Comments by "S S" (@SS-yj2le) on "Trans athletes in women's sports: Is this fair?" video.

  1. Actually. Women slightly outcompete men at that distance.
    2
  2.  @ViggoHinrichsen  The 1% edge women have at that distance speaks for itself.
    1
  3.  @blacktigerpaw1  Yet, the evidence says otherwise. The science is the one supporting me and also, you can't really call them males after transition due to gender and sex definitions.
    1
  4.  @billweasley1382  I know that. I'm just going off of the data presented here.
    1
  5. There is no person that is willing to go through the hell of transition just to do that. Plus, transition weakens to muscles far too much for it to be feasible and that is against women who are freaks of nature themselves. Many of them having androgynism. In those studies too, most of the differences are due to other factors like height. Lastly, a person like that would never win.
    1
  6.  @Cjeska  "if you were a mediocre athlete as a man and now break records as a "woman" you do not belong in female sports".
    1
  7. There would likely be a small number of trans male athletes. A number of them do very well.
    1
  8. The studies are all incomplete and do not even account for other differences like height which are bigger factors. The trans women do not have an advantage from their birth sex based on these studies alone. Also, trans women should also have athletic opportunity as well. Denying it to them simply for the way they are born is wrong.
    1
  9.  @wwlittlejOfficial  The studies are not conclusive and Sabine even states it herself. She even goes over the other factors that the studies do not take into account like age, height, size, and more. The other athletics have even taken those factors into consideration like the weight classes in wrestling and between those of the same cis gender athletes. There also isn't a single one of those studies with a sample size beyond 1000 which is the bare minimum standard to even be considered useful. How do you know they would always have an advantage assuming it were to be true? There also isn't even one that goes beyond three years and the Brazilian study which was the only one Sabine was able to find, found no advantage at all. It appears you don't understand why trans people go through the huge hurdle and mess of taking years of transition. People don't choose to become transgender. They either are or they aren't. The changes are irreversible. Even if there was somehow one guy who was going to attempt to try it somehow, they will fail to even get past the psychologist to even have it prescribed. Even if they were able to get through that, they would definitely fail to endure the years of grueling transition. If somehow, they were able to skip all of that just for the sake of argument and be at the place you are thinking of, they will have to go through all their training again just to even have a chance against cis women as trans women generally under-perform in athletics. Especially when women's sports are dominated by cos women with androgynism. Also, they will have to live in an awkward mental state on top of it as well. There is not a chance that they would make any significant athletic achievements. Why are you telling me to not be triggered? Also, athletics is also a business. Everyone wants money. No. You are denying money from women who have no proven advantage due to their birth sex. Also, even if they did, you would also have to remove the women who have androgynism as well who are the main ones setting the records. Saying blatant advantage and repeating it doesn't make it true.
    1
  10.  @wwlittlejOfficial  Unethical behaviors as in steroids and gene editing. She also made an example with the women's basketball team from Central American competing with another one and getting decimated due to the big height difference. No, not exactly. My point is it is impossible for a person to cheat simply by being transgender. I am saying there is no advantage and them trying to cheat that way is pointless as they would not be able to do it. Don't make strawmans of what I argue. Cheating with different means. Also, trans women literally have to be on estrogen for a certain amount of time to even be considered to compete and they evaluate them to make certain of it. They are hard on just cis women alone. All trans women competing have transitioned solely for their own bodily choice and comfort. None have transitioned for a competitive advantage and to claim so is a conspiracy and a failure in understanding trans people. For whoever these "transwomen are", they wouldn't even get away with it to begin with as you also don't seem to understand what the hormones do to the body. They don't just make you weaker. They affect your emotions, change your body shape, and more. A cis person trying to do this will fail to even start the transition let alone get through it and even be able to train after it. In fact, it could possibly be argued that trans women are actually at a disadvantage in women's sports due to having to be on these hormones. If that were the case, then you would be right to exclude them, but for the wrong reason.
    1
  11.  @wwlittlejOfficial  We're talking about women's sports. No one is talking about banning them from sports in general except for some extremist conspiratorial nutjobs. She never states that they are conclusive nor do even the studies themselves. They are general trends that do not account for the numerous other factors. They are not even close to conclusive enough as Sabine state herself, there are numerous other advantages that have a bigger difference than the gender. You also know that people born the male sex tend to be taller on average which she states is a huge factor. Those studies didn't account for it. Also, how one would know how fast the bird is to an aircraft is with a study of the aircraft and the birds themselves. Some birds are very fast with the peregrine falcon being able to fly nearly half the speed of a mid-air flight of the Boeing 747 and almost twice as fast than some of the fastest aircraft in world war one. Trans women have artificial disadvantage which evens out the playing field. Hence, gender would no longer be an advantage. Rather, it would be other factors like height and weight. The basketball girls actually makes the point that there ought to be height classes similar to how there are weight classes. Also, by that reasoning, wouldn't women have to be forced to overcome adversity to these people who would according to you, have that natural advantage? This is a logical inconsistency. You don't tell me how I feel. I say how I feel and how I feel is irrelevant to the topic. I believe that the questioning has motivated reasoning which is hatred of trans people. It is similar to what politicians do in redistricting to cheat elections.
    1
  12. 99%? Trans women generally underperform if they even make if to begin with. Also, are you implying trans men should be banned from men’s sports?
    1
  13. She didn’t make a claim. All she did was explain how complicated the whole issue is. Watch it again.
    1
  14. Trans women are normal people like everyone else. In fact, when transitioned, many of them end up also facing misogyny as well on top of transphobia.
    1