Comments by "RiC David" (@RiC_David) on "Homosexuality Is the Same As Pedophilia, Necrophilia, Zoophilia?" video.

"...or by society's view of them" More respect points to you for observing and accepting this. Much of the problematic nature of adult/child relationships (with or without sex) stem from its status within our societ(ies). The fact that we don't support this status is irrelevant, a child should *never* be made to suffer grief or misery whatever its source. We're adults, it's our job to protect the children - protect them from *any* hurt.
3
You're dishonest and I no longer respect you. When you say "you want to rape children" you know FULL WELL that this statement suggests he wants to have unwanted sex with a child. The statutory rape logic is you trying to abuse language to make a misleading point. Take a 17 year old and his 16 year old girlfriend (16 = AOC). Them having sex would be statutory rape. To say "that boys wants to rape that girl" would be utterly misleading and an unfair statement despite being legally correct.
2
(ctd) to his words and his reasoning, rather than bypass those and deal with your own conclusions or preconclusions. When you (or any of us) do the latter, you are essentially tangling with your own thoughts and already existing beliefs rather than making progress. Perhaps he is lying, I should merely have said "show that he is lying first before expanding on your notions". My respect is insignificant, you are right. Our individuality is a barrier - no more.
2
"16 or 17 year old. In those cases is wrong to accuse them of statutory rape, because those teens are already mature as an adult and they are unfairly being affected by age of consent laws" This is the essence of your disagreement with him. He, ostensibly, perceives that the maturity you speak of - in the context of sexuality, is not dependent upon age or advanced cognitive ability. If this is his honest analysis then he is not the rapist you speak of. All I ask is that you speak (ctd)
1
...do is say that either you or he are "just making excuses because you want to rape animals/children". He's thought about it and concluded that children can consent. There are good arguments for that, I just believe I have better counter arguments. There are good arguments to say animals can consent but there are also good counterarguments. Think about how people treat you and speak to you. Do you like it or think it's fair? No. So do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
1
I can't believe you. I sat and watched you face a storm of hatred and disgust from scores of people with no interest in hearing your attempts at objective analysis who wanted only to call you a rapist and spew venom upon you. Now I see you being those very people, I can't tell you how repulsive that is. I didn't 100% agree with you on your analysis but did I call you a rapist and disdain you? No, I saw that we'd drawn different conclusions on a difficult topic on which there is much room [ctd]
1
And you're promoting sex with animals! Read this: "IS wrong to have sex with animals because they are very likely to get harmed. I don't have a problem with zoophiles who chose not to molest animals, he instead is promoting that sex with animals is OK, he is promoting something that is harmful or illegal (illegal for a good logical reason)." The EXACT SAME argument can be used against you. Do I agree with sex with prepubescents? No. Do I agree with sex with animals? Sometimes. What I DON'T...
1
You said that a man "want(s) to rape children" - you're intentionally characterising him as a *rapist*, as a person who *wants* to *rape* somebody. Anybody with a brain can see the difference between this statement and saying "because you want to have underage sex with children". AGAIN, the same CAN and IS said about YOU. Where bestiality is illegal, you having sex with a dog would be rape. But you don't want to RAPE the dog, do you? You want to have sex with him, though it would be DEEMED rape
1