Comments by "S S" (@SS-yj2le) on "ABC News" channel.

Then you must not really travel anywhere and have likely never been to Tuscon or Phoenix or the Navajo reservation or the southern border areas.
13
How many times do you think Captain Obvious?
6
The fog comes from the San Francisco Bay and the wet estuaries near Sacramento. There is no mountain or hill area blocking the fog from coming through those areas and they get very high winds. Also, the Dutch have a large area of their country because they reclaimed it from the North Sea. One doesn't try to change nature, only use nature in ways to direct it into something people want.
5
Not my king. My country didn’t kick the mess out of England after the declaration of Independence for nothing.
3
Hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and sinkholes.
3
Just don’t.
2
If you don’t care about covid-19, then I’m not going to even care about the flu. I won’t even vaccinate for the flu.
2
The pole shift isn’t significant enough to cause this. The warmer weather is pushing the normal cells that provide rain in the west during winter farther north which affects the weather patterns of the cells that bring rain in other regions.
2
Don’t care and even then, it is not that much stress. Get over yourselves and your downplayed and exaggerated issues you force on everyone while pretending to be lenient on people.
2
@sexyblackjag The fog from the San Francisco definitely makes across the Bay. I lived in the east Bay and got fog from across the Bay. The Tule fog is more influenced by recent rains and what is in the delta, but is also influenced from the moisture and wind from the San Francisco Bay. Especially going out in Sacramento where there is still so much wetland that is uninterrupted until reaching the Bay. In the city, the hills shield the eastern side, but they still do get it. Also, Tule Fog also can go the opposite direction and push fog through the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco and the eastern and southern area of the city and Bay.
2
Other water sources and the fact that most water diverted from rivers are used for agriculture.
2
I remember thinking that the way she was on the show when I was just a 7 year old kid in northern California was her actual personality. Then seeing her take that photo years later and getting put in a bad light and everyone showing disappointment. I cannot believe that all of that was going on for all of that time.
2
@Itsmedicinal You do realize that you have to move those billions of dollars worth of farming infrastructure and crops, right? How exactly do you do that? This is like telling Mexico City to move off of its lake bed. How would you even do it if it were even the best decision? Also, they can do digging operations like they did with the lower San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento River to allow a smaller area to hold more water. Also, I live in San Jose, California born and raised. Lived in San Diego, Los Angeles, Oakland, and San Francisco as well. I'm guessing you are either not from California or don't even understand basic infrastructure development if you are making this crude assumption.
2
@evanR09-2 How do you relocate billions of dollars' worth of farmland and infrastructure that can literally be seen from space? I am a Californian and we do need water. At the same time, us and the whole world needs food and unless you have an amazing crane that can lift countless square miles worth of all this, we won't have it and we will only have half of the very uses that water is needed for. You also have fertility differences in soils too and location preferences. How do you even ensure these people are even willing to even relocate, let alone capable of doing the job the same as before under different conditions? The other main location for them to relocate is the Sacramento Valley which is a very different area from the San Joaquin. Good for farming, but still different. It being much farther north even likely has a significant sun-light difference.
2
Sad that people are voting for the people who are partly making the problem worse while blaming Biden. Not only heartless, but also bad economics just as Roosevelt said with the great depression.
1
@lizzieb6311 Below average poverty rate with this and better homelessness reporting than other states. Can’t buy anything cheap if you have no money to begin with.
1
@ThomasSmoth-rj4zt The population decline is quite slow and a lot of people move back here as well. For more, California contributes far more than it takes from the federal government. That is completely wrong.
1
@austin7037 Why are homeless less than.5% of the population who also happen to be majority people who would be in mental wards that had been shut down by Reagan here? Also counting the fact that the housing in San Francisco and LA is cramp due to everyone wanting to live here and limiting the amount of available housing.
1
@austin7037 No. It is because you can’t pay for a house that is already taken or doesn’t exist.
1
@FOAB-Carlos Really doesn’t when it is less than .5% of the population, most of those homeless have mental issues where they are mentally disabled to an extreme, and that one can only build so much in a small space.
1
People make it about money unfortunately.
1
@oanna1221 You said eventually for the pole shift and claimed that a new river gorge will develop. The pole shift isn't affecting this significantly and will not be SIGNIFICANT enough on its own to cause it at ANY point. I think I need to fly a plane ad with this over your place.
1
Wasn’t the great reset suppose to happen over a year and a half ago? I’m still waiting.
1
@tonysmith2045 I'm so sorry for having a life rather than wasting my time online with meaningless conspiracies where I don't even change anything anyways
1
@tonysmith2045 For one, you are assuming that I have some type of belief that something is or isn't happening by that statement alone. Two, it obviously takes years for said events to happen, but that isn't what the people who said the great reset said. They said that it was going to happen once Biden got into office. Three, playing a video game would probably contribute more to society than whatever would come out of this conspiracy. Especially after last year with what reddit pulled off with gaming stocks and the numerous uses people have made out of gaming. Fourth, assuming this is even possible let alone real, what are you actually doing about it?
