Comments by "Lawrence D’Oliveiro" (@lawrencedoliveiro9104) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1. Why sign up to an agreement in the first place, if you have no intention of honouring it?
    7
  2. First Putin vowed to punish the perpetrators. Then he lets the ringleader get off scot-free. Does that sound like a leader still firmly in charge, to you?
    5
  3. Anybody else notice the irony in this, that of the movies he could think of that have had their production stopped because of the strike, they are all sequels—every single one.
    4
  4. The ICC is supposed to serve as backstop when the countries themselves cannot or will not prosecute the perpetrators. Like the 🇺🇸 soldiers who committed those atrocities at Abu Ghraib ...
    4
  5. Why sign up to an agreement in the first place, if you have no intention of honouring it?
    3
  6.  @gj8550  This is not just some arbitrary and capricious accusation. The Prosecutor has already amassed a bunch of evidence, and a judge has agreed that he has a case to answer. That is why the arrest warrant was issued. This is how a Court of Law works.
    3
  7.  @bobgonzales9680  It applies to all their signatories. So yes, if there was evidence of someone in 🇺🇦 or 🇵🇸 committing war crimes, they could be prosecuted at the ICC as well.
    1
  8.  @gj8550  The evidence came from independent sources. Who do you think controls the ICC? It’s supported by over 100 countries.
    1
  9. Putin will never be able to trust the people of Rostov-on-Don again. But that’s the logistical hub for the Ukraine invasion. So what is he going to do?
    1
  10.  @gerri577  Saying one thing and doing another is described by a different word.
    1
  11. Trump supporter.
    1
  12. 3:38 “Truth is that which, when you stop believing in it,
    1
  13. doesn’t go away.” -- Philip K Di
    1
  14. ck
    1