Comments by "m g" (@07Flash11MRC) on "Russia Bans Not Having Children" video.

If Putin's Russia didn't want to tear families apart, they wouldn't wage endless w@rs. If you don't get involved in wars, both women and men can stay home and be safe.
36
@oglordbrandon : Are you just going to ignore that women had no access to medicine like birth control (which is a silly name, because it actually does the opposite for some women with illnesses such as pcos and endometriosis, who couldn't conceive without those hormones) and that children were born because they wouldn't go to school, they'd be on the fields working and making the family money as workers?
23
First and foremost it would require not waging offensive and unnecessary w@rs against countries that didn't attack Russia.
20
... knowing that all of thaose kids will grow up just to die in the next war that Putin, the party and the oligarchs, start / wage.
1
Women have always been treated like they weren't even humans. Men are only treated that way during wartimes. Still, ultimately under dictatorships nobody is save.
1
Not the exact same thing, but something similar, yes...
1
As long as every human being, every country, every economy on the planet live under cãpįtâlî$m, there always has to be growth in order for the system not to collapse.
1
They won't be orphans if you send them to the frontlines together with their father (and maybe even with their mother once she can't conceive any more kids). Checkmate!
1