Youtube comments of Dan (@Dan-di9jd).
-
792
-
598
-
484
-
379
-
266
-
177
-
164
-
152
-
143
-
139
-
133
-
101
-
101
-
99
-
98
-
93
-
90
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
76
-
69
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
56
-
55
-
54
-
50
-
49
-
47
-
47
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
Here's the real story. Egypt enslaved the Jewish population, then they were booted out. They wandered around until they found some empty land and were like, "Hey this place looks pretty cool." Then the Palestine were all like, "No way, Jose, this is our land!" Then they booted them out and most of the Jewish population spread across the European front. Then they were booted out repeatedly until about the beginning of the 20th century were most of them were in Germany and Italy. Then you know who was all these these people got to go! Then they were sent to camps where they were to be shipped back but instead most of them ended up not so lucky. Then WW2 ended and everyone was all like, "Whoa this is serious." So USA and England and some other countries said, "You know you guys had a great set of land over there where Palestine are at. So USA and England were like no freaking way this time around you guys better play nice or else. So they funded weapons, equipment, and various other things to make sure those Palestine stay off them this time around. So basically USA and England are both funding the Israel to basically make sure they stay on some land that may or may not be theres. Sort of like how someone comes into your home, the government says too bad to you and you're forced to live with it or push back.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
His entire role in this movie is confusing as his horrible ability to be a good assassin. First, it seems like the "I bet your pardon" people, who are CIA I assume, hired him at the start who was looking for the package. Somehow, Pete found the package, had it in his hands, and instead of just running away with it somehow gave it to Seagal. At the end of the movie, despite the fact the guy who they were delivering the package to is shot by Pete himself, he still wants the package. The package contains information about the guy he shot who shot down a plane carrying his wife's lover which again was not figured out by anyone but Seagal who knew his name that was never mentioned by anyone else in the film. Overall Pete's role was never explained, he kept getting killed for no reason, and the three times he came across the package that he seems to want, he didn't even tried to walk away with it. I honestly don't think when Seagal wrote this movie he meant for Pete to be killed off so many times. I think instead Seagal completely forgot he killed him and had him re-killed and the director and Pete were probably both trying to explain to Seagal about it but he probably protested by running off to his trailer.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
The thing I'd like to know is if prior to taking his class, you'd have to sign a liability waiver of some sort? That doesn't outright prove he's wrong but at least it'll prove he's aware that his advice is dangerous.
Unfortunately, this guy has a lot of "energy" so you can't stop his class and talk to him like a reasonable person. He yells and if you tried to yell over him, he'd yell louder than you and make you look foolish enough even though you might be right. You shown that video where that guy essentially backed away and was able to shoot him before he's even able to touch the gun. That would be realistically what would happen. He called him a "bad" student. And that's how his training survives. If you notice, he picks out people in the crowd who appears "weak" and he calls them for a demonstration. That one guy he was taking the rifle away couldn't stop giggling and looking at someone in the crowd. That's the kind of people he wants to convince because he isn't acting realistically and just giggling because it's a fun thing to him.
However, CQB training by Duane Dieter which is one of the most popular training in the SF community with SEALs, 75th Rangers, Delta, and SF Green Beret come to train. In the class, Duane makes you wear this huge helmet that you slap punch as you shoot multiple times. The idea behind the training is that you become aware if something is dangerous or not in a split second even though everyone is wearing the same huge helmet. Sometimes he would bring in the same person and that person would say something like, "I'd like a large pizza" and you're supposed to realize he's not a danger and you don't shoot him.
So it's really hard to determine if either of them are serious. Duane's classes are paid by a large government contract. I don't know if Detroit Urban Survival has any PD but his video often shows LE officers or military dressed person. It's unclear if any of his training is taken seriously or not and if so if it is sponsored by any PD.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I love how they're calling it a "science" and "facts" when they tell people to get the vaccine. Yet it is very clear that regardless of vaccine or not, you're capable of spreading the virus. The truth is wearing a mask is far more important than getting the vaccine.
