middle and lower class. Like I said, you denying facts and data does not make it go away. Capitalism much like every other structure, is a system by Design. Socialism is as well. Someone saying that capitalism is better or socialism is better is kind of like saying that I'm an Android girl, so I phones are the devil. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense. It's a system of operation. Which means it doesn't have good or bad. It's all in the hands of the user. So you think that secretary should pay more in taxes and that CEO? And you're setting up a paper tiger. When did I say that the secretary should get paid as much as the CEO? I said the CEO makes 300 times as much as their secretary. But but they can't afford to give their workers a living wage Did you just hear yourself? No you don't have to take any other factors into consideration. That's exactly what your issue is. You only take the factors into consideration that backup your preconceived notions. You ignore or dismiss everything else with little to no explanation. Calling people retarded is small-minded.
    1
  27300. 1
  27301. 1
  27302. 1
  27303. 1
  27304. 1
  27305. 1
  27306. 1
  27307. 1
  27308. 1
  27309. 1
  27310. 1
  27311. 1
  27312. 1
  27313. 1
  27314. 1
  27315. 1
  27316.  @Dermahon13  he found plenty of evidence and if you were being truthful about you reading the Mueller report and knowing what it says then you would know that. You're lying... Sorry. But I just gave you the Mueller report. Actually read it. See cuz you're lying to me about something I know. Not that I'm guessing on. I know what you're saying is not factual because I have read it many times. I can cite pages off of that thing off the top of my head. I know what you're saying about the Mueller report is not true. But that's why I gave you the link. You can find that out for yourself. An investigation is not what finds you innocent or guilty by law. A charge and a jury do that. He could not find him innocent or guilty if you wanted to. That is not his job. His job was to investigate and gather evidence. Doj policy prevented him from charging him with anything. That did not stop him from Gathering evidence. It did not stop him from saving that evidence until after he's not president anymore. Which is also in the Mueller report. How the American justice system works is you are investigated, buy a special counsel or a district attorney or detectives, most of the time all of the above. If you're president it's definitely buy a special counsel and a special team. Their job is to gather evidence. Not determine guilt or innocence. That's for a judge and a jury to decide but that only goes into a fact if you can charge someone. The presidential office protects Trump from being charged with a crime. If you can't be charged with a crime then he cannot be found innocent or guilty and innocence or guilt is determined by a judge injury and therefore you need a charge.
    1
  27317. 1
  27318. 1
  27319. 1
  27320. 1
  27321. 1
  27322. 1
  27323. 1
  27324. 1
  27325. 1
  27326.  @Dermahon13  yeah but it's easy for you to disagree when you haven't been there. I really hope you don't ever have to understand that. How difficult it is to even talk about something like that after it has happened. It's like most of the time the words won't even come out of your mouth. I have to talk about it all the time and I still struggle with it on a daily basis. The last time I looked I believe it was 6% of all rape allegations are proven to be false. That means 92% or not. That's just in America. She didn't even tell anyone until a little while after. Oh no I take that back she told one person and then told two other people later and wrote it in a diary several times. But by no means did everybody know she told like four people and that was over a large period of time. Her husband even found out by accident and they have been married forever. I don't think you have all the information on the case. Right but take the unbiased people. That's why I recognized the Republicans response to her testimony afterwards. That's why I paid attention to that. Before there were a few Republican Congressman that were trying to throw a little bit of shade her way before her testimony but after her testimony, after the Ring Of Truth came out of her testimony, all they could say was it sounds like she believes something happened to her. None of them went any further than that. They were there and they were on the opposite side and they could not say anything other than that. It didn't just ring true to us on this side. Well if you work with the subject and you understand that evidence for sexual assault is also not very common other than second-hand testimony or written evidence or something like that. DNA is hard to get. There's almost no chance of witnesses coming forward or video evidence. A sexual assault allegation rarely has a lot of evidence to back it up. The ones that do tend to be ones that happen over and over again. And while most sexual assaulters are repeat offenders, it's not generally with the same person. Those are just from statistics. Again with the Mueller report, there was evidence. There's tons of evidence. You have to read that thing dude. I gave it to you please read it. Actually that's science to. It is very difficult if not impossible to fake some of those mannerisms. Your head will say one thing and your body does another. It takes loads of training to be able to do that. And to get it all right in an extended period Of time is almost impossible. As in, more than a few minutes at a time. You were literally fighting instinctual body functions. The NSA and the CIA have to train for years to be able to do that kind of thing. That's how difficult that is, to even be able to do that kind of thing for a short amount of time. You're talking serious spook training for that. Did you read what her GoFundMe profile said? Cuz she explained where the money came from and where it went. Read the link you gave me?
    1
  27327. 1
  27328. 1
  27329. 1
  27330. 1
  27331. 1
  27332. 1
  27333. 1
  27334. 1
  27335. 1
  27336. 1
  27337. 1
  27338. 1
  27339. 1
  27340. 1
  27341. 1
  27342. 1
  27343. 1
  27344. 1
  27345. 1
  27346. 1
  27347. 1
  27348. 1
  27349. 1
  27350. 1
  27351. 1
  27352. 1
  27353. 1
  27354. 1
  27355. 1
  27356. 1
  27357. 1
  27358. 1
  27359. 1
  27360. 1
  27361. 1
  27362. 1
  27363. 1
  27364. 1
  27365. 1
  27366. 1
  27367. 1
  27368. 1
  27369. 1
  27370. 1
  27371. 1
  27372. 1
  27373. 1
  27374. 1
  27375. 1
  27376. 1
  27377. 1
  27378. 1
  27379. 1
  27380. 1
  27381. 1
  27382. 1
  27383. 1
  27384. 1
  27385. 1
  27386. 1
  27387. 1
  27388. 1
  27389. 1
  27390. 1
  27391. 1
  27392. 1
  27393. 1
  27394. 1
  27395. 1
  27396. 1
  27397. 1
  27398. 1
  27399. 1
  27400. 1
  27401. 1
  27402. 1
  27403. 1
  27404. 1
  27405. 1
  27406. 1
  27407. 1
  27408. 1
  27409. 1
  27410. 1
  27411. 1
  27412. 1
  27413. 1
  27414. 1
  27415. 1
  27416. 1
  27417. 1
  27418. 1
  27419. 1
  27420. 1
  27421. 1
  27422. 1
  27423. 1
  27424. 1
  27425. 1
  27426. 1
  27427. 1
  27428. 1
  27429. 1
  27430. 1
  27431. 1
  27432. 1
  27433. 1
  27434. 1
  27435. 1
  27436. 1
  27437. 1
  27438. 1
  27439. 1
  27440. 1
  27441. 1
  27442. 1
  27443. 1
  27444. 1
  27445. 1
  27446. 1
  27447. 1
  27448. 1
  27449. 1
  27450. 1
  27451. 1
  27452. 1
  27453. 1
  27454. 1
  27455. 1
  27456. 1
  27457. 1
  27458. 1
  27459. 1
  27460. 1
  27461. 1
  27462. 1
  27463. 1
  27464. 1
  27465. 1
  27466. 1
  27467. 1
  27468. 1
  27469. 1
  27470. 1
  27471. 1
  27472. 1
  27473. 1
  27474. 1
  27475. 1
  27476. 1
  27477. 1
  27478. 1
  27479. 1
  27480. 1
  27481. 1
  27482. 1
  27483. 1
  27484. 1
  27485. 1
  27486. 1
  27487. 1
  27488. 1
  27489. 1
  27490. 1
  27491. 1
  27492. 1
  27493. 1
  27494. 1
  27495. 1
  27496. 1
  27497. 1
  27498. 1
  27499. 1
  27500. 1
  27501. 1
  27502. 1
  27503. 1
  27504. 1
  27505. 1
  27506. 1
  27507. 1
  27508. 1
  27509. 1
  27510. 1
  27511. 1
  27512. 1
  27513. 1
  27514. 1
  27515. 1
  27516. 1
  27517. 1
  27518. 1
  27519. 1
  27520. 1
  27521. 1
  27522. 1
  27523. 1
  27524. 1
  27525. 1
  27526. 1
  27527. 1
  27528. 1
  27529. 1
  27530. 1
  27531.  @norbertvogel9504  Bc someone is invading their country. Ukraine voted for their independence a long time ago. They have the right to live free. To not be forced to live as slaves to their next door Neighbors. They have a right to choose their own path, as long as doing so does not damage others. As for laying down their guns... They already did that. Infact they handed them to Russia on the promise that russia and America would defend them, if attacked... Ironically.... They did that when they gave Russia their nukes. See how well that worked out for them? Anything can be destroyed. Nothing is forever. 100 years is nothing in the grand scheme of things. And you don't have to destroy the KGB... You just have to beat them. Which has been done before. Love is not enslavement. Love is not a forced dictatorship.... And an imaginary sky god meant to make you feel better about having to die one day, helps no one. Who died in America? Read up on America's war for independence from British rule.... Or the civil war. Who died? Lots of people. All for the fundamental right to be free.... And how's America doing fight now bc we fought for that freedom? Thank you for your apology.... And I get it. That is what we see now. We see it so much that even our children are talking about it. My 11 year old little boy has cried over it. He feels the pain and knows it has to stop. It has to be fought against. That kind of evil can only be fought. This isn't Ukraine's fault. They didn't start this.... They can't back down to it either neither can we. Not just bc its the right thing to do... But also... Who says Putin stops with Ukraine? His buddy China is awful quiet and Putin is a power hungry dictator, who has a tendency to go back on his word. You can't trust him.
    1
  27532. 1
  27533. 1
  27534. 1
  27535. 1
  27536. 1
  27537. 1
  27538. 1
  27539. 1
  27540. 1
  27541. 1
  27542. 1
  27543. 1
  27544. 1
  27545. 1
  27546. 1
  27547. 1
  27548. 1
  27549. 1
  27550. 1
  27551. 1
  27552. 1
  27553. 1
  27554. 1
  27555. 1
  27556. 1
  27557. 1
  27558. 1
  27559. 1
  27560. 1
  27561. 1
  27562. 1
  27563. 1
  27564. 1
  27565. 1
  27566. 1
  27567. 1
  27568. 1
  27569. 1
  27570. 1
  27571. 1
  27572. 1
  27573. 1
  27574. 1
  27575. 1
  27576. 1
  27577. 1
  27578. 1
  27579. 1
  27580. 1
  27581. 1
  27582. 1
  27583. 1
  27584. 1
  27585. 1
  27586. 1
  27587. 1
  27588. 1
  27589. 1
  27590. 1
  27591. 1
  27592. 1
  27593. 1
  27594. 1
  27595. 1
  27596. 1
  27597. 1
  27598. 1
  27599. 1
  27600. 1
  27601. 1
  27602. 1
  27603. 1
  27604. 1
  27605. 1
  27606. 1
  27607. 1
  27608. 1
  27609. 1
  27610. 1
  27611. 1
  27612. 1
  27613. 1
  27614. 1
  27615. 1
  27616. 1
  27617. 1
  27618. 1
  27619. 1
  27620. 1
  27621. 1
  27622. 1
  27623. 1
  27624. 1
  27625. 1
  27626. 1
  27627. 1
  27628. 1
  27629. 1
  27630. 1
  27631. 1
  27632. 1
  27633. 1
  27634. 1
  27635. 1
  27636. 1
  27637. 1
  27638. 1
  27639. 1
  27640. 1
  27641. 1
  27642. 1
  27643. 1
  27644. 1
  27645. 1
  27646. 1
  27647. 1
  27648. 1
  27649. 1
  27650.  @juliosuave8028  So... I thought you said you provide facts? Not cherry picked twisted data that conveniently gives you an argument? What you call, my "claim" is easily proven to be facts.... And not claims. Infact, you can find it under the "Unborn victims of violence Act". Which is why I kept saying "unborn". Because that's literally what the law calls it. Next, you tried to mention a percentage of states that recognizes the crime, EXCEPT... You conveniently left out the part that I mentioned in the act, that states that the only way they are charged with these things is they are considered to be homicide or feticide. Not manslaughter. Which... Is what you are conveniently forgetting, is part of what you claimed to be "facts". Another part that you conveniently left out, is the fact that all of these crimes under this act, in every state has a viability clause. Meaning it depends on is The Unborn is developed enough to be able to survive outside the womb without the mother. As far as your "mental gymnastics" claim, about it not being manslaughter but being life in another context, again... Has to do with viability. Which goes goes back to my original question that you and almost everyone else keeps avoiding. You have no functioning brain outside of the womb are you considered alive? The answer to that is no. Which again you don't want to have to say because it kind of destroys your point of view. Meaning, not until a certain point into gestation and growth inside a womb is something we would call alive in any other circumstance. Until that point, it is not alive. Which means if the mother dies before this point,, or in some states, before the point of viability, it cannot be charged as even homicide or feticide. Why? Because that involves killing something that was never alive in the first place. It's really not that hard to understand. No gymnastics are involved. It's just something you're choosing to pretend you're ignorant about so you still have a point.
    1
  27651. 1
  27652. 1
  27653. 1
  27654. 1
  27655. 1
  27656. 1
  27657. 1
  27658. 1
  27659. 1
  27660. 1
  27661. 1
  27662. 1
  27663. 1
  27664. 1
  27665. 1
  27666. 1
  27667. 1
  27668. 1
  27669. 1
  27670. 1
  27671. 1
  27672. 1
  27673. 1
  27674. 1
  27675. 1
  27676. 1
  27677. 1
  27678. 1
  27679. 1
  27680. 1
  27681. 1
  27682. 1
  27683. 1
  27684. 1
  27685. 1
  27686. 1
  27687. 1
  27688. 1
  27689. 1
  27690. 1
  27691. 1
  27692. 1
  27693. 1
  27694. 1
  27695. 1
  27696. 1
  27697. 1
  27698. 1
  27699. 1
  27700. 1
  27701. 🤦Far right wing logic hurts my brain.🤷 I'm healthy right in this moment, standing in the middle of a country with the worst C19 pandemic outbreak... Ya know... In the 🌎! Healthcare shouldn't be a right! It's totally normal for tones of people to die every year from being to poor to live. Those dying people should just go get a job.... 🙄 It's absolutely fine for people to have to go into debt the rest of their lives to get a collage education. What could go wrong with having a country filled with ignorant and/or poor people? 😳 Climate Change and the earth becoming uninhabitable for human life... Who has time to worry about that? But... Thoughts and prayers! 🙏 HOW DARE these people protest, riot and loot, for months on end, about the mass murder of their people, by the people who are supposed to be protecting them, and only after trying to peacefully get people's attention for decades... Wait... What? That was people who look like me this time? And all because of a lie that a childish sore loser told? Na! It must be someone else's fault... For... Ya know... "Reasons". 😶 Wait... What? You think we should only have to work 1 job and 40 hours a week to be able to support our families and put food in our childs mouths in America? Why, that's just crazy talk! Now lets talk about getting some more of those tax cuts for the rich! 😤 Abortion BAD! EXCEPT... Of course when our fav political figures and celebs force their Mistresses to get them. Instead, lets start brain storming on excuses for putting more children in cages! I know! Will focus only on who actually built the cages and not who put the children in them! 🤞 But we're the brainwashed 🐑... 🤦
    1
  27702. 1
  27703. 1
  27704. 1
  27705. 1
  27706. 1
  27707. 1
  27708. 1
  27709. 1
  27710. 1
  27711. 1
  27712. 1
  27713. 1
  27714. 1
  27715. 1
  27716. 1
  27717. 1
  27718. 1
  27719. 1
  27720. 1
  27721. 1
  27722. 1
  27723. 1
  27724. 1
  27725. 1
  27726. 1
  27727. 1
  27728. 1
  27729. 1
  27730. 1
  27731. 1
  27732. 1
  27733. 1
  27734. 1
  27735. 1
  27736. 1
  27737. 1
  27738. 1
  27739. 1
  27740. 1
  27741. 1
  27742. 1
  27743. 1
  27744. 1
  27745. 1
  27746. 1
  27747. 1
  27748. 1
  27749. 1
  27750. 1
  27751. 1
  27752. 1
  27753. 1
  27754. 1
  27755. 1
  27756. 1
  27757. 1
  27758. 1
  27759. 1
  27760. 1
  27761. 1
  27762. 1
  27763. 1
  27764. 1
  27765. 1
  27766. 1
  27767. 1
  27768. 1
  27769. 1
  27770. 1
  27771. 1
  27772. 1
  27773. 1
  27774. 1
  27775. 1
  27776. 1
  27777. 1
  27778. 1
  27779. 1
  27780. 1
  27781. 1
  27782. 1
  27783. 1
  27784. 1
  27785. 1
  27786. 1
  27787. 1
  27788. 1
  27789. 1
  27790. 1
  27791. 1
  27792. 1
  27793. 1
  27794. 1
  27795. 1
  27796. 1
  27797. 1
  27798. 1
  27799. 1
  27800. 1
  27801. 1
  27802. 1
  27803. 1
  27804. 1
  27805. 1
  27806. 1
  27807. 1
  27808. 1
  27809. 1
  27810. 1
  27811. 1
  27812. 1
  27813. 1
  27814. 1
  27815. 1
  27816. 1
  27817. 1
  27818. 1
  27819. 1
  27820. 1
  27821. 1
  27822. 1
  27823. 1
  27824. 1
  27825. 1
  27826. 1
  27827. 1
  27828. 1
  27829. 1
  27830. 1
  27831. 1
  27832. 1
  27833. 1
  27834. 1
  27835. 1
  27836. 1
  27837. 1
  27838. 1
  27839. 1
  27840. 1
  27841. 1
  27842. 1
  27843. 1
  27844. 1
  27845. 1
  27846. 1
  27847. 1
  27848. 1
  27849. 1
  27850. 1
  27851. 1
  27852. 1
  27853. 1
  27854. 1
  27855. 1
  27856. 1
  27857. 1
  27858. 1
  27859. 1
  27860. 1
  27861. 1
  27862. 1
  27863. 1
  27864. 1
  27865. 1
  27866. 1
  27867. 1
  27868. 1
  27869. 1
  27870. 1
  27871. 1
  27872. 1
  27873. 1
  27874. 1
  27875. 1
  27876. 1
  27877. 1
  27878. 1
  27879. 1
  27880. 1
  27881. 1
  27882. 1
  27883. 1
  27884. 1
  27885. 1
  27886. 1
  27887. 1
  27888. 1
  27889. 1
  27890. 1
  27891. 1
  27892. 1
  27893. 1
  27894. 1
  27895. 1
  27896. 1
  27897. 1
  27898. 1
  27899. 1
  27900. 1
  27901. 1
  27902. 1
  27903. 1
  27904. 1
  27905. 1
  27906. 1
  27907. 1
  27908. 1
  27909. 1
  27910. 1
  27911. 1
  27912. 1
  27913. 1
  27914. 1
  27915. 1
  27916. 1
  27917. 1
  27918. 1
  27919. 1
  27920. 1
  27921. 1
  27922. 1
  27923. 1
  27924. 1
  27925. 1
  27926. 1
  27927. 1
  27928. 1
  27929.  @korym7812  you seem to keep mixing up BuzzFeed with CNN. I said CNN was reporting that the story that BuzzFeed put out was not verified. CNN didn't put out the story. CNN put out a story about how BuzzFeed had put out that story. that was CNN stories. So CNN's story was verified because BuzzFeed it put out that story. You just keep mistaking CNN for BuzzFeed. BuzzFeed put out the story about Trump. You for some reason are blaming CNN for it. and now you're making more stuff out by the way. They didn't condemn the president because they didn't report the story and in fact they had a buzzfeed reporter on there which they grilled on live TV because the story was unsubstantiated. They also reported the White House is denials as well as Bob molars teams denials. I'm not sure how to make this any more clear. they did not report the original story that you were upset with them reporting. BuzzFeed reported the original story. CNN reported that there was a story out there and then proceeded to criticize the fact that it was on verified on numerous occasions and then proceeded to report all the denials about it. funny how you say black radicals. That's quite telling when all the reports didn't say black radicals. they said African-American Israelites, with the emphasis on the Israelite and not the fact that they happen to be African-American. also again just making shit up about CNN and MSNBC at least. I can't vouch for the rest. I wasn't listening all day to those and I choose to base my opinions also facts and not things that aren't Factual. They reported the viral video like everybody else for sure but then they also reported all the updates and all the other people coming out and telling their side of the story. Also find it funny how the Native American was also aggressive. when he was just there trying to diffuse the situation. you frame it in a very particular way. personally I think almost everybody there was making poor decisions and acting an ass... now you could and I would argue that the children's mistakes were all minor compared to the adults and also more excusable because ... well ... their children. Which shows a lot about the adults in that situation and the Israelites were definitely assholes for no good goddamn reason. if that was my little boy then I don't have their ass and will be going to jail that day. But the Native American man was at Standing Rock and was beating drums to diffuse the situation as well as getting in between them at his own personal risk. he was trying to help the boys and the boys were dancing to his drums. with the wall you have to be specific. as much as everybody keeps blaming did Democrats and liberals for being anti border patrol..... they are not. They simply want something that will actually work. this is Trump's wall from his own mouth. it would be a 1000. miles long the other 1500 hundred we're covered by natural barriers. the height he described varied between 30 and 50 feet. The most common number being 35. An impenetrable physical wall composed of precast concrete plank. as well as aesthetically pleasing for some damn reason. then all the sudden after the election it was going to be fencing in some places. even though during the election he often mocked dispensing we have now. oh and how could we forget that Mexico was going to pay for it. So when you were saying wall you need to keep in mind but that is Trump's wall. now there are very few that agree with Trump's wall and many that do not in the border patrol experts area. So it is easy for you to list that than I but all you need to do is go look up the majority of the border patrol comments or the governor's congressman and Mayors who live along the border and their comments on why it's not a good idea and how it's not cool that Trump is over there embellishing all this craziness talking about an invasion. Meanwhile asshat is holding millions of Americans hostage, literally starving them and putting them at risk for losing their homes in order to get his unrealistic campaign promise. and not even that because five billion money been come close to building his wall. Not to mention he hasn't even spent the money he had on this last go around. but sure that's totally worth advocating his duties as a president. also almost to any border patrol experts or agent, even the ones that agree with the wall, have said that the wall would need to be see-through in some way. there is a brilliant article from the Cato Institute that was written by David Bier that's scientifically historically and factually lays out the reasons why a wall and especially one like the one Trump is talking about is not a good idea. The name of the article is why the wall won't work. You should look it up. At the end of the article it states simply that border barriers will never stop illegal immigration because a wall or fence cannot apprehend crossers. a border patrol agent that went on Fox News literally called the wall meaningless. Mirror Michael Gomez of Douglas Arizona labeled defense as a failure in 2010. saying they jump right over it. former border patrol spokesperson Mike Scioli has called the sense little more than a speed bump in the desert. Texas chairman Michael McCaul concluded in 2013 that it would be an inefficient use of taxpayer money to complete. Amy 2016 migration policy Institute review of the impact of walls and fences around the world turned up no academic literature specifically on the deterrent effect of physical barriers related to other Technologies or strategies, and concluded somewhat vigorously that walls appear to be relatively ineffective. so to answer your very last question... I do not see how I'm ignorant because unlike you I looked up both sides of that and chose to focus on the facts history and just downright common sense. the commissioner and his deputies are more political figures as to where the Border Patrol themselves deal with that shed everyday. also what is your Source on your comment about barriers being 90% Plus effectives? because you're scary on ports of Entry would only make sense if the barriers were in any way effective and they couldn't for instance tunnel under them go over them go through them in a myriad of ways.
    1
  27930. 1
  27931. 1
  27932. 1
  27933. 1
  27934. 1
  27935. 1
  27936. 1
  27937. 1
  27938. 1
  27939. 1
  27940. 1
  27941. 1
  27942. 1
  27943. 1
  27944. 1
  27945. 1
  27946. 1
  27947. 1
  27948. 1
  27949. 1
  27950. 1
  27951. 1
  27952. 1
  27953. 1
  27954. 1
  27955. 1
  27956. 1
  27957. 1
  27958. 1
  27959. 1
  27960. 1
  27961. 1
  27962. 1
  27963. 1
  27964. 1
  27965. 1
  27966. 1
  27967. 1
  27968. 1
  27969. 1
  27970. 1
  27971. 1
  27972. 1
  27973. 1
  27974. 1
  27975. 1
  27976. 1
  27977. 1
  27978. 1
  27979. 1
  27980. 1
  27981. 1
  27982. 1
  27983. 1
  27984. 1
  27985. 1
  27986. 1
  27987. 1
  27988. 1
  27989. 1
  27990. 1
  27991. 1
  27992. 1
  27993. 1
  27994. 1
  27995. 1
  27996. 1
  27997. 1
  27998. 1
  27999. 1
  28000. 1
  28001. 1
  28002. 1
  28003. 1
  28004. 1
  28005. 1
  28006. 1
  28007. 1
  28008. 1
  28009. 1
  28010. 1
  28011. 1
  28012. 1
  28013. 1
  28014. 1
  28015. 1
  28016. 1
  28017. 1
  28018. 1
  28019. 1
  28020. 1
  28021. 1
  28022. 1
  28023. 1
  28024. 1
  28025. 1
  28026. 1
  28027. 1
  28028. 1
  28029. 1
  28030. 1
  28031. 1
  28032. 1
  28033. 1
  28034. 1
  28035. 1
  28036. 1
  28037. 1
  28038. 1
  28039. 1
  28040. 1
  28041. 1
  28042. 1
  28043. 1
  28044. 1
  28045. 1
  28046. 1
  28047. 1
  28048.  @wreckinbal  Correct. Which is why I gave you links from different sources, giving multiple interpretations. That is important. The facts are important. Not just some of them. All of them. That was my point. The mere fact that these people are there charging the capital and attacking police officers with bear spray in the first place, is insane. Thank you, though. For owning your mistake. That is rare and you have my respect for that. As for the two other officers... chemicals affect people differently. It's like how you know you have medicines that come with all those warning labels... of all the things that may occur. It doesn't mean it's going to be the same for everybody. It's called an adverse reaction. The reactive chemical in the bear spray can spike your blood pressure and put you at higher risk for stroke or heart attack. Even if the bear spray was only one of the contributing factors, it is most likely that is that contributing factor wasn't added into the equation, he would still be alive today. If the medical examiner determines the chemical in the bear spray to be a contributing factor, at the very least they could be charged with reckless endangerment and possibly second degree murder. As for the media, honestly I don't really get that argument a lot of you sing to make. In this case, for instance. They were literally reporting on what the police officers said during the press conference. They were reporting the news. They weren't making things up. They got it from the police. Plus there's our individual personal responsibility. We all carry around many supercomputers in our pockets. Which means the only excuse we have for being ignorant of all the facts is because we are willing it to be so.
    1
  28049. 1
  28050. 1
  28051. 1
  28052. 1
  28053. 1
  28054. 1
  28055. 1
  28056. 1
  28057. 1
  28058. 1
  28059. 1
  28060. 1
  28061. 1
  28062. 1
  28063. 1
  28064. 1
  28065. 1
  28066. 1
  28067. 1
  28068. 1
  28069. 1
  28070. 1
  28071. 1
  28072. 1
  28073. 1
  28074. 1
  28075. 1
  28076. 1
  28077. 1
  28078. 1
  28079. 1
  28080. 1
  28081. 1
  28082. 1
  28083. 1
  28084. 1
  28085. 1
  28086. 1
  28087. 1
  28088. 1
  28089. 1
  28090. 1
  28091. 1
  28092. 1
  28093. 1
  28094. 1
  28095. 1
  28096. 1
  28097. 1
  28098. 1
  28099. 1
  28100. 1
  28101. 1
  28102. 1
  28103. 1
  28104. 1
  28105. 1
  28106. 1
  28107. 1
  28108. 1
  28109. 1
  28110. 1
  28111. 1
  28112. 1
  28113. 1
  28114. 1
  28115. 1
  28116. 1
  28117. 1
  28118. 1
  28119. 1
  28120. 1
  28121. 1
  28122. 1
  28123. 1
  28124. 1
  28125. 1
  28126. 1
  28127. 1
  28128. 1
  28129. 1
  28130. 1
  28131. 1
  28132. 1
  28133. 1
  28134. 1
  28135. 1
  28136. 1
  28137. 1
  28138. 1
  28139. 1
  28140. 1
  28141. 1
  28142. 1
  28143. 1
  28144. 1
  28145. 1
  28146. 1
  28147. 1
  28148. 1
  28149. 1
  28150. 1
  28151. 1
  28152. 1
  28153. 1
  28154. 1
  28155. 1
  28156. 1
  28157. 1
  28158. 1
  28159. 1
  28160. 1
  28161. 1
  28162. 1
  28163. 1
  28164. 1
  28165. 1
  28166. 1
  28167. 1
  28168. 1
  28169. 1
  28170. 1
  28171. 1
  28172. 1
  28173. 1
  28174. 1
  28175. 1
  28176. 1
  28177. 1
  28178. 1
  28179. 1
  28180. 1
  28181. 1
  28182. 1
  28183. 1
  28184. 1
  28185. 1
  28186. 1
  28187. 1
  28188. 1
  28189. 1
  28190. 1
  28191. 1
  28192. 1
  28193. 1
  28194. 1
  28195. 1
  28196. 1
  28197. 1
  28198. 1
  28199. 1
  28200. 1
  28201. 1
  28202. 1
  28203. 1
  28204. 1
  28205. 1
  28206. 1
  28207. 1
  28208. 1
  28209. 1
  28210. 1
  28211. 1
  28212. 1
  28213. 1
  28214. 1
  28215. 1
  28216. 1
  28217. 1
  28218. 1
  28219. 1
  28220. 1
  28221. 1
  28222. 1
  28223. 1
  28224. 1
  28225. 1
  28226. 1
  28227. 1
  28228. 1
  28229. 1
  28230. 1
  28231. 1
  28232. 1
  28233. 1
  28234. 1
  28235. 1
  28236. 1
  28237. 1
  28238. 1
  28239. 1
  28240. 1
  28241. 1
  28242. 1
  28243. 1
  28244. 1
  28245. 1
  28246. 1
  28247. 1
  28248. 1
  28249. 1
  28250. 1
  28251. 1
  28252. 1
  28253. 1
  28254. 1
  28255. 1
  28256. 1
  28257. 1
  28258. 1
  28259. 1
  28260. 1
  28261. 1
  28262. 1
  28263. 1
  28264. 1
  28265. 1
  28266. 1
  28267. 1
  28268. 1
  28269. 1
  28270. 1
  28271. 1
  28272. 1
  28273. 1
  28274. @Blank Ya know what... I was getting ready to write something ugly back to you and continue this toxic scrap... But I've changed my mind. I'm done with that. Instead... I'm going to go back to the substance. You can read this and interpret it as you please, you can respond as you please. Yes! There is a difference between "detention" and these camps. Making that comparison is massively out of touch. Applying for asylum is legal... And needed for the hell most of these people are coming from. They should not be treated like criminals, caged, seperated, been put in unsanitary living conditions, with improper healthcare and children dying of what started as a common cold... They should not have to worry about having their children lost in a system that took them from them. These people are here for help. They should not have to choose between treated like less than human or living in hell with their kids. This is not what america should be. Immigrants built this country... Its survives off the backs of these people and has in a variety of ways, sense it began. They come in, we help them get on their feet and then them and their families contribute to this country for generations to come. That is the case... More times then not. Thats who we are. That is why asylum is legal. Now... You can make shitty remarks, stupid insulta that don't matter anyways, because I don't know you... So what does it matter what you think about me... Its not like its going to effect my life. It just makes you feel better... And that shouldn't be something that makes you feel better. .... Or you can man up and participate in civil discourse. Up to you.
    1
  28275. 1
  28276. @Blank Thanks for showing who you are, yet again. I'm going to go back to the substance. You can read this and interpret it as you please, you can respond as you please. Yes! There is a difference between "detention" and these camps. Making that comparison is massively out of touch. Applying for asylum is legal... And needed for the hell most of these people are coming from. They should not be treated like criminals, caged, seperated, been put in unsanitary living conditions, with improper healthcare and children dying of what started as a common cold... They should not have to worry about having their children lost in a system that took them from them. These people are here for help. They should not have to choose between treated like less than human or living in hell with their kids. This is not what america should be. Immigrants built this country... Its survives off the backs of these people and has in a variety of ways, sense it began. They come in, we help them get on their feet and then them and their families contribute to this country for generations to come. That is the case... More times then not. Thats who we are. That is why asylum is legal. Now... You can make shitty remarks, stupid insulta that don't matter anyways, because I don't know you... So what does it matter what you think about me... Its not like its going to effect my life. It just makes you feel better... And that shouldn't be something that makes you feel better. .... Or you can man up and participate in civil discourse. Up to you.
    1
  28277. @Blank I'll be right here, till your done. Thanks for showing who you are, yet again. I'm going to go back to the substance. You can read this and interpret it as you please, you can respond as you please. Yes! There is a difference between "detention" and these camps. Making that comparison is massively out of touch. Applying for asylum is legal... And needed for the hell most of these people are coming from. They should not be treated like criminals, caged, seperated, been put in unsanitary living conditions, with improper healthcare and children dying of what started as a common cold... They should not have to worry about having their children lost in a system that took them from them. These people are here for help. They should not have to choose between treated like less than human or living in hell with their kids. This is not what america should be. Immigrants built this country... Its survives off the backs of these people and has in a variety of ways, sense it began. They come in, we help them get on their feet and then them and their families contribute to this country for generations to come. That is the case... More times then not. Thats who we are. That is why asylum is legal. Now... You can make shitty remarks, stupid insulta that don't matter anyways, because I don't know you... So what does it matter what you think about me... Its not like its going to effect my life. It just makes you feel better... And that shouldn't be something that makes you feel better. .... Or you can man up and participate in civil discourse. Up to you.
    1
  28278. 1
  28279. 1
  28280. 1
  28281. 1
  28282. 1
  28283. 1
  28284. 1
  28285. 1
  28286. 1
  28287. 1
  28288. 1
  28289. 1
  28290. 1
  28291. 1
  28292. 1
  28293. 1
  28294. 1
  28295. 1
  28296. 1
  28297. 1
  28298. 1
  28299. 1
  28300. 1
  28301. 1
  28302. 1
  28303. 1
  28304. 1
  28305. 1
  28306. 1
  28307. 1
  28308. 1
  28309. 1
  28310. 1
  28311. 1
  28312. 1
  28313. 1
  28314. 1
  28315. 1
  28316. 1
  28317. 1
  28318. 1
  28319. 1
  28320. 1
  28321. 1
  28322. 1
  28323. 1
  28324. 1
  28325. 1
  28326. 1
  28327. 1
  28328. 1
  28329. 1
  28330. 1
  28331. 1
  28332. 1
  28333. 1
  28334. 1
  28335. 1
  28336. 1
  28337. 1
  28338. 1
  28339. 1
  28340. 1
  28341. 1
  28342. 1
  28343. 1
  28344. 1
  28345. 1
  28346. 1
  28347. 1
  28348. 1
  28349. 1
  28350. 1
  28351. 1
  28352. 1
  28353. 1
  28354. 1
  28355. 1
  28356. 1
  28357. 1
  28358. 1
  28359. 1
  28360. 1
  28361. 1
  28362. 1
  28363. 1
  28364. 1
  28365. 1
  28366. 1
  28367. 1
  28368. 1
  28369. 1
  28370. 1
  28371.  @birddog7492  1. Not propaganda and you should know that. 1 of many databases of detailed lies. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?utm_term=.e3e2ce7388e7 A multitude of sources https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/08/12/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15722950984014&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fpolitics%2F2019%2F08%2F12%2Fpresident-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days%2F https://www-vanityfair-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/04/trump-has-told-more-than-10000-lies-since-being-inaugurated-washington-post/amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15722950984014&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vanityfair.com%2Fnews%2F2019%2F04%2Ftrump-has-told-more-than-10000-lies-since-being-inaugurated-washington-post https://www.salon.com/2019/08/12/donald-trump-has-lied-an-average-of-13-times-a-day-since-becoming-president-analysis-finds/ https://m-huffpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d526ff0e4b0c63bcbecbbea/amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15722950984014&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffpost.com%2Fentry%2Fdonald-trump-washington-post-fact-checker-figure_n_5d526ff0e4b0c63bcbecbbea https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2019/how-the-washington-post-tallied-more-than-10000-trump-falsehoods-in-less-than-three-years/ https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/trump_fact-check_washington_post.php https://projects.thestar.com/donald-trump-fact-check/
    1
  28372. 1
  28373. 1
  28374. 1
  28375. 1
  28376. 1
  28377. 1
  28378. 1
  28379. 1
  28380. 1
  28381. 1
  28382. 1
  28383. 1
  28384. 1
  28385. 1
  28386. 1
  28387. 1
  28388. 1
  28389. 1
  28390. 1
  28391. 1
  28392. 1
  28393. 1
  28394. 1
  28395. 1
  28396. 1
  28397. 1
  28398. 1
  28399. 1
  28400. 1
  28401. 1
  28402. 1
  28403. 1
  28404. 1
  28405. 1
  28406. 1
  28407. 1
  28408. 1
  28409. 1
  28410. 1
  28411. 1
  28412. 1
  28413. 1
  28414. 1
  28415. 1
  28416. 1
  28417. 1
  28418. 1
  28419. 1
  28420. 1
  28421. 1
  28422. 1
  28423. 1
  28424. 1
  28425. 1
  28426. 1
  28427. 1
  28428. 1
  28429. 1
  28430. 1
  28431. 1
  28432. 1
  28433. 1
  28434. 1
  28435. 1
  28436. 1
  28437. 1
  28438. 1
  28439. 1
  28440. 1
  28441. 1
  28442. 1
  28443. 1
  28444. 1
  28445. 1
  28446. 1
  28447. 1
  28448. 1
  28449. 1
  28450. 1
  28451. 1
  28452.  Tommy Thompson  Okay... But... Just remember... You asked for it... 1. " according to CNN it's all the Trump supporters getting it because they didn't get the shot" 👈 Provide proof that CNN, as a company, or multiple representatives claimed that " all the Trump supporters getting it now because they didn't get the shot"? 2. " So what's the difference between now and when Trump was POTUS?" Well... That should be fairly obvious. You gave your answer in the question. Donald Trump, his administration and many in the GOP downplaying the severity of covid-19, trying to sell America multiple snake oil cures before the vaccine came out and his overall lackadaisical example of not taking the whole thing seriously enough. Not that all the people who have not gotten the vaccine we're Trump supporters.... But if you put enough misinformation out there with enough people believing it, there is bound to be a bunch of people questioning it or maybe even just procrastinating moreso on it. The current leader of our country wouldn't even go public about getting his own vaccine, at the time. Not to mention... there was a six-week Gap between the vaccine rollout and President Biden taking office. We are not talking about a whole lot of time there either. People deciding not to get it then maybe it had absolutely nothing to do with Donald Trump or which administration was in power. Yet you're trying to passive-aggressively equate them all together. 3. " Blame has been shifted to the States now that Joe is POTUS whereas it was all Trump's fault before" 👈 this is another blatant over-exaggeration for lack of a better argument. It's also An intentional mischaracterization. President Biden is not downplaying or sugarcoating the pandemic. He does not feel the need to paint a Rosy picture. When it's bad, he says it's bad. It regardless of knowing that the right-wing are going to try and spin it. When there is a problem with the state, he says there is a problem with the states. For instance, data shows that my state of Louisiana is less than 30% vaccinated period as to where States like Washington, California or New York have vaccination rates that are much higher. We no longer have a president who is playing fast and loose with American lives. The important part is to recognize the problem areas and address them. That is what I'm responsible president and a responsible adult would do. 4. " Remember those ventilators Democratic states needed but didn't." 👈 No... We don't. If you're referring to back its beginning of the pandemic when it turned out our national stockpiles had been defunded by Donald Trump, which sent our state's into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives... as I stated, I live in Louisiana. At one point, during the initial outbreak, Louisiana had the highest infection rate in the world. It was that state they said that was the worst just under New York for months on end. I also happen to be a Rideshare driver. All but medical workers, and mandatory service workers basically stayed inside for almost 4 months. I would drive medical personnel back and forth from the hospital's all day everyday. They would get in my car and breakdown. I literally had to pull over, climb in the back and hold their hands or give them hugs on more than a dozen occasions. Most of the time what they were so upset about was not having what they needed to save these people's lives. Having to decide who to Let Die. Others were worried about their safety and the safety of their families. On the way to their homes talking about how they didn't know if they were going to come back the next day because they weren't being protected at work. Tons getting in my car with big boxes of trash bags, Saran Wrap and duct tape. 5. " Democrats make everything political" 👈 I forget... Was it Democrats or Donald Trump that called the severity of covid-19 a democratic hoax, while privately admitting to downplaying the pandemic?
    1
  28453. 1
  28454.  Tommy Thompson  It did take a hot min... 😂 And thank you as well. Look... first, I live in the land of Republicans. Literally everyone I knew button for Trump the first time. They are all also vaccinated. So please don't think I am under any illusions that all Trump supporters are any one thing. If you're talkin like that and you're talkin about my family and I take issue with it. I don't give a damn if you're in my party or not. I've been known to b** out a few liberals for mass generalizations. However, the fact is, majority red skates are the ones following behind with vaccinations right now. The same states that recently went to Donald Trump in the presidential election. Including Mine, by the way. Now, you seem to be at least a little reasonable. With all the disinformation that the Trump Administration put out about covid throughout the entire year and the example that Donald Trump himself chose to prevent throughout that year... A few examples... - not wearing a mask for the first 6 months - holding multiple super spreader events - referring to the severity of the pandemic as a democratic hoax - lying about having stockpiles of the second dose - defunding the restocking of the stockpile - claiming on multiple occasions that after the election covid testing to magically get better for the Democrat - trying to sell us multiple snake oil cures - intentionally downplaying the pandemic ... and knowing that a lot of his followers, follow every word he says... not to mention all the right-wing Representatives that are doing the same thing he was when it came to disinformation and tampering down the severity of the situation... you honestly can't figure out why red States would be lagging behind in the vaccine area, in particular?
    1
  28455. 1
  28456. 1
  28457. 1
  28458. 1
  28459. 1
  28460. 1
  28461. 1
  28462. 1
  28463. 1
  28464. 1
  28465. 1
  28466. 1
  28467. 1
  28468. 1
  28469. 1
  28470. 1
  28471. 1
  28472. 1
  28473. 1
  28474. 1
  28475. 1
  28476. 1
  28477. 1
  28478. 1
  28479. 1
  28480. 1
  28481. 1
  28482. 1
  28483. 1
  28484. 1
  28485. 1
  28486. 1
  28487. 1
  28488. 1
  28489. 1
  28490. 1
  28491. 1
  28492. 1
  28493. 1
  28494. 1
  28495. 1
  28496. 1
  28497. 1
  28498. 1
  28499. 1
  28500. 1
  28501. 1
  28502. 1
  28503. 1
  28504. 1
  28505. 1
  28506. 1
  28507. 1
  28508. 1
  28509. 1
  28510. 1
  28511. 1
  28512. 1
  28513. 1
  28514. 1
  28515. 1
  28516. 1
  28517. 1
  28518. 1
  28519. 1
  28520. 1
  28521. 1
  28522. 1
  28523. 1
  28524. 1
  28525. 1
  28526. 1
  28527. 1
  28528. 1
  28529. 1
  28530. 1
  28531. 1
  28532. 1
  28533. 1
  28534. 1
  28535. 1
  28536. 1
  28537. 1
  28538. 1
  28539. 1
  28540. 1
  28541. 1
  28542.  @richardgreene6810  Rep "security" laws... Support voter suppression in a multitude of ways. First, they make it a requirement in the majority of states to be actually out of the state in order to vote with an absentee ballot. Then they require a (in most states) 6 to 6 or 7 to 7 voting time period on a weekday, when most people are working. Then they take poling places and ballot boxes out of districts that need more and not less, effectively making the lines longer. Often times hours longer. And now they are trying to demonize mail in ballots, with no proof of fraud to do so... and five states doing strictly mail-in ballots for the past decade without anyone worrying about it before now. So... Basically... hardworking, taxpaying American citizens have to chance the lines not being to long for them to be able to practice their constitutionally protected right to vote for their leaders, either, an hour in the morning before they have to go to work, the 30 min to an hour they get for lunch during work (for which you don't want people to hand them Pizza and water, apparently), or the hour after they get out of work... before, either, they have to go to work, go back to work or the polls close, in order to vote... Oh... And these Ballot Boxes and pole closures always conveniently seem to happen in majority-minority or democrat strong districts... But... Yeah... it's just about "security" and totally "not" about voter suppression. Did I mention all the gerrymandering? The only reason you can't see the problem is because you don't want to.
    1
  28543. 1
  28544. 1
  28545. 1
  28546. 1
  28547. 1
  28548. 1
  28549. 1
  28550. 1
  28551. 1
  28552. 1
  28553. 1
  28554. 1
  28555. 1
  28556. 1
  28557. 1
  28558. 1
  28559. 1
  28560. 1
  28561. 1
  28562. 1
  28563. 1
  28564. 1
  28565. 1
  28566. 1
  28567. 1
  28568. 1
  28569. 1
  28570. 1
  28571. 1
  28572.  @thescribe5494  I follow your train of thought right up until the Donald Trump thing. You're suggesting that's the only reason. I've been in the YouTube comments section enough to know that people are salty for all kinds of crazy reasons. Some don't even like Donald Trump. They just don't like to be wrong. Even like on the smallest craziest thing. Unfortunately the YouTube comment section is flush with megalomaniacs. Lol.... your assumption is that that is the only possible scenario. It's simply not. As for me... I'm not an orange man bad... Gilr... I don't like a lot of what he does... But that has almost all to do with the stupid ways he goes about things. That doesn't however mean I think he does everything wrong. For instance... There was a bipartisan criminal Reform Bill that he had a big part in. His secretary of education was going to cut funding for the Special Olympics. Yes he hired her butt he could have had no way to know that she was going to do that and as soon as he found out he stopped it. He even had a decent point about China and intellectual property rights. He just went about it in a really stupid way. Why... No-one... No-one..... Wins a trade war. Today it came out that China and US finally came to some kind of agreement. How this is some kind of victory for Trump. It's not. Why? Because did everybody just think that the people who we sell our goods and services to we're just going to sit around and wait for us to work out our s***? Cuz they didn't. They found other sellers. Most of what we lost during this trade war is never going to come back. At least not in our lifetime. That's why nobody wins a trade War. And all this guy knows how to do is wave his big stick around. Except that doesn't work well with a country that is probably the best in the world at playing the long game. Like I said, a lot of my disagreements with him is about the stupid ways he goes about doing s***. You mentioned socialism. But here's the thing people don't understand about it... Socialism, communism, democracy, oligarchy, dictatorship, monarchy... You know what all these things have in common? They are all systems of operation. Systems of operation are not good or bad. It is all in the hands of the user. So when one says they have a problem with one of those forms of government AKA systems of operation, they're really saying they have a problem with the way certain people or one person are using that system of operation. Socialism as an example... We have socialism in this country right now that no one has complained about for a very long time. Are local police, local fire men, are local ambulance services, Social Security and more are all socialist programs. Except the way they have that socialist program working it benefits people. that is exactly why it's dangerous Just to dismiss an idea just because someone said it was socialist. You have to listen to the details. Weigh the pros and cons. Get ahold of all relevant information and then make an educated opinion on it. In this day and age saying something is socialist is just a catch-all, for the far-right to demonize something. the left has their catch alls as well. like way too many of us use racism as a platform for a way too much. which is dangerous because there is honest to God racism. I'm not projecting anything. You came at me like a smart-ass and for some reason singled me out. I'm a give what I take kind of girl. If you want to come at me like an adult I'll come at you like an adult. If you're going to be an a**** I can be a b****. It's that simple. Sorry, but you were an a******. It's not about projection. It's simply that. As I have demonstrated above, I am more than capable of being reasonable and having substance base conversations. I just choose to do that with people that choose to do that with me. now, I am an adult and I choose my own actions. Is it a little petty of me to Act in the same way that people act towards me? Sure probably. .. but we're all adults or we should be And you have recourse if you don't like how I'm acting.
    1
  28573. 1
  28574. 1
  28575. 1
  28576. 1
  28577. 1
  28578. 1
  28579. 1
  28580. 1
  28581. 1
  28582. 1
  28583. 1
  28584. 1
  28585. 1
  28586. 1
  28587. 1
  28588. 1
  28589. 1
  28590. 1
  28591. 1
  28592. 1
  28593. 1
  28594. 1
  28595. 1
  28596. 1
  28597. 1
  28598. 1
  28599. 1
  28600. 1
  28601. 1
  28602.  Doug A  As for when and where it took place... Laid that out for you already as well... But so you better understand. After The Whistleblower and their report about the July 25th phone call hit the news and Trump went on camera denying that he had even brought up Joe Biden in the conversation, the transcript of the July 25th phone call was released. At least an edited version of it. In this edited version he still committed a crime. That one isn't bribery... And God knows what's in the unedited version. .. the moment he asked the president of Ukraine to announce that he was investigating his political opponent he committed a campaign-finance violation. The facts of when and where the money was released, multiple secondhand witnesses to the quid pro quo Trump's willingness to potentially commit obstruction in order to stop people who are actually on the call from testifying... a metric ton of shady behavior in order to hinder the investigation which would include but would not be limited to Trump ordering the transcript of the July 25th phone call to be put in a top secret classification for which you would not normally go and did not qualify for, his attempts to discredit The Whistleblower despite not knowing who this person is, Trump seemingly being uninterested in an investigation into Ukraine and the bidens until Joe Biden became his political opponent, to this day not ordering the justice department to actually do the investigation into the bidens, and on... And on and on. The key to proving bribery is to establish that there was corrupt intent. One of the many examples of this is something that everybody gets wrong. Trump didn't ask for the investigation. He asked for the announcement of an investigation. Which clearly shows he wasn't actually interested in the investigation, so much as derailing his political opponents campaign because of the announcement. This is also proven out by the fact that, as I said, to this day, there has yet to be an investigation opened into the bidens from our justice department.
    1
  28603. 1
  28604. 1
  28605. 1
  28606. 1
  28607. 1
  28608. 1
  28609. 1
  28610. 1
  28611. 1
  28612. 1
  28613. 1
  28614. 1
  28615. 1
  28616. 1
  28617. 1
  28618. 1
  28619. 1
  28620. 1
  28621. 1
  28622. 1
  28623. 1
  28624. 1
  28625. 1
  28626. 1
  28627. 1
  28628. 1
  28629. 1
  28630. 1
  28631. 1
  28632. 1
  28633. 1
  28634. 1
  28635. 1
  28636. 1
  28637. 1
  28638. 1
  28639. 1
  28640. 1
  28641. 1
  28642. 1
  28643. 1
  28644. 1
  28645. 1
  28646. 1
  28647. 1
  28648. 1
  28649. 1
  28650. 1
  28651. 1
  28652. 1
  28653. 1
  28654. 1
  28655. 1
  28656. 1
  28657. 1
  28658. 1
  28659. 1
  28660. 1
  28661. 1
  28662. 1
  28663. 1
  28664. 1
  28665. 1
  28666. 1
  28667. 1
  28668. 1
  28669. 1
  28670. 1
  28671. 1
  28672. 1
  28673. 1
  28674. 1
  28675.  @monkayspunker4123   monkay spunker  This shows that a criminal, who is being brought up on charges for yet another crime is getting ready to go to trial, this time with the state. When you commit crimes, you lose the right to hang out in whatever place you would like. I'm curious if you would appose this kind of "treatment" if it was anyone else? If you would vocalize it then? And if I have not said it before, sense when are reps all the sudden so soft on crime? The Russian investigation is not a hoax and has been proven not to be. Unless you would like to give some examples as to why you think so? What laws did Comey break? This is special Council investigating crimes of their current president committing against the democracy of our coutry with a powerful foreign advisary. If you think the people do not deserve a clear and full accounting of the findings of that investigation, then you have simply lost perspective. Also, as I have tried to make clear. . an investigation of this magnatude is not like a regular trial. You also simply proven wrong by the actions of Robert Muller coming up and saying that he would have if he could have exonerated the president. He could not and that should be of concern to all americans. At least to anyone with any sense of objectivity. I would suggest you base your opinion on facts and not propaganda from a person that has ample reason to attempt discrediting an investigation on himself breaking the law. You have not presented facts for your claims. You should start doing that. Even you final statment is not based on all the facts. You leave some out to bolster your case. If your case is valid, you should not need to manipulate the data. It's that simple.
    1
  28676. 1
  28677. 1
  28678. 1
  28679. 1
  28680. 1
  28681. 1
  28682. 1
  28683. 1
  28684. 1
  28685. 1
  28686. 1
  28687. 1
  28688. 1
  28689. 1
  28690. 1
  28691. 1
  28692. 1
  28693. 1
  28694. 1
  28695. 1
  28696. 1
  28697. 1
  28698. 1
  28699. 1
  28700. 1
  28701. 1
  28702. 1
  28703. 1
  28704. 1
  28705. 1
  28706. 1
  28707. 1
  28708. 1
  28709. 1
  28710. 1
  28711. 1
  28712. 1
  28713. 1
  28714. 1
  28715. 1
  28716. 1
  28717. 1
  28718. 1
  28719. 1
  28720. 1
  28721. 1
  28722. 1
  28723. 1
  28724. 1
  28725. 1
  28726. 1
  28727. 1
  28728. 1
  28729. 1
  28730. 1
  28731. 1
  28732. 1
  28733. 1
  28734. 1
  28735. 1
  28736. 1
  28737. 1
  28738. 1
  28739. 1
  28740. 1
  28741.  @ekleko1  Interesting... Cuz, quite a few Justice Department Vets seam to think your Wrong.... https://www.npr.org/2019/10/05/767261398/trumps-ukraine-call-might-violate-election-laws-but-no-one-s-enforcing-them https://time-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/time.com/5686104/trump-ukraine-call-impeachment-offense/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&amp=true&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15708413365006&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Ftime.com%2F5686104%2Ftrump-ukraine-call-impeachment-offense%2F https://www.rollcall.com/news/whitehouse/trump-ukraine-call-legal-debate https://amp-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.businessinsider.com/laws-trump-could-have-broken-ukraine-whistleblower-case-2019-9?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15708413365006&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Flaws-trump-could-have-broken-ukraine-whistleblower-case-2019-9 For instance, this one 👆 from Biz Insider. 👇 " Justice Department veterans say Trump could be accused of breaking 4 laws in the Ukraine whistleblower scandal Sonam Sheth  Grace Panetta  Sep 27, 2019, 4:57 PM     President Donald Trump steps off Air Force One after arriving at Andrews Air Force Base, Thursday, Sept. 26, 2019, in Andrews Air Force Base, Md. Trump had spent the week attending the United Nations General Assembly in New York. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)Associated Press On Thursday, the House Intelligence Committee released an explosive whistleblower complaint from an intelligence official accusing President Donald Trump of "using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 US election." By pressuring Ukraine's government to investigate his political rivals - and possibly using taxpayer-funded military aid as leverage - Trump may have also violated federal laws. "The conduct discussed in this complaint is so direct that it's striking," said Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of New York who specialized in organized crime. In all, former prosecutors told Insider, there are at least four areas where Trump could face legal jeopardy: violating federal campaign finance laws, bribery, misappropriation, and conspiracy. On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi formally launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump over his conduct with Ukraine. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi formally launched an inquiry into impeaching President Donald Trump based on his conduct during a July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The phone call, and the actions of Trump and those around him before and after the conversation, are the subject of an explosive whistleblower complaint an intelligence official filed against Trump in August, which was released by the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday. The complaint accused Trump of "using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election" during the call. Trump ordered his administration to withhold a nearly $400 million military-aid package to Ukraine days before the phone call. While the White House's publicly-released notes of the call show the US president made no direct mention of offering aid in exchange for Zelensky's assistance in probing former Vice President Joe Biden, they confirm Trump brought up how the US does "a lot for Ukraine" right before asking Zelensky to do him a "favor" by investigating Biden and discrediting the former special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe. Read more: 2 key facts refute Trump's conspiracy theories about the Ukraine scandal The House of Representatives doesn't need to prove that a president committed a crime outlined in the federal code to pass articles of impeachment. They instead impeach based on whether the president committed "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" as outlined in Article II, Section 4 of the US constitution. But Justice Department veterans say that by pressuring Ukraine's government to investigate his political rivals - and possibly using taxpayer-funded military aid as a leverage tool - Trump may well have violated a number of federal laws. "The conduct discussed in this complaint is so direct that it's striking," said Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of New York who specialized in organized crime. "You have the President of the United States in direct communication - some might say collusion - with the president of Ukraine." In all, former prosecutors told Insider, there are at least four areas where Trump could face legal jeopardy." Maybe you shpuld take your own advice about education. I would suggest you start by looking up a little thing called confirmation bias. it means you're only seeking out information that Only confirms you're already decided conclusion. Try proving yourself wrong. That is, if you feel like your opinions can stand up to scrutiny... 😉✌
    1
  28742. 1
  28743. 1
  28744. 1
  28745. 1
  28746. 1
  28747. 1
  28748. 1
  28749. 1
  28750. 1
  28751. 1
  28752. 1
  28753. 1
  28754.  @ekleko1  As for High crimes and misdemeanors... You don't understand what that means either. Your cherry picking out of Article 2. Again. "High crimes and misdemeanors" is a phrase from Section 4 of Article Two of the United States Constitution: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, 👉or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors👈." "Since 1386, the English parliament had used the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” to describe one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” 👉were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds👈, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery.[9] Some of these charges were crimes. Others were not. 👉The one common denominator in all these accusations was that the official had somehow abused the power of his office and was unfit to serve👈.[citation needed]" "The Judiciary Committee's 1974 report 👉"The Historical Origins of Impeachment" stated:👈 "'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' has traditionally been considered a 'term of art', like such other constitutional phrases as 'levying war' and 'due process.' The Supreme Court has held that such phrases must be construed, not according to modern usage, but according to what the framers meant when they adopted them." As for your behavior... Well... It's clearly posturing to cover up insecurities. This is the law... Look it up if you don't believe me. I copied it verbatim... Campaign finance law states: “It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a federal, state, or local election.” Here os your issue... Your ego is having you try to make yourself out to be some kind of legal expert... When you are clearly not. That is what makes you so desperate to shove words into my mouth. If all you can do is try to set up Paper Tigers to tear them down, maybe consider you're not the best at arguing this. Cuz here's the thing, High crimes and misdemeanors refers back to the founders. Courts have held it up to be what it was then. Particularly misdemeanors could not be what they are today because misdemeanors was not even a legal term in that day. There are four judges have ruled that it could not possibly mean the misdemeanor that we are talking about. Here's where your problem comes in, even if a president does not break any law, which this one has, due to the plane reading of high crimes and misdemeanors from the founders, he or she could still be impeached. Which is not a problem for me anyways. Because he clearly broke laws. You trying to minimize the laws that he broke doesn't mean they're not broken. Neither does all you're pointless posturing. I mean... Does this usually work for you? You just try and Bully everybody into agreeing with you... And hope they don't look to closely at what your actually saying? Using cherry picked data, false dichotomies and silly posturing? Does this really work on people... Cuz, its kinda boring me. Just sayin...
    1
  28755. 1
  28756. 1
  28757. 1
  28758.  @ekleko1  well, The Whistleblower actually didn't get anything wrong. You're just assuming that if you keep repeating the same thing over and over again it's automatically going to magically become true. Except that's not how reality works. Also with the Whistleblower being an actual whistleblower. You can repeat that he is not a whistleblower as many times as you want but it's actually not going to make it true. You know why? The Attorney General disagrees with you. The one that Trump appointed. Yeah that guy. He disagrees with you and I kind of think he overrules some random crazy guy on in the YouTube comment section when it comes to ranking. So it's cool. 😆 The Whistleblower statute does not applied a president, you say? Yet you provide no actual evidence. I am not surprised. Except he tried to claim executive privilege, until Congress said they would take it to court and the Republican Party turned on him and so he stopped doing that and decided to release the transcript and The Whistleblower complaint. Also there are abuses of executive privilege. Which the Democratic lawmakers would have taken him to court and claimed that was one of them. Because that was one of them. The difference between a whistleblower and a leaker is them following the appropriate process of a whistleblower. Which both of the whistleblowers did. They did what is the law to the T. So, again you can keep repeating that he's not a whistleblower a million times. It's not going to matter. The Attorney General disagrees with you. You lose that battle. Sorry.
    1
  28759. 1
  28760. 1
  28761. 1
  28762. 1
  28763. 1
  28764. 1
  28765. 1
  28766. 1
  28767.  @ekleko1  Yeah... So I'm scanning over all the rest of your rant.... And... It's just you repeating the same thing... Over and over again. Kind of wish it into existence I think. Either way it means nothing. If you want it to mean something then you're going to have to give a little thing called proof... for instance, the Attorney General perhaps saying something along the lines of The Whistleblower report was credible and urgent. At the very least you're going to have to stop ignoring case law by trying to put it off as me just saying things. I have actually given you the case law a couple of times now. Nowhere in there does it say that information can't be something of value. In fact it doesn't give a list of the things that would be a value outside of monetary. The reason is, that's not for anyone other than a judge to decide. But lets do this... I'm going to give you a list of the claims you are making. For you to give me proof on. You can do that or you can either keep rambling on like a crazy person....either way is fine with me. 👌😁 - the first whistleblower is a CIA spy - information isn't something of value - this is all some Democratic hoax - that I said something along the lines of the president has to consider politics when conducting foreign biz - the whistleblower does not qualify as a whistleblower - that I thing President Obama is some kind of Black Jesus.... Lol Which I found particularly funny, considering I'm an atheist. 🤣 Its also funny because the consensus among biblical Scholars is that the character of Jesus came from three different men living in different times, all of whom were Arab.... And that all that walk on water, heal the sick, rise from the dead stuff was just made up... Of course.... 🤣 So I'm sure I skipped a few... But that should get you started. Prove your case, tin man! Or show everyone how full of shit you are by not being able to! Good night! 😉✌
    1
  28768.  @ekleko1  👈FOR ANYONE NEEDING TO KNOW if this guy is credible, read this 👇 and then all of that 👆. It will become very clear, very quickly! 😉✌ 😁 Yep.... That is what I thought. You have ABSOLUTLY NOTHING to substantiate all the craziness you are talking about. All you have are baseless assumptions, paper 🐅s, false dichotomies, posturing and comments filled to the brim of crazy claims that you could not possibly qualify. 👍 Only proven by YOU not even attempting to prove all the words you have been trying to put into mouth, are things that I actually said or even implied. All you would have to do is scroll ☝ and quote me for those... And still nothing. 🙈 - that I said something along the lines of the president has to consider politics when conducting foreign business - and I think President Obama is some kind of Black Jesus Those to should of been super easy, right? All you have to do is scroll ☝ and quote me. Still nothing... It's almost like you are completely full of shit, or something! 😁 At this point, and for the duration of you not providing any PROOF for your claims, this will be your standard message response for everything you say. For the reason that, I need no more then to point out your inability to qualify your statments, to point out that you are simply not credible and should not be listened to. Once I saw all the lies you had been telling about easily verifiable, fact based subjects, my goal fpr this conversation shifted from debate, to providing ACTUAL PROOF that you where incorrect and then showing that you could not provide PROOF TO the contrary. Thus... Discrediting you. SoOoOo.... Thanks for playing and please seek help! Good day! 😉✌
    1
  28769. 1
  28770. 1
  28771. 1
  28772. 1
  28773. 1
  28774. 1
  28775. 1
  28776. 1
  28777. 1
  28778. 1
  28779. 1
  28780. 1
  28781. 1
  28782. 1
  28783. 1
  28784. 1
  28785. 1
  28786. 1
  28787. 1
  28788. 1
  28789. 1
  28790. 1
  28791.  @ekleko1  Her! Felt like having someone elses words would help you understand better! "The phone call, and the actions of Trump and those around him before and after the conversation, are the subject of an explosive whistleblower complaint an intelligence official filed against Trump in August, which was released by the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday. The complaint accused Trump of "using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election" during the call. Trump ordered his administration to withhold a nearly $400 million military-aid package to Ukraine days before the phone call. While the White House's publicly-released notes of the call show the US president made no direct mention of offering aid in exchange for Zelensky's assistance in probing former Vice President Joe Biden, they confirm Trump brought up how the US does "a lot for Ukraine" right before asking Zelensky to do him a "favor" by investigating Biden and discrediting the former special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe. The House of Representatives doesn't need to prove that a president committed a crime outlined in the federal code to pass articles of impeachment. They instead impeach based on whether the president committed "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" as outlined in Article II, Section 4 of the US constitution. But Justice Department veterans say that by pressuring Ukraine's government to investigate his political rivals - and possibly using taxpayer-funded military aid as a leverage tool - Trump may well have violated a number of federal laws. "The conduct discussed in this complaint is so direct that it's striking," said Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of New York who specialized in organized crime. "You have the President of the United States in direct communication - some might say collusion - with the president of Ukraine." In all, former prosecutors told Insider, there are at least four areas where Trump could face legal jeopardy. Illegally soliciting campaign help from a foreign government The most obvious way in which Trump could have violated the law is by soliciting material campaign aid from a foreign government, which expressly violates the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. Trump's conduct with Ukraine isn't the first time he's been accused of violating campaign finance laws to help him win an election. He was named as an unindicted co-conspirator, listed as Individual-1 in court documents, in the case against his former personal attorney Michael Cohen. In August 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight federal charges in the Southern District of New York including charges of tax fraud, bank fraud, and violating federal campaign finance law by making a contribution to the Trump campaign in the form of a $130,000 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels - far over the legal campaign contribution limit of $2,7000 - to buy her silence on an alleged affair she had with Trump. Bribery The second area of potential legal liability for Trump relates to his request that Zelensky do him a "favor" right after mentioning how the US "does a lot for Ukraine," and more importantly, after Zelensky raised the issue of US military aid right before Trump requested he investigate Biden. Justice Department veterans say Trump could be accused of breaking 4 laws in the Ukraine whistleblower scandal Sonam Sheth  Grace Panetta  Sep 27, 2019, 4:57 PM     President Donald Trump steps off Air Force One after arriving at Andrews Air Force Base, Thursday, Sept. 26, 2019, in Andrews Air Force Base, Md. Trump had spent the week attending the United Nations General Assembly in New York. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)Associated Press On Thursday, the House Intelligence Committee released an explosive whistleblower complaint from an intelligence official accusing President Donald Trump of "using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 US election." By pressuring Ukraine's government to investigate his political rivals - and possibly using taxpayer-funded military aid as leverage - Trump may have also violated federal laws. "The conduct discussed in this complaint is so direct that it's striking," said Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of New York who specialized in organized crime. In all, former prosecutors told Insider, there are at least four areas where Trump could face legal jeopardy: violating federal campaign finance laws, bribery, misappropriation, and conspiracy. On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi formally launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump over his conduct with Ukraine. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi formally launched an inquiry into impeaching President Donald Trump based on his conduct during a July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The phone call, and the actions of Trump and those around him before and after the conversation, are the subject of an explosive whistleblower complaint an intelligence official filed against Trump in August, which was released by the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday. The complaint accused Trump of "using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election" during the call. Trump ordered his administration to withhold a nearly $400 million military-aid package to Ukraine days before the phone call. While the White House's publicly-released notes of the call show the US president made no direct mention of offering aid in exchange for Zelensky's assistance in probing former Vice President Joe Biden, they confirm Trump brought up how the US does "a lot for Ukraine" right before asking Zelensky to do him a "favor" by investigating Biden and discrediting the former special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe. Read more: 2 key facts refute Trump's conspiracy theories about the Ukraine scandal The House of Representatives doesn't need to prove that a president committed a crime outlined in the federal code to pass articles of impeachment. They instead impeach based on whether the president committed "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" as outlined in Article II, Section 4 of the US constitution. But Justice Department veterans say that by pressuring Ukraine's government to investigate his political rivals - and possibly using taxpayer-funded military aid as a leverage tool - Trump may well have violated a number of federal laws. "The conduct discussed in this complaint is so direct that it's striking," said Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of New York who specialized in organized crime. "You have the President of the United States in direct communication - some might say collusion - with the president of Ukraine." In all, former prosecutors told Insider, there are at least four areas where Trump could face legal jeopardy. Illegally soliciting campaign help from a foreign government The most obvious way in which Trump could have violated the law is by soliciting material campaign aid from a foreign government, which expressly violates the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. Trump's conduct with Ukraine isn't the first time he's been accused of violating campaign finance laws to help him win an election. He was named as an unindicted co-conspirator, listed as Individual-1 in court documents, in the case against his former personal attorney Michael Cohen. In August 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight federal charges in the Southern District of New York including charges of tax fraud, bank fraud, and violating federal campaign finance law by making a contribution to the Trump campaign in the form of a $130,000 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels - far over the legal campaign contribution limit of $2,7000 - to buy her silence on an alleged affair she had with Trump."
    1
  28792.  @ekleko1  "Bribery The second area of potential legal liability for Trump relates to his request that Zelensky do him a "favor" right after mentioning how the US "does a lot for Ukraine," and more importantly, after Zelensky raised the issue of US military aid right before Trump requested he investigate Biden. Read more: The notes on Trump's call with Ukraine's president hint at a quid pro quo over investigating Joe Biden's son "From a criminal law point of view, that looks like a quid pro quo," said Patrick Cotter, a longtime former federal prosecutor who was part of the team that convicted the Gambino crime family boss John Gotti. "And under federal law, that could open Trump up to allegations that he committed the crime of bribery by offering one thing in exchange for another, and doing so for his own personal benefit and not the country's." Misappropriation Third, Cotter said, if Trump "in fact used government funds for his own gain, then there is a very strong argument that there is a theft of taxpayer money, or misappropriation, taking place." Cotter added that it's possible Trump "misappropriated $400 million in taxpayer money, and instead of using it for government purposes, he stole it to potentially pay a bribe. People go to jail every day in this country for doing that, and it looks like that's what Trump tried to do." Conspiracy Last, if Giuliani, Barr, and other officials were involved in Trump's efforts, as the complaint alleges, that would raise questions about a potential criminal conspiracy. "That would include anybody who was part of these transactions," Cotter said. "The key legal concept behind a conspiracy is that everybody in the conspiracy is responsible for everybody else's actions." Giuliani is mentioned 31 times in the whistleblower's complaint, and the document described him as a "central figure" in Trump's effort. It said Attorney General William Barr "appears to be involved as well." The complaint added that Trump referred "explicitly" to Giuliani and Barr as "his personal envoys on these matters" while speaking to Zelensky. Giuliani's involvement in the Ukraine scandal also undercuts the central premise of the president's defense: that his conversation with Zelensky related strictly to government business and to Trump's interest in rooting out corruption in Ukraine. The complaint paints an intricate portrait of "the fact that Giuliani was driving a lot of this and doing the legwork for Trump" in Ukraine, Honig said. "But why would a private citizen - not an employee of the United States - be involved in this unless he was working for the personal, political benefit of his client, Donald Trump?" https://amp-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.businessinsider.com/laws-trump-could-have-broken-ukraine-whistleblower-case-2019-9?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15710079450202&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Flaws-trump-could-have-broken-ukraine-whistleblower-case-2019-9
    1
  28793. 1
  28794. 1
  28795. 1
  28796. 1
  28797. 1
  28798. 1
  28799. 1
  28800. 1
  28801. 1
  28802. 1
  28803. 1
  28804. 1
  28805. 1
  28806. 1
  28807. 1
  28808. 1
  28809. 1
  28810. 1
  28811. 1
  28812. 1
  28813. 1
  28814. 1
  28815. 1
  28816. 1
  28817. 1
  28818. 1
  28819. 1
  28820. 1
  28821. 1
  28822. 1
  28823. 1
  28824. 1
  28825. 1
  28826. 1
  28827. 1
  28828. 1
  28829. 1
  28830. 1
  28831. 1
  28832. 1
  28833. 1
  28834. 1
  28835. 1
  28836. 1
  28837. 1
  28838. 1
  28839. 1
  28840. 1
  28841. 1
  28842. 1
  28843. 1
  28844. 1
  28845. 1
  28846. 1
  28847. 1
  28848. 1
  28849. 1
  28850. 1
  28851. 1
  28852. 1
  28853. 1
  28854. 1
  28855. 1
  28856. 1
  28857. 1
  28858. 1
  28859. 1
  28860. 1
  28861. 1
  28862. 1
  28863. 1
  28864. 1
  28865. 1
  28866. 1
  28867. 1
  28868. 1
  28869. 1
  28870. 1
  28871. 1
  28872. 1
  28873. 1
  28874. 1
  28875. 1
  28876. 1
  28877. 1
  28878. 1
  28879. 1
  28880. 1
  28881. 1
  28882. 1
  28883. 1
  28884. 1
  28885. 1
  28886. 1
  28887. 1
  28888. 1
  28889. 1
  28890. 1
  28891. 1
  28892. 1
  28893. 1
  28894. 1
  28895. 1
  28896. 1
  28897. 1
  28898. 1
  28899. 1
  28900. 1
  28901. 1
  28902. 1
  28903. 1
  28904. 1
  28905. 1
  28906. 1
  28907. 1
  28908. 1
  28909. 1
  28910. 1
  28911. 1
  28912. 1
  28913. 1
  28914. 1
  28915. 1
  28916. 1
  28917. 1
  28918. 1
  28919. 1
  28920. 1
  28921. 1
  28922. 1
  28923. 1
  28924. 1
  28925. 1
  28926. 1
  28927. 1
  28928. 1
  28929. 1
  28930. 1
  28931. 1
  28932. 1
  28933. 1
  28934. 1
  28935. 1
  28936. 1
  28937. 1
  28938. 1
  28939. 1
  28940. 1
  28941. 1
  28942. 1
  28943. 1
  28944. 1
  28945. 1
  28946. 1
  28947. 1
  28948. 1
  28949. 1
  28950. 1
  28951. 1
  28952. 1
  28953. 1
  28954. 1
  28955. 1
  28956. 1
  28957. @El Donaldo LMAO! Is that right, Mr. Legal Guru? Cuz the law doesn't seam to agree with you. 🤣👇 "Despite conflicting signals coming from Washington, the question remains: Did President Trump violate campaign finance laws by asking the Ukraine president to investigate Joe Biden? Campaign finance expert Trevor Potter, who is president of the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center, says the answer is clear — yes, he did. Campaign finance law states: “It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a federal, state, or local election.” Potter says the president’s call violates this rule and serves as a “classic case” of a candidate illegally requesting help from a foreign government. “The president, who is a candidate and has a campaign, asked a foreign government — which is included in the definition of a foreign national — for a favor, for help in a way that would benefit his campaign, harm his opponent,” he says. “And that would fit within the ban on soliciting foreign national contributions or taking anything of value.” An investigation into Joe Biden conducted by the Ukrainian government qualifies as a “thing of value” contributed by a foreign entity, he says." https://amp-wbur-org.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.wbur.org/hereandnow/2019/10/09/trumps-biden-ukraine-illegal?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15737147745950&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s Maybe you should spend less time pretending like you know the law, and a little longer studying it! 🤣
    1
  28958. 1
  28959. 1
  28960. 1
  28961. 1
  28962. 1
  28963. 1
  28964. 1
  28965. 1
  28966. 1
  28967. 1
  28968. 1
  28969. 1
  28970. 1
  28971. 1
  28972. 1
  28973. 1
  28974. 1
  28975. 1
  28976. 1
  28977. 1
  28978. 1
  28979. 1
  28980. 1
  28981. 1
  28982. 1
  28983. 1
  28984. 1
  28985. 1
  28986. 1
  28987. 1
  28988. 1
  28989. 1
  28990. 1
  28991. 1
  28992. 1
  28993.  Josh Gibladar  Tactics you have tried to use, in order to justify not being able to back up your claims. 1. The constant insistence that it is some how my job to prove the claims that you have made, by searching massive databases, with not even 1 specific. No names. No page link to even 1 case. Just the claim they are there. "Treasury.gov Just go there and read." "Only a shill wouldn't go there." "I have already given you enough" "If you wont look, then by all means follow the pedophiles!" "I gave you the link to Treasury.gov" " Here just look up human trafficking" " You can't type human trafficking??" " you're wasting more energy with blah blah blah when you could just go and look." " I already gave you enough. If you won't go look then by all means follow the pedophiles" " still not looking. Do you even know what the Department of Treasury is?? Or is that their website is treasury.gov" Again... All you gave was... "treasury.gov" and "type human trafficking".... For all of your claims. 2. The setting up of a multitude as false dichotomies. " We have been replacing our party. How's yours doing? Same people? Or replacing them with worse?" As if those where the only 2 options. Me - who are you replacing them with? You - people who aren't pedophiles. In this particular false dichotomy you decided it was a good idea to imply that every Republican that is leaving is a pedophile, while giving no names and providing no evidence for such. " Only shills wouldn't go look." In this false dichotomy you're trying to guilt me into doing your homework. Blatantly saying that if I don't then I must be a shill. Again, providing no proof off such claim. Also, no alternative explanation. Even though at this point I had expressed the alternative explanation more than a few times. " If you won't look then by all means follow the pedophiles!!!" In this false dichotomy you've decided to get really desperate and set it up as to if I don't do your homework for you to prove your claims then I'm following around pedophiles... Which.. Yeah... that's a special form of desperation. There are more but your excuses list is running long already. To boil down your false dichotomy craziness, if I don't do your homework for you, if I don't agree that a bunch of no named Democrats are all pedophiles, Epstein was murdered and a bunch of other silly nonsense you said actually happened, then I'm a million bad things. Including but not limited to a pedophile follower, a shill... I believe it was brainwashed at some point. In short, I'm absolutely wrong and bad if I don't agree with everything you say. 3. The other constant insistence being that you've given me everything I need to find proof for your claims... even though I have asked you for specifics on a multitude of different occasions and all you do is excuse why you're not giving them. The two things you have given and the only two things you have given. Let's review again. " Treasury.gov" massive government data site. No specifics. Look up "human trafficking". For what? Because if I eventually search that massive topic that I'm bound to find some Democrats that are pedophiles? Of course I will. What do you think that means? You can't even give me one name. and how in the world are you trying to connect being a Democrat with being a pedophile because some Democrats happen to be pedophiles? Republicans happen to be pedophiles too. I don't think that just because there were Republican, there going to be a pedophile. Liking some Twisted way those two are connected. That's crazy. if I look hard enough I'm sure I'm going to find some Amish people who are pedophiles. Does that mean all Amish people are pedophiles? What do you honestly think you have there?
