Comments by "" (@badluck5647) on "Ukraine Needs to Go on a Counteroffensive: Esper" video.

Ukraine's last successful offensive was with Toyotas.
1
@ExtrovertedCenobite Russia has fled from three major cities and it's only success is capturing a salt mine. Please explain the mental gymnastics required to think Russia is winning their unprovoked war against Ukraine?
1
@ExtrovertedCenobite You are obviously are very, very gullible as most of your claims can be easily debunked by common sense. For example, why is Russia retreating so much when Ukrainian causalities are so high that it would obviously make their army combat ineffective? If Russia has air superiority, then why are they so incapable of stopping HIMAR attacks? If the Ukrainian army is just preteens and the elderly, then why does Russia need to mobilize hundreds of thousands of men? Your fascist colors are showing by your unabashed glee at the idea of civilians including children dying thanks to Russian war crimes.
1
@ExtrovertedCenobite If there is such a surplus of artillery shells, then why did Russia State TV go from bragging about firing 40,000 shells/day to 8,000 shells/day? If Russia has such a surplus of precision missiles, then why are missile strikes now less frequent, less accurate, and consists of fewer missiles? If Russian causalities are so low, then why did Putin call for a mobilization after promising he wouldn't? Clearly, Russia still has plenty of tanks since they are happy to leave so many behind for Ukraine to have during Russia's lightning retreats. Russia is so generous that they have supplied more tanks to Ukraine during the war that NATO seems stingy by comparison.
1
@Josh93B93 It is unlikely the attrition rate is equal as Ukraine captured Kherson with a siege and Kharkiv through a thunder run, while Russia just keeps throwing themselves at heavily fortified positions to capture a few meters/day. Ukraine quality is better. According to Russian paratroopers on Telegram, the recruits sent to help them are poorly trained, poorly motivated, and poorly equipped. This probably due to Russia's mobilization being so desperately quick. Meanwhile, Ukrainians have been training and rotating soldiers for the better part of a year. In addition, NATO equipment seems to be of better quality than ancient Soviet equipment that has clearly not been maintained. Lastly, Russian numbers only look good on paper. The number of troops listed can't all be sent to Ukraine unless the Navy sends all their sailors, the nuclear missle forces abandon their silos, the border guards abandon station, and Russian occupiers leave Georgia and Moldova. After 250,000+ fled the last mobilization, I also question how much reserves Russia actually has.
1
@billgriffin8332 Russians said the same thing before Ukraine launched a counteroffensive to capture Kherson and the Kharkiv region.
1
@billgriffin8332 Just because Russia may have some forces remain in Crimea in 2024 doesn't mean a counteroffensive won't push Russia back.
1