It's unclear why a large portion of the medical community, including nurses and doctors are refusing the vaccine and yet they are very close with people with covid and seen the effects more so than others. Yet in the very same group, fewer people get covid because they are smart enough to be wearing a mask and other protective gear.
When the USS GW got the covid outbreak, a study found that 70% of people who took preventative measures, no matter how small, seem to fair better than those who didn't take any sort of precaution. This included wearing a face mask, washing your hands, staying away from others, and just using common sense.
I remember long ago I would get very sick at work. I didn't understood why and did everything I could to prevent getting sick. So I started documenting what I did and ultimately found that after washing my hands in the bathroom, I would open the door with my raw hands. Ever since I started using napkins to open door, I never got sick again. Maybe it was a coincident or not. I don't know. But if you think in terms like that, you're going to make it through this covid crisis untouched without putting unknown chemical in your body.
Don't just assume because you got the vaccine that you're okay. Try to avoid large social gatherings, wear a mask, and try to associate with the same people you know and seen before daily so that way the chances of you getting near covid is minimal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I don't quite believe these NDE qualify as evidence of life after death.
The reason being is that they usually describe events that took place while they were "there." The human body is amazing. It's like a computer. If I were to cut the power to the CPU on the computer, everything else is still "functioning" but since there is no CPU, everything is just sending signals and receiving signals that can't be processed in any meaningful way. That's the say way when you "die" at the OR. Your eyes are still "seeing" and your ears are still "listening" and your nerves are still "feeling." Signals are being sent to your brain but since your brain isn't functioning it isn't processed like it normally would. As your heart is pumped, blood and oxygen is carried around your body such that it is functioning to some degree.
So when you wake up, these "artifacts" of what you saw, heard, felt, etc are now being processed to some degree. Since you didn't saw it "real time" you're left to speculate on what you saw, heard, and felt so you begin to remember it sort of like a dream instead of real time as if you were there. So you experience these "NDE" only because you're able to process the information that you actually saw, heard, and felt but just wasn't processing it like you are now.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I feel like the media has drawn the wrong conclusion and again made this into a political show about being Anti-Trump or whatnot. Problem is she completely ignored the entire state of Wyoming by instead deciding to "do the right thing" and do this board thing. She ignored the entire inflation, pandemic, rising gas prices, rising food prices, rising cost of living, low wage jobs, the fact that many of her constitutes can't afford medical care, etc, etc, etc. She decided to put that all aside and go for this noble task of grand standing trying to appear like a moderate by standing with the democrat party. If she stood by her state, she would have easily won reelection even if she didn't get anything done. She should have fought for Wyoming citizens, not trying to make political friends.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let me first say I hope Biden gets better. Covid sucks and I hope he is doing well. With that said, his spin team is absolutely ridiculous because they're coming on now trying to spin this around. It seems like every time Biden does or says something, couple days later (hours later in this case), we have to wait to see what his spin team comes up with to explain whatever crap just happened. It's sickening and stupid. Personally I think he should come out like Trump did. He walks up a flight of stairs, stand at the top, and that says, "Hey you know I'm well, I'm better, I'm able, and America is well and strong." But nope, instead his spin team comes up with a silly explanation to blame someone or something. We're a complete joke at this point.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@popermen694 The problem is Alec claims the gun ACCIDENTALLY went off all by itself. However, the FBI lab tested the gun and found it was not able to fire without deliberately pulling the hammer back and pulling the trigger. The other problem is they were not filming at the time. Instead they were setting up the scene, and Alex took the gun and simply fired it at some random direction. The final problem is Alec and the AD said in prior scenes they set up these buffers and ballistic screens just to fire blanks. After the scene, Alec said he was so concerned about a child actor on the set he asked if she was okay just to make sure the gun smoke didn't make her ill or whatnot. Why Alec got so worried about her yet during the day of the accidental shooting, no safety net was set up and Alec, without any regard just pulled the hammer back and attempted to fire the gun?