1
Are you actually stupid Hillary? Even the 1000 quarter pounder humans know that.
1
@fuzzysham5926 Ok. The chicken bird brains.
1
I’m going to give it to my family just because you said this.
1
@reygallegos4912 The San Francisco fog itself reaches as far inland as Modesto. It has even been recorded on satellites reaching that far inland before receding. Though unsure if itself reaches that far south often as the central valley is huge, the conditions produced from the winds coming from the Bay Area influence the formation of Tule Fog after the rains even down there. Various rains that reach the Sacramento Valley are strengthened or produced from the Bay which influence the formation of the fog in the central and southern areas when it doesn't rain in those areas. It is the farming capital of the world. That area loses that farming, the world agriculture industry is going to get it ridiculously hard. To keep that water, there will need to be new waterways for this water to go.
1
Doesn’t make sense. A doctor is suppose to always take what the patient says into consideration in what is going on there. A doctor should also always without exception, have great self control. One without these isn’t fit for the field.
1
This is really bad. The world’s largest supplier of food is dealing with this.
1
Other thing is we still do not know what will be the final outcome of the infection.
1
Southwest. Rather get water from the Columbia and farther north from Canada and Alaska.
1
Seriously. How would this even actually work? Especially as what is feminine and masculine is subjective. Is a boy wearing a punk shirt drag? It wouldn’t even be outside gender as the colors use to be the other way around. What about the Whig wearing people who founded the country? What about men wearing boots with big heels? What about the Scots? Especially as Tennessee has a very high percentage of people with Scottish heritage with a number who even wear kilts. Also, if so concerned about children being exposed to inappropriate stuff, just have the drag queens cover everything and keep everything appropriate. Why ban the whole thing instead of simply legislating it? Out of all laws that have passed in Tennessee, this has to be one of the very ones that makes the least amount of sense.
1
Pink shirt I mean’t.
1
@onionsavoya1506 I literally answered it. The OTHER WATER SOURCES. Groundwater. De-salinization. Aquaducts from other locations like Los Angeles has with Owen's valley. The bottled water of the region coming from Lake Arrowhead.
1
@onionsavoya1506 I forgot. You can't understand science. All of this is like a different language.
1
@onionsavoya1506 Water doesn't come from spontaneous generation. So yes. It does matter.
1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WBpV8pNYBIQ&t=936s It is somewhere in the video discussing the election odds.
1
They said 1890s in this video.
1
Consequences of not masking and vaccinating you half whit. Then again, a worthless person like yourself isn’t even worth trying to convince. I’m pro-zero covid, but believe in doing nothing about this now and simply creating a separate society from worthless dunces like you who ruin everything for everyone else and cry about rights to harm others being infringed. Make me sick figuratively and literally despite having caught absolutely nothing for 4 years.
1
You realize that area has a portion of the largest food supplier on the planet right? If that lake stays, there is going to need to be some serious new projects for that area to redirect that water elsewhere.
1
@onelove7883 How do you go about those other options? How do you relocate billions of dollars worth of farmland and infrastructure? The other places they would grow are vastly different. The soils farther south are less fertile and have less water, east is sandier and drier, west is too rocky, farther north near Sacramento already has loads of farmland that definitely risk making the area very cramp, and farther north into the upper valley has significantly less sunlight that can complicate growing certain food. Any kind of relocation like that would take years just to even start. Let alone actually do ad probably wouldn't even be worth it. If wanting that lake so badly, better yet to probably create a deepened depression where more of that water would stay. We already have the naturally made Lake Tahoe with its extreme depth. You just pointed out the other issue. In the inland empire, where are those people going to live exactly in replacement for that farmland? The only other nearby space is really the desert past the mountains. For that to happen accounting for increasingly dangerous heat with climate change, that is a lot of infrastructure spending that would need to be done. People didn't drain that lake for nothing. Why not do what the Dutch have done?
