Comments by "J.D.S." (@j.d.s.1837) on "I went on a night out with an incel | Ben Zand interview" video.

"Bruh just meet people, so easy for me" Look who's talking.
63
@tussk. Also, like all normies like to do, you are twisting the words I used. I said, that unattractive people have to work hard. I did not say, that attractive/average people don't have to work hard, I simply stated that it is a must for unattractive people to make up for lost social interactions.
32
Damn, not playing football was the changing factor in my life, that is from where it all went downhill 🤣🤣🤣 (especially in Europe with American football) I'm left wing, pro LGBTQ+, anti Capitol stormers in/cel so nah. Your theory is just that. A theory. This video just gives off this whole cartoonish look on in/cels where we never leave the basement and are all NEET'S and big fans of violence. Sadly, like ITV states, hard work is for ugly people, good looking ones network their way up in society. Which means most in/cels are actually working members of the labour market. I don't even have time to watch in/cel forums or post on them. Radicalization happens in real life, through unprovoked things like snarky comments on your face or being pushed against lockers in HS. Later being excluded by coworkers etc.....
26
@beganitdidnt6535 His debunk for blackpill was literally that "it's wrong because it makes all in/cels go ER" (like 30% of men would do that JFL) and that "when I ask women they say it's all about the personality, bro". I can't even imagine how he'll react if someone tells him people are capable of lies and the earth is actually not flat. His whole Disney universe collapses 🤣🤣🤣.
25
@tussk. "Malcolm Gladwell famously found that over 68% of US CEOs were over six-foot tall, against 15% of the general population. 25% were over six-foot two inches, while just 4% of the US population exceed this height." Malcolm Gladwell is an in/cel? "Your overall behaviour and demeanour in an interview are crucial. But so is your appearance. A number of studies have found that certain physical characteristics can affect your chance of getting hired. It has also been found that a person’s employability can sometimes be based more on their attractiveness than education or job characteristics. Earning potential ‍ Sure, beauty may be in the eye of the beholder. But studies have also found that attractiveness is an enduring, positive labour market characteristic — and may impact your earning potential. In fact, candidates who are perceived as ‘attractive’ may even secure higher pay. Discrimination ‍ Unfortunately, in our modern society, people are often discriminated for their physical appearance and attractiveness. But discrimination of appearance is not just reserved for those who are perceived as ‘less attractive’. One study found that the common perception that attractive individuals have a greater sense of entitlement than less attractive individuals, can result in negative treatment of attractive people. A separate study also found that attractive women face discrimination when it comes to landing certain kinds of jobs. Interestingly, that same study found that attractive men did not experience this discrimination and were always at an advantage." Delight Dental SPA are all in/cels? "SUBSCRIBE FOR $1 Show more BUSINESS The Beauty Advantage: How Looks Affect Your Work, Your Career, Your Life BY JESSICA BENNETT ON 7/19/10 AT 4:15 AM EDT ILLUSTRATION BY PAUL SAHRE SHARE BUSINESS Most of us have heard the story of Debrahlee Lorenzana, the 33-year-old Queens, N.Y., woman who sued Citibank last month, claiming that, in pencil skirts, turtlenecks, and peep-toe stilettos, she was fired from her desk job for being "too hot." We've also watched Lorenzana's credibility come into question, as vintage clips of her appearance on a reality-TV show about plastic surgery portray a rambling, attention-obsessed twit, stuffed to the brim with implants and collagen. ("I love plastic surgery," she coos. "I think it's the best thing that ever happened.") Creepy, yes. But for all the talk about this woman's motives—and whether or not she was indeed fired for her looks—there's one question nobody seems to want to ask: isn't it possible Lorenzana's looks got her the job in the first place? Not all employers are that shallow—but it's no secret we are a culture consumed by image. Economists have long recognized what's been dubbed the "beauty premium"—the idea that pretty people, whatever their aspirations, tend to do better in, well, almost everything. Handsome men earn, on average, 5 percent more than their less-attractive counterparts (good-looking women earn 4 percent more); pretty people get more attention from teachers, bosses, and mentors; even babies stare longer at good-looking faces (and we stare longer at good-looking babies). " Wow! Even Newsweek are all in/cels?
25
No, you just ignore the 80% of men you deem unattractive.
