Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Hear why ex-agent thinks the Secret Service did the 'right thing' on Jan. 6" video.

@robertchilders5854 👈 When you can't defend, you deflect.
13
@life_with_dogs_2025 Hear you go talking about narratives... Seemingly oblivious to the fact that you just tried to pretend you have magical powers to see the future. Classic! 😂
6
@Mark-db8id What's wrong lil Marky? Still running 😂
4
@lornenoland8098 I agree with everything... Except... I think this may be one of those things where we need to consider the office and not the man, as far as ppl the president can trust. Those positions need to be appointed with ppl thar will serve the office abd the country. Not a particular president. It shouldn't matter either. Cuz the president should want that anyways.
2
@michaelvaladez6570 there was a violent mob coming after him a couple thousand deep, with a working gallons that constructed, while chanting to hang him, and he had his family with him. I don't know why he thought we would think that was weak. Now, being Trump's b** for 4 years was weak
1
@leftistmonitor5084 Let me show you the difference between us and you. A large portion of us do not care for Hillary. She is shady, entitled and lacking in substance. You can tell we don't just stand by whoever our party leadership puts up there by the fact that Trump became president, instead of her. Most who did vote for her, did so bc it was better then him. But, we, by no means, feel the need to defend her, or, play whataboutism for her, like you just did for him. Have some damn standards.
1
@Mark-db8id Dems... Let's form a bipartisan court made up of No sitting members of Congress, and one that is mostly comprised of criminal law experts like the one that was put together for the 911 commission. You guys pick half and we pick half! Deal? Reps... Well... I guess that would be... Oops! Nope! Daddy Trump said no, for no discernible reason... So... How dare you suggest such a reasonable thing! Dems... Okay.... You guys recommend 5 reasonable Congress ppl and we will pick 5 reasonable Congress ppl of our own. Then we will have one Dem chair and one V Rep chair. Reps... Here are 3 reasonable Reps, and 2 party hacks/Trump loyalists, put there to stop you from getting to the truth! Dems... We will take these 3, but you need to pick 2 more that fit the "reasonable" criteria, that we agreed on. Reps... Fine we will pull all of them! Dems... Okay... Then we will put together the committee and pick at least to Reps to be on there, even if you wont recommend any, anymore... And we will even put them in the highest seats of power. Reps... We will sue you for not putting together a bipartisan commission! Dems... WTF? Judge... Yeah... So they tried 2 different times to set up a bipartisan commission with you guys and you intentionally screwed that up with nonsensical BS. So... Sorry... You don't get to complain now. Reps... It's a kangaroo court! Anyone with common sense and a memory longer then a gold fish... WTF?
1
@far22186 Inciting violence Conspiracy Accessory after the fact Obstruction of Congress The breaching of dozens of emoluments clauses Oh... My bad... You meant crimes for just this go around...
1
@Mark-db8id Oh! You mean the tiny portion of her 2 hour testimony you puppet masters are allowing you to see, while ignoring all the rest. Yes! The story about the limo was hearsay. However it was hearsay that at least five other people heard the exact same thing. Two of which are Secret Service agents. Not to mention the entire rest of her testimony that wasn't hearsay.
1