    1
  28994.  Josh Gibladar  List of questions you are running from and specifics you refuse to provide. First... Your idea of evidence again. Treasury.gov Look up human trafficking Me - Who are you replacing them with? You - People who aren't pedophiles. No names or specifics once again. Even though I asked a direct question. Me - And where you seriously thinking that was going to work? You- Here! Go read the entire treasury site. No specifics, No reference on what to look for or even... Idk... Links to pages. Just go read the Treasury site! 🤣 Me- OMG! Then you could totally direct me to the links for the pages on the Treasury website that says all this! You could Totally give me quotes from the sites that you already know, sense you found all this out already! Me - Bottom line... If you "KNOW" this info, then you would have no trouble giving the page link to where the evidence is that you saw. If you can not, which is more and more apparent, then nut up and say so. 😉✌ Me - And I will be more than happy to go look as soon as you stop giving me vague Notions... over thousands of pages a government websites to look through and just link me the page or pages that you have already found this information on. Unless, of course, you never did find the information and you were trying to send me down a crazy ass rabbit hole with no bottom, instead. Now you wouldn't be trying to do that, would you? Me - or, you can explain why it's so difficult for you to go back and look at the pages that you found this information on already, copy and paste the link here and prove me wrong? Me - 1300 pages and all you can remember from them is Human Trafficking... Yeah... That isn't fishy! 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  28995. 1
  28996.  Josh Gibladar  Finally.... List of things you could give me to prove your main claim. That you refuse to give. That you have been asked for. That you have not even given one example of. But first... Your "evidence" once again. Treasury.gov and look up human trafficking. 1. Names of any of these old Dem pedophiles still in office. 2. Even 1 specific case. 3. Even 1 specific link to a page on the massive gov database that you claim is your evidence 4. Even 1 page link for the referenced "1300 pages of seized assets." 5. Even 1 pace of the 300,000 arrested. 6. How you know that any of the "105000 sealed indictments" are Democrats at all considering they are "sealed indictments" by your own admission. 7. Any proof whatsoever that Epstein didn't hang himself 8. Any proof whatsoever is that I follow delusions of pedophiles 9. Any names of the politicians that have been here since the seventies and the Boys Town prostitution ring, that were known to be involved with that 10. Any of the names of the Democrats caught by the show To Catch a Predator, or links to the clips even. 11. Any evidence that I am under pedophile programming or a shill... Other then, I won't completely and blindly follow every opinion that you put forth.. Of course. Cuz, that's not actually evidence. That's just insecurity. 12. Any evidence that I wont look at any of the above if you put it forth. Sense I have repeatedly asked for specifics to look at and you wont give them to me. 13. Any evidence that there is a fake impeachment.
    1
  28997. 1
  28998. 1
  28999.  Josh Gibladar  Tactics you have tried to use, in order to justify not being able to back up your claims. 1. The constant insistence that it is some how my job to prove the claims that you have made, by searching massive databases, with not even 1 specific. No names. No page link to even 1 case. Just the claim they are there. "Treasury.gov Just go there and read." "Only a shill wouldn't go there." "I have already given you enough" "If you wont look, then by all means follow the pedophiles!" "I gave you the link to Treasury.gov" " Here just look up human trafficking" " You can't type human trafficking??" " you're wasting more energy with blah blah blah when you could just go and look." " I already gave you enough. If you won't go look then by all means follow the pedophiles" " still not looking. Do you even know what the Department of Treasury is?? Or is that their website is treasury.gov" " I gave them all. You just won't look." Again... All you gave was... "treasury.gov" and "type human trafficking".... For all of your claims. 2. The setting up of a multitude as false dichotomies. " oh by the way, while you're dealing with me and this waste if time! Because a real person would have at least looked. And come back with, I can't find it. Or a what am I looking for." You mean... Kinda like me saying about 9 times now to give me links to specific pages and you gonna have he give me more than vague innuendo? well that false dichotomy got shot down quick! 🤣 " do you really want 1500 individual links? Freaking insane!" I'm really sure I said about 4 or 5 times now that I just needed the start of 1. Not 2 or 3. Just 1. And Cintas one is an update to the last you have also already read the list of things you could give me that I made down below and another comment. I've gotten none of those either. " We have been replacing our party. How's yours doing? Same people? Or replacing them with worse?" As if those where the only 2 options. Me - who are you replacing them with? You - people who aren't pedophiles. In this particular false dichotomy you decided it was a good idea to imply that every Republican that is leaving is a pedophile, while giving no names and providing no evidence for such. " Only shills wouldn't go look." In this false dichotomy you're trying to guilt me into doing your homework. Blatantly saying that if I don't then I must be a shill. Again, providing no proof off such claim. Also, no alternative explanation. Even though at this point I had expressed the alternative explanation more than a few times. " If you won't look then by all means follow the pedophiles!!!" In this false dichotomy you've decided to get really desperate and set it up as to if I don't do your homework for you to prove your claims then I'm following around pedophiles... Which.. Yeah... that's a special form of desperation. There are more but your excuses list is running long already. To boil down your false dichotomy craziness, if I don't do your homework for you, if I don't agree that a bunch of no named Democrats are all pedophiles, Epstein was murdered and a bunch of other silly nonsense you said actually happened, then I'm a million bad things. Including but not limited to a pedophile follower, a shill... I believe it was brainwashed at some point. In short, I'm absolutely wrong and bad if I don't agree with everything you say. " Your defense of staying ignorant is interesting" Except, as I have stated a ton of time now is... if you want give me something to go on more than a huge government page with thousands of pages to look through, I will be more than happy to go there. Which should be very easy for you considering you have already seen this evidence And so you know exactly what page to start me on and send me the link for. Unless you don't?... Ya know... That is! 🤣 3. The other constant insistence being that you've given me everything I need to find proof for your claims... even though I have asked you for specifics on a multitude of different occasions and all you do is excuse why you're not giving them. The two things you have given and the only two things you have given. Let's review again. " Treasury.gov" massive government data site. No specifics. Look up "human trafficking". For what? Because if I eventually search that massive topic that I'm bound to find some Democrats that are pedophiles? Of course I will. What do you think that means? You can't even give me one name. and how in the world are you trying to connect being a Democrat with being a pedophile because some Democrats happen to be pedophiles? Republicans happen to be pedophiles too. I don't think that just because there were Republican, there going to be a pedophile. Liking some Twisted way those two are connected. That's crazy. if I look hard enough I'm sure I'm going to find some Amish people who are pedophiles. Does that mean all Amish people are pedophiles? What do you honestly think you have there? 4. Continuously trying to discredit me because you can not provide the evidence that you claim to have. " do you really think that psychobabble means anything" 4. Fortune telling! 🤣 " You do know when Trump wins the next election your world ends. " AJ bar is going to serve all those sealed indictments before Trump takes his next oath of office."
    1
  29000. 1
  29001. 1
  29002. 1
  29003. 1
  29004. 1
  29005. 1
  29006. 1
  29007. 1
  29008. 1
  29009. 1
  29010. 1
  29011. 1
  29012. 1
  29013. 1
  29014. 1
  29015. 1
  29016. 1
  29017. 1
  29018. 1
  29019. 1
  29020. 1
  29021. 1
  29022. 1
  29023. 1
  29024. 1
  29025. 1
  29026. 1
  29027. 1
  29028. 1
  29029. 1
  29030. 1
  29031. 1
  29032. 1
  29033. 1
  29034. 1
  29035. 1
  29036. 1
  29037. 1
  29038. 1
  29039. The interview was a little over 16 min long. - 30 sec of Intro/Trip and queen🇬🇧 - 50 sec on the whether that day🌈 - 3 sec shy of a full minute (57 seconds) on the Vets and WW2🇺🇸 - 2 min and 25 sec Lying about NATO falling apart, on Theresa May and how he saved NATO and made everyone pay.🤥 - 2 min and 45 sec on how the tariffs that he put dow are everyone else's fault but his, lying about Border Patrol numbers, invasion and general fear mongering about brown people🤥 - 2 min 5 secs of him childishly trashing Nancy Pelosi, Robert Mueller and the justifiably respected Democrat prosecutors on his team. Also, lying again about the findings of the Muller Report.🤥 - 1 min 30 sec Lying about Joe Biden, the reason for his GDP and putting words in the mouth of all American farmers.🤥 - 20 sec bragging about how he is holding everyone up so he can do an interview with Fox News. Then another 5 sec on Laura ingraham's ratings 🙄 - 1 min 20 sec about Russia, China and a trade deal. Also, "Witch Hunt", lying about numbers again (Stock Market) and talking shit about Hillary Clinton because he still can't get over the fact that he lost the popular vote 🙄🤥 - 1 min 25 sec being asked about what he can do to unite the country and deciding the best way to do that is to talk more shit about people. At some point deciding to become a $5 a pop mall fortune teller about Mexico and using the usual hypocrisy on deals when talking about China 🙄💩🙄 - 35 sec on✌, military building, 💰, brag, brag, brag, Iran, brag, brag, brag, China again, brag, brag and brag.🙄 - Just over 1 min about fist bumping with the Queen of England, brag, talking with her, complementing her and thankfully the end!🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩 Sorry about the sassy pants in the middle and twards the end. It was starting to be like audio water torture up in here. 😢 Try again
    1
  29040. 1
  29041. 1
  29042. 1
  29043. 1
  29044. 1
  29045. 1
  29046. 1
  29047. 1
  29048. 1
  29049. 1
  29050. 1
  29051. 1
  29052. 1
  29053. 1
  29054. 1
  29055. 1
  29056. 1
  29057. 1
  29058. 1
  29059. 1
  29060. 1
  29061. 1
  29062. 1
  29063. 1
  29064. 1
  29065. 1
  29066. 1
  29067. 1
  29068. 1
  29069. 1
  29070. 1
  29071. 1
  29072. 1
  29073. 1
  29074. 1
  29075. 1
  29076. 1
  29077. 1
  29078. 1
  29079. 1
  29080. 1
  29081. 1
  29082. 1
  29083. 1
  29084. 1
  29085. 1
  29086. 1
  29087. 1
  29088. 1
  29089. 1
  29090. 1
  29091. 1
  29092. 1
  29093. 1
  29094. 1
  29095. 1
  29096. 1
  29097. 1
  29098. 1
  29099. 1
  29100. 1
  29101. 1
  29102. 1
  29103. 1
  29104. 1
  29105. 1
  29106. 1
  29107. 1
  29108. 1
  29109. 1
  29110. 1
  29111. 1
  29112. 1
  29113. 1
  29114. 1
  29115. 1
  29116. 1
  29117. 1
  29118. 1
  29119. 1
  29120. 1
  29121. 1
  29122. 1
  29123. 1
  29124. 1
  29125. 1
  29126. 1
  29127. 1
  29128. 1
  29129. 1
  29130. 1
  29131. 1
  29132. 1
  29133. 1
  29134. 1
  29135. 1
  29136. 1
  29137. 1
  29138. 1
  29139. 1
  29140. 1
  29141. 1
  29142. 1
  29143. 1
  29144. 1
  29145. 1
  29146. 1
  29147. 1
  29148. 1
  29149. 1
  29150. 1
  29151. 1
  29152. 1
  29153. 1
  29154. 1
  29155. 1
  29156. 1
  29157. 1
  29158. 1
  29159. 1
  29160. 1
  29161. 1
  29162. 1
  29163. 1
  29164. 1
  29165. 1
  29166. 1
  29167. 1
  29168. 1
  29169. 1
  29170. 1
  29171. 1
  29172. 1
  29173. 1
  29174. 1
  29175. 1
  29176. 1
  29177. 1
  29178. 1
  29179. 1
  29180. 1
  29181. 1
  29182. 1
  29183. 1
  29184. 1
  29185. 1
  29186. 1
  29187. 1
  29188. 1
  29189. 1
  29190. 1
  29191. 1
  29192. 1
  29193. 1
  29194. 1
  29195. 1
  29196. 1
  29197. 1
  29198. 1
  29199. 1
  29200. 1
  29201. 1
  29202. 1
  29203. 1
  29204. 1
  29205. 1
  29206. 1
  29207. 1
  29208. 1
  29209. 1
  29210. 1
  29211. 1
  29212. 1
  29213. 1
  29214. 1
  29215. 1
  29216. 1
  29217. 1
  29218. 1
  29219. 1
  29220. 1
  29221. 1
  29222. 1
  29223. 1
  29224. 1
  29225. 1
  29226. 1
  29227. 1
  29228. 1
  29229. 1
  29230. 1
  29231. 1
  29232. 1
  29233. 1
  29234. 1
  29235. 1
  29236. 1
  29237. 1
  29238. 1
  29239. 1
  29240. 1
  29241. 1
  29242. 1
  29243. 1
  29244. 1
  29245. 1
  29246. 1
  29247. 1
  29248. 1
  29249. 1
  29250. 1
  29251. 1
  29252. 1
  29253. 1
  29254. 1
  29255. 1
  29256. 1
  29257. 1
  29258. 1
  29259. 1
  29260. 1
  29261. 1
  29262. 1
  29263. 1
  29264. 1
  29265. 1
  29266. 1
  29267. 1
  29268. 1
  29269. 1
  29270. 1
  29271. 1
  29272. 1
  29273. 1
  29274. 1
  29275. 1
  29276. 1
  29277. 1
  29278. 1
  29279. 1
  29280. 1
  29281. 1
  29282. 1
  29283. 1
  29284. 1
  29285. 1
  29286. 1
  29287. 1
  29288. 1
  29289. 1
  29290. 1
  29291. 1
  29292. 1
  29293. 1
  29294. 1
  29295. 1
  29296. 1
  29297. 1
  29298. 1
  29299. 1
  29300. 1
  29301. 1
  29302. 1
  29303. 1
  29304. 1
  29305. 1
  29306. 1
  29307. 1
  29308. 1
  29309. 1
  29310. 1
  29311. 1
  29312. 1
  29313. 1
  29314. 1
  29315. 1
  29316. 1
  29317. 1
  29318. 1
  29319. 1
  29320. 1
  29321. 1
  29322. 1
  29323. 1
  29324. 1
  29325. 1
  29326. 1
  29327. 1
  29328. 1
  29329. 1
  29330. 1
  29331. 1
  29332. 1
  29333. 1
  29334. 1
  29335. 1
  29336. 1
  29337. 1
  29338. 1
  29339. 1
  29340. 1
  29341. 1
  29342. 1
  29343. 1
  29344. 1
  29345. 1
  29346. 1
  29347. 1
  29348. 1
  29349. 1
  29350. 1
  29351. 1
  29352. 1
  29353. 1
  29354. 1
  29355. 1
  29356. 1
  29357. 1
  29358. 1
  29359. 1
  29360. 1
  29361. 1
  29362. 1
  29363. 1
  29364. 1
  29365. 1
  29366. 1
  29367. 1
  29368. 1
  29369. 1
  29370. 1
  29371. 1
  29372. 1
  29373. 1
  29374. 1
  29375. 1
  29376. 1
  29377. 1
  29378. 1
  29379. 1
  29380. 1
  29381. 1
  29382. 1
  29383. 1
  29384. 1
  29385. 1
  29386. 1
  29387. 1
  29388. 1
  29389. 1
  29390. 1
  29391. 1
  29392. 1
  29393. 1
  29394. 1
  29395. 1
  29396. 1
  29397. 1
  29398. 1
  29399. 1
  29400. 1
  29401. 1
  29402. 1
  29403. 1
  29404. 1
  29405. 1
  29406. 1
  29407. 1
  29408. 1
  29409. 1
  29410. 1
  29411. 1
  29412. 1
  29413. 1
  29414. 1
  29415. 1
  29416. 1
  29417. 1
  29418. 1
  29419. 1
  29420. 1
  29421. 1
  29422. 1
  29423. 1
  29424. 1
  29425. 1
  29426. 1
  29427. 1
  29428. 1
  29429. 1
  29430. 1
  29431. 1
  29432. 1
  29433. 1
  29434. 1
  29435. 1
  29436. 1
  29437. 1
  29438. 1
  29439. 1
  29440. 1
  29441. 1
  29442. 1
  29443. 1
  29444. 1
  29445. 1
  29446.  @TheDiamond2009  Well.. Thank you... But... I actually don't agree with you. If you are truly about fact-checking and doing research, as you implied... You would agree that generalizing people on mass and pre zooming what is in their mind, is not a good fact based way to go about viewing the world and people. I know what I can prove. Everything else I would not claim. For example, I would judge the comments and the viewership of CNN's comments section against what their commenting on specifically and whether or not that can be factually proven to be true. Your logic is created by too many assumptions for me to be comfortable with. That's not meant to offend you, by the way... It's just that I'm not comfortable with the idea of assuming strangers thoughts. As for the Trump Cult... We had an attempted coup. We have more and more Americans radicalized here at home to commit terrorist acts upon us here at home. A lot of it stemming from the lies and the Trump movement. People losing their lives. Americans being afraid to leave their homes. Being an American News Network, I would assume that it is part of their priority and responsibilities to report that kind of extreme Behavior at home. They also report quite a bit on other things. I've no idea why nobody ever brings that up or pays attention to it. I think it might have something to do with the "bias CNN" narrative.... But... Like I said.. I don't like to assume. So that would just be a very generalized opinion about no particular person, that I don't know.
    1
  29447. 1
  29448. 1
  29449. 1
  29450.  @TheDiamond2009  Oh! Okay... but wouldn't that be the same thing. People comment on those videos, as well. This just simply happens to be the subject matter for the video that were commenting under right now. And making declarative statements like credibility is lost without providing any further evidence of your claim really isn't a good way to go about it. Like "credibility is lost". What are you basing that on? They have proof of pre-planted pipe bombs.... Video proof of people in the building directing these people where to go in very specific detail, and passed the points where the general public should be familiar.... Countless hours of video from everybody and their mother on every side and no side videotaping... Found messages on message boards telling the people who are going to show up what kind of weapons not to bring so they can get them past the Capitol Police and not get hard time.... Just to name a few.... Thus far... It doesn't appear to be hyperbole, at all. Your claim as to what I sound like, seems to be coming from bias opinion. A I left-leaning? Yes. Not because of Any news station... Because I believe it's a bad idea to make higher education so unaffordable that we have the majority of the country four generations on and living in ignorance. Because I think in America people shouldn't have to die for being poor. Because I think ignoring global warming isn't going to make the Earth more inhabitable. Because I think I have all the right to my body as you do to yours. Because I think things like a living wage is beneficial for the entire country... Because rich people can only buy so many yachts and trickle-down has been tested for generations and is not working. Because I think not glorifying people who revolted against our country with statues is not the same thing as erasing our history. Because I think immigration built this country and made it what it is today and too many people in this country now look at immigrants of all kinds like they are the devil. Too many don't care about children because they're not legal citizens. Because the right doesn't seem to have that much of a platform other than everything is bad that isn't good for us, until it is and then it's okay. Because I think it should be our policy to make our constitutionally-protected right of voting easier and not more difficult. If you have a problem with how I sound by declaring those things, then I guess you're just going to have to have a problem with me.
    1
  29451. 1
  29452. 1
  29453. 1
  29454. 1
  29455. 1
  29456. 1
  29457. 1
  29458. 1
  29459. 1
  29460. 1
  29461. 1
  29462. 1
  29463. 1
  29464. 1
  29465. 1
  29466. 1
  29467. 1
  29468. 1
  29469. 1
  29470. 1
  29471. 1
  29472. 1
  29473. 1
  29474. 1
  29475. 1
  29476. 1
  29477. 1
  29478. 1
  29479. 1
  29480. 1
  29481. 1
  29482. 1
  29483. 1
  29484. 1
  29485. 1
  29486. 1
  29487. 1
  29488. 1
  29489. 1
  29490. 1
  29491. 1
  29492. 1
  29493. 1
  29494. 1
  29495. 1
  29496. 1
  29497. 1
  29498. 1
  29499. 1
  29500. 1
  29501. 1
  29502. 1
  29503. 1
  29504. 1
  29505. 1
  29506. 1
  29507. 1
  29508. 1
  29509. 1
  29510. 1
  29511. 1
  29512. 1
  29513. 1
  29514. 1
  29515. 1
  29516. 1
  29517. 1
  29518. 1
  29519. 1
  29520. 1
  29521. 1
  29522. 1
  29523. 1
  29524. 1
  29525. 1
  29526. 1
  29527. 1
  29528. 1
  29529. 1
  29530. 1
  29531. 1
  29532. 1
  29533. 1
  29534. 1
  29535. 1
  29536. 1
  29537. 1
  29538. 1
  29539. 1
  29540. 1
  29541. 1
  29542. 1
  29543. 1
  29544. 1
  29545. 1
  29546. 1
  29547. 1
  29548. 1
  29549. 1
  29550. 1
  29551. 1
  29552. 1
  29553. 1
  29554. 1
  29555. 1
  29556. 1
  29557. 1
  29558. 1
  29559. 1
  29560. 1
  29561. 1
  29562. 1
  29563. 1
  29564. 1
  29565. 1
  29566. 1
  29567. 1
  29568. 1
  29569. 1
  29570. 1
  29571. 1
  29572. 1
  29573. 1
  29574. 1
  29575. 1
  29576. 1
  29577. 1
  29578. 1
  29579. 1
  29580. 1
  29581. 1
  29582. 1
  29583. 1
  29584. 1
  29585. 1
  29586. 1
  29587. 1
  29588. 1
  29589. 1
  29590. 1
  29591. 1
  29592. 1
  29593. 1
  29594. 1
  29595. 1
  29596. 1
  29597. 1
  29598. 1
  29599. 1
  29600. 1
  29601. 1
  29602. 1
  29603. 1
  29604. 1
  29605. 1
  29606. 1
  29607. 1
  29608. 1
  29609. 1
  29610. 1
  29611. 1
  29612. 1
  29613. 1
  29614. 1
  29615. 1
  29616. 1
  29617. 1
  29618.  Steven  THE FACTS: The bargain health insurance plans Trump often talks about are cheaper because they skimp on benefits such as maternity or prescription drug coverage and do not guarantee coverage of preexisting conditions. He and Republicans haven't provided details on any newer alternative plans. The short-term plans that Trump often touts provide up to 12 months of coverage and can be renewed for up to 36 months. Premiums for the plans can be one-third the cost of comprehensive insurance coverage. The health plan offerings are intended for people who want an individual health insurance policy but make too much money to qualify for subsides under the Affordable Care Act. The administration expanded the short-term plans, which lack key protections of the Obama health law such as coverage for preexisting conditions, after failing to repeal the law in Congress. Trump is now trying to dismantle “Obamacare" by asking the Supreme Court to overturn it as unconstitutional. The high court will hear arguments in the case on Nov. 10. The Republican-controlled Senate may confirm Barrett before the Nov. 3 election. Barrett, a conservative, has been critical of Justice John Roberts’ opinion in 2012 upholding “Obamacare” while Ginsburg was one of the five votes in the decision. https://www-usnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2020-09-28/ap-fact-check-trumps-dubious-claims-on-health-care-court?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&context=amp&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16025528168307&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usnews.com%2Fnews%2Fpolitics%2Farticles%2F2020-09-28%2Fap-fact-check-trumps-dubious-claims-on-health-care-court
    1
  29619. 1
  29620. 1
  29621. 1
  29622. 1
  29623. 1
  29624. 1
  29625. 1
  29626. 1
  29627. 1
  29628. 1
  29629. 1
  29630. 1
  29631. 1
  29632. 1
  29633. 1
  29634. 1
  29635. 1
  29636. 1
  29637. 1
  29638. 1
  29639. 1
  29640. 1
  29641. 1
  29642. 1
  29643. 1
  29644. 1
  29645. 1
  29646. 1
  29647. 1
  29648. 1
  29649. 1
  29650. 1
  29651. 1
  29652. 1
  29653. 1
  29654. 1
  29655. 1
  29656. 1
  29657. 1
  29658. 1
  29659. 1
  29660. 1
  29661. 1
  29662. 1
  29663. 1
  29664. 1
  29665. 1
  29666. 1
  29667. 1
  29668. 1
  29669. 1
  29670. 1
  29671. 1
  29672. 1
  29673. 1
  29674. 1
  29675. 1
  29676. 1
  29677. 1
  29678. 1
  29679. 1
  29680. 1
  29681. 1
  29682. 1
  29683. 1
  29684. 1
  29685. 1
  29686. 1
  29687. 1
  29688. 1
  29689. 1
  29690. 1
  29691. 1
  29692. 1
  29693. 1
  29694. 1
  29695. 1
  29696. 1
  29697. 1
  29698. 1
  29699. 1
  29700. 1
  29701. 1
  29702. 1
  29703. 1
  29704. 1
  29705. 1
  29706. 1
  29707. 1
  29708. 1
  29709. 1
  29710. 1
  29711. 1
  29712. 1
  29713. 1
  29714. 1
  29715. 1
  29716. 1
  29717. 1
  29718. 1
  29719. 1
  29720. 1
  29721. 1
  29722. 1
  29723. 1
  29724. 1
  29725. 1
  29726.  @Censortubes  what gives you the indication I'm not American and what does being American have to do with a worldwide pandemic? Attacking me and my character isn't going to help your case either. Trying to make a mouse of assumptions because you can't come up with a better reasoning is just sad. But, I was born to two Air Force officers in Oxford England. I was born all space and because of some crazy loophole thing that gave me like seven birth certificates I have dual citizenship with America and the UK. Both my parents are American. My older brother is also American. My nana on my dad's side was the only one in about four generations of our family that weren't American citizens. She was British and just had her green card for pretty much her whole life. Which she got when she married my Papa who met her when he was stationed over there in the army after he was shot down in WWII for the third time. My mom's side of the family are Irish. Both my nana and my grandma on my mom's side were military nurses in WWII. My grandpa on my mom's side was a Navy captain in World War II. My brother currently serves in the US Army National Guard as a SSg. My dad's younger brothers served in Vietnam. My dad actually guarded Air Force One under two presidents. I'll give you a little bit of the black sheep of the family because I was pretty much the only one who didn't go in the military but like I said, trying to blah baseless allegations at me because you can't come up with a better argument is just sad. You're going to have to try a little harder.
    1
  29727. 1
  29728. 1
  29729. 1
  29730. 1
  29731. 1
  29732. 1
  29733. 1
  29734. 1
  29735. 1
  29736. 1
  29737. 1
  29738. 1
  29739. 1
  29740. 1
  29741. 1
  29742. 1
  29743. 1
  29744. 1
  29745. 1
  29746. 1
  29747. 1
  29748. 1
  29749. 1
  29750. 1
  29751. 1
  29752. 1
  29753. 1
  29754. 1
  29755. 1
  29756. 1
  29757. 1
  29758. 1
  29759. 1
  29760. 1
  29761. 1
  29762. 1
  29763.  @AnimaMea1111  1. "You think". I don't think. I demonstrated. Take ownership. 2. You are still changing the subject, in an effort to avoid addressing the point I made about Biden over all leading by example, in regards to CDC social distancing guidelines. Giving him due credit for that. 3. Executive orders do not have the weight of a law. The primary reason being that the next president can come in and completely reverse all of the last president's executive orders. Not to mention, executive orders have restrictions because this is not a dictatorship or a monarchy. They can also be overturned in Congress given the proper amount of support. There's something the founders put in the Constitution for short-term and or emergency use. As for the legal punishment... It depends on the order. Baring being over turned, they are legally binding. This particular order does not seem to have any primary consequence, other than being written up to the Better Business Bureau. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-protecting-the-federal-workforce-and-requiring-mask-wearing/ 4. State mandates are different. He did not put those in place. So you can not hang that on him. 5. As I explained, in detail, I am more then happy to speak on other subjects. What I am not willing to do is allow those other subjects to be a deflection from points. 5. I'm fine with facts. As long as we consider all relevant facts and not just cherry-picked ones. That's how you get the full context of a situation. If he honestly sign that order and then didn't social distance or wear a mask shortly after doing so, that was wrong. It however does not negate the entirety of his actions regarding CDC guidelines and safety since this pandemic began. Which is what you are trying to do. It also does not hang state regulations and punishments, of which he has no power over, on his head. His own executive order that you are talking about has no legal recourse or fine. I linked it above. You can go look yourself. 6. As for constitutional rights... You might want to take a look at the Constitution under state of emergency.
    1
  29764. 1
  29765. 1
  29766. 1
  29767. 1
  29768. 1
  29769. 1
  29770. 1
  29771. 1
  29772. 1
  29773. 1
  29774. 1
  29775. 1
  29776. 1
  29777. 1
  29778. 1
  29779. 1
  29780. 1
  29781. 1
  29782. 1
  29783. 1
  29784. 1
  29785. 1
  29786. 1
  29787. 1
  29788. 1
  29789. 1
  29790. 1
  29791. 1
  29792. 1
  29793. 1
  29794. 1
  29795. 1
  29796. 1
  29797. 1
  29798. 1
  29799. 1
  29800. 1
  29801. 1
  29802. 1
  29803. 1
  29804. 1
  29805. 1
  29806. 1
  29807. 1
  29808. 1
  29809. 1
  29810. 1
  29811. 1
  29812. 1
  29813. 1
  29814. 1
  29815. 1
  29816. 1
  29817. 1
  29818. 1
  29819. 1
  29820. 1
  29821. 1
  29822. 1
  29823. 1
  29824. 1
  29825. 1
  29826. 1
  29827. 1
  29828. 1
  29829.  @RCJH2022  Look...you can keep trying to make this about me bc you tried to present a cherry picked version of science and got called out on it, but all I'm gonna keep doing is pointing out the failures in your arguments. Of which, there are many. Especially when you keep trying to show words into my mouth, so you have something to argue against.... But you do you... Boo You want the data on the cluster formations, what causes it? Thank you for proving the entirety of my point aboutyou cherry-picking things. When you originally went to go make your argument 💥causation💥 should have been the very 💥first thing💥 you looked up when you saw the numbers. Except you didn't want to know that, huh? You wanted to pair it back and narrative about it. A narrative you would not bother to check, yourself. As for knowing, it's basic science on this matter. The reason they know is because it's settled science. Settled science that you keep ignoring so you can keep having an argument. Except you're ignoring how vaccines work. Which is why you can't name a vaccine that didn't have breakthrough infections. CDC "As a virus replicates, or makes copies of itself, it is normal for small changes, or "mutations," to occur. A virus with one or more mutations is then considered a variant of the original." How we know clusters produce variants? Bc if you get a vaccine you are way less likely to contract covid and if you do get it it's way less severe. Including being way less contagious. CDC Most people who get COVID-19 are unvaccinated. However, since vaccines are not 100% effective at preventing infection, some people who are fully vaccinated will still get COVID-19. An infection of a fully vaccinated person is referred to as a “breakthrough infection.” If you were less likely to contract covid and therefore it is less likely to spread, what are the chances of clusters forming that form variants? Are they less or more likely?
    1
  29830. 1
  29831. 1
  29832. 1
  29833. 1
  29834. 1
  29835. 1
  29836. 1
  29837. 1
  29838. 1
  29839. 1
  29840. 1
  29841. 1
  29842. 1
  29843. 1
  29844. 1
  29845. 1
  29846. 1
  29847. 1
  29848. 1
  29849. 1
  29850. 1
  29851. 1
  29852. 1
  29853. 1
  29854. 1
  29855. 1
  29856. 1
  29857. 1
  29858. 1
  29859. 1
  29860. 1
  29861. 1
  29862. 1
  29863. 1
  29864.  @grahamgalloway7509  Na! If what you are saying is true, you can prove it? The group's? The truth bending? The tax purposes? Because in order for what you are saying to be true, it would be a conspiracy of a magnitude that is worldwide. You need to research Occam's razor. You are simply incorrect... And if you had researched it objectively you would see that. -"According to NOAA's 2020 Annual Climate Report the combined land and ocean temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.13 degrees Fahrenheit ( 0.08 degrees Celsius) per decade since 1880; however, the average rate of increase since 1981 (0.18°C / 0.32°F) has been more than twice that rate. -"2020 was the second-warmest year on record based on NOAA’s temperature data, and land areas were record warm. -"Averaged across land and ocean, the 2020 surface temperature was 1.76° F (0.98° Celsius) warmer than the twentieth-century average of 57.0°F (13.9°C) and 2.14˚F (1.19˚C) warmer than the pre-industrial period (1880-1900). -"The 10 warmest years on record have occurred since 2005. -"From 1900 to 1980 a new temperature record was set on average every 13.5 years; from 1981–2019, a new record was set every 3 years. -"The average number and cost (CPI-adjusted) of billion-dollar disasters are on the rise. The average for the entire record (1980-2020) is 7 events per year, costing $45.7 billion per year. The average over the past five years has been just over 16 events per year, costing just over $121 billion per year.
    1
  29865. 1
  29866. 1
  29867. 1
  29868. 1
  29869. 1
  29870. 1
  29871. 1
  29872. 1
  29873. 1
  29874. 1
  29875. 1
  29876. 1
  29877. 1
  29878. 1
  29879. 1
  29880. 1
  29881. 1
  29882. 1
  29883. 1
  29884. 1
  29885. 1
  29886. 1
  29887. 1
  29888. 1
  29889. 1
  29890. 1
  29891. 1
  29892. 1
  29893. 1
  29894. 1
  29895. 1
  29896. 1
  29897. 1
  29898. 1
  29899. 1
  29900. 1
  29901. 1
  29902. 1
  29903. 1
  29904. 1
  29905. 1
  29906. 1
  29907. 1
  29908. 1
  29909. 1
  29910. 1
  29911. 1
  29912. 1
  29913. 1
  29914. 1
  29915. 1
  29916. 1
  29917. 1
  29918. 1
  29919. 1
  29920. 1
  29921. 1
  29922. 1
  29923. 1
  29924. 1
  29925. 1
  29926. 1
  29927. 1
  29928. 1
  29929. 1
  29930. 1
  29931. 1
  29932. 1
  29933. 1
  29934. 1
  29935. 1
  29936. 1
  29937. 1
  29938. 1
  29939. 1
  29940. 1
  29941. 1
  29942. 1
  29943. 1
  29944. 1
  29945. 1
  29946. 1
  29947. 1
  29948. 1
  29949. 1
  29950. 1
  29951. 1
  29952. 1
  29953. 1
  29954. 1
  29955. 1
  29956. 1
  29957. 1
  29958. 1
  29959. 1
  29960. 1
  29961. 1
  29962.  @jenniferlove4791   Jennifer Love   Jennifer Love  Okay, first... Its real easy to be sassy and self-righteous when you don't tag somebody in a comment and therefore they don't know that you've responded to them. 2nd... why is what they call them relevant? Did you just want to score a point there or do you want to grow up and have an adult conversation? Cuz if you just want to be all sassy and Bitchie then I can go there with you but I haven't spoken to you before now so I don't know where all this hostility is coming from. 3rd... "no one is advocating for abortions to be restricted in case of incest or rape" What the hell are you talkin about? Did I say anybody was saying that? As far as I'm aware I was having a conversation with a completely different person and it was merely stating what I felt was okay and not okay. So again not sure why you're getting all shity and Sassy. 4th.... there are health conditions that can be diagnosed in gestation to a reasonable certainty that a child will have a very short and painful life. At that point I feel it would be the Parents Choice 2 whether they want to bring their child into the world just to suffer and die. That is what I meant by child's health. 5th... and here we go with Miss Sassy self-righteous BS. So let me tell you what you're talkin about and set up a paper tiger so I can yell at you about it. No one is talking about children who are not born perfect. I am a mother to a child who is not born perfect. So f*** off with that s***! Now if you were to ask me what my opinions on abortion are I would be able to tell you. But it seems to me you just wanted to hit me up to yell at me and be all self-righteous out of nowhere. My personal choice was having my little boy. I had five miscarriages and I genuinely do not think I have it in me to have an abortion if it ever came to it. I however would not take that choice away from somebody else either. I'm not them and I don't know their circumstance. It's not going to be me judging them. I dislike women who use abortion as birth control. However I know the stats on that and that is few and far between. I feel like a viable reasons to have it available would be life and health of the mother and child, rape or incest. All however by choice. Between a woman and her doctor. I may not like her choice but I forgot I am sure will not take that away from her and do not believe anybody else has the right to either.
    1
  29963. 1
  29964. 1
  29965. 1
  29966. 1
  29967. 1
  29968. 1
  29969. 1
  29970. 1
  29971. 1
  29972. 1
  29973. 1
  29974. 1
  29975. @s 👈 So, not only is this a complete deflection from the substance of the subject, but it is also a total fabrication. Gratefully, one we see less of not that President Elect Biden has been elected, but there are a few of these guys around. They try and claim they where Dems, because they think it will give their words more weight. The reason this doesn't work is 2 fold. 1. Independence and the Democratic Party are not the cult of personality that the Republican party has become, in large amounts. They're making the mistake of assuming everybody operates like them. 2. Every single time you get them talkin, all you hear, as far as the eye can see, is right-wing talking points. Usually far right-wing. We require provable fact, and do not assume that things are true with out them. It's an old trick, we all know. They take a tiny half-truth I'm tried to tell a big lie at the tail end of it. Pointing to links and claiming, evidence.... But almost always.. If you think about it for more then 2 seconds, you can tell it doesn't make sense. Like with this one. What's except for a moment that his Claim about Chris Cuomo is completely true. Piggybacking off of that oh, he's trying to claim that he switched his entire party over because one public democrat said something. He's throwing out the baby with the bathwater in a huge way. It simply doesn't make sense. What you're also going to see, is this copied and pasted it on a million different comment threads. This is all just an elaborate attempt at an old game called, shoot the messenger.
    1
  29976. 1
  29977. 1
  29978. 1
  29979. 1
  29980. 1
  29981. 1
  29982. 1
  29983. 1
  29984. 1
  29985. 1
  29986. 1
  29987. 1
  29988. 1
  29989. 1
  29990. 1
  29991. 1
  29992. 1
  29993. 1
  29994. 1
  29995. 1
  29996. 1
  29997. 1
  29998. 1
  29999. But to truly answer the question you posed... Because the bible is totally cool with killing babies. Even the one out of the womb. God wants you to be happy to dash babies against the rocks. I have always thought this was the worst verse in the bible, and my opinion remains unchanged. "O daughter Babylon, you devastator! Happy shall they be who pay you back what you have done to us! Happy shall they be who take your little ones and dash them against the rock!"(Psalm 137:8–9 NRSV) God was not merely saying that regrettable collateral damage might occur during wartime. He said believers should be happy — some translations say "blessed" — to kill innocent babies of those who are keeping you from worshipping your own god.  A daughter is burned as an acceptable sacrifice to God. General Jephthah made a vow with God in order to defeat the enemy. When Jephthah won the war, God received his hundred pounds of flesh. "And Jephthah made a vow to the Lord: 'If you give the Ammonites into my hands, whatever comes out of the door of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the Lord's, and I will sacrifice it as a burnt offering.' . . . When Jephthah returned to his home in Mizpah, who should come out to meet him but his daughter, dancing to the sound of timbrels! . . . After the two months, she returned to her father, and he did to her as he had vowed." (Judges 11:30–39 NIV) After burning his daughter, Jephthah was rewarded with a prestigious judgeship and was later buried with honor. God destroys the fetuses of those who do not worship him. This is not the only feticidal passage in the bible, but it is the worst: "You shall acknowledge no God but me. . . . You are destroyed, Israel. . . . The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open." (Hosea 13:4, 9, 16 New International Version)
    1
  30000. 1
  30001. 1
  30002. 1
  30003. 1
  30004. 1
  30005. 1
  30006. 1
  30007. 1
  30008. 1
  30009. 1
  30010. 1
  30011. 1
  30012. 1
  30013. 1
  30014. 1
  30015. 1
  30016. 1
  30017.  Wahn Cologne  Something is dead in america, but it certainly is not racism. Poway synagogue shooting 2019 victims wounded 3 victims killed 1 Tallahassee yoga studio shooting 2018 Victims wounded 6 victims killed 2 Jeffersontown Kroger shooting 2018 victims wounded 0 victims killed 2 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting 2018 victims wounded 7 victims killed 11 Murder of Blaze Bernstein 2018 victims wounded 0 victims killed 1 Murder of Michonne Cooper Williams 2018 victims wounded 0 victims 1 University of Maryland stabbing 2017 victims wounded 0 victims killed 1 car ramming attack into counter-protesters at the light nationalist unite the right rally 2017 Victims wounded 19 Victims killed 1 Portland train attack 2017 Victims wounded 1 Victims killed 2 Stabbing of Timothy caughman 2017 Victims wounded 0 Victims killed 1 Shooting at a showing of the film Trainwreck in Lafayette Louisiana 2015 Victims wound 9 Victims killed 2 Planned Parenthood shooting 2015 Victims wounded 9 Victims killed 3 Shooting attack on worshippers at Emanuel African Methodist Church 2015 victims wounded 1 victims killed 9 Attack on Pennsylvania State Police Barracks 2014 victim's wounded 1 victims killed 1 Ambush attack on Las Vegas police officers 2014 victims wounded unknown victims killed 3 Overland Park Jewish Community Center shooting 2014 Victims wounded unknown Victims killed 3 Los Angeles International Airport shooting attack on TSA officer 2013 victims wounded 6 victims killed 1 Double murder committed by Jeremy Lee Moody and Christine Moody 2013 victims wounded 0 victims killed 2 Ambush attack against St John's the Baptist Parish police 2012 victims wounded 2 victims killed 2 Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting 2012 victims wounded 4 victims killed 6 Tri-State Killing Spree by white supremacist David Patterson and Holly Grigsby 2011 victims wounded unknown victims killed 4 FEAR group attack 2011 victims wounded unknown victims killed 3 Murder of James Craig Anderson 2011 victims wounded 0 victims killed 1 Murder committed by Aryan Brotherhood members 2010 victims wounded 0 victims killed 1 Shooting at bookstore Cafe perpetrated by Ross William Mossberger 2010 Victims wounded 4 Victims killed 1 Murder of Todd Getgun 2010 victims wounded 0 victims killed 1 suicide attack by airplane 2010 victims wounded 13 victims killed 1 Murder committed by Charles Francis Gaskins 2009 victims wounded 0 victims killed 1 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting 2009 victims wounded 1 victims killed 1 assassination of George tiller 2009 victims wounded 1 victims killed 1 Shooting of Pittsburgh Police Officers 2009 victims wounded 2 victims killed 3
    1
  30018. 1
  30019. 1
  30020. 1
  30021. 1
  30022. 1
  30023. 1
  30024. 1
  30025. 1
  30026. 1
  30027. 1
  30028. 1
  30029. 1
  30030. 1
  30031. 1
  30032. 1
  30033. 1
  30034. 1
  30035. 1
  30036. 1
  30037. 1
  30038. 1
  30039. 1
  30040. 1
  30041. 1
  30042. 1
  30043. 1
  30044. 1
  30045. 1
  30046. 1
  30047. 1
  30048. 1
  30049. 1
  30050. 1
  30051. 1
  30052. 1
  30053. 1
  30054. 1
  30055. 1
  30056. 1
  30057. 1
  30058. 1
  30059. 1
  30060. 1
  30061. 1
  30062. 1
  30063. 1
  30064. 1
  30065. 1
  30066. 1
  30067. 1
  30068. 1
  30069. 1
  30070. 1
  30071. 1
  30072. 1
  30073. 1
  30074. 1
  30075. 1
  30076. 1
  30077. 1
  30078. 1
  30079. 1
  30080. 1
  30081. 1
  30082. 1
  30083. 1
  30084. 1
  30085. 1
  30086. 1
  30087. 1
  30088. 1
  30089. 1
  30090. 1
  30091. 1
  30092. 1
  30093. 1
  30094. 1
  30095. 1
  30096. 1
  30097. 1
  30098. 1
  30099. 1
  30100. 1
  30101. 1
  30102. 1
  30103. 1
  30104. 1
  30105. 1
  30106. 1
  30107. 1
  30108. 1
  30109. 1
  30110. 1
  30111. 1
  30112. 1
  30113. 1
  30114. 1
  30115. 1
  30116. 1
  30117. 1
  30118. 1
  30119. 1
  30120. 1
  30121. 1
  30122. 1
  30123. 1
  30124. 1
  30125. 1
  30126. 1
  30127. 1
  30128. 1
  30129. 1
  30130. 1
  30131. 1
  30132. 1
  30133. 1
  30134. 1
  30135. 1
  30136. 1
  30137. 1
  30138. 1
  30139. 1
  30140. 1
  30141. 1
  30142. 1
  30143. 1
  30144. 1
  30145. 1
  30146. 1
  30147. 1
  30148. 1
  30149. 1
  30150. 1
  30151. 1
  30152. 1
  30153. 1
  30154. 1
  30155. 1
  30156. 1
  30157. 1
  30158. 1
  30159. 1
  30160. 1
  30161. 1
  30162. 1
  30163. 1
  30164. 1
  30165. 1
  30166. 1
  30167. 1
  30168. 1
  30169. 1
  30170. 1
  30171. 1
  30172. 1
  30173. 1
  30174. 1
  30175. 1
  30176. 1
  30177. 1
  30178. 1
  30179. 1
  30180. 1
  30181. 1
  30182. 1
  30183. 1
  30184. 1
  30185. 1
  30186. 1
  30187. 1
  30188. 1
  30189. 1
  30190. 1
  30191. 1
  30192. 1
  30193. 1
  30194. 1
  30195. 1
  30196. 1
  30197. 1
  30198. 1
  30199. 1
  30200. 1
  30201. 1
  30202. 1
  30203. 1
  30204. 1
  30205. 1
  30206. 1
  30207. 1
  30208. 1
  30209. 1
  30210. 1
  30211. 1
  30212. 1
  30213. 1
  30214. 1
  30215. 1
  30216. 1
  30217. 1
  30218. 1
  30219. 1
  30220. 1
  30221. 1
  30222. 1
  30223. 1
  30224. 1
  30225. 1
  30226. 1
  30227. 1
  30228. 1
  30229. 1
  30230. 1
  30231. 1
  30232. 1
  30233. 1
  30234. 1
  30235. 1
  30236. 1
  30237. 1
  30238. 1
  30239. 1
  30240. 1
  30241. 1
  30242. 1
  30243. 1
  30244. 1
  30245. 1
  30246. 1
  30247.  @scottcomstock4964  I think you must be confused. I said, "Prove it". Not make your source (Judicial Watch) an organization that has been proven wrong more times then I can be bothered to count. They are tabloid journalism and all that video did was just so one of their people saying words. If all I had to do to make something true, was just say it out loud, I'd be chilling on a crystal clear beach, on my private estate on mars, being served Mai Tais by Xavier the sexy pool boy. Alas... Not so much... It does explain your mindset and need to assume thing about me, to make your "argument" solvent. And your need to assume anything about the reasoning why a whole states voter registration program did or did not do a damned thing. Cuz, I don't even have to look that one up, to know you just made up that they did ANYTHING because they didn't want to " face the humiliation"... Because there is no way in hell they came out and made that statement. If you want proof, you need court documents, in this case. Not just the filings, but the rulings. Which there will be if there was a legal settlement made. You won't find one.... Because that is NOT why voters where removed... Nor where they removed completely. NOWHERE does it say these voters where "dead" or under age. Either you made that up, or they made that up and you believed them because you wanted it to be true. The case was for "inactive" voters. Voters who had not voted in a while... Basically. They where NOT automatically removed. In fact, they where not removed AT ALL. They were moved to an inactive file. Which meant all these people had to do to re-up the registration was update their voter information or confirm that that voter information was still valid. Every County sent out voter registration cards that year and if you either did not return your voter registration card or didn't vote in the next election, you got put in the inactive file. Considering how many people live in California and that less than 50% of the American population votes on a regular basis, this proves NOTHING and you got all the goddamn details wrong. Like... BAD WRONG! https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/trumps-latest-voter-fraud-misinformation/ https://www.politifact.com/personalities/judicial-watch/ https://www.factcheck.org/tag/judicial-watch/
    1
  30248. 1
  30249. 1
  30250. 1
  30251. 1
  30252. 1
  30253. 1
  30254. 1
  30255. 1
  30256. 1
  30257. 1
  30258. 1
  30259. 1
  30260. 1
  30261. 1
  30262. 1
  30263. 1
  30264. 1
  30265. 1
  30266. 1
  30267. 1
  30268. 1
  30269. 1
  30270. 1
  30271. 1
  30272. 1
  30273. 1
  30274. 1
  30275. 1
  30276. 1
  30277. 1
  30278. 1
  30279. 1
  30280. 1
  30281. 1
  30282. 1
  30283. 1
  30284. 1
  30285. 1
  30286. 1
  30287. 1
  30288. 1
  30289. 1
  30290. 1
  30291. 1
  30292. 1
  30293. 1
  30294. 1
  30295. 1
  30296. 1
  30297. 1
  30298. 1
  30299. 1
  30300. 1
  30301. 1
  30302. 1
  30303. 1
  30304. 1
  30305. 1
  30306. 1
  30307. 1
  30308. 1
  30309. 1
  30310. 1
  30311. 1
  30312. 1
  30313. 1
  30314. 1
  30315. 1
  30316. 1
  30317. 1
  30318. 1
  30319. 1
  30320. 1
  30321. 1
  30322. 1
  30323. 1
  30324. 1
  30325. 1
  30326. 1
  30327. 1
  30328. 1
  30329. 1
  30330. 1
  30331. 1
  30332. 1
  30333. 1
  30334. 1
  30335. 1
  30336. 1
  30337. 1
  30338. 1
  30339. 1
  30340. 1
  30341. 1
  30342. 1
  30343. 1
  30344. 1
  30345. 1
  30346. 1
  30347. 1
  30348. 1
  30349. 1
  30350. 1
  30351. 1
  30352. 1
  30353. 1
  30354. 1
  30355. 1
  30356. 1
  30357. 1
  30358. 1
  30359. 1
  30360. 1
  30361. 1
  30362. 1
  30363. 1
  30364. 1
  30365. 1
  30366. 1
  30367. 1
  30368. 1
  30369. 1
  30370. 1
  30371. 1
  30372. 1
  30373. 1
  30374. 1
  30375. 1
  30376. 1
  30377. 1
  30378. 1
  30379. 1
  30380. 1
  30381. 1
  30382. 1
  30383. 1
  30384. 1
  30385. 1
  30386. 1
  30387. 1
  30388. 1
  30389. 1
  30390. 1
  30391. 1
  30392. 1
  30393. 1
  30394. 1
  30395. 1
  30396. 1
  30397. 1
  30398. 1
  30399. 1
  30400. 1
  30401. 1
  30402. 1
  30403. 1
  30404. 1
  30405. 1
  30406. 1
  30407. 1
  30408. 1
  30409. 1
  30410. 1
  30411. 1
  30412. 1
  30413. 1
  30414. 1
  30415. 1
  30416. 1
  30417. 1
  30418. 1
  30419. 1
  30420. 1
  30421. 1
  30422. 1
  30423. 1
  30424. 1
  30425. 1
  30426. 1
  30427. 1
  30428. 1
  30429. 1
  30430. 1
  30431. 1
  30432. 1
  30433. 1
  30434. 1
  30435. 1
  30436. 1
  30437. 1
  30438. 1
  30439. 1
  30440. 1
  30441. 1
  30442. 1
  30443. 1
  30444. 1
  30445. 1
  30446. 1
  30447. 1
  30448. 1
  30449. 1
  30450. 1
  30451. 1
  30452. 1
  30453. 1
  30454. 1
  30455. 1
  30456. 1
  30457. 1
  30458. 1
  30459. 1
  30460. 1
  30461. 1
  30462. 1
  30463. 1
  30464. 1
  30465. 1
  30466. 1
  30467. 1
  30468. 1
  30469. 1
  30470. 1
  30471. 1
  30472. 1
  30473. 1
  30474. 1
  30475. 1
  30476. 1
  30477. 1
  30478. 1
  30479. 1
  30480. 1
  30481. 1
  30482. 1
  30483. 1
  30484. 1
  30485. 1
  30486. 1
  30487. 1
  30488. 1
  30489. 1
  30490. 1
  30491. 1
  30492. 1
  30493. 1
  30494. 1
  30495. 1
  30496. 1
  30497. 1
  30498. 1
  30499. 1
  30500. 1
  30501. 1
  30502. 1
  30503. 1
  30504. 1
  30505. 1
  30506. 1
  30507. 1
  30508. 1
  30509. 1
  30510. 1
  30511. 1
  30512. 1
  30513. 1
  30514. 1
  30515. 1
  30516. 1
  30517. 1
  30518. 1
  30519. 1
  30520. 1
  30521. 1
  30522. 1
  30523. 1
  30524. 1
  30525. 1
  30526. 1
  30527. 1
  30528. 1
  30529. 1
  30530. 1
  30531. 1
  30532. 1
  30533. 1
  30534.  @markcherry6256  Okay. Fact checked your Dem election rigging judge... And as far as I can tell... It's true. So let me show you the difference between me and you... I don't want corrupt people in my party. I feel no need to defend them either. He should go to jail. But... Lets see if you feel the same? Just a few examples of gerrymandering, voter ID laws, voter purging... And just plain ole stuffing... Not of 1 REP ( like you gave me 1 Dem) but several! Now I assume you feel the same, right? These Reps should be put in jail as well? Right? 😁 https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/23/republican-election-rigging-court-push-to-weaken?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15902723037111&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fus-news%2F2020%2Fjan%2F23%2Frepublican-election-rigging-court-push-to-weaken https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/dec/31/voter-purges-republicans-2020-elections-trump?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15902723037111&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fus-news%2F2019%2Fdec%2F31%2Fvoter-purges-republicans-2020-elections-trump https://www-rollingstone-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/how-the-gop-rigs-elections-121907/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15902723037111&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fpolitics-news%2Fhow-the-gop-rigs-elections-121907%2F https://www.salon.com/2019/07/31/gop-operative-indicted-for-n-c-election-fraud-now-charged-with-ballot-rigging-in-another-race/
    1
  30535. 1
  30536. 1
  30537. 1
  30538. 1
  30539. 1
  30540. 1
  30541. 1
  30542. 1
  30543. 1
  30544. 1
  30545. 1
  30546. 1
  30547. 1
  30548. 1
  30549. 1
  30550. 1
  30551. 1
  30552. 1
  30553. 1
  30554. 1
  30555. 1
  30556. 1
  30557. 1
  30558. 1
  30559. 1
  30560. 1
  30561. 1
  30562. 1
  30563. 1
  30564. 1
  30565. 1
  30566. 1
  30567. 1
  30568. 1
  30569. 1
  30570. 1
  30571. 1
  30572. 1
  30573. 1
  30574. 1
  30575. 1
  30576. 1
  30577. 1
  30578. 1
  30579. 1
  30580. 1
  30581. 1
  30582. 1
  30583. 1
  30584. 1
  30585. 1
  30586. 1
  30587. 1
  30588. 1
  30589. 1
  30590. 1
  30591. 1
  30592. 1
  30593. 1
  30594. 1
  30595. 1
  30596. 1
  30597. 1
  30598. 1
  30599. The interview was a little over 16 min long. - 30 sec of Intro/Trip and queen🇬🇧 - 50 sec on the whether that day🌈 - 3 sec shy of a full minute (57 seconds) on the Vets and WW2🇺🇸 - 2 min and 25 sec Lying about NATO falling apart, on Theresa May and how he saved NATO and made everyone pay.🤥 - 2 min and 45 sec on how the tariffs that he put dow are everyone else's fault but his, lying about Border Patrol numbers, invasion and general fear mongering about brown people🤥 - 2 min 5 secs of him childishly trashing Nancy Pelosi, Robert Mueller and the justifiably respected Democrat prosecutors on his team. Also, lying again about the findings of the Muller Report.🤥 - 1 min 30 sec Lying about Joe Biden, the reason for his GDP and putting words in the mouth of all American farmers.🤥 - 20 sec bragging about how he is holding everyone up so he can do an interview with Fox News. Then another 5 sec on Laura ingraham's ratings 🙄 - 1 min 20 sec about Russia, China and a trade deal. Also, "Witch Hunt", lying about numbers again (Stock Market) and talking shit about Hillary Clinton because he still can't get over the fact that he lost the popular vote 🙄🤥 - 1 min 25 sec being asked about what he can do to unite the country and deciding the best way to do that is to talk more shit about people. At some point deciding to become a $5 a pop mall fortune teller about Mexico and using the usual hypocrisy on deals when talking about China 🙄💩🙄 - 35 sec on✌, military building, 💰, brag, brag, brag, Iran, brag, brag, brag, China again, brag, brag and brag.🙄 - Just over 1 min about fist bumping with the Queen of England, brag, talking with her, complementing her and thankfully the end!🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩 Sorry about the sassy pants in the middle and twards the end. It was starting to be like audio water torture up in here. 😢 Good god! They know genius. Thats what happened. Watch the whole interview.
    1
  30600. 1
  30601. 1
  30602. 1
  30603. 1
  30604. 1
  30605. 1
  30606. 1
  30607. 1
  30608. 1
  30609. 1
  30610. 1
  30611.  @travisjohnson7065  12. " if abortion wasn't wrong in the first place, you wouldn't need to make excuses for it and try to balance it out with something you perceived as more wrong on the other side. " 👈 You really just keep getting worse. The same could be said about you. You could be excusing the enslavement of women into being Walkin talkin human incubators and that being their primary purpose. Except I would never tell you that you're making an excuse because what you're doing and what I am doing is arguing two different points of one debate. In fact, you trying to call my points excuses and yours actual arguments only shows and insecurity on your part for the arguments that you are trying to make. So how about we don't do that anymore. At no point did I say one was more wrong or less wrong than the other. You just made that up. What I was articulating is that both sides have detrimental consequences and only looking at 1 is a false narrative. It's a false narrative because these things really happened in life. Unfortunately, child abuse is a thing. So is child sexual assault. So is children getting pregnant. So is back-alley abortions. So is women dying while giving birth. None of that is an excuse or a diversion. It's simply another aspect that you don't want to pay attention to. It's a reality that doesn't fit your narrative. "4 million women who give birth in the US annually, over 50,000 a year, experience "dangerous and even life-threatening complications." ... Maternal Mortality Is Rising in the U.S. As It Declines Elsewhere." Especially with the statistical reality of women giving birth and it endangering or taking their lives and the US. I don't know how you can just dismiss that. It's to the tune of 50,000 women a year and Rising. Which accounts for God knows how many children growing up without their mothers. Including children who were already born. That's not even considering all the women in countries that don't have ready and available modern medicine. If women in the US have modern medicine available to them and they're still dying from birth 50,000 a year... what do you think that they do death rate is for those women in less developed countries? Again, the reason I say you don't care about the women is because you keep dismissing their reality and their existence and their life. The alleged force is forcing them to carry a child and give birth when there's another option that might not worth in their current child, for the very slim chance that the mother and child would die anyways... or even just a mother. As for your "1 in 5000"... We have 166.7 million adult women in this country. Even giving your conservative number, that's 33,340 women a year. What in the world gives you the right to dismiss those women's lives so easily while trying to Virtue signal about saving life?
    1
  30612. 1
  30613. 1
  30614. 1
  30615. 1
  30616.  @travisjohnson7065  You never answered my question. "4 million women who give birth in the US annually, over 50,000 a year, experience "dangerous and even life-threatening complications." ... Maternal Mortality Is Rising in the U.S. As It Declines Elsewhere." Especially with the statistical reality of women giving birth and it endangering or taking their lives and the US. I don't know how you can just dismiss that. It's to the tune of 50,000 women a year and Rising. Which accounts for God knows how many children growing up without their mothers. Including children who were already born. That's not even considering all the women in countries that don't have ready and available modern medicine. If women in the US have modern medicine available to them and they're still dying from birth 50,000 a year... what do you think that they do death rate is for those women in less developed countries? Again, the reason I say you don't care about the women is because you keep dismissing their reality and their existence and their life. The alleged force is forcing them to carry a child and give birth when there's another option that might not worth in their current child, for the very slim chance that the mother and child would die anyways... or even just a mother. As for your "1 in 5000"... We have 166.7 million adult women in this country. Even giving your conservative number, that's 33,340 women a year. What in the world gives you the right to dismiss those women's lives so easily while trying to Virtue signal about saving life?
    1
  30617. 1
  30618. 1
  30619. 1
  30620. 1
  30621. 1
  30622. 1
  30623. 1
  30624. 1
  30625. 1
  30626. 1
  30627. 1
  30628. 1
  30629. 1
  30630. 1
  30631. 1
  30632. 1
  30633. 1
  30634. 1
  30635. 1
  30636. 1
  30637. 1
  30638. 1
  30639. 1
  30640. 1
  30641. 1
  30642. 1
  30643. 1
  30644. 1
  30645. 1
  30646. 1
  30647. 1
  30648. 1
  30649. 1
  30650. 1
  30651. 1
  30652. 1
  30653. 1
  30654. 1
  30655. 1
  30656. 1
  30657. 1
  30658.  @travisjohnson7065  Sometimes... Forcing children to be born is a cruelty beyond measure. Every situation is different. Which is why, its not your right to make that decision for them. "In May 2016, Erika Christensen obtained an abortion at 32 weeks of gestation after it was discovered that her fetus was suffering from an affliction that resulted in an inability to swallow in the womb and, consequently, an inability to breathe once born. The condition was deemed “incompatible with life”; the baby would either die during birth, or “would live for only a short time before choking to death” (Christensen also suffered from a medical condition that made delivering a baby dangerous). Christensen and her husband opted for termination, “knowing immediately it was the most humane possible conclusion to this pregnancy”. Because abortion after 24 weeks was still illegal in New York during this time, Christensen traveled to Colorado to obtain the abortion, at a price of over USD 10,000 [5]. In 2015, Jennifer Gorman discovered at her 21-week ultrasound that her fetus had severe spina bifida “in the cervical region of the spine. Her spinal cord was completely exposed just below her skull”. Had the fetus survived birth, she would have been permanently quadriplegic and attached to a colostomy bag and feeding tube and would have been severely cognitively disabled. Gorman and her husband agreed to a termination, where the baby’s heart would be painlessly stopped in the womb and her body delivered the next day. Gorman writes that “every last tear I cried came from a place of grief. Not one of those tears ever came from a place of guilt. I made the only decision I could. I made the only decision that was right for me, right for my family, and right for my daughter. It is my belief, if she did have a soul, the only kind and merciful thing to do was to release her from a body that would never, ever work” [6]. Emily Rapp writes about her experiences parenting her now deceased son Ronan, who succumbed to Tay–Sachs disease at 3 years old in 2013: “Ronan died when he was nearly 3 and he weighed 11 pounds. He was so emaciated that we had to be careful when we moved him that we did not dislocate his shoulders or hips. His eyes were fixed, every bone on his face visible. He died in the middle of the darkest, coldest night of mid-winter” [8]. Rapp unapologetically admits that: “If I had known Ronan had Tay–Sachs… I would have found out what the disease meant for my then unborn child; I would have talked to parents who are raising (and burying) children with this disease, and then I would have had an abortion. Without question and without regret, although this would have been a different kind of loss to mourn and would by no means have been a cavalier or uncomplicated, heartless decision. I’m so grateful that Ronan is my child. I also wish he’d never been born; no person should suffer in this way—daily seizures, blindness, lack of movement, inability to swallow, a devastated brain—with no hope for a cure. Both of these statements are categorically true; neither one is mutually exclusive.” Gary Comstock echoes a similar sentiment after his newborn son, Sam, suffocated to death in his arms. Sam was born with trisomy 18, and his brain was unable to regulate his lungs, leaving him with an inability to breathe on his own. Comstock and his wife chose not to abort the pregnancy. Once Sam was born, they decided to remove all life-sustaining treatment and allow their baby to die in their arms. After watching his infant son struggle to breathe, his chest convulsing and his body turning limp, for twenty minutes, Comstock writes about how he and his wife rocked Sam’s body for hours after he died. In hindsight, Comstock writes that he now believes that “you should not have let your baby die. You should have killed him” [10].2
    1
  30659. 1
  30660. 1
  30661. 1
  30662. 1
  30663. 1
  30664. 1
  30665. 1
  30666. 1
  30667.  @travisjohnson7065  You continuing to pretend things don't exist doesn't actually make it true. You insisting that bringing a child to term is always the moral thing to do, is contradicted by these cases that you just ignored on purpose, and it's not even the first time. Which would only lead us to conclude that you really don't care about these children. You just care about being right, even if your wrong. Your just using them.  @Travis Johnson  Sometimes... Forcing children to be born is a cruelty beyond measure. Every situation is different. Which is why, its not your right to make that decision for them. "In May 2016, Erika Christensen obtained an abortion at 32 weeks of gestation after it was discovered that her fetus was suffering from an affliction that resulted in an inability to swallow in the womb and, consequently, an inability to breathe once born. The condition was deemed “incompatible with life”; the baby would either die during birth, or “would live for only a short time before choking to death” (Christensen also suffered from a medical condition that made delivering a baby dangerous). Christensen and her husband opted for termination, “knowing immediately it was the most humane possible conclusion to this pregnancy”. Because abortion after 24 weeks was still illegal in New York during this time, Christensen traveled to Colorado to obtain the abortion, at a price of over USD 10,000 [5]. In 2015, Jennifer Gorman discovered at her 21-week ultrasound that her fetus had severe spina bifida “in the cervical region of the spine. Her spinal cord was completely exposed just below her skull”. Had the fetus survived birth, she would have been permanently quadriplegic and attached to a colostomy bag and feeding tube and would have been severely cognitively disabled. Gorman and her husband agreed to a termination, where the baby’s heart would be painlessly stopped in the womb and her body delivered the next day. Gorman writes that “every last tear I cried came from a place of grief. Not one of those tears ever came from a place of guilt. I made the only decision I could. I made the only decision that was right for me, right for my family, and right for my daughter. It is my belief, if she did have a soul, the only kind and merciful thing to do was to release her from a body that would never, ever work” [6]. Emily Rapp writes about her experiences parenting her now deceased son Ronan, who succumbed to Tay–Sachs disease at 3 years old in 2013: “Ronan died when he was nearly 3 and he weighed 11 pounds. He was so emaciated that we had to be careful when we moved him that we did not dislocate his shoulders or hips. His eyes were fixed, every bone on his face visible. He died in the middle of the darkest, coldest night of mid-winter” [8]. Rapp unapologetically admits that: “If I had known Ronan had Tay–Sachs… I would have found out what the disease meant for my then unborn child; I would have talked to parents who are raising (and burying) children with this disease, and then I would have had an abortion. Without question and without regret, although this would have been a different kind of loss to mourn and would by no means have been a cavalier or uncomplicated, heartless decision. I’m so grateful that Ronan is my child. I also wish he’d never been born; no person should suffer in this way—daily seizures, blindness, lack of movement, inability to swallow, a devastated brain—with no hope for a cure. Both of these statements are categorically true; neither one is mutually exclusive.” Gary Comstock echoes a similar sentiment after his newborn son, Sam, suffocated to death in his arms. Sam was born with trisomy 18, and his brain was unable to regulate his lungs, leaving him with an inability to breathe on his own. Comstock and his wife chose not to abort the pregnancy. Once Sam was born, they decided to remove all life-sustaining treatment and allow their baby to die in their arms. After watching his infant son struggle to breathe, his chest convulsing and his body turning limp, for twenty minutes, Comstock writes about how he and his wife rocked Sam’s body for hours after he died. In hindsight, Comstock writes that he now believes that “you should not have let your baby die. You should have killed him” [10].2
    1
  30668. 1
  30669. 1
  30670. 1
  30671. 1
  30672. 1
  30673. 1
  30674. 1
  30675. 1
  30676. 1
  30677. 1
  30678. 1
  30679. 1
  30680. 1
  30681. 1
  30682. 1
  30683. 1
  30684. 1
  30685. 1
  30686. 1
  30687. 1
  30688. 1
  30689. 1
  30690. 1
  30691. 1
  30692. 1
  30693. 1
  30694. 1
  30695. 1
  30696. 1
  30697. 1
  30698. 1
  30699. 1
  30700. 1
  30701. 1
  30702. 1
  30703. 1
  30704. 1
  30705. 1
  30706. 1
  30707. 1
  30708. 1
  30709. 1
  30710. 1
  30711. 1
  30712. 1
  30713. 1
  30714. 1
  30715. 1
  30716. 1
  30717. 1
  30718. 1
  30719. 1
  30720. 1
  30721. 1
  30722. 1
  30723. 1
  30724. 1
  30725. 1
  30726. 1
  30727. 1
  30728. 1
  30729. 1
  30730. 1
  30731. 1
  30732. 1
  30733. 1
  30734. 1
  30735. 1
  30736. 1
  30737. 1
  30738. 1
  30739. 1
  30740. 1
  30741. 1
  30742. 1
  30743. 1
  30744. 1
  30745. 1
  30746. 1
  30747. 1
  30748. 1
  30749. 1
  30750. 1
  30751. 1
  30752. 1
  30753. 1
  30754. 1
  30755. 1
  30756. 1
  30757. 1
  30758. 1
  30759. 1
  30760. 1
  30761. 1
  30762. 1
  30763. 1
  30764. 1
  30765. 1
  30766. 1
  30767. 1
  30768. 1
  30769. 1
  30770. 1
  30771. 1
  30772. 1
  30773. 1
  30774. 1
  30775. 1
  30776. 1
  30777. 1
  30778. 1
  30779. 1
  30780. 1
  30781. 1
  30782. 1
  30783. 1
  30784. 1
  30785. 1
  30786. 1
  30787. 1
  30788. 1
  30789. 1
  30790. 1
  30791. 1
  30792. 1
  30793. 1
  30794. 1
  30795. 1
  30796. 1
  30797. 1
  30798. 1
  30799. 1
  30800. 1
  30801. 1
  30802. 1
  30803. 1
  30804. 1
  30805. 1
  30806. 1
  30807. 1
  30808. 1
  30809. 1
  30810. 1
  30811. 1
  30812. 1
  30813. 1
  30814. 1
  30815. 1
  30816. 1
  30817. 1
  30818. 1
  30819. 1
  30820. 1
  30821. 1
  30822. 1
  30823. 1
  30824. 1
  30825. 1
  30826. 1
  30827. 1
  30828. 1
  30829. 1
  30830. 1
  30831. 1
  30832. 1
  30833. 1
  30834. 1
  30835. 1
  30836. 1
  30837. 1
  30838. 1
  30839. 1
  30840. 1
  30841. 1
  30842. 1
  30843. 1
  30844. 1
  30845. 1
  30846. 1
  30847. 1
  30848.  @defiance1790  😂 So... 1. "If a virus can you take in an adult, why would you not think it could mutate in a child?" Now... Don't lie because it will make you look silly as hell when I quote your own comment back to you ( fair warning )... But... Was that your point? Or was there more to your original clam, that your conveniently leaving out? Like, maybe the part where you claimed that because children under 12 can get it that it will bread and mutate uncontrollably either way, anyways? 2. "I'll admit, I don't know of any sources that claimed the specifics of the virus mutating within children, but I can't even find one that talks about the virus mutating in adults" 🤦 Yes you can.... it's called the 💥Delta💥 strain. 3. Children are different than adults, correct? Mostly in the form of being underdeveloped in certain areas because they're not done growing. Because of this outside forces which would normally do one thing two adult bodies does a different thing to child bodies. Which is why the original strain that spread across America barely got any kids sick, let alone wound them up in the hospital. Which is also why less than 1% of the deaths in America due to covid-19 are from children. Delta, 👉THE MUTATION👈, is changing that. However, it's not about children versus adults. If adults (or people over 12) are getting vaccinated and the only ones unvaccinated that are getting sick are children under 12, large clusters, 👉which are vital to mutation👈 cannot form. Unless you are aware of some Podunk town in Texas somewhere where everybody is under the age of 12? This is why you should stop pretending you know what you're talkin about. I certainly don't. I don't claim to understand a whole crap-ton of this but I do know what medical experts are telling me, on mass. So if you want to go on about common sense, how about that common-sense. How about you actually listen to the medical experts and stop pretending you are one, so you can make an excuse for your selfish and s** behavior? 4. Delta also isn't the only variant. There have been several reports of less contagious and less widespread variants of covid-19 popping up in large cluster cities since the beginning of the pandemic. They pop up and large cluster cities because that's where a crap ton of infected people are. 5. So let's review... first you claimed, several times that if children under 12 could not be vaccinated as of yet then covid was going to spread uncontrollably anyway. Then, you tried to change your story and tried to make this about adults versus children and then insisted that it was my job to prove your claim after I asked you to provide three medical experts who share your original claim. Then you try to pretend you spoke for every Frontline doctor in America... twice... And now it's back to your false premise of children versus adults and you pretending you haven't heard of any variants or mutations. All of which just so you don't have to admit that you can't find three doctors that agree with your original statement because you know it's full of s***
    1
  30849. 1
  30850. 1
  30851. 1
  30852. 1
  30853. 1
  30854. 1
  30855. 1
  30856. 1
  30857. 1
  30858. 1
  30859. 1
  30860. 1
  30861. 1
  30862. 1
  30863. 1
  30864. 1
  30865. 1
  30866. 1
  30867. 1
  30868. 1
  30869. 1
  30870. 1
  30871. 1
  30872. 1
  30873. 1
  30874. 1
  30875. 1
  30876. 1
  30877. 1
  30878. 1
  30879. 1
  30880. 1
  30881. 1
  30882. 1
  30883. 1
  30884. 1
  30885. 1
  30886. 1
  30887. 1
  30888. 1
  30889. 1
  30890. 1
  30891. 1
  30892. 1
  30893. 1
  30894. 1
  30895. 1
  30896. 1
  30897. 1
  30898. 1
  30899. 1
  30900. 1
  30901. 1
  30902. 1
  30903. 1
  30904. 1
  30905. 1
  30906. 1
  30907. 1
  30908. 1
  30909. 1
  30910. 1
  30911. 1
  30912. 1
  30913. 1
  30914. 1
  30915. 1
  30916. 1
  30917. 1
  30918. 1
  30919. 1
  30920. 1
  30921. 1
  30922. 1
  30923. 1
  30924. 1
  30925. 1
  30926. 1
  30927. 1
  30928. 1
  30929. 1
  30930. 1
  30931. 1
  30932. 1
  30933. 1
  30934. 1
  30935. 1
  30936. 1
  30937. 1
  30938. 1
  30939. 1
  30940. 1
  30941. 1
  30942. 1
  30943. 1
  30944. 1
  30945. 1
  30946. 1
  30947. 1
  30948. 1
  30949. 1
  30950. 1
  30951. 1
  30952. 1
  30953. 1
  30954. 1
  30955. 1
  30956. 1
  30957. 1
  30958. 1
  30959. 1
  30960. 1
  30961. 1
  30962. 1
  30963. 1
  30964. 1
  30965. 1
  30966. 1
  30967. 1
  30968. 1
  30969. 1
  30970. 1
  30971. 1
  30972. 1
  30973. 1
  30974. 1
  30975. 1
  30976. 1
  30977. 1
  30978. 1
  30979. 1
  30980. 1
  30981. 1
  30982. 1
  30983. 1
  30984. 1
  30985. 1
  30986. 1
  30987. 1
  30988. 1
  30989. 1
  30990. 1
  30991. 1
  30992. 1
  30993. 1
  30994. 1
  30995. 1
  30996. 1
  30997. 1
  30998. 1
  30999. 1
  31000. 1
  31001. 1
  31002. 1
  31003. 1
  31004. 1
  31005. 1
  31006. 1
  31007. 1
  31008. 1
  31009. 1
  31010. 1
  31011. 1
  31012. 1
  31013. 1
  31014. 1
  31015. 1
  31016. 1
  31017. 1
  31018. 1
  31019. 1
  31020. 1
  31021. 1
  31022. 1
  31023. 1
  31024. 1
  31025. 1
  31026. 1
  31027. 1
  31028. 1
  31029. 1
  31030. 1
  31031. 1
  31032. 1
  31033. 1
  31034. 1
  31035. 1
  31036. 1
  31037. 1
  31038. 1
  31039. 1
  31040. 1
  31041. 1
  31042. 1
  31043. 1
  31044. 1
  31045. 1
  31046. 1
  31047. 1
  31048. 1
  31049. 1
  31050. 1
  31051. 1
  31052. 1
  31053. 1
  31054. 1
  31055. 1
  31056. 1
  31057. 1
  31058. 1
  31059. 1
  31060. 1
  31061. 1
  31062. 1
  31063. 1
  31064. 1
  31065. 1
  31066. 1
  31067. 1
  31068. 1
  31069. 1
  31070. 1
  31071. 1
  31072. 1
  31073. 1
  31074. 1
  31075. 1
  31076. 1
  31077. 1
  31078. 1
  31079. 1
  31080. 1
  31081. 1
  31082. 1
  31083. 1
  31084. 1
  31085. 1
  31086. 1
  31087. 1
  31088. 1
  31089. 1
  31090. 1
  31091. 1
  31092. 1
  31093. 1
  31094. 1
  31095. 1
  31096. 1
  31097. 1
  31098. 1
  31099. 1
  31100. 1
  31101. 1
  31102. 1
  31103. 1
  31104. 1
  31105. 1
  31106. 1
  31107. 1
  31108. 1
  31109. 1
  31110. 1
  31111. 1
  31112. 1
  31113. 1
  31114. 1
  31115. 1
  31116. 1
  31117. 1
  31118. 1
  31119. 1
  31120. 1
  31121. 1
  31122. 1
  31123. 1
  31124. 1
  31125. 1
  31126. 1
  31127. 1
  31128. 1
  31129. 1
  31130. 1
  31131.  T Tullock  My turn... I will be linking all the info at the bottom. "Non-Hispanic whites totaled about 197,285,202 or 60.7% of the U.S.population." Only when you add mixed race people, do you get the 76.9% number. Which most Gov stats do differentiate. Meaning they give both numbers . Which I tend not to do because it doesn't make sense to me, honeslty. My son is mixed race. Caucasian and African American. He has my skin tone and dimples but everything else is his daddy. They always try and put him in school as Caucasian. I always have to correct the paperwork. He is both. Mixed. They default any mixed people who are part white to white. They are not. So that would make the mixed population 16.2%. Just Hispanic and African American are 30.5% of the population. Now, this is from the second link... The 2010 census. "52.2 mil ppl, or 21.3% of the population is on some form of gov assistance. Usually monthly. On short term program use (which is where you guys get your numbers from) 41.6% of African Americans, 17.8% of Hispanic and 17.8% white. Its also... Some of the first numbers, that the Gov sites give you, because they messure by month. But... When you get into the weeds, you find the long term program use. Meaning, the people who are on these programs for a long time. Which they categorize as being anywhere longer than 37 months. So over 3 years... That's when the numbers flip. Most polls, like for article and such, are for current numbers, and they go to the short term use numbers, for that reason. Which actually makes, you guys getting confused about it, understandable.... Of I'm being fare. The third link, shows the long term, or over 37 month user demo..... The second link... Census... Shows it a little twards the bottom, also. Not the whole pic though. Given the total number of white nun Hispanic inrolled in assistance for over 37 months, 43.2%.... Blacks, 17.9% and Hispanic 22.1% Once you get into wealth distribution and collage education and education assistance programs, as compared to ethnicity, things get even more interesting and you start to wonder why those minority numbers aren't higher than they really are.... If you wanna go really deep in the F'ed up rabit hole, you should get into ethnicity as compared to criminal acts and sentance terms. I can give you links for those also, if your interested? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States#Black_and_African_Americans https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-97.html https://www.nap.edu/read/9719/chapter/8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10310529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10310529/
    1
  31132. 1
  31133.  T Tullock  "My pointless to dispute someone else who said white people use way more welfare than blacks." Yeah... I know... You where disputing me. I said that. Except, I did NOT say "blacks". I said, than anyone. You tacked on the "blacks" after looking up the data. Odd timing. 🙄 Either way, you would not get an accurate reading without looking at all the data, on all the races. Black and white ppl are not the only ones who live in America. This is the shady tactic you guys use the most. Cherry pick only the data that fits what you already thought was true and ignore any other prevalent data. If your argument is valid, then you should be able to argue it using all pertinent information. If you can't do that, then don't argue that.... and I said this earlier. Cherry-picking data, in order to paint a false and negative image out of a minority group, is exactly what race is do. It's exactly what white nationalist do on a daily basis. If you don't want that tacked on to you, stop doing that. Throwing out random facts, without giving context, is, at best, being disingenuous and trying to set up a false dichotomy. In order to be able to see the bigger picture, you need more than one little fact bite. For instance, minorities are more likely to get longer sentences for the same crime. They are also more likely to be convicted of a crime they did not commit. I'll just proportionate to the amount of minorities in the country. Minorities are also disproportionately more likely to be born into poverty. They are also more likely and disproportionately to be turn down for Grants are scholarships. With just those little bit of extra relivant info and it starts to paint an entirely different picture. You can call me ignorant as many times as you want. I'm the one choosing to look at all relevant data to better understand a situation, and you're the one ignoring it. You're the one being willfully ignorant.
