Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "CNN reporter encounters shocking scene during police ride-along" video.
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Progressive_Canadian 👈 Keep in mind this fit of his, is all bc I made the bold claim that it was wrong to, 👉both👈, shoot children with drones (What the OG commenter brought up), and chase them down with horses, while using reins as whips (What the video was about). Instead of it being an either-or scenario. 😵Crazy!😵 I know...
However, you can tell, he knows it's a bad argument, bc is you scroll up, you will notice that he 👉deleted👈 his original comment.
People like 👆this👆 are a poor imitation of what us, on the left, actually stands for. 🙄
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Progressive_Canadian 👈 Keep in mind this fit of his, is all bc I made the bold claim that it was wrong to, 👉both👈, shoot children with drones (What the OG commenter brought up), and chase them down with horses, while using reins as whips (What the video was about). Instead of it being an either-or scenario. 😵Crazy!😵 I know...
However, you can tell, he knows it's a bad argument, bc is you scroll up, you will notice that he 👉deleted👈 his original comment.
People like 👆this👆 are a poor imitation of what us, on the left, actually stands for. 🙄
1
-
1
-
@Progressive_Canadian 👈 Keep in mind this fit of his, is all bc I made the bold claim that it was wrong to, 👉both👈, shoot children with drones (What the OG commenter brought up), and chase them down with horses, while using reins as whips (What the video was about). Instead of it being an either-or scenario. 😵Crazy!😵 I know...
However, you can tell, he knows it's a bad argument, bc is you scroll up, you will notice that he 👉deleted👈 his original comment.
People like 👆this👆 are a poor imitation of what us, on the left, actually stands for. 🙄
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@derekwang7330 So here is another... Posting some full context quotes separately from the article, encase it gets deleted for the link.
"Second, “human life” implies individuality, which is also not consistent with scientific observations. In the clinical practice of IVF, we often speak of preimplantation embryos as individual entities, with distinct qualities like a specific genotype (mosaicism notwithstanding), and morphologic and developmental characteristics. But at the same time we realize that each of the totipotent cells that comprise these embryos is, at least theoretically, capable of producing a complete new individual. Indeed, multiple individuals can arise from the implantation of a single embryo, as in the case of identical twins. Therefore, we know that the preimplantation embryo is not actually an individual. The preimplantation embryo is essentially an aggregate of stem cells, which has the potential to produce a pregnancy, including placental and fetal tissues, assuming that it successfully implants in a receptive endometrium. It is only after implantation that the early embryo can further differentiate into the organized cell groups that enable the developing conceptus to progress further in embryonic and eventually fetal development."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@derekwang7330 2. Which is when I moved on to an embryologist. Who is both a scientist and a doctor. So I have no clue what you're talking about how all these people aren't doctors.
I gave you the article again and where it came from. I also quoted specific sections out of it.
For which mostly ignored. Which is a habit you have had for quite a while. Ignoring things you can't argue against.
As per your definition or wherever you got that from. Of course a human embryo is a human embryo. That doesn't make it a human being. Embryos and people are different In A Million Ways. Many of which I have already stated and you have already ignored.
and forgot to post this a bit ago. 👇
"a zygote (a single-celled embryo)"
Not a human being. This is its classification in scientific terms.
@Derek Wang So here is another... Posting some full context quotes separately from the article, encase it gets deleted for the link.
"Second, “human life” implies individuality, which is also not consistent with scientific observations. In the clinical practice of IVF, we often speak of preimplantation embryos as individual entities, with distinct qualities like a specific genotype (mosaicism notwithstanding), and morphologic and developmental characteristics. But at the same time we realize that each of the totipotent cells that comprise these embryos is, at least theoretically, capable of producing a complete new individual. Indeed, multiple individuals can arise from the implantation of a single embryo, as in the case of identical twins. Therefore, we know that the preimplantation embryo is not actually an individual. The preimplantation embryo is essentially an aggregate of stem cells, which has the potential to produce a pregnancy, including placental and fetal tissues, assuming that it successfully implants in a receptive endometrium. It is only after implantation that the early embryo can further differentiate into the organized cell groups that enable the developing conceptus to progress further in embryonic and eventually fetal development."
1
-
1