General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Aaron Okeanos
BBC News
comments
Comments by "Aaron Okeanos" (@AaronOkeanos) on "BBC News" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
The UK left 7 months ago. And the current benefits and rules ends in 4 months automatically. Congrats you have won. The question now is, how badly should the recession (actually contraction) be next year, bad or very bad.
7
Go to bed, take your pills.
2
@alanraptor2569 Maybe it is an idiom but wording is important. And this is agressive language. LK also used "The EU would be mad". EU diplomats are never "mad" especially not the EU ones. LK is a drama queen she likes to inflate things. It just diminishes her work and credibility. She does more damage to the BBC and the standing and reputation of the BBC in the world than they realize.
2
That's misinformation spreaded by right-wing media.
2
Funny. Johnson actually wants to renage the divorce. Do you realize what this means? The UK is still married. Notice: I really don't like this comparison with a "divorce" it's a completly wrong interpretation of realities.
2
So you support the erosion of the Rule of Law in the UK? Congrats, just 2 more steps and are in Hitler Germany.
2
I suggest you look at the British Economy first. -20% this year, twice what the other G7 have and far from over. Debt double in the last 10 years despite the promise to reduce them and to stop Austerity at some point which hasn't been done yet. And Corona is just heating up gain. Furlough ending next month. And the consequences of Brexit in 4 months.
1
Do you want to say the UK is too weak to make good trade deals on it's own? Do you really want to moan about your own decission to vote leaving the EU who protected and fought for you in the last 47 years and now making them a rival instead?
1
@Grahamgusbull Who is we? You mean the US? Sure. But not the UK. The UK almost lost the hole army and almost got invaded if it weren't for the americans. Besides this nonsense is 85 years old. There is almost noone alive from that period and things have changed a lot since then. The EU was made to prevent exactly that.
1
@Grahamgusbull The UK did leave the EU 7 months ago. And in less than 4 months the transition period ends and the EU safety net with their benefits and rules is gone too. Congrats you won. Noone can change that, well unless Johnson is betraying the Leavers. Now we talk about what comes after this actually still the very same thing Remainer are talking about for years. Nothing changed, besides the fact that Remainer have lost the battle last december and now can't prevent anything anymore. They are now on board while Leavers drive the bus - and the Leavers drive terrible so far 12 U-Turns. And the only thing Remainer want is that you are not crashing the bus. So excuse me if Remainer will continue to complain about the driver if they drive so badly, but Remainer don't want to end up dead on this bus.
1
This happens, when you outsource the testing to private companies acting in the name of NHS to pretend it is still the NHS while you secretly managed to privatize a part of the NHS. And contrary to the NHS, companies relying on the funding are very "grateful" to the government officials giving them the contract and of course those companies do a favor now and than, for example deliver 10 instead 1000 tests, delivering the number one or two days after the press release, etc.
1
On the most basic level: That the executive can decide over the rules of the law according to their own interpretation. It's a power-grab by the government and undermining the rule of law. For now only on UK Market related things, but you find those tendencies across the board. And it's another power-grab by weakening the Union because devolved governments have after this bill less rights than before it and transfering power from the devolved governments and even from Westminister to the executive (government). It's just very hard to see, because it's tainted with Brexit and with all intention to divert attention and make people want it.
1
@chrisodonnell1269 There is a good explanation video on the Financial Times Channel. Search for "Can the government breach the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement?" for excellent legal details. And there is a Twitter Feed from the person who resigned from the Civil Service over this Bill. Search for "davidallengreen" on Twitter. I will not try to post links here because Youtube tends to delete those comments or hide them.
1
Look for "TLDR News" please for more explanations. It's a little to complex to explain it in one paragraph. Oh and there is an excellent video from the Financial Times about it with detailed legal references.
1
The EU will not come back anytime soon if this here and the last round at Sep-28 fails. The EU promised trade talks in the Withdrawal Agreement (the same Johnson is now torpedoing) and 9 rounds have been set until the end of this month. Brexit is a waste of time and money now in the 5th year. The EU will only come back for new talks if the UK specifially asks for it and until than trade based on WTO is happening and the border will come with the paperwork. The border would even be coming in case of Free Trade Deal, but noone is mentioning this right.
