Comments by "Hugh Jorgan" (@HughJorgan1) on "Late Night with Seth Meyers" channel.

  1. 7
  2. 6
  3. 6
  4. 5
  5. 5
  6. 5
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. dn va, ...We'll need to disagree on a number of issues. 1. The 'thanks to Obama' line regarding the economy is both illogical.... and overused. Trump has managed to maintain momentum since the 2008 recession despite massive challenges with the global economy 2. His tax reforms will go down as a historic point in the US economy and the best legacy from his first term. For example, he made the US globally competitive with the Corporate tax rate. It's already brought thousands of jobs and $Billions in investment back to the US. The reforms were the # 1 reason Apple gave for investing over $400 billion in new US-based spending. 3. Trumps' foreign policies have been excellent thus far. Remember, he's less than 2 years into his first term. Foreign policy takes time. 4. In a short period, he's rebuilt many relationships Obama tarnished. For example, with key allies Israel, China, South Korea, and Japan. 5. It's highly illogical to say Trump's been 'played' by North Korea and Russia. Unless you can offer anything to rationalize/substantiate the statement, you're simply repeating a line from propaganda shows. 6. Obama's Iran deal reduced sanctions on a terrorist regime. It allowed them to get billions in extra cash. And it did little to assure key US allies in Europe and the Middle East. It needs to be reworked. Which is why Trump has massive support from key allies on the decision. 7. MANY Presidents have promised to move the US embassy to Jurusalem. Trump is the only one with the guts to do it. There are many ongoing issues Trump is still working on. For example, the wall, healthcare, domestic energy programs, immigration policy, etc. But he's working on them. And sorry, but it's illogical to point to gas prices as any indicator of political success. Be patient. Thanks to Trump things look like they're going to get even better for the US in the future.
    2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. John Booth...You make many good points. I learned a few things from the Alberta milk website. I always find it interesting how jurisdictions spin stories to defend their trade practices. Or in this case, their supply management policies. As I said earlier, It's good that Canadians are learning from the US trade negotiations why they spend about $600 more per year than Americans for dairy and poultry products. It's all due to their "supply management" practices. (Of course, I'd be remiss to not mention the US also provides massive subsidies for farmers of certain products...and has its own supply management strategies that hurt US consumers). I think the difference between SCC and rBST levels in Canadian vs US milk is negligible... and a non-issue in terms of what you call "quality". It's like comparing the level of ANY aspect of a food product to the microscopic level. And every jurisdiction can provide some version of data to allege their product is superior or 'healthier' (which is a VERY subjective term). After doing a bit of research, I also learned Canada is importing a huge amount of a US dairy product called "ultrafiltered milk" (a US invention). It's used in the making of "Canadian" cheese. Major US plants have been built to service Canadian demand for the product. I didn't research the SCC and rBST levels of this US product that Canada is using to make their cheese...;) The link below is an excellent summary of the whole dairy discussion. It references all the concepts under discussion in this area, including supply management. I think it's a more neutral source than the Alberta milk site you provided. https://ipolitics.ca/2017/04/22/dairy-101-the-canada-u-s-milk-spat-explained/
    2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 1
  65. Chunkboi, you make many good points. However, we'll need to disagree on many topics. For every source/indicator you used to support your opinion (or counter my opinion) I could find a source/indicator to support my opinion and counter your argument. I'd be remiss to not address one of your key points, however. Trump's made many important decisions to reverse Obama mistakes (a big part of why he was elected)...but the following 3 are among my favorites: 1. Getting the US out of the ridiculous, unenforceable, photo-op, billion dollar boondoggle called the Paris Climate treaty. A deal that benefits the world's worst polluters at the expense of responsible countries. 2. Overturning Obama's perplexing cancellation of the Keystone Pipeline. 3. Giving more power to individual States to control their own environmental policies by reducing Federal regulatory hindrances. And remember...Citizens in the "energy" States have the ability to dictate whether they want coal mines, pipelines, fracking, etc. If the majority don't, they can simply vote for a different State government (or work to change State policy). I can't verify the following statement... but I believe most US states exceed emission targets and have significant environmental controls that surpass other countries? California comes to mind. And they have a larger population (and GDP) than Canada. Lastly, we'll REALLY need to disagree on what Seth Meyers' doing with his incessant anti-Trump propaganda. Propaganda is defined as "Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view." 1. Meyers misleads with almost every Trump or Republican "joke". Mostly with lies-by-omission from cherry picking quotes and articles. And his video subject lines are often flat-out lies intended to misinform/mislead. Finally, he regularly changes the context of 'news' to push his personal agenda. In other words, what he's doing fits the definition of propaganda. 2. Have you EVER heard Meyers joke about ANYTHING anti-Democrat or anti-Obama/Hillary? For example, why no mention of Bill Clinton in relation to the Stormy topic?! (the jokes write themselves). Meyers personal bias (and that of his employer) means he'd never speak negatively about the Clintons or the Democrat party. 3. Have you ever heard Meyers joke about ANYTHING positive Trump has done? As I noted above, the list is long. For example, his propaganda on the tax reforms was egregiously one-sided, negative and deliberately misleading. (yes, I know the personal tax breaks have a sunset clause. But can you imagine any future government raising personal taxes?! Trump's move was brilliant. ) 4. Meyers would rather joke incessantly about any topic that misleads and/or pushes his personal bias. For example, the dead-in-the-water "investigation" on Russia we've been hearing about for over a year. Or giving the porn star extra coverage at any opportunity (see # 2). 5. Meyers propaganda also uses repeated and cruel attacks on Trump's wife and family. It's ok to insult Trump... since he regularly insults others. But attacks on Melania, Ivanka and others makes Meyers look like a delusional idiot. It's not "comedy" to incessantly bring the President's family into his propaganda. Bottom line, we'll need to disagree on the most important principle. I think the US is doing excellent under Trump. It's significantly improved over Obama and the Democrats (I shudder to think where we'd be under Hillary). And Trumps less than 2 years into a likely 8 year run.