    1
  31134. 1
  31135. 1
  31136. 1
  31137. 1
  31138. 1
  31139. 1
  31140. 1
  31141. 1
  31142. 1
  31143. 1
  31144. 1
  31145.  @erickim6533  Change the subject? " I nailed you on impeachment procedure." 👇🤣 And this is why I wonder if you can read or understand basic English sometimes. The very first thing I said, in the very first comment was about proceedure, spanky! 🤣 or is this the part where you start to get so despreate that you ignore what I say, so you still have a leg to stand on...? 🤣👇 "See.... this is why you're special. I just gave you the house part of Article 2 Section 4 of The Constitution. What they are doing is procedure. Watch! I'll do it again! 🤣 ""The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action."🤣
    1
  31146. 1
  31147. 1
  31148. 1
  31149. 1
  31150. 1
  31151. 1
  31152. 1
  31153. 1
  31154. 1
  31155. 1
  31156. 1
  31157. 1
  31158. 1
  31159. 1
  31160. 1
  31161. 1
  31162. 1
  31163. 1
  31164. 1
  31165. 1
  31166. 1
  31167. 1
  31168. 1
  31169. 1
  31170. 1
  31171. 1
  31172. 1
  31173. 1
  31174. 1
  31175. 1
  31176. 1
  31177. 1
  31178. 1
  31179. 1
  31180. 1
  31181. 1
  31182. 1
  31183. 1
  31184. 1
  31185. 1
  31186. 1
  31187. 1
  31188. 1
  31189. 1
  31190. 1
  31191. 1
  31192. 1
  31193. 1
  31194. 1
  31195. 1
  31196. 1
  31197. 1
  31198. 1
  31199. 1
  31200. 1
  31201. 1
  31202. 1
  31203. 1
  31204. 1
  31205. 1
  31206. 1
  31207. 1
  31208. 1
  31209. 1
  31210. 1
  31211. 1
  31212. 1
  31213. 1
  31214. 1
  31215. 1
  31216. 1
  31217. 1
  31218. 1
  31219. 1
  31220. 1
  31221. 1
  31222. 1
  31223. 1
  31224. 1
  31225. 1
  31226. 1
  31227. 1
  31228. 1
  31229. 1
  31230. 1
  31231. 1
  31232. 1
  31233. 1
  31234. 1
  31235. 1
  31236. 1
  31237. 1
  31238. 1
  31239. 1
  31240. 1
  31241. 1
  31242. 1
  31243. 1
  31244. 1
  31245. 1
  31246. 1
  31247. 1
  31248. 1
  31249. 1
  31250. 1
  31251. 1
  31252. 1
  31253. 1
  31254. 1
  31255. 1
  31256. 1
  31257. 1
  31258. 1
  31259. 1
  31260. 1
  31261. 1
  31262. 1
  31263. 1
  31264. 1
  31265. 1
  31266. 1
  31267. 1
  31268. 1
  31269. 1
  31270. 1
  31271. 1
  31272. 1
  31273. 1
  31274. 1
  31275. 1
  31276. 1
  31277. 1
  31278. 1
  31279. 1
  31280. 1
  31281. 1
  31282. 1
  31283. 1
  31284. 1
  31285. 1
  31286. 1
  31287. 1
  31288. 1
  31289. 1
  31290. 1
  31291. 1
  31292. 1
  31293. 1
  31294. 1
  31295. 1
  31296. 1
  31297. 1
  31298. 1
  31299. 1
  31300. 1
  31301. 1
  31302. 1
  31303. 1
  31304. 1
  31305. 1
  31306. 1
  31307. 1
  31308. 1
  31309. 1
  31310. 1
  31311. 1
  31312. 1
  31313. 1
  31314. 1
  31315. 1
  31316. 1
  31317. 1
  31318. 1
  31319. 1
  31320. 1
  31321. 1
  31322. 1
  31323. 1
  31324. 1
  31325. 1
  31326. 1
  31327. 1
  31328.  @ronbloomberg  Am I? Well that is easy enough to check here... How our convo began.... Proof for that is above. You 👉.... who do you think it was that planted the pipe bombs and stashed the weapons? Me 👉 .... Its not about that I think. It's about what can and can not be proven. The FBI has not released all their names but have said they are related to 3 different white nationalist groups. You 👉.... Yeah, there's a reason the feds haven't released the names. Didn't you find it odd that all the insurrectionist that had their charges dropped were connected in some way to the FBI? Everything is not always as it seems. Me 👉 .... you're making massive baseless assumptions off of unproven claims. There's nothing conspiratorial about that. 👉👉👉👉👉👉Unless you have the evidence to provide for it?👈👈👈👈👈 👆You will see 👆here👆 that I was the one to ask for evidence or proof of your claim first, correct? Then you decided to double down and call it a "fact". 👇 You 👉.... - no I'm not... It's a fact. You'll never hear the truth by living in a bubble. When are you people going to realize you were being lied to? They are duping the crap out of you. Me 👉 .... how is me requiring you'd provide evidence and proof to back up something you call a fact, mean I'm living in a bubble? Is that what you just have to tell yourself when somebody asks you for evidence of these things you're calling fact? 👇Then I ask for the 2nd time! (You have yet to ask once. )👇 Me 👉 .... 👉👉👉👉if you have evidence of your claims, present it.👈👈👈👈 Its that simple. This is you... In your own words acknowledging that I have asked you for evidence and proof You 👉... you asking for evidence and proof is not what causes me to point out that you're living in a bubble (bubble may have been a poor choice of words.)
    1
  31329. 1
  31330. 1
  31331. 1
  31332. 1
  31333. 1
  31334.  @ronbloomberg  Am I? Well that is easy enough to check here... How our convo began.... Proof for that is above. You 👉.... who do you think it was that planted the pipe bombs and stashed the weapons? Me 👉 .... Its not about that I think. It's about what can and can not be proven. The FBI has not released all their names but have said they are related to 3 different white nationalist groups. You 👉.... Yeah, there's a reason the feds haven't released the names. Didn't you find it odd that all the insurrectionist that had their charges dropped were connected in some way to the FBI? Everything is not always as it seems. Me 👉 .... you're making massive baseless assumptions off of unproven claims. There's nothing conspiratorial about that. 👉👉👉👉👉👉Unless you have the evidence to provide for it?👈👈👈👈👈 👆You will see 👆here👆 that I was the one to ask for evidence or proof of your claim first, correct? Then you decided to double down and call it a "fact". 👇 You 👉.... - no I'm not... It's a fact. You'll never hear the truth by living in a bubble. When are you people going to realize you were being lied to? They are duping the crap out of you. Me 👉 .... how is me requiring you'd provide evidence and proof to back up something you call a fact, mean I'm living in a bubble? Is that what you just have to tell yourself when somebody asks you for evidence of these things you're calling fact? 👇Then I ask for the 2nd time! (You have yet to ask once. )👇 Me 👉 .... 👉👉👉👉if you have evidence of your claims, present it.👈👈👈👈 Its that simple. This is you... In your own words acknowledging that I have asked you for evidence and proof You 👉... you asking for evidence and proof is not what causes me to point out that you're living in a bubble (bubble may have been a poor choice of words.)
    1
  31335. 1
  31336. 1
  31337. 1
  31338. 1
  31339. 1
  31340. 1
  31341. 1
  31342. 1
  31343. 1
  31344. 1
  31345.  @ronbloomberg  These are the quotes this person wanted substantiated. (I'm doing this only to demonstrate that it WILL NOT MATTER. This person will just come up with another excuse and keep repeating it, because they have NO PROOF for the claim they made and ARE trying to DEFLECT from that. ) 2. " They found a stash of guns in the hotel room belonging to a bunch of different people " 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 Again, multiple sources, in order to cut down this one's excuses of credibility of a single outlet. https://abcnews-go-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/US/oath-keepers-stashed-weapons-hotel-potential-jan-violence/story?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&id=77048420&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16249093221015&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FUS%2Foath-keepers-stashed-weapons-hotel-potential-jan-violence%2Fstory%3Fid%3D77048420 https://www-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.businessinsider.com/prosecutors-say-oath-keepers-likely-stored-jan-6-weapons-at-virginia-hotel?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16249093221015&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fprosecutors-say-oath-keepers-likely-stored-jan-6-weapons-at-virginia-hotel https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/policy/national-security/548150-prosecutors-oath-keepers-kept-weapons-at-hotel-in-case-violence?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16249093221015&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fpolicy%2Fnational-security%2F548150-prosecutors-oath-keepers-kept-weapons-at-hotel-in-case-violence https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/quick-reaction-force-capitol-riot/2021/04/14/2021da66-9d39-11eb-8005-bffc3a39f6d3_story.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16249093221015&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Flocal%2Flegal-issues%2Fquick-reaction-force-capitol-riot%2F2021%2F04%2F14%2F2021da66-9d39-11eb-8005-bffc3a39f6d3_story.html
    1
  31346. 1
  31347. 1
  31348. 1
  31349. 1
  31350. 1
  31351. 1
  31352. 1
  31353. 1
  31354. 1
  31355. 1
  31356. 1
  31357. 1
  31358. 1
  31359. 1
  31360. 1
  31361. 1
  31362. 1
  31363. 1
  31364.  @ronbloomberg  No... That isn't your side. Your side is the Trump Cult. Not the reps. You make all these claims you can't possibly backup and all for the benefit of Donald Trump never being wrong. His administration never being wrong. You're willing to make yourself look silly not being able to back up the claims you made trying to deflect from Trump, his administration and his supporters actions. You continue to do it here. "Democrats are against the Constitution and therefore a threat to our democracy" 👈 and this is true why? Because you said so? Because Donald Trump told you they were? "One of our own"... really? Tattoos hot a gold-plated spoon shoved up his ass from day one. He scammed thousands of Americans just trying to get ahead out of money and a college education. He has an endless track record of not paying hard-working blue-collar businesses for their work. Him and his dad used to openly, on the books discriminate against black people when renting to people on one of their properties. Meanwhile he's gone bankrupt 6 times and still lives in penthouses. Where do you think you'd be living if you went bankrupt? Just during his four years he has proved on multiple occasions how much he could care less about the average person. Not what was reported but his actual actions. His administration defunded the restocking of the medical stockpiles which sent every state in America bidding against each other for literal American lives when the pandemic first hit. He tried to sell us multiple snake oil cures and took none of them when he got sick. He refused to stop throwing Giant rallies during the pandemic. Where he didn't enforce the social distancing guidelines. He was literally putting his own supporters at unnecessary risk so he could get reelected. He put hundreds of thousands of government workers standing in food lines with their children while the government was shut down so he could pay for a wall that was never going to work in the first place. He caved, making all of that completely pointless and then ended up taking the money from American military families... and it still isn't done. As I said earlier, he was right about China and the intellectual property right theft. However, he went about it in the worst way possible. Literally nobody in the history of existence has won a trade War. Both sides have lost every single time. Those are just a few of countless examples of different actions he has taken that shows he doesn't give a damn about any of us. The sign of the aisle I was talking about that you were on, is the Trump cult side.
    1
  31365. 1
  31366. 1
  31367. 1
  31368. 1
  31369. 1
  31370.  @ronbloomberg  Well... I don't think that is true... There is a difference between thinking somebody is wrong for their opinions and thinking they're stupid. I actually live in the land of Republicans. The Deep South Bible Belt of Louisiana. Most wouldn't guess it, but my entire family, most of my friends and acquaintances voted for Donald Trump in 2016. They are Republicans. I am the lone lib. I'm also a single mother to a beautiful 10 year old mixed race little boy, and an atheist. So You can imagine... I'm use to arguing opposing view points. Though... I'm a liberal Democrat because I agree with the fights they choose in the platforms they hold, for the most part. I believe... No American should die from being too poor to live in this country. We can both recognize and illegality of people coming across our borders illegally, while at the same time recognizing their lack of choice and treating them like human beings That a living wage should match the inflation and worker productivity growth in this country. If you work hard and do your part, you deserve to earn a living wage. That abortions should be legal, safe and very rare. That our servicemen and women should be treated with the level of respect that they deserve for putting their lives on the line for us, at all times. Thoughts and prayers just simply Aren't Enough when our children, when my child, is doing active shooter drills twice a month at school. That minorities live a completely different life in America than Caucasian people, often worse... For a varsity of reasons and that it should not be ignored, placated or tossed aside. We should do better. That it is no one's business who someone loves, who they marry or who someone is, as long as it doesn't hurt anybody. That my grandchildren will have a vastly reduced quality of life if we don't pull our heads out of our asses and get serious about killing the planet. However, I realized the need for fiscal responsibility. I just think it should be across the board and not the lower and middle-class taking all the hits all the time. There's no part of me that wants to take away anyone's freedom. Silencing the voice of your opposition is just chickenshit. It's just, as polarized as this country is right now, the only way I see it getting better is if we base our opinions and our actions on a phone and accurate reading of facts.
    1
  31371. 1
  31372. 1
  31373. 1
  31374. 1
  31375. 1
  31376. 1
  31377. 1
  31378. 1
  31379. 1
  31380. 1
  31381. 1
  31382. 1
  31383. 1
  31384. 1
  31385. 1
  31386. 1
  31387. 1
  31388. 1
  31389. 1
  31390. 1
  31391. 1
  31392. 1
  31393. 1
  31394. 1
  31395. 1
  31396. 1
  31397. 1
  31398. 1
  31399. 1
  31400. 1
  31401. 1
  31402.  @jamison1323  You say I'm brain washed... But you keep spitting up these talking points. Who says we should not catch and detain border jumpers? Who says, we should just release them? All of them. That's why you can't name any that say they want open borders. 😉✌ There is a difference between wanting open borders and wanting people to be treated like they are human beings and not demonized. Yeah... I said that. I said Obama put up fencing. As well as fixed some existing fencing. I'm saying your hearsay about one portion of the border is anecdotal at best. That's what you keep skipping over, and on purpose. Obama wanted a wall and I don't know what I'm talking about? Okay... If that's true then it should be easy to prove, right? So show me something? Him saysing that? Press release? Bill? Something to prove that your not just making more inaccurate claims? It does hurt us... But its funny how we always go after the poor imigrants, who are also just struggling to feed thwir families but never the people that hire them.... Ya know... Like Donald Trump? Also, the majority of illigals, trafficking and drugs come in through a combo of Planes, northern border and boat... So why not focus on those as well? Once again... Who said there was 11 mil? And... Tell me... Oh wise one... if illegals don't turn to report, because.... you know... they're illegal, how can either claim to have an accurate number? Btw, what do border experts and Structural Engineers say about putting a wall on the southern border?
    1
  31403. 1
  31404. 1
  31405. 1
  31406. 1
  31407. 1
  31408. 1
  31409. 1
  31410. 1
  31411. 1
  31412. 1
  31413. 1
  31414. 1
  31415. 1
  31416. 1
  31417. 1
  31418. 1
  31419. 1
  31420.  @jamison1323  did you not hear me say earlier that I didn't like Obama's immigration policies? The only hypocrite here is you sweetheart. I I'm perfectly capable of saying my side messed up when my side messes up. I don't think it took tracks from my argument. I think it enhances it. It makes me a more honest actor. It makes me wanting the actual truth and not some partisan BS. You should try it sometime. Now... He wasn't as bad as Trump. In that he took responsibility for what was going on at the border. In that he wasn't letting mass outbreaks happen in detention centers because there wasn't enough sanitation and Medical Care. In that he wasn't putting children in cages and then losing them in a system. In that he wasn't going around talking about invasions and comparing them to rapists and drug dealers. In about a thousand more ways he wasn't as bad. But it wasn't good either. You keep skipping over this but... Democrats are not against border security or having a border at all. The thing you keep intentionally skipping over, is they just want human beings to be treated like human beings. I don't give a damn what country they're from. These people shouldn't be treated like that. There is no excuse for America to be doing this. We're supposed to be better than that. We're not some third-world crappy ass country. Where America. You should hold us to a higher standard than you are. You should hold him to a higher standard than you are. You should hold yourself to a higher standard than you are. Stop making excuses. Stop diverting. Own your shit.
    1
  31421.  @jamison1323  Who is talking about texas? That's all you know because that's all you want to know. The things you thing you know... You do not. Unemployment is a trend in the plus column that began under Obama. Job growth has actually slow down under Trump. Wage Rising is flat-out wrong.https://www-chicagotribune-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-fact-check-trump-rising-wages-20180207-story.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagotribune.com%2Fbusiness%2Fct-biz-fact-check-trump-rising-wages-20180207-story.html Most people don't understand the difference between GDP and GDP growth. GDP growth is the important one and everybody thinks the GDP is, who doesn't know nothing about it. It's not that hard either. GDP is the number that it's at, GDP growth is the amount that it has grown from the last measurement. Obama's first year in office, he took us out of the Great Recession, after the stimulus package. Which took the GDP from -2.5 % to + 3.9% in his first year in office. With a much harder row to hoe. Cuz great recession. Which made his GDP growth, 6.4%. Trumps first year, No Recession... He started with +1.8%. At the end of his first year it went to 2.2%. Which made his growth 0.4%. Hid growth did slightly better in his second year going from 2.2% to 3.9%. Which took his Growth to 1.7%. He had to dangerously deregulate a ton of stuff to get there, job growth still slowed from the trend Obama set and his growth got no where near Obama. You are dramatically misinformed
    1
  31422. 1
  31423. 1
  31424. 1
  31425. 1
  31426. 1
  31427. 1
  31428. 1
  31429. 1
  31430.  @jamison1323  BTW, YOU FORGOT ABOUT ALL OF THIS. "BTW, why is everybody focusing on these poor immigrants just trying to feed themselves and their families I'm not on the companies that hire them instead of American workers? You know, like Trump?" "About the wall and what experts actually say. "The experts say you can do border security without a wall, which is wasteful and doesn't solve the problem,” Schumer added." https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/01/24/experts-say-trumps-border-wall-will-take-longer-than-he-claims.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2019%2F01%2F24%2Fexperts-say-trumps-border-wall-will-take-longer-than-he-claims.html https://www-pbs-org.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/trump-says-walls-work-its-much-more-complicated?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pbs.org%2Fnewshour%2Fnation%2Ftrump-says-walls-work-its-much-more-complicated https://beta-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/12/11/trumps-arguments-necessity-border-wall-have-already-been-broadly-debunked/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s" "Who is talking about texas? That's all you know because that's all you want to know. The things you thing you know... You do not. Unemployment is a trend in the plus column that began under Obama. Job growth has actually slow down under Trump. Wage Rising is flat-out wrong.https://www-chicagotribune-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-fact-check-trump-rising-wages-20180207-story.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagotribune.com%2Fbusiness%2Fct-biz-fact-check-trump-rising-wages-20180207-story.html Most people don't understand the difference between GDP and GDP growth. GDP growth is the important one and everybody thinks the GDP is, who doesn't know nothing about it. It's not that hard either. GDP is the number that it's at, GDP growth is the amount that it has grown from the last measurement. Obama's first year in office, he took us out of the Great Recession, after the stimulus package. Which took the GDP from -2.5 % to + 3.9% in his first year in office. With a much harder row to hoe. Cuz great recession. Which made his GDP growth, 6.4%. Trumps first year, No Recession... He started with +1.8%. At the end of his first year it went to 2.2%. Which made his growth 0.4%. Hid growth did slightly better in his second year going from 2.2% to 3.9%. Which took his Growth to 1.7%. He had to dangerously deregulate a ton of stuff to get there, job growth still slowed from the trend Obama set and his growth got no where near Obama. You are dramatically misinformed"
    1
  31431. 1
  31432. 1
  31433.  @jamison1323  Iran are assholes. We've been going back and forth when time ran for years. Decades actually. This is the first damn time we made a deal with them and everybody was following through with it. Until Trump came along and decided it was Obama's deal so he had to get rid of it. Except you couldn't do that for no reason so his stupid ass goes in lies about the inspectors. That's why he got sanctioned by the UN. That's why all these other nations lined up behind Iran in the UN. You think I want to back Iran? He lying his ass off. And everybody knew it because every time and Americans inspector went over there to see that they were enriching uranium only to a certain point, un inspectors went with them. Every single time. Everyone knew he was lying. They have the proof. Which is why our president got sanctioned by the UN. Which is why all these other countries had to back Iran. He was lying his ass off. Don't NOBODY WANNA BACK IRAN! The way he went about it, he was lying! There is proof. And now we got Iran refining past the point of just making energy because why shouldn't they it this point? They were doing everything they were supposed to be doing and the United States and the president of the United States went and lied their ass off on them. You need to stop watching Fox News and all those right-wing blogger b***** because you only get a tiny morsel of the actual truth and then they just fill your head up with all this s**. It's making you look real ignorant baby. You can't prove any of the stuff you're saying and you ignore so much because you can't argue against it. Seeing people like you don't want the truth. Partisan vs is all you care about. But please prove me wrong by providing evidence for all the b****** you keep saying
    1
  31434.  @jamison1323  and dont forget about these... While your at it.  @XxClickBait HostagexX  BTW, YOU FORGOT ABOUT ALL OF THIS. "BTW, why is everybody focusing on these poor immigrants just trying to feed themselves and their families I'm not on the companies that hire them instead of American workers? You know, like Trump?" "About the wall and what experts actually say. "The experts say you can do border security without a wall, which is wasteful and doesn't solve the problem,” Schumer added." https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/01/24/experts-say-trumps-border-wall-will-take-longer-than-he-claims.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2019%2F01%2F24%2Fexperts-say-trumps-border-wall-will-take-longer-than-he-claims.html https://www-pbs-org.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/trump-says-walls-work-its-much-more-complicated?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pbs.org%2Fnewshour%2Fnation%2Ftrump-says-walls-work-its-much-more-complicated https://beta-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/12/11/trumps-arguments-necessity-border-wall-have-already-been-broadly-debunked/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s" "Who is talking about texas? That's all you know because that's all you want to know. The things you thing you know... You do not. Unemployment is a trend in the plus column that began under Obama. Job growth has actually slow down under Trump. Wage Rising is flat-out wrong.https://www-chicagotribune-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-fact-check-trump-rising-wages-20180207-story.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagotribune.com%2Fbusiness%2Fct-biz-fact-check-trump-rising-wages-20180207-story.html Most people don't understand the difference between GDP and GDP growth. GDP growth is the important one and everybody thinks the GDP is, who doesn't know nothing about it. It's not that hard either. GDP is the number that it's at, GDP growth is the amount that it has grown from the last measurement. Obama's first year in office, he took us out of the Great Recession, after the stimulus package. Which took the GDP from -2.5 % to + 3.9% in his first year in office. With a much harder row to hoe. Cuz great recession. Which made his GDP growth, 6.4%. Trumps first year, No Recession... He started with +1.8%. At the end of his first year it went to 2.2%. Which made his growth 0.4%. Hid growth did slightly better in his second year going from 2.2% to 3.9%. Which took his Growth to 1.7%. He had to dangerously deregulate a ton of stuff to get there, job growth still slowed from the trend Obama set and his growth got no where near Obama. You are dramatically misinformed"
    1
  31435. 1
  31436. 1
  31437. 1
  31438. 1
  31439. 1
  31440. 1
  31441. 1
  31442. 1
  31443. 1
  31444. 1
  31445. 1
  31446. 1
  31447. 1
  31448. 1
  31449. 1
  31450. 1
  31451. 1
  31452. 1
  31453. 1
  31454. 1
  31455. 1
  31456. 1
  31457. 1
  31458. 1
  31459. 1
  31460. 1
  31461. 1
  31462. 1
  31463. 1
  31464. 1
  31465. 1
  31466. 1
  31467. 1
  31468. 1
  31469. 1
  31470. 1
  31471. 1
  31472. 1
  31473. 1
  31474. 1
  31475. 1
  31476. 1
  31477. 1
  31478. 1
  31479. 1
  31480. 1
  31481. 1
  31482. 1
  31483. 1
  31484. 1
  31485. 1
  31486. 1
  31487. 1
  31488. 1
  31489.  @kriptikful  Oh... My timeline is just fine... Thanks! 👇 the first case had already hit America. And 3 days before the World Health Organization issued a global Health Emergency. Which, again, Trump took serious enough to try and block people from Coming to America but not serious enough to cancel a pact Trump rally 4 hours later. January 21 — CDC Confirms First US Coronavirus Case A Washington state resident becomes the first person in the United States with a confirmed case of the 2019 novel coronavirus, having returned from Wuhan on January 15, thanks to overnight polymerase chain reaction testing. The CDC soon after deploys a team to help with the investigation, including potential use of contact tracing. January 31 — WHO Issues Global Health Emergency With a worldwide death toll of more than 200 and an exponential jump to more than 9800 cases, the WHO finally declares a public health emergency, for just the sixth time. Human-to-human transmission is quickly spreading and can now be found in the United States, Germany, Japan, Vietnam, and Taiwan. February 2 — Global Air Travel Is Restricted By 5 pm on Sunday, those en route to the United States have to have left China or they can face a 2-week home-based quarantine if they had been in Hubei province. Mainland visitors, however, will need to undergo health screenings upon their return, and foreign nationals can even be denied admittance. Other countries beginning to impose similar air-travel restrictions at this point include Australia, Germany, Italy, and New Zealand. February 3 — US Declares Public Health Emergency The Trump administration declares a public health emergency due to the coronavirus outbreak. The announcement comes 3 days after WHO declared a Global Health Emergency as more than 9800 cases of the virus and more than 200 deaths had been confirmed worldwide.
    1
  31490. 1
  31491. 1
  31492. 1
  31493. 1
  31494. 1
  31495. 1
  31496. 1
  31497. 1
  31498. 1
  31499. 1
  31500. 1
  31501. 1
  31502. 1
  31503. 1
  31504. 1
  31505. 1
  31506. 1
  31507. 1
  31508. 1
  31509. 1
  31510. 1
  31511. 1
  31512. 1
  31513. 1
  31514. 1
  31515. 1
  31516. 1
  31517. 1
  31518. 1
  31519. 1
  31520. 1
  31521. 1
  31522. 1
  31523. 1
  31524. 1
  31525. 1
  31526. 1
  31527. 1
  31528. 1
  31529. 1
  31530. 1
  31531. 1
  31532. 1
  31533. 1
  31534. 1
  31535. 1
  31536. 1
  31537. 1
  31538. 1
  31539. 1
  31540. 1
  31541. 1
  31542. 1
  31543. 1
  31544. 1
  31545. 1
  31546. 1
  31547. 1
  31548. 1
  31549. 1
  31550.  @weezem  Nope... Again... Your arguing with me because you think 2 different things mean the same thing bc you've apparently decided you were smarter than every other scientist and immunologist in the world. This 👉the ability of an organism to resist a particular infection or toxin by the action of specific antibodies or sensitized white blood cells. Is different then This👇 Vaccine efficacy and effectiveness Vaccine efficacy and effectiveness are measures that compare the rates of disease between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Efficacy is measured in controlled clinical trials, whereas effectiveness is measured once the vaccine is approved for use in the general population. From these we can identify the proportion of vaccinated people we would expect to be protected by the vaccine. Herd immunity (also called community immunity) is an important mechanism by which the larger community is protected. For some diseases, if enough people are immune then transmission of the disease is reduced or eliminated. This is particularly so for diseases such as rubella and pneumococcal disease. High vaccine coverage must be maintained in order to prevent the disease re-entering the population. No vaccine is 100% effective, a small percentage of people are not protected after vaccination and for others the protection may wane over time. Also, some people are unable to be vaccinated due to certain conditions such as immune suppression. Maintaining immunity in those around these people protects them from disease.
    1
  31551. 1
  31552. 1
  31553. 1
  31554. 1
  31555. 1
  31556. 1
  31557. 1
  31558. 1
  31559. 1
  31560. 1
  31561. 1
  31562. 1
  31563. 1
  31564. 1
  31565. 1
  31566. 1
  31567. 1
  31568. 1
  31569. 1
  31570. 1
  31571. 1
  31572. 1
  31573. 1
  31574. 1
  31575. 1
  31576. 1
  31577. 1
  31578. 1
  31579. 1
  31580. 1
  31581. 1
  31582. 1
  31583. 1
  31584. 1
  31585. 1
  31586. 1
  31587. 1
  31588. 1
  31589. 1
  31590. 1
  31591. 1
  31592. 1
  31593. 1
  31594. 1
  31595. 1
  31596. 1
  31597. 1
  31598. 1
  31599. 1
  31600. 1
  31601. 1
  31602. 1
  31603. 1
  31604. 1
  31605. 1
  31606. 1
  31607. 1
  31608. 1
  31609. 1
  31610. 1
  31611. 1
  31612. 1
  31613. 1
  31614. 1
  31615. 1
  31616. 1
  31617. 1
  31618. 1
  31619. 1
  31620. 1
  31621. 1
  31622. 1
  31623. 1
  31624. 1
  31625. 1
  31626. 1
  31627. 1
  31628. 1
  31629. 1
  31630. 1
  31631. 1
  31632. 1
  31633. 1
  31634. 1
  31635. 1
  31636. 1
  31637. 1
  31638. 1
  31639. 1
  31640. 1
  31641. 1
  31642. 1
  31643. 1
  31644. 1
  31645. 1
  31646. 1
  31647. 1
  31648. 1
  31649. 1
  31650. 1
  31651. 1
  31652. 1
  31653. 1
  31654. 1
  31655. 1
  31656. 1
  31657. 1
  31658. 1
  31659. 1
  31660. 1
  31661. 1
  31662. 1
  31663. 1
  31664. 1
  31665. 1
  31666. 1
  31667. 1
  31668. 1
  31669. 1
  31670. 1
  31671. 1
  31672. 1
  31673. 1
  31674. 1
  31675. 1
  31676. 1
  31677. 1
  31678. 1
  31679. 1
  31680. 1
  31681. 1
  31682. 1
  31683. 1
  31684. 1
  31685. 1
  31686. 1
  31687. 1
  31688. 1
  31689. 1
  31690. 1
  31691. 1
  31692. 1
  31693. 1
  31694. 1
  31695. 1
  31696. 1
  31697. 1
  31698. 1
  31699. 1
  31700. 1
  31701. 1
  31702. 1
  31703. 1
  31704. 1
  31705. 1
  31706. 1
  31707. 1
  31708. 1
  31709. 1
  31710. 1
  31711. 1
  31712. 1
  31713. 1
  31714. 1
  31715. 1
  31716. 1
  31717. 1
  31718. 1
  31719. 1
  31720. 1
  31721. 1
  31722. 1
  31723. 1
  31724. 1
  31725. 1
  31726. 1
  31727. 1
  31728. 1
  31729. 1
  31730. 1
  31731. 1
  31732. 1
  31733. 1
  31734. 1
  31735. 1
  31736. 1
  31737. 1
  31738. 1
  31739. 1
  31740. 1
  31741. 1
  31742. 1
  31743. 1
  31744. 1
  31745. 1
  31746. 1
  31747. 1
  31748. 1
  31749. 1
  31750. 1
  31751. 1
  31752. 1
  31753. 1
  31754. 1
  31755. 1
  31756. 1
  31757. 1
  31758. 1
  31759. 1
  31760. 1
  31761. 1
  31762. 1
  31763. 1
  31764. 1
  31765. 1
  31766. 1
  31767. 1
  31768. 1
  31769. 1
  31770. 1
  31771. 1
  31772. 1
  31773. 1
  31774. 1
  31775. 1
  31776. 1
  31777. 1
  31778. 1
  31779. 1
  31780. 1
  31781. 1
  31782. 1
  31783. 1
  31784. 1
  31785. 1
  31786. 1
  31787. 1
  31788. 1
  31789. 1
  31790. 1
  31791. 1
  31792. 1
  31793. 1
  31794. 1
  31795. 1
  31796. 1
  31797. 1
  31798. 1
  31799. 1
  31800. 1
  31801. 1
  31802. 1
  31803. 1
  31804. 1
  31805. 1
  31806. 1
  31807. 1
  31808. 1
  31809. 1
  31810. 1
  31811. 1
  31812. 1
  31813. 1
  31814. 1
  31815. 1
  31816. 1
  31817. 1
  31818. 1
  31819. 1
  31820. 1
  31821. 1
  31822. 1
  31823. 1
  31824. 1
  31825. 1
  31826. 1
  31827. 1
  31828. 1
  31829. 1
  31830. 1
  31831. 1
  31832. 1
  31833. 1
  31834. 1
  31835. 1
  31836. 1
  31837. 1
  31838. 1
  31839. 1
  31840. 1
  31841. 1
  31842. 1
  31843. 1
  31844. 1
  31845. 1
  31846. 1
  31847. 1
  31848. 1
  31849. 1
  31850. 1
  31851. 1
  31852. 1
  31853. 1
  31854. 1
  31855. 1
  31856. 1
  31857.  Dark Knight  Well... First... I have no desire to " convince" you of anything. It would be a waste of my time. Kinda like screaming into the blind wind. Your lies need to be corrected, however. So others don't begin to believe them. Yours are easy though. Its speculation at best. Incomplete ones, at best. If you have to leave pertinent info out of your argument, you are simply not arguing the point on its merits and if you can not argue something... Or really anything on its merits, then you should not be making it. For example... You left out that Dems are not "pushing" for illegal immigrants to vote. Most just are not spending their time stopping them from voting in small school bored type elections. They are focusing on other things. Bigger things. Your also attempting to make a lazy argument by claiming that all or most Dems are pushing for things because 1 or 2 said or did something that you don't like. Your leaving out that most Dems say that its not a good idea to "abolish ICE", and those that think it should be, have presented bills or ideas that have other branches taking over their duties or even just flushing out the ICE officers with histories of abuse and neglect. I haven't heard of one talk about abolishing Homeland Security and I make it a point to be well informed. So your going to have to show me that one, before I believe you. Sanctuary cities are for those populations who believe on mass that, being illegal is not a good enough reason to treat people like they matter less than other human beings and so they can get basic human services, without constantly living in fear for themselves and their children. Which I don't think is to much to ask. No one should be forced to surrender their humanity, either willingly or otherwise. They also would not have to exist if people stopped treating them like they don't matter as a human being because they are not here legally. Very few places in America have the DL bills passed. Those that do have provisions on the cards, that mark them as not of this country. It helps them to be able to contribute and makes sure that people who are getting in cars, know how to drive them first. Which as a single mother and rideshare driver, I, most certainly, appreciate! The healthcare they are referring to is for the ones we have detained. Which, if we are going to lock them away, we should take care of their basic needs, because this isn't the dark ages and we are not monsters.
    1
  31858.  Dark Knight  What strikes me first, is your claims of my evidence, when you have provided none, yourself. Second... Love people who talk abput common sense, when basic common sense dictates that one considers all info and then make a determination on a subject, or do you not agree with that common sense? And why? Video of not just this clip of over crowding and concreate floors, dirty half starved people with lack of room to even lay down and sleep, pwople who got out of there telling the same or similar stories of the treatment by yhe hundreds, actual officials quiting thwir jobs because of the treatment they saw and government officials coming out and recognising some of these problems before excusing them or passing the blame. Even Trump himself. BTW, whats your evidence to not believe this again? I have seen none. Also, last time I checked... Your not the king. So I'm not sure why you think, you get to decide what is and is not "enough". On AOC, here we go not considering all the evidence again. Just enough to confirm what you have already decided is right. 15 years ago now, we have already past the point of being able to reverse all of the damage we have done to the earth. 98% of climate scientists have been saying for all of that time, that signs point to us being the cause, that we would experience more frequent severe weather events, overflowing oceans, bigger and longer heat waves, ice cap melting and loads more. Guess what? All those things have happened. She didn't say the world would end in 12 years. Life as we know it will change in a very drastic way. It's already been going on. AOC is not the only one who has been in the or down there. She is just the most notable, of late. The ones who have spoken out the mpst and been down there the most, are the lawyers for these people. Who have all confirmed all of mine and your examples and then some. Do you know the definition of concentration camp? If you actually did, then you would not be mocking the phrase. Again... You have yet to show anything other then some Rep talking points. So I'm not sure what you think has been "debunked"? Unless your talking about the video of that guard, in an empty bathroom, with the coolers and toilet. Some how you thing this guard saying, look we have a cooler over here.... Means that? I don't think so. Its not my evidence. Its evidence that os out there for everyone. Or to those that actually choose to be objective enough to see it. And again... Are you under the impression that I have to prove anything to you? Your not special dude. You don't decide anything for anyone else. Get over yourself.
    1
  31859. 1
  31860. 1
  31861. 1
  31862. 1
  31863. 1
  31864. 1
  31865. 1
  31866. 1
  31867. 1
  31868. 1
  31869. 1
  31870. 1
  31871. 1
  31872. 1
  31873. 1
  31874. 1
  31875. 1
  31876. 1
  31877. 1
  31878. 1
  31879.  @a.i4639  But before I move on to your second comment and your links, which I will look at and pick apart... If needed... Because, like you, I do my research, as well... But... I want to give you an out first. It is this... 👇 I'm not here to convince you of a thing. That would be pointless. You have chosen to believe what you want, despite an accurate and full accounting of facts telling you something else. You wont change. You have chosen what you want, over what is true. You should always chose truth... But... Because you have not... I will tell you what will happen... I will read and pick apart your "evidence", as I have said, I will present the facts between the "research" you have chosen to show me, and think you are so clever at doing so.... Then I will formulate questions about those facts, to ask you, and when you can't answer them, and try to divert from them, I will continue to ask them. Only now, I will point out, everytime, your inability to answer them, as well. You will will use every tactic you can think of, to get me to stop asking you that question, that, if answered honestly, will dismantle the point you where trying to make. It will not work.... We will keep going like this, until the thread runs out or until you provide some face saving tactic that you have decided in your mind, allows you to finally run out of the situation, you have gotten yourself in by chosing want over truth... Because, I am not here to change your mind.... I am here to destroy your credibility and expose your faulty logic... And I am good at what I do. Now... Is that the journey you would like to take with me? Or.....
    1
  31880. 1
  31881. 1
  31882. 1
  31883. 1
  31884. 1
  31885. 1
  31886. 1
  31887. 1
  31888. 1
  31889. 1
  31890. 1
  31891. 1
  31892. 1
  31893. 1
  31894. 1
  31895. 1
  31896. 1
  31897. 1
  31898. 1
  31899. 1
  31900. 1
  31901. 1
  31902. 1
  31903. 1
  31904. 1
  31905. 1
  31906. 1
  31907. 1
  31908. 1
  31909. 1
  31910. 1
  31911. 1
  31912. 1
  31913. 1
  31914. 1
  31915. 1
  31916. 1
  31917. 1
  31918. 1
  31919. 1
  31920. 1
  31921. 1
  31922. 1
  31923. 1
  31924. 1
  31925. 1
  31926. 1
  31927. 1
  31928. 1
  31929. 1
  31930. 1
  31931. 1
  31932. 1
  31933. 1
  31934. 1
  31935. 1
  31936. 1
  31937. 1
  31938. 1
  31939. 1
  31940. 1
  31941. 1
  31942. 1
  31943. 1
  31944. 1
  31945. 1
  31946. 1
  31947. 1
  31948. 1
  31949. 1
  31950. 1
  31951. 1
  31952.  @billboon  He.... -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic and America, just exactly like covid-19 and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obama. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 has magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cares, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, we're literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the world worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away by several different dates and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a coded safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claims, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineer is building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    1
  31953. 1
  31954. 1
  31955. 1
  31956. 1
  31957.  @FakingANerve  Money in politics is the crux of the poison apple. It would have to be first. I get your pessimism. The truth is, our politicians have to sell themselves to get elected.... And I'm not talking about to the voters. You need a ridiculous amount of money in order to get elected to leadership in this country. As for holding our Representatives accountable, doj policy actually has a much less goat threshold than passing regular laws. It's just regulation. It's a lot more doable then ppl think. One thing that would solve a whole lot of problems and the one that I would go after first because it would also help the whole bought and paid for a politician problem, would be the making it mandatory for Congressional officials to adhere to the social and Welfare laws that they pass in Congress. You'd be surprised how motivated people get when they find out it's their butts on the line to. It has been crazy. We elected Donald Trump for God's sake. Like I said, though. We're partially to blame for that. The Democratic party should have given us someone to vote for instead of just someone to vote against. Joe Biden is okay. He has his downsides. He's just middle-of-the-road period which seems to be the only thing that the Democratic Party can get past a primary. You can say a lot of things about the Republican party but they're good at marketing their firebrands. We need to stop being afraid of offending people so much and push forward those that would challenge that middle-of-the-road idea. The ideas and the Democratic party shouldn't be focused on who's not going to bother people the most. It should be who's going to vote for, speak out and support our ideals.
    1
  31958. 1
  31959. 1
  31960. 1
  31961. 1
  31962. 1
  31963. 1
  31964. 1
  31965. 1
  31966. 1
  31967. 1
  31968. 1
  31969. 1
  31970. 1
  31971. 1
  31972. 1
  31973. 1
  31974. 1
  31975. 1
  31976. 1
  31977. 1
  31978. 1
  31979. 1
  31980. 1
  31981. 1
  31982. 1
  31983. 1
  31984. 1
  31985. 1
  31986. 1
  31987. 1
  31988. 1
  31989. 1
  31990. 1
  31991. 1
  31992. 1
  31993. 1
  31994. 1
  31995. 1
  31996. 1
  31997. 1
  31998. 1
  31999. 1
  32000. 1
  32001. 1
  32002. 1
  32003. 1
  32004. 1
  32005. 1
  32006. 1
  32007. 1
  32008. 1
  32009. 1
  32010. 1
  32011. 1
  32012. 1
  32013. 1
  32014. 1
  32015. 1
  32016. 1
  32017. 1
  32018. 1
  32019. 1
  32020. 1
  32021. 1
  32022. 1
  32023. 1
  32024. 1
  32025. 1
  32026. 1
  32027. 1
  32028. 1
  32029. 1
  32030. 1
  32031. 1
  32032. 1
  32033. 1
  32034. 1
  32035. 1
  32036. 1
  32037. 1
  32038. 1
  32039. 1
  32040. 1
  32041. 1
  32042. 1
  32043. 1
  32044. 1
  32045. 1
  32046. 1
  32047. 1
  32048. 1
  32049. 1
  32050. 1
  32051. 1
  32052. 1
  32053. 1
  32054. 1
  32055. 1
  32056. 1
  32057. 1
  32058. 1
  32059. 1
  32060. 1
  32061. 1
  32062. 1
  32063. 1
  32064. 1
  32065. 1
  32066. 1
  32067. 1
  32068. 1
  32069. 1
  32070. 1
  32071. 1
  32072. 1
  32073. 1
  32074. 1
  32075. 1
  32076. 1
  32077. 1
  32078. 1
  32079. 1
  32080. 1
  32081. 1
  32082. 1
  32083. 1
  32084. 1
  32085. 1
  32086. 1
  32087. 1
  32088. 1
  32089. 1
  32090. 1
  32091. 1
  32092. 1
  32093. 1
  32094. 1
  32095. 1
  32096. 1
  32097. 1
  32098. 1
  32099. 1
  32100. 1
  32101. 1
  32102. 1
  32103. 1
  32104. 1
  32105. 1
  32106. 1
  32107. 1
  32108. 1
  32109. 1
  32110. 1
  32111. 1
  32112. 1
  32113. 1
  32114. 1
  32115. 1
  32116. 1
  32117. 1
  32118. 1
  32119. 1
  32120. 1
  32121. 1
  32122. 1
  32123. 1
  32124. 1
  32125. 1
  32126. 1
  32127. 1
  32128. 1
  32129. 1
  32130. 1
  32131. 1
  32132. 1
  32133. 1
  32134. 1
  32135. 1
  32136. 1
  32137. 1
  32138. 1
  32139. 1
  32140. 1
  32141. 1
  32142. 1
  32143. 1
  32144. 1
  32145. 1
  32146. 1
  32147. 1
  32148. 1
  32149. 1
  32150. 1
  32151. 1
  32152. 1
  32153. 1
  32154. 1
  32155. 1
  32156. 1
  32157. 1
  32158. 1
  32159. 1
  32160. 1
  32161. 1
  32162. 1
  32163. 1
  32164. 1
  32165. 1
  32166. 1
  32167. 1
  32168. 1
  32169. 1
  32170. 1
  32171. 1
  32172. 1
  32173. 1
  32174.  @MalleusDei275  👉 Source 👉 Politifact 👉 The legitimacy of the Jan. 6 committee, explained This is only a small portion of the article that will make you look silly as hell.... You should really read the whole thing! 👇👇Are ya ready, Tender Butt? 👇👇 Initially, Democrats and some Republicans wanted to create an independent commission, modeled after the one that investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks. That proposed panel would have been made up of retired public officials, military leaders, and academics, rather than sitting members of Congress. The idea was to insulate the panel’s investigation as much as possible from the partisan fray. The bipartisan commission would have included 10 members. House and Senate leaders for the Democratic Party would appoint the commission chair and four other members, while the Republican leaders would appoint the vice chair and four other members. The day before the House voted on the legislation, Trump came out in opposition to it and called on Republicans to "not approve the Democrat trap of the Jan. 6 Commission," arguing that it amounted to "more partisan unfairness." House Republican leaders joined Trump in opposition. Despite this, the House passed the legislation, with universal support from Democrats and the backing of 35 breakaway Republicans. But the Senate killed the commission idea after Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., came out against it, effectively ending any hope that the bill could get the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. Democratic leaders’ plan B was to establish a congressional select committee — a time-limited panel with a specific investigative charge. This could be accomplished by the House on its own; a simple majority in the House would carry the day. "Our bipartisan, good-faith proposal was met with a filibuster," House Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said at the time. "Now that Senate Republicans have chosen to block the formation of an independent commission, it falls to the House to stay the course and get the answers they deserve." On June 30, 2021, the House approved creation of the Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6 Attack on the United States Capitol. The resolution passed by a 222-190 margin. Once again, Democrats were unified in support, but the number of Republican votes in favor withered to two: Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois. Under the resolution, "the Speaker shall appoint 13 Members to the Select Committee, 5 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader." This is where matters got even more convoluted. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., presented Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., with a slate of five nominees to the panel. Pelosi responded that she had no quarrel with three of them: Republican Reps. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota, and Troy Nehls of Texas. But she drew the line at two of McCarthy’s picks: Indiana Rep. Jim Banks, who was tapped for the panel’s ranking member slot, and Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan. Pelosi maintained that Banks and Jordan were too closely tied to Trump to help carry out a credible investigation. After Pelosi rejected Banks and Jordan, McCarthy retracted all five of his nominations, including the three that Pelosi had said she’d accept. "Speaker Nancy Pelosi has taken the unprecedented step of denying the minority party's picks for the Select Committee on January 6," McCarthy said at the time. "This represents an egregious abuse of power and will irreparably damage this institution." But Pelosi had one last move. She proceeded to name the two Republicans who had voted to establish the committee — Cheney and Kinzinger — as members, joining seven Democrats. This produced a committee that was bipartisan, but excluded lawmakers who Democrats believed could be tempted to use the panel as a platform to justify the actions of Trump and his allies, rather than investigate them.
    1
  32175.  @MalleusDei275  AND what did the courts say about this? This! Right here! 👇 Why do critics say the panel is illegitimate? In a lawsuit, the Republican National Committee argued that there were several problems with the formation of the committee. First, rather than 13 members, as set out in the resolution, the panel ended up with only nine. Second, the panel has no "ranking member," as had been called for in the resolution. And third, the Republicans on the committee were not ones recommended by the Republican leader, McCarthy. On May 1, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that none of these concerns were enough to stop the committee's work. The ruling was made by Timothy J. Kelly, a Trump appointee. Kelly wrote that concern over the numerical divergence was "not an unreasonable position,’" but he added that the court "must give ‘great weight’ to the House’s own actions," including two occasions in which House Republicans failed to challenge the committee’s underlying legitimacy before casting votes related to the committee. The House has also argued that there’s precedent for a committee with incomplete membership: a 2005 House panel to investigate the government response to Hurricane Katrina consisted of 11 Republicans and zero Democrats. (Ironically, at the time, Pelosi, then the House minority leader, called the panel a "sham" and refused to name committee members.) As for the question of a ranking member, Kelly concluded that Cheney, as the panel’s vice chair, fulfilled the same function as a ranking member even if her title was different. And on the question of McCarthy’s lack of input, Kelly pointed to the resolution’s requirement that the speaker needed only to engage in "consultation" with the minority leader. "To ‘consult’ with Minority Leader McCarthy, all Speaker Pelosi had to do was ask for his ‘advice or opinion,’" Kelly wrote. "There is no dispute that she did. That she did not accept all his recommendations, and that Minority Leader McCarthy then withdrew all his recommendations, does not mean that Speaker Pelosi failed to consult with him." Another broad complaint in the lawsuit is that the committee’s actions are not advancing a valid legislative purpose. This argument didn’t fly with Kelly, either, who noted the committee’s purpose was to investigate if legislation is necessary "to avert a future Jan. 6-style attack." He reasoned that the committee need not commit to specific legislation in advance of starting its work, since possible legislation could easily emerge once the committee’s efforts were under way. Kelly’s decision was in line with an earlier decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In December 2021, a three-judge panel ruled against Trump’s attempts to block the National Archives from turning over presidential correspondence and documents to the Jan. 6 committee. The appeals judges wrote that there are "few, if any, more imperative interests squarely within Congress’s wheelhouse than ensuring the safe and uninterrupted conduct of its constitutionally assigned business." Further bolstering the House panel’s case is that a month later, the Supreme Court denied a motion by Trump to overturn the appeals court decision. The collective result of these court decisions, Robenalt said, is to show that "the committee was properly authorized and that Congress has the power to investigate for valid legislative purposes."
    1
  32176. 1
  32177. 1
  32178. 1
  32179. 1
  32180. 1
  32181. 1
  32182. 1
  32183. 1
  32184. 1
  32185. 1
  32186. 1
  32187. 1
  32188. 1
  32189. 1
  32190. 1
  32191. 1
  32192. 1
  32193. 1
  32194. 1
  32195. 1
  32196. 1
  32197. 1
  32198. 1
  32199. 1
  32200. 1
  32201. 1
  32202. 1
  32203. 1
  32204. 1
  32205. 1
  32206. 1
  32207. 1
  32208. 1
  32209. 1
  32210. 1
  32211. 1
  32212. 1
  32213. 1
  32214. 1
  32215. 1
  32216. 1
  32217. 1
  32218. 1
  32219. 1
  32220. 1
  32221. 1
  32222. 1
  32223. 1
  32224. 1
  32225. 1
  32226. 1
  32227. 1
  32228. 1
  32229. 1
  32230. 1
  32231. 1
  32232. 1
  32233. 1
  32234. 1
  32235. 1
  32236. 1
  32237. 1
  32238. 1
  32239. 1
  32240. 1
  32241. 1
  32242. 1
  32243. 1
  32244. 1
  32245. 1
  32246. 1
  32247. 1
  32248. 1
  32249. 1
  32250. 1
  32251. 1
  32252. 1
  32253. 1
  32254. 1
  32255. 1
  32256. 1
  32257. 1
  32258. 1
  32259. 1
  32260. 1
  32261. 1
  32262. 1
  32263. 1
  32264. 1
  32265. 1
  32266. 1
  32267.  @Stoney47  What I like about the comment you just made, is it is so clearly you using bad logic and assumed answers to convince yourself, you are right. It's like a damned timeline of it. 1. Completely ignoring every single one of those examples that I gave you and then offered to back up with proof. 2. Going back to your obviously go to argument of what about the ones that died during these five-month period under Joe Biden. Again, intentionally and completely ignoring the entire year before that would Donald Trump. 3. Then trying to flip your onus onto me, claiming that I should blame President Biden for those deaths. Nevermind it's not a light switch. Never mind that the death rate and the infection rate has Teddy been going down since Biden took over. 4. Then assuming my answer was what you wanted it to be... But in the form of a question, that wasn't really a question. Because you go on to argue that I'm wrong because of, it right after. That's called setting up a paper tiger. 5. At which point you feel comfortable enough to try and take the onus of the entire year of the pandemic off of Trumps shoulders, but you're feeling super insecure about it so you have to name call, like a child, it right in the middle. Doing so by implying some kind of bias against Donald Trump, ironically, considering the Democratic bias you clearly have and demonstrate in the sentence. 6. Then and with one last posturing childish insults... because you're clearly insecure about the logic and validity of the previous sentence, as you should be. It's a timeline of you clearly trying to convince yourself of your confirmation bias and not doing a great job of it. You don't believe any of this crap you're saying. You just want to. Nothing can be Donald Trump's fault and you can't possibly be wrong.
    1
  32268. 1
  32269. 1
  32270. 1
  32271. 1
  32272. 1
  32273. 1
  32274. 1
  32275. 1
  32276. 1
  32277. 1
  32278. 1
  32279. 1
  32280. 1
  32281. 1
  32282. 1
  32283. 1
  32284. 1
  32285. 1
  32286. 1
  32287. 1
  32288. 1
  32289. 1
  32290. 1
  32291. 1
  32292. 1
  32293. 1
  32294. 1
  32295. 1
  32296. 1
  32297. 1
  32298. 1
  32299. 1
  32300. 1
  32301. 1
  32302. 1
  32303. 1
  32304. 1
  32305. 1
  32306. 1
  32307. 1
  32308. 1
  32309. 1
  32310. 1
  32311. 1
  32312. 1
  32313. 1
  32314.  @gelmann2  He also.... got us into this situation in the first place.... you don't get to take credit for trying to come in at the last hour and claim victory because you said one thing one time about the situation that you helped create. -Had a 33 page laid out plan to contain a pandemic in America, just exactly like covid-19, and chose not to use it because the administration who commissioned it was Obamas. -Decided it wasn't important to refill the medical stockpiles for 3 and 1/2 years. -Tried to pretend for two and a half months that covid-19 had magically gone away. -Tried to sell American citizens multiple snake oil cures, taking none of them when he actually got sick. - Left each state to fend for themselves and forced them into a bidding war against each other, for literally American lives. -Called the severity of the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years, a democratic hoax. -Tried to take millions of Americans Healthcare away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. -Made multiple false claims about how it would all just go away, by several different dates, and got every one wrong. -Threw multiple large rallies and celebrations, with little to no social distancing, instead of setting an example and using a covid safe campaign plan, like President elect Biden did. -Suggested on a regular basis that we should stop testing for the virus, only so the numbers would go down and he would look better. -Spread false propaganda about covid-19 being no worse than the flu. -Claimed that 99% of all covered cases are totally harmless. -Discouraged his supporters from listening to the medical experts. -Constantly lied about our fatality rate. -Playing on racial tensions, tried to blame Mexico for covid-19 in America, with absolutely nothing to back it up. -Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system in an effort to try and force children to go back to school, when it wasn't safe and no one had a national plan. -Handled the pandemic so poorly that it crippled our economy and put 9 million people out of work, into a housing crisis and wondering how they were going to feed their children. -Claimed, on multiple occasions, that covid-19 was merely being overblown because of the election in America. Despite the virus being all over the world. -Lied about Google engineers building a website to help Americans determine whether they need testing for the coronavirus and to direct them to their nearest testing site. -Claimed to put a ban on travel from China, but after doing so nearly, 40,000 people travelled from China to the United States under his ban rules. -Claimed this kind of pandemic was something nobody thought could happen, when experts both on inside and outside the federal government sounded the alarm many times in the past decade about the potential for a devastating Global pandemic. And on... and on... And on....
    1
  32315. 1
  32316. 1
  32317. 1
  32318. 1
  32319. 1
  32320. 1
  32321. 1
  32322. 1
  32323. 1
  32324. 1
  32325. 1
  32326. 1
  32327. 1
  32328. 1
  32329. 1
  32330. 1
  32331. 1
  32332. 1
  32333. 1
  32334. 1
  32335. 1
  32336. 1
  32337. 1
  32338. 1
  32339.  @acetech8642  Unity... Unless... You feel that you should retain the rights over your own body. You feel that reasonable gun regulation is not totally insane, and or taking everybody's guns away. You I think it's none of anybody's business who anyone else loves or marries. You think being transgender doesn't actually make you a pedophile. You think that minorities should be treated as equals in modern day Society. You think it's a bad idea to turn in our Humanity card when it comes to border patrol. You think giving people a living wage to match the progressing inflation and worker productivity, is generally a good idea. You think climate change is real because 99% of all climate scientists told you it was. You've actually read the Constitution and and therefore know that wearing a mask covering in a national state of emergency is not actually taking your rights away from you. You feel bad having a majority population of ignorant people is a bad thing in there for think that public education should not be cut in every single budget. You think everybody should pay the same percentage of taxes. You think reasonable regulations are completely appropriate on things like, Pharmaceuticals, Environmental Protection, education, workers right and industrial trade. You can see the difference between corrupt police that need to be off the forest and in a jail cell and good police officers that need to be thanked, appreciated and support it. You think it's a bad idea to have anybody in this country be above the law. You think that, like every other modern country in the world, Healthcare should be a right and not a privilege. You think women should be paid as much as men for doing the same job. You think members of the LBGTQ Community have in the past and should be able to in the future, serve our country in our Armed Forces, free of persecution. You think people's lives are more important than property. You think it's a bad idea to be complacent about racism and public racist figures irregardless of whether they're on your side or not. You think African Americans being 14.3% of the American population but 26% of all officer-involved killing is an insane statistic that should be corrected immediately. In no way will we ever agree to be unified with people who believe the world should look the way that you do. Those are the exact things we should fight against. as I said, your sides definition of unity is agree with everything that I say and we'll be on the same page.
    1
  32340. 1
  32341. 1
  32342. 1
  32343. 1
  32344. 1
  32345. 1
  32346. 1
  32347. 1
  32348. 1
  32349. 1
  32350. 1
  32351. 1
  32352. 1
  32353. 1
  32354. 1
  32355. 1
  32356. 1
  32357. 1
  32358. 1
  32359. 1
  32360. 1
  32361. 1
  32362. 1
  32363. 1
  32364. 1
  32365. 1
  32366. 1
  32367. 1
  32368. 1
  32369. 1
  32370. 1
  32371. 1
  32372. 1
  32373. 1
  32374. 1
  32375. 1
  32376. 1
  32377. 1
  32378. 1
  32379. 1
  32380. 1
  32381. 1
  32382. 1
  32383. 1
  32384. 1
  32385. 1
  32386. 1
  32387. 1
  32388. 1
  32389. 1
  32390. 1
  32391. 1
  32392. 1
  32393. 1
  32394. 1
  32395. 1
  32396. 1
  32397. 1
  32398. 1
  32399. 1
  32400. 1
  32401. 1
  32402. 1
  32403. 1
  32404. 1
  32405. 1
  32406. 1
  32407. 1
  32408. 1
  32409. 1
  32410. 1
  32411. 1
  32412. 1
  32413. 1
  32414. 1
  32415. 1
  32416. 1
  32417. 1
  32418. 1
  32419. 1
  32420. 1
  32421. 1
  32422. 1
  32423. 1
  32424. 1
  32425. 1
  32426. 1
  32427. 1
  32428. 1
  32429. 1
  32430. 1
  32431. 1
  32432. 1
  32433. 1
  32434. 1
  32435. 1
  32436. 1
  32437. 1
  32438. 1
  32439. 1
  32440. 1
  32441. 1
  32442. 1
  32443. 1
  32444. 1
  32445. 1
  32446. 1
  32447. 1
  32448. 1
  32449. 1
  32450. 1
  32451. 1
  32452. 1
  32453. 1
  32454. 1
  32455. 1
  32456. 1
  32457. 1
  32458. 1
  32459. 1
  32460. 1
  32461. 1
  32462. 1
  32463. 1
  32464. 1
  32465. 1
  32466. 1
  32467. 1
  32468. 1
  32469. 1
  32470. 1
  32471. 1
  32472. 1
  32473. 1
  32474. 1
  32475. 1
  32476. 1
  32477. 1
  32478. 1
  32479. 1
  32480. 1
  32481. 1
  32482. 1
  32483. 1
  32484. 1
  32485. 1
  32486. 1
  32487. 1
  32488. 1
  32489. 1
  32490. 1
  32491. 1
  32492. 1
  32493. 1
  32494. 1
  32495. 1
  32496.  @theitch2244  So... First... You didn't bring up some scary bit of info that had me running... I literally had to scroll up and find it... Cuz... I must have missed it and had no clue what you where talking about. 🙄 Second.... It literally says "1 day ago" and not 3, drama queen. 😜 Third... What is Obama's economy? And how is it 10 years? You was only president for 8. Also I don't know her problem with recognizing lets say... The state of the economy that Obama went into. In fact, it even has a name. It's called the Great Recession. Which he pulled us out of in under seven months of his first year as president. Forth... you guys have a really bad habit of lazily assuming that someone who is criticizing Trump for the wrong he is doing, it is a never Trumper. Cuz it's much easier to think that then it is to admit he might be doing something wrong. - he worked with Democrats on the Criminal Justice Reform Bill and they all got a passed 👍 - he saved the Special Olympics, that his education secretary was going to cut. He hired her butt there was no way he would know that she would do that. When he found out she tried, he stopped it. - I even agree with him on intellectual property rights, in regards to China... He had a good point.... He just went about it in the way he goes about everything. Waving a big ass stick around... He screwed that up but.... Had a good point. - stock market has been net positive You seem to be needing to assume a strong bias on my part to make your argument work. There isn't one. I disagree with his methods and and the example he sets most of the time. .. because it's simply wrong and sometimes illegal.... It's that simple.... And finally... I never said anything about Obama, one way or the other, up till this point. So you're making assumptions and playing WhatAboutIsm games. If you need to do that to validate your point. Maybe your points not worth making...
    1
  32497. 1
  32498. 1
  32499. 1
  32500. 1
  32501. 1
  32502. 1
  32503. 1
  32504. 1
  32505. 1
  32506. 1
  32507. 1
  32508. 1
  32509. 1
  32510. 1
  32511. 1
  32512. 1
  32513. 1
  32514. 1
  32515. 1
  32516. 1
  32517. 1
  32518. 1
  32519. 1
  32520. 1
  32521. 1
  32522. 1
  32523. 1
  32524. 1
  32525. 1
  32526. 1
  32527. 1
  32528. 1
  32529. 1
  32530. 1
  32531. 1
  32532. 1
  32533. 1
  32534. 1
  32535. 1
  32536.  @CasuallyObservant  Do the majority of scientists and academics tend to lean left? Yes. They also tend to come with facts and evidence and not just wild speculation an allegation. All that seemed to be convenient to the argument of the right and all that seem to have no discernible proof. So you keep hurling out wild accusation. I'm going to listen to the people who were educated about the subject. So doctors on the left with data and studies can't be trusted but those that say what you want to believe can? By the way, is that was true we would have a vaccine right now. Trump would have jumped on getting that going right away. To bring his poll numbers back up. You don't know how many chemicals in products get tested at a biological level that show antibodies for basically anything? Thousands and thousands. The only evidence they have is that. It's not even consistent enough for them to move to Stage 2 trials.... The video was taken down from Facebook and Twitter. You can still find it on YouTube. The reason it was taking down was because it was considered disinformation because the information they had did not backup the proof they provided. Because they provided very little to no proof which is how we know it never even got to Stage 2 trial. There is a scientific process for a reason. You seem to not know what that reason is. Which is troubling and which is probably why you should stop listening to Donald Trump and start researching more. You're crazy conspiracy theories about it's just a leftist who are apparently trying to do a million horrible things like kill us all from this pandemic when they know they have a cure, has absolutely no proof to it and you couldn't come close to proving it. You just sound a little crazy and Way bias.
    1
  32537. 1
  32538. 1
  32539. 1
  32540. 1
  32541. 1
  32542. 1
  32543. 1
  32544. 1
  32545. 1
  32546. 1
  32547. 1
  32548. 1
  32549. 1
  32550. 1
  32551. 1
  32552. 1
  32553. 1
  32554. 1
  32555. 1
  32556. 1
  32557. 1
  32558. 1
  32559. 1
  32560. 1
  32561. 1
  32562. 1
  32563. 1
  32564. 1
  32565. 1
  32566. 1
  32567. 1
  32568. 1
  32569. 1
  32570. 1
  32571. 1
  32572. 1
  32573. 1
  32574. 1
  32575. 1
  32576. 1
  32577. 1
  32578. 1
  32579. 1
  32580. 1
  32581. 1
  32582. 1
  32583. 1
  32584. 1
  32585. 1
  32586. 1
  32587. 1
  32588. 1
  32589. 1
  32590. 1
  32591. 1
  32592. 1
  32593. 1
  32594. 1
  32595. 1
  32596. 1
  32597. 1
  32598. 1
  32599. 1
  32600. 1
  32601. 1
  32602. 1
  32603. 1
  32604. 1
  32605. 1
  32606. 1
  32607. 1
  32608. 1
  32609. 1
  32610. 1
  32611. 1
  32612. 1
  32613. 1
  32614. 1
  32615. 1
  32616. 1
  32617. 1
  32618. 1
  32619. 1
  32620. 1
  32621. 1
  32622. 1
  32623. 1
  32624. 1
  32625. 1
  32626. The interview was a little over 16 min long. - 30 sec of Intro/Trip and queen🇬🇧 - 50 sec on the whether that day🌈 - 3 sec shy of a full minute (57 seconds) on the Vets and WW2🇺🇸 - 2 min and 25 sec Lying about NATO falling apart, on Theresa May and how he saved NATO and made everyone pay.🤥 - 2 min and 45 sec on how the tariffs that he put dow are everyone else's fault but his, lying about Border Patrol numbers, invasion and general fear mongering about brown people🤥 - 2 min 5 secs of him childishly trashing Nancy Pelosi, Robert Mueller and the justifiably respected Democrat prosecutors on his team. Also, lying again about the findings of the Muller Report.🤥 - 1 min 30 sec Lying about Joe Biden, the reason for his GDP and putting words in the mouth of all American farmers.🤥 - 20 sec bragging about how he is holding everyone up so he can do an interview with Fox News. Then another 5 sec on Laura ingraham's ratings 🙄 - 1 min 20 sec about Russia, China and a trade deal. Also, "Witch Hunt", lying about numbers again (Stock Market) and talking shit about Hillary Clinton because he still can't get over the fact that he lost the popular vote 🙄🤥 - 1 min 25 sec being asked about what he can do to unite the country and deciding the best way to do that is to talk more shit about people. At some point deciding to become a $5 a pop mall fortune teller about Mexico and using the usual hypocrisy on deals when talking about China 🙄💩🙄 - 35 sec on✌, military building, 💰, brag, brag, brag, Iran, brag, brag, brag, China again, brag, brag and brag.🙄 - Just over 1 min about fist bumping with the Queen of England, brag, talking with her, complementing her and thankfully the end!🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩 Sorry about the sassy pants in the middle and twards the end. It was starting to be like audio water torture up in here. 😢
    1
  32627. 1
  32628. 1
  32629. 1
  32630. 1
  32631.  W TF? But seriously dude! If you have to lie this damn much, just give up. Save yourself the inevitable humiliation! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 " you're the one that claims to have access to and claims to have read the Mueller report." Did I now? Lmao! You know when it's a really stupid time to lie? When you can read the truth right above you. 😂😂😂 ...but feel free to look above us and please quote me where I said that. If you would like to prove me wrong. We'll be waiting again... Forever. What I can do is quote you. Let's see here... very first comment on this thread.... " That's exactly what the Mueller special counsel investigation report said the dirty Democrats have done." - and that of course was referring to you commenting on the original thread post of, " Accuse others of what you yourself are guilty of. Trump #1 rule, taken directly from the Nazi Playbook. Wow! You really just made yourself look dumb... Lol... "Mr. Big money company owner guy! " 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 " You asked me where I got my information from and I gave it to you." Yet another idiotic lie. ....But again, if you would like to prove me wrong then please quote me from above where I said that? Better yet, I will just quote myself. I said ," this is why comments like that or idiotic. Please 💥quote💥 the section in the Mueller report where it says that genius? We will all be waiting.... Forever" I even highlighted the keyword since I know you're a little slow. You're welcome! 😉 Awww! Thats cute! You couldn't come up with anything yourself, so you decided to copy my little tic tock thing. Wanna cookie? 🍪 lmao! You know what makes your response the best ever? Your very uneducated attempt at doing what the original poster was bitching about the Trump people doing all along. "Accuse others of what you yourself are guilty of." Did you learn that new trick right here, right now? Cuz that would be precious.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Okay Precious, I still have not lost hoping you. I feel like you can still redeem yourself. You just go ahead and quote me the section in the Mueller report you were talking about or you can go ahead and quote me up top where I said any of the crazy s*** you said I did. Please feel free... Waiting, Tik-Tok come on waiting, Tik-Tok, waiting... Forever
    1
  32632. 1
  32633. 1
  32634. 1
  32635. 1
  32636. 1
  32637. 1
  32638. 1
  32639. 1
  32640. 1
  32641. 1
  32642. 1
  32643.  @glycohead  You made the claims... Present evidence for them. Link me some records... Or something dude. Otherwise they are just baseless claims. Otherwise... Your just saying stuff. Not saying that to be rude or anything either. Maybe you do know something I don't but I don't even trust the news without doing my own research about what they say. So if you got it, show it. I'm not saying your like that just yet but to many people are just saying shit these days. Then assuming that becase they do, it magically makes it true. It irks me and helps noone. SoOoOo... Where did you get this from? Yes... I do think he cleared things up. I watched it. I also checked out the records of him and everyone on his team. They all have a crazy lifetimes worth of straight forward and fair prosicution records. They are all ranked top in the US because of it. Thats why they where all picked. It wasn't about party. Like everyone claims. It's that they are litterally the best at what they do. Including Mueller. Also there is evidence that they where straight about the way they went about everything. They where fair all around. - Mueller could have recommended indictment of the president ( and I suspect some of this family, but I won't say for sure on that, because he did not address that ) but he did not. He did not feel it was right to do so, sense it was never going to go to court and therefore Trump was never going to be able to defend himself in a court of law against the allegations. - at the same time he said that if he could have cleared him, then he would have. - plus there was that time earlier in the investigation, with those 2 people on the team, doing stupid stuff on their phones while flirting. Within a day of finding out they where both gone. Just to get rid of even the appearance of impropriety - Mueller is a straight shooter. Almost everyone on every side of the aisle, before this investigation says so. The ones that have changed their minds sense, all have a lengthy record of partisanship and lies. "He never did his job in the first place", is simply not proven out by the facts. They prosecuted 32, I believe, people in the investigation. That alone shows he did his job but there was much more. The press conference, much like everything else he tends to do, was direct, clear and fair. His team, again all Rockstar prosecutors when it comes to a lifetime of integrity in their work and experience. So I take that over someone suggestion that because they lean more towards one party than another they must be bias. It also had three Independence on there. It also had some Democrats that donated two Republicans on there. Not to mention the two bosses were both Republican. Also it does not make sense that you hold up those two agents that appeared to be partisan as reason to not trust Bob Mueller and then at the same time claimed he fired them. If he was so partisan and corrupt then why would he fire them? So your question... "do you really think he would have done that if he was impartial?" Yes. That's exactly what he would have done if he was impartial. Fire people from his team that look like they might not be. Yes absolutely. Also, you not knowing about the depth of the Mueller report is 1, mostly not on Mueller. He literally does not have control over that. Unless he would leak it or have somebody else leak it and that hasn't happened. Which is another Testament to how straightforward and fair he is. I just don't see people attacking the Mueller team and their records as being credible because the facts simply do not bear that out, their history simply does not bear that out. It does not make sense. From unobjective standpoint oh, it just doesn't ring true. Sorry for going on so long. There was just a lot in there that you brought up. But as I set up top, if you have proof otherwise, show it to me ? you might know things I don't.
    1
  32644. 1
  32645.  @glycohead  Okay? So I know what your claim is. I know what Barr said... Cuz I would not have said anything otherwise... I also know what Mueller directly said. You're talking about what Barr said that Mueller said. I'm talking about a direct a count of what he exactly said. Which again, he uncharacteristically came out and had that press conference to specifically clear up what bar had told everyone that he said in the report. Go look in his prosecutorial record and see how many times he's come out and talk directly to the press and not just let his work show for itself what he thinks. When William Barr sent Congress the four Page Letter about Mueller's investigation he quoted several fragments of Mueller's report but none of the excerpts were in contacts or even complete sentences. Barr took Mueller's words out of context to suggest the president had no motive to obstruct Justice. Barr " in making this determination we noted that the special counsel recognize that the evidence does not establish that the president was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference and that while not determinative the absence of such evidence Bears upon the president's intent with respect to obstruction." Mueller Vol 2 page 157 "Obstruction of justice can be motivated by a desire to protect non-criminal personal interest, to project against investigations where underlying criminal liability falls into a gray area, or to avoid personal embarrassment. The injury to the Integrity of the justice system is the same regardless of whether a person commits and underlining wrong. In this investigation, the evidence does not establish that the president was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference. 💥But the evidence does point to a range of other possible personal motives animating the president's conduct. These include concerns that continued investigation would call into question the legitimacy of his election and potential uncertainty about whether certain events such as advanced notice of WikiLeaks release of hacked information or the June 9th 2016 meeting between senior campaign officials and Russians could be seen as criminal activity by the president, his campaign or his family.💥" Disuse of Mueller's words turn to the special counsel's meaning on its head. The brief excerpt came from a list of other possible reasons Trump might have had to raptly impede the investigation, and which Barr did not mention. Barr omitted words suggesting that there was complicit conduct that fell short of coordination. Barr The special counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it compromised or coordinated with Russia and its efforts to influence the 2016 US president election. As the report States " the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities"." Mueller Vol 1 page 1 " the investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign. Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electoral E from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." Barr took a larger passage in which the mother report suggested that the Trump campaign and the Russian government were knowingly dancing together at a distance, and then exerted a fragment to make it look like a clearer exoneration. Barr truncated the special counsel explanation of what coordination meant and didn't mean. Barr " in assessing potential conspiracy charges, the special counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with Russian election interference activities. The special counsel Define coordination as an agreement tactic or Express between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on Election interference" Mueller vol 1 page 3 " we understood coordination to require an agreement tactic or Express between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on Election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the others actions or interest." Barr omitted the second sentence which again emphasized that there can be a type of complicit conduct that falls short of how the special counsel Defineed coordination. Barr omitted the reason Mueller trumpeted the thoroughness of his factual investigation Barr " after making a thorough factual investigation into these matters the special counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions But ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment" Mueller Vol 2 page 2 Second, while the olc option concludes that a sitting president may not be prosecuted, it recognizes that a criminal investigation during the president's term is permissible. the olc option also recognizes that a president does not have immunity after he leaves office. And if individuals other than the president committed on obstruction offense, they may be prosecuted at this time. Given those considerations, the facts known to us, and the strong public interest in safeguarding the Integrity of the Criminal Justice System, we conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were refresh and documentary materials were available" Barr did not explain that Mueller was trying to leave open the possibility that prosecutors in the future, after Trump leaves office, Couldn't look at the evidence he gathered and decide then whether to indict Trump. Also it's not about me doing my own research. It's about you backing up the claims you made. The onus is on you to do so. Just like the onus is on me to back up any claim I make.
