Comments by "Madam Vaudelune" (@madamvaudelune3298) on "Female teachers found sexually assaulting young male students: What to look out for" video.

@Lawliet734 It is. Abuse, manipulation, if you have to ,"sneak around to do something" then you know you are doing wrong.
10
@emil_king8237 lovely comment. Not misogynistic at all. As a woman who spent 10 years in uniform supporting my mother and two young children, I Saw Many men abandon their families during their first unaccompanied tour, and male teachers who molested boy and girls Strength of character, honesty, integrity and fidelity are the traits of good men and women everywhere.
5
@paulm518 Since you can define neither "God" nor "is", you are left with one word and that word describes the concept of'infinite regression." I sugar coat nothing, but I would rather run the entire wedding party through a car wash full of fondant rather than deny the reality that NO ONE wears a white veil to a lawyer 's office. To live in the kind of denial of intention, societal expectation, emotional and sexual entwining and voluntary assumption of responsibility for another that is marriage is simply, in a word, immature. Only a child or an emotionally stunted adult deconstructs and limits marriage to it's legal parameters. Marriage existed long before the need to sanction the practicing shyster with the approval of a state bar.
4
@abubakrakram6208 You either don't understand English or you have some ax to grind with Christians. I don't need your permission to make my feelings known. You are entitled to your say as well as I but this has NOTHING to do with Christians. The idiot who thought he could keep up with me was trying to explain how marriage is only a CONTRACT. I POINTED OUT that the financial, societal, filial and yes SPIRITUAL connections involved in marriage could not be understood by a mental child. If you were expecting me to apologize you will wait a long time. You have whatever kind of marriage pleases you but if you are "offended ' by my suggestion that marriage is a sacred vow between man and woman, that is your problem, not mine. I am not going to apologize for my culture, my religion, my ethnicity or my God. I hold an exclusively Christian view because -surprise! i am a Christian. I will believe as I see fit and live accordingly. Why do you care?
3
 @paulm518 So you equate a car sale with a promise made before God and man. Interesting. Such moral fiber. Such integrity.
2
@abubakrakram6208 I don't care what you believe. You are a total stranger, a series of electronic blips I'm a thread. Honestly, . Carry on. If you don't believe in God that is your choice God DOSENT empower you with faith, I never said so. Faith empowers the believer, extends grace to him, gives him salvation. But whether not you believe is your issue Believe or don't believe. That is your choice. Legality and morality are two different.issues. This isn't new to Christians, even in the Roman empire we had to live alongside persons who worshipped as they pleased. married whom they please, Hadrian even married a boy named Antinoos and then sacrificed him. Do as you please, who is stopping you?You are offended? Be as offended as you like! Do you think I am going to be like my idiot countrymen who will apologize for their beliefs? You have every right to be as offended as you like. That is your business not mine.
2
@dillysgirl4ever But 'then' leads to 'now' DOSENT it? The damage done to this boy's mind can only be evaluated in retrospect. Whether or not he enjoyed this as it was happening, he is still left with the recollection that it is something that has to be hidden, from his parents and friends. Sooner or later he will realize that the 'good' feelings came from a place of deceit and mental sickness. Then the 'not so good' feelings start.
2
@dillysgirl4ever Here's a better idea, ask these men how they would feel if this happened to their 11year old sons. Their sweet little boys, the one he remembers feeding his puppy, the little boy playing with GI Joe, the little boy who tells him' I love you Daddy' before he goes to bed. Ask them if they remember their little guy getting up early on Father's Day so he could make you pancakes and sausage. Now, imagine this little boy confused, being fondled by his 6th grade teacher. "It must be ok because Miss Johnson is nice...she wouldn't do anything bad..but she's using words Daddy told me never to say....but why is she..." and later on crying and confused. "It must be bad if I can't tell anybody about it..I want to tell Mom and Dad but I can't..." Confusion. Shame. You want this for your little boy, Daddy?
2
@dillysgirl4ever You better read again. The boy in question was 11.
2
@paulm518 By the way, define "existence".Seems you neglected that particular definition during your hooting and chest pounding. Since you fancy yourself a ,'nailed it" kind of fellow, nail the meaning of "existence.' I'll wait.
