Comments by "Mikko Rantalainen" (@MikkoRantalainen) on "" video.

@Greippi10 I think it would have been fine to build multiple copies in tents and sheds and then test multiple subs into failure to see the variation in the end results. Even SpaceX failed quite a bit hardware in process. However, they only built one Titan and simply assumed it's okay.
105
@ColdWarSubSailor_- That's why I suggested doing multiple tests to failure to see amount of variation in the strength. If you see huge variation in test results, your trust to "final" part should be pretty low, too.
7
@ColdWarSubSailor_- If you want to switch to radically different design (e.g. carbon fiber) the only way to make it safe is to figure out the amount of actual variance in your production methods. Because there will be always a lot of variables in real world processes, you cannot estimate this even close to perfectly and testing to failure is the only way to know for sure.
1