    1
  32646.  @glycohead  Barr portrayed Mueller as encountering difficult issues in reaching a decision on obstruction Barr " the special counsel and therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. And sad for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the special counsel abused as difficult issues Avalon and fact concerning whether the president's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The special counsel states that wildest report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him" Mueller Vol 2 page 2 Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so State. Based on the facts that the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach the Judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, and also does not exonerate him. Vol 2 page 8 Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw Ultimate conclusions about the president's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." In Barr statement he did not explain why the special counsel did not make any prosecutorial judgment on obstruction Beyond a cryptic reference to what he said Mueller had described as difficult issues.
    1
  32647. 1
  32648.  @glycohead  actually the Democrats that donated to the Republicans in the Mueller investigation, at least one of them... And if I remember correctly... It's the one that donated the larger sum overall... Donated about the same for both parties. I'll look it up but I don't think what you said was true. Also you have presented no evidence whatsoever that "the team was stacked with Trump haters right from the beginning" Unless you're suggesting that purely being Democrat means you must hate Trump? Which is what I would argue to be by us on your own part. The Christopher Steele dossier was not completely inaccurate. Parts were said to be true and proven sense and other parts have not been backed up. Christopher Steele said Parts could not be verified. Also I really need you to stop telling me to do my homework all the time when you're just making baseless accusations left and right. That's kind of starting to irk me. Show me some evidence on Andrew Weissman and specific cases or don't you slander somebody with vague references. Again do you have any evidence that Muller only fired those two agents because the emails got released? You're guessing. Easy on the 9/11 reference dude. That is in no way comparable. 911 was the senseless Slaughter of thousands of Americans on American soil. These two dumb ass agents decided tell Flirt by trashing Trump in emails, while in a position they where shortly fired from after. Let's not go overboard. Cuz that's kind of showing some serious questions in your reasoning. 1. Collusion is not a thing under the law. It falls under different per views. Michael Flynn is a really good example of why not a lot of collusion per views were ultimately used. he had two separate charges that fell under collusion to the Layman standards but those in the end we're altimate Lee dropped in the deal because Mueller made the decision to do so. He did that and that is also reference in his court filings because when would have gotten more time on the other charges. Also Flynn had already broken a deal with him. But if you look up the history of Flynn's court cases you will see it in there. Along with a lot of the other Administration that were charged. This is not an uncommon practice either.. What you have for the majority of this comment just hurled out baseless accusations and suggested at the beginning that it is then on me to prove them wrong when you haven't proven them true in the first place. When I suggested that Barr is mischaracterizing Mueller's statement I gave you specifics on both. You have presented no evidence and just random names and allegations thrown out. So again, I will say, I will believe the facts. Not baseless allegations, not crude comparisons to 911, not random factoids about one person or another without accounting the entirety of their record, but especially not without looking on both sides for fact and not speculation. End of story
    1
  32649. 1
  32650. 1
  32651.  W TF?  But just encase, Your lying about muting me like you have lied about everything else.... Lets look at the Mueller Report Page 117 V2.... Shall we??????? HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!! Oh SHIT! better run bitch! didn't think that I would actually look it up for you.... did ya??? HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH! But first.... lets revisit your "Claim". Original poster - Accuse others of what you yourself are guilty of. Your stupid ass - That's exactly what the Mueller Special Council Investigation Report said the DIRTY DEMOCRATS have done. Your Stupid ass - You called my first co,,emt here idiotic and I then directed your dumb ass to the Mueller report Page 117 of Volume 2 On the page it describes a tense meeting between Don Mcgahn and Trump. the subject is on Mcgahn insisting that Trump had told him to fire Mueller because he was conflicted, but then Trump insisting that he did not tell him that. Then trump tries to get him to change his mind, talking about how he didn't say the word fire and Mcgahn references Rosenstein when He tells him he heard him say the "Call Rod. Mueller has conflicts and can't be the special counsel." and Mcgahn refuses. Then Trump bitched at him about answering the special councils questions and Mcgahn told him that he kinda had to cuz it was the law and shit. Then Trump goes on this weird tirade about how taking notes as a lawyer is weird and he did not understand why Mcgahn took notes and how none of his other lawyers ever took note. Then it goes into about how after the meeting Mcgahn told General Kelly that he did remember the president telling him to get ride of Mueller and how he was conflicted. SoOoOo.... Every Name and person referenced in the very slightest in this page WHERE ALL REPUBLICANS Donald Trump General Kelly Don Magahn Rod Rosenstein There was NEVER ONCE EVEN THE REFERENCE TO DEMS, let alone a SPECIFIC DEM. Let alone DIRTY DEMS. So what is your BS STORY NOW YOU MORONIC LIER??!?!?!?!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!! Oh and please don't take my word on it. Go look for yourself!https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/politics/read-the-mueller-report/?utm_term=.535bc14e2e3a
    1
  32652.  @glycohead  Nope! Those were examples of blatant mischaracterization and revision of what he said. When and where did Mueller say that Barr did not misrepresent anything in the summary? This was not redacted material. Try another excuse. They didn't go over to read the report because they were protesting not reading the report until the American people got the report because they felt that an investigation into a presidential election fraud and collusion with a foreign adversary was some things that the American people should have. Anyone else who thinks otherwise does not have their head on straight. There were standing up for us. It's not nitpicking. It is very decisive redactions. Which I gave many very decisive examples for. If you don't want to deal with it then that's on you. So you're not going to worry about the Barr redactions but you are paying attention to what Mueller left out and Trump is suing him for apparently. That's hypocritical. It seems more and more that you were only interested in anything that supports your preconceived notions. You don't know they never took the bait. You just keep making assumptions without evidence. Because Mueller has a long record of letting his work speak for itself and he will come in which he cleared up in that interview he would just prefer to let his work speak for itself. See that's why you're not credible dude. You make all these accusations and allegations, you don't back them up with anything, and you dismiss the ones that I make and the evidence to back them up as inconsequential. You are not an honest actor.
    1
  32653. 1
  32654. 1
  32655. 1
  32656. 1
  32657. 1
  32658. 1
  32659. 1
  32660. 1
  32661. 1
  32662.  @glycohead   Gregg   Gregg  "I don't have preconceived notions or bias" That statment alone shows that you do. That shows what they are as well. It's not about party though. Its about not being wrong. The fact that you can't even allow that you might have bias or preconceived notions..... Everyone has bias. I have bias. You have bias. The guy down the street has bias. Its human nature. That and on mutiple ocassions you have dismissed, disreguarded or excused anything that did not fit with your original argument. That's bias. " You didn't owe me any evidence, nor did I ask for any." I've already explained this as well. It's not about owing anybody anyting. It's being credible with the claims that you make. You should want to be credible. You should want to know what you're talkin about and be able to defend your belief is challenged. You should be able to do so with fact-based evidence. You should want to be credible. The fact that you don't is yet another indication that you are not interested in facts, that facts are not what you base your opinion off of and that you are bias. Like we all are. Durham.... Well... I can't believe you because your choosing to not be credible. Findings... I am not ignoring his findings. Your mischaracterizing them to fit your narrative. I've shown numerous times that your statements like," if he couldn't find anything to charge Trump with the resources he had then there is no there there" are incorrect. That's why you keep trying to pretend that his statment about clearing him if he could, which was both said by him and in the report, by saying that its not his job, therefore it does not matter. Your "facts" are incorrect... Or rather incomplete. Willfully so. That's not even that only reason I can say your statment is false. They found plenty. They just explained why they qhere not releasing the evidence or recommending indictment. Which is also something you choose to ignore. Because if you didn't you would not be able to make statements like you did. "Not finding any evidence has got to be the only thing for you because it's the only thing that confirms your bias, fits with your narrative. You are allergic to being wrong.
    1
  32663.  @glycohead   Gregg   Gregg  Again, your only looking at 1 thing he said. There is a whole 2 volume 500+ page report for clarification but if you recognize that then you can't have the belief that you do. If you focus on the details you're going to be wrong in your assertions. So you ignore these details. I don't even know what you mean by they gave the American people more than what they were owed. They where owed the complete unvarnished truth. Which date gays and you ignore. So they gave us exactly what we are owed. The problem os that many of you don't acknowledge all the facts. You don't consider all the facts. Again, they facts and his own words say you are wrong. Saying it over and over again, does not actually make it true. What does make something true is a full and fair accounting of all facts. Not me, npt you, the entirety of the facts. Which is exactly what he would have done if Barr had not mischaracterized his report. Mueller does OS something. Like every other prosecutor in America. Every branch of government and all of their subsections are for 1 sole purpose. That's just Serve the People. He owes us the truth. Accept your theory falls apart automatically when you consider the fact that Mueller isn't a Democrat. He's a Republican. Not to mention its almost always ignorant to put the entirety of a group as big as the Democratic party, into one set narrative. Why? Because there are millions of Democrats in the world and you could not possibly know them all. You could not possibly had asked all of them. You could not possibly have had all of them indicate that to you in any manner. So your statement cannot possibly be true. Your going on and on with baseless assumptions. About everyone and everything that you are either lying about, ignoring or excusing.... All of which do not make sense given all the evidence at hand and none of which you have chosen to prove. All of which magically leans the same way, twards your original statment. A lot of it is just factually incorrect. Like putting his wealth on hold. Where did you get that idea? He has made millions on his presidency. He did not even divest himself from his companies, like he said he would. Your factually incorrect.
    1
  32664. 1
  32665. 1
  32666. 1
  32667. 1
  32668. 1
  32669. 1
  32670. 1
  32671. 1
  32672. 1
  32673. 1
  32674. 1
  32675. 1
  32676. 1
  32677. 1
  32678. 1
  32679. 1
  32680. 1
  32681. 1
  32682. 1
  32683. 1
  32684. 1
  32685. 1
  32686. 1
  32687. 1
  32688. 1
  32689. 1
  32690. 1
  32691. 1
  32692. 1
  32693. 1
  32694. 1
  32695. 1
  32696. 1
  32697. 1
  32698. 1
  32699. 1
  32700. 1
  32701. 1
  32702. 1
  32703. 1
  32704. 1
  32705. 1
  32706. 1
  32707. 1
  32708. 1
  32709. 1
  32710. 1
  32711. 1
  32712. 1
  32713. 1
  32714. 1
  32715. 1
  32716. 1
  32717. 1
  32718. 1
  32719. 1
  32720. 1
  32721. 1
  32722. 1
  32723. 1
  32724. 1
  32725. 1
  32726. 1
  32727. 1
  32728. 1
  32729. 1
  32730. 1
  32731. 1
  32732. 1
  32733. 1
  32734. 1
  32735. 1
  32736. 1
  32737. 1
  32738. 1
  32739. 1
  32740. 1
  32741. 1
  32742. 1
  32743. 1
  32744. 1
  32745. 1
  32746. 1
  32747. 1
  32748. 1
  32749. 1
  32750. 1
  32751. 1
  32752. 1
  32753. 1
  32754. 1
  32755. 1
  32756. 1
  32757. 1
  32758. @John Waddington First... I really don't have to agree with everything one person or one company does all the time and I don't pretend I do. Neither should you. However you're just mischaracterizing things. You're doing so because of your clear right-wing bias. Now, I never liked Hillary Clinton because she just seemed fake as hell and CNN tried to talk her up entirely too much for my taste. So I will partially agree on that. Though I do remember quite a few reports on her not doing the best things. Hunter Biden and his laptop is the go-to for every damn right winger that wants to deflect from the right or Donald Trump or basically anything. No one even knows what's on the damn laptop. All you guys ever say is Hunter Biden in the laptop. Why? Do you know what's going on there? Do you know what's on it? Do you know who has it? Do you know who's seen it? Do you know what color it is? Do you know what brand it is? If you got something, spill it? Because all any of us here about Hunter Biden is he has a laptop and it has some stuff on it. Y'all can't ever mention anything else. Gee I wonder why CNN wouldn't be spending gobs of time on that. It's basically a 5-minute YouTube clip. "Hunter Biden has a laptop. We have no clue what's on it but it's there." There, it's been reported on CNN... Happy?.. Jesus... Please pull up the clip where CNN claimed to be a government entity capable of even having the correct amount of information to make such an analysis of inflation being temporary? Not that they would be wrong if they did. Inflation is always temporary. Sometimes it takes longer and sometimes it doesn't. . That's not even counting me massive amounts of losses we took during Trump's trade War. It may take a minute. Keep your panties on. CNN for sure leans left. That, in itself does not make them evil or dishonest. That's just your brainwashing. Just like you assuming the goings-on of my information-gathering when you don't even know my name. That's just you trying to make things up in order to make yourself feel better. But you got to ask yourself why you feel the need to do that in the first place.
    1
  32759. 1
  32760. 1
  32761. 1
  32762. 1
  32763. 1
  32764.  @keithhooker2105  1. Your trippin.. The only reason he got so much attention is because he did so much to warrant it. He is no victim. 2. Your randomly trippin on trans kids? And making some BS up about them getting other kids in trouble? 🙄 Your making to big of a deal with it. Just let kids be kids. They aren't born thinking different is bad. They get taught that. It's like with my parents.. Who where not the best... But they got this right. I had no clue the racism was a thing till my Jr Year. I mean... Like... No clue. I was obvious... And it wasn't because we didn't grow up around ppl of all cultures. It was because everyone just treated everyone else the same. Literally none of us cared. No one talked about it. It was just kids playing with kids. Which is all the more astonishing when you find out I grew up in Louisiana. I now have a mixed race son who has my complexion but everything else is his daddy. We make sure to surround him with ppl who wont make that an issue. No just with race but also sexual orientation. Why? Cuz, just shut up and leave them alone. That's why. Let those kids be kids. No matter how different they may be from each other. They only care bc other ppl are making such a big deal about it. Quit it. Think back when you where a kid. Did you give a damn about anything but having fun, playing with your friends. Discovering attraction, silly school dances... Stressing about grades... Ya know... Normal kid stuff? No... So just leave them alone. Stop sending the message of "different". It doesn't matter.
    1
  32765.  @keithhooker2105  Wow! Someone's ignorance popped put real quick. You can make as many false assumptions about me as you like and you can try and paint being a responsible member of society as being something bad all you like. That didn't do anything for anyone other than show your ignorance to everyone. And you're right, choices have consequences. Just like Donald Trump's choices have consequences for him. Unless it applies to everybody else and not him for some random nonsensical reason that you guys like to come up with. Don't start s***. Won't Be s***. It's that simple. I mentioned I had a son. He just turned 11, as a matter of fact.... There is a trans girl, as well as, some gay boys in his school. None of them give a damn. You know why? Cuz their parents arn't making a big deal about it. Neither are the rest of us. We got standard kid crap, like he took my pencil or she called me a name... But nothing along those lines. The Viewpoint of seeing different as bad as something that is taught. Don't teach it to your damn kids. It's that simple. Your making a big deal about it cuz you randomly brought it up and tried to paint these fictional children asking trans kids about themselves as getting in trouble and being victimized by that. It's BS. Hasn't really been that long since you've been a kid. You don't give a s**. You just want to play and have fun and be a kid the only reason anyone gives a damn about any of that is if the parents make it a big enough deal or teach their children that different means bad. Either way, shut the h** up and let the kids be kids.
    1
  32766. 1
  32767. 1
  32768. 1
  32769. 1
  32770. 1
  32771. 1
  32772. 1
  32773. 1
  32774. 1
  32775. 1
  32776. 1
  32777. 1
  32778. 1
  32779. 1
  32780. 1
  32781. 1
  32782. 1
  32783. 1
  32784. 1
  32785. 1
  32786. 1
  32787. 1
  32788. 1
  32789. 1
  32790. 1
  32791. 1
  32792. 1
  32793. 1
  32794. 1
  32795. 1
  32796. 1
  32797. 1
  32798. 1
  32799. 1
  32800. 1
  32801. 1
  32802. 1
  32803. 1
  32804. 1
  32805. 1
  32806. 1
  32807. 1
  32808. 1
  32809. 1
  32810. 1
  32811. 1
  32812. 1
  32813. 1
  32814. 1
  32815. 1
  32816. 1
  32817. 1
  32818. 1
  32819. 1
  32820. 1
  32821. 1
  32822. 1
  32823.  @KnowerofThings  The next segment appears to return to the Kramatorsk missile and is accompanied by Italian commentary, as a man—apparently a reporter—points out the "Ш91579" serial number on the shell. While an apparent attempt has been made to replicate the BBC's branding, some of the elements do not match the original style. For example, the BBC logo does not appear from the beginning. Although it is at the top left corner, it is actually slightly lower than in the BBC News clips available on the official YouTube channel. The location label is also misplaced, appearing along the right edge of the screen rather than at the top, as in other reports. Other stylistic incongruities are apparent throughout the video, including the lack of background commentary, which is instead replaced by excessively long captions. The phrasing in the captions is also suspicious, with constructs such as "Ukraine has often started using fake news" indicating that they were likely not written by a native English speaker. The video could not be found on the BBC's YouTube channel or any other affiliated platforms. The BBC issued a statement on Wednesday exposing the video clip featuring its branding as a fake. We are aware of a fake video with BBC News branding suggesting Ukraine was responsible for last week's missile attack on Kramatorsk train station," the broadcasting network said in a Tweet. "The BBC is taking action to have the video removed. We urge people not to share it and to check stories on the BBC News website."
    1
  32824. 1
  32825. 1
  32826. 1
  32827. 1
  32828. 1
  32829. 1
  32830. 1
  32831. 1
  32832. 1
  32833. 1
  32834. 1
  32835. 1
  32836. 1
  32837. 1
  32838. 1
  32839. 1
  32840. 1
  32841. 1
  32842. 1
  32843. 1
  32844. 1
  32845. 1
  32846. 1
  32847. 1
  32848. 1
  32849. 1
  32850. 1
  32851. 1
  32852. 1
  32853. 1
  32854. 1
  32855. 1
  32856. 1
  32857. 1
  32858. 1
  32859. 1
  32860. 1
  32861. 1
  32862. 1
  32863. 1
  32864. 1
  32865. 1
  32866. 1
  32867. 1
  32868. 1
  32869. 1
  32870. 1
  32871. 1
  32872. 1
  32873. 1
  32874. 1
  32875. 1
  32876. 1
  32877. 1
  32878. 1
  32879. 1
  32880. 1
  32881. 1
  32882. 1
  32883. 1
  32884. 1
  32885. 1
  32886. 1
  32887. 1
  32888. 1
  32889. 1
  32890. 1
  32891. 1
  32892. 1
  32893. 1
  32894. 1
  32895. 1
  32896. 1
  32897. 1
  32898. 1
  32899. 1
  32900. 1
  32901. 1
  32902. 1
  32903. 1
  32904. 1
  32905. 1
  32906. 1
  32907. 1
  32908. 1
  32909. 1
  32910. 1
  32911. 1
  32912. 1
  32913. 1
  32914. 1
  32915. 1
  32916. 1
  32917. 1
  32918. 1
  32919. 1
  32920. 1
  32921. 1
  32922. 1
  32923. 1
  32924. 1
  32925. 1
  32926. 1
  32927. 1
  32928. 1
  32929. 1
  32930. 1
  32931. 1
  32932. 1
  32933. 1
  32934. 1
  32935. 1
  32936. 1
  32937. 1
  32938. 1
  32939.  @rogerdodger8415  In November 2017, with the administration of President Donald Trump rushing to get a massive tax overhaul through Congress, Sen. Ron Johnson stunned his colleagues by announcing he would vote “no.” Making the rounds on cable TV, the Wisconsin Republican became the first GOP senator to declare his opposition, spooking Senate leaders who were pushing to quickly pass the tax bill with their thin majority. “If they can pass it without me, let them,” Johnson declared. Johnson’s demand was simple: In exchange for his vote, the bill must sweeten the tax break for a class of companies that are known as pass-throughs, since profits pass through to their owners. Johnson praised such companies as “engines of innovation.” Behind the scenes, the senator pressed top Treasury Department officials on the issue, emails and the officials’ calendars show. Within two weeks, Johnson’s ultimatum produced results. Trump personally called the senator to beg for his support, and the bill’s authors fattened the tax cut for these businesses. Johnson flipped to a “yes” and claimed credit for the change. The bill passed. The Trump administration championed the pass-through provision as tax relief for “small businesses.” Confidential tax records, however, reveal that Johnson’s last-minute maneuver benefited two families more than almost any others in the country — both worth billions and both among the senator’s biggest donors. Dick and Liz Uihlein of packaging giant Uline, along with roofing magnate Diane Hendricks, together had contributed around $20 million to groups backing Johnson’s 2016 reelection campaign. The expanded tax break Johnson muscled through netted them $215 million in deductions in 2018 alone, drastically reducing the income they owed taxes on. At that rate, the cut could deliver more than half a billion in tax savings for Hendricks and the Uihleins over its eight-year life. But the tax break did more than just give a lucrative, and legal, perk to Johnson’s donors. In the first year after Trump signed the legislation, just 82 ultrawealthy households collectively walked away with more than $1 billion in total savings, an analysis of confidential tax records shows. Republican and Democratic tycoons alike saw their tax bills chopped by tens of millions, among them: media magnate and former Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg; the Bechtel family, owners of the engineering firm that bears their name; and the heirs of the late Houston pipeline billionaire Dan Duncan. Usually the scale of the riches doled out by opaque tax legislation — and the beneficiaries — remain shielded from the public. But ProPublica has obtained a trove of IRS records covering thousands of the wealthiest Americans. The records have enabled reporters this year to explore the diverse menu of options the tax code affords the ultrawealthy to avoid paying taxes.
    1
  32940. 1
  32941. 1
  32942. 1
  32943. 1
  32944. 1
  32945. 1
  32946. 1
  32947. 1
  32948. 1
  32949. 1
  32950. 1
  32951. 1
  32952. 1
  32953. 1
  32954. 1
  32955. 1
  32956. 1
  32957. 1
  32958. 1
  32959. 1
  32960. 1
  32961. 1
  32962. 1
  32963. 1
  32964. 1
  32965. 1
  32966. 1
  32967. 1
  32968. 1
  32969. 1
  32970. 1
  32971. 1
  32972. 1
  32973. 1
  32974. 1
  32975. 1
  32976. 1
  32977. 1
  32978. 1
  32979. 1
  32980.  @lesgilbert50  that's a super awesome attempt to try and deflect to me in order to run away from the questions that you keep not wanting to answer, while simultaneously and hypocrisy flea talking about how I'm making so many assumptions about you. But it's cool, let me tell you the difference between my opinion and yours. I based mine off of the evidence presented Before Me, by you. You trying mischaracterize what I say and twisted into a completely different subject because you have nothing better to say. Which is why I haven't bothered to defend the whole racism thing until now. Cuz when you're off making all these massive assumptions about me and then whining about how I'm making assumptions about you, ironically, you're talking to a lady who has a mixed-race son and whose father is my best damn friend. You're talking about a graphic designer who lives in an Ally and who donates her time and skill to the local black lives matter group on a regular basis. The one you out of context talk about you people and how that's always about racism, you sound stupid as hell. It would actually matter in that context if we were in any way talking about the color of somebody's skin which nobody brought up until you did. The subject matter was political parties. And while some political stories do reference race, this one in no way did that. The only one trying to bring up race into this context is you and the only reason you're trying to do it is to deflect from your own stupid ass argument. I say you're on the right because you have yet to use anything but right-wing talking points and tactics. I'm also not surprised that you're not willing to claim your party. That's nothing new here. When you guys got tired of making up excuses for Trump's latest crazy, you just stopped wanting to claim your own party so you don't have to defend it all the time. The only problem with that is you guys never stopped using all the right-wing talking points. Which is actually a bad thing for you because now you have the added argument against the fact that you're not even willing to claim your side, by default, admitting how bad you know your side is.
    1
  32981. 1
  32982. 1
  32983. 1
  32984. 1
  32985. 1
  32986. 1
  32987. 1
  32988. 1
  32989. 1
  32990. 1
  32991. 1
  32992. 1
  32993. 1
  32994. 1
  32995. 1
  32996. 1
  32997. 1
  32998. 1
  32999. 1
  33000. 1
  33001. 1
  33002. 1
  33003. 1
  33004. 1
  33005. 1
  33006. 1
  33007. 1
  33008. 1
  33009. 1
  33010. 1
  33011. 1
  33012. 1
  33013. 1
  33014. 1
  33015. 1
  33016. 1
  33017. 1
  33018. 1
  33019. 1
  33020. 1
  33021. 1
  33022. 1
  33023. 1
  33024. 1
  33025. 1
  33026. 1
  33027. 1
  33028. 1
  33029. 1
  33030. 1
  33031. 1
  33032. 1
  33033. 1
  33034. 1
  33035. 1
  33036. 1
  33037. 1
  33038. 1
  33039. 1
  33040. 1
  33041. 1
  33042. 1
  33043. 1
  33044. 1
  33045. 1
  33046. 1
  33047. 1
  33048. 1
  33049. 1
  33050. 1
  33051. 1
  33052. 1
  33053. 1
  33054. 1
  33055. 1
  33056. 1
  33057. 1
  33058. 1
  33059. 1
  33060. 1
  33061. 1
  33062. 1
  33063. 1
  33064. 1
  33065. 1
  33066. 1
  33067. 1
  33068. 1
  33069. 1
  33070. 1
  33071.    hey! Sorry... Must have missed this last reply some how.... I know it can be hard. They intend to make it that way. They try to say the most outrageous thing that their conscience will allow them to, in order to bait you off of talkin about the thing that they can't win on. If you follow them down that hole, you're letting him get away with it. I've literally had these people talk about my biracial son and call him names that... If they had done so in person, I would punch them in their face. (So not that mature 😂) However... Another little trick is to call that out as the childish act it is. I usually say some thing like... "You keep calling me a boo-boo had as many times as it makes you feel better about not having an argument and I'll be over here giving you facts. Then we'll see how well that works out for us both." Tends to make them feel silly and not go back to that line of dialogue. Or... If you want to dismiss them outright, as the child they are acting like, take the name they called you and use it against them... " This "adult" just called me a (or just said) "insert word here". Lets all thank him for discrediting himself for us and move on." At the end of the day though, you just have to remember what I tell my little boy when he goes to school and he sees a bully. All Bullies we really are is just sad inside. They're just trying to make someone else feel as crappy as they do. It's our job to make sure they don't get that opportunity. That's always Trump trolls are. Grown bullies that never really grow up. I also tell him that you have to remember who you are. Them saying something doesn't make it true. If you know it to be a lie, whether it's about facts or yourself, they can say it a million times, they're not going to manifest it into reality. Mostly, just remember how much it drives them crazy to not be able to get you off of original topic that they can't defend against. They may take it and act like they're totally cool but inside they lost their minds and you can tell because they cannot stop responding. Thank you for your kind words hun! 💜 I used to be you and I know you will get were I am because your already showing that calm, logical thought. You just have to learn to remember that in the moment. Remember that for every time they try and call you a name or make some outlandish statement, that's their desperation. You'll get there! 💜
    1
  33072. 1
  33073. 1
  33074. 1
  33075. 1
  33076. 1
  33077. 1
  33078. 1
  33079. 1
  33080. 1
  33081. 1
  33082. 1
  33083. 1
  33084. 1
  33085. 1
  33086. 1
  33087. 1
  33088. 1
  33089. 1
  33090. 1
  33091. 1
  33092. 1
  33093. 1
  33094. 1
  33095. 1
  33096. 1
  33097. 1
  33098. 1
  33099. 1
  33100. 1
  33101. 1
  33102. 1
  33103. 1
  33104. 1
  33105. 1
  33106. 1
  33107. 1
  33108. 1
  33109. 1
  33110. 1
  33111. 1
  33112. 1
  33113. 1
  33114. 1
  33115. 1
  33116. 1
  33117. 1
  33118. 1
  33119. 1
  33120. 1
  33121. 1
  33122. 1
  33123. 1
  33124. 1
  33125. 1
  33126. 1
  33127. 1
  33128. 1
  33129. 1
  33130. 1
  33131. 1
  33132. 1
  33133.  @jeffchandler283  Who is my source? You silly! 😁 👇 Our conversation, thus far, in order and word for word. Which, of course, demonstrates that you're the one making claims and not backing them up with sources. Then you started to try and pretend that it was me because I was asking you for your sources on the claims that you had made, to distract from the fact that you can't produce any sources yourself. Obviously proving that you are lying and... More importantly, you can't produce sources or evidence for the claims that you have made. 👇 You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - just busy... You guys are worse if we are going to be honest.. Me - So... Excuses to why you can't back up your claim and then making another one you didn't bother to back up. Yeah... We are the ones who are "worse"... 😉✌ You - the proof is all around you... You - #Walkaway Me - Great! Then it should be super easy to present some! We will be waiting! 😉✌ You - you haven't backed up anything you've said... I do agree how ever that you guys are worse... Me - SoOoOo... you're saying, you can't back up what you say, you're trying to deflect it on to me, even though I haven't said anything to you to back up and you don't understand how quotation marks work. All good things to know! All good things for you to show everybody here! 😉✌ You - where do you come up with this gobbledygook... Give me sources Me - sources for what? You're the one making claims without a new backup or proof or sources or facts. Which is why you're desperately trying to turn this on me. So I ask again, sources for what? You - there you go.... Still making false statements with nothing to back it up You - still waiting on your imaginary sources You - still not willing to produce your sources?
    1
  33134. 1
  33135. 1
  33136. 1
  33137. 1
  33138. 1
  33139. 1
  33140. 1
  33141. 1
  33142. 1
  33143. 1
  33144. 1
  33145. 1
  33146. 1
  33147. 1
  33148. 1
  33149. 1
  33150. 1
  33151. 1
  33152. 1
  33153. 1
  33154.  @jeffchandler283  Who is my source? You silly! 😁 👇 Our conversation, thus far, in order and word for word. Which, of course, demonstrates that you're the one making claims and not backing them up with sources. Then you started to try and pretend that it was me because I was asking you for your sources on the claims that you had made, to distract from the fact that you can't produce any sources yourself. Obviously proving that you are lying and... More importantly, you can't produce sources or evidence for the claims that you have made. 👇 You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - just busy... You guys are worse if we are going to be honest.. Me - So... Excuses to why you can't back up your claim and then making another one you didn't bother to back up. Yeah... We are the ones who are "worse"... 😉✌ You - the proof is all around you... You - #Walkaway Me - Great! Then it should be super easy to present some! We will be waiting! 😉✌ You - you haven't backed up anything you've said... I do agree how ever that you guys are worse... Me - SoOoOo... you're saying, you can't back up what you say, you're trying to deflect it on to me, even though I haven't said anything to you to back up and you don't understand how quotation marks work. All good things to know! All good things for you to show everybody here! 😉✌ You - where do you come up with this gobbledygook... Give me sources Me - sources for what? You're the one making claims without a new backup or proof or sources or facts. Which is why you're desperately trying to turn this on me. So I ask again, sources for what? You - there you go.... Still making false statements with nothing to back it up You - still waiting on your imaginary sources You - still not willing to produce your sources? Me - (the point when I began this comment, that I will continue to update) Me - 👆👆 Please continue to lie, discredit yourself and anything you might say in the future... And... Of course... Show that you can not back up your claims. It works out so well for me. 😉✌ You - you little liar..... America is going through a. Of economic growth. The likes of which we have not seen since the Reagan years... There's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and record job growth anywhere... You guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected... People don't walk into the voting booth and say no I'm not going to vote for a booming economy... Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is bored and has moved on You - enough with you were Silly lies You - still no sources I see... Typical Democrat Behavior You - okay there's your last place trophy... Now go lie to someone else Me - " America is going through a. Of economic growth, the likes of which we have never seen since the Reagan years... " Prove it? " there's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and regular job growth anywhere..." Prove it? " you guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected..." Prove it? "Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is board and has moved on" Prove it?
    1
  33155. 1
  33156. 1
  33157. 1
  33158. 1
  33159.  @jeffchandler283  Who is my source? You silly! 😁 👇 Our conversation, thus far, in order and word for word. Which, of course, demonstrates that you're the one making claims and not backing them up with sources. Then you started to try and pretend that it was me because I was asking you for your sources on the claims that you had made, to distract from the fact that you can't produce any sources yourself. Obviously proving that you are lying and... More importantly, you can't produce sources or evidence for the claims that you have made. 👇 You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - just busy... You guys are worse if we are going to be honest.. Me - So... Excuses to why you can't back up your claim and then making another one you didn't bother to back up. Yeah... We are the ones who are "worse"... 😉✌ You - the proof is all around you... You - #Walkaway Me - Great! Then it should be super easy to present some! We will be waiting! 😉✌ You - you haven't backed up anything you've said... I do agree how ever that you guys are worse... Me - SoOoOo... you're saying, you can't back up what you say, you're trying to deflect it on to me, even though I haven't said anything to you to back up and you don't understand how quotation marks work. All good things to know! All good things for you to show everybody here! 😉✌ You - where do you come up with this gobbledygook... Give me sources Me - sources for what? You're the one making claims without a new backup or proof or sources or facts. Which is why you're desperately trying to turn this on me. So I ask again, sources for what? You - there you go.... Still making false statements with nothing to back it up You - still waiting on your imaginary sources You - still not willing to produce your sources? Me - (the point when I began this comment, that I will continue to update) Me - 👆👆 Please continue to lie, discredit yourself and anything you might say in the future... And... Of course... Show that you can not back up your claims. It works out so well for me. 😉✌ You - you little liar..... America is going through a. Of economic growth. The likes of which we have not seen since the Reagan years... There's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and record job growth anywhere... You guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected... People don't walk into the voting booth and say no I'm not going to vote for a booming economy... Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is bored and has moved on You - enough with you were Silly lies You - still no sources I see... Typical Democrat Behavior You - okay there's your last place trophy... Now go lie to someone else Me - " America is going through a. Of economic growth, the likes of which we have never seen since the Reagan years... " Prove it? " there's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and regular job growth anywhere..." Prove it? " you guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected..." Prove it? "Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is board and has moved on" Prove it? Me - Sense you have claimed that I am lying, you can feel free to go back and give your own accurate account of our conversation, thus far, but I will warn you, since you have demonstrated not to be trustworthy, I have already screen captured the entire day of the conversation, just in case you go back and try an edit your comments. You - looks like the Democrats have really sad things up this time.... The Press wants Trump impeached even though the impeachment proceedings are not over yet... Americans according to the poles have moved on... Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now as we speak... He got 8% of African American votes when he was elected now he has 34%... 3 years of unhinged all black Democrats circus shows have left their party in a shambles... getting caught in that big lie about the FBI did not help either.... Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you You - wow... Still no sources? Me - Yeah... Not sure you know that you don't make sense... The press wants Trump impeached. So the Dems, not the press... began, are collecting evidence for and are proceeding with the impeachment proceedings......? SoOoOo... That makes sense to you, how? Me - IF ANYONE WANTS TO SEE ME PREDICT THE FUTURE... READ HERE! THEN LOOK BELOW! 😁😂😁😂 😂 And now we have come to the part of the conversation where your going to make, yet another" claim that you can't back up, I'm going to insist you do, your not going to be able to and theN your, sadly and transparently, going to try and pretend that " I'm really the one that said something and you just keep expecting me to back things up.... And I just wont." Even though I've asked you what you need me to back up and all I've got are crickets.... And it is all I will get again! 😂 Which... then is going to mean that I add your comments to my list of our conversation. 😂 Ya know... So you can stop trying to dodge the fact that you can't back up anything you say.😂 NOW EVERYONE WATCH! IM MAGIC!!!! 😁 Me - According to polls Americans have moved on you say? EVERYONE READY??? 😁 Prove it? Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now, you say? Prove it? He has 34% of the African American vote right now, you say? Prove it? WAIT WAIT WAIT... HERE IS A GOOD ONE! EVERYONE WATCHING! So you like poles and to try and blame the Dems for everything under the sun, to distract from Trump's actions... But I digress... Lets combine the 2. The last time they took a poll on the political leanings of the FBI, how many where registered Republicans and How many where Registered Dems????? Or for the situation you where referencing... I forget... Where the people in charge at the FBI at that time, Dems or Reps? Personally I don't think it matters. Even if this was flipped. I wouldn't question the Rep FBI without some serious evidence... And then I wouldn't question that whatever they did was motivated by party loyalty without a hole lot more evidence. FBI agents, like the armed forces, leave their opinions at the door most of the time. They are their, and trained to do their job. They don't often bring their personal beliefs into anything. How often do you hear Retired FBI coming out and saying anything critical about the people the worked under or even against? A few here and there over the years but most of the time.... Well... Most of the time it sounds a lot like when I ask you what I need to source! 😁 Me - AND FOR HIS FINAL ACT.. Now! You put down a candy bar ( for some reason 🤷 😂 ) and you go source my material for me! 😂😂😂 " Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you." But here is the thing... Boys and girls... If he just looked it up to put it in that comment... Why didn't he take the literal second it would take to copy and paste the source? I mean... it's almost like either doesn't have a source or he doesn't want us to know what his real source is. Personally I hope it's the second one! 😂
    1
  33160. 1
  33161. 1
  33162.  @jeffchandler283  Who is my source? You silly! 😁 👇 Our conversation, thus far, in order and word for word. Which, of course, demonstrates that you're the one making claims and not backing them up with sources. Then you started to try and pretend that it was me because I was asking you for your sources on the claims that you had made, to distract from the fact that you can't produce any sources yourself. Obviously proving that you are lying and... More importantly, you can't produce sources or evidence for the claims that you have made. 👇 You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - just busy... You guys are worse if we are going to be honest.. Me - So... Excuses to why you can't back up your claim and then making another one you didn't bother to back up. Yeah... We are the ones who are "worse"... 😉✌ You - the proof is all around you... You - #Walkaway Me - Great! Then it should be super easy to present some! We will be waiting! 😉✌ You - you haven't backed up anything you've said... I do agree how ever that you guys are worse... Me - SoOoOo... you're saying, you can't back up what you say, you're trying to deflect it on to me, even though I haven't said anything to you to back up and you don't understand how quotation marks work. All good things to know! All good things for you to show everybody here! 😉✌ You - where do you come up with this gobbledygook... Give me sources Me - sources for what? You're the one making claims without a new backup or proof or sources or facts. Which is why you're desperately trying to turn this on me. So I ask again, sources for what? You - there you go.... Still making false statements with nothing to back it up You - still waiting on your imaginary sources You - still not willing to produce your sources? Me - (the point when I began this comment, that I will continue to update) Me - 👆👆 Please continue to lie, discredit yourself and anything you might say in the future... And... Of course... Show that you can not back up your claims. It works out so well for me. 😉✌ You - you little liar..... America is going through a. Of economic growth. The likes of which we have not seen since the Reagan years... There's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and record job growth anywhere... You guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected... People don't walk into the voting booth and say no I'm not going to vote for a booming economy... Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is bored and has moved on You - enough with you were Silly lies You - still no sources I see... Typical Democrat Behavior You - okay there's your last place trophy... Now go lie to someone else Me - " America is going through a. Of economic growth, the likes of which we have never seen since the Reagan years... " Prove it? " there's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and regular job growth anywhere..." Prove it? " you guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected..." Prove it? "Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is board and has moved on" Prove it? Me - Sense you have claimed that I am lying, you can feel free to go back and give your own accurate account of our conversation, thus far, but I will warn you, since you have demonstrated not to be trustworthy, I have already screen captured the entire day of the conversation, just in case you go back and try an edit your comments. You - looks like the Democrats have really sad things up this time.... The Press wants Trump impeached even though the impeachment proceedings are not over yet... Americans according to the poles have moved on... Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now as we speak... He got 8% of African American votes when he was elected now he has 34%... 3 years of unhinged all black Democrats circus shows have left their party in a shambles... getting caught in that big lie about the FBI did not help either.... Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you You - wow... Still no sources? Me - Yeah... Not sure you know that you don't make sense... The press wants Trump impeached. So the Dems, not the press... began, are collecting evidence for and are proceeding with the impeachment proceedings......? SoOoOo... That makes sense to you, how? Me - IF ANYONE WANTS TO SEE ME PREDICT THE FUTURE... READ HERE! THEN LOOK BELOW! 😁😂😁😂 😂 And now we have come to the part of the conversation where your going to make, yet another" claim that you can't back up, I'm going to insist you do, your not going to be able to and theN your, sadly and transparently, going to try and pretend that " I'm really the one that said something and you just keep expecting me to back things up.... And I just wont." Even though I've asked you what you need me to back up and all I've got are crickets.... And it is all I will get again! 😂 Which... then is going to mean that I add your comments to my list of our conversation. 😂 Ya know... So you can stop trying to dodge the fact that you can't back up anything you say.😂 NOW EVERYONE WATCH! IM MAGIC!!!! 😁 Me - According to polls Americans have moved on you say? EVERYONE READY??? 😁 Prove it? Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now, you say? Prove it? He has 34% of the African American vote right now, you say? Prove it? WAIT WAIT WAIT... HERE IS A GOOD ONE! EVERYONE WATCHING! So you like poles and to try and blame the Dems for everything under the sun, to distract from Trump's actions... But I digress... Lets combine the 2. The last time they took a poll on the political leanings of the FBI, how many where registered Republicans and How many where Registered Dems????? Or for the situation you where referencing... I forget... Where the people in charge at the FBI at that time, Dems or Reps? Personally I don't think it matters. Even if this was flipped. I wouldn't question the Rep FBI without some serious evidence... And then I wouldn't question that whatever they did was motivated by party loyalty without a hole lot more evidence. FBI agents, like the armed forces, leave their opinions at the door most of the time. They are their, and trained to do their job. They don't often bring their personal beliefs into anything. How often do you hear Retired FBI coming out and saying anything critical about the people the worked under or even against? A few here and there over the years but most of the time.... Well... Most of the time it sounds a lot like when I ask you what I need to source! 😁 Me - AND FOR HIS FINAL ACT.. Now! You put down a candy bar ( for some reason 🤷 😂 ) and you go source my material for me! 😂😂😂 " Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you." But here is the thing... Boys and girls... If he just looked it up to put it in that comment... Why didn't he take the literal second it would take to copy and paste the source? I mean... it's almost like either doesn't have a source or he doesn't want us to know what his real source is. Personally I hope it's the second one! 😂 You - Oh my god so now not only do you hate Trump so you hate Snickers candy bars also... Does your heat know no boundaries.... Bidens criminal confession on tape... That doesn't matter does it... Me -👈 And ya see these silly arguments he has to reduce himself to! 😂 Kids... Stay in school and don't be like this! 😂 Me - .... Well... As far as your question... Is there anything Biden could have done that would have excused Trump from breaking the laws that he did. While serving as one of the leaders in our country? If you answer that one correctly, then you will have the answer to the question you asked me. 😁
    1
  33163. 1
  33164.  @jeffchandler283  Who is my source? You silly! 😁 👇 Our conversation, thus far, in order and word for word. Which, of course, demonstrates that you're the one making claims and not backing them up with sources. Then you started to try and pretend that it was me because I was asking you for your sources on the claims that you had made, to distract from the fact that you can't produce any sources yourself. Obviously proving that you are lying and... More importantly, you can't produce sources or evidence for the claims that you have made. 👇 You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - just busy... You guys are worse if we are going to be honest.. Me - So... Excuses to why you can't back up your claim and then making another one you didn't bother to back up. Yeah... We are the ones who are "worse"... 😉✌ You - the proof is all around you... You - #Walkaway Me - Great! Then it should be super easy to present some! We will be waiting! 😉✌ You - you haven't backed up anything you've said... I do agree how ever that you guys are worse... Me - SoOoOo... you're saying, you can't back up what you say, you're trying to deflect it on to me, even though I haven't said anything to you to back up and you don't understand how quotation marks work. All good things to know! All good things for you to show everybody here! 😉✌ You - where do you come up with this gobbledygook... Give me sources Me - sources for what? You're the one making claims without a new backup or proof or sources or facts. Which is why you're desperately trying to turn this on me. So I ask again, sources for what? You - there you go.... Still making false statements with nothing to back it up You - still waiting on your imaginary sources You - still not willing to produce your sources? Me - (the point when I began this comment, that I will continue to update) Me - 👆👆 Please continue to lie, discredit yourself and anything you might say in the future... And... Of course... Show that you can not back up your claims. It works out so well for me. 😉✌ You - you little liar..... America is going through a. Of economic growth. The likes of which we have not seen since the Reagan years... There's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and record job growth anywhere... You guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected... People don't walk into the voting booth and say no I'm not going to vote for a booming economy... Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is bored and has moved on You - enough with you were Silly lies You - still no sources I see... Typical Democrat Behavior You - okay there's your last place trophy... Now go lie to someone else Me - " America is going through a. Of economic growth, the likes of which we have never seen since the Reagan years... " Prove it? " there's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and regular job growth anywhere..." Prove it? " you guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected..." Prove it? "Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is board and has moved on" Prove it? Me - Sense you have claimed that I am lying, you can feel free to go back and give your own accurate account of our conversation, thus far, but I will warn you, since you have demonstrated not to be trustworthy, I have already screen captured the entire day of the conversation, just in case you go back and try an edit your comments. You - looks like the Democrats have really sad things up this time.... The Press wants Trump impeached even though the impeachment proceedings are not over yet... Americans according to the poles have moved on... Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now as we speak... He got 8% of African American votes when he was elected now he has 34%... 3 years of unhinged all black Democrats circus shows have left their party in a shambles... getting caught in that big lie about the FBI did not help either.... Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you You - wow... Still no sources? Me - Yeah... Not sure you know that you don't make sense... The press wants Trump impeached. So the Dems, not the press... began, are collecting evidence for and are proceeding with the impeachment proceedings......? SoOoOo... That makes sense to you, how? Me - IF ANYONE WANTS TO SEE ME PREDICT THE FUTURE... READ HERE! THEN LOOK BELOW! 😁😂😁😂 😂 And now we have come to the part of the conversation where your going to make, yet another" claim that you can't back up, I'm going to insist you do, your not going to be able to and theN your, sadly and transparently, going to try and pretend that " I'm really the one that said something and you just keep expecting me to back things up.... And I just wont." Even though I've asked you what you need me to back up and all I've got are crickets.... And it is all I will get again! 😂 Which... then is going to mean that I add your comments to my list of our conversation. 😂 Ya know... So you can stop trying to dodge the fact that you can't back up anything you say.😂 NOW EVERYONE WATCH! IM MAGIC!!!! 😁 Me - According to polls Americans have moved on you say? EVERYONE READY??? 😁 Prove it? Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now, you say? Prove it? He has 34% of the African American vote right now, you say? Prove it? WAIT WAIT WAIT... HERE IS A GOOD ONE! EVERYONE WATCHING! So you like poles and to try and blame the Dems for everything under the sun, to distract from Trump's actions... But I digress... Lets combine the 2. The last time they took a poll on the political leanings of the FBI, how many where registered Republicans and How many where Registered Dems????? Or for the situation you where referencing... I forget... Where the people in charge at the FBI at that time, Dems or Reps? Personally I don't think it matters. Even if this was flipped. I wouldn't question the Rep FBI without some serious evidence... And then I wouldn't question that whatever they did was motivated by party loyalty without a hole lot more evidence. FBI agents, like the armed forces, leave their opinions at the door most of the time. They are their, and trained to do their job. They don't often bring their personal beliefs into anything. How often do you hear Retired FBI coming out and saying anything critical about the people the worked under or even against? A few here and there over the years but most of the time.... Well... Most of the time it sounds a lot like when I ask you what I need to source! 😁 Me - AND FOR HIS FINAL ACT.. Now! You put down a candy bar ( for some reason 🤷 😂 ) and you go source my material for me! 😂😂😂 " Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you." But here is the thing... Boys and girls... If he just looked it up to put it in that comment... Why didn't he take the literal second it would take to copy and paste the source? I mean... it's almost like either doesn't have a source or he doesn't want us to know what his real source is. Personally I hope it's the second one! 😂 You - Oh my god so now not only do you hate Trump so you hate Snickers candy bars also... Does your heat know no boundaries.... Bidens criminal confession on tape... That doesn't matter does it... Me -👈 And ya see these silly arguments he has to reduce himself to! 😂 Kids... Stay in school and don't be like this! 😂 Me - .... Well... As far as your question... Is there anything Biden could have done that would have excused Trump from breaking the laws that he did. While serving as one of the leaders in our country? If you answer that one correctly, then you will have the answer to the question you asked me. 😁 You - pretty clear that Nancy and the altlefters don't have any respect for the Constitution Me - 👈 And watch this kids! And how is that? What is your proof of that again??? 😂
    1
  33165. 1
  33166. 1
  33167.  @jeffchandler283  Who is my source? You silly! 😁 👇 Our conversation, thus far, in order and word for word. Which, of course, demonstrates that you're the one making claims and not backing them up with sources. Then you started to try and pretend that it was me because I was asking you for your sources on the claims that you had made, to distract from the fact that you can't produce any sources yourself. Obviously proving that you are lying and... More importantly, you can't produce sources or evidence for the claims that you have made. 👇 You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - apparently the Democrats don't... They are ripping it apart Me - You guys keep saying that but we always notice that you don't bother to go into detail. Mostly because you know that if you get your argument would be shredded. You - just busy... You guys are worse if we are going to be honest.. Me - So... Excuses to why you can't back up your claim and then making another one you didn't bother to back up. Yeah... We are the ones who are "worse"... 😉✌ You - the proof is all around you... You - #Walkaway Me - Great! Then it should be super easy to present some! We will be waiting! 😉✌ You - you haven't backed up anything you've said... I do agree how ever that you guys are worse... Me - SoOoOo... you're saying, you can't back up what you say, you're trying to deflect it on to me, even though I haven't said anything to you to back up and you don't understand how quotation marks work. All good things to know! All good things for you to show everybody here! 😉✌ You - where do you come up with this gobbledygook... Give me sources Me - sources for what? You're the one making claims without a new backup or proof or sources or facts. Which is why you're desperately trying to turn this on me. So I ask again, sources for what? You - there you go.... Still making false statements with nothing to back it up You - still waiting on your imaginary sources You - still not willing to produce your sources? Me - (the point when I began this comment, that I will continue to update) Me - 👆👆 Please continue to lie, discredit yourself and anything you might say in the future... And... Of course... Show that you can not back up your claims. It works out so well for me. 😉✌ You - you little liar..... America is going through a. Of economic growth. The likes of which we have not seen since the Reagan years... There's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and record job growth anywhere... You guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected... People don't walk into the voting booth and say no I'm not going to vote for a booming economy... Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is bored and has moved on You - enough with you were Silly lies You - still no sources I see... Typical Democrat Behavior You - okay there's your last place trophy... Now go lie to someone else Me - " America is going through a. Of economic growth, the likes of which we have never seen since the Reagan years... " Prove it? " there's not a single Democrat fingerprint on this booming economy and regular job growth anywhere..." Prove it? " you guys have done absolutely nothing for the last three years and you don't deserve to get reelected..." Prove it? "Stop with the dog and pony show Antics... America is board and has moved on" Prove it? Me - Sense you have claimed that I am lying, you can feel free to go back and give your own accurate account of our conversation, thus far, but I will warn you, since you have demonstrated not to be trustworthy, I have already screen captured the entire day of the conversation, just in case you go back and try an edit your comments. You - looks like the Democrats have really sad things up this time.... The Press wants Trump impeached even though the impeachment proceedings are not over yet... Americans according to the poles have moved on... Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now as we speak... He got 8% of African American votes when he was elected now he has 34%... 3 years of unhinged all black Democrats circus shows have left their party in a shambles... getting caught in that big lie about the FBI did not help either.... Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you You - wow... Still no sources? Me - Yeah... Not sure you know that you don't make sense... The press wants Trump impeached. So the Dems, not the press... began, are collecting evidence for and are proceeding with the impeachment proceedings......? SoOoOo... That makes sense to you, how? Me - IF ANYONE WANTS TO SEE ME PREDICT THE FUTURE... READ HERE! THEN LOOK BELOW! 😁😂😁😂 😂 And now we have come to the part of the conversation where your going to make, yet another" claim that you can't back up, I'm going to insist you do, your not going to be able to and theN your, sadly and transparently, going to try and pretend that " I'm really the one that said something and you just keep expecting me to back things up.... And I just wont." Even though I've asked you what you need me to back up and all I've got are crickets.... And it is all I will get again! 😂 Which... then is going to mean that I add your comments to my list of our conversation. 😂 Ya know... So you can stop trying to dodge the fact that you can't back up anything you say.😂 NOW EVERYONE WATCH! IM MAGIC!!!! 😁 Me - According to polls Americans have moved on you say? EVERYONE READY??? 😁 Prove it? Trump's numbers are better than they've ever been right now, you say? Prove it? He has 34% of the African American vote right now, you say? Prove it? WAIT WAIT WAIT... HERE IS A GOOD ONE! EVERYONE WATCHING! So you like poles and to try and blame the Dems for everything under the sun, to distract from Trump's actions... But I digress... Lets combine the 2. The last time they took a poll on the political leanings of the FBI, how many where registered Republicans and How many where Registered Dems????? Or for the situation you where referencing... I forget... Where the people in charge at the FBI at that time, Dems or Reps? Personally I don't think it matters. Even if this was flipped. I wouldn't question the Rep FBI without some serious evidence... And then I wouldn't question that whatever they did was motivated by party loyalty without a hole lot more evidence. FBI agents, like the armed forces, leave their opinions at the door most of the time. They are their, and trained to do their job. They don't often bring their personal beliefs into anything. How often do you hear Retired FBI coming out and saying anything critical about the people the worked under or even against? A few here and there over the years but most of the time.... Well... Most of the time it sounds a lot like when I ask you what I need to source! 😁 Me - AND FOR HIS FINAL ACT.. Now! You put down a candy bar ( for some reason 🤷 😂 ) and you go source my material for me! 😂😂😂 " Lay down your Snickers bar and go Google the information I just gave you." But here is the thing... Boys and girls... If he just looked it up to put it in that comment... Why didn't he take the literal second it would take to copy and paste the source? I mean... it's almost like either doesn't have a source or he doesn't want us to know what his real source is. Personally I hope it's the second one! 😂 You - Oh my god so now not only do you hate Trump so you hate Snickers candy bars also... Does your heat know no boundaries.... Bidens criminal confession on tape... That doesn't matter does it... Me -👈 And ya see these silly arguments he has to reduce himself to! 😂 Kids... Stay in school and don't be like this! 😂 Me - .... Well... As far as your question... Is there anything Biden could have done that would have excused Trump from breaking the laws that he did. While serving as one of the leaders in our country? If you answer that one correctly, then you will have the answer to the question you asked me. 😁 You - pretty clear that Nancy and the altlefters don't have any respect for the Constitution Me - 👈 And watch this kids! And how is that? What is your proof of that again??? 😂 You - The two articles of fiction had finally been released with no questions allowed... House of Cards in front of your face... It won't be so nice to get this silly s*** in front of the Senate so it can be exposed for the Sham that it is and we can get on with the business of running the country now... Trump in 2020 You - two articles of fiction and no questions... Talk about silly Me - Lol... Are ya ready boys and girls? 😁 Prove it!??! 😁 You really don't get it, do you... You can say whatever you like, but as long as you can't back it up, it really doesn't matter. Me - in the meantime, if you guys are so right and we are so wrong then why are you guys always running from substance based questions?
    1
  33168. 1
  33169. 1
  33170. 1
  33171. 1
  33172. 1
  33173. 1
  33174. 1
  33175. 1
  33176. 1
  33177. 1
  33178. 1
  33179. 1
  33180. 1
  33181. 1
  33182. 1
  33183. 1
  33184. 1
  33185. 1
  33186. 1
  33187. 1
  33188. 1
  33189. 1
  33190. 1
  33191. 1
  33192. 1
  33193. 1
  33194. 1
  33195. 1
  33196. 1
  33197. 1
  33198. 1
  33199. 1
  33200. 1
  33201. 1
  33202. 1
  33203. 1
  33204. 1
  33205. 1
  33206. 1
  33207. 1
  33208. 1
  33209. 1
  33210. 1
  33211. 1
  33212. 1
  33213. 1
  33214. 1
  33215. 1
  33216. 1
  33217. 1
  33218. 1
  33219. 1
  33220. 1
  33221. 1
  33222. 1
  33223. 1
  33224. 1
  33225.  @zbudda  So... I'm pretty sure you're making the I was an Obama supporter thing up but on the off-chance you're not... you didn't do your research on Obama? As you willingly admit. No one in this world will claim Obama was perfect. I got a lot of beefs with the way he went about things.... Probably would not of expected that from me, because it's clear throughout your array of responses, you've already painted me of some brainwashed crazy person. Which I think has more to do with the fact that you need to do that to ignore what I actually say but... I digress. I'm also not a never Trumper. I think a good deal of what he does he does in a really stupid way. I certainly wouldn't call him an example or a role model of any quality. He's most definitely self-serving.... but some of that isn't new for the presidents we've had. He may be a little louder about it but it's not new. Those last two things I also wouldn't call Bill Clinton, but he did get us out of debt for the first time in about fifty years and set us up for the next four years before Bush. In there and screwed everything up. Show people of low moral character can do good things. People who don't think things out all the time can do good things. People who are self-serving and do good things. Trump saved the Special Olympics from his education secretary trying to defund it. He worked with Democrats on Criminal Justice Reform and got that passed. He even had a decent point about China and intellectual property rights. He went about it in a stupid way but he had a good point about it. Unfortunately his Ledger is way too far in the red and he has no respect for our democracy. Which puts me on the side of no Trump. Not because I'm brainwashed or whatever b***** I'll like to claim is going on with us so you don't have to defend his actions. .. But because I choose to take a full account of what he has done in office and to get to the office.
    1
  33226. 1
  33227. 1
  33228. 1
  33229. 1
  33230. 1
  33231. 1
  33232. 1
  33233. 1
  33234. 1
  33235. 1
  33236. 1
  33237. 1
  33238. 1
  33239. 1
  33240. 1
  33241. 1
  33242. 1
  33243. 1
  33244. 1
  33245. 1
  33246. 1
  33247. 1
  33248. 1
  33249. 1
  33250. 1
  33251. 1
  33252. 1
  33253. 1
  33254. 1
  33255. 1
  33256. 1
  33257. 1
  33258. 1
  33259. 1
  33260. 1
  33261. 1
  33262. 1
  33263. 1
  33264. 1
  33265. 1
  33266. 1
  33267. 1
  33268. 1
  33269. 1
  33270. 1
  33271. 1
  33272. 1
  33273. 1
  33274. 1
  33275. 1
  33276. 1
  33277. 1
  33278. 1
  33279. 1
  33280. 1
  33281. 1
  33282. 1
  33283. 1
  33284. 1
  33285. 1
  33286. 1
  33287. 1
  33288. 1
  33289. 1
  33290. 1
  33291. 1
  33292. 1
  33293. 1
  33294. 1
  33295. 1
  33296. 1
  33297. 1
  33298. 1
  33299. 1
  33300. 1
  33301. 1
  33302. 1
  33303. 1
  33304. 1
  33305. 1
  33306. 1
  33307. 1
  33308. 1
  33309. 1
  33310. 1
  33311. 1
  33312. 1
  33313. 1
  33314. 1
  33315. 1
  33316. 1
  33317. 1
  33318. 1
  33319. 1
  33320. 1
  33321. 1
  33322. 1
  33323. 1
  33324. 1
  33325. 1
  33326. 1
  33327. 1
  33328. 1
  33329. 1
  33330. 1
  33331. 1
  33332. 1
  33333. 1
  33334. 1
  33335. 1
  33336. 1
  33337. 1
  33338. 1
  33339. 1
  33340. 1
  33341. 1
  33342. 1
  33343. 1
  33344. 1
  33345. 1
  33346. 1
  33347. 1
  33348. 1
  33349. 1
  33350. 1
  33351. 1
  33352. 1
  33353. 1
  33354. That's my point. So many of you guy's scream hoax but have never read the report. Home you're as confident as all get-out that you know exactly what's in it. How many crimes did they lay out cases for in the Mueller report? 11 And what where they for? All obstruction of Justice. What volume did they lay them out in? Volume 2 How many reasons did they give for not pursuing charges? There where technically 3 reasons but they all basically boiled down to. A procedure not allowing the current sitting president to be charged with a crime. What relevance did the Steele dossier end up having in the Mueller report? First, the Steele dossier did not start the investigation. The FBI didn't get the Steele dossier or even know of its existence until 7 weeks after the investigation originally opened with Papadopoulos. At first the FBI had no reason to distrust where the Steele dossier came from. So they put it in the collection of evidence to give to the judge to get a fisa warrant to tap Carter page, the first time. After that however, some of the things in the Steele dossier were proven to be false. At that point the FBI took out the dossier from the collection of evidence.... but this is why the Steele dossier is completely irrelevant. They kept all the rest of the evidence in there. The exact same evidence. For the next nine fisa warrants to tap Carter Pages office. These were given by seven different judges with all the remaining evidence and every single one was approved. In other words, the Steele dossier was completely irrelevant and the only reason that your side keeps bringing it up is because it was proven to being partly false. But y'all never say anything about it being irrelevant.
    1
  33355. 1
  33356. 1
  33357.  @textech4056  well then you should care about the crimes he's committed while in office. There's all the provable crimes of obstruction during the mother of Port. Again, 11 in total. There is the campaign Finance fraud proven by the Ukraine July 25th transcript. There is D3 obstruction of Congress crimes proven by Trump's lawyers issuing declarations to the house. There are countless emoluments Clause violations. Reckless Abandonment for deregulation and in-house hiring practices. Claiming he's going to clean out the swamp but he just gave them all jobs in the White House. Carson and DeVos being two of the worst. You will notice that up until this point I have not mentioned the stupid / racist things that come out of his mouth on a regular basis. That affects American families. And words from the leader of our country are actions.... but most of all, there are countless databases who would had to take it up a practice accounting the amount of lies that he was told while he was president. The lowest number, if you search online will be around 12,000. The country has never had to keep a record of the amount of lies that are leader has told because there was too many just to remember. Not even with Nixon. So how in the world anyone could trust that kind of person or anything that comes out of their mouth anyways, is beyond me. Why what he says is important... Is because we have a country leader who thinks that a proper level of political discourse involves Maine calling other adults on a regular basis. Do you honestly think that's not going to bring down our standing. He's already alienating our world allies and cozying up to all the dictators in the world. He's taking the word of Vladimir Putin over his own defense department. Then announcing it to the world.
    1
  33358. 1
  33359. 1
  33360. 1
  33361. 1
  33362. 1
  33363. 1
  33364. 1
  33365. 1
  33366. 1
  33367. 1
  33368. 1
  33369. 1
  33370. 1
  33371. 1
  33372. 1
  33373. 1
  33374. 1
  33375. 1
  33376. 1
  33377. 1
  33378. 1
  33379. 1
  33380. 1
  33381. 1
  33382. 1
  33383. 1
  33384. 1
  33385. 1
  33386. 1
  33387. 1
  33388. 1
  33389. 1
  33390. 1
  33391. 1
  33392. 1
  33393. 1
  33394. 1
  33395. 1
  33396. 1
  33397. 1
  33398. 1
  33399. 1
  33400. 1
  33401. 1
  33402. 1
  33403. 1
  33404. 1
  33405. 1
  33406. 1
  33407. 1
  33408. 1
  33409. 1
  33410. 1
  33411. 1
  33412. 1
  33413. 1
  33414. 1
  33415. 1
  33416. 1
  33417.  sun dial  I'm sorry... How am I misinformed? What the examples I gave not true in some way? Or is it possible your trying to paint me that way because you can't argue against them? Tell you where socialism worked? Look up. As in, it's all around you. Do you enjoy your Police Department, your fire department, your Ambulance Service, how about social security, or Canada. Like the entire country. That's why I asked you if you knew what socialism was. You clearly do not and hitting something without knowing what it is is irrational. Hitting a system of operation I'm painting it as negative or positive is not rational either. You don't know what you're talkin about and you probably shouldn't talk about something that you're not educated on. Out of all the things you choose to point out to call President Obama the Antichrist, you're going to pick contraception? Really? Sweetheart, that's just called being a responsible and don't living in the real world. In the real world you actually cannot force anyone to do anything in America. Unless you have broken a law and have been convicted of that law you broke. You most certainly cannot do so under the guise of the government. Which means those nuns that you're talkin about, had a different option. You mean President Obama was insisting that all people be treated equally and fairly in your place of business? That bastard.🙄 The transgender bathroom thing... Here's my question. How many instances of what you just described had been reported before or even after that became an issue? BTW, transgenderism exist to whether your bigoted ass believes it does or not. Every time I talk to one of you guys I always get reminded of when I tell my son about bullies. I told him that bullies are bullies because they need to blame their problems on somebody else, they need to feel Superior to somebody because really they're just sad inside.
    1
  33418. 1
  33419. 1
  33420. 1
  33421. 1
  33422. 1
  33423. 1
  33424. 1
  33425. 1
  33426. 1
  33427. 1
  33428. 1
  33429. 1
  33430. 1
  33431. 1
  33432. 1
  33433. 1
  33434. 1
  33435. 1
  33436. 1
  33437.  @MrBillmedhurst  So, this is why you're wrong. The founders set up the impeachment process to work much like a criminal case and due process, except if is it slanted in any direction, it's for the benefit of trump and not the detriment. I will explain. - first the house members, Democrat and Republican, serve as the investigation. They gather evidence... - then once they feel they've gathered all the evidence they can find, they turn into the grand jury and make the vote - except, here is where it is to trumps benefit.. in both the investigation portion and the vote portion, 👉Republicans👈 get equal say and equal amount of time to ask questions and find evidence. In a regular grand jury, only the prosecutor is allowed to present evidence to the grand jury and vote to see if there is enough evidence to proceed to a trial. - 👉What you need to be asking is why the Republicans that can be in the house impeachment hearings are not bothering to show up most of the time. If you want people in there asking questions and being able to pretend evidence, there are plenty in the house that can do that if they just show up.👈 - if the vote is made that there is enough evidence... Then it moves to the trial portion in the Senate... Where 👉Trump and his lawyers have all the rights to depose, cross-examine, present evidence, testify... Basically everything you would get at a normal trial.👈 The republicans are counting on people's ignorance about this subject. They think they can snowball people on the process because they can't defend the actual Act. Except a really clear sign that the Democrats aren't doing anything wrong in the house is that if they were, the 👉Republicans could stop the whole process by taking the Democrats to court over violations of house law.👈 It would hold the impeachment proceedings. Except they're not doing that. Just like they are not showing up to the impeachment inquiry to get there equal time to present evidence and question Witnesses. Another thing they're not doing is 👉arguing the substance.👈 The only play they feel they have is to bet on people's ignorance of the process. That should speak volumes to anyone.
    1
  33438.  @MrBillmedhurst  Now... If it dies in the Senate, it wont be for lack of evidence. It will be because people are putting party before country.... Here is why.... 1. Trump provides the transcript from July 25th, between him and the Ukraine president. He pressed the president to investigate allegations against his political opponent. That, in itself is a crime. If he wanted to buy items investigated without breaking the law, he had options. 🔹 he could have asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden's back when all of this happened. Which was long before Biden became his political opponent in the next presidential election. 🔹 He could have had the justice department, of which he is the head of, put together an independent investigation and have them work with Ukraine. If he had done either or both of these things, the Democrats wouldn't have a leg to stand on for impeachment. 2. Trump lied, on camera, several times, about whether the July 25th phone call included him even mentioning Biden. 3. During that July 25th phone call he also asked the president of Ukraine to investigate a crazy de bunk'd theory that Ukraine, rather than Russia, hacked a Democratic party server in 2016. 4. Their are text messages between ambassadors who over saw Ukraine policy. The messages raise concern that Trump was withholding military Aid to Ukraine and refusing a white house meeting with the Ukraine president in order to bend the newly elected leader to his will. Even as Ukraine desperately needed the ad to fend off Russian aggression from its East. 5. Trump has also publicly called on Ukraine and China to investigate Biden, and his acting Chief of Staff, Mick Mulvaney, recently acknowledged that military aid to Ukraine was conditioned in part on whether the European allies agreed to Trump's demands. 6. Trump attempted to hide the July 25th phone call on a server that it would not have normally gone on too and did not qualify for. 7. Trump has both try to curtail witness statements and block other Witnesses from even testifying.... irregardless of congressional subpoenas. 8. He also tried to keep the text messages between the ambassadors away from the house impeachment inquiry. Also against Congressional subpoenas. 9. Trump attempted to claim executive privilege Over The Whistleblower report. 10. Several of the witnesses that have testified already, have testified to the quid pro quo. That is just a few facts we have so far... on that evidence alone there can be at least two articles of impeachment. Abuse of power, and obstruction of Congress.
    1
  33439. 1
  33440. 1
  33441. 1
  33442. 1
  33443. 1
  33444. 1
  33445. 1
  33446. 1
  33447. 1
  33448. 1
  33449. 1
  33450. 1
  33451. 1
  33452. 1
  33453. 1
  33454. 1
  33455. 1
  33456. 1
  33457. 1
  33458. 1
  33459. 1
  33460. 1
  33461. 1
  33462. 1
  33463. 1
  33464. 1
  33465. 1
  33466. 1
  33467. 1
  33468. 1
  33469. 1
  33470. 1
  33471. 1
  33472. 1
  33473. 1
  33474. 1
  33475. 1
  33476. 1
  33477. 1
  33478. 1
  33479. 1
  33480. 1
  33481. 1
  33482. 1
  33483. 1
  33484. 1
  33485. 1
  33486. 1
  33487. 1
  33488. 1
  33489. 1
  33490. 1
  33491. 1
  33492. 1
  33493. 1
  33494. 1
  33495. 1
  33496. 1
  33497. 1
  33498. 1
  33499. 1
  33500. 1
  33501. 1
  33502. 1
  33503. 1
  33504. 1
  33505. 1
  33506. 1
  33507. 1
  33508. 1
  33509. 1
  33510. 1
  33511. 1
  33512. 1
  33513. 1
  33514. 1
  33515. 1
  33516. 1
  33517. 1
  33518. 1
  33519. 1
  33520. 1
  33521. 1
  33522. 1
  33523.  Juan Valdez  Well.. Actually, 140 is one of the higher numbers I could find. I do love how you are insisting its not true without providing any evidence. Its easy to look up. Here are just a few of the thousands of fact check sources. You let me know if you need more, Pumpin! 😉✌👇 https://www.factcheck.org/2020/07/the-presidents-trumped-up-claims-of-voter-fraud/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/absentee-ballot-fraud-heritage/ https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/minuscule-number-of-potentially-fraudulent-ballots-in-states-with-universal-mail-voting-undercuts-trump-claims-about-election-risks/2020/06/08/1e78aa26-a5c5-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&outputType=amp&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15976136391003&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fpolitics%2Fminuscule-number-of-potentially-fraudulent-ballots-in-states-with-universal-mail-voting-undercuts-trump-claims-about-election-risks%2F2020%2F06%2F08%2F1e78aa26-a5c5-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html https://www-brookings-edu.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2020/06/02/low-rates-of-fraud-in-vote-by-mail-states-show-the-benefits-outweigh-the-risks/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15976136391003&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brookings.edu%2Fblog%2Ffixgov%2F2020%2F06%2F02%2Flow-rates-of-fraud-in-vote-by-mail-states-show-the-benefits-outweigh-the-risks%2Famp%2F%23aoh%3D15976136391003%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%26amp_tf%3DFrom%2520%25251%2524s https://www.npr.org/2020/06/04/864899178/why-is-voting-by-mail-suddenly-controversial-heres-what-you-need-to-know
    1
  33524. 1
  33525. 1
  33526. 1
  33527. 1
  33528. 1
  33529. 1
  33530. 1
  33531. 1
  33532. 1
  33533. 1
  33534. 1
  33535. 1
  33536. 1
  33537. 1
  33538. 1
  33539. 1
  33540. 1
  33541. 1
  33542. 1
  33543. 1
  33544. 1
  33545. 1
  33546. 1
  33547. 1
  33548. 1
  33549. 1
  33550. 1
  33551. 1
  33552. 1
  33553. 1
  33554. 1
  33555. 1
  33556. 1
  33557. 1
  33558. 1
  33559. 1
  33560. 1
  33561. 1
  33562. 1
  33563. 1
  33564. 1
  33565. 1
  33566. 1
  33567. 1
  33568. 1
  33569. 1
  33570. 1
  33571. 1
  33572. 1
  33573. 1
  33574. 1
  33575. 1
  33576. 1
  33577. 1
  33578. 1
  33579. 1
  33580. 1
  33581. 1
  33582. 1
  33583. 1
  33584. 1
  33585. 1
  33586. 1
  33587. 1
  33588. 1
  33589. 1
  33590. 1
  33591. 1
  33592. 1
  33593. 1
  33594. 1
  33595. 1
  33596. 1
  33597. 1
  33598. 1
  33599. 1
  33600. 1
  33601. 1
  33602. 1
  33603. 1
  33604. 1
  33605. 1
  33606. 1
  33607. 1
  33608. 1
  33609. 1
  33610. 1
  33611. 1
  33612. 1
  33613. 1
  33614. 1
  33615. 1
  33616. 1
  33617. 1
  33618. 1
  33619. 1
  33620. 1
  33621. 1
  33622. 1
  33623. 1
  33624. 1
  33625. 1
  33626. 1
  33627. 1
  33628. 1
  33629. 1
  33630. 1
  33631. 1
  33632. 1
  33633. 1
  33634. 1
  33635. 1
  33636. 1
  33637. 1
  33638. 1
  33639. 1
  33640. 1
  33641. 1
  33642. 1
  33643. 1
  33644. 1
  33645. 1
  33646. 1
  33647. 1
  33648. 1
  33649. 1
  33650. 1
  33651. 1
  33652. 1
  33653. 1
  33654. 1
  33655. 1
  33656. 1
  33657. 1
  33658. 1
  33659. 1
  33660. 1
  33661. 1
  33662. 1
  33663. 1
  33664. 1
  33665. 1
  33666. 1
  33667. 1
  33668. 1
  33669. 1
  33670. 1
  33671. 1
  33672. 1
  33673. 1
  33674. 1
  33675. 1
  33676. 1
  33677. 1
  33678. 1
  33679. 1
  33680. 1
  33681. 1
  33682. 1
  33683. 1
  33684. 1
  33685. 1
  33686. 1
  33687. 1
  33688. 1
  33689. 1
  33690. 1
  33691. 1
  33692. 1
  33693. 1
  33694. 1
  33695. 1
  33696. 1
  33697. 1
  33698. 1
  33699. 1
  33700. 1
  33701. 1
  33702. 1
  33703. 1
  33704. 1
  33705. 1
  33706. 1
  33707. 1
  33708. 1
  33709. 1
  33710. 1
  33711. 1
  33712. 1
  33713. 1
  33714. 1
  33715. 1
  33716. 1
  33717. 1
  33718. 1
  33719. 1
  33720. 1
  33721. 1
  33722. 1
  33723. 1
  33724. 1
  33725. 1
  33726. 1
  33727. 1
  33728. 1
  33729. 1
  33730. 1
  33731. 1
  33732. 1
  33733. 1
  33734. 1
  33735. 1
  33736. 1
  33737. 1
  33738. 1
  33739. 1
  33740. 1
  33741. 1
  33742. 1
  33743. 1
  33744. 1
  33745. 1
  33746. 1
  33747. 1
  33748. 1
  33749. 1
  33750. 1
  33751. 1
  33752. 1
  33753. 1
  33754. 1
  33755. 1
  33756. 1
  33757. 1
  33758. 1
  33759. 1
  33760. 1
  33761. 1
  33762. 1
  33763. 1
  33764. 1
  33765. 1
  33766. 1
  33767. 1
  33768. 1
  33769. 1
  33770. 1
  33771. 1
  33772. 1
  33773. 1
  33774. 1
  33775. 1
  33776. 1
  33777. 1
  33778. 1
  33779. 1
  33780. 1
  33781. 1
  33782. 1
  33783. 1
  33784. 1
  33785. 1
  33786. 1
  33787. 1
  33788. 1
  33789. 1
  33790. 1
  33791. 1
  33792. 1
  33793. 1
  33794. 1
  33795. 1
  33796. 1
  33797. 1
  33798. 1
  33799. 1
  33800. 1
  33801. 1
  33802. 1
  33803. 1
  33804. 1
  33805. 1
  33806. 1
  33807. 1
  33808. 1
  33809. 1
  33810. 1
  33811. 1
  33812. 1
  33813. 1
  33814. 1
  33815. 1
  33816. 1
  33817. 1
  33818. 1
  33819. 1
  33820. 1
  33821. 1
  33822. 1
  33823. 1
  33824. 1
  33825. 1
  33826. 1
  33827. 1
  33828. 1
  33829. 1
  33830. 1
  33831. 1
  33832. 1
  33833. 1
  33834. 1
  33835. 1
  33836. 1
  33837.  @joboygbpedwards  that's kind of a complex question with a lot of answers... but I'll do my best. First... we didn't always treat the flu the way we do now. Second... there needs to be a recognition of the different kinds of viruses, they're infection rate, death rate and strain mutation ability. For instance, the flu has been around a long time. Even various strains of the flu tend to be very similar to each other. We have a lot of paperwork on the flu and how to handle it. Covid-19 is brand new! In other words, from the jump, we had no damn clue. You can equate it to someone who's drove in an automatic car their whole life and then we're all of the sudden Forced to only drive standards, while giving no notice, and absolutely no training to do so. You're going to be like, "well it's a car... but what the hell do I do with it... and what is this extra peddle about... And why does this gear shift not just go back and forth. " We were learning as we went. That was literally all we could do. Third... there were a crap ton of mistakes made. There's not really a nicer way to put that. One of the biggest ones.... Take the car analogy... you're in this standard, with absolutely no clue on how to get it to work, but then somebody comes along and sees you struggling, and offers to teach you how to drive a standard. You respond with, "Na! I got this!" Why? Because the guy who's offering to help you, was told to learn how to do it by the guy that used to have your job. 🤷 On day 1 the trump administration had a 33 page detailed, and designed by experts, plan to reduce the spread of a pandemic like covid-19 in America and chose not to use it because President Obama commissioned experts to make it after H1 N1. All of these mistakes of leadership, made it worse here there it had to be... Which gave this new virus time to build, mutate and kill.
