Comments by "Hugh Jorgan" (@HughJorgan1) on "Legal case for Trump’s impeachment is ‘relatively weak’: constitutional attorney" video.

Some people. Smart people question everything from media. And smart people are, by nature, skeptics.
5
@davidblasko2159 ...A couple other things smart people never do is generalize and use misplaced ad hominem.
3
@davidblasko2159 ..Good points. And part of being a good skeptic is questioning the ludicrous stories from organized religion and those afflicted with the delusional belief there's a "God" (pick one).
2
Let's bottom line this: There's zero chance Trump will be convicted. The Democrats will have wasted more time and money with their hate and political games. Worse, they've forever lowered the bar for impeachment. Democrat voters can never complain if a future Democrat President is impeached with a 100% partisan vote in the House (Trump's first impeachment) or impeached with no investigations or hearings.
1
@artgutierrez9037 ..Aside from the fact Trump wanted a "peaceful" protest, I think Allan Dershowitz said it best: "Nothing the president said constituted unprotected incitement, as narrowly defined by the Supreme Court over nearly a century of decisions. His volatile words plainly fell on the side of political advocacy, which is protected speech." I also remind you that Hillary repeatedly said the 2016 election was "stolen" and Trump was an "illegitimate" President. Did Hillary's refusal to accept an election results incite leftist riots? And did they incite the ACTUAL insurrection that occurred in Seattle with the formation of an "Autonomous Zone" (where people died).? If you say no to these questions you may want to reflect on how you can possibly blame Trump for the Capitol.
1