Comments by "Madam Vaudelune" (@madamvaudelune3298) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11.  @jacobjasch4397  There was a great and bitter war in the Eastern Roman Empire. Those who believed that the cross and Icons wers not godly, and those who did. In the end, a bishop of some renown brought forth a concept deeply rooted in reality: whatever we see makes an image. We cannot help it; what we see creates a visual memory indelibly printed on the subconscious. And an icon or crucifix is merely the expression of what we already have in our minds and hearts.When we say 'Jesus' we already see him in our mind and heart, to externalize this vision by means of an artistic effort is just an expression of this vision. To take a commandment or a law out of context is wrong. You must contextualize what you say else "Thou shalt not kill" nullifies 4 or 5 Levitical laws-including working on Sunday-that demand the penalty of death! Adultery was punished by stoning in the O T- but did not G.say' thou shalt not kill?' But execution IS killing for a transgression. You see my point about context. When the decalogue was given to the Hebrews the 'idols' where those of Moloch and Baal before whom sacrifices (horrible ones) were made. But G. demanded that CHERUBIM (a heavenly creature) be put on the Ark of the Covenant! Remember the fire serpents? 'Go and look upon them that you may be healed?' If you do not wish to have an image or a rosary or an icon, there is nothing wrong with that. But many do. If this helps a person with their devotions to a loving G. Then certainly a case can be made for its spiritual efficacy and edification
    1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1