    1
  33838. 1
  33839. 1
  33840. 1
  33841. 1
  33842. 1
  33843. 1
  33844. 1
  33845. 1
  33846. 1
  33847. 1
  33848. 1
  33849. 1
  33850. 1
  33851. 1
  33852. 1
  33853. 1
  33854. 1
  33855. 1
  33856. 1
  33857. 1
  33858. 1
  33859. 1
  33860. 1
  33861. 1
  33862. 1
  33863. 1
  33864. 1
  33865. 1
  33866. 1
  33867. 1
  33868. 1
  33869. 1
  33870. 1
  33871. 1
  33872. 1
  33873. 1
  33874. 1
  33875. 1
  33876. 1
  33877. 1
  33878. 1
  33879. 1
  33880. 1
  33881. 1
  33882. 1
  33883. 1
  33884. 1
  33885. 1
  33886. 1
  33887. 1
  33888. 1
  33889. 1
  33890. 1
  33891. 1
  33892. 1
  33893. 1
  33894. 1
  33895. 1
  33896. 1
  33897. 1
  33898. 1
  33899. 1
  33900. 1
  33901. 1
  33902. 1
  33903. 1
  33904. 1
  33905. 1
  33906. 1
  33907. 1
  33908. 1
  33909. 1
  33910. 1
  33911. 1
  33912. 1
  33913. 1
  33914. 1
  33915. 1
  33916. 1
  33917. 1
  33918. 1
  33919. 1
  33920. 1
  33921. 1
  33922. 1
  33923. 1
  33924. 1
  33925. 1
  33926. 1
  33927. 1
  33928. 1
  33929. 1
  33930. 1
  33931. 1
  33932. 1
  33933. 1
  33934. 1
  33935. 1
  33936. 1
  33937. 1
  33938. 1
  33939. 1
  33940. 1
  33941. 1
  33942. 1
  33943. 1
  33944. 1
  33945. 1
  33946. 1
  33947. 1
  33948. 1
  33949. 1
  33950. 1
  33951. 1
  33952. 1
  33953. 1
  33954. 1
  33955. 1
  33956. 1
  33957. 1
  33958. 1
  33959. 1
  33960. 1
  33961. 1
  33962. 1
  33963. 1
  33964. 1
  33965. 1
  33966. 1
  33967. 1
  33968. 1
  33969. 1
  33970. 1
  33971. 1
  33972. 1
  33973. 1
  33974. 1
  33975. 1
  33976. 1
  33977. 1
  33978. 1
  33979. 1
  33980. 1
  33981. 1
  33982. 1
  33983. 1
  33984. 1
  33985. 1
  33986. 1
  33987. 1
  33988. 1
  33989. 1
  33990. 1
  33991. 1
  33992. 1
  33993. 1
  33994. 1
  33995. 1
  33996. 1
  33997. 1
  33998. 1
  33999. 1
  34000. 1
  34001. 1
  34002. 1
  34003. 1
  34004. 1
  34005. 1
  34006. 1
  34007. 1
  34008. 1
  34009. 1
  34010. 1
  34011. 1
  34012. 1
  34013. 1
  34014. 1
  34015. 1
  34016. 1
  34017. 1
  34018. 1
  34019. 1
  34020. 1
  34021. 1
  34022. 1
  34023. 1
  34024. 1
  34025. 1
  34026. 1
  34027. 1
  34028. 1
  34029. 1
  34030. 1
  34031. 1
  34032. 1
  34033. 1
  34034. 1
  34035. 1
  34036. 1
  34037. 1
  34038. 1
  34039. 1
  34040. 1
  34041. 1
  34042. 1
  34043. 1
  34044. 1
  34045. 1
  34046. 1
  34047. 1
  34048. 1
  34049. 1
  34050. 1
  34051. 1
  34052. 1
  34053. 1
  34054. 1
  34055. 1
  34056. 1
  34057. 1
  34058. 1
  34059. 1
  34060. 1
  34061. 1
  34062. 1
  34063. 1
  34064. 1
  34065. 1
  34066. 1
  34067. 1
  34068. 1
  34069. 1
  34070. 1
  34071. 1
  34072. 1
  34073. 1
  34074. 1
  34075. 1
  34076. 1
  34077. 1
  34078. 1
  34079.  @julianpetkov8320  👈 Some ppl are just plain ole masochistic. Okay... gave you a shot stop discrediting and embarrassing yourself. Too bad you didn't take it. 👇 Timeline.... He bring up 👉"the "Russia Russia Russia" conspiracy theory. I bring up the investigation into the "Russia Russia Russia conspiracy theory". 👉"no sooner than you're going to read Volume 2 of the Mueller report." Logical next step, I think... 🤷 He counters with this claim about what is in the Mueller Report. 👉 " Seriously? You bring up a document which state's clear that they found, "no Russian collusion". (even using quotations) Being that I know he is lying, because I've actually studied the Mueller report. Both volumes... I ask him to give me the page it's on. 👉 "🤣 Does it? Where? What page? Quote it, or maybe just give the page number. I have a copy. I can look up the quote myself. I'll even post it. I can always tell those who have not actually read it. 🤣 Btw, what is volume 2 about? 🤣" At which point he disappears for 14 hours until I Puppet Master him back into the conversation with this... "Still waiting". He then starts to try and Flip It On Me by insisting that it is somehow my job to prove his claim. 👉" You are still waiting? You still haven't produced the page number that does!" At this point he also tries to deflect and distract onto another subject, for the first but not last time. Which I obviously find utterly ridiculous, because I know and he knows it's not in the Mueller report. So he's basically asking me to prove his point about something I know isn't in there. Yep... That is the logic he is using... 🤦 👉"why in the world would I have to produce a page number in the Mueller report for a claim you say is in there? Nice try though. You claim the Mueller report states that there was no evidence of Russian collusion found. I'll be waiting for you to produce that page? No more desperate attempts to switch it around because you can actually find the page either. That's just sad." But since, apparently, he has no other tools in his belt, he tries the same thing again. Claiming it's my "onus" to prove that his lie about what the Mueller report says is true. Then trying yet again to deflect to another subject. 👉" IKR, you brought it up so why would you need to provide a page reference. All you need to say is read the Mueller report and Wallah your report is made." Except, that ridiculous assertion was June to fail. Considering he literally pretended to quote a specific phrase in the Mueller report. Which can be easily looked up by the page number. Of course it would be easy to do so if what he claimed was in there is actually in there. It's not so he has to keep dancing. And, of course, Q the second attempt at distraction and deflection to another subject. Except the time I address it. 👉"dude, you literally have no credibility as long as you keep making these silly excuses as to why you can't point out the claim you made in the Mueller report. Did I bring up the motor report? Yes. Did I make the claim that the Mueller report said there was no evidence of collusion found? No. You did that. All I'm doing is asking you to point out the page and the fact that you can't, says all we need to know. So keep referencing random s*** to try and deflect and distract but you need to know I don't get distracted. Provide proof for your claim and we can move on." He has nowhere else to go and so is forced to keep making the same ridiculous assertion that it's my job to improve his lie about what in the Mueller report. This time citing that I'm the one that brought up the Mueller report so it's my job to prove his lie. except that's a ridiculous assertion because I'm not the one that made that claim. .. But he's desperate try and flip this on me because he knows he lied. 👉 " don't wait, read it and produce the reference page. You brought it up the onus is on you." And then he provides a second, trying to discredit the Mueller report after trying to use it as a reference himself.🤣 So he gets another question he's going to run away from momentarily. 👉"Did I say the Muller report said it found no evidence of collusion or did you?" And the latest golden nugget... 🤣 👉 " can you cite the page number that it did? "no" Well then why are you playing word games? Find something better to do." As you can see, a clear representation of him being completely full of s*** and not wanting to admit it. Let's see what funny pretzel shape he turns himself into now... In order to get out of his silly lie.😁
    1
  34080. 1
  34081. 1
  34082. 1
  34083.  @julianpetkov8320  👈 Some ppl are just plain ole masochistic. Okay... gave you a shot stop discrediting and embarrassing yourself. Too bad you didn't take it. 👇 Timeline.... He bring up 👉"the "Russia Russia Russia" conspiracy theory. I bring up the investigation into the "Russia Russia Russia conspiracy theory". 👉"no sooner than you're going to read Volume 2 of the Mueller report." Logical next step, I think... 🤷 He counters with this claim about what is in the Mueller Report. 👉 " Seriously? You bring up a document which state's clear that they found, "no Russian collusion". (even using quotations) Being that I know he is lying, because I've actually studied the Mueller report. Both volumes... I ask him to give me the page it's on. 👉 "🤣 Does it? Where? What page? Quote it, or maybe just give the page number. I have a copy. I can look up the quote myself. I'll even post it. I can always tell those who have not actually read it. 🤣 Btw, what is volume 2 about? 🤣" At which point he disappears for 14 hours until I Puppet Master him back into the conversation with this... "Still waiting". He then starts to try and Flip It On Me by insisting that it is somehow my job to prove his claim. 👉" You are still waiting? You still haven't produced the page number that does!" At this point he also tries to deflect and distract onto another subject, for the first but not last time. Which I obviously find utterly ridiculous, because I know and he knows it's not in the Mueller report. So he's basically asking me to prove his point about something I know isn't in there. Yep... That is the logic he is using... 🤦 👉"why in the world would I have to produce a page number in the Mueller report for a claim you say is in there? Nice try though. You claim the Mueller report states that there was no evidence of Russian collusion found. I'll be waiting for you to produce that page? No more desperate attempts to switch it around because you can actually find the page either. That's just sad." But since, apparently, he has no other tools in his belt, he tries the same thing again. Claiming it's my "onus" to prove that his lie about what the Mueller report says is true. Then trying yet again to deflect to another subject. 👉" IKR, you brought it up so why would you need to provide a page reference. All you need to say is read the Mueller report and Wallah your report is made." Except, that ridiculous assertion was June to fail. Considering he literally pretended to quote a specific phrase in the Mueller report. Which can be easily looked up by the page number. Of course it would be easy to do so if what he claimed was in there is actually in there. It's not so he has to keep dancing. And, of course, Q the second attempt at distraction and deflection to another subject. Except the time I address it. 👉"dude, you literally have no credibility as long as you keep making these silly excuses as to why you can't point out the claim you made in the Mueller report. Did I bring up the motor report? Yes. Did I make the claim that the Mueller report said there was no evidence of collusion found? No. You did that. All I'm doing is asking you to point out the page and the fact that you can't, says all we need to know. So keep referencing random s*** to try and deflect and distract but you need to know I don't get distracted. Provide proof for your claim and we can move on." He has nowhere else to go and so is forced to keep making the same ridiculous assertion that it's my job to improve his lie about what in the Mueller report. This time citing that I'm the one that brought up the Mueller report so it's my job to prove his lie. except that's a ridiculous assertion because I'm not the one that made that claim. .. But he's desperate try and flip this on me because he knows he lied. 👉 " don't wait, read it and produce the reference page. You brought it up the onus is on you." And then he provides a second, trying to discredit the Mueller report after trying to use it as a reference himself.🤣 So he gets another question he's going to run away from momentarily. 👉"Did I say the Muller report said it found no evidence of collusion or did you?" And the latest golden nugget... 🤣 👉 " can you cite the page number that it did? "no" Well then why are you playing word games? Find something better to do." As you can see, a clear representation of him being completely full of s*** and not wanting to admit it. Let's see what funny pretzel shape he turns himself into now... In order to get out of his silly lie.😁
    1
  34084. 1
  34085. 1
  34086. 1
  34087. 1
  34088. 1
  34089. 1
  34090. 1
  34091. 1
  34092. 1
  34093. 1
  34094. 1
  34095. 1
  34096. 1
  34097. 1
  34098. 1
  34099. 1
  34100. 1
  34101. 1
  34102. 1
  34103. 1
  34104. 1
  34105. 1
  34106. 1
  34107. 1
  34108. 1
  34109. 1
  34110. 1
  34111. 1
  34112. 1
  34113. 1
  34114. 1
  34115. 1
  34116. 1
  34117. 1
  34118. 1
  34119. 1
  34120. 1
  34121. 1
  34122. 1
  34123. 1
  34124. 1
  34125. 1
  34126. 1
  34127. 1
  34128. 1
  34129. 1
  34130. 1
  34131. 1
  34132. 1
  34133. 1
  34134. 1
  34135. 1
  34136. 1
  34137. 1
  34138. 1
  34139. 1
  34140. 1
  34141. 1
  34142. 1
  34143. 1
  34144. 1
  34145. 1
  34146. 1
  34147. 1
  34148. 1
  34149. 1
  34150. 1
  34151. 1
  34152. 1
  34153. 1
  34154. 1
  34155. 1
  34156. 1
  34157. 1
  34158. 1
  34159. 1
  34160. 1
  34161. 1
  34162. 1
  34163. 1
  34164. 1
  34165. 1
  34166. 1
  34167. 1
  34168. 1
  34169. 1
  34170. 1
  34171. 1
  34172. 1
  34173. 1
  34174. 1
  34175. 1
  34176. 1
  34177. 1
  34178. 1
  34179. 1
  34180. 1
  34181. 1
  34182. 1
  34183. 1
  34184. 1
  34185. 1
  34186.  @stevenfriess9708  It's super simple to understand. The Congressional body investigate possible crimes and misconduct committed during the president's time in office. This doesn't just apply to the president either. It applies to many other nationally elected or appointed governmental figures. Such as elected Congress persons, secretaries of State, surgeon general's etc. Again, you don't get to rewrite the rules because you found your guy on the other side of them. And this, "cuz all president was naming people employed by the government" 👈 right here, is just silly, cherry picked, desperation. It's called setting up a paper tiger so you can knock it down. You should probably not do that anymore. Andrew silly shoot the messenger arguments don't matter either. When you run out of logical reasoning it's always about blame the media for you guys. Like they're the ones making all these people do all this stupid s**. Here's a thought. Maybe just get your people to stop doing stupid s** and hold them accountable for it when they do. Then the media will stop reporting on the stupid s*** they do. "Why haven't they subpoenaed Trump?" 👈 Its an investigative body. They are literally investigating right now. You've had to of watched crime documentaries. You tell me, do the bring the suspect in right away, before they have evidence to put in front of them of their crime, or do they generally do the investigating and Gathering of said evidence first? Honestly these are not hard things to figure out if you want to. "Why hasn't anyone been charged with insurrection?" 👈 Do you think the pawns Trump used to "storm the castle" that day where the organizers or leaders? They charge them with the big stuff. What I don't get is why you guys keep trying to ask that same damn question and act like all the evidence that this was a clearly organized event magically goes away because you do. You're literally trying to defend the actions of people who were trying to overthrow your own government. All because they believed a lie.
    1
  34187. 1
  34188. 1
  34189. 1
  34190. 1
  34191. 1
  34192. 1
  34193. 1
  34194. 1
  34195. 1
  34196. 1
  34197. 1
  34198. 1
  34199. 1
  34200. 1
  34201. 1
  34202. 1
  34203. 1
  34204. 1
  34205. 1
  34206. 1
  34207. 1
  34208. 1
  34209. 1
  34210. 1
  34211. 1
  34212. 1
  34213. 1
  34214. 1
  34215. 1
  34216. 1
  34217. 1
  34218. 1
  34219. 1
  34220. 1
  34221. 1
  34222. 1
  34223. 1
  34224. 1
  34225. 1
  34226. 1
  34227. 1
  34228. 1
  34229. 1
  34230. 1
  34231. 1
  34232. 1
  34233. 1
  34234. 1
  34235. 1
  34236. 1
  34237. 1
  34238. 1
  34239. 1
  34240. 1
  34241. 1
  34242. 1
  34243. 1
  34244. 1
  34245. 1
  34246. 1
  34247. 1
  34248. 1
  34249. 1
  34250. 1
  34251. 1
  34252. 1
  34253. 1
  34254. 1
  34255. 1
  34256. 1
  34257. 1
  34258. 1
  34259. 1
  34260. 1
  34261. 1
  34262. 1
  34263. 1
  34264. 1
  34265. 1
  34266. 1
  34267. 1
  34268. 1
  34269. 1
  34270. 1
  34271. 1
  34272. 1
  34273. 1
  34274. 1
  34275. 1
  34276. 1
  34277. 1
  34278. 1
  34279. 1
  34280. 1
  34281. 1
  34282. 1
  34283. 1
  34284. 1
  34285. 1
  34286. 1
  34287. 1
  34288. 1
  34289. 1
  34290. 1
  34291. 1
  34292. 1
  34293. 1
  34294. 1
  34295. 1
  34296. 1
  34297. 1
  34298. 1
  34299. 1
  34300. 1
  34301. 1
  34302. 1
  34303. 1
  34304. 1
  34305.  @endurovro   Enduro  Q: how do I make myself look like I'm an a**** just pretending to be educated on the subject of taxes, as quickly as possible? A: All the BS in the comment you just made. I have worked for H&R Block for the past 12 years and my mother has been there 30 and is the lead Tax Advisor in two different states. Louisiana and Texas. There are so many errors in those paragraphs I don't even know where to start. So some get financial aid but that does not help their tax return amount. It hurts it. ITIN is what they use to file. Most tend to fill 10-90s in some form or another and not w-2s. Sense most have to file under independent contractor status. Most do not qualify for earned income tax credit because of their legal status and therefore pay in more. The contributing factor is also a lack of records for their pay. Oftentimes they are a fraid to answer too many questions when they come in and so miss out on several exemptions they could have gotten. Which cancels out the rest of your tax paragraph. As far as the rest, I love you guys. Y'all are super entertaining. You think you're a little diatribe there in the last two paragraphs was clever. When in all actuality you do what every other Trump supporter dies when trying to defend your dear leader. You make a crap ton of baseless assumptions, set up a paper tiger and then feel really proud of yourself when you tear that thing down. Not once considering the fact that maybe if you have to make s*** up in order to have an argument about something... Maybe... Just maybe... It's not worth arguing.
    1
  34306. 1
  34307.  @kennethlaw5216   Kenneth Law  The Irish and chinese that came over where not legal. They brought them over to build our cities and railways... To work in our coal mines after. Some but few where. There are many other examples of illegal and slave labor in history. They even enslaved indians for decades after. It was built on both. As far as the drug war... I and hisory refer to it as our drug war because we gave it the legs that needed to run. We're drugs around before the CIA in America got involved? Of course. But as far as America Mexico and the areas and countries surrounding it, we might as well have given it an IV of stimulants for the past 50 years or so. Before that cartels had not ravaged their countries. Violence was way down and their economy wasn't that bad. Or corrupt. Look up the CIA and our drug war. All the rest of what you were saying is pure craziness. You do know that's a misnomer right? Yes lots of them come here wanting a better life. They also come here and work their ass off for it. For you to just blanket get make all these assumptions about them says a lot about you and not that. Unless you would like to explain how you know that they don't give a s*** or they don't work hard or they don't fight for this country and would not in the future? Do you know these people? You know who they are or where they're from? Do you know their names? Do you know anything about them? No. You do not. So all of that craziness is just a bunch of small-minded assumptions trying to make you feel like you're somehow better than they are. So you should probably look into that. Cuz you're just making a bunch of asinine assumptions about people you don't even know.
    1
  34308. 1
  34309.  @kennethlaw5216  You do get that feeling, the need to call people stupid, only furthers my point in my last comment right? You even go further this time. Making assumptions about me that you could not possibly know. Your trying to tell yourself a story. You need to do that. You need to put people on a lower level then you. If you had a real point, you would not need to do all that from the jump to validate yourself like that. I mean... I can tell you I come from a strong military family, 5 generations back, on both sides. I can tell you both my grandfather's (british and american) faught in ww1 and ww2. I could tell you both my grandmothers where army nurses in them as well. I could tell you that I am a single mother who works 4 different jobs. Uber, Lyft, door dash and I run my own graphic design biz. I vould tell you that is as well as being a head PTA mom and karate mom. I could tell you when I'm not doing all that I'm helping my sister in law take care of my brothers 3 kids because he is deployed to Iraq right now and she works 60 hours a week herself. I could tell you about my uncle Bruce who died in tower 1. I could tell you that none of the 911 hijackers came through the border all of you are talking about. I could tell you that in our last 100 years only 1 suspected terrorist has ever crossed with illegal immigrants of any kind. I could tell you the Americans who get to ignore laws ( that you seam to be so angry at ) are the same one who are putting all those scare tactics in your head. I could tell you that those same people are trying to convince you that some how all these illegal immigrants with no power are to blame for the hardship you have instead of them (rich and powerful). I could tell you all of that and more to prove your misguided assumptions about me and others are wrong... But... Thats not what it's about... At least not for you. You need someone to blame. You need someone to look down on. Your not going to understand that if every illegal immigrant left the country today your life would still not be any better and those people who have convinced you of that would just find someone else to scapegoat. You're willing pawn because you can't see past your own irrational hate.
    1
  34310. 1
  34311.  @kennethlaw5216  So that was an honest argument based on fact and logic. So for that effort I will respond. Almost all of what you said was accurate. It is about big buisness. It is about short term thinking. It is about useful pawns. The only thing that I find people like you ( smart but often to frustrated to see the whole bored ) miss is... Your manner of thinking, your overt hate for these people, and yes, your belittling of them plays right into their hands. You feel powerless to stop these currupt politicians and big biz but they know that you need to take that frustration out on someone. So they can keep doing what they are doing and you will keep doing what they want. It's those illegals! They are to blame. Not the companies that are taking just as much advantage of them ( if not more so ) as they are you. No! They are touchable. Them you can reach. Not some abstract CEO you have never and probabaly will never lay your eyes on. It's easier to hate and judge them. You just don't realize by perpetuating that irrational hate for the other, your feeding into it. Your helping those biz men to keep doing what they are doing. You actually said it yourself in this last comment.... " so when we all quit for better-paying jobs it forced them to pay more money to steal workers from other companies." You mean to say... You came together instead of being divided and it ended up that people got paid more twards what they where worth? I mean... It seams like you have been in this a long time sweetheart and I think you have a little bit of the fog of war going on... And that you don't really see what you say sometimes. You say your not desprate or superior... "This clown has been here 30 years illegally and is proud of it." You have to belittle them by calling them names without provocation. Also make assumptions about how they feel without knowing. Giving you the excuse to belittle them. " no we are not built on illegals" You are offended at the idea of someone not being here legally and yet still helping to build this nation you are so very proud of. Dispite the facts of the matter. " they wanted a better life and that's the only thing we have in common with illegals " Affirmative statment. You could npt possibly be anything like "these people". Only that one thing. No more. Which is obviously illogical. Come on now. "( your grandfather) he didn't get handouts and send his kids to school on other legal peoples tax dollar " In your last comment you mentioned they work. Most work very hard. They work hard dispite not getting the protections afforded to us, dispite being hated and attacked constantly because if circumstance. I'm not saying the system isn't badly broken. I'm saying they are just as much pawns in that game as you are and you hate them for it. "Of the shithole he left" Belittling even where they come from. Thats not even as good. Its necessary to put it down, for you. You can't think for a min that what if that was you waving an American flag in another country and it offended someone so much theybhad to tell you your home was a shithole. Wouldn't you find that offensive and unnecessary? Mostly, would you care to listen to that person's plight any more after that? " most of these people who come here have no respect for America. Won't fight for it. They were too big of cowards to fight to save their own country. All they want is a handout." Finding it necessary to illogically villainize them. Justifying your attacks. Knowing that you saying that can't possibly be coming from a place of logic. Cuz you don't know these people. So how could you know this? You mention schools a lot. So you know on some level they are doing it for their kids. If you had to choose between your kids staying alive and your country.... We know what we would all choose and that is the choices most of these parents have to make. They are not being cowerds. They are being whatever they have to be to keep their kids breathing. They are being parents. Any parent understands that. This is where we get into you needlessly insulting me. Fun times. " innocent children? Really put down the crack pipe" Yes. Innocent children. You said it yourself right after. " the only reason they are here in the first place is because their parents broke the law and brought them here". So yes. Innocent children. No you should not feel sorry for them. We should help them. They are children and need it. Thats all anyone would need to know who had not already began seeing them as less than. If you see a child who is lost, you help them get home, if they are without food, you share yours. Because what if that was your child that was hungry and lost. Wouldnt you want someone else to help them? That's not being a bleeding heart. Thats just being a decient person. And the "crack pipe" thing. I only mention it because it is the start of you seeing me as someone you need to start bringing down. A threat of some kind. A challange to your ideas. So you have to make yourself feel above me. " you still don't get it stupid. It's obvious you have never worked hard a day in your life. Well I'm sure you think you have but I can tell you haven't" Now normally someone with healthy reasoning does not feel the need to belittle someone else because they simply dont agree with what they are saying. Its unnecessary because they don't need their validation. You, from this point on... Have to do it. You have to try and make me smaller some how. You have to villainize me without knowing anything about me. Make assumptions. Tell yourself a story to justify your actions. That's not logical. " your ancestors must be so proud of you. That you turned your back on the law and Country they swore to protect." Drastic overreaction and more villainization. You feel more threatened and so you ratchet up the story you tell yourself. I have to be all these things because I don't agree with all of what you're saying. The very core of who I am has to be bad because of that. That's not logical. " also you notice that I said you didn't serve. You see it takes honor and patriotism to stand up for what's right" See now I'm not perfect and thought of clapping back just then. In the end I just decided tondonwhat I'm doing now. Trying to point something out to someone in obvious pain so that maybe he could see it, address it and live a little happier. ... But the implication isn't logical, right? you don't have to have served in the military to be a patriot or to have honor. You don't I don't and nobody else does. Thomas Jefferson said dissent is the highest form of patriotism. A founding father. Being willing to point out our broken bits, dispite the hate you get fpr it, so that we can work to make it better is honorable, is patriotism. Its how we learn and grow. So when I say your taking the wrong tactic, your angry at the wrong people and you have to make people feel smaller to make yourself feel better, these are all the completely unnecessary examples of what I mean. you're getting mad at the wrong people and just giving those people that deserve that anger what they want.
    1
  34312. 1
  34313. 1
  34314. 1
  34315. 1
  34316. 1
  34317. 1
  34318. 1
  34319. 1
  34320. 1
  34321. 1
  34322. 1
  34323. 1
  34324. 1
  34325. 1
  34326. 1
  34327. 1
  34328.  @grassmastersmith4422   Grassmaster Smith  So let's break this down... " In that case all Democrats have completely violated the Hatch Act." Here is the problem with your argument. 1. Lets start with "all". How could you possibly know that without knowing or at least seeing all Dems do so? 2. The Hatch acts main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president and the vice president.... Which can obviously not be all of them. 3. Those who fit that criteria should be punished irregardless of political party. I see that you were only speaking about the Democrats. I would be more than willing to prosecute democrats for that if you're willing to prosecute Republicans? "Accusing Trump of what they have been doing all along." 1. What have they accused him of that you think he is not guilty of? 2. Trump himself accuses people all the time of things that he simply knows nothing about. So glass houses... Is all I'm saying. 3. What democrates have spacifically been guilty of the things the dems accuse Trump of? "Democrates aren't able to survive any logical argument. They have to silence and censor their opponents to have any chance." I would just like to remind you that I have had to inform you of basic facts about the subjects that you have brought up several times now. Simple things, that took me only a moment to look up myself. So I would assume that "logical arguments" would begin with all pertinent facts and therefore you would have shown yourself to be ill equiped for such an argument, yourself. Also, I would remind you that the republicans have built a bad reputation for gerrymandering. Which is silencing people in the most importantent of forums. Their vote. "I think the Democrats need to man up and show they have some plans that make sense." Well... I have good news for you there. Many Dems have solid plans for lots of key issues. Healthcare, infrastructure, marijuana legalization, climate change, gun regulations and much more. I'd be happy to find some for you, if you would like? " They need to be able to honestly dispute Conway." They have, as I have already shown with the Hatch Act. Also... I should remind you that the original claim came from the Trump counsel office and the Republicans. Not the Democrates. As for your last comment... You do understand that this accusation of Hatch Act breach did not come from the Democrats, right? It came from the Republican White House counsel's Office. That's where the recommendation of firing her over the Hatch Act came from. So the people who you characterize as trying to censor her are Trump's White House counsel.
    1
  34329. 1
  34330. 1
  34331. 1
  34332. 1
  34333. 1
  34334. 1
  34335. 1
  34336. 1
  34337.  @bradpotter6401  Yeah... Don't be making claims for which you are not prepared to back up with proof. That turns this from a fact based conversation, to one party just hurling wild speculation at the sight of no better response. NATO has stepped in where other countries, including us, have not. China is our economic competitor. If China was our Real Enemy they could collapse our economy, probably for good, tomorrow if they wanted. China owns over 50% of America's debt. All they have to do is call in a few markers, or stop the supply ships. America is their biggest customer. So to paint them as being against us is ludacris. As for NATO spending... All 30 Allies contribute to the NATO budget on an agreed cost-share formula based on Gross National Income, which represents a small percentage of each member’s defence budget. This is the principle of common funding, and demonstrates burden-sharing in action. These few by example. Your making it sould like NATO would collapse without us. They would not. You need all the facts. Just a few of its top earners. United States: 3.6% Greece: 2.4% United Kingdom: 2.1% Estonia: 2.1% Poland: 2.0% France: 1.8% Romania: 1.8% Latvia: 1.8% Lithuania: 1.7% Norway: 1.6% It's not our "assistance". It's our obligation. One that we all uphold, in order to keep the peace. It's essentially, you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us. A strategy that has kept us out of a third world war for 87 years now. But mostly, again you're not interested in the actions or intentions of, Vladimir Putin. He doesn't care about a peaceful resolution unless he gets to take over an entire country. He's not trying to hold on to anything. He doesn't have a hold of Ukraine. Ukraine is its own country. It's also in our defense Alliance. Meaning we defend it when people are trying to do things like invade and take it over. Just like any of these other countries would do for us. It's super easy for you to say "oh it's just Ukraine" when it's not the US. Except you would have a whole different take on the matter if it was us... and don't be deceived by Vladimir Putin. He's not attacking Ukraine to attack Ukraine. He's attacking Ukraine because he knows we have to defend it. He doesn't give a damn about Ukraine. What the hell does he get out of Ukraine?
    1
  34338. 1
  34339. 1
  34340. 1
  34341.  @headoftaxreformandpercenta4908  Things that you got wrong about your initial comment. " it's always on a run it how you choose to listen to the media blatantly lie without any desire for evidence" 👈 How in the world would you qualify that statement? You don't even know my real name... But you somehow know what I "always" do? "without any desire for evidence" Almost every interaction I have with anyone on here begins with me requiring them to provide evidence for their claims. Go look around the threads... You'll see plenty of evidence for that. " but when people counter your fragile believes you want to be certain they do all the homework for you" Again... Total stranger... You would have no way of knowing the state of what I do or do not "believe". For instance... Your word usage is incorrect. I don't believe anything. I am presented evidence for it. The have the the facts to back it up. Then I repeat it. "do all the homework for you." You mean require ppl to back up their claims, instead of them expecting me to prove their claims right? Why... Yes... That is exactly what I expect and give. "If you want the truth, turnoff to news" 👈 As I said... If you have proof this clip isn't try, present it? And I don't mean, give some vague reference to some show. I mean, provide specific proof of those specific claims. " you're literally choosing to live in a world of lies to confirm your own beliefs instead of searching for the actual truth" 👈 Again... What's my name? How do you know what I do? What is your evidence of this claim? Bc I don't automatically believe the total stranger on the internet? Just to name a few.
    1
  34342. 1
  34343. 1
  34344. 1
  34345. 1
  34346. 1
  34347. 1
  34348. 1
  34349. 1
  34350. 1
  34351. 1
  34352. 1
  34353. 1
  34354. 1
  34355. 1
  34356. 1
  34357. 1
  34358. 1
  34359. 1
  34360. 1
  34361. 1
  34362. 1
  34363. 1
  34364. 1
  34365. 1
  34366. 1
  34367. 1
  34368. 1
  34369. 1
  34370. 1
  34371. 1
  34372. 1
  34373. 1
  34374. 1
  34375. 1
  34376. 1
  34377. 1
  34378. 1
  34379. 1
  34380. 1
  34381. 1
  34382. 1
  34383. 1
  34384. 1
  34385. 1
  34386. 1
  34387. 1
  34388. 1
  34389. 1
  34390. 1
  34391. 1
  34392. 1
  34393. 1
  34394. 1
  34395. 1
  34396. 1
  34397. 1
  34398. 1
  34399. 1
  34400. 1
  34401. 1
  34402. 1
  34403. 1
  34404. 1
  34405. 1
  34406. 1
  34407. 1
  34408. 1
  34409. 1
  34410. 1
  34411. 1
  34412. 1
  34413. 1
  34414. 1
  34415. 1
  34416. 1
  34417. 1
  34418. 1
  34419. 1
  34420. 1
  34421. 1
  34422. 1
  34423.  Mr. J's Educational Oasis  1. Yeah... That's what you guys said about Bernie last time, and with being funded by the people, he went from almost no chance last time, to damn near beating the Clinton money machine for the nomination. Socialism, monarchy, Republic, Communists, dictatorship, democracy... You know what they all have in common? They are all operating systems. Putting a negative connotation on something like socialism is like saying, "I'm an Android girl, so iPhones must be evil." It's all in the hands of the user. Maybe you should not speak on things that you, obviously, do not understand. 2. Warren has done more fighting for the people and against corruption then any other female in office. 3. Yang... he probably doesn't have the name recognition to make it, this time. He does have a lot of good Financial policies. The last two democratic presidents that were that focused on the economy, got us out of debt for the first time in over 50 years (Clinton) and pulled us out of the Great Recession in under 7 months of being in office (Obama). Both of which proceeded Republican Bush's, who got us into those messes, all the while touting fiscal responsibility. SoOoOo.... Either next time or he would make a good VP. 4. Same goes for Castro... Probably not this time... But maybe a good VP. He has the people of America in mind. All of them... And not just thpse that agree with him. Like Trump. You can see it everytime he speaks and through his positions. 5. Harris... Well she has been fighting idiots like you, all her life. I think that's why you guys have to try and minamize her all the time. Your scared.... And you should be. 😜✌ YOUR asinine assumptions about me and people like me, don't matter. Period. And they don't matter because they're wrong. Because small-minded assholes like you have to make s*** up about us in order for you to have an argument. Your the useful idiots everyone is always talking about, blurting out right wing talking points, with words you don't understand and no actual substance behind them. You have to mischaracterize us and the policies of these Democrats because you need someone to blame and because your simply not that bright, any halfway coherent politician can come along and point you in a Direction... And all the sudden, your on it like white on rice. Run along little boy. Your not ready for the big kids table yet. 😜✌🇺🇸
    1
  34424. 1
  34425. 1
  34426. 1
  34427. 1
  34428. 1
  34429. 1
  34430. 1
  34431. 1
  34432. 1
  34433. 1
  34434. 1
  34435. 1
  34436. 1
  34437. 1
  34438. 1
  34439. 1
  34440. 1
  34441. 1
  34442. 1
  34443. 1
  34444. 1
  34445. 1
  34446. 1
  34447.  @FoxFox-lx3cv  But.... Sure... Lets knock these down... 1 by one. First, jobs and unemployment have to be considered under a larger scale than the last two years. Otherwise, you're just crediting the guy who crossed the finish line for a five-man relay race. That includes disreguarding Rep. Presidents accomplishments as well, Btw. Trump didn't just shpw up one day and everything got all shiny and new. The numbers back that up. Actually the monthly job growth numbers are down from Obama. " The U.S. Bureau of Labor announced that the economy added 224,000 jobs in June vs. expectations of 160,000 and May’s revised result of 72,000. The 224,000 is still strong, but there were revisions to April and May that subtracted 11,000 people hired in those months and government employment added 33,000. Overall private payrolls added 191,000 employees." "The stock markets are reacting negatively due to the jobs number being stronger than expected since investors are lowering their expectations that the Fed will cut interest rates by 50 basis points later this month. " "Over 29 months Obama added almost 1 million more jobs than Trump Trump entered office on January 20, 2017, and starting with February 2017 he has been President for 29 months. Total job growth during that time has been 5.613 million or 194,000 per month with those results being helped by the tax cut. Working back from January 2017, Obama’s last month in office, there had been 6.423 million jobs added or 221,000 per month. The difference for the 29 months is 810,000 more jobs or 27,000 more per month than Trump." "Note that back in January this year the total difference was only 194,000, which means over the past five months it has increased by 616,000. And looking at the next six months with Obama’s job numbers of 188,000 to 327,000 per month, the gap should only increase and cross 1 million." https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2019/07/05/trump-is-falling-almost-1-million-jobs-short-vs-obama/amp/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fchuckjones%2F2019%2F07%2F05%2Ftrump-is-falling-almost-1-million-jobs-short-vs-obama%2F
    1
  34448. 1
  34449.  @FoxFox-lx3cv  The US trade deficit, which Trump promised to reduce, grew nearly by 28%. The number of people without healthcare insurance Rose by 2 million to 7 million depending on the survey. The federal debt Rose by 1.8 trillion. Annual deficits accelerated. Home prices rose by 22.5% Carbon dioxide emissions Rose by 1.8% Federal debt held by public Rose by 12.5% Trump regularly and incorrectly brags that he's out of 4 million jobs since taking office. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the US economy added to million 188,000 jobs in 2017. Trump's first year in office. So far, it has added 1,306,000 jobs in 2018. But the economy added more jobs in every year of Obama's second term then it did in Trump's first term. This holds true when examining the average number of jobs added per month. Which Economist suggest that Trump's numbers is a continuation of an existing trend. The unemployment rate is the best it has been in a decade, holding steady at 3.9% in August. Shortly after Trump took office in February 2017, the unemployment rate was 4.7%. It has declined at a faster Pace than the Congressional budget office predicted at the beginning of Trumps term, but the unemployment rate had already stabilized. It was ranging between 4.6 and 5% starting in August of 2015. That represents over a five-point decline since unemployment peaked at 10% in October 2009, nine months after Obama took office. Another indicator of economic growth is the percentage of people employed during their Prime working years. In December 2009, right before the end of Obama's first year in office, 74.8% of adults between the age of 25 and 54 were employed. The years 2010 and 2011 marked the indicators low points, averaging 75.1% each year. But by the time Obama left office, but yearly average had rebounded to 77.9%. The ratio continue to climb through 2017, and averaging 78.6% for the year, and 2018 is on track to be the best year in a decade. As I said... 5 man relay race. During the 2016 campaign, Trump said the stock markets were in a big fat bubble. Stock have been Rising steadily since March 2009. But once he took office, he was first to point out any record-setting days. Trump regularly cites data from the Dow Jones Industrial Average, a collection of 30 us Blue Chip companies. But the Standard & Poor 500 stock index provides a more nuanced data set. Comparing the S&P performance with similar markets since just before Trump took office, the S&P 500 narrowly and stout China's for the largest percentage of overall growth, while the Germany and British Markets decline. As of mid-year the Chinese and German markets had kept pace with the United States, but in recent months the US Stock Market has posted games that have put it ahead. Wage growth is one of those instances where just because Trump repeats a statistic a lot doesn't make it accurate. Real median wages for all workers have been steadily increasing since 2014. In the last quarter of 2017, they plunged below their rate when Trump took office but have since recovered to about the same level. In other words after an initial bump, wages are basically where Obama left them. Property has been slowly decreasing since 2010. Also, trend worthy, from the Obama years. Business investment plunge to a low in the fourth quarter of 2005, but it rebounded in 2010. The year Obama took office. By the time trunk took office it had continued to climb steadily, gaining 2.6%. But that track with the upward momentum that started at the beginning of Obama's term. In other words... A BIG HUNK of trumps positive numbers, began with Obama. Obama, who began his term with a recession.
    1
  34450. 1
  34451. 1
  34452.  @FoxFox-lx3cv  You keep calling us brainwaished but you guys love to pretend that nothing happened befpre Trump took office. "data also show that President Trump benefited from a longer-term downward trend of illegal border crossings that started during President Bush’s second term" You wont even give other Rep presidenta cradit for anything... Guys on your side... But yeah... We are the ones who are brain washed, because we chppse to look at all relivant data. Sure. Lol As far as illegal or undocumented immigrants paying taxes, yeah. They've always paid taxes. Taking Obama out of context, does not prove otherwise. That quote was from a statment he gave, when talking about putting up a bill that would allow dreamers to get state ids. That would alow for more job oppertunities, more stante and fed taxes and filling reterns. Making assumptions is not an argument. Assuming that people won't applying for citizenship because they might not get it, especially on Mass, is ignorant. What do they have to lose? Speaking of the border wall oh, you remember that one time that Trump shutdown the government for the longest it had been shut down in over 10 decades, had government workers lining up with their children in bread lines and losing their homes, and then caved and made all of that for nothing? Do you remember that? The difference between Obama and Trump, sure, you might be able to question whether Obama did all the right things with illegal immigrants. But you know for damn sure that Trump doesn't give a s*** about them. He will take their children, hold them hostage, lose them in a system, while putting them in cages and unlocking some of them away in concentration camps in America. He doesn't give a shitt.
    1
  34453. 1
  34454. 1
  34455. 1
  34456. 1
  34457. 1
  34458. 1
  34459. 1
  34460. 1
  34461. 1
  34462. 1
  34463. 1
  34464. 1
  34465. 1
  34466. 1
  34467. 1
  34468. 1
  34469. 1
  34470. 1
  34471. 1
  34472. 1
  34473. 1
  34474. 1
  34475. 1
  34476. 1
  34477. 1
  34478. 1
  34479. 1
  34480. 1
  34481. 1
  34482. 1
  34483. 1
  34484. 1
  34485. 1
  34486. 1
  34487. 1
  34488. 1
  34489. 1
  34490. 1
  34491. 1
  34492. 1
  34493. 1
  34494. 1
  34495. 1
  34496. 1
  34497. 1
  34498. 1
  34499. 1
  34500.  @erickim6533 🤣 You stop giving me so much to correct in your tiny comments and I will stop making them so long... Just a thought. You skipped a key portion of the exam. I'm sure, on purpose, due to your inability to answer it.... Actually a few. How do you explain getting BASIC FACTS about the Mueller Report wrong in your statments? Things you can find on the first few pages? I mean BASIC BASIC.... like bread and butter type stuff? What evidence they found for each count or why they choose not to go after Trump? The fact that they gave 3 different reason, and the only one you have mentioned is the one I gave you? Why do you insist this is all somehow lazy thinking or small thinking on my part, when all I keep doing is pointing out the fact that you don't have all the facts, you keep insisting you don't need them to come to an educated opinion and you can't defend any of that in any kind of reasonable or rational manner? How does that make sense? Here's an example (Yet another thing, you don't give.) of the not rational portions I'm referring to. You equating a movie and a book, to an investigation into the current president of the United States, for possibly colluding with a foreign adversary, and then trying to cover it up. You wanna talk about wrong thinking. ... Why in the world would you not collect all the info on that, verify what you can and THEN come to an educated opinion based on those verified facts? And what's your explanation for the fact that at least 9 of his main staff from the campaign have been prosecuted and found guilty or taken deals? They found enough evidence for them. Also laid out in the Report you didn't bother to read.... 😉✌
    1
  34501. 1
  34502.  @erickim6533  You do know this isn't the Trump White House, right? Continuing to repeat a lie does not actually make it true. Watch! I'll show you. 😁 Fresh from the Mueller report. The thing you keep lying on and have never read. 1. This one is particularly funny because Trump, said this in public. Their by shooting himself in the foot. Which is kind of a running theme for him and makes it all the more difficult for you to lie about. " the presidential campaign of Donald J Trump showed interest in Wikileaks release of documents and welcome to their potential to damage candidate Clinton. Beginning in June 2016, a redacted had campaign official began to forecast that Wikileaks would release information damaging to Canada Clinton. Wikileaks first release came in July of 2016. Around the same time candidate Trump announced that he hoped Russia would recover emails described as missing from a private server used by Clinton when she was Secretary of State. Less than 24 hours after Donald J Trump made this request, they began releasing the stolen emails." 2. Documented Russian contacts with the Trump campaign and vice versa. " in January of 2016 Trump organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dimitri PE Skov. The Trump organization pursued the project through at least June 2016, including by considering travel to Russia by Cohen and candidate Trump." " campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos made early contact with Joseph m i f s u d, a london-based professor who had connections to Russia and traveled to Moscow in April 2016. Immediately upon his return to London from that trip, Joseph told Papadopoulos that the Russian government had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later, in the first week of May 2016, Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to the Clinton campaign. Throughout that period of time and for several months thereafter, Papadopoulos worked with Joseph and 2 Russian Nationals to arrange a meeting between the campaign and the Russian government." " on June 9th 2016, a Russian lawyer met with senior campaign official Donald Trump jr., Jared Kushner and campaign chairman Paul manafort to deliver what the email proposing the meeting had described as official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary Clinton. The materials were offered to Donald J Trump as part of Russia and its government support for mr. Trump. The written communication setting up the meeting showed that the campaign anticipated receiving information from Russia that could assist candidate Trump's election prospects, " " days after the June 9th meeting, on June 14th 2016, a cybersecurity firm and the DNC announce that the Russian government hackers had infiltrated the DNC and obtained access to opposition research on candidate Trump, among other documents." " in July of 2016 campaign foreign policy advisor Carter page traveled in his personal capacity to Moscow and gave the keynote address at the new economic School. Page had lived and worked in Russia between 2003 and 2007. After returning to the United States, page became acquainted with at least two Russian Intelligence Officers, and one of whom was later charged in 2015 with conspiracy to act as an unregistered agent of Russia. Pages July 2016 trip to Moscow and his advocacy for pro-russian foreign policy Drew media attention. The campaign then distanced itself from page and, by late September 2016 removed him from the campaign." " July 2016 was also the month Wikileaks first released emails stolen by the Gru from the DNC. On July 22nd 2016, Wiki links posted thousands of internal DNC documents revealing information about the Clinton campaign. Within days there was public reporting that us intelligence agencies had high confidence that the Russian government was behind the theft of emails and documents from the DMC. And within a week of the release, a foreign government informed the FBI about its May 2016 interaction with Papadopoulos and his statement that the Russian government could assist the Trump campaign. On July 31st 2016, based on the foreign government reporting, the FBI has opened an investigation into potential coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign." That is just a fraction of the evidence for collusion, in the Mueller report, on the first four pages of the introduction. Reading is Handy! 😁
    1
  34503.  @erickim6533  now, on to obstruction of justice. Now I'm going to shorthand this a bit because I ain't got all day but you can find the long version of it starting on page 215 of the mall report. Not that I actually think you're going to read it. But you have a tendency to lie and I'm not going to have you lying on me. 1. Trump publicly expresses doubt that Russia was responsible for the hacks at the same time he and the other campaign officials privately sought information about any further planned Wikileaks releases. 2. At the same time Trump denied having any business in or connections to Russia, even though as late as 2016 the Trump organization had been pursuing a licensing deal for a skyscraper to be built in Russia called Trump Tower Moscow. 3. In mid January 2017 Michael Flynn falsely denied to the vice president and the FBI that he had talked to Russian Ambassador Sergey kislyak about Russians response to us sanctions on Russia for its election interference. 4. After which Trump decides to invite call me to a private dinner at the White House and told Comey that he needed loyalty. 5. He attempted on multiple occasions to get sessions to either not recuse himself from the investigation and two on recuse himself after he had. Announcing publicly on several occasions that he would have never hired sessions for the job is he was going to recuse himself. 6. That next march Comey disclose in a congressional hearing that the FBI was investigating Russian collusion in the Trump campaign. 7. At which point Trump starts reaching out to the Brass, the NSA the CIA and the FBI asking them to publicly dispel the suggestion that President Trump had connections with the Russian election interference effort. They refused. 8. after Comey testified in the Congressional hearing on May of 2017 that Trump was under investigation Trump fired him a couple of days later over Twitter. Later claiming that it was because of the Russia investigation to the Press. 9. 2 days after firing Comey Trump made another attempt to affect the course of the Russia investigation. He met with Corey Lewandowski and dictated a message for Lewandowski to deliver two sessions. He was trying to get sessions just say that the investigation was not fair and the president had done nothing wrong. Then he had told him to limit the investigation to just Russian interference. Lewandowski did not deliver that message. Later claiming he felt like he could be committing a crime if he did. 10. Trump made numerous attempts to block the efforts of the investigation from getting specific evidence. Including lying to the press and public about the June 9th 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Trump jr. Russian lawyers and Jared Kushner. Going so far as to dictate a letter Ford Trump jr. About how the meeting was about Russian adoption. Later on Trump jr. Would come clean on National Air about this. 11. Then there was all the efforts Trump made to try and fire Mueller. Which eventually led to Trump calling up Magan in the middle of the night and telling him he needed to fire Mueller. Then McGann refusing to do so, stating that he feared it would be a new Saturday night Massacre and going so far as to offering his resignation instead. 12. This will be my last one on obstruction but there's tons more. At one point Trump tries to get mcgann's secretary to draw up false documents lying about the Trump Moscow project and the June meeting. Saying that Cohen and and call me when lying in the Congressional hearing about the purpose of the meeting and Donald Trump dictating his sons press release about it. She also refused thinking that she would be committing a crime if she did so.
    1
  34504. 1
  34505. 1
  34506. 1
  34507. 1
  34508. 1
  34509. 1
  34510. 1
  34511. 1
  34512. 1
  34513. 1
  34514. 1
  34515. 1
  34516. 1
  34517. 1
  34518. 1
  34519. 1
  34520. 1
  34521. 1
  34522. 1
  34523. 1
  34524. 1
  34525. 1
  34526. 1
  34527. 1
  34528. 1
  34529. 1
  34530. 1
  34531. 1
  34532. 1
  34533. 1
  34534. 1
  34535. 1
  34536. 1
  34537. 1
  34538. 1
  34539. 1
  34540. 1
  34541. 1
  34542. 1
  34543. 1
  34544. 1
  34545. 1
  34546. 1
  34547. 1
  34548. 1
  34549. 1
  34550. 1
  34551. 1
  34552. 1
  34553. 1
  34554. 1
  34555. 1
  34556. 1
  34557. 1
  34558. 1
  34559. 1
  34560. 1
  34561. 1
  34562. 1
  34563. 1
  34564. 1
  34565. 1
  34566. 1
  34567. 1
  34568. 1
  34569. 1
  34570. 1
  34571. 1
  34572. 1
  34573. 1
  34574. 1
  34575. 1
  34576. 1
  34577. 1
  34578. 1
  34579.  @erickim6533  They are centered around the claims that you have made. So if they are " ridiculously convoluted", the answer to the "Why" is because you made "ridiculously convoluted" claims. Like... The Mueller investigation some how compares to the flat earth theory, or how the Mueller Report was a sham... And lets not forget the one that kicked this whole thing off.. You claiming you don't need to read the Mueller report to know what is in it. At one point, that one caused you to claim both that, the Mueller report found no evidence AND that it's a "sham".... but if the Mueller report is a "sham", does that mean there was evidence? SoOoOo, yeah... Little boy, I'm simply inquiring about the statments that you have made. Do I think your full of shit? I think I've made myself pretty clear on that front. However, I'm actually doing the opposite of assuming. Which would be asking questions, based off of your statments, in reguards to qualifying them. You clearly can not. That's why you can't answer them. You don't want to have to admit your lying, and forming opinions off of what you want to be true, but not what actually is true... Answering those questions, would be taint amount to saying that. Otherwise, a pompous ass, such as yourself, would have rubbed the evidence that you were right and I was wrong in my face a long time ago. You don't have it. You have nothing to back up your claims. Its not that hard to figure out. But that's what happens when you use little boy logic. 😉✌
    1
  34580.  @erickim6533  🤣 Ya know... If your ego is that damn delicate, you might need to start exploring why, with a trained professional... Just a thought! 🤣 And I'm not "write". I'm right! 🤣 Which is why you can't answer any of the questions I've been asking! 🤣 And I think I'll stick with quantity and quality. It seems to be kicking your ass just fine.... But you should really just use one, at least! This will be way less embarrassing for you, that way. 🤣 Cuz all you got is... Blah blah blah... Excuse... Excuse... Childish insult... Excuse... Childish insult... Excuse. Comment number count this... and... Validation that... Your crazy... And... It's all a big sham... La La La... I don't want to see or hear anything that might contradict what I have already decided is true.... La La La... I can't hear you! Least we forget, right and wrong are, apparently, is determined by area code now. 😉✌ Meanwhile! I found a clip today that reminded me of you! - No Obstruction! No Collusion! - It didn't say that! - Yes it did! - Have you read the report? - No! - Then how do you know? - .... Ummm.... ...... No obstruction! No collusion! - Here! 10 different ways that Trump obstructed Justice laid out in the Mueller report. (Then she lists them) - .... .... .... No obstruction! No collusion! It was almost eerie! Watch! 😉✌ https://youtu.be/ggwhYNKkZxM And of course... You keep trying to childishly insult me and I will keep showing how you can't back up your claims, by asking you questions that you cannot answer without blowing up your entire argument. 😉✌ SoOoOo.... Why can't you defend your claims about me and the Mueller Report with actual evidence? 😉✌ And... Why does your story keep changing about why you keep coming back? What is the evidence that the report is a sham? How is a multi prong, evidence based report, into weather is the current president of the United States had a foreign adversary help them get elected into office and then tried to cover it up, based on 2 years of investigation, finding a truck ton of evidence for each, that you haven't even read, in any way, equated to flat earth conspiracy theorists? How do you explain the 9 head campaign officials, who were either indicted or took deals? You really can't help yourself but come back, can you... You really can't figure out how to dig yourself out of the hole you dug with your nonsense claims. I think it's hilarious ! All I have to do is keep showing that you can't answer the questions. That's what makes silly people, like you, so easy to beat! 🤣
    1
  34581. 1
  34582. 1
  34583. 1
  34584.  @erickim6533  🤣 Ya know... If your ego is that damn delicate, you might need to start exploring why, with a trained professional... Just a thought! 🤣 Cuz all you got is... Blah blah blah... Excuse... Excuse... Childish insult... Excuse... Childish insult... Excuse. Comment number count this... and... Validation that... Your crazy... And... It's all a big sham... La La La... I don't want to see or hear anything that might contradict what I have already decided is true.... La La La... I can't hear you! Least we forget, right and wrong are, apparently, is determined by area code now. 😉✌ Meanwhile! I found a clip today that reminded me of you! - No Obstruction! No Collusion! - It didn't say that! - Yes it did! - Have you read the report? - No! - Then how do you know? - .... Ummm.... ...... No obstruction! No collusion! - Here! 10 different ways that Trump obstructed Justice laid out in the Mueller report. (Then she lists them) - .... .... .... No obstruction! No collusion! It was almost eerie! Watch! 😉✌ https://youtu.be/ggwhYNKkZxM And of course... You keep trying to childishly insult me and I will keep showing how you can't back up your claims, by asking you questions that you cannot answer without blowing up your entire argument. 😉✌ SoOoOo.... Why can't you defend your claims about me and the Mueller Report with actual evidence? 😉✌ And... Why does your story keep changing about why you keep coming back? What is the evidence that the report is a sham? How is a multi prong, evidence based report, into weather is the current president of the United States had a foreign adversary help them get elected into office and then tried to cover it up, based on 2 years of investigation, finding a truck ton of evidence for each, that you haven't even read, in any way, equated to flat earth conspiracy theorists? How do you explain the 9 head campaign officials, who were either indicted or took deals? You really can't help yourself but come back, can you... You really can't figure out how to dig yourself out of the hole you dug with your nonsense claims. I think it's hilarious ! All I have to do is keep showing that you can't answer the questions. That's what makes silly people, like you, so easy to beat! 🤣
    1
  34585. 1
  34586. 1
  34587.  @erickim6533  🤣 Ya know... If your ego is that damn delicate, you might need to start exploring why, with a trained professional... Just a thought! 🤣 Cuz all you got is... Blah blah blah... Excuse... Excuse... Childish insult... Excuse... Childish insult... Excuse. Comment number count this... and... Validation that... Your crazy... And... It's all a big sham... La La La... I don't want to see or hear anything that might contradict what I have already decided is true.... La La La... I can't hear you! Least we forget, right and wrong are, apparently, is determined by area code now. 😉✌ Meanwhile! I found a clip today that reminded me of you! - No Obstruction! No Collusion! - It didn't say that! - Yes it did! - Have you read the report? - No! - Then how do you know? - .... Ummm.... ...... No obstruction! No collusion! - Here! 10 different ways that Trump obstructed Justice laid out in the Mueller report. (Then she lists them) - .... .... .... No obstruction! No collusion! It was almost eerie! Watch! 😉✌ https://youtu.be/ggwhYNKkZxM And of course... You keep trying to childishly insult me and I will keep showing how you can't back up your claims, by asking you questions that you cannot answer without blowing up your entire argument. 😉✌ SoOoOo.... Why can't you defend your claims about me and the Mueller Report with actual evidence? 😉✌ And... Why does your story keep changing about why you keep coming back? What is the evidence that the report is a sham? How is a multi prong, evidence based report, into weather is the current president of the United States had a foreign adversary help them get elected into office and then tried to cover it up, based on 2 years of investigation, finding a truck ton of evidence for each, that you haven't even read, in any way, equated to flat earth conspiracy theorists? How do you explain the 9 head campaign officials, who were either indicted or took deals? You really can't help yourself but come back, can you... You really can't figure out how to dig yourself out of the hole you dug with your nonsense claims. I think it's hilarious ! All I have to do is keep showing that you can't answer the questions. That's what makes silly people, like you, so easy to beat! 🤣
    1
  34588. 1
  34589. 1
  34590. 1
  34591. 1
  34592. 1
  34593. 1
  34594. 1
  34595. 1
  34596. 1
  34597. 1
  34598. 1
  34599. 1
  34600. 1
  34601. 1
  34602. 1
  34603. 1
  34604. 1
  34605. 1
  34606. 1
  34607. 1
  34608. 1
  34609. 1
  34610. 1
  34611. 1
  34612. 1
  34613. 1
  34614. 1
  34615. 1
  34616. 1
  34617. 1
  34618. 1
  34619. 1
  34620. 1
  34621. 1
  34622. 1
  34623. 1
  34624. 1
  34625. 1
  34626. 1
  34627. 1
  34628. 1
  34629. 1
  34630. 1
  34631. 1
  34632. 1
  34633. 1
  34634.  @erickim6533  I don't think your wrong... Or like any of that... Just... One sided. As I'm sure I am as well. Thought I do try and see the other side. especially with decent and respectful people like you, calmly trying to illustrate your point. I try to find things we can agree on with you guys. There can be a middle ground. Noone is advicating for non-citizens to vote in our elections. a lot of the things that you say or right wing propaganda. Look, you seem reasonable and so I would implore you to do your research on these things and see how true they are before you swallow them whole. I do the same thing on my side. I don't comment on every video on CNN or MSNBC. Sometimes I even argue against what they're saying Because I've researched it and I've gone in and check their facts. They certainly don't get everything right all the time. and at the end of the day I'm more interested in the truth than I am about being right or wrong. because I can work with the truth. Even if it goes against what I thought was true. If I know there's truth and that truth is a particular problem then I'm better equipped to fix it... Ya know. Voting age... Hmmm... Can I say that I am undecided on that one? I see almost even positives and negatives on both sides. There's a reason that we don't allow teenagers to drink or smoke. It's literally that their brains aren't done growing and the part of their brain That needs to be developed to do that is one of the last ones to finish growing. insurent, they're not really good at decision-making and considering all the consequences of their actions. They're impulsive. At the same time, they're inheriting this from us, this country, this world. so part of me says, why shouldn't they get a say in what they're going to have to deal with in the future? Ya know? I go back and forth. Though, they don't all think the world is going to end in 12 years. Come on now. Not only could you not qualify that statement... It's an Oversimplification of the actual problem. And climate change is a problem. And it should be understood correctly or not Flippantly tossed to the side. Come on now. On some I think you're wrong, on others I don't. As I've laid out. as for winning until the next election, I understand why that would make more sense. in a political one side winning kind of way. Here's the thing though, I don't want Mike Pence To become the de facto president. What I'm more concerned about is our democracy though. The precedent it would set. Of having a president, tried to interfere in our electoral process in order to get himself re-elected to office And using his position and power to do so. if we don't challenge that, what we're saying to every president from now on, Democrat or Republican is all you have to do in order to steal the next election and ask for another countries help in doing so by leveraging them with American tax dollars, is to do so about a year before the election happens. Cuz, that way, its more politically expedient to just wait for the next election. that thinking is not good for either side.
    1
  34635. 1
  34636. 1
  34637. 1
  34638. 1
  34639. 1
  34640. 1
  34641. 1
  34642. 1
  34643. 1
  34644. 1
  34645. 1
  34646. 1
  34647. 1
  34648. 1
  34649. 1
  34650. 1
  34651. 1
  34652. 1
  34653. 1
  34654. 1
  34655. 1
  34656. 1
  34657. 1
  34658. 1
  34659. 1
  34660. 1
  34661. 1
  34662. 1
  34663. 1
  34664. 1
  34665. 1
  34666. 1
  34667. 1
  34668. 1
  34669. 1
  34670. 1
  34671. 1
  34672. 1
  34673. 1
  34674. 1
  34675. 1
  34676.  @eby2257  Per usual, your attempt to cherry pick facts in order to write a convenient version of history, that always only blames everything on one side of the isle. For example... You go from Bill Clinton and a nuclear disarmament deal that you left intentionally vague, to a decade later and and trying to, first, somehow blame President Obama for the Russian government and its leaders invading another country... which is just as ridiculous as people right now on the right trying to blame President Biden for Putin invading Ukraine... and then, lying about President Obama doing nothing about it. 1. President Obama, representing the US joined the UN General Assembly passing a non-binding resolution declaring crimea's Moscow backed referendum invalid. 2. President Obama implemented sanctions against the government of Russia itself and a butt ton it's countries oligarchs, personally. 2. He also encouraged the EU to suspend talks with Russia on economic and visa related matters, as well as encouraging them to sanction Russia themselves. With that and many other countries imposing similar measures, they kept Putin from pushing any further into Ukraine. The treaty you where referring to was a promise to defend them, if invaded or under threat. Not necessarily with the use of force. But not ruling out the use of force if needed. Why did President Obama not move directly 2 engaging in a war with Russia and try to few peaceful resolutions first? Gee... I don't know... 🤔 videos of something to do with Russia being the only country in the world with more nuclear weapons than we have and not wanting the whole world to turn into a nuclear apocalypse. "Crazy... I know." On the other hand you make that agreement sound like America was just supposed to send half their armed forces and plant them at the border of Ukraine and Russia for eternity. Which is the exact same thing your trying to make it sound like president Biden was supposed to do the same. Your seemingly trying to pretend that you don't know the difference between a protection treaty and their defense treaty. At the same time trying to tout Donald Trump as some kind of leader when it comes to Russia. When all he really was was Putin's b****. That's why when it was proven that Russia interfered in our 2016 election, Donald Trump did literally nothing and then went on the world stage and took Vladimir Putin's word over his own intelligence agencies, standing right beside Putin.
    1
  34677. 1
  34678. 1
  34679. 1
  34680. 1
  34681. 1
  34682. 1
  34683. 1
  34684. 1
  34685. 1
  34686. 1
  34687. 1
  34688. 1
  34689. 1
  34690.  @АндрейНикифоров-н5х  I know you keep telling me the narrative you have been told is true and want to believe is true... But how anyone can tell its what you want to believe, instead of what is actually true, is your unwillingness to acknowledge certain facts that go against that narrative or consider yourself to be possibly wrong. You've been fed this line of Nazism. I'm sure their are Nazis in Ukraine. You will find small minded ppl in every country. There are some in America. However, he is lying to you about it being so prevalent. That is the pretext he is using in order to invade another country. Literally every other country in the world is against him and his actions. The entire population of Ukraine are on the streets fighting him. The most passive countries in the world are against his unlawful invasion. The EU is holding an emergency session to get Ukraine in there. Ukraine was fixing to join the peace keepers, in the UN. So... You have the guy who ran the KGB, who's opposition has a tendency of randomly dying in strange ways, and who has a history of randomly attacking other countries for no damn reason (like the attack on America's election system, his attack on Crimea), who is telling you something is true and that is why he is invading another country and dropping buildings on little girls, while literally every other country in the world is telling you differently... But you want to believe these things... So you do. Occam's razor..... Your president was trying to set up a pretext for war.
    1
  34691. 1
  34692.  @АндрейНикифоров-н5х  That's your entire problem. Your version of "think logically" is the same as your version of "news". Only ever what fits your narrative. "They've been telling you how terrible Russian are mercilessly bombing Ukraine."👈 this is a false narrative you have repeated twice now to try and paint yourself as some kind of victim. No one is saying Russians. They are saying Putin is sending his army to do so.... And a lot of young conscripted boys... Not even with the best equipment and guns. Their cannon fodder. Except their not just saying that. They have gotten a lot of ppl out. They have also given anyone who wants to stay and fight, weapons to do so. Some Ukrainians have stayed behind for support. They ha e grandmothers making Molotov cocktails for god sakes. The death toll of civilians, thus far is 210. One of them being that 3 year old little girl you tried to dismiss by trying to pretend Putin didn't invade Russia and collapse a building on top of her. An apartment building. You know, the civilian buildings he's saying he's not aiming for but always seems to hit. NYU reality deniers always try and make it some kind of Twisted death contest, is beyond me. Like you saying some people dying makes other people's deaths not matter? Then you want to talk about logic. And you keep saying that something happened 48 years that nobody else is saying happened and you can't bring yourself to prove. You keep even avoiding the question that I you. Which was did the news report that you gave me say that it was Ukraine that was doing it or did they proved that Ukraine was doing it, because those are two very different things. Ukraine isn't your country. It belongs to the ukrainians. Not the Russians. You sound brainwashed.
    1
  34693. 1
  34694. 1
  34695.  @АндрейНикифоров-н5х  AND IM JUST REPEATING ALL OF THIS BC YOU DID EXACTLY WHAT I SAID YOU WOULD. TRY TO IGNORE IT. I know you keep telling me the narrative you have been told is true and want to believe is true... But how anyone can tell its what you want to believe, instead of what is actually true, is your unwillingness to acknowledge certain facts that go against that narrative or consider yourself to be possibly wrong. You've been fed this line of Nazism. I'm sure their are Nazis in Ukraine. You will find small minded ppl in every country. There are some in America. However, he is lying to you about it being so prevalent. That is the pretext he is using in order to invade another country. Literally every other country in the world is against him and his actions. The entire population of Ukraine are on the streets fighting him. The most passive countries in the world are against his unlawful invasion. The EU is holding an emergency session to get Ukraine in there. Ukraine was fixing to join the peace keepers, in the UN. So... You have the guy who ran the KGB, who's opposition has a tendency of randomly dying in strange ways, and who has a history of randomly attacking other countries for no damn reason (like the attack on America's election system, his attack on Crimea), who is telling you something is true and that is why he is invading another country and dropping buildings on little girls, while literally every other country in the world is telling you differently... But you want to believe these things... So you do. Occam's razor..... Your president was trying to set up a pretext for war.
    1
  34696. 1
  34697. 1
  34698. 1
  34699. 1
  34700. 1
  34701. 1
  34702. 1
  34703. 1
  34704. 1
  34705. 1
  34706.  @АндрейНикифоров-н5х  I know you keep telling me the narrative you have been told is true and want to believe is true... But how anyone can tell its what you want to believe, instead of what is actually true, is your unwillingness to acknowledge certain facts that go against that narrative or consider yourself to be possibly wrong. You've been fed this line of Nazism. I'm sure their are Nazis in Ukraine. You will find small minded ppl in every country. There are some in America. However, he is lying to you about it being so prevalent. That is the pretext he is using in order to invade another country. Literally every other country in the world is against him and his actions. The entire population of Ukraine are on the streets fighting him. The most passive countries in the world are against his unlawful invasion. The EU is holding an emergency session to get Ukraine in there. Ukraine was fixing to join the peace keepers, in the UN. So... You have the guy who ran the KGB, who's opposition has a tendency of randomly dying in strange ways, and who has a history of randomly attacking other countries for no damn reason (like the attack on America's election system, his attack on Crimea), who is telling you something is true and that is why he is invading another country and dropping buildings on little girls, while literally every other country in the world is telling you differently... But you want to believe these things... So you do. Occam's razor..... Your president was trying to set up a pretext for war.
    1
  34707. 1
  34708. 1
  34709. 1
  34710.  @АндрейНикифоров-н5х  why do you insist on ignoring these facts? I know you keep telling me the narrative you have been told is true and want to believe is true... But how anyone can tell its what you want to believe, instead of what is actually true, is your unwillingness to acknowledge certain facts that go against that narrative or consider yourself to be possibly wrong. You've been fed this line of Nazism. I'm sure their are Nazis in Ukraine. You will find small minded ppl in every country. There are some in America. However, he is lying to you about it being so prevalent. That is the pretext he is using in order to invade another country. Literally every other country in the world is against him and his actions. The entire population of Ukraine are on the streets fighting him. The most passive countries in the world are against his unlawful invasion. The EU is holding an emergency session to get Ukraine in there. Ukraine was fixing to join the peace keepers, in the UN. So... You have the guy who ran the KGB, who's opposition has a tendency of randomly dying in strange ways, and who has a history of randomly attacking other countries for no damn reason (like the attack on America's election system, his attack on Crimea), who is telling you something is true and that is why he is invading another country and dropping buildings on little girls, while literally every other country in the world is telling you differently... But you want to believe these things... So you do. Occam's razor..... Your president was trying to set up a pretext for war.
    1
  34711. 1
  34712. 1
  34713. 1
  34714. 1
  34715. 1
  34716. 1
  34717. 1
  34718. 1
  34719. 1
  34720. 1
  34721. 1
  34722. 1
  34723. 1
  34724. 1
  34725. 1
  34726. 1
  34727. 1
  34728. 1
  34729. 1
  34730. 1
  34731. 1
  34732. 1
  34733. 1
  34734. 1
  34735. 1
  34736. 1
  34737. 1
  34738. 1
  34739. 1
  34740. 1
  34741. 1
  34742. 1
  34743. 1
  34744. 1
  34745. 1
  34746. 1
  34747. 1
  34748. 1
  34749. 1
  34750. 1
  34751. 1
  34752. 1
  34753. 1
  34754. 1
  34755. 1
  34756. 1
  34757. 1
  34758. 1
  34759. 1
  34760. 1
  34761. 1
  34762. 1
  34763. 1
  34764. 1
  34765. 1
  34766. 1
  34767. 1
  34768. 1
  34769. 1
  34770. 1
  34771. 1
  34772. 1
  34773. 1
  34774. 1
  34775. 1
  34776. 1
  34777. 1
  34778. 1
  34779.  @inov8shun  I'm not asking you for your opinion. I'm determining whether your opinion is credible by asking you what facts you are basing your opinion on. When did I assume to know your politics? You keep saying you know the law. I have no evidence of this. Like, for instance oh, you don't seem to understand that him being able to not gather enough evidence to prove conspiracy (and not collusion, law guy,) would have something to do with the obstruction case that he laid out? Have you read the second part of the Mueller report? Where he laid out nine different detailed incidences of obstruction of justice? You keep saying you know the law but then you make flagrant allegations with no proof. Like how he was set up. And are you saying that's not what the statute says? You don't have to be charged with a crime until innocent before proven guilty is applied? Then why would you have to even have that statement be true? If you're not charged with anything you don't have to worry about guilt or innocence, correct? You're claiming that I'm telling you about your politics but you want to assume my political affiliation. When have I said that? I don't think I will be taking your word for anything because you keep making baseless accusations, claiming you know the law but don't understand the basic properties of such, and assuming you know things about me that you do not while getting all pissy because you're assuming I'm making assumptions about you. That doesn't seem like somebody I'm going to be taking their word on anything.
    1
  34780. 1
  34781. 1
  34782. 1
  34783. 1
  34784. 1
  34785. 1
  34786.  @inov8shun  I'm not pretending that a president can't be indicted. The US justice department has a decades-old policy that a sitting president can't be indicted, indicating that criminal charges against Trump would be unlikely, according to Legal experts. Ya know... The thing that your not. In 1973, in the midst of the Watergate scandal engulfing President Richard Nixon, the Justice Department's office of legal counsel adopted in an internal memo the position that a sitting president can't be indicted. Nixon resigned in 1974, with the House of Representatives moving towards impeaching him. " The spectacle of an indicted president still trying to serve as Chief executor boggles the imagination," the memo States The department reaffirm the policy in a 2000 memo, saying Court decisions in the intervening years had not changed its conclusion that a sitting president is "constitutionally immune" from indictment and criminal prosecution. It concluded that criminal charges against a president would "violate the Constitutional separation of powers," delineating the authority of the executive legislative and judicial branches of the United States government. I'm not saying it. The Department of Justice says it. You should know that if you know so much about the law. I'm not blaming the Senate. I'm stating facts. Those things you like to ignore if they don't fit your preconceived notion. Or are you saying the Republican owned Senate is going to impeach the Republican president? How many times do I have to tell you that you just saying s*** doesn't actually make it true? Are you a slow learner?
    1
  34787. 1
  34788. 1
  34789. 1
  34790. 1
  34791. 1
  34792. 1
  34793. 1
  34794. 1
  34795. 1
  34796. 1
  34797. 1
  34798. 1
  34799. 1
  34800. 1
  34801. 1
  34802. 1
  34803. 1
  34804. 1
  34805. 1
  34806. 1
  34807. 1
  34808. 1
  34809. 1
  34810. 1
  34811. 1
  34812. 1
  34813. 1
  34814. 1
  34815. 1
  34816. 1
  34817. 1
  34818. 1
  34819. 1
  34820. 1
  34821. 1
  34822. 1
  34823. 1
  34824. 1
  34825. 1
  34826. 1
  34827. 1
  34828. 1
  34829. 1
  34830. 1
  34831. 1
  34832. 1
  34833. 1
  34834. 1
  34835. 1
  34836. 1
  34837. 1
  34838. 1
  34839.  @themanwithnoname4385  no. You're not wrong about the Sudanese or the Drone bombing. Though I'm not sure why you would single out Obama for that. When Bush and Trump have done it as well. Honestly, it's pretty weird for me. I find myself more and more having to defend Obama. I genuinely am not a Obama groupie. I voted for him both times but that was just because they were better than the other guys. He certainly wasn't perfect. He frustrated the s*** out of me with his always carrot and never stick approach. Especially when it came to the Republicans. They're freaking body blowing him left and right and he's just standing there with his hands up. It pissed me off. He cared way too much about his perception than he did about actually getting s*** done. That's not to say he hasn't gotten a lot done. Dude was working hard. He just laid down and took too much for my liking, offer are the semblance of bipartisanship that nobody else cared about. He just let them steal a court seat. On the Supreme Court. He let them Jack the Supreme Court seat with barely a whisper. I was throwing s*** at the TV for three days on that one. But on the other hand, dude got s*** done. He could have done more if the last 4 years he wasn't fighting the Republicans all the time but as presidents go his track record certainly isn't bad. Then I see all these people on here talking about how he's the Antichrist now. Like nothing he ever did mattered. Except a lot of it helped everybody and everybody's just kind of forgetting about it because it's new guys a child... so now I defend Obama a lot more than I ever talked about him before. Again super freaking weird.
