Comments by "dkosmari" (@dkosmari) on "The Lunduke Journal"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is happening exactly to sabotage C++ (and C will be next) to prop up the competing products, like C#, Go, Carbon, etc. It didn't start with C++17, it started a few years prior to C++11. That's why they introduced an unsafe thread class, and the worst possible hash table implementation in `std::unordered_map`. Coroutines in C++ is a disaster too. `std::async()` is so bad, Microsoft, of all companies, created a better replacement. They deprecated character set conversion routines/classes without adding a replacement. And they still refuse to add named parameters to functions (despite already having named member initialization for structs). Concepts almost didn't make it into the language, Stroustrup and a few others had to pretty much do it all by themselves, because they couldn't get the committee to make any useful decision.
Basically, the standards committee has a bunch of useless clowns that have doing nothing but drag down the work to a screeching halt, for more than 2 decades now. This fake "I'm offended" performance is just yet another tactic to do the same thing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1