Lastly, the set was so unsafe, others threatened to walk off set unless Alec and the AD fixed them. It seems to me that other actors and actresses in the industry knew the set was unsafe because of how they were conducted. It remains to be seen exactly what these concerns were, if any, and if it played into the overall problem.
The other problem is blanks and real bullets were mixed on set. They found about a dozen or so actual live rounds mixed with blanks. Some were in boxes while others were just loose sets mixed in.
Alec hired the armorer, he was told by others that there were safety issues, and on top of that earlier in the day hours before the accident Alec and the crew were out back target practicing with the very same firearm. Overall Alec knew the firearm was potentially dangerous and overall Alec knew of others voicing their safety concerns and did nothing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
CNN: Trump bad, Trump bad, Socialism is good, socialism is good, trump bad, trump bad, trump bad, socialism is good, socialism is good, trump bad, trump bad, trump bad, socialism, socialism, obey, obey, socialism, Trump bad, trump bad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zigfield723 I think the fact is live ammunition is not really to blame here because the problem is that Hannah never checked the prop. It was a very simple check to determine if she had live ammunition or props as demonstrated in her court case. All she had to do was literally shake it and you can immediately tell if it was a real live round or not. Alec is also responsible for a few reasons here. One, he knew of the various complaints staff made of Hannah during the production, and even days before several crew members quit, yet Alec did nothing to correct it. Secondly, on the day of the shooting, Alec wanted to get out of there hurry so he told Hannah to not check the firearms as it was wasting time. And thirdly, moments before the deadly shooting, Alec was practicing an unpracticed and unscripted move and Hannah, the head armorer, didn't have time to set up the safe guards and was never told of his new plans so she had no idea if he was doing so safely. In a safe environment, she would have set up ballistics screens and would have double checked the firearm for live/blanks ammunition.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I sort of see Biden's point. Not to say I agree with it but we should have pulled out years ago when it would have been way less devastating to everyone involved. By pulling out suddenly, it sort of removes any sort of needless plan to do anything. Think about it if you were to say step 1 do this, step 2 do that, etc and you actually do those steps you might find well step 1 is possibly but only if a, b, and c happens. Then it turns into months, then years, then they never pull out. So they can just pull out all at once. It's sort of like gambling where you go in, lose millions of dollars, then you say, "Well I can recover some of my losses...." but you know that won't happen and even though you lose a lot by leaving, you'd be better off in the long run.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheSuperappelflap Also, if after you meet her and you realize she's still doing online dating and reading messages, I would immediately leave. Do not even talk to her about and just go. There are a lot of bad women out there and it's all about knowing the red flags and bailing out. I'm pretty sure if this woman claims to be a nice person just wanting a nice guy, then approaching her in person will yield a lot better result than sending her a essay about why you should be together. Just don't take things personally, don't talk about "all" women, and just approach her, find out what she's about, what she's doing, and if she likes you and if it all good, then act in good faith until you find out enough info to make an informed choice. Just be clear that you want to be exclusive, that you want to be with her, and see what she says. If she is really an honest person, she'll take the time to tell you what is on her mind and what she might think of your relationship. It's painful to hear someone say she doesn't want to be with you but the sooner you discover that, the better off you are so find out early, ask early, and don't turn into a simp begging her to stay.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kristing9154 I wouldn't. His name would essentially be a "brand." So that means Dog the Bounty hunter would make millions off you and meanwhile he's not obligated to give you anything in return. So with that in mind, if my son was a national news, I would not accept anyone looking to make money off my missing son. I would want the police, FBI, or ATF to find him, and bring him home, not someone who is going to make money off it when they sell it to some network. Plus who knows what Dog the bounty hunter might do to my son. I would not want my son to be detained by a man who is goig to make money off him or try to get him to confess to something he might have not done. If I knew Dog the bounty hunter captured my son, I would immediately call the police or FBI and would want him immediately handed over to the proper authorities then I would want a lawyer present for all questionings.
