Comments by "" (@badluck5647) on "Why Modi Is Pouring Billions Into This Ancient Indian City | WSJ Breaking Ground" video.

  1. Ayodhya and Dome of the Rock are controversial for building on top of another's holy site. The Vatican and Mecca don't do that.
    21
  2. @Geopolitics-gt4fb You take pride in destroying a centuries old place of worship? Most would call that bigoty.
    12
  3. Because there is no controversy on holy sites in Jerusalem?
    4
  4. When did Hindi nationalist become bigger trolls than the Russians?
    2
  5.  @historicallegends3702  By "foreign", you mean Muslims have been a part of India for over fourteen hundred years?
    2
  6. Your Islamophobia just proves their point.
    2
  7.  @DoctorJaneDoe  Strange to brag about knowing your ancestors due to a caste system. Because ethnic and religious discrimination wasn't enough, you had to find a unique form of discrimination?
    1
  8.  @shubhamsaini4770  We get it. Proud racists.
    1
  9.  @tukaidas1272  What pagans are complaining?
    1
  10.  @noobgamer-xl3jk  Isreali want to destroy the Dome of the Rock that was built over their ancient temple to rebuild their Jewish temple. The international community agrees that is wrong to destroy a holy site for the sake of an ancient wrong. Your fake persecution complex doesn't work outside your borders.
    1
  11.  @holywarrior5719  Which Arabs? The Sunni Gulf Arabs? Multicultural North African Arabs? Shia Iraqi Arabs? Are you cherry picking one subgroup of another subgroup of Muslims to justify your point?
    1
  12.  @kgaurav7  I love how you rac ist nationalists keep ignoring Jerusalem because a holy city shared by three religions doesn't fit your narrative that helps justify your discrimination against a fifth of India's population.
    1
  13.  @Anna-pm3fq  Muslims have been in India for 14 hundred years. They are native to India despite what you bigots say.
    1
  14.  @plusultra7258  Because Hindis have never committed atrocities on Muslims, Christians, or Sikhs?
    1
  15. It would be the same reason it would be controversial if Christian government policy in the United States openly discriminated against Hindis. A secular democracy shouldn't have second class citizens.
    1