Comments by "jacq danieles" (@jacqdanieles) on "Joe Rogan u0026 Candace Owens ARGUE Over Climate Change" video.

  1. Bill Nada. It's impossible to argue with them. They refuse to believe facts or sources. Yet the very next moment they're convinced about some stupid conspiracy theory like Qanon. I give up. Not worth my time arguing with stupid people.
    1
  2. She's from the Tomi Lahren & Ben Shapiro school of debating: throw out as much bullshit as fast as possible & maybe no one will notice it's bullshit. She thinks she sounds intelligent by speed talking. The RW tactic is to deny facts. Scientific American? Oh no they have a "hidden agenda". 10,000 scientists... oh no, they are funded by xyz. It's a variant of screeching "fake news". Well Candace, maybe you can tell us who funds TPM & pays you to further their talking points?
    1