Comments by "jacq danieles" (@jacqdanieles) on "CNBC Television" channel.

  1.  @cesarcesar5129  ❌️
    1
  2.  @priestfultonjwingbajr1430  - Isaiah 59:2 is very appropriate for the current occupant of the WH
    1
  3. Oh, yeah, remember when Project 2025 was not the agenda of the trump administration?
    1
  4. Maga tears 💦
    1
  5.  @prolific1518  I got a big jug for your maga tears
    1
  6. 😂
    1
  7. ​@Mfnebjajdbbrwn the pretzel logic of imperialists is how they get their a$$es handed to them 🤦‍♂️
    1
  8. He's playing 5D chess -- trump's cult
    1
  9. Magatards before the election: we can't afford groceries because of Biden Magatards after the election: we still can't afford groceries, but let's talk about Biden supporters not complaining when he was president Yeah, the cognitive dissonance is epic ...😂
    1
  10. Hannity says he's buying one. trump said the same. Maybe the cult sheep will follow them.
    1
  11. Ironic coming from the master manipulator Musk
    1
  12. Jump to conclusions much? How do you know what they are investigating?
    1
  13. @tdata545 lol, you make lots of assumptions out of thin air. Typical trump supporter, just like the OP who jumped to conclusions without any data. Let THAT sink in.
    1
  14. Hopium
    1
  15.  @starbicycle  he didn't start PayPal -- & the success of PayPal was due to Peter Thiel The Boring Company is a flop. SpaceX has still to deliver on its lofty promises. Tesla is now facing real competition. The low-hangng fruit has already been picked. A little less fangirling & more research would be great.
    1
  16.  @starbicycle  where was it a month ago? 4 months ago? Like I said, a little less fangirling, a little more research.
    1
  17. He's a Republicunt. Lying is in their DNA.
    1
  18. The rest look like dentures
    1
  19. Hang on, I need another cup for your tears ...
    1
  20. This reporter is trash
    1
  21. You're going to upset his fan girls 😂
    1
  22. Just trust us, bro -- Current administration
    1
  23. ​ @robertjohnson-mt8pz TDS = Trump's Delusional Supporters
    1
  24. Billionaires for billionaires. Who'd a thunk it?
    1
  25. And may their ammo dumps end up like yours 😂
    1
  26. Intel is the supplier
    1
  27. John Holland. ...especially in your punctuation...
    1
  28. The US has a customs & border control. Why have THEY been unable to stop the fentanyl?
    1
  29. No, I can't stand her either. And her idiotic whiteboard too
    1
  30. Soros taught him well
    1
  31.  @ivanaaronhernandez  cut the crap. The hypocrisy & mental gymnastics is nauseating. The price of eggs had nothing to do with Biden to begin with.
    1
  32.  @ivanaaronhernandez  I didn't say you said it. It's just your hypocritical defense of trump that is nauseating.
    1
  33. ​ @geraldbrowne it's only "corrupted" when it's your guy. If the system is corrupted, then, by your logic, Hunter's case should be dismissed, right?
    1
  34.  @engineeringVirtue  your response has zero to do with my reply to the other guy.
    1
  35. The US has a bigger population than Canada so naturally the US will import more. Duh!
    1
  36. ​ @slapshot68  we're living in the present, doofus. Whataboutism about the past doesn't bring down the price of eggs.
    1
  37. Trump? 😂😂😂
    1
  38. Project 2025
    1
  39. ​ @ocampbell1954  he said the same thing in his first term. What did he accomplish back then?
    1
  40.  @ocampbell1954  I asked you a simple question. Try to answer it honestly, without deflection.
    1
  41. I thought China was paying the tariffs ...
    1
  42. Josh Vogel. Exactly. They were ruthless with Garland & now they're whiny bitches when Dems play hardball. I hope this nomination crashes & burns. And even if it doesn't, at least they'll have the scars to show for it.
    1
  43. gavin aston. If the outcome was "Garland would not get the votes", then why did they prevent a hearing? If this is all fabricated, why did Gorsuch sail thru without difficulty? Save us your hypocritical outrage. You're right about 1 thing: elections have consequences. And these are the consequences of having Republicans in power.
    1
  44. Biplav Shrestha. So you shouldn't be worried. But I sense that you are.
    1
  45. scorpiostrikes. If this is all fabricated, why did Gorsuch sail thru without difficulty?
    1
  46. scorpiostrikes. If these are "lies by the Dems", why not have the FBI investigate & expose them? Why did they remove Rachel Mitchell from questioning Kavanaugh? Why did they not subpoena Mark Judge? Why is Kavanaugh not willing to support a call to have the FBI investigate?
    1
  47. scorpiostrikes. They should have stopped the hearings if they were not satisfied with Mitchell. They sekected her snyway. But it was planned that way, so that she wouldn't corner Kavanaugh. And they also wanted to make political statements & praise Kavanaugh. The FBI investigation could always have a pre-agreed upon timeline. It happened in 3 days in 1992. This is just a sham hearing. And they'll ram him thru. They'll get what they want, but don't for a moment think you or they can gaslight the rest of us.
    1
  48. scorpiostrikes. Funny how suddenly a FBI investigation is going to happen. Guess there is something to investigate after all.
    1
  49.  @graniteguy8410  🥱
    1
  50. "Junker"?
    1