24
Attraction => Date => Interest => Personality. Not: Personality => Interest => Date => Attraction. You simply had a relationship and a scewed view due to nostalgia. You mistake the actual process and think backwards.
20
Respects for getting 2 girls in the first place. Never had any female friends my entire life, they despised me ever since kindergarden. But yeah, first hand experience blackpills you more than any forum or video.
19
@fenlandwildlifeclips You don't ask people, you look at what they do. Actions speak louder than words. If I were to ask any female she would repeat the same old pattern you did. "Muhhh personality ...." and so on. But if you look at their actions, it differs. They all married guys taller than them. They all married guys who were decently attractive, like 7/10 or 8/10. But you gotta see: You left the dating market (at least I hope so) when you marries your man. That means you haven't lived through the technological progress done in one decade (2010 - 2020). In 20 years, from 2000 to 2020 the dating market has gone insane. In 2008 about 8% of men were in/cels. Now it's 28% closing in on 30%. You lived in a time where people were in a small village and only had like 20 or 30 peers to choose from. Now its a global market with global competition. That leads, as we know in economy, to a few global players who monopolize the good. Same thing happened here. It's just that only men complain because females ARE the monopoly, they are the only suppliers of intimacy globalization has led to that realization for all females. Now they can raise the price (required looks) without losing any customers (men) as there are 0/nada/null substitutes for the good (intimacy). Do you get why I'm frustrated?
18
@Exsugarbabe1 1000000000000000000000000 approaches is just a warmup, bro!
17
@moa3813 🌿👈.
16
@beganitdidnt6535 based.
13
@katiePetsy He is still 5'11, whyte and he has money to betabuxx. You see, I know a guy who is 5'7, whyte, pretty average, 6/10, very outgoing, a little overconfident I'd say and he talks to alot of women. The results in 23 years of lifetime: 0 girlfriends 0 dates 100% virgin. You see, now I debunked your whole statement, women are only attracted to people above 6/10 and who are shy. Do you see your logical fallacy? You take one singular example and expand it to humanity.
9
@musicbyella3769 I was trying to convey her logical error to her by making a similar one. Although, my views are actually based on studies, not feelings. If you feel comfortable enough to leave your Disney bubble of limitless equality in love, maybe research into lookism and the role height as well as an attractive face plays.
7
I talked to the guy from the interview - he says he is NOT EVEN AN IN/CEL!!!!!! You guys are phony liars who twisted his statements and tried to frame him! The documentary should be deleted immediatly you guys faked it all!
7
@fookorf never was a people pleaser.
4
@lewiswhatley687 no.
4
This. There are no female in/cels every foid that claims she is one is a lying griftor and too lazy to download Tinder.
4
@fookorf okay normie. I don't think you are retarted. You are a rational human being. When it comes to other species, what have you learned in biology? Most likely, Darwin's Theory of Evolution, right? Okay, so now let's see what it states, shall we: The theory states, that there are 2 ways of selection, female and natural. A species has a certian gene pool with certian mutations that happen randomly (e.g. blue eyes). Then females select the members of the species with the highest biological fittness, the ones that are most likely to survive. Until now you are still able to follow my thought train, right? Okay and now we apply it to the human species [ NOT IN A WAY OF SOCIAL DARWINISM ]. But this seems to fail with you. All of a sudden genetics, looks, all that you agree matters with any other species is out of the picture and replaced my magic - love - that strikes randomly and is only caused by personality. Don't you kind off see, that this is completely irrational? It is like claiming, that the laws of gravity exist, the universe exists, but then you jump to the conclusion that the earth is the centre of the universe, because others said so and God said so, so it is that way. Absolute logical fallacy.
3
@morgannyan2738 lol exactly. Facists have tried to overthrow the democratically elected government in the US in 2021, the economy experiences inflation like never before, gas prices are rising and there is a war between Ukraine and Russia in the middle of Europe but somehow it is the lonely social outcast that is the real deal.
3
@gatotcka5017 Yeah it's all about the personality, right. That is why we see soooooo many ugly men living fulfilling love lifes while people like Andrew Tate or Jordan Peterson have no following 🤡.
2
@Soul of a robot And fools like you get to decide what is representative data and what is not? Next you'll decide that the earth is flat and the centre of the universe because Galileo was an old whyte man and not representative? JFL think of it what you want your opinion matters as much as the dirt under my boots.
2