Comments by "F Liu" (@F_Liu) on "CBC News" channel.

  1. ''A rule of law country'' defending for a 220kg meth drug smuggler and ''A rule of law country'' hostage taking the CFO of a tech rival of the US at the US request, it says a lot about the meaning of ''rule of law'' in the Canadian dictionary...
    370
  2. ''Papa America, come help me, I am biting off more than I can chew!''
    278
  3. ''China attacks''? Nice spin again by the lying CBC. China's ''attacking'' and ''bullying'' is totally unjustified because according to the West, China should just sit there and stay quiet when its law-abiding citizen get kidnapped abroad! Canada, we see your purest form of hypocrisy on full display...
    232
  4. ''Everything China does has bad intention'' is the official anti China narrative of the Western MSM, they are only paid to do their job, we need to show understanding. 🤨
    33
  5. Funny there is no mentioning of hand and leg cuffs on Meng in any Canadian media, I wonder why they don't want people to know about it.
    30
  6. China worries about its image getting damaged? OK, lets face it, China's image was never great to start with after being smeared and bashed by the Western medias like CBC all these years, how much worse can it get? but I can tell you Canada's image is seriously damaged after the arrest of Meng, at least in Chinese people's eyes, but then who cares about the Chinese right? CBC: hypocrisy at its best...
    29
  7. Classical hypocritical logic of the West, nothing surprising.
    25
  8.  Mario Lopez  Did I anywhere indicate in my comment that there were NO Chinese involved in the operation? As you mentioned he FOOLISHLY went there where the supply happen to be (btw, the places where these drugs might have been produced in China has now I am sure been destroyed as it is illegal) like many places on earth where supply could be found such as Afghanistan where opium is produced under the watchful eyes of the occupying Americans and got caught knowing China has zero tolerance policy on drugs. So it is not in any way his fault then, are you suggesting?
    16
  9.  @celyl  Yes they did. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/22/bank-sanction-violations_n_2934839.html
    12
  10. @Joma Yeah right, more like a gang of thugs with the US being the ringleader, lol...
    11
  11. You are absolutely right, many Western spies, more than the West think they have!
    7
  12.  @MrBlaxjax  Funny many US companies had also violated such ''sanctions'' but no CFOs of these companies were arrested and charged but Meng, a CFO of a tech competitor of the US while the US-China trade war is going on. I am afraid there are a lot of people who would disagree with you...
    7
  13.  @MrBlaxjax  Many international banks including some American ones had violated the sanctions but no individual bankers has been arrested and charged as it indicates in this article (link below), so maybe the US should arrest the bosses of these companies too just to make it look fair then, would you say? https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/22/bank-sanction-violations_n_2934839.html
    7
  14.  @brucehardy1640  I like when you say respect is earned, courtesy is given. Maybe Canada/US should have given China the respect and the courtesy at the fist place by not kidnapping their citizen for no good reason? You are a hypocrite, seriously!
    6
  15.  @sarahsokal  Funny when you talk about ''understanding and seeking information, openness'' stuff, I don't see any of these qualities in a lot of people in the West, at least not in many YouTube comment sections. I guess the ''good'' thing is you Westerners make up your mind very quickly as soon as you are fed any info whether they are true or false. I wish I didn't listen to my literacy teacher at school when he taught me to always ''read between the lines''.
    5
  16. He is basically saying the whites' laws are real laws and the other countries has to follow whites' laws, end of.
    5
  17.  @colepearson7758  I doubt too, but did I say he was doing this all by himself? So he should have received a lighter sentence because he was not the main man in this? Explain your logic?
    4
  18. @bb z You worship your criminal lord with loyalty, now go bark somewhere else!
    4
  19.  @billyhamlen9610  Well facts tell me that the US is the tyrant trying to rule over the entire world
    4
  20. Marvin Lim, CIA paid troll
    4
  21.  NOYDB  Here's some facts, your education in the Western system failed you. Tiananmen Square 1989 was a color revolution incited by the West to destabilise China and for regime change. Tibet has been part of China since Yuan dynasty from 1294, even when the British tried to invade Tibet in 1903 killing 600 Tibetans. The West can dream on of breaking China apart or helping Tibet become an independent country but you will never succeed so you can stop talking about it.
    4
  22.  @solitaryboyxiaomi1648  Brother, I am a lady by the way, but, yes I love my motherland!
