Comments by "m g" (@07Flash11MRC) on "Prince Andrew Still Trying To Silence Accuser Following Ghislaine Maxwell's Guilty Verdict" video.

It is in the world of affluent people. They think that htey are above the law, because only us peasants need to follow the law.
16
Exactly! Similar to the Elizabeth Holmes case. As a women, she gets punished, while wealthy men of other corporations like Exxon (oil companies) and many others (at least 170 companies), who have caused more damage to the world than Holmes by literally causing climate change, are all still walking around as free men.
8
@butterflykisses1222 I hope you're right. I don't believe for a second that she wants to end up like Epstein. His alleged suicide seems so strange. I think it's more likely that he was somehow eliminated in order to keep other peoples' identities save.
7
Apparently even the queen is now sick of it, despite Andrew being her favorite child-
6
@babesimmons4017 Absolutely right. Red states are on their way to become the Republic of Gilead that Margaret Atwood mentioned in her Handmaid's Tale saga.
3
@floris.927 You seem to have misinterpreted me. I never said it's about "power", I said it's about wealth ("affluent people"). Let's be honest: Very few of us actually have the means to pay off somebody who we wronged in any way. And no, it's not just a "contract thing". Not every one of us can get a contract done, especially not with a guy like Andrew, who thinks that r@ping kids isn't wrong and that he is innocent. Contracts are a "power thing", as you call it. Someone like Andrew, with tons of cash, is on top of the hierarchy. He's the one with the most negotiation power. His victim, who is middle class, has very limited negotiation power.
3
@ursaltydog Learn how to speak proper english, dude. Nobody knows what you're trying to say or who you're even talking to. You just outed yourself as uneducated, @ursaltydog.
2
@floris.927 Dude, you just keep on strawmanning me. Your entire word salad was uncalled for. You're simply repeating what I wrote in my third comment (tha one that was my answer to your first comment, which was in and of itself an entire strawman.).
1