1
There is something far more sinister in the new Bill but barely anyone sees it (besides some people resigning over it) because Johnson is painting all in Brexit context. This Bill allows the government to stay above the Law without the option on the judiciary to intervene and without any say by Parliament. So while Leavers congratulate Johnson for his strategy and giving contra to everthing which was done in the last 3 years, he is secretly making a precedent for undermining the Rule of Law in the UK. In the UK this will have far reaching consequences going far far far above North-Ireland and Brexit. Even breaking an international agreement pales in light of the attempt to undermine the Rule of Law.
1
3200 new cases every day. Is twice the amount of Germany and the levels of March again.
1
Keep them, they are way to Tory-friendly in the political department.
1
Wrong. May's deal had no Irish Protocol. The current nonsense would not be necesarry and the trade deal with the EU would be easy peasy.
1
@specialkgb1980 Oh simple: If you are in the Single Market and Customs Union a trade deal is really easy to make. May's solution would have preserved the frictionless trade which is now taking place. And it would have prevented building border infrastructure and getting 50.000 customs officers (BTW those are more burocrats that Brussels have for all EU matters, happy paying I wonder how fast you use up the 8.9bn EU membership fee).
1
I see it's pointless talking to you. You are way to far gone. Enjoy next year. I hope you learn a thing or two.
1
@specialkgb1980 I'm studying and analysing Brexit for over a year now the puzzle is set together from all kinds of sources, listening to different people, reading agreements, treaties, laws, learn about function, procedure and intentions, following the current events. And whenever I found a piece not fitting in I try to find out why if my puzzle has wrong pieces or the new puzzle piece is the problem. And the pieces which extremly rarly fit in are pieces from Brexiteers. 1/3 are outright lies, 1/3 are only half-truth and 1/3 are things I didn't know about, but also don't fit into the puzzle leading me to learn about it too. So they expanding the puzzle creating new connections which new and existing pieces have to match. Finding Danny Dorling recently actually helped me connecting three larger chunks of the puzzle I had problems finding any connecting pieces for.
1
Putin invaded and stolen Crimea in 2014. And with that Putin broke his own Budapest Agreement of 1994 protecting Ukraine in exchange for destroying the Nuclear Weapons inherited from Sovjet times. Putin might broken this promise, but the other nuclear powers like the US, UK and France didn't. Until Putin invaded the free and sovereign nation of Ukraine Ukraine never asked for help and not considered joining NATO as an invasion-insurance. Putin created this problem in the first place. And now he is there to steal all the rest of it.
1
Funny Ex-Remainer don't like the BBC very much and see it as government mouthpiece or to be fair the political department with Laura Kuennsberg in particular.
1
I hope it comes. Otherwise Brexiteers will never understand what grave mistake they made in trusting Johnson and vote-leave.
1
Funny you fall for this lie from Brexit-media. They yesterday spread this misinformation to look how much of it will stick and it worked on you at least. The Internal Market Bill wasn't even known in 2017. It's new this year, this month actually. I'm sorry you have been conned. But it proves how they manipulate the people into believing misinformtion and it shows how easy and far it spreads.
1
CrouchyTV The UK is already a tax haven, a tax avoidance paradise and a major money-laundring center. Why Do you think the 1% wanted to leave actually, they don't care about immigrants, but the EU was planning to give UK tax officials the right to look through their accounts for illicit money and tax-avoidance. All the fraud, all the hidden and untaxed money would have been discovered and we talk about trillions of pounds here. It could have solve the money issues currently but now they can keep doing that ... and the average UK citizens is paying for that and was even helping them by voting Brexit and Johnson.
1
CrouchyTV This has nothing to do with level of Corp-Tax, this has something to do with how easy it is to cheat the state and how easy it so to get away with it and how easy it is to transfer money between offshore-account and normal ones.
1
I spotted some exaggerations of Laura here and there as usual, but no misinformations. You really need to learn that sometimes the truth sucks but it is the truth no matter how you think about it.