    4
  23.  @SteveRogers-ix4cc  Exactly, lol, arrest someone and charge them whenever, in this case after the trade war negotiation ends preferably in favour of the US, just watch...
    3
  24.  Mario Lopez  It just seemed to me you are suggesting he only went there because that is where the drugs might be produced, but I am just saying there are a lot of places where drugs can be sourced and produced, and yes there are Chinese who produce illegal drugs for huge gain in China just like people from anywhere, they will all receive harsh sentences if they are caught in China.
    3
  25.  @stedavid13  No I don't have proof, do you have proof to suggest otherwise? And there are many places in the world where illegal drugs are produced, you seem to be suggesting China is the only country where all these drugs came from? Where is your proof? Just because you want to believe it? BTW what make you think these drugs are produced there for certain? Where is your proof again?
    2
  26. I am sure she is on a diet.... for about 4 years....
    2
  27.  @Hyperpandas  Yes Law-abiding. She is innocent until proven guilty, come on present your detailed evidence to prove otherwise! You don't have it and you can't prove it because your master the US don't have it as they have no legal base to punish a non US company with its domestic law and unilateral sanctions without UN backing.
    2
  28.  @MusicalTranscendence  Well if everything seems fully justified with Meng's arrest as you claim then there should be no issues with China arresting the two Canadians as that has nothing to do with Meng, so why is Canada crying and calling it arbitrary? Seems odd that Canada thinks China is not capable of carrying out justice because...? Because China has a different political system from the West. It still shows Canada's hypocrisy and double standard regardless.
    2
  29.  @MusicalTranscendence  You can claim it is kosher and accuse the Chinese not being transparent all you want, but at the end of the day, when your rule of law is being selectively applied, the whole justness is out of the window, I like when you don't want to face the fairness question by dismissing the article and calling me changing the topic. Let's see what evidence the US will present, by the way there is no date set for her extradition yet, if the US has already evidence at hand why they hang around for so long I wonder? Waiting for the outcome of the trade negotiations perhaps?
    2
  30.  @MusicalTranscendence  I don't know what you are talking about the words I use, it is Canada keeps on saying ''rule of law'' ''rule of law'' and ''arbitrary'' I am just using these words the same way as Canada uses in their statements. Did you read my article? Why are the US bankers who dealt with fraudulent transactions through their banks helping companies to evade sanctions not arrested and charged whereas only Meng is? This is what I meant when I say rule of law being selectively applied. Jan 30 is the deadline day when the US has to submit the request but it is not confirmed by the US yet.
    2
  31.  @MusicalTranscendence  You just confirmed with your comment where your bias lies. You are certain to think China does not have an independent justice system whereas Canada has is just arrogance and I can't agree. The fact is the US has not applied laws equally to all companies that has defrauded that already tells me what ''rule of law'' in the West means. In fact, Chinese gov't has put pressure to the US and there will be more to come, but sadly whatever the outcome of that will be, Canada-China relations is damaged for a long time to come, but I guess your rule of law come first the rest don't matter.
    2
  32.  @marvinlim9857  I am not liable for disloyalty, that is only what you think. Your words about China and the Chinese are just empty words unless you have spent at least 6 months in China, China is far from perfect and I never claimed it to be but a lot of you in the West are very biased and brainwashed about it but it does not matter to the Chinese or China in any way. The fact tells me the West has done worse in many regards such as human rights violations, war crimes, etc... but you think you are in a ''free'' country, as long as you are happy, I can't care less.
    2
  33.  @MusicalTranscendence  I admire your firm belief in your country's judiciary independence, but belief is one matter and the real outcome is another. I think China's judiciary is still developing if you view in terms of its maturity compare to the Western one, and it will always be subject to corruption and human factor that influence the independence of the system same applies in many countries, but I can not just outright generalise that China's judiciary is not independent at all. I don't know whether a Chinese can sue the central gov't or not but yes I think it is most likely unwinnable. But question China on that is pretty meaningless because has there ever a case anyone sued the US gov't and won? And what change did that make? You have elected presidents come and go but your war mongering policy remains and I understand most Americans are against war but the war continues, so has anyone came out to sue the gov't or presidents for war crimes, I am not aware of any case here. That tells me the US gov't and presidents are above the law and can not be sued and therefore no check and balances. Anyway, it looks like you are not going to be convinced by me whatever I say that is why I say we agree to disagree. No, you are right YouTube is not the best place to win a debate, but I did my bit. People in the West need to understand that China has its own system that serves the country well and it is continuing to improve in all ways but it is never going to be like the West completely and yes Chinese people suffered too much at the hand of the West hundreds years ago and they remember the humiliation and still today they are contained in all fields and seen as the threats which they are not. The Chinese people just want to have a better life and of course a dignified life, having the CFO of one of their biggest brand arrested on political ground is not dignifying that is why we are outraged and it is only natural.