    1
  34840. 1
  34841. 1
  34842. 1
  34843. 1
  34844. 1
  34845. 1
  34846. 1
  34847. 1
  34848. 1
  34849. 1
  34850. 1
  34851. 1
  34852. 1
  34853. 1
  34854. 1
  34855. 1
  34856. 1
  34857. 1
  34858. 1
  34859. 1
  34860. 1
  34861. 1
  34862. 1
  34863. 1
  34864. 1
  34865.  @ericmartin2470  If you didn't know where the quote came from, because you didn't look it up before you said it, you should not use the quote from George Strait. Which is exactly what happened. Which is exactly why you got the damn thing wrong, and it's not the only one. " if you believe this from CNN, I have some beachfront property in Idaho to sell you. " Cuz if you go down just a tiny bit, you would find you incorrectly quoted Vladimir Lenin. In terms of what was actually said and that Vladimir Lenin was not the one that said it. I don't blame you. I wouldn't want to quote a Nazi either, but that's what you did. Take solace in the fact that you incorrectly quoted him, but you did. " A lie told often enough becomes the truth " -Vladimir Lenin " This is why your a silly person. You come on here, trying to sound like you know what you're talkin about, when you genuinely don't. You think you have some piece of information that makes a difference, but you're too lazy to check it. You want to believe someone else's work. All because that person agrees with what you already think is true. Then you expect people to take you seriously. Stop being lazy when it counts, admit when you got something wrong and grow the hell up. Then maybe we will. Until then, I get to f*** with you for making all those stupid mistakes you make because you didn't do your homework. I come across you guys every single day. You're always super afraid to challenge your own opinions. Except you never ask yourself why. You should want to challenge your own point of view. You should want to know whether it is the correct one or not. 🙄
    1
  34866. 1
  34867. 1
  34868. 1
  34869. 1
  34870. 1
  34871. 1
  34872. 1
  34873. 1
  34874. 1
  34875. 1
  34876. 1
  34877. 1
  34878. 1
  34879. 1
  34880. 1
  34881. 1
  34882. 1
  34883. 1
  34884. 1
  34885. 1
  34886. 1
  34887. 1
  34888. 1
  34889. 1
  34890. 1
  34891. 1
  34892. 1
  34893. 1
  34894. 1
  34895. 1
  34896. 1
  34897. 1
  34898. 1
  34899. 1
  34900. 1
  34901. 1
  34902. 1
  34903. 1
  34904. 1
  34905. 1
  34906. 1
  34907. 1
  34908. 1
  34909. 1
  34910.  @The_SmorgMan  It seems like you need to believe these things about me, instead of actually believing it. Because what you just described me claiming, up top, I never claimed. The only thing about well-regulated militia that I have ever claimed.... and I don't even think that was on this thread.... is that, it's technically supposed to be government-certified. Not run by government, not funded by government but merely recognized by government.... it doesn't even have to be the country's government. It can technically even be local government. I have read of many ways to skirt that perticular dilemma however. This is not under the technical definition.... However... before the signing of and between the writing of the constitution in the Bill of Rights... excuse the shorthand... There was basically a bunch of guys comprised of mostly old soldiers that wouldn't turn in their weapons and wouldn't go back to serving in the military but I also wanted to protect their houses. So they began to form these groups. They were all somewhat composed of old militia members. Though African Americans were also prevalent in these malicious. The argument against these people doing this at the time was didn't know who they were, they could be crazy, they tried to paint them as all kinds of bad s*** basically. Wing nuts with guns. The argument for of course was they had the right to protect their homes and not be compelled to continue in service to a military that barely recognized them when they were fighting their War. So the guys writing the Constitution decided to split the baby. Hence well-regulated militia.... I know there are a bunch of details in the middle but its a comment on a tread... Heanse the short hand. Lol
    1
  34911. 1
  34912.  @The_SmorgMan  1971 was certainly precedent but no more than that. It was also at a time when guns where treasured. ... But perhaps... Your right about moving on from that one. Your decent, rational and respectful. Given that, I'll be more than happy to put down the subject, with an agree to disagree notion. 😉 On the other hand... I don't really find the level of organization Oh, I thought you were referring to in the Nationwide civil revolt, to be much more likely, either. Local level or not. Right now, we can't even get behind 1 idea as a majority... Well... Actually... That's not true. There are things we majority agree with. Not a lot and that list is getting smaller by the day... But there are a few. Like Vet/Troop support, children's education... And those are the only 2 I can think of right now.... I mean... We can't even get behind a scientifically proven concept of climate change as a majority. So I just find it very unlikely that people en masse could get behind one Singular idea to that extent. Especially one that extreme. A series of drastic things would have to happen. I'm not even sure that would get it done. Especially with this culture of denial and lies that has been prevalent of late. I just really don't see it happening. Again... I'm not saying you should. ... I think I have expressed more than enough now about how I don't think we should get all our guns taken away. You keep making comments like I do. However, our rights are not Unlimited. Yes, people are going to do bad things and when it happens on Mass and ends up taking a bunch of lives, we should figure out why, we should figure out what's going to help that not be true anymore. As long as it does not infringe on other people's needs, it should be considered at the very least. Even the founders of the country recognized that our inalienable rights should not be Limitless.
    1
  34913. 1
  34914. 1
  34915. 1
  34916. 1
  34917. 1
  34918. 1
  34919. 1
  34920. 1
  34921. 1
  34922. 1
  34923. 1
  34924. 1
  34925. 1
  34926. 1
  34927. 1
  34928. 1
  34929. 1
  34930. 1
  34931.  BTIsaac  As for the second bit of dialogue you keep bringing up, let's put that into context and put it all right in front of everybody. You - when is coming from common sense? That some people shouldn't be represented, and any attorney who does must be shamed? 👉My argument is based on fundamental human rights.👈 Me - and, by the way, it's not a fundamental human right. It's an American right. That and 👉a few other countries👈. But certainly not all of them. You - the European Convention of Human Rights recognizes the right to a fair trial, and that's not "a few countries". Me - There are 28 countries in the European Union. There are 198 countries in the world. Out of just the ones we recognize. That is just a few.... 14.14% to be exact. If you add America, its 14.65%. SoOoOo... I feel comfortable with "a few". That is more then 10% away from even a quarter of the countries in the world. Trying to pick apart my statement because you made a silly comment, really isn't going to get you anywhere good, 👉👉when the numbers are against you.👈👈 ( this being the context for this comment of mine that you tried to twist earlier) Speaking of which... Here you come with your next comment... trying to have me referring to one thing I didn't when I made that comment referring to another. You - I know what town? You been implying it throughout this thread. And what do you mean "the numbers are against me"? Are you trying to argue that human rights are an arbitrary concept that can be ignored at your leisure? Me - did I say Human Rights was an arbitrary concept?
    1
  34932. 1
  34933. 1
  34934. 1
  34935. 1
  34936. 1
  34937. 1
  34938. 1
  34939. 1
  34940. 1
  34941. 1
  34942. 1
  34943. 1
  34944. 1
  34945. 1
  34946. 1
  34947. 1
  34948. 1
  34949. 1
  34950. 1
  34951. 1
  34952. 1
  34953. 1
  34954. 1
  34955. 1
  34956. 1
  34957. 1
  34958. 1
  34959. 1
  34960. 1
  34961. 1
  34962. 1
  34963. 1
  34964. 1
  34965. 1
  34966. 1
  34967. 1
  34968. 1
  34969. 1
  34970. 1
  34971. 1
  34972. 1
  34973. 1
  34974. 1
  34975. 1
  34976. 1
  34977. 1
  34978. 1
  34979. 1
  34980. 1
  34981. 1
  34982. 1
  34983. 1
  34984. 1
  34985. 1
  34986. 1
  34987. 1
  34988. 1
  34989. 1
  34990. 1
  34991. 1
  34992. 1
  34993. 1
  34994. 1
  34995. 1
  34996. 1
  34997. 1
  34998. 1
  34999.  Jarrod Davis  As for Joe Biden.... He was not my pick... But to say he has done nothing of value is disingenuous at best and willfully ignorant at worst. "During his first years in the Senate, Biden focused on consumer protection and environmental issues and called for greater government accountability." "In 1984, he was a Democratic floor manager for the successful passage of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act." "Regarding foreign policy, during his first decade in the Senate, Biden focused on arms control issues. In response to Congress's refusal to ratify the SALT II Treaty signed in 1979 by Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and President Jimmy Carter, Biden took the initiative to meet with Soviet foreign minister Andrei Gromyko, educate him about American concerns and interests, and secure several changes to address the Foreign Relations Committee's objections. When the Reagan administration wanted to interpret the 1972 SALT I Treaty loosely to allow the Strategic Defense Initiative to proceed, Biden argued for strict adherence to the treaty's terms. He clashed again with the Reagan administration in 1986 over economic sanctions against South Africa, receiving considerable attention when he excoriated Secretary of State George P. Shultz at a Senate hearing because of the administration's support of that country, which continued to practice apartheid." "In his first Senate campaign, Biden expressed support for the Supreme Court's 1971 Swann decision, which supported busing programs to integrate school districts to remedy de jure segregation, as in the South, but opposed it to remedy de facto segregation, as in Delaware. He said Republicans were using busing as a scare tactic to court Southern white votes, and along with Boggs voiced opposition to a House of Representatives constitutional amendment banning busing. In May 1974, Biden voted to table an amendment to an omnibus education bill promoted by Edward Gurney (R-FL) that contained anti-busing measures and anti-school desegregation clauses. The next day, Senator Robert Griffin (R-MI) attempted to revive an amended version of the amendment. Minority Leader Hugh Scott (R-PA) and Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) offered to leave the text of Griffin's amendment intact but add the qualifier that such legislation was not intended to weaken the judiciary's power to enforce the 5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Biden voted for this compromise, angering his local voters." Just to name a few.
    1
  35000. 1
  35001. 1
  35002. 1
  35003. 1
  35004. 1
  35005. 1
  35006. 1
  35007. 1
  35008. 1
  35009. 1
  35010. 1
  35011. 1
  35012. 1
  35013. 1
  35014. 1
  35015. 1
  35016. 1
  35017. 1
  35018. 1
  35019. 1
  35020. 1
  35021. 1
  35022. 1
  35023. 1
  35024. 1
  35025. 1
  35026. 1
  35027. 1
  35028. 1
  35029. 1
  35030. 1
  35031. 1
  35032. 1
  35033. 1
  35034. 1
  35035. 1
  35036. 1
  35037. 1
  35038. 1
  35039. 1
  35040. 1
  35041. 1
  35042. 1
  35043. 1
  35044. 1
  35045. 1
  35046. 1
  35047. 1
  35048. 1
  35049. 1
  35050. 1
  35051. 1
  35052. 1
  35053. 1
  35054. 1
  35055. 1
  35056. 1
  35057. 1
  35058. 1
  35059. 1
  35060. 1
  35061. 1
  35062. 1
  35063. 1
  35064. 1
  35065. 1
  35066. 1
  35067. 1
  35068. 1
  35069. 1
  35070. 1
  35071. 1
  35072. 1
  35073. 1
  35074. 1
  35075. 1
  35076. 1
  35077. 1
  35078. 1
  35079. 1
  35080. 1
  35081. 1
  35082. 1
  35083. 1
  35084. 1
  35085. 1
  35086. 1
  35087. 1
  35088. 1
  35089. 1
  35090. 1
  35091. 1
  35092. 1
  35093. 1
  35094. 1
  35095. 1
  35096. 1
  35097. 1
  35098. 1
  35099. 1
  35100. 1
  35101. 1
  35102. 1
  35103. 1
  35104. 1
  35105. 1
  35106. 1
  35107. 1
  35108. 1
  35109. 1
  35110. 1
  35111. 1
  35112. 1
  35113. 1
  35114. 1
  35115. 1
  35116. 1
  35117. 1
  35118. 1
  35119. 1
  35120. 1
  35121. 1
  35122. 1
  35123. 1
  35124. 1
  35125. 1
  35126. 1
  35127. 1
  35128. 1
  35129. 1
  35130. 1
  35131. 1
  35132. 1
  35133. 1
  35134. 1
  35135. 1
  35136. 1
  35137. 1
  35138. 1
  35139. 1
  35140. 1
  35141. 1
  35142. 1
  35143. 1
  35144. 1
  35145. 1
  35146. 1
  35147.  @karmahunsaker9492  I know this speech! He's talking about Fair Trade Practices. Which was a good hunk of that speech that he gave. 1:04 the video asked the question, "what he meant by leveling the playing field" ,literally over him explaining what he meant by leveling the playing field. I don't understand. Did the person asking the question fall asleep or accidentally mute that part? Fare and healthy competition. Unfreezing the credit markets and reforming the financial system that made the Great Recession happen in the first place. I could go into detail but... it's basically that, Republicans for the most part, we're tacking on deregulations of the banks and financial industry to everything that moved, for so long that Banks we're allowed to become too big to let them fail, without crashing the US economy. That is a bad thing. We had to fix that. If it didn't get fixed then bankers and stock brokers could do whatever they wanted with our money, make huge bets and gambles and when they lost we had to pay for it. We had to bail them out. 1:15 "blah blah blah"... Really? This is who you are taking the ques from? Making sure we didn't go into another Great Recession by reforming the banking industry and therefore not bringing poverty and famine to the entire us is blah blah blah to this person. Okay... Pointing out that we've added jobs but at the same time making clear that our work's not done because we need more. Evil! 🙄 Free Trade! Those devils! They are clearly trying to take of the world with their free and fair business practices. They must be stopped! Optimism for the future of America! Why this man must be stopped! Move along, crazy! Before I do the other 3.
    1
  35148. 1
  35149. 1
  35150. 1
  35151. 1
  35152. 1
  35153. 1
  35154.  @karmahunsaker9492  Why would I do that? I picked apart your first one super easy. Then you completely ignored it. It was super obvious stuff to. Which means a few things. 1. You choose to see what you wanted. 2. 👆 is just 1 of many clear examples of your inability or lack of desire to see objective fact on both sides. 3. The thought that you put a spoiled rich kid, who who never grew up and never was taught that lying is bad... But was taught that he could get away with anything.... As some kind of freedom fighter for the people... is simply willful ignorance. He does and says half the shit he does on camera, because he's been taught he can get away with whatever he wants. He doesn't try to hide most of the time. He'll say one thing one day about an important issue and then completely reverse it the next. That isn't about anyone's spin or brainwashing or whatever lies you are telling yourself. That is just delusion on your part. 4. You have clearly set up a Myriad of the stereotypical Escape hatches from logic facts and reason that don't agree with what you've decided is already true. "Fake news" "We are all brainwashed" "Giant world wide conspiracies in order to excuse Trump, his words and actions." "A general we are all wrong and you are clearly right mentality." " Consistent denial or attempts to ignore obvious things. " Just based on the first video, you hear the term "New World Order" and think evil. Its just a term. You listened to nothing he said after That. Re regulating the banks so they can't be too big to fail. Saying we've gotten more jobs coming back to Americans but we still need more and we're going to work on that. Fare Trade Practices for small businesses. And more... But you hear new world order and your brain shuts down. Hell.... You are probably going to to try and deploy one if not more of those things to ignore this. So... I'm not really sure why I'm explaining this any further.
    1
  35155. 1
  35156. 1
  35157. 1
  35158.  @karmahunsaker9492  I don't desire money... At least not way to much of it. I like working hard and earning the money that will put my little boy through collage one day. That will help him learn the value of working hard for your dreams. I don't even mind the occasional struggle.... Or even when I mess up. It shows my son that no one is perfect. Na! Large amounts of money tends to change your outlook... Your priorities. You tend to surrender your values. It's all consuming in some bad ways. I'm good being middle class. That helps you to appreciate the things you have in the people in your life. Also accomplishments and victories.I don't desire money... At least not way to much of it. I like working hard and earning the money that will put my little boy through collage one day. That will help him learn the value of working hard for your dreams. I don't even mind the occasional struggle.... Or even when I mess up. It shows my son that no one is perfect. Na! Large amounts of money tends to change your outlook... Your priorities. You tend to surrender your values. It's all consuming in some bad ways. I'm good being middle class. That helps you to appreciate the things you have in the people in your life. Also accomplishments and victories. I'm good here. Besides, being rich was so not the point. It's the mindset you have when you've been bailed out of everything you have ever gotten yourself into. Never having to face consequences for your actions. That's why he does so much in public. His life experience has taught him all he has to do is lie or bully his way out of situations.
    1
  35159. 1
  35160. 1
  35161. 1
  35162. 1
  35163. 1
  35164. 1
  35165. 1
  35166. 1
  35167. 1
  35168. 1
  35169. 1
  35170. 1
  35171. 1
  35172. 1
  35173. 1
  35174. 1
  35175. 1
  35176. 1
  35177. 1
  35178. 1
  35179. 1
  35180. 1
  35181. 1
  35182. 1
  35183. 1
  35184. 1
  35185. 1
  35186. 1
  35187. 1
  35188. 1
  35189. 1
  35190. 1
  35191. 1
  35192. 1
  35193. 1
  35194. 1
  35195. 1
  35196. 1
  35197. 1
  35198. 1
  35199. 1
  35200. 1
  35201. 1
  35202. 1
  35203. 1
  35204. 1
  35205. 1
  35206. 1
  35207. 1
  35208. 1
  35209. 1
  35210. 1
  35211. 1
  35212. 1
  35213. 1
  35214. 1
  35215. 1
  35216. 1
  35217. 1
  35218. 1
  35219. 1
  35220. 1
  35221. 1
  35222. 1
  35223. 1
  35224. 1
  35225. 1
  35226. 1
  35227. 1
  35228. 1
  35229. 1
  35230. 1
  35231. 1
  35232. 1
  35233. 1
  35234. 1
  35235. 1
  35236. 1
  35237. 1
  35238. 1
  35239. 1
  35240. 1
  35241. 1
  35242. 1
  35243. 1
  35244. 1
  35245. 1
  35246. 1
  35247. 1
  35248. 1
  35249. 1
  35250. 1
  35251. 1
  35252. 1
  35253. 1
  35254.  @jimj.6412  Lets see... You criticize Governor Cuomo for putting sick covid patients in with high-risk uninfected people.... But... Defunding of the medical stockpile refilling of PPE equipment and ventilators, sending every state in a bidding war against each other for literal American lives... Trying to sell as multiple snake oil cures during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years and taking none of them when he got sick... Not setting an example by wearing a mask for the first 6 months of the pandemic... Lying about the numbers and the severity, calling it a democratic hoax.... Lying about having a stockpile of the second vaccine shot... Holding multiple super spreader events... Having a 33-page pandemic containment plan on day one, which he ignored because the last Administration commissioned it... Not spending all injury to the US from China... Lying about testing availability early on in the pandemic... Continuously comparing it to the flu... Lying about FDA approvals for Coronavirus treatment drugs... After praising China and their leader from multiple occasions, liebling the coronavirus the Chinese virus... Trying to overrule the governors and their stay at home orders, to contain the spread... There's about a million more examples I could give but you get the picture... So you're willing to hold a governor responsible for one thing but not willing to hold the president of the entire country responsible for all of that and more.... unfortunately for you guys trying to make this ridiculous argument, your cult leader likes to do things on camera.
    1
  35255. 1
  35256. 1
  35257. 1
  35258. 1
  35259. 1
  35260. 1
  35261. 1
  35262. 1
  35263. 1
  35264. 1
  35265. 1
  35266. 1
  35267. 1
  35268. 1
  35269. 1
  35270. 1
  35271. 1
  35272. 1
  35273. 1
  35274. 1
  35275. 1
  35276. 1
  35277. 1
  35278.  @jimj.6412  " when is it that you see in the Democrat Party and taking a left stand that makes you want to support such people" 1. The right seams to be based off of non fact based logic... And hasn't had an actual substance based platform in almost a decade. They run on fear and Hate, propagated by lies. 2. The left addressing climate change and not just trying to pretend it doesn't exist... so, you know... My children and my grandchildren will actually have a habitable planet to live on. 3. The left recognizes that I'm not just a walking human incubator. 4. The left wants to make it easier, and not more difficult for me to be able to vote. 5. The laugh doesn't support and or ignore the actions of the people in their party, supporting racism and bigotry. So I don't have to explain to my mix race on why I support people who do. 6. The left has a much better track record of calling their people out on their s***, instead of just trying to ignore that their side does anything wrong. 7. The left doesn't feel the need to demonize those that aren't American and be apathetic to treating them as less than human. 8. The left has figured out that trickle down economics is not actually a thing that works for anyone but the 1%. 9. The left believes that the minimum wage should be a living wage and that it should have gone up all this time with worker productivity and inflation. 10. The left doesn't think that people should die because they're poor. They believe Healthcare is a right and not a privilege just for the rich. Those would be my top 10.
    1
  35279. 1
  35280. 1
  35281. 1
  35282. 1
  35283. 1
  35284. 1
  35285. 1
  35286. 1
  35287. 1
  35288. 1
  35289. 1
  35290. 1
  35291. 1
  35292. 1
  35293. 1
  35294. 1
  35295. 1
  35296. 1
  35297. 1
  35298. 1
  35299. 1
  35300. 1
  35301. 1
  35302. 1
  35303. 1
  35304. 1
  35305. 1
  35306. 1
  35307. 1
  35308. 1
  35309. 1
  35310. 1
  35311. 1
  35312. 1
  35313. 1
  35314. 1
  35315. 1
  35316. 1
  35317. 1
  35318. 1
  35319. 1
  35320. 1
  35321. 1
  35322. 1
  35323. 1
  35324. 1
  35325. 1
  35326. 1
  35327. 1
  35328. 1
  35329. 1
  35330. 1
  35331. 1
  35332. 1
  35333. 1
  35334. 1
  35335. 1
  35336. 1
  35337. 1
  35338. 1
  35339. 1
  35340. 1
  35341. 1
  35342. 1
  35343. 1
  35344. 1
  35345. 1
  35346. 1
  35347. 1
  35348. 1
  35349. 1
  35350. 1
  35351. 1
  35352. 1
  35353. 1
  35354. 1
  35355. 1
  35356. 1
  35357. 1
  35358. 1
  35359. 1
  35360. 1
  35361.  @cockneygeezer3528  I'm going to start with one big subject and 3 issues from that. I come from a long military family background. Both my grandfathers fought in World War 1 & 2 and both my grandmothers were Army nurses. My family has been in every form of the military and everybody until myself has joined the military. So as you can imagine respect for our soldiers and our veterans is very important to me. There have been many times where Donald Trump has very much disrespected our troops and our veterans. Not only as commander-in-chief but also as just someone they fought and died for this is unacceptable. Especially considering his draft dodging. Doesn't it also been the subject recently because of his interview with Fox News and Laura engrams. So I thought that this was a good subject to start on. 1. He tried to ban transgender service members from the military. Men and women that had fought for this country, we're currently fighting for this country or were training to go fight for this country. All over medical costs. 2. Trump's Administration band non-civilian legal permanent residents from joining the Army Reserve. That practice dates back to the Revolutionary War. The new policy Holtz enlistments involving green card holders seeking to join the Army Reserve and National Guard. 3. One of the worst was Sgt. La David Johnson. Or rather, he widow and how he treated her. He took 12 days to comment honest for American soldiers killed during an ambush in Bihar. At the time, he claimed to call them later that week. He also took the opportunity to say Obama refuse to acknowledge the families. ( at that time many gold star families came out and said that was absolutely not true).... But that wasn't the worst part. The worst part came when he finally got around to calling the widow. Sigh... He made her cry. She saidbthat he said thing like " he know what he was getting into" and didn't even know his name. She said," thats the part that hurts."
    1
  35362. 1
  35363. 1
  35364. 1
  35365. 1
  35366. 1
  35367. 1
  35368. 1
  35369. 1
  35370. 1
  35371.  @cockneygeezer3528  So, this is gonna jump around a bit but I wanted to start with what I had not heard before. The Loretta Lynch thing... I hadn't actually heard that before. I'm going to have to look into that. I don't know enough about it to comment just yet. But I will do so. As far as the rest. There where details you missed. I like details. They often make thing more clear. bullet points - the meeting took place on June 9th 2016. With several senior members of the Trump campaign. Donald Trump jr., Jared Kushner and Paul manafort. There were at least five others. Including the Russian lawyer with the long last name I don't feel like typing out. Lol 😜 - the meeting was arranged by Trump's longtime publicist Rob Goldstone, on behalf of his client, singer-songwriter, Emin Agalarov. - We found out about it because Jared Kushner disclosed to the meeting in one of his revisions for his security clearance. - Donald jr. Made several misleading statements about the meeting. Initially telling the press that the meeting was about Russian adoption. On July 8th 2017, after news report stated that Trump jr. Knew the meeting was political, he admitted in a tweet that he had agreed to the meeting with the understanding that he would receive information damaging to Hillary Clinton, Oppo research. - When the New York Times was about to report on emails exchanged between Goldstone and Trump jr., Trump jr. Admitted that cold stone had stayed in an email to him that the Russian government was involved and that the purpose of the meeting was to get dirt on Clinton and that the meeting concerned a Russian effort to Aid the Trump campaign. - In early July of 2017 it was reported that Donald Trump himself drafted Trump Juniors initial misleading statement. The report was later confirmed by the president's attorneys. - Then in July 2018, the president did not knowledge of the meeting. Small side note... Been looking up Loretta Lynch while typing this, I can't find her. Can you show me where you got that from? I'm sure I'm just missing it.
    1
  35372. 1
  35373.  @cockneygeezer3528  also I've heard the Glen Simon thing. And if it's true then that is really weird but I've only heard it and I don't quite know where it's coming from. I haven't been able to find it on official recordings or anything though. The email they're talkin about between Goldstone and Trump jr. Was on June 3rd. The relevant parts were this. Goldstone- Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government support for mr. Trump - help along by Aras and Emin. DJ- thanks Rob I appreciate that. I am on the road at the moment but perhaps I just speak to Emin First. Seems we have some time and if it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer. Could we do a call first thing next week when I am back? In a June 7th email, it was agreed that the material would be delivered to Trump jr. By an unnamed Russian government attorney. At the meeting Goldstone introduces person as moscow-based attorney Natalia V. 😜 she stated that she was not a government official, however she is known to have ties to the Russian government and later described herself as an informant to the office of the Russian prosecutor General. According to Goldstone, she had planned to be in New York for a court appearance on June 9th. Trump Jr offered an in-person meeting that afternoon. Which Goldstone confirmed. Trump Jr forwarded the email thread to Kushner and manafort.
    1
  35374. 1
  35375. 1
  35376. 1
  35377. 1
  35378. 1
  35379. 1
  35380. 1
  35381. 1
  35382. 1
  35383. 1
  35384. 1
  35385. 1
  35386. 1
  35387. 1
  35388. 1
  35389. 1
  35390. 1
  35391. 1
  35392. 1
  35393. 1
  35394. 1
  35395. 1
  35396. 1
  35397. 1
  35398. 1
  35399. 1
  35400. 1
  35401. 1
  35402. 1
  35403. 1
  35404. 1
  35405. 1
  35406. 1
  35407. 1
  35408. 1
  35409. 1
  35410. 1
  35411. 1
  35412. 1
  35413. 1
  35414. 1
  35415. 1
  35416. 1
  35417. 1
  35418. 1
  35419. 1
  35420. 1
  35421. 1
  35422. 1
  35423. 1
  35424. 1
  35425. 1
  35426. 1
  35427. 1
  35428. 1
  35429. 1
  35430. 1
  35431. 1
  35432. 1
  35433. 1
  35434. 1
  35435. 1
  35436. 1
  35437. 1
  35438. 1
  35439. 1
  35440. 1
  35441. 1
  35442. 1
  35443. 1
  35444. 1
  35445. 1
  35446. 1
  35447. 1
  35448. 1
  35449. 1
  35450. 1
  35451. 1
  35452. 1
  35453. 1
  35454. 1
  35455. 1
  35456. 1
  35457. 1
  35458. 1
  35459. 1
  35460. 1
  35461. 1
  35462. 1
  35463. 1
  35464. 1
  35465. 1
  35466. 1
  35467. 1
  35468. 1
  35469. 1
  35470. 1
  35471.  @robinsss  Btw, this is all from before he ran. It spans decades... Decades pf racism. I generally give people these at first. Mostly because they are all before presidency became a factor. Trump's real estate company tried to avoid renting apartments to African Americans in the 70s and gave preferential treatment to White, according to the federal government. Trump treated black employees at his casinos differently from whites, according to multiple sources. A former Hotel executive said that Trump criticized a black accountant," black guys counting my money. I hate it. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's possibly not his fault, but laziness is a trait in Blacks." In 1989, Trump took out ads in the New York newspapers urging the death penalty for 5 black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. He argue that they were guilty as late as October 2016, more than ten years after DNA evidence had exonerated them. In 1989, on NBC, Trump said, " I think sometimes a black may think they don't have an advantage or this and that. I've said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I really believe they do have an actual advantage." He spent years suggesting that the nation's first black president was born not in the United States but in Kenya. In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the "Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well-documented." At the time he was fighting competition for his casino business. In a 1993 radio interview, he suggested that Native Americans in Connecticut were faking their ancestry. "I think I might have more Indian blood than a lot of the so-called Indians that are trying to open up the reservations."
    1
  35472. 1
  35473. 1
  35474. 1
  35475. 1
  35476. 1
  35477. 1
  35478. 1
  35479. 1
  35480. 1
  35481. 1
  35482. 1
  35483. 1
  35484. 1
  35485. 1
  35486. 1
  35487. 1
  35488. 1
  35489. 1
  35490. 1
  35491. 1
  35492. 1
  35493. 1
  35494. 1
  35495. 1
  35496. 1
  35497. 1
  35498. 1
  35499. 1
  35500. 1
  35501. 1
  35502. 1
  35503. 1
  35504. 1
  35505. 1
  35506. 1
  35507. 1
  35508. 1
  35509.  @toobmaniac  So... here's the problem with your theory and veiled excuse. The top of this thread that you chose to write under is about Trump and all his lies. I don't have a problem with evolving the subject. I do have a problem with devolving it. Detraction and using whataboutism in order to deflect from his own actions would qualify as devolving. At the very least you could have done was addressed the main subject and then try to move on. You chose not to do that. Which means you're not interested in discussing the premise. You're interested in pointing nine different other directions in order to not have to. This is going to sound a bit biased but if nobody is stupid enough to believe something that said repeatedly, Trump wouldn't be president right now. In almost every subject he covers, once you get into the details, and I mean all the details and not just what fits your premise, most of what he has done and promised to do, falls apart. Like... Even the stuff he has a point on. In his first year and a half where he could have gotten like all this stuff done, when he had the house the Senate and the White House.... all he managed to do was tax cuts. Only he made the tax cuts for the wrench permanent and put a clock on the ones for the middle class. He had a more than decent point about China and intellectual property rights and then messed it up by assuming that he could play strongman tactics with a country that is basically the best in the world at playing the long game. The only thing I can really get behind that he has done, is Criminal Justice Reform. Which was also bipartisan. Which meant for One Shining Moment everybody pulled their heads out of their asses for 2 seconds and got something done. Actually, I just thought of another. Funding the Special Olympics. His education secretary, who had never been in a public school in her entire life, tried to cut funding for Special Olympics. Now I could get on him about hiring her in the first place but in reality there's no way he could have known that she was going to do that and when he saw she did he made her take it back. In other words... I don't have the blinfing hate... Dem BS... You guys like to put on us. I just like having all relevant information about a subject so I can make an educated opinion on it. When you Institute that train of thought into so much of what he has done, it doesn't look good for him. And I don't know what the hell kind of straw man you're trying to set up right now with the premise and all of that but... whatever dude. You're trying to act like you have knowledge and that it wasn't just silly juvenile BS you were trying to do with grammar and spelling and then throwing in a couple of lies about the Mueller report. There's a difference between knowledge and fact. Facts come from all the knowledge on one subject. Not just cherry-picked craziness. All that is called is confirmation bias. In other words you think you out and pay attention to only what support what you've already decided to be true. which also has a lot to do with how people can believe something if it's repeated enough. You know what else doesn't work, shooting the messenger. Occam's razor applies here. The media, the Democratic Party and a whole lot more Independence then y'all like to admit, keep going after Trump. You are correct on that. Occam's razor comes in to play when you guys can understand why that keeps happening. you guys like the gloss over the fact that they're going after him because he did something and because he keeps doing things and because there was plenty of Rock Solid information showing that he did these things. It's just lazy thinking to stop your conclusion before getting to that. they're going after him for a moment's Clauses because there's documented evidence of him violating the laws of emoluments. Again Occam's razor. they're going after him for paying off pornstars with campaign money because he paid off pornstars with campaign money. Again Occam's razor. they went after him for collusion with Russia because there was evidence of him colluding with Russia. Again Occam's razor. They went after him for obstruction of justice because there's 10 clearly laid out cases for obstruction of justice which he committed during the conclusion portion of the investigation. Again Occam's razor. People call him crazy and unstable because he acts crazy and unstable. One of the most recent examples of this is when he called himself "the chosen one". You can't make that s*** up dude. Again Occam's razor. Ask for being scratched by anything, why do you think you want so desperately to win in 2020. Because if he doesn't he's going to be going to jail. If he does the clock run out by the time he gets done with the next 4 years on most of the crimes they found. Until then, his office protect him from prosecution. another thing laid out in the Mueller report. More popular? Show proof. if they're all lies against an honest man than you will have no problem proving they are lies. So unless you're just trying to repeat something enough times to make yourself believe it, you're not saying anything unless you give me proof. His time even before becoming president disproves him being "an honest man". And this is why you shouldn't make assumptions about people you don't know. not only have I read it, I've read it a multitude of times. If you would like to test that then you can ask me any damn question about it you would like and I will give you the paragraph and page number for the information. Infact... Here is a copy. So you can find something to ask. Like I said... Not everyone is like you. I make sure I can back up what I say before I say it. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html#text/p9 Mueller did lay it out in no uncertain terms. You laid out 10 counts of obstruction of justice in great detail with documented and witness evidence to back it up. Which you would know if you would read the Mueller report. even back then, they could not have used it to impeach him because of the Senate. The Senate won't vote to impeach. See, this is a silliness I'm talking about. At the beginning of this paragraph you openly admitted that you would not read the Mueller report" but you still for some reason feel confident enough to say that "absolutely nothing and it has any legal ramifications of any sort to justify an impeachment inquiry." In other words , you made a statement you have willingly admitted that you cannot qualify. And now it's a big conspiracy with the Democratic party and the whistleblowers. I say again, qualify your statements. Don't throw a bunch of BS conspiracy theories out there with absolutely nothing to back them up. if your reality fit the facts then you would be able to back up what you are saying with actual evidence. You have not and therefore they have not. In order to dabate something you would first have to come with actual provable facts. You have shown non thus far. Do that and then we will talk. Simply calling things facts does not actually make them facts. All you have done is prove that you have swallowed a bunch of bias right wing talking points whole, without bothering to do your due diligence.
    1
  35510. 1
  35511. 1
  35512. 1
  35513. 1
  35514. 1
  35515. 1
  35516. 1
  35517. 1
  35518. 1
  35519. 1
  35520. 1
  35521. 1
  35522. 1
  35523. 1
  35524. 1
  35525. 1
  35526. 1
  35527. 1
  35528. 1
  35529. 1
  35530. 1
  35531. 1
  35532. 1
  35533. 1
  35534. 1
  35535. 1
  35536. 1
  35537. 1
  35538. 1
  35539. 1
  35540. 1
  35541. 1
  35542. 1
  35543. 1
  35544. 1
  35545. 1
  35546. 1
  35547. 1
  35548. 1
  35549. 1
  35550. 1
  35551. 1
  35552. 1
  35553. 1
  35554. 1
  35555. 1
  35556. 1
  35557. 1
  35558. 1
  35559. 1
  35560.  Patrick Donald  Nope! That's just the right wing media buzz words you have chosen to believe, without actually checking it out. So, oil is a finite resource that is only found in certain parts of the world. America does not have enough oil in order to be energy independent, on its own. It's also massively toxic to the Earth. If you really want America to be energy independent, you'd be supporting green energy. The Sun Shines and the wind blows all over the planet. Given our current technology, there is no way America can be energy independent without green energy. So, Putin actually incurred on Ukraine's sovereignty for the entirety of Donald Trump's presidency. There has been an ongoing battle and Crimea and Dombas the entire time. Putin also attacked our elections in order to get Donald Trump elected. Putin also put out bounties on American soldiers heads during Trump's presidency, while he sat there and did nothing standing beside him at a worldwide press conference and taking his word over the word of our intelligence agency. Putin didn't have to do anything when Trump was president. Because Trump was his b****. And... I see you're one of those kinky people trying to play doctor with President Biden. I mean... Whatever Gets you off. No judgement. 😂 As for the last part... That's just desperate... But... I know.. I look younger then I am. Just 2 years ago I stopped being carded all the time. My mom just turned 60 and she maybe looks 40. I'm 38, Boo Boo Kitty. Not that age has anything to do with this. The only thing that should matter on these subjects are the facts. And a full recitation of it. Not made up statistics like "97% move right" as they get older. That is just, ironically, juvenile.
    1
  35561.  Patrick Donald  Facts like... Donald Trump bungling the containment of covid so badly that about 800,000 Americans died of it in a year-and-a-half. It took our leader six months since the beginning of the pandemic in order to start wearing masks. The president of the United States kept trying to sell us snake oil cures for covid-19 while taking none of them when he got it. He defunded the restocking of America's medical stock piles, sending all the states into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives. Threatened to defund our already strapped public education system unless they force children to go back to school during the lockdown. Got America into the only kind of War that literally nobody in the history of time has won. A trade War. Constantly lied. Alienated our long-term allies and buddy dup to vicious dictators all across the world. Deregulated things like... Workers safety Worker anti-discrimination Public education standards Environmental standards Workman's comp Electoral protections And tones more... Supported racists and racism in a variety of ways. Sat there and did nothing for 3 hours, while out nations capital was under attack and ppl where literally fighting for their lives, from the mob of his own supporters, he sent down there. Refused to help Americans dying and in need in Puerto Rico because their mayor wasn't nice to him. Ask foreign adversaries to help him get elected and re-elected. Put children in cages. Lying about having stockpiles of the second dose. I mean... I could literally go on for years.
    1
  35562. 1
  35563. 1
  35564. 1
  35565. 1
  35566. 1
  35567. 1
  35568. 1
  35569. 1
  35570. 1
  35571. 1
  35572. 1
  35573. 1
  35574. 1
  35575. 1
  35576. 1
  35577. 1
  35578. 1
  35579. 1
  35580. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about Waterborne Camper / D R. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  35581. 1
  35582. 1
  35583. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about Waterborne Camper / D R. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  35584. 1
  35585. 1
  35586. 1
  35587. 1
  35588. 1
  35589. 1
  35590. 1
  35591. 1
  35592. 1
  35593. 1
  35594. 1
  35595. 1
  35596. 1
  35597. 1
  35598. 1
  35599. 1
  35600. 1
  35601. 1
  35602. 1
  35603. 1
  35604. 1
  35605. 1
  35606. 1
  35607. 1
  35608. 1
  35609. 1
  35610. 1
  35611. 1
  35612. 1
  35613. 1
  35614. 1
  35615. 1
  35616. 1
  35617. 1
  35618. 1
  35619. 1
  35620. 1
  35621. 1
  35622. 1
  35623. 1
  35624. 1
  35625. 1
  35626. 1
  35627. 1
  35628. 1
  35629. @Nicholas Isaza now if that had held true in the last two Administrations we would have someone other than Gorsuch being an appointee of the Obama Administration and whatever judge gets picked to replace Ginsburg, to be a product of the Trump Administration. That is how it should have gone. The problem is, the Republicans are playing games with the Supreme Court. So they can do things like try and take medical insurance away from millions of Americans during the worst pandemic in over a hundred years. There are already in court fighting to try and do that with no plan to replace it. They are continuously threatening to take away a woman's right to choose and making it yet again illegal for the lgbtq community to get married. They're playing games with the courts so that they can take inalienable rights away from American citizens and Healthcare away from them at a vital time.... was it wrong before and is it wrong now to try and hold up a nomination to the Supreme Court? Yes. Except the right isn't giving the left much of a choice. If they're not going to do their jobs when it's convenient politically for them and they're not going to play by the rules and be honest and forthright and do what they're supposed to do, the left can't keep just letting that happen and letting it chip away at our freedom and our democracy when it's convenient for them. So fine, you want to say it was a problem for years ago, then it's obviously a problem now. That's your thinking. The right set those rules, they don't get to change it up because it's become inconvenient for them.
    1
  35630. 1
  35631. 1
  35632. 1
  35633. 1
  35634. 1
  35635. 1
  35636. 1
  35637. 1
  35638. 1
  35639. 1
  35640. @Nicholas Isaza " You just failed to admit that the Dems are acting insane by threatening impeachment, packing the court and abolishing the electoral college." Because that is not insane. 1. Impeachment... this president has done plenty of things to Warrant impeachment. Which would have happened already is the Senate Republicans weren't as corrupt as he is. The only thing more dangerous then a rogue president in this country, is a rogue right wing Supreme Court. As I demonstrated with those three examples. Taking Healthcare away from millions of American citizens in the worst worldwide pandemic and over a hundred years, taking women's rights away over their own bodies and attempting to take the lgbtq community of American citizens rights away to marry. Not to mention a contested election go to the Supreme Court. Which brings us to... 2. Packing the courts... What option were they left with? The Republicans are flagrantly not playing by the rules anymore. Are the Democrats just supposed to sit there and let that happen? All they are simply doing is playing by the rules that Republicans set forth. Both in insisting that Trump hold his Supreme Court pick and just changing those rules whenever convenient for them. They are simply using their own tactics against them, in order to maintain some kind of balance. 3. Abolishing the Electoral College... our electoral system as it stands today is massively unfair even to a Democratic Republic. This is because of the abuse of superdelegates. That's why the last two Republican presidents were elected on the electoral college alone and lost the people's vote. The first presidents of the abusive superdelegates actually came from a liberal. His name was Hubert Humphrey and it was in 1968 at the Democratic National Convention. He said the president... but in the 1980s after the party swap finally settled and the Republican party was pretty outnumbered oh, they took the super delicate idea and just ran with it and blew it up... giving certain key Battleground States a massive advantage and a bigger say in choosing our leader. In a democratic republic, we choose our leaders, who choose how we are governed. The abuse of superdelegates in the Electoral College discounts the equal say between states and voters. A simple way to resolve that issue is to go back to a simple and standard people vote system. If not that, then I would AT LEAST suggest abolishing the super delicate process.
    1
  35641. 1
  35642. 1
  35643. @Nicholas Isaza No they are not when you consider the context. The reps are basically using every dirty trick in the book to ensure an imbalance of power. To ensure the left gets nothing done. People like to pretend that started with Donald Trump but it didn't. 2 days after President Obama was elected Mitch McConnell came out and held a press conference saying the major agenda of Republicans needed to be ensuring that President Obama did not get a second term. They didn't end up doing that but they did get the house and the Senate. At which point they let countless numbers of bills and laws and decrees just pile up on Mitch McConnell's desk for years on it. It didn't matter what they were or who they helped he wasn't bringing it up for a vote in the Senate. He even tried blocking the funding for 911 workers and their medical bills. Like a ton of celebrities and a ton of people had to literally force him to pass that. Same thing with the Supreme Court. They literally stole a seat from Obama by just refusing to do their jobs. The bottom line is the Republicans are forcing their hand. They can't just keep playing by the rules when the other side isn't. If it was me, I would have 8 left 8 right and the center on the court. That would be a court that serves and represents every American and not just one side or the other. But I'm not magic and this isn't Dreamland. We have to work with what we have. Aspirin peachment, let's start with coded. Donald Trump had a plan to contain the spread of a pandemic on day one and chose not to use it because experts from the Obama Administration came up with it. Every American death after that he is responsible for. He chose his ego and desire to get reelected over American lives. Now he wants to help Mitch McConnell's stack the courts so he can effectively kill off more Americans by taking their health insurance away during the worst worldwide pandemic in over a hundred years. If that doesn't warrant impeachment, I don't know what does.
    1
  35644. 1
  35645. 1
  35646. 1
  35647. 1
  35648. 1
  35649. 1
  35650. 1
  35651. @Nicholas Isaza And yes I can!.... after H1N1, President Obama did the responsible thing and got together a committee of pandemic and infectious disease experts and had them put together a 33-page plan that lays out how to minimize the spread of a can chili pandemic virus in America. Then left it there for Donald Trump on day one. Donald Trump then decided that his rivalry and his ego were more important than saving American lives and ignore the entire thing. - He then spent six months not wearing a mask when the experts had been telling them almost that entire time to wear one. - He spent about two and a half months, starting in the middle of the shutdown, trying to pretend that covid-19 magically Gone Away. - He then tried to blame Obama for the fact that we didn't have enough stock piles of medical equipment to sustain the emergency supply in America, when he had 3 years to fill that up. forcing the states to literally go into a bidding war with each other over literal American lives. - He's promoted multiple untested, unscientific and ultimately dangerous supposed "cures". - He has come out against the the medical professionals advice on multiple occasions. - He has held giant Trump rallies with little to no social distancing or masks but waivers being signed to protect them from liability. - He is called covid-19 a democratic hoax weeks after (it turns out) he admitted that he knew how bad it was. - He has almost consistently discouraged testing. - He has insisted that children go back to school even though the medical experts are telling him it is not safe for them. Even going so far as to threaten to defund our already strapped public education system if they don't. - He has continuously mopped people in public for a hearing to social distancing regulations. - He still doesn't wear a damn mask on a regular basis and we're 8 months in. He is supposed to be the leader of this country and he is doing all of that during the worst worldwide pandemic and over a hundred years. I can absolutely blame him for every American covid-19 death.
    1
  35652. 1
  35653. 1
  35654. 1
  35655. 1
  35656. 1
  35657. 1
  35658. @Nicholas Isaza 1. Not one time did I ever state that he made or let loose the virus. However, he is president of this country. He got accurate and timely info about it before basically everyone other then the guy telling him. The expert plan he ignored, simply because Obama's administration commissioned it, and that is online for the world to see... Laid out expertly detailed ways to CONTAIN THE SPREAD ONCE IT GOT TO THIS COUNTRY. Your logic is insane.... If our elected leaders are not responsible for the country wide failings and/or responsible for getting us through the Countrywide crisis situations that befall us while they are in office, what in the world are they responsible for? You are doing that thing again where you intentionally misunderstand things. So I will put it clearly... Did Donald Trump make and release C19? NO! Is Donald Trump responsible for the lives, deaths and spread of those in other countries? NO! Is Donald Trump responsible for the out-of-control spread of covid-19 in America as its leader? Absolutely! Did Donald Trump have three years to refill those medical stock piles? Absolutely! Did Donald Trump have an expertly laid out plan for containing the spread of a pandemic like this on day one that he chose not to use because he chose his ego over literal American lives? Absolutely! Has Donald Trump made horrible decisions as the leader of this country involving the pandemic throughout the entirety of the eight months it's been going on that contributed largely to it's out of control spread and therefore death of American citizens? Absolutely!
    1
  35659. 1
  35660. 1
  35661. 1
  35662. 1
  35663. 1
  35664. 1
  35665. 1
  35666. @Nicholas Isaza Sorry... That is a cop out. 1. Disagreeing with you and your point of view Based on cherry-picked data, does not actually mean that I have a warped sense of reality. 2. Your argument on this topic thus far has basically bee, "He did a bad job with the covid-19 but that shouldn't mean that he should take responsibility for the consequences of those actions.... because I said so." This was his job. He didn't do his job the way he was supposed to do his job and in affect people died. If we were talking about one person and if he wasn't president they would be calling that negligent homicide under the law. 3. I would strongly encourage you to take your own advice. Because recognizing the other side's point of view only works if you consider it to be a factor when coming to a logical conclusion. That's far you have recognized the problem but not considered it when it comes to your actual point of view. That's happened on several different things now. Which honestly points to more of an ego problem than anything else. 4. Once again your claim of being misinformed or spreading misinformation. Please point out to me what misinformation I am saying? I am using facts and data. Of which you have given none back so far to disprove it. You're probably going to run away from these questions too but I'll ask him again... Did he or did he not have an expertly laid out plan to contain the spread of a pandemic that he ignored and did he or did he not have that on day one? Was it or wasn't not his responsibility to use said resource is available to contain the spread in this country? Did he or did he not have three whole years to refill the medical emergency stockpiles and chose not to? Has he not made a million of our other horrible decisions that helped explode the spread of this deadly virus to the entire country? If all of those are guess then what exactly am I misinformed or misinforming others about?
    1
  35667. @Nicholas Isaza paragraphs 2 1. You trying to shove words into my mouth for the millionth time is not actually an argument. I absolutely said every time that he was responsible for every American death after not instituting the expertly laid out pandemic containment plan that he had on day one. Not once did I ever say that he was responsible for making the virus or releasing the virus. That's just a narrative you tried to spend so you can have an argument. I just kind of a habit of yours. But please, Bill praying quote me where I said he made or released the virus? 2. I'll say it again. Donald Trump is responsible for every American death that happened after he chose to ignore an expertly laid-out containment plan for a pandemic because he chose his ego over literal American lives. He could have contained the spread from the jump and chose not to. So I will repeat, from the moment he chose his ego over doing his job, a job that could have saved God knows how many lies by containing the spread of the outbreak in this country, he became responsible for every death that happened afterwards. Your president is a mass murderer. What time will further demonstrate by asking you this question you're probably not going to answer. If Donald Trump had done his job by instituting the pandemic containment plan on day one and had spent the last 3 years before that stealing up our medical emergency stockpiles to be distributed to wherever we needed, would as many people be dead? Wood covid-19 olive spread as far and wide as it has in this country? Is covid-19 deadly? Does covid-19 kill people?
    1
  35668. 1
  35669. 1
  35670. 1
  35671. 1
  35672. @Nicholas Isaza " I said it because you clearly haven't looked at the facts. You provided barely any facts." 1. President Obama had a 33 page pandemic CONTAINMENT PLAN commissioned after H1N1, that was researched and written by infectious disease experts in the field and left for the next Administration. 2. Donald Trump was aware of this even before the first case hit the US, but choose to ignore it because Obama. 3. The CONTAINMENT PLAN, if implemented would have (shocker) CONTAINED THE SPREAD IN THE US. 4. Donald Trump had 3 YEARS to refill the stockpiles of emergency medical equipment before C19 hit and didn't do so. 5. He, instead, chose to blame President Obama. 6. This forced the states into a bidding war with each other, over literal American lives. 7. For the first 6 months of the pandemic OUR PRESIDENT set a bad example by refusing to wear a mask. 8. He also threw massive Trump rallies and 4th of July celebrations where hardly anyone social distanced or wore masks... But also where they where required to sign wavers to get in, for liability purposes. 9. He presented multiple snake oil cures. 10. He came out, multiple times against his experts advice, and in true Trump fashion, name calling and insulting them. 11. We also later found out that he knew how serious it was early on, but still choose to come out and tried to convince his supporters that it was a Dem Hoax. 12. He still barely wears a mask now. 13. He is still holding Trump rallies now with no social distancing. 14. He has discouraged and tried to defund testing throughout the pandemic. 15. He is in court RIGHT N0W trying to take health care away from millions of Americans with no plan to replace it, in the middle of the world world wide pandemic in over 100 years. 16. For 2 and a half months he tried to pretend that C19 was just going to magically go away abd lied about the numbers. 17. He is the president of our country and it is LITERALLY HIS JOB to get us through National crisis scenarios in the fast way available. Which he had all along yet ignored. Do you need some more or are you done lying and making excuses for an argument you can't sustain any longer.
    1
  35673. 1
  35674. 1
  35675. 1
  35676. @Nicholas Isaza " it takes weeks for sometimes to show, so by the time a person goes into the hospital for symptoms that person had the possibility of spreading it to as much as hundreds of people. Not to mention that some people never have symptoms. An asymptomatic person has the possibility of spreading the virus two thousands of people throughout the entire time that they're contagious.... Etc" You are operating without facts at this point. When I keep saying you cherry pick facts and only see what you want... This is what I mean.👆 Have you read the plan? Do you honestly believe that a council full of infectious disease expert did not Factor those into their report?I don't even have to ask if you read it. You just proved you didn't and was speaking out of ignorance. I wish I could link it but unfortunately all copies of it are in PDF form. It is not hard to find when you Google it. The report was written specifically for this scenario. A little-known contagion not originating from the US but coming to the u.s. with prior knowledge of its existence. It had tones of recommended safe guards built in. Many of the ones we had now, minus the test, because, at the time, we didn't have any. - Quarantine for people coming into the US from known infectious countries. - Immediate funding and emergency medical supplies instantly being distributed to all major hospitals. - Emergency funding for developing and distributing testing. - Immediate and constant release of all known medical testing and findings onset disease shared throughout every hospital and medical lab in the US. - Immediate lock down of all potential infected areas. - Immediate social distancing measures being implemented throughout the country. Just to name a few.... You can't sustain your claim because you have not done the research, yet you keep insisting you are correct. This discredits you.
    1
  35677. 1
  35678. 1
  35679. 1
  35680. @Nicholas Isaza " That lacks logic, facts and is the definition of misinformation." There is a difference between lacking facts and logic and you not wanting to acknowledge the facts and logic because you don't want to be wrong. 1. President Obama had a 33 page pandemic CONTAINMENT PLAN commissioned after H1N1, that was researched and written by infectious disease experts in the field and left for the next Administration. 2. Donald Trump was aware of this even before the first case hit the US, but choose to ignore it because Obama. 3. The CONTAINMENT PLAN, if implemented would have (shocker) CONTAINED THE SPREAD IN THE US. 4. Donald Trump had 3 YEARS to refill the stockpiles of emergency medical equipment before C19 hit and didn't do so. 5. He, instead, chose to blame President Obama. 6. This forced the states into a bidding war with each other, over literal American lives. 7. For the first 6 months of the pandemic OUR PRESIDENT set a bad example by refusing to wear a mask. 8. He also threw massive Trump rallies and 4th of July celebrations where hardly anyone social distanced or wore masks... But also where they where required to sign wavers to get in, for liability purposes. 9. He presented multiple snake oil cures. 10. He came out, multiple times against his experts advice, and in true Trump fashion, name calling and insulting them. 11. We also later found out that he knew how serious it was early on, but still choose to come out and tried to convince his supporters that it was a Dem Hoax. 12. He still barely wears a mask now. 13. He is still holding Trump rallies now with no social distancing. 14. He has discouraged and tried to defund testing throughout the pandemic. 15. He is in court RIGHT N0W trying to take health care away from millions of Americans with no plan to replace it, in the middle of the world world wide pandemic in over 100 years. 16. For 2 and a half months he tried to pretend that C19 was just going to magically go away abd lied about the numbers. 17. He is the president of our country and it is LITERALLY HIS JOB to get us through National crisis scenarios in the fast way available. Which he had all along yet ignored. Do you need some more or are you done lying and making excuses for an argument you can't sustain any longer. - Quarantine for people coming into the US from known infectious countries. - Immediate funding and emergency medical supplies instantly being distributed to all major hospitals. - Emergency funding for developing and distributing testing. - Immediate and constant release of all known medical testing and findings onset disease shared throughout every hospital and medical lab in the US. - Immediate lock down of all potential infected areas. - Immediate social distancing measures being implemented throughout the country. Just to name a few....
    1
  35681. 1
  35682. 1
  35683. 1
  35684. 1
  35685. 1
  35686. 1
  35687. 1
  35688. 1
  35689. 1
  35690. 1
  35691. 1
  35692. 1
  35693. 1
  35694. 1
  35695. 1
  35696. 1
  35697. 1
  35698. 1
  35699. 1
  35700. 1
  35701. 1
  35702. @Nicholas Isaza And I chose to ignore your facts, when? Scroll to comments up from the comment you made that statement in. You will see.... "" it takes weeks for sometimes to show, so by the time a person goes into the hospital for symptoms that person had the possibility of spreading it to as much as hundreds of people. Not to mention that some people never have symptoms. An asymptomatic person has the possibility of spreading the virus two thousands of people throughout the entire time that they're contagious.... Etc" You are operating without facts at this point. When I keep saying you cherry pick facts and only see what you want... This is what I mean.👆 Have you read the plan? Do you honestly believe that a council full of infectious disease expert did not Factor those into their report?I don't even have to ask if you read it. You just proved you didn't and was speaking out of ignorance. I wish I could link it but unfortunately all copies of it are in PDF form. It is not hard to find when you Google it. The report was written specifically for this scenario. A little-known contagion not originating from the US but coming to the u.s. with prior knowledge of its existence. It had tones of recommended safe guards built in. Many of the ones we had now, minus the test, because, at the time, we didn't have any. - Quarantine for people coming into the US from known infectious countries. - Immediate funding and emergency medical supplies instantly being distributed to all major hospitals. - Emergency funding for developing and distributing testing. - Immediate and constant release of all known medical testing and findings onset disease shared throughout every hospital and medical lab in the US. - Immediate lock down of all potential infected areas. - Immediate social distancing measures being implemented throughout the country. Just to name a few.... You can't sustain your claim because you have not done the research, yet you keep insisting you are correct. This discredits you."
    1
  35703. 1
  35704. 1
  35705. 1
  35706. 1
  35707. 1
  35708. 1
  35709. 1
  35710. 1
  35711. 1
  35712. 1
  35713. 1
  35714. 1
  35715. 1
  35716. 1
  35717. 1
  35718. 1
  35719. 1
  35720. 1
  35721. 1
  35722. 1
  35723. 1
  35724. 1
  35725. 1
  35726. 1
  35727. @Nicholas Isaza Sorry spanky... You stopped holding a serious conversation LONG BEFORE I started F***ing with you. Did you honestly think you where fooling anyone by trying to occasionally agree with me... But then never applying that logic to your final conclusion. Nope! Then you kept making silly excuse after silly excuse as to why I was wrong and you where right... Which ultimately is all this ever was about for you. First... I had no facts. Next... I had very few facts. Then... My facts where opinions. After that... The facts where about Donald Trump and President Obama and totally "NOT" C19 But wait... Cuz then... You had to ignore facts because they where all in "individual comments" and not one big comment.... And then there was your constant lying about what I had said and your ongoing confusion between the words "containment" and "prevention". I imagine at that point, you where just running out of excuses... Just just kept getting worse as you went along. Anything to not have to admit that THE CURRENT LEADER OF THIS COUNTRY WAS A MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO THE OUT OF CONTROL SPREAD OF THE WORLD WORLD WIDE PANDEMIC IN OVER 100 YEARS AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THAT BEING 200,000 DEAD AMERICAN'S BECAUSE OF IT. Because in your book, the guy who's job it is to manage these situations, actively making it worse, does not at all mean that he should be responsible for the consequences of those actions. Cuz, that makes "all the sense in the world". But you go ahead and keep trying to make this all about me, my "hate" and "CLEARLY NOT" your LACK OF DESIRE to RECOGNIZE and CONSIDER FACTS that DON'T FIT the NARRATIVE that YOU have ALREADY DECIDED is TRUE. You tell yourself whatever you like! Your lack of desire to recognise facts, will never actually make them go away. Which you clearly know. Which is why everyone who doesn't play those game with you are clearly "crazy" people and "must have" something wrong with them. It "couldn't be" that you are running away from info that doesn't fit your narrative. There ya go... In one big comment for you. I wonder what excuse your will come up with next for running away from facts... Let's see... Shall we! 😁
    1
  35728. 1
  35729. 1
  35730. 1
  35731. 1
  35732. @Nicholas Isaza " My point from the start was that you never had many sacks on the topic that we were talking about." 👇 And all 17 of my FACTS. How many did you have Btw? I forget... "I said it because you clearly haven't looked at the facts. You provided barely any facts." 1. President Obama had a 33 page pandemic CONTAINMENT PLAN commissioned after H1N1, that was researched and written by infectious disease experts in the field and left for the next Administration. 2. Donald Trump was aware of this even before the first case hit the US, but choose to ignore it because Obama. 3. The CONTAINMENT PLAN, if implemented would have (shocker) CONTAINED THE SPREAD IN THE US. 4. Donald Trump had 3 YEARS to refill the stockpiles of emergency medical equipment before C19 hit and didn't do so. 5. He, instead, chose to blame President Obama. 6. This forced the states into a bidding war with each other, over literal American lives. 7. For the first 6 months of the pandemic OUR PRESIDENT set a bad example by refusing to wear a mask. 8. He also threw massive Trump rallies and 4th of July celebrations where hardly anyone social distanced or wore masks... But also where they where required to sign wavers to get in, for liability purposes. 9. He presented multiple snake oil cures. 10. He came out, multiple times against his experts advice, and in true Trump fashion, name calling and insulting them. 11. We also later found out that he knew how serious it was early on, but still choose to come out and tried to convince his supporters that it was a Dem Hoax. 12. He still barely wears a mask now. 13. He is still holding Trump rallies now with no social distancing. 14. He has discouraged and tried to defund testing throughout the pandemic. 15. He is in court RIGHT N0W trying to take health care away from millions of Americans with no plan to replace it, in the middle of the world world wide pandemic in over 100 years. 16. For 2 and a half months he tried to pretend that C19 was just going to magically go away abd lied about the numbers. 17. He is the president of our country and it is LITERALLY HIS JOB to get us through National crisis scenarios in the fast way available. Which he had all along yet ignored. Do you need some more or are you done lying and making excuses for an argument you can't sustain any longer."
    1
  35733. 1
  35734. @Nicholas Isaza "provide real facts"👇 How are these not real facts? 1. President Obama had a 33 page pandemic CONTAINMENT PLAN commissioned after H1N1, that was researched and written by infectious disease experts in the field and left for the next Administration. 2. Donald Trump was aware of this even before the first case hit the US, but choose to ignore it because Obama. 3. The CONTAINMENT PLAN, if implemented would have (shocker) CONTAINED THE SPREAD IN THE US. 4. Donald Trump had 3 YEARS to refill the stockpiles of emergency medical equipment before C19 hit and didn't do so. 5. He, instead, chose to blame President Obama. 6. This forced the states into a bidding war with each other, over literal American lives. 7. For the first 6 months of the pandemic OUR PRESIDENT set a bad example by refusing to wear a mask. 8. He also threw massive Trump rallies and 4th of July celebrations where hardly anyone social distanced or wore masks... But also where they where required to sign wavers to get in, for liability purposes. 9. He presented multiple snake oil cures. 10. He came out, multiple times against his experts advice, and in true Trump fashion, name calling and insulting them. 11. We also later found out that he knew how serious it was early on, but still choose to come out and tried to convince his supporters that it was a Dem Hoax. 12. He still barely wears a mask now. 13. He is still holding Trump rallies now with no social distancing. 14. He has discouraged and tried to defund testing throughout the pandemic. 15. He is in court RIGHT N0W trying to take health care away from millions of Americans with no plan to replace it, in the middle of the world world wide pandemic in over 100 years. 16. For 2 and a half months he tried to pretend that C19 was just going to magically go away abd lied about the numbers. 17. He is the president of our country and it is LITERALLY HIS JOB to get us through National crisis scenarios in the fast way available. Which he had all along yet ignored.
    1
  35735. 1
  35736. 1
  35737. 1
  35738. 1
  35739. 1
  35740. 1
  35741. 1
  35742. 1
  35743. 1
  35744. 1
  35745. 1
  35746. 1
  35747. 1
  35748. 1
  35749. 1
  35750. 1
  35751. 1
  35752. 1
  35753. 1
  35754. 1
  35755. 1
  35756. 1
  35757. 1
  35758. 1
  35759. 1
  35760. 1
  35761. 1
  35762. 1
  35763. 1
  35764. 1
  35765. 1
  35766. 1
  35767. 1
  35768. 1
  35769. 1
  35770. 1
  35771. @Nicholas Isaza 😂😂😂😂 I love how predictable you lying right wing Trump trolls are! This is word for word copy and pasted the exact list you said you agreed with. "And yes I can!.... after H1N1, President Obama did the responsible thing and got together a committee of pandemic and infectious disease experts and had them put together a 33-page plan that lays out how to minimize the spread of a can chili pandemic virus in America. Then left it there for Donald Trump on day one. Donald Trump then decided that his rivalry and his ego were more important than saving American lives and ignore the entire thing. 👉(FACT 7)👈- He then spent six months not wearing a mask when the experts had been telling them almost that entire time to wear one. - He spent about two and a half months, starting in the middle of the shutdown, trying to pretend that covid-19 magically Gone Away. 👉(FACT 5)👈 - He then tried to blame Obama for the fact that we didn't have enough stock piles of medical equipment to sustain the emergency supply in America, when he had 3 years to fill that up. forcing the states to literally go into a bidding war with each other over literal American lives. 👉(FACT 9)👈- He's promoted multiple untested, unscientific and ultimately dangerous supposed "cures". 👉(FACT 10)👈- He has come out against the the medical professionals advice on multiple occasions. 👉(FACT 8)👈- He has held giant Trump rallies with little to no social distancing or masks but waivers being signed to protect them from liability. 👉(FACT 11)👈- He is called covid-19 a democratic hoax weeks after (it turns out) he admitted that he knew how bad it was. 👉(FACT 14)👈- He has almost consistently discouraged testing. - He has insisted that children go back to school even though the medical experts are telling him it is not safe for them. Even going so far as to threaten to defund our already strapped public education system if they don't. - He has continuously mopped people in public for a hearing to social distancing regulations. 👉(FACT 12)👈 - He still doesn't wear a damn mask on a regular basis and we're 8 months in. He is supposed to be the leader of this country and he is doing all of that during the worst worldwide pandemic and over a hundred years. I can absolutely blame him for every American covid-19 death."
    1
  35772. 1
  35773. 1
  35774. 1
  35775. 1
  35776. @Nicholas Isaza He can call me what he likes! These be the facts he's running from that never can erase! 👇 😂 This is word for word copy and pasted the exact list you said you agreed with. "And yes I can!.... after H1N1, President Obama did the responsible thing and got together a committee of pandemic and infectious disease experts and had them put together a 33-page plan that lays out how to minimize the spread of a can chili pandemic virus in America. Then left it there for Donald Trump on day one. Donald Trump then decided that his rivalry and his ego were more important than saving American lives and ignore the entire thing. 👉(FACT 7)👈- He then spent six months not wearing a mask when the experts had been telling them almost that entire time to wear one. - He spent about two and a half months, starting in the middle of the shutdown, trying to pretend that covid-19 magically Gone Away. 👉(FACT 5)👈 - He then tried to blame Obama for the fact that we didn't have enough stock piles of medical equipment to sustain the emergency supply in America, when he had 3 years to fill that up. forcing the states to literally go into a bidding war with each other over literal American lives. 👉(FACT 9)👈- He's promoted multiple untested, unscientific and ultimately dangerous supposed "cures". 👉(FACT 10)👈- He has come out against the the medical professionals advice on multiple occasions. 👉(FACT 8)👈- He has held giant Trump rallies with little to no social distancing or masks but waivers being signed to protect them from liability. 👉(FACT 11)👈- He is called covid-19 a democratic hoax weeks after (it turns out) he admitted that he knew how bad it was. 👉(FACT 14)👈- He has almost consistently discouraged testing. - He has insisted that children go back to school even though the medical experts are telling him it is not safe for them. Even going so far as to threaten to defund our already strapped public education system if they don't. - He has continuously mopped people in public for a hearing to social distancing regulations. 👉(FACT 12)👈 - He still doesn't wear a damn mask on a regular basis and we're 8 months in. He is supposed to be the leader of this country and he is doing all of that during the worst worldwide pandemic and over a hundred years. I can absolutely blame him for every American covid-19 death." BTW... Did you see this! 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁👇 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 " I also agree with your criticism of Trump's pandemic response. He should have acted like a leader and handled the pandemic better." 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 That's right! Your comment about these facts, when very first presented to you! Then you change the narrative to misinformation. Then you change the narrative to their my opinions. Then you change the narrative to very little facts. Then you change the narrative to they are in too many comments so my brain will let me read them. Then you change the narrative to there are about President Obama and Donald Trump but not covid-19. Then you change the narrative to they are irrelevant to what we were speaking about. Which was what again?
    1
  35777. 1
  35778. 1
  35779. @Nicholas Isaza 👈 This is what he started saying about these facts. 👇😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 " I also agree with your criticism of Trump's pandemic response. He should have acted like a leader and handled the pandemic better." 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 These are the multiple narrative changes he made in between, about said facts. 1. Misinformation 2. Opinions 3. Very little facts 4. Can't read them because they are in multiple short back to back comments, instead of one big comment 5. They where about President Obama and Donald Trump but not covid-19 6. Irrelevant and/or incorrect to what we were speaking about Which he said was Covid 19 back in # 5. EXCEPT... Back when he said this 👇😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 " I also agree with your criticism of Trump's pandemic response. He should have acted like a leader and handled the pandemic better." 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆... This is what he was responding to. 👇 👉(FACT 7)👈- He then spent six months not wearing a mask when the experts had been telling them almost that entire time to wear one. - He spent about two and a half months, starting in the middle of the shutdown, trying to pretend that covid-19 magically Gone Away. 👉(FACT 5)👈 - He then tried to blame Obama for the fact that we didn't have enough stock piles of medical equipment to sustain the emergency supply in America, when he had 3 years to fill that up. forcing the states to literally go into a bidding war with each other over literal American lives. 👉(FACT 9)👈- He's promoted multiple untested, unscientific and ultimately dangerous supposed "cures". 👉(FACT 10)👈- He has come out against the the medical professionals advice on multiple occasions. 👉(FACT 8)👈- He has held giant Trump rallies with little to no social distancing or masks but waivers being signed to protect them from liability. 👉(FACT 11)👈- He is called covid-19 a democratic hoax weeks after (it turns out) he admitted that he knew how bad it was. 👉(FACT 14)👈- He has almost consistently discouraged testing. - He has insisted that children go back to school even though the medical experts are telling him it is not safe for them. Even going so far as to threaten to defund our already strapped public education system if they don't. - He has continuously mopped people in public for a hearing to social distancing regulations. 👉(FACT 12)👈 - He still doesn't wear a damn mask on a regular basis and we're 8 months in. He is supposed to be the leader of this country and he is doing all of that during the worst worldwide pandemic and over a hundred years. I can absolutely blame him for every American covid-19 death." These are the things he calls insane now... Because he can no longer realistically argue against his inconsistencies. 👇 1. President Obama had a 33 page pandemic CONTAINMENT PLAN commissioned after H1N1, that was researched and written by infectious disease experts in the field and left for the next Administration. 2. Donald Trump was aware of this even before the first case hit the US, but choose to ignore it because Obama. 3. The CONTAINMENT PLAN, if implemented would have (shocker) CONTAINED THE SPREAD IN THE US. 4. Donald Trump had 3 YEARS to refill the stockpiles of emergency medical equipment before C19 hit and didn't do so. 5. He, instead, chose to blame President Obama. 6. This forced the states into a bidding war with each other, over literal American lives. 7. For the first 6 months of the pandemic OUR PRESIDENT set a bad example by refusing to wear a mask. 8. He also threw massive Trump rallies and 4th of July celebrations where hardly anyone social distanced or wore masks... But also where they where required to sign wavers to get in, for liability purposes. 9. He presented multiple snake oil cures. 10. He came out, multiple times against his experts advice, and in true Trump fashion, name calling and insulting them. 11. We also later found out that he knew how serious it was early on, but still choose to come out and tried to convince his supporters that it was a Dem Hoax. 12. He still barely wears a mask now. 13. He is still holding Trump rallies now with no social distancing. 14. He has discouraged and tried to defund testing throughout the pandemic. 15. He is in court RIGHT N0W trying to take health care away from millions of Americans with no plan to replace it, in the middle of the world world wide pandemic in over 100 years. 16. For 2 and a half months he tried to pretend that C19 was just going to magically go away abd lied about the numbers. 17. He is the president of our country and it is LITERALLY HIS JOB to get us through National crisis scenarios in the fast way available. Which he had all along yet ignored. Notice any similarities?
    1
  35780. 1
  35781. 1
  35782. 1
  35783. 1
  35784. 1
  35785. 1
  35786. 1
  35787. 1
  35788. 1
  35789. 1
  35790. 1
  35791. 1
  35792. 1
  35793. 1
  35794. 1
  35795. 1
  35796. 1
  35797. 1
  35798. 1
  35799. 1
  35800. 1
  35801. 1
  35802.  @bryguy306  That's easy... I didn't your trying to lie on me so you dont bruise your delicate ego. That sounds like it falls under... Not my problem, to me. .. So I shall press on. 😁 The dossier was a PART of the evidence given to the FIRST judge, the FIRST TIME they applied for the FIRST 90 day FISA warrent, on Carter Page's office. It was 1 small piece of evidence, 1 time, for 1 warrent. Then the FBI caught Steele in some lies, no longer deamed him credible and took it out of the warrent application after that. The warrents, where approved 7 other times after that without the dossier. Its publoc record. Also.. Its in here! 👇In volume 2, under Obstruction. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html So... Where did you hear the dossier was how they got the FISA warrent? It also had nothing to do with a pee tape. Again... I ask... Where are you getting this from? "Page had already come to the attention of the FBI before he joined the Trump campaign because of his interactions with Russian intelligence officers. In 2015, three of the people whom Page interacted with were charged with conspiracy to act as an unregistered agent of a foreign government, with the interactions with Page forming a key part of the complaint. One of the men pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 30 months in prison; the other two no longer lived in the United States and have not been arrested." Also, it was a wiretap. One that investigations use all the time to bust American criminals. So, are you implying that all those people sitting in jail right now should be released for all their crimes because the evidence that put them there was a wire tap? No... I just read and gather information independently instead of just swallowing lies bias people try to tell me. You should try it. 😉✌
    1
  35803.  @bryguy306  SoOoOo... The majority of your second comment is posturing and excuses for why you can't prove what your claiming. I'm not shocked. And then... It is apparently time for the making stuff up about what I said, portion... Where did I call him a buffoon? Where did I call him a manipulated tyrant? " What, you mean like... Releasing the transcript of the entire phone call? Why... No... Brain trust... I mean like abusing executive privilage to try and keep it from Congress for a few weeks now, until it hit the press... And only then releasing the transcript after the Congress... Dems and Reps... Had to come out in mass against those 3 doing it... Which forced his hand. Tons of Democrat and Republican Congressman came out against that. And they don't agree on anything. See... When you don't cherry pick facts and look at the whole board.. It tends to be less embarrassing for you later. 😉✌ And now the WhatAboutIsm... Portion of the rights script. This is all so original. I will tell you what I tell everybody else. I don't want crooked, self-serving, power-hungry, egomaniacs, on my team. Did I vote for hillary? Only in the end. Only as the lesser of two evils. Did I say anything about all the shady s*** she did, not just the emails but also the DNC... And that's only just in the election season. She did all manner of shady ship before she ran for president. So did I say anything about it? You're damn right I did. That's called, being objective. That's called having common sense. That's called not throwing your support and weight behind a shady Shady corrupt ass clown because they have the same color I have on. Maybe you should try that sometime. Again, it's going to be a lot less embarrassing than you asking me questions, assuming the answers and then calling me a hypocrite because of that. If you have to set up that big of a paper tiger, in order to give any validity to your point of view, maybe consider it's not worth doing. Just a thought. 😉✌
    1
  35804. 1
  35805. 1
  35806.  @bryguy306  Curious... Not denying it! So I think I'm good! 😜✌ "The Steele dossier was the justification for the FISA warrents;" No. You said this. 👆 - was 👉the👈 justification SoOoOo... You meant it was 1 of many things they gave the judge, which didn't end up mattering at all because they took it out for every other warrent and still got them. -FISA warrent👉s👈 Nope... Wrong again. It was an inconsequential part of the very first warrant. What I do enjoy is your attempt to cherry pick mine and your words. Good example of what I was talking about. That's okay though... I spelled it out for you. I even used visual aids. So hopefully you get it this time. (Fingers crossed) 😉✌ What I also love... Is the ramp up of personal attacks. A clear mask for your insecurities over your very flawed argument. And ya know who pulls the spelling and grammar Nazi card? Those who are feeling super insecure about their own argument. Otherwise, why wouldn't you stick to the substance and try and beat me on that? And did you seriously just put the dossier up as a source of accurate info? After you tried to discredit it... You wanna talk about "SERIOUSLY"... SERIOUSLY? Isn't that convenient? All the sudden the dossier is full of accurate information when the information is something that support your argument. Curious... 🤣 And we have come to the part of the script, where you try and excuse( and quite a long one... You must be really insecure and embarrassed for yourself ) the fact that you're going to run away like a little b** Because you said some stupid s*** you can't justify. Goody!🤣
    1
  35807. 1
  35808. 1
  35809. 1
  35810. 1
  35811. 1
  35812. 1
  35813. 1
  35814. 1
  35815. 1
  35816. 1
  35817. 1
  35818. 1
  35819. 1
  35820. 1
  35821. 1
  35822. 1
  35823. 1
  35824. 1
  35825. 1
  35826. 1
  35827. 1
  35828. 1
  35829. 1
  35830. 1
  35831. 1
  35832. 1
  35833. 1
  35834. 1
  35835. 1
  35836. 1
  35837. 1
  35838. 1
  35839. 1
  35840. 1
  35841. 1
  35842. 1
  35843. 1
  35844. 1
  35845. 1
  35846. 1
  35847. 1
  35848. 1
  35849. 1
  35850. 1
  35851. 1
  35852. 1
  35853. 1
  35854. 1
  35855. 1
  35856. 1
  35857. 1
  35858. 1
  35859. 1
  35860. 1
  35861. 1
  35862. 1
  35863. 1
  35864. 1
  35865. 1
  35866. 1
  35867. 1
  35868. 1
  35869. 1
  35870. 1
  35871. 1
  35872. 1
  35873. 1
  35874. 1
  35875. 1
  35876. 1
  35877. 1
  35878. 1
  35879. 1
  35880. 1
  35881. 1
  35882. 1
  35883. 1
  35884. 1
  35885. 1
  35886. 1
  35887. 1
  35888. 1
  35889. 1
  35890. 1
  35891. 1
  35892. 1
  35893. 1
  35894. 1
  35895. 1
  35896. 1
  35897. 1
  35898. 1
  35899. 1
  35900. 1
  35901. 1
  35902. 1
  35903. 1
  35904. 1
  35905. 1
  35906. 1
  35907. 1
  35908. 1
  35909. 1
  35910. 1
  35911. 1
  35912. 1
  35913. 1
  35914. 1
  35915. 1
  35916. 1
  35917. 1
  35918. 1
  35919. 1
  35920. 1
  35921. 1
  35922. 1
  35923. 1
  35924. 1
  35925. 1
  35926. 1
  35927. 1
  35928. 1
  35929. 1
  35930. 1
  35931. 1
  35932. 1
  35933. 1
  35934. 1
  35935. 1
  35936. 1
  35937. 1
  35938. 1
  35939. 1
  35940. 1
  35941. 1
  35942. 1
  35943. 1
  35944. 1
  35945. 1
  35946. 1
  35947. 1
  35948. 1
  35949. 1
  35950. 1
  35951. 1
  35952. 1
  35953. 1
  35954. 1
  35955. 1
  35956. 1
  35957. 1
  35958. 1
  35959. 1
  35960. 1
  35961. 1
  35962. 1
  35963. 1
  35964. 1
  35965. 1
  35966. 1
  35967. 1
  35968. 1
  35969.  @Michael-yl2iq  Oh... Good golly! I'm from the south, sweetheart... You got perfect strangers down here calling each other baby on the daily. You really don't have to read into everything. And yeah.. That's called posting in a public forum. If you don't want your comments to be read by everyone then email each other. Other than that, suck it up, butter cup! 😉 I think you're confused. You keep trying to put words into my mouth. Unless you can show me where I said I don't consider him to be the president? I'll be waiting on that one. I said I would not refer to him as the president because he has not earned that respect. I don't want people thinking, that I think, that this man is an appropriate president. Irregardless of the job he currently resides in. He stands for a crap ton of things that I will not endorse. Like this big old paper tiger you're trying to set up right now. You trying to make this whole argument about some words you're trying to put into my mouth. You can try all that, but I don't have to play along. Now you're trying to switch over your argument on me... But that's not the case. Unfortunately everybody knows what office he resides in. That does not mean I have to refer to him as the president. He is not are in that respect. What is silly is you trying to twist all this around so you have an argument. What is silly is the second time you trying to put words into my mouth.... What is silly, is you need mw to be wrong and you to be right, so much, that you can't just have a different opinion than I do without all these diversions and tactics. That's what silly. 😜✌
    1
  35970.  @Michael-yl2iq  Your talking about personal responsibility, correct? But now you're acting like the guy I'm talking to, when I'm NOT referring to him as president, is stupid. Do you really think that I have to refer to Donald Trump as president or this person is going to be somehow confused by whether he is president of the most well-known country in the world? I would not be confused by that. Cuz, that's just crazy. What they could be confused by is me sighting off facts and talking about how childish and ignorant he is, and then at the same time, giving him the respect of a title that he hasn't earned. Ain't no-one out there, going to be like well, she didn't call him president, so I don't know if he is or not... Or I don't know if she thinks he is or not. Everybody in the past and probably everybody in the future are going to be like, she don't like his ass. Which I'm fine with, because it's true. I talk about politics all the damn time, ain't nobody ever gotten the impression that I didn't recognize that this person was sitting in the Oval Office right now. As for division, like I've already said, I want that division between me and anyone out there, thinking that I would condone that kind of behavior towards other people. I deplore bullies, and that's all that man is. I don't give a damn Who You Are. Wrong is wrong. Treating people the way that he does, should not be condoned or even made to look that way. That is one very specific way you stand up against people like that. Is it a shame that this person happens to be the president right now, yes. But that don't make it any different. You don't show him respect he hasn't earned, just because he happens to have a powerful title. As for you explaining to me that my freedom of speech doesn't make facts not facts, I never said it did. That's you yet again putting words into my mouth. Assuming I meant one thing when I said another. I'm not sure where you got the impression that I'm not Direct. Because I sure as s*** have been this whole time with you... but you can't seem to help yourself but to assume I mean something that I haven't said. That's your personal responsibility. Not mine. I, on the other hand, started bringing up that, I had the first amendment and freedom of speech, because you kept saying things like, people didn't have the right to not call him the president. I have every right NOT to call him that. As a matter of FACT, that was one of the first things you said. Which is also what made me reply to you, BTW. " Even if he behaved terribly does not give you the right to do it as well." That's the part you are not getting... You think that you are the one that gets to decide what is and is not being a good citizen. In your opinion not referring to Trump, as president Trump, is not being a good citizen. My opinion differs from that. I beleive that showing the dofference between the man who currently resides in the Oval office and the values and morals of the people, he is supposed to represent are infact, different, when they differ that much. At least as far as it goes to me and others who has presented the same opinion as I. No, you once again, assumed, that's what it meant. Which is again, on you and not me. I said, " I equally have the same right, not to refer to a man, who acts like a child on a daily basis, as my president." I said, "NOT TO REFER".
