Comments by "Hugh Jorgan" (@HughJorgan1) on "Dershowitz in 1998: Doesn't have to be crime to impeach" video.
-
5
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
imemine7...Congratulations, you succeeded where many have failed in this section.
When I’m educating Democrats, I usually put one incorrect or exaggerated detail amongst many facts.
A smart person will find the mistake, and an even smarter person will point it out without resorting to insults or ad hominem. You accomplished both.
Clinton wasn’t convicted in the Senate. His bi partisan impeachment (Trump’s is partisan) was for perjury (a felony) and obstruction of justice, but the Senate didn’t convict. Votes were pretty much along party lines.
So good catch.
However, everything else I stated regarding the huge differences between Trump’s and Clinton’s impeachments are facts....and inconvenient truths for Dems.
History will look very differently on them. There’s not only zero chance Trump gets removed from office, but his legacy will remain solid. Particularly when he gets his second term.
Regarding the GAO saying Trump broke the law by withholding the funds, that’s being disputed. Moreover, it’s far too late to be included in the Senate trial. It’s just another huge Democrat mistake in their flawed, rushed circus.
Again, good job with your comment. While others were busy calling me a “Trumptard” (etc), you focused on the topic, didn’t lob insults, and made some good points.
My thumbs up for your comment is valid.
1