Comments by "Wīwaz" (@Wiwaz) on "Lex Fridman┃GRAHAM HANCOCK'S Response To His CRITICS Was LEGIT" video.
-
17
-
3
-
2
-
SerbianLifter997 "Archaeology is not about personal opinions, but rather a well-established science that relies on evidence, critical analysis, and systematic methods Unlike the claims made by people like Graham Hancock, who often mix speculative theories with sensationalism, archaeology seeks to understand the past through data and peer-reviewed research. Hancock's ideas, while intriguing to some, often lack solid evidence and rely more on imagination and conjecture. He is more of a promoter of controversial ideas than a credible scholar, and his work has been widely criticized by experts in the field. So, archaeology is about fact-based research, not fanciful theories or grifting
1
-
1
-
1