Comments by "S S" (@SS-yj2le) on "Tyler Oliveira" channel.

So much for supposedly having better opportunities to not be homeless.
8
It is technically true as the definition of white has varied throughout history.
1
Police used it as a facade to more easily arrest you.
1
What do you define as a country? Me being an American does not mean I own the country. It isn’t mine. I am just a subject of the country.
1
@LizyDuskdragon By who, for what, in what way, and why? North Korea does the same thing with their own citizens. It is the largest prison on Earth.
1
@LizyDuskdragon Why does a government of a specific piece of land get to decide who gets to be within it and who doesn’t? It is possible with this for 99% of the world’s land area to be owned by one person and that person would be able to deny anyone else of the 8 billion from entering. See the issue here. People are deciding where other people are allowed to be at even if they didn’t own the land or have too much legislating power over such land where they decide what people are allowed and which ones are not.
1
@LizyDuskdragon Let’s just let any person be born into any country and see how that goes. See the issue here. This is control of other people’s freedoms beyond what ought to be allowed and to where certain people and groups get way more power than they should.
1
@lunawense6288 People of each nation are entitled to their own nation only under international law. What if Bangladesh decided the Rohingya were not allowed to go there? They would be forced to get slaughtered in a genocide. What if the country they are in is over-crowded and has no room? They would also have no choice. Or even outside of these, people simply have the right to exist. To deny allowing people the right to exist on a piece of land is to deny the right to exist and deny the right ti which how people want to live. Just because someone has a right ti live in their own country does not mean they can control who can live there and who doesn’t. That would be a theocratic aristocracy of a group of people who would make up a nation. Frankly, I think it is pointless to care so much more about issues illegal immigrants have than those of their own citizens. Especially as most of the time, they are basically going to said countries just to do cheap labor so they can get a basic income and/or feed their families in their home country. Even if they were committing crimes, do the same thing for native citizens and if it is too much on taxes as they might not pay taxes, deny them benefits from the government and/or get their native country involved in their incarceration. These people are powerless. They are not only no threat to natives, but are generally beneficial to natives financially. I think the US lacking hard security on the border where over 60,000 Canadians are past came illegally into the US to live and work says something about the real intentions of immigration control by the politicians and their supporters.
1
@Aleks96 If they need to use the bathroom. For this case though, this analogy doesn’t apply as my country is not my house. It isn’t my property either. I don’t own my country.
1
@Aleks96 What house do you live in where people are born in it? Are you sick from the nuclear power plant? A house and a country are completely different things. If the country were my house, I would have kicked out over 99% of the population long ago. I wouldn’t care if they were legal migrants, illegal migrants, or US citizens. I don’t own the farmland Guatemalan guys go to work at to feed their families. I don’t own the white house. I don’t own a mountain in Utah. I don’t own anything. It isn’t mine for me to have any say on. If you want an actual analogy, try a place that I would actually own. Unless, are you saying a group of people house? If you are, that doesn’t work either as they don’t own it either. Your analogy only works for politicians in power who govern the land and even then, they are bound to guaranteeing rights to all people. In your case here, they would be only giving rights to be on land to certain groups if people of their choosing. One which assuming everyone has rights, violates certain people’s rights.
1