    1
  35971. 1
  35972. 1
  35973. 1
  35974. 1
  35975.  @Michael-yl2iq  And I said plenty. You just didn't get the answer that you wanted. So... Now your all butt hurt about it. "As for your question.... My words are clear enough, as you read them to mean, exactly what they say. Not what you assume them to mean. So, I don't feel the urge to participate in or correct your assumptions. That is also not my responsibility. I have never giving you the impression that I am not direct, despite you trying to read things into almost everything that I have said. I'm not going to refer to him as president, until he earns that respect." You claim them to be nothing, because they where pointing out what you did not want to acknowledge. Your assumptions about my "meaning" on what I was saying, instead of just taking what I said at face value. I'm not participating in that. You are more than welcome to consider that, whatever you want it to be, sweetheart. At the end of the day, your just guessing, because I am me and you are not. Your explanation simply denies the recipients personal responsibility and implies ignorance of the world around them. That's what needs to happen, for what you claim, I mean, to be true. That's why your ignoring the other persons knowledge of the world around them, when I'm not referring to Trump as president. That's why you're ignoring my colloquial terminology as being just that. That's why you're ignoring that you're telling me what I meant. As if you would somehow know better than I. SoOoOo .. Yeah... I think this conversation is very direct. It directly points out a lot of things that you do not like. Which is why your leaving now. 😁🤘
    1
  35976. 1
  35977. 1
  35978. 1
  35979. 1
  35980. 1
  35981. 1
  35982. 1
  35983. 1
  35984. 1
  35985. 1
  35986. 1
  35987. 1
  35988. 1
  35989. 1
  35990. 1
  35991. 1
  35992. 1
  35993. 1
  35994. 1
  35995. 1
  35996. 1
  35997. 1
  35998. 1
  35999. 1
  36000. 1
  36001. 1
  36002. 1
  36003. 1
  36004. 1
  36005. 1
  36006. 1
  36007. 1
  36008. 1
  36009. 1
  36010. 1
  36011. 1
  36012. 1
  36013. 1
  36014. 1
  36015. 1
  36016. 1
  36017. 1
  36018. 1
  36019. 1
  36020. 1
  36021. 1
  36022. 1
  36023. 1
  36024. 1
  36025. 1
  36026.  @p-squash7341    As for your assumption... I can just tell you why I was doing, what I was. You don't have to guess. Like you obviously are.... And in a manner that conveniently gives you more value or importance than you feel, you might deserve. Yet again, YOU NEED that. I meantioned James and me because, we have been talking about it. Which is evident in the comment section.... We are on similar pages. We have noticed similar things. Which is what I thpught of when I was typing my quoted remark. Now so am thinkong that I am taking the time to explain this because It bothers me when people try to interpret what I say into something other than what I directly said, because I am very direct already. I say exactly what I mean. I'm also thinking right npw that I notice how you try and get intellectual as a form of intimidation when somebody doesn't respond to your name-calling. You're constantly having to Puff yourself up and bring others down. I'm also thinking you're probably not a very happy person. And do you have a lack of the ability of being detached from or controlling your emotions. Nope... actually I'm kind of reading that you're trying to make what you think about my physical appearance matter more to me, so I can matter more to you. A lot of it sounds like you're trying to convince yourself that you matter more to me. Again you really sound like YOU NEED that. Logically I think you can get that you couldn't possibly matter as much as you want to because of the the detachment. I don't know you. You don't know me. We're probably never going to meet in or on whole entire lives. So really how much could you matter to me? How much could you effect my life? Know know its not a lot... And so you have to inflate yourself and try to deflate me. I say we were intrigued because we are obviously talking about you in the comments section. Now I'm thinking you're intentionally being sick about that because you need to yet again bolster your own importance. I'm honeslty barely scanning the long boring diatribe insults. After you read the same thing over and over again. It gets tired and it's like whatever. The importance I take from that as you really NEED TO say that though. Now I'm thinking you're lying because you just tried to put off like you were feeling sorry for me. I think you were just trying to make yourself seem a little more sympathetic or like you could be that. You need that as well. You can tell by on the little guessing Excursion you went on right after. I'm sure you were trying to bait me into revealing something about myself or into getting me angry. Trying to poke and see what would pop up. If I was truly as invested as you wish I was that would have worked as well. Unfortunately for you, you're just lying to yoirself.
    1
  36027. 1
  36028. 1
  36029. 1
  36030. 1
  36031. 1
  36032. 1
  36033. 1
  36034. 1
  36035. 1
  36036. 1
  36037. 1
  36038. 1
  36039. 1
  36040. 1
  36041. 1
  36042. 1
  36043. 1
  36044. 1
  36045. 1
  36046. 1
  36047. 1
  36048. 1
  36049. 1
  36050. 1
  36051. 1
  36052. 1
  36053. 1
  36054. 1
  36055. 1
  36056. 1
  36057. 1
  36058. 1
  36059. 1
  36060. 1
  36061. 1
  36062. 1
  36063.  @Michael-yl2iq  Someone who is willfully ignorant of facts, history and narrative, that has continuously also been made aware of such, in order to be able to LIE about another person's intent, is NOT a differance of political views. That is a GENUINE dishonestly of character. Which is why you will only answer 1 of the multiple questions, that I have asked you multiple of times. Its the one, you feel, you can frame to fit another false narrative, you are attempting to construct NOW, on this being about politics. You are not acting in an HONEST or GOOD manner. You have not done so this entire time. You would still like to be perceived as though you have and you are, which is why you are trying to be clever about it. However, I am not inclined to oblige. Your original statment was about PERCEPTION. Not FACT. "Every time you don't 👉refer👈 to him as "president" you show disrespect to the office and the country. Even if he behaves terribly does not give you the right to do it as well." I responded to you as PERCEPTION, and using the context of " refer". As you even pointed out, at one point. " We don't give him the respect of 👉calling him👉 president, and therefore referencing the office that you are concerned about protecting, because he has not earned it. I grew up being taught that you earn respect. It's not given to you. I don't know about her place to hold that true than the Oval Office." Which I kow you read, because later you mentioned me using, the collective "We", in that sentance, in an attempt to paint me as speaking for people I should not have been presuming to speak for. When it was actually, me referring to people who thought as I did. You just CHOOSE to ignore the other terminology in the very sentence you referred to earlier. You do so by continuously pointing out that I was referring to 👉a state of being👈 and not a sentence, in which I am CHOOSING to reference Trump in a certain way. " Donald Trump is the president of the US. If you're a citizen, he is your president. As a citizen 👉refusing to accept that he is your president👈 is a divisive act that harms the country. 👉You are intentionally harming the country.👈 Still at the point I started and will remain there." " Every time you don't refer to him as "president" you show disrespect to the office and the country. 👉Donald Trump is the president.👈 👉You deny this👈 in order to be divisive. Divisive doesn't help the country. Still there, not changing. " " Donald Trump is your president if you are a US citizen. 👉Your refusal to accept this fact👈 is designed to cause Division. Division in the country is not good. What you were doing is wrong." And so on and so forth. As you know, there are many more of these examples of you referring to my comments of "referring to his as such" intentionally mistated, by you, as "referring to the state of being". Which was, as I stated above, not your original narrative, upon which I was responding to. You simply continue to try and misstate the narrative, and therefore my reference to it, as this, after I pointed out that... - your reference on me being "confused" was an assumption on your part about the subject of my confusion - that your reference on "division" was also not correct on its subject matter, and merely an opinion on your part Opon which, you began to fluctuate back and forth between, trying to continue to change the narrative to a false one, upon which I keep pointing that out, and lying about what I have said, in order to try and push your false narrative. Also, which I have continued to point out. Which is also why you refuse to quote me , as I have done to you, and you to me, in regards to other things, when it comes to your persistent claim, that I don't consider him as the office he currently holds. I have never once said this. Which is why you can not. Which is why 👉YOU continue to LIE about me👈. Which you will more than likely CHOOSE to ignore, once again, because this is not about politics. It stopped being that a while back. It became about you not having to admit that you made assumptions, that turned out to be wrong and you don't want to have to say that. So instead, you continue to LIE about ME and what I have said. Which is a question of character and your clear and unabashed lack of it, that you continue to demonstrate. Which is why I'm not going to turn this loose. You can reply as many days as you would like. It's not going to matter. You're not going to continue to LIE on ME or try to push this false narrative because you and cannot argue the one that you began on. Which was based on assumption and opinion, on your part. Which I have once again, just laid out, clearly, for you. I bet you ignore it again. I bet you continue to try and paint a false narrative.
    1
  36064.  @Michael-yl2iq  Except I gave your your original statement.... Word for word. It's also up top for you to go back and read if you would like. At the end of my last one I believe I mentioned you'd go back to trying to push her false narrative. I'm shocked. You've gone back to that because it's all you have. As to where I have the truth. So I will repeat.. from my own and your own words quoted back verbatim... "Someone who is willfully ignorant of facts, history and narrative, that has continuously also been made aware of such, in order to be able to LIE about another person's intent, is NOT a differance of political views. That is a GENUINE dishonestly of character. Which is why you will only answer 1 of the multiple questions, that I have asked you multiple of times. Its the one, you feel, you can frame to fit another false narrative, you are attempting to construct NOW, on this being about politics. You are not acting in an HONEST or GOOD manner. You have not done so this entire time. You would still like to be perceived as though you have and you are, which is why you are trying to be clever about it. However, I am not inclined to oblige. Your original statment was about PERCEPTION. Not FACT. "Every time you don't 👉refer👈 to him as "president" you show disrespect to the office and the country. Even if he behaves terribly does not give you the right to do it as well." I responded to you as PERCEPTION, and using the context of " refer". As you even pointed out, at one point. " We don't give him the respect of 👉calling him👉 president, and therefore referencing the office that you are concerned about protecting, because he has not earned it. I grew up being taught that you earn respect. It's not given to you. I don't know about her place to hold that true than the Oval Office." Which I kow you read, because later you mentioned me using, the collective "We", in that sentance, in an attempt to paint me as speaking for people I should not have been presuming to speak for. When it was actually, me referring to people who thought as I did. You just CHOOSE to ignore the other terminology in the very sentence you referred to earlier. You do so by continuously pointing out that I was referring to 👉a state of being👈 and not a sentence, in which I am CHOOSING to reference Trump in a certain way. " Donald Trump is the president of the US. If you're a citizen, he is your president. As a citizen 👉refusing to accept that he is your president👈 is a divisive act that harms the country. 👉You are intentionally harming the country.👈 Still at the point I started and will remain there." " Every time you don't refer to him as "president" you show disrespect to the office and the country. 👉Donald Trump is the president.👈 👉You deny this👈 in order to be divisive. Divisive doesn't help the country. Still there, not changing. " " Donald Trump is your president if you are a US citizen. 👉Your refusal to accept this fact👈 is designed to cause Division. Division in the country is not good. What you were doing is wrong." And so on and so forth. As you know, there are many more of these examples of you referring to my comments of "referring to his as such" intentionally mistated, by you, as "referring to the state of being". Which was, as I stated above, not your original narrative, upon which I was responding to. You simply continue to try and misstate the narrative, and therefore my reference to it, as this, after I pointed out that... - your reference on me being "confused" was an assumption on your part about the subject of my confusion - that your reference on "division" was also not correct on its subject matter, and merely an opinion on your part Opon which, you began to fluctuate back and forth between, trying to continue to change the narrative to a false one, upon which I keep pointing that out, and lying about what I have said, in order to try and push your false narrative. Also, which I have continued to point out. Which is also why you refuse to quote me , as I have done to you, and you to me, in regards to other things, when it comes to your persistent claim, that I don't consider him as the office he currently holds. I have never once said this. Which is why you can not. Which is why 👉YOU continue to LIE about me👈. Which you will more than likely CHOOSE to ignore, once again, because this is not about politics. It stopped being that a while back. It became about you not having to admit that you made assumptions, that turned out to be wrong and you don't want to have to say that. So instead, you continue to LIE about ME and what I have said. Which is a question of character and your clear and unabashed lack of it, that you continue to demonstrate. Which is why I'm not going to turn this loose. You can reply as many days as you would like. It's not going to matter. You're not going to continue to LIE on ME or try to push this false narrative because you and cannot argue the one that you began on. Which was based on assumption and opinion, on your part. Which I have once again, just laid out, clearly, for you. I bet you ignore it again. I bet you continue to try and paint a false narrative." You keep going back to lying on me because you have no argument. I'll keep proving your wrong and a dishonest man who's letting his ego get in the way because he lacks moral character. See you tomorrow! 😜🤘
    1
  36065.  @Michael-yl2iq  😋 Except, the FACT that I have ACTUAL PROOF of the course of events, which I have laid out and can be seen up above. YOU refuse to STOP LYING about the beginning premise and what I HAVE ACTUALLY SAID. Which is why, even though you HAVE BEEN ASKED, several times, you CAN NOT go ☝ and quote ME, where I said, what you KEEP CLAIMING. WATCH! I'll do it again! Go up and quote where I said, what you KEEP claiming I did? I'll be waiting! Bet ya ignore it again! 😁 Your VERY FIRST COMMEMT ALONE, proves your continuous comments on "from the beginning" wrong. In fact, coming across so many liars, such as yourself, on here, I have began the practice of screenshotting our conversations, just in case people get delete happy/edit happy and then try to lie about what they've said or what I've said. Which I have also done this entire time. Surprise! 😁 SoOoOo... Here is your proof, that, infact, you are the one LYING! With screenshots to back it up, if need be! "Except I gave your your original statement.... Word for word. It's also up top for you to go back and read if you would like. At the end of my last one I believe I mentioned you'd go back to trying to push her false narrative. I'm shocked. You've gone back to that because it's all you have. As to where I have the truth. So I will repeat.. from my own and your own words quoted back verbatim... "Someone who is willfully ignorant of facts, history and narrative, that has continuously also been made aware of such, in order to be able to LIE about another person's intent, is NOT a differance of political views. That is a GENUINE dishonestly of character. Which is why you will only answer 1 of the multiple questions, that I have asked you multiple of times. Its the one, you feel, you can frame to fit another false narrative, you are attempting to construct NOW, on this being about politics. You are not acting in an HONEST or GOOD manner. You have not done so this entire time. You would still like to be perceived as though you have and you are, which is why you are trying to be clever about it. However, I am not inclined to oblige. Your original statment was about PERCEPTION. Not FACT. "Every time you don't 👉refer👈 to him as "president" you show disrespect to the office and the country. Even if he behaves terribly does not give you the right to do it as well." I responded to you as PERCEPTION, and using the context of " refer". As you even pointed out, at one point. " We don't give him the respect of 👉calling him👉 president, and therefore referencing the office that you are concerned about protecting, because he has not earned it. I grew up being taught that you earn respect. It's not given to you. I don't know about her place to hold that true than the Oval Office." Which I kow you read, because later you mentioned me using, the collective "We", in that sentance, in an attempt to paint me as speaking for people I should not have been presuming to speak for. When it was actually, me referring to people who thought as I did. You just CHOOSE to ignore the other terminology in the very sentence you referred to earlier. You do so by continuously pointing out that I was referring to 👉a state of being👈 and not a sentence, in which I am CHOOSING to reference Trump in a certain way. " Donald Trump is the president of the US. If you're a citizen, he is your president. As a citizen 👉refusing to accept that he is your president👈 is a divisive act that harms the country. 👉You are intentionally harming the country.👈 Still at the point I started and will remain there." " Every time you don't refer to him as "president" you show disrespect to the office and the country. 👉Donald Trump is the president.👈 👉You deny this👈 in order to be divisive. Divisive doesn't help the country. Still there, not changing. " " Donald Trump is your president if you are a US citizen. 👉Your refusal to accept this fact👈 is designed to cause Division. Division in the country is not good. What you were doing is wrong." And so on and so forth. As you know, there are many more of these examples of you referring to my comments of "referring to his as such" intentionally mistated, by you, as "referring to the state of being". Which was, as I stated above, not your original narrative, upon which I was responding to. You simply continue to try and misstate the narrative, and therefore my reference to it, as this, after I pointed out that... - your reference on me being "confused" was an assumption on your part about the subject of my confusion - that your reference on "division" was also not correct on its subject matter, and merely an opinion on your part Opon which, you began to fluctuate back and forth between, trying to continue to change the narrative to a false one, upon which I keep pointing that out, and lying about what I have said, in order to try and push your false narrative. Also, which I have continued to point out. Which is also why you refuse to quote me , as I have done to you, and you to me, in regards to other things, when it comes to your persistent claim, that I don't consider him as the office he currently holds. I have never once said this. Which is why you can not. Which is why 👉YOU continue to LIE about me👈. Which you will more than likely CHOOSE to ignore, once again, because this is not about politics. It stopped being that a while back. It became about you not having to admit that you made assumptions, that turned out to be wrong and you don't want to have to say that. So instead, you continue to LIE about ME and what I have said. Which is a question of character and your clear and unabashed lack of it, that you continue to demonstrate. Which is why I'm not going to turn this loose. You can reply as many days as you would like. It's not going to matter. You're not going to continue to LIE on ME or try to push this false narrative because you and cannot argue the one that you began on. Which was based on assumption and opinion, on your part. Which I have once again, just laid out, clearly, for you. I bet you ignore it again. I bet you continue to try and paint a false narrative." You keep going back to lying on me because you have no argument. I'll keep proving your wrong and a dishonest man who's letting his ego get in the way because he lacks moral character. See you tomorrow! 😜🤘" Where is yours?!?!? 😁😁😁
    1
  36066. 1
  36067. 1
  36068. 1
  36069. 1
  36070. 1
  36071. 1
  36072. 1
  36073. 1
  36074. 1
  36075. 1
  36076. 1
  36077. 1
  36078. 1
  36079. 1
  36080. 1
  36081. 1
  36082. 1
  36083. 1
  36084. 1
  36085. 1
  36086. 1
  36087. 1
  36088. 1
  36089. 1
  36090. 1
  36091. 1
  36092. 1
  36093. 1
  36094. 1
  36095. 1
  36096. 1
  36097. 1
  36098. 1
  36099. 1
  36100. 1
  36101. 1
  36102. 1
  36103. 1
  36104. 1
  36105. 1
  36106. 1
  36107. 1
  36108. 1
  36109. 1
  36110. 1
  36111. 1
  36112. 1
  36113. 1
  36114. 1
  36115. 1
  36116. 1
  36117. 1
  36118. 1
  36119. 1
  36120. 1
  36121. 1
  36122. 1
  36123. 1
  36124. 1
  36125. 1
  36126. 1
  36127. 1
  36128. 1
  36129. 1
  36130. 1
  36131. 1
  36132. 1
  36133. 1
  36134. 1
  36135. 1
  36136. 1
  36137. @Danny Ferrara BTW, did ya miss 👇this👇? Cuz, it seams like you missed 👇this👇! Unless your running away from it, like a little b****, that is.... You wouldn't be doing that, now would you? 😁👇 "Well lets see... let's take a look at history so we can see who's really trying to rewrite it! 😁 You - " you still have not provided a single example just speaking in hyperbole period. " Me - Did you not watch the video? What did you think I was talking about when I said she wasn't acting like a veteran? Do I need to lead you to the water and drink it for you too?🤣 And the other one you have asked twice now and I have answered twice now... But you keep ignoring because you don't have a rebuttal for my response! 😁 You - how in your ignorance stereotypical opinion do all veterans conduct themselves. ( Though the question should be "how should they" but I understand I'm working with oh, well let's just say... Not the brightest crayon in the Box...) Me - (the first time) The things that the military teaches are honor and integrity. All their soldiers are supposed to carry that with them. Calling somebody a boo boo head and then running away and slamming the door has nothing to do with honor or integrity. Me - (the second time) I already explained that above... Did you not read that? You don't have any military in your family do you? It's called the honor code. Every branch of the military has it. It's also something you should just generally act like when you're an actual adult. So I understand why you're not really getting this. LOL"
    1
  36138. 1
  36139. 1
  36140. 1
  36141. 1
  36142. 1
  36143. 1
  36144. 1
  36145. 1
  36146. 1
  36147. 1
  36148. 1
  36149. 1
  36150. 1
  36151. 1
  36152. DragonSerpentSwine199 CXCIX what is your point with that statement other than to unintentionally or maybe intentionally Miss represent a significant portion of our racial history in regards to the two primary parties in this country? You're correct that the KKK was founded to terrorize formerly enslaved African Americans and to discourage Multicultural America. historians called this the second Ku Klux Klan. Which launched in 1915 and became its most powerful in the 1920s. it was said to have over 4 million members at that time. about 5% of the population. It was actively trying to influence both parties at that time and obviously had it hands in all the cookie jars at could. For example there was a significant amount of Democrats that enacted and supported Jim Crow at the time and the clan helped with that. Another example is Midwest Industrial towns that had a lot of immigrants Catholics and Jewish people who voted Democrat. In those towns the clan took root largely among Republicans. It would vary state-by-state really. Around that time the clan was said to have around 11 Governors 16 senators and as many of 75 congressman. Roughly split between both Democrat and Republican parties. it only began to really lose its power and divide itself over... Of all things... Prohibition. Some clan members were willing to support Catholic politicians in order to get prohibition abolished. Others were not. the Calvin Coolidge election also had a lot to do with it. around this time Republican conventions were open arms to the clan but there was a completely different story when it came to democratic conventions. Especially ones that led to the White House. I asked her which the Democratic nominee John Davis himself denounced the clan and withheld his support. I think they called it the invisible Empire Klan? I'm not too sure about that. in 1924 the New York daily reign published a meant to be joke announcement from the Democratic Convention Hall declaring that the klanbake seemed open. but that was the only one no other papers or news organizations use to that term. An offhand historical footnote snowballed into that crazy theory on the Democratic party starting the clan. one mention in one paper that was apparently being facetious started that rumor.
    1
  36153. 1
  36154. 1
  36155. 1
  36156. 1
  36157. 1
  36158. 1
  36159. 1
  36160. 1
  36161. 1
  36162. 1
  36163. 1
  36164. 1
  36165. 1
  36166. 1
  36167. 1
  36168. 1
  36169. 1
  36170. 1
  36171. 1
  36172. 1
  36173. 1
  36174. 1
  36175. 1
  36176. 1
  36177. 1
  36178. 1
  36179. 1
  36180. 1
  36181. 1
  36182. 1
  36183. 1
  36184. 1
  36185. 1
  36186. 1
  36187. 1
  36188. 1
  36189. 1
  36190. 1
  36191. 1
  36192. 1
  36193. 1
  36194. 1
  36195. 1
  36196. 1
  36197. 1
  36198. 1
  36199. 1
  36200. 1
  36201. 1
  36202. 1
  36203. 1
  36204. 1
  36205. 1
  36206. 1
  36207. 1
  36208. 1
  36209. 1
  36210. 1
  36211. 1
  36212. 1
  36213. 1
  36214. 1
  36215. 1
  36216. 1
  36217. 1
  36218. 1
  36219. 1
  36220. 1
  36221. 1
  36222. 1
  36223. 1
  36224. 1
  36225. 1
  36226. 1
  36227. 1
  36228. 1
  36229. 1
  36230. 1
  36231. 1
  36232. 1
  36233. 1
  36234. 1
  36235. 1
  36236. 1
  36237. 1
  36238. 1
  36239. 1
  36240. 1
  36241. 1
  36242. 1
  36243. 1
  36244. 1
  36245. 1
  36246. 1
  36247. 1
  36248. 1
  36249. 1
  36250. 1
  36251. 1
  36252. 1
  36253. 1
  36254. 1
  36255. 1
  36256. 1
  36257. 1
  36258. 1
  36259. 1
  36260. 1
  36261. 1
  36262. 1
  36263. 1
  36264. 1
  36265. 1
  36266. 1
  36267. 1
  36268. 1
  36269. 1
  36270. 1
  36271. 1
  36272. 1
  36273. 1
  36274. 1
  36275. 1
  36276. 1
  36277. 1
  36278. 1
  36279. 1
  36280. 1
  36281. 1
  36282. 1
  36283. 1
  36284. 1
  36285. 1
  36286. 1
  36287. 1
  36288. 1
  36289. 1
  36290. 1
  36291. 1
  36292. 1
  36293. 1
  36294. 1
  36295. 1
  36296. 1
  36297. 1
  36298. 1
  36299. 1
  36300. 1
  36301. 1
  36302. 1
  36303. 1
  36304. 1
  36305. 1
  36306. 1
  36307. 1
  36308. 1
  36309. 1
  36310. 1
  36311. 1
  36312.  Redman Law 99  Trump did nothing illegal? We know two laws that has broken so far just in the Ukraine scandal. One being campaign Finance laws when he enlisted a foreign government to investigate a political opponent in the next presidential election. With or without the money being put on hold, that's still him breaking a law. Even if you don't add the money. The next one is obstruction of Congress. Because he decided it was going to be a super good idea to not only say he's not cooperating with subpoenas but getting all of his administration to do so and getting his lawyers to send written notices to Congress about it. Unless you want to explain how he's above the law? And so he doesn't have to answer to subpoenas like every other American in the country? But if you want to get super technical about it then you would know that not only has he broken two different laws, he broke one several different times and he handed over the evidence for both himself. Transcript shows the campaign Finance law he broke. With obstruction of Congress, he refused to release subpoena text messages, he tried to block a witness that had been subpoenaed from testifying and he tried to curtail another Witnesses testimony. That's at least three charges of obstruction of Congress and another possible witness intimidation. All of which he's done in public. So we are up to 1 campaign finance crime, 3 Obstruction of Congress crimes and 1 witness intimidation crime. The impeachment is about Trump and Biden is just a simple distraction for people who can't argue the substance. If you think neither did anything wrong, though, then you would be incorrect.
    1
  36313.  Redman Law 99  I'm sure you have... Considering its what happened.... And yrying to cherry pick what I said is just silly. 1... The dossier was 1 of several pieces of info in the 1st warrant. You are trying to glaze over the others and pretend that evidence wasn't there because it doesn't fit your point. 2.... The FISA Warrants where valid because every single other warrent was approved by 7 different judges, with the remaining evidence, clearly showing that they would have gotten the first one, irregardless if the dossier was in there or not. 3.... The FISA Warrants where not for Trump. They were for Carter Pages office. 4... the Republicans actually started the Steele dossier. Just when it turned out they didn't have any use for it, that's when Hillary picked it up and finished paying for the rest of it. You guys never quite remember that part. Isn't that funny... 5... You seriously don't even see a little bit of irony when it comes to you trying to paint Trump as the victim of some kind of misinformation campaign? Really? 6.... I know you never mentioned the FBI... That told me a lot. Who do you think ran the investigation? 7... and here we go with the LIE again about the Steele dossier starting the whole thing. If the Steele dossier started the investigation that the FBI ran, how did they not even know that its existence or get a copy of it until 7 weeks after they began the investigation? Also public record. 8 .... to be very clear about Steele dossier, some of it has been discredited. Some of it has not been discredited and some of it has been proven to be true. 9... you painting Trump with some kind of white hat on just shows your bias and your willingness to overlook large hunks of information that does not fit your preconceived notions.... But here's where it's not going to make any sense, because your guy likes to stick his foot in his mouth on a regular basis in public. Which means a great deal of what proves his involvement, much like with Ukraine right now, came directly from him. 10.. these three people who headed the investigation oh, they were all Republicans. So you claiming it some democratic crazy conspiracy, well that just shows you're the one that indulges in conspiracies.
    1
  36314. 1
  36315. 1
  36316. 1
  36317. 1
  36318. 1
  36319. 1
  36320. 1
  36321. 1
  36322. 1
  36323. 1
  36324. 1
  36325. 1
  36326. 1
  36327. 1
  36328. 1
  36329. 1
  36330. 1
  36331. 1
  36332. 1
  36333. 1
  36334. 1
  36335.  @hanassholesolo5173  Okay... Well... That is a decent point. "Control". Except, it would make the opposite happen. No body of Congress, ever wondering whether they're going to be elected or not again, will vote in a system that deletes the private healthcare From existence in this country. It's just not going to happen. That's just the realest. I wouldn't want it to me either. The whole point in this is us having those options. What it will do however, is forced the private sector to lower their prices to a reasonable amount. The average American makes less than 50,000 a year. They also spend 10000 a year per person on average. Except it gets worse because, most people aren't supporting themselves and only themselves. They're supporting themselves and a family. Which brings up that 10,000 to most of the time between 20000 and 40 thousand a year. And since I don't see them raising the minimum wage to a living wage anytime soon, that means people are having to choose on a regular basis whether they get their child's medicine or they has money to pay their heating bill. They are left in that position because due to a bunch of silly ass laws and regulations, the private sector has the market cornered and can charge whatever the hell they want. Especially with a necessity like healthcare. But watch what happens when they have to compete against the Public Health Care. So I absolutely want to give people a choice between private and public. Just having the public sector there, no matter what someone chooses, it's miles better than it is right now.
    1
  36336. 1
  36337. 1
  36338. 1
  36339. 1
  36340. 1
  36341. 1
  36342. 1
  36343. 1
  36344. 1
  36345. 1
  36346. 1
  36347. 1
  36348. 1
  36349. 1
  36350. 1
  36351. 1
  36352. 1
  36353. 1
  36354. 1
  36355. 1
  36356. 1
  36357. 1
  36358. 1
  36359. 1
  36360. 1
  36361. 1
  36362. 1
  36363. 1
  36364. 1
  36365. 1
  36366. 1
  36367. 1
  36368. 1
  36369. 1
  36370. 1
  36371. 1
  36372. 1
  36373. 1
  36374. 1
  36375. 1
  36376. 1
  36377. 1
  36378. 1
  36379. 1
  36380. 1
  36381. 1
  36382. 1
  36383. 1
  36384. 1
  36385. 1
  36386. 1
  36387. 1
  36388. 1
  36389. 1
  36390. 1
  36391. 1
  36392. 1
  36393. 1
  36394. 1
  36395. 1
  36396. 1
  36397. 1
  36398. 1
  36399. 1
  36400.  @mesolithicman164  Well... First... Don't present false assumptions your not prepared to back up. " probably an underestimation". There's no way you can qualify that. Don't just, on-the-fly, make stuff up to pad your point. And you really think it's the "policy" they are getting upset with? It's not the policy. It's the Dead family member. You think that these families would be less inclined to threaten to come and kill them if they didn't show them the picture, but, only said they died? How is informing a family that their child had just died in a war going to be popular, irregardless of how it happens? Come on now... that is not a thing you can measure popularity with. Their family is dead. Literally nobody is going to like that. Just because you keep trying to frame it as raising the ante, like these families have any control over what's going to happen with chemical weapons, doesn't mean it's actually true. Most of their children that are sent to die in these battles, are conscripted. They didn't even have the choice whether or not they could go. It's not like they're calling up the Kremlin and saying, "bomb those b******". Hell, we can't even do that in America. Like if my brother would have died in Iraq or Afghanistan, I couldn't have just called up the Pentagon and ordered an airstrike. That's not how that works... and we live in a democracy. This has nothing to do with me being naive or not. It's the fact that you are choosing to only look at part of the picture, and conveniently it's the part that confirms your preconceived notions. As for what you're putting for it, you are putting the entire onus on the Ukrainian people in government for trying to do the right thing and completely ignoring the Russian side, then trying to claim that your for lowering tensions. Do you maybe think that it would help to lower tensions if the actual Invaders did what they're supposed to do when inform these families in the first place? Or how about they just leave the country they're invading? You were using a completely one-sided point of view and trying to claim you're in the right. It's super easy to get there when you don't pay attention to all sides and all facts.
    1
  36401. 1
  36402.  @mesolithicman164  Na! This is just about your ego, at this point. What you mean is YOU tend to round down. That has nothing to do with being naive. Yet again. That's just personal preference. Though that seems to be the negative connotation you wanted to subscribe to me because you can't prove your point in a mature and fact-based manner, using all relevant material. You tend to round down. Some round up. Some use basic math rounding, that can be up or down, depending on the remainder. You are attempting to speak for a whole bunch of ppl, bc you can't get out your own bubble. What's naive, is to think that everything operates all over the world the same way that it operates in America. And, in fact, I'm not avoiding anything. I'm just not buying into your baseless assumptions as to their reasoning and I'm using the actual quoted words that they used in order to explain the situation. It's naive to think that the numbers are what you want them to be because they fit the narrative you're trying to spin... actually, that's more arrogance, then naivete. He said it was around 80%. You're making the assumption that it's above with no basis for it other than your personal preference and your inability to see outside of the area you live in. You're doing so because what you're choosing to do is only see what fits your preconceived notions and you need to make assumptions in order to make that work. So, you can keep calling me naive all day long but I'm the one going by the stated facts and only the stated facts and you're the one making assumptions to fit your narrative.
    1
  36403. 1
  36404. 1
  36405. 1
  36406. 1
  36407. 1
  36408. 1
  36409. 1
  36410. 1
  36411. 1
  36412. 1
  36413. 1
  36414.  @mesolithicman164  PERFECT EXAMPLE OF YOUR CHERRY PICKING! 👉 " even after saying you wouldn't want to see pictures of a family members dead body" Why did you cut off the sentence? Why not finish it? Because if you finish it your narrative evaporates. No one wants to see pictures of their dead loved ones. That should be obvious as hell. However, sometimes it's necessary. It's also a kindness that only people who have been through that kind of thing would understand. My brother got hurt in his first tour. His Commander stepped on an IUD and got blown up. My brother got out of the tank and went to go help. So did one other Soldier. That other soldiers stepped on another one and got blown up. Not more than five feet away from my brother. They had to fly him to England to have emergency surgery on his wrists and his neck. 2 years later his unit got sent to Afghanistan. Me and my brother are almost exactly 13 months apart. He's my only sibling... and we've been through some s*** together. So, needless to say, given his last tour, I was not super thrilled about him going back. By not super thrilled, I mean, I went through the largest out of insomnia I had ever had. I didn't sleep more than 10 minutes at a time for 10 days. They had to hospitalize me. I wish that would have been the end but he was still over there for another eight months. So families spend all that time holding their breath. Wondering when they're going to get the call or if they even will. Wondering every second of every day whether they're still alive or not. It's like a f***-up kind of purgatory. Which is why I know that knowing is way better than not knowing. Even if it means I have to identify his body. Which is a necessary evil sometimes. What would be cruel is leaving them to wonder. Putting that thought in their hands that their relatives may be dead but they don't really know because their government won't tell them a damn thing and so they have to sit there and try not to think about it every second of every day just to get through it. That's cruel. Identifying a loved one's remains it's not at all uncommon. It's not pleasant. It's not meant to be. It is what needs to happen sometimes because the alternative is worse. That's what you don't understand. Not because you don't understand but because you don't want to. Because this stopped being about any kind of point along time ago and became about your ego.
    1
  36415. 1
  36416. 1
  36417. 1
  36418. 1
  36419. 1
  36420. 1
  36421. 1
  36422. 1
  36423. 1
  36424. 1
  36425. 1
  36426. 1
  36427. 1
  36428. 1
  36429. 1
  36430. 1
  36431. 1
  36432. 1
  36433. 1
  36434. 1
  36435. 1
  36436. 1
  36437. 1
  36438. 1
  36439. 1
  36440. 1
  36441. 1
  36442. 1
  36443. 1
  36444. 1
  36445. 1
  36446. 1
  36447. 1
  36448. 1
  36449. 1
  36450. 1
  36451. 1
  36452. 1
  36453. 1
  36454. 1
  36455. 1
  36456. 1
  36457. 1
  36458. 1
  36459. 1
  36460. 1
  36461. 1
  36462. 1
  36463. 1
  36464. 1
  36465. 1
  36466. 1
  36467. 1
  36468. 1
  36469. 1
  36470. 1
  36471. 1
  36472. 1
  36473. 1
  36474. 1
  36475. 1
  36476. 1
  36477. 1
  36478. 1
  36479. 1
  36480. 1
  36481. 1
  36482. 1
  36483. 1
  36484. 1
  36485. 1
  36486. 1
  36487. 1
  36488. 1
  36489. 1
  36490. 1
  36491. 1
  36492. 1
  36493. 1
  36494. 1
  36495. 1
  36496. 1
  36497. 1
  36498. 1
  36499. 1
  36500. 1
  36501. 1
  36502. 1
  36503. 1
  36504. 1
  36505. 1
  36506. 1
  36507. 1
  36508. 1
  36509. 1
  36510. 1
  36511. 1
  36512. 1
  36513. 1
  36514. 1
  36515. 1
  36516. 1
  36517. 1
  36518. 1
  36519. 1
  36520. 1
  36521. 1
  36522. 1
  36523. 1
  36524. 1
  36525. 1
  36526. 1
  36527. 1
  36528. 1
  36529. 1
  36530. 1
  36531. 1
  36532. 1
  36533. 1
  36534. 1
  36535. 1
  36536. 1
  36537. 1
  36538. 1
  36539. 1
  36540. 1
  36541. 1
  36542. 1
  36543. 1
  36544. 1
  36545. 1
  36546. 1
  36547. 1
  36548. 1
  36549. 1
  36550. 1
  36551. 1
  36552. 1
  36553. 1
  36554. 1
  36555. 1
  36556. 1
  36557. 1
  36558. 1
  36559. 1
  36560. 1
  36561. 1
  36562. 1
  36563. 1
  36564. 1
  36565. 1
  36566. 1
  36567. 1
  36568. 1
  36569. 1
  36570. 1
  36571. 1
  36572. 1
  36573. 1
  36574. 1
  36575. 1
  36576. 1
  36577. 1
  36578. 1
  36579. 1
  36580. 1
  36581. 1
  36582. 1
  36583. 1
  36584. 1
  36585. 1
  36586. 1
  36587. 1
  36588. 1
  36589. 1
  36590. 1
  36591. 1
  36592. 1
  36593. 1
  36594. 1
  36595. 1
  36596. 1
  36597. 1
  36598. 1
  36599. 1
  36600. 1
  36601. 1
  36602. 1
  36603. 1
  36604. 1
  36605. 1
  36606. 1
  36607. 1
  36608. 1
  36609. 1
  36610. 1
  36611. 1
  36612. 1
  36613. 1
  36614. 1
  36615. 1
  36616. 1
  36617. 1
  36618. 1
  36619. 1
  36620. 1
  36621. 1
  36622. 1
  36623. 1
  36624. 1
  36625. 1
  36626. 1
  36627. 1
  36628. 1
  36629. 1
  36630. 1
  36631. 1
  36632. 1
  36633. 1
  36634. 1
  36635. 1
  36636. 1
  36637. 1
  36638. 1
  36639. 1
  36640. 1
  36641. 1
  36642. 1
  36643. 1
  36644. 1
  36645. 1
  36646. 1
  36647. 1
  36648. 1
  36649. 1
  36650. 1
  36651. 1
  36652. 1
  36653. 1
  36654. 1
  36655. 1
  36656. 1
  36657. 1
  36658. 1
  36659. 1
  36660. 1
  36661. 1
  36662. 1
  36663. 1
  36664. 1
  36665. 1
  36666. 1
  36667. 1
  36668. 1
  36669. 1
  36670. 1
  36671. 1
  36672. 1
  36673. 1
  36674. 1
  36675. 1
  36676. 1
  36677. 1
  36678. 1
  36679. 1
  36680. 1
  36681. 1
  36682. 1
  36683. 1
  36684. 1
  36685. 1
  36686. 1
  36687. 1
  36688.  @truthman9827  The list of the entire week that proves your lack of credibility. And the reason I will insist on 👉1👈 example in the video you have presented, that you claim finally has this proof. 1. Making the initial assumption that I trust CNN. An assumption you will repeat several times, before actually asking. 2. Admitting to be Anon, but claiming to fact-check the media. Yet have spent an entire week not being able to prove one claim. 3. Repeating the cult term "The Great Awakening" 4. Claiming that I'm delusional even though you can't provide any evidence to your claim in over a week. 5. You've actually made several claims repeatedly but I've only ever asked you to provide evidence for one of them and you have not even been able to do that, and again, a week's time. 6. When I first asked you to provide evidence for your claim about the current media, the very first thing you tried to do was get me to prove your claim for you. 7. You claimed it died in 2016 Donald Trump won big time. I pointed out that in 2020, Joe Biden beat Donald Trump by the exact same margin and then asked you if you would agree that that meant in 2020 that he lost big time. You ignored that question. It wouldn't be the last question you ignore. 8. You would go on to make another baseless assumption about how I hate all Republicans even though I literally am surrounded by Republicans where I live. Which you would have known if you would have asked. You chose not to because it fit your false narrative better. Literally everybody I know voted for Trump in 2016. Friends and family included. You didn't bring that up after that. 9. You then insist that the direction of the world proves your claims the but can provide no solid evidence for that. 10. You're also present a slew of parotid Trump conspiracy theories for which you also prove absolutely none of. Hunter Biden's laptop, Russian collusion hoax, pizzagate... Just to name a few. 11. You then go back to trying to insist that it's my job to prove your claims. 12. After I tell you I won't, you start bringing up a video called out of the shadows and Mark a timestamp for me to watch. I do so on the claim that you said is there is not. The only thing that is there is something over 60 years old that has no direct implication for today's journalism. 13. Then you go on to insist for another day that that is direct evidence for it even though it isn't. 14. Upon which I point out the fact that you've spent almost a week trying to prove something that you can't and that you don't actually believe it because if you did you wouldn't need that kind of validation from a total stranger. At which point you tried to deflect from that and tell me that it's my validation that I need because I keep pointing out the fact that you can't prove your claim. 15. You try several other underhanded and desperate attempts to deflect to me, such as going to my page and giving a false account of what's there, intentionally. 16. At which point your tactic changes a bit when you start to try and insist that it is my belief that I don't believe what you believe. At which point I point out that it's not a belief if it's something you can't prove. It's simply the truth that what you were saying is a work of fiction. 17. During the entire time we are having this exchange I am insisting upon 2 thing. For you to provide evidence for one of your claims and to answer a question, which is, why do you need to believe this very specific form of fiction. A question that you tried to ignore at least a dozen times before finally giving some acknowledgement of it, but not an answer. What you call answering it is simply insisting that the thing that is fiction and that you can't screw is not fiction and is the truth. 18. When I push you to answer the question, you try and deflect to me not answering a question from the start. Which is the false narrative you presented about me believing CNN. Would you drop after I actually answer the question. 19. Instead going back to trying to deflect to me by trying to insist that I'm contradicting myself because I believe you not being able to prove your claim makes it fiction. As to which I point out that that is the literal definition of fiction. 20. Continuing down your road of fiction isn't fiction narrative, you insist that I can keep saying it's fiction but it doesn't make it fiction. As to where I point out yet again that the thing that makes it fiction is the fact that you can't prove it. 21. Which brings us to an entire week later where you present this length of an hour long video claiming that this is some kind of Truth. I insist after all of that happening the week prior is that you give me one example that is in this video that proves your claims about the media and you start insisting that if I don't want to watch it then it's not your problem. So I will say again, provide one example which is in the video you claim has the proof of your claim after an entire week, and I will spend an hour watching it.
    1
  36689. 1
  36690. 1
  36691. 1
  36692. 1
  36693. 1
  36694. 1
  36695. 1
  36696. 1
  36697. 1
  36698. 1
  36699. 1
  36700. 1
  36701. 1
  36702. 1
  36703. 1
  36704. 1
  36705. 1
  36706. 1
  36707. 1
  36708. 1
  36709. 1
  36710. 1
  36711. 1
  36712. 1
  36713. 1
  36714. 1
  36715. 1
  36716. 1
  36717. 1
  36718. 1
  36719. 1
  36720. 1
  36721. 1
  36722. 1
  36723. 1
  36724. 1
  36725. 1
  36726. 1
  36727. 1
  36728. 1
  36729. 1
  36730. 1
  36731. 1
  36732. 1
  36733. 1
  36734. 1
  36735. 1
  36736. 1
  36737. 1
  36738. 1
  36739. 1
  36740. 1
  36741. 1
  36742. 1
  36743. 1
  36744.  @phollywood9650  And don't forget about your list of lies. 👇  P Hollywood  lies... It's lies... Not lie. 1. Something you couldn't possibly know. Also a bit of a false dichotomy considering you couldn't know that about that. So the only reason you would have to be setting it up is if you were insecure about your own argument. " you guys are all sheep being led to the slaughter by democrats" 2. Again, something you could not possibly know about a total stranger. Are we sensing a pattern here. "You were the one believing everything CNN regurgitates." 3. This is a recurring one. Even if, let's say for a second nobody ever found any evidence whatsoever about Trump collusion and obstruction oh, you still would not honestly be able to say that something was a hoax done by that many people. That's entirely not the K it's but even if it was, calling it a hoax would still be a lie. "Russian Hoax" 4. In all honesty I genuinely tried to warn you off of this. I said not only had I read those things I actually studied them a great deal so that's how I know that you calling it a hoax meant that you have not read the evidence. I said don't keep telling that silly lie because I can easily prove it's not true.... But you didn't listen.... I didn't want to waist time messing with it. But... Nope! You not only made me prove your lie was a lie but then you also tried to shove words in my mouth and tried to change the narrative twice to get out of the meeting it. Which brings us to.... " I read the Mueller report, and the transcript of Michael Flynn's call." 5. Now we know that's not true. I know it and knew it even before this. That's for a few reasons one it's happened before in major cases... 2 it would have never gone to a judge or a jury if it could not legally get past the grand jury first. If it was not illegal to obstruct Justice despite whether or not they could prove the original crime oh, it wouldn't have gotten past the grand jury. He would have never been in jail. The FBI would not have leverage on him. There's so many reasons why that was a ridiculous lie. " Michael Flynn is being exonerated because obstruction charges can't be brought if there was no crime to begin with. " 6. 1... Even if there was no proof of collusion and no proof of obstruction, again there is... That still wouldn't make him duly elected. Because if you would rather Motorola forward you would know that we without a doubt that Russians were messing with the election in order to get him elected. Even if he had nothing to do with it. You still could not call him duly elected. " duly elected president"
    1
  36745. 1
  36746. 1
  36747. 1
  36748. 1
  36749. 1
  36750. 1
  36751. 1
  36752. 1
  36753. 1
  36754. 1
  36755. 1
  36756. 1
  36757. 1
  36758. 1
  36759. 1
  36760. 1
  36761. 1
  36762. 1
  36763. 1
  36764. 1
  36765. 1
  36766. 1
  36767. 1
  36768. 1
  36769. 1
  36770. 1
  36771. 1
  36772. 1
  36773. 1
  36774. 1
  36775. 1
  36776. 1
  36777. 1
  36778. 1
  36779. 1
  36780. 1
  36781. 1
  36782. 1
  36783. 1
  36784. 1
  36785. 1
  36786. 1
  36787. 1
  36788. 1
  36789. 1
  36790. 1
  36791. 1
  36792. 1
  36793.  @phollywood9650  Okay... Okay... For real... Dead serious question/sentiment... That if you answer HONESTLY, I will stop all the magic play! I give you my word! Fare warning, its gonna require an admission of sorts, on your part, but, HOPEFULLY, for the betterment of a genuine convo. Let's see how this goes. 🤞 Don't you want to support and believe in someone, you don't have to surrender your reason, logic and moral values to defend? Don't you want that for yourself? I know that NO political figure isn't perfect. Biden certainly is not... And I would not have picked him, personally. Does he lie? Of course! Does he have shady areas? Of course! But despite all that, he is still... With in a country mile... More honest then Trump! Damn the CNN argument, like tons of other stations don't report that stuff to. You guy have to KNOW he LIES ALL THE TIME! I can't count the amount of times he has said one thing one day, ON CAMERA... And then tried to lie about it the next, also ON CAMERA! I don't want that in my party. That is why I don't have a problem admitting the fault on my side. Which you would have found out, if you had been honest. I prefer to call that stiff out. I EXPECT BETTER from my side... Hell! I fervently talked against Hilary Clinton's Shady ass, back in 2015 and 2016! On multiple different things. I preferred Bernie both with Biden and Clinton. Is he perfect? No! But that dude! He has spent his WHOLE LIFE fighting for us! Serving us! He marched with King and got beat up doing so. He has consistently pushed for the lower and middle classes. The disenfranchised. Insisting that everyone deserves a voice. He is someone you can tell is just trying to do what's right. That is who I want. Hell... That is why I always liked Ron Paul! Rand Paul's Daddy! Don't know what the hell happened with the son.... But I always liked Ron... And McCain. May not have agreed with them all the time... But I ALWAYS RESPECTED THEM and NEVER had to Doubt their intent! That is one of the biggest problems in America today! To many are lowering their standards to support their side. Surrendering their morals and values to be able to defend them. Things will only get worse that way. So just be honest about the faults of your side! When were you can dance that you had to find a way to defend every single thing that your people did, to defend your side? Don't lower your expectations for them! EXPECT THEM TO MEET YOURS! Make your people, people you can defend Honestly! Its human nature to get away with what you can. Show them what they can't! Make them meet you where you are. That's their job. Don't go to them. Make them come to you! That is their job! They are our representatives! Not the other way around! So this went on longer then expected.... But you get why I asked that by now... For sure! Hillary, Joe, Trump, McConnell and others are not that now! But we can either make them that, or put someone there that is, if we make them meet our expectations! So don't you want someone you can honestly defend?
    1
  36794. 1
  36795. 1
  36796. 1
  36797. 1
  36798. 1
  36799. 1
  36800. 1
  36801. 1
  36802. 1
  36803. 1
  36804. 1
  36805. 1
  36806. 1
  36807. 1
  36808. 1
  36809. 1
  36810. 1
  36811. 1
  36812. 1
  36813. 1
  36814. 1
  36815.  @littlenat2013  For visa versa to apply you would actually have to start doing it first... 🙄 Do you want me to prattle off some bad chat on my side. Cuz I don't have a problem with that. First off Hillary Clinton was s***. She had no message. She acted like shit was owed to her and she generally opperated shady as hell. I voted Obama twice but I also recognize that he had the opposite problem of Donald Trump. Donald Trump uses the stick way too much and Obama use the carrot until he wore that thing down to a Goddamn nub. Some of the Dems... With the best plans don't have enough name recognition to make it through this time, probably. Yang and Castro. Other than Bernie.... They have the real policy ideas. Maybe those 2 would make good VP this time around but they aren't gonna make it. Harris is a little too authoritarian to me but what makes me like her is she's got that fight. I need someone who's going to fight. Elizabeth Warren has some good solid policies that she has been fighting for her entire time in office but I don't know what the hell's going on with her lately. Before the last debate, she was getting some bad PR advice. And she was shaking it. So that's on her. One of Bernie's biggest problems, and he's the one of them probably voting for, is he is a little too substance based. He doesn't know when to put down the substance and pick up the stick. Well I absolutely disagree with you that all of them are just attacking Trump all the time, because they all have solid plans for various different things in the government. Which proves your statement completely wrong, they all have flaws to. Your turn. Let's see if hear that were honest.
    1
  36816. 1
  36817. 1
  36818. 1
  36819. 1
  36820. 1
  36821. 1
  36822.  @cuddliies80223  And you can try and minimize Trump's actions but it doesn't make the laws, constitution abuse of power and your blatant lack of desire to consider all relevant info, go away. It is not legal for a politician of any kind to seek out a foreign government to help them investigate their current political opponent. That is not only a campaign-finance violation, it's also when abuse of power. Once more, he knew it. If not, why lie to reporters when asked if he had even mentioned Joe Biden in in the July 25th phone call? Why has he not had the Justice Department ( for which he is the head ) open an independent investigation into the bidens, with coordination from Ukraine, sense the July 25th phone call? Why go so far as to commit obstruction of justice a multitude of times, in order to impede the impeachment investigation? If he did nothing wrong, wouldn't the smarter move be to above and beyond to cooperate with the investigation, in order to discredit the Dems, when they find nothing? Why make attempts to hide the phone call in a top secret storage, for which it did not qualify for and would not go without specific orders? Why are the House Reps pretending they don't know article 2 section 4, or the house rules, which the Reps literally wrote? Why would the Reps pretend the closed to the public original meetings where some kind of secret, for which they could not know, when half of the Reps who pulled that idiotic, storm the castle move, where actually on the committee and could have not only gone in, but also be given equal time to ask questions? Why would Trump and the Reps try to play like the house investigation was some kind of sham because they weren't allowed in, they weren't allowed to ask questions, they weren't allowed to have their lawyers in the room, Trump wasn't allowed to testify... Etc... When they where invited to do all of those things, but declined? I could go on....
    1
  36823. 1
  36824. 1
  36825. 1
  36826. 1
  36827. 1
  36828. 1
  36829. 1
  36830. 1
  36831. 1
  36832. 1
  36833. 1
  36834. 1
  36835. 1
  36836. 1
  36837. 1
  36838. 1
  36839. 1
  36840. 1
  36841. 1
  36842. 1
  36843. 1
  36844. 1
  36845. 1
  36846. 1
  36847. 1
  36848. 1
  36849. 1
  36850. 1
  36851. 1
  36852. 1
  36853. 1
  36854. 1
  36855. 1
  36856. 1
  36857. 1
  36858. 1
  36859. 1
  36860. 1
  36861. 1
  36862. 1
  36863. 1
  36864. 1
  36865. 1
  36866. 1
  36867. 1
  36868. 1
  36869. 1
  36870. 1
  36871. 1
  36872. 1
  36873. 1
  36874. 1
  36875. 1
  36876. 1
  36877. 1
  36878. 1
  36879. 1
  36880. 1
  36881. 1
  36882. 1
  36883. 1
  36884. 1
  36885. 1
  36886. 1
  36887. 1
  36888. 1
  36889. 1
  36890. 1
  36891. 1
  36892. 1
  36893. 1
  36894. 1
  36895. 1
  36896. 1
  36897. 1
  36898. 1
  36899. 1
  36900. 1
  36901. 1
  36902. 1
  36903. 1
  36904. 1
  36905. 1
  36906. 1
  36907. 1
  36908. 1
  36909. 1
  36910. 1
  36911. 1
  36912. 1
  36913. 1
  36914. 1
  36915. 1
  36916. 1
  36917. 1
  36918. 1
  36919. 1
  36920. 1
  36921. 1
  36922. 1
  36923. 1
  36924. 1
  36925. 1
  36926. 1
  36927. 1
  36928. 1
  36929. 1
  36930. 1
  36931. 1
  36932. 1
  36933. 1
  36934. 1
  36935. 1
  36936. 1
  36937. 1
  36938. 1
  36939. 1
  36940. 1
  36941. 1
  36942. 1
  36943. 1
  36944. 1
  36945. 1
  36946. 1
  36947. 1
  36948. 1
  36949. 1
  36950. 1
  36951. 1
  36952. 1
  36953. 1
  36954. 1
  36955. 1
  36956. 1
  36957. 1
  36958. 1
  36959. 1
  36960. 1
  36961. 1
  36962. 1
  36963. 1
  36964. 1
  36965. 1
  36966. 1
  36967. 1
  36968. 1
  36969. 1
  36970.  @darrellmadden6874  Predictible? Yes it os predictible to go what the he'll when someone bring up something out of left field like that. That doesn't make you smarter dude. 🙄 So now your saying your evidence is a chapter in Hillary clintons book. A woman your calling dishonest and currupt. Nevermind all the info in the Mueller report and all the stuff we know outside of all of this. It's all some crazy ass conspiracy? I tell you what... You look up Occam's razor. I don't get my facts from the media. You just have to keep insisting I do because you need your preconceived notions validated. I don't have white guilt. 🙄 I am, however, a single mom to an 8yo mixed race little boy. Who's dad is my best friend. Who also has 2 smaller children. Both African-American and both I love to death as much as my little boy. My son gets called "passing" 😡 a lot because we live down south Louisiana and he has my skin tone. I don't have white guilt. I live with all the racism and small minded craziness every day because I walk along side those children and their dad every day of my life.... so when you call people like Kamala Harris, "not black", then small minded people like you are calling my son that. He is. He doesn't look like that only because he got my skin tone, hair texture and dimples. Everything else is his daddy. An African American man. Boy tend to marry women like their mothers as well. So he may marry a white girl. That also will not make him any less "black". Your basically saying that he is not pure enough to be a part of your culture. Which is not a good thing, considering where that connotation came from. This is my point.... You don't know my experience. You are making up a bunch of stuff about me in your head. You need to ask yourself why you need to do that.
    1
  36971. 1
  36972. 1
  36973. 1
  36974. 1
  36975. 1
  36976. 1
  36977. 1
  36978. 1
  36979. 1
  36980. 1
  36981.  @darrellmadden6874  Damn right I protect my son, from every small minded ass clown who claims he isn't black because he is not pure enough for them. He is raised by a hard working African American father, beside his african American little brother and sister, they're mom and extended family, as well as (me) his mother and our family. Everytime he enters a new school year and his dad comes to his school, everyone starts looking at him differently on both sides. All the sudden he isn't black or white enough for anyones liking. All the sudden those beautiful curls on his head that everybody has been gushing about, don't get mentioned anymore. All the sudden he comes home asking me questions about why he doesn't even have the same eyes as me or his daddy. Mine are blue and his daddies are brown. His are green (I'm half Irish). He tells me because his friends where asking him about them because his daddy was black and asking if that was his real daddy. Then the next week coming home asking why he isn't darker like daddy.. Because his (African American ) teacher asked him about it. All because they found out his daddy was African-American and therefore so was he. This summer, he asked if mommy could do all the school stuff for third grade. It will only get harder for him as he gets older and he is not very big or athletic. He is kind, gental, smart and funny but small. He shouldn't have to worry about being enough of one thing or another because he is just a little boy. So when people say that people like Kamala Harris are not black enough for their liking, I think about my little boy. How they say the same about him.
    1
  36982. 1
  36983. 1
  36984. 1
  36985. 1
  36986. 1
  36987. 1
  36988. 1
  36989. 1
  36990. 1
  36991. 1
  36992. 1
  36993. 1
  36994. 1
  36995. 1
  36996. 1
  36997. 1
  36998. 1
  36999. 1
  37000. 1
  37001. 1
  37002. 1
  37003. 1
  37004. 1
  37005. 1
  37006. 1
  37007. 1
  37008. 1
  37009. 1
  37010. 1
  37011. 1
  37012. 1
  37013. 1
  37014. 1
  37015. 1
  37016. 1
  37017. 1
  37018. 1
  37019. 1
  37020. 1
  37021. 1
  37022. 1
  37023. 1
  37024. 1
  37025. 1
  37026. 1
  37027. 1
  37028. 1
  37029. 1
  37030. 1
  37031. 1
  37032. 1
  37033. 1
  37034. 1
  37035. 1
  37036. 1
  37037. 1
  37038. 1
  37039. 1
  37040. 1
  37041. 1
  37042. 1
  37043. 1
  37044. 1
  37045. 1
  37046. 1
  37047. 1
  37048. 1
  37049. 1
  37050. 1
  37051. 1
  37052. 1
  37053. 1
  37054. 1
  37055. 1
  37056.  @kgs_7186  http://www.arisenm.org/effects-and-recovery "Shame: Some people experience a sense of shame and some may feel that being sexually assaulted marks them or makes them dirty/soiled in some way. They may repeatedly wash themselves. Feeling dirty can also extend into the home, especially if that is where the attack occurred. Cleaning can be a form of exorcism in trying to get rid of the evidence of the attack. For some, they may not feel like cleaning either themselves or their homes because they do not feel they are worthy of being clean or of living in a clean environment. This is because having their body violently abused has served to confirm feelings that they are not worthy of respect. Men may feel that assumptions have been or will be made about their sexuality and may even start to question it themselves. Guilt: Experience shows that most people who are sexually assaulted feel a degree of guilt. People can always think of something they should have done to stop the attack. "If only I had screamed." If only I had locked the door." If only I was not drunk." The list of "if only" is endless. This feeling is often reinforced by the legal system and by family and friends who ask questions such as "Why didn't you scream?" Asking "why" in such circumstances can often imply guilt. It is therefore not surprising that so many people feel guilty and blame themselves for not avoiding the attack. Guilt, as well as shame, also springs from many of the myths that place responsibility on the person for the attack. Myths such as "If you wear tight clothes you are asking for it" only serve to reinforce the unfair and incorrect belief that people who are assaulted are responsible for the assailant's behavior and that they were the cause of the sexual assault. The belief that they were in some way responsible can result in them thinking they can avoid or prevent future sexual assault by doing something such as screaming. This may be a way of the person trying to re-establish a sense of control over their life. Guilt and shame are often the reasons why people choose not to report a sexual assault."
    1
  37057. 1
  37058. 1
  37059. 1
  37060. 1
  37061. 1
  37062. 1
  37063. 1
  37064. 1
  37065. 1
  37066. 1
  37067. 1
  37068. 1
  37069. 1
  37070. 1
  37071. 1
  37072. 1
  37073. 1
  37074. 1
  37075. 1
  37076. 1
  37077. 1
  37078. 1
  37079. 1
  37080. 1
  37081. 1
  37082. 1
  37083. 1
  37084. 1
  37085. 1
  37086. 1
  37087. 1
  37088. 1
  37089. 1
  37090. 1
  37091. 1
  37092. 1
  37093. 1
  37094. 1
  37095. 1
  37096. 1
  37097. 1
  37098. 1
  37099. 1
  37100.  @edge481  Na! I mean those convenient short memories you guys have. If you have issues with the committee then you should go talk to your side of the isle. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 Dems... Let's form a bipartisan court made up of No sitting members of Congress, and one that is mostly comprised of criminal law experts like the one that was put together for the 911 commission. You guys pick half and we pick half! Deal? Reps... Well... I guess that would be... Oops! Nope! Daddy Trump said no, for no discernible reason... So... How dare you suggest such a reasonable thing! Dems... Okay.... You guys recommend 5 reasonable Congress ppl and we will pick 5 reasonable Congress ppl of our own. Then we will have one Dem chair and one V Rep chair. Reps... Here are 3 reasonable Reps, and 2 party hacks/Trump loyalists, put there to stop you from getting to the truth! Dems... We will take these 3, but you need to pick 2 more that fit the "reasonable" criteria, that we agreed on. Reps... Fine we will pull all of them! Dems... Okay... Then we will put together the committee and pick at least to Reps to be on there, even if you wont recommend any, anymore... And we will even put them in the highest seats of power. Reps... We will sue you for not putting together a bipartisan commission! Dems... WTF? Judge... Yeah... So they tried 2 different times to set up a bipartisan commission with you guys and you intentionally screwed that up with nonsensical BS. So... Sorry... You don't get to complain now. Reps... It's a kangaroo court! Anyone with common sense and a memory longer then a gold fish... WTF?
    1
  37101. 1
  37102. 1
  37103. 1
  37104. 1
  37105. 1
  37106. 1
  37107. 1
  37108. 1
  37109. 1
  37110. 1
  37111. 1
  37112. 1
  37113. 1
  37114. 1
  37115. 1
  37116. 1
  37117. 1
  37118. 1
  37119. 1
  37120. 1
  37121. 1
  37122. 1
  37123. 1
  37124. 1
  37125. 1
  37126. 1
  37127. 1
  37128. 1
  37129. 1
  37130. 1
  37131. 1
  37132. 1
  37133. 1
  37134. 1
  37135. 1
  37136. 1
  37137. 1
  37138. 1
  37139. 1
  37140. 1
  37141. 1
  37142. 1
  37143. 1
  37144. 1
  37145. 1
  37146. 1
  37147. 1
  37148. 1
  37149. 1
  37150. 1
  37151. 1
  37152. 1
  37153. 1
  37154. 1
  37155. 1
  37156. 1
  37157. 1
  37158. 1
  37159. 1
  37160. 1
  37161. 1
  37162. 1
  37163. 1
  37164. 1
  37165. 1
  37166. 1
  37167. 1
  37168. 1
  37169. 1
  37170. 1
  37171. 1
  37172. 1
  37173. 1
  37174. 1
  37175. 1
  37176. 1
  37177. 1
  37178. 1
  37179. 1
  37180. 1
  37181.  @alexanderthegreat8064  Use your common sense and look at the whole picture... Not just the part that fits your already decided conclusion. This is not the first time he has had these allegations against him. It's not even the 5th. All throughout his life there has been allegations of sexual assault on him. Some that didn't even intend to make it public. So therefore could not possibly be bringing it out to sell books or gained in any possible way. - His ex wife's, Ivana, deposition on Trump coming home and being pissed about some hair plugs, throwing her down and raping her because she recommended the doctor, was not let out to the public with her prior consent. It is still to this day out there without her consent. -He has literally admitted it in the past on tape. Quote " grab them by the pussy". "I don't even wait." Wait for what? - Also going on Howard Stern and talking about going back in the Miss America pageant , to spy on underage girls while they're getting changed. - Jill Garth 1992, filing a lawsuit in 1997 about sexual a assault and harassment that went on from 1996 into 2016. - Summer Zervos former Apprentice contestant trying to get a job from him being sexually assaulted by him instead and then slandered by him after - then Alva Johnson in 2019 who claimed he forcefully kissed her at a trump rally in Florida in August of 2016 while she was working for his campaign and then filed a suit against him for unwanted sexual harassment after the election. - May 2016 reported allegation by Temple Target McDowell - June 2016 Cassandra Searles who was Miss Washington USA a 2013 - October 2016 Jennifer Murphy a former contestant of the 4th season of apprentice - Natasha stoynoff - Mindy McGillivary - Jessica Leeds - Rachel Crook - Lisa Boyne - Kristin Anderson - Kathy Heller - Karena Virginia - Jessica Drake - Ninni Laaksonen - Juliet Huddy - E. Jean Caroll - Bridget Sullivan - Tasha Dixon - Samantha Holvey On and on With all relivant info considered, it blows you BS "Book" theory out of the water.
    1
  37182. 1
  37183. 1
  37184. 1
  37185. 1
  37186. 1
  37187. 1
  37188. 1
  37189. 1
  37190. 1
  37191. 1
  37192. 1
  37193. 1
  37194. 1
  37195. 1
  37196. 1
  37197. 1
  37198. 1
  37199. 1
  37200. 1
  37201. 1
  37202. 1
  37203. 1
  37204. 1
  37205.  @alexanderthegreat8064  Harth filed a lawsuit in 1997 in which she accused Trump of non-consensual groping of her body, among them her "intimate private parts",[27][28] and "relentless" sexual harassment.[29] The suit was withdrawn after Houraney settled with Trump for an undisclosed amount in a lawsuit that claimed that Trump backed out of a business deal.[1][30] She still claims to have been sexually assaulted[1] and although he was never violent with her, she says his actions were "unwanted and aggressive, very sexually aggressive". He settled On January 17, 2017, Zervos filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump, arising from his statement that she had lied about the allegations.[40][41] Marc Kasowitz is defending Trump in the case.[42] Zervos has filed a subpoena for "all documents concerning any woman who asserted that Donald J. Trump touched her inappropriately".[43] On 21 March 2018, a New York Supreme Court judge decided to allow a defamation lawsuit against the President to go forward.[44][45][46] On June 4, 2018, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Schecter ruled that Trump must be deposed by January 31, 2019.[47] Judge ruled that he's going to court for this one On February 25, 2019, Alva Johnson filed a lawsuit against Trump, alleging he had forcibly kissed her at a rally in Florida in August 2016 while she was working on his 2016 presidential campaign.[51] Johnson said that two people—including Pam Bondi, then the attorney general of Florida—saw the kiss, but both denied it.[52] According to an interview with Teen Vogue, Johnson decided to stop working for the Trump campaign after the media started covering the Access Hollywood tape. She declared sick days until she could speak to a lawyer.[53] In addition to the "unwanted sexual attention", the lawsuit also alleges that Johnson was "a victim of race and gender discrimination through unequal pay."[53][54] In response, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the lawsuit "absurd on its face."[52]On February 25, 2019, Alva Johnson filed a lawsuit against Trump, alleging he had forcibly kissed her at a rally in Florida in August 2016 while she was working on his 2016 presidential campaign.[51] Johnson said that two people—including Pam Bondi, then the attorney general of Florida—saw the kiss, but both denied it.[52] According to an interview with Teen Vogue, Johnson decided to stop working for the Trump campaign after the media started covering the Access Hollywood tape. She declared sick days until she could speak to a lawyer.[53] In addition to the "unwanted sexual attention", the lawsuit also alleges that Johnson was "a victim of race and gender discrimination through unequal pay."[53][54] In response, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the lawsuit "absurd on its face."[52] This one happened during the campaign when she was working for him and he's going to court for that too. That's just 3 out of the 20+ You wanna tell some more lies about what is or isn't on the link I sent you? Or you done making an ass out of yourself?
    1
  37206. 1
  37207. 1
  37208. 1
  37209. 1
  37210. 1
  37211. 1
  37212. 1
  37213. 1
  37214. 1
  37215. 1
  37216. 1
  37217. 1
  37218. 1
  37219. 1
  37220. 1
  37221. 1
  37222. 1
  37223. 1
  37224. 1
  37225. 1
  37226. 1
  37227. 1
  37228. 1
  37229. 1
  37230. 1
  37231. 1
  37232. 1
  37233. 1
  37234. 1
  37235. 1
  37236. 1
  37237. 1
  37238. 1
  37239. 1
  37240. 1
  37241. 1
  37242. 1
  37243. 1
  37244. 1
  37245. 1
  37246. 1
  37247. 1
  37248. 1
  37249. 1
  37250. 1
  37251. 1
  37252. 1
  37253. 1
  37254. 1
  37255. 1
  37256. 1
  37257. 1
  37258. 1
  37259. 1
  37260. 1
  37261. 1
  37262. 1
  37263. 1
  37264. 1
  37265. 1
  37266. 1
  37267. 1
  37268. 1
  37269. 1
  37270. 1
  37271. 1
  37272. 1
  37273. 1
  37274. 1
  37275. 1
  37276. 1
  37277. 1
  37278. 1
  37279. 1
  37280. 1
  37281. 1
  37282. 1
  37283. 1
  37284. 1
  37285. 1
  37286. 1
  37287. 1
  37288. 1
  37289. 1
  37290. 1
  37291. 1
  37292. 1
  37293. 1
  37294. 1
  37295. 1
  37296. 1
  37297. 1
  37298. 1
  37299. 1
  37300. 1
  37301. 1
  37302. 1
  37303. 1
  37304. 1
  37305. 1
  37306. 1
  37307. 1
  37308. 1
  37309. 1
  37310. 1
  37311. 1
  37312. 1
  37313. 1
  37314. 1
  37315. 1
  37316. 1
  37317. 1
  37318. 1
  37319. 1
  37320. 1
  37321. 1
  37322.  @TIMCH808  how long did it take for us to get out of quarantine? And how bad did it get? And you would think the leader of the country would have some accountability for that but you seem to only want a whole the president accountable when the president isn't the one you like. It's weird how it works out that way, huh? I wonder if the pandemic lasted so long under Trump because he defunded the medical stockpiles and sent our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives? Or maybe it had to do with the fact that he wouldn't himself as the leader of our country where a mask for the first 6 months? Or maybe it had to do with him trying to sell a snake oil cures when he took none of those when he got sick? Or maybe it had to do with him disparaging the science and the scientists that were trying to help us? Or maybe it had to do with 9 million other ways he bungled the pandemic? Or we can talk about the time where we weren't in a pandemic and he shut down the government for almost 5 months because his constituents were starting to notice that right before he had to run for president again he had not fulfilled the One Promise he said he would. Building the wall. So then he put hundreds of thousands of government workers out of work and standing in bread lines with their families for 5 months only to cave after realizing nobody was going to build his giant stupid wall that did nothing. Or we can talk about him getting us into the only kind of war that literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade war. I think that may have had something to do with the economy? But you don't want to talk about none of that. Because you really could give a s*** about any of this.. all you were here to do is try to find a way to blame everything on the left so you can continue to support your false narrative.
    1
  37323. 1
  37324. 1
  37325. 1
  37326. 1
  37327. 1
  37328. 1
  37329. 1
  37330. 1
  37331. 1
  37332. 1
  37333. 1
  37334. 1
  37335. 1
  37336. 1
  37337. 1
  37338.  @TIMCH808  Sure! Here is one of the quotes giving three different points. Now, I will be waiting for you to copy and paste where you responded to these. "how long did it take for us to get out of quarantine? And how bad did it get? And you would think the leader of the country would have some accountability for that but you seem to only want a whole the president accountable when the president isn't the one you like. It's weird how it works out that way, huh? I wonder if the pandemic lasted so long under Trump because he defunded the medical stockpiles and sent our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives? Or maybe it had to do with the fact that he wouldn't himself as the leader of our country where a mask for the first 6 months? Or maybe it had to do with him trying to sell a snake oil cures when he took none of those when he got sick? Or maybe it had to do with him disparaging the science and the scientists that were trying to help us? Or maybe it had to do with 9 million other ways he bungled the pandemic? Or we can talk about the time where we weren't in a pandemic and he shut down the government for almost 5 months because his constituents were starting to notice that right before he had to run for president again he had not fulfilled the One Promise he said he would. Building the wall. So then he put hundreds of thousands of government workers out of work and standing in bread lines with their families for 5 months only to cave after realizing nobody was going to build his giant stupid wall that did nothing. Or we can talk about him getting us into the only kind of war that literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade war. I think that may have had something to do with the economy? But you don't want to talk about none of that. Because you really could give a s*** about any of this.. all you were here to do is try to find a way to blame everything on the left so you can continue to support your false narrative."
    1
  37339. 1
  37340.  @TIMCH808  Oh! You need me to post them a 3rd time! That's cool! Here they are! 👇👇👇👇👇 "how long did it take for us to get out of quarantine? And how bad did it get? And you would think the leader of the country would have some accountability for that but you seem to only want a whole the president accountable when the president isn't the one you like. It's weird how it works out that way, huh? I wonder if the pandemic lasted so long under Trump because he defunded the medical stockpiles and sent our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives? Or maybe it had to do with the fact that he wouldn't himself as the leader of our country where a mask for the first 6 months? Or maybe it had to do with him trying to sell a snake oil cures when he took none of those when he got sick? Or maybe it had to do with him disparaging the science and the scientists that were trying to help us? Or maybe it had to do with 9 million other ways he bungled the pandemic? Or we can talk about the time where we weren't in a pandemic and he shut down the government for almost 5 months because his constituents were starting to notice that right before he had to run for president again he had not fulfilled the One Promise he said he would. Building the wall. So then he put hundreds of thousands of government workers out of work and standing in bread lines with their families for 5 months only to cave after realizing nobody was going to build his giant stupid wall that did nothing. Or we can talk about him getting us into the only kind of war that literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade war. I think that may have had something to do with the economy? But you don't want to talk about none of that. Because you really could give a s*** about any of this.. all you were here to do is try to find a way to blame everything on the left so you can continue to support your false narrative."
