Comments by "Mikko Rantalainen" (@MikkoRantalainen) on "Will Ai come for the Pilots?! - Expert interview" video.

  1. There were lots of audio/video sync problems in this interview. I hope you improve your production workflow to avoid losing sync during the editing. Other than that, great video as usual!
    2
  2. Interesting discussion! I totally agree that ChatGPT or GPT-4 are not able to become AGI without major overhaul of the underlying architecture. However, future AGI could use GPT-4-like AI subsystems as part of its input. The major missing parts of GPT-4 are ability to learn anything over time (GPT-4 has learning phase totally separate from any input it has via its API or with the UI) and ability to estimate the accuracy of incoming data and the accuracy of its own output. That said, even GPT-4-like AI could be training in an aircraft simulator to accurately detect failures in the system, even when multiple systems fail at once. That would require giving all constantly known input data (all sensor readings, controller inputs, accelerometer data) and then training it to output estimate whether or not the aircraft will behave normally in near term future and if not, what's the cause for the non-normal operation. Such AI would be really valuable if it could emit message like "Engine 3 is using more fuel than expected but all temperatures are within spec. Possible fuel leak or fuel cauge sensor failure." In a sim environment, the AI could be trained for every failed system the simulator system can simulate. And then trained with multple failures happening at the same time. AI should be much better than humans in noticing the patterns in different sensors and controls.
    1