Comments by "m g" (@07Flash11MRC) on "" video.

This is now corporate imperialism...
3
@jorenvanderark3567 What makes you think that imperialism has stopped back then or isn't happening right now in front of the eyes of the entire world?
3
@jorenvanderark3567 Capitalism only works when supported by both imperialism and colonialism. You cannot separate these from capitalism! Why else do companies outsource jobs to poorer countries? They do so to make a profit by saving money that htey would have to pay their employees. This is imperative in order to uphold this @busive system.
2
@jorenvanderark3567 4. "And you say that I should learn the English language?" : Where did I say that? You're the only one putting words into other peoples mouths. You're being ridiculous. You keep acting as if you were the smart one who feels the need to lecture us all, yet you can't even tell apart statements (ending with a point " . " or occasionally even with an exclamation mark " ! " ) from questions (ending with " ? ")... xD
2
@jorenvanderark3567 Buddy, do you actually read what other people have written? Do you understand how languages and sentences work? My comment read "... or isn't happening right now ... ?": I asked you a question. I never claimed you stated something of the likes. Are you smart enough to prove your claims and provide sources for them or are you just looking for someone who you cxan troll when they question your intelligence and ingenuity? Just let me know! Then I'll spend my time elsewhere...
1
@jorenvanderark3567 Let me just quote you a couple of times: 1. "He called the final stage of capitalism blatantly ignoring that imperialism is by far onder than capitalism.": No, he didn't. He never even talked about timelines and neither did I. He merely stated that capitalism is thriving under imperialism. 2. "As for colonialism being older than capitalism?": Again, noone, except you ofc, is talking about timelines. You're ignorant to the fact that two systems can coexist at the same place and time. Just more prove that you don't actually bother reading what other people write. Instead you're being an impulisve reactionary clinging onto details that neither matter in this context nor have been denied by anyone. 3. "Anyone who has ever attended a high school history class ...." + "It's such a basic history fact ..." + "But since you apparently never attended a high school history class ..." + "Now fuck off." : The mere fact that you're offended at other people asking you a question, which you purposefully choose to misinterpret in order to get offended even more easily, combined with Wikipedia, a website where anyone can write anything, as your only (!) source (instead of actual research and studies), and a bunch of insults and ad-hominems just show how frigile your knowledge, your maturity and your confidence really is. Good to know that you're not interested in a reasonable and calm conversation.
1
@jorenvanderark3567 "Rum is a final stage of sugar, sugar is not a final stage of Rum. " This is because of the human experience of time and our percived timeline. Unlike living beings, who continously "age" (or rather decay and fall apart), molecules such as sugar, which is a soluble carbohydrate, can change their state without being bound to the concept of time, as proven by Einstein's General Relativity. Just because humans don't try to turn rum into sugar (for whatever reason), doesn't mean it's not physically possible. This is a logical fallacy and cannot be compared. A counter argument to that is photosynthesis: Humans inhale oxygen and exhale carbondioxide. Plants use carbondioxide (among other molecules and solar rays) and turn it (back) into oxygen.
1
@jorenvanderark3567 "Statements ending with a question mark" : No, that's the way you chose to (mis)interpret my question... "One would expect a master of the English language ... but apparently you do not." : And just when I thought you made progress, you're right back at the ad-homini... Such a shame! You could have used this as an opportunity to improve yourself and not continue to assume the absolute worst in strangers.
1
@jorenvanderark3567 Nope. As you quoted correctly, I said "languages", which is clearly plural... But please, go ahead and keep digging yourself even deeper. I'm having a good laugh... "If you're going to use outright bullshitting ... wouldn't require me suffering from alzheimers in order to fall for it.": Well, other than regurgitating insults you should be pleased that you're clearly not showing any signs of alzheimers since you keep quoting me correctly, while still misinterpreting every single word I say... xD
1
@jorenvanderark3567 "Even less by you playing at being a braindead idiot (but hey since you play at being one I'm perfectly happy to treat as one)": More insults comming through. lmfao... I love how you keep editing your comments, knowing that you messed up and hope to change that without me seing in (edited comments don't show up on the YT bell sign...) in order to discredit me. Just an fyi for you: People can see that you edited your own comments. It's painfully obvious that you do not know what you're talking about...
1
@jorenvanderark3567 "Those being you being a troll or you being braindead.": Awe, did I hurt your fee fees? Another comment with no meaning, just insults. Lmfao, keep it coming!
1
@jorenvanderark3567 And another comment with the paragraphs being: 1. a lame excuse, 2. an assumption that you can't back up, and 3. yet another paragraph of insults. Meanwhile you've also edited your other 5 comments for the third time. Your entire arguments are invalid.
1