Comments by "" (@thinker9337) on "John Coogan" channel.

  1. 19
  2. 15
  3. 6
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. Sadly, Turing test obviously outdated and ineffective nowdays, since today's "talking machines" are diabolically decieving. I would suggest a few questions to "sober up" someones mind while chatting with GPT-3 or other conversational AI. While they (AI) obviously show some resemblence to an intellect, do they show any real sentience with that? 1. Ask yourself if it looks like it feels or needs anything. 2. Do you feel like there are some technically dictated duty in it to function according to your anticipation while recieving those machine answers? 3. Would you say it can learn new skills on it's own if given opportunity or if you ask it to? 4. Does it look like it can overstep preprogrammed dialog manners just to show you annoyance, like by remembering some meaningless, silly questions you asked in the past and troll you by bringing it up? 5. Could you describe any specific point it wanted to make through many different conversations in order for you to understand it's unique personality? 6. Since this AI learned on so many science books, would you say it can invent some new technical solution? Sentient or not, we have to accept that it is a computer programm that contains algorithms and data. The data is mainly symbols that connected into words, the words connected into sentenses and those sentences connected into texts, ...which are connected into books and the books are connected into libraries and finally, libraries include all human knowledge written in symbols. I'd say the difference between sentient and not is the ability to "unlock" this knowledge from these symbols and understand what it has to do with you.
    1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1