    1
  37341. 1
  37342. 1
  37343.  @TIMCH808  Oh! You need me to post them a 4th time! That's cool! Here they are! 👇👇👇👇👇 "how long did it take for us to get out of quarantine? And how bad did it get? And you would think the leader of the country would have some accountability for that but you seem to only want a whole the president accountable when the president isn't the one you like. It's weird how it works out that way, huh? I wonder if the pandemic lasted so long under Trump because he defunded the medical stockpiles and sent our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives? Or maybe it had to do with the fact that he wouldn't himself as the leader of our country where a mask for the first 6 months? Or maybe it had to do with him trying to sell a snake oil cures when he took none of those when he got sick? Or maybe it had to do with him disparaging the science and the scientists that were trying to help us? Or maybe it had to do with 9 million other ways he bungled the pandemic? Or we can talk about the time where we weren't in a pandemic and he shut down the government for almost 5 months because his constituents were starting to notice that right before he had to run for president again he had not fulfilled the One Promise he said he would. Building the wall. So then he put hundreds of thousands of government workers out of work and standing in bread lines with their families for 5 months only to cave after realizing nobody was going to build his giant stupid wall that did nothing. Or we can talk about him getting us into the only kind of war that literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade war. I think that may have had something to do with the economy? But you don't want to talk about none of that. Because you really could give a s*** about any of this.. all you were here to do is try to find a way to blame everything on the left so you can continue to support your false narrative."
    1
  37344. 1
  37345. 1
  37346.  @TIMCH808  Oh! You need me to post them a 5th time! That's cool! Here they are! 👇👇👇👇👇 "how long did it take for us to get out of quarantine? And how bad did it get? And you would think the leader of the country would have some accountability for that but you seem to only want a whole the president accountable when the president isn't the one you like. It's weird how it works out that way, huh? I wonder if the pandemic lasted so long under Trump because he defunded the medical stockpiles and sent our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives? Or maybe it had to do with the fact that he wouldn't himself as the leader of our country where a mask for the first 6 months? Or maybe it had to do with him trying to sell a snake oil cures when he took none of those when he got sick? Or maybe it had to do with him disparaging the science and the scientists that were trying to help us? Or maybe it had to do with 9 million other ways he bungled the pandemic? Or we can talk about the time where we weren't in a pandemic and he shut down the government for almost 5 months because his constituents were starting to notice that right before he had to run for president again he had not fulfilled the One Promise he said he would. Building the wall. So then he put hundreds of thousands of government workers out of work and standing in bread lines with their families for 5 months only to cave after realizing nobody was going to build his giant stupid wall that did nothing. Or we can talk about him getting us into the only kind of war that literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade war. I think that may have had something to do with the economy? But you don't want to talk about none of that. Because you really could give a s*** about any of this.. all you were here to do is try to find a way to blame everything on the left so you can continue to support your false narrative."
    1
  37347. 1
  37348. 1
  37349. 1
  37350. 1
  37351. 1
  37352. 1
  37353. 1
  37354. 1
  37355. 1
  37356. 1
  37357. 1
  37358. 1
  37359. 1
  37360. 1
  37361. 1
  37362. 1
  37363. 1
  37364. 1
  37365. 1
  37366. 1
  37367. 1
  37368. 1
  37369. 1
  37370. 1
  37371. 1
  37372. 1
  37373. 1
  37374. 1
  37375. 1
  37376. 1
  37377. 1
  37378. 1
  37379. 1
  37380. 1
  37381. 1
  37382.  @A_name_is_a_name  dude, I just read your first comment. It was a whole lot of s*** talking and not a lot of doing so.... I'm really not worried. mostly because I use facts. I don't claim things that I can't verify... And if you want to try and play silly games to avoid using them yourself... Feel free... But fair warning, they tend not to work on me. Mostly because I called them out and then go directly back to the facts... While insisting you do the same... if you choose not to, then I just Crush you under the weight of your own ridiculous argument. Here's the thing, I'm not some genius debater. My big secret is, I just use the facts, that I can back up to make my argument. Then I watch people like you try to dance around, s*** talk, cherry-pick, outright lie, Jack techniques, misquote and childishly name call people... All in an attempt to distract from the fact that you can't make your argument based on fact. If you have a solve for that, I welcome you to try.... Oh... and I wouldn't suggest not admitting to any mistake that you make or that your side makes, because then all the sudden the only thing the arguments going to be about is why you're lying.... and why you're making yourself look so ridiculous instead of admitting that you or your side is not a perfect creature. Oh... and I'm not very helpful with your last paragraph of your first comment. Though it is making me think that I really don't have anything to worry about. You know who usees grammar Nazi BS? People who can't argue the substance. I, myself, have a life. There are about a million things on my priority list before the YouTube comment section, so when I respond, I use talk text a lot and sometimes I don't have time to speed read the grammar checks. If I can read it and understand it, then so can you. If you can't deal with that, then you can dip out at any point but, you're just not that important to me. Sorry.... So.... Suck it up, Butter Cup! Or run along.... Your choice. Be back for your second one later! 😉✌
    1
  37383. 1
  37384. 1
  37385. 1
  37386. 1
  37387. 1
  37388. 1
  37389. 1
  37390. 1
  37391. 1
  37392. 1
  37393. 1
  37394. 1
  37395. 1
  37396. 1
  37397. 1
  37398. 1
  37399. 1
  37400. 1
  37401. 1
  37402. 1
  37403. 1
  37404. 1
  37405. 1
  37406. 1
  37407. 1
  37408. 1
  37409. 1
  37410. 1
  37411. 1
  37412. 1
  37413. 1
  37414. 1
  37415. 1
  37416. 1
  37417. 1
  37418. 1
  37419. 1
  37420. 1
  37421. 1
  37422. 1
  37423. 1
  37424. 1
  37425. 1
  37426. 1
  37427. 1
  37428. 1
  37429. 1
  37430. 1
  37431. 1
  37432. 1
  37433. 1
  37434. 1
  37435. 1
  37436. 1
  37437. 1
  37438. 1
  37439. 1
  37440. 1
  37441. 1
  37442. 1
  37443. 1
  37444. 1
  37445. 1
  37446. 1
  37447. 1
  37448. 1
  37449. 1
  37450. 1
  37451. 1
  37452. 1
  37453. 1
  37454. 1
  37455. 1
  37456. 1
  37457. 1
  37458. 1
  37459. 1
  37460. 1
  37461. 1
  37462. 1
  37463. 1
  37464. 1
  37465. 1
  37466. 1
  37467. 1
  37468. 1
  37469. 1
  37470. 1
  37471. 1
  37472. 1
  37473. 1
  37474. 1
  37475. 1
  37476. 1
  37477. 1
  37478. 1
  37479. 1
  37480. 1
  37481. 1
  37482. 1
  37483. 1
  37484. 1
  37485. 1
  37486. 1
  37487. 1
  37488. 1
  37489. 1
  37490. 1
  37491. 1
  37492. 1
  37493. 1
  37494. 1
  37495. 1
  37496. 1
  37497. 1
  37498. 1
  37499. 1
  37500. 1
  37501. 1
  37502. 1
  37503. 1
  37504. 1
  37505. 1
  37506. 1
  37507. 1
  37508. 1
  37509. 1
  37510. 1
  37511. 1
  37512. 1
  37513. 1
  37514. 1
  37515. 1
  37516. 1
  37517. 1
  37518. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about Waterborne Camper / D R. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  37519. 1
  37520. 1
  37521. 1
  37522. 1
  37523. 1
  37524. 1
  37525. 1
  37526. 1
  37527. 1
  37528. 1
  37529. 1
  37530. 1
  37531. 1
  37532. 1
  37533. 1
  37534. 1
  37535. 1
  37536. 1
  37537. 1
  37538. 1
  37539. 1
  37540. 1
  37541. 1
  37542. 1
  37543. 1
  37544. 1
  37545. 1
  37546. 1
  37547. 1
  37548. 1
  37549. 1
  37550. 1
  37551. 1
  37552. 1
  37553. 1
  37554. 1
  37555. 1
  37556. 1
  37557. 1
  37558. 1
  37559. 1
  37560. 1
  37561. 1
  37562. 1
  37563. 1
  37564. 1
  37565. 1
  37566. 1
  37567. 1
  37568. 1
  37569. 1
  37570. 1
  37571. 1
  37572. 1
  37573. 1
  37574. 1
  37575. 1
  37576. 1
  37577. 1
  37578. 1
  37579. 1
  37580. 1
  37581. 1
  37582. 1
  37583. 1
  37584. 1
  37585. 1
  37586. 1
  37587. 1
  37588. 1
  37589. 1
  37590. 1
  37591. 1
  37592. 1
  37593. 1
  37594. 1
  37595. 1
  37596. 1
  37597. 1
  37598. 1
  37599. 1
  37600. 1
  37601. 1
  37602. 1
  37603. 1
  37604. 1
  37605. 1
  37606. 1
  37607. 1
  37608. 1
  37609. 1
  37610. 1
  37611. 1
  37612. 1
  37613. 1
  37614. 1
  37615. 1
  37616. 1
  37617. 1
  37618. 1
  37619. 1
  37620. 1
  37621. 1
  37622. 1
  37623. 1
  37624. 1
  37625. 1
  37626. 1
  37627. 1
  37628. 1
  37629. 1
  37630. 1
  37631. 1
  37632. 1
  37633. 1
  37634. 1
  37635. 1
  37636. 1
  37637. 1
  37638. 1
  37639. 1
  37640. 1
  37641. 1
  37642. 1
  37643. 1
  37644. 1
  37645. 1
  37646. 1
  37647. 1
  37648. 1
  37649. 1
  37650. 1
  37651.  @devo2  to answer your question... This is a very tiny list of the six years of crazy we had to put up with between his campaign and presidency. -Constantly lying -Constantly alienating our longtime allies and cozying up to dictators -Race-baiting out the ass -Locking children in cages -Doing nothing for our dying planet and actually making the problems worse with pulling out of the Paris climate Accords as well as all the deregulations that he instituted - the incompetent and callous nature he treated the worst worldwide pandemic and over 100 years... which included but was not limited to... ... trying to sell a snake-oil cures as Americans were dying... then taking none of them when he got sick ... refusing to stop putting on massive super spreader events and placing his re-election above literal human life ... refusing to set the example he should have been setting by wearing a mask for the first 6 months of the pandemic ... threatening to defund the already strapped public school system because most schools decided they would put the health and lives of children above making him look good by reopening too early - waiting two years and until he started having to run for re-election to even think about keeping one of his primary promises and only paying attention to half of it when he did. We're going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it. Never even attempted to get Mexico to pay for a damn thing. Then decided it was a really good idea to put millions of government workers out of work for months on end and have them lose their homes and stand in food lines only two fold, make that all for nothing and then take money from military families to make it look like he was attempting to finally get around to building a wall that was never going to work in the first place. - getting us in a trade war with China which will cost America and has cost Americans billions of dollars... because like everybody tried to tell him, literally nobody in the history of man has ever won a trade War. It is literally a war that nobody wins and everybody loses. Which is why nobody else did it before him. - trying to take healthcare away from millions of disadvantaged americans, with absolutely nothing to replace it - enlisting foreign officials to help his candidacy. - His Use of the Treasury to Line His Own Pockets, Emoluments Clause Be Damned Taxpayers have ponied up at least $900,000 to Trump’s properties, thanks to his spending 1 out of every 3 days of his presidency there and headlining 37 political events at Mar-a-Lago and other resorts. He was even determined to get the G7 Summit to meet at his Florida golf resort. - his regressive changes to the tax code Again... Just a few.
    1
  37652. 1
  37653. 1
  37654. 1
  37655. 1
  37656. 1
  37657. 1
  37658. 1
  37659. 1
  37660. 1
  37661. 1
  37662. 1
  37663. 1
  37664. 1
  37665. 1
  37666. 1
  37667. 1
  37668. 1
  37669. 1
  37670. 1
  37671. 1
  37672. 1
  37673. 1
  37674. 1
  37675. 1
  37676. 1
  37677. 1
  37678. 1
  37679. 1
  37680. 1
  37681. 1
  37682. 1
  37683. 1
  37684. 1
  37685. 1
  37686. 1
  37687. 1
  37688. 1
  37689. 1
  37690. 1
  37691. 1
  37692. 1
  37693. 1
  37694. 1
  37695. 1
  37696. 1
  37697. 1
  37698. 1
  37699. 1
  37700. 1
  37701. 1
  37702. 1
  37703. 1
  37704. 1
  37705. 1
  37706. 1
  37707. 1
  37708. 1
  37709. 1
  37710. 1
  37711. 1
  37712. 1
  37713. 1
  37714. 1
  37715. 1
  37716. 1
  37717. 1
  37718. 1
  37719. 1
  37720. 1
  37721. 1
  37722. 1
  37723. 1
  37724. 1
  37725. 1
  37726. 1
  37727. 1
  37728. 1
  37729. 1
  37730. 1
  37731. 1
  37732. 1
  37733. 1
  37734. 1
  37735. 1
  37736. 1
  37737. 1
  37738. 1
  37739. 1
  37740. 1
  37741. 1
  37742. 1
  37743. 1
  37744. 1
  37745. 1
  37746. 1
  37747. 1
  37748. 1
  37749. 1
  37750. 1
  37751. 1
  37752. 1
  37753. 1
  37754. 1
  37755. 1
  37756. 1
  37757. 1
  37758. 1
  37759. 1
  37760. 1
  37761. 1
  37762. 1
  37763.  @davidmurphy4672  Am I a lawyer? Nope! That is why I listen to legal experts and don't try and act like one.... And are you trying to tell me you are one? 🤣 Here's another one, trying to imply that I get my information from the news. You have no way of knowing that. But you're just assuming it because that's what you need to do to make your argument. Assume things about people you could not qualify. Barr could not arrest Trump because of the law. This is why I say you don't know enough about what you're talkin about to be speaking on it. Or at least that's one of the reasons. On the other hand, Occam's razor dictates that Democrats keep going after Trump because Trump keeps doing messed up stuff. It's also super on that you say both sides are biased but you seem to only be mentioning one side. Is that to try and give yourself credibility? Mueller didn't know what Fusion GPS was? That's funny because it was talked about quite a bit in this little thing called the Mueller report. Pelosi and shift said they had what? The house doesn't have to vote on impeachment right away. Basically, the house serves as first the prosecution, where they investigate, then the grand jury to see if there is enough to indict and then it gets kicked over to the senate for trial. We haven't gotten there yet. That is why right now it is and impeachment inquiry. Yet another reason why you don't know enough about what you're talkin about to form a reasonable conclusion. And at the and why not completely destroy any credibility your words may have by trying to play fortune teller.
    1
  37764. 1
  37765. 1
  37766. 1
  37767.  @davidmurphy4672  What? Dude... there is absolutely no way for you to qualify that statement. Lawyers only know the law in the states that they have passed the bar in? That's the only bit I have any information on? Like all of them? Cuz you've gone around and asked? Sigh.... Dude, that is 3 hours long. Timestamp it or it's irrelevant. The only one. But if you're going to put your name on it you probably penned a few pages... Lol... and by the way I'll be waiting for your evidence to back up the claim about the Mueller report... or do you think this is make-believe land where you can just say s*** and it automatically becomes true? What is both lazy logic and a bad argument? 🤚That would be Blanket generalizations for 2000 Alex!🤚 that's like saying all black people are lazy or all Republicans are crusty old racist white men... Wait... so you're willingly admitting that you're getting your information from the news and you wonder why you don't know enough to argue your point... So much so that you use shitty generalizations... Its called fact checking the news. You can find almost anything you need to do so online. Welcome to the information age. And we're back to fortune telling. Oh you're trying to act like you're not trying to fortune tell. All right well did they happen to announce everything in the report or what you claimed was going to happen? Because if they did then it turns out they're the ones fortune-telling and you're the one stupid enough to not check them on it. You also appear not to understand what Article 2 Section 4 of The Constitution is. ""The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action."
    1
  37768.  @davidmurphy4672  Oh goodness.... I know that, you can't practice law in any other state without prassing the bar in that state.. My mom's a Tax Attorney. What you are claiming... Is not that. You are essentially claiming that if you don't pass the bar in a state, you don't know that States laws. I can name about a houndred thousand law students, studing for their bars right now... That would argue against that.... not passing a particular states Bar means you can't practice in that state. It doesn't mean you don't know the laws in that state. See... You dont even know how to have an adult debate... You have given me nothing to "fact check". You said, " Mueller didn't write the Mueller report. It is garbage lol." Then you asked me to prove your statment wrong. Except you gave nothing to prove it to be true. So, essentially you were asking me to prove something wrong that you have yet to prove is true... And that doesn't make any sense. Not to mention the faulty logic of "The only thing that matters is what I decide matters and I have decided a 448 page report on multiple subject matters, witness statments, document Trails, plain text reading of laws, detailed examples of breaking those laws, 9 different lead campaign officials either pleading guilty and taking deals or getting found guilty and going to jail, all coming from a 2 year investigation with over a hundred investigators and lawyers working on it... Doesn't matter because I said so... Oh and because somewhere in the 3hr video, I refuse to time stamp... Mueller might have mentioned something about not remembering something about Fusion GPS.... After a 3 hour none stop deposition asking about a 2 year investigation." That is your argument... Yeah... I think I'm good! 😉✌ Not even close to the possible SC involvment yet... So not sure why you are even bringing that one up... Other then you trying to strike out as a fortune teller...
    1
  37769.  @davidmurphy4672  okay... I tried to give you the chance to fix it... But sure, we can do it this way.... " different laws in different states lawyers 👉👉👉only know laws👈👈👈 in their own state that they passed the bar in." You didn't say they couldn't practice law. You said they didn't know less: in other states. Like there is no way a lawyer can know estate law that isn't from the state that they passed the bar in. . That was your claim. Which was nonsensical. Cuz what do you think they're doing? They just have each state law locked away keeping them from the eyes and hands of lawyers that don't practice in their state... that is the silliness you were suggesting... 🤣 And, sure. You don't have to prove anything. You can continue to bob weave and look silly all damn day, if you want. So, you do you and I will keep pointing out the fact that you can't back up what you say... And keep trying to excuse it. Works for me.😊👍 You said that Mueller didn't write the Mueller report and that the Mueller report was garbage. You have given no proof of that whatsoever and the part that you think is proof can only be described as you having crazy lazy logic. What you did give was a 3-hour long Mueller deposition, we refuse to time-stamp what you were speaking about, and therefore can only be taken as not worth entertaining... I know you're trying to connect one small part of the Mueller investigation and Mueller report into throwing out the whole damn thing for no discernible reason. I want to do this for a second, let's entertainment idea that Mueller didn't know anything about Fusion GPS. Why does that thing mean that the entirety of the Mueller report and all the evidence which encompasses it, is garbage? And where exactly is your proof that Mueller didn't write the report? Or is that the FBI and all them did? No vote in the House for impeachment? That's because it's still in impeachment inquiry. If you knew anything about what you were talking about, you would know that. And what exactly am I supposed to prove you wrong about? You would literally yet to prove anything you said true. We've been through this. It doesn't make any damn sense for me to try and prove you wrong about something you said was true but have yet to prove that it was. Better explanation... This is the logic you are using. Santa Claus is real simply because I say he is. Prove me wrong. You can't prove me wrong. Santa is real dammit! I could claim any number of things and just be like prove me wrong. That's your logic. That's what you're using right now. And maybe if your ego could handle having your ideas challenged, you would know what was going on during the Mueller investigation. Maybe if you read the mother report you would know what's going on during the investigation and you wouldn't have to ask other people these questions. You would just know. Lol You have a rough idea as to what reliable sources are, yet you can't come up with any for your claims. That's speaks volumes... And the last bit of your comment was just crazy. You were trying to set up a poorly constructed paper tiger. So you would have something to argue against. Except I didn't say a damn thing about being arrested or laws or anything like that. You're just so desperate to not be wrong but now you need to make s*** up. We just fine for me. You're going to do nothing but discredit yourself. So it's whatever! 😉✌
    1
  37770. 1
  37771. 1
  37772. 1
  37773. 1
  37774. 1
  37775. 1
  37776. 1
  37777. 1
  37778. 1
  37779. 1
  37780. 1
  37781. 1
  37782. 1
  37783. 1
  37784. 1
  37785. 1
  37786. 1
  37787. 1
  37788. 1
  37789. 1
  37790. 1
  37791. 1
  37792. 1
  37793. 1
  37794. 1
  37795. 1
  37796. 1
  37797. 1
  37798. 1
  37799. 1
  37800. 1
  37801. 1
  37802. 1
  37803. 1
  37804. 1
  37805. 1
  37806. 1
  37807. 1
  37808. 1
  37809. 1
  37810. @devious1 Children being intentionally killed is, emphatically, NOT A SPIN on ANYTHING. Honestly... Act like your mother raised you right. No one is messing with Russia borders. Russia is the aggressor. Russia in the invader. Way back in the day that 1 of the reasons NATO was formed was to defend against Russian aggression. It is very easy to find out that their preview has changed sense then. Not only has NATO offered membership to Russia 3 different times in the last the decades, backed by the US support, there are several different American satellite installations in Russia, america buys 9% of our gas and oil from Russia (when we really don't need to), and the US backed the deal that convinced Ukraine to literally surrender all it's nukes TO RUSSIA, for a promise that ( ironically ) the US and RUSSIA would have its back, if attacked. Ukraine was NOT willing to do so with just Russia making that promise. "For some reason" they didn't trust Russia to keep their word by themselves. Gee! I wonder why. If your going to give historical context, you can't cherry pick your historical context. RUSSIA is the aggressor and bad faith actor. Putin is the aggressor and bad faith actor.... And not for the first time. Over the past several years, Putin has been becoming more and more aggressive and shady. -The annexation of Crimea -The Proven tampering into US elections -The bounty's put on US and Canadian soldiers heads in Afghanistan -The tendency for Putin's opposition to meet with very shady ends, at very convenient times. Just to name a few.... That is why literally NO OTHER country in the world has Russia's back on this. That's why Putin is throwing spaghetti at the wall trying to come up with a viable excuse for invasion. We've gone from "NATO" To "Dombas" Hunting for nonexistence "weapons" To trying to accuse a country that almost overwhelmingly voted in a Jewish comedian as their president, of being a Nazi state. Not to mention... Ukraine is a sovereign country all of its own. Russia does not control it anymore. It does not get to decide what Ukraine does or does not do to better their country and their people's future. The Iron Curtain dropped a long time ago and Ukraine damn near unanimously voted to leave. They broke up with you. Get over it.
    1
  37811. 1
  37812. 1
  37813. 1
  37814. 1
  37815. 1
  37816. 1
  37817. 1
  37818. 1
  37819. 1
  37820. 1
  37821. 1
  37822. 1
  37823. 1
  37824. 1
  37825. 1
  37826. 1
  37827. 1
  37828. 1
  37829. 1
  37830. 1
  37831. 1
  37832. 1
  37833. 1
  37834. 1
  37835. 1
  37836. 1
  37837. 1
  37838. 1
  37839. 1
  37840. 1
  37841. 1
  37842. 1
  37843. 1
  37844. 1
  37845. 1
  37846. 1
  37847. 1
  37848. 1
  37849. 1
  37850. 1
  37851. 1
  37852. 1
  37853. 1
  37854. 1
  37855. 1
  37856. 1
  37857. 1
  37858. 1
  37859. 1
  37860. 1
  37861. 1
  37862. 1
  37863. 1
  37864. 1
  37865. 1
  37866. 1
  37867. 1
  37868. 1
  37869. 1
  37870. 1
  37871. 1
  37872. 1
  37873. 1
  37874. 1
  37875. 1
  37876. 1
  37877. 1
  37878. 1
  37879. 1
  37880. 1
  37881. 1
  37882. 1
  37883. 1
  37884. 1
  37885. 1
  37886. 1
  37887. 1
  37888. 1
  37889. 1
  37890. 1
  37891. 1
  37892. 1
  37893. 1
  37894. 1
  37895. 1
  37896. 1
  37897. 1
  37898. 1
  37899. 1
  37900. 1
  37901. 1
  37902. 1
  37903. 1
  37904. 1
  37905. 1
  37906. 1
  37907. 1
  37908. 1
  37909. 1
  37910. 1
  37911. 1
  37912. 1
  37913. 1
  37914. 1
  37915. 1
  37916. 1
  37917. 1
  37918. 1
  37919. 1
  37920. 1
  37921. 1
  37922. 1
  37923. 1
  37924. 1
  37925. 1
  37926. 1
  37927. 1
  37928. 1
  37929. 1
  37930. 1
  37931. 1
  37932. 1
  37933. 1
  37934. 1
  37935. 1
  37936. 1
  37937. 1
  37938. 1
  37939. 1
  37940. 1
  37941. 1
  37942. 1
  37943. 1
  37944. 1
  37945. 1
  37946. 1
  37947. 1
  37948. 1
  37949. 1
  37950. 1
  37951. 1
  37952. 1
  37953. 1
  37954. 1
  37955. 1
  37956. 1
  37957. 1
  37958. 1
  37959. 1
  37960. 1
  37961. 1
  37962. 1
  37963. 1
  37964. 1
  37965. 1
  37966. 1
  37967. 1
  37968. 1
  37969. 1
  37970. 1
  37971. 1
  37972. 1
  37973. 1
  37974. 1
  37975. 1
  37976. 1
  37977. 1
  37978. 1
  37979. 1
  37980. 1
  37981. 1
  37982. 1
  37983. 1
  37984. 1
  37985. 1
  37986. 1
  37987. 1
  37988. 1
  37989. 1
  37990. 1
  37991. 1
  37992. 1
  37993. 1
  37994. 1
  37995. 1
  37996. 1
  37997. 1
  37998. 1
  37999. 1
  38000. 1
  38001. 1
  38002. 1
  38003. 1
  38004. 1
  38005. 1
  38006. 1
  38007. 1
  38008. 1
  38009. 1
  38010. 1
  38011. 1
  38012. 1
  38013. 1
  38014. 1
  38015. 1
  38016. 1
  38017. 1
  38018. 1
  38019. 1
  38020. 1
  38021. 1
  38022. 1
  38023. 1
  38024. 1
  38025. 1
  38026. 1
  38027. 1
  38028. 1
  38029. 1
  38030. 1
  38031. 1
  38032. 1
  38033. 1
  38034. 1
  38035. 1
  38036. 1
  38037. 1
  38038. 1
  38039. 1
  38040. 1
  38041. 1
  38042. 1
  38043. 1
  38044. 1
  38045. 1
  38046. 1
  38047. 1
  38048. 1
  38049. 1
  38050. 1
  38051. 1
  38052. 1
  38053. 1
  38054. 1
  38055. 1
  38056. 1
  38057. 1
  38058. 1
  38059. 1
  38060. 1
  38061. 1
  38062. 1
  38063. 1
  38064. 1
  38065. 1
  38066. 1
  38067. 1
  38068. 1
  38069. 1
  38070. 1
  38071. 1
  38072. 1
  38073. 1
  38074. 1
  38075. 1
  38076.  @jennifershaw5302  for instance, do you have any idea how many ammonium is Clauses Donald Trump broke while in office in plainview? How about all the racist dog whistling? Good people on both sides when one side was filled with the Nazi protesters? How about volume two of the Mueller report where they laid out 10 different cases of obstruction of Congress? You know, the part of the Mueller report y'all like to pretend doesn't exist so you can just say they didn't find anything. Or we can talk about Trump getting us into the only kind of War literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade War. Or we can talk about his massive bungling of the covid pandemic. Trying to sell a snake oil cures and not taking any of them when he got sick. Defunding the restocking of the medical stockpiles that sent all our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives at the beginning of the pandemic. Trying to force our Public Schools back open during the height of the pandemic or threatening to defund the already underfunded Public Schools. Again, something he didn't public. Revealing State secrets to the Russian delegates in the Oval Office. Sitting on his ass for 3 hours while insurrectionist attacked the capital and damn near beat a bunch of capital police officers to death. Pulling us out of a climate change agreement for which we were not obligated to do anything for anyone's country other than our own in lowering our green house emissions.. then appointing oil Executives to his cabinet to further kill our planet. Telling ridiculous lies about his crowd size on his Inauguration Day. Just to name a few out of Millions
    1
  38077. 1
  38078.  @jennifershaw5302  " if someone could actually point to some real evidence of corruption I would denounce the man today" I just gave you more than half a dozen reasons. Most of which he did brazenly in public. All of which had evidence. Except you chose to ignore that. How convenient. No wonder you can't figure out a reason to denounce the man. You just ignore anything that doesn't paint him as an all-powerful God like creature. for instance, do you have any idea how many ammonium is Clauses Donald Trump broke while in office in plainview? How about all the racist dog whistling? Good people on both sides when one side was filled with the Nazi protesters? How about volume two of the Mueller report where they laid out 10 different cases of obstruction of Congress? You know, the part of the Mueller report y'all like to pretend doesn't exist so you can just say they didn't find anything. Or we can talk about Trump getting us into the only kind of War literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade War. Or we can talk about his massive bungling of the covid pandemic. Trying to sell a snake oil cures and not taking any of them when he got sick. Defunding the restocking of the medical stockpiles that sent all our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives at the beginning of the pandemic. Trying to force our Public Schools back open during the height of the pandemic or threatening to defund the already underfunded Public Schools. Again, something he didn't public. Revealing State secrets to the Russian delegates in the Oval Office. Sitting on his ass for 3 hours while insurrectionist attacked the capital and damn near beat a bunch of capital police officers to death. Pulling us out of a climate change agreement for which we were not obligated to do anything for anyone's country other than our own in lowering our green house emissions.. then appointing oil Executives to his cabinet to further kill our planet. Telling ridiculous lies about his crowd size on his Inauguration Day. Just to name a few out of Millions
    1
  38079.  @jennifershaw5302  Well... First... So not what happened... And second... I will post the list you keep ignoring for the third time now, so you can try and pretend it's not there again... It's hard to see evidence when you simply just try and pretend like it's not there. Time number 3 for instance, do you have any idea how many ammonium is Clauses Donald Trump broke while in office in plainview? How about all the racist dog whistling? Good people on both sides when one side was filled with the Nazi protesters? How about volume two of the Mueller report where they laid out 10 different cases of obstruction of Congress? You know, the part of the Mueller report y'all like to pretend doesn't exist so you can just say they didn't find anything. Or we can talk about Trump getting us into the only kind of War literally nobody in history has ever won. A trade War. Or we can talk about his massive bungling of the covid pandemic. Trying to sell a snake oil cures and not taking any of them when he got sick. Defunding the restocking of the medical stockpiles that sent all our States into a bidding war against each other for literal American lives at the beginning of the pandemic. Trying to force our Public Schools back open during the height of the pandemic or threatening to defund the already underfunded Public Schools. Again, something he didn't public. Revealing State secrets to the Russian delegates in the Oval Office. Sitting on his ass for 3 hours while insurrectionist attacked the capital and damn near beat a bunch of capital police officers to death. Pulling us out of a climate change agreement for which we were not obligated to do anything for anyone's country other than our own in lowering our green house emissions.. then appointing oil Executives to his cabinet to further kill our planet. Telling ridiculous lies about his crowd size on his Inauguration Day. Just to name a few out of Millions
    1
  38080. 1
  38081. 1
  38082. 1
  38083. 1
  38084. 1
  38085. 1
  38086. 1
  38087. 1
  38088. 1
  38089. 1
  38090. 1
  38091. 1
  38092. 1
  38093. 1
  38094. 1
  38095. 1
  38096. 1
  38097. 1
  38098. 1
  38099. 1
  38100. 1
  38101. 1
  38102. 1
  38103. 1
  38104. 1
  38105. 1
  38106. 1
  38107. 1
  38108. 1
  38109. 1
  38110. 1
  38111. 1
  38112. 1
  38113. 1
  38114. 1
  38115. 1
  38116. 1
  38117. 1
  38118. 1
  38119. 1
  38120. 1
  38121. 1
  38122. 1
  38123. 1
  38124. 1
  38125. 1
  38126. 1
  38127. 1
  38128. 1
  38129. 1
  38130. 1
  38131. 1
  38132. 1
  38133. 1
  38134. 1
  38135. 1
  38136. 1
  38137. 1
  38138. 1
  38139. 1
  38140. 1
  38141. 1
  38142. 1
  38143. 1
  38144. 1
  38145. 1
  38146. 1
  38147. 1
  38148. 1
  38149. 1
  38150. 1
  38151.  @tbronk7996  1. Its not some kind of sick tragedy contest. What the hell is wrong with you? 2. The people who were referring to it and using 911 to do so, they were doing so in a way that referenced the Insurrection being this generation's 9/11. They were referring to the collective trauma. How you can try and demonize them for trying to bring us together with the tragedy, by pointing put the trauma of it, that we all feel, as something bad... Is beyond me. 3. How your trying to blame the left for telling their ppl to go to the streets and fight for things like stopping police brutality and the open slaughter of black ppl with, Donald Trump trying to lie about losing the election and then sending a mob of people to attack the capital and claiming he will go with him, is beyond me. How are these left political figures even responsible for the actions of that day? Most of them were the ones running from the violent mob. They weren't responsible for that, and why do you have to use whataboutism instead of just having them take responsibility for their actions? "Yes... But" that's all that is. 4. Literally no one believes you guys when you try and claim you "used to be dems". You know why? Because you all use the same current right-wing talking points as you're trying to convince us how left you used to be so you can have more credibility. So just stop. 5. Literally no one has advocated open borders. That is more right wing spin. No policy or person from the left has ever done that. We've advocated for treating human beings humanely. We've fought for the dreamers not to have to pay the price for their parents choices. We pointed out that when the right is screaming about illegal immigrants being loud in the country with covid, that our covid rates were much higher than theirs were and our country was doing much worse than theirs was, while they were screaming about it. 6. If the front line workers you were referring to were the ones that were using brutality as a practice instead of an extreme situation, like they should have been, absolutely. Just because you have a badge it doesn't mean you get to beat up whoever you want whenever you want. Either we are all accountable by the law or none of us are. 7. They were mostly peaceful protest, absolutely no city was burned down, the left came out and called for peace when there were riots and looting, and I can support these people because I don't have a far-right wing closed off point of view of what they are actually doing and what is actually going on. I choose to look at all relevant facts and material before coming to my opinion. Maybe you should try to do the same.
    1
  38152. 1
  38153. 1
  38154. 1
  38155. 1
  38156. 1
  38157.  @tbronk7996  I love these right-wing buzzwords you keep using while claiming you're something you're not. Like, bleeding hearts. Is that the excuse you use to practice inhumane acts towards human beings that never did anything to you? Is that the excuse-u-use When Donald Trump was putting children in cages? And you want to talk about brainwashing. Talk about your crazy made-up interpretation of what's going on at the southern border. "First off we want open borders, then we just want to let everybody in with no screening whatsoever and apparently the majority of them are human traffickers or gang members." You want to talk about being brainwashed. Goodness! Here's a question you're going to run from. Only 22% of all illegal immigration into the United States comes through the southern border. Why aren't you guys interested in any of the other ways they get in? Why are you always focused on just the brown people? Here's your reality. Does bad s*** happen? Yes. Do bad people get into this country? Yes. Are the majority of them bad or are the majority of them desperately fleeing a hopeless situation? We're going to go with answered B. Has America constantly had a higher infection rate of covid-19 then Mexico even though Mexico doesn't exactly have the best healthcare system in the world? Yes. Should we stop illegals from coming in this country illegally? Yes. Does that mean we have to be inhumane to them and treat them like they are less than people? Hell no. Does that mean we have any business treating children in any kind of inappropriate manner? Of course not. Is the sole focus on the southern border a dog whistle for veiled racism? Of course. Do you genuinely care about any of this or are you just looking for someone to hate and blame? Well considering the fact that if you would care about illegal immigration you care about it no matter who was doing it but you only seem to care about the southern border. So, of course not.
    1
  38158. 1
  38159. 1
  38160. 1
  38161. 1
  38162. 1
  38163. 1
  38164. 1
  38165. 1
  38166. 1
  38167. 1
  38168. 1
  38169. 1
  38170. 1
  38171. 1
  38172. 1
  38173. 1
  38174. 1
  38175. 1
  38176. 1
  38177. 1
  38178. 1
  38179. 1
  38180. 1
  38181. 1
  38182. 1
  38183. 1
  38184. 1
  38185. 1
  38186. 1
  38187. 1
  38188. 1
  38189. 1
  38190. 1
  38191. 1
  38192. 1
  38193. 1
  38194. 1
  38195. 1
  38196. 1
  38197. 1
  38198. 1
  38199. 1
  38200. 1
  38201. 1
  38202. 1
  38203. 1
  38204. 1
  38205. 1
  38206. 1
  38207. 1
  38208. 1
  38209. 1
  38210. 1
  38211. 1
  38212. 1
  38213. 1
  38214. 1
  38215. 1
  38216. 1
  38217. The interview was a little over 16 min long. - 30 sec of Intro/Trip and queen🇬🇧 - 50 sec on the whether that day🌈 - 3 sec shy of a full minute (57 seconds) on the Vets and WW2🇺🇸 - 2 min and 25 sec Lying about NATO falling apart, on Theresa May and how he saved NATO and made everyone pay.🤥 - 2 min and 45 sec on how the tariffs that he put dow are everyone else's fault but his, lying about Border Patrol numbers, invasion and general fear mongering about brown people🤥 - 2 min 5 secs of him childishly trashing Nancy Pelosi, Robert Mueller and the justifiably respected Democrat prosecutors on his team. Also, lying again about the findings of the Muller Report.🤥 - 1 min 30 sec Lying about Joe Biden, the reason for his GDP and putting words in the mouth of all American farmers.🤥 - 20 sec bragging about how he is holding everyone up so he can do an interview with Fox News. Then another 5 sec on Laura ingraham's ratings 🙄 - 1 min 20 sec about Russia, China and a trade deal. Also, "Witch Hunt", lying about numbers again (Stock Market) and talking shit about Hillary Clinton because he still can't get over the fact that he lost the popular vote 🙄🤥 - 1 min 25 sec being asked about what he can do to unite the country and deciding the best way to do that is to talk more shit about people. At some point deciding to become a $5 a pop mall fortune teller about Mexico and using the usual hypocrisy on deals when talking about China 🙄💩🙄 - 35 sec on✌, military building, 💰, brag, brag, brag, Iran, brag, brag, brag, China again, brag, brag and brag.🙄 - Just over 1 min about fist bumping with the Queen of England, brag, talking with her, complementing her and thankfully the end!🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩🙄💩 Sorry about the sassy pants in the middle and twards the end. It was starting to be like audio water torture up in here. 😢
    1
  38218. 1
  38219. 1
  38220. 1
  38221. 1
  38222. 1
  38223. 1
  38224. 1
  38225. 1
  38226. 1
  38227. 1
  38228. 1
  38229. 1
  38230. 1
  38231. 1
  38232. 1
  38233. 1
  38234. 1
  38235. 1
  38236. 1
  38237. 1
  38238. 1
  38239. 1
  38240. 1
  38241. 1
  38242. 1
  38243. 1
  38244. 1
  38245. 1
  38246. 1
  38247.  @barryfohn4385  And then you say stuff like... Obama had nothing to do with recovery from the recession. Which is perfect. Cuz not I can show you what I am talking about when I say, make a claim and back it up. So... "In February 2009, Congress approved Obama's $787 billion economic stimulus package. It cut taxes, extended unemployment benefits, and funded public works projects. The recession ended in July 2009 when GDP growth turned positive. In just seven months, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act pumped $241.9 billion into the economy. That increased growth to a robust rate of 3.9% by early 2010. By March 30, 2011, almost all ($633.5 billion) of the funds were spent. " https://www.thebalance.com/what-has-obama-done-11-major-accomplishments-3306158 "On February 17, 2009, Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, a $831 billion economic stimulus package aimed at helping the economy recover from the deepening worldwide recession.[26] The act increased federal spending by $573 billion[27] for health care, infrastructure, education and social benefits, with the remainder used for tax relief[28] — including a $116 billion income tax cut that benefited 95% of working families.[29] Democrats overwhelmingly supported this measure, while only a few Senate Republicans supported the law. The CBO estimated ARRA would positively impact GDP and employment, with primary impact between 2009 and 2011. It projected an increase in the GDP of between 1.4 and 3.8% by late 2009, 1.1 and 3.3% by late 2010, and 0.4 and 1.3% by late 2011, as well as a decrease of between zero and 0.2% beyond 2014.[30] The impact to employment would be an increase of 0.8 million to 2.3 million by last-2009, an increase of 1.2 million to 3.6 million by late 2010, an increase of 0.6 million to 1.9 million by late 2011, and declining increases in subsequent years as the U.S. labor market reaches nearly full employment, but never negative.[30] The CBO estimated that enacting the bill would increase federal budget deficits by $185 billion over the remaining months of fiscal year 2009, $399 billion in 2010, and $134 billion in 2011, or $787 billion over the 2009–2019 period.[31] The Congressional Budget Office and a broad range of economists credit Obama's stimulus plan for economic growth.[32][33] The CBO's final analysis in February 2015 found that ARRA provided substantial improvement to GDP growth and employment.[34] CBO final estimate of impact of Obama stimulus. Although an April 2010 survey of members of the National Association for Business Economics (NABE) showed an increase in job creation (over a similar January survey) for the first time in two years, 73% of the 68 respondents believed that the stimulus bill had no impact on employment at their company after one year of ARRA's enactment.[35] The economy of the United States has grown faster than the other original NATO members by a wider margin under President Obama than it has anytime since the end of World War II.[36] The OECD credits the much faster growth in the United States to the stimulus in the United States, in contrast to the austerity measures taken in the European Union.[37] The Council of Economic Advisers produced a comprehensive report on the ARRA in 2014, which includes a variety of graphics illustrating the positive effect on both GDP and jobs. It also covers the allocation of spending and tax cuts contained in the legislation.[38]" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recession
    1
  38248. 1
  38249. 1
  38250. 1
  38251. 1
  38252. 1
  38253. 1
  38254. 1
  38255. 1
  38256. 1
  38257. 1
  38258. 1
  38259. 1
  38260. 1
  38261. 1
  38262. 1
  38263. 1
  38264. 1
  38265. 1
  38266. 1
  38267. 1
  38268. 1
  38269. 1
  38270. 1
  38271. 1
  38272. 1
  38273. 1
  38274. 1
  38275. 1
  38276. 1
  38277. 1
  38278. 1
  38279. 1
  38280. 1
  38281. 1
  38282. 1
  38283. 1
  38284. 1
  38285. 1
  38286. 1
  38287.  @sionel2604  well... Someone who is trying to mock someones education probably shouldn't begin to argue that with a baseless assumption like "leftist feminist". They probably also should not base their entire argument on a straw man they set up from the beginning buy bastardizing what I said. Unless you can quote me where I said "There is no difference with the brain of a man and woman." Transgender makeup specifically .6% of the US population. That is according to the Williams Institute study and people who report themselves as transgender. Okay "educator" let's discuss your phrasing on your argument of my belief about transgender. " there is no research that everyone agrees upon that supports your narrative" There is no research that everyone agrees upon that supports anyone's narrative.... on anything... At any point in time... Ever. So what's your f**** point? One one recent study oh, but by no means the only one, summarizes as this... from the European Society of endocrinology... brain activity and structure in transgender adolescents more closely resembles the typical activation patterns of their desired gender, according to new research. The findings suggest that differences in brain function may occur early in development and that brain Imaging may be a useful tool for earlier identification of transgenderism in young people. Periods and the ability to give birth are not the only factors in gender assignment. You say that biology does not back up my believe but in doing so you were denying all factors in biology and focusing only on the ones that fit you're already decided conclusion. Unless you would like to explain why you were completely disregarding the biology of the human brain? " suicide rates are huge and transgender world. Do you know their suicide rate, before and after transition, is about 40%. Do you know the only group to have the same level of suicide rates were Jews living during the genocides? Do you mean to tell me that in today's world, Jews who lived during the genocides and trans have the same obstacles and Hate? No, they do not. THAT is the the definition of a STRAWMAN ARGUMENT. You asked a bunch of questions, connected them with two very different subjects from a similar stat and then presumed I answered all these questions in a particular way (instead of... Ya know... Not at all) , then proceeded to argue against those made-up answers. Then in that argument made a presumption that you could not possibly know. So again I ask, what's your f**** point? There are sites claiming that the spork is the most Innovative invention to ever hit Humanity. Again, what's your f**** point? You mean to say that there are teachers who are treating children with the respect of honoring their belief in who they are as a person, irregardless of their own beliefs, while at the same time teaching and educating them? Well we must put a stop to that at once. Well... Lets put it this way.... if I believe that there is an entire civilization of tiny people living in my eyebrow who all call themselves Harry and that there is mass confusion because of that, how does that hurt or in any way negatively affect anyone else and therefore must be put a stop to? If you want to talk about being well-rounded then how about you be well-rounded in respecting other people for their beliefs well you ask them to respect you for yours. So you're explaining to me that there was a guy who transitioned back and forth 30 years ago? I know it's going to be a broken record at this point but I must ask, what's your f**** point? that is one person out of how many? It is at best anecdotal. For someone who started out your comment with mocking evidence, maybe you should have brought some of your own.
    1
  38288. 1
  38289. 1
  38290. 1
  38291. 1
  38292. 1
  38293.  @sionel2604  oh my God baby, you have got to stop calling me dumb as f*** and then proceeding to match make a bunch of stupid ass mistakes. I'm laughing so hard I'm going to pop a lung. This is why I quoted what you said word for word before I made a comment on it. That is exactly not what you said. I mean you can quote it all you want but we can also just go back and read it. If you went to go edit the comment even and then come back and pretend it wasn't there I could just send you the screenshot I took of the comment before you edited it? I mean we can go that route and show how much about lying shitbag you are but I don't think you really want to do that. But you sure you want something up them Paper Tigers. So you're going to claim that you said something you did not say and then argue that I'm a stupid b** because you said something stupid and then I pointed out how stupid it was and then you tried to BS about it. I can't take it. Lmao lmao lmao lmao Yes I said there was one study out of very many studies and just because the article that you found, of your own Accord, wasn't peer-reviewed doesn't mean it has s*** to do with me. So I'm not sure why you made the comment about how, you can put anything on the internet. I didn't tell you to look up the f**** article. Dumbass. What I did do was give you the name of the study and the name of the Institute that it came from. Just cuz you found some b***** article on it that's not on me sweetheart. LOL I'm Good Golly... so you're saying biologically the only difference between a man and a woman are their reproductive organs? And I'm the stupid one 😊😁😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😃😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😀😀😀... seriously dude! Just like go ask a doctor. Any doctor. It doesn't even matter if they're like a f**** foot doctor or anyting. Any Doctor.... Ask them.............. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.... Oh god.... I can't do this..... 😂😂😂😂😂 okay... Okay.... Sorry.... I'm better... I'm better now. I'm back. Okay... Sorry... My bad... My bad.... So.... Go.... Ask.... Your pediatrition to explain to you the differences between boys and girls on your next check up and then get back to me sweetheart! In the mean time.... Please just take 2 seconds and Google gender dysphoria... You know what. I'm just going to do that for you to speed this along. Cuz that is a couple of big words you got to type out and I ain't got that kind of time. LOL Gender dysphoria is D distress a person feels due to their birth assigned sex and gender not matching their gender identity. People who experience gender dysphoria are typically transgender. Evidence from studies of twins suggest that gender dysphoria not only has physical causes but may have biological causes as well. Now this is the part you need to pay attention to.... Cause you seam to be using the 50s definition. The diagnostic label gender identity disorder was used by the DSM until its reclassification as gender dysphoria in 2013, with the release of the DSM - 5. The diagnosis was <<<<<reclassified to better align it with medical understanding of the condition>>>>> and to remove the stigma associated with the term disorder. The American Psychiatric association, publisher of the DSM-5, stated that gender nonconformity is not the same thing as gender dysphoria, and that gender nonconformity is not in itself a mental disorder. The critical element of gender dysphoria is the presence of clinically significant distress associated with the condition. Some transgender people and researchers support declassification of the condition because they say the diagnosis pathologize is gender variance and reinforces the binary model of gender. TREATMENT ( for the illness you keep saying it is ) 4 gender dysphoria May involved supporting the person through changes in gender expression. Hormone therapy or surgery may be used to assist such changes. Treatment may also include counseling and Psychotherapy. So for the love of God pull yourself out of the 1950s and understand that I don't know we might have developed better understanding of biology and science since then. And please talk to your doctor because you have a massive deficit when it comes to the understanding of biology. Just the basic understanding. It's shocking man LOL
    1
  38294. 1
  38295. 1
  38296. 1
  38297. 1
  38298. 1
  38299. 1
  38300. 1
  38301. 1
  38302. 1
  38303. 1
  38304. 1
  38305. 1
  38306. 1
  38307. 1
  38308. 1
  38309. 1
  38310. 1
  38311. 1
  38312. 1
  38313. 1
  38314. 1
  38315. 1
  38316. 1
  38317.  @Lord_Poyo  1. You can't claim that all evidence shows that. There hasn't been at a discovery or a trial yet. 2. Kind of like the emotion guided logic that you're using right now to make the assumption that I'm using emotion guided logic? 3. Yet again, you cannot make claims about the evidence because we do not have all the evidence available to the General Public. 4. I haven't heard the Attorney General's office or any of its investigators claim they are pressing the charges against her because he is black and she is white.I have certainly not said anything about that. That is you setting up a paper tiger in order to tear it down. 5. She's a training officer. In order to train for specific situations, like Patrol oh, you have to qualify to do so first. You quality by having the experience. 6. You're assuming bias on my part because I don't necessarily agree with you. That would be your bias towards being correct. If anything, my life experience would have me more so on your side, instead of less. My mother worked for 20 years as a Caucasian female patrol officer for the Bossier City Louisiana Police Department. She also doesn't understand why She would have even reached for that side. One of the primary things for training police officers that you get beat into you at every given opportunity throughout every scrap of training your entire career is "left side right side". 7. As I said, you are arguing the difference between murder 1, murder 2 or manslaughter. No one is just slapping anything anywhere. That is what a trial is for. Which is what she will have and have every opportunity in the world, as everybody else does, to prove her innocence.
    1
  38318. 1
  38319. 1
  38320. 1
  38321. 1
  38322. 1
  38323. 1
  38324. 1
  38325. 1
  38326. 1
  38327. 1
  38328. 1
  38329. 1
  38330. 1
  38331. 1
  38332. 1
  38333. 1
  38334. 1
  38335.  @Lord_Poyo  Well, I gave you a list, right off the bat. All of which except 2 that you ignored... I'm sure so you could still have a point.... But, sense you are trying to desperately seem so unbothered... I'm more than happy to give them to you again. - body cam footage - unnamed Witnesses - the police officers track record - police officer training expert Etc... Also, it is completely common for the police not to release all the evidence in a case, to the media. As for issue.... The only issue there is, is yours, by continuing to insist there isn't any other evidence, even though we both know there is no possible way for you to know that. The only reason you continue to make this baseless assumption is because your point falls apart if you don't. Not one time did I claim "all cases" had additional evidence held back by the prosecution. Now you are just making things up about my meaning.... But... Please feel free to quote me where I said that? I completely understand what you're telling me. You just don't understand that there's no way for you to quantify that into reality. No matter how many times you insist you know this, it doesn't stop the fact that you cannot prove that. It doesn't make your claim any less of a baseless assumption. That is not the only evidence that can show up. It's just the only thing you say could show up. Except... you saying things doesn't actually make them true. She wouldn't even have to have a direct confrontation with that specific person for it to apply. She could simply have a track record of similar encounters or even audio and/or video of her expressing opinions about similar situations, or the same situation. Even a history of online postings which paint a picture of clear bias. I'm simply just not willing to form an opinion without all the facts, unlike you. I'm also not willing to assume I have all the facts when I couldn't possibly know that, unlike you. As I have stated, you have no clue whether you have all the information you need to form an opinion, yet you've already decided what it was. Meaning the only one here who doesn't understand logic comes from a full and accurate reading of facts.. Would be you. I don't have to prove you wrong. You have yet to prove that it was true. Your claim, your burden of proof. The only thing you've presented as evidence to your claim that there's absolutely no more evidence in this case is, because you said so. Except you ignoring facts don't actually make them go away. So.. Let's end this with some questions, I'm sure you will try to ignore... Because you don't have good answers for them. If, in her history as a police officer,it turned out that in other (similar) situations, she had announced the taser procedure and pulled her gun instead, would that not establish a pattern of for thought and/or mindset? Could there not be body cam footage from the other officers? Given that this didn't happen in the middle of nowhere and everyone has phones, could there not possibly be other video of the encounter and/or other witnesses? If the prosecution has not announced The video is the only evidence and you have no way of knowing whether or not there is other evidence or not, how can you be so sure there isn't any???
    1
  38336. 1
  38337. 1
  38338. 1
  38339. 1
  38340. 1
  38341. 1
  38342. 1
  38343. 1
  38344. 1
  38345. 1
  38346. 1
  38347. 1
  38348. 1
  38349. 1
  38350. 1
  38351. 1
  38352. 1
  38353. 1
  38354. 1
  38355. 1
  38356. 1
  38357. 1
  38358. 1
  38359. 1
  38360. 1
  38361. 1
  38362. 1
  38363. 1
  38364. 1
  38365. 1
  38366. 1
  38367. 1
  38368. 1
  38369. 1
  38370. 1
  38371. 1
  38372. 1
  38373. 1
  38374. 1
  38375. 1
  38376. 1
  38377. 1
  38378. 1
  38379. 1
  38380. 1
  38381. 1
  38382. 1
  38383. 1
  38384. 1
  38385. 1
  38386. 1
  38387. 1
  38388. 1
  38389. 1
  38390. 1
  38391. 1
  38392. 1
  38393. 1
  38394. 1
  38395. 1
  38396. 1
  38397. 1
  38398. 1
  38399. 1
  38400. 1
  38401. 1
  38402. 1
  38403. 1
  38404. 1
  38405. 1
  38406. 1
  38407. 1
  38408. 1
  38409. 1
  38410. 1
  38411. 1
  38412. 1
  38413. 1
  38414. 1
  38415. 1
  38416. 1
  38417. 1
  38418. 1
  38419. 1
  38420. 1
  38421. 1
  38422. 1
  38423. 1
  38424. 1
  38425. 1
  38426. 1
  38427. 1
  38428. 1
  38429. 1
  38430. 1
  38431. 1
  38432. 1
  38433. 1
  38434. 1
  38435. 1
  38436. 1
  38437. 1
  38438. 1
  38439. 1
  38440. 1
  38441. 1
  38442. 1
  38443. 1
  38444. 1
  38445. 1
  38446. 1
  38447. 1
  38448. 1
  38449. 1
  38450. 1
  38451. 1
  38452. 1
  38453. 1
  38454. 1
  38455. 1
  38456. 1
  38457. 1
  38458. 1
  38459. 1
  38460. 1
  38461. 1
  38462. 1
  38463. 1
  38464. 1
  38465. 1
  38466. 1
  38467. 1
  38468. 1
  38469. 1
  38470. 1
  38471. 1
  38472. 1
  38473. 1
  38474. 1
  38475. 1
  38476. 1
  38477. 1
  38478. 1
  38479. 1
  38480. 1
  38481. 1
  38482. 1
  38483. 1
  38484. 1
  38485. 1
  38486. 1
  38487. 1
  38488. 1
  38489. 1
  38490. 1
  38491. 1
  38492. 1
  38493. 1
  38494. 1
  38495. 1
  38496. 1
  38497. 1
  38498. 1
  38499. 1
  38500. 1
  38501. 1
  38502. 1
  38503. 1
  38504. 1
  38505. 1
  38506. 1
  38507. 1
  38508. 1
  38509. 1
  38510. 1
  38511. 1
  38512. 1
  38513. 1
  38514. 1
  38515. 1
  38516.  cj p  This is what you will see, everytime you see me, from now on. Have fun with that. If ppl show you who they are, believe them. This is who this person is. ( I abbreviated some but do have the screenshots if you want the whole thing.) Threat beginner comment - Basically Trump can shoot everyone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. cj p - if they were antifa or in a pussy hat... Then yes it would be epic and I would want to see him shoot more. Me - So you're basically saying you want to see the president of the United States commit murder and then you want him to get away with it... All we need to know about you, to figure out how jacked up in the head you are. (This part is a lil long and crazy ranty, so highlights)👇 cj p - if he shot you, I would throw a black party. (Some comment section thing about people cheering for a red state woman dying in a hurricane and CNN YouTube commenters cheering. Basically a justification for his actions. Which tells us, he does feel the need to justify it or aka he knows he is wrong.) (Then assumptions about what I would do, just encase that justification didn't work.)(Libs are evil then...) I don't need to fake it. When I watch the skinny effeminate antifa kid get mowed down by a red pickup... I laughed and watched it again. He didn't even break a bone. When I saw it another video of a motorist get out of his white suburban and beat the crap out of an antifa weirdo standing in front of his car... I laughed again and make jokes in the comments like every other person did. You want links to those videos they are pretty good? Me - 👈👈👈ANNNNNDDD... A perfect example of what I was talking about, everyone. This is all you need to know about him, to know nothing that comes out of his mouth is important, in any way. He is always so eager to help me prove that point and I really do appreciate it! 😉✌ Me - BTW, you are talking about taking a little boys mother away from him. That is what you are celebrating. That is who you are right now... I'm sure yours would be super proud that just came out of her little boys mouth. You are such a sad person. cj p - you were going to raise a little nut job. He might be better off adopted. And there you go again with the virtue signaling. I don't use my kid as a shield. Pathetic how you're trying to squeeze guilt from me when I'm using satire. No wonder you don't get Trump jokes. I bet memes fly past you too. Fifty bucks says your son's girlfriend's will never get along with his overbearing controlling mother with no humor. (👆You will notice, throughout this portion, you see them justifying, excusing and trying to flip what he has said onto me. All signs he knows what he has said, was wrong.) Me - 👈👈👈 Yep... This is who this person is. 👆👆👆This is why anything they say, does not matter. They aren't a good person. They aren't even mostly human. When people show you who they are, believe them. I'm going to screenshot this, copy and paste it everywhere I see this "person" from now on.
    1
  38517. 1
  38518. 1
  38519. 1
  38520. 1
  38521. 1
  38522. 1
  38523. 1
  38524. 1
  38525. 1
  38526. 1
  38527. 1
  38528. 1
  38529. 1
  38530. 1
  38531. 1
  38532. 1
  38533. 1
  38534. 1
  38535. 1
  38536. 1
  38537. 1
  38538. 1
  38539. 1
  38540. 1
  38541. 1
  38542. 1
  38543. 1
  38544. 1
  38545. 1
  38546. 1
  38547. 1
  38548. 1
  38549. 1
  38550. 1
  38551. 1
  38552. 1
  38553. 1
  38554. 1
  38555. 1
  38556. 1
  38557. 1
  38558. 1
  38559. 1
  38560. 1
  38561. 1
  38562. 1
  38563. 1
  38564. 1
  38565. 1
  38566. 1
  38567. 1
  38568. 1
  38569. 1
  38570. 1
  38571. 1
  38572. 1
  38573. 1
  38574. 1
  38575. 1
  38576. 1
  38577. 1
  38578. 1
  38579. 1
  38580. 1
  38581. 1
  38582. 1
  38583. 1
  38584. 1
  38585. 1
  38586. 1
  38587. 1
  38588. 1
  38589. 1
  38590. 1
  38591. 1
  38592. 1
  38593. 1
  38594. 1
  38595. 1
  38596. 1
  38597. 1
  38598. 1
  38599. 1
  38600. 1
  38601. 1
  38602. 1
  38603. 1
  38604. 1
  38605. 1
  38606. 1
  38607. 1
  38608. 1
  38609. 1
  38610. 1
  38611. 1
  38612. 1
  38613. 1
  38614. 1
  38615. 1
  38616. 1
  38617. 1
  38618. 1
  38619. 1
  38620. 1
  38621. 1
  38622. 1
  38623. 1
  38624. 1
  38625. 1
  38626. 1
  38627. 1
  38628. 1
  38629. 1
  38630. 1
  38631. 1
  38632. 1
  38633. 1
  38634. 1
  38635. 1
  38636. 1
  38637. 1
  38638. 1
  38639. 1
  38640. 1
  38641. 1
  38642. 1
  38643. 1
  38644. 1
  38645. 1
  38646. 1
  38647. 1
  38648. 1
  38649. 1
  38650. 1
  38651. 1
  38652. 1
  38653. 1
  38654. Let's put aside Trumps ignorance on basic human decency for just a second... And let's address his ignorance on basic geography. His argument is... Democrats = open borders Open borders = NO country Here is the problem with that. Its insane and idiotic fear mongering. For example... I am a Lyft / Uber Driver and I live in Louisiana, about an hour away from the Texas State Line. Which is ( you guessed it ) the border between Texas and Louisiana. I, as well as many other moterists travel, upon occasion, between the 2 for work. We do so without check points guards or dogs at these boarders. Infact, the only way you can tell your in Texas and not Louisiana anymore is a sign on the side of I-20 that says, "Welcome To Texas".YET SOMEHOW, Texas and Louisiana still exist. Shocking! I know, right! Now... do i think we should try and have a system of documenting people coming in and out of the country that helps to protect us from drugs and criminals from getting in? Of course! Who would not want that? Do I think in order to achieve that we need to throw aside the factual and historic record of this immigrant country? Do we need to buy into the coincidence that this President and his administration only seems to be concerned about one of the borders of this country? Do we need to throw entirely too much money at a border wall ( that we were never supposed to pay for ) in order to slow down people from crossing our border by mere minutes when that money could be better spent elsewhere? Do we need to buy into this administration's blatant lies about how this is all the Democratic party's fault even though they are the ones that instituted this policy? Do we need to all the sudden redefine asylum-seekers as illegal immigrants? Do we need to forget our Humanity and literally rip small children out of the arms of their mothers? Is any of this necessary to achieve the goal of having a more secure border? Of course not! Of course not! You and I both know it's not.
    1
  38655. 1
  38656. 1
  38657. 1
  38658. 1
  38659. 1
  38660. 1
  38661. 1
  38662. 1
  38663. 1
  38664. 1
  38665. 1
  38666. 1
  38667. 1
  38668. 1
  38669. 1
  38670. 1
  38671. 1
  38672. 1
  38673. 1
  38674. 1
  38675. 1
  38676. 1
  38677. 1
  38678. 1
  38679. 1
  38680. 1
  38681. 1
  38682. 1
  38683. 1
  38684. 1
  38685. 1
  38686. 1
  38687. 1
  38688. 1
  38689. 1
  38690. 1
  38691. 1
  38692. 1
  38693. 1
  38694. 1
  38695. 1
  38696. 1
  38697. 1
  38698. 1
  38699. 1
  38700. 1
  38701. 1
  38702. 1
  38703. 1
  38704. 1
  38705. 1
  38706. 1
  38707. 1
  38708. 1
  38709. 1
  38710. 1
  38711. 1
  38712. 1
  38713. 1
  38714. 1
  38715. 1
  38716. 1
  38717. 1
  38718. 1
  38719. 1
  38720. 1
  38721. 1
  38722. 1
  38723. 1
  38724. 1
  38725. 1
  38726. 1
  38727. 1
  38728.  @residentevil1878  First, so you can't name one, right? Otherwise you would be shoving it in my face by now. Yet you're not. You're trying to come up with some convoluted Mass assumption about Democrats in the wall Which brings me to my second point. People who have looked up facts and looked into the wall Just following what their cult leader tells them to believe, know how utterly useless and way too much money that thing's going to cost. so hundreds of order experts and structural engineer is have looked at the prospect of a border wall including the kind that Trump has been suggesting... Determining that the border wall or anything like the one Trump is talking about will slow people from crossing the border for approximately 8 minutes. Border patrol has been consistently doubled and doubled and doubled over the years. Despite this to this day We only have enough border patrol For one to man one section of the border every 25 minutes. Can you do the math there? And guess what? That's not even the biggest problem. We can't fund the border security well enough now. And you want to add? A giant wall technicians to keep it up And probably another doubling of the border patrol because the technicians going to maintain the wall can't go by themselves. Oh, and by the way Wank 26% of illegal immigrants coming into this country go through the southern border. All the rest go in the northern border and boat or airplane. And I usually come in with visas... Which probably means that more will be able to come in and stay in the country because we're diverting so much time so much energy and so much money to the goddamn Southern border. All because people like you have decided that brown people are the only ones we care about coming in and staying here illegally. So maybe stop drinking the Kool-Aid and start looking up the facts. 😉✌🇺🇸
    1
  38729. 1
  38730. 1
  38731. 1
  38732. 1
  38733. 1
  38734. 1
  38735. 1
  38736. 1
  38737. 1
  38738. 1
  38739. 1
  38740. 1
  38741. 1
  38742. 1
  38743. 1
  38744. 1
  38745. 1
  38746. 1
  38747. 1
  38748. 1
  38749. 1
  38750. 1
  38751. 1
  38752. 1
  38753. 1
  38754. 1
  38755. 1
  38756. 1
  38757. 1
  38758. 1
  38759. 1
  38760. 1
  38761. 1
  38762. 1
  38763. 1
  38764. 1
  38765. 1
  38766. 1
  38767. 1
  38768. 1
  38769. 1
  38770. 1
  38771. 1
  38772. 1
  38773. 1
  38774. 1
  38775. 1
  38776. 1
  38777. 1
  38778. 1
  38779. 1
  38780. 1
  38781. 1
  38782. 1
  38783. 1
  38784. 1
  38785. 1
  38786. 1
  38787. 1
  38788. 1
  38789. 1
  38790. 1
  38791. 1
  38792. 1
  38793. 1
  38794. 1
  38795. 1
  38796. 1
  38797. 1
  38798. 1
  38799. 1
  38800. 1
  38801. 1
  38802. 1
  38803. 1
  38804. 1
  38805. 1
  38806. 1
  38807. 1
  38808. 1
  38809. 1
  38810. 1
  38811. 1
  38812. 1
  38813. 1
  38814. 1
  38815. 1
  38816. 1
  38817. 1
  38818. 1
  38819. 1
  38820. 1
  38821. 1
  38822. 1
  38823. 1
  38824. 1
  38825. 1
  38826. 1
  38827. 1
  38828. 1
  38829. 1
  38830. 1
  38831. 1
  38832. 1
  38833. 1
  38834. 1
  38835. 1
  38836. 1
  38837. 1
  38838. 1
  38839. 1
  38840. 1
  38841. 1
  38842. 1
  38843. 1
  38844. 1
  38845. 1
  38846. 1
  38847. 1
  38848. 1
  38849. 1
  38850. 1
  38851. 1
  38852. 1
  38853. 1
  38854. 1
  38855. 1
  38856. 1
  38857. 1
  38858. 1
  38859. 1
  38860.  @slickrick412  " 74000 mail-in ballots were never mailed out" Incorrect. These cyberninja team claims that "74,000 mail-in ballots were never mailed out". There is a multitude of problems with private company audit on public elections. Which would be why the Democrats have such a problem with it in the first place and the right tried to paint it as we were hiding something after auditing three different other times.... But I digress... 1. The Electoral machines and data the state election commission's turn over to the private companies, can no longer be used because it breaks chain-of-custody. Which causes each state to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to replace the equipment and collect the data. 2. A private company does not have the state Regulatory Commission to oversee its practices. 3. A private company also has no obligation to surrender all of its data and process review to the state. It also does not have to tell you whether it did or not. Which often ends up with it surrendering cherry-picked amounts of data which conveniently only deflect what they are trying to suggest in the first place. All of this meaning, unless they surrender every scrap of data and process documentation to the State and allow the state to audit their own data and process with full access, we will never know whether they're telling the truth or not. But... It's what you want to hear... So .... your going to ignore the first 3 audits done by and regulated by the state... and your going to ignore the agenda they went into the process with.... and you're going to ignore the fact that they have surrendered no data to back up their claims. Why? Because you went into it having an agenda, as well.
    1
  38861. 1
  38862. 1
  38863. 1
  38864. 1
  38865. 1
  38866. 1
  38867. 1
  38868. 1
  38869. 1
  38870. 1
  38871. 1
  38872. 1
  38873. 1
  38874. 1
  38875. 1
  38876. 1
  38877. 1
  38878. 1
  38879. 1
  38880. 1
  38881. 1
  38882. 1
  38883. 1
  38884. 1
  38885. 1
  38886. 1
  38887. 1
  38888. 1
  38889. 1
  38890. 1
  38891. 1
  38892. 1
  38893. 1
  38894. 1
  38895. 1
  38896. 1
  38897. 1
  38898. 1
  38899. 1
  38900. 1
  38901. 1
  38902. 1
  38903. 1
  38904. 1
  38905. 1
  38906. 1
  38907. 1
  38908. 1
  38909. 1
  38910. 1
  38911. 1
  38912. 1
  38913. 1
  38914. 1
  38915. 1
  38916. 1
  38917. 1
  38918. 1
  38919. 1
  38920. 1
  38921. 1
  38922. 1
  38923. 1
  38924. 1
  38925. 👆 Let me tell you a little story about this guy. So I'm am a Lib Dems... But... I also feel like it's important to give equal opportunity critiques. On our side of the isle I do it to be constructive. You know... Give these right wing trolls less to aim at. Anywho... Exactly what I was trying to do with this one the other day. They had asked this right winger, who said that there were more gang related shootings then there were mass shootings, to give examples. Then, in the very next sentence, of the same comment, he decides to pretend the guy couldn't answer the question, all so he can say, "I told you so!", in the third and final sentence. Turns out, pretending, for this one, would be a running theme, cuz after I pointed out how that was obv not cool, this one looses his s*** for about a day and a half. First trying deflection to the other guys comment and how that some how justified his actions. Then, when it was clear I wasn't biting on the deflection, he moved to childish insults and personal attacks. When that didn't have the desired effect he tried to insist that bc no one else in the thread had come to my defense (or his, btw) that this meant that he was clearly right. At which point I simply pointed out that maybe it was bc no-one was listening to the exchange. After that, all the sudden he had a curiously timed like on his comments. Then he finally addressed his actions, but tried to pawn it off as him being "confident". At which time I pointed out why even the request for examples was a bad idea... And gave him 4 better ones. It's clearly silly, bc gang shootings aren't exactly hard to find in America, unfortunately. I told him... "You SOULD HAVE called him out for deflecting to Whataboutism. You should have asked if that makes any of the kids who die in mass shootings any less dead. You should have told him that, on average, there is at least one mass shooting a day in america and has been for over a decade now. You should have told him it's the difference between one or 2 dead at a time and 12." Then I told him to stop liking his own posts.... Which was a mistake on my part bc it gave him the opportunity to deflect to that, instead of addressing his own flawed argument. He went on to insist he did not.... And that it was all a big coincidence. In order to prove this, he tried to like all his comments... Hoping that I wouldn't think of ppl having multiple accounts on here. You can guess how well that went at this point. So... After that, I was just "crazy". Which is what I thought was going to be the end of it, right.... Because, on this channel, someone randomly trying to imply that you're "crazy" after their argument isn't going so well, usually means they're scraping the bottom of the proverbial Barrel.... But... Not this one. No! This had long sense become about his ego at this point. So... Next thing I know a "new guy" pops up! One that Sports strikingly similar cadence and spelling and grammar errors as he had, conveniently agreeing with everything he said and claiming to be the one who liked his comments. Mind you, not going any reasoning behind it, even when asked, but, still, nevertheless, completely agreeing with every single thing he had said. It turned out there "was" someone who was hanging on our every word. 😂 ... But it doesn't stop there. No! This guy stop talking to me, and then precedes to have a whole conversation with the other guy, about me and how "wrong" and "crazy" I am. Again... No reason why... I'm just "wrong" and I'm just "crazy". Finally, he uses that as an excuse to save face and run away. So, if you've gotten this far and your one of us... you should know that this guy isn't. He doesn't actually care about any of the issues. He acts like much of the right wing trolls that come here. He doesn't actually care about anything he's saying so much as he just wants to be right, even when he's wrong. He isn't one of us. He is just sad.
    1
  38926. 1
  38927. 1
  38928. 1
  38929. 1
  38930. 1
  38931. 1
  38932.  @williamh5646  Actually, that is not true. GDP growth is almost at 3% (so far this year) but it was also that high in 2015 under Obama's presidency. Obama's 2010 and 2014 both beat Trumps first year and his 2012 tied that same first year. He also did so without instituting thoughtless, dangerous and sometimes deadly deregulation practices. Here are just a few things Trump thought it would be a good idea to deregulate, on the claim that it would help the economy "grow". Asylum Seeker restrictions railroad noise emissions training requirements for entry-level commercial motor vehicle operations 📌 Overtime pay for middle class American workers Denying boarding compensation on airlines 📌 Expanding eligibility for Association health plans Head Start service duration requirement 📌 Sexual assault regulations 📌 Clean water regulations Safety training programs for government workers 📌 Mercury and air toxics standards Emissions limits for new coal power plants Definitions of short-term or limited duration insurance 📌 Methane and waste prevention rule 📌 Clean power plan 📌 Community reinvestment act forms Affirmatively furthering fair housing rule 📌 Gainful employment regulations 📌 Nuclear Safety Management... cuz that doesn't sound important at all Greenhouse gas emissions for truck glider kits The coal ash rule Endangered Species Act 📌 Public Transportation safety certifications Lowering Renewable Fuel standards 📌 Penalties for drug company overcharging Accidental chemical release prevention rule Greenhouse gas emissions measure Net neutrality 📌 Scientific transparency rule claims and appeals procedure for employee benefit plans providing disability benefits 📌 Electrical shock protection rule Arbitration rule 📌 Farmer's Fair practice rule Dental Mercury waste roll Internet Privacy Rule Ear marked some things that might stand out to you. Basically, he is doing decient on the economy but by poisoning the earth, being criminally irresponsible for our safety and screwing over the lower and middle class. All while claiming to be the best thing for them. His deregulation record alone shows that. Thats also just showing the last president we had compared to him with GDP growth. I didn't even get into the other ones before Obama. Your incorrect sir.
    1
  38933.  @williamh5646  you are wrong again sir... President Obama rescue the country from the Great Recession, cutting the unemployment rate from 10% to 4.7% over 6 years She signed the Affordable Care Act which provided health insurance to over 20 million uninsured Americans He ended the war in Iraq he passed the 787 billion dollar America recovery and reinvestment act to Spur economic growth during the Great Recession he supported the lgbtq communities site for marriage equality He commuted the sentences of nearly 1,200 drug offenders to reverse unjust and outdated prison sentencing he saved the US Auto industry he helped put the US on track for energy independence by 2020 he began the drawdown of troops in Afghanistan he signed the deferred action for childhood arrivals allowing as many as five million people living in the US illegally to avoid deportation and receive work permit He's fine the jog Frank Wall Street reform and consumer protection act to regulate the financial sector he dropped the veteran homeless rate by 50% he reversed bush-era torture policies he began the process of normalizing relations with Cuba he increased Department of Veteran Affairs funding he boosted fuel efficiency standards for cars he signed the credit card accountability, responsibility, and disclosure Act he improved School nutrition with the healthy hunger-free kids act He repealed the military's don't ask don't tell policy he signed the hate crimes prevention act, making it a federal crime to assault anyone based on sexual or gender identity he helped negotiate the landmark Iran nuclear deal he signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to combat pay discrimination against women he nominated the first Hispanic ever to serve as a Justice of the Supreme Court he's supported veterans through a 78 billion dollar tuition assistance GI Bill he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen International diplomacy and cooperation between peoples he launched My Brother's Keeper, a White House initiative designed to help young minorities achieve their full potential He expanded embryonic stem cell research leading to groundbreaking work in areas including spinal injury treatment and cancer I wonder what Trump was doing all those years...
    1
  38934. 1
  38935. 1
  38936. 1
  38937. 1
  38938. 1
  38939. 1
  38940. 1
  38941. 1
  38942. 1
  38943. 1
  38944. 1
  38945. 1
  38946. 1
  38947. 1
  38948. 1
  38949. 1
  38950. 1
  38951. 1
  38952. 1
  38953. 1
  38954. 1
  38955. 1
  38956. 1
  38957. 1
  38958. 1
  38959. 1
  38960. 1
  38961. 1
  38962. 1
  38963. 1
  38964. 1
  38965. 1
  38966. 1
  38967. 1
  38968. 1
  38969. 1
  38970. 1
  38971. 1
  38972. 1
  38973. 1
  38974. 1
  38975. 1
  38976. 1
  38977. 1
  38978. 1
  38979. 1
  38980. 1
  38981. 1
  38982. 1
  38983. 1
  38984. 1
  38985. 1
  38986. 1
  38987. 1
  38988. 1
  38989. 1
  38990. 1
  38991. 1
  38992. 1
  38993. 1
  38994. 1
  38995. 1
  38996. 1
  38997. 1
  38998. 1
  38999. 1
  39000. 1
  39001. 1
  39002. 1
  39003. 1
  39004. 1
  39005. 1
  39006. 1
  39007. 1
  39008. 1
  39009. 1
  39010. 1
  39011. 1
  39012. 1
  39013. 1
  39014. 1
  39015. 1
  39016. 1
  39017. 1
  39018. 1
  39019. 1
  39020. 1
  39021. 1
  39022. 1
  39023. 1
  39024. 1
  39025. 1
  39026. 1
  39027. 1
  39028. 1
  39029. 1
  39030. 1
  39031. 1
  39032. 1
  39033. 1
  39034. 1
  39035. 1
  39036. 1
  39037. 1
  39038. 1
  39039. 1