So yeah, kudos to the parents for protecting their son. I think they're doing everything right despite the national headlines. He's not wanted for murder, btw, just questioning at this point. They have no proof he did anything to anyone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When I was growing up, malls had a special place. I remember my mom would go shop and I would hit all my favorite stores: Electronic Boutique, Hobby Town, arcade, then the food court. They also had the KB Toy Stores and the discount game rack was a big hit for me, and sometimes I could buy something off there. Usually the food court and arcades like the two top spots. Go in, play some, go grab samples from the Chinese food place, then come back to the arcade. This one mall I went to had a pet shop and I would go in there and look at all the dogs and sometimes buy a little pig ear for my dog back at home. It was fun times. Then around the early 2000s, I just never went back to the mall. I think in the last 10 years, I only recall ever going to the mall maybe once or twice.
Personally I think to make malls profitable they need to offer something aside from stores. They need to offer some sort of amusement like arcades or a fun center where you can go in and do stuff with the family. Just having stores a bit boring. I don't really see anything unique anymore. I go in a mall and yeah, I'm like I can buy that same exact item from Amazon or eBay and I don't even look at it or even price compare. I just buy it off Amazon or eBay when I can.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I feel like our country is moving to a dangerous position. The government itself cannot tell you what to say but private companies can control what you put on their platform. This is the loophole and the problem is those in power only want their side's opinion to matter. Right now the left can simply say "election fraud" is a unproven statement and therefore anyone sharing that must be blocked. So they won't hear or listen to it. Yet if GOP was in power and prevented these companies from blocking conservative users, then the left would be crying foul. Twitter and Facebook and YouTube/Google are all massive platforms where people shape their opinions. If such a company can block certain information and that persuades a voter to vote differently, then I think we should most certainly look at how these companies are handling. Not to mention many politicians launch their platform on these social media sites. Do you think if someone was powerful enough, they could simply get these companies to block lesser candidates to insure they win?
Think that's a joke? Try looking at Russia, China, New Zealand, UK, Germany, etc, and you'll see that it is entirely plausible. We're moving to a dangerous time. I don't agree or like this MyPillow guy but he should have every right to voice his opinion on a platform that hosts other political opinions. Why should one political opinion be held, but another one not? Just because it makes one side look bad?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@4204-k2f Also keep in mind that neither side gets things done. Joey Biden was voted in office with the idea that he was going to get things done. But as seen, they can't get things done. Too much people, too much crap trying to go through. Everyone has their own idea of what is right and nothing gets done as a result. During the Trump presidency, the democrats had their best chance to pass some of these bills, put them on the desk of Trump, but instead they choose to go after useless Russian investigations and looked for ways to discredit the other side.
