Comments by "Mikko Rantalainen" (@MikkoRantalainen) on "Russia Vs. Ukraine Or Civil War In The West?" video.

Great analysis but looking at the comments, you should make your own stance more explicit because surprisingly many seem to think that you were supporting Putin in this video. I guess it's because they fail to understand all the words you used. If you are totally misunderstood by people with lesser education, you should assume you have failed in communication. It would be better to repeat some parts in simpler language to make sure that even the people with poor education understand at least your overall stance.
2
@mariaolszowska3935 Could you give a timestamp for the part where "he's practically denying Ukraine right to exist"? If you use syntax minutes:seconds (with seconds with initial zero if less than 0, e.g. 03 or 00), YouTube will probably automatically link to current timestamp.
1
@mariaolszowska3935 OK, so could you give a timestamp for the part where "He's practically dening Ukraine right to exist as a soverign country." ? That's the exact wording you used, typos included.
1
Could you elaborate more? All I heard within first 10 minutes was analysis of importance of Ukraine to different foreign countries. I fully agree with Peterson's analysis that Russia had much bigger stake for the future of Ukraine than other countries (Ukrainians obviously care about their future, too, but Peterson listed reasons about the situation purely from the perspective of other countries). He also explicitly mentioned around 12:33 that these were three hypothetical reasons for the war. If you think that Peterson was siding Russia here, you just didn't follow his (granted, highly verbose) speech.
1
@KozakWatchman As far as I know, Saakashvili was President of Georgia, not Ukraine. And I agree that Ukraine will succeed in long run as long as they can avoid corruption of the state (which was pretty bad a couple of decades ago).
1