Comments by "" (@badluck5647) on "Ben Wallace becoming NATO secretary general is 'a long shot'" video.

  1.  @sugoidessho  Obviously, but if the US wants other countries to contribute more of their fair share, then it would be more effective to have the message come from within the EU instead of from the US or UK.
    4
  2.  @tony_1980  To be fair, it wouldn't be the first time a woman got a position that they were deeply unqualified for because a liberal party wanted to appoint a woman to up the party's progressive credentials. With that out of way, it is also sexist to just assume every woman is unqualified without looking at her resume and what the job entails. The two female prime ministers seem very qualified based on the little information I have.
    2
  3. Poland isn't diplomatic enough for the position.
    2
  4. I do enjoy the idea of a women emasculating Putin by laughing off his petty threats.
    2
  5. The position is more diplomatic than anything else.
    2
  6. That is because NATO isn't an offensive group. It is a defensive alliance.
    2
  7. The job probably shouldn't go to an American or Brit as EU members already feel like NATO is dominated by the two countries.
    2
  8. No. Zelenskyy would just have NATO fight Russia on Ukraine's behalf.
    1
  9. The job is a diplomatic job as it is more about navigating international politics than actual military strategy. This is why a head of state is preferred over a Secretary of Defense.
    1
  10. Gabbard is a clown 🤡 .
    1