Point is, the media, the politician's, and everyone, including Joe Biden at a national level is trying to divide this country into two. Meanwhile, corporations are making more money, middle class is paying more taxes, and nobody is able to do anything about it other than point fingers and get nothing done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I finally got around to watching this movie last night. I don't think this review was entirely fair, to be honest. To me, this is surprisingly one of Seagal's better movies of recent. That's not saying much as it is only about 60% coherent but it's still a pretty good plot compared to his other films that made 0 sense. The whole "snitch" thing with that kid is somewhat a subplot of its own that makes zero sense. So the kid witnessed his son's murder, and picked up the killer's gun and knew who the killer was. But for some reason, he was trying to protect his big brother from Seagal's murder rampage because he was worried he'd find the gun and think his brother did it.... whaaaaaaa? Made zero sense because Seagal broke into his house, then he finally made the big reveal on who the real killer was and Seagal decides to go murder that person but tells the kid he better be right this time around.... yeah as I said 60% coherent. Then at the end of the movie, the main villain who turns out not to be the actual killer but kept trying to kill Seagal throughout the movie and even shot him once, was let go by Seagal because Seagal claims his only reason was to get to his son's killer. Yet they're all the reason behind his son's death because the corrupt cop was using the drug dealer to make money and enforce dominance on the streets by killing people such as his son. So him letting him go didn't really make sense. Also, at the start of the film, they put the word out on the street that he's looking for his son's killer and Seagal even goes around telling people he's looking for his son's killer. Yet the main gangster who runs the street, wouldn't he want the heat off his back and would easily give up the cop who killed the other cop to the guy that is going around killing all his people? Overall a silly movie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ByddinRhyddidCymru That's socialism in a nutshell. On paper, socialism is about distributing wealth so it benefits the public which sounds great on paper. Realistically, what happens is what you see in Venezuela: the super rich (who were rich before the revolution) stays rich, middle class gets removed, everyone is poor and the government doesn't give a crap by not spending money on the things that make a country people rich. In USA, if socialism takes hold, which it seems like it well, that means companies like Walmart, Amazon, etc will be the only stores you find, small businesses will be gone and hospital, that are already swamped and overcrowded with people will be like what you see on this video. Meanwhile, politicians will be very rich, (which many of them currently are) and will continue to pass laws that keep them in power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vcash1112 I'm in my late 30s. I started at crossfit when I was 32. Before crossfit, I was a runner/swimmer and only done weightlifting back in my teens and early 20s. So I would say I'm a bit more knowledgeable about what sort of "scaling" I would need to do for a particular lift despite not doing so regularly. At my crossfit box, I'm seeing people age 40+, 50+ even 60+. One couple with an injury are in their 50s. There's one plankowner who been with the gym since the start and she been there for a little over a decade and is in her late 40s, early 50s. Average, I would say about late 20s though. Not one of us had any major injuries from crossfit. The coaches there very much monitor and will not let anyone go rx.
Big thin about crossfit is you don't have to do the exercise the way they say you should do it. Like the other day it said to deadlift 315lbs for men, and I just scaled it down to 235lbs, and had a blast. Had I done it at 315lbs, I might have injured myself, no doubt.
I think a combination of doing the right weight and the right movements or scaled/alternate movement, you can enjoy crossfit safely without injuries. As I said it might be the culture of the gym/box, but from what I've seen a lot of places will monitor you and tell you to scale appropriately. if you don't listen and get injured in such a case, then the fault is your own not because of crossfit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@axemenace6637 I don't find that he won being "fishy." What I find "fishy" is that the media is calling it a clear win when some areas are won by only 0.5% to 1% and they're saying any doubts to that cannot be brought up. I'm sure Biden ultimately won, but I just find it strange and odd that the media is calling him the winner and anyone who questions those tight areas to be sort of odd. I also think him winning by 5 million sounds like a lot but when you consider 150 million people voted, that doesn't seem that large of a margin. When George HW Bush lost his second term attempt, a lot of people say it is similar to Joe's win by 5 million margin. But when you look at the numbers, Clinton had nearly 45 millions of the 105 million votes where as Bush got nearly 40 million of the votes whereas the total votes is in the area of 109 million votes. So the margin is very clear that Clinton won by a large fraction of the votes whereas in 2020 election, Biden won similarly to 5 million votes, but when you look at the 150 million votes, Trump has 70 million of that. That's not that big of a difference when you think about it in terms of it being nearly 50-50 where as in the 1992 election, it was a 43 % to 37.5% of the votes. In other words, the country wasn't as split as it was in 1992. A lot of people wanted Clinton, but at the same time it's clear they didn't want either party. In today's election, it's either GOP or Dem and it's getting to a point where if you're not on one side, the other side hates you.
