Comments by "Dan" (@Dan-di9jd) on "NewsNation" channel.

The problem I feel is that they were relatively non-political for years but suddenly, they decided they wanted to switch their image from the so-called "frat" scene and into what I guess sophisticated beer. Problem is they decided to do this by going political and forgot the customers who would be buying it. It's sort of like they all sat down, brought up a bunch of stuff, and someone who doesn't speak often says, "What about the customers?" and everyone just poking fun him and calling him names and telling him to leave.
15
Nobody gave an adequate explanation as to why they're stuck there. I don't see anything in the video or anything in any article that can explain it. It seems like if people started to move everything would get going.
13
From what I read about the boyfriend kept the relationship hidden from her and she used a gun the boyfriend bought for the two of them. To me she should be directing her rage and anger towards the boyfriend but I suspect he tried to spin it that she was coming on to him and that he was innocent. To me the boyfriend should at least be charged with accessory.
12
You're absolutely right. This isn't really someone thinking her golf skill stinks. They're just trying to hit on her.
10
Who buys a $8 million dollars house and don't have any sort of alarm, security cameras, or anything? I mean I own a cheap ass $180k house and would immediately know if someone is in it with cameras and alarms.
6
He kept the relationship hidden and used a fake name on his phone to conceal it from his on/off girlfriend. So yes, the guy was trying to be a "player" and who knows what he might have explained to her. I'm thinking he tried to play it that she was coming on to him and that made her upset. Personally if he did that I think he should be charged too. @ItsNotRealLife
5
@rwhirsch it took a while to find some explanation but it sounds like there were some disabled trucks on the highway. Still doesn't adequately explain why it took over 12 hours to clear it but I guess that's the only plausible thing I heard.
4
Yeah very unusual. I don't think all the kids knew they were breaking into a home. I think someone who knew the family and knew they didn't have any sort of alarm or camera systems in place. Very unusual for someone who owns a $8 million dollars home.
3
Your keyboard could be a weapon and simultaneously press two or more keys at once there fore blame the idiot and take the keyboard away.
3
@Vgp-rp4iu I’m think there’s a scam involved. Just so unusual that a multi million dollar home and no security system whatsoever.
2
I don't know. When I was a teenager and a friend said, "Hey there's a party with blah at his house." I would show up but I be mighty suspicious about the size and scope of the party given that anyone can go anywhere. It's like straight out of a movie scene where you got this huge house party but reality is there's no way some of your stuff ends up missing.
2
They risked it by saying they want to go from a frat brand to something else. I think at this point they played the card and now they have to use the cards they were dealt with and hope they can gain new customers that they lost.
2
The problem isn't that despite the fact media is trying to make it about that. There's a good chance every company has people form all walks of life, religion and beliefs. That's fine and totally okay. Problem is when you make what is non-political, political suddenly it's going to anger a lot of people. The execs said they wanted to switch the brand from the "frat" scene and turn it into a sophisticated upper class beer. Which is fine, but they forgot the customer base and on top of that the fact that they went political that had nothing to do with converting it to from a frat beer to that of a sophisticated person's beer. It's like the execs just totally went all out and just didn't know what they were doing but had to do something.
2
There's a good chance that a majority of the kids involved are innocent or at least not in the house with the intent to break in. There's a good chance someone just said there's a party and people just showed up. I also think mob mentality goes into play. You see your friends there, and they're relaxed so you're relaxed and since there's no one there against it, you just roll with it.
2
Either way I feel more strongly against the home owner in this situation. Who in the world owns a $8 million dollar mansion with no alarm, no security system, no camera, nothing. Just a open home that's up for grabs. I'm guessing the owner's children or some such is friends with one of the party goers and he found out the home had no alarm system or anything so he just decided to throw this party when they said they will be out for a long duration.
2
@1ACL don't forget the judge can also declare a mistrial in some cases so it's possible he can walk without it ever going to a jury. So many things can go wrong but this is a sure way to know he's going to prison and never coming out.
1
@DarthVader1273 I mean even then they didn't even do it right. It's like they completely ignored everything they say they wanted to do, then did something else but completely forgot what they were going for. Sort of like going to Walmart, but stopping by Kmart, then trying to use a Target coupon there.
1
She probably voted for Biden too which makes the whole thing sadder when you buy into the lie.
1
I guess you can think more locally. Imagine for a second you wanted your son/daughter to play sports but she/he is into playing chess. So, what would a normal father do? Probably decide to introduce some sports casually to see if he/she begins to like it, maybe bring a favorite playmate of your child to talk about what a great time they had doing the sport. But if you're bud light exec, instead you decide to talk to your kid about how Joe Biden is an all american hero and you should vote for him next election and here's a baseball glove to honor that. Your kid looking at you like, Umm geez thanks dad, I guess?
1
I wonder why? The Yakuza has a pretty good payout to the politicians there so it's no doubt they don't want the international attention on any of them.