1
@draighodge6039 You are red hot. Not only that, but this young boy will grow up to expect OTHERS to 'make it better.' He will perceive his happiness and satisfaction as being in the hands of others, not his own. Because someone more powerful than him can give pleasure and affection and take it away, he must somehow control his source. When bills, work problems, family issues make him feel stressed and inadequate, unless his wife can take away the pain he must find another source And another. And another. Someone else, NOT himself, is the powerful one he will try to find again and again.
1
@paulm518 Sounds like it would work until you get to 'objective reality ' The same dictionary defines OBJECTIVE REALITY as "anything that exists as it is without conscious awareness of it s own existence. " So you define existence as objective reality and objective reality is defined as existence? Yeah you better help me out here Yankee Doodle 'cuz this sounds like circular reasoning to me...
1
@barbarakiewe2870 No one is blaming the victim, Einstein. The principal of RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR applies here. Look it up.
1
@paulm518 ? You provided the definition. All I did was go to your source and find the other, only to find that it uses reality to define existence and existence to define reality. That isn't a rabbit hole, that is you being Tweedle Dumb.
1
@barbarakiewe2870 The STUDENT is 11 years old, and the teacher has authority over the student. There is no shared responsibility for this . One peep, one victin
1
Ii have no idea what you are going on about, I said the SAMEL same thing TWICE. LET me clear this up for you The victim has zero responsibility in this case. None. Nada Butkus. Zip. Zilck. Niente. De rien. Nul. A machine has a defect, a human being a fault. The first conveys an imperfection in an object, the second a correctable behavior or trait in a human being. Grab a dictionary, and good bye. And please learn to spell.
1
@barbarakiewe2870 I really don't know what you are going on about. People are insinuating the child is NOT a victim, not blaming him. There IS NO shared responsibility for this crime because there is only one peep, the teacher. I'm sorry I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain it to you any more clearly than that.
1
@barbarakiewe2870 The student is a minor child. His conduct is not under scrutiny here. That would be 'blaming the victim' and in civilized nations we don't do that.
1
@barbarakiewe2870 Ma'am ( patiently) obviously a random post from a complete stranger means the world to you ( correct standard English spelling) . I pointed out, and I make the distinction because it is an important one, legally and morally, that NO ONE ON THIS THREAD S BLAMING THE VICTIM. Please read these posts carefully? What many ARE doing is insisting that the child in question is NOT a victim because, according to these horrible people, 'he enjoyed it's or 'it made him a man.' Do you see where this is an important thing to establish? It is to me because these dreadful, stupid people DENY and NEGATE the rights of MALE SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIMS. They are not denying it happens nor are they blaming the child ( even a moron will not do that). They are denying that a morally degenerate act took place. Now IF some brain donor posted something that held the child IN ANY WAY ACCOUNTABLE for this tragedy, they did so AFTER my initial post. I have NEVER, WOULD NEVER blame a child SA victim. When I posted There is NO shared responsibility ' that excludes the child from any wrongdoing as is right and just. Honestly, with all my heart, I just can't dumb it down for you any more.
1
@ModedeScode At 11 you would feel confused, ashamed, wondering why your classmates are laughing at you, scared of your parents finding out that a woman as old as your mother is doing things to you. Want to consider this again.
1
@abubakrakram6208 Most adults could figure it out for themselves. You have a legal right to go before a judge and be married. You have a legal right to sleep with a consenting woman and make a baby. At the purely legal level you have the sanction of the government. At a more human, thought provoking, spiritual and cultural level, you have more that a paper issued by the government, you have a blessed union . You can reproduce all you like. Opening your legs and breeding is not the same as conceiving a child in a loving home and being a mother and a father, not a 'baby momma' and ' baby daddy.' Water seeks its own level, and if you ooze out of a sewer or spring from the glorious fountains at Versailles you are still H2O. The explanation is something that will do you no good. If you have to ask why a person wants to be more than a woman with a government sanction paper or a bride A bride is wlling and courageous, seeing the opportunity to carry her gifts of love into a union blessed by God Obviously you hold such a concept at little account, When all you need is a government paper, why bother with the solemn and beautiful ideas that raise us up? Just like pure bred cattle you can prove that your offspring belong on an official register. Good for you, you aren't asking for much.
1
@Gregcoach EITHER child could say nom But they don't. Why? Because adults know how to manipulate, to coerce, to lie, to exploit. Of course a girl could say no . So could a boy. But they don't because the teacher is evil, manipulative and knows how to exploit. THAT is why both are victims.
1
@deepmalyadas6585 Deep insight, painfully true.
1