Comments by "Hugh Jorgan" (@HughJorgan1) on "Trump attacks Greta Thunberg on Twitter, GOP does nothing | Chris Cuomo" video.

Criticizing? Read the tweet and don't fall for fake news. Trump simply offered the brainwashed Swedish girl some fatherly advice. Yesterday it was "mock". Now it's "attack". I wonder what fake news CNN will come up with tomorrow to keep this non story going.
7
She's a victim of brainwashing and child exploitation. Trump's right to be concerned for her well being.
3
Good points. And I see her as a victim. She's been brainwashed and exploited by her activist parents and the climate change businesses.
2
@gunhedd5375 ..I hate to interrupt the CNN echo chamber, but the key point in my comment is that the tweet on the brainwashed Swedish girl is a non-story but CNN is going to try really hard to keep it in the news. I encourage all CNN viewers and the TDS crowd to try to focus on real news. Such as the fact the Democrat's impeachment circus is a massive failure and Trump is looking stronger than ever for a second term. It's going to be a long 5 years for you my friend.
1
@jockyoung4491 ..Climate change is indeed well supported. What isn't is the alarmist sky-is-falling rhetoric. Our 4.5 billion year old earth has been through FAR worse climate changes, including more extreme warming than we're currently seeing. And there's been periods with far more carbon in the atmosphere. The scientific 'consensus' we always hear about is a lie by omission, and often based on massive confirmation bias. Many scientists don't agree that human activity is entirely responsible for the recent climate changes. And many more point to the many factors to climate change completely beyond our control (i.e solar radiation, tectonics, tilts in earth's axis, and natural changes to wind patterns and ocean currents). And don't get me started on the massive lies by media and the climate alarmis businesses that weather events (storms and temperature) are getting more "extreme". We only have accurate data for about 150 years on temperature, and 50 years for storm strength! Yet people think every "record" is proof of climate change on a 4.5 billion year old planet. It's mind boggling ignorance. In my opinion, the only real accomplishment for the angry, brainwashed Swedish girl is to warn the world of the dangers of the mental illness known as "Eco Anxiety". (she's literally the face of the illness, google it).
1
@jockyoung4491 ..Please read my comment again. Slowly. I never said anything was "OK". And my reference to the 150 years of data wasn't regarding climate change, it was referring to reports on weather events by media and the climate alarmist businesses. Lastly, the 'rate of change' claim is also based on a lot of confirmation bias. As well, it uses a lot of computer modelling and assumptions based on ice core date to speculate on rates of change in past climate shifts (i.e the Medieval Warming Period and Mini Ice Age). And a lot of the "rate of change" theory is based on the aforementioned 150 years of data...on a 4.5 billion year old planet. I'm simply bringing some logic to the discussion. I agree we have to be FAR more responsible with pollution.
1
Or stop the earth's axis from shifting. Or stop solar radiation. Or stop the natural carbon cycle. Or stop natural changes to jet stream patterns and ocean currents. Or stop tectonics, which is related to volcanoes but an influence on ocean temperatures. etc etc etc We need to be far more responsible with pollution but the climate has been changing for billions of years.
1