If the media was on the side of Biden, they should be preaching what he ran on and that is unity of the country. Instead they pick sides saying either Trump won or Biden won and anyone who questions it is an outsider. The margin is very clear and it was/is a close race. The media shouldn't say anyone is the winner and should simply report that there are questions about the 0.5% to 1% area and that they plan a recount or a contest on the results. Either way the media shouldn't force an agenda down people's throat.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@frvicboi Of course not. The thing CNN, Fox, or any liberal news network won't tell you is that 97% of society won't be affected by covid-19. Covid-19 seems to really be harmful for people with pre-existing conditions and/or being elderly. With that in mind, since most of Europe and United States already had a health crisis prior to COVID-19 given that a vast majority of the population are either overweight or obese and diseases like high blood pressure and diabetic are common, it's no surprise that something like covid-19 is affecting a large percent of the population. When a disease or virus affects just 1% of the society, that is a major concern for hospitals because of the influx of new people coming in. They may not save some of those people. It seems like now we're in the political mindset that we're to be isolated and stores are close because we don't want to virus to spread. No we don't want to overwhelm the hospitals and slowly opening back up and letting people get sick will be the most helpful way to build a natural herd immunity.
With that in mind, Biden won't solve anything. As I said the enforcement ultimately comes down to the local cities and health department. There is already a shortage of police and health department is not exactly an enforcement agency so chances are if laws are passed, it won't be applied to a large segment of the population. Also, the natural course of heard immunity is that after so long, people naturally build immunity to the disease because the affected population is isolated. That's why the 1918 flu simply "disappeared" and it took decades of research by America and other countries to figure out why the 1918 flu went like it did. That created what modern things we see like iodine, rubbing alcohol and many other vaccine is a result of the 1918 pandemic.
With that said, Biden is coming in during the uptick time of the virus. By this time next year, we'll have 400-600k dead in America and probably several millions dead across the globe. Biden won't "solve" it any better than anywhere else. It'll simply disappear naturally within a year or two.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shenanigans2749 But you see you're trying to be political about it. What I'm getting at is CNN makes it out like they're the noble people who go after the bad politicians and call them out. Now I'm not saying right-wing media like Fox is innocent in all this. But what I am getting at is that CNN and CBS are both trying to scare us into believing there will be this "3rd wave" of coronavirus by bringing on all these experts. Keep in mind right now this is AFTER Trump and for all intent and purpose, CNN is supposed to act like all will be resolved now with Biden in office. Instead they're trying to scare us. What if in mid-December a CNN reporter asked Trump about the covid-19, he tells the reporter it's going to be over and there will be no issues. So the report says, "Hmm, that's strange. I'm going to dig into this." He comes on air, tells us that, "Hey look Trump is lying to you. This is big time, they're going to have to close the airports, closed the borders, etc or else we're going to have a lot of deaths on our hands."
But nope, none of that happens. After the fact CNN and CBS act like they're all noble watching our backs and warning us about a new variant like it's going to be worst than the last one. Yeah right. Nice try CNN, and CBS. Ain't going to work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I feel these researches are inconclusive for a reason. Same reason why oil companies tend to have inconclusive data on researching green house effect.They have billions of dollars and any time a research comes out to say their stuff is bad, they can equally push out billions more in advertising and push out misleading researches to counter said research.
The best, most common sense approach is to avoid soda when you can. I have been a huge Diet Soda drinker for about the last 24 years. I'm a bit of an excessive drinker and yes, I started to noticed I couldn't breathe, exercising a lot but no weight loss, high blood pressure, fat around the belly, extreme bloating feeling, etc, etc. I couldn't figure it out because whenever I would research about diet soda, I couldn't get anything conclusive. I just thought maybe I am eating too much or eating the wrong food or something. Then I just decided to ditch all diet soda. Kept eating what I was eating before. Massive headache for days, weeks, until finally I broke through and felt a heck of a lot better. Better than ever before and I started to notice a lot of improvements with my life.
So I don't know. You can say whatever you want about my experience with Diet Soda, but overall, after stopping, I feel a lot better and things just started to work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1