1
@onelove7883 Doesn't change the fact that it is a significant portion of the most productive agricultural region in the entire world. Those crops even if successfully relocated in nearby nature reserves, fertile valleys near there, or up north in the Northern Sacramento Valley, are going to take time to actually establish. For the same applying here, not exactly. It depends on where the water is coming from, what crops are being grown, and types of soil. The area of Gilroy is located in a smaller valley with a very different climate and watershed. For where the water is to go, there are numerous different places to pump it to. Owen's valley is not far from there and has been depleted for 100 years from LA's usage. There are also other valleys, channels, and even places with depleted ground water that would make great use of that water. Ideally, preparation should be done rather than waiting for the lake to return, but this would be far more practical. The Inland empire doesn't have even close to enough land area to compensate for all the farmland that could go underwater. Even if homes were removed, it would probably not be enough. Plus, the area is much drier and would put a heavier strain on water sources that these farmers previously didn't use while they were in the San Joaquin Valley. Not even counting soil fertility being a possible problem as well with the area being sandier. The cows though, can be relocated to the high desert. For foreign investors, what percentage as the output here is still very much big for the US. The main area foreign investors seem to be after is the cattle which Arizona has been doing. For infrastructure, even the most well paid of companies will struggle in relocating the infrastructure or building entirely new ones. It would take years just to even get approval, let alone actually build or relocate. Every single significant change here will take time. No. If an area is a deep enough depression and the channels all go there, the water will not go to the previous lake bed. It would also not change the soil type of the farming region that sit along the lake bed. Making it more beneficial than raising the area. Once again, relocating is difficult, time consuming, and will fail for various different farming groups as there isn't many other options.
1
@Youngerick1990 You know you can't grow anything without having a place to grow them, right? Especially for the correct fertile soil. For the Colorado, the Central Valley doesn't use water from the Colorado. That is the San Diego, Los Angeles, and the southeastern areas going out towards the Arizona border using it. For the water staying, it would have to go somewhere lower in order to keep the room needed for farming there. Plus, there are plenty of ways to store that water that do not require forcing people to give up billions of dollars worth of produce and several square miles of farmland.
1
@onelove7883 The solution taking time is why as much mitigation of the flooding right needs to be done as possible. The snowmelt will affect it again. The difference is more will be able to be done with what is there rather than taking years to get anything done elsewhere. Even waiting for all the water to be used up by other farmers in the valley would do the farmers better. It is possible to as the lake is and has always been shallow. For preparation, they have been making preparations for at least 100 years for these types of events. The reason here for what has happened is the rains being far more intense than they should be. This level of intensity was record breaking for amount of rain and snow in a short period of time. That is something hard to predict and even knowing ahead of time, to even prepare. There are always made up reasons for food prices going up. Even if this event didn't happen and there was no drought, they would be going up. They were clearing out the snow and everything. Plus, road blockages from these snow events in winter are not rare. What wasn't expected was this level of snow specifically in Southern California's mountains as the mountains in the south normally don't even get close to the amount of snow it received this winter. This snow was more similar to snows in the Sierra Nevada that regularly get enough snow to literally bury entire homes. That's why the news only mentioned this happening in San Bernardino mountains and the other nearby Southern California mountain areas. They have no faith in whatever landowner anyone could think of taking care of any of this. A landowner clearing out snow that was the heaviest on the entire North American continent and relates to the giant snow trails seen in the snowiest livable place on Earth in Hokkaido, Japan? Not a chance.
1
@evanR09-2 Where are those lands being cleared for farming? Are they arable? What kind of water streams are near them? Are they located near the numerous military bases the state has? How much sunlight does the place get? There is a reason why the Mojave desert is still largely desert in contrast to the fertile central valley. Also, the state needs more housing. Especially in the growing northern areas. RELOCATING WATER IS NOT GETTING RID OF WATER! Water relocation. People can create depressions to store more water in a smaller amount of space and there are areas in the valley to actually do it. It has even been done before with river courses farther north. We have been building reservoirs for 100 years. We already have them and have had them. Thei issue is abnormal timing of receiving the precipitation. Also, more reservoirs also means more water rerouted away from the lake bed. The lake staying has numerous square miles of farmland being destroyed, lost of probably some of the most fertile soil on earth which cannot be made up for with certain crops in the Sacramento valley in the North, pollution from the cities being flooded, and thousands of people losing their homes. Also, the lake is shallow. If used up enough or under drought conditions, it will dry up and leave behind debris that pose a health hazard to a place that already has enough issues with air pollution. If concerned about water, relocate the water and keep the farmland. That protects the water more, prevents whatever could be in the farms and cities from polluting the water, and keeps people's homes and the most productive farmland on the planet for certain instead of taking years to go somewhere else where other crops won't even probably grow as efficiently or at all.
1
@jameschristophercirujano6650 The issue here isn't population. It is land area that is the issue. Both places are areas that are directly on watersheds. For population, is that based on only King county's population? The population of that area is definitely much more than 100,000. Even then, this is a lot of people and a lot of people contributing a large portion to the largest agricultural economy on the planet. Especially with nearby Bakersfield. For dredging, that is what I said. There are already protected areas there that can be deepened into depressions that can store more water in a smaller area of space. Allowing the farmers to keep their land while also keeping the water nearby. It also has the benefit of not having to have contaminants from other areas harming the water quality of the lake as well.
1