1
The exec mentioned that she wanted to turn bud light from a "frat" brand to that of a sophisticated beer. They definitely did want to change the brand's image and who they wanted to market it to. The problem is they did a 90 degrees turn by first saying they wanted to market it to a sophisticated beer, but then they did one more 90 degree turn by going political that has nothing to do with turning it into a sophisticated beer. They totally forgot the customers and who they were selling it to, then they forgot who they were trying to sell it to. A double miss. If they lose the customer base, then great, if they can create a totally new segment along with that. I think at this point their only way to survive is to continue the trend they're going with and hope that they gain the same amount of people they're losing.
1
By even saying they wanted to change it from a "frat" beer assumes that they want to lose customers but they also want to gain customers. It's sort of like if you owned a car wash and only muscle cars came in to wash but suddenly you're like, "you know I want to wash high end sophisticated cars like Porche and Lambos." So you decide to hire your mayor as a spokesperson, and he/she's going around talking about how great your car wash is. That's basically what Bud Light did in a nutshell.
1
I see it in any sort of physical demanding places such as gyms, shooting ranges, and any kind of sports like golfing or baseball or even running. I once was at a 5k and I remember this dude went right up to this woman walking after she paused running and he's giving her tips on how to run and how she should land her feet and stuff. It's really beta males in these places and they see an alpha female who appears single in the same location and feel as if they can pretend to be an expert.@@olig4699
1
The problem is that you're looking at a single issue rather than the complete picture. There are laws, then there's the enforcement of the law. When they enforce the law, it is considered a "crime." They don't record or report crimes that they don't find. Sure you can say that a country reduced its gun violence by whatever fold, but when you compare to the crime rate it's either going up or the same as it was prior to enacting the gun law. Suicide rates are the same too because people find another means to carry it out so saying you "reduced" suicide rates or crimes rate, you're just leaving out facts. If you notice they never say they reduced the totality of crimes only that they reduced the specific "gun" related crimes.
1
Also, the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with crimes or the reduction of. It is purely there to prevent the government from overreach or to prevent outsiders from taking over the country. It has absolutely nothing to do with hunting or anything of the sort. It is there purely for self-defense of yourself, your family, and your community. Other countries do not have such thing in place and as such, it has shown time and time again that removal of access to weapons means that the government has plans to control you and your livelihood.
1
@donttreadonme1423 Correct, that's one of the bigger problems in the UK. They say crime and gun crimes are both going down since they passed their laws in the 90s but what they're not telling you is how they're recording said crimes. Also, it's not just a death rate that is concerning with what is going on there. Just in general some police departments aren't recording crimes, even if you called the police and had someone come out. They are not reporting ALL of the crimes to make it appear as if they reduced crime. In the USA, the reporting of a crime and specifically gun crimes are all politically motivated as the FBI, and local police are usually instructed on how they record a crime and in the event of a death, how they are supposed to record it depending on if a firearm was used. It's very concerning that people are not getting the full facts.
1
You're mixing up what I'm saying with what the other guy said. So I think that alone tells me you're not a very wise person and that you'd believe anything CNN tells you. @JT.Pilgrim
1
I think it is important to realize that when data is not recorded people assume that it is not as bad as people are making it based on the data they do have. So let's say they say crime is at an all time low but they don't record mugging when they don't use a weapon. It could be that it is a rare occurrence or it could be a very dangerous thing. I heard in cases in the UK, there is a particular bridge where mugging is so common that people are advised not to walk on it because this gang holds both ends and you can't escape. The police don't even come if called and if they do they are long gone. So with that in mind, the cases of mugging, for example, may be high or low but we can't really know for sure because they don't record it. So it's hard to know statistical data being correct or not because it really depends on knowing what is recorded and how they are recorded and how they are instructed to record it. @donttreadonme1423
1
Joe Biden wanted to defund the police. This is his America.
1
@djohny-ne3gg Correct. A lot of men, especially succesful ones, seem to be having trouble finding good women to marry. The dating market in America is very closed and a lot of women aren't open to marriage with a single man. Finding a woman willing to marry you and stay with you is very rare these days and unfortunately you get cases like these where it ends up that she secretly doesn't want to be with you but looking to get out any way possible. I'm willing to bet the guy caught her cheating and in those kind of cases it is hard to get a clean divorce where she wins half his stuff and instead he cane walk off without anything and probably gain custody.
1
The first thing she did was called the FAA? To me it sounds like a fake thing going on here. Who the heck things to call the FAA?
1
The news agency employs a large amount of people and got them probably on the same insurance. So they're in it just as much as the execs.
1
okay
1
Does it even matter why he did it? I don’t think any sort of reason will ever be logical. Even more so I think the parents were most angry because they simply don’t know why someone would do that. Bryan seemingly has no connection to any of the victims and it seems like he did it for no reason whatsoever.
1
They're news reporters, so it is okay. It's only bad when they're pushing an agenda by simply ignoring any sort of knowledge.
1