1
@sweetdreams3659 You can't even name the law or explain precisly where the breach is and how.
1
@sweetdreams3659 Funny Johnson is now attacked precisely because he is planing to actually change a law which proves it hasn't changed in at least 12 months since agreed ... by him.
1
Well we could see it in this video for ourselves. And does this make everything else go away which was in this video too? You're ridiculous.
1
@theservant4294 Iraq was not Free and not a Democracy and lead by monster terrorizing and killing his own people for disagreeing with him. And all other countries besides the UK refused to join the invasion.
1
Funny, they now burn a piece of paper. I wonder if they wonder if they can be indicted for that. Since the EU agreed on a law forbidding burning a flag ... any flags ... including the Union Jack. Last time someone tried to burn a real EU flag it was according to EU Fire Protection Regulations and made out of fire-resistent material, they couldn't make it burn ... a perfect image if you ask me for Brexiteers stance on the EU.
1
Funny the world is asking now if the Johnson government are gangster or not. Remember they are the same people who unlawfully wanted to suspend parliament just a year ago.
1
Who Do you think will have more issues. For the EU the UK bussiness is 8% (372 bn £ per year), for the UK the EU bussiness is 43% (300 bn £ per year) the 372 bn of the EU are 51% of all imports of the UK. Next year the new border will become active regardless if there is a deal or not. This alone will increase the costs for hauliers, importers and exporters because there will be new export/import declaration necesarry, security declarations, potentially checks at the border all this will make the costs of transport and the needed time increase on it's own. And when there is No Deal available everything goes back to WTO trade meaning 772 bn worth of goods will go from 0% to something between 2% and 40% tariffs in both directions. You still think this will have no consequences? THIS is what Remainer are warning about for 5 years.
1
@squizza28 Number games to making you feel better about a terrible outcome. Looking forward to No-Deal and Next year. Maybe you learn something.
1
Contrary to Putin America did not invade to steal a country and expand it's own territory with it. And America had reasons for most of those conflict some better some worse. But America never invaded a Free and Sovereign Country.
1
The worst thing is, it's already to late the damage is done just by announcing it.
1
Only the fish because it's usually swimming around don't caring about borders.
1
@sethandruby Only fish because it's a moving resouce. What's this nonsense with Oil and Gas? There is no dispute about them because they are static and firmly in the UK besides maybe that Oil belongs to Scotland as most of the fish does.
1
@tonyb9735 I even think it's designed to somehow make the EU break up the talks for the last round in 2 weeks. That way Johnson can blame No-Deal on the EU ... which he will do anyways somehow, but like that it looks better.
1
Rubbish it's Johnsons mouthpiece, but they don't want you to know that and they want you to continue to believe it's EU friendly. What better way to manipulate people when they are believed to support the opposit.
1
Wrong. The Irish Protocol is to allow Britain to make own trade deals without breaking the GFA in Northern-Ireland. Britains very home-brewed problem which has nothing to do with the EU. And Johnson even introduced it again after May found a solution without the need for an Irish Protocol.
1
International law also applies to international bodies ... like the EU. The EU is an international organization working only on international treaties. They don't make laws they make treaties, agreements and make directives all international without exception. It's so obvious like the nose in your face that here is not any problem.
1
It may look like that for you conned by the Brexit-media but this Bill is actually undermining the rule of law with much much wider implications ... and you don't even see it and want it. Tragically misguided. That the UK is losing international standing and trust is even harmless against that, but will have consequences now regardless if this Bill passes or not.
1
It is and always was even while in the EU, but even they are bound to the rules of law.
1
Laura Kuenssberg is a terrible drama queen and a disgrace for the world recognized BBC.
1
As it currently stands the UK is much more likly to break apart. Scotland now 56%, Wales jumped from 15% to 35% since Johnson, NI is Custom-Wise in the EU next year to preserve the peace and reunification with ROI is only a matter of time.
1
The trade of the EU with the UK is valueable, but not more valueable than the EU Single Market. Trade deficit, trade volume of 772 bn £ ... it all pales in comparison with the losses when the Single Market loses integrity.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All