Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Ukraine sends images of dead Russian soldiers to their families. Hear the responses they received" video.

  1. 45
  2. 20
  3. 19
  4. 13
  5. 9
  6. 7
  7. 7
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41.  @mesolithicman164  Well... First... Don't present false assumptions your not prepared to back up. " probably an underestimation". There's no way you can qualify that. Don't just, on-the-fly, make stuff up to pad your point. And you really think it's the "policy" they are getting upset with? It's not the policy. It's the Dead family member. You think that these families would be less inclined to threaten to come and kill them if they didn't show them the picture, but, only said they died? How is informing a family that their child had just died in a war going to be popular, irregardless of how it happens? Come on now... that is not a thing you can measure popularity with. Their family is dead. Literally nobody is going to like that. Just because you keep trying to frame it as raising the ante, like these families have any control over what's going to happen with chemical weapons, doesn't mean it's actually true. Most of their children that are sent to die in these battles, are conscripted. They didn't even have the choice whether or not they could go. It's not like they're calling up the Kremlin and saying, "bomb those b******". Hell, we can't even do that in America. Like if my brother would have died in Iraq or Afghanistan, I couldn't have just called up the Pentagon and ordered an airstrike. That's not how that works... and we live in a democracy. This has nothing to do with me being naive or not. It's the fact that you are choosing to only look at part of the picture, and conveniently it's the part that confirms your preconceived notions. As for what you're putting for it, you are putting the entire onus on the Ukrainian people in government for trying to do the right thing and completely ignoring the Russian side, then trying to claim that your for lowering tensions. Do you maybe think that it would help to lower tensions if the actual Invaders did what they're supposed to do when inform these families in the first place? Or how about they just leave the country they're invading? You were using a completely one-sided point of view and trying to claim you're in the right. It's super easy to get there when you don't pay attention to all sides and all facts.
    1
  42. 1
  43.  @mesolithicman164  Na! This is just about your ego, at this point. What you mean is YOU tend to round down. That has nothing to do with being naive. Yet again. That's just personal preference. Though that seems to be the negative connotation you wanted to subscribe to me because you can't prove your point in a mature and fact-based manner, using all relevant material. You tend to round down. Some round up. Some use basic math rounding, that can be up or down, depending on the remainder. You are attempting to speak for a whole bunch of ppl, bc you can't get out your own bubble. What's naive, is to think that everything operates all over the world the same way that it operates in America. And, in fact, I'm not avoiding anything. I'm just not buying into your baseless assumptions as to their reasoning and I'm using the actual quoted words that they used in order to explain the situation. It's naive to think that the numbers are what you want them to be because they fit the narrative you're trying to spin... actually, that's more arrogance, then naivete. He said it was around 80%. You're making the assumption that it's above with no basis for it other than your personal preference and your inability to see outside of the area you live in. You're doing so because what you're choosing to do is only see what fits your preconceived notions and you need to make assumptions in order to make that work. So, you can keep calling me naive all day long but I'm the one going by the stated facts and only the stated facts and you're the one making assumptions to fit your narrative.
    1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55.  @mesolithicman164  PERFECT EXAMPLE OF YOUR CHERRY PICKING! 👉 " even after saying you wouldn't want to see pictures of a family members dead body" Why did you cut off the sentence? Why not finish it? Because if you finish it your narrative evaporates. No one wants to see pictures of their dead loved ones. That should be obvious as hell. However, sometimes it's necessary. It's also a kindness that only people who have been through that kind of thing would understand. My brother got hurt in his first tour. His Commander stepped on an IUD and got blown up. My brother got out of the tank and went to go help. So did one other Soldier. That other soldiers stepped on another one and got blown up. Not more than five feet away from my brother. They had to fly him to England to have emergency surgery on his wrists and his neck. 2 years later his unit got sent to Afghanistan. Me and my brother are almost exactly 13 months apart. He's my only sibling... and we've been through some s*** together. So, needless to say, given his last tour, I was not super thrilled about him going back. By not super thrilled, I mean, I went through the largest out of insomnia I had ever had. I didn't sleep more than 10 minutes at a time for 10 days. They had to hospitalize me. I wish that would have been the end but he was still over there for another eight months. So families spend all that time holding their breath. Wondering when they're going to get the call or if they even will. Wondering every second of every day whether they're still alive or not. It's like a f***-up kind of purgatory. Which is why I know that knowing is way better than not knowing. Even if it means I have to identify his body. Which is a necessary evil sometimes. What would be cruel is leaving them to wonder. Putting that thought in their hands that their relatives may be dead but they don't really know because their government won't tell them a damn thing and so they have to sit there and try not to think about it every second of every day just to get through it. That's cruel. Identifying a loved one's remains it's not at all uncommon. It's not pleasant. It's not meant to be. It is what needs to happen sometimes because the alternative is worse. That's what you don't understand. Not because you don't understand but because you don't want to. Because this stopped being about any kind of point along time ago and became about your ego.
    1
  56. 1
  57. 1