Comments by "Howard the dot connector." (@peetsnort) on "Real Engineering" channel.

  1. Yes I fear the sun farting all over the satellite systems that we have become so dependent upon. Just this morning I experienced a nano glitch while collecting my win and buying the tickets. The whole shop came to a standstill So if the electricity is toasted then half the western world will perish in one mild winter
    17
  2.  @tribalismblindsthembutnoty124  Yes and no. The whole infrastructure is a bit too dependent and in the meantime a lot people won't make it
    7
  3. Right from the opening sentence all laden with side taking makes me sceptical about the validity of the rest of the video
    4
  4.  @GloomGaiGar  I think of nuclear power like a super fast car. Great to see but not to be in it when it crashes
    3
  5. Cost of decommission....??
    2
  6. What is the cost for decommission?
    2
  7. You lie. I know its cheap to run but fffbloody expensive to clean up afterwards. I have just started the video but I will bet you anything the video won't explain the costs of clean up. I believe they still haven't cleaned up Sellafield...................
    1
  8.  @bronzedivision  fukushima off. I am just an observer. You might argue that or this but when nuclear goes wrong it goes spectacularly wrong. Half of America is a cancer pot from the testing of the above ground nukes. It may be efficient to use in ideal condition. I concede. But the whole land mass around fukushima SANK by 2m. What super duper scientist was expecting that. We've been distracted by convenience of electrical use and need to be prepared for the next Carrington event that will surely happen. So now its diversity that will enable us to bounce back in such an event. We've just started the process of dismantling the too big to fail banks and the effects will be witnessed by the end of the year.... Not looking forward to the event. So that's all I can say about it romantic notion of nuclear
    1
  9. There a question about the capsule escaping the moons gravity. So it's 1/3 of earths gravitational pull.the saturn rocket was huge so it could be shrunk by a third But the moon lander had a tiny tiny rocket. So how could it escape the gravitational pull..?
    1
  10.  @bronzedivision  decommissioning costs are very high. I have lived through the 80s in UK and the bullshit. The advert used to be of a match burning in slow motion and then in reverse to lie about recapturing energy. Since proved to be a hoax And right up to today with Hinckley point nuclear power station deal signed off by Theresa May. The resultant electricity is going to be 3x more expensive. And to make matters worse. The Chinese and French builders have the lion shares of construction. Where is the media now..?? Have you learned nothing about the media in the last 2 months of plandemic.? WAKE up please
    1
  11.  @bronzedivision  121 pounds sterling billion to decommission Sellafield.
    1
  12. 121 billion pounds sterling to decommission Sellafield. You are lieing by the omission of the cost of decommissioning
    1
  13. What about the clean up.?
    1
  14.  @TheBlackB0X  the cost of the decommission..? Sellafield is still costing billions
    1
  15. I think the moon is held up there by the earths gravity. I think the tides are just bulging due to centrifugal force and not the pull of the moons gravity
    1
  16. Despite the fantastic engineering the human being is no better than ancient mayans in spending too much time wondering what's out there spending ridiculous amount of human resources on imagination and child sacrifices.
    1
  17. 20 000 years nuclear decay time and energy and money to maintain.!!
    1