Comments by "" (@kellygreenii) on "How to KEEP A WOMAN: the past is prologue" video.

I think that the danger is getting caught up in trying to get to please her with external things. I think that Bad Boys sink their hooks into women because what they get from him is ATTACHED TO HIM. She is chasing after something he never is willing to give her. I think the key isn’t to give her stuff to to be a puzzle that she can never quite solve. You are good to her…but you are also a mystery that she keeps finding new things with each layer she peels back. So if she leaves you…she loses YOU. Women want to know that you are a man that other women want…but that you chose her. That makes her feel good…and she’ll fight to keep that.
2
@jth_printed_designs …and greed is a bottomless pit. Which is why “Happy Wife, Happy Life” fails. You can’t give enough or do enough to make someone else happy. You will eventually run out of stuff. Thats Tarraban’s point. She’s eventually going to run out of toys she can collect. What I’m talking about is investing in your seas a person…and then letting her have the fun of going along for the ride of enjoying what you are becoming. Don’t confuse that for using her for sex and then forgetting about her until next time. That is not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about being such an interesting and dynamic person that she enjoys interacting with you everyday. Because she never gets to the point where there’s nothing new to learn about you or to experience of you.
2
@jth_printed_designs Not about more. It’s about “different”. If you keep growing and evolving, there will always be new things for her to learn about you. New things to teach her.
1
@jth_printed_designs Not the same thing. What I’m talking about isn’t being done for her. It’s being done for yourself, and keeping her interest is simply a convenient side-effect.
1
@jth_printed_designs You’re not listening to what I’m saying. You’re reacting to what you think I’m saying. My point has nothing to do with material investment other than to say it is a faulty strategy. My point is to invest in your own growth as person. It is a gift that keeps on giving to her. That kind of investment is something that she can’t get elsewhere…or take either her in a divorce. Because it’s a part of you.
1
@jth_printed_designs Still not listening. Go back and watch the video and then put what I said into its proper context. The issue is what is being given and familiarity with what is being given. What he is talking about is the emotional stimulation women need and get from novel experiences. If you rely upon externals for that you will run out of new experiences… and she can divorce you and get that sort of novelty elsewhere. What you keep missing is that when you continue to invest in yourself AS A PERSON, interacting with you remains novel. Because you keep growing and changing… and she can’t get that anywhere else and she can’t take it with her in a divorce. But if you let yourself stagnate as a person? You can invest as much time and energy as you want. She will eventually grow bored of you.
1
@jth_printed_designs That’s because most men think women are attracted to niceness and the things you do for them. Wrong rule book.
1
@jth_printed_designs Okay. Unwilling to listen and determined to be right and helpless. Got it. Good luck.
1
@jth_printed_designs No. Wrong again. I’m just old enough that I accept that it’s a waste of time to try to reason with someone who is arguing emotion. You will never be able to invest enough in a woman to keep her happy. Because you are missing a key variable to the equation. I can’t compel you to open your eyes and see it. So…I’m not going to waste my time. What makes a woman happy is not what makes her horny….and she is not going to stay (happily) long term with any man who doesn’t do both. Since women no longer are financially dependent, they no longer have to stay with men who are just providers. If you only give her the happy end, she’ll eventually get bored and cheat with(or leave you for) a guy who can stir her emotions. It is possible for the same man to do both. But he has to accept that he must do both.
1
@jth_printed_designs You’re assuming I did that for your benefit. I didn’t. 😎. Bye. You’re still arguing with yourself. Leave me out of it. You do not understand my point or Psychack’s point.
1
@jth_printed_designs …and twisted it to mean what you wanted it to mean so you can go on believing what you want to believe. Which has nothing to do with what either psychacks or myself are talking about.
1