Comments by "Dan" (@Dan-di9jd) on "Steven Seagal Half Past Dead - He Dies u0026 Goes To Prison In That Order - Worst Movie Ever" video.

  1. I guess they'd look more into your potential than your role in Seagal's film. But I think if you're trying to use Seagal as a ladder upwards, you'd be disappointed even if he was a star.
    39
  2. - Whenever Seagal is in a team, no one knows what they're doing and all rely or look at him for instructions. - Women half his age just go up to him immediately and falls in love and flirts nonstop. - Seagal never goes up to a person to fight instead they come up to him doing this strange slapping thing where they're leaning backwards a little to not get hit in the face as they're doing this slapping thing. - CIA, DEA, FBI, FAA, FTC, etc all have ultimate authority in some random country. Whenever he's CIA working undercover it makes no sense cause nothing he does is a direct treat to America.
    27
  3. At first I thought you said, "I could that, but butter." Which would have made a lot more sense too.
    17
  4. I think it's one of those things that Seagal didn't really sit down and think clearly. What he's thinking of is the backwash from an RPG that could in theory throw someone off balance if they're standing behind it. Realistically they wouldn't fly back but rather be seriously injured or knocked over depending. The person shooting it wouldn't move because from a physic standpoint it makes no sense because there is no force acting on them. With Seagal getting quotes wrong all the time ("I wasn't born on a turnip truck" and "I'll snatch every mfing birthday.", etc), I wouldn't be surprised he gets weapons wrong from time to time.
    16
  5. If I ever end up in prison, that's the line I'm giving to everyone there. I'm on a secret mission, shhhh!
    12
  6. I watched the movie and it has a huge plot hole in why Seagal needed to go undercover or even be at the prison itself. The entire assumption behind being undercover was that Seagal was going to gather information yet he already had everything figured out well before even going into the prison. He could have literally just went after the main villain but yet he required to kill off nearly the entire prisoner, and guards for reasons unclear.
    9
  7. Don’t forget that somewhere along in the movie Seagal beats up some bullies and somehow that causes the victim to tag along in his incoherent rampage killing spree. Also don’t forget that they never build up an actual bad guy in the movie. Seagal just goes around beating up people until he finds the bad guy and somehow all the people he killed were supposedly steps to discovering the main villain.
    5
  8. I think your intro summarized this movie perfectly. Seagal went in somewhere, did a bunch of stuff, a bunch of people got hurt and died, and what for? Absolutely nothing at all. Even if there was one criminal mastermind behind it all, Seagal would still somehow kill more innocent people and people who had nothing to do with it before revealing this grand plot that so-so who he could have just taken a taxi to confront.
    3
  9. That's Nia! She's the sidekick in the last couple seasons of Walker Texas Ranger. She's able to do some pretty good moves during the show so I'm a bit surprised she decided to star in a post-stardom Seagal film where she's not able to showcase her real talent.
    3
  10. He's following the other actors at the time where they're this quirky sidekick in an action film. The unfortunate part is that he's in a Seagal film where Seagal is untouchable, never needing help or anything and instead Ja Rule has to play this incompetent person who doesn't know anything until Seagal tells him.
    1
  11. Agreed. That era of films had a lot of side kick action roles that many people got famous for. I think the problem with being Seagal's sidekick is that you have to play as an imbecile who can't do anything and must rely on Seagal for directions. He wasn't able to be a true partner or sidekick and instead someone who Seagal teaches things to. I think that really ruined his career in an otherwise fun movie.
    1
  12. The problem is all of his movies have the same plot: he goes in somewhere, a bunch of people get hurt or end up dying, some huge grand plot twist that invalidates everything done up to that point, then the movie ends with the main villain getting off lightly compared to the others despite Seagal having a vendetta against that person that initiated the movie.
    1
  13.  @caliente-frio3966  I disagree. Seagal was making fewer friends in Hollywoood at the time. He was known to be difficult to work with. It seems the strangest thing about Seagal is that not only he wanted his fans to think of him as this lethal persona but also everyone on set. So it made it very difficult to work with as he would try to do everything he can to make himself appear better than anyone else on set. If he didn't like the story, or how something played out, he was known to throw a fit or even not appear on set for days causing everyone to have to work around him or even not work at all because the scene required him in it.
    1
  14. I'd rather find moose droppings than this movie.
    1