Comments by "Mikko Rantalainen" (@MikkoRantalainen) on "Donut" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. Sorry, I have to press the dislike button on this one due the lack facts even though your video production is otherwise nice. You are missing three huge elephants in the room for Hydrogen cars: (1) The efficiency for electricity -> hydrogen -> fuel cell -> electricity is much worse than electricity -> li-ion battery -> electricity which is used in pure electrical vehicles. When you have reneweable electricity source, it makes much more sense to load li-ion batteries than waste lots of energy on electricity -> hydrogen conversion because that produces lots of heat as waste. (2) The fuel tanks for hydrogen are both prohibitively expensive and weight way too much. Hydrogen also cannot be compressed very much. One liter of gasoline contains more hydrogen than 1L of pure hydrogen as a liquid in the hydrogen tank. And the gasoline also has lots of carbon in addition on that same volume. (3) Hydrogen economy would require A LOT more hydrogen stations to make any sense. However, there's no sense to invest to build any new hydrogen stations because issues 1 and 2 on this list. The only exception is local politics which may dump enough money to build the stations even though there will not be any customers in the long run. Elon Musk is right on this one even though he fails to clearly explain why. TL;DR: Hydrogen cars would be slightly better than gasoline or diesel cars. However, hydrogen cars are MUCH worse than pure electronic cars which is why there's no sense to build any hydrogen cars.
    1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1