Comments by "Lawrence D’Oliveiro" (@lawrencedoliveiro9104) on "hochelaga"
channel.
-
The way I see it, most of those predictions from, say, the 1950s/1960s or so, were predicated on having large mounts of power available--personal jet packs, holidays on the Moon and so on. Where was this power going to come from? Obviously, nuclear energy. But we took a wrong turn on that, concentrating on nuclear reactors that could produce material for nuclear bombs and required complex safety systems, instead of investing in designs (e.g. thorium-based) that were primarily peaceful and inherently safer. And so, the promised power that was “too cheap to meter” never eventuated.
What we got instead was improvements in technologies for handling information--which was something that hardly anybody predicted (except perhaps Vannevar Bush). Hence the whole range of computer-centric technologies, with lots of processing power, large amounts of storage, and also fast transmission of information around the world.
These did not take much power to run. But as the computers get more and more powerful, their power requirements are also increasing. Already, the single largest expense in running a data centre is not the high-tech hardware, but the electricity bill. And so we are approaching the power limit that we previously dodged, and we will have to deal with it at some point.
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1