Youtube comments of (@shadowminister4090).

  1. 15
  2. 9
  3. 9
  4. 7
  5. 6
  6. 6
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 3
  14. I partially agree, but maybe have a very different slant on it. Paul Keating established Super (SGC) @ 3%, with the longer-term goal of it increasing to 12%. It was an anti-poverty concept, because most people don't save. It was also intended to take pressure off the aged pension and with an aging population; in principal, a good concept. Keating had earlier introduced Capital Gains Tax, with tax only payable on your gains, after CPI adjustments. So, even from when Keating created Super, it became attractive, to avoid CGT. Along comes Costello and he axes CPI indexation for CGT calculations. He replaced that with CGT on 50% of your gains. (No discount on assets held less than 12mths). You could argue one way or the other: discounted CGT vs the loss of tax protection thru indexation. At the time, I was concerned about the loss of indexation. Costello, famously encouraged families to have a kid for each parent and one for the country, as a means of encouraging a larger population base to fund future budgets (and the Old Age Pension). One of the "carrot" options was to make Super "Tax-Free" from age 60. It was to encourage people to stay in the workforce an extra 5 years and potentially not exhaust their Super earlier and double dip into the Aged Pension. In 2017, ScoMo, as Treasurer, tightened up the Assets you could have (including in Super) and adjusted Deeming Rates, to force people to spend their own money and reduce the impact on Pensions and the Budget. The LNP also introduced the Downsizers Super contribution, allowing people to drop up to $300,000 each into Super, if they were downsizing their home. Behind the smoke, was a reality that you then homeowner would be losing a tax free asset for Old Age Pension purposes, with Super being an included Asset class. It should also be remembered that over time, the LNP froze the increases to the SGC. Keating's plan was that it would have increased it to 12% much quicker. With the benefit of hindsight, there have been 2 decisions that have had the biggest impact; 1.Discounted CGT: aka 50% Free Money and 2.Tax Free Super at 60: aka More Free Money. I'm more than happy to take my Free Money Super at 60, because I worked an extra 5-6 years to get that privilege. I now have more Super and won't be entitled to the Old Age Pension. I'm not going to be a drag on the Budget. On the other hand, the 50% CGT discount, in my opinion has been one of the key drivers in booming real estate prices. Maybe that's a problem? Yes, those on high incomes (which has never included me) and those with SMSFs are always going to benefit the most from these schemes, but it's not entirely the fault of Costello or ScoMo. You could argue that over the years, the LNP put the brakes on Super, with things like maximum Super balances, maximum amounts you could salary sacrifice etc. The positive thing is that these schemes do create savings. They do take the pressure off the Old Age Pension etc, so they are not all bad. While mostly, the article attacked the generosity of the LNP, it should be noted that when in power, the ALP didn't change the legislation. They were happy to protect their votes. The ALP commissioned Ken Henry to review the entire tax system but mostly shelved the review. Shorten tried to make changes but in order to protect his voter base, he wanted to grandfather the legislation. He then got lost trying to exempt different classes of taxpayers. If legislation needs to grandfathered, it's bad legislation. He lost the unloseable election because of it. ScoMo's mate Josh, flattened the tax rates so that most people will pay no more than 30%, which I think will come back to bite us. Albo, had his chance, but elected to let those tax cuts continue. Put simply, no politician of any persuasion are going to put their election or re-election at risk. Don't just blame Peter Costello.
    3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1