    1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. R Camacho, Boondoggle, lich109, mike racicot, and others in this section: Good points all around. I'm simply looking at the big picture. I'm also looking at the many great results from the summit. It's a 'glass half full' view of things. Trump took a great first step to repair the degradation of US/Russia relations due to Obama and Hillary's policies. I know it's hard for some to admit, but Trump has made some excellent decisions and has many major accomplishments in foreign policy. In less than 2 years. It appears many are unable/unwilling to admit there were great results from the Putin meeting (see my original comment). Many have clearly not watched the full press conference to get full context to each topic. The fake comedy shows are gleefully cherry picking a few clips and focusing on the few negatives (glass half empty). Worse, their propaganda just feeds the ignorance and enables those with TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome). Trump makes mistakes. And he misspeaks. A great leader admits his mistakes, which he's done. And his party legitimately called him out on a few comments. But it's illogical to ignore the great results and overall benefits to the US and world from the two world powers being diplomatic. And agreeing on many critical areas. If Obama or Hillary had had the exact same meeting and worked to improve relations, they'd be hailed by the fake comedy shows and media as being "statesman" and diplomatic. (except for Fox of course, they'd skewer them..;) It's also perplexing to me that anyone would think diplomacy with North Korea is a bad thing. Obama's ridiculous isolationist policy forced them to build their nuclear arsenal. Trump's trying to mitigate a brutal dictator starting WW3 and bombing key allies such as South Korea and Japan. Or even the US. I shake my head that anyone wouldn't look at starting diplomatic relations with NK as a great success for Trump and America. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. It's brilliant.
    1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. JC//DC....Myers and Colbert report on serious news stories. I agree they're expected to be funny when providing their opinion. But when they incessantly mislead, misinform and outright lie on their source material/opinions and provide a completely one-sided perspective, they cross the line from satire to propaganda. I put Maher in a different category of biased Liberal comedians. He regularly has guests on his show to provide a different perspective. And he regularly criticizes and jokes about his beloved Democrats. Something you'd never hear from Colbert and Meyers. In addition to their lies/lies-by-omission, Meyers and Colbert cherry-pick tiny snippets of news and footage. And regularly use quotes out of context. They've used fake pictures. Colbert even edited a Tweet on a very serious national issue to completely change the context to fit his propaganda. That's not "performing". It's a complete lack of personal integrity. A good example of such media/comedy show bias was the recent use of pictures of children in cages. The pictures were taken in 2014 under Obama. The clear goal of this lie was to support their propaganda and mislead on the recent border issue. This blatant lie should make people angry. I agree people don't need to watch their shows. But I also think it's important to bring facts and perspective to their propaganda vid's comment sections. Even though it's often hostile territory for logic! If I had a nickel for every time I've been called a "trumptard" or "russian bot" for simply stating facts. (or for every time someone used the 'orange' reference..;) I'm realistic though. I understand the vast majority of people getting their information from propaganda shows are unable/unwilling to have adult conversations or discuss serious issues. Most are incapable of even reading this far. They see a long comment and just reply with frustration/insults on how long the comment is. And most are only able to attack those they disagree with using insults or ad-hominem (the bottom 2 of the 7 levels of disagreement). Worse, this approach is often guaranteed to get lots of 'likes'...from others just like them. They feel empowered....and the cycle continues. I'll leave you with a thought. I firmly believe Meyers and Colbert are helping Trump and the Republicans. People have caught on to their game. They're tired of the lies and same basic jokes for over a year. They're tired of them creating issues where none exists. They're tired of cruel misplaced attacks on Melania or Ivanka, (etc). They're tired of being misled by propaganda cleverly disguised as 'satire'.
    1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. I think people are just happy the country's doing great in many key areas. For example, 1. Low income/working class families are enjoying economic gains not seen in 20 years. For example, the monthly unemployment rate for those without a HS diploma is the lowest since 2000. And for those with a diploma, its the lowest it's been since 2007. And contrary to propaganda, the unemployment rate for African Americans is lower under Trump than Obama. 2. Trump's tax reforms will prove to be the best legacy from his first term. Corporate investment has surged 9.3% in the past year. This translates into jobs and massive spending on infrastructure. 3. Related to 2, Trump FINALLY made the US corporate tax rate competitive with other developed countries. For example, the official reason Apple gave for investing $350 billion in US jobs/infrastructure was Trump's tax reforms. And the $350 billion was in addition to a $40 billion dollar "repatriation" tax they voluntarily repaid. 4 . On foreign policy, Trump is making great moves. For example, every recent President has promised to move the Israel embassy. He's the only one with the guts to do it. And getting North Korea to the table and starting important discussions will prove to be another great legacy from Trump's first term. It was a far better approach than Obama's ridiculous isolationist policy to NK (which forced them to build their nuclear arsenal). 5. National security is enhanced with better border protection and immigration processes. Trump's actions are similar to "deporter in chief" Obama... Who also was forced to separate families at the border and had significant travel/immigration restrictions on the same 7 countries in the recent Supreme Court decision. 6. Housing-starts show a significant post-2016 jump. It's one of the best overall indicators of any country's economy. Trump's policies are providing confidence and long term security for both consumers and investors.
    1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1