Comments by "F Liu" (@F_Liu) on "Cyrus Janssen"
channel.
-
910
-
453
-
There is still this sentiment from some within China that perhaps China should continue Deng's ''Hide your strength, bide your time (or keep a low profile)” diplomatic policy. Problem is that China can no longer hide its industrial capabilities and its strength in tech advancements, and since the US is determined to undermine China's economic progress, China might as well showcase what it is really capable of now and into the future. America should focus on improving its competitiveness instead of trying to politicize everything China related (banning TikTok, semiconductors bans), because in doing so, it undermines its neoliberal capitalistic values such as free market, free trade, respecting private property rights and so on, as we can see, when it comes to China, all these can be thrown out of the window, and meanwhile, China is open for cooperation and fair competition.
369
-
355
-
312
-
286
-
189
-
188
-
176
-
133
-
109
-
98
-
56
-
47
-
45
-
39
-
37
-
It is quite sad and shocking to hear your 76 year old mother needed a gun in order to feel safe, as a Chinese I found the idea of having to possess a gun to feel safe utterly incomprehensible and frankly insane, it is quite clear that there is something very wrong in the American society today that really needed to be addressed and changed, I was just talking to my husband who is an European about the fact that I, a Chinese, was never brought up to hate the West or America, even though my grandfather fought in the Korean war against the West and I of course am very proud of what they did for us so we Chinese could live in a peaceful and prosperous China today, but despite that, Chinese people have always had healthy admiration and respect to the West and the US, however more and more, Americans are brought up to hate China and/or Chinese people, thanks to their politicians and media, and more and more Chinese are developing dislike or hate towards America as well, this has to stop! This does no good to anyone and produce no benefits to any country, I really wish China and the US could just work together it will be a win win for both countries and win for the whole world too.
36
-
35
-
28
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
18
-
16
-
15
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
@joesalazar770 Hold on a second, the US didn't "give" (out of charitable heart) China so much in return for cheap labour, it INVESTED in China for its own material and monetary gains (taking advantage of the competitive and quality Chinese labour). And China's, specifically Deng's reform and opening up economic policy allowed this to happen at a time when the US seeked China's help in defeating Russia in the cold war. I just hate when you people claim this "America built China" nonsense, this idea is racist as far as I am concerned. And it was your corrupt corporations controlled politicians deindustrialised America, not the other way round, and that is what was and still is wrong with your country, don't blame China for it. Again, I stress, it was China's own economic policy put China where it is, not the US.
11
-
@billyehh The ''population crisis'' you are repeating is an anti China talking point.
''Although China's population growth rate has entered negative territory, its current population has reached its peak between 1.41 billion and 1.42 billion. As a matter of fact, the population will still be more than 1.4 billion in 2035 and over 1.3 billion in 2050. Furthermore, although the working-age population is declining, the supply of labor is still abundant. For instance, China's working-age population aged 16 to 59 was 880 million in 2020 and could be 820 million in 2035. And even if its working-age population declines to 650 million in 2050, it will still be more than the combined working-age population of developed countries. The number of people aged 60 or above will peak in 2054 to reach 520 million. However, the proportion of the people aged 60 to 69, who are in the early stage of aging, in the total elderly population will decline from 55.8 percent in 2020 to 40.9 percent in 2050.''
''Experts' take on China’s aging population'' by Yuan Xin, professor of demography at the Nankai University in Tianjin (Article from China Daily, 2023-05-24)
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@1239Elc Since you are interested in China, I shall waste some time with you (I've seen and dealt with too many Westerners like you...)
First, you consider videos/perspectives on this channel lack nuance, and portraying China in a ''fantasized'' way. But being objectively positive about China based on facts are NOT fantasizing China, you would only think that because you are conditioned to think about China this way, due to the overwhelmingly negative coverage of China (a lot of lies and misinformation too) from your mainstream media, and from many anti China channels here on YouTube. No, China is not perfect (no country is), China has its issues, some are the same ones as the West faces. The difference is that this channel and many other channels like this one provide you a perspective from Westerners who have (had) traveled, done business, lived/are still living in China, the perspective that is rarely presented in Western media, and guess what, some of their experiences are extremely positive and they are not afraid to speak about it. But does it mean they like everything about China, of course not, anyone with half of a brain knows this. Same as my comment, it is my own perspective, you might not agree, you might consider it lacks nuance, but it is based on my own experience, if you don't like it, it is your problem.