    2
  34. This opposition guy looks only worse.
    2
  35. Do you need 50 cents, let me share mine with you so you can get your food stamps🤣🤣🤣
    2
  36.  Philip V  Problem is they can't even get up from their chair, let alone go to the food station. 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  37.  NOYDB  OK, I can tell you are from Taiwan or Hong Kong, fair enough, I have no more to say to you.
    2
  38. If Canada says it is arbitrary detention, then it must be, end of... Justice served...Simple😂😂😂
    2
  39. To measure IQ, you need to have a brain first, not sure you could measure IQ of a robot.
    2
  40. Twist and spin that is what CBC does, shameless!
    1
  41. Exactly, funny right?
    1
  42. Wow, any politician not toeing the official lines gets fired, I thought Canada is a rule of law country with freedom of speech, what a joke.
    1
  43. Marvin Lim CIA paid troll
    1
  44.  @captaindave88  How are the Canadians not getting equal treatment under law? Show me your evidence, remember you started this first by kidnapping an innocent Chinese woman first. Oh that is because Canada is a loyal lap dog of the US and it does what the US tells it to do.
    1
  45.  @Hyperpandas  I am disappointed that you have not provided me with detailed evidence of Meng's crime, do you have images, videos and recordings and any written documents to prove her crime? So she is innocent until proven guilty, no evidence no crime. But with regards to your example that is quite different as in that situation there would be an overwhelming numbers of eye witnesses and still these witnesses and evidences have to be presented in court for a charge. Did you personally see Meng committing her crime? Who saw it, present your evidence as I said otherwise you are just talking empty words which is of no persuasion whatsoever. LOL. And I see you have not argued about the lack of legal base of the US because the US law does not and can not apply to a company of another sovereign country. I take it as you agree with me on that then...
    1
  46. ​ @Hyperpandas  How doe US laws and unilateral sanctions apply to her company registered in China when China has not sanctioned Iran and therefore can trade with Iran freely? The US banks should also have CFOs arrested then if they have violated the US sanctions. Since neither you nor I could prove her crime at this stage then I can totally claim she is innocent whether is from a legal stand point or any other stand point. She is presumed innocent at this point until proven guilty, so when I say she is innocent and law -abiding, which part of that is wrong then? Because you don't like it?
    1
  47.  @Hyperpandas  OK, come on I think you and me we both know she was arrested as a leverage for the US-China trade war or to contain China's rise in the tech sector, so the arrest is political motivated. However you want to argue or believe she is very much guilty, it does not change anything because Trump has said he would intervene if it favours the trade war negotiations. Your so called rule of law is easily bent as nothing at the moment could be more important and urgent for the US to have a good outcome from the new trade agreement with China and the US is not going to get a good one if they keep using this underhanded tactics of kidnapping Chinese CFOs.
    1
  48.  @Hyperpandas  It IS a sovereignty matter as the US has no jurisdiction over how a Chinese owned company operates in its own country or in a third country, US can not tell China who and how China would trade with outside the US. It is a domestic matter of a sovereign country. China's activities might be bound by international law however. The international law says the US has no right to invade, occupy and bomb an sovereign country without UN authorization but it did anyway, so the US has not proven to be a great example of a country that is law-abiding and since this is the case China or any other country could do exactly the same, arresting Tim Cook next time he will be in China, but China won't because how is that going to help with anything?
    1
  49. ​ @MusicalTranscendence  With all due respect too, however much I want to believe your rule of law is fully fair and just in the case of Meng, I still have every reason to believe that her arrest is more politically motivated and however you want to stress this is not the case, most of the Chinese will just not buy it. But I think I understand you feel your country has a better justice system than China but again many of us would not agree to that either.
    1
  50.  @Threadox  CIA paid troll right here
    1