Anyway, advice to you for the future is to offer arguments that can be substantialized with facts rather than slapping an emotional response, like ''oh China is all good like an angel'' which I have never said in the first place. No, China is not without any problem, the West is not all doom and gloom, but China is doing better than the West on many respects that the West can learn a lot from China. Finally, if you want to learn the real China, try remove your bias and preconception and best yet, go to China and see it for yourself.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Andy-P Wrong, SOME Taiwanese do not want to be ruled by PRC China, but it nevertheless does not change the fact that ROC, Taiwan's official name is a part of China, recognised by most countries in the UN. China is NOT threatening to kill their own fellow Chinese living in Taiwan, the ''threat'' is only intended for the separatists and the Western forces who are aiding them.
China has never prevented normal passing of vessels in the South China Sea, but it holds historical claims to some of the islands within that area of the sea, some of which are also claimed by other countries in the region, so this is just normal land disputes, not invasion. The same applies to with India. You seem want to claim China as the aggressor yet there is no fact and evidence to back this up, the country who has actually invaded ,occupied multiple countries and killed innocent people are Western countries, China has not been in any war with any nation for at least 50 years.
4
-
@martinfiedler4317 Lol, you love to play with words, but that doesn't change anything. There is only one sovereign country called China, yes just China, but it is named by the CPC government as PRC after their successful revolution and later winnings of the civil wars to overthrow the then corrupt Republic of China (1912 -1949) government led by the Chinese Nationalist Party (aka KMT). After the remnant KMT government and its forces retreated to the island of Taiwan, it continued its rule on the island with the same name Republic of China, yes the same ROC (Taiwan being part of it) when the KMT was in charge. But in 1979, after the US established formal relations with government of the PRC, the PRC became the sole legitimate representative of China, the island province of Taiwan (ROC) is a part of that China (PRC).
So when you say, Both, the ROC and the PRC are sovereign countries. You are essentially saying that there are TWO Chinas, which is not reality.
And no, I take no consideration of how the people of Taiwan feel about this. Neither should you, because you won't be sending yourself to the front-line to fight for Taiwan independence. Thus stop pretending you care about them.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@martinfiedler4317 You said, "That Taiwan is a sovereign country, seperate and distinct from the PRC."
Please find me this COUNTRY called either Taiwan or ROC on the list of UN member states. Until then your statement remains false.
You said, "Also the 1971 vote does not mention either 'Taiwan' or the 'Republic of China'.
False.
I quote the following from "American Institute In Taiwan" website. "On october 25, 1971, the UN General Assembly passed United Nations Resolution 2758 (XXVI) which stated that the People's Republic of China is the only legitimate government of China. The resolution replaced the ROC with the PRC as a permanent member of the Security Council in the United Nations."
I also quote part statement of the resolution itself as follows. "Decides to restore all its rights to the People's Republic of China and to recognize the representatives of its Government as the only legitimate representatives of China to the United Nations, and to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it."
Conclusion: KMT's ROC government lost its legitimate representation as "China", that the PRC's government replaced the ROC (Taiwan) government as the sole legal ruling government of "China".
ROC as a "country" has officially ended in 1971.
Martin, please do us a favour, if you don't have anything relevant to contribute, just be quiet.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ReWe1974 Is this why Julian Assange and a number of people got sent to prison for speaking the truth in the West? You can NOT say everything you want in the West, in fact there are more things you can not say freely in the West than China, I can tell you, but of course you can not say certain things in China publicly, it is the Chinese own political correctness and also for other reasons such as society harmony and stability, but there are plenty dissenting voices in the Chinese social media and guess what there is no problem whatsoever to the owners of these voices, how do you think China could have made this much progress if the Chinese government are blind and deaf to people's opinions and concerns, they care very much what people think, like in most countries, use your common sense, I am afraid to say, with your very narrow minded mentality on China, you are never going to learn about China.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
China is far from point to be panic about its population
By Global Times, Jan 18, 2023
''China's status as one of the most populous countries in the world will not change. A slight decline in population will not lead to stagnation of China's GDP growth and it will not become a stumbling block to surpass the US economy. If China's development slows down, population decline will not be the top reason.
Chinese scholars and ordinary people have long known that this was coming. Yuan Xin, a professor from the Institute of Population and Development at Nankai University's School of Economics, told the Global Times that China's national population is currently hovering around the zero-growth stage.
Some young people decided to delay pregnancy due to the pandemic. It is thus possible to see a population growth rebound in two or three years to come, said Yuan.
According to UN's World Population Prospects 2022, China's population will still remain larger than 1.3 billion by 2050. That is by no means a small population size. Yuan noted that in the next 30 years, China's population decrease will be mild, and China will still be a huge market. With rising incomes and consumption power, its enormous potential will remain inestimable.''
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1